Professional Documents
Culture Documents
39015011225003
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
HARRY W. HAZARD
NUMISMATIC STUDIES
No. 8
New York
1952
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword 7
Titles 18
Proper Names 22
Epithets 31
Minting Technique 47
Metrology 48
The Rulers and their Coinages (with Chronological Lists and Genealogical Charts):
^ Zirids of Tunisia 53
Murabit Sect 59
Muwahhid Sect 4
Marinids of Morocco 79
Wattasids of Morocco 85
Corpus of Coins:
'Abbasid Gold 89
Fatimid Gold 89
Hammudid Gold 96
Numismatic Bibliography:
Historical Bibliography:
Arabic 298
Inscriptions 304
Documents 305
Modern 306
Indices:
Scripts 321
Denominations 322
Mints 328
Table of Contents 5
Dates 345
Titles 355
Conventional Inscriptions 35
Mint-marks 372
FOREWORD
The term North Africa, as used in this study, signifies the region bounded on the north
by the Mediterranean Sea, on the west by the Atlantic Ocean, on the south by the Sahara
desert, and on the east by the desert and bay which separate Cyrenaica from Tripolitania.
The factors which have made of this region a single geographic and historical unit are
discussed in the next chapter. Portions of Spain ruled by North African Moslems are also
The late medieval period commences in the middle of the eleventh Christian century,
a.H. 439 by the lunar calendar of the Moslems, when the Z1rids of Tunisia began to establish
their independence of the Fatimids of Egypt, an event which, with the consequent second
Arab invasion of Tunisia and the simultaneous rise of the Murabits in Morocco, marks a
major watershed in the history of North Africa. The period terminates at different times
within the sixteenth century with the definitive Ottoman conquest of Algeria, Tunisia, and
In writing the history of this area during those five centuries one has four types of
tombstones, treaties and other archival material, and coins. I have, over a period of several
years, utilized all accessible sources in each of these categories; they are listed in the
Of the many possible aspects of numismatic history, I have chosen to stress the political
and dynastic history which is now somewhat out of fashion, but which must establish the
narrative framework on which more elaborate and specialized histories may be based. The
economic historian, the social historian, the historians of art and of religion, may each
claim with some justice that I have not treated his special aspect exhaustively; I can only
reply that I had neither space nor competence to do so, but that I have provided full
bibliographies to enable him to attack his favorite problem with a minimum of preliminary
drudgery.
in question, and to correlate them with evidence supplied by the Arabic chroniclers and
the surviving inscriptions and documents. One result of this approach is the establishment
of dynastic lists, inserted at the head of each chapter on the coinage of individual dynasties,
far more complete, more accurate, and better documented than any now available. I
apologize for the parenthetical method of indicating the source of each name and date; I
was unable to devise a less cumbersome or more attractive way of supplying equivalent
information.
It is beyond question that only a relatively small proportion of the coins struck in
North Africa, or in Andalusia by African rulers, during the late medieval period have
survived the subsequent vicissitudes. Relatively few of the surviving coins can have
achieved publication; many once published have since been dispersed or become inaccessible
including important collections at Madrid, Jena, and Leningrad. For assistance in com-
printed edition and the notes and proofs for the revised edition of Dr. Leo A. Mayer's
bibliography; for corrections to published sources I express my thanks to Dr. Georg Galster
Oxford, to M. J. Farrugia de Candia of Tunis, to Dr. John Walker of the British Museum,
to Senhor Joaquim Figanier of Lisbon, and to Dr. George C. Miles of the American
Senhor Figanier, and Dr. Miles (for coin at Yale), and to Prof. Dr. Paul Balog of Cairo, to
Mr. P. K. Anderson, and especially to Mr. Philip Thorburn of Cranleigh in Surrey. I also
thank Dr. Maurice Dimand for permission to describe two coins in the Metropolitan Museum
of Art.
In addition to the published sources, and to the unpublished ones just noted, I have
had access to three fine collections, of which the relevant coins are here published for the
first time. The splendid collection of the Hispanic Society of America, formed by Mr. Archer
M. Huntington and now on deposit at the American Numismatic Society, has proved
especially rich in Murabit and Muwahhid issues. The collection of the American Numis-
matic Society and that of the University (of Pennsylvania) Museum, also currently at the
Society on temporary loan, have likewise been of great interest. For the research fellowship
which enabled me to study these three collections under one roof over an extended period
I offer my sincere thanks to the American Numismatic Society, so many of whose officers
at the American Numismatic Society, in making the photographic copy for the plates
and that by Walter Heyne of the J. J. Augustin printing plant in drafting the map of
mint locations.
An early version of this study, without corpus or indices, was accepted by Princeton
University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree in Oriental
Languages and Literatures. The present volume has been drastically revised and com-
pletely rewritten.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND:
The region termed North Africa is a geographic unit whose natural isolation by
formidable physical barriers has led to an unusually persistent historical isolation. The
deserts to the east and south have proven far more effective deterrents to military and
commercial intercourse than the sea to the north; the ocean on the west was not opened as
At the time of the rise of Islam in the seventh century this region was divided between
the Eastern Roman Empire, which had retaken the fortified coastal cities from the Vandals,
and the Berbers, who held the interior. The Arab conquest of North Africa was slow and
bitter compared to the rapid successes in Egypt and Syria, but by the end of the seventh
century it was virtually complete. During the next five decades under the Umayyad
caliphs of Damascus the religion of Islam and the Arabic language spread unchecked, and
the transfer after 750 to agents of the 'Abbasids was not difficult.
The loss of Spain, to an Umayyad scion, the unrest of the Berbers, and the distance
from Baghdad made North Africa a troublesome province. Morocco broke away in 789
under the 'Alid Idr1sids, while in 8oo Tunisia and adjacent lands became semi-independent
under the hereditary governorship of the Aghlabids. All eastern bonds were severed in 909
when the Shi'ite Fatimids seized power; their conquest of Egypt in 969 and the transfer of
Between that date and 1047, when the late medieval period covered in this study may
arbitrarily be said to commence, Morocco was disputed among Berber chieftains, with some
intervention by Spanish Moslems, though only Ceuta remained under Andalusian control
at the terminal date. Western Algeria was also dominated by Berber leaders, while eastern
Algeria had been governed since 1014 by the Hammadid dynasty of Sanhajah Berbers and
Tunisia was still nominally a Fatimid dependency under their loyal Zirid governors.
Within the next decade Ceuta had expelled its Hammudid masters and come under
local Barghawatah Berber rule; the rest of Morocco was rapidly being brought under the
control of a militant new sect, the Murabits, whose leaders were veiled Lamtunah Berbers
from the Sahara; Tunisia had rebelled against the Fatimids and become independent and
officially Sunnite under the Zirids, and had been punished by a devastating invasion of
This new order lasted for nearly a century. The Murabits conquered all of Morocco as
well as western Algeria, the western Sahara, and Andalusia, ruling until 1147. The Hamma-
dids, though under Arab attack, held most of eastern Algeria until 1152. The Zirids, penned
by the Arabs into fortified ports, turned to commerce and piracy, when Normans from
Sicily started invasions which yielded them control of several ports until 1160.
The common victor over Murabits, Hammadids, and Sicilians, as well as over the
10
marauding Arabs and the petty princelings of Andalusia and Tunisia, were the Muwahhids,
a unitarian sect ruled by Kumiyah Berbers from the High Atlas, who established an empire
stretching from Tripolitania to the Atlantic and including all of Moslem Spain. Their sway
dissolved after half a century, and ended in 1269 with the fall of Marrakesh, their empire
being thenceforth divided among smaller but more enduring successor dynasties of less
theological motivation.
Moslem Spain regained its independence under the rival Hiidid and Nasrid families, each
of which occasionally controlled the part of North Africa around Ceuta. Pressure of Christian
reconquest steadily reduced the Moslem holdings, and finally eliminated them with the
Morocco was the portion of the conquerors of the Muwahhids, the Marinid dynasty of
Zanatah Berbers, who were replaced in 1465 by the Zanatah Wattasids, who in turn lost
a triangular struggle with the Portuguese and the 'Alid Sharifs. The Sharifian victory in
1554 after a 44-year contest marked the beginning of the modern period in Morocco.
Western Algeria fell to the Ziyanids, another Zanatah Berber family, who ruled at
Tlemcen despite invasions and other interruptions until the Ottoman conquest n 1556.
Eastern Algeria, Tunisia, and Tripolitania formed the domain of the Masmiidah Berber
Hafsids, whose powerful and prosperous state survived French, Spanish, and Italian
assaults as well as Marinid invasions, but fell in 1574 to the Ottoman Turks.
With the establishment of Ottoman hegemony over Algeria and Tunisia the modern
phase of North African history commenced, so that the late medieval period covered by
this study may be termed its independent Sunnite Berber epoch, between the early medieval
ShTites (Idrisids and Fatimids), Arabs, and foreigners (Umayyads, 'Abbasids, Spanish
Umayyads and Hammiidids, and Egyptian Fattimids), on the one hand, and the modern
Shi'ite Sharifs of Morocco and the Ottoman Turks on the other. Still later, of course,
European Christians dominated the whole of North Africa, with French efforts being most
57 Manurqah
As in the index of mints, the mints discussed in this chapter are divided by continents.
African mints are treated first, listed in strict Arabic alphabetical order, so that names
preceded by the definite article al- are grouped together between Aghmat and Bijayah.
The Spanish mints, similarly listed in strict Arabic alphabetical order, commence with
number 38, and are followed by notes on coins with illegible mints, mintless coins, and
mint inscriptions.
A. African Mints
1. Azammur
This Moroccan Atlantic port came into prominence, both as a town and as a mint, at a
relatively late date. Apart from one late Muwahhid double dinar (514) and one early
Wattasid dinar (869) neither of them beyond question its appearance is limited to a
handful of fourteenth-century Marinid gold, noteworthy chiefly for variant spellings of the
2. Aghmat cXA
This south Moroccan caravan center between mountain and desert appears exclusively
on Murabit gold. Dinars exist for almost every year from 486 to 540 except the decade 516
to 526, of which only 523 is known. The significance, if any, of this hiatus is not reflected
in historical accounts.
3. al-Jaza'ir jNj*)l
Algiers occurs with the definite article only on a square Muwahhid dirhem (1091).
4. al-Hammah <*\*S\
The only coin known to have been struck at this western Tunisian oasis is a Hafsid
5. al-Qayrawan
Kairouan, south of Tunis, was the Zirid capital before the eleventh-century Arab
invasion, and appears on al-Mu'izz's Sunnite gold (3-11) between 441 and 448 with the
6. al-Mahdiyah Co^ll
When ejected from Kairouan, the Z1rid al-Mu'izz fled to the strongly fortified Tunisian
port of Mahdia, where Sunnite dinars (12a, 13) had already been struck for him in 446 and
12
447; he and his sonTamim minted Sh1'ite dinars there (15-23) between 449 and 459. See
also Mahd1yah.
7. al-Nasiriyah i^bjl
This alternative Arab name for Bougie is said by Ibn-Khaldun to occur as the mint
for a dinar (25) struck by the last Hammadid ruler in 543, no surviving specimens of which
are recorded.
8. Bijayah iU
Bougie, an important port in eastern Algeria, appears in its usual form on early
Muwahhid gold, on Muwahhid or Hafsid silver (1085), on much Hafsid gold reflecting
its often independent status as a provincial capital, and on Marinid gold (759, 769, 778)
9. Biskirah J JCj
Biskra, in east central Algeria, appears only on a single Hafsid double dinar (611),
This Berber clan gave its name to a central Moroccan market town which served as a
Mazdara' ibn-Hayyan during his rebellion against the Muwahhids in 559 is said by
Ibn-abi-Zar' to have coined gold (499) in this north Moroccan fortress town, but it is
doubtful whether the mint name appeared on the coin, no specimens of which are known to
have survived.
This Idrisid mint near Sijilmasah in southern Morocco is said to appear on a single
Muwahhid dinar (449), but this must be considered unlikely. The transliterated form
13. Tatwan ol J*
Tetouan, near Ceuta, is reported as the mint for a single Marinid double dinar (818)
by Brethes, who does not specify the Arabic spelling and whose readings must always be
considered suspect.
Tlemcen served many dynasties as their chief mint in western Algeria: Murabits,
Muwahhids, Hafsids, and Marinids (the two last-named during recurrent conquests), as well
as the Ziyanids, whose capital it was and almost all of whose scarce coins were struck there
The Algerian port of Tenes is found on a single Hafsid double dinar (640) and on a
13
The inland Tunisian town of Tozeur, like its neighbors al-Hammah and Biskra, is
found only on one Hafsid gold piece (628) reported by Farrugia de Candia.
17. Tunis
The Hafsid capital appears as mint on a few Muwahhid and Marinid coins and several
Hafsid pieces of gold, silver, and copper; in addition, it was almost certainly the unnamed
This Atlas mountain cradle of Ibn-Tumart's Muwahhid sect is said by Bel to appear as
mint (in the form Tin Mahal) on a few specimens of a square Muwahhid dirhem (1089), but
The only coin reported for this pirates' haven off the Tunisian coast is a square
Algiers, without the definite article, was an outlying mint for Hafsid (549, 637, 638),
Rabat, on the Atlantic coast of northern Morocco, was a subsidiary Muwahhid mint
22. Sabtah
Ceuta, opposite Gibraltar, changed hands frequently during the late medieval period,
occurring as mint on Hammudid silver and copper, Murabit gold and silver, Muwahhid
gold and silver, Hudid silver, Hafsid gold, Marinid gold and silver, and Nasrid gold.
Especially important are the many coins struck at Ceuta by rebels and independent
chieftains, including the Barghawatah Saqaut and his son (880-886, 1157-1160), the last
Murabit insurgent Yahya al-Sahrawi (443), Muwahhid partisans (1057-1061) and rebels
(1076, 1077), Hudid agents (540, 1117-1120), local shaykhs (541, 1121), a Hafsid governor
(553), and Nasrid intruders (868, 1153); many of these do not bear the mint name.
This vanished south Moroccan city was the stronghold of the early Murabits and a
perennial haven for dissidents under later dynasties. An almost complete set of Murabit
dinars survives, scattered Muwahhid gold and silver, an odd Muwahhid-style dinar (554)
struck by al-Khazraji as a Hafsid vassal, and a considerable quantity of Marinid gold and
silver.
Sfax, a Tunisian port, is a Zirid mint on two exceptional dinars reported by Farrugia
25. Sala 5L
This twin port of Rabat, in northern Morocco, is found on one Murabit dinar (183),
two Muwahhid dinars (454, 455), and one Marinid double dinar (789), suggesting a slight
26. Sabrah
Reversion from the Fatimid name al-Mansuriyah to the original Sabrah was the first
numismatic fore-shadowing of the Zirid revolt, furnishing the arbitrary starting date for
this study. It occurs for this Tunisian suburb of Kairouan only on dinars (1, 2) dated 439
and 440.
27. Tarabulus J
Although Tripoli is a standard Fatimid mint, Syrian rather than Libyan Tripoli was
intended at this period, so such coins are excluded. The only North African coins struck
after 439 with this mint are a handful of Hafsid gold pieces. No coins are known for the
28. Tanjah
Fez has been since Idrisid times one of the most important cities of Morocco, and this
importance is reflected in its use as mint on a nearly complete series of Murabit dinars
from 484 to 539, several Muwahhid coins of gold, silver, and copper, and a large quantity
of Marinid gold with occasional silver. Many mintless Muwahhid and Marinid coins were
Gabes, an important south Tunisian port, was identified on a single Jami'id dinar
Marrakesh shared with Fez the supremacy of Morocco, and consequently is found on
a rich group of Murabit dinars, several Muwahhid gold and silver pieces, and a quantity of
Marinid gold, to which must be added the bulk of mintless Muwahhid and Marinid gold.
Meknes, near Fez, was overshadowed by its neighbor, being reported on scattered
Murabit silver (906, 907) and Muwahhid gold (464, 465) and silver (1099).
15
This variant without the definite article is reported on a single Hafsid dinar (621) by
36. Nul Jy
This caravan depot on the Wadi Nun in southern Morocco appears in this form between
After 513 Nul was modified by adding the clan-name of the local Berbers, occurring
regularly past the downfall of the Murabits to an anonymous dinar (444) dated 542.
Distorted forms of this name may occur on Muwahhid gold (490) and silver (1100), but it
B. Spanish M1nts
Seville issued a steady stream of Murabit dinars from 489 to 541 except for the decades
5oo-509 and 527-534, with occasional silver. The earliest Muwahhids minted gold and
silver there, and just before its reconquest by Castile a double dinar (555) was struck for the
This variant for Granada was used instead of Gharnatah on a quantity of Murabit
gold and some silver and copper struck between 504 and 527, and on dinars dated 540
and 541 (438-440), when it was one of the few Spanish towns still under Murabit contro1.
A Murabit dinar (115) of Yiisuf, dated 496, is ascribed by Colson to Alcantara, with
Almeria was one of the most prolific Murabit mints in Spain, being represented in 492,
from 494 to 499, and from 506 to 539 by a rich series of dinars, with several varieties per
year at times and with many specimens in excellent condition of typical issues.
43. Balansiyah
Between 496 and 512 Valencia struck Murabit dinars, and a dirhem (947) in 503; no
other coins are ascribed to this mint except a square Muwahhid dirhem (1107).
Codera noted a Murabit dinar dated 497 from Baeza (106), an otherwise unrecorded
45. Jayyan
Jaen struck occasional silver for Murabits and early Muwahhids, and a single Mu-
Denia is found on a few Murabit dinars from 495 to 504, and on a square Muwahhid
dirhem (1109).
Saragossa appears as mint only on a very few Murabit dirhems (948, 949, 1162),
San Lucar struck a little gold (108) and silver (900, 901) for the Murabit Yiisuf ibn-
Tashfin.
50. Sharish
Only silver is known for Jerez: Murabit (950) and Muwahhid (1110).
This Arabic equivalent for Granada, though less popular with the Murabits than
Ighranatah, occurs on gold, silver, and copper, including a post-downfall dinar (445) of
Maymun ibn-Badr dated 545. This spelling also appears on square Muwahhid dirhems and
Cordova is found on Murabit gold and silver from 486 to 507. In 540 and 541 the
rebel Hamdin ibn-Muhammad struck Murabit gold (441, 442) and silver (1038,1052) there,
as well as silver in his own name; then followed Ibn-Ghaniyah's 542 dinar (446). Cordova
also served the Muwahhids briefly as a mint for gold (472) and silver (1112).
This alternative for Alcantara may occur on the dinar (115) reported by Colson,
instead of al-Qantarah.
17
At Malaga were struck a few Murabit dinars between 494 and 506, a Murabit qirat
(967), and some Muwahhid silver. Muwahhid gold reported for Malaga by Prieto y Vives
was misread.
57. Manurqah
A series of Murabit dinars was struck at Murcia from 501 to 512, and both Murabit
and Muwahhid silver. Noteworthy are anonymous dirhems (968, 969) dated 502 and 503
and a square half dirhem (1074) in the name of 'Abd-al-Mu'min, though Murcia was not
C. Illeg1ble Mints
A certain number of coins have mint names which are illegible either by clipping, by
poor engraving, by wear, or by obscure reproduction. These coins are listed in the index,
and whatever can be reconstructed of the mint name is given under each such coin's
D. W1thout M1nts
A large number of coins have no mint inscription, and only rarely has an effort been
made to attribute them to definite towns. The bulk of Murabit silver is mintless, probably
having been coined at various mints, chiefly in Spain. Most of the mintless Muwahhid and
Marinid gold was probably struck at Marrakush and Fas, but the plentiful mintless silver
comes from many places, including European imitators. Hafsid mintless gold and silver
must have been struck chiefly at Tunis, and Hudid North African issues at Sabtah. No
rule can be deduced by which the mint was named or omitted, except that it was almost
E. M1nt Inscr1pt1ons
TITLES
A. Transcendent
Certain titles found on the coins under consideration transcend the purely human and
were in general reserved for divinely inspired leaders second only to Muhammad (and 'Ali
among Shi'ites). Such titles include khalifat Allah, imam al-ummah, and imamuna.
Vicar of God: applied only to the Mahdi, Muhammad ibn-Tiimart, by the Muwahhids
Leader of the community: applied to the Mahdi by the Muwahhids and the Hafsids,
solely on their gold, and to the 'Abbasid caliph on Hudid gold (541).
3. imamuna L.Ul
Our leader: applied to the Mahdi by the Muwahhids and the Hafsids, chiefly on their
silver, to the 'Abbasid caliph on Hudid silver (1117-1120), and to himself by Muwahhid 10
(1078-1083).
B. Cal1phal
The titles al-khalifah, al-imam, and amir al-mu'minin were strictly limited to rulers
of caliphal pretensions and were often used consecutively to stress various aspects of the
supreme authority.
4. al-khalifah iiiijl
The caliph: a title reserved by the Muwahhids for their first ruler, 'Abd-al-Mu'min,
except on the medal (M1); applied to the 'Abbasid caliph by the Hudids (540, 541, 1121).
5. al-imam ^UVl
The leader: applied to the Fatimid Ma'add by his Zirid vassals, to the 'Abbasids by
nominal Jami'.d, Hammadid, Murabit, and Hudid vassals, to themselves by the Hammu-
the Muwahhids, to additional Muwahhids on the medal (M1), and to unspecified persons by
Commander of the believers: applied exactly as al-imam, and usually together with it;
also used by all the Muwahhids, most of the Hafsids including 15B, who had no right to
Titles
*9
it (603), and Marinids 12 (always), 24 (rarely: 839, 853), and 26 (once: 867); attributed
(probably incorrectly) to Ziyanid 5 (648, 649); applied to the Ottomans by their Ziyanid
C. Caliphal (Dual)
7. al-khalifatayn ociiij'i
Of the two orthodox caliphs: misapplied to the first three Muwahhids on a hybrid
Of two commanders of the believers: applied only to the first two Muwahhids (511).
D. Cal1phal (Plural)
The corresponding plural forms were similarly used after ibn- to indicate descent from
Of the caliphs: used only on one coin (512) in reference to three and to four Muwahhids.
Of the orthodox caliphs: used correctly by the early Muwahhids in reference to three
by the Marinids, this phrase is also found on two coins dubiously ascribed to Ziyanid 5
(648, 649) and on one Hudid double dinar (540) in reference to the 'Abbasids.
E. Sub-Cal1phal
The title amir al-muslimin has been appropriately designated sub-caliphal by van
Berchem in his definitive study of occidental titles; no other title falls into this category.
20
Commander of the Moslems: used by the later Murabits but never by Yflsuf, despite
the historians, also by the Murabit partisan Yahya al-Sahrawi (443), by most of the Ziya-
nids, most of the Marinids except 12, and several of the Wattasids. Noteworthy are a
Murabit qirat (913), assigning this title to Yusuf, and a Marinid double dinar (793) where it
F. Royal
Titles which may be considered royal include al-malik, sultan or al-suhSan, and al-
amir al-ajall.
The king: used only by Hafsid 21 (637, 638) and Marinid 13 (787).
15. sultan
Sultan: used only by the late Hafsid 27 on his silver (1130, 1132).
16. al-sultan
The sultan: used by the same late Hafsid on his silver (1124-1129) and by his predeces-
G. Princely
Several titles were used to indicate non-royal ancestors, heirs, or independent princes
not aspiring to dynasty-wide rule; these may be termed princely, and include al-amir, al-
*.
The commander: used by all the early Murabits exclusively and by the later ones for
heirs or for themselves in limited space. Used while heir by Hammudid 9 (872-874) and
Muwahhid 9A (1076, 1077), Hafsid 6A (574-576), Hafsid 12 (594), and Nasrid 8 (868); for
20. sayyid aL
Titles 21
The chief: used only by Marinid 20A as independent prince (831, 832).
Of our chief: used only by Muwahhids 12 (M1) and 13 (538) in reference to non-royal
ancestors.
H. Pr1ncely (Dual)
The dual forms al-amirayn and sayyidayna were used following ibn- to indicate
Of the two commanders: applied only to the first two Muwahhids as a contraction of
Of our two chiefs: applied only to the first two Muwahhids (M1).
I. Pr1ncely (Plural)
The plural forms al-umara' and al-umara' al-rashidin were likewise used after ibn- to
25. al-umara' l
Of the orthodox commanders: used of the first 3 Muwahhids (1076, 1077), and con-
J. Her1tor1al
The final group of titles wali al-'ahd, wali 'ahdihi, and al-hajib was reserved
Heir: used for Hammiidid 9 (875-879), Murabit 4 (1017), and Muwahhid 4 (1075:
tentative).
PROPER NAMES
The Arabic and Berber proper names as they appear on the coins can be grouped into
four classes. There are personal names (Arabic singular ism), many of them Koranic
equivalents of Biblical names, others ordinary Arabic substantives. There are such names
preceded by abu-, father of, seldom indicating actual relationship. There are both such
types preceded by ibn-, son of, indicating direct sonship and arbitrarily differentiated in
this study from Ibn-, indicating more remote kinship, a form which never appears
on the coins. Forms in ibn- and abu- are both termed kunyah in Arabic. And there
are clan or tribe names, usually in the nisbah form al-'Abbasi or the Ibn- (plural
Banu-) form. Each group is treated briefly in Arabic alphabetical order, with names
A. Personal Names
1. Ibrahim ^1 j\
2. Abu-Bakr Jy)
Father of young camel: Murabit 1; Hafsid 10. Despite its composition this is a personal
3. Ahmad
Most praised: Hafsids 17, 27; Ziyanid /9; Marinid 20; Waftasid 4. N.o.c.: Hudid 1A;
4. Idris
5. Ishaq jU-J
Isaac: Murabit 6.
a. al-Hasan
6. al-Rashid
""II
1 111
page
item or coin
line
now reads
should read
10
16
n 1556-
in 1556.
18
Jami'.d
Jami'id
24
23
Hafsids
Hafsid
37
23
38
24
,o, .--
40
54
40
60
411
56
11
Hammadids
HammId1ds
59
13
MURabiT
MURlbiT
61
through
though
63
Almerica
Almeria
65
(genealogical tree)
(connect 4 to 5 by a vertical
line)
70
abiTl-Baqa'
abu'l-Baqa'
76
20
ibn-al-Za'im
page
should read
item or coin
now reads
line
160
547
RF 3
162
560
RF 2
162
561
OS 1
JP\
163
563
OF 2
167
582
RS 1
167
582
RS 2
168
582
584
OS 1
172
6oo
OS 2
178
629
OS 1
178
630
168
RF 1
j..1
189
669
OF 1
198
704
RF 1
198
707
OF 2
203
735
RF 4
205
747
pi. Xiii
pi. Xxin
210
780
RF 3
214
793
217
810
RF 2
217
810
OS 1
r^j
MISCELLANEOUS INDEX
938
935. 988, 1oo9, 1012, 1013, 1024-1026, 1028, 1049, 105o; also 1Q64 (Muwahhid)
1033
11, 18, 26, 42, 47, 49, 54, 63, 72, 94, 97, 129, 170, 217, 219, 221, 230, 258, 273, 340,
359. 395. 407. 426, 438, 469. 490. 5o6, 513, 516, 530, 609, 613, 638, 667, 715,
610, 617, 618, 622, 623, 624, 629, 630, 634, 642, 704-706, 709, 740, 804, H 1-H 14,
Proper Names 23
b. al-Zalm j^cj)1
c. al-Sa'id .k..".)\
7. al-Tzz >J l
d. al-'Az1z
8. al-Fadl Jidl
e. al-Qa'id jJlill
f. al-Mu'izz jS\
g. al-Mansur jj^'.ll
h. al-Nasir
i. Badis ^-jjl
: N.o.c.: Hammadid 7.
j. Bulukkin <ySX
: N.o.c: Hammadid 4.
9. Tashfin uyLil"
k. Tam1m ~J
10. Hasan
I. Hammu jL-
II. Khalid
12. Zakariya* fj
: Murabit 3A.
m. 'Amir jAe
Servant of the merciful: Hafsid 15A; Ziyanids 5, 9, 15; Marinid 20A. N.o.c:
Ziyanid 21.
Servant of the powerful: Hafsid 19; Marinids 18, 24. N.o.c: Hafsid 5.
Servant of God: Ziyanids 13, 26; Marinid 25. N.o.c: 'Abbasid 37; Muwahhids 7, 7A.
Servant of the believing: Muwahhid 1 (on 1-13, Hafsid 1); Marinid 17A. N.o.c:
Hafsid 23.
Servant of the one: Muwahhid 10 (on 10, 11); Ziyanid 17. N.o.c: Muwahhid 6;
Hafsid 12C.
Young snake: Hafsids 21; Marinids 10, 26. N.o.c: Ziyanids 2, 6; Marinid 2.
Proper Names 25
24. 'Ali Jo
Marinid 11.
25. 'Umar y
26. 'Imran ol jf
: Muwahhid 9A.
o. Muhsan {j-**
29. Muhammad
20, 25, 26; Ziyanids 12, 14, 20, 27; Marinids 13, 17, 19, 22; Nasrid 8; Wattasids 1, 2.
N.o.c: 'Abbasid 31; Muwahhid o; Hudid 1; Hafsids 12A, 28; Ziyanids 3, 8A, 18, 22, 23;
: Muwahhid 2A.
31. Ma'add In
p. Maymun Oy~
33. Yashir j\
34. Yahya ^
35. Ya'qub
q. Yaghmurasan j_l_/ju_
: N.o.c: Ziyanid 1.
36. Yusuf
Joseph: Murabit 2; Muwahhids 2 (on 2-5, 8, 9,12,13, Hafsid 1), 5. N.o.c.: Ziyanid 11;
Marinid 7.
37.?
The paternal relationship suggested by this form is usually arbitrary, certain combin-
sons, or even of his sonlessness. These were so invariable that late historians frequently
apply them to the Murabits, who did not use them, while the Ziyanid rulers actually
r. abu-Ahmad j.l
38. abu-Ishaq y\
39. abu'l-Baqa' y)
Father of the enduring: Hafsid 8. N.o.c.: Hafsid 18. With Khalid. No instance of the
s. abu'l-Hajjaj ^lJl y)
Father of the pilgrim: N.o.c.: Ziyanid 11. With Yusuf. Al-Hajjaj does not occur as a
Father of the fortunate: Muwahhid //; Hafsid 20^1. N.o.c.: Marinid 11; Wattasid 3.
With 'Ah.
671). N.o.c.: Marinid 9. With Sulayman. Al-Rabi' does not occur as a personal name in this
study.
Father of the leonine: Hafsids 4A (assumed name), 15,17, 27; Ziyanid 19; Marinid 20.
N.o.c.: Hudid 1A; Hafsid 14; Marinid 20; Wattasid 4. With Ahmad or al-Fad1. Al-'Abbas
II ITT I II
Proper Names 27
43. abu'l-'Um
Father of the noblest: Muwahhids 8, (on 8, 10, 11), 13. With Idris. Al-'Ula does not
t. abu'l-Futuh ^yuJl y\
Father of the victories: N.o.c.: Zirid 7. With 'Ali. Al-Futiih does not occur as a
u. abu'l-Qasim jJi)ly\
Father of the handsome: N.o.c.: Hudid 3A. With Ibrahim. Al-Qasim does not occur
abfl-Bakr jA
v. abu-Tashfin Ojiitjil
44. abii-Tamim y\
Father of strong: Fattimid 8 (on Zirids 4, 5): with Ma'add. N.o.c: Zirid 4: with al-
Mu'izz.
w. abu-Thabit ob y)
Father of steadfast: N.o.c: Ziyanids 7,10 (al-Zalm); Marinid 8 ('Amir). Thabit does
45. abu-Ja'far y\
Father of rivulet: 'Abbasid 36 (on Hudid 1A: 1121). With al-Mansur (used as proper
name, not as epithet). Ja'far does not occur as a personal name in this study.
Father of lion-cub: Muwahhid 12; Hafsids 6, 13. N.o.c: Marinid 5. With 'Umar.
x. abu-Hammu ^ y\
Father of Hammu: N.o.c.: Ziyanids 4,8, 25. With Musa. Sometimes spelt l^ y \ in
inscriptions.
Father of Zachariah: Muwahhid 9; Hafsids /, 3, 6A. N.o.c.: Hafsid 22. With Yahya.
y. abu-Ziyan o\j
Father of ornament: N.o.c.: Ziyanids 3, 8A, 12, 24, 28; Marinids 12A, 17, 19, 22, 23.
With Muhammad or Ahmad. Ziyan does not occur as a personal name in this study.
49. abu-Salim 1L y)
Father of safe: Mar1nid 14. With Ibrah1m. Salim does not occur as a personal name in
this study.
Father of happy: Marinid 10. N.o.c: Ziyanids 2, 6; Marinids 2, 26. With 'Uthman.
z. abu-Tahir _/>U> jA
Father of righteous: N.o.c: Zirid 6. With Yahya. Tahir does not occur as a personal
Father of (the) servant of God: 'Abbasid 31 (on Hammadid 9: 25); Muwahhid 4 (on
5-5. 8, 9); Hafsids 2, 7, 12, 15B, 20, 25, 26; Ziyanids 18, 20, 27; Marinid 13. N.o.c: Hudid
j; Hafsids 12A, 28; Ziyanids 14, 22, 23; Marinid 27; Nasrids 1, 8; Wattasids /, 2, 5. With
Muhammad.
cc abu-'Umar jt- y \
Father of life: Hafsid 21. With 'Uthman. 'Amr does not occur as a personal name in
this study.
Father of bridle: N.o.c: Marinid 12. With Faris. 'Inan does not occur as a personal
Father of cavalier: Hafsid 19; Marinid 21 (with Miisa). N.o.c: Hafsid 5; Marinids 18,
Father of ruler: Marinid 17A : with 'Abd-al-Mu'min. N.o.c.: Ziyanid 17: with 'Abd-al-
Wahid. Malik occurs in this study as a personal name only for an engraver or mintmaster.
Proper Names
29
55. abu-Muhammad y)
Father of benefit: N.o.c.: Marinid 3. With Muhammad. Ma'ruf does not occur as a
56. abu-Musa y\
57. abu-Yahya y\
(Abu-Bakr).
Father of Jacob: Muwahhids 2 (on 2-13, Hafsid 1), 5. N.o.c.: Marinid 7. With Yusuf.
59. abii-Yusuf
Father of Joseph; Muwahhid 3 (on 3-5, 8-11). N.o.c.: Marinid 6. With Ya'qiib.
ff. abu-?
These names, and their analogues titles and epithets preceded by ibn occur
constantly on the coins to indicate direct descent, which is often very useful for the
those of groups A and B, and reference to the index of proper names will serve to locate any
As was stated at the start of this chapter, an arbitrary distinction has been made
between ibn-, indicating sonship, and Ibn-, indicating more remote descent, a form which
never appears on the coins. This distinction is not derived from the coins, on which J
Four persons mentioned in this study are frequently referred to by names in Ibn-; they
are Ibn-abi-'Umarah (Hafsid 4A; real name), Ibn-al-Ahmar (Nasrid /), Ibn-Ghaniyah
30
An Arab or Berber generally has a nisbah ending in -i, indicating tribe or birthplace;
sometimes he has several. The only one of these occurring on the coins is al-'Abbasi,
occurring on Hammadid, Murabit, and Hudid gold and Hudid silver. Naturally, all the
persons discussed in this study possessed a name or names of this type, but the only ones
which require listing are those of rebels and governors not belonging to the main dynasties.
One other proper name occurring on the coins belongs to this general group: Ban1-
Tashfin (445, 446,1053-1056) as an inclusive term for all the Murabits commencing with 2,
EPITHETS
One royal prerogative throughout Islam has been the use of epithets (Arabic singular
laqab) in conjunction with proper names and titles or as substitutes for them. Those used
in late medieval North Africa can best be subdivided by grammatical form; participial
nouns, participial phrases, adjectival nouns, adjectival phrases, and other types. Only
A. Part1cip1al Nouns
1. al-Ma'miin
The trustworthy: Muwahhid 8 (on 8,10, 11). Also occurs with ibn- on Muwahhids 10,
11, referring to 8.
2. al-Mujahid -mUll
3. al-Murtada ^ J."i
4. al-Mustansir _raii_lT
5. al-Ma'an oUl
6. al-Mu'tamid ojJA
7. al-Mansur jyaA^
Muwahhids 8, 10, referring to 3. Occurs also as personal name, though not on coins.
8. al-Mahdi
9. al-Mu'ayyad -T^ll
B. Participial Phrases
The upright in (the) commandment of God: 'Abbasid 36 (on Hudid 1); Muwahhid 1
The upright for God in (the) nobility of (the) faith of the truth: Maraud 6.
The relying upon God: Hafsids 10, 15, 17, 19, 20 A, 21, 25,27; Ziyanids 5, 15, 17, 18,
The relying upon (the) master of the worlds: Ziyanids 4, 8, 9, 12-14; Marinid 12;
Wattasid 3.
The holy-warrior in (the) path of God: Muwahhid 10 (on 10, 11); Hafsids 4, 19, 21.
- - Si
The approved in (the) commandment of God: Muwahhid 12. Occurs on his medal in
The asking assistance of God: 'Abbasid 36 (on Hudid 1A); Fatimid 5 (on ZTrids 4, 5);
22. al-Muzaffar-bi-Allah
Epithets 33
The rendered-victorious in (the) honor of God: Hafsids 2, 4A, 7, 8, II, 13, 15A, 15B,
16, 17.
m - Wft ft
C. Adject1val Nouns
The fortunate: Hafsid 26. Also occurs with ibn- on Hafsid 27, referring to 26. Occurs
38. al-Rashid
The orthodox: Muwahhid 10 (on 10, n); Marinid 13. Occurs also as personal name.
39. al-Sa'id
The happy: Mar1nids 13,17, 19; Wattasid 1. Occurs also as personal name, though not
on coins.
40. al-Gharib
D. Adject1val Phrases
The powerful for God: occurs only with ibn- on Hammadid 9, referring to Hammadid 8.
E. Other Types
Most merciful of (the) commanders of the Moslems: Murabits 6B, 6C, referring to
Splendor of the state: Hammiidid 9A. This typically oriental Moslem epithet is almost
Brightness of the state: Hammudids 9B, 9C. This is the only other such epithet found
on these coins.
Servant of God: the most common epithet, used in reference to the 'Abbasids by
Zirid 8A and all the Murabits; applied to themselves by Hammudids 9A, 9B; Hafsids 15B,
21, 27; most of the Ziyanids and Marinids; Nasrid 8; Wat^asids 1-4. Occurs also on
Guided of the faith: on Muwahhid partisan silver. Epithets in -Dm, like those in
Epithets
Our master: Hafsid 27; Marinids 20, 24. A relatively modern epithet.
CONVENTIONAL INSCRIPTIONS
A large majority of the conventional inscriptions on the coins are religious. Of these
some are Koranic, some call down blessings on Muhammad and his family and companions,
some praise 'A1i or the Mahdi, some intercede on behalf of the ruler or the mint, some intro-
duce the clause on the striking of the coin, and others are general expressions of piety. They
are grouped in the order given, being listed alphabetically within each group, and are
A. Koran1c Verses
i:1.
Ljj <JJI
40:47.
- . ,. J- - *-
Conventional Inscriptions 37
10. Verily we have opened for thee a manifest open- Jjjf ^ 'jj^J (Ui s S3 Qci U
ing so that God may pardon thee for what has - "- -
preceded among thy sin and what came later, SZl ') li; L
guide thee on a straight path, and that God gtAc. (for Koranic <i^)
. - o-,= .
I J, JC <D I
12. In (the) name of God the merciful, the com- >^ 1 ft-j
passionate; passim.
13. May he be blessed who (has) in his hand the J & .A"
ful;67:1. ^"jT
BE tm y O 5
AiJl .-i.
17. My sufficiency (is) God, and how excellent is the <^ I (f0r Koranic uj) ^
18. Our master, judge between us and our people as ^IJ J*1 k ^j* crrJ..> "2
arbitrators; 7:87.
20. Our master, upon thee we have relied and unto ,&^\j SLJc j
result; 60:4.
understood in Koran).
24. Upon him I have relied and unto him I return; > .j Jjj- ^
I1:90, 42:8
25. Say (that) nothing befalls us except what God ^1 Q ii)T ~-f U Sfl lT~ v*[ jj
God then let the believers rely; say do you oy*>Jl J^>^ Jcj L;V^
await; 9:51-52. _ , ,
'J> $\ aJl'
28. (There is) no god except him the merciful, the in*\!r) l 0*0l y ^l <Jl ^
compassionate; 2:158.
J ,5s-l
32. Muhammad (is the) messenger of God; he has a.3'} iS-^\ <AJl
the truth, so that he may proclaim it above )^i < <j'..^,, Jc ^a" J J*)l
t> , u _ o -
33. And whoever has recourse to God, then he has JJ ^ [..*." 1 cr* (
a * - Go.
35. Victory (is) from God and conquest (is) near; ^. J ^i) <Dl j*
61:13.
37. (The) victory of God (is) near; 2:210. r:J^ (for Koranic
38. He (is) the first and the last and the evident and -r?1^lJ ^*'l >*
Conventional Inscriptions 39
wronged; 2:281.
42. And your god (is) a single God; 2:158. julj a)l
2:223 etc.
44. God has promised to those among you who have l>L_ j |JC^. J.jJ l <JJ l jlcj
he will make them successors on the earth as u*j^l ft'. j*i<-ij -^UJLaJl
S -o U O 5 j U w -o _____
46. And (there is) not the victory except from beside <JJ| xc ^ Vl i.)
God; 3:122.
47. And (there is) not the victory except from <iJl ^ Vl ^l U>
49. And you will not will unless God has willed; 00 <Dl ol<Ul >l o}!^" Uj
50. And (there is) not my success except with God; *Ul * j
11:90.
51. And (there is) not any god except God; 5:77 <Ul >l ^l ^ Uj
(paraphrased). o _0,
40
53. And whoever desires other than Islam as a faith, ,o -fl"'r.r ^o;.': - -
3:79. ^""^"'
56. And whoever relies upon God, then he (is) his <Ul o[ v-* . ^ JTj-:1:
57. And he (is) master of the mighty throne; 9:130. r^*-" <^v*JI j*j
and persevere and fear God, then perhaps you ,, T, . , ,' , <'
59. O you who have believed, obey God and obey l^jJlj<lJl L^l L
**--_-^_r
60. O thou prophet, we have sent thee as a witness l-t*Li liS'Li-jl LI ,^Jl L^.' L
Conventional Inscriptions 41
of the large group of conventional inscriptions which ring changes on the single theme: the
blessing of God be upon our chief Muhammad and upon his family and companions. An
62.
63-
64.
65.
-u ko_- ^ <ill
66.
67-
68.
69.
70.
72.
73-
74-
75.
servant.
86. Muhammad (is) his messenger and his servant. .-l*> J^-j -u
87. Muhammad (is the) servant of God and his j U>l -Vs
messenger.
91. 'Ah (is the) most distinguished of the agents and t>L-Jl j j.jjj uj-^yl J-il ^ (j)
93. (The) messenger of God, who delivered the good oil Jj-j <. jl.
news of it.
94. I ask help of God; how excellent is the helper. uJll ^ oil o^-\
96. God help him and render him victorious by grace c-r <c j <uI
of his compact.
1oo. God help his commandment and render strong j*. jclj <ul o.J
his victory.
him victorious.
113. God may he be exalted preserve it for the oyLJi JL" <dI LI* I
Moslems.
grace.
it.
Conventional Inscriptions
43
Most of this group of inscriptions are variations or abridgments of the formula: in the
name of God the merciful, the compassionate this dinar (or dirhem) was struck at .. .
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
130.
131-
132.
133.
134.
l*e-Jl Cf)\
upon him.
his commandment.
uto
4jb-j u &
* J* J*> to
<ul JaUl
J*"
Uu\ o\ji\
Oil jl ji\
<ul Ji\
u ddll (j)
u 5Clll
<ul al^l
Oil ^-U
<ul yl
158. (There is) no might and no strength except in God. ul, Vl iji Vj J_p- V (j)
161. How near (is the) succor of God. (Early Ziyanid *u1 gj ^J\ U
motto)
165. And the thanksgiving (is) unto God for his grace. <u*" Jc <u _dlj
.1 <-, j*0
182. Year.
183. Year.
<*-*
month).
fJi Ojj
The style and script traditional in the caliphal coinage, round fields surrounded by
unbroken margins in plain Kufi, are characteristic of all the coins at the opening of this
survey. The Zirid coins continued to be based on Fatimid models; the Hammudid silver
was a debased version of that struck by the Spanish Umayyads; the Murabits combined
these styles into a strong simple style of their own which was a model of clarity. A few
Naskhi or part-Naskhi pieces are found among their silver, but Kuf1 greatly predominated.
All this was deliberately changed by the Muwahhids, probably to fulfill the prophecy
that power would be seized by a leader who would alter the currency on the occasion of a
conjunction of certain planets. The style then introduced, which lasted with minor changes
and exceptions for the balance of the late medieval period, included square silver, chiefly in
the cursive Naskhi script, and round gold with field inscriptions in a square inscribed in a
circle, the segments of which also held legends, all in Naskh1 script except for some orna-
many orientalists, although it has no connection whatever with the Qarmat1 heretical
sect. This fallacy has persisted despite complete refutation by Fraehn in the Journal
Asiatique for 1828. The script, which had a wide but short-lived popularity in the last half
of the thirteenth Christian century and the first decade of the fourteenth, was probably
introduced into North Africa by refugees from Andalusia after the fall of Seville.
Vagaries in the spelling of the inscriptions abound. Abu- and ab1- are used inter-
changeably by the Hafsids; masculine and feminine dates, by the Murabitts. Alifs are
inserted in or omitted from such words as ibn-, rahman, ta'ala, and dinar according to the
whim of the engraver. Diacritical marks are usually entirely absent; when present they are
In rare cases, punches were used by the engraver to incise straight lines and circles,
especially on Hammudid coins. The general practice, however, was to engrave the design
by hand in reverse on a die like the one described by Marcais. This inevitably led to such
minor errors as the omission or duplication of letters and even of whole words, but these
were held to a reasonable minimum by careful supervision, and faulty dies were frequently
withdrawn and corrected. An index of coins with engraving errors is supplied for the use of
Very few of the dies are signed: two with the name Sa'd in tiny letters, possibly one
with Malik.
coins bears a pictorial device, and only a few pieces of silver, separately indexed, have a
face covered by a geometrical design. Individual letters and blank spaces are often enhanc-
46
ed by the application of minor scrolls and flourishes, though the effort to decode any
meaning they may have conveyed has been fruitless. Otherwise it is limited to line and
dotted squares surrounding field inscriptions, and occasional lengthening of letters to fill
MINTING TECHNIQUE
The methods used in striking the late medieval North African coinage are nowhere
clearly described, but can easily be deduced from the money itself and from the coin die
described by Marcais. The obverse was engraved on one tool, the reverse on a base, a cold
metal flan of the correct size was inserted, a blow was struck, and the finished coin was
Some control was exercised so that obverse and reverse appeared in the desired
relative position, but this was subject to great relaxation. Occasional coins survive, and
are listed in the miscellaneous index, with errors in striking, including the combining of
two obverses, the use of a flan of the wrong size, and such mistakes. Misstruck and double-
Very few names of mint-masters appear on these coins. Yashir, Malik, and Ibn-Kaukab
may be Murabit mint-masters; others may be indicated by the relatively frequent mint-
No systematic study of these mint-marks has been attempted. They are frequently
not mentioned by persons recording coins, so that the existing data are necessarily in-
Mention should be made here of certain Murabit silver on which one side has been
deliberately left blank. Vives ascribes this to a system of indicating denominations, though
not all extant coins fit into his table. These coins are listed in the miscellaneous index, as
METROLOGY
Much the larger portion of the coins under examination were made of gold. The Zirid
and Murabit dinar, and presumably the Hammadid, was designed to weigh about 4.2 grams,
with halves and quarters and even eighths weighing correct fractions of that figure. The
Z1rid dinar, of which surviving specimens average 4.11 grams and are known as heavy as
4-35, was 22-24 millimeters in diameter; the Murabit, averaging 4.05 grams and never
over 4.3, was 23-27 millimeters across. Half dinars were 15-16 millimeters, quarters 13-15,
The coins as struck were apparently fairly uniform in size and weight, and the gold
was of good quality. It came across the Sahara from the negroes' regions, in sufficient
With the advent of theMuwahhids the quality and quantity of the gold used apparently
was sustained, but the standard of weight and size was permanently altered. A wide, thin
double dinar was introduced, averaging 4.55 grams, 27-32 millimeters in diameter. The
dinar, averaging 2.27 grams, was 19-22 millimeters; the half, at 1.15 grams, 14-16 milli-
meters, the quarter, at .55, about 13 millimeters. Successor dynasties followed these
specifications with minor alterations; some Hafsid double dinars were slightly smaller,
some Marinid slightly broader; most dinars somewhat broader; a few Ziyanid and Marinid
halves considerably broader; but in general the plan was adhered to without significant
modification.
After the middle of the Muwahhid period the number of specimens diminishes sharply,
with Ziyanid and Wattasid gold definitely scarce. The quality was never seriously di-
minished, and purchasing power remained high, though definite analyses belong rather to
economic than to numismatic history. Apparently far more need of fractional gold existed
under the later dynasties than under the Murabits, whose dinars account for over 99%
The place of silver in the various dynastic coinages varied greatly. For the Hammudids
only silver so base as to be readily considered copper was struck, whereas the Zirids followed
the Fatimids in seldom using silver. The Murabits struck large quantities of silver, both
dirhems of traditional appearance with dates and mints and 1-gram qirats and fractions
A few electrum coins survive for the Murabits, but no data is available indicating
The square silver struck by the Muwahhids and Hafsids is plentiful and found
Christians of Spain and France. The square dirhems averaged about 1.5 gram and were
13-19 millimeters square. They survive in great numbers, making more unaccountable the
Metrology
49
lack of identifiable Ziyanid silver and the relative scarcity of silver attributable to the
Silver was presumably mined locally in Morocco and Spain. Its value relative to gold
fluctuated, being never more than one tenth and seldom less than one twentieth by weight.
The purity of the alloy also suffered fluctuations, being depreciated and restored on several
occasions.
Copper was simply not recognized as a precious metal suitable for coinage. Dinars and
square and round dirhems were occasionally imitated in copper or struck in silver so base
as to be distinguishable only with difficulty from it, but the few attempts to coin copper
openly met with violent popular opposition. Only at the very end of Hafsid rule were a
few coppers struck, foreshadowing modern token currency, but this development was
The following chapters cover the coinage of each dynasty as a separate unit. Before
each has been inserted a chronological list of rulers, with a condensed genealogical tree for
each except the Fatimids, the Hudids, and the Ottomans, which have but one ruler apiece
affected by North African numismatic history for the late medieval period. The information
in the lists of rulers has been derived from medieval inscriptions and documents and from
and other works; it has been corrected or confirmed from evidence found on the coins
themselves. Although the actual coins have been consulted whenever possible, the other
sources have been used in the best modern published versions, as listed in the bibliographies.
When such sources conflict, the more probable has been determined and utilized; when
gaps remained after exhaustive research, I have filled them from modern sources or from
After each item of information there has been placed, within parentheses, a short
reference to one or more sources, in this order: gold (g), electrum (e), silver (s), and copper
(c); inscriptions (B and a number, referring to the historical reference bibliography, part B);
documents (C and a number); medieval Arabic works (A and a number). Failing these,
modern sources (D and a number) or my own conclusions (H) supply the data. Although
this system is rather unwieldy and unattractive, no better way of supplying this essential
reference material has presented itself; it is hoped that familiarity will render it less ob-
jectionable. The parentheses following Christian dates indicate the source from which the
month of the Moslem year was derived, enabling me to specify the correct one of the two
Ahmad (28; A35h) a.H. 530 (A35h) -555 (A35h) a.d. 1136 (no alternative) -1160
(A35h): generically on Z1rid gold 24a and Murabrfc gold (see above), specified on
(55; A35h) a.H. 623 (A35h) -640 (A2oa) a.d. 1226 (no alternative) -1242 (A2oa):
generically on Hiidid gold 540 and silver 1117-1120, specified on Hudid silver 1121.
5i
(36; A35h) a.h. 640 (A35h) -656 (A35h) a.d. 1242 (A35h) -1258 (A35h): generically on
26
Muhammad
27
28
II
29 31
II
30 32
33
34
35
36
37
The 'Abbasid caliphs of Baghdad had once controlled all North Africa, but their sway
had ended with the attainment of independence by the Aghlabids and the Idrisids about
a.d. 8oo, just as it had previously been terminated in Spain by the establishment of the
Umayyad am1rate. The Fattimid conquests in the tenth century had closed all Africa to
them permanently.
With this in mind, it is clear that the appearance of 'Abbasid names and titles on late
medieval North African coins in no respect represented a revival of their temporal power.
What it did signify was a spiritual submission to the theory of a single orthodox Sunnite
caliphate.
This distinction is clearly seen in the Murabit gold coinage. With a single unexplained
exception (91) every piece of Murabit gold accords the epithet 'Abd-Allah and the caliphal
titles al-imam and amir al-mu'minin to this distant and shadowy suzerain, who was never
individually named, though occasionally generically called al-'Abbasi on the later dinars.
For themselves the Murabits adopted the lesser titles al-amir and amir al-muslimin, never
aspiring to full caliphal rank. The silver, not restricted by Moslem political theory to the
Shortly after the downfall of the Murabits in a.h. 541, two of their neighbors rendered
analogous numismatic homage to the 'Abbasids. Yahya, the 9th Hammadid, specified al-
52
Muqtafi on a dinar dated 543 (25) reported by Ibn-Khaldun, while the Jami'id Rashid of
Gabes followed the Murabit formula in his 551 dinar (24a). Both of these coins indicate
anti-Fatimid sentiment similar to that motivating the great Zirid revolt, in which 'Abbasid
banners and prayers were substituted for Fatimid, though for some reason the 'Abbasid
Both Yahya and Rashid fell, like the Murabits, before the powerful Muwahhid military
machine, and the 'Abbasids disappeared from North African coins for nearly eighty years.
The Banu-Ghaniyah, collateral descendants of the Murabitts, invaded Tunisia from their
Balearic stronghold, and referred to the 'Abbasids as suzerains in their Friday prayers,
following family tradition, but no coins exist for their decades of banditry on the Muwahhid
frontiers. If any are ever located, they may be expected to bear 'Abbasid formulas.
During the Muwahhid collapse after a.h. 624 Ibn-Hud made good his independence in
Spain and struck several coins in nominal allegiance to the distant 'Abbasid caliph, as an
act of defiance to the Muwahhids. The only Hudid coins considered in this study are those
few struck in North Africa; during the three months of a.h. 630 that Ibn-Hud controlled
Ceuta both gold (540) and silver (1117-1120) were apparently struck there, with pro-
A further step was taken by the shaykh al-Yanashti, who governed Ceuta for the next
five years and coined silver in the name of the 36th 'Abbasid, al-Mustansir,dated635 (1121).
The final 'Abbasid coin struck in North Africa (541), although mintless and dateless,
can confidently be ascribed to the amir al-'Azafi at Ceuta between a.h. 647 and the termin-
With the end of the caliphate proper came the end of numismatic recognition in
North Africa, for the puppet-caliphs maintained by the Mamliiks at Cairo seem to have
exercised no such dominance over occidental loyalties as their legitimate predecessors had
8 al-Mustansir-bi-Allah (g, A35e) abu-Tamim (g, A41a) Ma'add (g, A35e) ibn-'Ali (7; A35e)
a.H. 427 (A18b) -487 (A18b) a.d. 1036 (A18b) -1094 (A18b): specified on Zirid gold 1,
2, 15-23.
Although the Shi'ite Fatimid imams had risen to power in Tunisia, they resolved in
a.D. 969 to shift their seat of government to newly-conquered Egypt, leaving North Africa
under a governor. For this post was chosen the able Sanhajah Berber general Bulukkin
ibn-Ziri; the demands of loyalty were dutifully fulfilled by him, by his son al-Mansur, and
by al-Mansur's son Badis. By the fourth generation, however, the bonds had greatly
slackened, and the combined motives of personal ambition, Sunnite proclivities, and
apparent security from reprisal led to the Zirid revolt of al-Mu'izz ibn-Badis.
The historians give a variety of dates for the various steps in this revolt; the coins
afford an exact chronology. The standard Fatimid dinars minted at al-Mahdiyah and al-
53
Mansuriyah through a.H. 438 represent the old order; both mint cities were named for
Fatimid founders. The first sign of aversion appeared in 439, when the old name Sabrah was
used instead of al-Mansuriyah, though Fatimid formulas were retained and al-Mustansir
With 441, however, the revolt became unequivocal. The dinars of that and subsequent
years eliminated all reference to al-Mustansir, substituted Sunnite for Shi'ite formulas,
and were usually minted at Kairouan. As far as Arabic historians disclose, the revolt was
final, though numismatists have long known of later coins naming al-Mustansir and struck
at al-Mahdiyah.
Apparently Farrugia de Candia was the first to make the obvious deduction that the
Zirids must have sought a reconciliation with their vindictive former overlord, who had
sent the Banii-Hilal and the Banu-Sulaym to ravage Tunisia. Whether this tardy remorse
was accepted by al-Mustansir cannot now be determined, but since the new series con-
tinued for ten years, it may be supposed to have met with some measure of success.
The net effect from the Fatimid point of view may be briefly recapitulated. Until 438,
normal dinars. In 439 and 440, normal dinars (1, 2) except for the ominous change in
mint-name. From 441 to 449, rebellion. From 449 to 454, resumption of normal dinars
under al-Mu'izz. From 454 to 459, continuation of normal dinars under Tamim. After 459,
nothing, despite one coin reported for 480 but rejected as unbelievable.
Thus the long history of Fatimid coinage in North Africa came to its final close in 459,
as far as surviving coins indicate. The last quarter-century, analysed here, was perhaps the
The nominal Fatimid suzerainty over the Hammadids of eastern Algeria probably
lasted somewhat longer but does not seem to have been reflected on coins, for the only
recorded coin of this dynasty (25) is said by Ibn-Khaldun to have been struck on the
Sanhdjah Berber rulers of the Banu-Ziri of Tunisia a.H. 362-543 (a.d. 972-1148).
4 abu-Tamim (B11, A27b) al-Mu'izz (B11, A35e) ibn-Badis (3; B11, A35e) a.h. 406 (A35e)
First series (for Fatimid 8) a.h. 439 (g) -440 (g, A35e) gold 1, 2.
Second series (independent) a.h. 441 (g,A41a) -449 (g) anonymous gold 3-14,
Third series (for Fatimid 8) a.h. 449 (g) -454 (A35e) gold 15-17.
a.h. 451 (A35e) -493 (A35e) a.d. 1059 (H) -1099 (D9) anonymous gold 24.
5 abu-Yahya (A30c) Tamim (Bn, A35e) ibn-al-Mu'izz (4; Bn, A35e) a.h. 454 (g, A35e)
First series (for Fatimid 8) a.H. 454 (g, A35e) -459 (g) gold 18-23.
54
6 abu-Tahir (A36c) Yahya (A35e) ibn-Tam1m (5; A35e) a.h. 501 (A35e) -509 (A35e)
7 abii'l-Futuh (A35e) 'Ali (A35e) ibn-Yahya (6; A35e) a.h. 509 (A35e) -515 (A35e) a.d.
8 abu-Yahya (A36c) al-Hasan (A35e) ibn-'Ali (7; A35e) a.h. 515 (A35e) -543 (A35e)
8A Rashid (g) ibn-Rashid (g, A35e) independent Jami'id Arab governor of Gabes a.h.
5xx (?) -554 (A84e) a.d. 115x (?) -1159 (H) gold (for 'Abbasid 31, not identified) 24a.
I 4A, 8A
The history of the Sanhajah Berber dynasty known as the Zirids is successively one of
prosperity, disaster, and redirection. From a.h. 372, the effective date of Bulukk1n's
This study opens in 439 with the first stirrings of revolt, the substitution on otherwise
normal Fatimid dinars of the ancient name Sabrah for theFatjimid al-Mansuriyah. Al-Mu'izz
struck Shi'ite dinars of this type through 440, anonymous Sunnite coins from 441 to 449,
and Shi'ite dinars from 449 to his death in 454; these were continued through 459 by his
son Tamim. Apparently no further coins were struck by members of the main Zirid dynasty.
These sparse facts suggest many questions, to which only the most tentative answers
can be supplied. The motives for the revolt are well known: al-Mu'izz's ambition and
Sunnism buttressed by his misplaced feeling of security. Apparently no one event was the
occasion for his rebellion, but rather a general sense that the time was ripe.
Numismatically, the changes made in 441 were not far-reaching. The shape, weight,
and diameter of the standard dinar were retained; quarters and eighths were occasionally
minted for change, with scanty silver, just as under the Fatimids. Only the inscriptions
were altered, but this was done thoroughly. The Shi'ite praise of 'Ali was eliminated from
the obverse face; for the Fatimid names and titles on the reverse face was substituted a
55
Koranic quotation; another replaced the previous obverse margin; even the mint inscription
The new style lasted at Kairouan through 448, with a similar coin from Sfax ascribed
to 449. In that year al-Mu'izz fled to the fortified port of al-Mahdiyah, leaving the rest of
Tunisia to be pillaged by the Arab invaders. His coins from 449 to his death in 454 were
struck at al-Mahdiyah, where his son Tamim as governor had already coined Sunnite
The unexpected fact is that the final group is Shi'ite in every respect. 'Ali is venerated;
al-Mustansir is named and accorded caliphal titles; the concentric style is revived. There
can be no possible doubt as to the significance of all this: an attempt at reconciliation with
This Shi'ite series was continued by Tamim through 459; its duration, and the variety
in styles utilized, suggest acceptance by Cairo as a Fatimid mint in good standing from
449 to 459. Motives on both sides are easy to understand: the Zirids seeking any ally
against the ferocious horde devastating Tunisia and vainly hoping that al-Mustansir could
control the destroyers he had loosed; the Fatimid delighted with his revenge and welcoming
Between 459 and the Sicilian conquest of al-Mahdiyah in 543, the Zirids, ruling chiefly
judicious alternation of commerce and corsairship partially restored their power and
prosperity. For what reason, then, did they not resume coining money?
The answer must surely be sought in the cutting by nomad Arabs of their source of
supply for raw gold, previously shipped across the Sahara by camel caravan. What gold
they secured by trade or raid was already minted, and adequate to their needs. Silver had
always been rare in Tunisia, even in Aghlabid times. And finally, if any coins were struck by
the later Zirids, they were probably looted by the Sicilian Normans and eventually melted
into bullion.
The relatively few surviving Zirid coins are chiefly gold dinars weighing about 4.05
grams, with a diameter of about 23 millimeters, neatly struck, in Kuf1 script. The inscrip-
tions on the Sh1'ite series are identical with standard Fatimid legends; the Sunnite ones,
being anonymous, are remarkable only in the unusual minting phrase "struck in (the) city
of (the) power of Islam and al-Qayrawan", ironic in view of the fact that Kairouan would
An anonymous dinar of Zirid type (24) is, because of its mint and date, ascribed by
ibn-Malil, whose attack on al-Mahdiyah was defeated by Tam1m. Its date, 461, is the latest
A still more unusual Murabit-style dinar (24a) is reported by Prieto y Vives as struck
at Qabis in 551 by al-Rashid ibn-Rafi'. Since his illustration is execrable, and since the al-
Rashid to whom he refers died in 543 and was not the son or descendant of Rafi', I at first
reluctantly rejected this coin, until I located the Schulman specimen, the clear photograph
of which disproves its ascription to Qadis (Cadiz) for 552. Prolonged scrutiny led me to the
present reading, al-Rashid ibn-Rashid, suggesting one of the two sons of Prieto's al-Rashid
who ruled between his death and the Muwahhid conquest of Gabes in 554, with Sicilian
interruptions. Ibn-Khaldiin gives their names as Muhammad and Mudafi'; the latter
that the dinar was struck by the last Jami'id under his real name al-Rashid.
Any alternative explanation would have either to identify another person named al-
Rash1d who could have ruled Gabes in 551 or to explain why the first al-Rashid was not
ibn-Kamil, .as Ibn-Kaldun calls him, as well as the discrepancy in dates. Perhaps my
No coins are recorded for the other local Arab and Berber rulers of cities or tribes in
Tunisia, Tripolitania, or eastern Algeria during this turbulent period, though some few of
Sanhdjah Berber rulers of the Banu-Hammdd of eastern Algeria a.h. 405-547 (a.d.
1014-1152).
1 too early.
2 al-Qa'id (A35e) ibn-Hammad (j; A35e) a.h. 419 (A35e) -446 (A35e) a.d. 1028 (A41a)
3 Muhsan (A35e) ibn-al-Qa'id (2; A35e) a.h. 446 (A35e) -447 (A35e) a.d. 1055 (A41a)
4 Bulukkin (A35e) ibn-Muhammad ibn-Hammad (j; A35e) a.H. 447 (A35e) -454 (A35e)
5 al-Nasir (C12,A35e) ibn-'Alannas ibn-Hammad (j; A35e) a.H. 454 (A35e) -481 (A35e)
6 al-Mansfir (A35e) ibn-al-Nasir (5; A35e) a.h. 481 (A35e) -498 (A35e) a.d. 1088 (A41a)
7 Badis (A35e) ibn-al-Mansur (6; A35e) a.h. 498 (A35e) -498 (A41a) a.d. 1104 (D9,D14)
Zirid 1
Muhammad
'Alannas
8 al-'Azlz (A35e) ibn-al-Mansur (6; A35e) a.h. 498 (A41a) -515 (A35e) a.d. 1105 (A41a)
9 Yahya (g,A35e) ibn-al-'Aziz (8; g.Atfe) a.H. 515 (A35e) -547 (A35e) a.d. 1121 (A60b)
inadequate material, for the sad fact is that no coin survives which has been soundly
in 481 no coins were minted, according to Ibn-Khaldun, but between 481 and the Muwahhid
conquest in 547 several coins must have been struck; we know only the 543 dinar (25)
preposterous sketches, purporting to represent this and other Hammadid coins; fortunately,
appears to be a well-worn Fatimid dinar of indeterminable mint and date; the original,
The external politics of the Hammadids were to counter their kinsmen, the Zirids.
Whichever supported the 'Abbasids would find its neighbor in the Fatimids' camp. Each
strove to turn the Arab hordes, and the Sicilian Normans, against the other. Before the
Arab invasions they were military rivals; afterwards, piratica1. When the last Zirid was
defeated by the Sicilians, he fled for refuge to the last Hammadid, who put him in prison.
'Alid Arab rulers of the Banu-Hammud of Malaga a.h. 407-449 (a.d. 1016-1057).
6 Idris II (s,A48a) ibn-Yahya I (3; A48a) a.h. 434 (A6b) -446 (s,A6b) a.d. 1043 (A48a)
Without heir a.h. 434 (A6b) -439 (H) a.d. 1043 (A48a) -1047 (H) too early.
With heir Muhammad (9; s,A27c) a.h. 439 (s) -446 (s, A6b) a.D. 1047 (H) -1055
interregnum between end of dynasty proper and independence of 9A a.h. 449 (D9) -453
9B al-'Izz (s,A27c) ibn-Saqaut (9A; A35e) Barghawattah Berber governor of Ceuta a.h.
Hammud
Not related
9A
9B
9C
Pre-eminent among the petty kings who divided up Umayyad Spain in the early
eleventh century were, at first, the Hammudids of Malaga, but by a.h. 439, when this study
starts, they had been outmatched by the 'Abbadids of Seville, and even within their tiny
state they dissipated their strength in internecine warfare. A branch of the family held
Algeciras, while the main dynasty also ruled Ceuta in Africa, bringing them within the
The only member of the dynasty proper to coin at Ceuta after 439 was the6th, Idris II,
with his son Muhammad as heir. He struck only silver of poor alloy, like all his family, of
whom Muhammad I, Idris III, and al-Qasim II were at war with him after 438. It was for
this reason that he was often forced to take refuge at Ceuta, where his support was centered,
His dirhems are similar to those of the later Spanish Umayyads and the other petty
kings in style and content. He assumed caliphal titles and epithets but did not mention his
After the collapse of the dynasty in 449, Ceuta was held by a succession of non-royal
adventurers culminating in the Barghawatah Berber Saqaut and his posterity. His coins,
in an illegible stubby Kuf1 script on silver so base it is usually termed copper, are none-
theless important. They are said by Vives to date from 455 to 467, but del Rivero, who is
far from infallible, challenges all dates prior to 464. 462 does exist; for 455 and 456, doubt
may be justified.
They are crowded with names, titles, and epithets. Saqaut is al-Mansur, al-Ma'an,
The tough, elderly ex-slave who assumed this welter of nomenclature died in battle
against the Murabit Yiisuf ibn-Tashfin, leaving al-Tzz to continue the defense of Ceuta.
This he managed for an incredible five additional years before being captured; by insolence
he provoked Yusuf into killing him untortured. His embattled tenure 471-476 is
represented numismatically by a mintless, dateless base silver dirhem with the field
Again he, or some unknown and unspecified person, is al-imam, 'Abd-Allah, am1r al-
59
with an oriental flavor not found elsewhere in this study. And al-hajib is Saqaut, Diya'-al-
Daulah too. Though the latter is generally presumed to be al-Tzz's father, no explanation
has been offered for the change in epithets or for his appearance as chancellor following his
undoubted death. My own conclusion is that a third generation is involved, with the
younger Saqaut as heir to his father al-Tzz and sharing the same epithet. He is not
mentioned by historians.
Of the other pre-Murabit rulers of Morocco no coins survive dated after a.h. 439,
unless some of the curious small gold coins ascribed by Brethes to the Banu-Khazriin of
Sijilmasah are that late. As noted in the corpus, these coins are not available for study, nor
are published descriptions and plates adequate; there are probably many such coins to be
unearthed by archaeologists and ethnologists in Morocco for the use of later generations of
scholars.
j Abu-Bakr (g,s,c,A35e) ibn-'Umar (g,s,c,A35e) a.h. 448 (A84e) -480 (g,A35e) a.d. 1056
(A84e) -1087 (A84d) gold (for 'Abbasids 26 and 27, not identified) 26-52, silver 888-890,
copper 1161.
1A 'Ali (g) ibn-x (?) governor of Sijilmasah about a.h. 459 (H) a.d. 1067 (H) gold (for
1B Ibrahim (g) ibn-Abi-Bakr (1; g) governor of Sijilmasah a.H. 462 (g) -467 (g) a.D. 1070
(H) -1074 (H) gold (for 'Abbasid 26, not identified) 54-57.
Without heir a.h. 480 (g,A35e) -496 (A84d) a.d. 1087 (A84d) -1103 (A84d) gold
With heir 'Ali (3; g,s,A35e) a.h. 496 (A84d) -5oo (g,A36c) a.d. 1103 (A84d) -1106
(A36c) gold (for 'Abbasid 28, not identified) 121-151, silver 902-904.
3 'AH (g,e,s,c,A35e) ibn-Yusuf (2; g,e,s,c,A35e) a.h. 5oo (A36c) -537 (g,A35e) a.d. 1106
Without heir a.h. 5oo (A36c) -522 (g) a.d. 1106 (A36c) -1128 (no alternative) gold
(for 'Abbasids 28 and 29, not identified) 152-291, electrum 939, silver 905-938,
With heir Sir (3A; g,e,s,A51b) a.h. 522 (g) -533 (g) a.d. 1128 (no alternative) -1139
(H) gold (for 'Abbasids 29-31, not identified) 292-361, electrum 991, 992,
With heir Tashfin (4; g,s,A35e) a.h. 533 (g,A84d) -537 (g,A35e) a.d. 1139 (H) -1143
(A36c) gold (for 'Abbasid 31, not identified) 362-403, silver 995-1017.
4 Tashfin (g,s,A35e) ibn-'Ali (3; g,s,A35e) a.h. 537 (g,A35e) -540 (g.As1c) a.d. 1143
Without heir a.h. 537 (g, A35e)~538 (A91) a.d. 1143 (A84e) -1144 (A91) gold (for
With heir Ibrahim (5; g,s,A35e) a.H. 538 (g.A91) -540 (g.As1c) a.D. 1144 (A91)
-1145 (A51c) gold (for 'Abbasid 31, not identified) 422-432, silver 1034-1038.
6o
5 Ibrahim (A35e) ibn-Tashfin (4; Atfe) a.H. 540 (A51c) -540 (H) a.d. 1145 (A51c) -1145
(H) no coins.
6 Ishaq (g,s,A35e) ibn-'Ali (3; g,s,A35e) a.H. 540 (g) -541 (g,A35e) a.d. 1145 (H) -1147
(A35e) gold (for 'Abbasid 31, not identified) 433-442, silver 1039-1052.
6A Yahya (g,A35e) ibn-Ab1-Bakr ibn-'AH (3; g,A35e), called al-Sahrawi (A35e), rebel at
Ceuta against Muwahhids a.H. 542 (A35e) -543 (g,A84e) a.d. 1147 (H) -1148 (H) gold
6B Yahya (C11,A35e) ibn-'Ali (C11, A35e), called Ibn-Ghaniyah (A35e), Massufah Berber
governor of Granada a.h. 541 (A51c) -543 (C11,A35e) a.d. 1147 (A51c) -1148 (Cn)
gold (for 'Abbasid 31, not identified, and the Banu-Tashfin) 446, silver (for the Banu-
Tashfin) 1053-1056.
6C Maymun (A35e) ibn-Badr (Codera) Lamtunah Berber governor of Cordova until a.h.
549 (A35e) a.d. 1154 (H) gold (for 'Abbasid 31, not identified, and the Banu-Tashfin)
445.
6D unidentified governor of Nul Lamtah about a.h. 542 (g) a.d. 1147 (H) anonymous
Related
through
mother
6B
Talakakin
'Umar
Yahya
1B
Ibrahim
Tashfin
Not related
1A?
6C
6D?
Abu-Bakr
6A
3A
After the sparse coinage of their predecessors and contemporaries, the Murabits
provide a splendid contrast. Here we have available a rich and bountiful series generous in
None of this was to be expected of the puritanical sect established by the reformer
'Abd-Allah ibn-YaS1n among the veiled (mulaththimun) tribesmen of the Sahara. After
the death, in battle against negroes of Ghana to the south, of the founder and of his skilled
the Murabit (outpost) army, and is generally considered to have been the first temporal
Sijilmasah, the first important city taken by the Murabits, fell in a.h. 446; Abu-Bakr
assumed command in 448; his first surviving dinar was struck there in 450. Yet the pattern
61
established by this grave and uncultured desert chieftain in this remote Moroccan stronghold
was followed without important alteration by his veiled successors ruling not only Morocco
but all Moslem Spain, and was fully worthy of that prosperous and civilized land.
The coinage was based on the gold dinar, with a weight of about 4.2 grams and an
average diameter of 25 millimeters. Over 15oo specimens are reported, with over 4oo having
recorded weights averaging 4.05 grams. Much of this was struck in Spain, through the raw
gold doubtless was obtained from the negroes south of the Sahara, and was thus the first
large quantity of gold struck in western Europe since Roman times. Spanish Christian gold
Very little fractional gold is known: two half dinars (52, 210) and a single quarter
dinar (91). Of more interest are the few electrum coins reported (939, 991, 992), the only
instance in this study of the use of this alloy; I have not discovered the name applied to
include both the old dirhem, the size of a dinar but varying in weight, and the new qirat,
about 13 millimeters in diameter and averaging .95 gram, with halves, quarters, eighths,
and even sixteenths thereof. Mints are often named, but more often not; the great assort-
Copper is restricted to a few imitation dinars and dirhems which may have been
Nearly half the known gold coins included in this survey are Murabit, and nearly half
the total number of specimens recorded. This prolific minting within less than a century
must reflect an extraordinary prosperity, which had the usual effect of softening up the
heirs of the warriors so that they fell easy prey to the next wave of hardy Berber invaders,
Except for a few silver pieces in Naskhi, or Kiifi and Naskhi, the Murabit coins are
engraved in a plain Kiifi, somewhat coarse at the start but usually clear and elegant. The
usual terse religious invocation precedes the name and title of the ruler and of his heir, if
The reverse field is normally devoted to the 'Abbasid caliph: al-imam, 'Abd-Allah,
amir al-mu'minin, sometimes al-'Abbasi. The obverse margin is Koranic; the reverse
contains the minting inscription with mint and date, an estimable custom from the
historian's point of view. Because of this, there is little difficulty in attributing Murabit gold,
Abu-Bakr, with the title al-amir, struck dinars at Sijilmasah from 450 to 480. The 450
pattern recurs for every succeeding year except three small clusters: 452-453, 459-460, and
464-466. In 452 a slightly different pattern was tried, but soon discarded. The second gap
probably corresponds to the dinar (53) dated 45x, the last digit being punched out, struck
by one 'Ali, who is otherwise completely unidentified; the assumption is that he was a
relative or lieutenant left in command while Abu-Bakr led a military expedition southward.
The same theory would account for the dinars (54-57) dated 462 to 466 or 467 and struck
These historians say that in 453 Abu-Bakr turned Morocco over to his cousin and
62
lieutenant Yusuf ibn-Tashfin, devoting the remainder of his life to spreading Islam by
militant methods among the negroes of the Senegal region. Yusuf's 27-year tenure as
viceroy, before Abu-Bakr's death in battle in 480, left no slightest numismatic traces in
direct contradiction of several Arabic chroniclers though during this period he founded
Marrakesh, conquered Fez and Ceuta in Morocco, took Tlemcen in Algeria, and defeated
Again contrary to the evidence of the Arabic historians, when Yusuf did assume power
in 480 he did not adopt the title amir al-muslimin, for all his coins limit themselves simply
to al-amir.
Commencing with Sijilmasah alone, Yiisuf slowly added other mints: Ceuta (484),
Fez (484), Aghmat (486), Cordova (486), Seville (489), Jativa (489), Marrakesh (490), San
Lucar (491), Almeria (492), Granada (493), Tlemcen (494), Nul (494), Malaga (494),
Denia (495), Alcantara (496), and Baeza (497). Not all of these struck annually, but they
Among the few innovations found on Yusuf's dinars are mint-marks (often once j,)
and the first instance of the substitution of Je for its synonym <i_, year (112). Both of
In 496 Yusuf had his son 'Ali proclaimed heir apparent, and this event was reflected
on half of the surviving issues of 497, while by 499 all the mints then striking had redesigned
their dies to honor the heir. Apparently each mint was free to do this when and how it
willed, to judge from the variety of solutions contrived; even mints using the mark K,
Sijilmasah dinar (172) outdid itself by implying that 'Ali rather than Yusuf was ruling, a
change which actually occurred in 5oo, on the first day of which Yusuf died at a very
advanced age.
All coins of Yusuf dated 5oo (132, 140, 146, 147) are presumably posthumous issues
from previously prepared dies; for convenience they are grouped with his regular coins.
The coinage as inherited by 'Ali might be characterized thus; mostly gold, of high
quality and regularity, well engraved and well struck at almost every important city of
Morocco and Andalusia, with considerable autonomy at each mint as regards selection and
arrangement of legends on both gold and silver. During his tranquil reign of 37 years it
proclamation as heir apparent of his son S1r in 522 and of his son Tashfin in 533 after
Sir's death.
His African mints in 500 were Aghmat, Sijilmasah, and Marrakesh, to which were
added Fez (501), Nul (501), Tlemcen (505), Sala (508), Ban1-Tawada (513), and Ceuta and
Meknes (dateless silver). Sijilmasah, which had recognized him prematurely, continued to
accord him only the family title al-amir until 520, but the others used the sub-caliphal
Mints for dinars in Spain were Seville (from 510), where a slight rearrangement of the
obverse face was made, and where a mint-master named Yashir added his name to the
coins after 519, Valencia (5oo-512), Algeciras (507-509), Denia (5oo-504), Jativa (5oo only),
Granada (from 501), where a new reverse margin was introduced in 519 and in 520 a
special annotation treated in the following paragraph, Cordova (503 only), Loja (511 only),
63
Malaga (5oo-506), Murcia (501-512), where oddly anonymous dirhems were also struck,
and Almerica (from 506). It is noteworthy that only Seville, Granada, and Almeria were in
Granada's innovation of 520 was the insertion of the words "waznu qadimu", former
weight, outside the inner circle. This implication of a deficiency made good will not bear
scrutiny; 30 Granada dinars struck between 501 and 520 average 3.97- grams, while 12
with the new claim average 3.94+; apparently this was merely bureaucracy at work, twelfth
century model.
Several of the dinar mints also struck silver, as did Saragossa, Jerez, and Cuenca.
Much of the mintless silver is also probably attributable to Spain; it is varied and well-
The eleven years in which Sir was heir, 522-533, found his name added by each mint
as local option specified. Aghmat, Sijilmasah, Fez, Marrakesh, and Nul Lamtah continued
to be the African dinar mints, with Ceuta and Tangier coining silver. Seville, with Yashir
as mint-master, Granada, and Almeria struck dinars in Spain; Murcia continued dirhems.
The final years 533-537, with Tashfin as heir, used the same five Moroccan dinar
mints, with Tlemcen in western Algeria, while Ceuta still coined silver. Al-'Abbas! was
often added to the reverse field, and minor varieties proliferated. Only Seville and Almeria
Thus over the long generation of 'Ali's reign the coinage remained fairly stable in
appearance, weight, and legends, but the mints gradually closed and those which stayed
open lost their fine judgment, changing styles rapidly and overcrowding fields and margins
as if the insertion of an extra pious phrase afforded more in spiritual merit than it cost in
artistic self-respect.
The same mints for gold that had served Tashfin as heir of 'Ali continued to serve him
as ruler. His own dinars, especially those on which his son Ibrahim appears as heir, tend to
be overcrowded in field and margin, and their style was changed more frequently than
necessary. Codera made skillful use of the 540 Tlemcen dinar (406) to refute the Arabic
historians' oft-repeated assertion that Tashfin's death occurred at Oran in Ramadan of 539.
His silver is wholly mintless except for a Cordovan coin which must have been struck by
Hamdin must also have been responsible for two (441, 442) of the few dinars bearing
Ishaq's name; they were minted at Cordova in 540 and 541. Granada was revived as a
dinar mint along with Seville, for Almeria had fallen to Christian assailants. Similarly,
available mints in Morocco were limited to Aghmat, Marrakesh, and Nul Lamtah, and the
number of issues dropped sharply under heavy Muwahhid pressure, though a good deal of
The fall of Marrakush and execution of Ishaq in 541 brought the main dynasty to its
close, but Murabit garrisons held out in several strongholds. The dinar (443) struck by al-
Sahrawi at Ceuta in 543 gives his genealogy, his sub-caliphal and extraordinary spiritual
pretensions, and the true date of his surrender, often set at 542. The dinars (445, 446) and
silver minted in memory of the Banii-Tashfin mark the continued resistance of Cordova
and Granada.
64
Nul Lamtah, too, must have held out for a few months, as the anonymous dinar (444)
The other petty rulers who struck coins in Spain either, like Hamdin, just prior to 541,
or between Murabit and Muwahhid rule, fall outside the scope of this study. It should
not be forgotten that it is to this transitional period that the unique Jami'id (24a)
and Hammadid (25) dinars belong, as well as the partisan Muwahhid gold and silver
when it is compared with the extreme paucity of their epigraphic and documentary remains
and with the extraordinary meagerness of the historical sources concerning their supre-
macy. Ibn-Khaldun, for example, devotes about one-fifth as much space to the Murabits
as to the Muwahhids, and his colleagues do likewise, so that much of the information
derivable from the legends on the gold fills a vacuum left by the historians.
0 al-Mahdi (g,s,c,A35e) Muhammad (A35e) ibn-Tiimart (A35e) spiritual leader a.h. 515
(A35e) -522 (A35e) a.d. 1121 (A85c) -1128 (no alternative) no coins; mentioned
interregnum between death of o and proclamation of 1 a.h. 522 (A35e) -524 (A35e)
a.h. 524 (A35e) -558 (A35e) a.d. 1130 (A15) -1163 (A35e):
Without heir a.h. 524 (A35e) -551 (C11) a.d. 1130 (A15) -1156 (C11) anonymous
With heir abu-'Abd-Allah (g,A35e) Muhammad (1A; g,A35e) a.h. 551 (C11) -558
With heir abu-Ya'qub (g,A35e) Yusuf (2; g,A35e) a.h. 558 (A35e) -558 (A35e)
a.h. 558 (A35e) -580 (A35e) a.d. 1163 (A84d) -1184 (A51c):
First series, as amir a.h. 558 (A35e) -563 (A35e) a.d. 1163 (A35e) -1168 (A84d)
gold 481-492.
Second series, as amir al-mu'mimn a.h. 563 (A35e) -580 (A35e) a.d. 1168 (A84d)
2A Mazdara' (g,A84d) ibn-Hayyan (A51c) Sanhajah Berber rebel at Taza a.h. 559 (A84d)
3 abu-Yusuf (g,A35e) Ya'qub (g,A35e) ibn-Yusuf I (2; A35e) a.h. 580 (A35e) -595 (A35e)
Without heir a.h. 580 (A35e) -587 (A35e) a.d. 1184 (A84d) -1191 (H) gold 500-503.
With heir abu-'Abd-Allah (s,A5ic) Muhammad (4; Atfe) a.h. 587 (A35e) -595
65
4 abu-'Abd-Allah (g,A51c) Muhammad (g,A35e) ibn-Ya'qub (3; A35e) a.H. 595 (A35e)
5 abii-Ya'qub (g,A85c) Yusuf II (g,A35e) ibn-Muhammad (4; A^e) a.H. 610 (A35e) -620
6 abu-Muhammad (A35e) 'Abd-al-Wahid I (A35e) ibn-Yusuf I (2; A35e) a.h. 620 (A35e)
-621 (A35e) a.d. 1224 (A35e) -1224 (A35e) (opposed during 621 by 7) no coins.
(A84d) -624 (B1,A35e) a.d. 1224 (A84d) -1227 (B1,A35e) (opposed during 621 by 6 and
Mu'min (1; A^Se) rebel at Baeza a.h. 621 (A35e) -626 (A35e) a.d. 1224 (H) -1229 (H) no
coins.
8 abu'l-'Ula (g,A35e) Idris I (g,A35e) ibn-Ya'qub (3; g,A35e) a.h. 624 (A35e) -629
First series, with al-Mahdi a.h. 624 (A35e) -627 (A84e) a.d. 1227 (A84e) -1230
Second series, without al-Mahdi a.h. 627 (A84e) -629 (A84d) a.d. 1230 (A84e)
9 abu-Zakariya' (g,A84d) Yahya (g,A35e) ibn-Muhammad (4; Atfe) a.h. 624 (A35e) -633
(A35e) a.D. 1227 (A84d) -1236 (A84d) (opposed during 624 by 7, 624-629 by 8, and
9A abu-Musa (s,A35e) 'Imran (s,A84d) ibn-Ya'qub (j; A35e) rebel amir at Ceuta a.H. 629
(A84d) -630 (A35e) a.d. 1232 (H) -1232 (D15) silver 1076, 1077.
(A35e) -640 (A35e) a.d. 1232 (A35e) -1242 (A84d) (opposed 630-633 by 9):
First series, without al-Mahdi a.h. 630 (A35e) -631 (H) a.d. 1232 (A35e) -1234 (H)
Second series, with al-Mahdi a.h. 631 (H) -640 (A35e) a.D. 1234 (H) -1242 (A84d)
gold 514-517.
I o, 2A
1A 2 'Umar
3 6 Ishaq Muhammad
4 7 8 9A 12 7 A 13
5 9 10 11
66
11 abii'l-Hasan (g,A35e) 'Ali (A35e) ibn-Idris I (8; g,A35e) a.h. 640 (A35e) -646 (A35e)
646 (A35e) -665 (A35e) a.d. 1248 (A35e) -1266 (A84e) (opposed during 665 by 13)
(j; g,A35e) a.h. 665 (A35e) -668 (A35e) a.d. 1266 (A84d) -1269 (A36c) (opposed during
2-13 and Hafsids: anonymous silver 1085-1116, anonymous copper 1170, 1171.
The parallels between Murabit and Muwahhid history are striking. Each was a fanatic-
ally militant sect founded by a religious reformer in a remote section of Morocco, drawing
its initial support from a previously unimportant group of tribes, sweeping irresistably
over the strongly defended cities, and finally conquering all of Moslem Spain. Muhammad
difference; he was not a warrior-missionary like his prototype but a subtle theologian who
the Masmudah Berbers of the high Atlas, while the first Murabrfcs had been Lamtah and
Lamtunah Berbers of Sanhajah stock from the edge of the Sahara. His opposition was
more unified and better organized than had been the case in the preceding century, and
Numismatically the contrast was complete and spectacular. The Murabit gold had
derived its style and weight standard from a long Moslem tradition ascending to the
(unitarians). The new dinar had a diameter of 19-22 millimeters and a standard weight of
2.4 grams; 146 weighed specimens average 2.27. The metal remained excellent, as did the
A cursive Naskhi script replaced the traditional Kufl. The field inscription was placed
in a square inscribed in a circle, with the four segments available for additional legends
instead of the former single margin. The new style, with only slight modifications, was
retained by all the later dynasties considered in this study, so that a.h. 540 may be con-
sidered as a numismatic watershed. Double dinars as well as fractions were soon introduced
to provide flexibility; the large coins served admirably to house the extended genealogical
inscriptions and epithets on which the Muwahhids laid so much importance. The range of
their diameters is 27-32 millimeters; 275 weighed specimens average 4.55 grams.
The content of the legends underwent an equally drastic revision. The Mahdi's
preeminence was added to the usual religious dogmas, while 'Abd-al-Mu'min and his
successors with their names, titles, epithets, and genealogies gradually crowded all other
phrases off the coins. Dates were never noted, and mints only occasionally, so that the
The most important point, and one which has never heretofore been adequately
clear late Muwahhid double dinars have been badly misread by competent scholars who
Vives, Prieto, and others analyzed these coins and corrected individual misreadings while
67
perpetuating others because they did not apprehend this underlying principle, which may
After a few trial pieces he jettisoned the traditional style in favor of square silver in a
cursive Naskhi script; his heirs developed this into the anonymous square dirbem which
was struck for decades throughout North Africa and Andalusia in enormous quantities,
With occasional exceptions the remaining silver considered in this study, by whatever
dynasty it was minted, is square with legends derived from the Muwahhid pattern. Thus
the net effect of the numismatic reforms introduced by one man and developed by his heirs
As was true for the Murabits, the Muwahhids left no copper coins except a few debased
or fraudulent dirhems. Al-Marrakushi noted that gilded copper dinars were minted to
ransom the sayyid 'Isa ibn-'Abd-al-Mu'min from his Arab captors, but none has survived,
The first partisan issues, oddly inscribed gold (446a) and silver (1057-1064), soon gave
way to a standardized coinage with a variety of African and Andalusian mints. The
conquests of the Muwahhids were promptly reflected on their dinars, possibly as a deliberate
method of propaganda, possibly by opening mints to coin the captured gold and silver for
paying the soldiers. Any late Zirid and Hammadid coins may have been lost to posterity in
'Abd-al-Mu'min used the caliphal title amir al-mu'minin on both gold and silver.
Mint-names and mint-marks occur in various positions on his gold, most of which was
struck in Africa. A preponderance of his silver, aside from the mintless variety, came from
Spanish mint-towns, including Murcia, not captured until nine years after his death.
In 551 he made his son abu-'Abd-Allah Muhammad his heir and added his name to
the gold with the title al-amir al-ajall. Though both of these events are recorded by
reputable historians, the resulting series of dinars has usually been ascribed to the 4th
Muwahhid, of the same name, Silvestre de Sacy's correct attribution having been dis-
regarded.
Just before his death in 558 'Abd-al-Mu'min chose another son, Yusuf, as heir instead
of the dissolute Muhammad. It is impossible to distinguish any dinars on which Yusuf may
have appeared as heir from those of the early part of his own reign, during which he
contented himself with the title al-amir al-ajall. Seville is his only Spanish mint, both
No silver bears Yusuf's name or that of most of his successors, for it was at this
period that the anonymous square dirhems were introduced. It is almost impossible to
ascribe these coins to individual rulers, or even to dynasties, as the Hafsids continued to
strike them for an indeterminate period. Blancard's study on the European imitations
enables them to be recognized with comparative ease by their confused engraving, while
Bel and Farrugia de Candia have made valuable studies of these coins, but except for
Hafsids.
68
During 559, early in Yusuf's reign, Mazdara* ibn-Hayyan rebelled at Taza, struck
gold of which no specimen has been reported in modern collections , and was sup-
pressed.
Ya'qub struck the first of the splendid series of double dinars, with his father and
grandfather named on the reverse field and himself on the reverse segments. Some numis-
matists refer to these double dinars as dinars, but the correct value is established by the
"quarter dinar" denomination specified on coin 446a, weighing .55 gram, about one eighth
of the normal weight of the double dinars. An odd square silver piece (1075) may refer to
As caliph, Muhammad struck double dinars quite unlike the series of dinars often
erroneously ascribed to him. His conquest of the Baleares is reflected in the appearance of
His son Yusuf II continued to add his name to those of his ancestors on the gold, but
he was soon replaced by his great-uncle 'Abd-al-Wahid I, for whom no coins are known.
The latter's nephew and successful opponent 'Abd-Allah is assigned an undescribed dinar.
The rebel al-Bayyasi struck no coins which have survived. Coins of any of this group may
Idris I is said by the historians to have deleted al-Mahdi's name from the gold in 627,
but his only surviving double dinar (511) must have preceded that event, as it is orthodox
except for having six lines instead of five in each field. His nephew and opponent Yahya
also has but a single known double dinar, while Idris' brother Tmran, who made himself
independent at Ceuta, apparently coined only silver (1076, 1077) with the title al-amir.
gold and silver. His early gold praised the Koran instead of the Mahdi; his early silver was
round and substituted his own epithet al-Rashid for the Mahdi as imamuna. Suggestions
of a date appear on some of this silver, but clearer specimens must be found to determine
whether the historical date for the restoration of al-Mahdi's name, 631, is confirmed or
contradicted by the silver. The later gold coins show that this restoration actually did
occur. One of these bears an unidentified mint misread by Prieto as Malaqah (Malaga).
His brother 'Ali struck a few normal double dinars; he was succeeded by a distant
cousin named 'Umar who minted a variety of gold. 'Umar's mints included Ceuta, Sijil-
masah, and an unidentified city, also misread by Prieto as Malaqah. An interesting gold
The final Muwahhid, another distant cousin named Idris II, struck a few more gold
pieces to close out the numismatic history of this distinguished dynasty, since no coins are
reported for the several Muwahhid pretenders who arose after the Marinid victory in 668.
/ abii-'Abd-Allah (notes to A84e) Muhammad I (A35e) ibn-Yusuf (A35e) a.h. 625 (A26)
-635 (A35e) a.d. 1228 (A48a) -1238 (A48a) anonymous gold (for 'Abbasid 36, not
identified) 540, anonymous silver (for 'Abbasid 36, not identified) 1117-1120.
69
1A abu'l-'Abbas (A26) Ahmad (A35e) ibn-x (?), called al-Yanashti (A35e), independent
amir of Ceuta a.h. 630 (A26) -635 (s,A35e) a.d. 1233 (A84e) -1238 (A84e) silver (for
2, 3 no African coins.
'Azafi (A35e), independent amir of Ceuta a.h. 647 (A35e) -677 (H) a.d. 1249 (H) -1278
(notes to A8ob) anonymous gold (for 'Abbasid 37, not identified) 541.
4 no African coins.
The Hudids, as one of the petty dynasties of Moslem Spain which arose on the ruins of
the Muwahhid empire, are excluded from this study except for their North African issues.
After the Muwahhid amir Tmran had declared himself independent at Ceuta in a.h.
629, he found himself unable to hold out, so in 630 he exchanged the town for a sinecure
under Ibn-Hiid, who retained Ceuta for three months under the governorship of one al-
Qashtini. To this period may be ascribed a double dinar (540) and several square dirhems
(1117-1120) on which references to the Mahdi and the Muwahhids were replaced by
generalized homage to the 'Abbasid caliph, never individually specified. The approximate
pieces, and the attribution follows because Ibn-Hud is the only ruler during this period
Later in 630 Ibn-Hud's governor was expelled by the inhabitants, who gave the
command to the amir Ahmad al-Yanashti. This amir kept power for five years, including
a sea blockade by the Genoese, whom he bought off for a large ransom. To him must be
attributed the round dirhem dated 635 (1121), which was struck in the name of the 'Abbasid
Then Ceuta passed into Muwahhid control until 643, and into Hafsid vassaldom until
647, but for the next three decades it was again independent under the local amir abu'l-
Qasim, al-'Azafi, who struck a double dinar (541) of Hafsid type with pro-'Abbasid legends
at some time before 656, when the last 'Abbasid caliph was killed by Hulagu during the
sack of Baghdad. The date is established by the date of the Hafsid coins from which it
clearly derives; the attribution rests on the elimination of other possibilities for this date
Masmudah Berber rulers of the Banu-Hafs of Tunisia and eastern Algeria a.H. 627-982
(a.D. 1230-1574).
a.h. 627 (A84e) -647 (A35e) a.d. 1230 (A84e) -1249 (A35e):
First series, Muwahhid name a.h. 627 (A84e) -634 (A35e) a.d. 1230 (A84e) -1236
Second series, Muwahhid and Hafsid names a.h. 634 (A35e) -640 (A85c) a.d. 1236
Third series, Hafsid name a.h. 640 (A85c) -647 (A35e) a.D. 1242 (A85c) -1249
70
a.h. 647 (A35e) -675 (A35e) a.d. 1249 (A35e) -1277 (A35e):
First series, as amir a.h. 647 (A35e) -650 (A85c) a.d. 1249 (A35e) -1253 (A85c)
gold 557-561.
Second series, as amir al-mu'minin a.h. 650 (A85c) -675 (A35e) a.d. 1253 (A85c)
(A35e) -678 (A35e) a.d. 1277 (A35e) -1279 (A35e) (opposed 677-678 by 4) gold 567,568.
4 abu-Ishaq (g,A35e) Ibrahim I (g,A35h) ibn-Yahya I (1; g,A35e) a.h. 677 (A85c) -681
(A35e) a.d. 1279 (A85c) -1283 (A35e) (opposed 677-678 by 3 and during 681 by 4A)
gold 569.
ing to be abu'l-'Abbas (g) al-Fadl (g,A35e) ibn-Yahya II (3; Atfe) a.h. 681 (A35e) -683
(A35e) a.d. 1282 (A65) -1284 (A35e) (opposed during 681 by 4, 681-682 by 5, and
5 abii-Faris (A35e) 'Abd-al-'Aziz I (A35e) ibn-Ibrahim I (4; A35e) a.h. 681 (A35e) -682
(A35e) a.d. 1283 (A35e) -1283 (A35e) (opposed 681-682 by 4A) no coins.
-694 (A35e) a.d. 1284 (A65) -1295 (A35e) (opposed during 683 by 4A and 683-694 by
a.h. 683 (A35e) -7oo (D4) a.d. 1284 (D4,D14) -1301 (D4) (opposed 683-694 by 6 and
a.h. 694 (A35e) -709 (A35e) a.d. 1295 (A35e) -1309 (A35e) (opposed 694-7oo by 6A and
8 abu'l-Baqa' (g,A35e) Khalid I (g,C12,A35e) ibn-Yahya (6A; C12,A35e) a.h. 7oo (D4)
-711 (A35e) a.d. 1301 (D4) -1311 (A85c) (opposed 7oo-709 by 7, during 709 by 9,
First series, as amir at Bougie a.h. 7oo (D4) -709 (A35e) a.d. 1301 (D4) -1309
(A35e) no coins.
Second series, as amir al-mu'minin a.h. 709 (A35e) -711 (A35e) a.d. 1309 (A35e)
(j; A35e) a.h. 709 (A35e) -709 (A35e) a.d. 1309 (A35e) -1309 (A35e) (opposed during
709 by 8) no coins.
(A35e) -747 (A35e) a.d. 1310 (A18b) -1346 (A35e) (opposed 710-711 by 8, 711-717 by
11, 717-723 by 12, 721-730 by 12A, 724-725 by 12B, and 729-732 by 12C):
First series, as amir at Bougie and Constantine a.H. 710 (A35e) -718 (A85c) a.D.
Second series, as amir al-mu'minin a.H. 718 (A85c) -747 (A35e) a.D. 1318 (A85c)
7i
of 1; C2,A35e) a.h. 711 (A35e) -717 (A35e) a.d. 1311 (A65) -1318 (A85c) (opposed
12 abu-'Abd-Allah (g,A35e) Muhammad III (g,A35e) ibn-Zakariya' I (11; A35e) a.H. 717
(A35e) -723 (A35e) a.d. 1317 (A35e) -1323 (no alternative) (opposed 717-723 by 10 and
A35e) pretender a.h. 721 (A35e) -730 (A35e) a.d. 1321 (A35e) -1330 (A35e) (opposed
721-730 by 10, 721-723 by 12, 724-725 by 12B, and 729-730 by 12C) no coins.
12B abu-Ishaq (A35e) Ibrahim (A35e) ibn-Abi-Bakr I (9; A35e) pretender a.h. 724 (D14)
-725 (A35e) a.d. 1324 (D14) -1325 (A35e) (opposed 724-725 by 10 and 12A) no coins.
12C abu-Muhammad (H) 'Abd-al-Wahid (A35e) ibn-Zakariya' I (11; A^e) pretender a.h.
729 (A35e) -732 (A35e) a.d. 1329 (H) -1332 (A35e) (opposed 729-732 by 10 and
13 abu-Hafs (g,A35e) 'Umar II (g,A35e) ibn-Abi-Bakr II (10; g,A35e) a.h. 747 (A35e)
-748 (A35e) a.D. 1346 (A35e) -1347 (A85c) (opposed during 747 by 14) gold 595, 596.
14 abu'l-'Abbas (A35e) Ahmad I (A35e) ibn-Abi-Bakr II (10; Atfe) a.H. 747 (A35e) -747
(A35e) a.d. 1346 (A35e) -1346 (A35e) (opposed during 747 by 13) no coins.
interregnum under Marinid 11 between death of 13 and independence of 15 a.h. 748 (A35e)
15 abu'l-'Abbas (g,A35e) al-Fadl (g,A35e) ibn-Abi-Bakr II (10; g,A35e) a.H. 749 (A35e)
-751 (A35e) a.d. 1348 (D4,D14) -1350 (A35e) (opposed 749~751 by 15A and 15B):
First series, at Bougie a.h. 749 (A35e) -749 (A35e) a.d. 1348 (D4,D14) -1349
Second series, at Tunis a.h. 750 (A35e) -751 (A35e) a.d. 1350 (A85c) -1350 (A35e)
A35e) amir at Constantine a.h. 749 (A35e) -755 (A35e) a.d. 1348 (D4,D14) -1355
g,A35e) amir at Bougie a.h. 749 (A35e) -753 (A35e), 761 (A35e) -767 (A35e) a.d. 1348
(A35e) -1352 (D14), 1360 (D14) -1366 (A61b) (opposed 749-751 by 15 and 761-767 by
16 and 17):
(A35e) -770 (A35e) a.d. 1350 (A35e) -1369 (A65) (opposed 751-755 by 15A, 761-767 by
Bakr II (to; g,C14,A35e) a.h. 755 (A35e)-758 (A35e),761 (A35e) -796 (A35e) a.d. 1354
(D14) -1357 (D4,D14), 1360 (A85c) -1394 (A35e) (opposed 761-767 by 15B, 755-758,
72
18 abu'l-Baqa' (A35e) Khalid II (A35e) ibn-Ibrahim II (16; A35e) a.h. 770 (A35e) -772
(A85c) a.d. 1369 (A65) -1370 (A85c) (opposed 770-772 by 77) no coins.
a.h. 796 (A35e) -837 (A85c) a.d. 1394 (A35e) -1434 (A85c) gold 610-625.
(/9; A85c) a.h. 837 (A85c) -839 (A85c) a.d. 1434 (A85c) -1435 (A85c) gold 626.
20A abii'l-Hasan (g,A85c) 'Ali (g,A85c) ibn-'Abd-al-'Aziz II (79; g,A85c) amir at Bougie
a.h. 839 (A85c) -856 (A85c) a.D. 1435 (A32) -1452 (D4) (opposed839-856 by 21) gold 627.
(79; C2,A85c) a.h. 839 (A85c) -893 (A69) a.d. 1435 (A85c) -1488 (A69) (opposed
839-856 by 20A):
Second series, Hafsid style with 4-line reverse field: gold 637, 638.
Third series, Marinid style with 4-line fields: gold 639, 640.
22 abu-Zakariya' (A85c) Yahya III (A85c) ibn-Muhammad ibn-'Uthman (27; A69) a.h.
893 (A69) -894 (A69) a.d. 1488 (A69) -1489 (A69) (opposed during 894 by 23) no coins.
894 (A69) -895 (D4) a.d. 1489 (A69) -1490 (D4) (opposed during 894 by 22) no coins.
24 abu-Yahya (D4) Zakariya' II (A69) ibn-Yahya III (22; A69) a.h. 895 (D4) -899 (A18a)
'Uthman (21; A18a) a.h. 899 (A18a) -932 (A18a) a.d. 1494 (A18a) -1526 (A18a)
gold 641-643.
(A18a) -941 (D14), 942 (D14) -948 (D14) a.d. 1526 (A18a) -1534 (D14), 1535 (D14)
-1542 (D14):
a.h. 941 (D14) -942 (D14) a.d. 1534 (D14) -1535 (D14).
27 abu'l-'Abbas (c,A18a) Ahmad III (s,c,A18a) ibn-Muhammad VI (26; s) a.h. 948 (D14)
-977 (D14) a.d. 1542 (D14) -1569 (D14) silver 1124-1132, copper 1173,1174.
interregnum under Turks between deposition of 27 and installation of 28 a.h. 977 (D14)
Philip II of Spain a.h. 981 (A32) -982 (A32) a.d. 1573 (D14) -1574 (A32) no coins.
The Hafsids claimed the spiritual and political succession from the Muwahhids, and
their coins were designed accordingly. Their double dinars, dinars, and smaller gold pieces
followed the Muwahhid standards, and surviving specimens average slightly better weight
than those of their predecessors. By restricting the field inscriptions to three lines, they
avoided over-crowding them; the script used was a cursive Naskhi or a highly ornamented
Kufi. Silver in the latter script is definitely Hafsid; otherwise, their anonymous silver is
73
abu-Hafs 'Umar
abu-Muhammad 'Abd-al-Wahid I
l_
~i
6A
Abu-Bakr
'Abd-al-Rahman
al-Fadl 7
(impersonated
by 4A)
-\ r
10
12B
1 T" 1 1 f
13 1 4 15 Muhammad Yahya 16
r-H
15A
17
_L
18
19
Muhammad
21
~~l
20A
20
Muhammad
22
24
al-Hasan
26
I,
Ibrahim
23
Muhammad
Ahmad
Distantly
related
12A
Not related
44
_L
J3
12c
27
28
74
The inscriptions on the gold almost invariably include, in the obverse field, one of
several phrases in honor of the Mahdi; the sequence of these fields affords one of the
best methods of dating these dateless gold pieces. The reverse field and segments normally
give the current ruler's name, title, epithets, and condensed genealogy. Mints occur on
many of these coins but dates are unknown until near the end of the dynasty, when
they appear on the silver in the form of numerals, under Ottoman influence.
The power of the Hafsids lasted for over three centuries, with minor interruptions by
Marinid invaders in the fourteenth century and major conflicts with Turks and Spanish
in the sixteenth, at which time the legibility of the coins was seriously impaired.
The attribution of Hafsid gold, though not as automatic as that of the Murabit and
Muwahhid pieces, is seldom difficult, because of the sequence of obverse styles and scripts.
Yahya I's gold falls into three series corresponding to the stages by which he passed from
with the title al-amir al-ajal1. In 627, when his suzerain Idris I renounced the unitarian
doctrines of the Mahdi and removed him from the coins, Yahya seized the opportunity to
disown this heresy and strike coins in the name of the Mahdi and 'Abd-al-Mu'min, friend of
his own name; in 640 he deleted that of 'Abd-al-Mu'min, completing the political separation
from the Muwahhids, but he and his heirs never repudiated the Mahdi or deleted his name
from their money. Of particular importance are the coins struck for Yahya by vassals in
Morocco (553, 554) and Spain (555, 556), as each can be linked with a particular event in
his intricate maneuvering for power. Ceuta acknowledged him from 643 to 647, between the
Muwahhid domination and its freedom under al-'Azafi, whose gold is described with that
of the Hudids. Sijilmasah under al-Khazraji recognized his authority only in 640 and 641.
Seville sought his aid during its final siege by the Christians, while Granada recognized
him briefly before Ibn-al-Ahmar established independent Nasrid rule there, to endure until
a.D. 1492.
Muhammad I, the opponent of Louis IX of France in his fatal crusade, did not inherit
his father's foreign holdings, but his prosperous home province was an ample heritage which
he carefully strengthened, while developing commerce with Italy. His coins fall into two
series, as he used the title al-amir al-ajall until 650, when he adopted the caliphal amir
al-mu'minin.for which he secured international approval after the Mongol conquest of Bagh-
dad in 656. It is on the latter series that the ornamented Kuf1 script was introduced, possibly
by exiles from Seville, who were very numerous and influential in Muhammad's court.
The gold of his son Yahya II was patterned on his, but when Ibrahim I seized power
The impostor Ibn-abi-'Umarah, claiming to be al-Fadl ibn-Yahya II, who had been
murdered in prison, left a single double dinar (570), which has not heretofore been correctly
ascribed. No coins can be attributed to his rival 'Abd-al-'Aziz I, whose reign lasted less
than a year.
Several ornamented Kufi coins were struck by 'Umar I and by his contemporary at
Bougie, Yahya, who used the title al-amir. A small group of double dinars in both scripts
can safely be ascribed to Muhammad II, and a single ornamented Kufi one to his rival
75
During his long embattled tenure Abu-Bakr II struck a big group of gold coins, while
his opponents Zakariya' I and Muhammad III left a few with unusual obverse inscriptions.
A double dinar belongs to 'Umar II, and the eighth dinar of Paris is probably his, but
he murdered his brother Ahmad I before the latter had a chance to mint gold. The Marinid
invasion caused by this event led to partition among al-Fadl, 'Abd-al-Rahman, and
Muhammad, each of whom struck distinctive gold; the double dinar (603) struck by
Muhammad during his second reign after captivity among the Marinids is particularly
A group of double dinars struck by Ibrahim II, including the last ornamented Kufi
gold piece, precedes two minted for his opponent Ahmad II, the second of which (609)
followed his Marinid captivity, judging by its five-line fields. Khalid II's short reign left no
numismatic records.
The long and prosperous reign of 'Abd-al-'Aziz II is reflected by his plentiful gold, in
much of which the diameter is wrong for the denomination indicated by the legends and
weight. One double dinar may be attributed to his successor Muhammad IV, though this
'Uthman's long rule produced a quantity of gold, some of which, struck in Algeria, is
unusual in the wording and arrangement of the legends and in the modified Kufi script.
No coins are reported for his three ephemeral successors, while the gold assigned
Muhammad V is either partly illegible, the wrong size, or tentative. Muhammad VTs single
gold piece also has illegible segments; it was during his reign that the Turks and Spaniards
fought each other for control of Tunis. It is apparent that the troubles which overwhelmed
the Hafsid state after 'Uthman's death seriously affected both the quantity and the quality
For the long, turbulent reign of Ahmad III no gold survives, but a quantity of dated
silver showing Turkish influence has been found, and a few pieces of copper. No coins are
reported for the final Hafsid, Muhammad VII, nor for the many independent Hafsid
This lengthy series of Hafsid gold, with the final silver and copper pieces, is most
useful in correcting existing lists of the Hafsid rulers. Extensive revisions have been made
in such points as nomenclature and relationships, following the excellent start made by
-681 (A35e) a.d. 1236 (A81) -1283 (A35e) anonymous gold, Hafsid style 645.
2 abu-Sald (A81) 'Uthman I (A35e) ibn-Yaghmurasan (j; A35e) a.H. 681 (A35e) -703
3 abQ-Ziyan (A35e) Muhammad I (A35e) ibn-'Uthman I (2; A35e) a.H. 703 (A35e) -707
4 abu-Hammu (C12,A35e) Musa I (g,A35e) ibn-'Uthman I (2; A35e) a.h. 707 (A35e) -718
a.h. 718 (A35e) -737 (A35e) a.d. 1318 (A35e) -1337 (A35e) gold 647-649.
interregnum under Marinid 11 between death of 5 and independence of 6 a.h. 737 (A35e)
rasan (7; A35e) a.H. 749 (A35e) -753 (A35e) a.d. 1348 (A35e) -1352 (A35e) no coins.
rasan (j; A35e) a.h. 753 (A35e) -753 (A35e) a.d. 1352 (A35e) -1352 (A75) no coins.
interregnum under Marinids 12 and 13 between death of 7 and independence of 8 a.H. 753
Yahya ibn-Yaghmurasan (j; B8,A35e) a.H. 760 (A35e) -791 (A35e) a.d. 1359 (Asa)
762 (A35e) -779 (A35e) a.d. 1360 (D14) -1377 (Dl4) (opposed 7^~779 by 8) no
coins.
(A35e) -795 (A35e) a.d. 1387 (D14) -1393 (A35e) (opposed 788-791 by 8) gold 652.
10 abu-Thabit (A5c) al-Za'im II (Asa) ibn-'Abd-al-Rahman II (9; A35e) a.h. 795 (A35e)
11 abu'l-Hajjaj (A8) Yusuf (A35e) ibn-Musa II (8; A35e) a.h. 795 (Asa) -796 (A35e)
12 abu-Ziyan (A35e) Muhammad II (g,A35e) ibn-Musa II (8; A^e) a.h. 796 (A35e) -802
13 abu-Muhammad (g,A75) 'Abd-Allah I (g,A5a) ibn-Musa II (8; Asa) a.h. 802 (Asa) -804
14 abu-'Abd-Allah (A75) Muhammad III (g,B8,Asa) ibn-Musa II (8; B8,Asa) a.H. 804
15 abu-Tashfin (H) 'Abd-al-Rahman III (g,A75) ibn-Muhammad III (14; A75) a.h. 813
(A75) -814 (A75) a.d. 1411 (A75) -1411 (A75) gold 658.
16 abu-x (?) al-Sa'id (A75) ibn-Musa II (8; A75) a.h. 814 (A75) -814 (A75) a.d. 1411 (A75)
17 abu-Malik (B8) 'Abd-al-Wahid (g,B8,A85c) ibn-Musa II (8; B8,A85c) a.h. 814 (A75)
-827 (A75), 831 (A75) -833 (B8.A75) a.d. 1411 (A75) -1424 (A75), 1428 (A75) -1430
827 (A75) -831 (A75), 833 (A75) -834 (A75) a.d. 1424 (A75) -1428 (A75), 1430 (A75)
19 abil'l-'Abbas (g,B8,A85c) Ahmad I (g,B8,A85c) ibn-Musa II (8; A85c) a.h. 834 (A75)
(jo; A75) a.h. 866 (A75) -873 (D1) a.d. 1462 (A75) -1468 (D1) gold 669.
77
21 abu-Tashfin (D1) 'Abd-al-Rahman IV (H) ibn-Muhammad V (20; D1) a.h. 873 (D1)
22 abii-'Abd-Allah (B8) Muhammad VI (B8) ibn-Muhammad V (20; D18) a.h. 873 (D1)
23 abu-'Abd-Allah (B8) Muhammad VII (B8) ibn-Muhammad VI (22; B8) a.h. 910 (D1)
Independent a.h. 910 (D1) -918 (H) a.d. 1505 (D1) -1512 (D14) no coins.
Vassal of Ferdinand II of Aragon a.h. 918 (H) -922 (D1) a.d. 1512 (D14) -1516 (D1)
no coins.
24 abu-Ziyan (D14) Ahmad II (H) ibn-Muhammad VI (22; D14) vassal of Ottoman Salim I
(9) a.h. 922 (D14) -922 (D14), 923 (D14) -924 (D14) a.d. 1516 (D14) -1516 (D14), 1517
25 abu-Hammu (D18) Musa III (D18) ibn-Muhammad V (20; D18) vassal of Charles I of
Spain a.h. 922 (D14) -934 (D1) a.d. 1516 (D1) -1528 (D1) (opposed 923-924 by 24)
no coins.
Ziyan
2 abu-Zakariya' Yahya
J_
Muhammad
20
1I
5I
4 abu-Zayd 'Abd-al-Rahman
6 7 abu-Ya'qiib Yusuf
II
8A 8
"1 I I \ \ \
11 12 13 14 16 17 19
I1
10 18 15
II1
21 22 25 26
r~^1 1 1 1
23 24 2J 28 29
78
26 abu-Muhammad (B8) 'Abd-Allah II (g,B8) ibn-Muhammad V (20; D18) a.h. 934 (D1)
Vassal of Ottoman 10 a.h. 934 (D1) -942 (D14) a.d. 1528 (Di) -1535 (D14)
gold 670.
Vassal of Charles I of Spain a.h. 942 (D14) -947 (D1) a.d. 1535 (D14) -1540 (D1)
no coins.
27 abu-'Abd-Allah (g,D14) Muhammad VIII (g,D14) ibn-'Abd-Allah II (26; D18) a.h. 947
(D14) -949 (D14), 949 (D1) -950 (D14) a.d. 1540 (D14) -1543 (H), 1543 (D1) -1543
(D14):
28 abu-Ziyan (D18) Ahmad III (D18) ibn-'Abd-Allah II (26; D18) vassal of Ottoman
10 a.h. 949 (D14) -949 (Di), 950 (D14) -957 (D1) a.d. 1543 (H) -1543 (D1), 1543 (D14)
29 abu-Muhammad (g,D14) Hasan (g,D14) ibn-'Abd-Allah II (26; D18) a.h. 957 (D1) -964
Crushed between their powerful neighbors, the Hafsids and the Marinids, the Ziyanids
were frequently besieged or driven from their capital at Tlemcen into the mountains,
and were occasionally overthrown, with subsequent interregnums, yet they managed to
survive as a dynasty for well over three centuries, until the controversy between Turks and
Spaniards was settled by the Ottoman conquest. During this span they also suffered an
excessive amount of intra-dynastic rebellion, yet their capital prospered and a fair amount
Relatively few specimens of this Ziyanid gold are extant, and their attribution is made
more difficult by the repetition of proper names in the family, but by correlation with
Brosselard's epigraphic studies and with the historians of the earlier period, a reasonable
certitude may be achieved. Thus the anonymous gold piece inHafsid style, identical except
for mint with the contemporary gold of Morocco, is ascribed to Yaghmurasan because at the
period when it was struck he was master of Tlemcen, and because he, like his Marinid
No coins can be ascribed to 'Uthman I and Muhammad I, but the double dinars
inscribed "ma aqrabu farju Allah" surely belong to Musa I and 'Abd-al-Rahman I,
referring as they do to the unexpected lifting of the eight-year siege of Tlemcen at the
Two of the most puzzling coins in the corpus (648, 649) are reluctantly inserted here,
but I have been completely unable to account for the title amir al-mu'minin and the other
anomalous features, or to read the last line of the reverse field, of which all reported versions
are demonstrably wrong. The Algiers issue may be questionable but the Tlemcen coin does
exist; it was struck by an 'Abd-al-Rahman with caliphal pretensions; his name and title
For the brothers 'Uthman II and al-Zalm I, who ruled between the two Marinid
conquests, no gold is known to have survived, though 'Uthman is said by Yahya Ibn-
11
79
Musa II's long reign bore fruit in one double dinar and probably in one dinar, while a
similar double dinar exists for 'Abd-al-Rahman II, if Brethes' attempt to paint the name of
No coins exist for the short reigns of al-Zalm II and Yusuf, but Moyse reports a double
dinar of Muhammad II and the Paris specimen seems to fit 'Abd-Allah I, though ascribed
to Muhammad V.
Three gold pieces are assignable to Muhammad III by the epithet al-Wathiq-bi-Allah,
and a Paris dinar tentatively to 'Abd-al-Rahman III, with no coins for al-Sa'id, who ruled
An assortment of gold coins bears the name of 'Abd-al-Wahid, while similar coins can
be attributed to his opponent Muhammad IV. Ahmad I left a group of gold pieces with his
epithet al-Mu'tasim-bi-Allah, and a half dinar may belong to Muhammad V or one of his
namesakes.
No coins have been assigned to the next five rulers, whose reigns were very disturbed
assigned the two double dinars (670, 671) which bear besides their names and titles that
among such experts as Lavoix, van Berchem, Prieto, and Fasmer has been fomented by
these coins, which were obviously struck by these vassals of the Ottoman sultan Sulayman,
called the Magnificent by Europeans and the Lawgiver by his own people.
The fact that he did not actually bear the kunyah abu'l-Rabi' is no objection; all
Sulaymans in the occident used this name, and it was ascribed to him as unhesitatingly
though as their gold shows the Murabitts, like the Ottomans, did not use names in abu-. In
Tunisia, on the other hand, an inscription termed Sulayman abu'l-Futuh with equally
little justification.
With this discussion permanently closed, it may be hoped, we may skip Ahmad III,
with no coins reported, for the final Ziyanid gold piece, a half dinar of Hasan.
The numismatic history of this dynasty is sketchy because of the scarcity of available
specimens; it is possible that future archaeological finds will complete the representation of
this family.
No silver and copper can be ascribed to the Ziyanids, although they must certainly
have struck some silver during their lengthy control of western Algeria; Leo Africanus'
assertion that at least the later rulers of this dynasty coined both silver and copper is
Zandtah Berber rulers of the Banii-Mann of Morocco a.h. 592-869 (a.d. 1196-1465).
2 abu-Sa'id (A35e) 'UthmanI (A35e) ibn-'Abd-al-Haqq I (j; A35e) a.h. 614 (A35e) -638
8o
3 abu-MVruf (A84CI) Muhammad I (A35e) ibn-'Abd-al-Haqq I (r; A35e) a.h. 638 (A92)
4 abu-Yahya (A35e) Abu-Bakr (A35e) ibn-'Abd-al-Haqq I (1; A35e) a.H. 642 (A35e) -656
(A35e) a.d. 1244 (A84d) -1258 (no alternative) anonymous gold, Hafsid style 673-712,
5 abu-Hafs (A5b) 'Umar (A35e) ibn-Abi-Bakr (4; Atfe) a.h. 656 (A35e) -658 (A92)
A35e) a.h. 656 (A35e) -685 (A35e) a.d. 1258 (no alternative) -1286 (A35e) (opposed
656-658 by 5):
First series, Hafsid style a.h. 656 (A35e) -668 (A35e) a.d. 1258 (no alternative)
Second series, Marinid style a.h. 668 (A35e) -685 (A35e) a.d. 1269 (A35e) -1286
7 abii-Ya'qub (Bn,C12,A35e) Yiisuf (A35e) ibn-Ya'qub (6; B24,A35e) a.h. 685 (A35e)
-706 (B24,A35e) a.d. 1286 (A35e) -1307 (B24,A35e) anonymous gold 715-725, ano-
8 abu-Thabit (C12,A35e) 'Amir (A35e) ibn-'Abd-Allah ibn-Yusuf (7; A84d) a.h. 706
9 abu'l-Rabi' (C12,A35e) Sulayman (A35e) ibn-'Abd-Allah ibn-Yusuf (7; A84d) a.h. 708
a.h. 710 (A35e) -731 (A35e) a.d. 1310 (A35e) -1331 (A35e) (opposed 714-731 by 10A)
gold 726-745.
sah a.h. 714 (A35e) -733 (A35e) a.d. 1315 (A84e) -1333 (D17) (opposed 714-731 by 10
(A35e) -752 (B9,A35e) a.d. 1331 (A35e) -1351 (B9,A35e) (opposed 731-733 by 10A and
749-752 by 12):
1141-1146.
Second series, Marinid and Nasrid inscriptions a.h. 731 (A35e) -740 (A35e) a.d.
Third series, Marinid and Ziyanid inscriptions a.h. 737 (A35e) -752 (B9,A35e) a.d.
1337 (A35e) -1351 (B9,A35e) anonymous gold 759-768, anonymous silver 1147.
12 abu-'Inan (B4.C12.A35e) Faris (g,B4,A35e) ibn-'Ali (11; B4,A35e) a.h. 749 (A35e) -759
12A abu-Ziyan (Asb) Muhammad (Asb) ibn-Faris (12; A$b) pretender a.h. 759 (A5b)
13 abu-'Abd-Allah (g) Muhammad II (A35e) ibn-Faris (12; A^e) a.h. 759 (A35e) -760
81
14 abu-Salim (B2,C14,A35e) Ibrah1m (A35e) ibn-'Ali (11; B2.C14.A35e) a.h. 760 (A35e)
-762 (A35e) a.d. 1359 (A35e) -1361 (A35e) gold 788, anonymous silver 1148.
25 abu-'Umar (A35e) Tashfin (A35e) ibn-'Ali (11; A^e) a.h. 762 (A35e) -763 (A35e)
16 abu-Muhammad (A39a) 'Abd-al-Halim (A35e) ibn-'Umar (10A; Atfe) a.H. 763 (A35e)
-764 (A35e) a.d. 1361 (Asb) -1362 (A35e) (opposed 763-764 by 17) no coins.
1 j abu-Ziyan (A35e) Muhammad III (g,A35e) ibn-Ya'qiib ibn-'Ali (11; A35e) a.H. 763
(A35e) -767 (Asb) a.d. 1361 (A35e) -1366 (Asb) (opposed 763-764 by 16 and 764-765
by 17 A) gold 789-792.
17A abu-Malik (g) 'Abd-al-Mu'min (g,A35e) ibn- 'Umar (10A ; g,A35e) am1r at Sijilmasah
a.h. 764 (D14) -765 (H) a.d. 1362 (D14) -1363 (H) (opposed 764-765 by 17) gold 793.
interregnum under vizir between death of 17 and accession of 18 a.h. 767 (Asb) -768
18 abu-Faris (B4,Asb) 'Abd-al-'Aziz I (g,B4.A35e) ibn-'Ali (11; B4,A35e) a.h. 768 (A35e)
(Asb) -786 (A35e), 789 (A35ej -796 (A35e) a.d. 1373 (Asb) -1384 (Asb), 1387 (A35e)
Second series, without amir al-muslimin, with Nasrid inscription: gold 806-809.
Third series, with amir al-muslimin, without Nasrid inscription: gold 810-829,
silver 1149.
Fourth series, with amir al-muslimin and Nasrid inscription: gold 830.
sayyid at Marrakesh a.h. 776 (A35e) -784 (A35e) a.d. 1374 (A7ob) -1382 (A35e)
21 abu-Faris (g.Asb) Musa (g,A35e) ibn-Faris (12; Atfe) a.h. 786 (A35e) -788 (Asb) a.D.
22 abu-Ziyan (Asb) Muhammad V (g,A35e) ibn-Ahmad (20; A35e) a.h. 788 (Asb) -788
23 abii-Ziyan (Asb) Muhammad VI (A35e) ibn-Muhammad ibn-'Ali (11; A35e) a.H. 788
24 abu-Faris (A35e) 'Abd-al-'Aziz II (g,A35e) ibn-Ahmad (20; A35e) a.h. 796 (A35e) -799
25 abu-'Amir (Asb) 'Abd-Allah (g.Asb) ibn-Ahmad (20; Asb) a.h. 799 (Asb) -8oo (Asb)
26 abu-Sa'id (B4,Asb) 'UthmanHI (g,C14,Asb) ibn-Ahmad (20; C14,Asb) a.H. 8oo (Asb)
-823 (A74) a.d. 1398 (Asb) -1420 (A74) Hafsid style gold 860-867.
H) a.h. 823 (A74) -830 (D6) a.d. 1420 (A74) -1427 (H) (opposed 823-830 by 28) no coins.
82
a.H.823 (D6.D9) -869 (A85c) a.d. 1420 (D6,Dg) -1465 (A85c) (opposed 823-830 by 27)
Mahyu
1r
'Abd-Allah 10A
I 1 I-
8 9 'Ali 16 17A
10
12
_L_
it
III
23
17 19
14 15 Ya'qub 18 Muhammad
'Abd-AUah 22
27
24
25
26
28
The numismatic history of the Mar1nids is essentially simple, but the necessary
preliminary groundwork has never been done, so that all major collections contain more or
less large groups of "unascribed Moorish gold". This anonymous gold can easily be divided
into two portions by the number of lines in each field, and it is the three-line Hafsid type
No Marinid gold bearing proper names in known for any ruler earlier than Ya'qub,
whose accession occurred in a.h. 656. The anonymous gold was not struck by the Hafsids,
as the Mahdi is not named and the mint towns were not under Hafsid control, nor by the
Ziyanids, by reason of the mints; there are no such objections to terming it Marinid, which
it obviously is. In style and legends it most closely resembles the earlier Hafsid gold,
Hafsids for a few decades starting about 650. The early Marinids were nominal Hafsid
vassals; presumably this gold was struck by Abu-Bakr and Ya'qub chiefly, but not
entirely, before the final overthrow of the Muwahhids in 668. It is likely, but less certain,
that much of the anonymous silver with similar inscriptions was also struck by these two
rulers.
Next come two gold pieces of Ya'qub with his name and titles, probably struck after
668, and then another gap during the prosperous reign of his son Yusuf. This can promptly
83
be filled with a single fine series from the five-line group, as shown in the corpus, a group
whose style and legends are intermediate between those of Ya'qub and those of 'Uthman II,
and whose mints are plentiful but limited to Morocco. Anonymous silver bearing similar
legends can also be assigned to Yusuf. For 'Amir and Sulayman no coins are extant.
A substantial series of gold bears the name of 'Uthman II, from several mints within
Morocco, but none survives for his son and opponent 'Umar, am1r of Sijilmasah, and none
bearing the name of 'Uthman's son and successor 'Ah, a pious but ambitious man who
invaded Spain but was disastrously defeated by the Christians at Tarifa, conquered Algeria
and Tunisia, was again disastrously defeated by Arabs near Kairouan, and was the victim
To him belongs the balance of the anonymous gold, some of which bears the Nasrid
motto and was doubtless struck before his defeat at Tarifa in 740, and some of which bears
the Ziyanid motto and was struck, after the conquest of Tlemcen in 737, at mints which
include not only Fez and Sijilmasah but Tlemcen, Algiers, Bougie, and Tunis. To these
groups of gold exactly fitting the known facts of 'Ali's career may be added corresponding
His son and rival Faris assumed the title of am1r al-mu'minin, and a full series of gold
displays it for mints which include Tlemcen and Bougie, again victims of Marinid conquest.
A parallel series of Hafsid-type gold with three-line fields also bears Faris' name and titles.
For the rulers who followed in quick succession a handful of gold survives: none for
the pretender Muhammad, one tentatively for Muhammad II, one for Ibrahim if my
reading of Brethes' illegible specimen is correct, none for Tashfin, none for 'Abd-al-Halim,
three or four for Muhammad III, and one fine double dinar for the am1r 'Abd-al-Mu'min at
Sijilmasah.
'Abd-al-'Aziz I again conquered Tlemcen and left numismatic evidence of his achieve-
ment, with two other double dinars from Fez. Muhammad IV minted three coins at Fez.
The only silver attributable to this troubled era is an anonymous piece ascribed to
Ibrahim because of similarity to the gold which seems to bear his name.
For Ahmad's bisected reign a large quantity of gold and a little silver is extant, while
his rival at Marrakesh, 'Abd-al-Rahman, also minted both gold and silver.
Again rulers gained and lost power rapidly: Miisa two years, two issues; Muhammad V
less than a year, one double dinar; Muhammad VI one year, no coins. In his three years
'Abd-al-'Aziz II struck four coins in Marinid style and several in Hafsid style, with an
unexpected change to the three-line field. This was continued on a handful of gold by
'Abd-AUah, who reigned only one year, and on a larger group by 'Uthman III, who ruled
until 823.
No coins exist for Muhammad VII and no gold for 'Abd-al-Haqq II, though one silver
piece may definitely be ascribed to his violent reign and another tentatively.
This dynasty's numismatic history, then, can readily be understood by matching each
group of anonymous gold and silver to its most likely originator on considerations of style,
inscriptions, and mints. When this is done a steady development is made available for
its Hafsid equivalent but extant specimens average slightly lighter. 4.57 grams is the
84
average weight of 182 double dinars and 2.26 grams of 51 dinars. The style is less attractive
and the inscriptions less legible than those of all but the last Hafsids, but they are not
inferior to the Ziyanids'. The silver is adequately engraved and struck, but the general
629 (A84d) -671 (B14,A74) a.d. 1232 (D9) -1273 (B14) no African coins; gold struck as
2 no African coins.
B15,C17,A35e) a.h. 701 (B14,A35e) -708 (B14,A35e) a.d. 1302 (B14,A35e) -1309
4 abu'l-Juyush (B14,A35e) Nasr (B14,A35e) ibn-Muhammad II (2; B14, A35e) a.h. 708
(B14,A35e) -713 (A48a) a.d. 1309 (B14,A48a) -1314 (A48a) see below.
a.h. 755 (A35e) -760 (A35e), 763 (A35e) -793 (A48a) a.d. 1354 (A35e) -1359 (A35e),
Yusuf
1 Isma'il
1i
2 Faraj
Ii
345
.L
89
The Nasrids of Granada controlled Ceuta from a.h. 705 to 709 and from 786 to 789.
The square silver (1153) bearing the name of this mint and their motto "wa-la ghalibu
ilia Allah" could belong to either of these periods, but similar silver reported for Fez must
be tentatively rejected, as the Nasrids never held secure control of the inland capital. If the
Fez coins should be confirmed as correct, they might be ascribed to the Marinid 'Ali, who
85
struck gold bearing the Nasrid insription; this would raise the question of whether he also
The only Nasrid gold reported from North Africa is a double dinar (868) minted at
Ceuta by Muhammad V, though the first Nasrid ruler before declaring his independence
Except for the coins just discussed, the numismatic history of the Nasrids falls outside
Zanatah Berber rulers of the Banu-Wattds of Morocco a.h. 869-961 (a.d. 1465-1554).
1 abu-'Abd-Allah (H) Muhammad I (g,A29b) ibn-Yahya (A29b) a.H. 869 (D6) -910 (D6)
C6.A32) a.h. 910 (D6) -932 (A29b) a.d. 1504 (D6) -1525 (D6) gold 870, silver 1154.
3 abii'l-Hasan (A32) 'AH (s,A29b) ibn-Muhammad I (1; A32) a.h. 932 (A29b) -932
(A29b), 961 (A29b) -961 (A29b) a.d. 1525 (D6) -1526 (A29b), 1554 (A29b) -1554 (A29b)
silver 1155.
(A29b) -952 (D6), 956 (D14) -957 (D14) a.d. 1526 (A29b) -1545 (D6), 1549 (D14) -1550
5 abu-'Abd-Allah (H) Muhammad III (A32) ibn-Ahmad (4; A32) a.h. 952 (A32) -956
interregnum under Sharifs between surrender of 4 and restoration of 3 a.h. 957 (D14) -961
Ziyan
2 3 abii'l-Hasan 'Ah
During the reign of the last Marinid, 'Abd-al-Haqq II, who came to the throne as a
child, the vizirial power was held by several members of the Wattasid family, a few of
death they competed for power with the rising Sharifs, and succeeded in controlling part
86
Very few coins are attributed to the Wattasids. A small series of silver in a thin
Naskhi script, reported and illustrated by Brethes, seems fairly safe because of the sequence
of names; the few gold coins are less satisfactory. Studies by Massignon and Cour have
established the names and dates of this obscure dynasty; it may be that further gold will
be discovered.
(a.d. 1299-1924).
jo Sulayman I (g,B13) ibn-Salim I (9; D18) a.h. 926 (D18) -974 (D18) a.d. 1520 (D18)
The Ottoman Turks, who conquered Tunisia and Algeria from the Hafsids and
Ziyanids, are excluded from this study. An exception is made for the two gold pieces
struck in the name of Sulayman I by his Ziyanid vassals, and for a Hafsid square dirhem
The gold pieces show no Ottoman influence; the name abu'l-Rabi' prefixed to Sulay-
silver.
CORPUS OF COINS
a above
b beneath
d date
F field
fig. figure
m mint
M margin
o obverse
p. page
pi. plate
r reverse
s segment
sp. specimens
v. volume
GOLD
'Abbasid Gold
the Banu'l-'Abbas
of Baghdad.
As the 'Abbasids exercised no direct control over North Africa during this period, all
coins bearing their name were actually struck by independent local rulers, and are therefore
listed under the respective dynasties: Z1rid, Hammadid, Murabit, and Hiidid.
Fatim1d Gold
the Banu-Fatimah
of Cairo (al-Qahirah).
As the Fatimids exercised no direct control over North Africa during this period, all
coins bearing their name were actually struck by Z1rid rulers, and are therefore listed under
Z1r1d Gold
the Banu-Z1ri
in Kuf1 script.
Coins struck by the earlier Zirids, and by al-Mu'izz prior to a.h. 439, are excluded
Struck in a.H. 439 and 440 in the name of the Fatimid imam
BN III 337 (pi. 1v): om ends with ydl, mint given as Tabariyah (corrected by Monchicourt).
F.Fatimites 165 (pi. 1v): om ends with 15"; 166 (2 sp.): mint given as ^ (misprint).
As 1.
Struck anonymously by al-Mu'izz between a.h. 441 and 449 after his repudiation of
Fatimid suzerainty.
OF <ulVlJlV RF J* 7. Cfi
KM II 855 (pi. v). Welzl 12232,12233 (2 sp.): illustrated in Schiepati (pi. n, no. 14). Soret .F
As 3.
KM II 856 (pi. v): d illegible, margins largely illegible. Soret .F 130: margins partly illegible.
As 3.
Schiepati 70 (pi. n, no. 1): d uncertain. F:Fatimites 171 note: d, m only. B 793 bis (p. 271):
Schiepati 71 (pi. n, no. 2): d uncertain. F :Fatimites 171 note. F :Fatimites II 47: length of
om not specified.
OF <i\ RF <j>
om (outer) as om of 3.
rm (outer) as rm of 3.
F :Fatimites II49.
mites II 48.
As 3 except om, which ends at LcUj, and rm, which has errors in engraving.
Farrugia: j a rf.
of as of of 3. rf as rf of 3.
om as om of 1.
rm as rm of 1 plus .
Farrugia.
Apparently as 3.
Struck between a.h. 449 and 454 in the name of the Fatimid imam
As 1 except rm:
Farrugia.
of <ul Vl 4\ V RF a-
om as om of 1 through _/Al.
May be as 15.
Shi'ite series:
Struck between a.h. 454 and 459 in the name of the Fatimid imam
om (inner) (o~) J-\ s*- jjjj 0*i*J\ J-*l <"l J_yj <ul V
om (outer) as om of 1.
rm (outer) as rm of 1.
om (outer) as om of 16.
rm (outer) as rm of 1.
Apparently as 20.
Balog.
of as rf of 18. RF as OF of 18.
om (outer) as om of 1.
BM IV 167: j b of.
No coins are reliably reported for the rest of Tamim's reign, a.h. 460-501. Blau :N 101,
ascribed to al-Mahdiyah for a.h. 480 without further description, is presumably misread;
Blau..AT 103, ascribed to al-Mahdiyah for an illegible date, is, because of the criss-cross
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins are reported for the local Arab and Berber rulers in Tunisia and Algeria
other than the Zirids and Hammadids in the interval between the Arab invasion of
a.h. 443 (a.d. 1051) and the completion of the Muwahhid conquest in a.h. 555 (a.d. 1160)
94
Hammu ibn-MalU
Sfax (Safaqus)
of as of of 3. rf as rf of 3.
om as om of 1 through jl\.
rm as rm of 1.
Farrugia.
Rashid ibn-Rashid
Gabes (Qabis)
Struck in the name of the 'Abbasid khalifah, who was not individually identified:
S:Beyram 293 (pi. n): given as 552 Qadis (Cadiz) (disproved by piate), of misread.
Hammadid Gold
the Banu-Hammad
in Kuf1 script.
No Hammadid coins are reported for the period prior to a.h. 439.
al-Qa'id ibn-Hammdd
No coins reported.
Muhsan ibn-al-Qd'id
No coins reported.
Bulukkin ibn-Muhammad
No coins reported.
al-Ndsir ibn-'Alannds
No coins reported.
al-Mansur ibn-Ndsir
om (outer) illegible.
rm (inner) illegible.
rm (outer) illegible.
Beylie (fig. 74): not described; tentatively reconstructed from figure; attribution to this
ruler not expiained; apparently an illegible Fatimid dinar falling outside the scope of this
corpus. Ibn-Khaldun states that this ruler was the first Hammadid to mint coins.
Bddis ibn-al-Mansur
No coins reported.
al-'Aziz ibn-al-Mansur
No coins reported.
Yahyd ibn-al-'Aziz
This coin is not listed in any modern collection, and it is possible that no specimens have
survived. It is, however, fully described (except for division into lines) by Ibn-Khaldun
(Kitab al-'ibar, Bulaq edition, vol. VI, page 177). The purported illustration in de Beylie's
appendix (fig. 6) is, like the other alleged coins from the same source, incredible, as de Beylie
realized.
Hammud1d Gold
in the name of
the Banu-Hammud
of Malaga (Malaqah)
No gold reported.
No coins are reported for the period following a.h. 439 for the petty pre-Murabit
Berber rulers in Morocco with the exception of Hammudid silver and copper, to be de-
scribed later, and a curious group of small gold coins B 774-793 (pi. xn) ascribed by
Brethes to the Banu-Khazriin, who ruled Sijilmasah until the Murabit conquest of a.H. 446,
and to their contemporaries. His readings are too tentative and fragmentary, and his
plates too illegible, to permit intelligent discussion of these coins, although they clearly
demand careful study and comment when they can be made available to scholars.
Murabit Gold
in Kufi script.
Almost all Murabit gold was struck in the name of the 'Abbasid khalifah, who was
never individually identified, but was generically termed "al-imam, 'Abd Allah, amir
Abu-Bakr ibn-'Umar
OF aI Vl i\ V RF fUVI
V 1425 (AV). BN II 507 (pi. n): engraving errors. C:Decadencia p. 375, no. 1 (pi. 1).
As 26.
om as om of 26.'
rm as rm of 26.
S:Beyram 288 (pi. n). B 794 (pi. xm): date given as 454 (disproved by piate.)
As 28.
As 26.
As 26.
B 796-802 (pi. xm: 801; coin illustrated under no. 800 is 38) (7 sp.).
As 26.
As 26.
As 26.
As 26.
98
As 26.
As 26.
As 26.
As 26.
V1432 (AV). BN II 510. Cerda 350: d, m only. Spink (1902) 79532. Sotheby 379: d, m only.
S:Michael II453.
As 26.
V 1433 (AV). BN II 511. L:Calvert 45. Spink (1907) 36491: d, m only. B 808.
As 26.
As 26.
HSA 13156: for yja in rm (engraving error). V 1435 (AV). J :Mohammedan p. 267:
date read as 491 but presumably this year since ruler is given as Abu-Bakr. S:White2ljj.
S:Judice II3089. Sotheby 379: d, m only. S :Michael II456, 457? (pi. n) (2 sp. ?). S :Grantley
As 26.
ANS. V 1436 (AV). Adler: C 85 (pi. vi). S: Michael II 458. S: Grantley 2159.
As 26.
HSA 15796. V 1437 (AV). Spink (1902) 79531: d, m only. Sotheby 379: d, m only.
As 26.
As 26.
As 26.
V 1439 bis (p. 393). BN II 512. B 811. Balog: engraving errors in rm.
As 26.
As 26.
V1441 (AV, 1 other), 1442 (AV). BM V 2: Vl for J>V| in om (engraving error). Markov: E
As 26.
As 26.
B 817.
OF as of of 26. rf ^.Vl
(jo
om illegible.
rm largely illegible.
B 818 (pi.xm), 818 bis (2 sp.): description indicating no margins disproved by piate showing
'Ali ibn-?
governor of Sijilmasah
As 26 except of: Vl Jl V
<Ul
Jc
B 821 (pi. xm): last digit of date punched out, misread as 450.
Ibrahim ibn-Abi-Bakr
governor of Sijilmasah
As 54.
100
As 54.
V 1448 (AV).
As 54.
As 58.
V 1466 (AV). BN II 516: Sb rf. Soret:F 132: Sb rf. C:Decadencia p. 376, no. 2 (pi. 1):
Sb rf. B 836.
As 58.
V 1467 (AV). BN II 517 (pi. n): Sb rf. Weyl:G 1183: d, m only. Markov: p. 90, no. 4:
d, m only. B 837.
As 58.
V 1468 (AV). BM V 6 (pi. 1): without S BN II 518: without S Markov: p. 881 no. 4a:
As 58.
V 1470. BM V 7: Sb rf.
As 58.
As 58.
V1472 (AV). BN II521: Sb rf. CunhaII 1524. Markov :E p.966, no.4b: d, m only. J :Mo-
Yusuf ibn-Tdshfin
a.h. 480-5oo
As 26 except of:
a.D. 1087-1106
As 58.
HSA 13173: Sb rf. V 1473 (AV, 1 other), 1474. BM Xp. 3, no. 91: Sb rf. BN II 522:
Sb rf. Soret:F 133: Sb rf. Demaeght v. IX, p. 202 (fig.): Sb rf. Markov :E p. 90, no. 5:
As 58.
V 1475 (AV). BN II 523: Sb rf. H6st: and N 4 (pi.xxxm): Sb rf. Weyl:G 1184: d,
As 58.
V 1476 (AV). BN II 524: Sb rf. Weyl:G 1185: d, m only. Markov:E p.90, no.7: d, m only.
As 58.
As 58.
As 58.
As 58.
L:Calvert 48: mint Sb rf. If date is correctly read, mint is presumably Tilimsan, as
As 58.
V 1464 (AV, 1 other). MA 488. Cerda 354: d, m only. Rivero:M 99 (pi. n): without S.
As 58.
As 58.
V 1450 (AV). Weyl:G 1182:^, m only. Markov:p. 90, no. 3: d, m only. 0 2073. B 823,
824 (2 sp.).
As 58.
As 58.
V 1452 (FC, AV). D.Lorichs 4705. Cerda 352: d, m only. Markov:E p. 880, no. 3a: d, m only.
As 58.
V 1453 (PG, AV). BM X p. 3, no. 3k: z> (for S?) b Rf. BN II 528: Sb rf. Cerda 353:
d, m only. Colson p. 241: d, m only. B 825 bis (pi. xin, under no. 825): Sb rf.
As 58.
HSA 13182: Sb rf. V1454 (AV 2 sp., 2 others), 1455 (AV). BM X p. 3, no. 3m: => (for S ?)
b rf. BN II 529: without S. Cerda 355: d, m only. Markov :E p. 880, no. 3b: d, m only. S:
As 58.
V 1456 (AV 2 sp.). Cerda 356: d, m only. Zambaur II 267: without S. B 826-828 (3 sp.).
As 58.
Presumably as 58.
As 58.
B830.
As 58.
V 1458 (PG, AV 3 sp.). L:Khedivial p. 328: date read as 471 but presumably this year since
As 58.
V 1459 (AV).
As 58.
Markov: p. 881, no. 6a: d, m only. Ziya 2028. B 831, 832 (2 sp.).
As 58.
As 58.
As 58.
As 58.
V 1463 (AV).
103
91. Sijilmasah - (no date) - quarter dinar: Kufi and Naskhi script.
Plate I
(mint)
No margins.
BN II 532 (pi. 1n), 533 (2 sp.):: before mint (not visible in piate). D:Lorichs 4707: described
as one third of a dinar in Naskhi script, may be this coin. S :White 2180: denomination only.
Presumably as 58.
As 58.
V 1484 (AV).
As 58.
V 1485 (AV): date faultily engraved, read as 499 but probably this year since 'Ali is not
designated heir.
As 58.
V 1481 (AV 2 sp.). BM X p. 3, no. ft (pi. xx1): without S. Brooke p. 77 (pi. v1, no. 2):
As 58.
Presumably as 58.
As 58.
B 848 (pi.xin): Sb rf; this coin is a dinar with margins rendered illegible by clipping, not a
without S.
.oil -u;
om as om of 26.
rm as rm of 26.
104
This coin, the inscriptions of which are reported by al-Maqrizi, citing abu-Muhammad 'Abd-
al-Hal1m al-Gharnati, has not been reported as existing in any modern collection; since the
legends correspond to those of Murabit coins struck several decades later, it can be con-
fidently rejected as erroneous. Likewise coins, reported by several Moslem historians, with
Spanish mints.
Presumably as 58.
Yale.
As 58.
As 58.
V 1493 (AV).
As 58.
V 1494 (PG).
As 58.
V 1495 (AV). BN II 535 (pi. ui):Sb rf. Longperier :D p. 429: d, m only. Rivero: (pi. 1n,
See 72.
As 58.
Presumably as 58.
Presumably as 58.
KM II 565: without S.
As 58.
V 1491 (PG).
105
As 58.
V 1490 (Andujar).
As 58.
As 58.
V 1487 (PG).
As 58.
As 58.
Presumably as 58.
Colson p. 241: d, m only; mint given in Spanish, may be either of above forms in Arabic.
As 58.
V 1502 (AV).
As 58.
V 1496 (AV).
As 58.
V 1497 (AV). BN II 543 (pi. 1n): without S. Longperier:D p. 429: d, m only. Rivero:M 101
As 58.
As 58.
a.H. 496-5oo
With heir
'Ali ibn-YUsuf
a.D. 1103-1106
Io6
V 1524 (AV 2 sp.). BN II 526: for .mV1 in fourth line of of, Sb rf. B 859: Sb rf.
As 121.
V 1525 (AV).
See 172.
Presumably as 121.
Spanish mints.
As 125.
V 1505 (PG, AV 2 sp., 1 other). BM X p. 4, no. 9I: no letter b rf, ascribed to 'Ali. BN II 536
As 127.
V 1506 (PG, AV 2 sp., 2 others). BN II 537: no letter b rf. Longprier:D p. 429: d, m only.
V 1507 (AV, 2 others). MA 489: at end of rm. S :Ciscar 31 (pi. 1): rm obscure in piate, no
As 58 plus Jc b Rf.
V 1517 (PG, AV 2 sp., 1 other). BM X p. 4, no. 9s: description inaccurate, ascribed to 'Ali,
As 127.
V 1508. BN II 538: no letter b rf. Longperier:D p. 429: d, m only. D .Lorichs 4706: d, m only.
V 1509 (AV). Longperier.D p. 429: d, m only. Caballero p. 15, no. 2:Sb rf.
As 131.
V 1518 (PG). BN II 539: no letter b rf. C:Tratado p. 197, no. 4 (pi. xx): no letter b rf.
V 1521 (Garcia).
As 131.
io8
V 1504 (AV).
As 125.
V 1527 (AV).
As 144.
V 1511 (Garcia).
'Jc
^ fUVl
'y
cr\l_jll jj\
V 1512. BN II 544: no letter b rf. Longperier:D p. 429: d, m only. Weyl:G 1187: d, m only.
As 136.
V 1513 (AV).
As 136.
109
As 136.
V 1515 (AV).
Yusuf with 'Ali as heir; recapitulation of types. All coins as 58, standard type of
Yusuf, with following modifications (coins on which Je replaces ii- in rm are designated
by*).
Last 3 lines of of: <ul J^-j -u* / uuit & >-i-j,. / Jc ;130.
Mi Ii V
'Ali ibn-Yiisuf
Oil J JJ 0sfc
V 1553 (AV). BM V 10: Sb rf. BN II 547: Sb rf. Marsden 352 (pi. xxi): Sb rf (given as
As 153.
no
As 153.
V 1555 (AV).
As 153.
As 153.
As 153.
As 153.
As 153.
V 1560 (AH, AV). Lagumina p. 100, no. 1: Sb rf, for <yj in om (misprint ?).
As 153.
As 153.
As 153.
V 1563 (AV), 1564 (AV), 1565 (AV). BM V 17 (pi. 1): Sb rf. BN II 550: Sb rf. KM II 590:
Sb rf.
As 153.
HSA 9174:^6 rf. S:Michael I 1668: Sb rf. B 872 bis: Sb rf, description incompiete.
As 153.
As 153.
As 153.
h1
Colson p. 242: d, m only. B 873 (pi. x1v): mint given as Talaveira (error), illegible letters
As 1B2.
0 2080.
As 168.
172. Sijilmasah - 499 - dinar. This coin, if correctly reported, was struck for 'Ali as heir
a J*
V 1545 (AV).
As 172.
V 1546 (AV). B 835: three letters after date, ascribed to Yusuf, may be this coin misread.
As 172.
V 1547 (AV).
As 172.
As 172.
V 1548 (AV).
As 172.
V 1549 (AV).
Presumably as 172.
As 172.
V 1550 (AH).
112
As 172.
As 153.
V 1590 (AV).
As 153.
V 1591. BM X p. 5, no. 29c: top line of of divided <ul / V| A)l V (error), no letter b rf.
As 153.
V 1583 (AV).
V 1569: date uncertain. BM V 12: date uncertain, 5th line of of illegible, S b rf.
As 153.
V 1570 (AV).
As 168.
As 168.
Presumably as 168.
As 168.
V 1574 (PG).
As 168.
Presumably as 168.
Spink (1900) 63240, (1902) 79537 (2 sp.): d, m only. B 882: description incompiete.
As 168.
V 1576 (UV, PG, FC, AV 2 sp.). MA 517. Spink (1901) 68378: d, m (given as Fas) only.
Presumably as 168.
113
Probably as 152.
G p. 182: d, m only.
Presumably as 168.
As 168.
As 168.
V 1587. MA 518.
As 168.
V 1588 (PG).
As 184.
B 880 (pi. x1n): ifb rf, description inaccurate. Seaby G992: d, m only.
As 168.
As 152.
V 1577 (UV).
As 153.
Marcais p. 182 (pi. 1): Sb rf, mint dubious, may be Aghmat (161).
As 153.
As 153.
V 1579 (AV).
As 153.
V 1580 (AV). B 885: r6rf, description incompiete, date given as 523, mint given as Nul,
Presumably as 153.
As 153.
KM II 628: Sb rf.
As 153.
V 1581 (UV).
As 153.
V 1582. MA 515. C:Monedas p. 381: d, m only. S .Gotha 980 (pi. x1): date uncertain, given as
of as of of 152. rf as rf of 152.
Spanish mints.
As 211.
V 1655 (PG), 1656 (AV). MA 521. Cerda 365: d, m only.Figanier 275: Si b rf (confirmed by
letter).
As 211.
V 1657 (UV, PG, AV 3 sp., 1 other). BN II 575: Si b rf. MA 522. KM II 582, 583 (pi. 1n)
(2 sp.): Si b rf. Tychsen, O. p. 42. Dorn.vl p. 401. Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only. D.Lorichs
4710: d, m only. Cerda 367: d, wonly. h.Oriental p. 235: Si b rf, reported as 153 (error).
Calvo (pi. x1, no. 5): mint given as al-Mariyah (disproved by piate), S-) b rf. Figanier 276
HSA 7896: Si b rf. V 1658 (FC, AV 3 sp.). BN II 576: Sb rf (error for J3). MA 522 note.
Tornbergp. 275, no. 1: for OuLA\ (error), Si b rf. Fraehn: N p. 87, no. 2: Si b rf,
description inaccurate. Dorn I p. 55, no. 7, 8 (2 sp.): Si 6Jrf. Markov:T 183(= Swedish
As 211.
ANS: Si b rf. V 1659 (PG 2 sp., FC, AV 2 sp.). BM V 22: Si b rf. MA 523. KM II 584:
<_& b rf. Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only, with heir Tashfin (error). Fraehn:iV p. 87, no. 4:
Si b rf, description inaccurate. Cerda 369: d, m only. Dorn I p. 56, no. 11: for ii-
in rm (error ?), Si 6rf. Brosset col. 400: d, monly. Weyl:G 1202: d, wonly. Markov:Ep. 91,
111
"5
no. 19, 20 (2 sp.): d, m only. Spink (1898) 46650, (1901) 68380, (1902) 79534 (3 sp.): d, m
only.
As 211.
HSA 13155: JO b rf. V 1660 (UV, AV 4 sp.). BM V 23: ^mUJl for J.^-lil in om, Si b rf.
BN II 578: iSi (read as J) b rf. MA 524 (2 sp.). KM II 585: S b rf. Cerda 371: d, m only.
Dorn I p. 56, no. 13: for <i~ in rm (error ?), Si b rf. Brosset col. 400: d, m only.
C:Monedas p. 381: d, m only. Markov:E p. 91, no. 21: d, m only. SJudice II 3092 (pi. n):
HSA 9175. V 1662 (UV, PG, AV, 2 others). BM V 24, 25 (2 sp.). BN II 577: date given
as 517 but probably this year as appears. MA 525. KM II 586. Cerda 372: description
Weyl:G 1204: d, m only. Markov :E p. 91, no. 22, 23 (2 sp.): d, m only. L:Khedivial p. 329.
As 218.
HSA 13154. V 1663 (UV, PG, AV 3 sp., 1 other), 1664 (AH, PG, AV): date faulty. BM V 16:
date 510 but probably engraving error for this year as jii> appears; 27 (2 sp. ?). BN II 579.
MA 526 (2 sp.). Cerda 375: description incompiete. Spink (r898) 46651, (1901) 68379, (1902)
As 218.
ANS. V 1665 (UV 2 sp., PG, AV 3 sp.). BM V 29 (pi. 1). BN II 580. MA 527 (3 sp.). KM II
587: ^lil for a.j-^ in oM. Cond p. 279 (pi. 1n, no. 5): several slight errors. Longperier:D
p. 430: d, m only; with heir Tashfin (error). Cerda 378: description incompiete.
HSA 13205: -> for j in (engraving error ?). V 1666 (PG, AV). MA 528: as 218, corrected
See 241-256.
As 152.
V 1592 (PG, AV, 2 others), 1593 (AV): - at end of rm. MA 493. Fleischer p. 387 (pi.):
J after in rf (error), no letter b rf. Sentenach (pi. xv1, no. 1): no letter b rf.
s*
As 152.
V 1594 (AV).
As 152.
V1595 (UV, AV, 1 other). BNII581: no letter b rf. Colson p. 242 (4 sp.): d, m only. D :Lorichs
4709: d, m only. Bartholomaei 61. Cerda 361: d, m only. Sotheby 381: d, m only. B 862
As 152.
V 1596 (PG, AV, 1 other). BN II 582: no letter b rf. KM II 591: no letter b rf. Longpe-
As 152.
As 152.
As 184.
V 1599 (PG, AV). Longprier:D p. 430: d, m only. Colson p. 242 (2 sp.): d, m only. D.Garcia
As 168.
V 1634 (UV, PG, AV). BN II 585 (pi. 1v), 586 (2 sp.): Sb rf. Longperier:Z1 p. 430: d, m only.
Colson p. 242 (15 sp.): d, m only. Caballero p. 16: d, m only, Sb rf. Markov :E p. 90, no. 12:
d, m only. Rivero: M 105 (pi. n): S~ b rf. 0 2082: misread, identified from impression
furnished by Galster.
As 168.
V 1635 (AV).
As 168.
V 1636 (AH, AV, 1 other). BN II 587: S b rf. Longprier :D p. 430: d, m only. Colson p. 242
(7 sp.): d, m only. Caballero p. 16: d, m only, iS"b rf. 0 2083: misread, identified from
impression furnished by Galster. B 864 (pi. xiv): date read as 507 (corrected from piate),
Presumably as 168.
117
As 172.
As 152.
V 1601 (AV 2 sp.). Conde p. 278 (pi. 1n, no. 4): slightly misread, no letter b rf. Longperier .D
p. 429: d, m only. L :Oriental p. 235: incorrectly described, no letter b rf. Caballero p. 17.
As 152.
As 152.
V 1543 (Garcia).
As 152.
V 1606 (AV): for -i* in rm (misprint ?). BN II 588: no letter b rf, mint given as
As 152.
V 1607 (AV, 1 other). Weyl:G 1194: d, m only. Markov: p. 90, no. 11: d, m only.
As 153.
. As 153.
As 153.
V 1610 (UV 2 sp., FC, AV 2 sp.). BN II 589: no letter b rf. KM II 594: mint given as
Ighranatah (error ?), no letter b rf. Colson p. 242: d, m only. Cerda 362: d, m only. Figanier
As 153.
V 1612 (AV). Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only. C:Monedas p.381: d, m only. B 874: S b rf,
description incompiete.
As 168.
V 1613 (AV). BM V 19: U a of, lXI b rf. BN II 590: U a of, Si (given as J) 6 rf. MA
496 (2 sp.).
As 153.
V 1614 (PG 2 sp., AV 2 sp.). BM V 21: U a of, l) b rf. BN II 591: U a of, b rf.
MA 497 (2 sp.). KM II 595: U a of, cXJ b rf. Marsden 355 (pi. xx1): description inaccurate,
piate shows U a of, iJ3 6 rf. G p. 182: d, m only. Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only, with
name <iUU. Fraehn:0 p. 26: description incompiete, citing Aurivillius pi. 1v, no. 7. Weyl:G
1199 (2 sp.): d, m only. Markov : p. 90, no. 15; p. 91, no. 16 (2 sp.): d, m only.
As 168.
HSA 10624: U a of, JTJ b rf. KM II 596: U a of, JO 6 rf. Dorn I p. 55, no. 4, 5, 6 (?)
As 153.
V 1615 (PG, AV 2 sp.). BN II 592: L. a of, jTj b rf. MA 498 (2 sp.). KM II 597: L. a of,
lX) 6 Rf. D :Lorichs 4711: m only. Cerda 368: d, m only. Weyl .G 1201: d, m only. Markov :E
As 168.
As 153.
V 1617. MA 499.
As 153.
V 1618 (AH, UV 2 sp., PG, AV). MA 500. C:Monedas p. 381: d, m only. L:Calvert 49: <-J
b Rf.
As 252.
description of rm inaccurate.
V 1621 (AH, AV). MA 502. KM II 599 (pi. m): 1 b rf (reported as ornament). Cerda 374:
As 254.
V 1622 (AV, 1 other). BN II 593 (pi. 1v): 1 (read as J) b rf. MA 503. KM II 600: \ b rf
11 t' l
ng
As 254.
V 1623 (PG, AV). BM V 32 (pi. 1): { (read on p. xxfas yf) b rf. BN II 594: |i (read
as J) b rf. MA 504 (2 sp.). C:Tratado p. 198, no. 5 (pi. xx): jl b rf. B 883 (pi. xm): (Urf.
V 1654 (PG). MA 520 (2 sp.). KM II 603: *) (read as Jl) b rf. Rivero: (pi. 1n, no. 4):
As 153.
B 869 (pi. xm): mint given as "EL OUAKHA (LOJA)", for which correct Arabic name is
Laushah, piate shows Ojll (?), no letter b rf. This may be a poorly engraved specimen
of 278.
As 152 or 184.
As 184.
V 1604 (AV). BN II 598 (pi.1v): j b rf. Longperier:D p.430: d, m only. Cerda 360: d, m only.
Probably as 184.
V 1605 (PG).
As 152.
V 1624 (UV, PG, AV, 1 other). BM V n: - outside o inner circle. KM II 606: ^ outside o
As 152.
As 184.
As 152.
As 152.
V 1627 (PG, FC, AV 3 sp., 1 other). Colson p. 242: d, m only. Sotheby 380: d, m only.
120
As 152.
ANS: no letter b rf. V 1628 (AV, 2 others). BM V 13: no letter b rf. BN II 599 (pi. 1v): no
letter b rf. MA 505. Longprier :D p. 430: d, m only. Colson p. 242 (2 sp.): d, m only. 0 2081:
no letter b rf.
As 152.
As 184.
V 1630 (AV), 1631 (AV, 2 others). BN II 600: no letter b rf. Colson p. 242 (2 sp.): d, m only.
As 184.
V 1632 (UV, PG, 1 other). MA 507. Colson p. 242 (2 sp.): d, m only. 0 2084. B 865 (coin
As 184.
V 1633 (PG, FC, AV, 2 others). BM X p. 4, no. 18f: ^ b rf. C:Donativo 10. S.Gotha 978
(pi. x1): ^b rf. B 870 (pi. xm, under no. 865): ^ b rf (misread as j), description inaccurate.
As 152.
in rm, no letter b rf. Conde' p. 281 (pi. 1v, no. 4): misread, apparently this date. B 863: ^
As 153.
As 153.
V 1639. BM V 15: ^ b rf. Marsden 353 (pi. xxi): ^ b rf. Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only.
As 153.
V 1640 (AV).
As 153.
As 153.
As 153.
V 1643 (AV).
121
As 153.
V 1644 (AV).
As 168.
As 153.
As 168.
HSA 7895, 13147 (2 sp.): f b rf. V 1646 (UV 2 sp., PG, FC, AV 2 sp.). BM X p. 5, no. 20d:
j. b rf. BN II 602: b rf. MA 510 (5 sp.). KM II 608: f b rf. Fraehn:iV p. 87, no. 1: -1 at
end of rm. Cerda 364: d, m only. Dorn I p. 54, no. 1; p. 55, no. 2, 3 (3 sp.): ^ (read as y)
b rf. London p. 92 (2 sp.): date given as 525 but probably this year since Sir is not designated
heir. Weyl:G 1196: d, m only. L:Oriental p. 235: date given as 525 but Sir not designated.
As 168.
HSA 13165: f b rf, J at end of rm. V 1647 (pG, AV): - at end of rm. BN II 603, 604
(2 sp.): ^ b rf. MA 511. KM II 609: ^ b rf, - (?) at end of om and of rm. Welzl 12236.
Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only. Fraehn:5 13: ^ b rf. Cerda 366: d, m only. Weyl:G 1198: d,
m only. Spink (1898) 46649, (1901) 68381 (2 sp.): d, m only. S :White 2181: d, m only. 0 2085:
As 168.
V 1648 (UV, PG 2 sp., AV 3 sp.). BN II 605: f b rf. KM II 610: f b rf. LongperierD p. 430:
d, m only. Fraehn :2V p. 87, no. 3:. (read as y) b rf. D .Lorichs 4712: d, m only. Dorn I p. 56,
no. 12: ^ (read as y) b rf. Weyl:G 1200: d, m only. Markov: p. 91, no. 17: d, m only.
As 168.
V 1649 (UV, AV 2 sp.). BN II 606: f b rf. MA 512. KM II 611: - b rf. Dorn:4 p. 401.
Fraehn:iV p. 87, no. 5: ^ (read as y) b rf. Cerda 370: d, m only. Dorn I p. 56, no. 14: ^
As 168.
HSA 13148: ^ b rf, outside inner r circle. UM: ^ b rf. V 1650 (AH, PG, AV 2 sp.). BM
V 26: ^ b rf. Weyl:G 1203: d, m only. Markov :E p. 91, no. 24: d, m only. Spink (1902) 79535:
d, m only. S:Judice II3096 (pi. n): date given as 529 (corrected from piate), ^ b rf, outside
inner r circle.
Presumably as 168.
122
As 184.
V 1651 (UV, PG 2 sp., AV 2 sp.). BM V 28: ^ b rf. BN II 607: . b rf, outside inner r
circle. MA 513 (2 sp.). Longperier:/! pi. lv, no. 8):. b rf. Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only,
with heir Tashf1n (error). D.Lorichs 4713: d, m only. Cerda 373: d, m only.
As 153.
V 1652 (AH, PG, AV, 1 other). BN II 608: ^ b rf, outside inner r circle. Tornberg p. 275,
no. 2: <jc.jll for OwL-ll in of (error), ^ (read as y) b rf. Soret:F 134: ^ 6 rf. Long-
perier:D p. 430: rf, w only, with heir Tashfin (error). Fraehn:AT p. 87, no. 6: . (read as y)
b rf, for ii- in rm (error ?). Cerda 377: d, m only. Dorn I p. 56, no. 17: ^ (read as y)
As 168.
V 1653 (UV, PG, AV). BM V 31: ^ b rf, outside inner r circle. BN II 609: f i rf, . outside
circle. MA 514 (2 sp.). Cerda 379: d, m only. C:Monedas p. 381: d, m only. Markov:Ep. 881,
'Ali without heir; recapitulation of types. All coins as 153, standard type of 'Ali, with
Standard: 153-167, 168*, 170*, 171*. 181-183, 185, 186-193*, 195-198*, 200*, 202-209,
229*, 230, 231-233*, 241-244, 245*, 246, 247*, 248, 249*. 250, 251, 258, 274-280, 281*,
With ^Jl after <Ll ^ in rm: 152, 169, 184*, 194 ?, 199*, 201, 222-227, 228*,
235-237, 239, 240, 259* ?, 260*, 261* ?, 263, 264, 265*, 266-269, 270-272*, 273, 289*.
With heir
Sir ibn-'Ali
Probably as 295.
B 901: d, m only.
123
Probably as 295.
Probably as 295.
V 1723 (UV 2 sp.). MA 564. Weyl:G 1207: d, m only. Markov:E p. 91, no. 26: d, m only.
As 295.
HSA 15793: Sb rf. V 1724 (FC, AY). Cerda 388: description incompiete. Markov: p.91,
As 295.
V 1725. BN II 55r (pi. 1n): J"Z> rf. Weyl:G r2o8: d, m only. Markov: p. 91, no. 30: d,
As 295.
As 295.
V 1727 (UV 3 sp.): date uncertain. B 957 (pi. x1v): Sb rf, Tashfin for Sir (disproved by
V 1713 (UV).
As 300.
As 300.
124
As 300.
As 300.
As 300.
V 1717 (UV).
As 300.
As 300.
As 300.
As 300.
As 300.
V 1728 (AV). B 905 (pi. x1v): S'b rf; piate not clear, may be 311a.
As 311 but with y_ shifted from 4th to end of 3rd line of of.
BN II 561: Sb rf.
As 311.
V 1729 (UV 2 sp., PG, 1 other). B 907 (without Madinat ?), 908 (2 sp. ?): Sb rf, description
incompiete.
125
V 1758 (UV 2 sp., PG, AV 2 sp.). MA 565 (3 sp.). C:Monedas p. 381: d, m only. B 915:
d, m only.
As 314.
As 314.
As 314.
As 314.
V1762 (UV, AV 2 sp.). BN II563: Sb rf. Weyl:G 1210: d, m only. Markov :E p. 91, no. 28, 29
rf. B 932 (coin illustrated under no. 932 in pi. x1v is 319): d, m only.
As 314.
V 1763 (PG, AV 2 sp., 1 other). BN II 564: Sb rf. C.Donativo 12. B 936 (pi. x1v, under
As 314.
V 1764 (PG). BM X p. 5, no. 39c!: J)) for J) on of (engraving error ?), Sb rf. B 938: d,
m only.
As 311.
As 311.
V 1735 (AV). BN II 569: Sb rf. MA 561. T>.Lorichs 4714. B 899: Sb rf, description in-
compiete.
As 311.
V 1736 (UV). KM II 604: Sb rf. 0 2089: rm incorrectly described. B 904 (pi. x1v): S b rf,
As 311.
HSA 13152: Sb rf.' V 1737 (UV, AV). MA 562. S Judice II 3095. Rivero:M 108 (pi. 1n):
As 311.
As 311.
As 295.
B 926: d, m only, Sb rf. B 895 with this date and mint is, from its numerical position,
As 311.
Presumably as 311.
B 940: d, m only.
V 1711 (UV). MA 553: jmV1 for j in fourth line of of (error ?). C:Monedas p. 381: d, m
only. B 897 (pi. x1v, under no. 898): Sb rf, description inaccurate.
As 295.
HSA 13153: Sb rf. V 1730 (PG, AV). S Judice II 3094 (pi. n): Sb rf. B (pi. x1v, under
127
As 295.
As 295.
V 1732 (PG, AV). MA 563. C:Monedas p. 381: d, m only. B 925: d, m only, Sb rf.
As 295.
V 1733 (PG, 1 other). BM V 38 (pi. 1): lil for co-lil in om, S b rf. BN II 573: S b rf.
As 295.
Presumably as 295.
Thorburn.
As 331, except rm, in which replaces lu., and rf, under which jt\ occurs.
HSA 13185: J following V 1754 (AH, AV, 1 other). BMV30: j following Cerda
381: description incompiete. B 896 (pi. x1v): j following ^il, description inaccurate.
V 1755 (AV). KM II 588: <- for c- in rm (engraving error). B 900: description incompiete.
Presumably as 340.
As 340.
V 1756 (AV). BM V 36: j following jZi. Cerda 383: description incompiete. B 910:
description incompiete.
As 340.
Spanish mints.
128
OF <ul Jl V RF
<iil ul J_^~,
om as om of 152.
rm as RM of 252.
Probably as 311.
Probably as 344.
V 1741 (PG, AV, 1 other): as 295 (error ?). MA 554. 0 2088: rm incorrectly described.
As 311a.
KM II612: J at end of om, ^ b rf, outside inner R circle. C: Tratado p. 200, no. 8 (pi. xx):
As 347.
V 1742 (PG, AV): as 295 (error ?). BM V 34: ^ b rf, outside circle. Marsden 356 (pi. xx1):
Markov:E p. 881, no. 25b: d, m only. L:Khedivial p. 329: . b rf, outside circle.
As 347.
V 1743 (UV, PG, AV): as 295 (error ?). BM V 35: f b rf, . outside circle. MA 555 (2 sp.).
V 1744 (PG, AV 2 sp.): as 295 (error ?). BN II 610: as 295, f b rf, outside circle. MA 556.
KM II614: b rf, outside circle. Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only, with heir Tashfin (error).
Cerda 382: description incompiete. Weyl:G 1206: d, m only. S:Karabaczek 863: wrong
reference given. S:Dodgson 59: wrong reference given. B 909: ^ b rf, description incompiete.
As 311.
V 1745 (PG, AV). MA 557: as 311a (error). KM II615:- b rf, .outside circle. D.Lorichs
As 347.
As 295.
As 295.
V 1747 (UV, PG). BN II 611: f. b rf, . outside circle. KM II 616: j. b rf, outside circle.
As 295.
V 1748 (PG, AV). MA 558: as 347 (error). Longprier:D p. 430: d, m only. Cerda 386:
As 311.
V 1749 (AV). BN II 612: ^ b rf, . outside circle. MA 558 note: as 311a (error). KM II 617:
As 311.
V1750 (PG, AV3 sp.). BM V 37: . b rf, . outside circle. MA 559: as 311a (error). KM II 618:
As 311.
V 1751 (PG, AV). BN II 613: . b rf. KM II 620: f b rf. Weyl:G 1209: d, m only. Markov:
p. 91, no. 31: d, m only. Spink (1898) 46652, (1901) 68383, (1902) 79538 (3 sp.). B 933: d, m
only, ^ b rf.
As 311.
V 1752 (PG, AV 2 sp.). BN II 614: . b rf. MA 560: as 311a (error). C:Monedas p. 381: d, m
As 311.
V 1753 (AV). KM II 622: . b rf. Cond p. 280 (pi. 1v, no. 3): ^ b rf, several slight errors.
'Ali with Sir as heir; recapitulation of types. All coins as 153, standard type of 'Ali,
with following modifications (coins on which replaces <i- in rm are designated by *).
Last 3 lines of of; J. ic ^uUl j\ / ^ J, Ul-j. / > ^Vl: 292-299, 311*, 312*, 313* ?,
321-326*, 327, 328-330*, 333 ?, 334, 336-338b, 345*, 352*, 353-355, 356-358*, 360*,
361*.
130
Last 3 lines of of: ym a ^ OuUl ^ / Jj / jj- -c^l: 311a*. 347, 348*, 349-351.
Different of and rm; rf: fUVl / <ul ju / oo^l j~l / >- ^Vl: 344*, 346* ?.
With heir
Tashjin ibn-'AU
g (JruL-ll jrv>l
V 1790 (PG, AV, 1 other). D.Lorichs 4716: description incomplete. Markov:E p. 91, no. 32:
Ol l J J
^ OjJu-il jy\
As 363.
As 363.
As 366.
131
As 366.
HSA 13151: no letter b rf. V 1782 (AV). MA 576: date uncertain. C:Monedas p. 381: d, m
only.
As 362 or 369.
As 362 but with j.. shifted from 4th to end of 3rd line of OF.
b Rf.
As 153 and 362 except rm, in which fW replaces o., and OF:
As 373.
ANS: Sb rf. V 1784 (UV, PG, AV). BM V 42: J"6 of and b rf.
As 362.
J* (jruluJtl j*\
9*
132
rm as rm of 184.
KM II 6o1: Sb rf.
Plate I
HSA 13134: Sb rf. V 1807 (PG, FC, AV). BM X p. 5, no. 42! (pi. xxi): Sb rf. BN II 565
pi. 1n): Sb rf. MA 579. Adler:C 87 (pi. v1): Sb rf. Cerda 396: description incompiete.
Weyl:G 1211: d, m only. Markov :E p. 91, no. 33: d, m only. B 949: Sb rf, description
of , Vl <)I V rf J,Vl
HSA 13132: Sb rf. V 1808 (PG, FC, AV, 1 other): for jyti\ on oF (error ?). BM
V 45 (pi. i): S b rf. BN n 566: Sb rf. KM II 602: Sb rf. C:Decadencia p. 381, no. 7
(pi. 1): Sb rf. B 956 (pi. x1v): Sb rf, description inaccurate. Mateu I p. 482 (pi. xxxv,
V 1791 (UV, PG, AV). B 958 (coin illustrated under no. 958 in pi. x1v is 383): Sb rf,
description inaccurate.
As 380.
V 1792 (PG). BN II 571 (pi. m): Sb rf. Markov: p. 881, no. 32a: d, m only.
of u1 Vl <|1 V
RF
133
OF Vljl V RF
om as om of 366.
of as of of 382. rf as rf of 382.
La) l (jrC.^ll
rm as rm of 152.
Probably as 371.
As 362.
V 1793 (AV).
As 386.
V 1786 (PG, AV 2 sp.). J :Mohammedan p. 267: d, m only. Sotheby 381: d, m only. Rivero:M
As 386.
Probably as 386.
As 362.
Soret:S 77 (pi. xv, no. 13: mint only): as 380 (error ?). Figanier 277 (pi. v):Sb rf (given
As 386.
Spanish mints.
Probably as 394.
OF ilVNlV RF UVl
As 394.
V1806 (Howland): b rf. KM II589 (pi.lli): ^b rf, J-ll for i>ul_Il in of (engraving error).
As 380.
As 362.
ANS: ^ 6 rf. V 1795 (PG, AV, 1 other). Cerda 395: description incompiete. Sotheby 382:
d, m only.
As 371.
As 380.
As 380.
As 380.
HSA 13133: { b rf. V 1798 (PG, AV 2 sp.). BN II 617: ^ b rf. Cerda 397: description in-
135
As 400a.
As 362.
V 1799 (PG 2 sp., AV). Longperier:D p. 430: d, m only. Markov: p. 881, no. 33a: d, m
As 371.
KM II 626, 627 (2 sp.): ^ b rf. C:Tratado p. 201, no. " (pi. xx): . 6 rf.
As 400a.
'Ali with Tashf1n as heir; recapitulation of types. All coins as 153, standard type of
'Ali, with following modifications (coins on which replaces <i- in rm are designated by *).
Last 3 lines of of: a. ^ M / Jj^yJ cniit ^Vl: 362, 372 ?, 375, 380*, 381*,
As type of 362 but with y. in 3rd line: 371, 385 ?, 398, 400a*, 401a*, 402a, 403*.
As type of 362 with VVl omitted from last line of of: 386, 388-390, 392.
Last 3 lines of of: OuLil j*\ / oc J} / qjiit: 376* (margins with added words).
As preceding type except rf: fL.VI / ^ UI / <uI jlc / <j*J.\ jy\: 377*.
Different of, om, rm; rf: fL.Vl / oil -uc / ^U1 / oc-^ll ^1: 378*.
Different of, om, rm; rf: ^UVl / *ul oji/ oj^jll / :379*.
Different of, om, rm; rf: fL.Vl / -lc / <ul / Ul c.c^ll ^1 / 382*, 383, 384*.
Tdshfin ibn-'Ali
OF <ul V RF fUVl
B 971 (coin illustrated under no. 971 in pi. xv is 422): Sb rf, description incompiete.
136
Probably as 404.
B 974: <S"b rf, 983: with heir Ibrahim (error ?) (2 sp. ?): description inaccurate.
OF
RF
RF
<u1 Vl Jl V
uviil"
Margins as on 404.
OF <ul Vl Jl V
om as om of 404.
rm (date) As (mint) .. jb Jl
of oil VI Jl V
Ae o; cni-l" u^JuJll
Margins as on 404.
of <ul VI Jl V
rm as rm of 404.
OF , Vl Jl V RF
fUVl
^Ul <ul
fUV1
<jrC_jll jv\
RF
fUVl
rf as rf of 404.
JI <UI Jj-J
fuv1
jwl oil
(jji_jll
137
om as om of 409.
rm as rm of 407.
V 1852 (PG, AV). BN II 638 (pi. rv): S~b rf. MA 589: rf and om incorrectly described,
corrected by Vives. S.Gotha 982. B 973 (pi. xv) :fb rf, description inaccurate. Figanier 278:
As 404.
As 404.
Oil -Usm
C/VLik QuiuJll
B 972: Sb rf.
V 1854. BN II 641 (pi.iv): Sb rf. KM II 652: Sb rf. Host :E and N 3 (pi.xxxm): Sb rf.
0 2103: illegible letter b rf. B 975 (pi. xv): S~b rf, description inaccurate.
As 414.
V 1855. MA 591.
As 414.
V 1856 (AV).
Spanish mints.
OF oil Vl ^1 V rf fL.Vl
Margins as on 404.
Jc # t>uilr ^Jl
138
V 1861 (AV 2 sp., 2 others). BN II 643 (pi. 1v): ^b rf. KM II 649: . b rf. LongpeVier:Z)
As 418.
V 1864 (PG).
With heir
Ibrahim ibn-Tashjin
om as om of 404.
rm as rm of 414.
B (pi. xv, under no. 971): not described, reconstructed from piate, of not clear, <_T6rf.
om as om of 404.
rm as rm of 407.
of as of of 424. rf as rf of 404.
om as om of 404.
rm as rm of 407.
V 1867: rm wrongly reported. BM V 68: Sb rf. B 982 (pi. xv): mint given as Fas and date
139
as 538 (corrected from piate), jCb rf, omitted from rm (engraving error), description
inaccurate.
BN II639: J~6 rf, o^c for J^fi in fourth line of of (engraving error).
.UJl JJ -Ujm
om as om of 409.
rm as rm of 404.
B 984 (pi. xv): date given as 537 (corrected from piate); 985 (2 sp.): Sb rf, description
inaccurate.
Probably as 427.
Probably as 427.
Spanish mints.
of , VNl V rf as rf of 417.
al 'I
140
ul V| J| V
V 1870 (AV, 2 others). BM V 69: of .j^c shifted to start of last line of of, ^ b of, f 6 rf.
BN II 645-647 (3 sp.): a of aa^c omitted (error), 6 of, b rf. MA 592 (3 sp.): 6 of,
om without <ul j^j, corrected by Vives. KM II650 (pi. 1n), 651 (2 sp.): p b of, om without
<ul (visible in piate), . b rf, (jjJuJl for in rf (error). Fraehn:B 15: gjb of, ^ (read
no. 43: d, m only. Rodgers 7981: of, description inaccurate. C .Decodencia p. 383, no.8
(pi. 1): 6 of, ^ 6 rf. Ziya 2029 (pi. n): ^ b of, description inaccurate, piate illegible.
Ibrahim ibn-Tdshfin
No coins reported.
Ishdq ibn-'Ali
ul J*
a. ^ a.
As 433.
As 433.
Spanish mints.
V1892 (AV): ^>-J\ not reported in rm (error ?). KM II656 (pi. in): S"b rf. Rivero :M
of <ul Vl i\ V rf as rf of 406.
<1|I
<~*-y. a Jc a
om as om of 404.
V1889. BN II 653 (pi. 1v): o (read as j) b of, >.(?)6 rf. KM II 657: o b of, (?) b rf.
OF oil Vl )I V RF fUVl
rm as rm of 404.
HSA 13202: o b of, 6 RF. v l890 (PG, AV). BN II 652 (p1. iv): (read as j) 6
of, (?) 6 rf, oil J-t omitted (visible on piate). KM II658: J b of, (?) 6 rf, oil Ju
of as of of 439. rf as rf of 439.
om as om of 404.
rm as rm of 407.
HSA 15794: Sb rf, rm largely illegible, date and mint uncertain. V 1891 (FC). Sawasz-
ml J_jj x^xj
a Je . a.
om as om of 409.
rm as rm of 421.
Many coins in Murabit styles were struck after the downfall of the main dynasty at the
death of Ishaq; most of these were struck in Spain by local rulers and are therefore ex-
cluded from this corpus, but can be found in section 6a of Vives; those with North African
mints, or with Spanish mints but struck in the name of the "Bani-Tashfm", follow.
443. Sabtah - 543 - dinar struck by a final Murabit rebel against Muwahhid rule, Yahya
cf. J* a.
C.Familia p. 155.
See 407.
Ol| J>-J
the Bani-Tashfin.
445. Madinat Gharnatah - 545 - dinar struck by the Lamtunah Berber governor Maymun
Vl <J| V
411l J yJ JUsm
446. Madinat Qurtubah - 542 - dinar struck by the Massufah Berber governor Yahya.
143
of as of of 445. rf as rf of 406.
om as om of 404.
HSA 14169: JCJ b rf. V 1978 (AV, 2 others). BM V 81 (pi. 1): J3 b rf, JJl misread
as j^-jt ^Vl.
Coins struck by the descendants of Ibn-Ghaniyah during their reign in the Balearics
are excluded from this corpus, and no coins are known to have been struck by them during
their North African invasions in the later Muwahhid and early Hafsid periods.
Muwahh1d Gold
in Naskhi script.
Debased gold struck by Muwahhid partisans in North Africa before the downfall of
the Murabits in a.h. 541 (a.d. 1147), in the name of the Mahdi, Muhammad ibn-Tumart.
of ^ll V RF Lj <ul
HSA 14156. S Judice II 3105 (pi. n): 4th line of of uncertain, 4th line of rf illegible.
447. Bijayah (b of and b rf) - dinar struck after a.h. 547. Plate II
OF Vl <Jl V RF fU ^a^ll
ANS.
RS ^zc'-C?^ XeJ^w
448. Madinat (a rf) Bijayah (6 rf) - dinar struck after a.h. 547.
As 447.
As 447.
144
As 447.
As 447.
V 2055. P 1j. BM V 84 (pi. n). LJnedited 10. Weyl:G 1218. S:White 2183. B 1027, 1028
(2 sp.).
As 447.
As 447.
ANS. V 2054 (PG). P 1i. BM V 85. Weyl:G 1219 (2 sp.). S:Karabaczek 914, 918 ? (2 sp. ?).
C:Lebrija p. 564.
As 447.
As 447.
V 2059. P 1n. BN II 711 (pi. v1). Markov:E p. 93, no. 1: m only. S:Michael I 1670.
S.Gotha 985.
As 447.
V 2051. P 1e. BM X p. 8, no. 84d. L:Khedivial p. 329. S :Ciscar 34 (pi. 1): mint illegible in
As 447.
J :Gold 3. B1010 (pi. xv1, under no. 1010 bis): description inaccurate, mint illegible in plate.
As 447.
HSA 13192: c b rf. V 2048 (PG, AV). P 1b. BN II 712. MA 661. Sotheby 383: m only.
As 447.
V 2049. P 1c. MA 662. KM II 683 (pi. 1v): ^.U for ^li a rf and at end of 4th os (both
As 447.
461. Madinat (b rf) Fas (b of) - dinar struck after a.h. 540.
As 447.
P 1f.
145
462. Mad1nat (a rf) Fas (b rf) - dinar struck after a.h. 540.
As 447.
463. Madinat (a rf) Marrakush (b rf) - dinar struck after a.h. 541.
As 447.
As 447.
V 2053 (AV). P 1h. B 1025 (pi. xv1), 1026 (2 sp.): mint illegible in piate.
As 447.
V 2052 (AV). P 1g. BN II 713 (pi. v1). KM II 684. Cerda 420: description incompiete.
S :Ciscar 35.
As 447.
ANS: ^ b rf. HSA 535, 7899, 10627, 13167, 13172, 13189 (6 sp.). V 2047 (AH, PG 12 sp.,
AV 7 sp.): plsJ for ^la)l in rf (misprint). P 1a (pi. 1). BM V 86, 87 (2 sp.).BN II 715:
^ b of and b rf, 716 (2 sp.). MA 660, 664: ^ b of and b rf (2 sp.). KM II 686-688 (3 sp.).
Cond p. 285 (pi. h1, no. 8): slightly misread. Welzl 12238. D.Garda 6128. Cerda 421:
description incompiete. 'L:Muwahhids p. 154, no. 1 (pi. vi), 2 (2 sp.). Weyl:G 1217: slight
errors in om and rf. Spink (1901) 68337: ^ b rf, 68338, 68339, (1902) 79540, 7954T (5 sp.):
mintless, not described. J.Gold 1 (2 sp.). Sotheby 383 (2 sp.). Maguelonne p. 22 (fig. 2).
S:Karabaczek 916. S:Castro 421. S.Gotha 987. 0 2109. B 1033-1045 (13 sp.): mint-marks
include ^, x, J, ^- 6 of, rf, or both. Rivero: (pi. 1v, no. 10). Lisbon.
of as of of 447. rf ^ji^I1
OS j^Jl <ul
rs as rs of 447.
V 2060 (PG, AV, 2 others). P 2 (pi. 1). BM V 88 (pi. n). BN II 717. S:Karabaczek 917.
OS UI
V 2060 note.
Spanish mints.
As 447.
10
V 2057. P11. BM X p. 8, no. 85c!: mint spelledIshbiliyah. S:Karabaczek 915. Rivero.M 132
(pi. 1n).
470. Madinat (a rf) Ishb1liyah (b rf) - dinar struck after a.H. 541.
As 447.
HSA 10628 ?, 13190,13193 (3 sp. ?). V 2058 (PG 2 sp., AV 2 sp., 1 other). P 1m. BN II 714:
<ul for os in 4th rs (misprint). Cerda419: Madinat misread as Mursiyah, description in-
complete. C:Tratado p. 221, no. 3 (pi. xxn). S:Judice II 3107. B 1031, 1032 (2 sp.).
471. Jayyan (location on coin not indicated) - dinar struck after a.H. 541.
Presumably as 447.
C:f ecas p. 343: m only, given as J^- (error), termed double dinar (error).
472. Madinat (a of) Qurtubah (b of) - dinar struck after a.h. 542.
As 447.
B 1029.
With heir
(mint)
OS J^lj
V 2072 (AV). P 9d. Spink (1901) 68377, l1*)02) 79555 (2 Sp.): m oruy, ascribed to 'Abd-Allah.
As 473.
As 473.
V 2071 (AV): L>j for ]\,j (error). P 9b (pi. 1): lotj for b\,j (disproved by piate).
As 473.
As 473.
147
HSA 7898. P 9c. Spink (1901) 68376, (1902) 79554 (2 sp.): m only, ascribed to 'Abd-AUah.
As 473.
HSA 13170. V 2070 (AV). P 9a. Cerda 426: description incompiete. Spink (1901) 68374,
68375, (1902) 79553 (3 sp.): m only, ascribed to 'Abd-Allah. J.Gold 18 (3 sp.). Sotheby 389
(2 sp.): m only, ascribed to "Abd-Mohammad". Rivero:M 135 (pi. 1n). B 1149 (pi. xv1):
As 473.
HSA 13194. Leite 24: J*VI omitted from 1st rs (misprint ?), u*) <ul for in 2nd os
(error). J.Gold 19. S:Judice II 3108 (pi. n): mint and rs illegible in piate.
As 473.
Sacy p. 539: uVl for JVI in 1st rs (error). Maguelonne p. 22 (fig. 1): misread.
With heir
Since the coins struck while Yiisuf was heir are identical with those struck during the
early part of his reign, they are listed under his own name as amir: 481^492.
V 2064 (AV). P 3b. BN II 724 (pi. v1). Spink (1901) 68350. Sotheby 384: m only. B 1083,
1084 (2 sp.) (pi. xv1, unnumbered). Rivero: (pi. 1v, no. 11): mint uncertain.
As 481.
As 481.
As 481.
Spink (1901) 68368, (1902) 79552 (2 sp.): m only. J .Gold 8 (2 sp.). Sotheby 385: m only.
10*
148
As 481.
P 3d (p. 113). KM II 691. ]:Gold 9. Sotheby 385: m only. B 1077. Mateu II 21 (pi. xvm,
no. 3).
As 481.
Spink (1901) 68340-68343, (1902) 79542, 79543 (6 sp.): m only. ].Gold 10 (5 sp.). Sotheby
387: m only.
As 481.
Spink (1901) 68357-68363, (1902) 79548 (8 sp.): m only. J.Gold n (15 sp.). Sotheby 387
(3 sp.): m only.
As 481.
P 3c (pi. 1): ;_ri>- for jU*- (disproved by piate). Spink (1901) 68364-68367, (1902) 79549,
7955o (6 sp-): m only- J'-Gold 12 (8 sp.). B 1078 (pi. xv1): -j for jix* b of (error),
As 481.
Spink (1901) 68354-68356, (1902) 79546, 79547 (5 sp.). J.Gold 13 (4 sp.). B 1079-1082
As 481.
Spink (1901) 68351-68353 (3sp.): mint given as Cl y~. J.Gold 14(5 sp.): mint given as -uSCl.
As 481.
(pi. 1n, no. 7): misread, name of amir uncertain. Sacy p. 534: for JVl in 1st rs (error).
L:Khedivial p. 329. Spink (190T) 68369-68372, (1902) 79551 (5 sp.): mintless, not described.
J :Gold 4 (231 sp.). Sotheby 386 (5 sp.): mintless, not described. S:Karabaczek 919: misread.
Spink (1917) 57100: mintless, not described. Codrington, H.: Ceylon 1. S.Gotha 988. 0 2113.
Spanish mint.
As 481.
149
As 493.
As 493.
ANS (2 sp.). HSA 10630, 13169, 13171, 13195 (4 sp.). V 2061 (AH, AV 4 sp.). P 4a. BM V
90-96 (pi. n: 92) (7 sp.). MA 670 (3 sp.). KM II 693. Castiglioni 244 (pi. x). Fraehn:i? p. 623,
no. 1. Sacy p. 540. D:Garcia 6130. D:Lorichs 4721. Cerda 424: description inadequate.
L:Muwahhids p. 157, no. 3 (pi. v1). Weyl:F 6494 (4 sp.). C:Tratado p. 222, no. 5 (pi. xxn).
Weyl:G 1224. Lagumina p. 101, no. 1. Markov. p. 93, no. 2: mintless, not described.
L:Khedivial p. 329. S:Karabaczek 920. S:Beyram 290. S:Ciscar 36-38 (pi. 1: 36) (3 sp.).
S:Castro 422. C.Lebrija p. 564. Codrington, H.: Ceylon p. 158. Rivero:M 133 (pi. 1n). Spink
OF Vl <Jl V rf ^ajil
ul .ml
oS a3m #l ijojv\
Jecf. O*^ -V
RS <1 ji l Oojiwl
UM. V 2065 (AV). P 5 (pi. 1). Cerda 425: description inadequate. B 1100 (pi. xvi), 1101
Spanish mints.
As 493.
HSA 13168. V 2062. P 4c. BN II 725 (pi. v1). D:Lorichs 4720. Spink (1901) 68344-68348,
As 493.
Mazdara Hbn-Hayydn
rebel at Taza
OF RF J**
Ibn-Abi-Zar' (... Rawd al-qirjds, ed. Tornberg, p. 137, line 21) notes coins of this
Sanhajah Berber rebel bearing the inscription noted, but does not specify metal or style,
or divide the inscription into lines or even into obverse and reverse. As no specimens have
15o
<UlVI4)IV Ocu^ll^lJ*
oiI J
(mint)
As 500.
ANS (electrotype). HSA 13175. V 2066 (AV). P 6a (pi. 1). BM V 100,101 (2 sp.). BN II 729.
Sacy p. 530 (pi.), p. 539 (2 sp.): os slightly misread. Grotefend p. 242 (fig.): cross soldered
over rf. L:Muwahhids p. 158, no. 1: j for ^ in 3rd os (error). Weyl:F 6495 (2 sp.):
mintless, not described. Weyl:G 1225: description incompiete. Lagumina p. 102, no. 2.
L:Khedivial p. 329: description uncertain, may be 502. Holu 749: a. omitted from 3rd rs
(error). Spink (1901)68373. J .Gold 15 (2 sp.). Dieulafoyp.57 (140 sp.): description inaccurate.
Sotheby 388 (2 sp.): mintless, not described. S:Beyram 291: "variant", may be 502. Spink
(1917) 57101: mintless, not described. Rivero:M 134 (pi. 1n). B 1103-1123 (21 sp.): descrip-
As 500 but with ^. shifted from 2nd to start of 3rd line of RF.
BM V 102 (pi. n), 103 (2 sp.). KM II 694 (pi. IV), 695 (2 sp.). L:Muwahhids p. 159, no. 2, 3
(pi. v1) (2 sp.): j for in 3rd os (error). S :White 2186. B 1102 (pi. xv1): description in-
compiete.
L:Muwahhids p. 159, no. 4, 5 (2 sp.): it seems improbable that these coins were intended as
dinars.
OF Vl )1 V RF iiii.
J>-"J J* a y\
rs as rs of 496.
V 2069: 3rd and 4th os misread. P 7: 4th os misread. Weyl:G 1226: description incompiete.
151
With heir
No gold reported.
of as of of 500. rf as rf of 502.
j.xi1j1 tail a.
rs as rs of 500.
P 8b (pi. 1): mint obscure in piate. Mateu I p. 483 (pi. xxxv1, no. 8): given as 508 (disproved
As 504.
B 1124 (pi. xv1), 1125 (2 sp.): description incompiete, piate partly illegible, including mint.
As 504.
HSA 13181. V 2073 (AV). P 8a. BN II732: iiiil for Utl a. in 3rd os (engraving error),
2nd rs largely illegible. KM II 696. Sotheby 388: mintless, not described. Rivero:^4 p. 24,
no. 11 (pi. 1x). B 1126-1146 (21 sp.). Gonzalez p. 106 (fig. 29).
os ^y**> y \ o^*^\
V 2075: jjl omitted from 3rd rs (corrected by Prieto), s*\ for Iy\ in 4th rs (error). P 10b:
jwl for Iy\ in 4th rs (error). BN II 733 (pi. v1): ^.1 omitted from 3rd rs, j?\ for Iy\ in 4th
As 507.
P 10a (pi. n): j*\ for Iy\ in 4th rs (disproved by piate). Sallet p. 147 (fig. 2). KM II 698: s*\
152
OS i_)yu y\ OCj>y\\
Jl Ull j.
rs as rs of 493.
P 11. BM V 97, 98 (pi. n) (2 sp.): ascribed to Yiisuf I. L:Muwahhids p. 156, no. 1, p. 157,
no. 2 (2 sp.): ascribed to Yiisuf I. h:Khedivial p. 329: ascribed to Yiisuf I. Rodgers 7982.
No coins reported
Not described.
S:White 2187. Coins ascribed to this ruler by Spink were presumably struck by 'Abd-al-
No coins reported.
153
V 2076 (AV): jy\ for ^^.1 in 4th os (corrected by Prieto), for 1 in 2nd rs (error).
P 13 (pi. n): jy\ for Iyl (disproved by piate). BM V 106 (pi. n): jy\ for Iy\ (disproved
by piate), for -t*Uil in 1st os (error). B 1151 (pi. xv1): description incompiete, piate
partly illegible.
No coins reported.
624-629 by Idris I,
J.JLil)\ UiI al
No gold reported.
As 514.
As 514.
As 514.
V 2077 (Canovas). P 15a. BM V 107 (pi. n): o*Ul for jaUI1 in 1st rs (error). BN II 734:
jj^aill omitted from 4th os. Weyl:G 1227: description incompiete. B 1155 (pi. xv1):
518. Sabtah (location on coin not indicated) - double dinar struck, if mint is correctly
B 1157.
0J-a-
155
As 518.
V 2078: several errors. P 16 (pi. n). MA 672: several errors. 0 2108: many errors, ascribed
(mint)
ANS. BM V 113".
P 19c: several slight differences (errors ?). BM V 112. B 1174-1184 (" sp.): some of these
156
As 524.
V 2081 (AV): several slight differences (errors ?). P 19b: several slight differences (errors ?).
BM V 108-111 (pi. n: 108) (4 sp.). BN II 735. MA 674 (3 sp.). D.Garcia 6135 (pi. xv1, no. 5,
not pi. xv): > before mint (disproved by piate). L:Muwahhids p. 162, no. 1 (pi. v1), p. 163,
no. 2-3 (3 sp.). L:Khedivial p. 329. B 1165, 1173 (pi. xvn: both) (2 sp.). Mateu I p. 483
of as of of 473. rf as rf of 473.
f+J,\ ^l ^ujl
As 526.
V 2084 (AV): a.l for jl in 4th os (error). P 20b (pi. 1n). B 1185-1188 (pi. xvn: 1185)
As 524.
V 2082 (AV): several slight differences (errors ?). P 19d: several slight differences (errors ?).
BM V 114. MA 675 (2 sp.). Rivero:M 136 (pi. in): misread slightly. B 1159-1164 (pi. xvn:
1159) (6 sp.).
As 526.
As 524.
P 19e (pi. m): mint given as Malaqah (error), piate shows W.; -ul| for .ul-lj in 3rd line of
of (disproved by piate).
As 523.
V 2079 (AV): juL\ for juJ-l j in 3rd line of of (error). P 18a (pi. n): -ull for-ullj (disproved
by piate). BM V 116.
V 2079 note: -uil for in 3rd line of of (error ?). P 18 note: -ull for -uilj (error ?).
BM V 117.
157
As 524.
V 2080 (AH, PG, AV 3 sp.): several slight differences (errors ?). P 19a: several slight
differences (errors ?). BM V 115. BN II 736, 737 (2 sp.). MA 673 (n sp.). KM II 699: .i* y,
for uai>- y) in 2nd os (engraving error). Tychsen, O.: Introductionis p. 49. Conde p. 285
(pi. 1v, no. 1). Sacy p. 537. Soret:i7 134 note. D.Garda 6136. D.Lorichs 4723. L:Muwahhids
p. 163, no. 4, 5 (2 sp.). C:Tratado p. 224, no. 4 (pi. xxn). Markov:E p. 93, no. 3: mintless,
not described. Sotheby 390: mintless, not described. S:Karabaczek 921 (pi. n). S.Gotha 989.
0 2114: engraving errors, 2115 (2 sp.). B 1189-1209 (21 sp.). Figanier 279 (pi ): os slightly
misread. Mateu I p. 483 (pi. xxxvi, no. 10). Seco p. 468 (pi. xxm) (4 sp.).
As 526.
V 2083 (PG, AV): jr| for ^l in 4th os (error). P 20a. BM X p. 9, no. 117e, II7f (2 sp.).
B 1210-1219 (coin illustrated under no. 1219 in pi., xvn is 536) (10 sp.). Thorburn.
V 2085 (PG, AV). P 21 (pi. 1n). BM X p. 8, no. 103k (pi. xxi): ascribed to Ya'qQb, apparently
this coin with 2nd and 4th os misread. BN II 738 (pi. vi): y.\ omitted from 2nd rs (error).
MA 677: os misread. KM II 700 (pi. 1v). D.Garcia 6137-6139 (3 sp.). S.Gotha 990. B 1220,
1221 (pi. xvn, under no. 1219, 1220, 1221) (3 sp.): description incomplete, piate partly
illegible.
of as of of 523. rf as rf of 522.
RS as rs of 522.
As 537 but with l'-u~ for -u~ in 3rd and 4th os.
V 2086 note. P 22. BM V 120 (pi. n). Sotheby 390: not described. B 1222-1225 (pi- xvn.
158
V 2087 (PG). P 23 (pi. 1n). MA 678 (2 sp.). D.Garcia 6140-6142 (3 sp.): 4th rs misread.
No coins are known to have been struck by the several Muwahhid pretenders who
arose in North Africa for decades after the downfall of the dynasty in a.h. 668 (a.d. 1269).
Hud1d Gold
by the Banu-Hud
of Murcia (Mursiyah)
in Naskhi script.
Anonymous gold (Muwahhid style) probably struck in a.h. 630, when this ruler
controlled Sabtah for three months, in the name of the 'Abbasid khalifah, who was not
individually identified:
oil Jl V
os fL.Vl iai1
RS JU-lj A\
P 63 (pi. vn). Weyl:G 1212 and S:Karabaczek 926: described as double dinars with legends
159
Anonymous gold (Hafsid style) probably struck at Sabtah between a.h. 647 and 656
oF <Ul J\ RF til
RS <>^^l
P 62 (pi. vn): <ulfor <u in 3rd line of rf, -U for ^jU in 4th rs (errors, corrected by Fasmer).
Hafs1d Gold
the Banii-Hafs
OF RF ^^ll .ucy\
B 1007 (pi. xv1): mint obscure in piate, read as Madinat Fas (error ?), ascribed to the
Muwahhid 'Abd-al-Mu'min.
As 542.
Prieto no. o (p. 112). KM II 685. B 1008 (coin illustrated under no. 1008 in pi. xv1 is 454).
544. (no mint) - half dinar with diameter of dinar. Attribution tentative.
OF Vl <ll V RF iJal|
os - [ ? ] [ p*Jl ] a>Jl ^ n
-[ ? ]- [ ? ]
-[ ? ]- [ ? ]
of as of of 542. rf as rf of 542.
^ a. J^** ^ a.
rs as rs of 545.
P 30 (pi. 1v). BM V 159. B 1229 (pi. xv1n), 1230 (pi. xvn1:0 only) (2 sp.): description
Oil J_>i-)lj
As 547.
P 31c (coin illustrated under no. 31c in pi. 1v is 556). D.Garcia 6641. Rivero:M 142 (pi. 1n):
description inaccurate.
As 547.
Soret:F 138: i\ for <u in 1st and 2nd lines of rf (error)> mint read as Jl (?).
As 547.
P 31a. BN II 936 (pi. 1x), 937 (2 sp.): <iil for y> in 4th os (disproved by piate). B 1231: de-
scription incompiete.
ANS. P 32. BM V 158 (pi. 1n). BN II 938. KM II 857 (pi. v), 858 (2 sp.). Lavoix:H p. 260
(pi. cxc1, no. 1): termed quarter dinar. Chalon p. 389 (fig.): termed quarter dinar. Weyl:G
1228. S:White 2193. S:Karabaczek 867. Ziya 1764 (pi. n). S.Gotha 991. 0 2116: incorrectly
of as of of 544. rf as rf of 544.
os as rs of 545.
rs Uj <il cJu>\
ul *"' Cf
P 33 (pi- Iv). BN II 939 (pi. 1x), 940 (2 sp.). KM II 859. Weyl:F 6498: wrong reference.
Dorn II p. 65, no. 1. Spink (1933) 22477. F.Hafsites 1 note. B 1236 (pi. xvm, o only; r
belongs to an unidentified coin, illegible), 1237 (pi. xvm): diameter of dinar (2 sp.).
There is historical testimony that in a.h. 673 this ruler struck a few gold coins for gifts
553. Sabtah (b of) - double dinar struck between a.h. 643 and 647 by abu-'Ali ibn-Khalas
As 547.
554. Sijilmasah (b of) - dinar (Muwahhid style) struck in a.h. 640 or 641 by 'Abd-Allah
ibn-Zakariya', al-Khazraji.
P p. 53.
555. Ishbiliyah (b of) - double dinar struck presumably by abu-Faris ibn-Yiinus, cousin
11
162
ibn-Yusuf, called Ibn-al-Ahmar, before a.h. 647, when he became independent as the
As 547.
P 31e (pi. 1v, under no. 31c, noted by Fasmer). B 1232 (pi. xvm: r only).
B 1239 (pi. xvm): piate shows reverse of 2 sp., no obverse, description inaccurate.
As 558.
ANS: j of Juj shifted to end of 3rd os. BN II 943: j shifted to end of 3rd os (not noticed
by Lavoix; read by G. C. Miles). Lavoix:H p. 262 (pi. cxcn, no. 1). Weyl:G 1229: description
incompiete. L:Khedivialp. 329. S:Karabaczek 866. F:Ha/s7t's4(pi.1): j shifted to end of 3rd os.
of Vl <jl V rf J. [fj
OS <_$oll oil
<ul iiii
RS Juc yl J* Vl
a a. J^A <uI
BM V 159a (pi. 1n). D.Garda 6645: description inaccurate. 0 2117. F:Hafsites 4 note.
OF VI V RF oil J2S
<Jll <ic AJ
os ^iVl
RS a. [fj ^1 a.
163
OF iiii RF <ul JU y\
RS <d>
S:Karabaczek 922 (pi. n). F.Hafsites 2 (pi. 1). B 1238 (pi. xvm).
OF RF <ul a-c y|
os as os of 562.
rs as rs of 562.
As 562.
BM X p. 11, no. 160k (pi. xx1, r only), 160I (2 sp.): ascribed to Muhammad II. BN II 946.
As 563.
Conde p. 286 (pi. 1n, no. 6). Cimino p. 220 (fig. 30, bottom: r only). Rivero:M 143 (pi. m):
description inaccurate.
D.Garcia 6132: script not specified, ascribed to Muwahhids. B 1241. 566 maybe 565 misread.
of as of of 562. RF \fj y\
os as os of 562.
164
of as of of 563. rf as rf of 567.
rs as rs of 567.
of as of of 542. rf ^ 1/3 ^
.Xm ^) v.
os as os of 545.
BN II 947 (pi. x): l'-u- omitted from 2nd os (error). KM II 860. Tychsen, O. p. 128:
misread. Lagumina p. 105, no. 2: for -uUll in 1st rs (error). 61244,1245 (pi. xvm:
Ahmad ibn-Marzuq
called Ibn-ab1-'Umarah
pretending to be
681-682 by 'Abd-al-'Aziz I,
os as os of 562.
at Bijayah
No coins reported.
Presumably as 572.
B 1248 bis: m only. If mint is correctly given, this coin must have been struck in a.h. 683
572. Tunis (b rf) - double dinar: ornamented Kufi script. Plate III
of as of of 562. RF y\
os as os of 562.
RS <ul
BM X p. 11, no. 16od (pi. xx1). BN II 948 (pi. x), 949 (2 sp.). Longperier:^4 (pi. lv, no. 9).
D.Garcia 6133: for in 2nd rs (error ?), J^i. for in 3rd rs (error ?), mint
misspelled, script not specified, ascribed to Muwahhids. Lavoix:#p. 265 (pi. cxc1, no. 3):
description inaccurate. S.Gotha 992 (pi. xn). F.Hafsites 5 (pi. 1), 6 (2 sp.). B 1247-1249
(pi. xvIn: all; o and R of 1248 in piate belong to different specimens) (3 sp.): segments of
of as of of 563. rf u***
rs as rs of 572.
amir at Bijayah
i66
of as of of 542. rf as rf of 547.
os as os of 545.
575. Bijayah (6 of) - double dinar struck after a.h. 684: ornamented Kufi script.
As 575 (Fasmer I p. 213 reads <i for <ul in 3rd line of rf).
BN II 950 (pi. x): partly illegible, for in rf (illegible in piate). Lavoix:// p. 266
(pi. cxcn, no. 2): partly illegible, aJ-l for <Jl) in rf (disproved by piate).
As 577.
As 577 but with y \ shifted from top line of rf to end of 4th rs.
T?.Hafsites 14.
As 578.
No coins reported.
580. (mint ?) (b rf) - double dinar: ornamented Kufi script. Plate III
axil J\
os as os of 562.
No coins reported.
711-717 by Zakariya' I,
724-725 by Ibrahim,
Lagumina p. 106, no. 3: joull for ju^ll in 3rd rs, a} repeated before J\ in rf (errors?);
[ ? ] ^Mljc,
of as of of 542. rf Ji y\ iJ*>_ f\
BN II 960 (pi. x): os largely illegible, piate does not show OOjll reported at end of
4th RS.
of as of of 544. rf as rf of 582.
of <u JjJ\ RF y\
os as os of 562.
rs <ul Jc jf^ll
F :Hafsites 30.
RS <ul J* jTj^l
BN II 952 (pi. x), 955-957 (4 sp.). Lavoix:i/ p. 268 (pi. cxc1, no. 4): description incompiete.
As 584.
F .Hafsites 19.
As 584.
BN II 953, 954 (2 sp.). KM II 863: for j>wl in 3rd rs, rs divided differently (errors ?).
169
As 585a.
F .Hafsites 20 (pi. n), 21 (2 sp.): mint above 3rd line of rf (disproved by piate), rs as rs of 584
(disproved by piate).
587. Qafsah (b rf) - double dinar struck after capitulation in a.h. 735.
As 584.
BN II 958, 959 (2 sp.): ascribed to Bijyah. 0 2118 (pi. v1): ^^ll for Jb^ll in 2nd rs (dis-
As 587.
of as of of 563. rf as rf of 583.
ijf*. Oj^jll
of as of of 560. rf as rf of 583.
os as os of 560.
RS 0^j> jv>l
us*.
RS <u| ^.l^U)l
170
OF J_y_j jusw RF
os [ ? ] hi ctM1
-[?]-[?]
RS <1l1 j\ jvLiJI
os [ *ul r->
- [? ] - [ ? ]
RS [>]^l [ ? ] ^.Vl
- [ "? ] - [ ?~ ]
pretender
724-725 by Ibrahim,
No coins reported.
pretender
No coins reported.
pretender
No coins reported.
of as of of 584. RF ^ai*
os as os of 562.
rs as rs of 580.
of V RF jll jml
No segment inscriptions.
No coins reported.
os as os of 562.
rs as rs of 584.
As 597.
of Vl Jl V rf JjJl
<ul <-!>.
RS Oo^ll
lt^l
F :Hafsites 39.
am1r at Qusantinah
RS [ ? <at ytll ] [ ? ]
173
am1r at Bijayah
First reign:
OF as OF of 601. RF \
os as os of 584.
RS _raM Oi
603. Madinat (at end of 1st rs) Bijayah (at start of 2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate III
os as os of 562.
<tl xc jA
761-767 by Muhammad,
os as os of 562.
rs as rs of 562.
174
BN II 966 (pi. xi): a. before J* ^ in 3rd line of rf (error ?, blurred in piate), <ul< at end
of 1st rs (disproved by piate). F.Hafsites 41: y \ for jl twice in 3rd line of rf, segments
partly illegible.
As 604.
F.Hafsites 40 (pi. 1v): y\ for ^l twice in 3rd line of rf, segments partly illegible.
As 604.
BM V 161 (pi. 1n): rs rotated counterclockwise 90 degrees (disproved by piate), y_\ for^l
in middle of 3rd line of rf (piate seems to have y\ for ^l twice in 3rd line of rf).
As 604.
First reign:
os as os of 562.
rs as rs of 584.
BN II 963 (pi. x): ^l omitted from 2nd line of rf (engraving error), ascribed to al-Fadl.
175
No coins reported.
os as os of 584.
As 610 but with jl shifted from 2nd to start of 3rd line of rf.
F .Hafsites 43 (pi. 1v): mint uncertain in piate, which shows ^l for y \ in 3rd line of rf.
As 610.
As 611.
BN II 969 (pi. x1): mint poorly engraved. Lavoix:H p. 271 (pi. cxc1, no. 5; not, as given,
of as of of 583. RF ^.jli y\
OS ^\}
- prJl o*Ji ~ * * V
RS >i\ a._^ll
BM V 163 (pi. 1n): ji*U)| for ji*UIl in 2nd rs (error). Marsden 360 (pi. xx1): misread,
ascribed to Sharifs.
176
F.Hafsites 45 (pi. 1v): mint read as al-Hammah (disproved by piate), segments partly
illegible.
As 611.
Cimino (fig. 31, lower left: r only) may be this coin; o not shown or described, rs largely
As 616.
As 610.
As 615.
As 615.
F.Hafsites 52: weight of double dinar; 53, 54 (3 sp.): # added to end of 2nd line of rf
As 615.
BM V 164: 3rd line of of and all segments illegible; may be a poor specimen of 623 misread.
Segments illegible.
of as of of 601. RF as rf of 615.
os apparently as os of 615.
rs apparently as rs of 615.
os as os of 562.
rs as rs of 572.
BN II 944: ascribed to Muhammad I. Longperier:.4 (pi. lv, no. n). Lavoix:// p. 262
(pi. cxc1, no. 2): os not given, reconstructed from piate, ascribed to Muhammad I. Blancard
amir at Bijayah
of as of of 584. rf J* y \
(jOji\ jr|
os apparently as os of 584.
Soret:D93 (pi. n, no. 12): os tentatively reconstructed from piate; u^ji\ j*\ given for
12
os apparently as os of 584.
rs illegible.
RS JJljJloil Jcjj^dl
BN II 975 (pi. xi): jf iox j jf m top line of rf. F:Hafsites 57 (pi. v): segments illegible,
of as of of 583. rf ^.1
os illegible.
rs- j. - jTjil
Oil
BN II 976: segments largely illegible, mint uncertain, jf. for in top line of rf;
1st os starts in a rs (both tentative). F:Hafsites 58: 1st os starts ^Vl (misprint
03 as os of 562.
rs oil jc jTydl
Oil Jj ^ JOkUll
Presumably as 628.
BN II977 (pi. x1): segments clipped off, for j yf. in top line of rf, piate shows traces of mint.
Sacy p. 541: segments illegible, size not indicated, slightly misread, ascribed to Marinid.
Presumably as 628.
Segments illegible.
F:Hafsites 60.
179
os illegible.
rs as rs of 630.
637. Jaza'ir (b rf) - double dinar: modified Kuf1 script. Plate III
j. oil j\ 1 yJ\
os [ ? ^] j\ .on p-j
BN II 974 (pi. x1): segments partly illegible, for in 3rd line of rf. KM II 861
KM II 862: engraving errors, jf for jjl- in 3rd line of rf. Weyl:P" 6744 (pi. xln) (2 sp.):
of *u RF o-p y\
Segments illegible.
B 1255 (pi. x1x):j** for-ol in 4th line of rf (disproved by piate), 1st rs starts <ul
RS Jl ^a-JI <uI ^
BN II 972 (pi. x1): j). I for ^1 in 3rd line of rf (piate seems to show ^1).
18*
I8o
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
[ctjutljl] l^Vl
OS- [ ? ] - [ ? ]
RS [? J^jTjdl
- -l [ ? ] - [ ? ]
Segments illegible.
No inscriptions in segments.
181
No coins reported.
No gold reported.
No coins reported.
No coins are known to have been struck by the many independent Hafsid amirs who
flourished between the death of 'Uthman in a.h. 893 and the end of Hafsid rule in a.H. 982,
nor by local Arab and Berber rebels, while coins struck by the Ottoman sultans and their
local Turkish allies, and those struck by Spanish and Portuguese rulers, are excluded from
this corpus.
Z1yan1d Gold
the Banu-Ziyan
in Naskhi script.
Anonymous gold (Hafsid style) presumably struck by this ruler under nominal
182
rs ^Ulj^iy1j >VljJjVly,
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
646. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate IV
OF pi-J\ |*-! ^ 06
OS 4)lVjUlj 4)l^lj
prJ\ - j* 1\
RS (mint) ii oc y
BN II 1010. Demaeght v. VII, p. 66 (fig.). Berchem p. 326, no. 1, 2 (2 sp.): 4)l shifted
from 1st to start of 2nd rs (error ?). B 1323 (pi. xxn, under no. 1322): ascribed to Marinids,
mint given as Mad1nat Fas (error), segments illegible, apparently this coin misread; 1395
647. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
oiIVI<))IV jrj^
183
OS rQlj
rs as rs of 646.
BN II 1012.
648. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar. Attribution very doubtful.
Plate IV
afij
AVl5>V, aJl^.E ? ]
ajtil Jl Uil a\
RS (mint) at. -j
BM V 195 (pi. v): last line of rf starts <ul (error), for in 4th line of rf
(error). BN II 1on: last line of rf starts u J^l\} (error). Soret:F 137 (pi. n): segments
slightly misread. 0 2125: last line of rf starts <ul jf\ L(error). B 1396 (pi. xxv): last
649. Madinat (in 1st rs) Jaza'ir (2nd rs) - double dinar. Attribution very doubtful.
As 648.
B 1396 bis.
No coins reported.
650. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate IV
184
os as os of 647.
rs as rs of 646.
651. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - dinar. Attribution tentative.
oil ^f-y
os |X lj oil L, U
oil ^ l^s (y
rs as rs of 646.
pretender
No coins reported.
652. Mad1nat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
Oulll jryil
os as os of 647.
rs as rs of 646.
B 1394 (pi. xxv): description incompiete, division into lines and segments not indicated;
tentatively reconstructed from partly illegible piate; name of ruler uncertain, ascribed to
Yaghmurasan.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
185
653. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
rs as rs of 646.
<lll Ol t/ul ll jl
Segments illegible.
655. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate IV
OS^Jl^jl
B 1326,1327 (pi. xxn: both) (2 sp.): piate partly illegible, os misread, ascribed to Marinids.
I86
656. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
rs as rs of 646.
Jjlj J^-Jl'
rs as rs of 646.
a.H. 813-814
OF
RF
J6
rs (mint) j
a.D. 14II-14II
.V
jfydl nil
<u| Jc
No coins reported.
659. Madinat (in 3rd rs) Tilimsan (4th rs) - double dinar.
OS ^ po-jl -
RS v> p>
(mint) iioe
D.Lorichs 4725: division into lines and segments not indicated, iyr a} for juIjII (error).
660. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate IV
olj)I o-c
u\l-ll .A*1
rs as rs of 646.
HSA 10622.
661. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
Moyse 2: Ji^ll for jT/ll in 2nd line of rf (misprint ?). B 1397 (pi. xxv, unnumbered): de-
662. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tilimsan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
of as of of 659. rf as rf of 660.
oS Oil +j .Oil ^
RS (mint) our o
i88
663. Madinat (in 2nd rs) Tilimsan (3rd rs) - double dinar. Plate IV
(jr<ilinll jy>\
os as OS of 655.
RS ii ac y
Rivero: . 4 p. 13, no. 2 (pi. v). Rivero:M 145 (pi. 1n): several slight errors. B 1399 (pi. xxv):
3+ l Je jfell <al
Ol j>.l iJc
os not given.
(mint) ^ f?-
Brosselard p. III.
665. Madinat (in 2nd rs) Tilimsan (3rd rs) - double dinar.
l |^ll
^ J til| OiJ
rs as rs of 663.
<julu.il j^l ^
189
666. Madinat (in 2nd rs) Tilimsan (3rd and 4th rs) - dinar.
os o* |X k>
<il o*
RS U ^
os illegible.
668. Madinat (in 2nd os) Tilimsan (3rd os) - half dinar.
OF Vl Jl V RF till aji
RS Uj
<"l o** O*
669. Madinat (in 2nd os) Tilimsan (3rd and 4th os) - half dinar. Attribution tentative.
of Vl i V RF -Us y\
OS ii OC. >_>
oL. lr
RS <U|
r~Jl - o*J\
BN II 1015 (pi. xm): margins interchanged (error), mint largely illegible, ascribed to
Muhammad VI or VII.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
Sulayman I ibn-Salim I
670. Madinat (in 2nd rs) (mint in 3rd rs illegible, presumably Tilimsan) - double dinar.
os apparently as os of 655.
rs iiue J
BN II 987: segments partly illegible, j,\ for ^1 in 4th line of rf (error), ascribed to
Sulayman the Marinid. L:Khedivial p. 329: segments partly illegible, ascribed to Sulayman
the Marinid. Ascribed by Prieto (p. 86) to an unidentified vassal of the Ziyanids.
No coins reported.
Sulayman I ibn-Salim I
671. Madinat (in 2nd rs) Tilimsan (3rd rs) - double dinar. Plate IV
oil JU> jI
<**>j oil J I
os as os of 655.
rs as rs of 670.
BN II 986 (pi. xn): for ^1 in 4th line of of and of rf (disproved by piate), ascribed
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
192
672. Madinat (in 2nd RS) Tilimsan (3rd and 4th rs) - half dinar.
of as of of 669. rf -u**j, l
Cr~
os as rs of 669.
rs as os of 669.
No coins are known to have been struck by local Arab and Berber rulers, while coins
struck by the Ottoman sultans and their local Turkish allies, and those struck by Spanish
Mar1n1d Gold
the Banu-Marin
The Marinids from time to time controlled areas of varying extent in Spain, but no
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
Anonymous gold (Hafaid style) presumably struck by this ruler and his successor
under nominal Hafsid suzerainty, chiefly before the conquest of Marrakush in a.h. 668
OF Vl 4)l V rf *u d1ll
RS ^ Vl jvJl Lj
F :Hafsites 66. This mint seems improbable, historically, although Farrugia affirms its cor-
rectness by letter.
H6st:F and N 1 (pi. xxxm): no mint given, piate seems to indicate this mint, without
Madinat.
As 674.
<u dil1j
As 674.
P 34d. BM V 215 (pi. v), 216 (2 sp.). BN II 1019, 1020 (2 sp.): probably this coin with os
misread. Soret:F 135. Weyl:G 1215. S:Karabaczek 924. B 1349, 1352-1355 (pi. xx1v:
1352-1355; coin illustrated under no. 1349 in pi. xxm is H 10) (5 sp.).
13
i94
RS alj <)l
B 1356 (pi. xx1v), 1357 (pi. xx1n, under no. 1381; coin illustrated under no. 1357 in pi. xx1v
of as rf of 673. RF <u
tul Vl Sy
rs as rs of 679.
B 1380 bis (pi. xx1v, under no. 1357; coin illustrated under no. 1380 bis is 691): description
inaccurate.
P 38e: for in 1st rs (error), os as 677 (error ?). BM X p. 30, no. 224a.
rs Oi\ iy j*
rij* Cf*J
B 1371: description uncertain. This coin must be rejected, or possibly classed with the
hybrid gold.
As 674.
ANS. P 34b. BM V 217, 218 (2 sp.). BN II 1023. H6st: and N 2 (pi. xxxm): apparently
this mint. Soret:.F 135 note. Lavoix:ff p. 273 (pi. cxc1, no. 6): slightly misread. B 1341,1342,
1342 bis (pi. xx1v, under no. 1358, 1359; coins illustrated under no. 1341, 1342 in pi. xxm
As 674,
KM II 868.
til jjd)|
-U.l Vl iy V
BM V 221.
of as of of 674. rf as rf of 684.
os as os of 681.
rs as rs of 673.
As 679.
As 676.
P38b: ^Ul for _raJl in 1st rs (error). BN II 1024: j shifted from 3rd to start of 4th rs
(error ?).
of as of of 673. rf jT^Jl
ulI J*
OS <UI ^. ...
- jT^1 - r)
RS oil j^,
689. Marrakush - double dinar struck presumably in, or shortly after, a.h. 668.
As 674.
of uoJ.I rf
os (mint) j [ ? ]
RS oil j*\
B 1368, 1369 (2 sp.): description incompiete. This coin and its mint must be considered
dubious.
As 674.
p. 88, no. 4. Sotheby 395. S:Karabaczek 923: description incompiete. S.Gotha 995 (pi. xn).
0 2119-2121 (3 sp.). F:Hafsites 67, 68 (2 sp.). B 1298 (pi. xx1), 1299 ? (pi. xx1): both
13*
196
OF <ul <I V RF
<ul J JJ JUPt*
<o dill
P 37 (pi. v). B 1381 (pi. xx1v, under no. 1380 bis; coin illustrated under no. 1381 in pi. xxm
is 679): os uncertain.
As 679.
B 1383 (pi. xx1v; coin illustrated under no. 1383 in pi. xxm is half of 694 and half of 698):
description inaccurate.
As 680.
B 1384 (pi. xxm, under no. 1382 top half and no. 1383 top half): description inaccurate,
P 38a (pi. v): jJd\ for in 1st rs (error). BM V 224. L:Khedivial p. 330. F.Hafsites 69.
B 1373 (pi. xx1v, under no. 1372 and 1373) (2 sp. illustrated, though only 1 recorded).
As 681.
of as of of 673. rf as rf of 684.
os as rs of 679.
P 39: for j^rJl in 1st rs (error). BM X p. 30, no. 224c: <ul for <u in top line of rf (mis-
print). B 1372 (coin illustrated under no. 1372 in pi. xx1v is 695).
of as of of 673. rf oi-l
As 676.
cnlUl
JUJM Oll
LX Lie
B 1382 (pi. xxm, under no. 1382 bottom half and no. 1383 bottom half).
Segments illegible.
BM X p. 32, no. 224g: for <y in 2nd line of rf (error, corrected by John Walker).
As 688.
of as of of 673. rf Jf yJl
oil
til SjJl
OS ^ Uj
rs as rs of 688.
of as of of 673. rf L_,
oil ^
RS Oll O* -r*
of as of of 673. rf as rf of 702.
rs as rs of 688.
BM X p. 32, no. 224p (pi. xxm), 224q (2 sp.). Dorn II p. 66, no. 2 (pi. 1): os misread, partly
illegible. B 1374 (pi. xx1v): diameter of quarter dinar, os uncertain. Fasmer I p. 212 suggests
that these coins are specimens of 702 misread; the piate in Brethes disproves this.
OF c>\ RF ilTjt,
os <u j&d1
rs as rs of 688.
BN II 1039: os not described. B 1385: diameter of quarter dinar, division into lines and
OF RF &j
No segments.
OF <llI RF
No segments.
HSA13174. P43 (pi. v). BN II 1041: diameter of eighth dinar. Conde (pi. nl, no. 9). S:Gotha
this coin). F:Hafsites 70. B 1377 (coin illustrated under no. 1377 in pi. xx1v is 708).
OF <lll, RF 111
No segments.
B 1378.
OF <llI RF <lll
No segments.
OF RF <1l1.
No segments.
P 44. BN II 1040.
OF 11I Jc RF jZij
y^
No segments.
F :Ha/sites 72 (8 sp.).
199
of as OF of 710. RF
No segments.
OF oil RF as RF of 710.
No segments.
F:Ha/sites 71.
No coins reported.
See also anonymous gold (Hafsid style) listed under Abu-Bakr 673-712 but struck
oilVUlV jlljj^l
OS V <)I ^Ij
rs as rs of 674.
B 1274 (pi. xx), 1274 bis, 1274 ter (3 sp.): *u\, for <u in 2nd line of rf (disproved by piate).
os as rs of 679.
200
os as rs of 674.
rs as rs of 679.
P45d, and note: _^LJl for _raJl in 4th line of rf (error), description incompiete. BM V 204:
<ul for )1 in 2nd rs (engraving error). BN II 1018. KM II 866. B 1366: <ul for 4)l in 2nd rs
As 715.
As 715.
201-203 (3 Sp.). KM II 865 (pi. v): slight engraving errors. D.Garcia 6647: description
P 45c (pi. v): jUl for j^.M in 4th line of rf, os as rs of 679 and 715 (both disproved by
As 717 but with Jo of J>1i\} shifted from 3rd to start of 4th rs, and with 4))l shifted
BM V 196.
As 717.
P 4sb: for in 4th line of rf, os as rs of 679 and 715 (both errors). BM V 199: *i\
BN II 1022.
201
BM V 197,198 (2 sp.). B 1367 (pi. xxn1, under no. 1341 and 1342) (2 sp. illustrated, though
only 1 recorded).
As 715.
P 45a, and note: _^U| for ^aJl in 4th line of rf (error), description incompiete. BM
V 204a.
As 715 but with ^ of JbU\j shifted from 2nd to start of 3rd os, and V from 3rd to
BN II 1027.
As 721.
Anderson.
P 45a: for in 4th line of rf (error), os as rs of 679 and 715 (error ?). BM V
B 1361: 3rd and 4th lines of rf not described. This coin is probably a poor specimen of 725
misread.
No coins reported.
No coins reported. Coins frequently ascribed to this ruler are listed under the later Ziyanid
726. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammiir (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
202
727. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sabtah (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
As 726.
728. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Sijilmasah (in 2nd line of rf) - double dinar.
of as of of 726. rf i, js_
rs (mint) ojic v
P 73. BM X p. 14, no. 165h: rs partly illegible, juIIj for 4Jl in 3rd line of of (error ?).
730. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (2nd rs) - double dinar.
P 72.
731. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (2nd rs) - double dinar.
(mint) iiac ja
P 74 (pi. vm): rs given as rs of 729 (corrected from piate, partly by Fasmer I p. 215), mint
illegible on piate.
732. Madinat (in-1st rs) Sijilmasah (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
P 71b. BM X p. 14, no. 165g (pi. xx1): 1st rs not described (legible on piate), Jui-l) for -ui-l in
733. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
729.
Cf- (mint)
of as of of 726. rf
203
OF Vl <)l V
RF
<U JuiI
os as rs of 697.
rs as rs of 731.
B 1277 (pi. xx): m only, reconstructed from piate, 4th rs partly illegible.
Plate V
HSA 10623. P 69 (pi. vm). BM X p. 15, no. 165m (pi. xx1): juilj for jJ-\ in 3rd line of of
738. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
P 71a. BM X p. 14, no. 165i: .d-lj for -ull in 3rd line of of (error ?), 1st rs not described
739. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
As 726.
P 70a. BM X p. 15, no. 165I: -ull} for jJI in 3rd line of of (error ?). BN II 990 (pi. xn).
Dombay p. 789: os not described, divisions not indicated. B 1276 (pi. xx): reconstructed
from piate.
740. Madinat (in 1st os and 1st rs) Fas (in 1st line of of and of rf) - double dinar.
741. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar.
B 1280 (pi. xx): ascribed to date of death, description incompiete, reconstructed from piate.
As 732.
204
742. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - dinar.
of as of of 734. rf <ul jl
^ if ^
BM X p. 16, no. 165X (pi. xx1): rs partly illegible. Dombay p. 788: o:. added to 3rd rs
(error ?), divisions not indicated. B 1328: JUr for y\ in 4th rs (error ?), ascribed to 'Uth-
man III.
743. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - dinar.
(jc <aI W-
P 76: Vl at end of 1st os (error ?). BN II 991: Vl at end of 1st os (error ?). Demaeght v. X,
p. 232 (fig.): 4th rs illegible. B 1278 (pi. xx): m only, reconstructed from piate.
of as of of 734. rf <tl x
a j^ij <1l1
rs (mint) iioc
y\ oil Vul
r&1 - j.jJ1
rs not described.
B 1281: division into lines and segments not indicated; as no reason is given for the ascription
Segments illegible.
B 1273 (pi. xx): description inaccurate, ascribed to 'Uthman I, 1329: 'Uthman omitted
205
amir at Sijilmasah
No coins reported.
746. Madinat (in 1st os) Azammur (2nd os, spelt Azamwar) - dinar.
OS (mint) i<_Jir ja
JU" 41il
- rrJ\ crJ\ - * J| V
747. Madinat (in 1st os) Azammur (2nd os, spelt al-Zamwar) - dinar. Plate V*
<ul Vl <ll V
os as os of 746.
rs as rs of 746.
P 54: of divided differently (error ?). BM X p. 32, no. 224f (pi. xm, under no. 224e).
748. Madinat (in 1st os) Azammur (2nd os, spelt al-Zamwar) - dinar.
<fll H\ iy V
P 53. BM X p. 31, no. 224e (coin illustrated under no. 224e in pi. xxm is 747): <ul for a
206
rs as rs of 746.
P 47 (pi. v1).
Struck probably before the defeat at Tarifa in a.h. 740 (a.d. 1340).
750. Madfnat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (2nd rs) - double dinar.
41llJ^-jO*^ OllVl_JlfiVj
os as rs of 746.
rs as os of 746.
751. Mad1nat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (2nd rs) - double dinar.
Juska Jc <U|
jj-lj
Oil Vl <lt V
BM V 209.
752. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (2nd rs) - double dinar.
of as of of 749. rf as rf of 750.
os as rs of 746.
rs as os of 746.
754. Mad1nat (in 1st rs) Fas (2nd rs) - double dinar.
(mint) ooc ^
<ul Vl Jlc V
os as rs of 746.
rs as os of 749.
P 46 (pi. v).
J^JJIJ J>l
OS -
(JO^ <lll j
RS
P 50b: jwLJl for in 1st os (error). B 1358, 1359 (coins illustrated under no. 1358 and
1359 in pi. xx1v are 682) (2 sp.). This coin may be 756a misread.
As 756 but with .oil shifted from 3rd to end of 2nd OS.
0 2126: misread, rs illegible. B 1343, 1344 (pi. xxm: both) (2 sp.): description inaccurate,
As 756.
P 50a (pi. v1): _^Ul for j-aJl in 1st os (error). BM X p. 29, no. 223d (pi. xxm). B 1363:
description inaccurate.
ul Vl Jlc V
rs as os of 756.
208
ill rj I*
Struck presumably after the conquest of Tilimsan in a.h. 737 (a.d. 1337).
759.
rs as os of 749.
F.Hafsites 63: * before mint. B 1340 (pi. xxm): description incompiete, mint given as
760. Madinat Tilimsan (b of) - double dinar struck between a.h. 737 and 749. Plate V
As 759.
As 759.
L :Calvert 52.
762. Hadrat Tunis (6 rf) - double dinar struck in a.h. 748 or 749.
As 759.
763. Jaza'ir (b rf) - double dinar struck between a.h. 748 and 750.
As 759.
B 1345.
B 1350, 1351 (2 sp.) (pi. xxm: 1351, obverse only, reproduced twice; coin illustrated under
P 49d. BN II 1021: <u ^Vlj instead of <ul fyllj in 5th line of rf (error ?).
ANS. P 49b. BM V 211-213 (3 sp.): 5th line of of misread. BN II1025,1026 (2 sp.): <u _^V| j
As 759.
As 759.
209
As 759.
769. Bijayah (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar struck after a.h. 753.
of as of of 749. rf (mint)
Oil JU y,\
os as rs of 746.
rs as os of 749.
P 77f: rf incorrectly divided. B 1287, 1288 (pi. xx1) (2 sp.): description incompiete, re-
770. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Tilimsan (in 2nd line of rf) - double dinar struck after
y\ (mint)
P 77d and note. BM V 187. Spink (1901) 68388: m only. S:White 2192. B 1294 (pi. xxi):
description inaccurate.
771. Sijilmasah (in 1st and 2nd lines of rf, divided i- / UU-.) - double dinar.
P 77c and note. BN II1003. B 1290 (pi. xx1; coin illustrated under no. 1290 in pi. xx is 776):
description inaccurate.
772. Mad1nat (in 1st line of rf) Sijilmasah (in 2nd line of rf) - double dinar.
Cf (mint)
ul ox ^.1
t>jlU)l v_,j
P77b: rf incorrectly divided. BM V186. BNII 1oo4: without *l\jin 2nd line of of (error?)
14
210
773. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Sijilmasah (in 2nd line of rf) - double dinar.
774. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Fas (in 2nd line of Rf) - double dinar.
As 770.
775. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Fas (in 2nd line of rf) - double dinar. Plate V
P 77a (pi. vn1). BM V 183-185 (pi. 1v: 184) (3 sp.). Soret:F 136 (pi. n): ^Ul for ouUl
in 5th line of rf (engraving error), ascription by Fraehn. Demaeght v. VII, p. 133 (fig.).
Rivero:M 144 (pi. m). B 1289 (pi. xx1, under left no. 1289; coin illustrated under right
776. Mad1nat (in 1st line of rf) Marrakush (in 2nd line of Rf) - double dinar.
As 775.
P 77e: Madinat omitted (error ?). B 1292 (pi. xx, under no. 1290; coin illustrated under
no. 1292 in pi. xx1 is 785): description incomplete, reconstructed from piate.
<Jll JLC jA f
JO*
778. Madinat (in 1st rs) Bijayah (2nd rs) - double dinar struck after a.h. 753. Plate V
rs as os of 746.
P 79d. BM V 193 (pi. iv): jS^JLlj for in 3rd line of of (disproved by piate).
This misreading is common to all published descriptions of all coins in this series.
779. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (2nd RS) - double dinar.
As 778.
of Vl 4)1V RF o->
ul <]yi
P80.
211
782. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (2nd rs) - double dinar.
of as of of 778.
rf as rf of 778.
os as os of 759.
rs as rs of 754.
BM V 190. BN II1009. Dombay p. 790: ^jli omitted (error ?), slightly misread, division
783. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (2nd rs) - double dinar.
B 1286 (pi. xx1, under right no. 1289): description incompiete, reconstructed from piate.
784. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (2nd rs) - double dinar.
As 778.
P 79a. BM V 189.
785. Madinat (in 1st rs) Marrakush (2nd rs) - double dinar.
P 79b (pi. 1x). BM V 192. S.Gotha 994. B (pi. xx1, under no. 1292): not described, recon-
Apparently as 780.
of as of of 780. rf k V^l
No segments.
Dombay p. 791: division into lines not indicated; must be tentatively rejected because of
As 778.
pretender
a.h. 759-759
a.D. 1358-1358
No coins reported.
14*
787. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar. Attribution tentative.
o Jur <ul
P 88: for ^l in 4th line of rf (error), ascribed to Muhammad IV. BM X p. 19, no. I71t
(pi. xxn): a.l for ^l in 4th line of rf (error), 5th line of of partly illegible, ascribed to al-
Rashid ibn-al-Sa'Id.
788. Madinat (in 1st rs) ? (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar. Plate V
B 1295 (pi. xx1): description incompiete, reconstructed from piate, 3rd and 4th os and 2nd
and 3rd lines of rf largely illegible, mint given as Madinat Fas (error), wrongly ascribed.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
213
789. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sala (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
OS -U Jc <U| J\ {jTJ\ ~J
rs as rs of 787.
P 87 (pi. 1x): for lin 2nd line of of (disproved by piate), ascribed to Muhammad
790. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
of <iLi ja -X U ul rf as rf of 789.
ljt**" "J
B 1307, 1308 (pi. xxn: both) (2 sp.): piate partly illegible, ascribed to Muhammad IV.
791. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
792. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas ? (in 2nd rs) - dinar. Attribution tentative.
am1r at Sijilmasah
793. Madinat Sijilmasah (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar. Plate V
L l i>>l_,l|
214
os as rs of 746.
P 81: ^1 for y \ in 5th line of rf (error). BM X p. 27, no. 193ee (pi. xxn).
794. Madinat Tilimsan (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar struck after conquest in a.h. 7;
VjJl JU cftJuJil
os as rs of 746.
rs as os of 749.
As 794.
P 82a. BM V 167 (pi. 1v, r only): for <ll in 2nd os (engraving error). S:White 2190: 4)
As 794, but with a) shifted from 4th to end of 3rd line of rf.
j^uj .Oil
799. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Fas (in 2nd line of rf) - dinar.
OF <U-ul-l RF OJC.Uji
os as rs of 746.
RS illlxc^Vl L.J
- r&>\ - j-jJl
800. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Azammur (in 2nd line of rf, spelt al-Zamwar) - dinar.
VlaIlV ^ (mint)
f^)l * Vl 4)l ^
RS L* ^ ^aJl Ly
801. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Fas (in 2nd line of rf) - dinar.
Vl <)l V, y\ 1* (mint)
os as os of 800.
RS Oll Xc ^ Vl j^\\*)
- ,Xil - j->Jl
ju** Jc <ul
os as os of 800.
P96.
2l6
of Vl <ll V RF
v cf
Jjr\ <il1
OS ll {j jA,
rlJ1
RS
<ul (mint)
of as OF of 803. RF [ ? ] url
os as os of 803.
rs illegible.
806. Sijilmasah (in 1st and 2nd rs, divided i- / U*-) - double dinar.
j^i:T,nll
OF
RF
*u <JuJl J
os as os of 800.
HSA 13176.
.Ul all) J
217
r*c
B 1316: description uncertain, division into lines and segments not indicated.
ml -LC
Moysep. 503.
A double dinar is ascribed to this ruler with date 788, and is said to be of the type of BM V 68
(a Murabit dinar dated 539) by the following: S:Judice III 6950; Spink 33305. As the re-
ference is wrong and the date extremely unlikely, this coin must be tentatively rejected.
810. Madinat Azammur (in 1st line of rf, spelt Azamwar) - double dinar.
0_JJL\J\ Ulll a\
P 94c: segments incorrectly divided, Madinat omitted (error). BM V 178. B 1314 (pi. xxn):
811. Madinat (in 2nd rs) Azammur (3rd rs) - double dinar.
of as of of 802. rf <ul w /I j
tOil Oi I
os as os of 800.
rs as rs of 803.
P 95 note. BM V 172 (pi. 1v): <ul for <u in 3rd line of of (engraving error).
812. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammur (2nd rs, spelt al-Zammur) - double dinar.
(mint) t jut,
, JL" <ul j
BM V 173.
218
813. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammur (2nd Rs, spelt al-Zamwar) - double dinar.
BM V 177.
814. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammur (2nd Rs, spelt al-Zamwar) - double dinar.
As 812.
P 95 note (pi. x). BM V 174 (pi. Iv, r only), 175 (2 sp.). BN II 999.
815. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammur (2nd rs, spelt Azamwar) - double dinar.
816. Madinat (in 1st rs), Azammur (2nd RS, spelt Azamwar) - double dinar.
P 95 note. BM V 176.
817. Madinat (in 2nd rs) Azammur (3rd Rs, spelt Azammu) - dinar.
os as os of 800.
rs as rs of 803.
P 101: ) omitted from 2nd line of of (error ?). BM X p. 20, no. 181d: l*j* for U-in
4th rs (engraving error). S:White 2191 (pi. 1): description incompiete, piate obscure.
818. Madinat (in 1st rs) Tatwan (2nd rs) - double dinar.
Presumably as 812.
os as os of 808.
rs as os of 800.
B 1312: description of of uncertain, division into lines and segments not indicated.
P95.
of as of of 801.
KF
Jjr\ <u|
j^i) Oll
os as os of 803.
219
^ - crJ\ yv1
BN II1000: rs as os of 800 (error ?). Rivero:^4 p. 13, no. 1 (pi. v): os obscure in piate.
As 821, but with of ^Ulj shifted from 2nd to start of 3rd os.
HSA 13179. P 93 (pi. 1x): segments incorrectly divided (corrected from piate by Fasmer I
p. 215).
BM V 179 (pi. 1v, r only). BM X p. 20, no. 176a: description inadequate, corrected by John
of 3rd line,
os as os of 800.
rs as os of 808.
<Ul o-c y\
J Ui1
os as os of 800.
rs as os of 808.
HSA 13177. P 94a: rf as rf of 810 (error). BM V 180. BN II 1001. B 1311 (pi. xxn):
coin.
description incompiete, reconstructed from partly illegible piate. Thorburn: apparently this
ail j*&A\
Oulill j<a\
.oil
220
os as os of 800.
rs (mint) j
<S|
os as os of 808.
rs as os of 800.
os as os of 800.
rs as rs of 803.
sayyid at Marrakush
OF rf Jfy Jj <ul
221
of <ut< Vl RF juJl
?' <ul ^c
OS jtij ml y j*.
P 91: all but 4th os illegible. BN II 1002 (pi. xn): 3rd os not described, rs misread, mint
uncertain. B 1317, 1318 (pi. xxn: both) (2 sp.): rs misread, mint uncertain.
833. Madinat Fas (in 1st line of rf) - double dinar. Plate VI
Oil jl j\
os as os of 800.
rs as os of 808.
P 105. BM V 182 (pi. 1v): ^.y misread as J*-l (?). B 1322 (coin illustrated under no.
OF Vl <ll V RF xo yljo
RS <L-LC V
B 1324 (pi. xxn): f or OvLll 2nd line of rf (disproved by piate), oF and rs uncertain.
Ol| -Utf y\ ^
Owlll JUmh
axilJ\ Ui.l a
os not described.
rs as os of 808.
B 1325: division into lines and segments not indicated. Seaby G993: mint and ruler only.
222
No coins reported.
<1ll J-C y\
oil ,,'l.tl
os as os of 808.
rs as os of 800.
837. Madinat (in 1st rs) Marrakush (2nd rs) - double dinar.
of as of of 823. rf hi dill
<u H1 J
<ul Vl <)l Vj
B 1296 (coin illustrated under no. 1296 in pi. xx1 is 845): ascribed to 'Abd-al-'Aziz I,
division into lines and segments not indicated, -uJI for kVy. in 3rd rs (error ?).
838. Madinat (in 1st rs) Marrakush (in 2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate VI
<u jui-l
tii SjJlj
<u jCjlj
839. Madinat (in 1st line of rf) Marrakush (2nd line of rf) - double dinar.
(mint)
(JCa_)ll jv>\
B 1305: ascribed to 'Abd-al-'AzIz I, of uncertain, division into lines and segments not
indicated.
840. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammiir (in 2nd Rs, spelt al-Zammur) - double dinar.
Ml iy JljJl JUS
BM X p. 33, no. 226b (pi. xxm): j omitted from 2nd and 3rd lines of of (disproved by piate).
841. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammiir (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
842. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammiir (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
B 1301 (pi. xx1, under no. 1300): segments partly illegible, ascribed to 'Abd-al-'Aziz I.
<U ui-lj
B 1301 bis: division into lines and segments not indicated, ascribed to 'Abd-al-'Aziz I.
of - Vl i\ V rf as rf of 840.
<ttl (J J JUsm
B 1303 (pi. xx1): description inaccurate, reconstructed from partly illegible piate, ascribed
to 'Abd-al-'Aziz I.
845. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate VI
As 841.
P 106a (pi. x): for in 4th os (misprint ?, obscure in piate). B 1300 (pi. xxi,
under no. 1296; coin illustrated under no. 1300 is 842): os uncertain, ascribed to 'Abd-al-
'Aziz I.
846. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (2nd rs) - double dinar.
of 2nd line.
OS ju Jc .oil J*, j* J\ ul
rs (mint) ii. oc ^
847. Mad1nat (in 1st rs) [Fas] (2nd rs) - double dinar.
848. Mad1nat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - dinar.
of VI 4)I V rf as rf of 840.
-u%* oil
.till Jj-j
OS Jc ul j*j\ .oil ^
P107. BN II995,996 (2 sp.): ascribed to 'Abd-al-'Aziz I, -u** added to 2nd rs (misprint ?).
849. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd RS) - dinar.
BM V 225.
of as of of 848. rf j>\ f
os y VI j^ci\ Uj
pXU j.jJI
RS (mint) iioc ja
JL <u\
'Aziz I.
225
Apparently as 850.
BN II 997 (pi. xn): ascribed to 'Abd-al-'Aziz I, segments largely illegible. Weyl:G 1230:
description incomplete.
<ul *JuJ
Segments illegible.
of as of of 848. RF O-c
oil
os as os of 848.
rs illegible.
B 1306: division into lines not indicated. Inscription is so improbable that this coin must be
tentatively rejected.
<UI .Jul
os xc ^ [VI] Uj]
^1 J,jJI <ul
RS <ol[?] [?]^l
<Jll Jil
Hafsid style
855. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammur (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
RS as rs of 840.
P 11Oc.
15
226
856. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammiir (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
As 855, but with l~ of shifted from 2nd to start of 3rd rs, and JLr from 3rd to
857. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
As 855.
P nob.
858. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate VI
BM X p. 25, no. 193t (pi. xxn): as 855 (disproved by piate). B 1283 (pi. xx): segments
859. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
As 855.
Hafsid style
860. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sabtah (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
of as of of 842. rf Ji\ *
<il t|
os as os of 855.
rs as rs of 840.
HSA 9173: segments partly illegible. P 109: os incorrectly divided. BM X p. 26, no. 193cC
861. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
<ul a>J
P 108b (pi. x). B 1272 (pi. xx): description uncertain, piate largely illegible, ascribed to
'Uthman I.
862. Madinat (in 1st rs) Sijilmasah (in 2nd rs) - double dinar: modified Kuf1 script.
As 861.
B 1271 (pi. xx): description uncertain, piate largely illegible, ascribed to 'Uthman I, o and r
863. Madinat (in 1st RS) Sijilmasah (2nd rs) - double dinar.
os as os of 861.
227
rs as rs of 846.
864. Mad1nat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
As 861.
P 108a. B 1284 (pi. xx): description inaccurate and uncertain, piate partly illegible, wrongly
ascribed.
865. Madinat (in 1st rs) Fas (in 2nd rs) - double dinar. Plate VI
866. Madinat (in 1st rs) Marrakush (in 2nd rs) - double dinar.
As 861.
P 108c.
of as of of 848. rf oL*>
Oil aJkl
os and rs (identical):
_ <ir -
No coins reported.
No gold reported.
ir,*
Nasrid Gold
by the Banii-Nasr
of Granada (Gharnatah)
in Naskhi script.
The Nasrids controlled Sabtah from a.h. 705 to 709 and from 786 to 789.
This ruler struck no coins in Africa. The only coin struck by him which falls within
the scope of this survey is one bearing the name of his Hafsid suzerain before he declared
his independence in a.h. 647, and it is therefore listed with Hafsid coins: 556.
868. Madinat (in 2nd os) Sabtah (3rd os) - double dinar. Plate VI
os cji,
<u\ (mint)
Wattasid Gold
the Banu-Wattas
in Naskhi script.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
No coins reported.
869. Madinat (in 1st rs) Azammur (2nd rs) - dinar. Attribution tentative.
os illegible.
Not described.
OF u JuL\ RF
Margins illegible.
BM X p. 28, no. 193ft (pi. xx1n): <ul for <u in 1st line of of (misprint).
No gold reported.
Not described.
No coins reported.
Coins struck by the Sharifian rivals and successors of the Wattasids, and those struck
Ottoman Gold
the Banu-Uthman
of Istanbul (al-Qustant1nah).
Ottoman coins in general fall outside the scope of this corpus. The only exceptions to
this rule are two gold coins struck in the name of the Ottoman sultan by the later Ziyanid
rulers, which are therefore listed under the latter dynasty: 670, 671.
231
Hybrid Gold
in which an obverse and a reverse not intended for use together are accidentally or fraudul-
ently combined.
Muwahhid style
H3. Obverse like 506, but with iiiil for UiI in 3rd os; reverse of 522. Plate VI
V 2074: Ull for aiill in 3rd os (error), ascribed to Muhammad. P recognized as hybrid.
BM V 104 (pi. n). BN II 730, 731 (2 sp.). KM II 697 (pi. 1v). D.Lorichs 4722. L:Muwahhids
p. 161, no. 2 (pi. v1): 3rd rs misread, corrected from piate. Cimino p. 220 (fig. 30, top).
H4. Obverse like 506, but with ocUil for Ull in 3rd os; reverse of 522.
Hafsid style
F:Hafsites 22 (pi. n): os illegible. Farrugia states by letter that this is not a hybrid.
Marinid style
rs as rs of 765.
BN II 1017 (pi. xm) and 1121 are contemporary imitations or counterfeits. Similar
232
Gold Medal
The only gold medal known appertaining to these dynasties was struck by the
Muwahhid khalifah
M1. (no mint) - twenty-one dinar weight (49.4 grams); 65 millimeters in diameter,
B 1158 (piate on cover, title page, and half-title page for chapter vm).
'Abbasid S1lver
the Banu'l-'Abbas
of Baghdad.
As the 'Abbasids exercised no direct control over North Africa during this period, all
silver bearing their name was actually struck by Hudid rulers, and is therefore listed under
Fat1m1d S1lver
the Banu-Fatimah
of Cairo (al-Qahirah).
None reported.
Z1rid S1lver
the Banu-Ziri
in Kufi script.
Sunnite series:
Struck anonymously by al-Mu'izz between a.h. 441 and 449 after his repudiation of
Fatimid suzerainty.
of (as of of 3) rf (as rf of 3)
Margins illegible.
Hammad1d Silver
the Banu-Hammad.
None reported.
Hammud1d S1lver
in the name of
the Banii-Hammud
of Malaga (Malaqah)
in Kufi script.
These rulers and their virtually independent governors controlled Sabtah and the
234
litis II ibn-Yahyd I
With heir
Muhammad ibn-Idns II
OF Vl i\ V RF
.J dkj. V ul jul
P:/?eyes 94a: JJl for JUl in 3rd line of rf (error), base silver.
As 872.
V 834 (AV): date and mint uncertain. P.Reyes 94b: date incompiete, base silver.
As 872.
V 835 (Cabre). C:Estudio p. 462, no. 1 (pi. n). P.Reyes 94c (pi. 1v): base silver.
S:Judice II 3081.
As 872 except rm, which ends at jil, and 1st line of rf: J).
V 836 (FC): date uncertain. Guillen p. 421 (pi. H, no. 16): mint illegible in piate, copper
(error for base silver ?). P.Reyes 95a: JJl for JUl in 3rd line of rf, base silver.
As 875.
As 875.
V 837 (AH). C:Estudio p. 462, no. 2 (pi. n). P.Reyes 95c: base silver.
As 875.
235
As 875.
No silver with North African mint is reported for other late Hammudid rulers.
Saqaut ibn-Muhammad
governor at Sabtah
With heir
al-'Izz ibn-Saqaut
of RF
Vl <l| V fUVl
om as om of 872.
V 874 (AV). Rivero:M p. 104 says this coin does not exist.
As 880.
V 875 (AV): date uncertain. Rivero:M p. 104 says this coin does not exist.
As 880.
V 876 (AV): date uncertain. Rivero:M p. 104 says this coin does not exist. See also copper:
1157.
As 880.
HSA 14217: date uncertain, base silver. V 877 (FC, AV 3 sp.). P.Reyes 126a (pi. v): base
As 880.
V 878 (PG 2 sp., AV 2 sp.). P.Reyes 126b: base silver. See also copper: 1159.
As 880.
As 880, but with 5th line of rf: <ul Jy*d\, 6th line: y\.
BM IX p. 145, no. I55g: base silver. Probably a poor specimen of 885 misread.
236
As 880.
V 880 (PG 2 sp., FC, AV 6 sp.). F.Reyes 126d: base silver. See also copper: 1160.
al-'Izz ibn-Saqaut
governor at Sabtah
a.H. 471-476
a.d. 1078-1083
a.D. 1078-1083
With heir
Saqaut ibn-al-'Izz
a.h. 471-476
OF (in octagon)
HSA 14218: partly illegible, base silver. V 881 (FC). V.Reyes 127: 1st line of rf partly
fUV1"
Oil O-
Abu-Bakr ibn-'Umar
OF ^ Vl <)l V M RF ^.Vl
<1l1
No margins.
V 1443 (PG 2 sp., AV). BN II 513 (pi. n): piate shows traces of margin. MA 486. Rivero:M 98
of ul Vl *i [I V] rf as rf of 888.
41]
No margins.
V 1444: 3rd line of rf largely illegible. MA 487: 3rd line of rf largely illegible. V :Indicaci6n
p. 518 calls this a half qirat struck with the die of a qirat and notes a 4-line of, though
of blank. rf as rf of 888.
No margins.
V 1445 (PG).
Yusuj ibn-Tdshfin
of as of of 888. rf (mint)
cniL^lr (Jr.
(mint, continued)
No margins.
No margins.
No margins.
ANS. V 1538 (AV 3 sp.). Dombay p. 786: division into lines not indicated.
No margins.
ANS. HSA 13733. V 1535 (PG 14 sp., FC, AV 8 sp.). BN II 546. MA 490 (4 sp.). KM II
572-581 (10 sp.). Cond p. 295: ^L-Vl for in 1st line of rf (error). C:Tratado p. 196, no. 2
(pi. xx): a- b rf. S Judice II3090. 0 2076, 2077 (pi. v1) (2 sp.).
238
of as of of 889. rf as rf of 894.
No margins.
V 1536 (PG 9 sp., AV). BN II 545. KM II 566-570 (pi. 1n: 566) (5 sp.). Soret:B 109.
of as of of 893. rf as rf of 894.
No margins.
V 1537 (AV). KM II 571. Rivero:M 102 (pi. n). Rivero: (pi. 1n, no. 2).
Thorburn.
of blank. RF
No margins.
OF blank. RF
No margins.
V 1540 (PG).
Spanish mint.
om as om of 900.
V 1532 (AV).
With heir
'Ali ibn-Yusuf
OF Vl<)lV rf
239
rm as RM of 901.
No margins.
of ul Vl -Jl V RF as RF of 894.
Ol| JJUst
No margins.
Spanish mint.
OF , Vl <ll V ., RF jvVl
(m1nt)
.Vl
No margins.
V 1533 (AV). Rivero:M 103 (pi. n). Rivero: (pi. 1n, no. 3).
a.h. 5oo-537
OF . Vl Jl V
L____Jl
<ul
No margins.
V 1684 (PG 2 sp., FC, AV). BN II 618. MA 544. D.Garcia 6104: 3-line of (error).
of as of of 905. rf J*
ANS. V 1707. MA 552: semicircle not indicated, mint misspelled. D .Garda 6105: 3-line of,
jji for jjk) in 3rd line of rf (errors). B 889 (pi. x1v, under no. 989): of partly illegible in
'Ali ibn-Yusnj
a.D. II06-I143
RF OuLil jml
(mint)
240
OF Vl i\ V RF M
No om.
V 1844 (AV).
of as of of 909. RF _*.|
a. ^
of Vl 4)l V . rf as rf of 910.
[ju* <ul]
No margins.
of as of of 909. RF as rf of 909.
No om.
of as of of 888. rf J* ^.Vl
No margins.
V 1697 (AV).
OF <ul Vl <1\ V RF
<ul >_
No margins.
V 1689 (AV).
of as of of 914. RF
No margins.
of as of of 914. rf Je jr-Vl
No margins.
V 1688 (AV).
of as of of 914. RF Je.
No margins.
of <ul RF J*
Vl Jl V owUl jjA
No m argins.
of <ul RF as rf of 909.
<il Jl V
No margins.
of A Vl <ll V RF as rf of 909.
No margins.
Muller p. 59.
10
of as of of 909. RF as rf of 909.
No margins.
V 1694 (AV 2 sp.). D.Garrfa 6113: base silver. 0 2093: description inadequate.
of as of of 914. rf ^
No margins.
V 1696 (FC, AV 2 sp.). MA 540 (2 sp.): not noted by Vives. Soret :D 90. 0 2097: description
of Vl 4 V rf as rf of 922.
No margins.
No margins.
No margins.
OF RF oil
No other margins.
ANS: rto left and J to right of Je. in rf. V 1703 (PG, FC, AV 3 sp.). MA 545: semicircle
not indicated.
243
of as of of 923. rf a Jj n
No margins.
V 1701 (PG 10 sp., FC, AV 5 sp.). BM V 49 (pi. i). BN II 621, 622 (2 sp.). MA 548 (7 sp.).
KM II 630, 631 (2 sp.). Conde p. 291: misread. D.Garcia 6106-6108 (5 sp.): description in-
accurate. C:Tratado p. 199, no. 6 (pi. xx). 0 2099: ul above (misprint); impression
furnished by Galster shows J to left and I to right of ^ in rf. B 893 (pi. xiv): description
inaccurate. Pedersen 230, 231 (pi. xcvn) (2 sp.): J to left and I to right of in rf. Figanier
of as of of 905! rf OuLil
(Jr. ^
No margins.
ANS: Sb rf. UM: illegible letter b rf. V 1708 (PG, AV 3 sp.). MA 551 (2 sp.). Conde p. 280
(pi. 1n, no. "): misread, S b rf. Miinter 306: identified by Galster. 0 2095, 2096: ^(read
as i) b rf (2 sp.): description inaccurate. B 886 bis: i_f 6 rf. Thorburn: S^b rf.
of as of of 914. rf as rf of 928.
No margins.
B 888 (pi. xrv): b rf, description inaccurate; 892 ? (pi. x1v): description inaccurate,
of as of of 920. rf
No margins.
V 1709 (AV).
of Vl *)\ V rf as rf of 928.
No other margins.
10*
OF -Usk RF
Semicircle a, RF OwLll
No other margins.
V 1702. MA 547 (4 sp.): jl omitted from rf (misprint ?), semicircle not indicated.
OF as OF of 918. RF Jc
No margins.
of blank. rf
No margins.
of ornament. rf <ul
4,l
No marg1ns. tf
of blank. rf as rf of 934.
No margins.
V 1691 (FC, AV): rf not described. V Jndicacidn p. 518 terms this a quarter qirat struck
of blank. rf Jc
No margins.
of ^ rf as rf of 934.
No margins.
ELECTRUM
of Vl Jl V rf as rf of 909.
No margins.
245
V 1845 (AV 2 sp.). MA 538. D.Garcia 6112. P.Reyes 449. 0 2091: l/a g0l d and 2/3 copper
instead of electrum (according to letter from G. Galster). See also copper: 1169.
Spanish mints.
of ml RF as rf of 907.
isr"-
(mint)
No RM.
OF as OF of 918. RF oil
<_>ul11
">
Semicircle a rf
Semicircle b rf (mint)
No other margins.
V 1675 (PG): 4)lj for 4)l Jcj 6 of (error ?). BM V 48. C:Tratado p. 199, no. 7 (pi. xx).
of , Vl <)I V RF as rf of 941.
<uI oI jL
Semicircle b of *l-u
Semicircle a rf uui-j
Semicircle b RF (mint)
No other margins.
of as of of 942. RFasRFof941.
Semicircle a rf OuLj
Semicircle b rf (mint)
No other margins.
V1677 (AV): .-u> for oil o-c 6of (error ?). BMV47 (pi. 1). C:Decadencia p. 379, no. 5 (pi. 1):
-uc for ml o-c b of (disproved by piate). Rivero: (pi. 1n, no. 6).
of blank. RF
t>Jll
(mint)
No margins.
OF blank. rf Jc
No margins.
(mint)
of blank. RF (mint)
Jc
No marg1ns.
V 168r. MA 534.
See 951-953.
of as of of 908. rf as rf of 908.
As 947.
of as of of 909. rf as rf of 909.
om as om of 947.
rm as rm of 947.
V 1837 (AV): rm partly illegible. P.Reyes 446a: base silver. See also copper: 1162.
Not described.
of as of of 923. rf as rf of 907.
rm as rm of 947.
ANS: J b rf. V 1839 (PG 2 sp., FC, AV). P.Reyes 450a: base silver.
V 1840 (AV). D.Garcia 6086. Sotheby 382: d, m only. P:Reyes 450b (pi. xv1): J b rf,
silver. Rivero: (pi. m, no. 9, not no. 8 as given): piate partly illegible. Thorburn: J
247
of V| <ll V rf as rf of 928.
<ul
of as of of 914. rf as rf of 909.
rm as rm of 954.
V 1843 (PG 6 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 2 sp.). D.Garcia 6110: m only. P.Reyes 446c: base silver.
of as of of 909. rf as rf of 910.
om as om of 955.
rm as rm of 954.
V 1841 (AV 2 sp.). D.Garcia 6111: description inadequate. P.Reyes 447: base silver. Ri-
vero:M no (pi. 1n): base silver, margins partly illegible. See also copper: 1166.
<ul Vl )l V J*
No OM.
V 1667 (PG, AV). C.Decadencia p. 376, no. 3 (pi. 1). Rivero: (pi. m, no. 7, not no. 9, as
of as of of 923. RF Je
(mint)
No OM.
rm (date) j vO- J\ a\ ^
V 1670 (AV).
248
As 961.
V 1671 (AV).
V 1682 (Delgado).
Oil
No other margins.
V 1706: j^j for in 3rd line of of (error ?), one-line cartouche (error). MA 550 (2 sp.).
C:Decadencia p. 380, no. 6 (pi. 1). Zambaur I 66 (pi. 1). Rivero:M 106 (pi. n): jj for in
As 947.
of as of of 918. rf Vifl
*-*-y. J. Jc
(mint)
No margins.
V 1683 (AV).
of as of of 939. RF
As 968.
249
rf as RF of 918.
of as of of 914.
om as om of 947.
rm as rm of 947.
As 970 except om, which starts with and ends with ^ (sic, pointed out by
Fasmer II p. 224).
a.H. 522-533
OF
With heir
Sir ibn-'Ali
RF
(mint)
No margins.
of Vl <) V RF
<Jll
(mint)
No margins.
V 1765 (Domeck).
of <uI V1 4)I V RF
OF
tul
RF
a.D. 1128-1139
oil
No margins.
J"
cnJLil
.A-
ANS (3 sp.). HSA 15905, 27807, 27808 (3 sp.). V 1768 (PG 13 sp., FC, AV 5 sp.). BM V 53.
BN II 624-627 (4 sp.). MA 568 (15 sp.). KM II 633, 634 (2 sp.). D.Garcia 6093-6095
(5 sp.): without j on 4th line of rf (error ?).C:Tratadop. 201,110.9 (pi. xx). S:Castro 413.
No margins.
V 1767 (AV). 0 2100: description uncertain, identified from impression furnished by Galster.
of as of of 977. rf oil Jj
a Jc
No margins.
of a Vl .01V . rf Jj iI
<ul Jy)
/- .^Vl
No margins.
V 1771 (PG, AV): script not indicated. BN II 623: for <jruL-lI in 2nd line of rf
(error).
OF . Vl<)l V RF oil
^ ^.Vl m1
No margins.
of as of of 977. rf j^I
(JruL-ll
No margins.
D.Garcia 6092. Weyl:G 1192 (3 sp.). B 941 (pi. x1v), 942 (pi. x1v), 944 ?, 945 ? (4 sp. ?):
of as of of 979. rf as rf of 981.
No margins.
ANS. HSA 13734~13736, 13908-13914 (10 sp.). V 1775 (PG 14 sp., FC 6 sp., AV 3 sp.).
251
S:fudice II 3099 (3 sp.). S:Ciscar 32. S:Castro 413. Pedersen 233 (pi. xcvn); 235: differs in
of as of of 979. rf OjJ-11
No margins.
ANS. HSA 13915: I b rf; 13916 (2 sp.). V 1774 (PG 15 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 4 sp.). BM V 50
(pi. 1), 51 (2 sp.). BN II 631: Sb rf. MA 571 (6 sp.). KM II 636-638 (3 sp.). Dombay p. 783:
^ju- for in last line of of (error), division into lines not indicated. D.Garcia 6088a,
6089 (3 sp.): without j in 2nd line of rf (error). C:Tratado p. 201, no. 10 (pi. xx): jTb rf.
Weyl:G 1193. Lopes 17. S:Judice II3099. S:Castro 413. 0 2094, 2098 (2 sp.). Pedersen 234.
of ml Vl 4)1 V rf as rf of 983.
No margins.
V 1776 (AV).
No margins.
Thorburn: ^ a rf.
of as of of 975. rf uuL.ll
No margins.
V 1777 (AV).
of ornament. RF Jc
No margins.
252
V 1685: JL (?) for in rf, corrected by Vives; 1770 (PG 4 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 5 sp.).
BN II 620: JL (?) for in rf (error). MA 569, 570 (6 sp.). KM II 632 (pi. m). Conde
of blank. rf <11I ~j
No margins.
HSA 13919, 13922, 13923 (3 sp. ?): all doubtful. V 1766 (AV).
OF blank. rf Je
No margins.
V 1769 (AV).
ELEcTRUM
>!r"
No margins.
of as of of 991. RF
No margins.
Spanish mint.
.US*.
<JUI
om as om of 947.
rm as rm of 947.
V 1846 (PG, AV): 2nd line of of inaccurately reported, date uncertain. P .Reyes 451 (pi. xvi):
base silver.
253
With heir
Tdshfin ibn-'Ali
of blank. RF
Qui.. Il yj>\
(mint)
No margins.
OF as OF of 975. RF uuLil jl
No margins.
No margins.
V 1820 (PG 3 sp., AV 3 sp.). BM V 59. BN II 633. MA 583. Nasir 38 (pi. 1).
OF as of of 997. RF aJjtl ^1
No margins.
of as of of 997. rf as rf of 983.
No margins.
HSA 13737: S b rf. V 1824 (PG 6 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 5 sp.). BM V 56, 57 (2 sp.): Sb rf.
MA 582: not noted by Vives. KM II 642, 643 (2 sp.): J b rf. Castiglioni 239 (pi. x): 3-line of
(disproved by piate), cf b rf. S:Castro 415. B 963-965 (pi. x1v: 963, 965), 968, 969 (5sp.):
No margins.
V 1823 (PG ?). MA 581 (2 sp.). Conde p. 290: presumably this coin misread. Miinter 307:
254
1001. (no mint) - (no date) - qirat: Naskh1 script. Plate VII
of as of of 1000. rf as rf of 981.
No margins.
HSA 13917, 13918 (2 sp.). V 1822 (PG 9 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 3 sp.). BM V 60-62 (pi. 1: 60)
(3 sp.). BN II 635. MA 580 (3 sp.). KM II 644 (pi. 1n): Ml piaced above !l in 1st line of
of. Conde p. 289: presumably this coin misread. D :Garcia 6098: without j in 3rd line of rf
(error). Lisbon.
of <ul rf as RF of 981.
Ml JIM
No margins.
HSA 13740. V 1826 (PG 7 sp., FC 4 sp., AV 3 sp.). BM V 58. S:Judice II3101. S:Castro 415.
of . Ml Jl M .. rf as RF of 985.
4_____JI
<UI Jy-J JU
t ^Ml
No margins.
ANS (4 sp.):^arf. HSA 13738: rf. V 1827 (PG 9 sp., FC 3 sp., AV 3 sp.). BM V 54,
55 (2 sp.): ^a rf. BM X p. 6, no. 55d: rf. BN II 636, 637 (2 sp.): rf. MA 585
a rf. C:Tratado p. 202, no. 12 (pi. xx): rf. Weyl:G 1191 (2 sp.): rF. Lopes 18.
of a M1 <11 M n rf OjJJil
No margins.
of as of of 975. rf as rf of 1005.
No margins.
V 1829 (AV).
No margins.
Welzl 12237.
of as of of 973. RF
J)
No margins.
of ornament. RF
No margins.
OF blank. RF s*\
No margins.
No margins.
V 1821 (AV): top line of rf misread, corrected p. 552. V:Indicacidn p. 518 calls this a half
of ornament. RF >
No margins.
of blank. RF ic
No margins.
HSA 13921. V 1814 (PG, FC). Rivero:M 107 (pi. n): ornament on of. Rivero : (pi. 1n,
of as of of 975. RF as rf of 1012.
No margins.
HSA 13920, 13924 (2 sp.). V 1818 (PG 2 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 4 sp.): script not indicated.
of as of of 975. rf ^Ml
t J)
No margins.
OF blank. RF as RF of 1015.
No margins.
Spanish mints.
Not described.
Cerda 400.
Cerda 401.
4au>
OM uylllr Jj p*-J\ J\ u1 jH
ANS: o-not visible. V 1810 (AV). Cerda398: description incompiete. Rivero:M 109bis
Tdshfin ibn-'Ali
No margins.
257
B 979: division into lines not indicated. This is the only Murabir, silver reported to have
been struck in the name of the 'Abbasid khalifah; it must be considered very dubious.
<ul
No margins.
V 1872 (Codera).
OF , Ml )1 M ,, RF UwLil j*\
1 Jc a. O***
<Ul
No margins.
of as OF of 1019. RF OuL-ll
ctJl jji}
No margins. v
<llt Jy J -U3t
No margins.
1022. (no mint) - (no date) - qirat: Naskhi script. Plate VII
of as of of 1021. RF jy\
XT Jc a
No marg1ns.
HSA 13739,15911,15912 (3 sp.). V1882 (PG 2 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 4 sp.): script not indicated.
BM V 73 (pi. 1), 74 (2 sp.). MA 596: script not indicated, for jji in 3rd line of rf
OF <ul RF
<UI Ml aJI M ^
<juUi<lr
No margins.
17
OF ornament. RF
No margins.
V 1878 (PG, AV 6 sp.): termed eighth qirat (error). MA 599. KM II 655. As a half qirat,
this coin does not fit into the table in V :Indicaci6n p. 519.
of ornament. RF xa\
Oulll
No margins.
V 1877 (PG, AV 3 sp.). MA 597 (2 sp.). Rivero:M 113 (pi. m). B 977 (pi. xv). Rivero:E
of ornament. rf oU~ll ^1
No margins.
V 1873 (PG, AV): a ^ for ^ a. in 3rd line of rf (misprint ?). MA 595 (4 sp.).
OF Jj <ul RF cQi&l"
No margins.
Variant of 1025.
of as of of 1021. rf as rf of 1026.
No margins.
No margins.
V 1875: termed hybrid in V :Indicaci6n p. 519; it was apparently struck in error, and was
recorded by Codera.
of blank. RF
No margins.
V 1879 (AV).
259
of rf l"
No margins.
HSA 15910, 15913-15915 (4 sp.). V 1880 (PG 6 sp., FC 4 sp., AV 5 sp.). BM V 76 (pi. 1),
77 (2 sp.). BN II 648-650 (3 sp.). MA 598 (25 sp., of which Vives noted 5). C:Tratadop. 203,
OF blank. RF as RF of 1018.
No margins.
V 1876 (AV).
With heir
Ibrahim ibn-Tdshfin
No margins.
ANS: ^ c a rf. HSA 15909,15917,15918,15920 (4 sp.): ^ c a rf. V 1885 (PG 6 sp., FC 4 sp.,
AV 4 sp.). BM V 71 (pi. 1), 72 (2 sp.): ^ c a rf. MA 600 (5 sp.): pj> j\ for ^1 j.\ in 4th line
of of (misprint ?). Soret:/?3. C:Tratadoj>. 204, no. 3 (pi. xx1) :^c a rf. S:Castro 416. B 991:
rf; 992: f c a rf (pi. xv: both) (2 sp.). Figanier 187 (pi.): ^ j \ for ^1 in 4th line of
of (disproved by piate).
As 1035 but with j \ for ^1 x\ in 4th line of of, and without j in 2nd line of rf.
HSA 15916,15919 (2 sp.). KM II 653 (pi. in). D.Garcia 6114. Rivero:M 112 (pi. 1n). B 989,
of j\ rf as rf of 1024.
No margins.
Spanish mint.
1038. Qurtubah (divided <J / J) - (no date) - quarter qirat, struck presumably by
Hamdin ibn-Muhammad.
W^
(mint)
260
No margins.
V 1884 (AV 2 sp.). V Jndicacidn p. 518 gives jr.l for l^.l in 2nd line of of.
Ishdq ibn-'Ali
a.H 540-541
a.D. 1145-1147
of as of of 1019.
KF
No margins.
V 1895 (PG 5 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 3 sp.). H6st: and N 12 (pi. xxxm). B 1000 (pi. xv):
Sb rf.
HSA 15921, 15922 (2 sp.): no letter b rf. BN II 657, 658 (2 sp.). MA 602. KM II 659, 660
(2 sp.). Conde- p. 291: this is the coin described, not that illustrated. T>.Garcia 6116, 6117
(2 sp.): 3-line of (error). Rivero:M 116 (pi. 1n): no letter b rf. B 999 (pi. xv), 1001 (2 sp.).
Thorburn.
of Ml <)l M. rf OUJl
No margins.
HSA 13741, 15923 (2 sp.). V 1896 (PG 3 sp., FC, AV 2 sp.): ) at start of 3rd line of rf
(error ?). BM V 78 (pi. i), 79 (2 sp.). BN II656. MA 603 (4 sp.): with j (error ?). KM II 662.
Cond p. 291 (pi. 1n, no. 10): apparently this coin misread; differently misread on p. 279.
Marsden 348 (pi. xx): apparently this coin misread, attributed to Hammudids (corrected
by Codera: Errores p. 16, and by Fraehn.O p. 25). D.Garcia 6118 (2 sp.): description
No margins.
V 1897 (AV).
of as of of 1018.
RF
No margins.
261
0 2104: description uncertain, impression furnished by Galster appears identical with 1045.
OF oil RF as RF of 1043.
ml
No margins.
OF i{ ^1 <)l ^ M RF
Qulu.il
Je
No margins.
OF Jc a\ RF
No margins
V 1902 (PG): termed qirat, corrected on p. 552. KM II 664. Conde p. 291 misread.
OF a\ RF yyl
No margins
KM II 663 (pi. 1n). Does not fit into the table in V:Indicaci6n p. 519.
of ornament. rf as rf of 1048.
No margins.
V 1898 (AV). MA 604. KM II 665 (pi. m). Rivero: (pi. 1n, no. 18).
of ornament. rf as rf of 1048.
No margins.
V 1899 (AV). C:Decadencia p. 385, no. 9 (pi. i). Rivero: (pi. nl, no. 19).
OF jy>\ RF JU-.I
No margins.
262
Spanish mint.
1052. Qurtubah - (no date) - qirat: Naskhi script; struck presumably by Hamd1n ibn-
411n
OF ., Ml All M RF s*\
(mint) ^ *JI ^
No margins.
BN II 655. MA 601 (2 sp.): with j (error ?). Longperier:/) p. 431 (several sp.): m only.
C:Tratado.p. 205, no. 5 (pi. xx1). Sotheby 382: m only; with date 541 (error ?). S:JudiccII
3103. Rivero:M 117 (pi. 1n): with j (disproved by piate). B 997, 998 (pi. xv: both) (2 sp):
Sawaszkiewicz p. 204 apparently refers to silver of this mint and ruler, but too vaguely to
be accepted.
Many coins in Murabit styles were struck after the downfall of the main dynasty at
the death of Ishaq; most of these were struck in Spain by local rulers and are therefore
excluded from this corpus, but can be found in section 6a of Vives; mintless coins struck in
of ^JUjLIj1 rf r->1 ^
No margins.
V 1980 (AV). MA 611. Script not indicated; probably KOf1 obverse and Naskhi reverse.
No margins.
V 1981 (AV): script not indicated. C:Decadencia p. 391, no. 15 (pi. n): SS b of.
No margins.
No margins.
V 1983: script not indicated. MA 612. C:Monedas p. 381. C.Decadencia p. 391, no. 16
Muwahhid S1lver
Silver struck by Muwahhid partisans in North Africa and Spain before the downfall
Muhammad ibn-Tumart
OF
Ml
RF
(mint)
V 2017 (AV).
of as of of 1057.
V 2018 (AV).
4 t 1 Il
fU*il
OF -cut
nil
RF
RF
RF
<al
LJ_j_ j -use*
Dl
L.Ul ^l
264
of . )1 *i RF as rf of 1059.
V 2015 (AV): 4th line of of uncertain. May be an unusually debased specimen of 446a
Struck in Spain
in the name of
OF Lj <BI RF
bui JuScAJ
b.L.1
HSA 14168. V 2043 (PG 4 sp., AV, 1 other). MA 659 (2 sp.): without j in 3rd line of OF
V 2045 (AV).
As 1062, but with U^-j for bJ in 2nd line of of; } omitted from 2nd and 3rd lines of of.
V 2044. MA 658.
Weyl:F6493.
V 2046 (AH 2 sp., AV 2 sp.). P 26 (pi. in): ascribed (p. 32) to Idris I. BM V 88a (pi. 11).
BM X, p. 10, no. 88b, 88c ? (cut square) (2 sp. ?). BN II 718, 719 (2 sp.). MA 665 (4 sp.,
of which Vives noted 2): termed half dirhem (error). KM II 689. Weyl.G 1221. S:Castro
265
420. Bel p. 18. Rivero:M 131 (pi. m). 0 2110. B 1046-1049 (pi. xv1: 1046) (4sp.). Rivero:
As 1065.
As 1065.
ANS. HSA 13906, 14164 (2 sp.). V 2113 (AH 2 sp., PG 10 sp., FC, AV 12 sp.). P 25a.
BN II 720. MA 666 (90 sp., of which Vives noted 16). KM II 690: gold instead of silver
(misprint). Adler:C 89 (pi. vi). Moura 2 (fig.). D.Garcia 6129. Cerda 423: description
incompiete. Leite 23. S:Judice II 3126. S:Castro 420. Bel p. 14 (fig. 2, 3). 0 2111, 2112
(2 sp.). B 1051-1054 (pi. xv1: 1051) (4 sp.). Figanier 169 (2 sp.). Lisbon. Thorburn.
As 1065.
Spanish mints.
1070. Ishbiliyah (b rf) - square half dirhem struck after a.h. 541
As 1065.
1071. Jayyan (b rf) - square half dirhem struck after a.h. 541.
As 1065.
1072. Gharnatah (b rf) - square half dirhem struck after a.h. 549.
As 1065.
As 1065.
Zambaur II 269: mint uncertain, above instead of beneath rf. This mint is unidentified,
1073. Malaqah (b rf) - square half dirhem struck after a.h. 548.
As 1065.
1074. Mursiyah (b rf) - square half dirhem (posthumous) struck after a.h. 567.
As 1065.
Nor described.
dubious.
266
With heir
1075. (no mint) - square half dirhem. Attribution doubtfu1. Plate VII
of ^ Uj RF 4JI Jj
P 27 (pi. 1n): 3rd line of of given as tiil "i\ iy M (disproved by piate). MA 707. Fasmer I 3.
1078. Ribat (in 4th os and 2nd rs) al-Fath (in 1st os and 3rd rs) - (date ?) - qirat.
OF Jj*M RF Lj <11I
os [ ?] (mint, continued)
(mint) j ^ J
rs (mint) . .
[ ? ] fW (mint, continued)
1079. Sijilmasah (in 4th and 1st os and 2nd and 3rd rs; divided <-U/j*-) - (date ?) -qirat.
As 1078.
L:Johnston p. 169 (2 sp.): m only, date obscure. Thorburn: date uncertain, read as 0.
267
1080. Hadrat (in 4th os and 2nd rs) Fas (in 1st os and 3rd rs) - (date ?)-qirat. Plate VII
As 1078.
KM II 698b, 698c (2 sp.): os as rs (error ?). Fraehn:i? p. 624, no. 3: largely illegible, mint
uncertain, (s)LL- in rs (error ?). Soret :D 92: (ju^tl for -ui J\ in 3rd line of rf (error ?), seg-
ments largely illegible. Weyl:F 6496: not described, mint given as Fas; probably this
coin. L:Bodleian 319: wrongly recorded, apparently this coin, segments largely illegible,
rs as os ?. Thorburn.
1081. Hadrat (in 4th os and 2nd rs) Fas (in 1st OS and 3rd rs) - (date ?) - qirat.
Adler:C9o (pi. vi): segments largely illegible, SLL. in 2nd rs (error ?), may be another
specimen of 1080.
1082. Marrakush (in 4th and 1st os and 2nd and 3rd rs; division not specified) - (date ?)
- qirat.
As 1078.
1083. Hadrat (in 4th os and 2nd rs) Marrakush (in 1st os and 3rd rs) - (date ?) - qirat.
As 1078.
Markov:E p. 921, no. 2a: not described, mint given as Marrakush; corrected by Fasmer I1,
with description.
of as of of 1078. rf <ul L j
Segments illegible.
L:Bodleian 319, 320 ? (2 sp. ?). Apparently a misreading of poor additional specimens of
Anonymous silver
tiilMlsyM U.I
ANS. HSA 13886. V 2100 (AH, PG 5 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 3 sp.). P 24ba. BM V 121 (pi. m).
BN II 739. MA 689 (29 sp., of which Vives noted 12). KM II 701-703 (pi. 1v: 701), 723?
(4 sp. ?). L:Muwahhids p. 165. Zambaur:W 86. S:Judice II 3120. Bel p. 25 (fig. 9, 10).
268
1086. Tilimsan (b OF and b rf) - square dirhem struck before a.h. 640.
As 1085.
Plate VII
As 1085.
HSA13882,13887, (2 sp.). V 2101 (AH 3 sp., PG4sp., FC, AV 9 sp.). P 240b. BM V122-124
(pi. n1: 123) (3 sp.). BN II 740, 741 (2 sp.). MA 697 (35 sp., of which Vives noted 10):
mint misspelled. KM II 704. L:Muwahh.ids p. 165 (pi. v1) (2 sp.). L:Khedivial p. 329.
S:Judice II 3121 (2 sp.). Boneschi 32 (pi.). Bel p. 22 (fig. 6, 7, 8). B 1055 (pi. xvn).
As 1085,
ANS. V2103 (AV2sp.). P24bd. BN II742, 743 (2 sp.). MA 694. KM II724: mint uncertain.
Adler:M p. 169 (fig. on p. 98): description inaccurate. Castiglioni 241. Krehl p. 36, no. 1.
L:Muwahhids p. 165. Markov:E p. 93, no. 4, p. 921, no. 4a (2 sp.). Rivero:M 140 (pi. 1n,
under no. 141). Bel p. 25 (fig. n, 12). F.Hafsites 75, 76 (pi. v: both) (2 sp.). 0 2141, 2142
As 1085.
As 1085.
As 1085.
As 1085.
ANS.
As 1085.
HSA 13857: mint uncertain. V 2104 (PG, AV): Ltj for Jl>j (error). P 24be: Ja>j for l>\j
(error). MA 695 (5 sp.): J*j for (error). Bel p. 28 (fig. 13). Cottevieille p. 214
ANS (2 sp.). HSA 13884: mint uncertain. V 2105 (AH 4 sp., PG 4 sp., FC, AV 11 sp.).
P 24bf. BM V 129 (pi. in). BN II 744, 745 (2 sp.). MA 690 (74 sp., of which Vives noted 12).
KM II 7o8-71o( 3 sp.). D.Garcia 6150. Cerda 430: m only. L:Muwahhids p. 165. S:White
2188 (2sp.). S:Beyram2g2b (2sp.). S :Castro423: mint uncertain. Belp. 23 (fig. 9,10). 02152.
As 1085.
V 2106 (AH 2 sp., AV4sp.). P 24bg. MA 693 (8 sp., of which Vives noted 2). Bel p. 25 (fig. 11).
Plate VII
As 1085.
269
As 1085.
As 1085.
ANS (4 sp. ?): mint uncertain on 1 sp. HSA (15 sp. ?): mint uncertain on 1 sp. UM. V 2107
(AH 9 sp., PG 9 sp., FC 3 sp., AV 20 sp.), 2111: mint misread as (?). P 24bh. BM V
130-133 (pi. in: 130) (4 sp.). BM X p. 10, no. 133a, 133b (2 sp.). BN II 746-748 (3 sp.).
MA 691 (116sp., of which Vives noted 20), 698: mint misread as u-l (?) (9 sp.), 699: mint
misread as u-jl (?). KM II 711-718 (8sp.). Tychsen, O. p. 123. Schiepati 72. Castiglioni
240. Welzl 12240. D.Garda 6145-6148 (12 sp.). Fraehn:N p. 88, no. 2a. T>:Lorichs 4850
(2 sp.): m only. Cerda 427: m only. L:Muwahhids p. 165. Weyl:F 6491 (4 sp.). Markov:
p. 93, no. 5. S:White 2188. S:Judice II3122 (6 sp.). S:Beyram 292c. S:Castro 423. Bel p. 19
(fig. 4, 5, 6). 0 2144, 2146, 2149, 2150 (4 sp.). B 1057 (pi. xvh). Lisbon. See also copper:
1170.
As 1085.
V 2112. MA 700. This mint is unidentified, and is probably either misread or poorly engraved.
As 1085.
ANS: mint uncertain. HSA 13817 ?, 14160 (2 sp. ?). V 2109 (AH 2 sp., AV 3 sp.). P 24bj.
BM V 134 (pi. 1n). MA 692 (4 sp.). Welzl 12239. S:Judice II3124. 0 2148: mint uncertain.
As 1085.
V 2110 (AV). P 24bk. D.Garcia 6149. Rivero:M 141 (pl. 1ll, o only, under no. 140). Bel p. 25
As 1085.
As 1085.
KM II 727.
As 1085.
ANS (20 sp.). HSA (101 sp., of which 1 no. 10632 is gilded). UM. V 2088 (AH 63 sp.,
PG 42 sp., FC 23 sp., AV 15 sp.). P 24a. BM V 141-157,147a (pi. in: 141,144,145) (18 sp.).
BN II 758-766 (9 sp.). MA 680 (4689 sp., of which Vives noted 60). KM II 728-773 (46 sp.).
And additional specimens too numerous and scattered to list. Many of these coins are con-
words ul, -uaw, and (ja^ll. A few specimens (termed Hafsid by Farrugia) have horizontal
F.Dragut 13 (pi. n): clipped so that much of legend is missing; probably Hafsid counter-
stamped by Turks.
As 1085.
ANS (3 sp.). HSA (11 sp.). BM V 136-139 (pi. 1n: 136) (4 sp.). BN II 757. KM II 774-776
(3 sp.). Conde p. 283 (pi. v, no. 2). L:Bodleian 321. Lagumina p. 103, no. 4. Zambaur: W 87.
S:Judice II 3113 (2 sp.). Vollers 14 (pi. 1). S:Castro 423. Bel p. 40 (fig. 20, 22). B 1060
(pi. xvn). Script is not specified by, among others, V(ives), P(rieto), or MA, so some coins
B 1266, 1267 (2 sp.) (pi. x1x): 4th line of of doubtful, illegible in piate. This is probably a
of as of of 1065. rf as rf of 1085.
Spanish mints.
As 1085.
HSA 13805 ?, 14161 ? (2 sp. ?): mint uncertain. V 2089 (PG 2 sp., FC, AV 6 sp.). P 24cb.
BM X p. 10, no. 120k. BN II 749. MA 681 (35 sp., of which Vives noted 11). KM II 700a.
Dombay p. 782. D .Garrta 6143-6144 (3 sp.). Cerda 429: m only. S Judice II3116. Bel p. 32.
As 1085.
HSA 14157 ?, 14158 ? (2 sp. ?): mint uncertain. V 2090 (PG, AV 2 sp.). P 24cc (pi. 1n).
This mint is listed by Vazquez Queipo III: 536 note, but has not been identified on surviving
As 1085.
V 2091 (AV). P 24cd. BN II 751, 752 (2 sp.). MA 683 (2 sp., not 3 as in Vives). B 1065
(pi. xvn).
As 1085.
As 1085.
V 2098 (AV 3 sp.). P 240k. MA 688 (7 sp.). Rivero:M 139 (pi. 1n).
As 1085.
HSA 13852: mint uncertain. V 2097 (AH, PG 3 sp., FC, AV 3 sp.). P 24cj. MA 687 (7 sp.,
As 1085.
ANS. HSA 14162, 14163 (2 sp.). V 2092 (PG 3 sp., AV 3 sp.). P 24cC MA 684 (12 sp., of
which Vives noted 7). C:Tratado p. 219, no. 7 (pi. xxn). S:Judice II3118 (2 sp.). Bel p. 29
As 1085.
V 2095 (AH 2 sp., PG 3 sp., FC 2 sp., AV 5 sp.). P 24ch. MA 685 (20 sp., of which Vives
noted 4). Guillen p. 426 (fig.). Calvo p. 192 (pi. x1, no. 8). Bel p. 29 (fig. 14).
As 1085.
V 2094 (PG, FC, AV). P 24cg. Campaner:iV and M 7 (pi. 1). Rivero:M 138 (pi. in, o only):
As 1085.
HSA 13858, 13885 (2 sp.). V 2096 (PG 4 sp., FC, AV 7 sp.). P 24ci. BM V 135 (pi. m).
BN II 753, 754 (2 sp.). MA 686 (25 sp., of which Vives noted 12). KM II 720-722: * omitted
from mint in 722 (3 sp.). Tychsen, O. p. 123 (pi. n, no. 27). Dombay p. 782. Cerda 428:
m only. S:Judice II 3119 (3 sp.). Bel p. 29 (fig. 14, 15). 0 2151: mint uncertain. B 1068
As 1085.
V 2093 (PG2 sp., FC, AV). P 24cf. D.Lorichs 4849: m only. Campaner:N and M 6 (pi. 1).
Bel p. 29 (fig. 14). B 1066 (pi. xvn): mint illegible in piate. Lisbon.
B 1072-1076 (pi. xvn: 1072-1074) are silver amulets with religious inscriptions, not coins.
Plate VIII
Hud1d S1lver
by the Barm-Hud
of Murcia (Mursiyah)
in Naskhi script.
Anonymous silver (Muwahhid style) probably struck in a.H. 630, when this ruler
controlled Sabtah for three months, in the name of the 'Abbasid khalifah, who was not
individually identified:
As 1117.
<al Ml ;yM
HSA 13808: j* (?) b of. P 64 (pi. vn, under no. 66). MA 702 (4 sp.). B 1062 (pi. xvn,
V 2129 (AH 2 sp., AV). P 66 (pi. vn, under no. 65): vestiges of a mint in piate noted by
Fasmer I p. 215.
Anonymous silver (Hudid style) struck at Sabtah in a.h. 635 by the independent amir
Plate VIII
273
j l <ul (date)
(date, continued)
No margins.
Soret:.F 171: jJ for -.l in 3rd line of of (error), date divided ^./J >fe (error ?), attributed
to 'Imran. Soret :K p. 556 (fig. 7): j>.l for in 3rd line of of (error), date divided ^-/i >b
(error ?), correctly attributed. B 427 (pi. 1x): attributed to Hudids. The reference in C:
Tratado p. 228 to Sabtah as a Hudid mint may refer to this coin, to 1117, or to an un-
reported coin.
Hafs1d S1lver
the Banu-Hafs
Anonymous silver struck presumably by several Hafsid rulers between a.h. 650 and
711 (a.d. 1253 and 1311), to which should be added many specimens of Muwahhid-style
dirhems 1085-1088a, 1090, 1091, 1101-1105, struck over a somewhat longer period and
As 1085.
BM V 125 (pi. 1n), 126 (2 sp.). KM II 706, 707 (2 sp.): apparently this script. Weyl:F 6492:
probably this script. L:Muwahhids p. 165 (pi. v1). 0 2143. F.Hafsites 74 (pi. v). Script is
not specified by Vives, Prieto, or MA, so some coins listed as 1088 probably belong here.
1123. (no mint) - square dirhem: ornamented Kufi script. Plate VIII
As 1085.
ANS (2 sp.). HSA13775,13776 (2 sp.). BM V140 (pi. 1n). BNII755, 756 (2 sp.). S:Judicc II
3114 (2 sp.). Bel p. 42 (fig. 24). 0 2139, 2140 (2 sp.). B 1059 (pi- xvn), 1209 (2 sp.). Script
is not specified by Vives, Prieto, or MA, so some coins listed as 1101 probably belong here.
F.Somdp. 55 (5sp.).
(date)
(mint)
18
274
As 1124.
F.Somd p. 55 (n sp.).
As 1124.
F.Somd p. 56 (8 sp.).
1127. Tunis - (9)56 (in figures: ai) - square double dirhem. Plate VIII
As 1124.
FSomd p. 56 (n sp.).
As 1124.
(mint)
As 1130.
Monchicourt p. 306.
Z1yan1d S1lver
the Banii-Ziyan
in Naskhi script.
None reliably reported. Silver with Ziyanid inscriptions was probably struck by
Marinid rulers, and is therefore listed under that dynasty: 1147. Leo Africanus asserts that
the later Ziyanids struck both silver and copper, and by analogy with the later Hafsids
this is probably correct, but such coins have not yet been recognized, if indeed any survive.
Mar1nid S1lver
the Banu-Marin
in Naskhi script.
Anonymous silver struck presumably by this ruler and his successor, chiefly before the
OF MI<)IM RF |fSTk*
oil
if
V2211 (AV).
OF as OF of 1133. RF oil
^f if
Anonymous silver struck presumably by this ruler. See also anonymous silver listed
under Abu-Bakr 1133, 1134 but struck presumably by both rulers, chiefly before a.H. 668.
ml H\ <)I M U*U j ml
0 2131: Ml for <)l in 3rd line of of (this and other misspellings visible on impression
furnished by Galster). Because of its errors and dupiicated inscriptions this coin must be
considered doubtful.
18*
276
OF <u .d-l
Plate VIII
udUl
RF
a.H. 685-706
of <15" RF
a.D. 1286-1307
<fll
*Jb.J ill
(mint)
B 1365 ter.
of as of of 1135. RF
Plate VIII
V 2118 (PG, AV 2 sp.). P 58 (pi. vn). BM V 157a (pi. m). BN II 767. MA 703 (3 sp.).
As 1136.
P 61. B p. 180. Mateu III 44 (pi. xvm, no. 12): of misread, corrected from piate.
of as of of 1135. RF ^1 Lj
As 1139
a.h. 731-752
a.d. 1331-1351
OF .oil Ml i)l M
RF
(mint)
277
Plate VIII
As 1141.
HSA 13813.
As 1141.
As 1141.
ANS: mint uncertain. KM II719,726 ?(2sp. ?). 02155: mint uncertain. B p. 180 (100 sp.)
As 1141.
As 1141.
V 2130 (PG 2 sp., AV 2 sp.). P 55a. KM II 777, 778, 779 ? (3 sp. ?). H6st: and N 14
(pi. xxxm). Adler:C 91. Tychsen, O. p. 124. Tychsen, T. p. 93. Moura 3 (fig.). S:Castro 425
(4 sp.). 0 2153.
See silver ascribed to Nasrids 1153 and succeeding rejected coins , which may
Plate VTII
a.h. 760-762
of as of of 1135. RF
a.d. 1359-1361
Plate VIII
P 57 (pi. vn).
1149. (no mint) - square half dirhem. Attribution tentative. Plate VIII
V 2126 (AV): Cfl~ J>\ for t>ul-ll in 3rd line of rf (termed error by Prieto and Fasmer). P 104
(pi. x). S:Beyram 294. This coin differs from 1156 only in style.
sayyid at Marrakush
OF as OF of 1141. RF jf>Jl
P 92 (pi. 1x).
of as of of 1135. RF a-e
B p. 178: division into lines not indicated. The coins illustrated in Brethes pi. xxn under
no. 1319 and 1320, ascribed to 'Abd-al-Rahman for mints Fas and Miknasah, appear to be
almost illegible varieties of this coin in two quite different styles, with 1320 left the obverse
of which 1319 left is the reverse, and 1320 right the obverse of which 1319 right is the reverse.
279
Nasrid Silver
by the Bami-Nasr
of Granada (Gharnatah).
The Nasrids controlled Sabtah from a.h. 705 to 709 and from 786 to 789. The ano-
nymous silver struck there, identical except for mint with much of their Spanish silver,
may belong to either or both of these periods, and hence to any or all of the following three
rulers.
of as of of 1133. RF Jk Mj
oil Ml
(mint)
V 2199 (PG 3 sp., AV 6 sp.). BN II 822 (pi. v1). Figanier 166 (2 sp.). Mateu III 44 (pi. xvm,
P 59 ter (p. 113). Naijrids never controlled Fas, so this coin must either be erroneously
reported or be a Marinid issue, struck perhaps by 'Ali, who struck gold with Naijrid legends.
Wattasid S1lver
the Banu-Wattas
in Naskhi script.
1155. (no mint) - square dirhem struck presumably in a.h. 932. Plate VIII
of jO*l RF <al.4c
Host 15 (pi. xxx1n). B 1389-1391 (pi. xxv: all) (3 sp.): 1391 is clipped.
Ottoman S1lver
the Banu-'Uthman
of Istanbul (al-Qustantanah).
None reported which would come within the scope of this corpus, though the \
COPPER
'Abbas1d Copper
None reported which would come within the scope of this corpus.
281
FiTiMiD Copper
None reported which would come within the scope of this corpus.
ZIrid Copper
None reported.
Hammadid Copper
None reported.
Hammudid Copper
in the name of
the Banu-Hammiid
of Malaga (Malaqah)
in Kuf1 script.
Saqaut ibn-Muhammad
governor at Sabtah
With heir
al-'Izz ibn-Saqaut
As 882.
BN II 503 (pi. n): jUll for olll in 5th line of of (error). MA 356: date uncertain, slightly
As 883.
As 884.
BN II 505, 506 ? (2 sp. ?): jLll for oUil in of, without sA on rf.
As 886.
MurIbit Copper
in Kuf1 script.
Abu-Bakr ibn-'Umar
As 41.
'.All ibn-Yusuf
As 949.
MA 541.
As 243.
V 1611 (AV).
As 952.
BN II 595, 596 (2 sp.): J (?) b rf. KM II 647: J (?) b rf, date illegible. Tychsen, 0. p. 120:
As 956.
ANS: ij a of and rf, b of and rf. BM V 66: & a of and rf, b of and rf; 67 (2 sp.).
KM II 646 (pi. m): a of and rf, ^ 6 of and rf. MA 542 (2 sp.): om misread, corrected
by Vives. Tychsen, O. p. 120: mint given as al-Andalus (error), probably this coin.
As 957.
MA 537.
283
As 970.
As 910.
BN II 597.
1169. (no mint) - (no date) - denomination not specified. Plate VIII
As 939 (electrum).
HSA 547: fragment. Fraehn:F 12: not described. Fraehn:iV p. 279, no. 7.
Muwahhid Copper
in Naskhi script.
None of the gilded copper dinars, reported by al-Marrakushi as minted to ransom 'Abd-al-
Mu'min's son 'Isa from his Arab captors, has been reported in any modern collection; the
Anonymous.
As 1096.
KM II 780.
As 1101.
Blau :0 247a.
Hudid Copper
None reported.
Hafs1d Copper
the Banu-Hafs
in Naskh1 script.
1172.
Copper struck by this ruler is mentioned, but not described, by Ibn-Khaldun (Kitab
al-'ibar, Bulaq edition, vol. VI, p. 288). Al-Zarkashi (Ta'rikh al-daulatayn ..., Tunis ed.,
p. 29) ascribes it to a.h. 660 (a.d. 1261). It has not been identified in any modern collection.
OF _^l> RF ^Ul y\
OF [_>c] RF l
(mint) j
F.Hafsites 62.
B 1270 (pi. x1x) is a copper ornament, not a coin. The 3 fels noted by Babelon (p. lxx1)
Z1yIn1d Copper
Mar1n1d Copper
the Banii-Marin.
None reliably reported. The following dated felses, ascribed to this dynasty, are
Nasr1d Copper
WattIsid Copper
None reported.
Ottoman Copper
None reported which would come within the scope of this corpus.
NUMISMATIC BIBLIOGRAPHY
All the sources of coins noted in the corpus are here listed in alphabetical order of the
abbreviations by which they are indicated. In addition to published books and articles, the list
includes the collections in America to which I have had access, letters from scholars abroad, and
a few selected coin-dealers' auction catalogues. Relevant numismatic literature from which no
coins are derived are separately listed in the numismatic reference bibliography.
The sequence of the arrangement of references in the corpus is as follows: first, coins which
I have personally examined, including the collections of the American Numismatic Society, The
Hispanic Society of America, the University (of Pennsylvania) Museum, and the Metropolitan
Museum of Art; second, previous partial compilations, including Vives (Monedas de las dinastias
arabigo-espanolas) and Prieto (La reforma numismatica de los Almohades); third, the four great
public collections in Europe, those of the British Museum (catalogued by Lane-Poole, abbreviated
to BM), of the Bibliotheque Nationale (catalogued by Lavoix, BN), of the Museo Arqueologico
National (catalogued by Rada, MA), and of the Konigliche Museen (catalogued by Niitzel, KM);
fourth, all other published material in chronological order, including dealers' catalogues; and
Following each entry will be found a summary by dynasty and metal of the coins derived from
it for this corpus; each dynasty is indicated by the first three letters of its name (except the
Hammadids, spelled out to avoid confusion with the Hammudids), each metal is represented by
its initial letter. The figure to the left of a slanting line or standing alone indicates different
identifiable issues; the figure to the right of a slanting line indicates additional specimens re-
corded, whether dupiicates, rejected coins, or inadequately described coins which cannot be
identified.
Adler :C Jakob G.C. Adler, Collectio nova numorum cuficorum seu arabicorum veterum, CXVI
continens numos plerosque ineditos e museis Borgiano et Adleriano, Copenhagen, 1792. (Mur g 3;
Adler :M Jacob G.C. Adler, Museum Cuficum Borgianum Velitris, Rome, 1782. (Muw s 1)
Ashmolean Ashmolean Museum's unpublished collection; a coin presented by A.C. Kay and
B J.D. Brethes, Contribution a l'histoire du Maroc par les recherches numismatiques, Casablanca,
1939. (A superb private collection, inaccurately described and illegibly illustrated in the most
exasperating numismatic treatise ever published; Zir g 1; Mur g 147/30, s 23/20; Muw g 41/149
and 1 medal, s 19/15 and 5 amulets; Hud s 2/1; Haf g 27/5, s 1/1; Ziy g 9/3; Mar g 78/29
Babelon Emest Babelon, Untitled note in Bulletin Archeologique du Comiti des Travaux
Numismatic bibliography
287
Balog Dr. Paul Balog's unpublished collection, described in letters to G.C. Miles and myself.
Bartholomaei J.deBartholomaei, "Troisime lettre ... M. F. Soret sur des monnaies koufi-
ques indites", in Revue de la Numismatique Belge 3:VI (1862) :23-1o5. (Mur g 2; Muw g 1)
Bel Alfred Bel, "Contribution l'tude des dirhems de l'poque almohade ...", iaHesprisXVI
Berchem Max van Berchem, "Titres califiens d'occident propos de quelques monnaies
titles from numismatic and epigraphic evidence, to which I have ventured to offer a few
Beylie L. de Beylie, La Kalaa des Beni-Hammad ..., Paris, 1909. (Hammadid g -/1)
Bigonet E. Bigonet, "Dinar hafside indit", in Revue Africaine XLV (1901): 97-100. (Haf g 1)
Blancard Louis Blancard, "Besants d'or et d'argent de Tunis au XIIIe sicle", in Annuaire
Blau:0 O(tto) Blau, Die orientalischen Mnzen des Museums der Kaiserlichen Historisch-
BM IV Stanley Lane(-)Poole, Catalogue of oriental coins in the British Museum; vol. IV - The
BM V Stanley Lane(-)Poole, Catalogue of oriental coins in the British Museum; vol. V - The
coins of the Moors of Africa and Spain and the kings and imams of the Yemen, London, 1880.
(Mur g 47/3, s 18/11, c 1/1; Muw g 21/14 and 2 hybrids, s 10/26; Haf g 7/2, s 2/1; Ziy g 2;
Additions to the oriental collection, 1876-1888; part I, London, 1889. (Ham s -/1)
BM X Stanley Lane-Poole, Catalogue of oriental coins in the British Museum; vol. X - Additions
to the oriental collection, 1876-1888; part II, London, 1890. (Several emendations of BM V
and BM X were kindly suppiied in a letter from the present curator, John Walker, who
reports that there have been no additions to the oriental collections since their compilation;
Mur g 17, s 2; Muw g 5/1, s 3/2; Haf g 3/1; Mar g 39/4 and 2 hybrids; Wat g 1)
Espagne et Afrique, Paris, 1891. (Several emendations were kindly suppiied by G.C. Miles;
Zir g 1 ; Ham c 3/1 ; Mur g 112/6, s 20/11, c 2/1 ; Muw g 16/4 and 2 hybrids, s 14/18; Haf g 39/10
BN III Henri Lavoix, Catalogue des monnaies musulmanes de la Bibliothque Nationale; vol. III
degli Studi Orientali X(1925) :377-4o6. (Chiefly important as a reference work on metrology;
Muw s 2)
Brooke G.C. Brooke, "A brief survey of the coinage of Africa and Australasia", in J.G. Bar-
tholomew, A literary and historical atlas of Africa and Australasia (pp.65-92), London, (n.d.).
(Mur g 1)
Brosselard C. Brosselard, "Mmoire pigraphique et historique sur les tombeaux des mirs
288
in Bulletin de l'A cadmie Impriale des Sciences de Saint Ptersbourg XXV(1879) :col. 391-409.
(Mur g 1, s 1; Muw g 1)
C.Donativo Francisco Codera (y Zaidin), "Donativo de monedas rabes ... por D. Francisco
C:Estudio Francisco Codera (y Zaidin), "Estudio crtico sobre la historia y monedas de los
C:Familia Francisco Codera (y Zaidin), Familia real de los Beni Texufin, Saragossa, 1903.
Reprinted in his Estudios criticos ...; second series (pp. 75-165), Madrid, 1917. (Mur g 1)
(Ham s -/1)
C.Lebrija Francisco Codera (y Zaidin), "Dos monedas rabes de oro halladas en Lebrija", in
C:Monedas (Francisco Codera y Zaidin), "Monedas rabes adquiridas para el Museo Arqueolo-
(The first competent survey of the coinage of the Arabs in Spain, to which all succeeding
Caballero Francisco Caballero-Infante, Estudio sobre las monedas drabes de Denia, Denia, 1889.
(Mur g 11)
Calvo I(gnacio) Calvo and C(asto) M(aria) del Rivero, Catdlogo-guia de las colecciones de
monedas ... en el Museo Arqueoldgico Nacional, Madrid, 1925. (A tantalizing summary of the
numbers of coins of each dynasty, dispersed during the civil war; Mur g 2/369, s -/322,
Campaner:M Alvaro Campaner (y Fuertes), Monedas propias de las islas baleares acuadas por
los dominadores islamitas, Palma de Mallorca, 1879. (Condensed version of next entry; Muw s 2)
Campaner :2V Alvaro Campaner y Fuertes, Numismdtica balear, Palma de Mallorca, 1879.
(Muw s 2)
Castiglioni (Cario Ottavio Castiglioni), Monete cufiche de' I. R. Museo di Milano, Milan, 1819.
(Ham c 1; Mur g 39, s 4/15, c 1; Muw g 6, s 7/3; Haf g -/1; Mar g -4)
Chalon R(en) Chalon, "Souvenir des croisades; quart de dinar trouv prs d'Ypres", in Revue
Cimino Guido Cimino, "Storia e numismtica delT Africa del Nord", in Libya III(1927):
202-227. (Mur g -/3; Muw g 1/1 and 1 hybrid, s -/2; Haf g 1/3)
Numismatic Bibliography
289
Codrington, 0. O(liver) Codrington, Some rare and unedited Arabic and Persian coins, Hertford,
1889. (Haf g 1)
Colson Colson, "Notes sur les dinars trouvs, en 1851, dans l'ancienne chapelle du Monastre
Cond Josef Antonio Cond, "Memoria sobre la moneda arbiga y en especial la acufiada en
V(1817) :225-314. (A pioneer work in the field but of little present value; Mur g 4, s 9/1;
Cunha II J. Gerson da Cunha, Catalogue of the coins in the numismatic cabinet; part II, Bombay,
1889. (Mur g 1)
D.Garcia Antonio Delgado, "Monnaies arabes", in Joseph Gaillard, Description des monnaies
espagnoles ... du cabinet de D. Jos Garcia de la Torre (pp. 344-418), Madrid, 1852. (Ham
c 2/3; Mur g 4, s 23/21 ; Muw g 6/4, s 6/61 ; Hud g 1; Haf g 5/3; Mar g 4/18, s -/1)
D .Lorichs Antonio Delgado, Catalogue des monnaies ... de Mr. Gustave Daniel de Lorichs ....
Madrid, 1857. (Mur g 13/1, s -/20; Muw g 3 and 1 hybrid, s 3/12; Ziy g 1)
Demaeght Louis Demaeght, "Contribution au recueil des monnaies frappees sous les dynasties
Dieulafoy (Marcel) Dieulafoy, "(Monnaies d'or de l'poque almohade)", in Comptes Rendus des
Sances; Institut de France; Acadmie des Inscriptions et Belleis-Letres (1905) :56-58. (Muw
g I/I39)
Dombay Franz von Dombay, "Abhandlung ber die marokkanischen Gold-, Silber- und
Dorn:^4 (Bernhard) Dorn, Das Asiatische Museum der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissen-
Dorn I (Bernhard) Dorn, Inventaire des monnaies des khalifes orientaux et de plusieurs autres
dynasties; part 1 - Classes I-IX, St. Petersburg, 1877. (Mur g 10/7; Muw s 1/8)
Dorn II (Bernhard) Dorn, Inventaire des monnaies des khalifes orientaux et de plusieurs autres
Eichhorn J.G. Eichhorn, "Nachtrag zu Reiske's Briefen tiber das arabische Mnzwesen", in
F.Hafsites J. Farrugia de Candia, "Monnaies haf sites du muse du Bardo", in Revue Tuni-
19
290
Fasmer I R(ichard) Vasmer, "Zwei neue Biicher iiber spanisch-arabische Numismatik; part I"
(review of Prieto: Reforma), in Zeitschrift fur Numismatik XXXVIII (1928) :206-222. (Muw s 2)
Figanier Joaquim Figanier, Moedas drabes: part I (711-1492); Museu Numismdtico Portugues,
Lisbon, 1949. (emendations kindly furnished by letter; Mur g 7, s 3/1; Muw g 2, s 2/28;
Nas s 1/1)
Fleischer H.L. Fleischer, "Vermischtes; no. 5", in Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlndischen
Fraehn:B Ch(ristian) M(artin) Fraehn, "Inedita aus der orientalischen Miinzsammlung des
H(err)n v(on) Bose in Leipzig", in Bulletin Scientifique IV(1838) :col. 246-250. (Mur g 3)
Fraehn:0 Chr(istian) M(artin) Fraehn, Opusculorum postumorum; vol. II, St. Petersburg, 1877.
(Mur g 2)
Scient. Petropolitanae, St. Petersburg, 1826. (A great pioneering work in Islamic numismatics,
Fraehn:F Ch(ristian) M(artin) Fraehn, "Verzeichniss der ... verehrten Miinzen", in Bulletin
G L.J.G., "Monnaies arabes trouvees dans le Dauphine", in Revue Archologique II(1845) :182.
(Mur g 2)
161-343. (Muw s 1)
from original in Zeitschrift des Historischen Vereins fur Niedersachsen (1853) :414~417) in
Host :E Georg Host, Efterretninger om Marokos og Fes ..., Copenhagen, 1779. (Mur g 2, s 1;
H6st:iV Georg Host, Nachrichten von Morokos und Fes, Copenhagen, 1781. (Translation of
Society. (The finest collection in the western hemisphere of coins of Spain and associated
countries, including Arabic coins of Spain and North Africa; Ham s 2; Mur g 31/1, s 20/27,
Ibn-Abi-Zar' I bn-Abi-Zar' (edited by Carolus Johannes Tornberg), Kitab al-anis al-mufrib biraud
al-qirfas ..., Upsala, 1843. (A basic historical source with incidental mention of coins; Muwg 1)
Ibn-Khaldun Ibn-Khaldun, Kitab al-Hbar, Bulaq, a.h. 1284 (a.d. 1867/8). (A basic historical
Numismatic Bibliography
291
J .Gold J.M.C. Johnston, "Gold coins of the Muwahhids", in Numismatic Chronicle 4:II(1902):
KM II (Heinrich Nutzel), Katalog der orientalischen Miinzen; vol. II - Die Mtinzen der musli-
mischen Dynastieen Spaniens und des westlichen Nordafrika; Konigliche Museen zu Berlin,
Berlin, 1902. (One of the great European collections, now presumably dispersed; Zir g 2;
Mur g54/5, s 21/21, c 2; Muwg11/3 and 1 hybrid, s 15/64, c 1; Haf g7/1, s1/1; Marg5, s 2/3)
Krehl Ludolf Krehl, De numis muhammadanis in Numophylacio Regio Dresdensi, Leipzig, 1856.
(Muw s 2/4)
L: Bodleian Stanley Lane-Poole, Catalogue of the Mohammadan coins preserved in the Bodleian
Library at Oxford, Oxford, 1888. (These coins are now in the Ashmolean Museum, the curator
of which, Mr. J.G. Milne, kindly suppiied me with photographs; Muw s 2/1)
coins, and other essays in oriental numismatics (pp. 9-16), London, 1892. (Mur g 5; Muw s 1/1;
Mar g 1)
L.Inedited Stanley Lane(-)Poole, "Inedited Arabic coins - I", in Journal of the Royal Asiatic
Society NS:VII(1875) :243-261. Reprinted in his Essays in oriental numismatics; 2nd series
L:Johnston S(tanley) Lane-Poole, "Fasti Arabici; VII - Mr. J.M.C. Johnston's cabinet, etc.",
(Muw s 1/1)
L:Khedivial Stanley Lane-Poole, Catalogue of the collection of Arabic coins preserved in the
Khedivial Library at Cairo, London, 1897. (Mur g 5, s 1; Muw g 6, s 2/10; Haf g 1; Ziy g 1;
Mar g 2/2)
h.Muwahhids Stanley Lane(-)Poole, "On the coins of the Muwahhids in the British Museum",
field by the great British numismatist; Muw g 8/8 and 2 hybrids, s 6/19; Haf s 1)
Lagumina Bartolomeo Lagumina, Catalogo delle monete arabe esistenti nella Biblioteca Communale
Lavoix:H Henri Lavoix, "Memoires sur les monnaies frappees par les Beni-Hafss", in Revue
Archologique 1 :IX(1852) :257-275. (The first important monograph in this field by the great
Leite J. Pereira Leite Netto, Catalogo das moedas arabes existentes no Museu Municipal
Longperier:/! Adrien de Longperier, "Histoire de l'art monetaire chez les modernes ... par
Hafg2)
Arabes d'Espagne; programme, Paris, 1851. Reprinted in his Oeuvres (vol. I, pp. 417-434),
19*
22
MA Juan de Dios de la Rada y Delgado, Catdlogo de monedas arbigas espanolas que se conservan
en el Museo Arqueolgico National, Madrid, 1892. (Formerly one of the great European
collections, dispersed during the civil war; Ham c 2/3; Mur g 66/20, s 52/89, c 5/1; Muw
Marais Georges Marais, "Un coin montaire almoravide du Muse Stphane Gsell", in Annales
de l'Institut d'tudes Orientales II(1936) :18o-188. (Important for minting technique; Mur g 1)
Marcel Jean-Joseph Marcel, Numismatique orientale: tableau gnral des monnaies ayant cours
Mareschal H.-R. Mareschal, "Dinar et quart de dinar du souverain de la famille des BeniZian,
Abou el-Abbs Ahmed ben Abi Hammou Mousa II, qui rgna Tlemcen, de 1431 1462",
Ermitazha, St. Petersburg, 1896. (This great Russian collection had relatively few western
coins; they are merely listed by mint and date; Mur g 40/4, s -/15; Muw g 3, s 4/4; Haf g
Marsden William Marsden, Numismata orientalia illustrata; vol. I, London, 1823. (Mur g 7,
s 1; Muw s 1; Haf g 2)
Mateu F(elipe) Mateu y Llopis, Adquisiciones en 1931; Monetario que perteneci a Don Basilio
XVI (1951):205-21o.
Miles George C. Miles, Ftimid coins: Numismatic notes and monographs no. 121, New York,
1951. (Zir g 1)
285-319. (Haf s 3)
Moura Jos de Santo Antonio Moura, "Memoria de cinco medalhas Africanas", in Historia e
Mller A(ugust) Mller, Katalog der Bibliothek der Deutschen Morgenlndischen Gesellschaft;
Numismatic Bibliography
293
Munter (Friedrich C. Munter), Museum Miinterianum; part III - Numos byzantinorum alio-
0 J. 0strup, Catalogue des monnaies rabes et turques du Cabinet Royal des Mdailles du Muse
estudios y textos drabes (pp. 11-114), Madrid, 1915. (An excellent survey of part of this
coinage; Muw g 60, s 32; Hud g 2, s 4; Haf g 12; Mar g 107 and 3 hybrids, s 10; as S-/2)
127-133. (Zir g 1)
P:Reyes Antonio Prieto y Vives, Los reyes de taifas, Madrid, 1926. (Ham s 12; Mur s 19)
Rivero :4 Casto M(ari)a del Rivero and Felipe Mateu y Llopis, Adquisiciones en 1932; Collec-
Ziy g 1; Mar g 1)
Rivero: Casto M(ari)a del Rivero, "El arte monetario en la Espaa musulmana", in Revista
de Archivos, Bibliotecas, y Museos LIV(1948) :51-72. (Mur g 2, s 13/1; Muw g 4/1, s 2/1)
Rivero:M Casto M(ari)a del Rivero, La moneda ardbigo-espaola, Madrid, 1933. (Mur g 10,
Rodgers Cha(rle)s J(ames) Rodgers, Catalogue of the coins of the 1ndian Museum; part 4,
S:Beyram J(acques) Schulman, Collection de Mr. Moustapha Beyram Bey ..., Amsterdam,
1909. (All entries under Schulman are auction catalogues prepared with unusual competence;
collections ... de Castro ... AureU ... Oosterman, Amsterdam, 1912. (Mur s 10; Muw g 2,
S:Ciscar J(acques) Schulman, Collection Ciscar y Montolin ..., Amsterdam, 1910. (Mur g 1,
s 1; Muw g 3/2, s 1)
S:Comte J(acques) Schulman, Catalogue d'une superbe collection ... de feu Monsieur le Comte
Catalogue illustr des collections ... Dodgson ... et ... gentleman ..., Amsterdam, 1908.
(Mur g 1)
in Catalogue des collections ... Bucknill, ... Henderson, ... Vogel, ... amateur ..., Philippe
2Q4
S:Judice III J(acques) Schulman, Collection Joaquim Jos Judice dos Santos; part 3, Amster-
S:Karabaczek J(acques) Schulman, "Collection de ... von Karabaczek ...", in Catalogue illu-
str des collections ... Oliver ... von Karaback (sic) ... Bourdillon, Amsterdam, 1907. (Mur
Bleazby, ... Straus(s) ..., et ... Michael ..., Amsterdam, 1913. (Mur g 2; Muw g 2)
S:White J(acques) Schulman, Collection White King; 3rd part, Amsterdam, 1905. (Mur g 6;
Sacy (Antoine Isaac) Silvestre de Sacy, "Mmoire sur quelques monnaies arabes en or des
Almohades et des Mrinites", in Journal des Savants (1837) :530-545. (Muw g 5/2; Haf g 2)
Sallet Alfred von Sallet, Miinzen und Medaillen, Berlin, 1898. (Muw g 1)
Sawaszkiewicz L(opold) L(on) Sawaszkiewicz, Le gnie de l'orient, comment par ses monu-
ments montaires, Brussels, 1846. (Mur g 2/3, s -I4, c -/1; Muw g 1, s -/2)
Schiepati (Giuseppe Schiepati), Descrizione di alcune monete cufiche del museo di Stejano de
Seaby B.A. Seaby, Ltd., Coin and medal bulletin # 368 (1949). (Other coins catalogued by
this dealer are either dupiicates of listed issues or insufficiently described; Murg1;
Mar g 1)
Seco Luis Seco de Lucena, "Hallazgos de monedas arabes", in al-Andalus XIV(1949) :467-469.
Soret:/? F(rdric) Soret, "Lettre M. le Colonel aux Gardes de Bartholomae ... ; part 2",
Soret .D F(rdric) Soret, "Lettre M. le Conseiller d'tat de Dorn ... ; part 2", in Revue de la
Soret .F Frdric Soret, "Lettre S. E. Monsieur le Conseiller d'tat actuel de Fraehn ...",
Soret :K F(rdric) Soret, "Lettre Mr. le Dr. L. Krehl ... sur quelques monnaies orientales
... ", in Zeitschriff t der Deutschen Morgenlndischen Gesellschaft XIX(1865) :544-561. (Hud s 1)
Soret:/? Frdric Soret, "Trois lettres sur des monnaies cufiques ... du Muse de Genve;
Sotheby Sotheby, Wilkinson, and Hodge, Catalogue of the collection of ... Mohammedan coins
... of the late J.M.C. Johnston ..., London, 1906. (Mur g 11, s 2/13; Muw g 18/10, s -/12;
Spink Spink and Son, Ltd., "Catalogue of coins and medals for sale", in Monthly Numismatic
Circular, 1893-1950. (Mur g 12/10 ; Muw g 16/44, s 1 ; Haf g 1 ; Ziy g-/2; Mar g 4/12 ; Wat g-j2)
Tornberg Cari Johan Tornberg, Numi cufici Regii Numophylacii Holmiensis, Upsala, 1848.
[(Mur g 2)
Numismatic Bibliography
295
Tychsen, O.: Introductionis Olaf Gerhard Tychsen, Introduction's in rem numarium Muham-
Numismatic Society, formed by Yaqub Artin Bey, presented by Robert C.H. Brock. (Mur
g 1, s 1; Muw g 1, s 2/1)
V Antonio Vives y Escudero, Monedas de las dinastias ardbigo-espanolas, Madrid, 1893. (The
first corpus of Spanish Arabic coins; includes many Hammudid, Murabit, and Muwahhid
issues but few of the later African dynasties; does not include weights or mintmarks and has
many minor errors, but remains indispensable for modern scholars, as many of the collec-
tions accessible to Vives have been dispersed; Ham s 14/18; Mur g 325/271, s 142/337, c 2;
Muw g 42/38 and 2 hybrids, s 38/323; Hud s 1/2; Mar s 7/7; Nas s 1/8)
Vollers K(arl) Vollers, "Das orientalische Munzkabinett der Universitat Jena im Jahre 1906",
a fine collection, for a compiete description of which I have inquired in vain; Zir g-/2;
Mur g -/12, s -/18, c -/1; Muw g 1/20, s 1/24, c -/1; Haf g -/8; Ziy g -/2; Mar g -J7, s -/1)
Welzl Leopold Welzl von Wellenheim, Verzeichniss der Miinz- und Medaillen-Sammlung; vol. II,
Weyl:i" Adolph Weyl, Verzeichniss von Miinzen ... der Jules Fonrobert'schen Sammlung,
Weyl:G Adolph Weyl, Verzeichniss der reichhaltigen Sammlung ... desFiirstenG(agarin), Berlin,
1885. (Mur g 26/1, s3/5; Muwg7/4, s 2/4; Hudg 1; Haf g 2; Mar g3 and 1 hybrid)
Zambaur: WEduard von Zambaur, Kollektion Ernst Prinz zu Windisch-Gratz; vol. VII, part 1 -
(a.d. 1872/3). (A basic historical source with incidental mention of coins; Haf c 1)
Ziya Ahmed Ziya, Catalogue of Islamic coins, Constantinopie, 1910. (Mur g 2; Haf g 1/1)
*****
In addition to the sources of coins reported in the numismatic bibliography, the following
works are useful for reference; they are listed alphabetically by author. No attempt has been
made to include every outlying reference consulted during the preparation of this study.
Barthelemy, J.B.A.A., Nouveau manuel complet de numismatique du moyen age et moderne, Paris,
296
van Berchem, Max, "Notes d'archologie arabe: monuments et inscriptions fatimites", in Journal
Blancard, Louis, Essai sur les monnaies de Charles 1er, Comte de Provence, Paris, 1868. (Discussion
of exchange values)
Marais (pp. 63-94), Paris, 1950. (Excellent modern monograph stressing metrology)
Codera y Zaidin, Francisco, Errores de varios numismdticos extranjeros al tratar de las monedas
sharp-eyed expert)
Codera y Zaidin, Francisco, Titulos y nombres propios en las monedas ardbigo-espanolas, Madrid,
Decourdemanche, J(ean) A(dolphe), "Etude mtrologique et numismatique sur les misqals et les
Decourdemanche, J(ean) A(dolphe), Trait pratique des poids et mesures des peuples anciens et des
Ethem, Halil, Essai d'une bibliographie pour la numismatique musulmane, Ankara, 1933. (Biblio-
Fasmer II R(ichard) Vasmer, "Zwei neue Bcher iiber spanisch-arabischeNumismatik; part II",
Fiorelle, Giuseppe, "Delie monete arabe dette moumini", in Annali di Numismatice I(1853) :47-48.
Fraehn, Ch(ristian) M(artin), "Du caractre d'criture arabe nomm carmatique; dissertation ou l'on
prouve qu'il n'a jamais exist un caractere ainsi nomm", in Journal Asiatique 2:I(1828) : 379-
391. (Classic refutation of the Qarmati fallacy, inexpiicably ignored by many later orientalists)
de Gayangos (y Arce), Pascual, "The Morabeti and other coins of Mohammedan Spain", in The
Gonzlez-Palencia, Angel, Loz mozarabes de Toledo en los siglos XII y XIII; vol. I, Madrid, 1926.
(Exchange)
Guilhiermoz, P., "Note sur les poids du moyen-ge", in Bibliothque de l'cole des Chartes
Hofmeier, Karl Wilhelm, "Die Verleihung des Titels "Frst der Muslimen" an Jsuf ibnTsfn",
in Wiener Zeitschrift der Kunde des Morgenlandes XXII(19o8) :184-199. (Murabit titles)
Numismatic Bibliography
297
de Lastanosa y Baraiz de Vera, Vincencio Juan, Museo de las medallas desconoidas espanolas,
Leggett, Eugene, Notes on the mint-towns and coins of the Mohamedans, London, 1885. (Stimulating
but inaccurate)
de Longperier, Adrien, in Journal des Savants 3 :XLI(1876) :428-442. Reprinted in his Oeuvres
Massignon, Louis, Le Maroc dans les premires annes du XVIe sicle, Algiers, 1906. (Exchange
and metrology)
finds)
Mayer, L(eo) A.., Annual bibliography of Islamic art and archaeology, India excepted; vol. I - 1935,
vol. II - 1936, vol. Ill -1937, Jerusalem, 1937-1939. (Includes additions to next entry)
Mayer, L(eo) A., Bibliography of Moslem numismatics, India excepted (Oriental Translation Fund,
vol. XXXV), London, 1939. (Indispensable foundation for all work in this field, soon to be
issued in a revised edition, of which the author generously allowed me to use the proofs)
de la Rada y Delgado, Juan de Dios, Bibliografia numismdtica espanola, Madrid, 1886. (Not
Reiske, Johann Jacob, "Briefe iiber das arabische Miinzwesen", in Repertorium filr Biblische und
Morgenlndische Literalur IX(1781) :199-268; X(1782) :165-240; XI(1783) :1-44. (Early and
difficult)
Gunzburg)
de Sacy, A(ntoine) I(saac) Silvestre, "De quelques monnoies arabes et des monnoies de Tunis
graph)
de Sacy, (Antoine Isaac) Silvestre, in Journal des Savan(t)s (1823) :131-141, 259-270, 387-399.
de St. Elie, Anastase-Marie, An-nuqud al-'arabiyeh wa HIm an-nummiyt, Cairo, 1939. (Biblio-
graphy)
Soret, F(rdric), lments de la numismatique musulmane, Basle, 1868. (General reference work
Vazquez Queipo, V., Essai sur les systmes mtriques et montaires des anciens peuples depuis les
premiers temps historiques jusqu' la fin du khalifat d'orient; vol. II, Paris, 1859. (Metrology)
Vives (y Escudero), Antonio, "Indicacin del valor en las monedas arbigo-espanolas", in Homendje
D. Francisco Codera (pp. 513-522), Saragossa, 1904. (Useful monograph on design con-
ventions)
HISTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
and specifically of the personal names and relationships, the place-names, and the dates
used in preparing the text and corpus. It is divided into four portions: the medieval Arabic
historians (that is, historians of any nationality writing in the Arabic language), from whom
the vast majority of the information has been obtained; the modern compilations of
physical objects; the modern compilations of medieval Arabic and European letters,
treaties, and other documents; and the most important of the innumerable modern
Within each of these four divisions the works are arranged alphabetically by author
or compiler, and to each work is prefixed an index number by which it is designated in the
lists of rulers inserted at the start of each chapter on the coinage of individual dynasties.
A. ARABIC
These works are alphabetized under the name by which the author is usually known,
disregarding such prefixes as al-, Abu-, and Ibn-. Editions which I have not personally
consulted are included for the sake of utility, but are enclosed within parentheses. Those
which I have used have naturally varied greatly in importance, from Ibn-Khaldun and
other basic historians through YaqQt and other geographers down to travellers and eastern
chroniclers who may have confirmed a single date or the spelling of a place-name. Ab-
breviations used in this division of the index include: ed(ited by), ex(cerpts), translated
by), and w(ith) n(otes), as well as the usual p(age), v(olume), etc. Within an author heading
different works, and different editions and translations of the same work, are listed chrono-
logically.
A1. Ibn-al-Abbar Kitab al-hullah al-siyara': (a) ex. ed. w.n. R. Dozy, Notices sur quelques
manuscrits arabes (pp. 29-260), Leyden, 1847-1851; (b) ex. ed. w.n. M.J. Miiller, Beitrage
zur Geschichte der westlichen Araber (pp. Arabic 161-360), Munich, 1866-1878;(c) ex.
ed. & tr. E. Lvi-Provencal, Documents inedits d'histoire almohade (pp. 227-230, Arabic
A2. Ibn-al-Abbar Kitab al-takmilah li-kitab al-?ilah:(a) 2 v. ed. w.n. F. Codera y Zaidin as
Complementum libri Assilah, Madrid, 1887-1889;^) ex. ed. w.n. M. Alarcn and C.A.
estudios y textos arabes (pp. 149-690), Madrid, 1915 ;(c) ex. ed. & tr. w.n. A. Bel and M. ben
Cheneb in Revue Africaine (1918) :3o6-335;(d) v. 3 ed. w.n. A. Bel and M. ben Cheneb as
Historical Bibliography
299
A2a. 'Abd-al-Bsit Al-raud al-basim fi hawadith al-'umr wa'l-tarjim: ex. ed. &tr. w.n.
A3. al-'Abdari Al-rihlah al-Maghribiyah: ex. tr. w. n. (A.) Cherbonneau in Journal Asiatique
5: IV (1854) : 144-176.
A4. Ibn-'Abdun Risalah :(a) ed. w.n. E. Lvi-Provenal in Journal Asiatique CCXXIV(1934):
Paris, 1947.
A5. Ibn-al-Ahmar Raudat al-nisrn fi daulat Bani Marn:(a) v. 2 tr. w.n. R. Dozy as "Histoire
des benou-Ziyan de Tlemcen", in Journal Asiatique 4:III(1844) :378~416;(b) v. 1 ed. & tr.
w.n. G. Bouali and G. Marais as "Histoire des Ben Mern, rois de Fs", in Bulletin de
Correspondance Africaine LV(1917) :i-xxi, 1-157;(c) ex. ed. &tr. w.n. E. Lvi-Provenal
A6. Ibn-al-Athir Kitab al-kmil fi'l-ta'rikh:(a) ed. w.n. C.J. Tornberg as Chronicon ...
(14 v.), Leyden, 1851-1876;^) ex. tr. w.n. E. Fagnan as "Annales du Maghreb et de
A7. Ibn-al-'Attar Ta'rikh balad Qusanrinah: tr. w.n. A. Dournon in Revue Africaine
LVII(1913):265-305.
A8. al-'Ayni Ta'rikh al-badr (abridgment of his 'Iqd al-jumn fi ta'rikh ahl al-zamn):
ex. tr. E. Fagnan, Extraits indits relatifs au Maghreb (pp. 262-270), Algiers, 1924.
A9. al-Badisi Al-maqsad al-sharif wa'l-manza' al-la^if fi dhikr sulah' al-Rif: tr. w.n. G.S.
Ao. Ibn-Badrn Sharh qasidat Ibn 'Abdun: ed. w.n. R. Dozy as Commentaire historique sur
Au. al-Bakri Kitab al-masalik wa'l-mamalik:(a) ex. tr. w.n. (E.M.) Quatremre as "Descrip-
Slane, Algiers, 1857) ;(c) ex. tr. w.n. (MacG.) de Slane as "Description de l'Afrique
A12. al-Bkuwi Talkhis al-athr wa-'aja'ib al-malik al-qahhr: ex. tr. w.n. de Guignes in
A13. Ibn-Bashkuwal Kitab al-?ilah fi ta'rikh a'immat al-Andalus:(a) ed. w.n. F. Codera (y
Zaidin) as Assila (2 v.), Madrid, 1882-1883; (b) ex. ed. w.n. F. Codera (y Zaidin) in Ibn-
al-Faradi's Historia vivorum doctorum Andalusiae (v. II, pp. ix-xiii, ArabiC 75-120),
Madrid, 1891-1892.
A.14 Ibn-Batttah Tuhfat al-nuzzr fi ghara'ibal-am?r wa-'aja'ib al-asfar: (a) ex. tr. w.n. S.
Lee, London, 1829 ;(b) ed. & tr. w.n. C. Defrmery and B.R. Sanguinetti as Voyages (5 v.),
Paris, 1853-1859 (later'reprinted) ;ex. tr. w.n. H.A.R. Gibb, London, 1929 (reprinted 1939).
A15. al-Baydhaq Ta'rikh al-Muwahhidin: ed. & tr. w.n. E. Lvi-Provenal as "L'histoire des
Almohades", in Documents indits d'histoire almohade (pp. i-xii, 75-225, 232-246, ArabiC
A16. al-abbi Kitab bughyat al-mutalammis fi ta'rikh rijal ahl al-Andalus: ed. w.n. F. Codera
Madrid, 1885.
A17. al-Dimashqi Kitab nukhbat al-dahr fi 'aja'ib al-barr wa'l-bahr:(a) ed. w.n. A.F. Mehren
as Cosmographie ..., St. Petersburg, 1865-1866 (reprinted with index Leipzig, 1923);^)
A18. Ibn-Abi-Dinar Al-mu'nis fi akhbar Ifriqiyah wa-Tunis:(a) tr. w.n. E. Pellissier and (G.)
A19. Ibn-al-Faq1h Kitab al-buldan: ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje as Kitdb al-bolddn, Leyden, 1885.
A20. Abu'l-Fida' Mukhtasar ta'rikh al-bashar:(a) 2nd half ed. & tr. w.n. J.J. Reiske as A nnales
1869/70).
A21. Abu'l-Fida' Taqwim al-buldan:(a) ed. w.n. (J.) Reinaud and MacG. de Slane as Geogra-
phic, Paris, 1840 ;(b) 1st half tr. w.n. (J.) Reinaud, Paris, 1848; (c) (2nd half tr. S.Guyard,
Paris, 1883).
A22. Ibn-Ghalbun Al-tadhkirah fi man malaka Tarabulus ...: tr. w.n. E. Rossi as La cronaca
A23. al-Ghubrini 'Unwan al-dirayah fi man 'urifah min 'ulama' al-mi'ah al-sabi'ah fi Bijayah:
(a) ex. tr. w.n. A. Cherbonneau in Journal Asiatique 5 :VII(1856) :475-496;(b) (ed. M. ben
A24. Ibn-Hammad Akhbar muluk Bani 'Ubayd wa-siratihim: ed. & tr. w.n. (N.) Vonder-
A25. Ibn-Hauqal Kitab al-masalik wa'l-mamalik:(a) ex. tr. w.n. MacG. de Slane in Journal
Asiatique 3:XIII(1842) :153-196, 209-258;^) ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje as Viae et regna,
Leyden, 1872-1873 ;(c) ed. w.n. J.H. Kramers as Liber imaginis terrae, Leyden, 1938-1939.
A26. al-Himyari Kitab al-raud al-mi'tar fi khabar al-aqtar: ed. & tr. w.n. E. Levi-Provencal as
A27. Ibn-al-'Idhari Kitab al-bayan al-mughrib ... :(a) 2 v. ed. w.n. R. Dozy as Histoire de
A28. al-Idrisi Nuzhat al-mushtaq fi ikhtiraq al-afSq:(a) ex. tr. w.n. J.M. Hartmann as Africa,
Gottingen, 1796 (2nd ed.);(b) ex. ed. & tr. w.n. J.A. Conde as Descripcion de Espana,
Madrid, 1799;(c) (tr. P.A. Jaubert (2 v.), Paris, 1836-1840) ;(d) ex. ed.&tr. w.n. R. Dozy
A29. al-Ifrani Nuzhat al-hadi bi-akhbar muhlk al-qarn al-hadi:(a) ed. O. Houdas, Paris,
A30. al-Istakhri Kitab masalik al-mamalik:(a) tr. w.n. (from Persian) W. Ousely as The
oriental geography of ebn Haukal, London, 1800 ;(b) (ed. Moller as Liber climatum, Gotha,
1839) ;(c) tr. w.n. A.D. Mordtmann as Das Buch der Lander, Hamburg, 1845 ;(d) ed. w.n.
M.J. de Goeje as Viaeregnorum, Leyden, 1870 ;(e) (rev. ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje, Leyden, 1927).
A31. Ibn-Iyas Nashaq al-azhar fi 'aja'ib al-aqtar: ex. ed. w.n. L. Langles as "Cosmographie",
A32. al-Jannabi Al-bahr al-zakhkhar wa'l-'aylam al-tayyar: ex. tr. w.n. E. Fagnan in Extraits
A33. al-Jazna'i Zahrat al-as: ed. & tr. w.n. A. Bel in Bulletin de Correspondance Africaine
A34. Ibn-Jubayr Rihlah:(a) (ed. W. Wright, Leyden, 1852);(b) tr. w.n. C. Schiaparelli as
Viaggio ..., Rome, 19o6;(c) ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje, Leyden, 1907.
A35. Ibn-Khaldun Kitab al-'ibar: (a) ex. tr. w.n. P. de Gayangos in al-Maqqari's The history
of the Mohammedan dynasties in Spain ... (v. II, pp. xlix-lxxx), London, 1843; (b) ex. ed.
& tr. w.n. C.J. Tornberg as "Narratio de expeditionibus Francorum ...", in Acta ...
Upsaliensis XII(1844) :1-154; (c) ex. tr. w.n. M(ac)G. de Slane as "Autobiographic", in
Historical Bibliography
301
(MacG.) de Slane as Histoire des Berberes (2 v.), Algiers, 1847-1851;(e) v. 6, 7 tr. w.n.
(MacG.) de Slane as Histoire des Berberes (4 v.), Algiers, 1852-1856 (3 v. reprinted Paris,
et Extraits XVI(1), XVII(1), XVIII(1), Paris 18581(g) v. 1 tr. w.n. (MacG.) de Slane as
"Les prolegomenes", in Notices et Extraits XIX(1) (1862), XX(1) (1865), XXI(1) (1868) ;(h)
ed. at Bulaq, 1867/8 ;(i) ex. tr. w.n. (M.) Gaudefroy-Demombynes as "Histoire des
A36. Ibn-Khallikan Kitab wafayat al-a'yan wa-anba' abna' al-zaman:(a) ed. w.n. F. Wiisten-
feld as Vitae illustrium virorum ... (2 v.), Gottingen, 1835-1843;^) v. 1 ed. MacG. de
Slane, Paris, 1838-1842;^) tr. w.n. MacG. de Slane as Biographical dictionary (4 v.),
Le collier d'or, Paris, 186o);(b) (tr. E. Bourgade, Paris, 1865) ;(c) ed. at Bulaq, 1866/7.
A38. Ibn-al-Khatib Al-hulal al-marqumah ... :(a) ex. ed. & tr. M. Casiri, Bibliotheca arabico-
hispana escurialensis (v. II, pp. 246-319), Madrid, 1770;(b) (ed. at Tunis, 1898) ;(c) ed. at
Tunis, 1915/6.
A39. Ibn-al-Khatib Al-lumhah al-badriyah fi'l-daulah al-Nasriyah:(a) ex. ed. & tr. M. Casiri,
Bibliotheca arabico-hispana escurialensis (v. II, pp. 177-246), Madrid, 1770;(b) ed. Muhibb
A40. Ibn-al-Khatib Al-ihatah bi-ta'rikh Gharnatah:(a) ex. tr. w.n. M. Casiri, Bibliotheca
arabico-hispana escurialensis (v. II, pp. 71-121), Madrid, 1770;(b) ed. at Cairo, 1901/2.
A41. Ibn-al-Khatib A'mal al-a'lam:(a) ex. ed. w.n. H.H. 'Abd-al-Wahhab in Centenario delIa
nascita di Michele Amari (v. II, pp. 427-482), Palermo, 1910;(b) (ed. w.n. E. Levi-
A42. Ibn-al-Khatib Mi'yar al-ikhtiyar:(a) (ed. & tr. F.X. Simonet as Descripcion del Reino de
Granada ..., Madrid, 1861) ;(b) ex. ed. w.n. M.J. Muller, Beitrge zur Geschichte der west-
lichen Araber (pp. Arabic 45-100), Munich, 1866 (text reprinted Fez, 1907/8);^) rev. tr.
A43. Ibn-al-Khatib Mufakharat Malaqah wa-Sala:(a) ed. w.n. M.J. Muller, Beitrage zur Ge-
schichte der westlichen Araber (pp. Arabic 1-13), Munich, 1866 (text reprinted Fez,
A44. Ibn-Khayr Fihrist ma rawahu 'an shuyukhihi ...: ed. w.n. F. Codera (y Zaidin) and
A45. Ibn-Khurdadhbih Kitab al-masalik wa'l-mamalik^a) ed. & tr. w.n. C. Barbier de Meynard
in Journal Asiatique 6 :V(1865) :5-127, 227-296, 446-532 ;(b) ed. & tr. w.n. M.J. de Goeje,
Leyden, 1889.
A46. Leo Africanus (Arabic original lost, name unknown) :(a) tr. w.n. C. Schefer as Description
de l'Afrique ... (3 v.), Paris, 1896-1898;^) tr. w.n. J. Pory as The history and description
A47. al-Maqdisi Ahsan al-taqasim fi ma'rifat al-aqalim:(a) ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje as Descriptio
imperii Moslemici, Leyden, 1877 ;(b) ex. tr. w.n. G.S.A. Ranking and R.F. Azoo, Calcutta,
A48. al-Maqqari Nafh al-tib min ghusn al-Andalus ... :(a) tr. w.n. P. de Gayangos as The
history of the Mohammedan dynasties in Spain ... (2 v.), London, 1840-1843;^) ex. ed.
w.n. G. Dugat, Analectes sur l'histoire et la littrature des Arabes d'Espagne (v. ii, pp. Arabic
A49. al-Maqrizi Al-suluk li-ma'rifat duwal al-muluk: tr. w.n. (E.M.) Quatremere as Histoire
A50. al-Maqrizi Shudhur (or Nubdhat) al-'uqud fi umur al-nuqud:(a) ed. & tr. w.n. O.G.
Tychsen as Historia monetae Arabicae ..., Rostock, 1797;(b) ex. tr. w.n. A.I.S. de Sacy as
A51. al-Marrakushi Kitab al-mu'jib fi talkhis akhbar al-Maghrib:(a) (ed. R. Dozy as The
history of the Almohades, Leyden, 1847) ;(b) rev. ed. w.n. R. Dozy, Leyden, 1881;(c) tr.
A53. Ibn-Marzuq Kitab al-musnad al-sahih al-hasan ...: ed. & tr. w.n. E. Levi-Provencal
A54. al-Mas'udi Muriij al-dhahab wa-ma'adin al-jawahir:(a) ex. tr. w.n. de Guignes in Notices
et Extraits I(1787) :1-b7;(b) ex. tr. w.n. A. Sprenger as Historical encyclopaedia, London,
1841 ;(c) ed. & tr. w.n. C. Barbier de Meynard and (v. 1-3) P. de Courteille as Les prairies
A55. al-Mas'udi Kitab al-tanbih wa'l-ishraf :(a) ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje, Leyden, 1893-1894;^)
A56. al-Mazini Tuhfat al-albab wa-nukhbat al-a'jab: ed. w.n. G. Ferrand in Journal Asiatique
CCVII(1925):1-148, 193-304.
A57. al-Miknasi Al-raud al-hatun fi akhbar Miknasat al-Zaytun: tr. w.n. O. Houdas as "Mono-
A58. al-Munajjim Kitab akam al-marjan fi dhikr al-mada'in al-mashhurah fi kull makan:
ed. & tr. w.n. A. Codazzi as "II compendio geografico arabo", in Rendiconti ... dei
A59. Mflsa II Wasitat al-suhik fi siyasat al-muluk:(a) (ed. M. Kabadu and M. Baslur
al-Tuwati, Tunis, 1862) ;(b) tr. w.n. M. Gaspar (y Remiro) as El collar de perlas, Sara-
gossa, 1899.
A60. al-Nuwayri Nihayat al-arab fi funun al-adab :(a) ex. tr. MacG. de Slane in Ibn-Khaldun's
Histoire des Berberes (v. I, p. 313), Algiers, 1852 ;(b) ex. ed. & tr. w.n. M. Gaspar y Remiro
A61. al-Qalqashandi Subh al-a'sha fi ijina'at al-insha':(a) ex. tr. w.n. H. Sauvaire in Memoires
de l'Acadmie de Marseille (1886/7) 79-111 ;(b) e<i. M.A. Ibrahim (14 v.), Cairo, 1913-1920.
A62. Ibn-al-Qasim Ikhtiijar al-akhbar 'amma kanah bi-thaghr Sabtah ...: ed. w.n. E. Levi-
145-176.
A63. Ibn-al-Qattan Nazm al-juman: ed. & tr. w.n. E. Levi-Provencal in Melanges Rene Basset
A64. Qudamah Kitab al-kharaj ...: ex. ed. & tr. w.n. M.J. de Goeje, Leyden, 1889.
A65. Ibn-al-Qunfudh Al-farisiyah fi mabadi al-daulah al-Hafijiyah: ex. ed. & tr. w.n. A. Cher-
(1851):51-84; 4:XX(1852):208-244.
A66. Ibn-al-Qunffldh Kitab al-wafayat: ed. H. Husain in Journal of the Asiatic Society of
A67. Ibn-Rustah Kitab al-a'laq al-nafisah: v. 7 ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje, Leyden, 1891-1892.
A68. Ibn-Sa'id Kitab al-mughrib fi hula al-Maghrib: v. 4. ed. & tr. K.L. Tallqvist, Leyden,
1898-1899.
A69. al-Sakhawi Al-tibr al-masbuk fi dhayl al-suliik: ex. tr. w.n. E. Fagnan, Extraits indits
Historical Bibliography
303
A72. al-Shantarini Kitab al-dhakhirah fi mahsin ahl al-jazirah: ex. ed. at Cairo, 1939.
A73. Shihab-al-Din Kitab 'uqd al-jumn fi mukhtasar akhbar al-zamn: ex. ed. w.n. (A.I.)
A74. Ibn-Taghribirdi Al-nujm al-zhirah fi mulk Misr wa'l-jhirah: tr. w.n. E. Fagnan in
Constantine XL(1906):269~382.
A75. al-Tanasi Nazm al-durr wa'l-'iqyn fi bayn sharaf Bani Zayn: ex. tr. w.n. J. J.L. Bargs
A76. al-TauzariKitab al-iktifa'fi akhbar al-khulafa': ex. tr. w.n. P. de Gayangosin al-Maqqari's
The history of the Mohammedan dynasties in Spain ... (v. II, pp. xxii-xlviii), London,
1843.
A77. al-Tijni Rihlah: ex. tr. w.n. A. Rousseau in Journal Asiatique 4:XX(1852):57-2o8;
A78. Ibn-Tmart Tauhid al-bari ... : ed. w.n. J.D. Luciani, Algiers, 1903.
A79. al-Turtshi Sirj al-mulk:(a) (ed. at Cairo, 1872/3); (b) ed. at Cairo, 1888/9;(0) tr. w.n.
A80. al-'Umari Masalik al-ab?r fi mamalik al-amsr:(a) ex. ed. w.n. A. Zaki, Cairo, 1924;^)
ex. tr. w.n. (M.) Gaudefroy-Demombynes as L'Afrique moins l'gypte, Paris, 1927;(c) ex.
ed. w.n. (M.) Gaudefroy-Demombynes as " Quelques passages relatifs au Maroc", in Mmo-
A81. Yahy Ibn-Khaldun Bughyat al-rwad fi dhikr al-mulk min Bani 'Abd al-Wad: ed. &tr.
w.n. A. Bel as Histoire des Beni 'Abd el-Wd (2 v.), Algiers, 1904-1913.
A82. al-Ya'qbi Kitab al-buldn:(a) (ex. ed. w.n. M.J. de Goeje as Descriptio al Magribi,
Leyden, 186o);(b) ex. ed. w.n. A.W.T. Juynboll, Leyden, 186o-1861;(c) ed. w.n. M.J. de
Goeje, Leyden, 1891-1892;^) (tr. w.n. G. Wiet as Les pays, Cairo, 1937).
A83. Yqt Mu'jam al-buldn: ed. w.n. F. Wstenfeld as Geographisches Wrterbuch (6 v.),
Leipzig, 1866-1873.
A84. Ibn-Abi-Zar' Kitab al-anis al-mu^rib bi-raud al-qirtas fi akhbar mulk al-Maghrib wa-
ta'rikh madinat Fs:(a) (tr. F. von Dombay (2 v.), Zagreb, 1794-1795);^) (tr. J. Moura,
Lisbon, 1828) ;(c) ex. ed. & tr. C.J. Tornberg as "Primordia dominationis Murabitorum
...", in Nova Acta ... Upsaliensis XI(1839) :297-407;(d) ed. & tr. w.n. C.J. Tornberg as
Annales regum Mauritaniae, Upsala, 1843-1846;(e) tr. w.n. A. Beaumier as Roudh el-
A85. al-Zarkashi Ta'rikh al-daulatayn al-Muwahhidiyah wa'l-Hafsiyah:(a) ex. ed. & tr.
A. Rousseau in Journal Asiatique 4:XIII (1849): 269-315 ;(b) ed. at Tunis, 1872/3;(c) tr.
A86. al-Zuhri Kitab al-jaghrafiyah:(a) ex. ed. & tr. w.n. O. Houdas and R. Basset as "Descrip-
tr. w.n. R. Basset, Documents gographiques sur l'Afrique septentrionale (pp. 14-30), Paris,
1898;(c) ex. ed. & tr. w.n. R. Basset in Homenaje D(on) Francisco Codera (pp. 619-647),
Saragossa, 1904.
A87. ? Ta'rikh ... mulk al-tawa'if :(a) ex. ed. w.n. E. Lvi-Provenal in Ibn-al-'Idhr's
Kitb al-bayn al-mughrib ... (v. Ill) (pp. ArabiC 287-316,327-368), Paris, 1930; (b) ex. tr.
E. Lvi-Provenal in Histoire des musulmans d'Espagne (v. III, pp. 215-235), Leyden,
1932.
304
A88. ? Kitab al-istibsr fi 'aja'ib al-amsr:(a) ex. ed. w.n. A. von Kremer in Sitzungsberichte
A89. ? Kitab al-ansab fi ma'rifat al-a?hab: ex. ed. & tr. w.n. E. Lvi-Provenal, Documents
indits d'histoire almohade (pp. i-ix, 25-74, ArabiC 18-49), Paris, 1828.
A90. ? Kitab mafkhir al-Barbar: ex. ed. w.n. E. Lvi-Provenal as Fragments historiques sur
X(193o) :49-90.
A92. ? Al-dhakhirah al-saniyah fi'l-ta'rikh al-daulah al-Marniyah: ed. w.n. M. ben Cheneb as
B. INSCRIPTIONS
In this section are included the modem compilations of non-numismatic and non-
buildings, but some are also found on textiles and other artifacts. The works are alpha-
B1. Amador de los Rios, Rodrigo, "Noticia", in Boletin de la Real Academia de la Historia
XIV(1889):563-565.
B2. Basset, Henri, and Lvi-Provencal, E., "Chella, une ncropole mrinide", in Hespris
11 :XIV(1919) :467-479.
B5. van Berchem, Max, "L'pigraphie musulmane en Algrie: tude sur le corpus", in Revue
B6. van Berchem, Max, "Titres califiens d'occident propos de quelques monnaies mrinides et
B7. Brosselard, Ch(arles), "Inscriptions arabes de Tlemcen", in Revue Africaine III(1858) :81-94,
321-331.
B8. Brosselard, C(harles), "Mmoire pigraphique et historique sur les tombeaux des mirs Beni-
B9. Codera (y Zaidin), Francisco, and Saavedra, Eduardo, "Inscriptiones rabes de Xela", in
B1o. Colin, Gabriel, Corpus des inscriptions arabes et turques de l'Algrie: Dpartement d'Alger,
Paris, 1901.
Bu. Combe, Etienne, Sauvaget, J., and Wiet, G(aston), Rpertoire chronologique d'pigraphie
B12. Hlouis, E., "Une inscription arabe du XlVe sicle ...", in Journal Asiatique 9^(1895):
174-181.
B.13. Houdas, O., and Basset, Ren, "Epigraphie Tunisienne", in Bulletin de Correspondance
Historical Bibliography
305
B16. (Marais, William, Corpus des inscriptions arabes et turques de l'Algrie: Dpartement d'Oran,
B18. Marais, William, "Six inscriptions arabes de Tlemcen", in Bulletin Archologique (1902):
538-551.
B19. Mercier, Ernest, "Une inscription arabe de Gafa", in Recueil des Notices et Mmoires de la
B20. Mercier, Gustave, Corpus des inscriptions arabes et turques de l'Algrie: Dpartement de
B21. Michaux-Bellaire, Ed(ouard), "A propos d'une inscription mrinide al-Qasr al-Kabir", in
B22. Michaux-Bellaire, E(douard), and Salmon, G., "El-Qar el-Kebir", in Archives Marocaines
II(2)(1904):1-228.
B23. Ricard, Prosper, "Sur un type de reliure des temps almohades", in Ars Islamica I(1934) : 74-79.
B24. Rieu, Charles, Supplement to the catalogue of the Arabic manuscripts in the British Museum,
London,1894.
C. DOCUMENTS
In this section are included the published medieval and modern collections of docu-
ments dating from the late medieval period ; they include chiefly treaties between the North
African Moslems and the Christians of Spain, France, and Italy, and letters from the Mos-
lem rulers to both Moslem and Christian contemporaries. The works are alphabetized under
C1. Alarcn y Santn, Maximiliano, and Garcia de Linares, Ramn, Les documentos arabes
C2. Amari, Michele, / diplomi arabi del Reale Archivio Fiorentino, Florence, 1863 (1867 appendix
not available).
C3. Amari, Michele, "Nuovi ricordi arabici su la storia di Genova", in Atti delia Societ Ligure di
C4. Brunschvig, Robert, "Note sur un trait conclu entre Tunis et l'empereur Frdric II", in
C5. de las Cagigas, Isidro, "Un trait de paix entre le roi Pierre IV d'Aragon et le sultan de Tunis
C6. de Castries, Henri, et al., Les sources indites de l'histoire du Maroc (series 1, part 5, v. III),
Paris, 1921-1946.
C7. Champollion Figeac in Documents historiques indits tirs des collections manuscrites de la
Bibliothque Royale ... (v. II), Paris, 1843 (ArabiC edited and translated by Reinaud).
C8. Gaspar y Remiro, M(ariano), "Correspondencia dipiomtica entre Granda y Fez, siglo XIV",
from Revista del Centro de Estudios Histricos de Grandda y su Reino, and Granada, 1916.
d'histoire almohade (pp. i-vii, 1-24, I-IV, ArabiC 134-145), Paris, 1928.
C1l. Lvi-Provenal, E., "Un recueil de lettres officielles almohades", in Hespris XXVIII (1941):
1-80.
20
3o6
C12. de Mas-Latrie, (J.M.J.) L(ouis), Traits de paix et de commerce et documents divers concernant
les relations de l'Afrique septentrionale au moyen ge, Paris, 1866 (1872 suppiement not
available).
C13. (de la Primaudaie, Elie, Documents indits sur l'histoire de l'occupation espagnole en Afrique,
C15. de Sacy, (A.I. Silvestre), "Mmoire sur le trait fait entre le roi de Tunis et Philippe-le-Hardi,
C16. de Sacy, (A.I. Silvestre), "Mmoire sur une correspondance de l'Empereur de Maroc Yakoub,
... IX(1831):478-5o6.
C17. de Sacy, (A.I.) Silvestre, "Pices dipiomatiques tires des archives de la rpublique de
C18. Tafel, G.L.F., and Thomas, G.M., "Urkunden zur lteren handels-und staatsgeschichte der
C19. Tisserant, Eugne, and Wiet, Gaston, "Une lettre de l'Almohade Murtad' au pape Inno-
D. MODERN
Unlike the three previous sections of the historical reference bibliography, this section
is highly selective rather than relatively comprehensive. Only the outstandingly useful
reference works and monographs prepared by mode1n historians are listed here, alpha-
betically by author.
D1. Bargs, J.J.L., Complment de l'histoire des Beni-Zeiyn, rois de Tlemcen, Paris, 1887.
D3. Brockelmann, Cari, Geschichte der arabischen litteratur (2 v., 1898-1902, rev. 1943-1949,
D4. Brunschvig, Robert, La Berbrie orientale sous les Hafsides ... (2 v.), Paris, 1940-1947,
D5. Cour, A(uguste), "Les derniers mrinides", in Bulltin de la Socit de Gographie d'Alger ...
X(not IX)(1905):103-119.
D6. Cour, Aug(uste), La dynastie marocaine des Beni Watts, Constantine, 1920.
D7. Cour, Auguste, L'tablissement des dynasties des chrifs au Maroc ..., Paris, 1904.
D8. Hazard, Harry W., et al., Atlas of Islamic history, Princeton, 1951.
D9. Houtsma, M.T., et al., The encyclopaedia of Islam (4 v. and supp.), Leyden, 1913-1938.
D10. Lvi-Provenal, E., "Rflexions sur l'empire almoravide au dbut du XIIe sicle", in
D11. Marais, Georges, Les Arabes en Berbrie du XIe au XIVe sicle, Constantine, 1913.
D12. Marais, Georges, La Berbrie musulmane et l'orient au moyen ge, Paris, 1946.
D13. Massignon, Louis, Le Maroc dans les premires annes du XVIe sicle, Algiers, 1895.
D15. al-Salw, "Les almohades (tr. by Ismal Hamet)", in Archives Marocaines XXXII(1927).
D16. al-Salw, "Les almoravides (tr. by G.S. Colin)", in Archives Marocaines XXXI(1925):
111-238.
D17. al-Salw, "Les mrinides (tr. by Ismal Hamet)", in Archives Marocaines XXXIII(1934).
D18. de (for von) Zambaur, d(uard), Manuel de gnalogie et de chronologie pour l'histoire de
The categories of coins are listed in the same order as in the corpus; within each
category the sources are listed alphabetically by abbreviation, followed by the numbers
of the coins derived from each source and by a notation in parentheses of the number of
ZIRID GOLD:
ANS: 20.
B(rethes): 7.
Balog: 21.
Bergmann: 16.
BN II: 14.
BN III: 1, 18.
Casanova: 13.
Ibn-Khaldun: 24a.
KM IL3, 6.
Miles: 20.
Schiepati: 3, 5, 7, 8.
Soret: F(raehn): 3, 6.
VoUers (+2).
Welzl: 3, 5 (+1).
HAMMADID GOLD:
Ibn-Khaldun: 25.
20*
308
MURABIT GOLD:
B(rethes): 28, 29, 31, 33, 34, 38, 40, 45-53, 57. 59. 60, 62, 64, 65, 70, 71, 74, 75, 77, 78,
80, 81, 83, 86, 87, 91, 121, 123-125, 161, 164, 168, 173, 178, 188, 191, 193, 195, 199, 205, 210,
211, 216, 218, 219, 224, 232, 234, 241, 244, 256, 258, 271-273, 284, 286, 288, 292-295, 297, 299,
303. 307-309. 3". 312, 314-335, 337-342, 351-354. 357, 358, 364. 365. 370, 372, 375, 377. 378,
BM V: 33, 49, 54, 58, 61, 63, 96, 113, 153, 163, 167, 170, 184, 215, 216, 218-220, 245, 246,
256, 263, 268, 273, 275, 287, 289, 291, 338, 339, 342, 344, 349, 350, 357, 363, 367, 374, 378, 384,
BM X: 66, 78, 79, 95, 127, 132, 152, 166, 182, 272, 283, 320, 377, 394, 399, 403, 407.
BN II: 26, 32, 36, 39, 40, 47, 54, 55, 59-62, 64-69, 74, 78, 79, 87, 89, 91, 97, 103, 1", 118,
121, 127, 128, 133, 135, 144, 146, 148, 153, 156, 159, 163, 186, 203, 213, 214, 2l6, 218-220,224-227,
230, 232, 239, 243, 245, 246, 248, 255, 256, 260, 268, 270, 281, 283-286, 289-291, 297, 302-304,
309, 3Ha, 316, 318, 319, 322, 327, 338, 351, 354, 356, 358, 360, 363, 366, 371, 377-379. 38l, 392,
396, 400, 401, 408, 410, 412, 414, 417-419, 426, 432, 438, 439, 442 (+6).
Brooke: 95.
C(odera): Monedas: 158, 209, 216, 244, 251, 254, 255, 277, 291, 314, 315, 332, 337, 352,360,
369.
Cerda: 39, 48, 73, 77-80, 82, 212, 213, 215, 216, 218-221, 224, 228, 243, 248, 254, 260, 283,
284, 286, 289-291, 296, 339, 342, 343, 346, 351, 355, 356, 377, 397, 401.
Cimino (+3).
Colson: 69, 78, 92, 98, 110, 115, 130, 132, 152, 168, 171, 224,225, 227-230, 232, 241-243,
D(elgado): Lorichs: 77, 91, 133, 213, 224, 248, 259, 285, 289, 322, 352, 362, 430a (+1).
Demaeght: 66.
Dorn I: 214-216, 218, 247, 249, 283, 285, 286, 290 (+7).
Eichhorn (+2).
Fleischer: 222.
Index of Sources
309
G: 194, 246.
HSA: 42, 44, 66, 79, 159,164, 214, 216-219, 221. 247. 283. 284, 287, 296, 301, 324, 329, 334,
339. 359. 369. 377. 378, 401, 401a, 439- 440, 446 (+1)-
KM II: 35,107, 127,163, 207, 213, 215, 216, 218, 220, 225, 243, 246-248, 253-255, 257, 263,
265, 283-286, 304, 310, 323, 325, 338, 340, 348, 350-352, 354. 356-359. 361, 376. 378. 395, 398,
Lagumina: 160.
Leite: 345.
LongpeYier: Documents): 103,105,118,128,133, 134,144,147, 148, 210, 213, 215, 220, 225,
228, 230, 232, 233, 235, 239, 242, 244, 246, 260, 263, 268, 269, 275, 284, 285, 289, 290,349-351,355.
MA: 73, 129, 158, 192, 197, 200, 209, 212-216, 218-222, 226, 229, 245, 246, 248, 250-252,
254-257, 268, 269, 271, 277, 278, 283, 284, 286, 289, 291, 295, 314, 315, 317, 322, 324, 332, 337,
347. 350-352, 355-357. 360, 364. 368, 369. 377. 392- 406, 409, 410, 415. 42<>, 432 (+2<>).
Marcais: 202.
Markov: E(rmitazha): 49, 60, 61, 65-68, 75, 77, 79, 86, 88, 104, 133, 148, 162, 206, 215, 216,
218, 230, 240, 246, 248, 255, 283, 285, 287, 291, 295-297, 318, 349, 358, 362, 377, 381, 402, 432
(+4).
Mateu (+1).
Mateu I: 378.
0(strup): 27, 35-37, 66, 67, 75, 169, 216, 230, 232, 253, 259, 267, 268, 271, 284, 318, 323,
Rivero: M(oneda): 27, 61, 73, 118, 230, 239, 324, 388, 432, 437.
Rodgers: 432.
Romero (+1).
S(chulman): Gotha: 42, 89, 129, 175, 209, 272, 362, 410.
S(chulman): Judice II: 42, 216, 219, 283, 287, 309, 324, 334.
3Io
Seaby:199.
Sentenach: 222.
Sotheby: 39, 42, 44, 65, 74, 224, 267, 313, 355, 388, 397.
Spink: 39, 40, 44, 74, 191, 192, 215, 219, 284, 287, 358, 360 ( + 10).
UM: 287.
V(ives): 26, 27, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38-40, 42-49, 54-56, 58-71, 73-81, 84, 85, 87-90, 93-97.
100-104, 108-114, 116-122, 126-137, 139-141. 143-163. 165-167, 170-174, 176, 177, 179-187,
189, 190, 192, 196-198, 200, 201, 203-205, 208, 209, 212-232, 234-246, 248-257, 260, 262-264,
266-273, 275-281, 283-287, 289-291, 295-300, 302-311, 312, 314-327. 332, 334-340, 342-344.
347. 349-358, 360-369, 371. 373, 374, 377-382, 384, 386-389, 392, 394, 395-397, 399. 400, 401,
402, 406-410, 412, 414-421, 423, 425, 430, 431, 432, 437-442, 445, 446 (+271).
Vollers ( + 12).
Weyl: G(agarin): 60, 67, 68, 75, 88, 133, 142, 148, 206, 215, 218, 233, 240, 246, 248, 255,
Yale: 99.
MUWAHHID GOLD:
B(rethes): 448, 451, 454, 456, 457, 463, 464, 466, 467, 470, 472-474. 476, 478, 481, 485, 488,
489, 491, 496, 501, 502, 505, 506, 511, 514, 515, 517-519. 524. 525. 527-529. 533. 534. 536, 538,
539, M1 (+149).
Balog (+3).
Bartholomaei: 449.
BM V: 451, 453, 466, 467, 491, 495, 500-502, 509, 511, 517, 522, 524, 525, 528, 531-533,
Calvo (+64).
Castiglioni: 495.
Index of Sources
311
Demaeght: 498.
Grotefend: 501.
Holu: 501.
HSA: 446a, 458, 460, 466, 470, 477-479. 494. 495. 497. 51. 506. 535 (+10).
Ibn-Abi-Zar': 499.
J(ohnston): Gold: 450, 457, 466, 473, 477~479, 482-492, 501 (+277).
KM II: 459. 465, 466, 485. 491. 495. 502, 506, 508, 533, 536 (+3; 1 hybrid).
L(ane-Poole): Muwahhids: 466, 495, 501, 502, 509, 525, 533, 537 (+8; 2 hybrids).
MA: 448, 458, 459, 466, 495, 519, 525, 528, 533, 535, 536, 539 (+17; 2 hybrids).
P(rieto): 448, 451, 453-456. 458-461, 464-467. 469, 470. 473. 475. 477. 478, 481. 485. 488,
539.
491, 494-497. 5oo, 501, 503. 504, 506-509, 5"-513. 515-517. 519-521, 523-528, 530-536, 538,
Rodgers: 509.
S(chulman): Karabaczek: 453, 466, 467, 469, 491, 495, 533 (+1).
Sallet: 508.
Sawaszkiewicz: 512.
Sotheby: 450, 458, 466, 473, 477, 478, 481, 483-487. 491. 492. 501, 506, 533, 538 (+10).
Spink: 466, 473, 477, 478, 481, 482, 484, 486-491. 495. 497. 5o1 (+44).
UM: 496.
V(ives): 448, 451, 453, 455, 456, 458-460, 464-470, 473. 475. 478, 481. 49*. 495-497. 5<>o,
501, 503, 506, 507, 5", 517. 519. 525. 527. 528, 531-534. 536-539 (+38; 2 hybrids).
Welzl: 466.
Weyl: G(agarin): 451, 453, 466, 495, 501, 503, 517 (+4).
HDID GOLD:
HAFSID GOLD:
Ashmolean: 598.
B(rethes): 542, 543, 546, 547, 550-553. 556, 558, 562, 564. 566-572, 575. 585a, 586, 598, 599.
Bigonet: 601.
Blancard: 626.
BN II: 544, 545, 550-552, 557, 559- 563. 564, 569, 572, 576. 580, 582, 584, 586, 588, 591, 594,
Cerda (+1).
Chalon: 551.
Conde: 565.
F(arrugia): Hafsites: 551, 552, 559-562, 564, 572-574, 577. 577*. 578. 583. 585, 5863-588,
591-593, 595, 597, 598, 600, 602, 604-606, 610-612, 616, 617, 619-622, 624, 628-630, 635, 636
(+18; 1 hybrid).
Friedlander (+2).
Lavoix: H(afss): 551, 559, 572, 576, 584, 603, 609, 613, 626, 644 (1 hybrid).
Seco: 555.
Sotheby (+2).
Spink: 552.
Vollers (+8).
ZIYANID GOLD:
B(rethes): 645, 646, 648, 649, 652, 655, 661, 663, 666 (+3).
BM V: 648, 650.
Brosselard: 664.
HSA: 660.
0(strup): 648.
Sotheby (+2).
Spink (+2).
Thorburn: 648.
Vollers (+2).
MARlNID GOLD:
Anderson: 724.
B(rethes): 675, 678-680, 682, 686, 688-691, 693-695, 697, 698, 703-708, 713, 715, 721, 727,
733. 734. 737. 739. 741-743. 745. 75&, 756a, 757, 759, 763, 764, 768-771, 773, 775, 776, 783, 785,
786, 788, 790-792, 794, 795, 808, 810, 818-820, 825, 832-835, 837-839, 842-845, 850, 851, 858,
BM V: 678, 682, 684, 689, 690, 692, 695, 715, 716, 718, 719, 721, 722, 725, 750, 751, 753, 754,
766-768, 770, 772, 775, 778, 779, 782, 784, 785, 794, 795, 797, 798, 810-814, 816, 823, 825, 829,
BM X: 681, 696, 697, 699, 703, 726, 729, 732, 735, 736, 738-740, 742, 744, 746-748, 757, 758,
781, 787, 789, 793, 799-801, 803-805, 817, 823, 828, 830, 840, 856, 858, 860, 863 (+4; 2 hybrids).
314
BN II: 678, 682, 687, 690, 693, 700-702, 704, 706, 709, 715, 720, 723, 728, 736, 739, 743,
765, 767, 771, 772, 774, 779, 782, 796, 797, 814, 821, 825, 827, 832, 846, 848, 852, 865 (+11;
2 imitations).
Brosset (+1).
Cerda (+4).
Cond: 706.
F(arrugia): Ha/sites: 673, 690, 695, 706, 710-712, 759, 762 (+53).
P(rieto): 675-678, 681, 682, 685, 687, 689-691, 692, 693, 695, 697, 700-702, 706, 709, 714,
715, 716, 717, 719, 722, 725-732, 736, 738, 739, 743, 744, 746-750, 752-756. 757. 758, 765-772,
774-776, 778-781, 784, 785, 787, 789, 793-795. 797. 799-803. 807, 810, 811, 814-817, 822, 825,
828-833, 836. 838, 841, 845, 848, 850, 855, 857, 859-861, 864, 866 (3 hybrids).
Seaby: 835.
Vollers (+7).
NASRID GOLD:
WATTASID GOLD:
B(rethes): 869.
BM X: 870.
Spink (+2).
ZIRID SILVER:
HAMMUDID SILVER:
BM IX (+1).
Guilten: 875.
ANS: 893, 894, 906, 926, 928, 951, 953. 976, 982, 983. 1004, 1017, 1027, 1035, 1052 (+7).
B(rethes): 888, 891, 892, 906, 919, 927-929, 981, 985, 999,1003,1019,1020,1025,1034-1036,
BM V: 927, 941, 943, 976, 982, 983, 997, 999,1001, 1003,1004,1015,1022, 1029,1032,1035,
BM X: 931, 1004.
BN II: 888, 894, 895, 905, 927, 933, 976, 979, 982, 983, 988, 997, 1001, 1002, 1004, 1032,
C(odera): Tratado: 894, 903, 927, 941, 976, 983, 1004, 1032, 1035, 1041, 1052.
Calvo (+322).
Castiglioni: 999.
Conde: 894, 927, 928, 988, 1000, 1001, 1040, 1041, 1047
D(elgado): Garcia: 891, 892, 905, 906, 921, 927, 939, 952, 954, 956, 957, 976, 978, 981, 983,
Gonzalez (+1).
HSA: 894, 953, 976, 982, 983, 989, 998, 999, 1001, 1003, 1004, 1013, 1014, 1022, 1032, 1035,
316
KM II: 894-896, 927, 976, 982,983, 988,999, 1oo1, 1002, 1004, 1024, 1036, 1037, 1040. 1041,
MA: 888, 889, 891, 894, 902, 905, 906, 908, 911, 915, 917, 918, 922, 923, 925-928, 932,
938-940, 945, 946, 963, 965, 973, 976, 982, 983, 988, 991, 997, 999-1001, 1002, 1004, 1014, 1019,
1022, 1024-1026, 1032, 1035, 1040, 1041, 1049, 1052, 1053, 105 (+89).
Marsden: 1041.
Miiller: 920.
0(strup): 894, 921, 922, 927, 928, 939, 956, 977, 983, 1000, 1044 (+4).
P(rieto): Reyes: 908, 939, 947-949, 951, 952, 955-957, 966, 968, 969, 971, 972, 991-994.
Rivero: E(spana): 896, 904, 940, 943, 952, 958, 965, 971, 1013,1017,1025,1049,1050 (+1).
Rivero: M(oneda): 888, 896, 904, 957, 965, 1013, 1017, 1025, 1032, 1036, 1040, 1052.
S(chulman): Castro: 976, 982, 983, 999, 1003, 1004, 1009, 1028, 1035, 1045.
S(chulman): Judice II: 894, 953, 982, 983, 998, 1003, 1004, 1022, 1041, 1052 (+2).
Sawaszkiewicz (+4).
Thorburn: 897, 927, 928, 952, 982, 983, 986, 1004, 1022, 1040.
UM: 928.
V(ives): 888-891, 893-896, 898-902, 903-910, 912-918, 921-928, 930, 932-949, 951, 952,
956-970, 972-980, 982-984, 987-1001, 1003-1006, 1008-1014, 1016, 1017-1026, 1029-1033, 1035,
Vollers (+18).
Welzl: 1007.
Zambaur I: 965.
MUWAHHID SILVER:
ANS: 1068, 1085, 1088, 1088a, 1091, 1093, 1095, 1096, 1098, no1, 1103, 1112 (+32).
Blancard: 1101.
Index of Sources
317
BM V: 1066, 1085, 1087, 1093, 1096, 1098, 1101, 1103, 1109, 1115 (+26).
BN II: 1063, 1066, 1068, 1085, 1087, 1088, 1093, 1096, 1101, 1103, 1106-1108, 1115 (+18).
Cimino (+2).
Conde:1063, 1103.
Cottevieille: 1092.
Geitlin: 1082.
Gonzalez: 1101.
Guillen: 1113.
HSA: 1062, 1068, 1085, 1087, 1092, 1093, 1096-1098, 1101, 1103, 1106, 1107, m1, 1112,
1115 (+134).
KM II: 1066, 1068, 1078, 1080, 1085, 1087, 1088, 1088a, 1093, 1096, "ooa, 1101, 1103,
Marcel (+1).
Marsden: 1101.
3I8
Moeller: 1101.
Miinter (+11).
Nesselmann: 1101.
0(strup): 1066, 1068, 1085, 1088, 1093, 1096, 1098, 1101, 1115 (+11).
P(rieto): 1066, 1068, 1070-1076, 1085-1088, 1092-1096, 1098, 1099, 1101, 1106-1116.
S(chulman): Judice II: 1068, 1074, 1085, 1087, 1095, 1096, 1098, 1100, 1101, 1103, 1106,
Sawaszkiewicz (+2).
Schiepati: 1096.
Seco: 11o1.
Sotheby (+12).
Spink: 1101.
Zambaur II ( + 1).
HUDID SILVER:
HSA: 1119.
P(rieto): 1117-1120.
JIAFSID SILVER:
Bel: 1123.
Index of Sources
Monchicourt: 1130-1132.
MARINID SILVER:
ANS: 1144.
BM V: 1137.
BN II: 1137.
HSA: 1142.
Moura: 1146.
Vollers (+1).
NASRID SILVER:
BN II: 1153.
P(rieto) (+2).
Thorburn: 1153.
WATTASID SILVER:
HAMMTJDID COPPER:
Cerda: 1160.
MURABIT COPPER:
ANS: 1165.
BM V: 1165 (+1).
Calvo (+26).
Cerda: 1164.
HSA: 1169.
Sawaszkiewicz (+1).
Vollers (+1).
MUWAHHID COPPER:
KM II: 1170.
Vollers (+1).
HAFSID COPPER:
Babelon (+3).
Ibn-Khaldun: 1172.
al-Zarkashi: 1172.
INDEX OF SCRIPTS
Kufi script: 1-90, 92-446a, 871-957, 959-964, 966-977, 981-1000, 1002-1011, 1013, 1017-1021,
Kufi or Naskhi script: 978, 980, 1012, 1016, 1023, 1057-1059, 1061.
691a, 692, 695-697, 699-703, 705-861, 863-870, H1-H14, M1, 979, 1001, 1014, 1015, 1022,
Ornamented Kufi script: 562-566, 571-573, 575, 576, 577a, 580, 607, 679, 680, 686, 691, 693,
21
INDEX OF DENOMINATIONS
Gold
Muwahhid M1
DOUBLE DINAR
Hafeid 542, 543, 545, 547-550, 553. 555-557, 562, 564, 567, 569-572, 574-582, 584-589. 592,
Marinid 674, 675, 678, 679, 682-686, 689-693, 713, 715-733, 735~741. 749-755, 759~779,
782-785, 787-791, 793-798, 802, 806-816, 818, 819, 821-827, 829, 831, 833,
Na9rid 868.
DINAR
Hammadid 25.
Muwahhid 447~466, 469-495. 497-499, 509, 510, 526, 527, 529, 534, 535.
Hafijid 546, 551, 554, 558, 559, 563, 565, 566, 568, 573, 583, 590, 593, 615, 620-623, 630,
634, 635.
Marinid 673, 676, 677, 680, 681, 687, 694-699, 714, 734, 742-744, 746-748, 756-757, 780, 781,
786, 792, 799-801, 817, 820, 828, 830, 832, 834, 843, 848-852, 854.
Wattasid 869,870.
HALF DINAR
Haf9id 544, 552, 560, 591, 600, 624, 625, 636, 643.
Index of Denominations
323
QUARTER DINAR
Zirid 6.
Murabit 91.
Muwahhid 446a.
Hafsid 561.
Marinid 706-710.
Zirid 14.
Hafgid 596.
Marinid 711,712.
EIGHTH DINAR
EJectrum
Silver
DIRHEM
Hammudid 872-887.
Murabit 908-910, 947-949, 951-957. 9^6, 968-972, 975, 993, 994, 1017.
Hudid 1121.
HALF DIRHEM
Zirid 871.
QIRAT
Murabit 888, 891-897, 900, 902-906, 911-933.94-943. 950, 958-965, 967. 973. 974. 976~987.
HALF QIRAT
QUARTER QIRAT
EIGHTH QIRAT
SIXTEENTH QIRAT
21*
324
Muwahhid
Hafi.rid
Muwahhid
Hudid
Hafijid
Marinid
Wattasid
Muwahhid
Hafijid
Marinid
Muwahhid
Marinid
Naijrid
"ooa.
1127.
SQUARE DIRHEM
1117-1120.
1154-1156.
1131.
1069.
1153.
Marinid 1140.
Murabit 1169.
Hammudid 1157-1160.
Hafijid 1172-1174.
Copper
PSEUDO-DINAR
PSEUDO-ELECTRUM
PSEUDO-DIRHEM
SQUARE PSEUDO-DIRHEM
EELS
The early (pre-Muwahhid) gold is listed first, followed by the later gold, the electrum, the
silver, and the copper. Weights are expressed in grams, diameters in millimeters (sides for square
coins).
Early Gold
DINAR
Zirid
24
36
10 4.35
4.11
24
22
Hammadid
Murabit
425
561
605 4.30
27
23
4.05
HALF DINAR
Murabit
1 2.10
2.10
16
15
QUARTER DINAR
Zirid
2 1.02
.92
13
13
Murabit
3 110
1.08
15
14
EIGHTH DINAR
Zirid
1 .52
52
11
11
Late Gold
Muwahhid
49.4
49.4
65
326
Dynasty
Issues Specimens
Recorded Recorded
Maximum Minimum
Diameter Diameter
Ziyanid
2.50
2.32 .
25
22
Marinid
43
68
52
2.50
2.26
25
21
Wattasid
2.30
2.10
24
22
HALF DINAR
Muwahhid
47
21
1.40
115
16
14
Hafijid
29
24
1.30
115
16
15
Ziyanid
1.05
1.O1
20
14
Marinid
15
QUARTER DINAR
21
1.30
113
19
15
Muwahhid
327
Dynasty
Murabit
Muwahhid
Hafijid
Muwahhid
Hudid
Hafijid
Marinid
Wattasid
Muwahhid
Hafijid
Marinid
Muwahhid
Marinid
Naijrid
Marinid
Murabit
Murabit
Hammudid
Murabit
Muwahhid
Hafijid
SIXTEENTH QIRAT
40-
1 1 3.04
304
14
14
1 1 3.48
348
29
25
SQUARE DIRHEM
36
1.41
19
13
16 1 1.50
1.50
15
15
82 75 1.75
1.67
16
14
345 4 1.51
1.43
15
15
7 2 1.50
1.50
17
13
INDEX OF MINTS
Mints are listed by continents, with those in Africa preceding those in Spain. In the interests
of uniformity strict Arabic alphabetical order is followed, so that all names preceded by al- are
grouped together. Dates are all a.h. Diacritical marks are omitted from dynastic names. Abbre-
(731-752) 11 746-748
(796-799) 24 840-842
487 59
488 60
489 61
490 62, 63
491 64
492 65
493 66
494 67
495 68
496 69
497 70
498 71
499 122
500 3 152
501 153
502 154
503 155
504 156
505 157
506 158
507 159
508 160
509 161
Index of Mints
329
Mint
Aghmat
al-Jaza'ir
al-HSmmah
al-Qayrawan
al-Mahdiyah
Date
510
511
512
513
514
515
523
527
528
529
530
531
532?
533
533
535
537
538
539
540
536
590 (error)
Dynasty
Ruler
3+3A
3+4
4+5
(796-837) Hafsid
19
al-Nasiriyah
441
442
443
444
445
446
448
446
447
449
451
453
454
455
456
457
459
543
Zirid
Zirid
Coins
162
163
164
165
166
Mint
Date
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
Bijyah
(547-551)
Muwahhid
g: 447, 448
(551-558)
1+1A
473. 474
(558-563)
481, 482
(558-640)
2-10
s: 1085
(640-647)
Hafsid
g: 547
Mint
Date
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
(647-650)
557. 558
(650-675)
562, 563
(683-684)
571
(684-700)
6A
574. 575
(710-718)
10
581
(718-747)
584-586a
(748-749)
Marinid
11
g: 759
(749)
Hafsid
15
g: 597
(753-759)
Marinid
12
g: 769, 778
(761-767)
Hafsid
15B
g: 603
(796-837)
19
610
(839-856)
20A
627
Biskirah
(796-837)
Index of Mints
Mint
Date
Tilimsan
(796-802)
(802-804)
(804-813)
(813-814)
(814-833)
(827-834)
(834-866)
(839-893)
(866-873)
(934-942)
(947-949)
(957-964)
Tanas
(839-893)
Tuzar
(839-893)
Tunis
(554-558)
(558-563)
(558-627)
(642-668)
(650-711)
(681-683)
(683-694)
(694-709)
(748-749)
(749-751)
(796-837)
(948-977)
952
954
955
956
958
95*
961
962
964
Tin Mallal
(558-668)
Jarbah
(558-627)
Jaza'ir
(640-647)
(718-737)
(748-750)
(839-893)
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
12
653
13
654?
14
655-657
15
658
17
659-662
18
663, 664
19
665-668
Hafsid
332
(630-631) 10 1078
440? 873
441 874,874a
442 875
443 876
444 877
446? 878
44x 879
456? 881
466 s: 885
484 Murabit 2 g: 73
(500-522) 3 s: 905
(563-580) 2 g: 493
635 1A 1121
(640) 11 518
(731-752) 11 s: 1141
(775-796) 20 g: 819,820
Sijilmasah 450
451
Murabit 1 g: 26
27
452
28
Index of Mints
455 31
456 32
457 33
458 34
45* 1A 53
461 1 35
462 36
462 1B 54
463 1 37
465 1B 55
466 56
467 1 38
467? 1B 57
468 1 39
469 40
471 g:42
472 43
473 44
474 45
475 46
476 47
477 48
478 49
479 50
480 51
480 2 74
481 75
482 76
483 77
484 78
485 79
486 80
487 81
488 82
490 83
491 84
493 85
494 86
495 87
496 88
497 89
498 90
(480-498) 91
499 3 172
334
502 174
504 175
505 176
508 177
511 178
513 179
518 180
520 181
521 182
524 301
525 302
526 303
527 304
528 305
529? 306
530 307
531 308
532 309
533 310
534 370
535 371
536 372
(630-631) 10 1079
(710-731) 10 728-734
(737-752) 764-766
(775-796) 20 806
(799-800) 25 857
(800-S23) 26 861-863
461 4A 24
Index of Mints
Mint
Sala
Sabrah
Tarabulus
Tan j ah
Fas
Date
508
(540-551)
(763-767)
439
440
(749)
(751-770)
(796-637)
(839-893)
(522-533)
484
494
497
(480-498)
501?
508
509
5"
512
520
521
522
524
525
526
527
528
529
53o
531
532
533
533
534
535
536
537
537
538
539
515?
(540-551)
(551-558)
(558-563)
Dynasty Ruler
Coins
Murabit
Muwahhid
Marinid
Zirid
Hafsid
Murabit
Murabit
17
15
16
19
21
g: 183
g: 454. 455
336
(58o-595) 3 g: 5oo
(595-610) 4 504,505
(610-620) 5 507
(685-706) 7 719-721
(710-731) 10 735-743
(731-752) 11 s: 1144
(731-740) g: 753-756a
(737-752) g: 767
(749-759) 12 774.775.782-784
(763-767) 17 790-792
(774-776) 19 797-799
(788) 22 835
(799-800) 25 858,859
(796-837) 19 618
(839-893) 21 631
(751-770) 16 605
(796-^37) 19 619,620
490 95
491 96. 97
500 3 194
51o 195
516 196
518 197
519 198
520 199
521 200
523 322
524 323
Index of Mints
Mint
Marrakush
Miknasah
Mahdiyah
Nul
Date
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
525
324
527
325
528
326
529
327
530
328
531
329
533
330
533
380
534
381
535
382
536
383
537
384
537
411
538
412
539
4+5
427
540
428
540
434
541
435
3+4
(541-551)
Muwahhid
g: 463
(551-558)
1+1A
478, 479
(558-563)
487-489
(558-668)
2-13
s: 1098
(563-580)
g:494
(621-624)
338
516 207
518 208
522 209
523 332
524 333
525 334
527 335
528 336
530 337
531 338
532 338a
533 338b
534 387.388
535 389
536 390
537 391.392
537 4 413
538 414
539 415
540 4 416
540 6 436
542 6D 444
(448-480) Murabit 1 g: 52
(631-640) g: 516
(646-665) 12 530
(709-711) 8 g: 580
(760-762) 14 788
(775-796) 20 803
Date
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
(471-476)
Hammudid
9B+9C
s: 887
(480-498)
Murabit
s: 892-899
(496-500)
2+3
902a, 903
506
912
(500-522)
c: 1169
(522-533)
3+3 A
(533-537)
3+4
s: 996-1016
(537-540)
1018-1033
(539-540)
4+5
1034-1037
(540-541)
1039-1051
(540)
Muwahhid
g: 446a; s: 1059-1064
(540-551)
466-468
(540-558)
s: 1066-1069
(541-543)
Murabit
6B
s: 1053-1056
(551-558)
Muwahhid
1+1A
g:48o
(558-563)
491
(558-668)
2-13
s: nooa-1105; c: 1171
(563-580)
g: 495, 496
(58o-595)
501-503
(587-595)
3+4
s: 1075
(595-610)
340
(717-723) 12 594
(718-747) 10 588-591
(737-752) 768
(749-751) 15 600
(751-770) 16 606,607
(755-758) 17 608
(776-784) 20 A s: 1150
(796-799) 24 g: 854
(839-893) 21 632-636
(899-932) 25 641-643
(932) 3 "55
(932-957) 4 1156
SPANISH MINTS
491 100
493 101
496 102
497 103
499 126
510 3 211
515 212
516 213,214
517 215
518 216,217
519 218
520 219
521 220
522 221
(500-522) s: 940-946
Index of Mints
341
Mint
IshbHiyah
Ighranatah
al-Jazirah
al-Qantarah
al-Mariyah
Date
Dynasty Ruler
Coins
523
340
524
341
525
342
526
343
535
3+4
393
536
394
537
395
(533-537)
s: 1016a, 1016b
538
g: 417
539
4+5
430, 430a
540
431
541
437
(541-558)
Muwahhid 1
(558-563)
g: 492
(558-624)
2-7
s: 1106
(563-58o)
g: 497, 498
(641-646)
Hafsid 1
g: 555
504
Murabit 3
g: 241
508
242
509
243; c: 1163
515
g: 244. 245
516
246, 247
517
248, 249
518
250
342
507 274?
508 275
509 276
510 277
5" 278
512 279
513 280
514 281
516 284
517 285
518 286
519 287
521 290
522 291
523 349
524 350
525 351
526 352
527 353
528 354
529 355.356
530 357
531 358
532 359.360
533 361
534 397-399
536 401,401a
538 4 418,419
539 420,421
496 104
497 105
500 132
500 3 222
501 223
Index of Mints
343
Mint
Date
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
Balansiyah
503
s: 947
504
g: 224
505
225
508
226
509
227
512
228, 229
(558-624)
Muwahhid
2-7
s: 1107
Bayyasah
497
Murabit
g?:106
Jayyan
536
Murabit
3+4
s: 1017
(541-558)
Muwahhid
g: 471; s: 1071
(558-624)
2-7
s: 1108
Daniyah
495
Murabit
g: 107
497
2+3
133
498
134. 135
499
136-139
500
140
500
234. 235
5o1
236
504
237
(558-624)
Muwahhid
2-7
s: 1109
Saraqustah
504
Murabit
344
Mint
Qurtubah
Date
498
(496-500)
502
503
505
506
507
(500-522)
(539-540)
540
541
(540-541)
542
(542-558)
(558-624)
Dynasty
Ruler
Muwahhid
4+5
6B
2-7
Mayurqah
502
503
504
505
506
508
509
5"
512
525
526
(567)
(567-624)
(599-624)
Coins
145
s: 904
958
g: 257
s: 959-961
962
963
964. 965
1038
g: 441
442
s: 1052
g: 446
g: 472
s: 1112
Qantarat al-Sayf
496
Murabit
g: "5?
Qunkah
506
Murabit
s: 966
Laushah
INDEX OF DATES
All dates are a.h. Diacritical marks are omitted from names of mints and dynasties.
Date
Mint
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
401
Marrakush
Murabit
97
(error)
439
Sabtah
Hammudid
6+9
872
Sabrah
Zirid
440
Sabtah
Hammudid
6+9
873?
Zirid
441
Sabrah
al-Qayrawan
Zirid
Sabtah
Hammudid
6+9
874, 874a
442
al-Qayrawan
Zirid
4, 5
Sabtah
Hammudid
6+9
875
443
al-Qayrawan
Zirid
Sabtah
Hammudid
64-9
876
444
al-Qayrawan
Zirid
Sabtah
Hammudid
6+9
877
445
al-Qayrawan
Zirid
Date
Mint
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
457
al-Mahdiyah
Zirid
22
Sijilmasah
Murabit
33
458
Sijilmasah
Murabit
34
459
al-Mahdiyah
Zirid
23
Sijilmasah
Murabit
53?
461
1A
Sijilmasah
Murabit
35
Safaqus
Zirid
4A
24
462
Sabtah
Hammudid
9A+9B
882?, 1157?
Sijilmasah
Murabit
36
Sijilmasah
1B
54
463
Sijilmasah
Murabit
37
464
Sabtah
Hammudid
9A+9B
883, 1158
465
Sabtah
Hammudid
9A+9B
884, 1159
Sijilmasah
Murabit
1B
55
466
Index of Dates
Sijilmasah 82
Aghmat 61
Shatibah 109
Sijilmasah 83
Qurtubah 112
Marrakush 95
Aghmat 64
Sijilmasah 84
Sanlukah 108
Marrakush 96, 97
al-Mariyah 117
Qurtubah 113
Aghmat 66
Sijilmasah 85
Gharnatah no
al-Mariyah 118
Balansiyah? 72
Tilimsan? 72
Sijilmasah 86
Fas 93
Malaqah 116
Nul 98
Daniyah 107
Sijilmasah 87
Aghmat 69
al-Qantarah? 115
Balansiyah 104
Sijilmasah 88
Qurtubah 114
Aghmat 70
Balansiyah 2 105
Bayyasah 2 106
348
Sijilmasah 2 89
Shatibah 2 +3 141
Fas 2 94
Qurtubah 2 +3 144
Nul 124
Aghmat 2 71
al-Mariyah 150
Sijilmasah 2 90
Shatibah 2 +3 142
Qurtubah 145
Aghmat 122
al-Mariyah 151
Daniyah 136-139
Sijilmasah 3 172
Shatibah 2 +3 143
Marrakush 123
Balansiyah 2 +3 132
Balansiyah 3 222
Daniyah 3 234,235
Sijilmasah 173
Shatibah 238
Malaqah 3 259
Marrakush 194
Balansiyah 223
Daniyah 236
Gharnatah 239
Fas 184?
Malaqah 260
Mursiyah 263
Nul 201
Sijilmasah 174
Gharnatah 240
Qurtubah 958
Malaqah 261
Balansiyah 947
Qurtubah 257
Aghmat 156
Balansiyah 224
Daniyah 237
Sijilmasah 175
Saraqustah 948
Mursiyah 267
Balansiyah 225
Tilimsan 169
Sijilmasah 176
Qurtubah 959-961
Mursiyah 268
al-Mariyah 273
Qurtubah 962
Qunkah 966
Malaqah 262
Mursiyah 269
no mint 912
al-Jazirah 230,231
al-Mariyah? 274
Qurtubah 963
Aghmat 160
al-Jazirah 232
al-Mariyah 275
Balansiyah 226
Sijilmasah 177
Sala 183
Mursiyah 270,970,971,1167?
Aghmat 161
al-Jazirah 233
al-Mariyah 276
Balansiyah 227
Fas 187
Mursiyah 271
Nul 202
350
Date
51o
5"
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
Mint
Ishbiliyah
Aghmat
al-Mariyah
Marrakush
Nul
Aghmat
al-Mariyah
Tilimsan
Sijilmasah
Fas
Laushah?
Mursiyah
Nul
Aghmat
al-Mariyah
Balansiyah
Fas
Mursiyah
Aghmat
al-Mariyah
Bani-Tawada
Sijilmasah
Nul Lamtah
Aghmat
al-Mariyah
Ishbiliyah
Ighranatah
Aghmat
al-Mariyah
Fas
Nul Lamtah
Ishbiliyah
Ighranatah
al-Mariyah
Marrakush
Nul Lamtah
Ishbiliyah
Ighranatah
al-Mariyah
Ishbiliyah
Ighranatah
al-Mariyah
Sijilmasah
Marrakush
Nul Lamtah
Ishbiliyah
Dynasty
Murabit
Ruler
Murabit
Murabit
Murabit
Murabit
Murabit
Index of Dates
al-Mariyah 287
Marrakush 198
Sijilmasah 181
Fas . 191
Marrakush 199
Ighranatah 255
al-Mariyah 290
Sijilmasah 182
Fas 192
Marrakush 200
Ighranatah 3 256
al-Mariyah 291
Fas 3 193
Ighranatah 344
Aghmat 292
al-Mariyah 349
Sijilmasah 300
Marrakush 322
Ighranatah? 345
al-Mariyah 350
Sijilmasah 301
Fas 311,311a
Marrakush 323
al-Mariyah 351
Sijilmasah 302
Fas 312
Marrakush 324
Mursiyah 993
352
al-Mariyah 352
Sijilmasah 303
Fas 313
Mursiyah 994
Aghmat 293
al-Mariyah 353
Sijilmasah 304
Fas 314
Marrakush 325
al-Mariyah 354
Sijilmasah 305
Fas 315
Marrakush 326
Sijilmasah 306?
Fas 316
Marrakush 327
al-Mariyah 357
Sijilmasah 307
Fas 317
Marrakush 328
al-Mariyah 358
Sijilmasah 308
Fas 318
Marrakush 329
Sijilmasah 309
Fas 319
Index of Dates
353
Date
534
535
536
537
538
539
Mint
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
Fas
3+4
373
Marrakush
3+3A
329
Marrakush
3+4
380
Nul Lamtah
3+3A
338b
Nul Lamtah
3+4
385. 386
al-Mariyah
Murabit
3+4
397-399
Tilimsan
366
Sijilmasah
370
Fas
374. 375
Marrakush
381
Nul Lamtah
387. 388
Ishbiliyah
Murabit
3+4
393
Aghmat
364
al-Mariyah
400, 400a
Tilimsan
367
Sijilmasah
371
Fas
376. 377
Marrakush
382
Nul Lamtah
389
Ishbiliyah
Murabit
3+4
394
Aghmat
365
al-Mariyah
401, 401a
Tilimsan
368
al-Mariyah
4+5
432
Fas
425, 426
Marrakush
427
Nul Lamtah
415
Nul Lamtah
4+5
429
540
Ishbiliyah
Murabit
4+5
431
Ighranatah
438. 439
Aghmat
433
Tilimsan
406
Qurtubah
441
Marrakush
4+5
428
Marrakush
434
Nul Lamtah
416
Nul Lamtah
436
541
Ishbiliyah
Murabit
437
Ighranatah
440
Qurtubah
442
Marrakush
435
542
Qurtubah
Murabit
6B
446
Nul Lamtah
6D
444
543
al-Nasiriyah
Hammadid
25
Sabtah
Murabit
6A
INDEX OF TITLES
Titles are listed in strict Arabic alphabetical order. The rulers listed are those to whom the
given title refers, not necessarily those who struck the coins. Diacritical marks are omitted from
dynastic names.
Title
al-imam
al-umara'
al-umara' al-rashidin
al-amir
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
'Abbasid
26
26-37. 53-56
26, 27
38, 52, 57
27
27, 28
59. 81
28
28, 29
29
29, 30
30, 31
31
36
540, 1121
Fatimid
1, 2, 15-23
Hammudid
872-879
880-887, 1157-1160
Muwahhid
H5, M1
M1
12
M1
446a, 1059-1061
Muwahhid
1-3
1075
Muwahhid
1-3
1076, 1077
Hafsid
626,628,629,631-634,637,638,641,642,
H6, H7
Zirid
356
al-amir Murabjt 1
1B
3A
Muwahhid
9A
Hafsid
6A
12
Nasrid
al-amir al-ajall
Muwahhid
1A
Hafsid
10
al-amir al-tahir
Muwahhid
al-amirayn
Muwahhid
I, 2
al-hajib
Hammudid
9B
9C
al-khulafa'
Muwahhid
1-3
1-4
al-khulafa' al-rashidin
'Abbasid
Muwahhid
I, 2
1-3
1-4
Ziyanid
Marinid
al-khalifah
'Abbasid
36
37
Muwahhid
al-khalifatayn
Muwahhid
I. 2
Coins
54-57
Index of Titles
357
Title
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
al-khalifatayn al-rashidayn
Muwahhid
1-3
H4
al-sul^an
Hafsid
21
637. 638
26
644
27
1124-1129
al-sayyid
Marinid
20A
831, 832
al-malik
Hafsid
21
637. 638
Marinid
787
13
imam al-ummah
'Abbasid
37
541
Muwahhid
imamuna
'Abbasid
36
1117-1120
Muwahhid
10
1078-1083
umara' al-mu'minin
Muwahhid
1-3
520, 521
amir al-muslimin
Murabit
913
1038
6A
443
Ziyanid
358
Title
am1r al-muslimm
amir al-mu'minin
Dynasty Rider
20
21
22
26
28
Wattasid 2
'Abbasid 26
26, 27
27
27, 28
28
28, 29
29
29. 30
30, 31
31
36
37
Fatimid 8
Hammudid 6
Muwahhid 1
10
11
12
13
Hafsid 2
Coins
833. 834
835
861-866
1151, 1152
870, 1154
"55
1156
26-37. 53-56
38, 52, 57
59. 81
339-354
541
1, 2, 15-23
872-879
Index of Titles
359
Title
Dynasty
Ruler
Coins
amir al-mu'minin
571-573
577-579
580
10
11
592, 593
13
595. 596
15
597-600
15B
603
16
604-607
17
608-614, 616-619
19
20
626
21
628-640, H8
25
641-643
26
644
Ziyanid
648, 649
Marinid
12
769-786, H12
24
839. 853
26
867
Ottoman
10
670, 671
amiray al-mu'minin
Muwahhid
1, 2
5"
khalifat Allah
Muwahhid
sultan
Hafsid
27
1130, 1132
sayyid
Muwahhid
537
sayyidina
Muwahhid
Names and epithets are listed in strict Arabic alphabetical order, including the prefixes al-,
Name
Ibrahim
abu-Ishaq
abu'l-Baqa'
abu'l-Hasan
abu'l-Rab1'
abu'l-'Abbas
abu'l-'Ula
Abu-Bakr
abu-Tamim
abii-Ja'far
abii-Hafs
abu-Zakarfya'
abii-Zayd
abu-Salim
abu-Sa'id
abu-'Abd-Allah
abti-'Amr
abu-Faris
abu-Malik
abu-Muhammad
abu-Musa
abu-Yahya
abu-Ya'qiib
abu-Yusuf
Ahmad
Idris
Ishaq
al-As'ad
al-Hasan
al-Rashid
al-Rashid-bi-Allah
Coins
569, 604-607
580
518-521, 627
670, 671
1121
601
788
726-745
628-640, H8
610-625, 833
793
1076, 1077
581-592, H7
H5, M1
511, 872-879
433-442, 1039-1052
361
Name
al-Sa'id
al-'Ali-bi- Allah
al-'Abbasi
al-'Izz
al-Ghar1b
al-Fadl
al- Qa'im-bi-amr-Allah
al- Qa'im-bi-haqq-Allah
al-Qa'im-li-Allah-bi-a'la'-din-al-haqq
al-Ma'mun
al-Mutawakkil- 'ala-Allah
al-Mutawakkil-'ala-Allah-wahdihi
al-Mutawakkil-'ala-rabb-al-'alam1n
al-Mujahid
al-Murtada
al-Murtada-li-amr-Allah
al-Murtada-li-amrihi
al-Musta'in-bi- Allah
al-Mustanijir
al-Mustanijir-bi-Allah
al-Mu zaffar-bi-Allah
al-Ma'an
al-Mu'ta^im-bi- Allah
al-Mu'tadid-bi-Allah
al-Mu 'tamid
al-Muqt afi-li-amr-Allah
al-Muntakhab-li-ihya'-din-Allah
al-Man^ur
al-Manijur-bi-fadl-Allah
al-Mahdi
al-Mahdi-alladh1-yashriku'l-nabi
al-Mu'min-bi-Allah
Coins
872-879
880-887, 1157-1160
499
653, 868
570, 597-60o
570
713, 714
511, 513-521
630
5", 594
M1
788
603, 805
1, 2,15-23,562-566,571-573,577-579,602,604-607,
601
880-886, 1157-1160
362
Name
al-Mu'ayyad
al-Mu'ayyad-bi- Allah
al-Naeir-li-din-AUah
al-Wathiq
al-Wathiq-bi-Allah
ibn-abi-Ibrahim
ibn-abi'l-'Abbas
ibn-abi'l-'Ula
ibn-Abi-Bakr
ibn-ab1-Hafi
ibn-abi-Zakariya'
ibn-abi-'Abd- Allah
ibn-abi-'Ali
ibn-abi-Faris
ibn-abi-Muhammad
ibn-abi-Yahya
ibn-Ahmad
ibn-Isma'il
ibn-al-imam
ibn-al-umara'
ibn-al-umara' al-rashidin
ibn-al-amir
ibn-al-amir al-ajall
ibn-al-amir al-tahir
ibn-al-amirayn
ibn-al-Hasan
ibn-al-khulafa'
ibn-al-khulafa' al-rashidin
ibn-al-khalifah
ibn-al-khalifatayn
ibn-al-khaMatayn al-rashidayn
ibn-al-'Aziz-bi- Allah
ibn-al-Ma'miin
ibn-al-Manijur
ibn-amir-al-mushmin
Coins
583, 594
1076, 1077
567, 568
58o, 595
539
522-536, M1
610-614, 616-619
793
627
545-561, 569
610-614, 616-619
868
M1
1075
363
Name
Corns
ibn-amiray-al-mu'minin
ibn-Tashfin
ibn-Rashid
ibn-sayyid
ibn-sayyidina
ibn-sayyidayna
ibn-'Abd-al-'Aziz
ibn-'Ali
ibn-'Umar
ibn-Kaukab
ibn-Muhammad
ibn-Na?r
ibn-Yahya
ibn-Yusuf
Bani-Tashfin
Baha'-al-Daulah
Tashfin
Hasan
Khalid
Zakariya'
Sa'd
Saqaut
Sir
Sulayman
Diya'-al-Daulah
'Abd-al-Haqq
'Abd-al-Rahman
'Abd-al-'Aziz
'Abd-Allah
'Abd-al-Mu'min
5"
24a [903
537
538, M1
M1
713. 714
627
546, 554, 831, 832, H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, M1,
1019-1023,1026,1029-1031,1034-1036,1039-1048,
907
609, 644
868
569, 602
868,905,908-912,914-925,928-931,939,947-949,
953-957,964-967,970-973,975,977.978.980-984,
1165-1169
880-886, 1157-1160
362-432, 995-1038
672
580
592, 593
904, 1017
880-887, 1157-1160
670, 671
292-361, 973-994
887
364
Name Coins
'Ali 53,121-403,627,902-967,970-1017,1155,1162-1169
Malik 933
Mazdara' 499
Ma hdi-al-Din 1057
Miisa 646,650,651,833,834
998-1006,1017,1020-1023,1034-1036,1039-1046,
1052
H5, 891-904
? 897
Coins Phrase
665 i-ivalcl
642, 648, 649,691,713,715-725,750-755. 758, 802, 806, 809, 827, 837, H1, tii <Aj"yiVl (j)
H2, H10, 1076, 1085-1119, 1122, 1123, 1137, 1141-1147, 1150, 1170,
1171
603, 609, 639, 640, 666, 673, 676, 677, 679-681, 684-687, 691-697, 734, <u J-l (j)
742-744, 746, 749, 755, 759-768, 799-802, 807, 808, 817, 820, 834,
447-472, 542, 543, 545, 648, 649, 698, 870, 1065-1074, 1105, 1135. Ojl(l)Jl *u J-\ (j)
810-816, 818, 819, 821-826, 828, 829, 833, 836-839, H3-H5, H10,
H11, H13
637. 638, 640, 641, 644, 645, 674, 675, 678, 682, 683, 689, 690, 714,
541 . 547-550, 553. 555-557, 562-568, 570-580, 583-590, 595, 597-599,601- <u pi\ (j)
642, 644, 645, 666, 673-687, 689-697, 704, 749-755, 759-768, 806, 808,
H10, H11
513 ul OlJi\
Coins Phrase
1170,1171
979,997,1027 <ul
1on <ul
593. 673, 676, 677, 679-681, 686, 687, 691-696, 714, 749, 802, 807, 837, u dftil (.,)
838, H1o
541 . 547-550, 553. 555-557. 574-576. 592, 645, 674, 675, 678, 682, 683, u Hl ())
855-866, H9-H11
541-543. 545. 547-550. 553. 555-557. 569. 574-576, 581, 582, 594. 645. <al J-Jjll
789-791 Lsi. Ul^ dCa^j dClc l_jti; jJs L> cSl;j ^ l il tiXJ jiiJ 1*3 b*"i L'l
l <ill cT^oi j
651, 654, 655, 672, 778-786, 800, 803, 832, 853, 861-867, H13 Oil .-u l
646, 647, 653, 656, 659-663, 665, 666, 670, 671, 726-733, 735-740, 744, .j~\) <ul m\
541 <al
1173 411l
12
107, 366-368, 382, 409, 410, 427-429, 432, 439, 442, H8, 924,974,989,1023 <ul p-i
802, 806-816, 818, 819, 821-827, 829, 831, 833, 836-842, 845-849,
367
Coins Phrase
15, 17, 25, 147, 152, 169, 184, 194, 199, 201, . . j Jl v> p^-J1 (*-1.
222-228, 235-237, 239, 240, 257, 259-261, 263-273, 289, 376, 377,
379, 382-384, 404-406, 408, 409, 411, 412, 417, 421, 427-432,
24a - jb Jl i* j"""'.
872-886, 900-902, 907,947-949,951,952,954-957, 966, 968-972, 993, . . jpjJI (1)0* ^> <ul ^
1, 2, 12, 13, 16, 18-24, 26-51, 53-90, 92-146, 148-151, 153-168, . . J)) Jl (l)o* uI
241-251, 258, 262, 274-288, 290-343, 345, 347-375, 380, 381, 385-
m1 ""
663, 665, 668, 670, 671, 803, 811, 817, 828, 830, 868, 869, H14 <u1 i*-,^
662, 746-748, 750-752, 778-781, 784-786, 812-814, 818, 850-852, H" J(l)-" <ul l*-^
729, 730, 840-842, 845, 855-862, 864-866 <cc JLr <ul L~_^-
646, 647, 650-653, 656-658, 660, 661, 754, 782, 783, 815, 816 Lulj J(l)v <ul L-_^
1075 <ul
488
18-23
446a j b J1
1084 <uI
741 <ul
368
Coins Phrase
1-24, 25-51, 53-90, 92-111, 113-128, 130-133, 135, 140-147, 152-167, <i-
234-244, 246, 248, 250, 251, 257, 258,263, 264, 266-269,273-280, 282,
362-365, 369-372, 375, 383, 385-392. 397. 398. 402, 402a, 414-416,
419, 421-423, 430, 430a, 432, 436, 442, 444, 446, 872-886, 900, 912,
947-949, 951, 959, 960, 963, 966, 968-972, 993, 994, 1124-1129,
1157-1163
545. 547. 553. 556, 557. 562-574, 577-58o, 583-590, 595, 597-599.602-613, l-u- Jc <ul
616-619,626-628,631-634, 640,645,655,663,670,671,674,675,678,
679, 682-684, 686, 689, 690, 691a-693, 758-768, 782, H6, H9, H12
575. 576, 849. 865 LLi jJl-j 4))1j .u*< I;ju- Je <ul J*
656, 673, 788, 855-864, 866 LLi |Ju-j *i\ Jcj .u** kju-. Jc oil
601, 841, 842, 845 LLi jju-j <,(1).*^ <)l Jcj JU* Lu Jc <Jll
522, 542, 543, 546, 555, 629, 637, 638, 647, 658, 660, 698, 702, 713-716, ju*. Jc <ul
511, 513-519, 523-525. 528, 530-533. 537. 538, 540, 646, 648-650, 652, 4)lj -u*. Jc till
793-798, 802, 807, 808, 810-816, 818, 819, 821, 825, 826, 833, 836, 839
541. 551, 558, 559. 657. 661, 676, 677, 681, 685, 687, 695, 696 LLi 4)l Jcj ju*. Jc <ul
382-384, 404, 405, 411, 412, 422, 427-429, 433-435, 439, 440 pL-j <ul
393-395. 417. 430, 431. 437. 442 LLi <J* <ul J"
10, 603, 646-653, 655-658, 660-666, 668, 669, 672, 726-744, 746-748, 750-
752, 754. 765. 766. 769-803, 806, 807, 810-830, 833-842, 845-852,
1127 j v>
369
Coins Phrase
912 jjl o*
24a, 112, 134, 136-139, 148-151, 168, 170, 171, 184, 186-193, 195-200, flc
214, 221, 228, 229, 231-233, 245, 247, 249, 252-256, 259-261, 265,
356-358, 360, 361, 366-368, 373, 374. 376-382, 384. 393-396, 399-
401a, 403-413, 417. 418, 420, 424-429. 431, 433-435. 437-441, 443.
1127 Sjc
1, 2, 15-17 oil Jj
832 ^j1^J1jai/Uc
603, 639, 640, 646, 647, 650, 652-667, 670, 671, 726-744, 769-777, 787- y\
10 oLi _^
262 c- ^
13, 23 0L~i ^
16 ^ Jl >i j
22 OL*i ^
1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 17-23, 24a-498, 500-509, 5"-54o, 544. 546, 55*, 552, 554, *n\ Ml )l M (j)
619, 626-629, 631-634, 637, 638, 641, 646-652, 666, 668, 669, 672,
867, H1-H8, H10, H", H13, H14, M1, 888, 889, 891-897, 900, 901,
3-7, 10-14, 16, 24, 596, 871-887, 902, 908, 939, 947, 948, 965, 966, 968, Jo-j .oil Ml 4)l M
788 Ml .01 M
473-495, 497. 498, 500-502, 540, 542, 543, 545, 547-550, 553, 555-557. r^J1 cfj\ y Ml 4)I M
569, 574, 615, 620-623, 625, 645-647, 650, 652, 674, 675, 678-680,
682-684, 686, 689, 690, 691a-694, 697, 713-729, 732, 733, 735,
802, 806, 807, 809-819, 821-830, 833, 834, 836, 838, 839, H1, H2,
H9, H12-H14
21
370
Coins Phrase
3-7, 10-14, 16, 24, 871-887, 902, 908, 947, 948, 965, 966, 1157-1160 *i M
648, 649, 750-758, 806-809, 830, 837, 868, H1o, 1153 oil Ml Jlc M (j)
648, 649, 679, 680, 684-686, 691a-694, 697, 715-725, 746-748, 820, 840- <l Ml M (j)
18-23 ju-JUMIo^>J
651 <11I Li L
1-498, 500-509, 511-593, 595, 597-600. 602-613, 616-619, 626-629, 631- <ul J^-j -u*
867, H1-H8, H10-H14, M1, 871, 888, 889, 891-897, 902a~93o, 932,
933. 941. 947-949. 951-964. 966, 967. 970, 972-987. 993. 994. 996-
1, 2, 12, 15-24, 872-887, off ^a^1 Jc *.rfkJ ji-1 aJj &*}\ <"1 J^-j
900-902, 947-949, 951, 952, 954, 966, 970-972, 993. 994. "57-
12, 92, 93, 95, 96, 100, 101, 111-113, 1l6, 120, 140, 146, 171, 184-193, 229, K,Jl*
234, 238, 275, 276, 288, 311-320, 366-368, 373, 374, 378, 379, 406,
754, 760, 767, 770, 772-776, 778-801, 803, 810-827, 830, 833-843,
845-851, 855-866, 868, 869, H1o, H11, H13, H14, 873-875, 877-886,
3-11, 14 j f}L.UI y.
980 <ul
Coins Phrase
645, 674, 675, 678, 682-684, 689, 690, 713, 715- fie j >j ^Ulj jM>) >Mlj JjMl y
798, 808, 81o, 819, 821-827, 829, 833, 835-837, 839, H9, Hn, H12
592 <ul j*
473-495, 497, 498, 500-502, 540, 542, 543, 545, 547-550, 553, 555-557. "*4> " f&b
569, 574, 615, 620-623, 625, 645-647, 650, 652, 674, 675, 678-680,
682-684, 686, 690, 691a-694, 697, 713-729. 732, 733, 735, 736, 738-
254-256 p. j oh
655, 656 fi aJl tf"i>jMl-/ (n^l~HJ oliUl l>^, ^ ly,l aJl <ul aej
500-502, 542, 543, 552, 651, 666, 668, 701-703, 781, 1075, 1133 till jrf ja (^TUj
24a, 26-51, 53-90, 92-209, 211-446, uo-lil ^ J>Ml ^ yj o JJi Ji Lj f5L.Ml A j*)
654, 659-663 ljai ^ jC) till Jm. ui .^l )l till Ol <^ > <ul Jc jS^i
868 0>*1." <ul lyrlj l_,j l^/.Uj lj,*-l lyl a.Jl V.l!;
657 ^ yi\ Jjlj Jj-Jl lj-jUlj till ljj.l ly,l ajl lj>j C
25 till Jj2
21*
INDEX OF MINT-MARKS
Coins Mint-mark
927 I
466 j.
129, 222
19, 22 j
260 j
"3 J>
394. 395, 430, 432, 458, 953. 954. 1034, 1035, 1165
438,439
58-61,63-69,71,72,78,79,84,103,121,125,126,134,152-154.156,158-161, 163, S
164,166, 167, 170, 178, 184, 186, 195,199, 202, 203, 205, 207, 209, 210, 230, 232,
244, 274, 288, 293-297, 299, 311, 311a, 312, 316, 318-329, 331, 332, 334, 337, 338,
338a, 345. 363-367, 370, 374-384, 386, 388, 389, 391, 392, 394, 404, 405. 408,
410-414, 422, 424-427. 431. 433-437. 440. 444. 926, 928, 983. 999. 1039
466,926,951,952,999,1164? J
251 J
257 1
123? >
952? J
348,350 -J
253-256. 344 ^
245-249 U
259
11 j
"65 ^
Index of Mint-Marks
373
Coins Mint-mark
136-143, 145, 147, 149-151, 155, 157, 162, 165, 169, 171-174, 176, 177, 179-181, 183, 185,
187-194, 196-198, 200, 201, 204, 206, 208, 211, 223, 228, 229, 231, 233, 236-238, 240-242,
250, 252, 261, 262, 264, 266, 269, 276-280, 292, 298, 300, 305-308, 313-315, 317, 330, 333.
335. 336, 346. 347. 355. 362, 368, 372, 373. 385. 387. 390. 402, 406, 407, 409, 415, 416, 420,
Murabit gold recorded both with and without mint-mark beneath rf:
61, 79
26-57, 62, 73, 74, 76, 80, 87, 89, 91, 95-97, 107, 1", 114, 118, 120, 127-129, 133, 135, 146, 148,
175,182, 222, 224, 225, 234, 235, 239. 243. 258, 267, 268, 270, 281, 301-304, 309, 310, 369, 371
Coin
Specimen
19
BM IV 166 (pi. n)
20
24a
26
BN II 507 (pi. n)
28
53
55
BN II 515 (pi. n)
66
HSA 13173
91
127
ANS
256
220
BM V 32 (pi. 1)
377
HSA 13134
439
446
HSA 14169
446a
HSA 14156
447
ANS
477
HSA 7898
507
5"
BM V 106 (pi. n)
513
516
P 15c (pi. n)
519
P 16 (pi. n)
530
M1
540
P 63 (pi. vn)
541
P 62 (pi. vn)
546
P 30 (pi. Iv)
556
569
BN II 947 (pi. x)
570
572
375
643 ANS
700 P 40 (pi- v)
Plate
Coin
Specimen
H14 note
H14 note
VII 874
883
887
888
894
904
906
926
953
965
968
983
993
1001
1004
1017
1022
1036
1041
1052
1062
1066
1068
1075
1076
1080
1085
1087 obverse
1088 millares
1090 reverse
1091 obverse
1097
1101 rules
1101 millares
1102 obverse
1103
1104
1116 note
HSA 13206
HSA 10621
HSA 14217
HSA 14218
BN II 513 (pi. n)
ANS
ANS
ANS
HSA 14147
HSA 13916
HSA 13917
ANS
ANS
HSA 15911
HSA 15919
HSA 15923
ANS
HSA 14168
P 26 (pi. 1n)
377
Coin
Specimen
1117
1119
HSA 13808
1120
1121
1123
1127
F.Somd p. 56 (pi.)
1129
F.Somd p. 56 (pi.)
"35
P 59 (pi. vn)
"37
1142
HSA 13813
1147
P 56 (Pl. V1)
1148
1149
P 57 (pi. vn)
P 104 (pi. x)
1150
P 92 (pi. Ix)
"53
"54
"55
1156
1169
HSA 547
"73
F .HaJsites 61 (pi. v)
1174 note
PLATES
IlI
IV
VI
VII
VIII
WATTASID Silver: 1154-1156; MURABIT Copper: 1169; HAFSID Copper: 1173, Amulet: 1174 note.
NEW YORK
1958
BY
NEW YORK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction I
The Type 3
Incuse Coinage 7
Enlargements 10
Fractions 17
Bronze Issues J8
Plated Coins 19
Catalogue 20
Incuse Staters 20
Fractions 53
Bronze Coins 57
Plated Coins 57
INTRODUCTION
This study of the coinage of Caulonia was started many years ago in the reasonable
expectation that it might provide information that would parallel or clarify the procedure
at the mints of its neighbors and add valuable data to the history of these Greek cities in
South Italy. The destruction of Caulonia in 389/388 b.C. with the consequent stoppage
of its coinage affords a fixed date of considerable significance and some convenience.
The scantiness of the literary sources for Caulonia makes the evidence which the coins
of the enigmatic type. The years which have intervened have shown this to be a wise
decision, and although in the discussion I cite many who have attempted an explanation
"darkened counsel with wisdom" I leave the solution of this sphinx-like question to some
daring student of the future someone who will perhaps bring an unbiased approach
To make acknowledgement for the courtesies received during the preparation of this
study would involve citing again the names of the many cabinets and collectors listed in
the catalogue which follows. Casts, photographs and information have been furnished with
prodigal generosity by the Curators of all the great national collections and my thanks to
them are both heartfelt and entirely inadequate. Many individual collectors have been no
less kindsome of them are no longer with us to receive this expression of gratitude. An
initial advantage lay in that Mr. Newell's gathering of the coins of this mint was unusually
to the late Mrs. Agnes Baldwin Brett I am under great obligation for helpful advice. To
Miss Margaret Thompson and to Mr. Sawyer McA. Mosser and the members of his editorial
staff I owe a debt for cooperation and encouragement that beggars words. To Mr. Ray-
mond W. Johnson is due the credit for the photographic results, often wrung from material
that was unpromising. Last but not least, to the American Numismatic Society and the
unmatched facilities of its museum, I am glad to make acknowledgement for the oppor-
The objective, first of all, is to establish a sequence in the coinage, which started with
the incuse format (customary in this region) and later, after a period whose length has been
the Greek world). Little if any effort to place the double-relief staters in order had been
made previously; for example, the engraved reproductions of Carelli and Garrucci are
As most students of the coinage of South Italy know, it was the practice of many
of these mints to continue using the survivor of a pair of dies with the newly cut die
which replaced the outworn one. Because the upper die had to withstand greater stress, it
usually broke before the lower one whose longer life was due to the bolstering or buttressing
it received from the anvil in which it was set. Although there is little data other than the
coins to tell us anything regarding the material from which the dies were made, we do find
that the anvil die would often outlast three punch dies and sometimes more. Once this has
been recognized it is possible to build up groups of connected dies groups which often
reach considerable extent. By employing other criteria, such as the evidence provided by
it is possible to eliminate doubt as to which of two groups must have preceded the other.
When all the data has been gathered, a sequence frequently may be established which
carries conviction except for the placement of a relatively few singletons for which no
The sequence submitted here does not claim finality. Perhaps an unpublished variety in
possession of some fortunate collector will be all that is needed to clarify uncertainty in the
arrangement. Among the double-relief staters there are many known by a single specimen
only, and since some of the flans are too small for the dies, the symbol and the form of the
inscription are often uncertain. The coins show that dies were often used after cracks or
fissures had developed and long beyond the point at which they would have been discarded
in larger or better regulated mints. It is the growth of these defects, however, which
frequently dispels any doubt as to which of the accompanying dies, whether obverse or
There is some ground for the feeling that the date in the Historia Numorum for the
beginnings of coinage at Caulonia (550) is too early. It would be most helpful if we could
fix the date for the change at this mint to coins having both sides in relief and the hoard
from South Italy appended (p. 59) provides reason for placing this before 473 b.C. The
bronze coins of Caulonia are to be dated shortly before the city's destruction; they are of
very great rarity. The introduction of symbols in addition to the type occurs soon after the
change from incuse to double-relief. These symbols precede the introduction of single
letters, which herein are usually considered to be the initials of die-cutters. At Caulonia
1 For the procedure at Tarentum, cf. Evans, The Horsemen of Tarentum (London, 1889), p. 45.
THE TYPE
the interpretations will show the thorniness of the problem. There is very little evidence
that is new. Even the excavation of the site by Orsi2 was disappointing in that it disclosed
A careful description of the coin type is given by Macdonald:3 "Naked male figure,
standing with one foot planted in advance of the other; hair bound with diadem and falling
in ringlets; in raised right hand a branch; on left arm, which is outstretched, a small figure
running forward with head turned back, holding a branch in each hand; in front, a stag on
basis, with head reverted." The identification of the larger figure as Apollo seems to be
generally agreed upon,4 but several differing interpretations exist concerning the identifi-
cation of the smaller figure.5 Head, offering an unique interpretation to both figures, states
the following:
"I am inclined to believe that the original name of the town (KocuAcov) may have had a simpler
though humbler origin in (KauX6s), a vegetable with a single stalk, such for instance as the Pastinaca
sativa, a tall erect plant the stalk of which is flanked by a row of pinnate leaves. The roots of this plant
have been cultivated from very remote times as a valuable esculent. Subsequently, here as elsewhere, a
nobler origin and an eponymous oekist would naturally be sought for and identified as KotOXos, son of
the Amazon Kleite; and the local plant would be assigned to him as an emblem, just as the crfXivov
leaf became the emblem of the eponymous hero of Selinus. On the coins of Caulonia the principal figure
would thus represent the mythical founder holding in his raised right hand the irapdoTmov of the city,
and on his left arm a small genius running at full speed and carrying apparently the same emblem in
each hand. If the earliest coins of Caulonia, like those of so many other cities, were chiefly used on
special occasions, e.g., recurrent agonistic festivals ..., then the small running genius with winged feet
may have been intended for a personification of 'Ay6v or Hermes dycovios or 8p6uios ..."
If Head's statement on the founding of Caulonia shows but little connection between
the legendary beginning and the coin type, his explanation of that type shows its signi-
ficance to be far from obvious and his usual acumen in analyzing published opinions to be
soon as the initial premise the identification of the branch is challenged. The size of
2 Cf. NSc, 1912, 1913, 1915. These excavations afford evidence regarding the temple and the walls
of the city. Of the former, the floor and the foundations alone remain, but it was possible to reconstruct
a peripteral structure with a facade of six columns, having a roof of Parian marble tiles. This may be an
indication that the wealth of the city was greater than the extent of its coinage would have led one to
suppose. The city's walls were constructed of boulders from the beds of the streams on either side of the
site.
* George Macdonald, Coin Types, their Origin and Development (Glasgow, 1905), p. 132.
4 William Watkiss Lloyd, "On the Types of the Coins of Caulonia," NC X (1847-48); M. Raoul-
Rochette, "Observations sur le type du monnaies de Caulonia, et sur celui de quelques autres m6dailles
5 HN2, p. 93; Lloyd, op. cit.; Raoul-Rochette, op. cit.; Robinson, op. cit.
this growth is more similar to the laurel than to the pastinaca sativa. Furthermore, the
leaves on the coin are pinnate whereas those of the pastinaca sativa are irregular.
that such a nude, virile figure is to be identified, if this is possible, by the distinguishing
attributes and peculiarities or symbols. The long hair of this beardless figure, as well as the
diadem, are of a form which can be associated with the youthful Apollo. He feels that the
Hermes, Perseus, and Boreas as possibilities. The subordination of the winged figure to
that of Apollo precludes the suggestion of Hermes and the absence of a single occurrence of
the caduceus among the symbols on the coinage of the city is surely conclusive evidence that
the figure is not Hermes. The lustral branches make it unlikely that this figure is Perseus as
Boreas, however, seems a preferable identification for the smaller figure to Lloyd.8 He
endeavors to connect it with the tradition quoted by Pausanias9 that Caulonia was founded
under the leadership of Typhon of Aegium. An unconvincing effort to connect Typhon with
the daimon of stormy winds is not pressed, but support is claimed from the name given to
Cape Zephyrius (between Caulonia and Locri) as the indication of a local cult of this
particular wind-god.
It is possible that due to certain climatic conditions Caulonia's daimon type was a
wind-god. The coin type of another southern Italian town reflects its climatic conditions;
e.g., Metapontum used the ear of barley which was an indication of its agricultural wealth.
Caulonia, situated on the coast in a mountainous region, seems to have derived its chief
source of wealth from the nearby forests. Apparently this town enjoyed a rather constant
water supply furnished by the streams Alaros on the south and Precariti (the modern
name) on the north.10 Lying on the southern slope of the watershed, Caulonia was in the lee
and consequently protected from the west and northwest winds in the winter. During the
remainder of the year a sea breeze tempered the heat11 and the south and southeast winds
prevailed at that time. These favorable conditions may possibly have been attributed by
Each figure on the coin carries a lustral branch, an essential part of every sacrifice.12
Could these branches indicate that Caulonia was cleansed from a pestilence? This is not
true of the healthy and prosperous Croton whose later type shows Herakles Oikistas holding
a lustral branch13 as Raoul-Rochette14 points out. Although southern Italy is known to have
been conducive to miasmatic conditions, the fact that Caulonia was surrounded by forests
and had adequate drainage facilities would seem to indicate that she enjoyed healthful
8 William Watkiss Lloyd, "On the types of the Coins of Caulonia," NC, X (1847-1848), pp. 1-20.
10 Thucydides vii. 25. David Randall-McIver, Greek Cities in Italy and Sicily (Oxford, 1931),
p. 53.
18 A Companion to Greek Studies, ed. Leonard Whibley (Cambridge, 1916), p. 405. Cf. Dictionnaire
des Antiquitis Grecques et Romaines, ed. Ch. Daremberg, Edm. Saglio and E. Pottier (Paris, 1905), III,
pp. 1408-1409.
13 Cf. Plate XIV, nos. 176-181, where the fillet is hanging over the arm of the god.
The Type
conditions. We may therefore the more warrantably concur with Raoul-Rochette's belief
that the coin type did not refer to the city's having been cleansed from a pestilence.
Robinson, in discussing the association on coins of olive and bay with the head of
Apollo as signifying his function as god of midday light and heat, recently suggested the
It may be suggested that this aspect of the god was well-known in this particular corner of Italy,
and should also be recognized in the familiar coin type of neighboring Kaulonia: a youthful figure
striding with a branch in his hand and with a secondary figure, sometimes with winged heels, also
holding branches, running along his outstretched arm (Traits III 1, PI. LXX 14-5, PI. LXXI 1-5).
This figure has from time to time been interpreted as a river-god, but the deer that always accompanies
him should mark him for Apollo; the lustral branch which he is swinging is the means of fertility, and
the little winged figure on his arm symbolizes the same power as the swastika or triskeles, to which
incidentally it bears some resemblance. It is interesting to note in this connection that on an early
Kaulonian obol (B.M.C. Italy, p. 336, No. 16) Apollo as type is replaced by the triskeles, and that on a
group of late fifth-century staters the hair of the striding figure is deliberately treated so that the locks
The resemblance of the daimon to a swastika or triskeles and the interpretation of the
is to arrive at a convincing exposition of the meaning of the type. Let us conclude merely
that the chief figure is probably that of Apollo, presented as the city's founder, that the
daimon figure still eludes identification, and that the stag is the parasemon of the city.
For some time students of Greek sculpture and numismatics have questioned whether
this coin type was originated by a die-cutter or was derived from a sculptural prototype.
Percy Gardner rejects the latter suggestion when he writes, "exact and servile imitations of
things (statues) however beautiful did not suggest itself to the mind of the artists who
executed coin dies..." and concludes, "as long as Greek art was alive, an exact or slavish
copy of a statue or a relief was all but unknown."16 Regling holds a similar view but at the
same time he feels that the persistence of a coin type almost unchanged for 150 years may
latter as a possibility only in the case of the Apollo figure. Macdonald, however, rejects the
idea that the stag might be an integral part of a group because it rests upon a separate
groundline.20 But the attitude of dependancy or expectancy to be seen on the part of the
small figure and on that of the stag seem to me to indicate a relationship between them.
Such an attitude is retained even by the crudest die-cutters up to the time of the disap-
pearance of the two figures from the obverse. The separate groundline of the stag might
The daimon figure is in opposition to any consideration of the obverse types as derived
from a group sculptured in the round because of the technical difficulty of supporting it
mechanically. Nor do known remains of other groups provide a satisfactory analogy. The
15 E. S. G. Robinson, "Rhegion, Zankle-Messana and the Samians," JHS, LXI (1946), p. 16.
"Percy Gardner, The Types of Greek Coins (Cambridge, 1883), pp. 68-69.
17 Kurt Regling, in Handbuch der Archdologie, ed. Walter Otto (Munchen, 1939); "Anhang:
colored terra cottas found at Locri by Orsi,21 may have been inspired by such an earlier
monumental relief. The remarkable metopes found at Paestum in recent years by Dr.
Zanconi Montuori22 demonstrate how limited the known examples of sculpture from Magna
Graecia are, and suggest that important additions to what we know may be awaiting
excavation at this site or at the sites of other Greek cities in Italy. But even on the earliest
of the incusi at Caulonia, the treatment of the reverse details, especially the delineation of
Apollo's long locks of hair, remind one of the like care taken with the folds of the chlamys
worn by Poseidon on the reverses of the incuse staters of Poseidonia.23 And certainly the
way in which the lustral fillet hangs over the arm of the figure on the latest staters
(Plates XIV and XX) implies that the figure is inanimate. As for the stag, the attachment
of a long and thin fillet (Plate XI, 139 - unique piece from Mr. Newell's collection) as well
as the wreath about the stag's neck (Plates VI and VII, 69-70, 72-75, and 77) also seem
type. On only a few of the staters with both sides in relief is the animal represented as
Although these conditions may not be enough to prove that the type of Caulonia was
originally inspired by a sculptural prototype, they do show, it seems to me, that such a
derivation is admissible.
The completed form, KAVAOHIATAM, which does not occur until well along
Poseidonia, and Sybaris (in a single instance). The inscription occurs sometimes on the
obverse and sometimes on the reverse, and sometimes singularly enough, it occurs on
both. Variants include the interchanging of the letters O and 2, and also the final M
and M (i.e., a prostrate 2). The customary form of Z occurs on the coins of the last
group in this study. None of the known specimens of nos. 119-23, 160, and 161 show any
mentions that the characteristically Italiot use of the nominative singular adjective of
the national name standing by itself is found on Caulonia's coins among others.24 In the
double-relief coinage with Apollo on the obverse and the stag on the reverse one might
supply the words "oekist" and "parasemon" respectively thereby rendering the readings
The coinage of Caulonia has two clear-cut divisions; namely, incuse and double-relief.
The incusi are separable according to flan-diameters. Four steps or gradations are dis-
tinguishable. The broadest flan-diameters are found on the earliest coins and the changes
to smaller flan-diameters are abrupt rather than gradua1. The last incuse staters approxi-
mate in size the first double-relief coins as well as contemporary coins of the neighboring
cities of Croton, Metapontum, and Tarentum,25 and the Sicilian mints of Agrigentum, Gela,
21 See RE, s. v. Locri, sec. III and D. Randall-McIver, op. cit., PI. VIII.
22 For illustrations see G. M. A. Richter, Archaic Greek Art (New York, 1949), Figs. 204-6.
Additional metopes have been found within the past year. Cf. A J A, Vol. 62 (1958), p. 418, pi. 113.
21 George Macdonald, "The Original Significance of the Inscription on Ancient Coins," Procis-
(Bruxelles, 1910), pp. 287s. 2 Cf. ANSMN VII, 1957, pp. I3ff-
INCUSE COINAGE
The Caulonian incusi are herein sub-divided into four groups. The first, and the largest
numerically, uses the largest flan (c. 30 mm.). Throughout this group, the inscription is
limited to the first four letters of the city's name, and it occurs on the obverse only. Fifteen
obverse dies with twenty-seven reverses have heen distinguished. On the reverse, the
outlined figure of the daimon, being incised in the die, would have been susceptible
to possible deepening, but neither this nor any other modification has been detected.
Throughout this group, the obverse has a cable border, with the possible exception of
Some justification for the order within Group A should be submitted. These staters
will be seen to have their inscriptions in larger letters than are to be found for the succeeding
group. Of these letters, the V is different in the later coins of Group A, where it takes a
curved form which resembles Y. There is also support for this sequence in the posture of
Apollo. On what have been considered the earlier pieces he is shown with his right heel
raised, giving a sense of forward movement. For the pieces on Plate II, and notably on
nos. 23-25 of Plate III, both feet are flat on the groundline, thereby lessening the feeling of
movement. The frontal eye on both obverse and reverse is consistently present. The order
of the first four pieces on Plate I is determined 'by the die-flaw between the initial letters
of the inscription. The break behind the head of Apollo, not to be seen in no. 1, is present in
nos. 2-4.
The intriguing changes in the posture of the reverse daimon should be noted. There
is a slight shrinkage in the diameter of the flan so that the transition to Group II is less
noticeable than between Groups II and III. In this shrinkage, it is the borders which suffer.
Nos. 11-15 come into position because the branches held in each hand of the daimon
are minimized as though their significance has been lost. Again, because this figure wears a
chlamys it is less simple and direct than in the earlier form. For no. 15, the daimon figure
has been omitted from the reverse, a condition which recurs in succeeding groups. The
reverses of only two dies (nos. 1 and 11) show this figure carrying a branch. Can the reason
for this omission have been that it offered more complication than the die-cutter was
willing to face?
Of the pieces on Plates II and III (nos. 16-26), a sharply bent left arm distinguishes
nos. 23-25, with the fore arm slanting upward instead of horizontal as heretofore. No. 20
is a variety which Garrucci26 desribes from a specimen in his possession as bearing in tiny
letters IKETEZI(A). The first three of these letters are read by him to the left of the
head of Apollo and parallel with his arm; the other four follow the rim in front of the
stag. The specimens which I have examined show that this reading is unwarranted and
fanciful.
Throughout this group the flans are slightly reduced and a tiny circle or annulet,
usually with a pellet in its center, is frequently placed above the obverse stag. This is
usually and perhaps correctly identified as the letter theta, although Regling reads it as the
fifth letter of the ethnic.27 This letter, if it is a letter, also occurs on the reverses of nos. 27,
29, 34( ?), 35, 36 and 39-40, but is is not uniformly placed. These reverse occurrences and
the well-defined central dot preclude associating it with the ethnic. Another letter, re-
sembling epsilon or digamma retrograde, occurs between the feet of Apollo on one obverse
die (37-39) and is also found on the reverse of one of the varieties associated with this die
(nos. 39-40). The first four letters of the city's name occur on the reverses with three
exceptions (nos. 21, 28, 29). The assignment of the varieties at the beginning of the group
is due to their retention of the cable border. This is almost immediately replaced by a
border with dots between two linear circles. Besides this, these first three varieties share
with the latest issues of Group A the omission of any reverse inscription. To replace the
daimon on the reverse, Apollo is sometimes given a second lustral branch (nos. 30-32, 36,
39), the branch held over his shoulder being indicated very summarily throughout the
This group hardly deserves the distinction of being classed separately, since there are
but five varieties with a single obverse die. The shrinkage of flan is now more marked
(27-26 mm.). The inscription is in five letters and now appears on both obverse and
reverse. A long-necked water bird resembling a swan replaces the letter above the rump of
the stag. None of the five reverses omit the daimon figure, which, however, does not have
The last of the four incuse groups shows further shrinkage of the flan (from 24 to 21 mm.
for the smallest) and a growing crudity in the die-cutting, especially for the reverses (cf.,
no. 58). The ethnic, usually occurring with three letters but sometimes with five letters, is
confined to the obverse except for nos. 49, 53, 54, 56, and 57. On nos. 59, 60 and possibly
61, a heron or crane occupies the reverse space usually reserved for the inscription, paral-
leling the procedure at Croton. The interval between may have been considerable since
almost all of the refinements of the incuse process seem to have been forgotten.
Certain of the technical features of these incuse staters call for comment. In their
beginnings, there is little or nothing that might be called primitive about either the type or
the workmanship. The incuse format itself marks an advanced stage in coining, and
although at Caulonia this might be explained by its having been borrowed from Croton,
this can hardly be claimed for the type. For analogy regarding the type, we must go to
Poseidonia, where the figure of Poseidon immediately reminds one of the heroic statue
27 Kurt Regling, Die Griechischen Miinzen der Sammlung Warren (Berlin, 1906), p. 22, no. 136.
Incuse Coinage
found in the sea of Cape Artemesion.28 As has been mentioned, Regling makes a specific
exception of the Caulonia and Poseidonia types in formulating his opinion that the die-
cutters did not draw their inspiration from statues until the Hellenistic period.29 In studying
the composition or design of the Caulonia type, we note the effectiveness with which it
fills the circular field, the nice placement of the inscription and the daimon's figure, and,
not least, the proportions of the stag. The avoidance of awkwardness in the Apollo figure
commands admiration the torso frontal, the head and lower limbs in profile. The shorten-
ing of the right arm is disguised by the hair tresses, so that the contrast is less noticeable.
By comparison, the earliest issues of Poseidonia are less finished and much more
primitive than those of Caulonia. For Croton, there are too few elements in common to
permit a decision as to difference in incidence. We do not know how long the disaster at the
River Sagras antedated the coinage beginnings at Croton (Head dates the latter as 550 b.C.).
Croton must have suffered a severe setback, however, in which Caulonia would have
shared, being within a short distance from the Sagras. At Caulonia, such refinements as the
cutting of the small-scale daimon suggest an interval between the coinage on which it first
appears and those of the other cities using the incuse convention. Moreover, the outlining
of this figure on the reverses is a technicality not found at Metapontum until well along in
the coinage of that city. These conditions point to an earlier beginning at Metapontum, it
seems to me, but there is not yet sufficient data for establishing how much earlier.
28 Cf. article by George E. Mylonas, "The Bronze Statue from Artemision," A J A, XLVIII (1944),
pp. 143-160.
fortunate that for the purposes of comparison this group does not greatly overrun a single
plate. In one of the fasciculi30 of the Sylloge, the type for the reverse with the branch in front
of the stag (heie Group F) is given precedence over this group (E), and for that reason the
cause for differing should be made clear. In Group E, the obverse inscriptions are of three
letters only whereas in Group F they are consistently of four letters. The cable border, a
convention inherited from the incuse format, gives place to a dotted border before we
reach the end of Group E. Whether the branch characteristic of Group F is considered a
symbol or part of the type may be open to question, but the varieties without this accessory
are more likely to precede than to follow its introduction, and stylistically, they come
The arrangement within the group is simplified by the die combinations which dictate
the sequence. I have found but seven obverses combined with sixteen reverses; there must
be further dies not represented. No. 62 is placed at the very beginning because of the form
of its reverse rim and because 64a which immediately follows (by reason of the scale of
the inscription letters) occurs in the hoard discussed hereafter (cf. p. 59). This stater is
the latest of the Caulonia issues in that hoard along with it is a single double-relief
stater of Poseidonia. The hoard must have been secreted not long after the transition
to the double-relief form had taken place at Caulonia and Poseidonia, and to judge from
the staters of Metapontum and Croton in this hoard, before the change took place at
those two cities. The small-scale letters of the inscription for Group E give place almost
immediately to larger ones. The reverses of this group bear no inscription. Those showing
the farasemon of the city with a wreath about the neck of the stag (nos. 69, 69a, 6gd
and 70) are joined to obverses also combined with a wreathless stag which show by the
lessened wear of the obverse die that the wreathless form preceded the other, as was to
be anticipated. Finally, no. 62 has a reverse, unique among double-relief staters, which has
a countersunk rim bearing a border of dots a form obviously derived from the rim of the
incuse reverses. The border of dots on the reverse which immediately follows is minimized
In Group F both obverses and reverses bear inscriptions. In addition the reverses have
either a leaf or a branch in front of the stag. The sequence is achieved by working back-
wards. No. 101, which has the longest inscriptions so far, is placed last because a tendency
toward longer inscriptions becomes common in the following group. It also shares the same
ii
obverse die with no. 100, where there is a complex of branches on the reverse. Because
nos. 88-90 are closely copied from no. 87, the complex of branches is simpler for no. 87 than
for the following dies. It is reasonable that the simpler branch should precede the more
complicated form, and although we may not determine the progression die by die, it is
fairly certain. This suggested evolution is confirmed by changes in the inscriptions, by the
placement of the daimon figure, and by the proportions of the stag on both obverse and
reverse. It is not certain that nos. 78 and 79, with the leaf instead of the branch, belong at
the beginning of the group. The three letter reverse inscription and the scale of the stag seem
There is a marked change in style between this group and Group F. If the arrangement
submitted is correct, there is a clear indication of an extended interval between nos. 101
and 102. In this group both the figures of the obverse Apollo and the reverse stag, instead of
having their customary quiet pose, are represented in motion with a vigor little short of
violence, alternating with and ultimately returning to a static position. There is notable
improvement in the die-cutting which seems to partake of the new vigor in the types.
Another innovation is the introduction of symbols or accessories to the type. Except for the
reverse of no. 102 these are placed on the obverse. For the succeeding group, these additions
Within the coining interval for this group, the daimon figure disappears. Although it
had previously been minimized to some extent, it here reaches a limit of crudity and
unintelligibility (cf. enlargements of nos. 104 and 107 on Plates XIX and XX respectively).
The daimon figure is omitted from nos. 105, 106, 116 and 117 while there are possible
traces on nos. 110 and III. On no. 104 the stag is badly placed and on no. 105 which shares
the same reverse there is no stag at all. The stag is again omitted on the obverses of nos. no
and 1n. Another change is so casual that it might easily evade observation. The obverse
stag, up to this time, has been shown with head reverted, indicating a dependent re-
lationship to Apollo. Beginning with no. 112 the stag's head is like that on the reverse
The order reached is best explained by working backward from no. 117. Nos. 115-117
have a common reverse and on this reverse, the progression of the die break shows that this
must be the order. Nos. 113-115 share the same obverse die, the deterioration of which
gives this sequence. The bounding stag of nos. 110-113 ties them together. On nos. 107-109,
the reverse stag is stationary but the obverse figure of Apollo is not. It agrees perfectly with
either no. 106 which precedes or no. no which follows. Nos. 105 and 106 (same obverse)
have contrasting reverse stags while a common reverse brings no. 104 into place. Nos. 102
and 103 have a common obverse, the latter being more worn. Perhaps the leaves on the
reverse of no. 102 are a stylization of the branch of Group F rather than a symbol. On the
obverse of no. 116, the spray of three leaves seems to be the prototype of the reverse spray
on nos. 118-126, although two berries have been added to the latter.
The additions to the obverse type for this group are very interesting, partly because
they successfully elude classification. Their nature is quite different from the more personal
12
symbols (plough, star, oinochoe, etc.) which are accompanied by the initials of the names of
magistrates on the late fourth century staters of Metapontum. In the fifth century there are
parallels or analogies to the Metapontine symbols. Their occurrence on the reverse generally
gives them a less obvious relation or connection with the main type. For if the reverse
branch which is common to Group F at Caulonia is a symbol for woods or the forest (a
natural enough connotation to indicate the habitat of the stag), the branch added to the
obverse of nos. 11o and 11 1 would have the same significance, although its appropriateness
or relation to Apollo is less clear. The connection between the conventionalized tree form
on no. 107 and the obverse stag is almost obvious, but the sprig on the reverse of no. 102 is
so conventionalized as to deprive it of any connection with the stag. The wreath on no. 112
and the birds on nos. 105 and 113 are less easily associated with Apollo although the birds
are logical enough as wild life. Moreover, on no. 108 the mask of a fox or hind in a frame of
We thus have an indication that the regularity which had marked Group F has
Whereas Group F was marked by the branch on the reverses, this group is distinguished
by a twig or spray with berries or a single leaf. The daimori, which disappeared in the
preceding group, is also completely lacking here. There seems to be a slight deterioration in
the die cutting and notable changes in the treatment of the inscription, including its
omission from both obverse and reverse on nos. 119-123. The figure of Apollo is generally
smaller in scale, and the sense of movement on both sides which marked the issues of
Group G has quite disappeared by the end of Group H. The die mulings bring into close
relationship several pieces which one would have hesitated to associate otherwise.
The ten pieces placed at the beginning of this group, as already noted, have in common
a spray of three leaves and two berries in the field of the reverse. It seems reasonable to see
in the three-leaved twig on the obverse of no. 116 the prototype of this reverse symbo1.
Stylistically, these initial reverses of Group H are inferior to those of nos. 115-117 which
fact may imply an interval between nos. 117 and 118. Die combinations and progressing die
breaks dictate the order shown as will be seen from the diagram of die combinations.
No. 118 shows a reversion to an earlier form in that the head of the obverse stag is
turned back. As with Group G, we occasionally find obverse additions. On nos. 121-123
there is a large insect (in my judgment not a cicada) which also occurs on nos. 127-129,
possibly indicating a closer relation between these coins although the muhngs seem to
indicate the contrary. The reverse symbol on no. 129 is a tree which is far more conventional-
ized than the other tree forms described previously. On nos. 130 and 131 the reverse spray-
is given a summary treatment, which marks a time separation from the form used on
nos. 118-126.
In the discussion of Caulonia's type I gave reasons for thinking that the placing of the
stag in the field with a separate groundline was perhaps an indication that the two figures
had been inspired by a local cult statue of Apollo accompanied by a stag with some
13
traditional implication impossible to follow now. In Group G we find the stag's groundline,
which had persisted throughout the incuse format, undergoing a change. On nos. 107-109
and 112 there is something resembling the capital of a column beneath the stag. On
nos. 130-135 this support has been modified so that it is very much like a statue-basis
having high and narrow proportions. On nos. 124-126, however, this basis, which ordinarily
is crowned by the figure of the stag, bears a strange animal without antlers and with a
huge head which is lowered in somewhat the same way as the head of the charging bull on
the staters of Thurium is represented. Gross carelessness seems a more likely explanation
Many of the varieties in this group are known in a single or in a small number of
specimens, and no. 139 is one of the former. Inscriptions, although worn and in shortened
forms, are present for both dies. The fillets hanging from the antlers of the stag, however,
give this piece its greatest distinction. Their delicate linear treatment is best seen in the
enlargement on Plate XIX. Stylistically, the spread legs of this stag are like those of
certain others in this group. The size of the letters of the inscription might give it a place-
Only two specimens of no. 140 are known to exist; one is in Paris and the other in
Naples. These have long been known and Raoul-Rochette31 has written about this type.
Although I have included these coins, I consider them suspect. Looking at the reverse first,
one notices the rectangular position of the inscription with three letters in a vertical line,
which is unlike any found elsewhere in this city's coinage. The position of the stag's antlers
is an awkward one when the stance with the spread forelegs is employed. It is the obverse,
however, that is most questionable. Both the thick groundline and the heavy, clumsy body
of Apollo standing upon it are in contrast to the presentation we have come to know.
Moreover, such a clutter of symbols is not found elsewhere. The fountain is not unlike one
on the reverse of nos. 155-157, but the lion's-head water spout would more appropriately
empty into a basin or pool as it does on the staters of Terina than into a stationary font. In
the right field there is an ithyphallic herm facing to right with a filleted bucranium above it.
These are unrelated to the figure of Apollo or to each other, and suggest a hand or a mind
that is not Greek. The whole design, if such it can be called, bears the earmarks of the
It should be noted that die combinations unknown to me may alter the arrangement
submitted. For example, nos. 127-129 with the obverse insect, and nos. 130-131 with the
reverse leaves and berries may come later rather than where they have been placed. The
reverse letters AE on no. 127 and A on no. 128 might with equal appropriateness entitle
these dies to a place in Group I, and the long vertical inscription in tiny letters on the
obverse of nos. 130-131 might follow rather than precede nos. 132-134.
This group, as was true of some of the preceding classes, provides evidence that the
mint of this city was not a large one and that strict regularity of procedure, whether stylistic
14
which have little else in common (cf. nos. 150-151). For this group an ivy leaf symbol is to
be found on either obverse or reverse of some of the pieces. Other symbols such as the crab,
wreath or octopus occur sometimes with the leaf on the same die and sometimes with the
leaf on the combining die. The letter phi (is this a signature such as we find at Terina ?) is
usually of moderate size. It is found beneath the right arm of Apollo on no. 142, below the
base line of the stag on nos. 143-147 and on the reverses of nos. 149-151 and 154 The letter
theta, larger in scale, appears on the obverse of no. 150 and in the form GE on the obverses
of nos. 152-153 and on the reverses of nos. 155-158, as well as on the bronze pieces (nos.
233-234).
The inscriptional data are puzzling, differing forms sometimes occurring on the same
stater. As early as nos. 101 and 102 we have the fifth letter, an omicron. This is repeatedly
180-181). The final letter of the inscription when given in full, is sometimes N, sometimes
M (the prostrate sigma), and on the last dies, sigma in its normal form. The archaic form
There are other irregularities. The obverse stag is sometimes present, sometimes not.
In the earlier pieces of the group, he resembles a goat more than a deer. The stag's size
differs widely. The figure of Apollo grows steadily heavier almost pugilistic. His attitude
of striding becomes one of running in nos. 158-161. His hair is usually short, but in
nos. 153-154, tresses over his shoulder are clear. A knot at the back of the head is visible
in nos. 162-163. The branch in his right hand interferes with the inscription in nos. 141-145
were no other dies to establish this intention. The reverse stag is frequently heavy and
The accessories to the type are intriguing; e.g., the bird with upraised wings in a font
on the reverse of nos. 155-156, and on the obverse of no. 155 what seems to be an altar (cf.
enlargements on Plate XX). The palmettes at its corners, the strut and the manner in
which the legs are joined to the top indicate a structure made of meta1.
On the obverse of nos. 153-154 there are long fillets tied to both arms of Apollo.33
I know of no parallel to explain the purpose of these fillets. The tetrobols on Plate XV
afford a hint. On no. 216, which is connected with this group by the presence of the letter <t>,
the obverse die is first used without the fillet, and then with the fillet. Is it possible that
fillets such as this have been added to the city's cult statue (which may originally have
inspired the coin type) during an agonistic celebration, and have been used on the coinage
with this commemorative implication ? This is but one of the unresolved questions raised by
Caulonia's coinage.
Both the die combinations and the style of these coins leave hardly any alternative as
to the order submitted. The top-knotted Apollo continues on the earliest staters in this
group (nos. 162-163), giving way to a god with clipped hair which bears some resemblance
82 For interpretation of inscriptional forms see Macdonald reference cited in note 24.
83 For enlargements of coins with fillets see Plates XIX and XX.
15
to a wig. On nos. 158-161 there is a running Apollo which is replaced on nos. 162-166 by
a figure standing with the weight on the left foot, a much more awkward stance than that
of the striding Apollo to which we had become accustomed, and to which there is a return
in nos. 168-181. The heavy-bodied figure continues to the end of the coinage.
The additions to the type are mostly on the obverse; e.g., turtle, dolphins, star and
fibula. There are also large single letters A on the reverse of nos. 168-173, 0 on the
obverse of nos. 173-175, and E on the reverse of no. 175. If these letters are initials of
die cutters, those with one letter on the obverse and another on the reverse would show that
which is supported by the relatively large number of surviving specimens of nos. 179 and
180. The significance of the two dolphins is difficult to fathom. The fillet laid across the arm
of Apollo on the obverse of the last type is of a familiar form; i.e., wool with terminal
tassels. The puzzling symbol on nos. 176-181 has never been satisfactorily explained; it
does not resemble a fibula any more than it does a bird trap. The increased scale of the
letters in the inscriptions is consistent throughout this group as opposed to that of Group I.
ENLARGEMENTS
The selection of the coins shown on the two plates of enlargements was given careful
thought. The arrangement is designed to emphasize some of the ideas presented in the
preceding text, and therefore it does not follow the sequential order in the catalogue. The
liberal, yet limited, number shown may be supplemented by the other plates. It would have
been highly instructive if a series of enlargements devoted to the daimon had been included
to show the changes in form which occur before final disappearance from the obverse.
Two of the misunderstood presentations (nos. 73 and 104) appear on these two plates.
Enlargements are not so necessary for the incuse staters as they are for the smaller
On nos. 62, 102, 104, 108 and 113 of Plate XIX the increased stride of the main
figure is to be noted. This is most marked on no. 102, which, in my opinion, provides a clear
indication that Apollo was being presented as moving from the very beginning nearly or
quite as much so as the subsidiary daimon. The static stag on the reverse of no. 62, which
comes at the very beginning of the double relief, changes for only a few dies to a realistic
and lively animal (see reverses of nos. 102 and 113). The return to the quiet position is
Some of the comparisons emphasized extend from one plate to another. The suggested
statue basis on no. 108 is to be compared not only with no. 112 but also with nos. 121 and
124. The addition of the fillet to both obverse and reverse types is shown for the entire
bottom row of both plates. Its significance is far from obvious; for discussion see page 6
and for descriptions the catalogue entries (105, 139, 153 and 176-181).
Several of the enlargements have individual interest. No. 73, for instance, is not
overstruck as one might think, but in some manner the die has been injured and recut for
the injured section. It must have been deplorably bad from the beginning. There are
several examples and combinations with differing reverses. The stylized tree on no. 107
differs from previous tree forms; compare also the reverse of no. 129. No. 121b is noteworthy
for the large insect symbol and for the long-haired head of Apollo. No. 112 has a fine
wreath which differs from the much later die of no. 151. Both obverse and reverse of no. 155
are shown the obverse to display the altar which seems to be entirely of metal to judge
from the palmettes and the supports for its top, and the reverse to illustrate the stylized
treatment of the antlers of the stag as well as the bird with upraised wings in a pedestalled
water-basin. The letters 0E connect this with the obverses of the bronze issues.
The reverse of the tetrobol (no. 216) shows the kantharos symbol which does not occur
among the staters. Further, the fillet of the obverse is a later addition to this die. The fine
style of the heads on nos. 231 and 232 deserves attention I am unable to find any
parallels from which they might have been derived. Except on the bronze coins, heads such
as these do not occur in Caulonia's coinage, and as conceptions they are of outstanding
FRACTIONS
Even though there are fairly clear indications that the four divisions of these fractions
are not continuous, no sharp separation exists between the two later divisions.
The coinage of small denominations in the incuse form is not prolific. This condition is
similar to that found at Metapontum for its incuse coinage. Very few of the incuse
fractional issues at Caulonia examined by me have been in good condition; there is seldom
one without considerable evidence of circulation. This makes it difficult to find stylistic
parallels among the incuse staters. The three-letter obverse inscription on nos. 201 and 202
and the five-letter inscription on nos. 203-205 do not occur among the dies of the early
staters until Group D (cf. Plate V). Likewise, the reverse inscriptions such as those of
nos. 202 (mistakenly numbered 203 on Plate XV), 204 and 205 appear relatively late
among the staters. The obol bears the triskeles for its obverse type (nos. 206 and 207)
and this may have been conceived as a correlative of the daimon as Robinson suggests.34
That this issue belongs with the incuse pieces is shown by the reverse border which is like
that of the staters and tetrobols (cf. Plate IV and no. 208).
The group which follows (nos. 208-214) with the later issues having the subsidiary
branch on the reverse, is interesting for the occasional change in orientation for both
obverse and reverse types (any significance for which escapes me) and for the minimizing or
entire omission of the daimon figure. The striding attitude is more pronounced here than
in the first group. The order within the group becomes clear by comparing the rim of
no. 208 with that of no. 62 of the staters. This reverse rim, sunken at first, changes to a
beaded form.
The third group is significant for the kantharos symbol which does not occur among the
staters known to me. There is a further distinctive peculiarity in the fillet which hangs from
the arm of Apollo and also in the circumstance that this has been added to a die already in
use (no. 216). 35 The sprig with two leaves (obv. of no. 217) is also found among the staters
(nos. 120-126) although in the latter occurrence it bears three leaves and two berries.
The youthful head of the fourth group (nos. 229-232) has been thought by Gagliardi36
to represent a river god because of the horn-like projection on no. 231. In earlier discussions
this head is supposed to have had better claim to being that of Apollo. The exquisite style
of these dies as well as the ivy leaf symbol on the reverse of no. 230 (paralleled on
nos. 150-152 of the staters) marks them as late in the coinage of the city and therefore not
much before 389 b.c. I do not trace any notable resemblance to the issues of neighboring
mints, with the possible exception of Terina where certain staters and late sixths bear a
se E. Gagliardi, "Di Alcune Monete in Bronzo di Caulonia," Atti e Memorie dell' Istituto Italiano di
BRONZE ISSUES
The bronze coins of Caulonia present problems, some of which have been outlined
admirably by Gagliardi.37 It is generally thought that the introduction of bronze for coins
in the Greek cities did not much antedate 400 b.C.38 and since Caulonia was destroyed in
389 B.C. these bronzes provide significant data. Before the introduction of bronze for
coinage small silver coins of low denominations seem to have sufficed for currency needs.
Of the four bronze pieces cited by Gagliardi39 two are of the same denomination and a third
is an issue which Garrucci,40 with strong probability, rejects as the core of a plated coin.
Gagliardi41 thinks that this conclusion is less likely because of the patination and the
excellent condition of the coin. This coin seems to me to be what Regling calls a "mysti-
fication."42
Gagliardi's proposed identification of the head on the fractions and on the bronzes as a
river god does not carry complete conviction, although the suggestion is an intriguing one.43
If this theory were correct, it would seem that we should have a greater number of ap-
propriately related symbols or other indications associated with a river god than can be
cited. The letters OE which occur on the obverses of two varieties also occur on the staters
(nos. 152-159). The scanty number of bronze pieces known is indicative of their intro-
38 HN*, p. 99. Head dates Croton's bronze coinage as beginning 'Before circ. b. c. 400.'
PLATED COINS
Plated coins are fairly frequent in the coinage of Caulonia, and Plate XVI has been
devoted to them. Some of these may prove to be counterfeits which are not ancient; e.g.,
The first piece is one of the rare, plated incusi. Comparison with genuine dies will be
found rewarding, especially for the reverse where the failure to understand the incuse
technique is most noticeable in the rim. The silver coating of the torso and left arm is
wanting.
Of the thirteen pieces illustrated, the fruit of a fairly exhaustive search, ten of these
plated pieces have a branch or branches in front of the stag on the reverse, an interesting
indication that the coinage with this branch extended over a considerable period. In most
instances the hand at work is obviously one not familiar with the practices of the mint and
betrays itself in one or more of the details; e.g., the over-sized letters on the obverse of
no. 3, the letter beneath the body of the stag on the reverses of nos. 6 and 8, the obverse
stag facing in the wrong direction on no. 7, and the form of the lustral branch on no. 12.
In addition there is usually the tell-tale break in the silver coating and excessive aberrations
of weight. This corroboration as to weight is lacking for no. 12, but I believe it is safe to
recognize this piece as not a genuine one on the basis of comparisons with the authentic
types.
CATALOGUE
The descriptions in the catalogue which follows are of the respective dies rather than
of the particular specimen illustrated which may have been selected for its superior con-
dition even though part of the design is off-flan. In some cases all of the known specimens
are in poor condition because of wear or over-zealous cleaning, in consequence of which the
given coin's inscription will have been taken from a specimen which is not illustrated. As
an example, there is but a single example of no. 155 which gives the reverse inscription.
This is shown on the plate of enlargements (XX). Occasionally the off-flan portion is
supplied by a second variety whose reverse is combined with that of the first.
The abbreviations will, I trust, be self-evident. The great national collections are in-
dicated by their respective citiesParis, Vienna, Glasgow, with added citation of cata-
logue numbers, as Glasgow, Hunter 234. "BM-Lloyd SNG 207" is, being interpreted,
Specimen in the British Museum, from the Lloyd Bequest, illustrated in the Sylloge
Numorum Graecorum (Lloyd), No. 207. ANS-ETN indicates that the specimen is in the
collection of the American Numismatic Society, from the benefaction of Edward T. Newel1.
The first piece listed is the one illustrated on the plates. When other pieces from the
same pair of dies are illustrated an asterisk appears before its catalogue listing and its letter
has been added to the number on the plates. Those specimens with a dagger before their
catalogue listings are illustrated in enlarged size on Plates XIX-XX and commented
either the dealer or owner, with the year of the sale, and the number in the catalogue. The
numbers at the bottom of the plates indicate the die-combinations. Thus 3839 40
shows that the obverses of 38 and 39 were struck from the same die and that the reverses
INCUSE STATERS
Group A
Catalogue
21
border.
a. Berlin -.
b. Vienna 7.40
ginning). 8.24
a. Berlin -.
b. ANS 8.45
c. ANS-ETN 7.96
1914, 27 8.36
208 7.83
Apollo differ.
m.
7.24
n.
7.15
7.20
0.
7.25
p.
8.17
q.
8.22
r.
7.86
22
to be visible.
b. Munich 7.46
6. Die of No. 5.
a. Berlin 7.42
b. Vienna 7.50
a. B. Y. Berry Coll.
8.02
a. Naples -.
b. Berlin -.
c. British Museum -.
8. Die of No. 7.
ally slender.
Catalogue
23
a. ANS
8.54
8.25
a. Paris -.
b. Berlin -.
c. ANS 8.17
curve at rim.
162
7.93
7.75
8.05
8.09
7.55
a. London -.
a. Berlin -.
No. 4 8.08
Coll. 7.86
24
8.20
Brett 171
b. Naples
8.03
c. Berlin
d. The Hague
8.25
a. Paris
is distinctive.
7.92
a. Berlin -.
smaller.
Catalogue
25
r. hand oversized.
a. Munich
b. Vienna
c. Berlin
8.70
7.92
7.96
357 7.70
No. 33 7.99
b. Naples -.
c. Vienna 6.68
to the right.
a. B. Y. Berry Coll.
-. b. Berlin
7.90
shaped.
a. ANS-ETN 8.04
b. Berlin -.
forms.
26
Group B
annulet.
a. BMC 7
b. Munich
7.67
6.19
6.63
264 7.83
letter theta.
the letter A.
break.
Catalogue
27
b. Berlin
a. Commerce
Die of No.
7.43
new die-break
defect of the A.
a. Berlin -.
b. Vienna 7.44
17.
b. Berlin -.
d. Vienna 7.01
1907,561 7.96
8.05
1. field.
and faint.
486 8.03
28
a. Paris -.
b. Berlin -.
in the exergue.
7-65
replaced by a branch.
arm of Apollo.
6.90
7-95
Group C
a. Paris
b. The Hague
c. British Museum
7.88
7.70
7.88
7.46
Catalogue
29
exergue.
7.64
shows in exergue.
a. ANS-ETN 8.43
b. Berlin
c. Berlin
(Plated ?) 6.97
interva1.
320 7.67
Group D
8.05
a. Vienna
b. Paris
8.00
7.55
stag.
a. Berlin
b. ANS
7.46
30
line double.
a. London -.
b. Berlin -.
figure in relief.
c. Vienna
8.00
6.46
double.
b. Berlin
8.02
7.76
daimon.
51. Similar to No. 50. The head of Apollo Similar to No. 50 but differs in position of
a. Munich
b. Munich
7.30
7.32
c. Berlin
a. Berlin
7.68
a. Berlin -.
b. Berlin -.
Catalogue
31
a. Berlin -.
a. ANS-ETN 7.98
b. Berlin -.
c. Berlin -.
d. Vienna 7.88
double lined.
a. Berlin
indicated.
b. Berlin -.
32
Group E
a. fBerlin
b. Vienna 7.79
c. Dresden 8.10
1490a -.
a. Berlin
c. ANS-ETN 7.86
overstruck.
b. *Vienna 7.85
b. ANS-ETN 8.06
Catalogue
33
a. Berlin
c. Vienna 7.92
d. Brussels
e. Munich 7.36
b. Vienna 7.75
c. Vienna 7.70
i. Commerce 8.00
like an H.
head.
a. British Museum
d. E. Zygman Coll., N. Y.
a. ANS-ETN 8.15
b. Vienna 7.18
fore.
34
.. b. Gotha
a. Berlin
b. Vienna
c. Frankfurt
8.00
7.91
7.98
8.50
a. Berlin -.
b. Berlin -.
c. Vienna 7.88
d. ANS-ETN 8.15
heavy dots.
654 8.09
c. Dresden 7.14
b. Vienna 7.52
f. Berlin -.
Catalogue
35
Group F
lent.
b. Paris -.
c. Berlin -.
d. Dresden 7.85
b. BMC, 18
c. Brussels
8.04
7-94
d. Munich
7.90
7-73
7.70
the A is larger.
b. BMC, 18
7.76
7-94
8.02
a. Berlin
b. Berlin
c. Vienna
d. The Hague
8.12
7.90
e. ANS-ETN 7.96
slants upward to r.
36
a. Berlin
b. Munich
7.85
7.88
stem.
85. Similar to No. 81, the stag notably Die of No. 84.
a. British Museum
b. Berlin
8.00
7.82
border is heavy.
a. Gotha
7.83
is larger in scale.
b. Berlin -.
c. Paris -.
a. Berlin -.
three branches.
56 7.39
g. Commerce (Ravel) -.
Catalogue
37
b. Vienna
7.87
7.80
7.80
a. ANS-ETN 7.95
a. Berlin -.
a. Berlin -.
b. Munich 7.19
c. Gotha 7.83
e. Paris -.
h. ANS-ETN 7.82
Coll., 99 7.92
1911, 26 7.68
18 7.90
1490c
7.85
7.90
38
wise.
8.05
vertical antler.
a. Berlin -.
a. ANS-ETN
b. Berlin
7-95
6.24
preceding pieces.
a. Munich 8.00
c. BMC, 22 7.80
408
8.11
c. Dresden 7.94
distinctive.
Catalogue
39
101. Die of No. 1oo, possibly deepened. Stag, crudely cut, to r. The first four
Group G
a. tBerlin
b. Munich
7.90
a. Vienna
of large dots.
7-85
tANS-ETN
Berlin -.
Munich 7.94
7-83
7-52
a. Berlin
Design
7-58
7.81
8.07
7.89
7.98
40
7.92
7.70
daimon.
a. Berlin
b. Paris
c. Vienna
7.13
7.89
a. fBerlin
c. British Museum
6.71
6.65
7.67
7.92
a. Berlin -.
b. Berlin -.
197 6.99
b. Berlin
c. Munich
d. ANS-ETN
7.35
7.92
stroke form.
stag.
e. ANS-ETN 7.76
Catalogue
4I
a. Berlin -.
b. Berlin -.
b. Berlin
7-97
a. Berlin
Ravel No. 87
7.90
a. Vienna 7.79
c. ANS
6.68
7-74
Linear border.
7.80
upraised wings.
a. fBerlin -. b. ANS
7.90
Linear border.
7.70
42
117. Similar to No. 116 save that the Die of Nos. 115 and 116 with the die
a. Berlin -.
Group H
reading clockwise.
a. BMC, 26 7.65
7.89
7.92
7.91
a. Vienna
7.41
No inscription.
a. Vienna
b. tBerlin
7.80
6.93
7.80
7.06
Catalogue
43
lowered head to r.
b. 'Vienna 7.58
c. Berlin -.
instead of O.
d. Munich 7.97
exergual line.
to r. No inscription.
leaves
127. Similar to No. 121, with both stag Standing stag to r. The inscription follow
a. Berlin
b. ANS-ETN
7.71
574 7-82
a. Vienna 7.90
a. BMC, 36 7.83
b. Vienna 7.60
44
Linear border.
a. Berlin -.
a. BMC, 33 7.49
a. Berlin
b. Berlin
c. Vienna
d. Munich
e. BMC, 34
b. Berlin
7.45
7.77
7.92
7.86
Beaded border.
b. Berlin -.
f. tANS 6.62
i. SchlessingerXIII,Feb.1935, Hermitage
stem differ.
361
break.
Catalogue
45
inscription.
a. Berlin -.
letter is an omega.
a. tANS-ETN 8.17
linear border.
b. Vienna 7.76
stag.
Group I
straight antlers.
c. Vienna
8.31
7-45
8.00
follows rim.
7.56
46
a. BMC, 31 7.88
b. Vienna 7.70
KAVAONIATAN.
7.76
7.85
a. BMC, 30
7.93
a. Berlin
7.77
c. ANS-ETN
7.90
7.45
a. BMC, 22 7.75
a. Berlin -.
7-74
clockwise.
7.81
Catalogue
47
outstretched arm.
a. Munich 7.85
b. BMC, 17 7.93
149. Die of No. 148. Similar to No. 148, but with phi or theta
a. Berlin -.
b. "Paris -.
c. ANS-ETN 7.53
d. S. P. Noe 7.70
clockwise.
a. fANS-ETN
b. British Museum
d. Berlin
7.35
7.81
8.02
8.04
e. Munich
7.84
7.82
7.45
152. Apollo to r. with OE between legs. Die of Nos. 150 and 151.
in field to 1.
a. BMC, 29 7.66
153. Long-haired Apollo to r. A fillet hangs Stag to r. Four (?) letter inscription, in 1.
in two lines from the 1. wrist and another field, reading clockwise,
Linear border.
48
a. ANS
b. ANS-ETN
c. Vienna
8.02
7.90
7.78
an exergual line.
which, palmette-finials.
b. tANS-ETN 7.73
c. Vienna 7.58
specimens.
575 7-40
counter clockwise.
a. Berlin
b. Paris
c. Berlin
7.76
b. Vienna
7-52
spaced dots.
b. Berlin -.
c. Berlin -.
Catalogue
49
a. tANS-ETN 7.66
break.
b. 'Vienna 7.82
tion.
Group J
a. Berlin
b. Paris
c. Vienna
d. Frankfurt
e. ANS-ETN
the r.
diminutive antlers.
165 Similar to No. 164 - possibly a Later stage of the die of No. 163.
a. Berlin -.
50
b. BMC, 32 7.15
a. Berlin -.
a. ANS-ETN 7.85
a. BMC, 37 7.96
b. Berlin -.
c. Munich 7.67
e. E. Zygman Coll., N. Y. -.
426 7.60
wise).
f. ANS-ETN 7.74
a. Berlin
b. Paris
c. Vienna
7.60
7.76
Catalogue
51
a. Berlin
scription.
7.24
7.43
a. Berlin -.
b. Vienna 7.02
of the stag.
a. Berlin
b. Paris
7.70
7.92
a. ANS-ETN
7.85
exergual line.
a. J. P. Morgan Coll., N. Y.
7.22
7.93
52
a. BMC, 27 7.63
b. Munich 7.69
1898, 25 7-58
same die.
b. Berlin -.
c. Berlin -.
d. Munich 7.83
e. Vienna 7.33
center.
1191
c. Berlin -.
d. Berlin -.
e. Berlin -.
f. Paris -.
g. Munich 7.80
h. Brussels -.
j. ANS-ETN 7.80
lambda is archaic.
Catalogue
53
FRACTIONS
a. Vienna 2.32
17.5 mm.
a. Berlin
a. Berlin
2.86
1921,272 2.37
a. BMC, 15
2-45
in center.
b. Berlin
inscription.
d. Vienna
2.40
2-55
d. ANS-ETN 2.17
b. Paris -.
208. Apollo (without daimon) and stag Stag to r.; border of dots on a sunken rim
to r. Four-letter inscription. Border of dots - cf. No. 62. Raised exergual line with
a. Munich
2.38 b. ANS
2.49
54
a. Vienna
2.52
Border of dots.
a. BMC, 42 1.20
a. ANS-ETN 2.30
d. Vienna 2.20
Border heavy.
e. Vienna
2.01
2.41
2-13
2.14
212. Similar to 211. The torso of Apollo Three-letter inscription (retrograde) above
heart shaped. Figure of daimon uncertain, stag facing r.; branch in r. field.
b. ANS 2.50
c. ANS 2.11
d. Berlin -.
j. Vienna 2.32
k. Vienna 2.35
b. ANS-ETN
2.37
2.34
2.29
2.34
Die of 212.
991
2.65
2.40
2.60
Catalogue
55
a. Vienna 2.18
figure slender.
a. BMC, 45 0.96
Diameter 15 mm.
a. BMC, 40 2.35
i. Vienna 1.70
body of stag.
b. Munich 1.29
stag.
inscription.
56
a. ANS-ETN Coll.
b. BMC, 44
1.oo
1.26
a. ANS-ETN Coll.
a. Vienna 1.10
r. and 1. fields.
a. BMC, 43
1.13
11 mm.
0.44
at back.
a. BMC 47
a. BMC, 46
0.66
0.76
11.5 mm.
0.87
b. Berlin .-
c. Vienna 1.10
Die of 226.
stag.
Stag to r.
a. fBMC, 48
0.79 b. BMC, 49
0.94
Catalogue
57
1.20
upward.
2.90
Incuse
Double relief
letter inscription.
disproportionately large.
the design.
Vienna
6.56
58
Berlin -.
N. Y., ANS
8.51
lower r.
No. 121.
Copenhagen
London, BMC 35
5.22
6.16
7-94
Berlin -.
a surface cavity.
N. Y., ANS
7.10
This hoard is said to have been found in 1929 southeast of Taranto near the coast. The
wishes his name withheld. According to his information, the hoard did not contain more
than thirty-eight coins. Similar hoards previously unearthed in South Italy have been
inadequately recorded, if at all, and therefore the value of studying this find is enhanced.
What may be learned from this hoard could probably have been deduced from earlier
discoveries if we had an accurate statement regarding them. Since almost all of the pieces
have been reproduced on the plates and since those not so reproduced have their dies
identified with published pieces to which reference is comparatively easy, the descriptions
have been abbreviated. The entry in the Hoard Bibliography NNM 78 is under No. 507.
TARENTUM
Weight
1. Obv. Taras r., holding squid. Rev. Hippocamp 1. with scallop shell. Dies of McClean 533,
2. Obv. Taras on dolphin r. with shell. Rev. Oekist seated r., holding kantharos. Vlasto, Taras
METAPONTUM
6. Inscription divided. Cf. Metapontum l,89 for obv., 94 for rev. 7.64
8. Obv. Barley ear w. META in 1. field and ram's head downward on r. Rev. Die-break in r.
9. Four letter inscription on r. A new obv. die. Cf. Metapontum I,73-78 for obv. and 76 for rev. 7.86
SYBARIS
15. Obv. Bull 1. with VM in exergue. Rev. Same type incuse. 7.67
6o
croton
20. Obv. Tripod w. three-letter inscription in 1 field. Rev. Tripod incuse. 8.20
22. Similar but flan slightly smaller than above. Not illustrated 7,61
23. Obv. Tripod w. crab in 1. field and three-letter inscription in r. Rev. Type incuse w. chelys in 1.
25. Obv. similar to 23 above, but flan reduced to 23 mm. Rev. Dolphin in r. field and three-letter
inscription on 1. 7-55
26. Obv. Three-letter inscription to 1. of tripod, heron or crane on r. Rev. without inscription or
symbol. 7.88
27. Similar except that inscription reads upward. Naville Sale XVL324. 7.95
28. Similar to 26 and 27 above except that inscription is on r. and heron in 1. field. 7.<>4
29. Obv. Tripod w. three-letter inscription in small letters on 1. Rev. Eagle flying r. on sunken
CAULONIA
36. No. 64a in Catalogue, p. 32. Now ANS ex Helbing Sale LXX, 1922, 427 andNaville XVI,309.
POSEIDONIA
37. Obv. Poseidon r., four-letter inscription. Rev. Bull l., four-letter inscription. Cf. BMC 25. 7.99
GELA
38. Obv. Androcephalous bull r. Rev. Nike crowning horses drawing biga to r. Tetradrachm.
Because the study of this South Italian hoard had to be made from casts or photo-
graphs without reference to the coins themselves except in a few instances, deductions from
relative wear are not dependable. Nos. 2, 36 and 37 in double relief are comparatively the
sharper. The stater of Poseidonia seems weakly struck rather than worn. The staters of
Sybaris show more wear than the earliest staters of Metapontum, and the late small-flan
issues of Croton are sharper than the spread-flan varieties. There is, consequently, con-
firmation of the accepted belief in the gradual constriction of the flans for the coinage of
Metapontum and Croton. The presence of the tetradrachm of Gela suggests a relationship
between Magna Graecia and Sicily (not sufficiently recognized hitherto) for which over-
strikes (cf. no. 36) offer supporting evidence as I have tried to show in a separate paper.**
The double-relief stater of Poseidonia (no. 37) along with the one of Caulonia (no. 36)
and the Tarentine seated-oekist type (no. 2) have great significance considering the length
of the output of their respective mints. Tarentum had always favored the small flan staters
Catalogue
61
except for a brief dallying with the incuse form, which, however, never approached the
30 mm. diameter reached by the finest incuse pieces of nearby Metapontum (cf. no. 8).
Gela, Agrigentum and Leontini were growing in importance at this time, and all three
were putting forth extensive issues of didrachms. Can it be that their example had some
influence on Caulonia and Poseidonia ? Applying Keary's theory of morphology,45 the choice
of the smaller, thick flanned form might have been induced by competition in a market in
which such forms were prevalent. Velia and Naples would have provided this condition for
Poseidonia since neither of these cities had struck incuse coins. Only in weight do these
As Babelon46 recognized, the change to the size of the Sicilian didrachms at Meta-
pontum can be dated rather closely, since a Metapontum stater (no. 234) is struck over a
scarce didrachm of Syracuse which Boehringer47 dates after 474 b.c. If this is so, the Meta-
pontum overstrike would have been struck after 474 b.c.; at present a more exact date
cannot be determined.
Considering that the present hoard is said to have been found not far to the southeast
of Taranto and near the coast, it seems strange that there should have been only two coins
of that city among the thirty-eight. Evans48 thought that the seated-oekist type was
initiated in 473 b.c., in which year the army of the Tarentines was defeated by the Messa-
pians and many of the younger men of the city were slain. Vlasto48 dates the introduction of
this type as c. 485 b.c. The oekist-type coin in this hoard shows wear. The style seems to
indicate a date earlier than 473 b.c. Vlasto's date, therefore, seems preferable.
The defeat of the Tarentines could have provided ample inducement for the secretion
of this hoard in 473 b.c. The numerical preponderance of staters from Metapontum and
Croton in a hoard found not far from Tarentum is striking. A fleeing citizen of Tarentum
might have hastily gathered these coins in the belief that they would have been more
easily exchangeable than the staters of his own city. The preponderance of issues other than
difficult, however, to read any significant evidence from the make-up of the accumulation.
In any event the staters of Sybaris, destroyed more than two decades previously, must have
been still circulating at Tarentum. The total amount, seventy-eight drachms, hardly
indicates a wealthy owner. I believe that these sparse findings point to a quick gathering
No close parallel is provided by any of the three comparable published hoards. The
Taranto Hoard, to judge from the portion published by Babelon,50 is earlier, but it gives very
little help. The Cittanuova Find (Bibliography 253) is inadequately described and is
without illustrations; it seems to have been buried shortly after this one. The Curinga
Hoard was found at a considerable distance from Tarentum, and had no Tarentine issues
in the portion published it offers the closest analogies, especially as to the date of buria1.
There is the same heavy proportion of Metapontum staters, the same inclusion of a few
47 Boehringer, E. Die Miinzen von Syrakus (Berlin, 1929) no. 497, PI. 30, Z 4.
62
staters of Sybaris and a showing of the staters of Croton and Caulonia similar to that in this
South Italy Hoard. Although the Curinga Hoard is not intact, there is good reason to
think that a dependable cross-section is provided in what is recorded. Its burial must have
There would be a step forward if we could use the presence of no. 36 to fix the date for
the change at Caulonia from the incuse form to double relief, for we should then have
determined the length of the period during which the coinage had both sides in relief, since
the date for the destruction of the city in 389/388 is unquestioned. Within these years, a
period slightly less than a century, there are seventy-six obverse dies recorded in this study.
Since for several years there have been no additions to this list despite diligent searching,
additions in any considerable number seem improbable. But to reason that we can estimate
the average life of these obverse dies by dividing the number of years in this period by the
number of dies is over-simplification. In the first place there are indications that the coinage
of this moderate-sized colony of Croton was not continuous. Regling is of the opinion that
this was true for Terina, where he records only thirty-eight obverse dies for its entire
coinage.61 Head suggests that in some cities coining may have been coincident with agonistic
festivals periodic rather than annua1.62 The stater commemorating games in honor of
tetrobols have for symbol an amphora, and this symbol does not occur in the stater issues.
An interval during which only tetrobols were struck seems highly probable. Secondly a
steady or regular supply of silver ore is unlikely. The coinage needs of the city must have
varied from year to year. Finally, the obverse die frequently outlived the reverse. There are
nineteen combinations of one obverse with two reverses, nine with three and one with no
less than six; in consequence there must have been variance in the period during which the
individual dies were in use. Under these circumstances the "life span" can have little
chronological dependability.
It is probable that the defeat of the Tarentines in 473 b.c. caused the secretion of
other accumulations, and the value of our find may be greater for comparison than for its
inherent evidence. It clearly seems to indicate that Poseidonia and Caulonia had changed
the form of their coinages to double relief some years before it was buried and that Croton
and Metapontum had not done so, and this deduction is supported by the Cittanuovo and
Paestum hoards. Vlasto's date (c. 485) for the introduction of the seated-oekist type53 gains
support as against that of Evans. The presence of the single tetradrachm of Gela bolsters the
coins of that island. Finally, the continuing circulation of the staters of Sybaris is an
interesting phenomenon.
"HN*, p. 99.
PLATES
GROUP A
GROUP A
-12-13-14-15 16 17-18-19 20 21 22
GROUP A
23 24 25 26
GROUP B
27-28 29 30-31-32-33-
GROUP B
-34-35-36 37-38-39-40-41
GROUP C
42-43-44-45-46
VI
GROUP E
62-63 64 65 66-67-68-69-70-71 72
VIII
GROI P F
IX
GROUP F
100-101
GROUP G
XII
GROI P I
GROUP I
GROUP J
162-163_164_165-166
XIV
GROUP J
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
KNLAKCiKMKNTS