Ever dreamt about the ultimate gaming monitor? Okay, maybe not. But if you did, it would be an enormous (say, 65-inch?) panel with all the features for the highest of high-performance gaming: a built-in sound system, G-Sync support, a 4K native resolution, an extreme refresh rate. Ourselves, we woke up and found HP's TV-size Omen X Emperium 65 ($4,999.99) on our test bench. Dream screen or not, it sets a new standard for sheer monitor audacity. Provided you have an equally outrageous gaming rig to push 4K at extreme frame rates, the Omen X Emperium 65 will blow away everyone in its sight lines, with rich color and buttery-smooth graphics. Our key concerns—the price, plus the supporting cast of hardware to leverage it—are far from trivial. But the day after you hit Powerball, settle your debts, and set up your loved ones for life, put one of these on order (along with a monster gaming PC, and that Bugatti Chiron).
Anatomy of a Behemoth
The Omen X Emperium 65 belongs to a class of monitor that Nvidia, which spearheaded this initiative, has dubbed BFGDs (officially, for "Big Format Gaming Displays," whatever else you might think). These 65-inch monsters, first unveiled at CES 2018, incorporate Nvidia's G-Sync adaptive-sync technology, as well as the Nvidia Shield streaming hardware and UI, which lets you stream Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Vudu, and other content at 4K. The BFGDs can manage frame rates of 120Hz or higher, and are certified for VESA's DisplayHDR 1000 standard. The latter means they can handle HDR content and have a peak rated brightness of 1,000 nits, which the Omen X Emperium nailed in testing.
In addition to HP, Acer and Asus have announced their intentions of making BFGDs, but HP's is the first to market. Therefore, it's safe to say that you've never seen a computer monitor anything like the HP Omen X Emperium 65—because nothing like it has existed up until now. You could easily mistake this colossus for a very large-screen HDTV. It has a 64.5-inch viewable area (measured diagonally) with native 4K UHD resolution (that's 3,840 by 2,160 pixels), and it supports refresh rates of up to 144Hz.
Similar Products
Acer Predator X27
Asus ROG Strix XG32VQ
Dell 24 Gaming Monitor S2417DG
Acer XR382CQK
Samsung CHG70 27-Inch Curved Monitor
AOC Agon AG271QX
Samsung CHG90 49-Inch Curved Ultrawide Monitor
HP Omen X Emperium 65 Big Format Gaming Display Review
The panel makes use of vertical alignment (VA) technology, illuminated by 384 zones of full direct-array LED backlighting. This monitor is more than 15 inches larger than the next-biggest monitors we've reviewed, the gaming-centric Samsung CHG90 49-Inch Curved Ultrawide Monitor and the Dell UltraSharp 49 Curved Monitor (U4919DW), a business display. Compared with the rest of today's gaming monitors, when you sum up its size, capabilities, performance, and price, the Omen X Emperium 65 is in a class of its own.
The Omen X Emperium 65's matte-black cabinet measures 32.8 by 57 by 3.3 inches (HWD), exclusive of the depth of the feet. Top and side bezels are practically nonexistent, given the overall screen size (a mere eighth of an inch wide each), and the bottom bezel is just half an inch wide. The back of the cabinet is molded at a slant, with a number of tiny, diamond-shaped holes cut into the angled section for heat dissipation. (We measured its power usage at 255 watts with a Kill A Watt electricity usage meter.)
In the middle of the back panel is a diamond-shaped HP Omen logo in metallic red, bracketed by four holes for a VESA mount. The power-cord socket is to the left of the logo, as are an on/off button and a mini-joystick control. The controls are the size they would be on an ordinary monitor and look comically tiny on this enormous cabinet.
Also in back, running most of the width of the cabinet, is a thin but bright RGB lighting strip. It shines red by default, but you can set it via the onscreen display (OSD) to glow in a range of colors, or to match the screen color as an ambient backlight. You can also turn it off altogether, which you may prefer if you find it distracting or choose to wall-mount the panel.
The ports are, blessedly, side-facing, instead of the downward-facing back ports typical of today's junior-size monitors. Two USB 3.0 ports for charging devices are on the right side (when viewed from the Omen X Emperium 65's front), with the rest of the ports on the left: an Ethernet jack, two DisplayPort 1.4 connectors (with HDCP support), three HDMI 2.0 connectors (also with HDCP support), one S/PDIF out, and a 3.5mm audio-out jack. In a nice touch, the bank of ports on the left side has some backlighting that illuminates the connectors automatically when you bring your hand near.
This beast tips (if not breaks) the scales at 71 pounds. You'll need to have at least two people on hand to assemble and position it. (Some minor assembly is required, using an included Allen wrench.) The panel can be mounted either atop its included soundbar or fastened to a pair of feet that prop up either end of the panel. In the latter case, you can leave the soundbar placed in front of the monitor. Whichever installation configuration you choose adds about three inches to the height. Alternately, as mentioned, the Omen X 65 has VESA-mount holes that enable it to be wall-mounted (with the soundbar attached).
A Bit of Background: Who Needs a 144Hz Display?
One big question that's been asked since the BFGD monitors were first shown off back at CES in 2018, and rightfully so: Who are these enormous high-speed displays for, exactly?
Aside from the obvious answer ("people who want to burn a Saturn-sized hole in their pocketbook"), as with everything, there's nuance. First and foremost, gamers who lust after ever-higher screen refresh rates are usually (though not always) focused on competitive multiplayer esports titles. Take the hyper-popular game Rainbow Six: Siege, for example. This is a game that's very reliant on lightning-fast reflexes and reaction times...but you can only react to what you can see, right? This is where high-refresh displays come into play.
Let's say that Player A is using a standard 60Hz monitor. (That's the refresh rate of most non-gaming LCD panels in circulation.) That screen is updating the visual information provided by the game 60 times every second. And while that may sound plenty fast for most of us, to the dedicated gamers out there it feels like being stuck behind an Oldsmobile in the fast lane.
Meanwhile, A's opponent, Player B, is using a monitor that features a 240Hz refresh rate. That means the screen is updating four times as quickly as the example above (240 times per second), which in theory, means Player B, while perhaps not reacting four times as quickly to onscreen events, sees them updated in much greater granularity of time. So while Player A is acting on a coarser time scale, looking at Player B's precise location onscreen, Player B has already lined up a precision sniper shot during those critical slivers of a second while Player A is processing what he or she sees.
Now, we're dealing here with fractions of a second and the limits of human reflexes, so it's not quite as simple as that 4x multiplier suggests. But in online games, snap reflexes measured in those terms do count between expert players. This faster stream of visual information provides a significant competitive edge in games like Siege and the esports staple CS:GO, and it's the main reason why gamers are willing to shell out the extra cost that high-refresh displays demand, and the high-end video cards to push all those frames.
So, Where Does This Leave the BFGD?
Well, in a bit of a "monitor-in-the-middle" situation. First off, many competitive CS:GO players will actually opt to turn their in-game resolution down to 720p, even on 1080p screens, not just for the faster frame rates but because the increased model sizes and rougher edges make it easier to see enemies around corners. So that's something of an argument against 4K in a multiplayer gaming scenario. Plus, gamers of this ilk tend to prefer smaller screens (24 inches seems to be the sweet spot), because it makes it easier to keep the whole frame in view from a closer distance. You have to be pretty far from the Omen X Emperium (think, couch-to-TV distance) to see it all at a glance.
Second, and perhaps more important, very few AAA games right now (multiplayer or otherwise) are optimized well enough to run consistently at 144 frames per second (fps) at 4K resolution. You can fix that, in part, by brute force and a lot of money: running two GeForce RTX 2080 Ti graphics cards in a very specialized setup (one that will cost you, at bare minimum, roughly $3,500 on top of the cost of the BFGD).
We decided to give that ultimate configuration a try, given we have this BFGD in hand and the supporting gear. We "scrounged up" two GeForce RTX 2080 Ti cards and bonded them in an NVLink twin-card configuration with a new NVLink bridge in our usual video-card testbed computer. (For those keeping a shopping list, that's $2,500 for the two cards, plus the necessary bridge.) As you can see below, even when running on a top-of-the-line testbed, a dual GeForce GTX 2080 Ti setup was only able to get six of our typical testing games above even the 120fps mark at top detail settings—in other words, the zone in which the BFGD shines. (Again, it tops out at 144Hz.)
Of those, two are highly optimized multiplayer games (which, as we already mentioned, don't make a whole lot of sense to play on this display), and three are titles that are three years old or more. The last is Shadow of the Tomb Raider, which only just got an optimization update during the writing of this review that took its results from 103fps to the 143fps you see above.
However, with all of that in mind, there is plenty to be said for smoothness. If you're the type of person who already has $5,000 to blow on a monitor for gaming, it's likely that the extra four grand or so needed to help it sing in its best key won't break you, either. And seeing the difference here in PC Labs between a 60Hz 1080p monitor and, say, a 3,440-by-1,440 120Hz monitor, we can fully appreciate the argument for smoother gameplay. Everything just flows more naturally and looks better at higher refresh rates, especially in single-player games.
So, although the BFGD is not the kind of high-refresh display you'll want to take with you into multiplayer arenas (due to both its gargantuan size and the practicality of playing at 4K in competition), it will still enhance the experience of single-player, couch-based controller gaming for anyone who can afford it...in the same way a vintage Dom Perignon enhances a meal, versus just "ordinary" Champagne. But given the frame rates we saw in our NVLink experiment, the BFGD is clearly getting ahead of the abilities of today's video cards with cutting-edge games at high detail settings. It's an investment in your next gaming PC, too, not just your current one.
Wielding the Shield
Ever since Steve Jobs declared his war on buttons, product designers have been trying to match his phobia with sleeker, touch-sensitive devices that try to minimize the number of inputs. This can make for some sexy-looking tech, as well as some frustrating user-interface problems, like those we ran into with the Nvidia Shield platform embedded in the Omen X Emperium 65.
The Shield itself is fine; it's essentially an Android TV reskin with Nvidia colors thrown on top. Standard apps for key content platforms like Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, and YouTube all make an appearance. You also have the option to install Android games directly to the device. But the frustrating part is the remote, and how it behaves once you're in the Shield application.
For example, we wanted to change the brightness of the picture when testing 4K video clarity in YouTube. Cool, should just be able to press the ol' menu button here and...oh, no, that pauses the video. Well, surely this button with a vague circle on it will do the trick? Nope, that just hot-swaps between apps.
Okay, maybe Google Assistant can help out. "Hey Google, open the display settings menu." "I did not understand your request". Sigh, of course not.
Eventually, we found out that the only way to get back to the display menu (to handle anything from brightness settings to changing inputs) is to completely exit the app you're using, use the drop-down settings gear from the top-right corner, and choose "on-screen display menu" from that menu. We needed a menu to open the menu. Not ideal.
A further befuddlement: All of these buttons change function when you're hooked into your PC. The circle button becomes your display menu (so does the middle button), and the arrow keys don't do anything unless you're using the display menu. Overall, all this combined made for an unintuitive UI to deal with. You don't have to use Shield as your main media hub, of course, though it's no doubt nice that it's there if you want it. Just know that there is a learning curve unless you're already a Shield convert.
These frustrations can be part alleviated by attaching either a mouse/keyboard combo or an Xbox gamepad directly to the TV, though. Using these input methods was far more intuitive than the included Shield remote, and if you've got a wireless adapter hooked up to your Xbox gamepad, in essence it works all the same.
The Omen X Emperium 65 also lets you connect external USB storage devices directly to the TV, and access any photos, videos, or even regular files both locally or through the internet if you choose to mount the files to your Nvidia Shield account. This was a nice little unexpected touch, and adds a bit of credence to the argument that the Shield could act as your main media hub if you're more interested in watching your own downloaded content than anything else.
More Streaming Stuff in Shield
Given that the BFGD is destined for your living room or den, it's no surprise to see that HP included Nvidia's Shield game-streaming application as a default in the display. This lets you push a game signal over your Wi-Fi network from a remotely situated PC to your Omen X Emperium 65 panel, without the need to run a display cable between. Also in the UI here is access to Nvidia's GeForce Now gaming-on-demand cloud service.
Overall, the Shield GameStream service worked just about as we expected, with a few hiccups and pixelation artifacts that appeared every so often during gameplay. But that was likely down to the wireless network we were testing on and that we were attempting to stream in 4K. Things were smoother at 1080p.
Once we got Nvidia's on-demand GeForce Now service working, we booted up a game of Fortnite to test both the latency and the overall quality of the stream itself. In each of these tests, the Omen X Emperium 65 was wildly overequipped for the job. This is mainly because GeForce Now streams max out at 1080p and 60fps, and claiming that our stream stayed at a consistent 1080p throughout the tests is shall we say, generous. Unlike other services in this category such as Shadow, GeForce Now struggled to maintain a strong connection to the servers, and as a result our video was choppy, blocky, and pixelated throughout the test. Not only that, but the input lag was so severe that even playing a single-player game became tedious.
All that said, like with GameStream, serious gamers (and who wouldn't be serious if they're spending $5,000 on a monitor?) will simply skip these two options altogether and instead opt to plug their gaming rig directly into the back of the screen to get the most out of their purchase.
One issue of note in this department is that Nvidia's Shield service as a whole (not just on the Omen X 65, and excepting the even more limited GeForce Now) will max out at 60fps at a 4K resolution. The extra frames that this screen is capable of displaying will be lost if you intend on doing all your gaming through the Shield service alone, and, at that point, you're better off saving yourself a couple of grand and getting a TV or other display that does 4K at 60Hz instead.
Of course, you're forking over five large for this panel, so we doubt you'll gimp it by using it solely with streaming game services. (If you do, you're Doing It Wrong.) Just know that this means that to get the full capabilities out of your 144Hz 4K Omen X 65, you'll need to have a very well-equipped gaming PC attached through DisplayPort 1.4b wherever you intend to game. Whether this is your bedroom, your living room, or your office, be ready to have a serious piece of machinery sitting close by.
Decent Sound, Limited Audio Connectivity
We mentioned the soundbar earlier in discussing the panel setup. HP includes a large soundbar with the BFGD that can be installed separately, or bolted to the bottom of the display as the stand itself. It's shaped to fit between the feet.
We were disappointed to see the only way to connect the soundbar to the BFGD itself was through a standard 3.5mm jack, despite the panel's ability to output optical digital 5.1 audio through an S/PDIF port.
The display itself has no native speakers, so if you don't use the soundbar, you'll need a separate sound system to hear your games, movies, and TV shows. The quality of the sound we heard off the soundbar was decent, if nothing to write home about. While you can certainly crank it up loud, it lacked a particular richness and "oomph" factor of bass that we've heard in other, similarly sized soundbars.
If you're tight on space and don't have an external sound system, the soundbar will certainly do, but for a maxed-out audio field to match the monster screen, we'd recommend either your own stereo system or using decent wireless headphones if you want to get the full cinematic gaming experience.
Sunlike Brightness, Plus Accurate Color
For this display, we did our color-accuracy, brightness, and black-level testing as we would an HDTV, using a Klein K10-A colorimeter, a Murideo SIX-G test-pattern generator, and SpectraCal CalMAN 5 software, under a methodology based on the Imaging Science Foundation's calibration techniques.
We tested color accuracy in both Cinema and Vivid modes. The above chart, made with the display in Cinema Mode and set to measure Rec. 709, the standard HDTV color space (which is nearly identical to sRGB), shows Rec. 709 color levels as boxes and measured color levels, taken with the color temperature set to Warm, as dots. Based on our testing, the Omen X 65 covers a healthy 97.4% of Rec. 709.
As HP makes a point of noting that the Omen X 65 covers the DCI-P3 gamut, a wider-gamut color space used in digital cinema, we took a close look at it in our testing. As seen in the chart above, while testing in Vivid mode, we measured the Omen X 65 as covering 91.8 percent of DCI-P3. Neither HP nor Nvidia make any claims about the color spec capabilities of the Omen X 65, but on both accounts these are fairly high results for this class of monitor that will make HDR or SDR content look great.
We also found the Omen X Emperium 65 to be impressively bright, at 863 nits (cd/m2) with a full-field white screen and 1,177 nits with an 18 percent white screen, all but exceeding its 1,000-nit peak brightness rating and easily ranking as the brightest display we've measured to date. The only other DisplayHDR 1000 monitor we've tested, the Acer Predator X27, eked out 643 nits, very bright for a desktop display but well short of its 1,000-nit rating.
The black level isn't quite as amazing, at 0.1 nit, but no matter: With that brightness, that still works out to a phenomenal 11770:1 contrast ratio for anything connected over HDMI with HDR. That's exceptionally impressive, since the monitor's rated contrast ratio is 4000:1.
In our input lag tests using our usual Leo Bodnar lag testing tool, the Omen X 65 fared very well, scoring a response time of 15.9ms, which puts it at the top end of the scale among both TVs and monitors we've tested using the same process.
It bears mentioning, however, that these metrics were recorded at the 60Hz refresh rate, due to the limitations of the Leo Bodnar tool. It's likely that the input lag figures would drop even further when the display is clocked to either 120Hz or 144Hz, but because the Leo Bodnar isn't capable of reading signals at those speeds, we were stuck with the one result that may not represent the full spectrum of what the Omen X 65 is capable of under ideal conditions. (We're working to develop a new input-lag-testing tool to more accurately represent how high-refresh panels like this behave.)
We viewed a selection of 4K YouTube videos, some in SDR and some in HDR, including one of Costa Rican wildlife we watched in both SDR and HDR modes. Although they looked mighty fine in both modes, there was a definite improvement in brightness and contrast when viewed in HDR.
A One-of-a-Kind Monitor—for Now
There are no gaming monitors directly comparable to the Omen X 65 on the market today. Its competition is really HDTVs. As mentioned, both Acer and Asus announced BFGD intentions more than a year ago, but neither company has responded to our inquiries about them. You could use a like-sized HDTV for gaming, provided it has low enough input lag, but "ordinary" HDTVs lack support for high-end gaming features like G-Sync. (A few TVs do support AMD's rival FreeSync.) And few of them have peak refresh rates greater than 60Hz.
Let's take the closest monitor model we've seen in size. As a 49-inch gaming monitor, the Samsung CHG90 provides an ultra-widescreen, immersive gaming experience, and it can reach a frame rate of up to 144Hz over a DisplayPort connection. But it's a very different animal, as it has only 1,080 vertical pixels. A better analogue might be the Editors' Choice 27-inch Samsung CHG70, which has a more conventional form factor, WQHD (2,560-by-1,440-pixel) resolution, and the same blistering 144Hz maximum frame rate as the CHG90. Its peak measured brightness is 371 nits. Of course, its screen is far, far smaller than the Omen X Emperium 65's, emphasizing just how extreme the HP display really is.
The same is true of the Acer Predator X27, our Editors' Choice high-end gaming monitor. On raw specs (excepting screen size), it's the closest a panel comes to our HP model here. It has a 4K native resolution, features a refresh rate up to 144Hz, supports G-Sync, and is VESA DisplayHDR 1000 certified—though, as mentioned, we measured its luminance at a much lower figure.
That said, games looked truly magnificent on it, bright and with great color. For the price of the Omen X 65 alone, you could buy an Acer Predator X27 plus a potent gaming rig to run it (or two X27s, if you prefer), and have cash left over. It lacks the Omen X 65's imposing size, but it is more practical if you're not looking for a room-filler. (For one thing, it would fit on a desk.) And though pricey in its own right, it's in the mid-$1,000s, not $5,000.
A few other gigantic gaming monitors are on the horizon; more BFGDs may emerge, and we saw some really big gaming panels from Asus at CES 2019. But for now, the Omen X 65 Emperium has this rarified niche to itself. There are plenty of other alternatives, but no equivalents; none that comes close to its audacious size and gaming-centric specs (and not to mention, its price). It's a room-centric device, not a desk-centric one.
Because of that special status, we were extra-disappointed by the Omen X 65's stock warranty. HP offers a mere one-year standard warranty, which, given the product's price and complexity, seems wholly inadequate. Also included is a 30-day return/exchange policy.
Mind you, HP does offer two- and three-year onsite protection programs, ranging from $279.99 to $349.99. If you're willing and able to invest five grand in this product, you'd best bite the bullet and add one of these. But we'd like to have seen the maximum plan come included in the price. This is just too expensive a screen to not protect as best you can. (Heck, we'd look into outside insurance, as well.)
You Don't Install It, You Unleash It
The bottom line on the Omen X 65? We love it, but we'd also love to win Powerball to pay for it. That might be the only scenario in which this panel makes sense for most folks.
If you have five grand kicking around that you can shell out on a monitor, plus thousands more to spend outfitting or upgrading a screaming dual-video-card rig to do it justice, the HP Omen X Emperium 65 will not disappoint on the gaming or entertainment fronts. It's certainly a monitor to be reckoned with, an audacious showpiece for your downtime dream cave. Just be sure you have a physical space that can fit it before pulling the trigger—unless you see a BFGD in person, you will find it is bigger and wider than you can possibly imagine, as evidenced by the gigantic, person-size box it arrives in. Know what you are getting yourself into.
Also know what you're not getting: a long warranty, or an overly intuitive control scheme. But given the "best of everything" potpourri of features, and its near-unimpeachable showing in color and brightness testing, gaming on the Omen X 65 is an experience unlike anything else. It is the biggest, baddest, most brag-worthy gaming monitor ever. The biggest question about it: Will the price drop? Please and thank you?
The HP Omen X Emperium 65, the first Nvidia Big Format Gaming Display (BFGD), is an epic, extravagant high-refresh mega-monitor. It's impossibly pricey and far from flawless, but play on it is unmatched, if you have the monster PC to support it.
Like What You're Reading?
Sign up for Lab Report to get the latest reviews and top product advice delivered right to your inbox.
This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.
Thanks for signing up!
Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!
Sign up for other newsletters
