Next Article in Journal
Single and Combined Abiotic Stress in Maize Root Morphology
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Paddy Plants at the Northern Region of Malaysia Using ICPMS and Its Risk Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Study of 5S rDNA Non-Transcribed Spacers in Elaeagnaceae Species

by
Oleg S. Alexandrov
*,
Olga V. Razumova
and
Gennady I. Karlov
All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaya 42, 127550 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 26 November 2020 / Revised: 21 December 2020 / Accepted: 21 December 2020 / Published: 23 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics, Genomics and Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
5S rDNA is organized as a cluster of tandemly repeated monomers that consist of the conservative 120 bp coding part and non-transcribed spacers (NTSs) with different lengths and sequences among different species. The polymorphism in the 5S rDNA NTSs of closely related species is interesting for phylogenetic and evolutional investigations, as well as for the development of molecular markers. In this study, the 5S rDNA NTSs were amplified with universal 5S1/5S2 primers in some species of the Elaeagnaceae Adans. family. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of five Elaeagnus species had similar lengths near 310 bp and were different from Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt. and Sh. argentea (Pusch.) Nutt. samples (260 bp and 215 bp, respectively). The PCR products were cloned and sequenced. An analysis of the sequences revealed that intraspecific levels of NTS identity are high (approximately 95–96%) and similar in the Elaeagnus L. species. In Sh. argentea, this level was slightly lower due to the differences in the poly-T region. Moreover, the intergeneric and intervarietal NTS identity levels were studied and compared. Significant differences between species (except E. multiflora Thunb. and E. umbellata Thunb.) and genera were found. Herein, a range of the NTS features is discussed. This study is another step in the investigation of the molecular evolution of Elaeagnaceae and may be useful for the development of species-specific DNA markers in this family.

1. Introduction

It is well known that the ribosomes of cells in living organisms consist of two subunits, which are named large and small. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules are the important component of both subunits. In cases with all Bacteria, Archaea, and Eucariota, the key role in large subunit formation is played by 5S ribosomal RNA (with the exception of animal and some fungi mitochondria) [1,2]. 5S rRNA is highly conservative, encoded by the 120 bp gene that also has a highly conservative sequence. In the vast majority of seed plants, the 5S rRNA genes are organized as tandem DNA repeats that consist of monomers. Each monomer is composed of the coding 120 bp part and non-transcribed spacer (NTS) [3,4]. In contrast to the coding part, the NTSs may be very different, even among closely related species. Indeed, there are reports about applications of the NTS polymorphism in species-specific DNA marker development [5,6,7].
The Elaeagnaceae Adans. family includes three genera: Elaeagnus, Hippophae L., and Shepherdia Nutt. [8]. Plants of these genera grow in temperate zones, mainly in Western Europe, Minor, Central, and Southeast Asia, the Far East, and North America, and less often in the subtropics and tropics. Some species are found in eastern Australia and on the islands of the Sunda Archipelago [9,10,11]. These plants are trees and bushes with shoots and leaves that are often covered with scales or hairs so that they have a silvery green color. Elaeagnaceae plants are classified as phanerophytes, because their buds and shoot tips are high above the soil surface and survive unfavorable times without much protection [12,13]. Moreover, they can grow in regions with poor soil due to the existence of symbiosis with some nitrogen-fixing bacteria in their root nodules [14,15,16]. The Elaeagnus genus comprises nearly 100 species of trees and bushes with bisexual flowers. Their shoots are often supplemented with rather long thorns. The most economically valuable species of this genus are E. angustifolia L., E. commutata Bernh., E. pungens Thunb., E. multiflora, and E. umbellata. These species are grown as ornamental or medicinal plants, and the fruit of E. angustifolia, E. multiflora, and E. umbellata are widely used for food [17]. In this vein, new Elaeagnus varieties are bred in many countries. The Hippophae and Shepherdia species are grown for the same purposes [18,19,20,21]. Unlike the Elaeagnus species, they are dioecious plants with male and female flowers in different samples. These species are used for the investigation of plant sex evolution [22,23,24].
The 5S rDNA NTSs of H. rhamnoides have previously been sequenced and studied [25]. It was shown that the length of sea buckthorn NTSs is 807 bp. Further analysis has revealed a high level of identity between the rather extended regions in studied NTSs and the sequenced microsatellite loci of H. rhamnoides [26], E. angustifolia [27], and Calligonum mongolicum Turcz. (Polygonaceae) [28]. All of these sequences have a tandem (GA)10 motif. To date, this is the only report about NTSs in Elaeagnaceae plants. The NTSs of the Elaeagnus and Shepherdia species remain unexplored.
In this article, the amplification of the E. angustifolia, E. commutata, E. pungens, E. multiflora, E. umellata, Sh. argentea, and Sh. canadensis. 5S rDNA NTSs was carried out. Their sequences were analyzed, compared, and used to find species-specifics polymorphisms.

2. Results

2.1. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification of Elaeagnus and Shepherdia 5S rDNA Non-Transcribed Spacers (NTSs)

The amplification of the E. angustifolia, E. commutata, E. pungens, E. multiflora, E. umellata, Sh. argentea, and Sh. canadensis 5S rDNA NTSs was carried out with the help of 5S1/5S2 primers, which were designed on the basis of the 5S rRNA encoded Vitis vinifera L. conservative sequence [29]. Single PCR fragments were obtained in all samples. All PCR products of the five Elaeagnus species had similar lengths near 310 bp. The amplified fragments of Sh. argentea and Sh. canadensis differed significantly from those of Elaeagnus and among themselves in length (they were near 260 bp and 220 bp, respectively). These results are presented in Figure 1.

2.2. Sequencing of the PCR Products and Analysis of the Intraspecifc NTS Alignments

The 5S1/5S2 PCR products of all of the studied species were cloned into AT-vector and sequenced. Thus, 54 sequences with NTSs were obtained in total: Six from E. angustifolia, five from E. commutata; five from E. multiflora, three from E. pungens, 29 from all of the studied varieties of E. umellata, five from Sh. argentea, and one from Sh. canadensis (Table S1). The NTSs from these sequences were compared within each species (or variety for E. umbellata) as well as among different species and genera. In the case of all Elaeagnus species, the intraspecific level of NTS identity was high and ranged from 95.00 ± 0.71% in E. pungens to 96.30 ± 0.59% in E. commutata (Table S2). The differences between these values were not statistically significant according to the results of the t-tests. However, Sh. argentea had some lower values (88.50 ± 2.28%) due to the substantial differences between NTSs in poly-T region (Figure 2a). These values were statistically different from all of the Elaeagnus species, except for E. pungens.
Sh. argentea NTSs consisted of three parts that differ in the level of polymorphism. The first part was a region from the 1st to the 12–15th nucleotides, which mainly included the C and T nucleotides (except the A nucleotides occupying the 2nd position in Sharg5 and the 11th position in Sharg9 and Sharg10) and had the (C)CWYTTCCYYCMC(CC) consensus sequence. The second part was a poly-T region, which was very polymorphic. Sharg5 and Sharg10 had the same formula with 15 T only. In Sharg9 and Sharg14, (T)13 and (T)37 were observed, respectively. An interesting variant was found in Sharg8, which had the (T)12G(T)8 formula. The third part (from the 53rd to the 144th position of the alignment) is a highly conservative region, in which only single polymorphic position was observed (132 G/T).
The alignment of the E. angustifolia NTSs is shown in Figure 3a. Large differences in the NTSs’ length (as in the second part of the Sh. argentea NTSs) were not found. All E. angustifolia NTSs were 207 bp in length. In the alignment, 18 single nucleotide mutations were identified. Ten C/T transitions and seven transversions were observed (five A/T, one A/C, and one T/G). Thus, more transitions than transversions were revealed in the E. angustifolia NTSs. One single nucleotide insertion (T) was found at the 208th position in Eang41. The transcription stop-signal poly-T region without mutations was located from the 1st to the 5th nucleotides in Eang34, Eang39, and Eang43. Another (T)5 region was found at the 60th–65th position. Moreover, there was a poly-A region at the 156th–160th position. The TTATA region (181st–185th position or “–27” to “–23” upstream of the coding part) was identified as a TATA-like regulatory element. There were two additional TATA-like motifs at the 7th–11th (in Eang38, Eang42, and Eang43) and the 115th–119th (in Eang34, Eang39, Eang42, and Eang43) positions.
The E. commutata NTSs were similar in length (208–209 bp). In the alignment (Figure 3b), 13 single nucleotide substitutions were identified. Ecom45 and Ecom47 had an insertion (A) at the 1st position, and these NTSs were 209 bp in length. Transitions of two types were found (four C/T and one G/A). Transversions were as follows: three A/C, two A/T, and one T/G. Moreover, one multipolymorphic site (A/T/C) was revealed. On the whole, more transversions than transitions were identified in the E. commutata NTSs. That is, the picture turned out to be the opposite of that of the E. angustifolia NTSs. The poly-T region (a stop-signal for transcription) without mutations was located from the 1st to the 5th nucleotides in Ecom48, Ecom49, and Ecom50. In Ecom45 and Ecom47, it was located at the 2nd–6th position. The next (T)5 region was observed at the 62nd–66th position. The TATA-like box with TTATAA (183rd–187th position or “–27” to “–23” upstream of the coding part) was found.
The E. multiflora NTSs were slightly longer than the NTSs of E. angustifolia or E. commutata (Figure 3c). Their lengths were 213–214 bp. The length of Emult61 was 214 bp due to an insertion (T) at the 23rd position. In addition to this mutation, 17 single nucleotide substitutions were seen: nine transitions (two C/G, four A/C, and three A/T); eight transitions (five C/T, and three A/G). The transcription stop-signal poly-T region without mutations locates in the start of all E. multiflora NTSs from the 1st to 5th nucleotides. In addition, these NTSs had two other (T)5 regions (the 66th–71st and 104th–108th positions, respectively). The TATA-like box was also identified at the 188th–192nd position (“−27”–“−22” upstream to the encoded part), but it had TTATGA formula with G-substitution. Another TATA-like sequence with TTATAA formula was detected at the “−7”–“−2” upstream to the coding part.
For E. pungens, three NTSs were sequenced and aligned (Figure 3d). All NTSs were 213 bp in length without indels. The distribution of single nucleotide mutations was the following. There were five C/T transitions and two A/G transitions. The number of and five transversions: one A/C, two A/T and two C/G. The transcription stop-signal (T)5 sequence without mutations in the start of NTS was detected in Epung64 only (at the 1st position in other E. pungens NTSs the C/T substitution was observed). Two additional (T)5 regions were found at the 65th–70th and the 109th–113th positions. The picture of the TATA-like sequences in the E. pungens NTSs was the same as in the E. multiflora NTSs, but there were found an additional TTATA motif at the 98th–102th position in Epung64 and Epung65.
The NTS sequences of each E. umbellata variety were also compared (except “Sweet’n’Sour”, in which one sequence was obtained only). The results are presented in Figure 3e–h and in Table S3. In these NTSs, transversions were slightly more common than transitions. The pictures of the (T)5 and TATA-like motif distribution were similar to those in E. multiflora, but some E. umbellata NTSs had some features. Thus, the second additional (T)5 motif in EumbF79 had an A/T substitution at the end, and EumbBR92 had an ATTTT variant of this motif. The transcription stop-signal poly-T in EumbB111, EumbB115, and EumbB117 had a C/T substitution at the 2nd nucleotide position. Moreover, numerous mutations of the “–7” to “–2” TATA-like sequence were detected in EumbB104, EumbB111, EumbB115, EumbB116, and EumbB117. In EumbBR89, there was an additional TTATA motif at the 24th–28th position.
In summary, 137 mutations were detected in all Elaeagnus NTS alignments (Table S4): four indels and 133 substitutions. Four substitutions were identified as multipolymorphic. Finally, 129 substitutions were transitions or transversions, transversions were slightly more common. The most frequent mutation was the C/T transition, and the rarest were the T/G and C/G transversions.
An intraspecies nucleotide polymorphism in the Sh. canadensis NTS cannot be analyzed, because data for only a single variety were available (Shcan25). However, some features were found in this sequence (Figure 2b). Firstly, it had the transcription stop-signal (T)5 at the start, as in most Elaeagnus NTSs. This fact distinguished the Sh. canadensis NTS from the Sh. argentea NTSs. Secondly, Shcan25 had the (T)10 region at the same position as the second part of the Sh. argentea NTSs. Thirdly, other poly-T sequences were not revealed in Shcan25 as in the Sh. argentea NTSs. Lastly, it did not have the second TATA-like box at the “–7” to “–2” position. Thus, Shcan25 combined the features of Sh. argentea and Elaeagnus NTSs. Moreover, it had its own peculiarities. The most important feature was the presence of the classical TATA-box with the TATAAA formula at the 55th–60th position. Additionally, there was one additional TATA-like motif at the 119th–125th position (TTATAAG). Finally, Shcan25 had three poly-A regions at the 58th–62nd, 92nd–96th, and 108th–114th positions.

2.3. Interspecific, Intervarietal, and Intrageneric Level of NTS Identity in the Studied Elaeagnaceae Plants

In the next step of the investigation, all NTS sequences were aligned and identity values were calculated (Table S5). The intervarietal and interspecific identity values were computed for further analysis by t-tests. Thereby, collation of the intraspecific (intravarietal) and interspecific levels of identity was carried out (Table S6). The lowest level of interspecific identity was observed in the Sh. argenteae/Sh. canadensis pair (45.80 ± 1.75%). In Elaeagnus spp., the lowest level of interspecific identity was observed in the E. angustifolia/E. umbellata var. “Sweet’n’Sour” pair (55.17 ± 0.18%). The highest value of this indicator (97.20 ± 0.55%) was in the E. multiflora/E. umbellata var. “Sweet’n’Sour” pair. In general, E. multiflora showed high values in the pairs with all varieties of E. umbellata. These values did not have any statistically valuable differences compared to the E. multiflora intraspecific level of identity. E. pungens also showed high values in the pairs with E. multiflora and E. umbellata (84–86%), but these values were reliably lower than their intraspecific values. Other pairs demonstrated a near 60% level of interspecific identity, which reliably differed from the corresponding intraspecific values according to the t-tests. The levels of intervarietal identity were high (from 95.31 ± 0.12% to 97.43 ± 0.32%) and some values were higher than the corresponding intravarietal identity values. However, some differences were not statistically confirmed, since the empirical values of the t-tests fell into an uncertainty zone.
Similar comparative analyses were carried out in the two investigations of the intergeneric level of identity (Sh. argentea/Elaeagnus spp. and Sh. canadensis/Elaeagnus spp.). The results of these investigations are presented in Tables S7 and S8. In each line of the matrices obtained, the comparisons of the intergeneric and interspecific (from Table S5) values were conducted by t-tests. All differences were identified as statistically significant. The intergeneric values with Sh. argentea were low (from 30.60 ± 0.35% to 33.76 ± 0.28%). In the case of Sh. canadensis, the intergeneric values were higher, but they could not be assessed as high (from 41.43 ± 0.32% to 45.67 ± 0.41%).

3. Discussion

In this article, 5S rDNA NTS sequences were presented and analyzed for the first time in five Elaeagnus species and two Shepherdia species from the Elaeagnaceae family. The 5S rDNA in these species is obviously organized according to the classical model, with alternations of the conservative coding and variable non-coding parts [30]. This conclusion was indirectly confirmed by the successful PCR in all of the studied samples using universal primers designed for the conserved coding region [29]. The electrophoresis detection showed that the patterns of all of the PCR products consisted of single fragments. Such an electrophoretic pattern was previously observed in other experiments with the same (or similar) universal primers. For example, this picture has been revealed in H. rhamnoides, Petrosimonia oppositifolia (Palas) Litvinov, P. glaucescens (Bunge) Iljin, Populus suaveolens Fisch., Populus koreana Rehder., and other species [25,31,32,33]. A radically different pattern was observed in species of a hybrid or polyploid origin. In such cases, the electrophoresis discovers two or more fragments. These results have been described in Petrosimonia litwinowii Korsh., Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marshall, Populus alba L., Populus ×rasumowskyana (R.I. Schrod. ex Regel) C.K. Schneid., and Atropa belladonna L. Poaceae Barnhart. spp. [31,34,35,36,37,38]. Thus, it can be assumed that the Elaeagnus and Shepherdia species are most likely not of a hybrid or polyploid origin.
As a potentially useful result, differences in the length of the PCR products between Sh. argentea, Sh. canadensis, and Elaeagnus spp. were detected. The corresponding single fragments of 220, 260, and 310 bp in length were clearly distinguishable in the electrophoresis picture. In addition, they can be even more distinguishable with the ~900 bp PCR product included the H. rhamnoides NTSs [25]. Thus, these differences can be used at the first stage of Elaeagnaceae plant identification, when species-specific morphological characters do not allow exact identification (for example, in the leafless period or in homogenized samples). However, the Elaeagnus species cannot be identified in this way due to a high similarity in the length of their PCR products. In this case, PCR products require sequencing and comparison with the sequences presented in this article. Similarity in length is not rare among NTSs of closely related species. Therefore, the previously sequenced NTSs of P. suaveolens and P. koreana were shown to have similar lengths and polymorphic regions [32,33].
In this work, 54 sequences of the Elaeagnaceae NTSs were obtained. The intraspecific alignments required finding some interesting features in these NTSs. For example, one of such features was poly-T regions in different places of the NTSs. All Elaeagnus and Sh. canadensis species had the (T)5 region at the start of their NTSs (but different single nucleotide mutations were found in some NTSs). This feature was also detected in the previously described NTSs of Vitis vinifera, A. belladonna, Phytolacca Americana L., Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and D.R. Dewey, Lens culinaris Medic., and others [29,37,39,40,41]. However, Sh. argentea had a C/T-rich part at the start of its NTSs instead of the (T)5 region and the poly-T stretch after the 12th–15th nucleotides only. Similar variants at the start of the NTSs have also found in other plants, such as Populus euphratica Olivier [36]. In the Elaeagnus NTSs, two additional poly-T motifs were revealed. Such motifs are far from uncommon among NTSs. In a range of balsamic poplar species, there are many poly-T or poly-A regions, and their NTSs are often AT-rich [36].
The next important feature of the NTSs was the presence of TATA-like boxes in the upstream region relative to the coding part of the 5S rDNA. Sometimes, even several TATA-like sequences are interspersed into one NTS. Such incidents have been described in different organisms: Engistomops Jiménez De La Espada spp., Donax L. spp., Erythroculter ilishaeformis Bleeker, Populus fremontii S. Watson, etc. [36,42,43,44]. In the studied Elaeagnaceae species, there was one TATA-like motif in the NTSs of Sh. argentea, two in Elaeagnus spp., and three in the Sh. canadensis. The Shcan25 TATA-box from the 55th–60th position had the classical TATAAA formula, and the others were slightly modified. On the whole, the modified variants of the TATA-box come across more often. For example, TTATAAG (119th–125th position of the Sh. canadensis NTS) has also been found in a wide range of poplars (Populus ciliata Wall. ex Royle, P. trichocarpa (Torr. and A. Gray ex Hook.) Brayshaw, P. lasiocarpa Oliv., P. simonii Carriére, P. deltoides, P. yunnanensis Dode, etc.) [34,36]. TATATA, TGATATA, and TATTTA occur in the NTSs of different Donax species, TTATAT in Engistomops spp., TTATGTA in H. rhamnoides and most of the other variants [25,42,43]. Assessing the functionality of these modified TATA-boxes as regulatory elements (TATA-box is a signal sequence for RNA polymerase II/III [45]) is difficult, and a lot of in vitro translation experiments are required.
In all Elaeagnus intraspecific NTS alignments, different mutations were counted. The observed mutations were single nucleotide substitutions or indels without regularity of their locations. Numerous reports have provided information regarding a similar picture of NTS mutations in other organisms [29,37,42]. Authors’ attention is often drawn to the ratio of transitions to transversions. Thus, there is an opinion that transitions are usually more common than transversions in the coding regions of the genome [46,47]. However, NTSs are not coding regions and this rule may not work. In this article, it was found that the ratio of transitions to transversions was nearly 1:1 (the prevalence of transversions was small). Studying the substitutions in the long variants of A. belladonna NTSs, Volkov et al. observed the same ratio. However, the intermediate and short variants had more transitions [37]. Moreover, Maughan et al. reported different ratios of transitions to transversions in two NTS classes in Chenopodium quinoa C.L. Willdenow (Willd.) (transitions predominated in class I, and transversions were more common in class II) [41]. In sum, there are different cases that provide different ratios of transitions to transversions among different NTSs.
The investigations of the intraspecific, interspecific, intervarietal, and intergeneric identity in the studied Elaeagnaceae plants found that the intraspecific level of NTS identity was high (from 95.00 ± 0.71% to 96.30 ± 0.59%) in Elaeagnus spp. In the case with the A. belladonna long variant of NTSs, the sequence identity was also high (from 96.40% to 99.60%) [37]. In addition, three species of the Rosa L. genus had the following values of this indicator: In R. wichurana Crép., from 91.70% to 95.40%; in R. rugosa Thunb., 99.10%; in R. nitida Willd., from 97.90% to 99.50% [48]. The deviation from 100% in all cases was due to a small number of single nucleotide changes. The sequences of the Sh. argentea NTS had more serious differences in the poly-T part and the intraspecific level of their identity was significantly lower (88.50 ± 2.28%). The differences observed in the poly-T regions could be for different reasons. It is possible that some of them are associated with errors in the Taq-polymerase work during PCR because poly-A/T stretches are a difficult template [49,50]. However, it is equally possible that this part of the Sh. argentea NTSs behaves like a microsatellite, and that the differences in the length of the poly-T motifs were caused by errors in replication. In general, microsatellites were previously found in the NTSs of P. deltoides, H. rhamnoides, L. culinaris, some species of fish, etc. [25,34,41]. It is interesting to note that the (GA)9 microsatellite of the H. rhamnoides NTSs was absent in the Elaeagnus and Shepherdia NTSs studied.
Some interspecific and all intervarietal values of the NTS identity in the Elaeagnus genus were similar to the values of the intraspecific identity. These results were obtained in the comparison between the E. multiflora and E. umbellata NTSs. Thus, these results provide a reason to consider these species names synonymous. Such a concept has been expressed previously, i.e., by Handell-Mazzetti [51]. The intervarietal values of identity in several E. umbellata varieties were high (from 95.31 ± 0.12% to 97.43 ± 0.32%). Therefore, NTSs are not suitable for creating variety-specific molecular markers, at least not in this case. The other interspecific values of NTS identity among Elaeagnus spp. ranged from 55.17 ± 0.18% to 86%. The values of this indicator in such plants as Nicotiana L. spp. (nearly 80%), Astrgalus L. spp. (nearly 70%), and Rosa spp. (from 52.8% to 57.6%) are also within this range [48,52,53]; however, the value of the Sh. argenteae/Sh. canadensis pair (45.80 ± 1.75%) was not. The presence of large polymorphisms in these NTSs could be useful, for example, in species-specific marker development (as there are difficulties in the differentiation of these Shepherdia species based on their morphological characteristics, especially during the juvenile and leafless periods). Finally, the intergeneric values of the NTS identity between two Shepherdia and five Elaeagnus species were low and ranged from 30.60 ± 0.35% to 45.67 ± 0.41%. Thus, three ranges of NTS identity can be indicated in the case with the studied Elaeagnaceae spp.: 30–45% for the intergeneric, 45–86% for the interspecific, and 95–97% for the intraspecific level.
The results obtained may be interesting for the wide range of specialists that study the organization of 5S rDNA. Furthermore, this study is another step in the investigation of the molecular evolution of Elaeagnaceae and may be useful for the development of species-specific DNA markers in this family.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and DNA Isolation

In this work, a collection of Elaeagnus spp. and Shepherdia spp. samples were created (Table S9). The E. angustifolia, E. commutata, E. multiflora, and E. umbellata var. “Sweet’n’Sour” trees were grown in open ground in KIZ “Allea”, Kievsky village, Moscow, Russia. The E. umbellata var. “Pointilla Fortunella”, “Brilliant Rose” bushes, E. umbellata sample without the variety from the “Sad pochtoj” nursery (cloned from non-identified cuttings, Bulgaria), and E. pungens var. “Maculata” were grown in a greenhouse in the All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaya 42, Moscow, Russia. The leaf tissue samples of Sh. argentea and Sh. canadensis were received as dried material from the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University (Boston, MA, USA) and Botanic Garden Meise (Meise, Belgium), respectively. DNA from young, fresh, and dried leaves was isolated according to the Doyle and Doyle CTAB protocol with some modifications [54,55]. DNA samples were equalized in concentration, aliquoted, and stored at –20 °C.

4.2. The PCR Experiments, Electrophoresis and Sequencing

Amplification of the 5S rDNA fragments was carried out with the 5S1/5S2 primers designed by Falistocco et al. [29]. The primers were synthesized by ZAO “Synthol” (Moscow, Russia). PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s; 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR mix consisted of approximately 10 ng of genomic DNA, 2.5 U of Taq-polymerase (ZAO “Sibenzyme”, Novosibirsk, Russia), 1× SE-buffer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 100 µM of each dNTP, and 0.25 µM of the forward and reverse primers and ddH2O. The PCR products were detected by electrophoresis on 2.5% agarose gel at 10 V/cm in 0.5 M of TBE buffer using a Sub-Cell Model 192 camera (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and photographed using the gel documentation system GelDoc XR Plus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Purification of the PCR products was carried out with the “CleanMag” Kit ZAO “Evrogen” (Moscow, Russia). The purified amplicons were cloned to the AT-vector (pAL2-T Kan, ZAO “Evrogen”, Moscow, Russia). Clones with the target insert were found by white-blue selection and PCR testing with the M13 standard primers. Sequencing of M13 PCR products was performed by ZAO “Evrogen” (Moscow, Russia).

4.3. Analysis of the Sequences and Statistical Tests

The sequences were processed in the GenDoc program (coding parts were cut) [56], and the NTSs were collected and submitted to GenBank (Table S1). The alignments and calculations of the NTS identity values were also carried out in GenDoc. The calculation of the average NTS identity values (of the intraspecific, interspecific, and intergeneric levels) and the standard errors was carried out using an online calculator (https://medstatistic.ru/calculators/calcvaries.html). Comparison of the average values was performed using Student t-tests with an online calculator (https://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/student/) for unrelated samples.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/1/4/s1: Table S1. The sequences of Elaeagnaceae spp. non-transcribed spacers (NTSs) and their characteristics; Table S2. Comparisons of the average values of intraspecific NTS identity by t-tests; Table S3. Mutations in the Elaeagnus umbellata NTSs; Table S4. Mutations in the Elaeagnus spp. NTSs; Table S5. The values of NTS identity at the intraspecific (or intravarietal), interspecific, intervarietal and intergeneric levels; Table S6. A comparative analysis of the average levels of interspecies (intervariety for Elaeagnus umbellata) identity by t-tests; Table S7. A comparative analysis of the average levels of interspecies (intervariety for Elaeagnus umbellata) and intergeneric (between Shepherdia argentea and Elaeagnus spp.) identity by t-tests; Table S8. A comparative analysis of the average levels of interspecies (intervariety for Elaeagnus umbellata) and intergeneric (between Shepherdia canadensis and Elaeagnus spp.) identity by t-tests; Table S9. The studied plants of the Elaeagnus and Shepherdia species.

Author Contributions

O.S.A., G.I.K., and O.V.R. conceived and designed the experiments and formulated the discussion; O.S.A. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by a grant from the President of the Russian Federation MK-3916.2019.11, agreement No. 075-15-2019-278, dated 11.06.2019.

Data Availability Statement

Shepherdia spp. samples were used in this study. The Sh. argentea dried leaves were kindly provided by Kathryn Richardson (AA#102-77*A sample of Arnold Arboretum, The Harvard University, USA). The Sh. canadensis dried leaves were kindly provided by Kenneth Bauters (*19801643-I34ZZ sample of Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mikhail Romanov and Alexey Sorokin (Department of Tropical and Subtropical Plants, Main Botanical Garden named by N.V. Tsitsin, RAS), Kenneth Bauters (Scientific Manager of the outdoor collection, Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium), Kathryn Richardson (Curatorial Assistant, Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, USA), “Martin-Sad” nursery, “Opt-khoz” nursery, “Sad pochtoj” nursery, and “Nara-Sad” nursery for their help in plant material collection, as well as Karina Bone-Prolesova for her help with the organization of the experiments and Tatyana Alexandrova for critically reading the English version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Szymanski, M.; Barciszewska, M.Z.; Erdmann, V.A.; Barciszewski, J.; Barciszewska, M.Z. 5 S rRNA: Structure and interactions. Biochem. J. 2003, 371, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Szymański, M.; Karlowski, W.M. Assessing the 5S ribosomal RNA heterogeneity in Arabidopsis thaliana using short RNA next generation sequencing data. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2006, 63, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pendás, Á.M.; Moran, P.; Martínez, P.M.; Vázquez, E.G. Applications of 5S rDNA in Atlantic salmon, brown trout, and in Atlantic salmon brown trout hybrid identification. Mol. Ecol. 1995, 4, 275–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Z.-L.; Zhang, D.; Wang, X.; Ma, X.-F.; Wang, X.-R. Intragenomic and interspecific 5S rDNA sequence variation in five Asian pines. Am. J. Bot. 2003, 90, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Avadhani, M.N.M.; Selvaraj, C.I.; Tharachand, C.; Rajasekharan, P.E. Molecular characterization of medicinal and aromatic plants by 5S rRNA NTS and PCR RFLP—A mini review. Res. Biotechnol. 2012, 3, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexandrov, O.S.; Karlov, G.I. Development of 5S rDNA-based molecular markers for the identification of Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marshall, Populus nigra L., and their Hybrids. Forests 2018, 9, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Alexandrov, O.S.; Karlov, G.I. The development of Populus alba L. and Populus tremula L. species specific molecular markers based on 5S rDNA non-transcribed spacer polymorphism. Forests 2019, 10, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bartish, I.V.; Swenson, U. Elaeagnaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants; Kubitzki, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelgerg, Germany, 2004; pp. 131–134. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lian, Y.S.; Chen, X.; Lian, H. Systematic classification of the genus Hippophae L. Seabuckthorn Res. 1998, 1, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rousi, A. The genus Hippophae L.: A taxomic study. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1971, 8, 177–227. [Google Scholar]
  11. Veldkamp, J.F. Elaeagnaceae. Fl. Males. Ser. I 1986, 10, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
  12. Djamali, M.; De Beaulieu, J.-L.; Shah-Hosseini, M.; Andrieu-Ponel, V.; Ponel, P.; Amini, A.; Akhani, H.; Leroy, S.A.; Stevens, L.; Lahijani, H.; et al. A late Pleistocene long pollen record from Lake Urmia, Nw Iran. Quat. Res. 2008, 69, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Raunkiaer, C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Geography; The Claderon Press: Oxford, UK, 1934; p. 623. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner, I.C. Nitrigen fixation in Elaeagnus root nodules. Nature 1958, 181, 717–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gatner, E.M.S.; Gardner, I.C. Observations on the fine structure of the root nodule endophyte of Hippophae rhamnoides L. Arch. Mikrobiol. 1970, 70, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Stangeland, R.J. The Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Endophyte of Shepherdia argentea. Master’s Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  17. Patel, S. Plant genus Elaeagnus: Underutilized lycopene and linoleic acid reserve with permaculture potential. Fruits 2015, 70, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Xu, M. The medical research and exploitation of sea buckthorn. Hippophae 1994, 7, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bernath, J.; Foldesi, D. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A promising new medicinal and food crop. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 1992, 1, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Knowles, D.; Wilk, I. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) content of the buffalo berry. Science 1943, 97, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wyman, D. Woody plants with ornamental fruits. Bull. Pop. Inf. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. Ser. 4 1936, 4, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  22. Puterova, J.; Razumova, O.; Martinek, T.; Alexandrov, O.; Divashuk, M.; Kubat, Z.; Hobza, R.; Karlov, G.; Kejnovsky, E. Satellite DNA and Transposable Elements in Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides ), a Dioecious Plant with Small Y and Large X Chromosomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bone, K.D.; Razumova, O.V.; Karlov, G.I. Silver buffalo berry is a new perspective berry crop with an unknown sex determination system. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists Dedicated to the 160th anniversary of V.A. Michelson, Moscow, Russia, 9–11 June 2020; Publishing House of the RSAU-Moscow Agricultural Academy: Moscow, Russia, 2020; pp. 87–88. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  24. Bone, K.D.; Razumova, O.V.; Karlov, G.I.; Kirov, I.V. Analysis tandem repeats and retrotransposons of Shepherdia argentea (Pursh) Nutt. In Proceedings of the 12th International Multiconference Bioinformatics of Genome Regulation and Structure/Systems Biology (BGRS/SB-2020), Novosibirsk, Russia, 6–10 July 2020; Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2020; p. 18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Alexandrov, O.S.; Evtukhov, A.V.; Kiselev, I.I.; Karlov, G.I. Molecular genetic features of 5S rDNA non-transcribed spacer in Hippophae rhamnoides L. Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2016, 4, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  26. Islam, A.; Sinha, P.; Sharma, S.S.; Negi, M.S.; Tripathi, S.B. Isolation and Characterization of Novel Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci in Hippophae rhamnoides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 87, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gaskin, J.F.; Hufbauer, R.; Bogdanowicz, S.M. Microsatellite Markers for Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia; Elaeagnaceae). Appl. Plant Sci. 2013, 1, 1300013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, Q.; Zhu, X.-T. Microsatellite DNA loci from the drought desert plant Calligonum mongolicum Turcz. (Polygonaceae). Conserv. Genet. 2009, 10, 1891–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Falistocco, E.; Passeri, V.; Marconi, G. Investigations of 5S rDNA of Vitis vinifera L.: Sequence analysis and physical mapping. Genome 2007, 50, 927–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sastri, D.C.; Hilu, K.; Apples, R.; Lagudah, E.S.; Playford, J.; Baum, B.R. An overview of evolution in plant 5S DNA. Plant Syst. Evol. 1992, 183, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feodorova, T.A.; Aleksandrov, O.S. The molecular-phylogenetic study of Petrosimonia species of Chenopodiaceae Juss. family. Izv. TAA 2015, 5, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  32. Alexaandrov, O.S.; Karlov, G.I.; Sorokin, A.N.; Evtukhov, A.V. Comparative analysis of 5S rDNA non-transcribed spacers in some poplar species of Tacamahaca Spach. section. Int. J. Appl. Fund. Res. 2015, 12, 1084–1086. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Alexandrov, O.S.; Evtukhov, A.V. Study of 5S rDNA non-transcribed spacers of Tacamahaca Far Eastern poplar species. In Conservation of the Variety of the Plant World of Tuva and the Adjacent Regions of Central Asia: History, Modernity, Prospects, Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kyzyl, Russia 5–7 June 2016; Sambuu, A.D., Ed.; Tuva Institute for the Integrated Development of Natural Resources of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Kyzyl, Russia, 2016; pp. 55–56. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  34. Negi, M.S.; Rajagopal, J.; Chauhan, N.; Cronn, R.; Lakshmikumaran, M. Length and sequence heterogeneity in 5S rDNA of Populus deltoides. Genome 2002, 45, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alexandrov, O.S.; Karlov, G.I.; Sorokin, A.N.; Potapenko, N.C. Development of the molecular marker system for species identification of poplars and analysis of hybrids. In Proceedings of the III (V) All-Russia Youth Conference with Participation of Prospects of Development and Problems of Modern Botany, Novosibirsk, Russia, 10–14 November 2014; Asbaganov, S.V., Ed.; Akademizdat: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2014; pp. 123–124. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson, N. Genome Analysis of Populus Species: Assessment of Genetic Diversity of P. deltoides, Characterization of Wide Hybrids and Phylogenetic Analysis Using Molecular Markers. Master’s Thesis, Teri University, New Delhi, India, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Volkov, R.A.; Panchuk, I.I.; Borisjuk, N.V.; Hosiawa-Baranska, M.; Maluszynska, J.; Hemleben, V. Evolutional dynamics of 45S and 5S ribosomal DNA in ancient allohexaploid Atropa belladonna. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Baum, B.; Bailey, L. The molecular diversity of the 5S rRNA gene in Kengyilia alatavica (Drobov) J.L. Yang, Yen and Baum (Poaceae: Triticeae): Potential genomic assignment of different rDNA units. Genome 1997, 40, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Diao, Y.; Lin, X.M.; Liao, C.L.; Tang, C.Z.; Chen, Z.J.; Hu, Z.L. Authentication of Panax ginseng from its adulterants by PCR-RFLP and ARMS. Planta Med. 2009, 75, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mahelka, V.; Kopecky, D.; Baum, B.R. Contrasting patterns of evolution of 45S and 5S rDNA families uncover new aspects in the genome constitution of the agronomically important grass Thinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2065–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Maughan, P.J.; Kolano, A.B.; Maluszynska, J.; Coles, N.D.; Bonifacio, A.; Rojas, J.; Coleman, E.C.; Stevens, M.R.; Fairbanks, D.J.; Parkinson, E.S.; et al. Molecular and cytological characterization of ribosomal RNA genes in Chenopodium quinoa and Chenopodium berlandieri. Genome 2006, 49, 825–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rodrigues, D.S.; Rivera, M.; Lourenço, L.B. Molecular organization and chromosomal localization of 5S rDNA in Amazonian Engystomops (Anura, Leiuperidae). BMC Genet. 2012, 20, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fernández-Pérez, J.; Nantón, A.; Méndez, J. Sequence characterization of the 5S ribosomal DNA and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region in four European Donax species (Bivalvia: Donacidae). BMC Genet. 2018, 19, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. He, W.; Qin, Q.; Liu, S.; Li, T.; Wang, J.; Xiao, J.; Xie, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y. Organization and variation analysis of 5S rDNA in different ploidy-level hybrids of red crucian carp × topmouth culter. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, Y.; Stumph, W.E. RNA polymerase II/III transcription specificity determined by TATA box orientation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 8606–8610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Duchêne, S.; Ho, S.Y.; Holmes, E.C. Declining transition/transversion ratios through time reveal limitations to the accuracy of nucleotide substitution models. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Alexandrov, O.S. Study of the upstream ricin gene sequences in different castor (Ricinus communis) varieties as a preliminary step in CRISPR/Cas9 editing. Res. Crops 2020, 21, 344–348. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tynkevich, Y.O.; Volkov, R.A. Novel structural class of 5S rDNA of Rosa wichurana Crep. Dopov. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2014, 5, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Clarke, L.A.; Rebelo, C.S.; Gonçalves, J.; Boavida, M.G.; Jordan, P. PCR amplification introduces errors into mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeat sequences. Mol. Pathol. 2001, 54, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Kieleczawa, J. Fundamentals of sequencing of difficult templates—An overview. J. Biomol. Tech. 2006, 17, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Handell-Mazzetti, H.R.E. Elaeagnus umbellata var. siphonantha (Nakai) Hand.-Mazz. Symb. Sin. 1933, 7, 540. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fulnecek, J.; Lim, K.Y.; Leitch, A.R.; Kovarík, A.; Matyásek, R. Evolution and structure of 5S rDNA loci in allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum and its putative parental species. Heredity 2002, 88, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, X.Q.; Duan, J.A.; Zhu, D.Y.; Dong, T.T.X.; Tsim, K.W.K. Species identification of Radix Astragali (Huangqi) by DNA sequence of its 5S-rRNA spacer domain. Phytochemistry 2000, 54, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  55. Razumova, O.V.; Alexandrov, O.S.; Divashuk, M.G.; Sukhorada, T.I.; Karlov, G.I. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of monoecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars reveals its karyotype variations and sex chromosomes constitution. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. GeneDoc: Analysis and Visualization of Genetic Variation. Available online: http://www.nrbsc.org/gfx/genedoc/ebinet.htm (accessed on 26 November 2020).
Figure 1. The results of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments with 5S1/5S2 in the Elaeagnus and Shepherdia species. The lines correspond to the samples in the follow order: (1) E. angustifolia, (2) E. commutata, (3) E. multiflora, (4) E. pungens, (5) E. umbellata, (6) Sh. canadensis, and (7) Sh. argentea. The molecular weight marker is 100 bp.
Figure 1. The results of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments with 5S1/5S2 in the Elaeagnus and Shepherdia species. The lines correspond to the samples in the follow order: (1) E. angustifolia, (2) E. commutata, (3) E. multiflora, (4) E. pungens, (5) E. umbellata, (6) Sh. canadensis, and (7) Sh. argentea. The molecular weight marker is 100 bp.
Plants 10 00004 g001
Figure 2. The alignment of Shepherdia argentea (a) and Sh. canadensis (b) non-transcribed spacers (NTSs). The poly-T regions are indicated by red. The poly-A region is indicated by pink. The TATA-like motifs are indicated by green.
Figure 2. The alignment of Shepherdia argentea (a) and Sh. canadensis (b) non-transcribed spacers (NTSs). The poly-T regions are indicated by red. The poly-A region is indicated by pink. The TATA-like motifs are indicated by green.
Plants 10 00004 g002
Figure 3. The alignment of the Elaeagnus angustifolia (a), E. commutata (b), E. multiflora (c), E. pungens (d), E. umbellata var. ‘‘Fortunella’’ (e), E. umbellata var. ‘‘Brilliant Rose’’ (f), E. umbellata without variety (g), and E. umbellata var. ‘‘Sweet’n’Sour’’ (h) NTSs. The poly-T regions are indicated by red. The poly-A region is indicated by pink. The TATA-like motifs are indicated by green.
Figure 3. The alignment of the Elaeagnus angustifolia (a), E. commutata (b), E. multiflora (c), E. pungens (d), E. umbellata var. ‘‘Fortunella’’ (e), E. umbellata var. ‘‘Brilliant Rose’’ (f), E. umbellata without variety (g), and E. umbellata var. ‘‘Sweet’n’Sour’’ (h) NTSs. The poly-T regions are indicated by red. The poly-A region is indicated by pink. The TATA-like motifs are indicated by green.
Plants 10 00004 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alexandrov, O.S.; Razumova, O.V.; Karlov, G.I. A Comparative Study of 5S rDNA Non-Transcribed Spacers in Elaeagnaceae Species. Plants 2021, 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010004

AMA Style

Alexandrov OS, Razumova OV, Karlov GI. A Comparative Study of 5S rDNA Non-Transcribed Spacers in Elaeagnaceae Species. Plants. 2021; 10(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alexandrov, Oleg S., Olga V. Razumova, and Gennady I. Karlov. 2021. "A Comparative Study of 5S rDNA Non-Transcribed Spacers in Elaeagnaceae Species" Plants 10, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop