Genetic association of COVID-19 severe versus non-severe cases by RNA sequencing in patients hospitalised in Hong Kong

Hong Kong Med J 2024 Feb;30(1):25–31 | Epub 8 Feb 2024
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Genetic association of COVID-19 severe versus non-severe cases by RNA sequencing in patients hospitalised in Hong Kong
Qi Li, PhD1,2 #; Zigui Chen, PhD3 #; Yexian Zhang, PhD2 #; Renee WY Chan, PhD4,5,6,7; Marc KC Chong, PhD1,2; Benny CY Zee, PhD1,2; Lowell Ling, MD8; Grace Lui, MD8; Paul KS Chan, MD3; Maggie H Wang, PhD1,2
1 The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China
3 Department of Microbiology, Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
5 Laboratory for Paediatric Respiratory Research, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
6 CUHK-UMCU Joint Research Laboratory of Respiratory Virus and Immunobiology, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
7 Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
8 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
# Equal contribution
 
Corresponding author: Prof MH Wang (maggiew@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused extensive disruption of public health worldwide. There were reports of COVID-19 patients having multiple complications. This study investigated COVID-19 from a genetic perspective.
 
Methods: We conducted RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis of respiratory tract samples from 24 patients with COVID-19. Eight patients receiving mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were regarded as severe cases; the remaining 16 patients were regarded as non-severe cases. After quality control, statistical analyses were performed by logistic regression and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to identify genes associated with disease severity.
 
Results: Six genes were associated with COVID-19 severity in both statistical tests, namely RPL15, BACE1-AS, CEPT1, EIF4G1, TMEM91, and TBCK. Among these genes, RPL15 and EIF4G1 played roles in the regulation of mRNA translation. Gene ontology analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in nervous system diseases.
 
Conclusion: RNA sequencing analysis showed that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is associated with the overexpression of genes involved in nervous system disorders.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • Differentially expressed genes between patients with severe and non-severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were reported.
  • Overexpression of genes involved in cell proliferation, viral binding and replication, and neurological and lung diseases was observed, suggesting a pathophysiological mechanism by which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 induces lung inflammation and neurological complications.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Future studies that involve gene expression profiling with larger sample sizes, in vitro infection experiments, and animal models can help to elucidate the mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic approaches for neurological complications of COVID-19.
 
 
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread to >500 million people and caused 6.2 million deaths worldwide as of 22 April 2022.1 Approximately 20% of patients with COVID-19 develop severe symptoms and 5% of patients require intensive care.2 A wide range of complications were reported with COVID-19 infection, including nervous system diseases,3 4 circulatory system diseases,5 6 7 8 9 urinary system diseases,10 and digestive system diseases.11
 
Various genetic associations with COVID-19 outcomes have been explored.12 13 14 15 A whole-genome sequencing study of germline mutations revealed a cluster of six genes (SLC6A20, CCR9, FYCO1, CXCR6, XCR1, and LZTFL1) that increased susceptibility to severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure.16 In a Chinese population, a whole-genome sequencing study of 332 patients with COVID-19 identified loci in the genes TMEM189 and UBE2V1 with potential genome-wide implications through the IL-1 signalling pathway.17 In an intensive care unit cohort of 15 patients with severe COVID-19, analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data from blood samples showed that the immune-modulating genes PD-L1 and PD-L2 were differentially expressed among patients with fatal outcomes.18
 
Thus far, studies of gene expression at initial sites of infection in patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 remain limited. To investigate COVID-19 from a genetic perspective, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis of respiratory tract samples from patients with COVID-19; we sought to identify genes associated with disease severity.
 
Methods
Patients
Twenty-four patients were recruited from Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong between 7 February and 10 April 2020. All patients had severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, confirmed by two independent real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction assays targeting the N gene.19 Symptoms on admission were recorded, and medical histories were collected from clinical health records. Among the recruited patients, eight who received mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were regarded as severe cases; the remaining 16 patients showed asymptomatic or mild (no pneumonia) to moderate (pneumonia but not requiring oxygen supplementation) disease and were regarded as non-severe cases. RNA sequencing was performed on upper and lower respiratory swab samples collected within 3 days after hospitalisation.
 
RNA sequencing data
Total RNA was extracted from respiratory swab samples using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), pre-treated with DNase I and depleted of human rRNA and globin genes using the QIAseq FastSelect ribosomal RNA and globin mRNA Removal Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Illumina libraries for RNA-Seq next-generation sequencing were prepared using the KAPA HyperPrep Kit (Roche, Pleasanton [CA], US) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, then sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 system (Illumina, San Diego [CA], US) using 150 bp paired-end reads. The raw data consisted of 58 735 Ensembl-annotated20 genes. Quality control was performed to remove patients with low numbers of RNA-Seq reads (three samples) and genes with zero reads in >20% of samples (55 571 genes). Thus, 3164 genes remained available for differential expression analysis. Raw read count data were summarised as fragments per million reads mapped21 and then log2-transformed.
 
Statistical analysis
Logistic regression was utilised to identify genes associated with severity outcomes. Subsequent evaluations by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test were performed to test for differences in gene expression between groups. The Bonferroni corrected significance threshold was 1.58 × 10-5.
 
Functional analysis of genes
According to their disease relevance in the GeneCards21 22 and MalaCards23 24 databases, genes were categorised into the following 10 disease groups: nervous system, integumentary system, circulatory system, urinary system, digestive system, respiratory system, musculoskeletal system, endocrine system, reproductive system, and infectious diseases.
 
Results
Demographics and baseline characteristics
The patients’ demographics and baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1. The mean age of patients in the severe group was 62.13 years (95% confidence interval [CI]=53.34-70.91), which was significantly higher than that in the non-severe group (29.73 years; 95% CI=22.11-37.36). Compared with the non-severe group, the severe group had higher prevalences of complications including cardiovascular, liver, endocrine, and metabolic disorders, as well as higher rates of respiratory, fever, and diarrhoea symptoms. The COVID-19 World Health Organization score25 was significantly higher in the severe group than in the non-severe group. Lopinavir, antibiotics, conventional oxygen therapy, and mechanical ventilation were more commonly used for treatment in the severe group than in the non-severe group (Table 1).
 

Table 1. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of patients with severe and non-severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
 
Differentially expressed genes according to RNA sequencing
Six genes, namely RPL15, BACE1-AS, CEPT1, EIF4G1, TMEM91, and TBCK, were differentially expressed between the severe and non-severe groups (all P values <0.05 in both logistic regression and the KS test) [Table 2]. Fold-change and odds ratio results indicated that these genes were consistently highly expressed in the severe group. The complete list of genes with P values <0.05 in KS test is provided in online supplementary Table 1.
 

Table 2. Differentially expressed genes between patients with severe and non-severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 according to RNA sequencing analysis
 
Gene ontology and enrichment analysis
The functions of the identified genes were summarised through database and literature searches. Two genes, 60S ribosomal protein L15 (RPL15) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 (EIF4G1), play roles in host translation of viral mRNA.26 27 28 Furthermore, the top genes were mainly involved in neurological disorders. RPL15 is involved in the life cycle of human immunodeficiency virus,29 30 and baculovirus infection reportedly disrupts the expression of this gene.31 32 EIF4G1 plays a role in viral binding and affects the pathogenicity and virulence of H5N1 influenza A virus, foot-and-mouth disease virus, and vaccinia virus33 34 35; it also contains multiple mutations among patients with familial Parkinson’s disease.36 TBCK encodes a conserved protein kinase that regulates cell size and proliferation.37 CEPT1 encodes choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase, which is used in the synthesis of choline- or ethanolamine-containing phospholipids. The function of TMEM91, a transmembrane protein, is unclear; however, the results of genome-wide association studies suggest that loci containing this gene are involved in lung diseases.
 
The non-coding gene BACE1-AS regulates the stability of the BACE1 protein and directly increases the abundance of amyloid beta-peptide (Aβ1-42) in Alzheimer’s disease.38 The implications of this gene in severe COVID-19 are unclear. For the top 15 overexpressed genes (P values in KS test <0.05), disease relevance data were retrieved from GeneCards22; 14 of the 15 genes (93.3%) have been linked to neurological diseases, followed by eye (80.0%) and psychiatric (73.3%) diseases. Thus, all of the top genes were involved in nervous system disorders (Fig).
 

Figure. Frequency of diseases related to the top identified genes (n=15)
 
Discussion
Nervous system disorders such as encephalopathy, impaired consciousness, seizure, ataxia, neuropathies, neurodegenerative diseases, and anosmia have been extensively documented in patients with COVID-19.39 40 41 The two major potential pathogenesis pathways are direct viral invasion and immune-mediated injury. Direct viral entry to the central nervous system can travel through hematogenous or olfactory routes, or by transneuronal spread from the lungs.42 Post-mortem analysis of brain tissue from patients with COVID-19 encephalitis reportedly contained SARS-CoV-2 viral particles.43 44 Furthermore, a series of autopsy studies showed that localised inflammation of the brainstem nuclei, as well as the cytokine storm associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, could disrupt the blood–brain barrier and cause necrosis in the brains of patients with severe COVID-19.45 46 In patients with COVID-19, anosmia may be caused by an inflammation-mediated decrease in odorant receptor expression.47 Several studies have utilised RNA-Seq to characterise the transcriptomic profiles of patients with COVID-19.48 49 Significant downregulation of genes related to the hypoxia-inducible factor system was observed during periods of infection and oxygen deprivation.50 Additionally, transcriptomic profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed that patients with COVID-19 shared several dysregulated genes with individuals who had bipolar illness, post-traumatic stress disorder, or schizophrenia.51 The present findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with differential expression of genes involved in nervous system disorders. Future studies that involve gene expression profiling with larger sample sizes, in vitro infection experiments, and animal models can help to elucidate the mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic approaches for neurological complications of COVID-19.
 
Limitations
A major limitation of this study was its small sample size. Patient age distributions considerably differed between groups. However, age-stratified analysis showed effects consistent with the directions reported in Table 2, although the statistical significance was hindered by the small sample size (online supplementary Table 2 and online supplementary Fig). Further sequencing of samples collected from respiratory tract sites may provide stronger evidence of protein expression abnormalities at the initial site of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
 
Conclusion
In this study, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis to identify differentially expressed genes between patients with severe and non-severe cases of COVID-19. We observed overexpression of genes involved in cell proliferation, viral binding and replication, and neurological and lung diseases, suggesting a pathophysiological mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 induces lung inflammation and neurological complications.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: BCY Zee, PKS Chan, MH Wang.
Acquisition of data: Z Chen, PKS Chan.
Analysis or interpretation of data: Q Li, Z Chen, Y Zhang, RWY Chan, MKC Chong, PKS Chan, G Lui, L Ling.
Drafting of the manuscript: Q Li, MH Wang.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Q Li, Y Zhang, MH Wang.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
BCY Zee is a shareholder of Health View Bioanalytic Limited. As a statistical adviser of the journal, MKC Chong was not involved in the peer review process. MH Wang is a shareholder of Beth Bioinformatics Co, Ltd. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research was partially supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund of the former Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government (Ref Nos.: COVID190103, COVID190112 and INF-CUHK-1), The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) Project Impact Enhancement Fund (Ref No.: CUPIEF/Ph2/COVID/06) and CUHK Direct Grant (Ref No.: 2020.025). The funders had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
The study protocol of this research was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref No.: 2020.076). All patients provided written informed consent for participation in this research.
 
Supplementary material
The supplementary material was provided by the authors and some information may not have been peer reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by the Hong Kong Academy of Medicine and the Hong Kong Medical Association. The Hong Kong Academy of Medicine and the Hong Kong Medical Association disclaim all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content.
 
References
1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 global data. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/WHO-COVID-19-global-data.csv. Accessed 22 Apr 2022.
2. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323:1239-42. Crossref
3. Gusev EI, Martynov MY, Boyko AN, et al. The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) and nervous system involvement: mechanisms of neurological disorders, clinical manifestations, and the organization of neurological care. Neurosci Behav Physiol 2021;51:147-54. Crossref
4. Kubota T, Kuroda N. Exacerbation of neurological symptoms and COVID-19 severity in patients with preexisting neurological disorders and COVID-19: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021;200:106349. Crossref
5. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-62. Crossref
6. Li X, Xu S, Yu M, et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;146:110-8. Crossref
7. Chen R, Liang W, Jiang M, et al. Risk factors of fatal outcome in hospitalized subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 from a nationwide analysis in China. Chest 2020;158:97-105. Crossref
8. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 2020;369:m1985. Crossref
9. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA 2020;323:2052-9. Crossref
10. Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int 2020;97:829-38. Crossref
11. Mao R, Qiu Y, He JS, et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:667-78. Crossref
12. Pairo-Castineira E, Clohisey S, Klaric L, et al. Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19. Nature 2021;591:92-8. Crossref
13. COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative. The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, a global initiative to elucidate the role of host genetic factors in susceptibility and severity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic. Eur J Hum Genet 2020;28:715-8. Crossref
14. Anastassopoulou C, Gkizarioti Z, Patrinos GP, Tsakris A. Human genetic factors associated with susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity. Human Genomics 2020;14:40. Crossref
15. Kousathanas A, Pairo-Castineira E, Rawlik K, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19. Nature 2022;607:97-103. Crossref
16. Severe Covid-19 GWAS Group; Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, et al. Genomewide association study of severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1522-34. Crossref
17. Wang F, Huang S, Gao R, et al. Initial whole-genome sequencing and analysis of the host genetic contribution to COVID-19 severity and susceptibility. Cell Discov 2020;6:83. Crossref
18. Fredericks AM, Jentzsch MS, Cioffi WG, et al. Deep RNA sequencing of intensive care unit patients with COVID-19. Sci Rep 2022;12:15755. Crossref
19. Lui G, Ling L, Lai CK, et al. Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 across a spectrum of disease severity in COVID-19. J Infect 2020;81:318-56. Crossref
20. Howe KL, Achuthan P, Allen J, et al. Ensembl 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;49:D884-91. Crossref
21. Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, et al. The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2016;54:1.30.1-33. Crossref
22. GeneCards. Available from: www.genecards.org. Accessed 15 Jan 2024.
23. Rappaport N, Twik M, Plaschkes I, et al. MalaCards: an amalgamated human disease compendium with diverse clinical and genetic annotation and structured search. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D877-87. Crossref
24. MalaCards. Available from: www.malacards.org. Accessed 15 Jan 2024.
25. WHO Working Group on the Clinical Characterisation and Management of COVID-19 infection. A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:e192-7. Crossref
26. Ulyanova V, Shah Mahmud R, Laikov A, et al. Anti-influenza activity of the ribonuclease binase: cellular targets detected by quantitative proteomics. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:8294. Crossref
27. Hanson P, Zhang HM, Hemida MG, Ye X, Qiu Y, Yang D. IRES-dependent translational control during virus-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis. Front Microbiol 2012;3:92. Crossref
28. Miller MD, Farnet CM, Bushman FD. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes: studies of organization and composition. J Virol 1997;71:5382-90. Crossref
29. Frankel AD, Young JA. HIV-1: fifteen proteins and an RNA. Annu Rev Biochem 1998;67:1-25. Crossref
30. Kash JC, Goodman AG, Korth MJ, Katze MG. Hijacking of the host-cell response and translational control during influenza virus infection. Virus Res 2006;119:111-20. Crossref
31. van Oers MM, Doitsidou M, Thomas AA, de Maagd RA, Vlak JM. Translation of both 5’ TOP and non-TOP host mRNAs continues into the late phase of Baculovirus infection. Insect Mol Biol 2003;12:75-84. Crossref
32. Zhou H, Zhu J, Tu J, et al. Effect on virulence and pathogenicity of H5N1 influenza A virus through truncations of NS1 eIF4GI binding domain. J Infect Dis 2010;202:1338-46. Crossref
33. Foeger N, Kuehnel E, Cencic R, Skern T. The binding of foot-and-mouth disease virus leader proteinase to eIF4GI involves conserved ionic interactions. FEBS J 2005;272:2602-11. Crossref
34. Zaborowska I, Kellner K, Henry M, Meleady P, Walsh D. Recruitment of host translation initiation factor eIF4G by the Vaccinia Virus ssDNA-binding protein I3. Virology 2012;425:11-22. Crossref
35. Chartier-Harlin MC, Dachsel JC, Vilariño-Güell C, et al. Translation initiator EIF4G1 mutations in familial Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet 2011;89:398-406. Crossref
36. Bhoj EJ, Li D, Harr M, et al. Mutations in TBCK, encoding TBC1-domain-containing kinase, lead to a recognizable syndrome of intellectual disability and hypotonia. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:782-8. Crossref
37. Chong JX, Caputo V, Phelps IG, et al. Recessive inactivating mutations in TBCK, encoding a Rab GTPase-activating protein, cause severe infantile syndromic encephalopathy. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:772-81. Crossref
38. Khatoon F, Prasad K, Kumar V. COVID-19 associated nervous system manifestations. Sleep Med 2022;91:231-6. Crossref
39. Butowt R, von Bartheld CS. Anosmia in COVID-19: underlying mechanisms and assessment of an olfactory route to brain infection. Neuroscientist 2021;27:582-603. Crossref
40. Ye M, Ren Y, Lv T. Encephalitis as a clinical manifestation of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun 2020;88:945-6. Crossref
41. Johansson A, Mohamed MS, Moulin TC, Schiöth HB. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a comprehensive literature review and discussion of mechanisms. J Neuroimmunol 2021;358:577658. Crossref
42. Paniz-Mondolfi A, Bryce C, Grimes Z, et al. Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). J Med Virol 2020;92:699-702. Crossref
43. Moriguchi T, Harii N, Goto J, et al. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-coronavirus-2. Int J Infect Dis 2020;94:55-8. Crossref
44. von Weyhern CH, Kaufmann I, Neff F, Kremer M. Early evidence of pronounced brain involvement in fatal COVID-19 outcomes. Lancet 2020;395:e109. Crossref
45. Virhammar J, Kumlien E, Fällmar D, et al. Acute necrotizing encephalopathy with SARS-CoV-2 RNA confirmed in cerebrospinal fluid. Neurology 2020;95:445-9. Crossref
46. Radmanesh A, Derman A, Ishida K. COVID-19–associated delayed posthypoxic necrotizing leukoencephalopathy. J Neurol Sci 2020;415:116945. Crossref
47. Daamen AR, Bachali P, Owen KA, et al. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of COVID-19 blood, lung, and airway. Sci Rep 2021;11:7052. Crossref
48. Xiong Y, Liu Y, Cao L, et al. Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020;9:761-70. Crossref
49. Gagliardi S, Poloni ET, Pandini C, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome and whole transcriptome sequencing in frontal cortex of COVID-19 patients. Brain Behav Immun 2021;97:13-21. Crossref
50. Moni MA, Lin PI, Quinn JM, Eapen V. COVID-19 patient transcriptomic and genomic profiling reveals comorbidity interactions with psychiatric disorders. Transl Psychiatry 2021;11:160. Crossref
51. MAQC Consortium; Shi L, Reid LH, et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:1151-61. Crossref

COVID-19 vaccination and transmission patterns among pregnant and postnatal women during the fifth wave of COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong

Hong Kong Med J 2024 Feb;30(1):16–24 | Epub 16 Jan 2024
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj2210249
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
COVID-19 vaccination and transmission patterns among pregnant and postnatal women during the fifth wave of COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong
PW Hui, MD, FRCOG; LM Yeung, BNur, MPH; Jennifer KY Ko, MB, BS, MRCOG; Theodora HT Lai, MB, BS, MRCOG; Diana MK Chan, MB, BS, MRCOG; Dorothy TY Chan, MB, BS; Sophia YK Mok, MB, BS, MRCOG; Kitty KW Ma, MB, BS; Pamela SY Kwok, BNur, MSM, Polly WC Pang, BN; Mimi TY Seto, MB, BS, MRCOG
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr PW Hui (apwhui@hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Vaccination is a key strategy to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Safety concerns strongly influence vaccine hesitancy. Disease transmission during pregnancy could exacerbate risks of preterm birth and perinatal mortality. This study examined patterns of vaccination and transmission among pregnant and postnatal women during the fifth wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: The Antenatal Record System and Clinical Management System of the Hospital Authority was used to retrieve information concerning the demographic characteristics, vaccination history, COVID-19 status, and obstetric outcomes of women who were booked for delivery at Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong and had attended the booking antenatal visit from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022.
 
Results: Among 2396 women in the cohort, 2006 (83.7%), 1843 (76.9%), and 831 (34.7%) had received the first, second, and third doses of COVID-19 vaccine, respectively. Among 1012 women who had received the second dose, 684 (67.6%) women were overdue for their third dose. There were 265 (11.1%) reported COVID-19 cases. Women aged 20 to 29 years had a low vaccination rate but the highest disease rate (19.1%). The disease rate was more than tenfold higher in women who had no (20.3%) or incomplete (18.8%) vaccination, compared with women who had complete vaccination (2.1%; P<0.001).
 
Conclusion: Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination was low in pregnant women. Urgent measures are needed to promote vaccination among pregnant women before the next wave of COVID-19.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • As of 30 June 2022, only 34.7% of women in Hong Kong had received three doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine.
  • Two-thirds women scheduled for a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine did not receive the booster dose during pregnancy.
  • The disease rate was almost ten times higher in women who had no or incomplete vaccination, compared with women who had complete vaccination.
  • Women aged 20 to 29 years had a low vaccination rate but the highest disease rate.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Pregnant women should receive education concerning the importance and safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
  • Delayed receipt of booster doses increase susceptibility to COVID-19 during future waves.
  • A comprehensive programme incorporating pertussis and COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women should be considered.
 
 
Introduction
Vaccination is an effective tool to combat the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Two types of COVID-19 vaccines are used in Hong Kong: the Sinovac-CoronaVac inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine (Sinovac Biotech Ltd, Beijing, China) and Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 (Pfizer Inc, Philadelphia [PA], United States) messenger RNA vaccine began distribution on 26 February 2021 and 10 March 2021, respectively.
 
According to the World Health Organization, vaccine hesitancy is defined as delaying or refusing vaccination despite the availability of vaccination services.1 In a study conducted during the third wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong, the overall vaccine acceptance rate was approximately 37%.2 Although the subsequent acceptance rate has varied with pandemic progression, confidence in COVID-19 vaccines has remained a key factor in reducing vaccine hesitancy.3
 
Pregnant women were generally excluded from clinical trials focusing on the development, safety, and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.4 When COVID-19 vaccines were introduced in Hong Kong, routine vaccination was not recommended for women who were pregnant or breastfeeding, except when there was a high risk of exposure or complications.5 The relative lack of data may have contributed to vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women.6 7 8 Based on data concerning the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing serious illness,9 COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, planning to become pregnant, or may become pregnant in the future.10 11
 
On 23 April 2021, the Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (HKCOG) issued an interim recommendation that pregnant women receive the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine at the same time as the general population.12 On 18 February 2022, the Sinovac vaccine was also recommended for use in pregnant women.12 Furthermore, the recommended interval between the second and third doses of COVID-19 vaccine was shortened from 180 days to 90 days, beginning on 4 March 2022. The vaccine pass policy for entry to specific premises was tightened on 31 May 2022.13 For persons who were over 18 years old and had no history of infection, a minimal of two doses of vaccination was required. A third dose was required if the second dose was taken over 6 months ago. Starting from 13 June 2022, women attending obstetric clinics were required to provide a negative result proof of a polymerase chain reaction–based nucleic acid test conducted with specimen collected within 48 hours before the visit if they did not fulfil the vaccine pass requirement.14
 
The fifth wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong has resulted in an overwhelming number of COVID-19 cases. Pregnant women are not automatically protected from COVID-19; indeed, their vaccine hesitancy and low vaccination rate may lead to greater susceptibility. Information concerning the patterns of COVID-19 vaccination and disease transmission among pregnant women in Hong Kong is unavailable. This study examined patterns of vaccination and transmission among pregnant women who were booked for delivery at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong, with the goal of providing insights into maternal disease characteristics.
 
Methods
This retrospective review included women who were booked for delivery at Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong and had attended the booking antenatal visit from 1 July 2021 to 31 March 2022. Information concerning COVID-19 vaccination history was retrieved from the Clinical Management System of the Hospital Authority, which captured COVID-19 vaccination data from the Department of Health.
 
Pregnant women were diagnosed with COVID-19 because of symptoms or (in the absence of symptoms) during admission screening. Women diagnosed with COVID-19 through other channels were able to reschedule their appointments. Phone consultations were provided by the obstetric team at Queen Mary Hospital. The clinical details of COVID-19 cases were documented in the computerised Antenatal Record System. Additionally, antenatal progress notes were updated if a pregnant woman reported a history of COVID-19 during a follow-up visit. Data regarding demographic characteristics, COVID-19 status, and obstetric outcomes were retrieved from the Antenatal Record System.
 
The vaccinated group comprised women who received at least one dose of any type of COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccination periods were classified as pre-pregnancy, antenatal, and postnatal for women with a known date of delivery, miscarriage, or termination of pregnancy as of 30 June 2022. For women with ongoing pregnancies and unknown obstetric outcomes, the vaccination period was estimated according to the expected date of delivery. Antenatal status was regarded as known ongoing pregnancy before 42 weeks of gestation. A vaccination episode was defined as any episode of COVID-19 vaccination including the first, second, and third doses. The number of days elapsed since vaccination was defined as the interval between the last dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 30 June 2022 for women who had received one or two doses of vaccine. Complete vaccination was regarded as the period between 15 and 90 days after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine, or 14 days after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine for women who had never been diagnosed with COVID-19. For women with COVID-19, the date of diagnosis was regarded as the reference point when determining vaccination status.
 
Descriptive statistics were reported. Vaccination rates were calculated according to age-group. Background demographic characteristics were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Student’s t test, analysis of variance, and the Chi squared test were used as appropriate. Regression analyses were conducted to identify factors affecting vaccine acceptance. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Windows version 26; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States).
 
Results
Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of 2396 pregnant women who had attended the booking antenatal visit between 1 July 2021 and 31 March 2022. As of 30 June 2022, 2006 (83.7%), 1843 (76.9%), and 831 (34.7%) women had received the first, second, and third doses of COVID-19 vaccine, respectively. Among the 1843 women who had received two doses of vaccine, 1056 (57.3%) underwent vaccination before pregnancy (Fig 1). Of these 1843 women, 831 received a third dose; the median interval between the second and third doses was 280 days (interquartile range, 239-308). Of the remaining 1012 women who had received only two doses of vaccine, 684 (67.6%) and 504 (49.8%) had already passed the 90-day and 180-day intervals, respectively. Their median number of days elapsed since the last vaccine was 315 (interquartile range, 145-368), which considerably exceeded the recommended 90-day interval.
 

Table 1. Background characteristics of women who received antenatal care between 1 July 2021 and 31 March 2022
 

Figure 1. Pattern of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination episodes according to timing of vaccination
 
Only 26.6% (1243/4680) of vaccination episodes occurred during pregnancy. Among women who underwent antenatal vaccination, 65.7% (817/1243) had it during the fifth wave of COVID-19 between January 2022 and June 2022; 65.7% (537/817) of these women received the third dose. The two peaks of vaccination for third dose were observed in early March 2022 and late May 2022 (Fig 2).
 

Figure 2. Vaccination episodes during the fifth wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
 
The vaccination rate was the lowest among Chinese women (81.4%), but the highest among Caucasian women (96.4%) [Fig 3]. Multivariate analysis showed that active working status (odds ratio [OR]=1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.47-2.56) was significantly associated with a higher COVID-19 vaccination rate, whereas Chinese ethnicity (OR=0.21; 95% CI=0.13-0.33) and women with obstetric complications (OR=0.72; 95% CI=0.55-0.94) were significantly associated with a lower COVID-19 vaccination rate.
 

Figure 3. Percentages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and disease transmission among pregnant women by ethnicity
 
In total, there were 265 (11.1%) COVID-19 cases in this cohort; the earliest diagnosis was made on 1 January 2022 during the fifth wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong (Table 2). The disease rate was more than tenfold higher in women who had no (20.3%) or incomplete (18.8%) vaccination, compared with women who had complete vaccination (2.1%; P<0.001). After exclusion of pregnancies among women aged ≤19 years, there was an insignificant trend of lower vaccination among young women (ie, aged 20-29 years), but their disease rate was the highest (19.1%) [Fig 4].
 

Table 2. Vaccination background and pregnancy outcome among pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
 

Figure 4. Percentages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and disease transmission among pregnant women by age
 
Among 237 (89.4%) women who had an antenatal diagnosis of COVID-19, 42 (17.7%) required admission for monitoring and 26 (11.0%) delivered in an isolation facility. No women required intensive care or oxygen support. There were no adverse maternal outcomes or cases of vertical transmission.
 
Discussion
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination
To our knowledge, this is the first report of the low COVID-19 vaccination rate (83.7%) among pregnant women in Hong Kong. This rate is considerably lower than the single-dose rate among the general public (92.7%) that was reported on the government’s vaccination dashboard on the final day of the study period (ie, 30 June 2022).15 Furthermore, the disease rate was more than threefold higher in women who had no or incomplete vaccination, compared with women who had complete vaccination.
 
Pregnant women are considered a vulnerable group. The substantial increase in the disease rate, combined with a lower vaccination rate, among women aged 20 to 29 years is particularly concerning. A case of COVID-19 during pregnancy can lead to adverse obstetric outcomes, including increased risks of preterm delivery, growth restriction, and stillbirth.16 In addition to the effectiveness of vaccination in terms of reducing severe complications, the transplacental transfer of immunoglobulins after maternal vaccination might provide infants with protection against COVID-19.10 16 17 18
 
Vaccine hesitancy
Vaccine hesitancy is a potential public health problem.19 The five psychological antecedents of vaccination are confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility.20 21 Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination has varied among countries, with the highest rates reported in India, the Philippines, and Latin America.22 In the present study, Chinese women had a lower vaccination rate, compared with their non-Chinese counterparts.
 
The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a decrease in vaccine hesitancy.23 In May 2021, a systemic review showed that an estimated 47% of pregnant women worldwide intended to undergo COVID-19 vaccination.24
 
Communities generally become more complacent when the number of disease cases is low, suggesting that the perceived risk of disease transmission is minimal. This phenomenon was evident in Hong Kong across several waves of COVID-19 transmission.15 The vaccination rate increased during the fifth wave of COVID-19 when there was an exponential surge in the number of disease cases. A similar pattern was observed in the present study, such that two-thirds of the antenatal vaccination episodes occurred during the fifth wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong.
 
Despite this relative surge in vaccination, around two-thirds of women eligible for the third dose did not receive it during pregnancy. This delay poses a major threat because the protective effect of the previous two doses may have dissipated. Importantly, although the rate of vaccination was higher in the antenatal group than the postnatal group, most women in the antenatal group had undergone vaccination before pregnancy. Thus, they may have a higher risk of serious adverse effects from COVID-19 if they become ill in the peripartum period. After exclusion of the small number of pregnant women aged ≤19 years, vaccination rates were consistently low among pregnant women of all ages. Pregnant women may have a higher risk of disease transmission in future waves of COVID-19; at the end of the present study, only one-third of pregnant women in this cohort had received three doses of vaccine.
 
Lack of confidence has been identified as the main factor consistently associated with lower COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.3 The implementation of the stringent vaccine pass policy had driven another peak of vaccination in late May 2022. However, nearly half of the women who had received two doses of vaccine were indeed overdue for the third dose, and hence did not fulfil the vaccine pass for entrance to specific premises or could not attend obstetric clinics without undergoing nucleic acid testing. This group of vaccine had received COVID-19 vaccine before but had it mostly before pregnancy. Pregnancy could represent the key hindrance for their vaccination in the antenatal period. Government policy might not be adequate enough for promoting vaccination in pregnant women. Concern about possible harmful side-effects was the top reason for reluctance; confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy was the main predictor of acceptance, particularly in the pregnant population.8 22 In a Japanese cohort, concerns about potential effects on the fetus and breastfeeding were the main reasons for low COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.25 These findings highlight the need to distribute correct information and provide sufficient education to address concerns among women of reproductive age. In particular, antenatal women should receive additional information concerning vaccine safety during pregnancy.
 
Vaccination promotion
A study in Hong Kong showed that recommendations from the government constituted the strongest factor driving COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.2 Education about the safety and benefit of vaccination is also important.7 Webinars would be useful in efforts to educate the general public. Within the hospital setting, vaccination teams comprising obstetricians and midwives could allay concerns and dispel myths about vaccination among working staff at all levels; this approach could provide useful information for pregnant and breastfeeding women. There is also a need to combat physician hesitancy in recommending COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women.26 To address this need, the HKCOG revised its recommendations on 3 March 2022 to indicate that women who are planning to become pregnant, are pregnant, or are breastfeeding should undergo COVID-19 vaccination along with the general population.12 A corresponding educational video to promote COVID-19 vaccination was made available on 5 March 2022.12
 
Possible interventions to promote vaccination in Hong Kong include the provision of vaccines at convenient venues and the involvement of healthcare professionals in information dissemination.27 During the fifth wave of COVID-19, pregnant women were proactively asked to consider COVID-19 vaccination when they attended obstetric clinics. Leaflets were distributed with information about the HKCOG recommendations, as well as community vaccination sites. The establishment of a pathway specifically for pregnant women, which reduced their waiting time in vaccine clinics, also helped to increase the vaccination rate. Moreover, vaccination was provided to women in the maternity wards of some hospitals and women attending antenatal clinics in Maternal and Child Health Centres. All of these measures helped reduce vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women.28
 
In Hong Kong, a pertussis vaccination programme for pregnant women was launched on 2 July 2020.29 The programme was incorporated into antenatal care, such that all pregnant women received counselling concerning the rationale for vaccination; the vaccine was administered during obstetric follow-up. To facilitate vaccine availability in our hospital, all women were asked to indicate their preference concerning pertussis vaccination during the first antenatal visit. It may be useful to incorporate COVID-19 vaccination into the maternal immunisation programme.
 
Strengths
This study had some notable strengths. The results of the present large cohort study provide clinicians and policymakers with key insights concerning the COVID-19 vaccination rate among pregnant women in Hong Kong. The study period was designed to include both antenatal and postnatal periods for a better understanding of vaccination behaviour among women in each period. A real-time collection method was adopted to capture COVID-19 vaccination records from the Clinical Management System, thereby ensuring data reliability.
 
Limitations
Nevertheless, this study had some limitations. A small number of women who underwent COVID-19 vaccination outside Hong Kong were not automatically identified in the system; however, they were included in the cohort if their vaccination history had been documented in antenatal records. Because rapid antigen self-tests were acceptable for diagnosis in Hong Kong beginning on 26 February 2022, the number of recorded COVID-19 cases in our cohort might have been lower than the actual number of cases if patients did not report positive COVID-19 test results to our department. Finally, this study did not explore whether the generally more cautious approach of pregnant women, in terms of avoiding all types of diseases, might contribute to a lower disease rate compared with the general public.
 
Conclusion
The rate of COVID-19 vaccination was low among pregnant and postnatal women in Hong Kong in early 2022. Pregnant women had a high risk of disease transmission because many of them had not received the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Urgent measures are needed to promote vaccination among pregnant women before future waves of COVID-19. In particular, women should receive information concerning vaccine safety to avoid unnecessary delays related to pregnancy.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: PW Hui, DTY Chan.
Acquisition of data: All authors.
Analysis or interpretation of data: PW Hui.
Drafting of the manuscript: PW Hui, LM Yeung, JKY Ko, THT Lai, MTY Seto.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr TW Chay, Dr YF Chiu, Ms WK Choi, Dr TY Hui, Dr KH Lam, Dr KS Lee, Dr YH Luk, Dr SK Ma, Dr HS Wang, Dr CCY Wong, Dr CL Wong, Dr LC Wong, and Dr CWK Yan of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital for their contributions to research data retrieval and entry.
 
Declaration
The abstract has been presented online in the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists World Congress 2023 (14 June 2013, London, United Kingdom).
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref No.: UW 22-205). Informed patient consent has been waived by the Board due to the retrospective nature of the research.
 
References
1. MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine 2015;33:4161-4. Crossref
2. Wong MC, Wong EL, Huang J, et al. Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the health belief model: a population-based survey in Hong Kong. Vaccine 2021;39:1148-56. Crossref
3. Xiao J, Cheung JK, Wu P, Ni MY, Cowling BJ, Liao Q. Temporal changes in factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among adults in Hong Kong: serial cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022;23:100441. Crossref
4. Beigi RH, Krubiner C, Jamieson DJ, et al. The need for inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 vaccine trials. Vaccine 2021;39:868-70. Crossref
5. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Zoonotic Disease and Scientific Committee on Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong SAR Government. Consensus interim recommendations on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in Hong Kong (as of Jan 7, 2021). Available from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/consensus_interim_recommendations_on_the_use_of_covid19_vaccines_inhk.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2022.
6. Tao L, Wang R, Han N, et al. Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine and associated factors among pregnant women in China: a multi-center cross-sectional study based on health belief model. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021;17:2378-88. Crossref
7. Sznajder KK, Kjerulff KH, Wang M, Hwang W, Ramirez SI, Gandhi CK. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and associated factors among pregnant women in Pennsylvania 2020. Prev Med Rep 2022;26:101713. Crossref
8. Sutton D, D’Alton M, Zhang Y, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant, breastfeeding, and nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021;3:100403. Crossref
9. Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. Preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2273-82. Crossref
10. Halasa NB, Olson SM, Staat MA, et al. Effectiveness of maternal vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy against COVID-19–associated hospitalization in infants aged <6 months—17 states, July 2021–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:264-70. Crossref
11. Girardi G, Bremer AA. Scientific evidence supporting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine efficacy and safety in people planning to conceive or who are pregnant or lactating. Obstet Gynecol 2022;139:3-8. Crossref
12. The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists advice on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant and lactating women (interim; updated on 3rd March 2022). 2022. Available from: http://www.hkcog.org.hk/hkcog/Upload/EditorImage/20220304/20220304134806_9035.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2022.
13. Hong Kong SAR Government. FEHD reminds catering premises operators and customers to observe requirements on third stage of Vaccine Pass. 2022. Available from: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202205/30/P2022053000726.htm?fontSize=1. Accessed 30 May 2022.
14. Hong Kong SAR Government. Government to implement Vaccine Pass arrangement in designated healthcare premises. 2022. Available from: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202205/21/P2022052100421.htm. Accessed 21 May 2022.
15. Together, We Fight the Virus. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available from: https://www.coronavirus.gov.hk/eng/index.html. Accessed 30 Jun 2022.
16. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020;370:m3320. Crossref
17. Male V. SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol 2022;22:277-82. Crossref
18. Nir O, Schwartz A, Toussia-Cohen S, et al. Maternal-neonatal transfer of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies among parturient women treated with BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022;4:100492. Crossref
19. Shook LL, Kishkovich TP, Edlow AG. Countering COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy: the “4 Cs”. Am J Perinatol 2022;39:1048-54. Crossref
20. Betsch C, Schmid P, Heinemeier D, Korn L, Holtmann C, Böhm R. Beyond confidence: development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS One 2018;13:e0208601. Crossref
21. Chau CY. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and challenges to mass vaccination. Hong Kong Med J 2021;27:377-9. Crossref
22. Skjefte M, Ngirbabul M, Akeju O, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women and mothers of young children: results of a survey in 16 countries. Eur J Epidemiol 2021;36:197-211. Crossref
23. Gencer H, Özkan S, Vardar O, Serçekuş P. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine decisions in pregnant women. Women Birth 2022;35:317-23. Crossref
24. Shamshirsaz AA, Hessami K, Morain S, et al. Intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2022;39:492-500. Crossref
25. Hosokawa Y, Okawa S, Hori A, et al. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women: an internet-based cross-sectional study in Japan. J Epidemiol 2022;32:188-94. Crossref
26. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Grünebaum A. Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;226:805-12. Crossref
27. Wang K, Wong EL, Cheung AW, et al. Influence of vaccination characteristics on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among working-age people in Hong Kong, China: a discrete choice experiment. Front Public Health 2021;9:793533. Crossref
28. Iacobucci G. COVID-19 and pregnancy: vaccine hesitancy and how to overcome it. BMJ 2021;375:n2862. Crossref
29. Hospital Authority. Public hospital pertussis vaccination programme for pregnant women. Jun 28, 2020. Available from: https://www.ha.org.hk/haho/ho/cc/pertussis_press_release_en.pdf. Accessed 29 Jun 2023.

Non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus

Hong Kong Med J 2024 Feb;30(1):10–5 | Epub 8 Feb 2024
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj2210034
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
Non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus
Kevin KH Kam, MB, ChB, MRCP1; Jeffrey SK Chan, MB, ChB1; Alex PW Lee, MD, FRCP1,2
1 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Laboratory of Cardiac Imaging and 3D Printing, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Prof Alex PW Lee (alexpwlee@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional treatment comprises warfarin-mediated anticoagulation; it is unclear whether non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) exhibit comparable efficacy and safety. Limited data are available for Asian patients. This study compared NOACs with warfarin in terms of clinical efficacy and safety for managing LVT.
 
Methods: Clinical and echocardiographic records were retrieved for all adult patients with echocardiography-confirmed LVT at a major regional centre in Hong Kong from January 2011 to January 2020. Discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was recorded. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving NOACs and those receiving warfarin. Primary outcomes were cumulative mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACEs). Secondary outcomes were complete LVT resolution and percentage reduction in LVT size at 3 months.
 
Results: Forty-three patients were included; 28 received warfarin and 15 received NOACs, with follow-up periods (mean ± standard deviation) of 20 ± 12 months and 22 ± 9 months, respectively (P=0.522). Use of NOACs was associated with significantly lower NACE risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.111, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.012-0.994; P=0.049) and a tendency towards lower cumulative mortality (HR=0.184, 95% CI=0.032-1.059; P=0.058). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Considering LVT resolution, discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was not significantly associated with different outcomes.
 
Conclusion: Non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants may be an efficacious and safe alternative to warfarin for LVT management. Future studies should explore the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation discontinuation by 1 year as an overall strategy.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • In a Hong Kong cohort, non–vitamin K oral anticoagulant users had fewer net adverse clinical events and tended to exhibit lower mortality, compared with warfarin users.
  • Considering left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resolution, discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year may be a safe overall strategy.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants may be an efficacious and safe alternative to warfarin for LVT management.
  • Further studies are needed to explore the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant discontinuation by 1 year as an overall strategy for patients with LVT resolution.
 
 
Introduction
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) primarily occurs in patients who exhibit heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, particularly when these conditions are secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy or myocardial infarction. Recent advances in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia and heart failure have reduced the estimated incidence to 7 cases per 10 000 patients.1 However, this lower incidence does not reduce the importance of identifying and treating LVT; one study has shown very high risks of major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients with LVT.2
 
Although LVT has conventionally been managed with warfarin, multiple guidelines suggest different treatment algorithms based on expert opinion and small-scale studies, reflecting the lack of evidence that underlies such recommendations.3 4 This lack of evidence is partly related to the low incidence of LVT, which hinders adequately powered research with high evidence quality. Considering the growing popularity of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), there has been increasing interest in the use of NOACs as an alternative to warfarin for LVT management.5 A systematic review in 2020, which involved only relevant case series and case reports, concluded that NOACs constitute a ‘reasonable alternative’ to warfarin for LVT management.6 However, another 2020 study of >500 patients showed that NOACs increased the incidence of stroke or systematic embolism compared with warfarin.7 Nonetheless, only thromboembolic events were compared in that study; safety outcomes, specifically bleeding events, were not investigated. Thus, it remains unclear whether NOACs exhibit efficacy and safety similar to warfarin for LVT management. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin for the treatment of LVT.
 
Methods
Patient population
This retrospective cohort study included all patients with LVT diagnosed by echocardiography from January 2011 to January 2020 at our institution, a major tertiary university hospital in Hong Kong. Only patients aged ≥18 years were included. Patients were excluded if baseline echocardiography, pharmacotherapy regimen or clinical records were non-retrievable, or if the type of anticoagulation therapy (warfarin or NOACs) was switched within the first 2 years after LVT diagnosis.
 
At our institution, all patients began anticoagulation therapy upon echocardiography-based diagnosis of LVT. Patients either received warfarin with titration and maintenance of a therapeutic international normalised ratio of 2-3, or they received NOAC therapy. Because there are no specific treatment recommendations in current guidelines, anticoagulant selection was performed at the treating physicians’ discretion, generally considering patient-specific factors such as renal function, presence of other indications, and drug compliance. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 3 months after diagnosis of LVT, and further follow-up echocardiography was performed as clinically indicated. Anticoagulation was only discontinued if LVT had been resolved; this step required a shared, informed decision between the patient and the physician. Anticoagulation discontinuation was not considered for patients with persistent LVT.
 
Outcomes and measurements
All patients were followed up for ≤3 years. Echocardiographic images of all included patients at baseline and the 3-month follow-up were reviewed. The left ventricular ejection fraction, baseline size of LVT, and any resolution of LVT by the 3-month follow-up or the size of residual LVT at the 3-month follow-up were recorded. Clinical records of all patients were reviewed using the Clinical Management System of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority; important pre-morbid conditions, types of anticoagulants used, and pre-specified clinical outcomes were recorded. Any discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was recorded.
 
The primary outcomes were cumulative mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACEs), defined as any of the following: ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, systemic thromboembolism other than cerebral embolism, fatal bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium class 58), and major non-fatal bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium class 38). Secondary outcomes were complete resolution of LVT and percentage reduction of LVT size at the 3-month follow-up. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had discontinued anticoagulation by 1 year and those who continued anticoagulation for >1 year.
 
Statistical analysis
Unless otherwise specified, all continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Pre-morbid conditions and clinical outcomes in the two anticoagulation therapy groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test (for dichotomous variables) or Mann-Whitney U test (for continuous variables); the Mann-Whitney U test was chosen over parametric tests because the sample sizes were unlikely to support an assumption of data normality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to visualise survival status and freedom from NACEs throughout the study period; Cox regression was used to compare mortality and NACE use between the two groups. Cases with missing values were excluded from analysis of the respective variables; no imputation was performed. All P values were two-sided, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Windows version 25.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States).
 
Results
In total, 43 patients (37 men) with LVT were included in this study: 28 received warfarin and 15 received NOACs. No patients were excluded for switching anticoagulant therapy during the first 2 years after LVT diagnosis. Of the patients treated with NOACs, 10 received apixaban, four received dabigatran, and one received rivaroxaban. Their baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1; the two cohorts were generally comparable, except the NOAC cohort included more patients with diabetes mellitus (P=0.001) and atrial fibrillation or flutter (P=0.043). Eleven patients in the warfarin cohort and three patients in the NOAC cohort had non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (P=0.308), including one patient with non-compaction cardiomyopathy and another patient (lost to follow-up after 6 months) with myocarditis. Both of these patients were in the warfarin cohort.
 

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of included patients
 
Three patients (all in the warfarin group) were lost to follow-up: one after 6 months (as noted above), one after 22 months, and one after 26 months. One of these patients had discontinued anticoagulation therapy by 1 year. The warfarin and NOAC cohorts were followed up for mean intervals of 20 ± 12 months (median, 20; interquartile range, 7-33) and 22 ± 9 months (median, 19; interquartile range, 15-31), respectively (P=0.522). All patients were examined by follow-up echocardiography at 3 months after initiation of anticoagulation therapy, except one patient in the warfarin cohort who died 1 month after diagnosis of LVT. In total, 14 deaths were observed in the NOAC (n=2; 13.3%) and warfarin (n=12; 42.9%) cohorts during the study period. Causes of death in the NOAC cohort were cardiovascular (sudden death; n=2); in the warfarin cohort, the causes of death were cardiovascular (n=8), intracerebral haemorrhage (n=3), gastrointestinal haemorrhage (n=1), and malignancy (n=2). Of the 34 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up, nine had discontinued anticoagulation therapy.
 
All primary and secondary outcomes are summarised in Table 2. We observed a significantly lower risk of NACEs in the NOAC cohort (n=1 [6.7%] in the NOAC cohort vs n=13 [46.4%] in the warfarin cohort; hazard ratio [HR]=0.124, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.016-0.952; P=0.045), which remained statistically significant after adjustment for the clinical statuses of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation or flutter (HR=0.111, 95% CI=0.012-0.994; P=0.049) [Fig 1]. There was a tendency towards lower mortality in the NOAC cohort (n=2 [13.3%] in the NOAC cohort vs n=12 [42.9%] in the warfarin cohort; HR=0.285, 95% CI=0.064-1.275; P=0.101 [before adjustment of clinical statuses]), which remained similar after adjustment for the clinical statuses of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation or flutter (HR=0.184, 95% CI=0.032-1.059; P=0.058) [Fig 2]. Numerically lower rates of ischaemic stroke (n=0 [0%] in the NOAC cohort vs n=5 [17.9%] in the warfarin cohort), major non-fatal bleeding (n=0 [0%] in the NOAC cohort vs n=4 [14.3%] in the warfarin cohort), and fatal bleeding (n=1 [6.7%] in the NOAC cohort vs n=4 [14.3%] in the warfarin cohort) were observed among patients receiving NOACs.
 

Table 2. Comparison of outcomes between warfarin and non–vitamin K oral anticoagulant cohorts
 

Fig 1. Kaplan-Meier curve of cumulative freedom from net adverse clinical events (NACEs) during the study period. The hazard ratio was calculated by Cox regression with adjustment for clinical statuses of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation or flutter
 

Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier curve of cumulative survival during the study period. The hazard ratio was calculated by Cox regression with adjustment for clinical statuses of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation or flutter
 
Concerning secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between the two cohorts in LVT resolution (P=0.451) or percentage reduction in LVT size (P=0.390) at the 3-month follow-up.
 
The outcomes of patients whose had or had not discontinued anticoagulation therapy by 1 year are summarised in Table 3. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts.
 

Table 3. Comparison of outcomes between patients with or without anticoagulation discontinuation at 1 year
 
Discussion
In this retrospective cohort study, we explored the use of NOACs as an alternative to warfarin for LVT management in a Hong Kong hospital. Although the sample size was limited, we found that NOAC use was associated with significantly fewer NACEs, with a tendency towards differences in cumulative survival. Additionally, anticoagulation discontinuation by 1-year post-diagnosis was not associated with significantly different clinical outcomes.
 
Our results confirm and extend previous findings concerning similar rates of LVT regression between NOAC and warfarin therapies; moreover, it has been reported that NOAC use is at least non-inferior to warfarin in terms of cumulative survival.2 Importantly, we demonstrated significantly lower rates of NACEs in NOAC users, a key finding that was likely driven by tendencies towards reductions in ischaemic stroke and major non-fatal bleeding. The numerically lower rate of major non-fatal bleeding in NOAC users was consistent with previous findings of lower bleeding risk among patients receiving NOACs compared with patients receiving warfarin.9 10 11 This reduction in bleeding risk is more prominent among Asian individuals than among non-Asian individuals.12 Therefore, it is possible that clinical practice recommendations for Asian individuals should be different from that for non-Asian individuals.
 
A recent study by Abdelnabi et al13 demonstrated significantly more effective resolution of LVT with rivaroxaban. We did not observe such difference, consistent with recent findings by Iqbal et al.14 These discrepancies may be related to differences in imaging intervals: we repeated echocardiography at 3 months and Iqbal et al14 repeated imaging at a mean interval of 233 days, whereas Abdelnabi et al13 repeated imaging at 1 month. Importantly, Abdelnabi et al13 observed converging rates of thrombus resolution by 3 and 6 months after initiation of anticoagulation, when they performed additional imaging. It is thus possible that frequent imaging intervals (more frequent than that recommended by societal guidelines3 4) are required to demonstrate differences in the rate of thrombus resolution. Although the clinical benefits of NOACs in our cohort were mainly driven by a reduction in bleeding events, more rapid thrombus resolution may be relevant in other populations. Further investigation in this area may be warranted.
 
Another recent study by Robinson et al7 revealed significantly higher rates of systemic thromboembolism among patients receiving NOACs, compared with those receiving warfarin. In the present study, systemic embolism was rare, and there were no pronounced numerical differences in the rates of systemic embolism between cohorts. Although this finding may be partly related to our small sample size, ethnic differences in thromboembolic tendencies could also play important roles. It has been observed that Asian individuals are generally less susceptible to thromboembolism than Caucasian and Hispanic individuals,15 consistent with the rarity of systemic thromboembolism in our cohort. These findings may imply that any increase in systemic thromboembolism associated with NOAC use, as detected by Robinson et al,7 is less relevant for Asian patients. Considering this lack of relevance and the reduction in NACEs observed in the present study, NOAC use may be preferrable to warfarin in Asian patients. Further studies with larger cohorts should be conducted to confirm these findings.
 
Additionally, we observed that considering the resolution of LVT, anticoagulation discontinuation by 1 year probably did not lead to significantly different rates of adverse outcomes, despite the numerically higher rate of cerebrovascular accidents. Although Lattuca et al2 showed that anticoagulation for ≥3 months reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, it has been unclear whether anticoagulation can be discontinued after resolution of LVT. Our results, derived from a small cohort, warrant further investigation in larger cohorts.
 
Limitations
There were several limitations in this study. First, the sample size was limited, primarily due to the rarity of LVT—although the study was conducted in a large tertiary hospital, only 43 patients could be included over a 9-year period. Second, various NOACs were used. Nonetheless, subgroup analysis was precluded by the small sample size; the present study design remains valid as a general comparison of vitamin K versus non–vitamin K anticoagulants, especially because all included NOACs are commonly prescribed. Third, more patients in the NOAC cohort had diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation or flutter. Despite these co-morbidities, we found that NOACs remained statistically superior to warfarin for NACEs; we also found a tendency for better cumulative mortality among patients receiving NOACs after adjustment for these two co-morbidities. Thus, our results remain valid in terms of demonstrating the probable superiority of NOACs over warfarin for LVT management in Asian patients.
 
Conclusion
The use of NOACs to treat patients with LVT was associated with significantly fewer NACEs, with a tendency towards lower cumulative mortality. Additionally, anticoagulation discontinuation by 1 year might be safe for patients with LVT resolution. Overall, NOACs may be superior to warfarin for LVT management. Further studies are required to confirm our findings and determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for LVT management.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: KKH Kam, JSK Chan.
Acquisition of data: KKH Kam.
Analysis or interpretation of data: JSK Chan.
Drafting of the manuscript: JSK Chan.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
KKH Kam and JSK Chan have disclosed no conflicts of interest. APW Lee received grants, consulting fees/honoraria, and research support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Pfizer.
 
Declaration
This research was presented as a poster at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2021 (27-30 August 2021, online).
 
Funding/support
This research was supported by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government Health and Medical Research Fund (Grant No.: 05160976). The funder had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
This research was approved by The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref No.: 2020.425). The need for individual patient consent was waived by the Committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.
 
References
1. Lee JM, Park JJ, Jung HW, et al. Left ventricular thrombus and subsequent thromboembolism, comparison of anticoagulation, surgical removal, and antiplatelet agents. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:73-93. Crossref
2. Lattuca B, Bouziri N, Kerneis M, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for patients with left ventricular mural thrombus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:1676-85. Crossref
3. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119-77. Crossref
4. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45:2160-236. Crossref
5. McCarthy CP, Murphy S, Venkateswaran RV, et al. Left ventricular thrombus: contemporary etiologies, treatment strategies, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2007-9. Crossref
6. Kajy M, Shokr M, Ramappa P. Use of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus: systematic review of current literature. Am J Ther 2020;27:e584-90. Crossref
7. Robinson AA, Trankle CR, Eubanks G, et al. Off-label use of direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin for left ventricular thrombi. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:685-92. Crossref
8. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the bleeding academic research consortium. Circulation 2011;123:2736-47. Crossref
9. Adeboyeje G, Sylwestrzak G, Barron JJ, et al. Major bleeding risk during anticoagulation with warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2017;23:968-78. Crossref
10. Chan YH, See LC, Tu HT, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008150.Crossref
11. Patel P, Pandya J, Goldberg M. NOACs vs. warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cureus 2017;9:e1395. Crossref
12. Yamashita Y, Morimoto T, Toyota T, et al. Asian patients versus non-Asian patients in the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants relative to vitamin K antagonist for venous thromboembolism: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2018;166:37-42. Crossref
13. Abdelnabi M, Saleh Y, Fareed A, et al. Comparative study of oral anticoagulation in left ventricular thrombi (No-LVT trial). J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:1590-2. Crossref
14. Iqbal H, Straw S, Craven TP, Stirling K, Wheatcroft SB, Witte KK. Direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonist for the management of left ventricular thrombus. ESC Hear Fail 2020;7:2032-41. Crossref
15. Zakai NA, McClure LA. Racial differences in venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9:1877-82. Crossref

Long-term trends in the incidence and management of shoulder dystocia in a tertiary obstetric unit in Hong Kong

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Dec;29(6):524–31 | Epub 14 Sep 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Long-term trends in the incidence and management of shoulder dystocia in a tertiary obstetric unit in Hong Kong
Eric HL Chan, MB, ChB, MRCOG; SL Lau, MB, ChB, MRCOG; TY Leung, MD, FRCOG
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Prof TY Leung (tyleung@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Because there have been changes in the management of macrosomic pregnancies and shoulder dystocia in the past decade, this study was conducted to compare the incidences of shoulder dystocia and perinatal outcomes between the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019.
 
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary obstetric unit. All cases of shoulder dystocia were identified using the hospital’s electronic database. The incidences, maternal and fetal characteristics, obstetric management methods, and perinatal outcomes were compared between the two study periods.
 
Results: The overall incidence of shoulder dystocia decreased from 0.23% (134/58 326) in 2000-2009 to 0.16% (108/65 683) in 2010-2019 (P=0.009), mainly because of the overall decline in the proportion of babies with macrosomia (from 3.3% to 2.3%; P<0.001). The improved success rates of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre (from 31.3% to 47.2%; P=0.012) and posterior arm extraction (from 52.9% to 92.3%; P=0.042) allowed a greater proportion of affected babies to be delivered within 2 minutes (from 59.0% to 79.6%; P=0.003). These changes led to a significant reduction in the proportion of fetuses with low Apgar scores: <5 at 1 minute of life (from 13.4% to 5.6%; P=0.042) and <7 at 5 minutes of life (from 11.9% to 4.6%; P=0.045).
 
Conclusion: More proactive management of macrosomic pregnancies and enhanced training in the acute management of shoulder dystocia led to significant improvements in shoulder dystocia incidence and perinatal outcomes from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • The incidence of shoulder dystocia decreased from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019, mainly because of a reduction in the proportion of babies with macrosomia.
  • Perinatal outcomes in cases of shoulder dystocia were improved because of enhanced dystocia relief skills and an overall decline in birth weight.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Proactive management in cases of suspected macrosomia (eg, early induction of labour) effectively reduced the incidence of shoulder dystocia.
  • The incidence of shoulder dystocia was significantly greater among cases with birth weight ≥4200 g, which may be a reasonable threshold for considering elective caesarean section.
  • Appropriate training (eg, using SOPHIE course) led to improvements in shoulder dystocia relief skills and better perinatal outcomes.
 
 
Introduction
Shoulder dystocia is an uncommon obstetric emergency with an incidence that reportedly ranging from 0.58% to 0.7%.1 2 3 It can result in severe perinatal morbidities, including brachial plexus palsies, clavicular fractures, humeral fractures, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, and even mortality soon after birth.1 2 3 4 5 6 Considering the unpredictable and complex nature of shoulder dystocia, many professional bodies have established systematic approaches with routine training simulations and algorithms to improve fetal outcomes in such cases.1 2 7 8 9 The most common approach is represented by the HELPERR mnemonic, which consists of a sequence of manoeuvres including the McRoberts’ manoeuvre, suprapubic pressure, rotational methods, posterior arm delivery, all-fours position, and clavicular fracture.7 Although the McRoberts’ manoeuvre and suprapubic pressure are often the preferred initial manoeuvres, their success rates (56.0%) are lower than that of the rotational methods (62.4%) and posterior arm delivery (86.1%).5 6 10 The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) in 20121 and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in 20172 revised their guidelines to indicate that either posterior arm delivery or rotational methods can be used after an unsuccessful attempt of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre. Furthermore, a randomised controlled trial published in 2015 demonstrated that the induction of labour at 38 weeks in macrosomic pregnancies could reduce the risk of shoulder dystocia, compared with expectant management.11 The overall caesarean rate did not increase when using this approach. Accordingly, early induction of labour has become an option in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia.
 
Considering changes in the management of macrosomic pregnancies and shoulder dystocia in the past decade, this study compared the incidences of shoulder dystocia, the maternal and fetal characteristics in such cases, and their obstetric management methods and perinatal outcomes between the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019.
 
Methods
Study design
This retrospective study was conducted in a university tertiary obstetric unit that provided obstetric services in the New Territories East Cluster of Hong Kong. All consecutive cases of shoulder dystocia reported from 2000 to 2019 inclusive were identified using the hospital’s electronic database.12 Shoulder dystocia was objectively defined as the requirement of an ancillary obstetric manoeuvre following failed delivery of the anterior shoulder after downward fetal neck traction or head-to-body delivery interval (HBDI) >1 minute, as described in previous reports.4 5 13 Multiple pregnancies, vaginal breech deliveries, and known stillbirths before labour were excluded. Our unit protocol for the management of shoulder dystocia followed the RCOG Green-top Guidelines for shoulder dystocia that was published in 2005 and updated in 2012.1 Beginning in 2002, hands-on training in shoulder dystocia relief was routinely conducted using the ALSO (Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics) program7; the PROMPT (Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)8 and the SOPHIE (Safe Obstetric Practice for High risk and Emergency)9 training methods were added in 2011, after the publication of our articles regarding shoulder dystocia.4 5 The McRoberts’ manoeuvre with or without suprapubic pressure was usually the first manoeuvre performed, followed by a rotational manoeuvre or posterior arm delivery if the McRoberts’ manoeuvre was unsuccessful. A midwife was designated to document each event, including the personnel involved, usage and duration of manoeuvres, and delivery times of the fetal head and fetal body. Umbilical cord blood was collected immediately after delivery for blood gas analysis using a Bayer Rapidpoint 400 Blood Gas Analyzer (Bayer HealthCare, Seattle [WA], United States), as described in our previous reports.14 15 Delivery data, including birth weight and perinatal complications, were recorded immediately after delivery by the attending staff, then crosschecked by another staff member. Two to 3 months later, fetal outcomes were subjected to further review and confirmation during postnatal follow-up and monthly audit meetings. All midwives and obstetricians attended annual training sessions regarding the management of shoulder dystocia.
 
Identified cases and corresponding medical records were reviewed to collect maternal, fetal, and obstetric characteristics. Advanced maternal age was defined as ≥35 years at the estimated date of delivery. Short stature was defined as maternal height <150 cm. Maternal body weights at booking and delivery were recorded to calculate the body mass index (BMI) at each time point. Obesity was defined as BMI >30 kg/m2, in accordance with World Health Organization guidelines.16 17 Parity and diabetes mellitus/gestational diabetes mellitus statuses were noted. Obstetric and neonatal characteristics were recorded, including delivery mode, fetal distress, birth weight, HBDI duration, and the use and sequence of manoeuvres. Macrosomia was defined as birth weight ≥4000 g. Neonatal outcomes were also recorded, including the Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes of life, cord arterial pH, and neonatal complications (eg, subgaleal haemorrhage, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, brachial plexus injury, clavicular fracture, and humeral fracture).
 
Statistical analysis
The incidences of shoulder dystocia were calculated for three groups: all singleton live pregnancies (excluding multiple pregnancies and stillbirths), all singleton live cephalic-presenting pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour (excluding cases of fetal malpresentation and elective caesarean deliveries), and all singleton live cephalic-presenting pregnancies with successful vaginal delivery (excluding emergency caesarean deliveries).12 The incidences of shoulder dystocia were also calculated for various birth weight ranges.
 
The incidences of shoulder dystocia, maternal and fetal characteristics in each case, and perinatal outcomes were compared between 2000-2009 and 2010-2019. Analyses were performed using SPSS (Windows version 26.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States). The incidences of shoulder dystocia; maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics; and neonatal complications related to shoulder dystocia during 2000-2009 and 2010-2019 were analysed using the Chi squared test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, t test for parametric continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric continuous variables. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
 
Results
In total, this study included 242 cases of shoulder dystocia in the study unit. Table 1 shows the incidences of shoulder dystocia in each decade according to type of birth and range of birth weight. The overall incidence of shoulder dystocia among all singleton live pregnancies decreased from 0.23% (134/58 326) during 2000-2009 to 0.16% (108/65 683) during 2010-2019 (P=0.009). Similarly, the incidence of shoulder dystocia among singleton cephalic-presenting pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour decreased from 0.25% to 0.19% (P=0.031), and the incidence of shoulder dystocia among singleton cephalic-presenting pregnancies with vaginal delivery decreased from 0.29% to 0.21% (P=0.017). The incidences of shoulder dystocia were generally similar across birth weight categories, but the incidence considerably decreased in the 4200-4399 g group.
 

Table 1. Incidences of shoulder dystocia according to birth weight category among all singleton pregnancies, singleton cephalic-presenting pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour, and singleton live cephalic-presenting pregnancies delivered vaginally during the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019
 
Table 2 shows the birth weight distribution for all singleton cephalic live pregnancies. The mean birth weight decreased from 3180 ± 472 g during 2000-2009 to 3132 ± 463 g during 2010-2019 (P<0.001). The proportion of babies weighing ≥4000 g was 3.3% during 2000-2009, whereas it was 2.3% during 2010-2019.
 

Table 2. Birth weight distribution among all singleton cephalic live pregnancies during the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019
 
Table 3 illustrates the maternal and obstetric characteristics in cases of shoulder dystocia during each decade. There were no statistically significant differences between the two decades in terms of advanced maternal age, maternal age, maternal height, maternal weight at booking and delivery, BMI at booking and delivery, obesity at delivery, or nulliparity. However, the proportion of shoulder dystocia cases involving maternal diabetes increased from 9.0% during 2000-2009 to 19.4% during 2010-2019 (P=0.018). Additionally, the proportion of shoulder dystocia cases involving instrumental delivery decreased from 65.7% to 47.2% (P=0.004), but there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of deliveries involving fetal distress. Although there was no significant change in birth weight, the proportion of babies with macrosomia among shoulder dystocia cases tended to decrease over time (from 27.6% to 18.5%; P=0.097).
 

Table 3. Maternal and obstetric characteristics in cases of shoulder dystocia during the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019
 
Table 4 shows the success rates of various manoeuvres in terms of alleviating shoulder dystocia. During 2010-2019, 79.6% of babies in cases of shoulder dystocia had HBDI ≤2 minutes; 14.8% and 5.6% of such babies had HBDI of 3-4 minutes and ≥5 minutes, respectively. These proportions were significantly better than the proportions during 2000-2009 (59.0%, 31.3%, and 9.7%, respectively; P=0.003). The success rate of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre in terms of alleviating shoulder dystocia increased from 31.3% to 47.2% (P=0.012) among all vaginal deliveries, which was partially attributed to the increased success rate among instrumental deliveries (from 20.5% to 39.2%; P=0.017). Although the rotational manoeuvre continued to be preferred over posterior arm extraction (77.6% vs. 22.4%) after failure of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre and suprapubic pressure, the success rate of posterior arm extraction increased from 52.9% in 2000-2009 to 92.3% in 2010-2019 (P=0.042). Table 5 shows the neonatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia. There were significant reductions in the rates of low Apgar scores: for an Apgar score <5 at 1 minute of life, the rate decreased from 13.4% to 5.6% (P=0.042); for an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes of life, the rate decreased from 11.9% to 4.6% (P=0.045). There were no statistically significant changes in the rates of other neonatal complications.
 

Table 4. Performances of various manoeuvres in terms of alleviating shoulder dystocia during the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019
 

Table 5. Neonatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia during the periods of 2000-2009 and 2010-2019
 
Discussion
Trend in the incidence of shoulder dystocia
This study revealed a significant reduction in the overall incidence of shoulder dystocia over the past two decades in a tertiary obstetric unit in Hong Kong. One possible reason is the increased use of caesarean delivery, in both elective and emergency settings, in cases of suspected macrosomia. This hypothesis is supported by the decrease in the incidences of shoulder dystocia among all births and among all pregnancies with onset of labour in the 4200-4399 g subgroup during 2010-2019 (Table 1). However, such decreases were not observed in other subgroups with babies weighing ≥4000 g (4000-4199 g, 4400-4599 g, and ≥4600 g) [Table 1]. These findings suggest that caesarean delivery in cases of suspected macrosomia is not a major factor contributing to shoulder dystocia prevention. Furthermore, the absence of any change in shoulder dystocia incidence among subgroups with babies weighing <4200 g was consistent with our departmental practice of using 4200 g, rather than 4000 g, as a threshold for offering caesarean delivery to non-diabetic women. The use of a lower fetal weight threshold (eg, 4000 g) in pregnant Chinese women could lead to an unnecessary increase in the rate of caesarean delivery.18 The practice of early induction of labour in cases of suspected macrosomia may be the main factor contributing to the decrease in shoulder dystocia incidence.11 Since 2011, women with a fetal abdominal circumference or estimated fetal weight above the 97th percentile (but <4200 g) have been counselled about the risk of difficult labour, along with the benefits and risks of inducing labour to prevent further macrosomia. These approaches are consistent with the decreases in overall mean birth weight and proportion of babies ≥4000 g from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019 (Table 2).
 
Improvements in the acute management of shoulder dystocia
Additionally, our study revealed improvements in the acute management of shoulder dystocia. In particular, the overall success rate of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre in terms of alleviating shoulder dystocia improved from 31.3% during 2000-2009 to 47.2% during 2010-2019; these results were consistent with rates in published reports, which have considerably varied from 23% to 70%.5 6 19 20 21 Our improved success rate was mainly attributed to the increased success rate among instrumental deliveries (from 20.5% to 39.2%) [Table 4]. We previously speculated that instrumental delivery increased the risk of shoulder dystocia while reducing the likelihood of McRoberts’ manoeuvre success, presumably related to delayed descent of the shoulders during instrumental delivery.22 The SOPHIE training emphasises that proper performance of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre should result in cephaloid rotation of the mother’s pelvis, manifested by elevation of the mother’s buttocks from the bed. To achieve this goal, the best method for hyperflexion of the mother’s hips involves grasping the back of the mother’s distal thigh and pushing it in the direction of the mother’s head. By leaning in the same direction, the clinician can use their own weight to facilitate hip hyperflexion. A common mistake is holding the mother’s knee and pushing at the foot. The resulting force is reduced and the mother may experience discomfort at the ankle joint (Fig a and b).9
 

Figure. McRoberts’ manoeuvre. (a) A common mistake involves holding the mother’s knee and pushing at the foot (blue arrow), which makes the manoeuvre less effective. (b) Hyperflexion of the mother’s hips is achieved by grasping the back of the mother’s distal thigh and pushing it in the direction of the mother’s head (blue arrow). By leaning in the same direction (red arrow), the clinician can use their own weight to facilitate hip hyperflexion. An effective McRoberts’ manoeuvre should result in cephaloid rotation of the mother’s pelvis (curved yellow arrow), manifested by elevation of the mother’s buttocks from the bed (black arrow). (c and d) Posterior arm delivery. The fetal left posterior forearm is grasped by the clinician’s left hand. The direction of the extraction is outward and upward (blue straight arrow), enabling rotation of the posterior shoulder (curved red arrows; clockwise direction in this scenario)
 
Importantly, this study showed an increasing trend in the utilisation of posterior arm delivery during 2010-2019, which is consistent with the updated practice guidelines from the RCOG and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists during the same period.1 2 The success rate of posterior arm delivery also substantially increased (from 52.9% to 92.3%) [Table 4] and humeral fracture (a complication associated with posterior arm delivery) did not occur in any case during 2010-2019. The improvement in the success and safety may be related to the enhanced training through the SOPHIE course, which emphasises that the clinician should use the correct hand (ie, right hand for a fetus facing the mother’s left side, and vice versa); this hand should be inserted into the vagina with sufficient depth to reach the fetal posterior forearm, and extraction should be conducted by grasping the forearm (rather than the elbow or upper arm). The direction of the extraction should be outward and upward to generate a rotational effect on the shoulders (Fig c and d).9 10
 
In addition to enhanced clinician skills, improved management of shoulder dystocia may have resulted from a decline in birth weight from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019, although the difference was not statistically significant. Improvements in the success rates of the McRoberts’ manoeuvre and posterior arm delivery led to improved management of shoulder dystocia, represented by a shorter HBDI (Table 4). Among cases of shoulder dystocia, the proportion of babies with an HBDI of ≤2 minutes increased from 59.0% during 2000-2009 to 79.6% during 2010-2019; conversely, the proportion of such babies with HBDI ≥5 minutes decreased from 9.7% to 5.6% (Table 4). Along with the improvement in HBDI, fewer babies had a low Apgar score. However, such improvements did not lead to significant reductions in the incidences of severe fetal acidosis and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, possibly because of the small sample size. The management of prenatally missed macrosomia with severe shoulder dystocia remains a substantial challenge. Our group recently reported a severe case of shoulder dystocia in which the posterior shoulder was also lodged in the middle of the pelvic cavity. The situation was resolved by our modified posterior axillary sling traction technique, which involved using a ribbon gauze to form a sling, in combination with long and slim right-angle forceps to facilitate sling placement.23 In our report as well as in our recent review, we emphasised that the sling primarily functions by facilitating shoulder rotation to enable delivery through the wider diagonal diameter of the outlet of the birth canal.10
 
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of this study include its analysis of a relatively large number of women over two decades, the use of complete and audited outcomes data, and the uniform management of pregnancy complications in accordance with standard guidelines and department protocols.12 However, because this was a retrospective study, causal factors underlying the findings could not be fully elucidated; possible confounding factors included changes in the management of pregnancy complications, management of babies with macrosomia, and management of shoulder dystocia, as well as changes in the levels of skills and experience among clinical personnel during the study period.
 
Conclusion
More proactive management of macrosomic pregnancies led to decreases in the overall proportion of babies with macrosomia and incidence of shoulder dystocia from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019. Improvements in shoulder dystocia relief skills were demonstrated by increases in the success rates of manoeuvres (eg, the McRoberts’ manoeuvre and posterior arm delivery), as well as decreases in HBDI and Apgar scores.
 
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the concept or design of the study, acquisition of the data, analysis or interpretation of the data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
The corresponding author is the programme director for the Safe Obstetric Practice for High risk and Emergency (SOPHIE) course. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the creators of the SOPHIE course (https://www.obg.cuhk.edu.hk/training-education/sophie-course/) and Ms Catherine Chan at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong for contributing to the illustrations.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref No.: CRE 2017.442). Informed patient consent was waived by the Committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.
 
References
1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder Dystocia. Green-Top Guideline No. 42. 2nd Edition. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2012. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/ewgpnmio/gtg_42.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.
2. Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia [editorial]. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e123-33. Crossref
3. Leung TY, Chung TK. Severe chronic morbidity of childbirth. Best Pract Clin Res Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:401-23. Crossref
4. Leung TY, Stuart O, Sahota DS, Suen SS, Lau TK, Lao TT. Head-to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in shoulder dystocia: a retrospective review. BJOG 2011;118:474-9. Crossref
5. Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SS, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Lao TT. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG 2011;118:985-90. Crossref
6. Hoffman MK, Bailit JL, Branch DW, et al. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1272-8. Crossref
7. American Academy of Family Physicians. Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO®). Available from: https://www.aafp.org/cme/programs/also.html. Accessed 7 Jan 2022.
8. PROMPT Maternity Foundation. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training. Available from: https://www.promptmaternity.org. Accessed 7 Jan 2022.
9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong & Prince of Wales Hospital. SOPHIE Course–Safe Obstetric Practice for High risk and Emergency Course. Available from: https://www.obg.cuhk.edu.hk/training-education/sophie-course/. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.
10. Lau SL, Sin WT, Wong L, Lee NM, Hui SY, Leung TY. A critical evaluation of the external and internal maneuvers for resolution of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. In press. Crossref
11. Boulvain M, Senat MV, Perrotin F, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:2600-5. Crossref
12. Wong ST, Tse WT, Lau SL, Sahota DS, Leung TY. Stillbirth rate in singleton pregnancies: a 20-year retrospective study from a public obstetric unit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2022;28:285-93. Crossref
13. Spong CY, Beall M, Rodrigues D, Ross MG. An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:433-6. Crossref
14. Leung TY, Lok IH, Tam WH, Leung TN, Lau TK. Deterioration in cord blood gas status during the second stage of labour is more rapid in the second twin than in the first twin. BJOG 2004;111:546-9. Crossref
15. Leung TY, Tam WH, Leung TN, Lok IH, Lau TK. Effect of twin-to-twin delivery interval on umbilical cord blood gas in the second twins. BJOG 2002;109:63-7. Crossref
16. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-63. Crossref
17. Leung TY, Leung TN, Sahota DS, et al. Trends in maternal obesity and associated risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a population of Chinese women. BJOG 2008;115:1529-37. Crossref
18. Cheng YK, Lao TT, Sahota DS, Leung VK, Leung TY. Use of birth weight threshold for macrosomia to identify fetuses at risk of shoulder dystocia among Chinese populations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;120:249-53. Crossref
19. McFarland MB, Langer O, Piper JM, Berkus MD. Perinatal outcome and the type and number of maneuvers in shoulder dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55:219-24. Crossref
20. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian JG, Paul RH. The McRoberts’ maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:656-61. Crossref
21. Spain JE, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Colvin R, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:353.e1-5. Crossref
22. Lok ZL, Cheng YK, Leung TY. Predictive factors for the success of McRoberts’ manoeuvre and suprapubic pressure in relieving shoulder dystocia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:334. Crossref
23. Kwan AH, Hui AS, Lee JH, Leung TY. Intrauterine fetal death followed by shoulder dystocia and birth by modified posterior axillary sling method: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:672. Crossref

Ten-year territory-wide trends in the utilisation and clinical outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Hong Kong

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Dec;29(6):514–23 | Epub 16 Nov 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  CME
Ten-year territory-wide trends in the utilisation and clinical outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Hong Kong
Pauline Y Ng, MB, BS, FHKCP1,2; Vindy WS Chan1; April Ip, MPH1; Lowell Ling, MB, BS, FHKCA3; KM Chan, MB, ChB, FCICM3; Anne KH Leung, MB, ChB, FHKCA4; Kenny KC Chan, MB, ChB, MStat5; Dominic So, MB, BS, HKCA6; HP Shum, MB, BS, MD7; CW Ngai, MB, ChB, FHKCP2; WM Chan, MB, ChB, FHKCP2; WC Sin, MB, ChB, FHKCP2,8
1 Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Department of Adult Intensive Care, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
3 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Department of Intensive Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
5 Department of Intensive Care, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
6 Department of Intensive Care, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
7 Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
8 Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr PY Ng (pyeungng@hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: The utilisation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been rapidly increasing in Hong Kong. This study examined 10-year trends in the utilisation and clinical outcomes of ECMO in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all adult patients receiving ECMO who were admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of public hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2019. Temporal trends across years were assessed using the Mann–Kendall test. Observed hospital mortality was compared with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV–predicted mortality.
 
Results: The annual number of patients receiving ECMO increased from 18 to 171 over 10 years. In total, 911 patients received ECMO during the study period: 297 (32.6%) received veno-arterial ECMO, 450 (49.4%) received veno-venous ECMO, and 164 (18.0%) received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The annual number of patients aged ≥65 years increased from 0 to 47 (27.5%) [P for trend=0.001]. The median (interquartile range) Charlson Comorbidity Index increased from 1 (0-1) to 2 (1-3) [P for trend<0.001] while the median (interquartile range) APACHE IV score increased from 90 (57-112) to 105 (77-137) [P for trend=0.003]. The overall standardised mortality ratio comparing hospital mortality with APACHE IV–predicted mortality was 1.11 (95% confidence interval=1.01-1.22). Hospital and ICU length of stay both significantly decreased (P for trend=0.011 and <0.001, respectively).
 
Conclusions: As ECMO utilisation increased in Hong Kong, patients put on ECMO were older, more critically ill, and had more co-morbidities. It is important to combine service expansion with adequate resource allocation and training to maintain quality of care.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • During the 10-year study period, there was increasing utilisation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in older patients, patients with more co-morbidities, and patients with greater disease severity.
  • Patients receiving ECMO require significant resources for out-of-hours services, inter-hospital transfers, and major operations.
  • Although the observed hospital mortality was comparable with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV–predicted mortality, efforts should be made to systematically collect physiological data for computation of Survival after Veno-Arterial ECMO and Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction scores in the future.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Among patients receiving ECMO in Hong Kong, clinical outcomes can be improved by revising patient selection criteria, enhancing therapy for bridge to transplantation and promoting organ transplantation, and consolidating ECMO services in specialised centres.
 
 
Introduction
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) offers life-sustaining support by supplementing heart and lung functions in patients with circulatory or respiratory failure. There is increasing utilisation of ECMO in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide; for example, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry reported a 10-fold increase in ECMO runs from 1643 in 1990 to 18 260 in 2020.1 Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, with a population of 7.4 million and an independent healthcare system.2 In Hong Kong, various assessments of ICU performance have been performed for other disease entities,3 but there have been few reports of ECMO-specific data and patient outcomes.4 In particular, Hong Kong has a higher ECMO centre–to-population ratio compared with international guidelines.5 6 A retrospective study examined the risk score–mortality association in patients receiving ECMO, but it only included data from a single tertiary ICU and was not fully representative of territory-wide practices.7 Because ECMO is a high-cost, labour-intensive ICU treatment modality, it is important to understand how ECMO is utilised in Hong Kong, its associated resource implications, and review patient outcomes for future planning efforts.
 
In this study, using a territory-wide administrative registry of all patients receiving ECMO in the ICUs of public hospitals in Hong Kong, we examined trends in ECMO utilisation and clinical outcomes. Our primary objective was to summarise the status of ECMO services in Hong Kong over the past decade.
 
Methods
Study population
This retrospective observational study covered the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019. All adult patients aged ≥18 years with an ECMO episode and admission to the ICU of a public hospital under the Hospital Authority were identified using an administrative ECMO patient registry managed by a centralised ICU committee. An episode of ECMO was defined on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure code for ECMO.8 The need for ICU admission was determined using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV) evaluation form.9 10 Patients with missing ECMO details (eg, ECMO duration and configuration) and patients managed in non-mixed disciplinary ICUs were excluded from the study.
 
Data collection
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation data were extracted from the administrative patient registry, which contained information about ECMO configuration, time of initiation, and time of discontinuation that had been entered by qualified nurses at the corresponding ECMO centre. The Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a central de-identified data repository comprising electronic health records from all public hospitals in Hong Kong, was accessed to collect patient baseline characteristics and components of the following disease severity scores: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA),11 Survival after Veno-Arterial ECMO (SAVE),12 Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP),13 Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and APACHE IV14 (online supplementary Table 1). For patients with multiple ICU admissions during a single hospital stay, the APACHE IV score for the first ICU admission was used. Clinical outcomes including length of stay (LOS) and mortality were retrieved from the CDARS.
 
Study outcomes and definitions
The primary outcomes were trends in ECMO utilisation over 10 years, including number of patients receiving ECMO, illness severity (as measured by disease severity scores), and numbers of tertiary and quaternary inter-hospital transfers. Secondary outcomes were mortality, hospital and ICU LOS, transplantation procedures, ventricular assistive device (VAD) implantation, and complications. For patients who were transferred between hospitals, hospital mortality was defined as death during the final hospitalisation. Four common complications of ECMO, namely haemorrhagic, neurological, renal and cardiovascular complications, were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedural codes (online supplementary Table 2).8 Major non-cranial bleeding was identified as the diagnosis of gastrointestinal, major internal, and/or postoperative bleeding; alternatively, it was identified by the need for haemostatic procedures, transfusion of >2 units of packed red blood cells over 24 hours, and/or use of recombinant factor VII. Stroke was subdivided into haemorrhagic and ischaemic types. Patients with acute ischaemic limbs were identified by the diagnosis of acute limb ischaemia or compartment syndrome or by the performance of limb-saving procedures (eg, fasciotomy and amputation). Brain death was identified by the appropriate diagnostic code or by a procedure code indicating organ collection from a deceased donor.
 
For the purposes of subsequent analyses, ECMO centres referred to designated ICUs under the governance of the Hospital Authority Central Organising Committee in ICU Services. An emergency admission was defined as an admission in which the patient had emergency room attendance records within the preceding 12 hours. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation in the emergency room was defined as an ECMO episode in which the patient had emergency room attendance records within the preceding 24 hours. An inter-hospital transfer was defined when ECMO was started at another institution before patient transferal with ECMO in situ to one of six ECMO centres. A transfer to a quaternary cardiothoracic unit was defined as an instance of intra- or inter-hospital transfer from a mixed ICU to cardiothoracic care in one of three centres, either during ECMO care or within 12 hours after stopping ECMO.
 
Statistical analysis
Frequencies and percentages were used to describe categorical variables. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess data normality; data were expressed as means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the Chi squared test; continuous variables were compared by the t test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. The Mann–Kendall test was used to assess temporal trends in patient characteristics and outcomes across years, in sequential order from 2010 to 2019. Model discrimination and model calibration of risk scores in predicting hospital mortality were examined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. The observed hospital mortality was compared with that predicted from risk scores using standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). Patients with missing APACHE IV scores were excluded from this analysis.
 
All statistical analysis and data visualisation procedures were performed in Stata 16 (StataCorp; College Station [TX], United States). Tests were considered statistically significant when two-tailed P values were <0.05.
 
Results
Patient characteristics and co-morbidities
From January 2010 to December 2019, among 125 101 ICU admissions overall in Hong Kong, 911 (0.73%) involved patients receiving ECMO as follows: 297 (32.6%) veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO, 450 (49.4%) veno-venous (V-V) ECMO, and 164 (18.0%) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) [Fig 1]. There was a steady increase in the annual number of patients receiving ECMO, with a 9.5-fold increase from 18 episodes in 2010 to 171 episodes in 2019 (Fig 2). The annual number of V-A ECMO episodes significantly increased from 3 (16.7%) to 67 (39.2%) over 10 years (P for trend=0.001) [Table 1]. The total number of ECMO patient-days increased from 109 in 2010 to 1565 in 2019 (online supplementary Fig 1).
 

Figure 1. Study cohort
 

Figure 2. Numbers and types of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) episodes from 2010 to 2019
 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from 2010 to 2019 in Hong Kong (n=911)
 
A total of 583 (64.0%) patients were male, with a median age at admission of 54 years (interquartile range, 42-62), and 185 (20.3%) patients of ≥65 years. There was increasing utilisation of ECMO among patients aged ≥65 years (P for trend=0.001). The median CCI was 1 (0-2), and an increasing number of patients had a CCI ≥2 (P for trend=0.002) [Table 1].
 
Among the 889 (97.6%) patients with complete APACHE IV data, the median APACHE IV score was 100 (73-132), with an increase from 90 (57-112) in 2010 to 105 (77-137) in 2019 (P for trend=0.003); the median APACHE IV–estimated risk of death was 0.5 (0.2-0.8). Complete demographic details are shown in Table 1; trends in co-morbidities and disease severity scores are shown in online supplementary Figure 2.
 
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation resources and inter-hospital transfers
Within the publicly funded hospital system, the number of ECMO centres under centralised ICU governance increased from three in 2010 to five in 2015, and then seven in 2019. The total number of available ECMO consoles paralleled the increase: from three in 2010 to nine in 2015, and then 11 in 2019 (online supplementary Table 3).
 
Among the 911 patients receiving ECMO, 469 (51.5%) were initiated outside of the regular 9 am to 5 pm period, including 247 (52.7%) patients receiving V-V ECMO, 137 (29.2%) patients receiving V-A ECMO, and 85 (18.1%) patients receiving ECPR. In total, 710 (77.9%) emergency admissions were identified. These patients were younger, had fewer co-morbidities, and were more likely to receive V-V ECMO [371/710 (52.3%) vs 79/201 (39.3%); P=0.001]. In total, 370 (40.6%) patients had ECMO initiated within 24 hours of emergency admission; these patients were more likely to receive ECPR [113/370 (30.5%) vs 51/541 (9.4%); P<0.001] and have higher APACHE IV scores [118 (86-146) vs 91 (69-118); P<0.001].
 
Overall, there were 222 (24.4%) episodes of inter-hospital transfer from non-ECMO centres to ECMO centres; the annual number of episodes increased from one (1/18 [5.6%]) in 2010 to 22 (22/171 [12.9%]) in 2019 (P for trend<0.001) [online supplementary Fig 3]. In total, 173 (77.9%) patients were transferred from ICUs in other hospitals; the remaining 49 patients were transferred from non-ICU settings. Most transferred patients (66.2%) received V-V ECMO (online supplementary Fig 4a); their principal diagnoses are shown in online supplementary Figure 4b and 4c. Transferred patients had worse RESP scores [-2 (-4 to 0) vs -1 (-3 to 2); P<0.001], better SAVE scores (-6 ± 5 vs -8 ± 5; P=0.012), and lower APACHE IV scores [89 (69-117) vs 104 (75-136); P<0.001]. Among the patients transferred to ECMO centres, 54 (24.3%) underwent a major operation within 7 days of transfer, and 32 (59.3%) of these surgeries involved the cardiovascular system. Other procedural details are shown in online supplementary Figure 4d and 4e.
 
There were 52 (5.7%) episodes of inter-hospital transfer to quaternary cardiothoracic ICUs; the annual number remained relatively consistent throughout the 10-year study period (P for trend=0.121) [online supplementary Fig 3]. Patients in these transfers were younger (P=0.048); they were more likely to receive V-A ECMO [31/52 (59.6%) vs 266/859 (31.0%); P<0.001] and ECPR [15/52 (28.8%) vs 149/859 (17.3%); P=0.036] (online supplementary Fig 5a). The primary diagnoses are shown in online supplementary Figure 5b and 5c. Among the patients involved in quaternary transfers, 22 (42.3%) underwent a major operation within 28 days of transfer, and 18 (81.8%) of these surgeries involved the cardiovascular system. Other procedural details are shown in online supplementary Figure 5d and 5e.
 
Patient outcomes
The overall numbers of hospital mortalities and ICU mortalities were 456 (50.1%) and 382 (41.9%), respectively. The numbers of hospital mortalities among patients receiving V-V ECMO, V-A ECMO, and ECPR were 152 (33.9%), 178 (59.9%), and 126 (76.8%), respectively (online supplementary Table 4). The median hospital LOS was 26.8 (interquartile range, 10.7-55.6) days, and the median ICU LOS was 10.2 (interquartile range, 4.8-20.1) days [Table 2]. Throughout the 10-year study period, the annual number of hospital mortalities increased from one (5.6%) in 2010 to 90 (52.6%) in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). The hospital LOS decreased from 36.6 (interquartile range, 26.8-57.2) to 25.2 (7.6-50.2) days [P for trend=0.011], and ICU LOS decreased from 15.5 (10.8-18.2) days in 2010 to 7.9 (3.9-19.8) days in 2019 (P for trend<0.001).
 
After adjustments for age, sex, APACHE IV score, and type of ECMO, the odds of hospital mortality were significantly lower in patients with ECMO initiated within 24 hours of emergency admission (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.40-0.78; P=0.001). There were no significant associations with hospital mortality among patients who had emergency admission (adjusted OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.54- 1.12; P=0.17), patients who were transferred to ECMO centres (adjusted OR=0.74, 95% CI=0.52- 1.05; P=0.09), or patients who were transferred to quaternary cardiothoracic ICUs (adjusted OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.30-1.13; P=0.11). Patients transferred to quaternary cardiothoracic ICUs had significantly lower ICU mortality [4 (7.7%) vs 378 (44.0%); P<0.001] and significantly longer hospital LOS [38.3 (22.1-111.0) vs 25.6 (9.4-53.1) days, P<0.001]. The unadjusted and adjusted outcomes in various patient subgroups are presented in online supplementary Table 5.
 
In total, 41 (4.5%) patients were successfully bridged to VAD or transplantation. Among 461 patients who were receiving V-A ECMO and ECPR, 31 (6.7%) patients underwent VAD implantation and eight (1.7%) patients underwent heart transplantation. Among 450 patients who were receiving V-V ECMO, one (0.2%) patient underwent lung transplantation.
 
In terms of complications, there were 466 (51.2%) cases of major bleeding, 28 (3.1%) ischaemic limb complications, and nine (1.0%) patients who were declared brain-dead. Among 76 (8.3%) patients with stroke, 54 (5.9%) had haemorrhagic stroke (Table 2).
 

Table 2. Clinical outcomes among patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from 2010 to 2019 in Hong Kong (n=911)
 
Prediction of hospital mortality
The ability of risk scores to predict post-ECMO hospital mortality was examined. There was a significant increase in the annual median APACHE IV score from 90 (57-112) in 2010 to 105 (77-137) in 2019 (P for trend=0.003). The SOFA score on the first day of ICU admission and the SAVE score in patients receiving V-A ECMO also showed significant trends (P for trend<0.001). No significant trends were observed regarding the SOFA score on the first day of ECMO (P for trend=0.58) or the RESP score in patients receiving V-V ECMO (P for trend=0.46) [Table 1].
 
The APACHE IV score showed good discriminatory power and was well calibrated for the prediction of hospital mortality (AUROC=0.727; Hosmer–Lemeshow test P=0.356); as was SOFA score on the first day of ECMO (AUROC=0.670; Hosmer–Lemeshow test P=0.322) [Fig 3]. The overall SMR for hospital mortality compared with APACHE IV–predicted mortality was 1.11 (95% CI=1.01-1.22) and there was no significant trend over the 10-year study period (P for trend=0.135) [Fig 4]. The SAVE and RESP scores, estimated using data from electronic health records, displayed limited discriminatory power for the prediction of hospital mortality in patients receiving V-A and V-V ECMO (AUROC=0.604 and 0.527, respectively). The ROC curves for various risk prediction models are shown in Fig 3.
 

Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for various risk prediction models
 

Figure 4. Standardised mortality ratio (SMR) for hospital mortality
 
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first 10-year longitudinal study of the majority of patients receiving ECMO in Hong Kong; the results showed that the numbers of patients and complexities of medical conditions increased throughout the study period. Although patients receiving ECMO represent a small proportion of ICU patients overall, they require significant resource utilisation including out-of-hours services, inter-hospital transfers, and major operations. Comparisons with standardised risk scores suggested satisfactory performance based on the APACHE IV model, but the lack of complete and granular patient data precluded meaningful conclusions with respect to ECMO-specific risk scores.
 
Trends in patient characteristics
In addition to the observation of a 9.5-fold increase in ECMO utilisation in Hong Kong over the 10-year study period, including greater use of V-A ECMO after 2012 and rapid uptake of ECPR after 2015, this study revealed that patients receiving ECMO were increasingly older, had an increasing co-morbidity burden, and displayed greater disease severity upon ICU admission. This is not only attributable to the overall advances in ECMO,15 but also encouraged by the multiple studies showing indistinguishable survival after ECMO in older adult patients compared with the younger ones.16 17 18 The increased utilisation of ECMO in ECPR is supported by clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of this approach. In the CHEER trial (mechanical CPR, Hypothermia, ECMO and Early Reperfusion), treatment with mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hypothermia, ECMO, and early reperfusion led to increased survival among patients with refractory cardiac arrest.19 The ARREST trial (Advanced Reperfusion Strategies for Refractory Cardiac Arrest) showed a similar increase in survival upon initiation of early ECPR among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation.20 The increasing numbers of patients receiving ECMO have also resulted from greater utilisation of V-A ECMO to manage conditions such as acute myocardial infarction complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock,21 as well as efforts to transition to therapies including VAD and heart transplantation.22 The overall growth of ECMO utilisation in Hong Kong is similar to global patterns evident in the ELSO registry.1
 
Patient mortality
The observed overall SMR for post-ECMO hospital mortality was slightly worse than the predicted overall SMR, possibly because ECMO services were in early phases of development at various centres throughout the study period. The decrease in SMR in the later portion of the study period, when ECMO services had matured at most centres, may be an indication of progress. When the results were stratified according to the type of ECMO, we found that the rate of hospital mortality among patients receiving V-V ECMO was better in Hong Kong than in the global ELSO registry (33.9% vs 40.8%), whereas the rates of hospital mortality among patients receiving V-A ECMO and ECPR were worse (V-A ECMO: 59.8% in Hong Kong vs 55.4% globally; ECPR: 76.8% in Hong Kong vs 69.8% globally). The sharp increase in ECPR utilisation may have contributed to an artificially elevated SMR, considering that ECPR is associated with worse survival relative to V-V ECMO and V-A ECMO19; notably, in a pilot cohort of patients receiving ECPR in Hong Kong, ICU survival was 32.4%.23 The low rate of ECMO bridging to transplantation in Hong Kong—nine (1.0%) patients over 10 years—also reduces overall cohort survival. Among developed countries/regions, Hong Kong has a very low rate of registration in the Centralised Organ Donation Register (3.8%) and limited motivation to participate in organ donation.24 Nevertheless, it remains important to actively explore methods to lower the SMR. One possibility involves consolidating ECMO services to a few specialised centres, based on evidence of a volume-outcome relationship repeatedly identified in other observational cohorts across various geographical regions and healthcare settings.25 26 Furthermore, a study in the United States showed that multidisciplinary interventions—including coordination among surgeons, cardiologists, and ECMO specialists, as well as the implementation of standardised ECMO admission and weaning protocols—were associated with lower mortality in patients receiving ECMO,27 indicating a need to strengthen interdisciplinary communication or expand collaborations with allied health services to maintain standards of care.
 
Risk prediction
The comparative utility of various risk scores for outcome prediction in Hong Kong merits attention. In terms of predicting hospital mortality among patients receiving ECMO in the present study, the APACHE IV score performed best, followed by the SOFA score on the first day of ECMO; the SAVE and RESP scores had moderate discriminatory power. The satisfactory performance of the APACHE IV score in Hong Kong was previously demonstrated in a large retrospective cohort study of ICU patients (c-statistic=0.889).28 Importantly, most data were available for APACHE IV scores in the present study, and the corresponding accuracy was high. However, the main limitation of APACHE IV scores is the lack of definite correlation with the time and patient condition upon ECMO initiation,29 which likely leads to a systemic under-representation of disease severity. The SOFA score, which can be calculated on a daily basis, has the theoretical advantage of more closely reflecting disease severity and clinical progression30; the SOFA score on the date of ECMO initiation demonstrated good performance in predicting hospital mortality among patients in our cohort. We note that the limited predictive performances of ECMO-specific SAVE and RESP scores are mainly related to the difficulty of retrieving accurate physiological data from the CDARS; various components of the scores were determined by a combination of diagnostic codes, procedural codes, and laboratory parameters. Although these scores have been validated in international cohorts,12 13 their systematic adoption as benchmarks for ECMO service performance in Hong Kong is hindered by the lack of available patient data. Among the six ECMO centres included in the present study, only four routinely collect patient and ECMO data for submission to the international ELSO registry; none of the centres compute SAVE and RESP scores. Within the community of ECMO providers in Hong Kong, we strongly encourage collaborative efforts to routinely document ECMO-specific severity scores and improve coding practices within electronic health records and the CDARS; these approaches will facilitate outcome monitoring and resource allocation. Moreover, validation of these scores in Hong Kong will be informative because Asians were substantially underrepresented in the original scoredevelopment cohorts established using the ELSO international registry.12 13
 
Limitations
There were some limitations in this study. First, the retrospective observational design utilised data that were not recorded in a manner intended for research purposes; systematic biases in missing data may be present. Inaccurate diagnoses and procedural coding practices may have led to insufficient collection of relevant clinical data and information regarding ECMO circuit complications. However, the clinical outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS were captured from administrative data with a low risk of error. Second, the presence of between-centre heterogeneity related to non-uniform clinical practices may have contributed to outcome differences that were not reflected in the overall cohort. Third, patients receiving ECMO in non-mixed disciplinary ICUs or coronary care units were excluded from the study; outcomes and resource utilisation may have been considerably different among these patients. Finally, the collected data did not allow examination of ECMO cost-effectiveness, an important metric for service and resource planning.
 
Conclusion
In this territory-wide study, we observed increasing trends in ECMO utilisation in Hong Kong that were similar to global patterns. The overall observed mortality was reasonably close to the APACHE IV–predicted mortality. Systematic documentation of ECMO-specific risk scores is needed to ensure high-quality data for ECMO service benchmarking and development efforts.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: PY Ng, A Ip.
Acquisition of data: VWS Chan, A Ip.
Analysis or interpretation of data: PY Ng, VWS Chan.
Drafting of the manuscript: PY Ng, VWS Chan.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research was supported by an unrestricted philanthropic donation from Mr and Mrs Laurence Tse. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref No.: UW 20-573). The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Board due to the retrospective nature of the research.
 
References
1. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ECLS Registry Report. International Summary. October 2021. Report data through 2020. Available from: https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/Files/Reports/2021_October/International%20Report%20October_page1.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021.
2. Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Health Facts of Hong Kong. 2021 Edition. Available from: https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/statistics/statistics_hs/files/2021.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
3. Lam KW, Lai KY. Evaluation of outcome and performance of an intensive care unit in Hong Kong by APACHE IV model: 2007-2014. J Emerg Crit Care Med 2017;1:16. Crossref
4. Sin SW, Young K. Development of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Hong Kong: current challenges and future development. Hong Kong Med J 2017;23:216-7. Crossref
5. Combes A, Brodie D, Bartlett R, et al. Position paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:488-96. Crossref
6. Ng PY, Ip A, Fang S, et al. Effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a territory-wide longitudinal observational study. J Thorac Dis 2022;14:1802-14. Crossref
7. Ng WT, Ling L, Joynt GM, Chan KM. An audit of mortality by using ECMO specific scores and APACHE II scoring system in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a tertiary intensive care unit in Hong Kong. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:445-55. Crossref
8. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Accessed 10 Oct 2023.
9. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1297-310. Crossref
10. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM, Shaffer VL. Intensive care unit length of stay: benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2517-29. Crossref
11. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707-10. Crossref
12. Schmidt M, Burrell A, Roberts L, et al. Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)–score. Eur Heart J 2015;36:2246-56. Crossref
13. Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, et al. Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:1374-82. Crossref
14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83. Crossref
15. Mosier JM, Kelsey M, Raz Y, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for critically ill adults in the emergency department: history, current applications, and future directions. Crit Care 2015;19:431. Crossref
16. Lee SN, Jo MS, Yoo KD. Impact of age on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival of patients with cardiac failure. Clin Interv Aging 2017;12:1347-53. Crossref
17. Narotsky DL, Mosca MS, Mochari-Greenberger H, et al. Short-term and longer-term survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in an adult patient population: does older age matter? Perfusion 2016;31:366-75. Crossref
18. Saito S, Nakatani T, Kobayashi J, et al. Is extracorporeal life support contraindicated in elderly patients? Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:140-5. Crossref
19. Stub D, Bernard S, Pellegrino V, et al. Refractory cardiac arrest treated with mechanical CPR, hypothermia, ECMO and early reperfusion (the CHEER trial). Resuscitation 2015;86:88-94. Crossref
20. Yannopoulos D, Bartos J, Raveendran G, et al. Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020;396:1807-16. Crossref
21. Tsao NW, Shih CM, Yeh JS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention may improve survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock. J Crit Care 2012;27:530.e1-11. Crossref
22. Brugts JJ, Caliskan K. Short-term mechanical circulatory support by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of cardiogenic shock and end-stage heart failure. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2014;12:145-53. Crossref
23. Ng PY, Li AC, Fang S, et al. Predictors of favorable neurologic outcomes in a territory-first extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation program. ASAIO J 2022;68:1158-64. Crossref
24. Tsai NW, Leung YM, Ng PY, et al. Attitudes of visitors at adult intensive care unit toward organ donation and organ support. Chin Med J (Engl) 2019;132:373-6. Crossref
25. Muguruma K, Kunisawa S, Fushimi K, Imanaka Y. Epidemiology and volume-outcome relationship of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in Japan: a retrospective observational study using a national administrative database. Acute Med Surg 2020;7:e486. Crossref
26. Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM, et al. Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:894-901. Crossref
27. Ratnani I, Tuazon D, Zainab A, Uddin F. The role and impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critical care. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2018;14:110-9. Crossref
28. Ling L, Ho CM, Ng PY, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to adult intensive care units in Hong Kong: a population retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2018. J Intensive Care 2021;9:2. Crossref
29. Ko M, Shim M, Lee SM, Kim Y, Yoon S. Performance of APACHE IV in medical intensive care unit patients: comparisons with APACHE II, SAPS 3, and MPM0 III. Acute Crit Care 2018;33:216-21. Crossref
30. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, Francois B. The SOFA score–development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit Care 2019;23:374. Crossref

Uveal and conjunctival melanomas: disease course and outcomes in Chinese patients

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Dec;29(6):506–13 | Epub 4 Dec 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Uveal and conjunctival melanomas: disease course and outcomes in Chinese patients
Julia YY Chan, FCOphthHK, FHKAM (Ophthalmology)1,2; Stacey Carolyn Lam, FCOphthHK, FHKAM (Ophthalmology)1,2; Hunter KL Yuen, FRCOphth, FRCSEd1,2
1 Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr Julia YY Chan (yy.chan@link.cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Epidemiological studies of ocular melanomas have largely focused on Caucasian populations. This study reviewed the course and outcomes of uveal melanoma (UM) and conjunctival melanoma (CM) in Chinese patients.
 
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with UM and CM who received treatment in a tertiary eye centre in Hong Kong from January 1994 to December 2019. Data were recorded concerning patient demographics, tumour laterality, tumour characteristics, investigations performed, treatment regimen, and final outcomes.
 
Results: During the 25-year study period, there were 13 patients with UM and 11 patients with CM who did not display nodal or systemic involvement at diagnosis. The mean ± standard deviation ages at diagnosis of UM and CM were 59 ± 15.8 and 57 ± 13.9 years, respectively. There were more men among patients with UM than among those with CM (P=0.042). Most patients with UM underwent primary enucleation (n=12; 92.3%), whereas most patients with CM underwent orbital exenteration (n=9; 81.8%). The prognosis was significantly worse for CM than for UM. The median disease-free survival were 5.2 years (range, 0.7-20.5) and 2.1 years (range, 0.1-24.9) for UM and CM, respectively. Melanoma-related mortality was significantly higher among patients with CM than among those with UM (P=0.006).
 
Conclusion: Compared with UM, CM has higher rates of systemic metastasis and tumour-related mortality in Hong Kong Chinese patients, regardless of prior definitive treatment.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • Among Chinese patients, conjunctival melanoma constituted a larger proportion of ocular melanoma cases than previously identified in Caucasian populations, similar to the findings in a Korean study.
  • Compared with uveal melanoma, conjunctival melanoma has a worse prognosis with a higher rate of metastasis, shorter disease-free survival, and shorter overall survival.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Primary enucleation is an effective treatment for patients with uveal melanoma, but patients with conjunctival melanoma may experience systemic metastasis despite radical treatment with wide excisional biopsy or primary orbital exenteration.
  • Ophthalmologists and oncologists should offer long-term follow-up with regular systemic surveillance to patients with conjunctival melanoma who have received definitive treatment.
 
 
Introduction
Primary ocular melanoma from melanocytes within the eye constitutes uveal melanoma (UM), whereas ocular melanoma from melanocytes on the globe surface is considered conjunctival melanoma (CM). Although both UM and CM develop from similar neural crest lineages and are classified as ocular melanomas, they have distinct clinical behaviours, management, prognosis, cancer staging features, and molecular characteristics. Overall, 85% of melanomas in ocular regions arise from the uvea (iris, choroidal, and ciliary body), 5% arise from the conjunctiva, and 10% occur in other sites.1 The most common site of UM is the choroid, which is involved in 90% of cases.2
 
For most cases of UM, the primary treatment is enucleation. Alternative options include plaque brachytherapy and proton beam radiation; these options are currently unavailable in Hong Kong and similar Asian countries (eg, Singapore). Systemic metastases of UM most commonly affect the liver, followed by lung and bone. Conjunctival melanoma is usually managed by complete excisional biopsy with wide surgical margins, using a ‘no-touch’ technique. Adjuvant therapies such as cryotherapy or topical mitomycin C are offered, followed by reconstruction with an amniotic membrane graft. Orbital exenteration may be necessary for advanced tumours where local resection is not feasible. Metastatic disease, often to regional lymph nodes and the brain, occurs in 20% to 30% of patients with CM.3
 
Melanomas are generally rare tumours and their incidences are particularly low in Asian populations. The annual incidence of UM in Caucasian populations is 5.1 cases per million,2 whereas the respective incidences in Japanese4 and Korean5 populations are 0.2 and 0.6 cases per million. The incidences of CM are similar: 0.2 to 0.5 cases per million in Caucasian populations3 and 0.15 cases per million in Asian populations.6 Because of this rarity among Asian populations, very few studies have focused on Chinese patients. Epidemiological studies have largely involved Caucasian populations. Clinical characteristics may differ in Asian populations; for example, Asian patients are initially diagnosed with UM5 and CM6 at younger ages.
 
Known risk factors for UM include fair skin, light-coloured eyes, congenital ocular melanocytosis, ocular melanocytoma, and BAP1 tumour predisposition syndrome.7 In contrast, risk factors for CM include increased conjunctival pigmentation and a history of primary acquired melanosis. Predictors of recurrence or new tumour formation after CM treatment are older age, a history of prior conjunctival surgery, and advanced T subclassification in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.8
 
This study explored the disease course and outcomes of UM and CM in Chinese patients without nodal metastasis on presentation.
 
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who received treatment for UM or CM in a single tertiary ophthalmic centre in Hong Kong between January 1994 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria included Chinese ethnicity and imaging-confirmed lack of tumour dissemination at diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were <6 months of follow-up, insufficient available information, loss to follow-up, or presence of any precursor lesions (eg, atypical primary acquired melanosis). The following data were recorded: patient demographics, tumour laterality, tumour characteristics (eg, presentation and staging according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [8th Edition]9 10), investigations performed, treatment regimen, and final outcomes. The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
 
Provisional clinical diagnoses of UM and CM were made based on each patient’s medical history, primary acquired melanosis status, and clinical presentation. Final diagnoses of UM and CM were confirmed by excisional biopsy or analysis of a specimen collected during definitive surgical treatment. Unless refused by the patient, positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans of UM and CM were performed after 2001 (when such scans became commercially available). Magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain and orbit, as well as fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography, were conducted to investigate suspected UM. All patients with pathologically confirmed UM or CM underwent definitive surgical treatment. The specific surgical treatment was selected according to melanoma location and size, depth of invasion, systemic metastasis status, and the patient’s physical condition.
 
SPSS software (Windows version 20; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], US) was utilised for statistical analysis. Differences between patient groups were calculated using the Chi squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate disease-free survival and overall survival in patients who had received definitive treatment. Continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation.
 
Results
In this 25-year retrospective study, there were 13 and 11 patients with pathologically confirmed UM and CM, respectively. Two other patients were excluded: both displayed ocular symptoms (upper eyelid mass and bloody discharge) but were subsequently diagnosed with ocular metastases of primary nasal melanoma. The mean follow-up durations for UM and CM were 67 ± 53.2 and 74 ± 83.3 months, respectively. There were more men among patients with UM than among those with CM (P=0.042). The incidence of pre-existing conjunctival nevus was higher among patients with CM than among those with UM (P=0.049). There were no other significant differences in terms of age at diagnosis, tumour laterality, duration of symptoms, history of ocular nevi, or pathologically determined lesion diameter (Table 1).
 

Table 1. Patient demographics and tumour characteristics
 
Twenty-three of the 24 included patients had visual symptoms on presentation. Among patients with UM, 84.6% (n=11) reported blurring of vision and 7.7% (n=1) presented with photopsia. In one male patient (7.7%), the tumour was discovered during a routine ophthalmological examination. Patients with CM had more diverse visual symptoms: 63.6% (n=7) exhibited conjunctival pigmentation, 18.2% (n=2) had either an upper or lower eyelid mass, 9.1% (n=1) displayed bloody ocular discharge, and 9.1% (n=1) had experienced bleeding from the mass.
 
Tumour staging
Retrospective melanoma staging of UM9 and CM10 was conducted in accordance with the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (8th Edition). Uveal melanoma stages varied from T1a to T4a and from stage I to IIIa. Most UM cases were clinical stage II: 38.5% (n=5), 38.5% (n=5), 7.7% (n=1), and 15.3% (n=2) of patients with UM had clinical stage I, IIA, IIB, and IIIA tumours, respectively. Pathological staging of the tumours revealed that 46.2% (n=6) were spindle cell type, 38.5% (n=5) were epithelioid cell type, and the remaining 15.3% (n=2) were mixed cell type (ie, >10% epithelioid cells and <90% spindle cells). Pathological staging tended to be equivalent to or higher than the initial clinical staging: two patients with pathological stage IIB disease were initially diagnosed with clinical stage I disease, and three patients with pathological stage IIB disease were initially diagnosed with clinical stage IIA disease. For the remaining eight patients, the clinical and pathological stages were identical. Overall, 23.1% (n=3), 15.4% (n=2), 46.2% (n=6), and 15.3% (n=2) of patients with UM had pathological stage I, IIA, IIB and III tumours, respectively.
 
At diagnosis of CM, the clinical T (cT) stage was cT2 in 72.7% (n=8) of patients and cT3 in 27.3% (n=3) of patients. There were no cT1 or cT4 tumours in our cohort. The pathological T (pT) stage was pT2 in 54.5% (n=6) of patients and pT3 in 45.5% (n=5) of patients. No patients were diagnosed with pT1 or pT4 disease. Unlike the approach or UM, the AJCC staging system for CM does not include guidance regarding overall stage; there is only clinical and pathological staging for the T (tumour) component. One patient had a lower clinical stage (T2b) than pathological stage (T3b); all other patients had identical clinical and pathological stages.
 
Disease management
In terms of disease management, biopsies were more frequently performed before definitive treatment in patients with CM than in those with UM (P=0.003). Enucleation was performed in 92.3% (n=12) of patients with UM, whereas orbital exenteration was performed in 81.8% (n=9) of patients with CM. The interventions and treatments performed are shown in Table 2.
 

Table 2. Interventions for uveal and conjunctival melanomas
 
After definitive treatment, all patients initially attended weekly follow-up visits; they gradually transitioned to follow-up at 6-month intervals. Clinical examinations were performed for any surgical complications or disease recurrence. In cases of suspected disease recurrence or metastasis, contrast CT scans of the brain and orbit were performed. No patients with UM or CM had short-term or long-term wound complications. There were no instances of local recurrence during follow-up.
 
One patient with UM (7.7%) had metastasis to bone, lung, and breast tissue, as determined by high-resolution CT at 105 months of follow-up. The patient died 117 months after initial diagnosis. Two patients (15.3%) died of causes unrelated to melanoma, such as hepatocellular carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.
 
Patients with CM had worse outcomes than those with had UM, in terms of systemic metastasis (P=0.031) and tumour-related mortality rates (P=0.006). Overall, 45.5% (n=4) of patients with CM developed systemic metastasis during follow-up; the mean time from definitive treatment to systemic metastasis was 55.8 ± 66 months (range, 14-168). Cases were detected when patients were symptomatic and admitted to an acute care hospital for whole-body PET-CT or brain magnetic resonance imaging. Lymph node metastasis in two patients and liver metastasis in one patient were confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology. Brain metastasis was identified by brain CT in two patients, one of whom had simultaneous bone and lung metastases confirmed by PET-CT. Overall, 18.2% (n=2) of patients died of causes unrelated to melanoma. The mean time from definitive treatment to death was 39 ± 26 months (range, 1-64). Patients with CM had shorter median disease-free survival (P=0.004) and overall survival (P=0.006). Detailed results are presented in Table 3.
 

Table 3. Outcomes of primary uveal and conjunctival melanomas
 
At 2 years after definitive treatment, the probabilities of disease-free survival were approximately 0.55 for CM and 1.0 for UM. At 10 years, these probabilities decreased to 0.4 for CM and 0.7 for UM. Overall survival was 100% among patients with UM at 10 years after definitive treatment. In contrast, patients with CM displayed a progressive decrease in overall survival, reaching 35% at 5 years after definitive treatment. Survival curves are depicted in Figures 1 and 2.
 

Figure 1. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves for uveal and conjunctival melanomas. Blue line represents conjunctival melanoma and green line represents uveal melanoma; hash marks indicate censoring
 

Figure 2. Overall survival (OS) curves for uveal and conjunctival melanomas. Blue line represents conjunctival melanoma and green line represents uveal melanoma; hash marks indicate censoring
 
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective study of disease course and outcomes among patients with UM and CM in southern China.
 
Demographics
In the present study, the mean ages at diagnosis of UM and CM were 59 and 57 years, respectively. These findings are similar to the ages at diagnosis of UM in Taiwan (55 years)11 and the US (58 years),12 but slightly older than the ages in Singapore (52 years)13 and South Korea (53 years).14 The findings are also similar to the ages at diagnosis of CM in the US and mainland China (61 years15 and 54 years,16 respectively). It is clear that UM and CM both affect patients in their late 50s to early 60s, regardless of ethnicity.
 
Uveal melanoma primarily affected men in the present study, consistent with findings in Australian17 and European18 Caucasian populations. No previous studies have identified oestrogen receptors in normal uveal tissue or UM tumours,19 and there is no evidence that oral contraceptives or postmenopausal oestrogens participate in UM aetiology.20 Because female hormones do not have protective or exacerbating roles in UM, there is speculation that testosterone receptors are present on UM tumours, leading to a higher incidence in men.21 The present study revealed that CM primarily affected women, but previous studies have not found a relationship between sex and CM incidence.22 23 In contrast to our results, a study in mainland China showed that CM primarily affected men.15 Further studies are needed regarding the relationship between sex and CM.
 
Studies in Caucasian populations have demonstrated that the incidence of UM is much higher than that of CM, with a ratio of approximately 3 to 1.21 24 In the present study, CM constituted a larger proportion of ocular melanoma cases than previously identified in Caucasian populations, with results similar to epidemiological findings from Korea.5 Asian populations may have a lower risk of UM, but further research is warranted to confirm this speculation.
 
Clinical presentation
Zloto et al21 described an intriguing phenomenon whereby men were less likely than women to report symptoms of UM. Among our patients with UM, nearly all reported symptoms; one male patient did not report symptoms and had a tumour identified during a routine examination. Although this finding was not statistically significant, it is consistent with the previous results in a Caucasian population.2
 
In the present study, more patients with CM had pre-existing conjunctival pigmented lesions, compared with those who had UM. Somatic mutations in the BRAF gene frequently occur in human melanomas, including CM; such mutations are strongly associated with ultraviolent light exposure.25 In subtropical regions such as Hong Kong where there is abundant sunlight, analyses of underlying BRAF gene mutations could be insightful.
 
Tumour staging
Among 10 ophthalmology centres on four continents (North and South America, Europe, and Asia), the proportions of UM stages I, IIA, IIB, and IIIA were 32%, 34%, 22.1%, and 8.8%, respectively10; the present study demonstrated a comparatively greater proportion of cases with stage IIB or higher.
 
Comparative analysis of CM data revealed similar results: patients in the present study had higher clinical stages relative to patients in the US, where three-quarters and more than half of the patients had clinical and pathological stage I disease. This discrepancy could be explained by the rare nature of CM, particularly in Asian populations, leading to lower disease awareness and delayed referral to an ophthalmologist.
 
Treatment
Primary enucleation was an effective treatment for patients with UM in the present study; only one patient (7.7%) had systemic metastasis. In that patient, although no systemic metastasis was detected on PET-CT at diagnosis, the maximum standardised uptake value of the UM tumour was particularly high (9.4); UM tumours in other patients had maximum standardised uptake values of 0 to 3.9. Considering the exceptionally high metabolic rate in the UM tumour of the patient with systemic metastasis, microscopic metastasis may have been present before enucleation.
 
Despite radical treatment with wide excisional biopsy or primary orbital exenteration, systemic metastasis occurred in nearly half of the patients with CM. Regular imaging surveillance by PET-CT may be beneficial for patients with CM after orbital exenteration.
 
Prognosis
Among patients with UM, we observed a much lower rate of systemic metastasis than reported in Singapore (7.7% vs 45.5%26). This difference could be attributed to the performance of early radical treatment (ie, enucleation) before detection of systemic metastasis. Notably, the disease-free survival rate was better in our cohort of patients with UM than in another study of Chinese patients with UM (5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates of 80% and 70%, respectively)27 and better than in a study of Singaporean patients with UM (5-year disease-free survival rate of 56.8%).13 For comparison, in Caucasian populations, the 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 81.6%17 and 50%,28 respectively.
 
The rates of systemic metastasis and tumour-related mortality are consistently higher in patients with CM than in those with UM. In the present study, tumour-related mortality at 5 years was similar to the rate in Chinese patients (30.5%)16 but higher than that among patients in the US (7%).29 In five large studies (n=734 cases overall) of CM after surgical resection with tumour-free margins, the 5-year overall survival rates ranged from 74% to 86%.30 31 32 33 34 A recent Singaporean study revealed a slightly lower 5-year overall survival rate (68.8%).13 In the present study, the 5-year overall survival rate was substantially lower than the rates in other countries. Shields et al29 reported that a pathologically confirmed positive tumour margin and the absence of limbal involvement were risk factors for CM metastasis. Although all patients with CM in our cohort had pathologically confirmed clear margins, most patients with metastasis (n=6) had palpebral CM (83.3%, n=5) in which the melanoma did not reach the limbus. Thus, tumour location and ethnicity may explain the poor overall survival among patients with CM in the present study.
 
The higher risk of metastasis and lower rates of 5- and 10-year overall survival in CM, compared with UM, could be attributed to multiple factors. We did not find significant differences between UM and CM in terms of tumour stage or delays in diagnosis/treatment. We suspect that the differences between tumours are related to the nature of the disease, the primary mode of metastasis (UM spreads through the vasculature, whereas CM spreads through the lymphatic system), and genetic alterations (UM is associated with chromosomal abnormalities and CM is associated with mutations in specific genes). In terms of monitoring UM recurrence, the use of single-cell technologies to identify circulating tumour cells has implications for clinical stratification, particularly in cases of UM where specific genetic mutations have been identified.35 Because circulating tumour cell tests have received US Food and Drug Administration’s approval for clinical use in the management of various tumours (eg, metastatic breast and prostate cancers), they may be utilised in future efforts to detect circulating UM tumour cells.
 
In our centre, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not performed as a component of CM management. Mor et al36 recommend SLNB for patients with CM because false-negative findings are rare and 5-year survival can reach 79%. Therefore, early diagnosis of CM, including SLNB in cases with poor prognosticating factors (lack of limbal involvement and positive biopsy margin), and radical neck dissection as appropriate (with support from head and neck surgeons) should be considered before systemic treatment is offered.
 
Limitations
This retrospective study included a low number of patients. Additionally, genetic testing was not performed on tissue samples from patients with pathologically confirmed tumours. Chromosomal abnormalities (monosomy 3, gain of chromosome 8q, and monosomy 3 combined with loss of 1p36) have been associated with decreased survival in UM,37 whereas mutations in the BRAF, RAS, cKIT, and NF1 genes have been associated with CM38; thus, survival could be more closely related to specific genetic features, and it may be inappropriate to consider these tumours as single entities.
 
Conclusion
Because UM and CM are rare conditions, they represent challenges for primary physicians (ie, timely referral) and ophthalmologists (ie, appropriate treatment and adequate long-term follow-up). Currently, there is limited information regarding the roles of newer targeted therapies for UM and CM, compared with the application of such therapies to cutaneous melanoma. Among patients with CM, long-term mortality remains high despite definitive radical treatment. This study explored the disease course and outcomes in Hong Kong Chinese patients, then compared the findings with data from patients in other countries. For patients with UM and CM, we recommend long-term follow-up with close monitoring, a detailed medical history, holistic assessment involving cervical and head lymph node palpation, and ophthalmological examination. Collaborations with oncologists to provide regular systemic evaluation during long-term followup, with the goal of early detection for distant metastases, are also important. Chest X-ray, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and cytology with SLNB should be performed regularly (annually if possible) to improve survival, particularly in patients with CM.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: HKL Yuen.
Acquisition of data: JYY Chan.
Analysis or interpretation of data: SC Lam, JYY Chan.
Drafting of the manuscript: JYY Chan.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: SC Lam, HKL Yuen.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (Kowloon Central/Kowloon East) of Hospital Authority, Hong Kong (Ref No.: KC/KE-21-0129/ER-1). Patients were treated in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, provided written informed consent for all treatments and procedures, and consented to publication of this report.
 
References
1. Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Cancer 1998;83:1664-78. Crossref
2. Kaliki S, Shields CL. Uveal melanoma: relatively rare but deadly cancer. Eye (Lond) 2017;31:241-57. Crossref
3. Vora GK, Demirci H, Marr B, Mruthyunjaya P. Advances in the management of conjunctival melanoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2017;62:26-42. Crossref
4. Stang A, Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Jöckel KH. International uveal melanoma incidence trends in view of a decreasing proportion of morphological verification. Int J Cancer 2005;114:114-23. Crossref
5. Park SJ, Oh CM, Kim BW, Woo SJ, Cho H, Park KH. Nationwide incidence of ocular melanoma in South Korea by using the national cancer registry database (1999-2011). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:4719-24. Crossref
6. Hu DN, Yu G, McCormick SA, Finger PT. Population-based incidence of conjunctival melanoma in various races and ethnic groups and comparison with other melanomas. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:418-23. Crossref
7. Jager MJ, Shields CL, Cebulla CM, et al. Uveal melanoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:24. Crossref
8. Vaidya S, Dalvin LA, Yaghy A, et al. Conjunctival melanoma: risk factors for recurrent or new tumor in 540 patients at a single ocular oncology center. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31:2675-85. Crossref
9. Baron ED, Di Nicola M, Shields CL. Updated AJCC classification for posterior uveal melanoma. Available from: https://retinatoday.com/pdfs/0518RT_Oncology.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.
10. Jain P, Finger PT, Damato B, et al. Multicenter, international assessment of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual for conjunctival melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019;137:905-11. Crossref
11. Ma ST, Hsieh YT, Wei YH, Liao SL. A 45-year experience of uveal melanoma in Taiwan: verification of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and prognostic factors. J Formos Med Assoc 2021;120:1361-8. Crossref
12. Shields CL, Furuta M, Thangappan A, et al. Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033 consecutive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:989-98. Crossref
13. Tan LL, Hong J, Goh WL, et al. Clinical features and survival outcomes of ocular melanoma in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort. Sci Rep 2020;10:16367. Crossref
14. Lee CS, Lee J, Choi JJ, et al. Cytogenetics and prognosis for uveal melanoma in Korean patients. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:e310-4. Crossref
15. Yousef YA, Finger PT. Predictive value of the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for conjunctival melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:599-606. Crossref
16. Zhou C, Wang Y, Jia R, Fan X. Conjunctival melanoma in Chinese patients: local recurrence, metastasis, mortality, and comparisons with Caucasian patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:5452-9. Crossref
17. Vajdic CM, Kricker A, Giblin M, et al. Incidence of ocular melanoma in Australia from 1990 to 1998. Int J Cancer 2003;105:117-22. Crossref
18. Singh AD, Turell ME, Topham AK. Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1881-5. Crossref
19. Mäkitie T, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Comparative immunohistochemical oestrogen receptor analysis in primary and metastatic uveal melanoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:415-9. Crossref
20. Holly EA, Aston DA, Ahn DK, Kristiansen JJ, Char DH. Uveal melanoma, hormonal and reproductive factors in women. Cancer Res 1991;51:1370-2.
21. Zloto O, Pe’er J, Frenkel S. Gender differences in clinical presentation and prognosis of uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:652-6. Crossref
22. McLaughlin CC, Wu XC, Jemal A, Martin HJ, Roche LM, Chen VW. Incidence of noncutaneous melanomas in the U.S. Cancer 2005;103:1000-7. Crossref
23. Wong JR, Nanji AA, Galor A, Karp CL. Management of conjunctival malignant melanoma: a review and update. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2014;9:185-204. Crossref
24. Hu DN, Yu GP, McCormick SA, Schneider S, Finger PT. Population-based incidence of uveal melanoma in various races and ethnic groups. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:612-7. Crossref
25. Besaratinia A, Pfeifer GP. Sunlight ultraviolet irradiation and BRAF V600 mutagenesis in human melanoma. Hum Mutat 2008;29:983-91. Crossref
26. Wong W, Sundar G, Chee C, Zhao PS, Rajagopalan R, Gopal L. Clinical spectrum, treatment and outcomes of uveal melanoma in a tertiary centre. Singapore Med J 2019;60:474-8. Crossref
27. Yue H, Qian J, Yuan Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis for survival after enucleation of uveal melanoma in Chinese patients: long-term follow-up. Curr Eye Res 2017;42:759-65. Crossref
28. Virgili G, Gatta G, Ciccolallo L, et al. Survival in patients with uveal melanoma in Europe. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1413-8. Crossref
29. Shields CL, Shields JA, Gündüz K, et al. Conjunctival melanoma: risk factors for recurrence, exenteration, metastasis, and death in 150 consecutive patients. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1497-507. Crossref
30. Tuomaala S, Eskelin S, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Population-based assessment of clinical characteristics predicting outcome of conjunctival melanoma in whites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3399-408.
31. Missotten GS, Keijser S, De Keizer RJ, De Wolff-Rouendaal D. Conjunctival melanoma in the Netherlands: a nationwide study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:75-82. Crossref
32. Shields CL, Kaliki S, Al-Dahmash SA, Lally SE, Shields JA. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical classification predicts conjunctival melanoma outcomes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;28:313-23. Crossref
33. Esmaeli B, Wang X, Youssef A, Gershenwald JE. Patterns of regional and distant metastasis in patients with conjunctival melanoma: experience at a cancer center over four decades. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2101-5. Crossref
34. Werschnik C, Lommatzsch PK. Long-term follow-up of patients with conjunctival melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2002;25:248-55. Crossref
35. Wang MM, Chen C, Lynn MN, et al. Applying single-cell technology in uveal melanomas: current trends and perspectives for improving uveal melanoma metastasis surveillance and tumor profiling. Front Mol Biosci 2021;7:611584. Crossref
36. Mor JM, Rokohl AC, Koch KR, Heindl LM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of conjunctival melanoma: current insights. Clin Ophthalmol 2019;13:1297-302. Crossref
37. van den Bosch T, Kilic E, Paridaens D, de Klein A. Genetics of uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma: two of a kind? Dermatol Res Pract 2010;2010:360136. Crossref
38. Gkiala A, Palioura S. Conjunctival melanoma: update on genetics, epigenetics and targeted molecular and immune-based therapies. Clin Ophthalmol 2020;14:3137-52. Crossref

Cross-sectional study to assess the psychological morbidity of women facing possible miscarriage

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Dec;29(6):498–505 | Epub 20 Nov 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Cross-sectional study to assess the psychological morbidity of women facing possible miscarriage
Patricia NP Ip, FHKCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics & Gynaecology); Karen Ng, FHKCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics & Gynaecology); Osanna YK Wan, FHKCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics & Gynaecology); Janice WK Kwok, BSc; Jacqueline PW Chung, FHKCOG, FHKAM (Obstetrics & Gynaecology); Symphorosa SC Chan, MD, FHKCOG
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr Patricia NP Ip (patricia.ip@cuhk.edu.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Threatened miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy. This study aimed to assess psychological morbidity in women with threatened miscarriage, with the goal of identifying early interventions for women at risk of anxiety or depression.
 
Methods: Women in their first trimester attending an Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic were recruited between July 2013 and June 2015. They were asked to complete the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Spielberger’s State Anxiety Inventory State form (STAI-S), the Fatigue Scale–14 (FS-14), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) before consultation. They were also asked to rate anxiety levels before and after consultation using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
 
Results: In total, 1390 women completed the study. The mean ± standard deviation of GHQ-12 (bi-modal) and GHQ-12 (Likert) scores were 4.04 ± 3.17 and 15.19 ± 5.30, respectively. Among these women, 48.4% had a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 and 76.7% had a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, indicating distress. The mean ± standard deviation of BDI, STAI-S, and FS-14 scores were 9.35 ± 7.19, 53.81 ± 10.95, and 2.40 ± 0.51, respectively. The VAS score significantly decreased after consultation (P<0.001). Compared with women without a history of miscarriage, women with a previous miscarriage had higher GHQ-12, BDI, and POMS scores (except for fatigue-inertia and vigour-activity subscales). A higher bleeding score was strongly positively correlated with GHQ-12 (Likert) score. There were weak correlations between pain score and the GHQ-12 (bi-modal) ≥4, BDI >12, and POMS scores (except for confusion-bewilderment subscale which showed a strong positive correlation).
 
Conclusion: Women with threatened miscarriage experience a considerable psychological burden, emphasising the importance of early recognition for timely management.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • A substantial proportion of women with threatened miscarriage had symptoms of anxiety or depression.
  • Women with a previous miscarriage had a higher level of distress and would benefit from additional attention and psychological support.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Women with problems in early pregnancy should receive both clinical and psychological care to alleviate their anxiety.
  • Further studies of maternal psychological outcomes and fetal outcomes are needed to determine the long-term effects of anxiety and depression among women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester.
 
 
Introduction
Miscarriage occurs in 10% to 15% of pregnancies, mainly in the first trimester.1 Spontaneous miscarriage is associated with psychological problems such as anxiety and depression.2 3 4 Post-traumatic stress disorder may also occur after a miscarriage.3 Threatened miscarriage affects 15% to 20% of pregnant women.5 Management of threatened miscarriage involves reassurance and counselling. Women with threatened miscarriage and/or pregnancy-related uncertainty may experience frustration and anxiety. Although there are extensive data regarding the association between miscarriage and psychological morbidity, higher incidences of anxiety and depression among women with threatened miscarriage have only been detected in small studies.6 7
 
Antenatal depression and anxiety disorders are associated with increased fetal risks, such as low birth weight; antenatal symptoms of depression have been positively associated with postnatal depression.8 9 Furthermore, antenatal maternal stress and anxiety appear to predict long-term behavioural and emotional problems in children.10 11 Therefore, early detection and intervention are needed in women with antenatal psychological symptoms to minimise the impacts of those symptoms.
 
This study assessed psychological morbidity in women with threatened miscarriage, with the goal of identifying early interventions for women at risk of anxiety or depression.
 
Methods
Study design
This cross-sectional study, conducted at a university hospital in Hong Kong between July 2013 and June 2015, was part of a study that examined the ability of an early pregnancy viability scoring system to support counselling for women.12 In this hospital, an outpatient Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic (EPAC) provides medical care for women experiencing abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, or other problems in early pregnancy (gestational age ≤12 weeks). Referrals are usually made by medical officers from the Accident and Emergency Departments across Hong Kong, as well as general practitioners. All gynaecologists at the EPAC have ≥3 years of experience performing ultrasound scans. All Chinese women attending the EPAC were invited to participate; written informed consent was obtained from women who agreed to take part in the study.
 
Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancies, gestational age >84 days (>12 weeks), requested termination of pregnancy, and loss to follow-up. Demographic data, obstetric history, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and body mass index were recorded. Details of early pregnancy complaints were assessed, including abdominal pain (graded by a pain score of 0 to 3, where a higher score represents greater pain) and vaginal bleeding (determined by a pictorial blood loss chart according to the number of pads used, where 0 corresponds to no bleeding and 4 corresponds to clots or flooding).
 
Psychometric instruments
Chinese validated versions of five questionnaires were used to assess psychological well-being among the participants: the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Spielberger’s State Anxiety Inventory State form (STAI-S), the Fatigue Scale–14 (FS-14), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). All questionnaires have demonstrated reliability and validity in previous studies.13 14 15 The GHQ-12 and BDI scores were reported as both continuous and categorical variables, while the scores of other questionnaires were reported as continuous variables.
 
The GHQ-12 is a self-reporting rating scale intended to identify individuals with reduced psychological well-being or diminished quality of life. It is sensitive to short-term psychiatric disorders. A total score of ≥4 using the bi-modal scoring method (0-0-1-1) is considered ‘high distress’. When using the Likert scoring method (0-1-2-3), scores ≤12 are considered normal, while scores >12 are considered evidence of psychological distress.16 17 The questionnaire has been used as a tool to evaluate women with miscarriage.18 19 20
 
The BDI is a 21-item self-reporting rating scale intended to measure symptoms of depression in both general and psychiatric populations.21 It is used to measure depression severity, and psychological morbidity is defined as a score of >12, indicating probable depressive disorder. The STAI-S is a 20-item self-reporting inventory that measures state anxiety, including transitory and situational feelings of worry.22 Its use has been validated in pregnant women.23 A higher score indicates a higher level of anxiety. The FS-14 is a 14-item self-rating questionnaire that measures fatigue severity. A lower score indicates a higher level of fatigue.
 
The POMS is a self-reporting tool for the assessment of mood alterations in clinical and psychiatric populations.24 This 65-item questionnaire contains seven components: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, confusion-bewilderment, vigour-activity, and total mood disturbance. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher positive mood scores indicate an ideal mood, whereas higher negative mood scores indicate severe mood disturbance.
 
In addition to the above questionnaires, each woman’s level of anxiety and worry before consultation was assessed using a 0 to 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). A higher value represents a higher level of anxiety and worry about their pregnancies. The VAS has previously been validated with respect to its correlations with other measures of anxiety.25 26
 
During the consultation, women were counselled based on their ultrasound findings and clinical diagnosis. These women used the VAS to indicate their level of pregnancy-related anxiety after consultation. Follow-up scans (1-2 weeks later) were offered for women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability. Actual pregnancy outcomes were reassessed at 13 to 16 weeks, either by phone or by retrieval of information from the hospital’s centralised computer antenatal records system.
 
Statistical analysis
The sample size was calculated based on the number of participants required for the primary study to validate the scoring system.12 SPSS software (Windows version 26.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States) was used for data entry and analysis. A 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to determine the estimated errors and prevalence. Descriptive analyses were used for demographic data. The Chi squared test was used to explore associations between categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare median values when data were not normally distributed, while the t test was used to compare means when data were normally distributed. Univariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with psychological distress or morbidity. Factors with P values <0.1 in univariate analysis were entered into multivariate analysis, which was conducted via binary logistic regression. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
 
Results
Among the 1508 women who attended the EPAC during the study period, 64 were excluded and 54 declined to participate; thus, 1390 women completed the study (Fig). The demographic data are shown in Table 1. At the first clinic visit, most women (n=1048, 75.4%) had a viable pregnancy, 223 women (16.0%) had a pregnancy of uncertain viability, and 119 (8.6%) women had a miscarriage. At 13 to 16 weeks of gestation, 1111 women (79.9%) had a viable pregnancy, and an additional 160 (11.5%) women had a miscarriage.
 

Figure. Study recruitment and pregnancy outcomes of all participants after the first trimester
 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics, pain severity, and bleeding scores among all participants (n=1390)
 
The GHQ-12 (both bi-modal and Likert), BDI, STAI-S, FS-14, POMS, and VAS results are presented in Table 2. Overall, 48.4% and 76.7% of women had a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 and a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, respectively, indicating distress. Among the viable pregnancy, uncertain viability, and miscarriage groups, the percentages of women with a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 (43-52%) and a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12 (73-83%) were similar. Women with miscarriage had the highest GHQ-12 score and the highest percentages of a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 and a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12. The miscarriage group also had relatively higher POMS subscale scores for tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, confusion-bewilderment, and total mood disturbance compared with women who had other diagnoses.
 

Table 2. Scores of various psychometric tests among women based on their pregnancy outcome
 
The VAS scores for anxiety are also presented in Table 2. The score before consultation was the highest among women with a miscarriage (mean ± standard deviation=7.02 ± 2.50). Although the scores for the viable pregnancy and uncertain viability groups were significantly lower after consultation, the score was substantially higher in the uncertain viability group than in the viable pregnancy group.
 
Subgroup analysis showed that GHQ-12, BDI, and POMS (except fatigue-inertia and vigour-activity subscales) scores were significantly higher among women with previous miscarriage than among those without (Table 3). The bleeding score was strongly positively correlated with the GHQ-12 (Likert) score (correlation coefficient=0.56; P=0.032). Univariate analysis revealed that compared with women who had a lower bleeding score (<2), women with a higher bleeding score (≥2) had a significantly higher risk of having a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 (P=0.041), a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12 (P=0.025), and a BDI score >12 (P=0.022) [Table 4]. There were statistically significant but weak positive correlations between the pain score and a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 (P=0.001), a BDI score >12 (P<0.001), and a POMS total mood disturbance score (P<0.001), as well as various subscales. Notably, the POMS confusion-bewilderment subscale (correlation coefficient=0.93; P<0.001) demonstrated a strong positive correlation with the pain score.
 

Table 3. Scores of various psychometric tests among women based on their history of miscarriage (n=1390)
 

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with 12-item General Health Questionnaire [GHQ-12] (bi-modal), GHQ-12 (Likert), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores
 
Statistically significant factors associated with the various psychometric instrument scores were subjected to multivariate analysis (Table 4). Previous miscarriage was an independent risk factor for a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 (odds ratio [OR]=1.570, 95% CI=1.19-2.07) and a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12 (OR=1.459, 95% CI=1.04-2.06), indicating distress; it was also a risk factor for a BDI score >12 (OR=1.717, 95% CI=1.28-2.30), suggesting probable depression. A bleeding score ≥2 was an independent risk factor for a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12 (OR=1.506, 95% CI=1.05-2.17) and a BDI score >12 (OR=1.423, 95% CI=1.04-1.95).
 
Discussion
In this cohort study, nearly 50% and approximately 77% of women had a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4 and a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, indicating distress. Around one-fourth (24.5%) of women had a BDI score >12, suggesting probable depression.
 
Regardless of diagnosis, the VAS score decreased after consultation. However, the decrease in VAS score was smaller for the uncertain viability group, which may be attributed to the enhanced anxiety resulting from uncertainty among these women. This anxiety would be alleviated after an ultrasound examination and consultation with an accurate diagnosis. These findings emphasise the need to implement an early pregnancy assessment service that provides both clinical and psychological guidance to alleviate anxiety among women with problems in early pregnancy.
 
Emotional disturbances can have long-term effects on women with a previous miscarriage. Lok et al19 reported consistently higher scores on the GHQ-12 and BDI among women with a previous miscarriage, although these scores could decrease over time. In the present study, we observed a higher level of distress among women with a previous miscarriage, as demonstrated by the significantly greater proportion of women with GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4, GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, and BDI score >12. Profile of Mood States scores were also significantly higher on all subscales, except for the fatigue-inertia and vigour-activity subscales. Similarly, the baseline VAS score before consultation was significantly higher among women with a previous miscarriage than among those without. In multivariate analysis, previous miscarriage was an independent risk factor for GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score >4, GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, and BDI score >12. Baseline psychological morbidity may be greater among women with a previous miscarriage than among those without, consistent with findings in other studies.3 27 Therefore, additional attention and psychological support would be beneficial for women with greater distress and worse mood status.
 
A higher pain score was positively correlated with higher levels of distress and anxiety, as indicated by the positive relationships with various scales used in the present study. Pain is associated with anxiety and depression in pregnant women.28 Nevertheless, we observed weak relationships between pain and anxiety or distress, which might be related to the subjective nature of pain assessment.
 
Women with moderate to heavy bleeding (bleeding score ≥2) had significantly higher GHQ-12 (bi-modal), GHQ-12 (Likert), and BDI scores. Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that moderate to heavy bleeding (bleeding score ≥2) was an independent risk factor for a GHQ-12 (bi-modal) score ≥4, a GHQ-12 (Likert) score >12, and a BDI score >12. Heavy bleeding is often regarded as a common sign of threatened miscarriage. These findings highlight the importance of addressing pain and bleeding symptoms among women who attend early pregnancy services. The underlying complications of pregnancy, as well as anxiety and low mood in affected women, should be promptly managed.
 
Pregnancy loss is associated with negative mood status, including depression and anxiety.3 18 19 27 29 Whereas many studies have investigated the effects of miscarriage or pregnancy loss on depression, the effects of threatened miscarriage or early pregnancy-related complaints on women have not been extensively explored, despite the burdensome experience of a threatened miscarriage that appropriately causing anxiety in affected women. Our results are consistent with findings by Zhu et al,6 who reported that a substantial proportion of women with threatened miscarriage had symptoms of depression or anxiety.
 
The present study had a large sample size and a high rate of participation. Additionally, multiple psychometric instruments were used to assess the participants. The findings emphasise the importance of assessing and managing depression and anxiety symptoms in women with threatened miscarriage. Mental health assessments should be performed when women with threatened miscarriage attend clinics and hospitals. Early recognition of relevant mood problems will facilitate timely management. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as antenatal group therapy, constitute effective treatment for pregnant women with anxiety and depression.6 Pharmacological therapies (eg, most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines) can be administered after considering the side-effects of medications relative to the risk of untreated antenatal depression and anxiety.30
 
Limitations
Nevertheless, this study had some limitations. First, it used a cross-sectional design without longitudinal follow-up, and the subgroup analysis might have been underpowered. Second, information was unavailable regarding social factors (eg, education level or marital status) and the presence of an underlying psychiatric disorder, which might contribute to differences in baseline mood status. Third, the study did not include a comparison group of women without symptoms of threatened miscarriage.
 
Conclusion
There is a considerable psychological burden among women with early pregnancy problems and concerns about future pregnancy viability. These women experience emotional disturbances, as indicated by a significant proportion of women in this study who had high scores on psychometric tests. A gynaecologist consultation, in combination with an ultrasound assessment, is reassuring and can alleviate anxiety among women with early pregnancy problems. This study on maternal psychological outcomes provides insights concerning psychological morbidity among women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester, while also demonstrating the usefulness and feasibility of various psychometric instruments in identifying women who require additional psychological support. Further studies exploring maternal psychological well-being later in pregnancy, as well as fetal outcomes, are needed to determine the long-term effects of anxiety and depression among women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: OYK Wan, SSC Chan.
Acquisition of data: OYK Wan, JWK Kwok.
Analysis or interpretation of data: PNP Ip, K Ng.
Drafting of the manuscript: PNP Ip, K Ng.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: PNP Ip, K Ng, OYK Wan, JPW Chung, SSC Chan.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
As an editor of the journal, JPW Chung was not involved in the peer review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research was supported by a grant from the Health and Medical Research Fund of the former Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government (Ref No.: 12131091). The study sponsor was not involved in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, or in the writing of the manuscript.
 
Ethics approval
This research was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref No.: CRE.2013.348). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
 
References
1. Tong S, Kaur A, Walker SP, Bryant V, Onwude JL, Permezel M. Miscarriage risk for asymptomatic women after a normal first-trimester prenatal visit. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:710-4. Crossref
2. Broen AN, Moum T, Bödtker AS, Ekeberg O. Predictors of anxiety and depression following pregnancy termination: a longitudinal five-year follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:317-23. Crossref
3. Farren J, Jalmbrant M, Ameye L, et al. Post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011864. Crossref
4. Jensen KL, Temple-Smith MJ, Bilardi JE. Health professionals’ roles and practices in supporting women experiencing miscarriage: a qualitative study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;59:508-13. Crossref
5. Park C, Kang MY, Kim D, Park J, Eom H, Kim EA. Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0182341. Crossref
6. Zhu CS, Tan TC, Chen HY, Malhotra R, Allen JC, Østbye T. Threatened miscarriage and depressive and anxiety symptoms among women and partners in early pregnancy. J Affect Disord 2018;237:1-9. Crossref
7. Aksoy H, Aksoy Ü, İdem Karadağ Ö, et al. Effect of threatened miscarriage on maternal mood: a prospective controlled cohort study. J Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015;25:92-8. Crossref
8. Gelaye B, Sanchez SE, Andrade A, et al. Association of antepartum depression, generalized anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder with infant birth weight and gestational age at delivery. J Affect Disord 2020;262:310-6. Crossref
9. Siu BW, Leung SS, Ip P, Hung SF, O’Hara MW. Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: a prospective study of Chinese women at maternal and child health centres. BMC Psychiatry 2012;12:22. Crossref
10. Ibanez G, Bernard JY, Rondet C, et al. Effects of antenatal maternal depression and anxiety on children’s early cognitive development: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135849. Crossref
11. O’Connor TG, Heron J, Golding J, Glover V; ALSPAC Study Team. Maternal antenatal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children: a test of a programming hypothesis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003;44:1025-36. Crossref
12. Wan OY, Chan SS, Chung JP, Kwok JW, Lao TT, Sahota DS. External validation of a simple scoring system to predict pregnancy viability in women presenting to an early pregnancy assessment clinic. Hong Kong Med J 2020;26:102-10. Crossref
13. Chan DW, Chan TS. Reliability, validity and the structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Chinese context. Psychol Med 1983;13:363-71. Crossref
14. Shek DT. Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory. J Clin Psychol 1990;46:35-43. Crossref
15. Shek DT. Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1988;10:303-17. Crossref
16. Liang Y, Wang L, Yin X. The factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in young Chinese civil servants. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016;14:136. Crossref
17. Rao WW, Yang MJ, Cao BN, et al. Psychological distress in cancer patients in a large Chinese cross-sectional study. J Affect Disord 2019;245:950-6. Crossref
18. Lok IH, Lee DT, Yip SK, Shek D, Tam WH, Chung TK. Screening for post-miscarriage psychiatric morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:546-50. Crossref
19. Lok IH, Yip AS, Lee DT, Sahota D, Chung TK. A 1-year longitudinal study of psychological morbidity after miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1966-75. Crossref
20. Kong GW, Lok IH, Yiu AK, Hui AS, Lai BP, Chung TK. Clinical and psychological impact after surgical, medical or expectant management of first-trimester miscarriage—a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;53:170-7. Crossref
21. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561-71. Crossref
22. Hedberg AG. Review of State–Trait Anxiety Inventory. [Review of the Book State–Trait Anxiety Inventory, by C. D. Spielberger, R. L. Gorsuch & R. E. Lushere]. Prof Psychol 1972;3:389-90. Crossref
23. Bann CM, Parker CB, Grobman WA, et al. Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2017;38:53-62. Crossref
24. McNair DM, Heuchert P. Profile of mood states: technical update. North Tonawanda (NY): Multi-Health Systems; 2013. Crossref
25. Williams VS, Morlock RJ, Feltner D. Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:57. Crossref
26. Facco E, Stellini E, Bacci C, et al. Validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A) in preanesthesia evaluation. Minerva Anestesiol 2013;79:1389-95.
27. Cumming GP, Klein S, Bolsover D, et al. The emotional burden of miscarriage for women and their partners: trajectories of anxiety and depression over 13 months. BJOG 2007;114:1138-45. Crossref
28. Virgara R, Maher C, Van Kessel G. The comorbidity of low back pelvic pain and risk of depression and anxiety in pregnancy in primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:288. Crossref
29. Kong GW, Lok IH, Lam PM, Yip AS, Chung TK. Conflicting perceptions between health care professionals and patients on the psychological morbidity following miscarriage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:562-7. Crossref
30. Vitale SG, Laganà AS, Muscatello MR, et al. Psychopharmacotherapy in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2016;71:721-33. Crossref

Moral distress and psychological status among healthcare workers in a newly established paediatric intensive care unit

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Dec;29(6):489–97 | Epub 19 Dec 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Moral distress and psychological status among healthcare workers in a newly established paediatric intensive care unit
WL Cheung, MB, BS, MRCPCH1; KL Hon, MB, BS, MD1; Karen KY Leung, MB, BS, MRCPCH1; WF Hui, MB, ChB, MRCPCH1; Judith JM Wong, MBBChBAO, MRCPCH2; JH Lee, MB, BS, MRCPCH2; SC Kwok, BNur3; Patrick Ip, MB, BS, MD4
1 Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Children’s Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatric Subspecialties, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
3 Nursing Services Division, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr KL Hon (ehon@hotmail.com)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare workers in intensive care units often experience moral distress, depression, and stress-related symptoms. These conditions can lower staff retention and influence the quality of patient care. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of moral distress and psychological status among healthcare workers in a newly established paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Hong Kong.
 
Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in the PICU of the Hong Kong Children’s Hospital; healthcare workers (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals) were invited to participate. The Revised Moral Distress Scale (MDS-R) Paediatric Version and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale–21 items were used to assess moral distress and psychological status, respectively. Demographic characteristics were examined in relation to moral distress, depression, anxiety, and stress scores to identify risk factors for poor psychological outcomes. Correlations of moral distress with depression, anxiety, and stress were examined.
 
Results: Forty-six healthcare workers completed the survey. The overall median MDS-R moral distress score was 71. Nurses had a significantly higher median moral distress score, compared with doctors and allied health professionals (102 vs 47 vs 20). Nurses also had the highest median anxiety and stress scores (11 and 20, respectively). Moral distress scores were correlated with depression (r=0.445; P=0.002) and anxiety scores (r=0.417; P<0.05). Healthcare workers intending to quit their jobs had significantly higher moral distress scores (P<0.05).
 
Conclusions: Among PICU healthcare workers, nurses had the highest level of moral distress. Moral distress was associated with greater depression, anxiety, and intention to quit. Healthcare workers need support and a sustainable working environment to cope with moral distress.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • Among paediatric intensive care unit healthcare workers, nurses had the highest moral distress scores.
  • Moral distress was associated with greater depression, anxiety, and intention to quit.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Healthcare workers need support and a sustainable working environment to cope with moral distress.
  • Considering the high levels of moral distress experienced by nurses as well as the substantial moral distress in relation to end-of-life care, coping strategies should target nurses and focus on end-of-life education.
 
 
Introduction
Paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are highly specialised workplaces that support children with critical illnesses and their caregivers. Advances in paediatric critical care have significantly improved survival among critically ill children, although this improvement has also led to higher rates of morbidity, more disabilities, and longer hospital stays.1 2 3 4 5 These changes have resulted in potentially conflicting views regarding expectations and treatment goals among healthcare workers and patients’ families, increasing the incidence of moral distress among healthcare workers.6
 
Moral distress is a term that refers to experiences of frustration and failure arising from healthcare workers’ attempts to fulfil their moral obligations to patients, families, and the public.7 8 In an intensive care setting, healthcare workers frequently encounter ethical issues. Moral distress arises when a healthcare worker has determined the right course of action but cannot follow it because of internal or external constraints (eg, limited resources, institutional policies, or family preferences).9 Moral distress has been identified among healthcare workers in both adult ICUs and PICUs.10 11 It is associated with greater experience and lower staff retention.12
 
Depression and stress-related symptoms are common in healthcare workers, particularly among ICU staff.13 14 Studies have shown that these symptoms can ultimately impair patient care quality.15 16 Thus far, most literature regarding moral distress has been published in Western countries; the concept of moral distress is not well-known outside of the Western world.17 To our knowledge, there have been few analyses of moral distress and psychological status among healthcare workers in non-Western PICUs. Factors that can influence the level and type of moral distress include cultural backgrounds; beliefs of the patient, their family, and the clinical team; and differences among healthcare systems. Hong Kong is a multicultural city influenced by both Eastern and Western cultures; challenges in this setting may be unique. This study assessed moral distress prevalence and psychological status among PICU healthcare workers in Hong Kong.
 
Methods
Study population and study design
This prospective single-centre cross-sectional study was conducted from June to July 2020 in the six-bed tertiary PICU of the Hong Kong Children’s Hospital (HKCH), which began operation at the end of March 2019. The HKCH is the only dedicated paediatric oncology centre in the region, and most PICU admissions (54%) during the study period involved patients with cancer.
 
Study participants were healthcare workers involved in direct clinical care within the HKCH PICU, including doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals (ie, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, pharmacists, and dietitians). Healthcare workers were excluded if they had <3 months of critical care experience in the PICU or were temporarily on leave from the PICU during the study period. The survey was distributed to all eligible healthcare workers in the HKCH PICU during working hours within the study period.
 
Data collection and outcome measurement
The survey included two validated instruments (Revised Moral Distress Scale [MDS-R] Paediatric Version and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale–21 items [DASS-21]) to measure levels of moral stress, depression, anxiety, and stress in all participants.18 19 The participants’ demographic details were also collected. The survey explored job-quitting intentions related to moral distress or other reasons. It was piloted with two HKCH PICU staff members; questions were refined based on feedback from them. The final survey was paper-based. An email was sent to all participants before study commencement with information regarding the aim and details of the study. The survey was distributed by hand, and all copies were collected in a sealed box after completion. To ensure anonymity, the survey did not contain any identifiers.
 
Moral distress, the main outcome of the study, was measured using the validated paediatric version of the MDS-R (online supplementary Appendix 1).18 It consists of 21 items describing predetermined potentially morally distressing situations. There are five predetermined categories of situations: end-of-life care and quality of life, poor communication, staffing and material resources, hierarchies of decision making, and witnessing unethical behaviour. Each item on the MDS-R is scored according to the frequency and intensity that a healthcare worker experienced, using a Likert scale that ranges from 0 to 4. If a specific situation has never been experienced, participants are asked to indicate how disturbing the situation would be if they encountered it in their workplace. The frequency and intensity scores are then multiplied to produce an overall score for each item. The total moral distress score is the sum of the 21 overall scores for each item, ranging from 0 to 336. The English version of this instrument was used.
 
Psychological status was assessed using the DASS-21 (online supplementary Appendix 2).19 It is a set of three self-reporting subscales that measure participants’ emotional states: depression, anxiety, and stress. Each scale contains seven items for each emotional state. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (‘Did not apply to me at all’) to 3 (‘Applied to me very much or most of the time’). The total score for each emotional state is the sum of the subscale scores multiplied by 2. Depression, anxiety, or stress was considered present if the relevant scores exceeded the normal cut-off. The emotional state was categorised as mild, moderate, severe, or extremely severe, based on published cut-offs. The English and Chinese versions of this instrument were used; both language versions have been validated.19 20
 
Data analysis
Outcome measures were demographic data and the levels of moral distress, depression, anxiety, and stress. Data were expressed using median (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables and count (percentage) for categorical variables. Results of the MDS-R and DASS-21 were compared among doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals using the Chi squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Cohen’s d. Correlations between participant variables and outcome measures were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Windows version 26.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States).
 
Results
In total, 46 of 56 healthcare workers in the PICU completed the survey; the response rate was 82%. On one survey, the moral distress section was incomplete; that survey was excluded from the analysis of moral distress.
 
Demographic characteristics
Most participants were women (n=36, 78%) and were aged ≥30 years (n=35, 76%). More than half of the participants were nurses (n=26, 57%). Approximately half of the participants (n=24, 52%) had >5 years of PICU experience. Detailed participant characteristics are presented in Table 1.
 
Moral distress
The median MDS-R score was 71 (IQR=34-115). There was a significant difference in MDS-R score among the three professions (P<0.001). Doctors and nurses had significantly higher MDS-R scores, compared with allied health professionals (P<0.05). Nurses had the highest median MDS-R score (102, IQR=71-126), whereas allied health professionals had the lowest (20, IQR=6-39). There were no significant differences in MDS-R score according to sex, age, or duration of PICU experience (Table 1).
 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics according to level of moral distress (n=46)
 
Among the 21 items on the MDS-R, the most morally distressing item was related to end-of-life care and quality of life: ‘Honour the family’s wishes to continue life support even though I believe it is not in the child’s best interest’. This item also scored highest in frequency and intensity among the 21 items. All three groups of health professionals ranked this item as the most morally distressing situation in the clinical setting. The second most morally distressing item was also related to end-of-life care and quality of life: ‘Initiate extensive life-saving actions when I think they only prolong death’. This item also consistently scored high in frequency and intensity (Table 2). Situations involving poor communication constituted the remaining three most morally distressing items in this study. The top five most morally distressing items, as well as the top five items with the highest frequency and intensity, are presented in Table 2.
 

Table 2. The five most distressing, frequent, and intense survey items as perceived by paediatric intensive care unit healthcare workers
 
A higher MDS-R moral distress score was associated with the intention to quit. Healthcare workers who intended to quit their jobs had significantly higher moral distress scores (P<0.05). A higher moral distress score was also associated with higher DASS-21 depression factor (r=0.445; P<0.05) and anxiety factor scores (r=0.417; P<0.05). Nurses who had worked for a greater number of years in the PICU also experienced higher moral distress (r=0.512; P<0.05). Twenty-eight percent of all participants and 35% of nurses reported they intended to quit their jobs because of moral distress.
 
Psychological status
The median depression, anxiety, and stress scores were 11 (IQR=0.5-18), 8 (IQR=3-145), and 30 (IQR=21-38), respectively; these scores corresponded to mild depression, mild anxiety, and severe stress. Among the three groups, nurses had the highest median anxiety (11, IQR=6-16) and stress scores (20, IQR=12-26) [Fig]; these scores corresponded to mild depression, moderate anxiety, and moderate stress. Participants with significantly higher depression and anxiety (both P<0.05) scores also intended to quit their jobs. There was no significant difference in stress score between participants who did and did not intend to quit their jobs (P=0.434).
 

Figure. Comparison of psychological statuses among paediatric intensive care unit professions
 
Discussion
Moral distress levels among various healthcare workers
In this study, various levels of moral distress were present in all three groups of PICU healthcare workers. There was a significant difference in MDS-R scores among the three professions, and nurses had the highest median MDS-R score. This finding is contrary to the results of previous PICU studies, which showed that moral distress did not differ among various healthcare workers.21 22 The literature suggests that nurses exhibit higher moral distress scores because they often have less autonomy concerning options in situations that involve moral dilemmas, and they are required to implement care plans with which they do not agree.23 24 25 26 Studies of PICU healthcare workers’ behaviours in ethical and morally distressing dilemmas have shown that 48% of PICU nurses reported needing to perform actions that violated their conscience. These results reflect the culture and hierarchies of power in the PICU.23 26 27 Moreover, nurses are the frontline workers who directly experience the impacts of clinical decisions on patients and their families.26 28 In newly established PICUs, decreased self-confidence or increased fear in a new working environment, combined with an uncertain ethical climate, unclear team dynamics, and less decision-making autonomy regarding care plans, can cause nurses to perceive less moral agency (ie, ability to act morally and change a situation).22 24 25 26 29 30 31 A reduced sense of moral agency can result in moral distress, which may be more apparent in newly established PICUs.29 31
 
Our nurses’ moral distress levels among published studies
We note that moral distress scores among nurses in the present study are among the highest in published studies of PICU healthcare workers (Table 3). In addition to the aforementioned lack of clarity in working environment and team dynamics, the diverse levels of experience among nurses might have also contributed to their high moral distress scores. In the present study, 54% of nurses had <3 years of PICU experience, whereas 39% of nurses had >10 years of PICU experience. These proportions of nurses with extensive and minimal experience were both larger than the proportions reported in previous PICU studies.32 33 The presence of such a large number of inexperienced junior nurses in the PICU may place additional stress on more experienced nurses. Indeed, survey items related to staffing (item 17 ‘Work with nurses or other care providers who are less competent than the child’s care requires’ and item 21 ‘Work with levels of care provider staffing that I consider unsafe’ in the MDS-R) were ranked by nurses as the seventh and eighth most morally distressing items; these rankings were higher than in other professions.
 

Table 3. Moral distress among paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) healthcare workers in various studies, assessed using the Revised Moral Distress Scale Paediatric Version
 
Case mix in contribution to moral distress levels
The PICU case mix might also contribute to moral distress. The majority of PICU admissions during the study period involved patients with cancer, who had considerably higher mortality rates; care for such patients frequently involved end-of-life and palliative care issues.34 35 In a study of nurses’ experiences while caring for dying children, Davies et al36 found that when nurses recognise a child’s death is inevitable, they often have to manage conflicting obligations: follow the doctor’s treatment orders and allow the child to die without unnecessary pain. These disparate treatment goals for critically ill children with terminal cancer can exacerbate moral distress.36 37 In a comparison of moral distress scores among various paediatric disciplines (eg, general care and surgical service), Trotochaud et al21 found that healthcare workers in haematology/oncology areas experienced the second highest amount of moral distress on the list, second to healthcare workers in PICUs. Moreover, the proportion of patients with cancer in our PICU is much higher than the proportions in previous PICU studies.38 39 Therefore, it is entirely understandable that moral distress in our PICU was particularly high among nurses.
 
Years of experiences in paediatric intensive care units in contribution to moral distress levels
The present study revealed a positive correlation between years of PICU experience and moral distress scores among nurses, consistent with previous results concerning healthcare workers in PICUs and adult ICUs.12 26 This correlation may be related to effective utilisation of clinical knowledge and experience, along with greater awareness concerning the impacts of potentially inappropriate treatment plans on patients.40 Conversely, a study by Larson et al26 revealed a negative correlation between moral distress scores and years of experience among doctors in the PICU. However, the present study showed no correlation between moral distress scores and years of experience among doctors. This finding might be attributed to the small number of doctors involved, which was insufficient to demonstrate an association.
 
Potential impact of moral distress
Moral distress is often associated with the intention to quit a job.41 42 43 44 The results of the study were consistent with previous findings. Studies by Sannino et al11 and Trotochaud et al21 showed that 10.3% to 25% of PICU nurses intended to quit their jobs because of moral distress. The proportion of nurses in our study who intended to quit their job because of moral distress (34.6%) was higher than the proportions in previous PICU studies,11 21 which could be explained by their high moral distress scores. However, further studies are needed to determine the impact of moral distress alone on a healthcare worker’s intention to quit their job, compared with other possible distressing factors (eg, working hours and promotional opportunities) that can have a synergistic effect on the decision to quit.
 
Strengths and limitations
To our knowledge, this is the first study of moral distress among healthcare workers in an East Asian PICU. The results of this study provide insights concerning the broader understanding of moral distress in newly established PICUs. The high response rate also suggests strong participation and indicates that the study sample is representative of healthcare workers in our PICU.
 
However, the results of this study should be interpreted with the following caveats. First, this was a single-centre study with a relatively small sample size, which limits the generalisability of the findings. The small sample size also hindered further evaluation of identifiable demographic factors, such as education level and whether participants had any children; another study indicated that such factors may be associated with moral distress.11 Moreover, the small sample size precluded subgroup analysis. Second, this study was susceptible to ‘survivorship’ bias because the sample did not include PICU staff who already quit their jobs, including some who quit because of moral distress. Third, considering the cross-sectional nature of this study, causal relationships among various factors could not be established. For example, although participants with higher depression and anxiety scores reported a stronger intention to quit their jobs, we could not determine whether these participants reported more psychological symptoms because of their intention to quit, or if their intention to quit led to more psychological symptoms. Larger multicentre studies are needed to further explore moral distress among healthcare workers in Hong Kong PICUs. As our unit expands to a 16-bed PICU and a five-bed high-dependency unit, a longitudinal study will also enhance the broader understanding of moral distress dynamics in a developing PICU, as well as the efficacies of various strategies to address moral distress.
 
Coping strategies for moral distress and stress
Considering the results of this study, moral distress should be regarded as a key area for service improvement. The high levels of moral distress experienced by nurses, as well as the substantial moral distress in relation to end-of-life care, suggest that coping strategies should target nurses and focus on end-of-life education. These coping strategies are urgently needed to improve staff retention and quality of care; they can be implemented at the individual, organisational, and administrative levels.20
 
At the individual level, ethics education is essential for improvements in coping capacity and sense of moral agency, which can reduce the levels of moral distress.22 45 Education can be provided through interactive workshops or self-guided programmes.41 Prentice et al42 suggested that education should focus on improving knowledge regarding patient outcomes, the degree of uncertainty in specific situations, and appropriate pain control. Instead of emphasising ethical dilemmas and underlying principles, education should highlight communication skills, clarify values, and enhance the overall understanding of the healthcare system to address potential environmental conflicts.31 This approach can ultimately increase staff confidence (ie, moral courage) in constructively communicating their concerns.42 Screening tools for various emotional states, such as the DASS-21, should also be included to help individuals gain better awareness of their own psychological well-being and seek professional help if necessary. Additionally, these tools can be used to monitor emotions that might cause moral distress.
 
At the organisational level, efforts should be made to promote intra- and interdisciplinary communication. Poor communication, one of the five most morally distressing items, can lead to diminished quality of care, reduced job satisfaction, and poor patient outcomes.46 Ethics rounds, formal and informal discussions, and debriefing sessions regarding morally distressing cases could improve interdisciplinary communication.22 These initiatives can help promote better mutual understanding of viewpoints across disciplines and individuals.22 Participation in these events may also allow nurses to feel more empowered and experience a greater sense of decision-making autonomy.43 Finally, the establishment of formal ethical consultation services may provide support and clarification with respect to ethical dilemmas.44
 
At the administrative level, administrators should recognise that it is acceptable for staff to perceive moral distress; this perception is a sign of humanity and an affirmation of moral values.44 Improvements in clinical environments (eg, reduction of staff shortages, promotion of intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration, and encouragement of a safe and supported ethical climate) can help decrease moral distress.47 These measures include providing respectful feedback to staff, empowering staff to voice perceptions and emotions, and making difficult decisions in a timely manner after open discussion.48
 
Conclusion
This study revealed significant differences in moral distress among doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals in a newly established PICU in Hong Kong. Nurses had the highest moral distress scores among the three groups of PICU healthcare workers in this study and among published studies involving PICU nurses. Most areas of moral distress were related to end-of-life care and poor communication. Higher moral distress was also associated with greater depression, anxiety, and intention to quit. There is an urgent need for interventions to help healthcare workers cope with moral distress and create a more sustainable working environment.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: WL Cheung, KL Hon, KKY Leung, WF Hui.
Acquisition of data: WL Cheung, KL Hon, KKY Leung, WF Hui.
Analysis or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
As an editor of the journal, KL Hon was not involved in the review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This research was approved by the Hong Kong Children’s Hospital Research Ethics Committee (Ref No.: HKCH-REC-2020-008) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice Guideline. All participants provided informed consent to take part in the research.
 
References
1. Jones S, Rantell K, Stevens K, et al. Outcome at 6 months after admission for pediatric intensive care: a report of a national study of pediatric intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Pediatrics 2006;118:2101-8. Crossref
2. Cremer R, Leclerc F, Lacroix J, Ploin D; GFRUP/RMEF Chronic Diseases in PICU Study Group. Children with chronic conditions in pediatric intensive care units located in predominantly French-speaking regions: prevalence and implications on rehabilitation care need and utilization. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1456-62. Crossref
3. Namachivayam P, Shann F, Shekerdemian L, et al. Three decades of pediatric intensive care: who was admitted, what happened in intensive care, and what happened afterward. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010;11:549-55. Crossref
4. Edwards JD, Houtrow AJ, Vasilevskis EE, et al. Chronic conditions among children admitted to U.S. pediatric intensive care units: their prevalence and impact on risk for mortality and prolonged length of stay. Crit Care Med 2012;40:2196-203. Crossref
5. Ebrahim S, Singh S, Hutchison JS, et al. Adaptive behavior, functional outcomes, and quality of life outcomes of children requiring urgent ICU admission. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013;14:10-8. Crossref
6. Bruce CR, Miller SM, Zimmerman JL. A qualitative study exploring moral distress in the ICU team: the importance of unit functionality and intrateam dynamics. Crit Care Med 2015;43:823-31. Crossref
7. Austin W. Moral distress and the contemporary plight of health professionals. HEC Forum 2012;24:27-38. Crossref
8. Jameton A. Nursing practice: the ethical issues. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall Inc; 1984.
9. Garros D, Austin W, Carnevale FA. Moral distress in pediatric intensive care. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:885-6. Crossref
10. Lusignani M, Giannì ML, Re LG, Buffon ML. Moral distress among nurses in medical, surgical and intensive-care units. J Nurs Manag 2017;25:477-85. Crossref
11. Sannino P, Giannì ML, Carini M, et al. Moral distress in the pediatric intensive care unit: an Italian study. Front Pediatr 2019;7:338. Crossref
12. Dodek PM, Wong H, Norena M, et al. Moral distress in intensive care unit professionals is associated with profession, age, and years of experience. J Crit Care 2016;31:178-82. Crossref
13. Ohayon MM, Priest RG, Guilleminault C, Caulet M. The prevalence of depressive disorders in the United Kingdom. Biol Psychiatry 1999;45:300-7.Crossref
14. de Vargas D, Dias AP. Depression prevalence in intensive care unit nursing workers: a study at hospitals in a northwestern city of São Paulo State. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2011;19:1114-21. Crossref
15. Poghosyan L, Clarke SP, Finlayson M, Aiken LH. Nurse burnout and quality of care: cross-national investigation in six countries. Res Nurs Health 2010;33:288-98. Crossref
16. Humphries N, Morgan K, Conry MC, McGowan Y, Montgomery A, McGee H. Quality of care and health professional burnout: narrative literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2014;27:293-307. Crossref
17. Prompahakul C, Epstein EG. Moral distress experienced by non-Western nurses: an integrative review. Nurs Ethics 2020;27:778-95. Crossref
18. Hamric AB, Borchers CT, Epstein EG. Development and testing of an instrument to measure moral distress in healthcare professionals. AJOB Prim Res 2012;3:1-9. Crossref
19. Tran TD, Tran T, Fisher J. Validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) 21 as a screening instrument for depression and anxiety in a rural community-based cohort of northern Vietnamese women. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:24. Crossref
20. Wang K, Shi HS, Geng FL, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China. Psychol Assess 2016;28:e88-100. Crossref
21. Trotochaud K, Coleman JR, Krawiecki N, McCracken C. Moral distress in pediatric healthcare providers. J Pediatr Nurs 2015;30:908-14. Crossref
22. Sauerland J, Marotta K, Peinemann MA, Berndt A, Robichaux C. Assessing and addressing moral distress and ethical climate part II: neonatal and pediatric perspectives. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2015;34:33-46. Crossref
23. Papathanassoglou ED, Karanikola MN, Kalafati M, Giannakopoulou M, Lemonidou C, Albarran JW. Professional autonomy, collaboration with physicians, and moral distress among European intensive care nurses. Am J Crit Care 2012;21:e41-52. Crossref
24. Corley MC. Nurse moral distress: a proposed theory and research agenda. Nurs Ethics 2002;9:636-50. Crossref
25. Wilkinson JM. Moral distress in nursing practice: experience and effect. Nurs Forum 1988;23:16-29. Crossref
26. Larson CP, Dryden-Palmer KD, Gibbons C, Parshuram CS. Moral distress in PICU and neonatal ICU practitioners: a cross-sectional evaluation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017;18:e318-26. Crossref
27. Solomon MZ, Sellers DE, Heller KS, et al. New and lingering controversies in pediatric end-of-life care. Pediatrics 2005;116:872-83. Crossref
28. Molloy J, Evans M, Coughlin K. Moral distress in the resuscitation of extremely premature infants. Nurs Ethics 2015;22:52-63. Crossref
29. McCarthy J, Gastmans C. Moral distress: a review of the argument-based nursing ethics literature. Nurs Ethics 2015;22:131-52. Crossref
30. LaSala CA, Bjarnson D. Creating workplace environments that support moral courage. Online J Issues Nurs 2010;15:Manuscript 4. Crossref
31. Epstein EG, Delgado S. Understanding and addressing moral distress. Online J Issues Nurs 2010;15:Manuscript 1. Crossref
32. Ahmed GE, Abosamra OM. Knowledge of pediatric critical care nurses regarding evidence based guidelines for prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). J Educ Pract 2015;6:94-101.
33. Hickey PA, Pasquali SK, Gaynor JW, et al. Critical care nursing’s impact on pediatric patient outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:1375-80. Crossref
34. Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ, Block S. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1133-8. Crossref
35. Wösten-van Asperen RM, van Gestel JP, van Grotel M, et al. PICU mortality of children with cancer admitted to pediatric intensive care unit a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019;142:153-63. Crossref
36. Davies B, Clarke D, Connaughty S, et al. Caring for dying children: nurses’ experiences. Pediatr Nurs 1996;22:500-7.
37. Johnston EE, Alvarez E, Saynina O, Sanders L, Bhatia S, Chamberlain LJ. Disparities in the intensity of end-of-life care for children with cancer. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20170671. Crossref
38. Demaret P, Pettersen G, Hubert P, Teira P, Emeriaud G. The critically-ill pediatric hemato-oncology patient: epidemiology, management, and strategy of transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care 2012;2:14. Crossref
39. Dalton HJ, Slonim AD, Pollack MM. Multicenter outcome of pediatric oncology patients requiring intensive care. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2003;20:643-9. Crossref
40. Zhang W, Wu X, Zhan Y, Ci L, Sun C. Moral distress and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study in China. Nurs Ethics 2018;25:470-80. Crossref
41. Beumer CM. Innovative solutions: the effect of a workshop on reducing the experience of moral distress in an intensive care unit setting. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2008;27:263-7. Crossref
42. Prentice T, Janvier A, Gillam L, Davis PG. Moral distress within neonatal and paediatric intensive care units: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2016;101:701-8. Crossref
43. Browning AM. CNE article: moral distress and psychological empowerment in critical care nurses caring for adults at end of life. Am J Crit Care 2013;22:143-51. Crossref
44. Santos RP, Garros D, Carnevale F. Difficult decisions in pediatric practice and moral distress in the intensive care unit. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2018;30:226-32. Crossref
45. Burston AS, Tuckett AG. Moral distress in nursing: contributing factors, outcomes and interventions. Nurs Ethics 2013;20:312-24. Crossref
46. Whitehead PB, Herbertson RK, Hamric AB, Epstein EG, Fisher JM. Moral distress among healthcare professionals: report of an institution-wide survey. J Nurs Scholarsh 2015;47:117-25. Crossref
47. Atabay G, Çangarli BG, Penbek Ş. Impact of ethical climate on moral distress revisited: multidimensional view. Nurs Ethics 2015;22:103-16. Crossref
48. Benoit DD, Jensen HI, Malmgren J, et al. Outcome in patients perceived as receiving excessive care across different ethical climates: a prospective study in 68 intensive care units in Europe and the USA. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:1039-49. Crossref

Anaemia prevalence and risk factors among children aged 6 to 23 months in rural China

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Oct;29(5):432–42 | Epub 1 Aug 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE (HEALTHCARE IN MAINLAND CHINA)
Anaemia prevalence and risk factors among children aged 6 to 23 months in rural China
L Zeng, MA, BA; W Zheng, MSc, BSc; Q Gao, PhD, MEcon; N Qiao, PhD, LLM; K Du, MEcon; A Yue, PhD, MEcon
Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China
 
Corresponding author: Dr Q Gao (gqiufeng820@163.com)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Anaemia is a global public health problem among children. However, few studies have examined anaemia prevalence and risk factors among Chinese children of different ages, particularly in poor rural areas. This study investigated these two aspects among children aged 6 to 23 months in poor rural areas of China.
 
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1132 children aged 6 to 23 months in three prefectures of the Qinba Mountains area. A finger prick blood test for haemoglobin and anaemia was conducted, along with household surveys of socio-demographic characteristics, illness characteristics, and feeding practices. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of anaemia.
 
Results: Overall, 42.6% of children in the study displayed anaemia. Children aged 6 to 11 months had the highest anaemia prevalence (53.6%). Anaemia risk factors differed among age-groups and throughout the overall sample. Bivariate and multivariable regression results showed that continued breastfeeding, any history of formula feeding, and consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods were associated with anaemia prevalence. However, continued breastfeeding and any history of formula feeding had the greatest impact across age-groups (both P<0.05).
 
Conclusion: Anaemia remains a severe public health problem among children aged 6 to 23 months in rural China. Healthy feeding practices, nutritional health knowledge, and nutrition improvement projects are needed to reduce the burden of anaemia among children in rural areas of China.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • The prevalence of anaemia among rural children was higher in the Qinba Mountains area than in the central and eastern areas of China.
  • Anaemia prevalence varied among age-groups, and the lowest prevalence was observed in children aged 18 to 23 months.
  • Continued breastfeeding, any history of formula feeding, and consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods were associated with anaemia prevalence among children in rural China.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • The government should more closely monitor anaemia among children in rural areas and introduce relevant policies to address this issue.
  • Healthy feeding practices, nutritional health knowledge, and nutrition improvement projects are needed to reduce the burden of anaemia among children in rural China.
 
 
Introduction
Anaemia is a global health issue that affects one-quarter of the world’s population; it is particularly prevalent among preschool-aged children in developing countries.1 Approximately 47.4% of preschool-aged children worldwide display anaemia.1 There are three categories of factors associated with anaemia: inherited disorders, infectious diseases, and micronutrient deficiencies.2 3 Among these factors, iron deficiency is the most common cause,4 especially in China.5 There is evidence that iron deficiency anaemia affects developmental potential in children.6 7
 
Anaemia prevalence among children in China, particularly in poor rural areas, is higher than that in developed countries.2 3 In the United States and the Netherlands, the rate is <10%.2 The rate in urban areas of China is <20%,8 9 whereas the prevalence in rural areas is more than double that in urban areas.10 11 12 Thus, there is a need for considerable effort from the Chinese Government to ensure that regional anaemia prevalence among children aged <5 years are below 10% by 2030.13
 
Few studies have examined factors associated with anaemia among children of different ages, particularly in poor rural areas of China. Previous studies have shown that anaemia may be associated with the demographic, social, and health characteristics of children and their families.14 15 16 17 Feeding practices have also been associated with anaemia in children.1 18 19 20 However, few studies have extensively analysed anaemia prevalence and associated factors among children of different ages in rural China.16 21 22 For example, one study explored risk factors for anaemia in children aged 0 to 5 months and those aged 6 to 36 months; however, the age ranges were excessively broad.14 In another study exploring risk factors for anaemia in children aged <36 months, stratified according to age, relatively few potential associated factors (eg, socio-demographic and illness characteristics) were considered; there was no consideration of other potential associated factors, such as complementary feeding.18
 
This study was therefore conducted to explore anaemia prevalence and risk factors among children aged 6 to 23 months in poor rural areas of China; analyses were performed focusing on the overall sample and with stratification according to age. Therefore, we established three objectives: to examine anaemia prevalence among children in the study area; to identify socio-demographic and illness characteristics associated with anaemia in children; and to explore feeding practices associated with anaemia in children.
 
Methods
Sample selection
This study was conducted in 22 nationally designated poverty-stricken counties (all of which are now out of poverty) within three prefectures in the Qinba Mountains area of northwest China. By the end of 2015 in the survey year, the total population of the sample area was 8 464 200, including a rural population of 4 716 100 (55.7%). The per capita income was 20 939 yuan, which was less than half of the national per capita income (42 359 yuan) in the same period in China.23 Sample villages and households were selected in two stages. First, from each of the 22 counties, all townships (ie, the middle level of administration between county and village) that met the criteria were selected to participate in the study, with two exceptions: the township in each county containing the county government (which represents the level of county development), as well as townships containing <800 people. In total, 115 of 400 townships were included in this study. Second, in each sample township, we selected random villages with ≥10 children. All children in our target age range (6-23 months) were enrolled in the study, including premature but not congenitally abnormal children; thus, we included 1694 children and their households. Because one prefecture did not survey feeding practices, the corresponding analysis only included 1210 participants from the other two sample prefectures. In total, 1132 participants (children and their households) fully completed the survey (response rate of 93.6%).
 
Data collection
Survey data were collected in three waves in November 2015, April 2016, and February 2017. After identification of the primary caregiver responsible for a child’s diet and care, well-trained enumerators collected information through one-on-one questionnaire interviews with the primary caregiver.
 
First, specific components of socio-demographic and illness characteristics were recorded in the survey. The socio-demographic characteristics included the child’s age, sex, gestational age, and birth order; the primary caregiver’s identity; maternal education and age; and whether the family received social security support (ie, government welfare for the lowest income families nationwide). Illness characteristics comprised any history of fever, cold, or diarrhoea in the previous 2 weeks.
 
Second, detailed information regarding the child’s feeding practices was collected via dietary recall, using a series of questions based on the ‘Indicators for assessing infant feeding practices’ compiled by the World Health Organization (WHO).24 The following definitions were used: continued breastfeeding, proportion of children aged 6 to 23 months who had received breast milk during the previous day; any history of formula feeding, proportion of children who had ever been formula-fed; minimum dietary diversity, proportion of children aged 6 to 23 months who had consumed ≥4 of the 7 food groups under WHO’s classification24 during the previous day; minimum meal frequency, proportion of children aged 6 to 23 months who consumed a meal at a standard frequency during the previous day, considering their breastfeeding status (two times for breastfed infants aged 6 to 8 months, three times for breastfed children aged 9 to 23 months, and four times for non-breastfed children aged 6 to 23 months); minimum acceptable diet, proportion of children aged 6 to 23 months who consumed a meal that met standards for minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency during the previous day; and consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods, proportion of children who consumed iron-rich or iron-fortified foods specifically designed for children aged 6 to 23 months during the previous day.
 
Third, each child’s haemoglobin (Hb) concentration and anaemia status were assessed by trained nurses from the Xi’an Jiaotong University, who performed tests on fingertip blood samples collected from all children. These analyses were performed using the HemoCue Hb201 haemoglobin analyser (HemoCue Inc, Ängelholm, Sweden), which is accurate, rapid, and convenient for children in remote rural areas.11 15 21 25 Its measurement accuracy is 1 g/L.18 We confirmed that the sample villages’ altitudes were below 1000 m; therefore, no adjustments to measured Hb concentrations were required. Anaemia status was determined according to Hb concentration and divided into four categories: non-anaemic, Hb concentration ≥110 g/L; mild, 100-109 g/L; moderate, 70-99 g/L; and severe, <70 g/L.26 Children with severe anaemia were referred to a local hospital for treatment.
 
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 15.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station [TX], United States). The children’s socio-demographic and illness characteristics, feeding practices, and anaemia statuses were summarised using descriptive statistics. In bivariate analyses, P values for differences in mean Hb concentration between subgroups were estimated using t tests. The Pearson Chi squared test was also used to compare categorical variables between anaemia and non-anaemia groups. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify covariates that were significantly associated with Hb concentration. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of anaemia. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
 
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics, illness characteristics, and feeding practices
Table 1 presents the socio-demographic and illness characteristics of the 1132 children. Of these, 51.0% were boys, 5.2% were born prematurely, and more than half were first-born (54.9%). Additionally, more than half of the primary caregivers (68.9%) were the children’s mothers; the remaining primary caregivers were the children’s grandmothers. Less than one-quarter of the children’s mothers (22.5%) had >9 years of education, and more than half of them (59.4%) were aged ≤28 years. Social security support was received by 11.9% of the participating families. Approximately half of the children (55.6%) had been sick (with fever, cold, or diarrhoea) in the previous 2 weeks.
 

Table 1. Detailed socio-demographic characteristics, illness characteristics, and feeding practices
 
Table 1 also presents the feeding practices of the children; notably, 29.8% and 86.6% of the children had continued breastfeeding and any history of formula feeding, respectively. With respect to complementary feeding, most children (80.9%) consumed iron-rich or iron-fortified foods; however, approximately 65.0% and 44.2% of the children met the standard requirements for minimum dietary diversity and meal frequency, respectively. Moreover, only 19.9% of the children met the standard requirement for a minimum acceptable diet. All children were divided into three age-groups: 6 to 11 months (n=343), 12 to 17 months (n=472), and 18 to 23 months (n=317).
 
Prevalence of haemoglobin concentration and anaemia
Table 2 presents the children’s Hb concentrations and anaemia prevalence; the mean and standard deviation of their Hb concentration was 110.95 ± 0.42 g/L. Overall, 42.6% of the children had anaemia, including 21.6% with mild anaemia, 20.1% with moderate anaemia, and 0.8% with severe anaemia. A similar pattern was observed upon stratification according to age: few children had severe anaemia, and approximately one-quarter of children displayed mild or moderate anaemia in 6 to 11 months and 12 to 17 months age-groups.
 

Table 2. Prevalence of haemoglobin concentrations and anaemia prevalence
 
As age increased across the groups (from 6-11 months to 12-17 months, and then to 18-23 months), the mean Hb concentration increased, whereas anaemia prevalence decreased. The mean and standard deviation Hb concentrations in the three groups (from youngest to oldest) were 106.85 ± 0.72 g/L, 111.10 ± 0.64 g/L, and 115.18 ± 0.78 g/L, respectively. Furthermore, children aged 6 to 11 months had the highest anaemia prevalence (53.6%), followed by children aged 12 to 17 months (43.4%) and then children aged 18 to 23 months (29.3%).
 
Bivariate analysis of socio-demographic and illness characteristics
Table 3 shows the bivariate associations of Hb concentration/anaemia prevalence with the children’s socio-demographic and illness characteristics, stratified according to age. Among children aged 12 to 17 months, birth order and health status were significantly associated with Hb concentration/anaemia prevalence; however, the associations were not statistically significant in the other two age-groups or the overall sample. Among children aged 12 to 17 months, Hb concentrations were significantly higher in first-born children than in non-first-born children (P=0.020). Moreover, among children aged 12 to 17 months, children who had been sick in the previous 2 weeks were more likely to display anaemia, compared with children who had not been sick (P=0.029).
 

Table 3. Prevalence of haemoglobin concentrations and anaemia, stratified according to socio-demographic and illness characteristics
 
A similar trend was observed regarding the relationship of Hb concentration/anaemia prevalence with the primary caregiver; however, the only statistically significant result was observed in the overall sample. In summary, the Hb concentration was lower (P=0.003) and anaemia prevalence was higher (P=0.001) among children whose primary caregiver was their mother, compared with children who had a different primary caregiver. Furthermore, in the overall sample and all age-groups, there were no significant binary associations between the Hb concentration/anaemia prevalence and variables such as sex, premature birth, maternal education and age, or receipt of social security support.
 
Bivariate analysis of feeding practice variables
Table 4 shows the bivariate associations of Hb concentration/anaemia prevalence with feeding practices. The associations varied among age-groups and in the overall sample. Children with any history of formula feeding had higher Hb concentrations and lower rates of anaemia, compared with children who had never received formula (both P<0.001); these differences were statistically significant in all age-groups. Children who had continued breastfeeding displayed lower Hb concentrations and higher rates of anaemia, compared with children who had stopped breastfeeding (both P<0.001); these differences were statistically significant among children aged 12 to 17 months (both Hb concentration and anaemia prevalence) and 18 to 23 months (anaemia prevalence only).
 

Table 4. Prevalence of haemoglobin concentrations and anaemia, stratified according to feeding practices
 
Additionally, observable complementary food–related variables were significantly associated with Hb concentration and anaemia prevalence. In the overall sample, children with feeding practices that met the minimum requirements for dietary diversity had significantly higher Hb concentrations (P<0.001) and lower rates of anaemia (P=0.005), compared with children whose feeding practices did not meet those requirements. Children with feeding practices that met the minimum meal frequency requirements had higher Hb concentrations (P=0.018), compared with children whose feeding practices did not meet those requirements. Regarding the consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods, a significant positive association with Hb concentration and a significant negative association with anaemia prevalence was observed among children aged 12 to 17 months and in the overall sample (both P<0.001).
 
Multivariable analysis of socio-demographic and illness characteristics, and feeding practice variables
The results of multivariable analysis of the relationship between Hb concentration and anaemia prevalence are presented in Table 5. The initial multivariable model included variables related to socio-demographic and illness characteristics, continued breastfeeding, and any history of formula feeding; the results showed that Hb concentrations were significantly higher in first-born children (P=0.031) and significantly lower in children of younger mothers (P=0.032), but no factors were significantly associated with anaemia prevalence. Any history of formula feeding was positively associated with Hb concentration (P=0.031) and negatively associated with anaemia prevalence (odds ratio [OR]=0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.41-0.86; P=0.006), whereas continued breastfeeding was significantly negatively associated with Hb concentration (P=0.001) and positively associated with anaemia prevalence (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.07-2.11; P=0.019). A subsequent multivariable model included socio-demographic and illness characteristics, as well as complementary food–related variables; the results showed that Hb concentration remained positively associated with first-born-child status (P=0.025) and younger maternal age (P=0.032), whereas consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods was negatively associated with anaemia prevalence (OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.46-0.94; P=0.021). The final multivariable model included all variables; the results showed that continued breastfeeding was positively associated with anaemia prevalence (OR=1.75, 95% CI=1.21-2.51; P=0.003), whereas any history of formula feeding was negatively associated with anaemia prevalence (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.87; P=0.010).
 

Table 5. Multivariable analysis of haemoglobin concentrations and anaemia prevalence
 
Discussion
In this analysis of 1132 children aged 6 to 23 months in a poor rural area of China, we found that the anaemia prevalence was high in the overall sample, although it varied among age-groups. Bivariate analysis of socio-demographic characteristics, illness characteristics, and feeding practices revealed diverse risk factors among age-groups and in the overall sample. Additionally, multivariable analysis showed that feeding practice–related variables were risk factors for anaemia prevalence. Compared with complementary food–related variables, continued breastfeeding and any history of formula feeding had much greater impacts across age-groups.
 
Anaemia prevalence among children in rural China
Our findings revealed that 42.6% of children in the overall sample displayed anaemia, and anaemia prevalence among children in rural China varied according to age. According to WHO guidelines, anaemia prevalence exceeding 40% is a ‘severe public health problem’.26 Previous studies revealed anaemia prevalence among children in rural areas of central China (29.7%) and eastern China (24.2%)21 27; the prevalence was higher among children in our sample, indicating that urgent attention is needed regarding anaemia among children in rural areas of western China. Furthermore, our results showed that anaemia prevalence decreased with increasing age, consistent with previous reports.8 15 17 28 We found that anaemia prevalence was lower among children aged 18 to 23 months than among those aged 6 to 11 months or 12 to 17 months; this may have been related to the successful inclusion of complementary foods after 12 months of age. There is evidence that increasing iron intake from various foods contributes to a slow decrease in anaemia prevalence.26 Overall, our findings imply substantial differences in anaemia prevalence according to age; thus, analyses of anaemia in children, along with its risk factors, should consider the effect of age (in months).
 
Bivariate and multivariable analyses of risk factors of anaemia
Our bivariate analysis showed significant differences in risk factors for low Hb concentration and anaemia prevalence among children in the overall sample and in each age-group. These findings were consistent with the results of other studies regarding anaemia among children in China.21 22 In particular, a study of children aged 6 to 23 months showed that complementary feeding practices meeting the minimum dietary diversity requirement were negatively associated with anaemia prevalence among children aged 12 to 17 months; however, the association was not statistically significant among children aged 6 to 11 months or 18 to 23 months. Additionally, complementary feeding practices meeting the minimum meal frequency requirement were negatively associated with anaemia prevalence in all age-groups.22 Therefore, we conclude that the risk factors for anaemia prevalence in children differ according to age.
 
Our results also indicated that socio-demographic and illness characteristics were associated with anaemia prevalence among children in poor rural areas of China, consistent with previous findings.11 17 Specifically, birth order and a history of illness in the previous 2 weeks were statistically significant risk factors for anaemia in children aged 12 to 17 months. Regarding health status, previous studies revealed that anaemia is positively associated with a history of recurrent illness, such as diarrhoea or fever.11 19 We found that children who had been sick in the previous 2 weeks were more likely to display anaemia, presumably because they experienced a loss of appetite and had poor intestinal nutrient absorption.27 The child’s relationship with their primary caregiver was significantly associated with Hb concentration and anaemia prevalence in the overall sample. Previous studies showed greater dependence on breast milk among children whose primary caregiver was their mother; this dependence may lead to anaemia. Thus, the provision of adequate nutrition via complementary food is recommended.29
 
Bivariate and multivariable analyses showed that feeding practices (continued breastfeeding, any history of formula feeding, and consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods) were associated with anaemia prevalence in poor rural areas of China. However, continued breastfeeding and any history of formula feeding had greater impacts on specific age-groups. Children who had continued breastfeeding displayed significantly lower Hb concentrations and higher rates of anaemia, both in the overall sample and among children aged 12 to 17 months or 18 to 23 months. These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies.30 31 32 Although the importance of breastfeeding for children before the age of 2 is widely recognised, empirical studies have shown that prolonged breastfeeding (ie, beyond 6 months of age) is positively associated with anaemia in children aged <2 years.31 32 Increases in total breastfeeding duration are associated with decreases in iron stores, implying late introduction or poor quality of complementary foods in children, as well as maternal anaemia.31 33 Accordingly, although there remains a need to encourage breastfeeding, careful monitoring of maternal and infant anaemia should be implemented, along with timely introduction of appropriate complementary foods to infants by 6 months of age; maternal diets and nutritional supplementation should also be improved.33 Children with any history of formula feeding had a higher Hb concentration and lower anaemia prevalence in each age-group, as well as the overall sample, consistent with previous findings.11 19 34 Formula feeding protects against anaemia in children, presumably because most commercially available formulas are fortified with micronutrients (eg, iron).27 Children with any history of formula feeding would have received additional iron, which have may helped to improve their anaemia status.11 Therefore, high-iron formulas are recommended for infants aged >6 months.35
 
In the overall sample, children with feeding practices that minimum dietary diversity standards and children who consumed iron-rich or iron-fortified foods were less likely to display anaemia. These results are consistent with the findings of studies in other rural areas of China.16 20 22 Regarding minimum dietary diversity, the WHO recommends that children aged 6 to 23 months receive a variety of foods to ensure that their nutrient requirements are met.36 A child’s needs with respect to the type and quantity of complementary foods increase with monthly age.37 Other studies have shown that the addition of complementary food in moderate amounts protects against anaemia.18 30 After 6 months of age, sources of iron for anaemia prevention are mainly derived from complementary foods.19 20 22 The consumption of iron-rich foods can reduce the risk of anaemia by improving iron storage and subsequent Hb production.19 The results of some studies have highlighted the importance of high-energy foods rich in iron, including beans, dark green leafy vegetables, meat, and viscera. These foods constitute sources of haem iron, which has better bioavailability.18 Therefore, caregivers should receive information concerning the importance of iron-rich complementary foods before they begin introducing complementary foods to their children.37
 
However, there is evidence that many children in rural China do not meet the standards for complementary feeding recommended by the WHO.18 22 24 Family income level substantially impacts nutritional intake.20 Although formula and complementary foods are widely available, they may not be prioritised in poor rural households.22 Because parents in such households often lack nutritional knowledge, they may assume that nutrient deficiency is unlikely; this belief can lead to inappropriate feeding in many children.20 Therefore, active intervention is needed; effective communication methods should be established to provide nutritional health knowledge and social support for family nutrition.
 
Limitations
This study had several important limitations. First, we could not determine whether seasonal or temporal factors were associated with anaemia. Although we had some seasonal and temporal data regarding the three survey waves, key information was unavailable; thus, we could not confirm the findings of Luo et al.11 Second, although previous studies indicated that anaemia during pregnancy is a risk factor for anaemia in children,38 39 the present study lacked data regarding maternal anaemia during pregnancy; thus, we could not explore this relationship. Third, we only assessed any history of formula feeding, rather than ongoing formula feeding, which may have led to inaccurate results. Additional studies are needed to address these limitations.
 
Conclusion
Anaemia remains a severe public health problem among children aged 6 to 23 months in rural China. Continued breastfeeding was significantly positively associated with anaemia prevalence, whereas any history of formula feeding and the consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods were significantly negatively associated with anaemia prevalence. Although we could not make causal inferences on the basis of findings in this cross-sectional study, our analysis provided key information concerning factors associated with anaemia prevalence among children of various ages in rural China; these findings will help to guide clinical practice and support policy formulation.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: L Zeng, W Zheng, Q Gao.
Acquisition of data: K Du, A Yue.
Analysis or interpretation of data: L Zeng, Q Gao.
Drafting of the manuscript: W Zheng, A Yue, Q Gao.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Q Gao, N Qiao.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgement
We thank the enumerators for their contribution to data collection.
 
Funding/support
This research was supported by the 111 Project (Grant No.: B16031), the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 22BGL212), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 72203134), and the Special Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Shaanxi Province (Grant No.: 2023QN0058). The funders had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation, or manuscript preparation.
 
Ethics approval
This study protocol was approved by the Sichuan University Institutional Review Board of China (Protocol ID: 2013005-01). All caregivers of the children under investigation provided oral informed consent before participating in this study.
 
References
1. McLean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D, de Benoist B. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993-2005. Public Health Nutr 2009;12:444-54. Crossref
2. Tolentino K, Friedman JF. An update on anemia in less developed countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007;77:44-51.Crossref
3. Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Ozaltin E, Shankar AH, Subramanian SV. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2011;378:2123-35. Crossref
4. World Health Organization. Anaemia. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/anaemia#tab=tab_1. Accessed 17 May 2023.
5. Wang L, Sun Y, Liu B, et al. Is infant/toddler anemia a problem across rural China? A mixed-methods analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1825. Crossref
6. Lozoff B, Smith JB, Kaciroti N, Clark KM, Guevara S, Jimenez E. Functional significance of early-life iron deficiency: outcomes at 25 years. J Pediatr 2013;163:1260-6. Crossref
7. Deng X. Effects of iron deficiency anemia on physical development, intelligent behavior development and sleep quality of infants [in Chinese]. Pract Clin Med 2019;4:719-81.
8. Jin D, Zhuo Y, Hu L, Ruan D. Influence of iron deficiency anemia on intelligence of infants aged 6 to 36 months [in Chinese]. Chin J Woman Child Health Res 2019;30:281-3.
9. Zhang B. Analysis of the prevalence of anemia in infants and young children and the causes of transformation in a community in Shanghai [in Chinese]. Shanghai Med Pharm J 2019;40:61-2.
10. Wang L, Liang W, Zhang S, et al. Are infant/toddler developmental delays a problem across rural China? J Comp Econ 2019;47:458-69. Crossref
11. Luo R, Shi Y, Zhou H, et al. Anemia and feeding practices among infants in rural Shaanxi province in China. Nutrients 2014;6:5975-91. Crossref
12. Nie J, Yang J, Zhang L, Li Y, Yang J. Current situation and influencing factors of anemia in infants in poor rural areas in western China. J East China Norm Univ Sci 2019;37:58-69.
13. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. Circular of the General Office of the State Council on the Issuance of China’s Food and Nutrition Development Program (2017-2030) [in Chinese]. State Office 2017. Available from: http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfbh/xwbfbh/wqfbh/42311/44583/xgzc44589/Document/1695253/1695253.htm Accessed 9 Sep 2021.
14. Gao W, Yan H, Wang D, Dang S, Pei L. Severity of anemia among children under 36 months old in rural western China. PLoS One 2013;8:e62883. Crossref
15. Chen L, Li Y, Li Y, Yang F, Bi X. Iron deficiency anemia status and influencing factors among children aged 6 to 23 months in rural minority areas in Yunnan [in Chinese]. Chin J Child Health Care 2017;25:85-7.
16. Huang Y, Wang L, Huo J, et al. Prevalence and causes of anaemia in children aged 6-23 months in rural Qinghai, China: findings from a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031021. Crossref
17. Yang Y, Liu L, Yang W, Zhang S, Wang Y. State and influencing factors for anemia of infants aged 0-18 months in rural area of Shaanxi province [in Chinese]. Matern Child Health Care China 2013;28:1897-9.
18. Luo RF, Liang X, Liu CF, Zhang LX, Yue A. Risk factors for anemia in infants aged 6-12 months from rural areas of southern Shaanxi Province, China [in Chinese]. Chin J Contemp Pediatr 2016;18:736-41.
19. Sun S, Wu Y, Chen Y, Hao G, Zhou H. Analysis of the influencing factors of infant anemia in underdeveloped rural areas of southern Shaanxi [in Chinese]. Chin J Dis Control Prev 2015;19:1138-41.
20. Zhou X, Fang JQ, Luo JY, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of anemia among 6-23 months old children in poor rural areas [in Chinese]. Chin J Public Health 2017;33:1302-5.
21. Xin QQ, Chen BW, Yin DL, et al. Prevalence of anemia and its risk factors among children under 36 months old in China. J Trop Pediatr 2017;63:36-42. Crossref
22. Hipgrave DB, Fu X, Zhou H, et al. Poor complementary feeding practices and high anaemia prevalence among infants and young children in rural central and western China. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:916-24. Crossref
23. Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Shaanxi statistical yearbook [in Chinese]. 2016. Available from: http://tjj.shaanxi.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/tjnj/sxtjnj/index.html?2016. Accessed 17 May 2023.
24. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices (Part I—definitions). Conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6-8 November 2007 in Washington, DC, USA. 2008. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43895/9789241596664_eng.pdf;jsessionid=96860366C0058393F12BC11CE25498BA?sequence=1. Accessed 23 Dec 2021.
25. Seguin P, Kleiber A, Chanavaz C, Morcet J, Mallédant Y. Determination of capillary hemoglobin levels using the HemoCue system in intensive care patients. J Crit Care 2011;26:423-7. Crossref
26. World Health Organization. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. 2011. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85839/WHO_NMH_NHD_MNM_11.1_eng.pdf?sequence=22&isAllowed=y. Accessed 4 Jul 2023.
27. Huang Z, Jiang FX, Li J, Jiang D, Xiao TG, Zeng JH. Prevalence and risk factors of anemia among children aged 6-23 months in Huaihua, Hunan Province. BMC Public Health 2018;18:1267. Crossref
28. Huo J, Sun J, Fang Z, et al. Effect of home-based complementary food fortification on prevalence of anemia among infants and young children aged 6 to 23 months in poor rural regions of China. Food Nutr Bull 2015;36:405-14. Crossref
29. Li H, Xiao J, Liao M, et al. Anemia prevalence, severity and associated factors among children aged 6-71 months in rural Hunan Province, China: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2020;20:989. Crossref
30. Hopkins D, Emmett P, Steer C, Rogers I, Noble S, Emond A. Infant feeding in the second 6 months of life related to iron status: an observational study. Arch Dis Child 2007;92:850-4. Crossref
31. Hu S, Tan H, Peng A, et al. Disparity of anemia prevalence and associated factors among rural to urban migrant and the local children under two years old: a population based cross-sectional study in Pinghu, China. BMC Public Health 2014;14:601. Crossref
32. Wu LX, Wang PW, Liu S, Li SY, Yan H, Zuo D. Analysis on breast feeding and anemia status among infants under 2 years old in rural areas of Hubei province [in Chinese]. Chin J Child Health Care 2013;21:1175-7.
33. Meinzen-Derr JK, Guerrero ML, Altaye M, Ortega-Gallegos H, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Morrow AL. Risk of infant anemia is associated with exclusive breast-feeding and maternal anemia in a Mexican cohort. J Nutr 2006;136:452-8. Crossref
34. Dong C, Ge P, Zhang C, et al. Effects of different feeding practices at 0 to 6 months and living economic conditions on anemia prevalence of infants and young children [in Chinese]. J Hyg Res 2013;42:596-9.
35. Vendt N, Grünberg H, Leedo S, Tillmann V, Talvik T. Prevalence and causes of iron deficiency anemias in infants aged 9 to 12 months in Estonia. Medicina (Kaunas) 2007;43:947-52. Crossref
36. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: definitions and measurement methods. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240018389. Accessed 20 Sep 2021.
37. Lu P, Wang J, Jiang W, et al. Feeding status of 0~23-month-old infants in poor rural areas of Gansu Province from 2018 to 2019 [in Chinese]. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 2020;49:731-43.
38. Wang L. Investigation on risk factors of iron deficiency anemia in infants [in Chinese]. Chin J Woman Child Health Res 2017;(S4):434-5.
39. Shukla AK, Srivastava S, Verma G. Effect of maternal anemia on the status of iron stores in infants: a cohort study. J Family Community Med 2019;26:118-22. Crossref

Cutaneous manifestations, viral load, and prognosis among hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a cohort study

Hong Kong Med J 2023 Oct;29(5):421–31 | Epub 19 Oct 2023
© Hong Kong Academy of Medicine. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Cutaneous manifestations, viral load, and prognosis among hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a cohort study
Christina SM Wong, MRCP, FRCP1 #; Ivan FN Hung, MD, FRCP2 #; Mike YW Kwan, MSc (Applied Epidemiology), FHKAM (Paediatrics)3; Martin MH Chung, MRCP, FHKAM (Medicine)1; Mandy WM Chan, MRCP, FHKAM (Medicine)1; Adrian KC Cheng, MRCP, FHKAM (Medicine)1; YM Lau, MB, BS, MRCP1; CK Yeung, MD, FRCP1; Henry HL Chan, PhD, FRCP1; CS Lau, MD, FRCP4
1 Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
3 Paediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
4 Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
# Equal contribution
 
Corresponding author: Prof Christina SM Wong (wongsm11@hku.hk)
 
 Full paper in PDF
 
Abstract
Introduction: Various cutaneous manifestations have been reported as symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which may facilitate early clinical diagnosis and management. This study explored the incidence of cutaneous manifestations among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and investigated its relationships with viral load, co-morbidities, and outcomes.
 
Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to a tertiary hospital for COVID-19 from July to September 2020. Clinical information, co-morbidities, viral load (cycle threshold [Ct] value), and outcomes were analysed.
 
Results: In total, 219 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. Twenty patients presented with new onset of rash. The incidence of new rash was 9.1% (95% confidence interval=6.25%-14.4%). The most common manifestations were maculopapular exanthem (n=6, 42.9%, median Ct value: 24.8), followed by livedo reticularis (n=4, 28.6%, median Ct value: 21.3), varicella-like lesions (n=2, 14.3%, median Ct value: 19.3), urticaria (n=1, 7.1%, median Ct value: 14.4), and acral chilblain and petechiae (n=1, 7.1%, median Ct value: 33.1). The median Ct values for patients with and without rash were 22.9 and 24.1, respectively (P=0.58). There were no significant differences in mortality or hospital stay between patients with and without rash. Patients with rash were more likely to display fever on admission (P<0.01). Regardless of cutaneous manifestations, patients with older age, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease stage ≥3 had significantly higher viral load and mortality (P<0.05).
 
Conclusion: This study revealed no associations between cutaneous manifestation and viral load or clinical outcomes. Older patients with multiple co-morbidities have risks of high viral load and mortality; they should be closely monitored.
 
 
New knowledge added by this study
  • Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could display various cutaneous manifestations. The incidence of new rash in our cohort was 13.6%. The most common manifestation attributed to COVID-19 was maculopapular exanthem, followed by livedo reticularis.
  • Informal extrapolation of our results to the general population in Hong Kong suggested that 0.91% solely involve rash presentation; these patients would remain undiagnosed without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing. This lack of diagnosis is a potential health threat and could facilitate viral spread.
Implications for clinical practice or policy
  • Rash is self-limiting in patients with COVID-19, potentially because of a more robust immune response among patients with rash.
  • Older patients with multiple co-morbidities should undergo early screening and receive close monitoring if they develop symptoms of COVID-19; early treatment beginning at symptom onset can improve clinical outcomes.
 
 
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei, China.1 2 According to World Health Organization Coronavirus (COVID-19) data, as of 7 May 2022, 188 countries and territories had reported more than 510.2 million cumulative confirmed cases and more than 6.23 million deaths3; in Hong Kong, there were 330 670 confirmed cases and 9308 (2.81%) deaths.4 Common symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, sore throat, cough, malaise, dyspnoea, and anosmia or aguesia.1 Although most people have mild symptoms, some develop acute respiratory distress syndrome, which may lead to cytokine storm, multiorgan failure, septic shock, and even death.5
 
There is evidence that rash is an early symptom or the only symptom in patients who are ‘asymptomatic’ or paucisymptomatic.6 7 8 9 Early detection of this ‘silent’ sign and corresponding diagnosis are important for epidemiologic management because asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic cases may function as sources of community spread. Various dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19 have been reported including maculopapular eruption, urticarial eruption, livedo reticularis, pernio/chilblain, vasculitis, vesicular eruption, and papulo-necrotic eruption.10 11 12 13 14 15 The incidences of cutaneous manifestations in patients with COVID-19 have varied among case series (from 0.2% to 20.4%10 11 12 13), possibly because of the under-recognition of asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic cases.
 
The spread of SARS-CoV-2 mainly involves droplets; it can also occur via direct contact and is speculated to occur through faecal excretion.2 The primary target of SARS-CoV-2 is the upper respiratory mucosa, where angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) serves as a functional receptor for viral spikes and eventual viral entry into host cells. Gene expression of the SARS-CoV-2 cellular receptor ACE2 has been demonstrated in multiple human tissues, including skin and adipose tissue.16 17 18 Therefore, the proposed mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 affect cutaneous tissues include direct attacks on epidermal basal cells and vascular endothelial cells (possibly targeting ACE2 expressed on skin keratinocytes) and indirect impacts through the antiviral inflammatory response.16 17 18
 
There is speculation that patients with rash occurrence may have a better prognosis because they display better antiviral immunity.19 Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, little was known about relationships among cutaneous manifestations, viral load, co-morbidities, and clinical outcomes. A recent systematic review showed inconclusive results about the relationship between COVID-19 severity and viral load; however, it suggested that older age and higher SARS-CoV-2 viral load were directly related.20 Likewise, some rashes such as maculopapular rash and chilblain-like lesions were found to be strongly associated with paucisymptomatic disease course and lower severity of COVID-19 while skin changes such as acro-ischaemia, livedo reticularis and purpura may be useful indicators of higher severity of COVID-19.21 22 In 2020, according to the Public Health Ordinance of Hong Kong, all patients with SARS-CoV-2–positive test results were hospitalised for quarantine, regardless of symptoms.4 Here, we explored the incidences and patterns of clinical and cutaneous manifestations among hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19, then investigated associations with viral load, co-morbidities, and prognosis.
 
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1 July to 30 September 2020 in an acute tertiary hospital, Queen Mary Hospital (ie, a major public hospital within one of seven hospital clusters) serving one-fifth of the population of 7.5 million in Hong Kong. Electronic hospital records were used to identify adult patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted during the study period for suspected COVID-19.
 
The flow of patient recruitment is illustrated in Figure 1. Patients included in this study were adults with laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay from a nasopharyngeal swab. Clinical information was collected from electronic clinical photographs of patients who had provided informed consent to receive treatment. A physical examination was performed by a dermatologist within 48 hours of rash onset to confirm clinical signs; follow-up was conducted monthly until 3 months after discharge. Rashes were considered COVID-19–related if they were new, could not be explained by the patient’s previous or pre-existing skin conditions or an alternative diagnosis (eg, drug eruption or other viral exanthem of varicella, parvovirus, enterovirus, influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus, or respiratory syncytial virus detected in nasopharyngeal swab [performed as clinically indicated and excluded]), occurred along with the SARS-CoV-2–positive rRT-PCR test results, and resolved when other symptoms improved.
 

Figure 1. Patient recruitment
 
Clinical and laboratory data
Clinical and laboratory data, including patient demographics, initial COVID-19 viral load according to cycle threshold (Ct) value, treatment received, co-morbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease [CKD]), and pre-existing skin diseases, were retrieved from electronic medical records for analysis. For the detection of viral nucleic acids, rRT-PCR is considered a gold standard diagnostic assay. The Ct value refers to the number of rRT-PCR cycles needed to amplify viral RNA to a detectable level; it is inversely related to viral load.23 Thus, the Ct value can indicate the relative quantity of viral RNA in a specimen (lower Ct values reflect greater quantities of viral RNA). In this study, Ct values of <26, 26-30, and ≥31 were regarded as high, intermediate, and low viral load, respectively.24 25
 
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) or means (± standard deviations), as appropriate. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare median values between two groups and among ≥3 groups, respectively. Categorical variables, expressed as proportions, were compared using the Chi squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
 
To identify factors independently associated with outcomes, variables with P values <0.1 in univariate analyses were subsequently entered into binary logistic regression multivariate analyses; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Windows version 26.0; IBM Corp, Armonk [NY], United States). Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
 
Results
From 1 July to 30 September 2020, 414 patients with suspected COVID-19 were admitted to our hospital. This study included 219 patients who had SARS-CoV-2–positive rRT-PCR results in analyses of nasopharyngeal swab samples (from 213 recovered patients and six patients who had died). One hundred and ninety-five patients were excluded because of non–COVID-19 diagnosis, unconfirmed status, non-Asian ethnicity, or refusal to consent (Fig 1).
 
The mean patient age was 54.7 ± 17.5 years (range, 18-99), the male-to-female ratio was approximately 1:1, and 90.4% of the patients were Chinese (Table 1). The mean duration of hospitalisation was 9.87 ± 6.99 days and the overall mortality rate was 2.7%. The mean SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR Ct values for nasopharyngeal swab on admission was 24.2 ± 7.1. The median time to the first post-discharge visit was 38 days (range, 28-42) and the median duration of follow-up was 14 weeks (range, 13.1-15.5).
 

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with nasopharyngeal swab–confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (n=219)
 
Clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019
The three most frequent symptoms were upper respiratory symptoms: cough (51.5%), fever (42.5%), and sputum production (27.8%). Among the 219 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, 58 (26.5%) were asymptomatic and had undergone compulsory SARS-CoV-2 testing in accordance with the Public Health Ordinance. Of the 58 patients, 75.9% reported contact with identifiable index cases, such as household members, domestic helpers, or work colleagues.
 
Cutaneous manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019
Twenty patients presented with new rash. The incidence of new rash was 9.1% in this 3-month study period (95% CI=6.25%-14.4%). At the time of this study, there were no biomarkers or diagnostic tests for COVID-19–related cutaneous manifestations. Any new cutaneous manifestation not attributable to a previous/pre-existing skin disease or alternative diagnosis was considered COVID-19–related. Upon review by a dermatologist, six patients were diagnosed with localised urticarial eruptions after interferon injection treatment; 6.4% of patients (14/219) displayed various forms of COVID-19–related rash (Fig 2 and Table 2).
 

Figure 2. Cutaneous manifestations in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. (a) Urticarial eruptions. A 60-year-old man had tender urticarial plaques on the abdomen after interferon injection. (b) Maculopapular exanthem. A 40-year-old woman presented with maculopapular eruptions on the trunk as well as urticarial plaques on the right abdomen secondary to interferon injection. (c) Petechiae. A 37-year-old woman presented with petechial rash on the thighs. (d-f) A 59-year-old man presented with symmetrical erythematous vesicular papules on his extremities and back. (g) A 59-year-old woman presented with reticular erythema on the bilateral lower legs
 

Table 2. Characteristics of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 and cutaneous manifestations (n=14)
 
The most common manifestations were maculopapular exanthem (n=6, 42.9%, median Ct value: 24.8), followed by livedo reticularis (n=4, 28.6%, median Ct value: 21.3), varicella-like lesions (n=2, 14.3%, median Ct value: 19.3), urticaria (n=1, 7.1%, median Ct value: 14.4), and acral chilblain and petechiae (n=1, 7.1%, median Ct value: 33.1) [Fig 2]. The median Ct values for patients with and without rash were 22.9 and 24.1, respectively (P=0.58). The timing of symptom onset ranged from day 1 to day 9 (median, 4; mean, 4.28 ± 2.26). Skin symptoms were the sole symptoms in two patients with COVID-19 (0.91%), highlighting the importance of carefully evaluating patients who only display initial cutaneous symptoms or signs.
 
Outcomes and prognostic factors
Characteristics of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019: rash vs no rash
Compared with patients without rash, patients with rash were more likely to exhibit fever (OR=5.73; P=0.008) and display pulmonary infiltrates on chest X-ray (OR=5.06; P=0.013). Among patients with pulmonary infiltrates (n=19), four of them had rash. The episodes of desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen were less common in patients with rash (25%, 1/4) than in those without (93.3%, 14/15; OR=0.02, 95% CI=0.001-0.49; P=0.02). Furthermore, among these 19 patients with pulmonary infiltrates, systemic corticosteroids were less frequently required by patients with rash (25%, 1/4) than by those without (73.3%, 11/15; OR=0.12, 95% CI=0.01-1.53; P=0.10), but it was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in age, sex, co-morbidities or Ct values between patients with and without rash. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was slightly lower in older patients without rash (P=0.024); 10.2% of these patients had CKD stage ≥3. In terms of outcomes, patients with and without rash had mortalities of 0.0% and 2.9%, respectively (P=0.97). The length of hospitalisation was similar in both groups (Table 3).
 

Table 3. Characteristics of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019: rash vs no rash
 
Characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019: co-morbidities and viral load
Patients aged ≥70 years had a significantly higher viral load (as reflected by a lower Ct value), compared with those aged <70 years (mean Ct value: 21.97 vs 24.65, P=0.03). Regardless of age, patients with hypertension and CKD stage ≥3 had a significantly higher viral load and lower initial Ct value on admission (OR=2.65, 95% CI=1.08-6.45 and OR=3.65, 95% CI=1.18-11.3, respectively; both P<0.05).
 
All six patients who died were men; their mean age was 87.0 ± 7.3 years. The rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a glycated haemoglobin level of ≥6.5%, CKD stage ≥3, and higher viral load (ie, lower Ct value on admission) were significantly greater among patients who died than among those who survived (Table 4). Older age, hypertension, and low eGFR were associated with a higher risk of mortality (all P<0.05) [Table 5].
 
 

Table 4. Comparison of characteristics between patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who died (mortality group) and those who recovered (recovered group)
 

Table 5. Multiple Cox regression of all-cause mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (n=219)
 
Treatment received
Treatment varied in this cohort because there was no standard of care in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Symptomatic treatment was administered to 53 patients (24.2%); 166 patients (75.8%) received early treatment within the first week of symptom onset, including interferon beta-1b and ribavirin, which were administered based on the results of a triple therapy clinical study.21 Emollients and topical corticosteroids of mild to moderate potency (1% hydrocortisone cream and 0.1% mometasone furoate cream) were prescribed for symptomatic relief.
 
Follow-up and dermatological outcome
During follow-up, we observed that urticarial eruption after interferon injection resolved within 10 to 14 days upon completion of treatment. With respect to COVID-19–related skin eruptions, most lesions (maculopapular exanthem, livedo reticularis, and urticaria) were self-limiting and spontaneously resolved without specific treatment; there were no severe sequelae. Two patients with varicella-like lesions had mild post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation without scarring.
 
Discussion
Cutaneous manifestations of the COVID-19 pandemic have been gaining increasing attention because they may be useful in the early diagnosis of COVID-19, triage of patients with SARS-CoV-2–positive test results, and risk stratification. There is speculation that the mechanism involves the direct action of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues, the complement/interferon-driven immune response, and the coagulation system; alternatively, it involves nonspecific skin symptoms of systemic viral infection.16 17 22 26 27 28 Although more investigations are needed, it is possible that some symptoms are clinical signs of milder COVID-19, whereas others are indicators of more severe clinical illness.
 
Maculopapular exanthem: the most common cutaneous manifestation
Our study showed that patients with confirmed COVID-19 could display various cutaneous manifestations. The most common manifestation attributed to COVID-19 was maculopapular exanthem, followed by livedo reticularis. Because most skin lesions were transient and self-limiting, skin biopsy was only performed in one patient. In that 40-year-old female patient, skin biopsy of the left trunk revealed low to moderate numbers of perivascular lymphocytes and histiocytes, as well as sparse eosinophils, in the superficial dermis; focal parakeratosis was present in the epidermis. There was no evidence of vasculitis or interfacial changes. These findings were compatible with maculopapular exanthem.
 
In previous reports, erythema multiforme–like lesions, chilblain-like acral eruptions, and livedo erythema were identified in children and young adult patients with asymptomatic or mild disease.26 28 29 In contrast, maculopapular rash and acro-ischaemic lesions were often observed among adult patients with more severe disease. Among our patients who presented with rash, there were no instances of mortality; the duration of hospitalisation was similar regardless of rash status. The results of a previous study has suggested that the cutaneous manifestation is the only manifestation of COVID-19 in some patients30; thus, careful documentation of any cutaneous symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic may be necessary for early recognition and diagnosis.30 Additionally, urticaria with fever has diagnostic implications because this combination may be an early symptom of subsequently confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.19 In our cohort, patients with cutaneous manifestations were more likely to present with fever. Although most of our patients had symptoms other than rash alone, two patients (0.9%) presented with rash only (one with urticaria and one with maculopapular exanthem); the clinical significance of these symptoms should not be ignored. Informal extrapolation of these results to the general population in Hong Kong suggested that 2477 cases (2/219; ie, 0.91% × 272 235 confirmed cases)4 solely involve rash presentation; these patients would remain undiagnosed if they did not undergo SARS-CoV-2 testing. This lack of diagnosis is a potential health threat and could facilitate viral spread.
 
Incidence of cutaneous manifestations
In our cohort, the incidence of new rash was 13.6%. In the study by Guan et al31 in China, the prevalence of rash was much lower in patients with COVID-19 (0.2%; 2/1099). In that study, patients with rash may have been underdiagnosed because patients with suspected COVID-19 were managed by general practitioners or hospitalists who had less familiarity with cutaneous manifestations.31 In contrast, our patients underwent prompt assessment by in-hospital dermatologists to detect cutaneous manifestations. In an Italian study, the prevalence of rash presentation was much higher (20.4%),13 presumably because asymptomatic patients were excluded through a lack of testing. However, if we exclude the 58 asymptomatic patients in our cohort (all of whom underwent compulsory testing in accordance with the Public Health Ordinance), the incidence of new rash in our study was 16.7% (95% CI=14.5-18.8), which remains lower than the incidence in the Italian study. We speculate that this difference is related to the early initiation of combined treatment (ribavirin and interferon beta-1b) in our cohort, which may modify or halt the SARS-CoV-2–induced inflammatory process.21 Importantly, the genomic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 spread are under investigation worldwide; this approach helps identify transmission routes in various regions. In a case series in the United States, SARS-CoV-2 genomes in one region were predominantly associated with isolates that originated in Europe (>80%), similar to the distributions of viral strains in other regions in the United States32; a smaller subgroup of SARS-CoV-2 genomes displayed similarity to strains that originated in Asia (15%), indicating multiple sources of viral spread within the community.32 Differences in the prevalences of cutaneous manifestations may represent variations in SARS-CoV-2 genomic characteristics among regions; in Hong Kong, a cosmopolitan city with many travellers from mainland China and other countries, the prevalences of cutaneous manifestations may be the result of viral strains from all provinces of China as well as Europe and other regions. Further studies are needed concerning genomic variations and clinical manifestations.
 
Prognostic factors
In terms of viral load and prognosis, higher viral load on admission was significantly associated with greater mortality in patients with older age, history of hypertension, and CKD stage ≥3. Univariate analysis showed that the risk of mortality was the greatest among patients with older age, hypertension, higher glycated haemoglobin level, and renal impairment. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that older age, hypertension, and low eGFR were significantly associated with greater mortality risk.
 
Conversely, patients with renal impairment were less likely to present with rash, suggesting that the immune response is weaker in patients with renal impairment. However, the length of hospitalisation was similar regardless of cutaneous manifestations; the presence of cutaneous manifestations was not associated with other co-morbidities. There was no clear association between Ct values and rash occurrence. Additional studies with larger sample sizes may be necessary to explore the relationship between rash subtype and viral load.
 
Rash as immunological response
The results of a previous study suggested that cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 were related to immunological responses rather than the direct results of viral invasion17; cutaneous manifestations may be an early sign of immunological responses elsewhere in the body, similar to pulmonary infiltrates secondary to cytokine storm. The present study showed that the incidence of pulmonary infiltrates was considerably higher among patients with rash (28.6%) than among those without (7.3%) [Table 3]; conversely, patients with rash were less likely to display further deterioration, such as oxygen desaturation and a requirement for oxygen supplementation (P=0.016). Only one patient with rash (25%) received dexamethasone, whereas multiple patients without rash required such treatment (73.3%) [P=0.11]. Another explanation is that, overall, patients with rash tended to seek medical attention earlier than those without, which would increase the likelihood of prompt treatment. A previous study has indicated that patients with cutaneous manifestations may have a better prognosis because those patients develop a more robust immune response.17
 
In patients with new pulmonary infiltrates as well as evidence of respiratory decompensation/failure (eg, desaturation and/or tachypnoea), systemic corticosteroids have been used to prevent tissue destruction from cytokine storm after other causes had been ruled out. In this context, patients receiving systemic corticosteroids had more severe disease that involved evidence or features of respiratory decompensation and carried a greater risk of mortality.
 
In the present study, after the exclusion of patients with nosocomial/secondary bacterial pneumonia, heart failure, or pulmonary changes related to prior disease, 19 patients (8.7%) had new pulmonary infiltrates on admission. All 19 patients received interferon beta-1b and ribavirin treatment; 12 patients received dexamethasone (daily dosage range, 6-8 mg; mean duration, 8.63 ± 2.53 days) [Table 4]. Among the 12 patients receiving dexamethasone, five patients (41.7%) died despite the use of systemic corticosteroids, together with empirical antibiotics, interferon beta-1b, and ribavirin; in contrast, only one death (14.3%) occurred among seven patients receiving interferon beta-1b and ribavirin without corticosteroids (OR=4.28, 95% CI=0.38-47.6; P=0.23). The mean interval from symptom onset to systemic corticosteroid initiation was shorter among patients who recovered than among those who died (5.14 ± 2.14 days vs 8.61 ± 2.30 days; P=0.0026). These results suggest that the early use of systemic corticosteroids may lead to a better survival outcome.
 
Mortality
Although no deaths occurred among patients with cutaneous manifestations, the mortality rate did not significantly differ from the rate of 2.9% among patients without rash. Most patients received treatment within the first week after diagnosis of COVID-19 (according to detection of SARS-CoV-2–specific immunoglobulin G within 14 days after symptom onset; mean, 7.71 ± 3.05 days; range, 4-13), which may have improved disease outcomes and shortened hospitalisation. These findings highlighted the importance of early treatment beginning at symptom onset (ie, in the first week) and supported the use of interferon therapy described in a previous report.21
 
Limitations
First, this study had a small number of patients. Second, there was potential selection bias because only hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2–positive test results were included in the analysis; patients with COVID-19 who did not undergo screening or seek medical consultation were not diagnosed, and thus they were excluded from the study. Third, Ct value analysis was not conducted according to rash subtype and severity because of the limited number of patients. Fourth, some viral laboratory tests (eg, test for human herpesvirus 6) were not routinely available in our hospital, which may have hindered the interpretation of possible causes of rash or the identification of coexisting infections. Nevertheless, most other possible viral infections were excluded from this study. Additional studies with larger sample sizes and comparisons with treatment outcomes are needed.
 
Conclusion
This study did not demonstrate direct relationships among rash, viral load, and mortality. Furthermore, cutaneous manifestations may be early signs of immunological responses (similar to pulmonary infiltrates). Patients with older age, hypertension, and renal impairment have greater mortality risk and higher viral load. These high-risk groups should be prioritised in early screening and vaccination efforts to avoid poor clinical outcomes.
 
Author contributions
Concept or design: CSM Wong, IFN Hung.
Acquisition of data: CSM Wong, MMH Chung, MWM Chan, AKC Cheng, YM Lau.
Analysis or interpretation of data: CSM Wong, IFN Hung. Drafting of the manuscript: CSM Wong, IFN Hung, CK Yeung, HHL Chan.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: CSM Wong, IFN Hung, MYW Kwan, CK Yeung, HHL Chan, CS Lau.
 
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity.
 
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgement
The authors thank all patients for their participation.
 
Funding/support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Ethics approval
This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (Ref No.: UW20-725) and was conducted in full compliance with the ICH E6 guideline for Good Clinical Practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Appropriate patient consent was obtained for clinical information and images to be publicly reported. All participants’ clinical data and reports were deidentified to maintain anonymity.
 
References
1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507-13. Crossref
2. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727-33. Crossref
3. World Health Organization. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. Situation by region, country, territory & area. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/table. Accessed 7 May 2022.
4. Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government. Latest situation of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard in Hong Kong. Available from: https://chp-dashboard.geodata.gov.hk/covid-19/en.html. Accessed 7 May 2022.
5. Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘cytokine storm’ in COVID-19. J Infect 2020;80:607-13. Crossref
6. Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. COVID-19 can present with a rash and be mistaken for dengue. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;82:e177. Crossref
7. Hassan K. Urticaria and angioedema as a prodromal cutaneous manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. BMJ Case Rep 2020;13:e236981. Crossref
8. Andina D, Noguera-Morel L, Bascuas-Arribas M, et al. Chilblains in children in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Dermatol 2020;37:406-11. Crossref
9. Marzano AV, Genovese G, Fabbrocini G, et al. Varicella-like exanthem as a specific COVID-19-associated skin manifestation: multicenter case series of 22 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;83:280-5. Crossref
10. De Giorgi V, Recalcati S, Jia Z, et al. Cutaneous manifestations related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a prospective study from China and Italy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;83:674-5. Crossref
11. Tammaro A, Adebanjo GA, Parisella FR, Pezzuto A, Rello J. Cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19: the experiences of Barcelona and Rome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020;34:e306-7. Crossref
12. Marraha F, Al Faker I, Gallouj S. A review of the dermatological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dermatol Res Pract 2020;2020:9360476. Crossref
13. Recalcati S. Cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19: a first perspective. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020;34:e212-3. Crossref
14. Galván Casas C, Català A, Carretero Hernández G, et al. Classification of the cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19: a rapid prospective nationwide consensus study in Spain with 375 cases. Br J Dermatol 2020;183:71-7. Crossref
15. Zhao Q, Fang X, Pang Z, Zhang B, Liu H, Zhang F. COVID-19 and cutaneous manifestations: a systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020;34:2505-10. Crossref
16. Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis ML, Lely AT, Navis G, van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol 2004;203:631-7. Crossref
17. Novak N, Peng W, Naegeli MC, et al. SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, skin and immunology—what do we know so far? Allergy 2021;76:698-713. Crossref
18. Li MY, Li L, Zhang Y, Wang XS. Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor gene ACE2 in a wide variety of human tissues. Infect Dis Poverty 2020;9:45. Crossref
19. Rahimi H, Tehranchinia Z. A comprehensive review of cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:1236520. Crossref
20. Dadras O, Afsahi AM, Pashaei Z, et al. The relationship between COVID-19 viral load and disease severity: a systematic review. Immun Inflamm Dis 2022;10:e580. Crossref
21. Hung IF, Lung KC, Tso EY, et al. Triple combination of interferon beta-1b, lopinavir-ritonavir, and ribavirin in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1695-704. Crossref
22. Wollina U, Karadağ AS, Rowland-Payne C, Chiriac A, Lotti T. Cutaneous signs in COVID-19 patients: a review. Dermatol Ther 2020;33:e13549. Crossref
23. Infectious Diseases Society of America; Association for Molecular Pathology. IDSA and AMP joint statement on the use of SARS-CoV-2 PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values for clinical decision-making. Available from: https://www.idsociety.org/globalassets/idsa/public-health/covid-19/idsa-amp-statement.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2022.
24. Aranha C, Patel V, Bhor V, Gogoi D. Cycle threshold values in RT-PCR to determine dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 viral load: an approach to reduce the isolation period for COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol 2021;93:6794-7. Crossref
25. Cevik M, Tate M, Lloyd O, Maraolo AE, Schafers J, Ho A. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe 2021;2:e13-22. Crossref
26. Genovese G, Moltrasio C, Berti E, Marzano AV. Skin manifestations associated with COVID-19: current knowledge and future perspectives. Dermatology 2021;237:1-12. Crossref
27. Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020;370:eabd4585. Crossref
28. Chua GT, Wong JS, Lam I, et al. Clinical characteristics and transmission of COVID-19 in children and youths during 3 waves of outbreaks in Hong Kong. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e218824. Crossref
29. Chua GT, Wong JS, Chung J, et al. Paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2: a case report. Hong Kong Med J 2022;28:76-8. Crossref
30. Leung TY, Chan AY, Chan EW, et al. Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020;9:2190-9. Crossref
31. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708-20. Crossref
32. Zhang W, Govindavari JP, Davis BD, et al. Analysis of genomic characteristics and transmission routes of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in southern California during the early stage of the US COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2024191. Crossref

Pages