Skip to main content

Collaborative Action Research for Biocultural Heritage Conservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Field Environmental Philosophy

Part of the book series: Ecology and Ethics ((ECET,volume 5))

Abstract

Given the rapid pace of environmental and cultural change all over the world, including Indigenous hotspots like the greater Amazon-Orinoco basin, innovative strategies are needed to meet the challenge of biocultural conservation. Collaborative Action Research (CAR) focused on the preservation and revitalization of traditional and local environmental knowledge (TEK/LEK) represents a promising approach in this regard. CAR entails cooperation, exchange, and complementary labor between different stakeholders—local communities, scientific researchers, and potentially others—for the purpose of studying and understanding issues of mutual concern and then taking informed measures to address those issues. In contrast to basic research, which is guided by academic questions and geared toward information extraction, CAR is focused on assessing and ameliorating community-defined problems. This chapter argues for the particular importance of CAR for the challenge of intergenerational TEK/LEK enculturation and maintenance in the face of rapid cultural and environmental change. The customary processes of such knowledge transmission and the contextual factors that alter or affect such processes are very site-specific. CAR offers a participatory and bioculturally appropriate strategy for bolstering traditional mechanisms of transmission and for developing new ones that actually incorporate ongoing changes. Examples of long-term CAR between local communities of the Jotï Amerindian group and researchers from the Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research (IVIC) are described. The specific application of this approach in support of TEK/LEK transmission in this biocultural context is described in a companion chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baer A (1989) Maintaining biocultural diversity. Conservat Biol 3(1):97–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservat Biol 18(3):621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2008) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Turner NJ (2006) Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation practice for social-ecological system resilience. Hum Ecol 34(4):479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater O, Rotherham ID (2019) A critical perspective on the concept of biocultural diversity and its emerging role in nature and heritage conservation. People Nat 1:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant P (1995) Collaborative action research “on the cutting edge”. Master in education thesis. The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey J, Davenport MA, Emery MR, Carroll C (2016) “A lot of it comes from the heart”: The nature and integration of ecological knowledge in tribal and nontribal forest management. J Forest 114(2):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1992) Convention Text. CBD Secretariat, United Nations Environment Programme. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/

  • Cristancho S, Vining J (2009) Perceived intergenerational differences in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in two indigenous groups from Colombia and Guatemala. Culture Psychol 15(2):229–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descola P, Palsson G (1996) Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard DM, Simons DF, Fenning CD (eds) (2020) Ethnologue: languages of the world, 23rd edn. SIL International, Dallas, TX. Online version: http://ww.ethnologue.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezeanya-Esiobu C (2019) Indigenous knowledge and education in Africa. Springer Open. eBook: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6635-2

  • Fluehr-Lobban C (2008) Collaborative anthropology as twenty-first-century ethical anthropology. Collab Anthropol 1:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2017) 6 ways indigenous peoples are helping the world achieve #ZeroHunger. Available at: http://www.fao.org/zhc/detail-events/en/c/1028010/

  • Freire G, Tillett A (eds) (2007) El estado de la salud indígena en Venezuela, vols. I–II. Coordinación Intercultural de Salud de los Pueblos Indígenas (CISPI), Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social, Caracas, VE

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavito-Bermúdez D (2020) Biocultural learning—beyond ecological knowledge transfer. J Environ Plan Manag 63(10):1791–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin MC, McCarter J, Mead A, Berkes F, Stepp JR, Peterson D, Tang R (2015) Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 30(3):140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulart A, Barretto Filho HT (2012) Mapeamentos Participativos e Gestaô de Territórios Indígenas na Amazônia. America Indígena, Brasília, BR. https://www.academia.edu/5694281/Anais_do_Semin%C3%A1rio_Internacional_Mapeamentos_Participativos_e_Gest%C3%A3o_de_Territ%C3%B3rios_Ind%C3%ADgenas_na_Amaz%C3%B4nia_Legal_organizador

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanspach J, Haider LJ, Oteros-Rozas E, Stahl Olaffson A, Gulsrud NM, Raymond CM, Torralba M, Martín-López B, Bieling C, García-Martín M, Albert C, Beery TH, Fagerholm N, Díaz-Reviriego I, Drews-Shambroom A, Plieninger T (2020) Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature. People Nat 2:643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, Volume 1. Findings of the condition and trends working group of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T, Palsson G (2013) Biosocial becomings: integrating social and biological anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2013) La población indígena de Venezuela. Boletín 1(1):1–15. XIV Censo de población y vivienda 2011. Gerencia general de estadísticas demográficas

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR) (2019) Situation of human rights of the indigenous and tribal peoples of the Pan-Amazon region. ISBN 978-0-8270-6931-2. Available at: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/Panamazonia2019-en.pdf

  • International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) (2021) Biocultural heritage: an evolving concept. Available at: https://biocultural.iied.org/evolving-concept

  • Kodirekkala KR (2017) Internal and external factors affecting loss of traditional knowledge: evidence from a horticultural society in South India. J Anthropol Res 73(1):22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancey DF, Bock J, Gaskins S (eds) (2010) The anthropology of learning in childhood. AltaMira, Walnut Creek, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: situated peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maffi L (2005) Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annu Rev Anthropol 34:599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffi L, Woodley E (2010) Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook. Earthscan, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrie H (2019) Emerging trends in the generation, transmission and protection of Traditional Knowledge. Paper prepared for the Eighteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, April-May 2019, New York. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2019/04/TK-Emerging-trends-in-the-generation-transmission-and-protection-of-TK-final-paper.pdf

  • McCandless S (2019) A local project with global support helps reduce malaria-related deaths. Available via https://www.global-diversity.org/a-local-project-with-global-support-helps-reduce-malaria-related-deaths/. Accessed 25 Apr 2021

  • McCarter J, Sterling EJ, Jupiter SD, Cullman GD, Albert S, Basi M, Betley E, Boseto D, Bulehite ES, Harron R, Holland PS, Horning N, Hughes A, Jino N, Malone C, Mauli S, Pae B, Papae R, Rence F, Revo O, Taqala E, Taqu M, Woltz H, Filardi CE (2018) Biocultural approaches to developing well-being indicators in Solomon Islands. Ecol Soc 23(1):32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09867-230132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey DA (ed) (1999) Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. United Nations Environment Program. http://www.unep.org/Biodiversity/unep.pdf

  • Pretty J, Ball A, Benton T, Guivant J, Lee DR, Orr D, Pfeffer M, Ward H (2007) The SAGE handbook of environment and society. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Adams B, Berkes F, Ferreira de Athayde S, Dudley N, Hunn E, Maffi L, Milton K, Rapport D, Robbins P, Sterling E, Stolton S, Tsing A, Vintinner E, Pilgrim S (2009) The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conservat Soc 7(2):100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quatra M (2008) Bajkewa Jkwïkïdëwa-Jya. Diccionario Básico Castellano-Jodï. Ediciones IVIC, Caracas, VE

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH, Brosius PJ (2006) Diversity and homogenization in the endgame. Global Environ Change 16:317–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García V, Broesch J, TAPS Bolivian Study Team (2015) The transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge and skills among the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. In: Ellen RK, Lycett SJ, Johns SE (eds) Understanding cultural transmission in anthropology: a critical synthesis. Methodology and history in anthropology series, vol 26. Berghahn Books, Oxford, UK, pp 191–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross N (2002) Lacandon-Maya intergenerational change and the erosion of folkbiological knowledge. In: Stepp J, Wyndham FS, Zargar RK (eds) Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity. International Society of Ethnobiology, Athens, GA, pp 585–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham ID (2015) Bio-cultural heritage and biodiversity: emerging paradigms in conservation and planning. Biodivers Conservat 24:3405–3429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2013) Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world, Ecology and ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 9–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2018) Biocultural homogenization: a wicked problem in the Anthropocene. In: Rozzi R, May RH Jr, Chapin FS III, Massardo F, Gavin M, Klaver I, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (eds) From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation, Ecology and ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Massardo F, Anderson C, Heidinger K, Silander JA Jr (2006) Ten principles for biocultural conservation at the southern tip of the Americas: The approach of the Omora Ethnobotanical Park. Ecol Soc 11(1):43. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01709-110143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein R (2018) Action anthropology. In: Callan H (ed) The international encyclopedia of anthropology. Wiley, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2230

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle K (1993) The transmission of traditional ecological knowledge. In: Inglis JT (ed) Traditional ecological knowledge: concepts and cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, International Development Research Centre, Ottowa, ON, pp 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Si A (2020) Patterns in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge: a case study from Arnhem Land, Australia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 16:52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00403-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp DC (2014) Action anthropology. In: Coghlan D, Brydon-Miller M (eds) The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling E, Ticktin T, Morgan TKK, Cullman G, Alvira D, Andrade P, Bergamini N, Betley E, Burrows K, Caillon S, Claudet J, Dacks R, Eyzaguirre P, Filardi C, Gazit N, Giardina C, Jupiter S, Kinney K, McCarter J, Mejia M, Morishige K, Newell J, Noori L, Parks J, Pascua P, Ravikumar A, Tanguay J, Sigouin A, Stege T, Stege M, Wali A (2017) Culturally grounded indicators of resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Soc Adv Res 8:63–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauro A, Ojeda J, Caviness T, Moses K, Moreno R, Wright T, Zhu D, Poole A, Massardo F, Rozzi R (2021) Field environmental philosophy: a biocultural ethic approach to education and ecotourism for sustainability. Sustainability 13(8):4526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (2002) Ethnoecology: a conceptual framework for the study of indigenous knowledge of nature. In Stepp J, Wyndham F, Zarger R (eds) Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity: proceedings of the 7th international congress of ethnobiology, Athens, Georgia, USA, October 2000. International Society of Ethnobiology, pp 511–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey ST, Bryant JV, McClune KA (2018) Differential loss of components of traditional ecological knowledge following a primate extinction event. Roy Soc Open Sci 5:172352. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNPFII (2019) Traditional knowledge: generation, transmission and protection. Discussion paper for the Eighteenth Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. New York, 22 April–3 May 2019. Available via https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/unpfii-sessions-2/18-2.html. Accessed 1 May 2021

  • Vinyeta K, Lynn K (2013) Exploring the role of traditional ecological knowledge in climate change initiatives. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-879. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, 37 p. Available at: https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr879.pdf

  • Wali A, Alvira D, Tallman P, Ravikumar A, Macedo MO (2017) A new approach to conservation: using community empowerment for sustainable well-being. Ecol Soc 22(4):6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09598-220406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren D M (1991) Using indigenous knowledge in agricultural development. World Bank Discussion Paper 127. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at: https://www.who.int/traditional-complementary-integrative-medicine/WhoGlobalReportOnTraditionalAndComplementaryMedicine2019.pdf?ua=1

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent E (1999a) Etnobotánica Hotï: Explorando las interacciones entre la flora y el ser humano del Amazonas Venezolano. PhD dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S (1999b) The quandary of conserving ethnoecological knowledge: a Piaroa example. In: Blount B, Gragson T (eds) Ethnoecology: knowledge, resources, and rights. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, pp 90–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S (2009a) Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and biocultural diversity: a close-up look at linkages, delearning trends, and changing patterns of transmission. In: Bates P, Chiba M, Kube S, Nakashima D (eds) Learning and knowing in indigenous societies today. UNESCO, Paris, FR, pp 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S (2009b) A genealogy of scientific representations of indigenous knowledge. In: Heckler S (ed) Landscape, process and power: a new environmental knowledge synthesis, Studies in environmental anthropology and ethnobiology, vol 10. Berghahn, Oxford, UK, pp 19–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent E (2013a) Jodï Ecogony, Venezuelan Amazon. Environ Res Lett 8:015008. http://stacks.iop.org/1748-9326/8/015008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zent S (2013b) Processual perspectives on traditional environmental knowledge: continuity, erosion, transformation, innovation. In: Ellen RK, Lycett SJ, Johns SE (eds) Understanding cultural transmission in anthropology: a critical synthesis, Methodology & history in anthropology series, vol 26. Berghahn, Oxford, UK, pp 213–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent E, Zent S (2007) Los Jodï. In: Freire G, Tillett A (eds) El estado de la salud indígena en Venezuela. Coordinación Intercultural de Salud de los Pueblos Indígenas (CISPI), Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social, Caracas, VE, pp 77–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent E, Zent S (2019) “Malaria among the indigenous people of Venezuela: the Jotï of Amazonas and Bolívar States.” Symposium: malaria resurgence in Venezuela and its regional implications, American Society for Topical Medicine & Hygiene 68th annual meeting, Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center, National Harbor, MD, USA, 23 Nov 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S, Zent E (2023) Collaborative action research with the Jotï in Venezuela: experiences in autoethnography and TEK vitality assessment. In: Rozzi R, Tauro A, Wright T, Avriel-Avni N, May Jr. RH (eds) Field environmental philosophy: education for biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 229–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S, Zent E, Marius L (2001) “Informe Final del Proyecto ‘Etnobotánica Cuantitativa de los Indígenas Hotï de la Región Circum-Maigualida, Estados Amazonas y Bolívar, Venezuela’”. Research project report prepared for Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICIT), Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela. 275 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent E, Zent S, Marius L (2004) Autodemarcando la Tierra: Explorando las Ideas, los Árboles y Caminos Hotï. Boletín Antropológica 58(2):313–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S, Zent E, Juae Molo L (2011) Un largo y sinuoso camino: breve historia de la autodemarcación territorial Jodï en su décimo aniversario. In: Bello LJ (ed) El Estado ante la Sociedad Multiétnica y Pluricultural: Políticas Públicas y Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas en Venezuela (1999-2010). Copenhagen, DK, IWGIA, pp 97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S, Zent E, Juae Mölö L, Chonokó P (2016) Reflexiones sobre el Proyecto Auto-Demarcación y EtnoCartografía de las Tierras y Hábitats Jodï y Eñepa. Revue d’ethnoécologie [En ligne] 9. Available at: http://ethnoecologie.revues.org/2670

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zent, S., Zent, E. (2023). Collaborative Action Research for Biocultural Heritage Conservation. In: Rozzi, R., Tauro, A., Avriel-Avni, N., Wright, T., May Jr., R.H. (eds) Field Environmental Philosophy. Ecology and Ethics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23368-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics