Abstract
Macrophages are innate immune cells that prevent infections and help in wound healing and vascular inflammation. While these cells are natural helper cells, they also contribute to chronic diseases, e.g., by infiltrating the endothelial layer in early atherosclerosis and by promoting vascular inflammation. There is a crosstalk between inflammatory pathways and key players in thrombosis, such as platelets and endothelial cells – a phenomenon known as ‘thromboinflammation’. The role of the embedded macrophages in thromboinflammation in the context of vascular disease is incompletely understood. Blood vessels-on-chips, which are microfluidic vascular cell culture models, have been used extensively to study aspects of vascular disease, like permeability, immune cell adhesion and thrombosis. Blood perfusion assays in blood vessel-on-chip models benefit from multiple unique aspects of the models, such as control of microvessel structure and well-defined flow patterns, as well as the ability to perform live imaging. However, due to their simplified nature, blood vessels-on-chip models have not yet been used to capture the complex cellular crosstalk that is important in thromboinflammation. Using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells and polarized THP-1 monocytes, we have developed and systematically set up a 3D blood vessel-on-chip with embedded (lipid-laden) macrophages, which is created using sequential cell seeding in viscous finger patterned collagen hydrogels. We have set up a human whole blood perfusion assay for these 3D blood vessels-on-chip. An increased deposition of fibrin in the blood vessel-on-chip models containing lipid-laden macrophages was observed. We anticipate the future use of this advanced vascular in vitro model in drug development for early atherosclerosis or aspects of other vascular diseases.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Vascular diseases are the main cause of death worldwide (WHO 2019). An integral part of vascular pathophysiology is vascular inflammation. This inflammation can be induced by pathogens, vascular damage or long-term exposure of healthy blood vessels to (external) inflammatory factors such as cholesterol, toxins, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (Grootaert et al. 2018; Jia et al. 2018; Phillipson and Kubes 2011; Teague et al. 2017). Vascular inflammation leads to alterations in endothelial cell functionality, including increased expression of endothelial cell markers such as cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) and junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs) (Krieglstein and Neil Granger 2001; Weber et al. 2007). This upregulation can in turn lead to the activation and recruitment of innate immune cells from the blood stream. Innate immune cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, have a key role in wound healing, phagocytosis and in resolving vascular inflammation. These cells can be activated by an inflamed endothelial layer and are an integral part in the pathogenesis of many arterial diseases such as atherosclerosis and aneurysms (Shirai et al. 2015). After activation, monocytes can polarize towards macrophages, promoting their ability to pass through the endothelial barrier and embed underneath the endothelial layer. Macrophages have been proven to interact with endothelial cells when embedded underneath the endothelial layer (Shirai et al. 2015). These embedded macrophages can affect the endothelial cell layer by excreting either proinflammatory cytokines such as tissue necrosis factor-α (TNF- α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (‘M1’ macrophages) or anti-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) (‘M2’ macrophages) (Chistiakov et al. 2017). Macrophages are also known as a key players in early atherosclerosis, where polarized lipid-laden macrophages embed underneath the endothelial layer and form foam cells (Bobryshev et al. 2016; Chistiakov et al. 2017; Libby et al. 2019; Mestas and Ley 2008; Sakakura et al. 2013; Shirai et al. 2015).
Thromboinflammation is a process in which innate immune cells such as neutrophils and monocytes, interact with an inflamed or damaged endothelial layer, leading to the activation of platelets and formation of a thrombus (Rayes et al. 2020). The processes towards thrombus formation are different in arteries compared to veins, which can largely be attributed to the enormous difference in shear rates and flow (Li et al. 2019). In arteries, excreted von Willebrand factor plays a large role in platelet adhesion and accumulation, leading to recruitment of more platelets, neutrophils, and red blood cells, with fibrin threads being formed to stabilize the thrombus. Blood flow through veins can be a factor 100 lower than arterial flow, giving monocytes the opportunity to roll over the endothelial layer and therefore detect inflamed endothelial cells (Li et al. 2019; Sakariassen et al. 2015). The cell recruitment process in veins therefore differs from arteries, with monocytes instigating platelet recruitment but also being able to polarize and transmigrate through the endothelial barrier and excrete pro- or anti-inflammatory factors. Due to lower flow rates in veins and the accompanying lower shear rates experienced by endothelial cells, thrombi have a distinct histopathological presentation, typically with a high content of fibrin (Chandrashekar et al. 2018).
A relatively new method to investigate mechanisms of cardiovascular disease, including thrombosis, immune cell recruitment and endothelial inflammation are vessels-on-chips (VoCs). These microphysiological systems (MPS) are designed to recapitulate the microenvironment of blood vessels in terms of geometry, flow, extracellular matrix and cellular composition (Branchford et al. 2015; Cable et al. 2022; Ko et al. 2022; Ko and Kamm 2022; Myers and Lam 2021; Paloschi et al. 2021; Pandian et al. 2018; Song et al. 2018). VoCs typically consist of an actively perfused microfluidic channel or network of channels lined by endothelial cells. They are widely used to investigate disease processes. Multiple VoCs have already been reported that model the endothelial layer and its role in the context of thrombosis by using blood perfusion assays as an end-point measurement. (Albers et al. 2019; Barrile et al. 2018; Costa et al. 2017; van Dijk et al. 2020; Hasan et al. 2015; Jia et al. 2019; Mannino et al. 2015; Tsai et al. 2012; Westein et al. 2013; Zheng et al. 2012). Due to limitations in microfabrication, many of these VoC models have square and rectangular cross-sections, which do not mimic the human vessel structure. Advanced fabrication techniques provide the ability to make more physiologically relevant models, for example by using a viscous finger patterned hydrogel as a 3D lumen to contain the required cell types (Bischel et al. 2012; de Graaf et al. 2019; Herland et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2012). Such models can also be used to incorporate multiple cell types for studies of disease. For example, incorporation of vascular smooth muscle cells and neurovascular cells such as pericytes and astrocytes has been accomplished in multiple designs (Herland et al. 2016; Saili et al. 2018).
To study vascular inflammation in VoC models, a very important factor is the realistic incorporation of immune cells such as monocytes and macrophages. The incorporation of monocytes flowing through the blood vessel has been performed when using monocyte adhesion as an end point measurement (Halaidych et al. 2018). Even though monocyte activation, extravasation and polarization into macrophages is a long process which is hard to mimic in a VoC model, it can be an integral part of the vascular immune response. Vascular inflammation can be either induced or reduced by respectively embedded M1 and M2 macrophages. To have a physiologically relevant model and observe the cell-to-cell crosstalk in the context of vascular inflammation, and early atherosclerosis, macrophages should be incorporated directly underneath the endothelial cell layer. The complexity of a model containing human induced pluripotent derived endothelial cells (hiPSC-EC) as well as embedded (lipid-laden) macrophages, which can be kept in culture for longer periods of time and can be perfused with human whole blood has not been explored yet. By using different cell types, such as lipid-laden or non-lipid-laden macrophages, and different flow profiles, this VoC model can be used to study arterial as well as venous thromboinflammation. Such an advanced VoC model would be a key enabling technology to unravel mechanisms of thromboinflammation, potentially even in a patient-specific manner.
By performing systematic optimization of seeding properties, medium properties, and a human whole blood perfusion assay, we can now present the first blood-perfusable 3D VoC system with incorporated (lipid-laden) macrophages. We use this new 3D VoC to demonstrate that key aspects of thromboinflammation can be captured in MPS models.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Microfluidic chip fabrication
The microfluidic chip consists of 6 channels which are one centimeter in length and 500 × 500 μm in width and height (Fig. 1a). The chip was fabricated by conventional polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based soft lithography using a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA, Arkema innovative chemistry) mould. The mould was produced by micromilling (Sherline, model 5410) based on designs in SolidWorks (Dassault Systèmes, France). PDMS (10:1 base:crosslinker ratio, Sylgard 184) was added to the PMMA mould and was left to cure overnight at 65 °C after which it was removed from the mould. 1 mm inlet and outlet holes were created using biopsy punchers (Robbins Instruments). PDMS was spin coated (SPS Spin150) on a glass microscope slide and PDMS was left to cure overnight at 65 °C. The surfaces of both the microfluidic device and the microscope slide were activated by exposing them to air plasma (50 W) for 40 s (Cute, Femto Science, South Korea), after which the microfluidic chip was bonded to the microscope slide. The activated chip was then used for viscous finger patterning.
2.2 Viscous finger patterning
The plasma-activated chips were coated with poly-dopamine (Sigma Aldrich) by adding 2 mg/ml poly-dopamine in 10 mM TrisHCl (pH 8.5) to the channels. Chips were incubated at room temperature for an hour and quickly rinsed 3 times using sterile Mili-Q water and dried. A 5 mg/ml rat tail collagen type-1 (Corning™) solution was prepared on ice, by diluting the collagen with 1/10th of the final volume of 10× PBS, supplemented with dH2O and NaOH to obtain a pH of 6.5–7.5. The mixture was vortexed and spun down and used within 15 minutes after mixing. 3D lumens were created in the microfluidic channels using viscous finger patterning (Bischel et al. 2012; de Graaf et al. 2019; Herland et al. 2016). A 7 mm high pipette tip was added to the outlet of the channels. 10 μl of collagen solution was pipetted in the inlet, until a meniscus formed on the outlet tip. A droplet of 2.2 μl of ice-cold PBS solution was then pipetted onto the collagen meniscus, forming a finger-like structure inside the hydrogel (Fig. 1b). Chips were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for one hour, after which pipette tips were removed and new pipette tips were added to the inlet and outlet. Further steps were performed using gel loader tips inside the pipette tips to not disturb the collagen lumens. 100 μl Endothelial Cell Growth medium 2 (EGM-2, PromoCell Inc.) was added to the channels and chips were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to equilibrate, before cell seeding.
2.3 Cell culturing of hiPSC-derived endothelial cells and THP-1 monocytes
2.3.1 hiPSC-EC
Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells were derived from hiPSC using an adapted previously described protocol (Orlova et al. 2014), by first performing a differentiation of the monolayer of hiPSC by inducing mesoderm using B(P)EL supplemented with CHIR (8 μM, Axon Medchem), followed by vascular specification using B(P)EL supplemented with VEGF (50 μg/ml, Miltenti) and SB431542 (10 μM, R&D Systems). Endothelial cells were isolated using CD31+ Dynabeads (Thermo fisher). hiPSC-EC were then cultured in pre-coated collagen culture flasks (Greiner bio one) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 using Endothelial cell serum free medium (EC-SFM (Gibco)), supplemented with 1% platelet-poor plasma-derived serum (Biomedical Technologies), 30 ng/ml VEGF (R&D systems) and 20 ng/ml bFGF (Miltenyi Biotec) (Orlova et al. 2014). To confirm the successful differentiation toward endothelial cells, the cells were stained for EC markers von Willebrand factor and VE-Cadherin (Fig. 1c).
2.3.2 Monocytes
THP-1 monocytes (ECACC) were cultured in RPMI 1640 + GlutaMAX medium (Gibco) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) and 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were used up to passage 25.
2.3.3 Lipid-laden macrophages
To polarize monocytes towards macrophages, cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at 4·105 cells/well and cultured overnight in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 50 ng/ml phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, Sigma). Fresh serum-free medium supplemented with 50 ng/ml PMA and 50 μg/ml Oxidized-LDL (DiI-OxLDL from human plasma, Invitrogen) was added after 24 hours and cells were incubated for 24 hours.
2.4 Cell seeding in microfluidic chips
After overnight incubation of chips, cells were seeded sequentially, starting with the (lipid-laden) macrophages. Macrophages were removed from the well plate using a cell scraper and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 100×g. Cells were counted using a cell counter (Luna™ automated cell counter (brightfield cell counter)) and seeded in the channel at 1·105 cells/ml. To make sure cells attached to the top of the channel, the microfluidic chips were incubated invertedly for 15 minutes at 37 °C and 5% CO2 after cells were added to the channel, after which chips were placed upright and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for another 15 minutes.
hiPSC-EC were seeded at passage number 3. To seed the hiPSC-EC, cells were removed from the cell culture flask, by incubating cells with 3 ml TrypLE (Gibco) for 3 minutes at 37 °C and 5% CO2. TrypLE was inactivated by adding 7 ml of cell culture medium to the flask. Cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 300×g and counted. Cells were seeded at 5·106 cells/ml. To assure the cell attachment to both the top and the bottom of the channel, the microfluidic chips were first inverted after cells were added to the channel for at least half an hour, after which the procedure was repeated, and microfluidic chips were incubated upright at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for at least 30 minutes. 150 μl EGM-2 was added to the microfluidic channels. Microfluidic chips were placed on a rocking table (10° angle, 30 sec interval; BenchBlotter™ 2D platform rocker) inside the incubator for 24 hours.
2.5 Medium optimization in microfluidic chips
Medium optimization was performed for the co-culture of hiPSC-EC and macrophages. Cells were incubated overnight with either EGM-2 or a combination of EGM-2 and RPMI 1640. After 24 hours 4× magnification brightfield images were obtained. Two separated operators individually counted the number of sprouts per channel.
2.6 Endothelial layer assessment
After overnight incubation, the endothelial layer integrity was assessed using three conditions: healthy endothelium (control), endothelium with embedded macrophages (sample) and TNF-α treated endothelium (inflamed). Inflamed samples were treated with 5 ng/ml TNF-α (Peprotech) for 4 hours. Cells were fixated and cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 solution for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with Nucblue (nuclei, Thermo fisher) and actinRed (Thermo fisher). Immunocytochemistry imaging data was collected using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope at 10× magnification.
2.7 Blood perfusion assay
Blood was provided by the Experimental Centre for Technical Medicine (ECTM, Techmed Centre, University of Twente) and was used within 4 hours of blood draw. Whole blood was collected in vacuvette tubes, containing 3.2% citrate. The first tube was always discarded. Platelets and fibrin were stained with respectively CD41-FITC (40 μl/ml; Beckmann-Coulter) and conjugated fibrinogen (10 μg/ml; Fibrinogen from human plasma, Invitrogen) for 10 minutes. Immediately before perfusion, blood was recalcified using a recalcification buffer containing HEPES; 63.2 mM CaCl2 (1 M stock, Thermo fisher) and 31.6 mM MgCl2 (Thermo fisher).
The pipette tip at the outlet was removed and replaced by a bent 14-gauge blunt needle to which tubing (Tygon) was connected, which in turn was connected to a syringe on a syringe pump (Harvard PHD Ultra). Blood was pulled through the channel at 6 μl/min for 20 minutes. After perfusion, channels were flushed manually with EGM-2 and fixated with 4% formaldehyde for 15 minutes and subsequently washed 3 times with PBS and imaged for data analysis.
2.8 Staining and imaging
After fixation, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 solution for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with Nucblue (nuclei, Thermo fisher) and actinRed (Thermo fisher) or actinGreen (Thermo fisher).
Immunocytochemistry imaging data was collected using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope at 10× magnification. Images for data analysis after blood perfusion were obtained using an EVOS M5000 imaging system (Thermo Fisher) at 4× magnification.
2.9 Data analysis
To calculate the fibrin and Ox-LDL area coverage percentage, the thresholding function in FIJI image analysis software (Schindelin et al. 2012) was used. To avoid human error, two operators individually performed a blind assessment of the coverages and values were then compared and averaged. A paired sample t-test was performed for both the area coverage and clot size calculations.
The scoring of endothelial cell layer was performed by two operators, who individually observed endothelial cell layers and scored them from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good). While scoring the endothelial layer, operators assessed cells morphology, monolayer formation and holes.
2.10 Generation of figures
3D images were generated using Imaris software (Oxford Instruments). Parts of the figure were drawn by using pictures from Servier Medical Art. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 3D blood vessels-on-chip
To achieve a VoC model with embedded macrophages, we followed the scheme in Fig. 1a. 3D lumens were created in a collagen I hydrogel in a PDMS chip. These chips were acclimated in an incubator overnight before cell seeding. (Lipid-laden) macrophages were seeded, followed by hiPSC-EC. After 24 hours of incubation on a rocking table, a functional 3D VoC with embedded macrophages was achieved. To attain this model, multiple optimization steps were performed.
Firstly, circular lumen-shaped channels in a square PDMS chip by using viscous finger patterning in a collagen 1 hydrogel had to be created (Fig. 1b). Viscous finger patterning of lumens in collagen is a difficult process due to manual handling, but by standardizing the protocol, high success rates can be achieved (de Graaf et al. 2019). The most important parameters to optimize were the PBS droplet size and NaOH concentration to effectively drive flow upon viscous finger patterning and to promote proper gelation after patterning, respectively.
We systematically incorporated different cell types in our 3D blood vessel-on-chip. THP-1 monocytes were polarized, and loaded with Ox-LDL (Fig. 1d, e). The lipid-laden macrophages remained stable for up to 6 days (Fig. 1f). No difference in the number of lipid-laden macrophages was observed in well-plate experiment, when loading the cells with or without the presence of PMA. After seeding the cells at 1·105 cells/ml we observed dispersed cells throughout the channel (Fig. 2a, b). Macrophages polarized from THP-1 monocytes using PMA are widely used in research, but due to differences in protocols it can be challenging to arrive at a single definitive protocol. For example, PMA incubation times can vary between 3 and 72 hours, giving the cells a completely different stimulation time (Lund et al. 2016). We have stimulated the THP-1 cells for 24 hours and, without a resting period afterwards, loaded them immediately by incubating with Ox-LDL and PMA for 24 hours, before seeding them in the lumen.
Medium optimization for co-culture of hiPSC-EC and macrophages was performed combining different ratios of EGM-2 and RPMI 1640. Figure 2d shows the difference in endothelial layers when incubated in different types of medium. It was observed that when culturing cells in anything other than EGM-2, the endothelial cells were more actively migrating and started sprouting into the hydrogel (Fig. 2c, d). A significantly higher amount of sprouts was observed for cells cultured in 1:1 (RPMI 1640: EGM-2) compared to merely EGM-2 (p < 0.05, Fig. 2d). Therefore, it was determined that for long-term culture of the combination of macrophages and hiPSC-EC in our VoCs, individual EGM-2 was most effective. EGM-2 is a widely used endothelial cell growth medium, optimized for primary endothelial cells and has been widely used in other projects as it contains antibiotics recommended for MPS culture (Bezenah et al. 2018; Gu et al. 2017; Olmer et al. 2018; Zhou et al. 2021).
Different macrophage seeding concentrations were tested, ranging from 7.4·103 to 5·106 cells/ml. Interestingly, we observed no difference between these conditions in terms of LDL coverage inside the VoC after 24 hours of co-culture with hiPSC-EC (Fig. 2e). However, VoCs seeded with high concentrations of macrophages were not able to survive for more than 24 hours. This suggests a negative effect of an abundance of macrophages on the endothelial layer. Scoring the endothelial layers of VoCs containing 1·105 macrophages/ml versus 5·106 macrophages/ml showed a significantly better endothelial cell layer at lower macrophage seeding densities after 24 hours (p < 0.05, Fig. 2f), the full extent of the endothelial layer scoring system, including scoring examples can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1. Seeding the macrophages at a lower density (7.4·103–2·105) and subsequent seeding of hiPSC-EC at 5·106 cells/ml resulted in a full monolayer, covering the whole microfluidic channel (Fig. 2g) and enabled the VoCs to be cultured for at least 5 days. Actin staining of the channels show a quiescent monolayer of cells. We show that after 5 days, channels previously seeded with lipid-laden macrophages still contain these lipid-laden macrophages in the channel (Fig. 2g).
To assess the integrity of the endothelial layer, an actin staining was performed (Fig. 2h). A healthy endothelium, presents with a cortical actin distribution, which also is known as a barrier integrity factor, whereas in an inflamed endothelial layer, actin is known to redistribute into stress fibers (Dudek and Garcia 2001; Ehringer et al. 1999; Prasain and Stevens 2009). Figure 2h shows 3 conditions that were considered in the actin assessment: healthy endothelium (Fig. 2h(i)), endothelium with embedded macrophages (Fig. 2h(ii)) and TNF-α treated (inflamed) endothelium (Fig. 2h(iii)). It can be observed that both the healthy and the macrophage embedded endothelium show cortically distributed actin on the overall endothelial layer. The inflamed, TNF-α treated endothelium, shows a redistributed actin pattern. Therefore the observed actin distribution in the macrophage embedded VoCs indicated a quiescent, integer, endothelium. To further quantify the VoCs other functional assays may be required such a barrier permeability assay or mapping endothelial inflammation markers such as CAMs. Endothelial inflammation can also be assessed functionally, by for instance a blood perfusion assay, which is discussed in the next section.
The VoC was kept on a rocking table set to a 10° angle with a 3 second interval, giving it continuous bidirectional flow, which was calculated to yield a maximum shear rate of 140 s−1. This bidirectional flow enabled the cells to experience some shear stress, and we achieved culture times of up to 5 days. However, bidirectional flow is not physiologically accurate in blood vessels and preferably cells experience unidirectional flow at relevant shear stresses (Wang and Shuler 2018). Recent developments show the possibility of maintaining unidirectional flow in similar blood vessel-on-chip models at relevant shear stress, which is recommended for future research (de Graaf et al. 2022a; de Graaf et al. 2022b; Wang and Shuler 2018).
3.2 Blood perfusion assay
We successfully have set up a blood perfusion assay for the 3D blood vessels-on-chip. Blood was perfused at 6 μl/min, representing a shear rate of approximately 35 s−1, which corresponds to the shear rate found in the human veins (Sakariassen et al. 2015). We observed a different deposition of fibrin in the blood vessels containing embedded macrophages, compared to the control samples without embedded macrophages (Fig. 3a, b). Analysis of the area covered by deposited fibrin showed a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05, Fig. 3d). Moreover, average analysis of clot size showed a significantly bigger fibrin clot size in the blood vessels containing embedded macrophages (p < 0.05, Fig. 3c), indicating the formation of bigger fibrin networks in this vascular inflammation model. The fibrin content in the clots is higher than what is typically seen in blood perfusion assays in vessels-on-chips with activated endothelial monocultures at high shear rates (750–1000 s−1) (Jain et al. 2016). This difference may reflect a more vein-like response in our model, which is expected with the flow rates used (Chandrashekar et al. 2018).
Interestingly, these results suggest the immediate negative effect of embedded macrophages on the endothelial cell layer, even without any additional external stimulation. THP-1 polarization with PMA leads to M0 macrophages, leaving them free to differentiate into either M1 or M2. The phenotype of the embedded macrophages was not determined in the current study, but future monitoring and control over this aspect could provide further insight in the model and its predictive value in disease modeling. Embedding of M1 or M2 macrophages or lipid-laden macrophages can possibly lead to a different endothelial response (Binnemars-Postma et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2018). Future studies could then focus on investigating the different effects of different types of (lipid-laden) macrophages on the endothelial layer and thromboinflammatory processes.
During the blood perfusion assay, platelet aggregation was observed. However, after the chips were fixated, washed and prepared for analysis by fluorescence microscopy, no significant difference in platelet aggregation was observed between control conditions and conditions of co-culture. Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the difference of a channel before and after preparing it for microscopic analysis. The pressure of washing clearly reduces the big platelet aggregates. To study the effect of platelet aggregation, live imaging during the blood perfusion assay would be recommended.
To obtain arterial responses and shear rates, flow rate should be increased to approximately 160 μl/min. Instantaneous high flow rate on the channels resulted in loss of cells and therefore monolayer. Optimization of the system is required if arterial rates are desired. Using unidirectional continuous flow during cell culture overnight with increasing flow rates, might assist the cells to get adjusted to the constant shear.
4 Conclusion
The aim of this project was to set up a 3D vascular model containing embedded macrophages in an hiPSC-EC layer. For the first time, we have systematically set up and presented the protocol for a hiPSC-EC-loaded blood vessel-on-chip model with embedded macrophages arranged underneath the hiPSC-EC layer to study the effect of macrophages on the endothelial layer. We have successfully set up a blood perfusion assay for this vessel-on-chip model, which contains embedded (lipid-laden) macrophages and have studied the effect of these macrophages on the endothelial cell layer. Our results demonstrate a significantly higher area coverage of fibrin in the channels containing embedded macrophages, suggesting a proinflammatory effect of these macrophages and therefore endothelial response. In future studies, this blood vessel-on-chip will be used as a model to study mechanisms of vascular disease, thereby contributing to (personalized) drug development.
References
H.J. Albers, R. Passier, A. van den Berg, A.D. van der Meer, Automated analysis of platelet aggregation on cultured endothelium in a microfluidic Chip perfused with human whole blood. Micromachines 10(11) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10110781
R. Barrile, A.D. van der Meer, H. Park, J.P. Fraser, D. Simic, F. Teng, D. Conegliano, J. Nguyen, A. Jain, M. Zhou, K. Karalis, D.E. Ingber, G.A. Hamilton, M.A. Otieno, Organ-on-Chip recapitulates thrombosis induced by an anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody: Translational potential of advanced microengineered systems. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 104(6), 1240–1248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1054
J.R. Bezenah, Y.P. Kong, A.J. Putnam, Evaluating the potential of endothelial cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells to form microvascular networks in 3D cultures. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20966-1
K.A. Binnemars-Postma, H.W. Ten Hoopen, G. Storm, J. Prakash, Differential uptake of nanoparticles by human M1 and M2 polarized macrophages: Protein Corona as a critical determinant. Nanomedicine 11(22), 2889–2902 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-0233
L.L. Bischel, S.H. Lee, D.J. Beebe, A practical method for patterning lumens through ECM hydrogels via viscous finger patterning. J. Lab. Autom. 17(2), 96–103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068211426694
Y.V. Bobryshev, E.A. Ivanova, D.A. Chistiakov, N.G. Nikiforov, A.N. Orekhov, Macrophages and their role in atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology and transcriptome analysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9582430
B.R. Branchford, C.J. Ng, K.B. Neeves, J. Di Paola, Microfluidic technology as an emerging clinical tool to evaluate thrombosis and hemostasis. Thromb. Res. 136(1), 13–19 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.05.012
J. Cable, P. Arlotta, K.K. Parker, A.J. Hughes, K. Goodwin, C.L. Mummery, R.D. Kamm, S.J. Engle, D.A. Tagle, S.F. Boj, A.E. Stanton, Y. Morishita, M.L. Kemp, D.A. Norfleet, E.E. May, L. Aric, R. Bashir, A.W. Feinberg, S.M. Hull, et al., Engineering multicellular living systems—A keystone Symposia report. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1518(1), 183–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14896
A. Chandrashekar, G. Singh, J. Garry, N. Sikalas, N. Labropoulos, Mechanical and biochemical role of fibrin within a venous Thrombus. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 55(3), 417–424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.002
D.A. Chistiakov, A.A. Melnichenko, V.A. Myasoedova, A.V. Grechko, A.N. Orekhov, Mechanisms of foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. J. Mol. Med. 95(11), 1153–1165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-017-1575-8
P.F. Costa, H.J. Albers, J.E.A. Linssen, H.H.T. Middelkamp, L. Van Der Hout, R. Passier, A. Van Den Berg, J. Malda, A.D. Van Der Meer, Mimicking arterial thrombosis in a 3D-printed microfluidic: In vitro vascular model based on computed tomography angiography data. Lab Chip (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc00202e
M.N.S. de Graaf, A. Cochrane, F.E. van den Hil, W. Buijsman, A.D. van der Meer, A. van den Berg, C.L. Mummery, V.V. Orlova, Scalable microphysiological system to model three-dimensional blood vessels. APL Bioeng. 3(2), 026105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5090986
M.N.S. de Graaf, A. Vivas, D.G. Kasi, F.E. van den Hil, A. van den Berg, A.D. van der Meer, C.L. Mummery, V.V. Orlova, Multiplexed fluidic circuit Board for Controlled Perfusion of 3D blood vessels-on-a-Chip. Lab Chip 23(1), 168–181 (2022a). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2lc00686c
M.N.S. de Graaf, A. Vivas, A.D. van der Meer, C.L. Mummery, V.V. Orlova, Pressure-driven perfusion system to control, multiplex and recirculate cell culture medium for organs-on-chips. Micromachines 13(8) (2022b). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13081359
S.M. Dudek, J.G.N. Garcia, Cytoskeletal regulation of pulmonary vascular permeability. J. Appl. Physiol. 91, 1487–1500 (2001)
W.D. Ehringer, S. Yamany, K. Steier, A. Farag, F.J. Roisen, A. Dozier, F.N. Miller, Quantitative image analysis of F-actin in endothelial cells. Microcirculation 6(4), 291–303 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-8719.1999.tb00112.x
M.O.J. Grootaert, M. Moulis, L. Roth, W. Martinet, C. Vindis, M.R. Bennett, G.R.Y. De Meyer, Vascular smooth muscle cell death, autophagy and senescence in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 114(4), 622–634 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvy007
M. Gu, N.Y. Shao, S. Sa, D. Li, V. Termglinchan, M. Ameen, I. Karakikes, G. Sosa, F. Grubert, J. Lee, A. Cao, Y. Shalina Taylor, Z.Z. Ma, J. Chappell, R. Hamid, E.D. Austin, J.D. Gold, J.C. Wu, M.P. Snyder, M. Rabinovitch, Patient-specific IPSC-derived endothelial cells uncover pathways that protect against pulmonary hypertension in BMPR2 mutation carriers. Cell Stem Cell 20(4), 490–504.e5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.08.019
O.V. Halaidych, F. van den Hil, C.L. Mummery, V.V. Orlova, Microfluidic assay for the assessment of leukocyte adhesion to human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells (HiPSC-ECs). J. Vis. Exp. 2018(141), 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3791/58678
A. Hasan, A. Paul, A. Memic, A. Khademhosseini, A multilayered microfluidic blood vessel-like structure. Biomed. Microdevices 17(5), 1–13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-015-9993-2
A. Herland, A.D. Van Der Meer, E.A. FitzGerald, T.E. Park, J.J.F. Sleeboom, D.E. Ingber, Distinct contributions of astrocytes and Pericytes to Neuroinflammation identified in a 3D human blood-brain barrier on a Chip. PLoS One 11(3), 1–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150360
A. Jain, A.D. van der Meer, A.L. Papa, R. Barrile, A. Lai, B.L. Schlechter, M.A. Otieno, C.S. Louden, G.A. Hamilton, A.D. Michelson, A.L. Frelinger, D.E. Ingber, Assessment of whole blood thrombosis in a microfluidic device lined by fixed human endothelium. Biomed. Microdevices 18(4), 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-016-0095-6
G. Jia, A.R. Aroor, C. Jia, J.R. Sowers, Endothelial cell senescence in aging-related vascular dysfunction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. basis Dis., 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.08.008
L. Jia, F. Han, H. Yang, G. Turnbull, J. Wang, J. Clarke, Microfluidic fabrication of biomimetic helical hydrogel microfibers for blood-vessel-on-a-Chip applications. 1900435, 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201900435
K. Kim, D. Shim, J.S. Lee, K. Zaitsev, J.W. Williams, K.W. Kim, M.Y. Jang, H.S. Jang, T.J. Yun, S.H. Lee, W.K. Yoon, A. Prat, N.G. Seidah, J. Choi, S.P. Lee, S.H. Yoon, J.W. Nam, J.K. Seong, O. Goo Taeg, et al., Transcriptome analysis reveals nonfoamy rather than foamy plaque macrophages are Proinflammatory in atherosclerotic murine models. Circ. Res. 123(10), 1127–1142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312804
E. Ko, R.D. Kamm, Neurovascular models for organ-on-a-chips. In Vitro Models 1(2), 125–127 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44164-022-00015-y
J. Ko, D. Park, S. Lee, B. Gumuscu, N.L. Jeon, Engineering organ-on-a-Chip to accelerate translational research. Micromachines 13(8) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13081200
C.F. Krieglstein, D. Neil Granger, Adhesion molecules and their role in vascular disease. Am. J. Hypertens. 14(6 II), 44–54 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02069-6
J. Li, X. Han, E.A. Knauss, D.S. Woulfe, M.T. Nieman, GPCRs in Thromboinflammation and Hemostasis (Elsevier Inc., 2019)
P. Libby, J.E. Buring, L. Badimon, G.K. Hansson, J. Deanfield, M.S. Bittencourt, L. Tokgözoğlu, E.F. Lewis, Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 5(1), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z
M.E. Lund, J. To, B.A. O’Brien, S. Donnelly, The choice of Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-acetate differentiation protocol influences the response of THP-1 macrophages to a pro-inflammatory stimulus. J. Immunol. Methods 430, 64–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2016.01.012
R.G. Mannino, D.R. Myers, B. Ahn, Y. Wang, M. Rollins, H. Gole, A.S. Lin, R.E. Guldberg, D.P. Giddens, L.H. Timmins, W.A. Lam, Do-it-yourself in vitro vasculature that recapitulates in vivo geometries for investigating endothelial-blood cell interactions. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12401
J. Mestas, K. Ley, Monocyte-endothelial cell interactions in the development of atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 18(6), 228–232 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2008.11.004
J.S. Miller, K.R. Stevens, M.T. Yang, B.M. Baker, H.T. Duc, D.M. Nguyen, E.T. Cohen, A.A. Chen, P.A. Galie, Y. Xiang, R. Chaturvedi, S.N. Bhatia, C.S. Chen, Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for Perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mater. 11(9), 768–774 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3357
D.R. Myers, W.A. Lam, Vascularized microfluidics and their untapped potential for discovery in diseases of the microvasculature. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 23, 407–432 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-091520-025358
R. Olmer, L. Engels, A. Usman, S. Menke, M.N.H. Malik, F. Pessler, G. Göhring, D. Bornhorst, S. Bolten, S. Abdelilah-Seyfried, T. Scheper, H. Kempf, R. Zweigerdt, U. Martin, Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into functional endothelial cells in scalable suspension culture. Stem Cell Rep. 10(5), 1657–1672 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.017
V.V. Orlova, F.E. van den Hil, S. Petrus-Reurer, Y. Drabsch, P. Ten Dijke, C.L. Mummery, Generation, expansion and functional analysis of endothelial cells and Pericytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 9(6), 1514–1531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.102
V. Paloschi, M. Sabater-Lleal, H. Middelkamp, A. Vivas, S. Johansson, A. van der Meer, M. Tenje, L. Maegdefessel, Organ-on-a-Chip Technology: A novel approach to investigate cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc. Res. 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab088
N.K.R. Pandian, R.G. Mannino, W.A. Lam, A. Jain, Thrombosis-on-a-Chip: Prospective Impact of microphysiological models of vascular thrombosis. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 5, 29–34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.12.001
M. Phillipson, P. Kubes, The neutrophil in vascular inflammation. Nat. Med. 17(11), 1381–1390 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2514
N. Prasain, T. Stevens, The actin cytoskeleton in endothelial cell phenotypes. Microvasc. Res. 77(1), 53–63 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2008.09.012
J. Rayes, J.H. Bourne, A. Brill, S.P. Watson, The dual role of platelet-innate immune cell interactions in Thrombo-inflammation. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 4(1), 23–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12266
K.S. Saili, T.J. Zurlinden, T.B. Knudsen, Modeling the Neurovascular Unit in Vitro and in Silico, Second edn. (Elsevier Inc, 2018)
K. Sakakura, M. Nakano, F. Otsuka, E. Ladich, F.D. Kolodgie, R. Virmani, Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis plaque progression. Heart Lung Circ. 22(6), 399–411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2013.03.001
K.S. Sakariassen, L. Orning, V.T. Turitto, The Impact of blood shear rate on arterial Thrombus formation. Future Sci. OA 1(4) (2015). https://doi.org/10.4155/fso.15.28
J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.Y. Tinevez, D.J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, A. Cardona, Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9(7), 676–682 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
T. Shirai, M. Hilhorst, D.G. Harrison, M. Weyand, Cornelia., Macrophages in vascular inflammation – From atherosclerosis to Vasculitis. Autoimmunity 48(3), 139–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3109/08916934.2015.1027815.Macrophages
H.H.G. Song, R.T. Rumma, C.K. Ozaki, E.R. Edelman, C.S. Chen, Vascular tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and clinical promise. Cell Stem Cell 22(3), 340–354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.009
H.L. Teague, M.A. Ahlman, A. Alavi, D.D. Wagner, A.H. Lichtman, M. Nahrendorf, F.K. Swirski, F. Nestle, J.M. Gelfand, M.J. Kaplan, S. Grinspoon, P.M. Ridker, D.E. Newby, A. Tawakol, Z.A. Fayad, N.N. Mehta, Unraveling vascular inflammation: From immunology to imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 70(11), 1403–1412 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.750
M. Tsai, A. Kita, J. Leach, R. Rounsevell, J.N. Huang, J. Moake, R.E. Ware, D.A. Fletcher, W.A. Lam, In vitro modeling of the microvascular occlusion and thrombosis that occur in hematologic diseases using microfluidic technology. J. Clin. Investig. 122(1), 408–418 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI58753
C.G.M. van Dijk, M.M. Brandt, N. Poulis, J. Anten, M. van der Moolen, L. Kramer, E.F.G.A. Homburg, L. Louzao-Martinez, J. Pei, M.M. Krebber, B.W.M. van Balkom, P. de Graaf, D.J. Duncker, M.C. Verhaar, R. Luttge, C. Cheng, A new microfluidic model that allows monitoring of complex vascular structures and cell interactions in a 3D biological matrix. Lab Chip 20(10), 1827–1844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0lc00059k
Y.I. Wang, M.L. Shuler, UniChip enables long-term recirculating unidirectional perfusion with gravity-driven flow for microphysiological systems. Lab Chip 18(17), 2563–2574 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8lc00394g
C. Weber, L. Fraemohs, E. Dejana, The role of junctional adhesion molecules in vascular inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7(6), 467–477 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2096
E. Westein, A.D. van der Meer, M.J.E. Kuijpers, J.P. Frimat, A. van den Berg, J.W.M. Heemskerk, Atherosclerotic geometries exacerbate pathological Thrombus formation Poststenosis in a von Willebrand factor-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(4), 1357–1362 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209905110
WHO. 2019. WHO. n.d. Leading Causes of Death Worldwide in 2016 (in Millions). Statista. Retrieved 21 March 2019 (https://www.statista.com/statistics/288839/leading-causes-of-death-worldwide/)
Y. Zheng, J. Chen, M. Craven, N.W. Choi, S. Totorica, A. Diaz-Santana, P. Kermani, B. Hempstead, C. Fischbach-Teschl, J.A. López, A.D. Stroock, In vitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109(24), 9342–9347 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201240109
D. Zhou, Y. Tan, X. Liu, L. Tang, H. Wang, J. Shen, W. Wang, L. Zhuang, J. Tao, S. Jun, T. Gong, X. Liu, P. Liang, Y. Feng, M. Zhao, Patient-specific IPSC-derived endothelial cells reveal aberrant P38 MAPK signaling in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Stem Cell Rep. 16(9), 2305–2319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.07.011
Funding
This work was supported by the Netherlands Organ-on-Chip Initiative, an NWO Gravitation project (024.003.001) funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the government of the Netherlands. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 812954. This work was supported by the Impulse grant 2018 awarded to the PHAEDRA-IMPACT consortium (Grant number: CVON-2018-29 PHAEDRA-IMPACT), which includes collective funding by the Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers, The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences. Mees de Graaf is kindly acknowledged for his help in establishing protocols for viscous finger patterning.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.H.T.M. conducted the experiments and analyzed the results. Blood perfusion assay was set up by H.J.A and H.H.T.M. H.H.T.M and H.J.W. conducted the blood perfusion assay. K.V. performed endothelial cell differentiation. Operators for data analysis were H.H.T.M, H.J.W. and L.E.H. Endothelail assessment was performed by H.H.T.M and L.E.H. Confocal images were obtained by T.G., L.E.H. and H.H.T.M. A.B. and A.D.M. supervised the study. All authors wrote and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary files
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Middelkamp, H., Weener, H., Gensheimer, T. et al. Embedded macrophages induce intravascular coagulation in 3D blood vessel-on-chip. Biomed Microdevices 26, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-023-00684-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-023-00684-w