Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of competency judgments by experienced laparoscopic surgeons

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The definitive criteria for assessing competence remain elusive. In our study, we aimed to identify the determinants of competence assessment used by individual laparoscopic surgeons. Methods: In a blinded fashion, five laparoscopic surgeons rated 27 subjects on three laparoscopic simulations in four skill categories: clinical judgment, dexterity, serial/simultaneous complexity, and spatial orientation. The raters then assessed overall subject competence for each procedure. Point-biserial correlational analyses and cluster analyses were performed to ascertain the relationships among the various scales. Results: All of the correlations between the skills’ ratings and competence judgments were statistically significant (p < .05). No skill rating was consistently more highly correlated with the competence rating. There were no distinct patterns of correlations for each rater or each procedure. One factor emerged from each cluster analysis of the skills measures. Conclusions: The results suggest that the four skills scored in the study are highly correlated with each other and are important in determining competence. The cluster analyses revealed that the surgeon raters shared a common perception of competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Board of Medical Specialties (2000) Toolbox of Assessment Methods. ACGME Outcomes Project, ACGME and ABMS Joint Initiative. http://www.acgme.org/Outcome

  2. GL Adrales UB Chu DB Witzke MB Donnelly J Hoskins MJ Mastrangelo Jr A Gandsas AE Park (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluating minimally invasive surgery training using low-cost mechanical simulations. Surg Endosc 17 580–585 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8841-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7nvFGqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12582771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adrales GL, Chu UB, Witzke DB, Donnelly MB, Hoskins JD, Mastrangelo MJ Jr, Gandsas A, Park AE (2002) Assessment of competence using laparoscopic simulations: a valid method of training and evaluation. Association for Academic Surgery Proceedings, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  4. M Donnelly D Witzke M Mastrangelo Jr. A Park (2001) ArticleTitleThe educational implications of the importance of clinical judgment in performing laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 15 (Suppl) S119

    Google Scholar 

  5. A Hawasli R Featherstone L Lloyd M Vorhees (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic training in residency program. J Laparoendosc Surg 6 171–174 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymH3c7hsVY%3D Occurrence Handle8807518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. LT Kohn JM Corrigan MS Donaldson (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. AI Macmillan A Cuschieri (1999) ArticleTitleAssessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the advanced Dundee endoscopic psychomotor tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg 177 274–277 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00016-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jsFaktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10219869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. WS Melvin JA Johnson EC Ellison (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic skills enhancement. Am J Surg 172 377–379 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00186-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD38jjvFE%3D Occurrence Handle8873534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. R Reznick G Regehr H MacRae J Martin W McCulloch (1996) ArticleTitleTesting technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173 226–230 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89597-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D Risucci A Geiss L Gellman B Pinard J Rosser (2001) ArticleTitleSurgeon-specific factors in the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 181 289–293 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00574-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzotVyqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11438260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JC Rosser (1997) ArticleTitleSkill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132 200–204 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC1MvkvV0%3D Occurrence Handle9041927

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DJ Scott PC Bergen RV Rege R Laycock ST Tesfay RJ Valentine DM Euhus DR Jeyarajah WM Thompson DB Jones (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191 272–283 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00339-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktF2mtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10989902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. SJ Shapiro L Paz-Partlow L Daykhovsky LA Gordon (1996) ArticleTitleThe use of modular skills center for the maintenance of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 10 816–819 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900168 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2M7gtVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8694945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Witzke DB, Adrales GL, Donnelly MB, Chu UB, Hoskins JD, Mastrangelo MJ Jr, Gandsas A, Park AE (2002) The relationship of psychomotor ability to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technical skills performance. Association for Surgical Education 36th Annual Meeting Proceedings, p 288

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA

    G. L. Adrales, M. B. Donnelly, U. B. Chu, D. B. Witzke, J. D. Hoskins, M. J. Mastrangelo Jr., A. Gandsas & A. E. Park

Authors
  1. G. L. Adrales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. B. Donnelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. B. Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. B. Witzke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. D. Hoskins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. J. Mastrangelo Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Gandsas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. E. Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adrales, G., Donnelly, M., Chu, U. et al. Determinants of competency judgments by experienced laparoscopic surgeons . Surg Endosc 18, 323–327 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8958-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8958-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation