Abstract
The chapter proposes a cultural semiotics of mathematics meant as a language that is modeled after human cognition but then turns often not only into a beneficial instrument for the patterning of reality, but also into a biased rhetoric that bestows an aura of commensurability, accurateness, and precision to human domains that are, on the contrary, unpatterned, and subject to ideological choices. The chapter dwells, in particular, on the mathematical mensuration of the body, and specifically of the head and the face. Counting and measuring the body were indispensable to the raise of ancient medicine and to its development as modern science and practice, yet they have also often turned into techniques of biopolitical control. The chapter focuses, in particular, on the tradition of “face mensuration” that, starting from the Enlightenment, claimed that measuring heads, skulls, and faces could lead to objective knowledge about their beauty, intelligence, morality, and placement in the ranking of natural evolution. A cultural semiotic analysis of this tradition shows that it adopted facial mathematics as a way to conceal and objectify racist biases. It also points out that the bias was not in the measurements, but in the decision itself of measuring.
Alle sind gleichmäßig zur Freiheit bestimmt
Alexander Von Humboldt (1845. Kosmos, vol. 1)
This chapter results from a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No 819649–FACETS).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balan, B. (1979). L’Ordre et le temps : L’anatomie comparée et l’histoire des vivants au 19e siècle. Vrin.
Blanckaert, C. (1987). ‘Les vicissitudes de l’angle facial’ et les débuts de la craniométrie (1765–1875). Revue de synthèse, 108, 417–453.
Blumenbach, J. F. (1795). De generis humani varietate nativa. Apud Vandenhoek et Ruprecht.
Boylan, M. (2007). Galen: On Blood, the Pulse, and the Arteries. Journal of the History of Biology, 40(2), 207–230.
Broca, P. (1871a). Description d’un nouveau goniometre (1864), 1. In Memoires d’anthropologie (5 vols, pp. 106–109). Reinwald.
Broca, P. (1871b). Memoire sur le cräniographe et sur quelques-unes de ses applications (communiqué à la Société d’Anthropologie dans les séances du 19 décembre 1861 et 6 novembre 1862), 1. In Id. Memoires d’anthropologie (5 vols, pp. 41–42). Reinwald.
Broca, P. (1872). Sur la direction du trou occipital. In Bulletins de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris (2e série, 7, pp. 649–668).
Cloquet, J. (1825). Manuel d’anatomie descriptive du corps humain, 4 vols. Béchet jeune.
Cuvier, G., & É. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. (1795). Histoire naturelle des Orangs-Outangs. Magasin encyclopédique, 3, 451–463.
Daubenton, L.-J.-M. (1764). Mémoire sur les différences de la situation du grand trou occipital dans l’homme et dans les animaux. In Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences, 1764: Avec les Mémoires de mathématique et de physique, pour la même année, tirés des registres de cette Académie (pp. 568–575). Imprimerie royale.
Della Porta, Giambattista. (1586). De humana physiognomonia libri IIII. Apud Iosephum Cacchium.
Gossiaux, P.-P. (1985). Anthropologie des Lumières (culture ‘naturelle’ et racisme rituel). In D. Droixhe & P.-P. Gossiaux (Eds.), L’Homme des Lumières et la découverte de l’autre. Bruxelles: Éd (pp. 49–69). Éd. de I’Universite de Bruxelles.
Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man (1981); revised and expanded edition. W.W. Norton and Company.
Harris, J. C. (2012). Lovesickness: Erasistratus Discovering the Cause of Antiochus’ Disease. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 549.
Lanteri-Laura, G. (1970). Histoire de la phrénologie : L’homme et son cerveau selon F.J. Gall. P.U.F.
Le Brun, Charles. (1702). Méthode pour apprendre à dessiner les passions: Proposée dans une conférence sur l’expression générale et particulière. Van der Plaats.
Mead, M. (2015). Vicissitudes of the Study of the Total Communication Process. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Approaches to Semiotics: Cultural Anthropology, Education, Linguistics, Psychiatry, Psychology (Transactions of the Indiana University Conference on Paralinguistics and Kinesics (1962)) (pp. 277–288). De Gruyter Mouton.
Meigs, J. A. (1861). On the Mensuration of the Human Skull. In The North American Medico-Chirurgical Review (Vol. 5, pp. 837–861). J.B. Lippincott & Co..
Pittard, E. (1924). Les races et l’histoire: Introduction ethnologique à l’histoire. La Renaissance du Livre; 2nd revised edition 1953: Paris: Albin Michel. Engl. trans. of the 2nd edition: Berr, Henri. 2003. Race and History: An Ethnological Introduction to History. London/New York: Letchworth, Herts/Kegan Paul; distributed by Turpin Distribution.
Sebeok, T. A. (2015). Discussion Session on Linguistics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Approaches to Semiotics: Cultural Anthropology, Education, Linguistics, Psychiatry, Psychology (Transactions of the Indiana University Conference on Paralinguistics and Kinesics (1962)) (pp. 265–276). De Gruyter Mouton.
Stefanou, M. I. (2020). The Footprints of Neuroscience in Alexandria during the 3rd-Century BC: Herophilus and Erasistratus. Journal of Medical Biography, 28(4), 186–194.
Virey, J.-J. (1800 (an IX)). Histoire naturelle du genre humain, ou Recherches sur ses principaux fondements physiques et moraux; précédées d’un Discours sur la nature des êtres organiques et sur l’ensemble de leur physiologie, 2 vols. Dufart.
Wills, A. (1999). Herophilus, Erasistratus, and the Birth of Neuroscience. The Lancet, 354(9191), 1719–1720.
Wiltse, L. L., & Glenn Pait, T. (1998). Herophilus of Alexandria (325–255 BC): The Father of Anatomy. Spine, 23(17), 1904–1914.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Leone, M. (2022). Visage Mathematics: Semiotic Ideologies of Facial Measurement and Calculus. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-03944-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-03945-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering