• Open Access

Quantifying grade benefits of study: Practice makes better

W. K. Black, Rebecca L. Matz, Mark Mills, and A. E. Evrard
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010139 – Published 7 June 2023

Abstract

Problem Roulette (PR), an online study service at the University of Michigan, offers points-free formative practice to students preparing for examinations in introductory science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Using four years of PR data involving millions of problem attempts by thousands of students, we quantify the benefits of increased practice study volume in introductory physics. After conditioning the mean final grade on standardized (ACT and SAT) math test score, we analyze deviations based on student study volume. We find a strong effect; mean course grade rises quadratically with the logarithm of the total number of PR questions encountered over the term (NQ,tot), with an overall gain of 0.77±0.12 grade points between 1<NQ,tot<1000. The gains are persistent across the range of math test scores represented in our sample. While NQ,tot surely correlates with other study habits, the benefits of increased study in general still hold. A model for final grade using test score and study volume largely accounts for demographic stratification, including by sex, parental education level, number of parents at home, nationality or underrepresented minority status, and regional income level, with two significant exceptions: students whose parents did not earn a college degree, who earn 0.27±0.04 grade points (6.1σ) below expectations, and underrepresented minority students at 0.14±0.04 points (3.6σ). Residual scatter in final grade remains comparable to the maximal study gains, implying that the model is far from deterministic: individual variation trumps mean trends. Our findings can help motivate students to study more and help teachers to identify which types of students may especially need such encouragement.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 20 December 2022
  • Accepted 25 April 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010139

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Physics Education Research

Authors & Affiliations

W. K. Black1,*, Rebecca L. Matz2, Mark Mills2, and A. E. Evrard1,3

  • 1Departments of Physics and Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, Michigan, USA
  • 2Center for Academic Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104, Michigan, USA
  • 3Program in Computing for the Arts and Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, Michigan, USA

  • *wkblack@umich.edu

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 19, Iss. 1 — January - June 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×