The Three Streptomyces lividans HtrA-Like Proteases Involved in the Secretion Stress Response Act in a Cooperative Manner

Rebeca L. Vicente; Sonia Gullón; Silvia Marín; Rafael P. Mellado

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168112

Abstract

Overproduction of Sec-proteins in S. lividans accumulates misfolded proteins outside of the cytoplasmic membrane where the accumulated proteins interfere with the correct functioning of the secretion machinery and with the correct cell functionality, triggering the expression in S. lividans of a CssRS two-component system which regulates the degradation of the accumulated protein, the so-called secretion stress response. Optimization of secretory protein production via the Sec route requires the identification and characterisation of quality factors involved in this process. The phosphorylated regulator (CssR) interacts with the regulatory regions of three genes encoding three different HtrA-like proteases. Individual mutations in each of these genes render degradation of the misfolded protein inoperative, and propagation in high copy number of any of the three proteases encoding genes results on indiscriminate alpha-amylase degradation. None of the proteases could complement the other two deficiencies and only propagation of each single copy protease gene can restore its own deficiency. The obtained results strongly suggest that the synthesis of the three HtrA-like proteases needs to be properly balanced to ensure the effective degradation of misfolded overproduced secretory proteins and, at the same time, avoid negative effects in the secreted proteins and the secretion machinery. This is particularly relevant when considering the optimisation of Streptomyces strains for the overproduction of homologous or heterologous secretory proteins of industrial application.

Citation: Vicente RL, Gullón S, Marín S, Mellado RP (2016) The Three Streptomyces lividans HtrA-Like Proteases Involved in the Secretion Stress Response Act in a Cooperative Manner. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0168112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112

Editor: Adam Lesner, Uniwersytet Gdanski, POLAND

Received: August 23, 2016; Accepted: November 26, 2016; Published: December 15, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Vicente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by MINECO/FEDER grant BIO2015 71504-R.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Most bacterial secretory proteins transported across the membrane via the Sec pathway are released out of the cell in a misfolded manner. The accumulation of these misfolded proteins could interfere with the correct functionality of the cell [1], and triggers a secretion stress response, whereby a so-called CssRS two-component system has been described to activate in Bacillus subtilis [2] and Streptomyces lividans [3] in order to induce the synthesis of specific proteases, which degrade the misfolded proteins.

The B. subtilis CssRS two-component system responds to the secretion stress resulting from the overproduction of heterologous extracellular alpha-amylase (AmyQ of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens); the phosphorylated regulator CssR activates the synthesis of two HtrA-like proteases (HtrA, HtrB) [4], specifically binding to the htrA and htrB regulatory regions [5].

The two B. subtilis HtrA-like proteases have an N-terminal predicted membrane-spanning segment, a catalytic protease domain and a unique C-terminal PDZ domain; which probably participate in binding to the substrate [6]. In spite of the fact that HtrA is a membrane-bound protein, it is also found extracellularly where it acts as a chaperone for YqxI [7]. These combined proteolytic and chaperone activities for HtrA were also previously described for E.coli HtrA as well [8].

Streptomyces lividans has often been used as a host for the secretory production of homologous and heterologous proteins that are valuable for industrial and pharmacological purposes [9]. The optimization of this production is important to maximize the yield and quality of these proteins. Therefore, the characterisation of the control factors involved in the degradation of misfolded proteins is necessary to optimize secretory protein production, avoiding the potential interference of the accumulated misfolded proteins with essential bacterial cell processes.

In our laboratory a CssRS two-component system in S. lividans was recently identified as being responsible for the degradation of misfolded proteins upon alpha-amylase overproduction and this system surprisingly activates the synthesis of three HtrA-like proteases (HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrB) [3]. In this work, a direct interaction between CssR and the three proteases encoding genes has been found. The three proteases play an essential role in the degradation of extracellular misfolded proteins. Moreover, the overproduction of these proteases plays a detrimental role in their correct functioning of the secretion stress response in S. lividans.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and media

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Streptomyces bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.t001

The S. lividans TK21 wild-type strain [10] and its derivatives were cultured in liquid NMMP medium using mannitol as carbon source [11]. Apramycin (25 μg/ml), thiostrepton (50 μg/ml), kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (25 μg/ml) were added to the R5 and MS solid media, when required.

Construction of gene disruption mutants

To construct the htrB mutant strain, oligonucleotides htrBdis_Fw and htrBdis_Rv (Table 2) were used to amplify a 531 nt DNA fragment from the S. lividans TK21 genome. To construct the htrA1 mutant strain, oligonucleotides htrA1dis_Fw and htrA1dis_Rv (Table 2) were used to amplify a 502 nt DNA fragment from the S. lividans TK21 genome. To construct the htrA2 mutant strain, oligonucleotides htrAdis2_Fw and htrAdis2_Rv (Table 2) were used to amplify a 675 nt DNA fragment from the S. lividans TK21 genome. These fragments were inserted into plasmid pOJ260 [14] through its unique BamHI and EcoRI sites to generate plasmids pOJB, pOJA1 and pOJA2 respectively. The plasmids were used to conjugate E. coli to Streptomyces, as described [18]. E. coli ET12567 carrying the non-transmissible ‘‘driver” plasmid pUZ8002 was used for conjugation [19]. Apramycin resistant strains containing the disrupted genes htrB, htrA1 and htrA2, respectively, were selected upon verification of the disruption by PCR amplification and Southern blot hybridization analysis (not shown).

Download:

Table 2. Primer sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.t002

Plasmid pAMI11 [17] is a pIJ486 [16] derivative carrying the S. lividans gene amlB (encoding alpha-amylase B) and a frame-shift-mutated thiostrepton resistance gene; which was used to transform the S. lividans TK21, S. lividans ΔhtrB, S. lividans ΔhtrA1 and S. lividans ΔhtrA2 protoplasts. Plasmid pIJ487 was propagated in S. lividans TK21 and protease mutant strains to generate the corresponding isogenic strains (Table 1)

Construction of complementation strains

For the multicopy complementation of the mutant strains, gene htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 with their respective predicted regulatory region were amplified with oligonucleotides htrB_Fw2 and htrB_Rv2, htrA1_Fw and htrA1_Rv, and htrA2_Fw and htrA2_Rv (Table 2), respectively. The chromosomal DNA of S. lividans TK21 strain was used as a template in all cases. The obtained DNA fragments were subsequently sequenced and digested with BamHI and HindIII and cloned in the respective sites of the multicopy plasmid pFD666 [15].

An 1845-nt long fragment containing the thiostrepton resistance gene (tsr) was retrieved from plasmid pAC301 [13] by BglII. The fragment was inserted into plasmid pFD666 and its derivatives already containing htrB, htrA1, htrA2 through their respective BamHI sites generating plasmids pFDT, pFDB, pFDA1 and pFDA2 respectively.

Plasmids pFDB, pFDA1 and pFDA2 were used to transform the S. lividans TK21, htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 mutant strains carrying pAMI11 to generate the strains used in this study (Table 1). Plasmid pFDT was propagated into the S.lividans TK21, htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 mutant strains carrying pAMI11 to generate the corresponding isogenic strains (Table 1).

To complement the htrB and htrA mutant strains with their respective genes in monocopy, two DNA fragments, EcoRI-HindIII blunt-ended 1.2 and 1.6 kb long were retrieved from pFDB and pFDA1 respectively. Each fragment, containing the htrB and htrA1 genes with their respective regulatory regions, was inserted in pUC19 previously linearized with EcoRI and SmaI to generate pUC19B and pUC19A1, respectively. Plasmids pUC19B and pUC19A1 were restricted with EcoRI and BamHI to retrieve intact htrB and htrA1 genes that were transferred to the integrative plasmid pSET152tsr digested with EcoRI and BamHI to obtain pSETB and pSETA1 respectively. The integrative plasmid, pSET152tsr was previously obtained by inserting into pSET152 an XbaI-BamHI 1.8 kb long fragment containing the tsr gene from pFDA1.

To complement the htrA2 mutant strain with its own gene, an EcoRI-HindIII blunt ended 4.1 kb long fragment from pFDA2 containing htrA2 and the tsr gene was inserted in pSET152 digested with EcoRI and BamHI blunt-ended to obtain pSETA2.

Quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from bacteria growing cultures at the exponential phase of growth using the RNeasy midi Kit (Qiagen). Cell lysates were extracted twice with phenol-chloroform before being loaded onto RNeasy midi columns for RNA purification. DNA, potentially contaminating the RNA preparations, was removed by incubation with RNase-free DNAse (Ambion) and its absence was tested by quantitative real time PCR amplification in the absence of reverse transcriptase. Complementary DNA was synthesised using the High Capacity Archive kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using SYBR Green technology as previously described [3]. Three biological samples from the different bacterial cultures were amplified in triplicate in separate PCR reactions. All PCR products were between 50 and 150 bp in length.

A melting curve analysis was conducted after amplification to distinguish the targeted PCR products from the non-targeted ones. The melting curves were obtained by heating at temperatures ranging from 60°C to 95°C at a rate of 0.2°C per sec, with continuous fluorescence scanning. The hrdB transcript was carried out as an internal control to quantify the relative expression of the target genes as before [3]. The oligonucleotides used as primers were previously described [3].

Construction and purification of a six-His-tagged CssR protein

To obtain an N-terminally six-His-tagged CssR protein, the cssR open reading frame was amplified by PCR using the primers CssRHisFw and CssRHisRv2 (Table 2). The chromosomal DNA of S. lividans TK21 strain was used as a template. The product of this reaction was digested with BamHI and HindIII and cloned into the similarly digested pET28a (+) plasmid (Novagen), yielding plasmid pRHIS.

To induce expression, Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) carrying pRHIS was diluted 1:100 to fresh medium from an overnight culture. At an optical density of 600 nm of 0.5, expression was induced by the addition of 1 mM of IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside). Cells were harvested after an additional 4 hours of growth and pellets were suspended in 20 ml of lysis buffer (NaH₂PO₄/ Na₂HPO₄ 50 mM, NaCl 400 mM, DNAase I (0.1 mg ml^-1) in the presence of one tablet of EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) and disrupted by two passages through a French pressure cell at 1000 p.s.i. Soluble and insoluble fractions of the E. coli lysate were separated by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 1 hour at 4°C. The soluble protein extract corresponding to the cytoplasmic fraction was loaded onto a chromatography column filled with a Cobalt-containing resin (Talon, Clontech). After loading and washing His₆-CssR it was subsequently eluted with a buffer containing 150 mM imidazole. Fractions containing CssR were collected and analysed by SDS-PAGE 12% (S1 Fig).

The eluted fractions were dialysed and protein concentration was estimated using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce), as indicated by the supplier.

When necessary, eluted fractions were concentrated using the Centricon filter (10 kDa cutoff; Millipore).

Protein identification by nano LC–MS/MS Triple Tof analysis

The samples were subjected to methanol-chloroform precipitation to isolate proteins and remove interfering substances and taken to dryness. The protein extracts were dissolved in 8M Urea / 25mM ammonium bicarbonate solution, reduced by 10mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and alkylated by addition of cysteine-blocking reagent (iodoacetamide). Samples were further diluted and digested with trypsin at an enzyme-to protein ratio of 20:1, at 37°C overnight. All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

The peptide samples were analyzed on a nano liquid chromatography system (Eksigent Technologies nanoLC Ultra 1D plus, AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA) coupled to 5600 Triple TOF mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA) with a nanoelectrospray ion source. Samples were injected on a C18 PepMap trap column (5 μm, 100 μm I.D. x 2 cm, Thermo Scientific) at 2 μL/min, in 0.1% formic acid in water, and the trap column was switched on-line to a C18 nanoAcquity BEH analytical column (1.7 μm, 100 Å, 75 μm I.D. x15 cm, Waters). Equilibration was done in mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water), and peptide elution was achieved in a 40 min linear gradient from 5%–40% B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at 250 nL/min. The mass spectrometer operated in data-dependent acquisition mode. For TOF scans, the accumulation time was set to 250 ms, and per cycle, up to 15 precursor ions were monitored.

MS and MS/MS data obtained for each sample were processed using Analyst TF 1.5.1 Software (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA). Raw data were translated to mascot general file (mgf) format and searched against a database built from sequences in the Streptomyces lividans TK24 and Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) [20, 21] at Uniprot Knowledgebase (as of Oct 2016), using an in-house Mascot Server v. 2.4 (Matrix Science, London, U.K.). Search parameters were set as follows: carbamoidomethylcysteine as fixed modification and oxidized methionines as variable one. Peptide mass tolerance was set to 25 ppm and 0.02 Da, in MS and MS/MS mode, respectively and 1 missed cleavage was allowed.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

The oligonucleotides used to PCR amplify the respective regulatory regions of the cssRS operon, and genes htrB, htrA1, htrA2 and degU (carried as a negative control) are indicated in Table 2.

The amplified DNA fragments were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Purified CssR protein was phosphorylated in vitro with acetyl phosphate as described before [22] and was then mixed with the DNA fragments in a 20 μl reaction volume containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl₂, 2,5 mM dithiothreitol, and 5% glycerol. After incubation at 37°C for 15 minutes and the addition of the DNA dye solution (10% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue), the mixture was loaded directly onto a pre-run 6% polyacrylamide gel. Gel electrophoresis was performed in TBE at 100 V for 2 h at 4°C. After electrophoresis the gel was dyed with a TBE solution containing 0.01% ethidium bromide. Signals were detected with a UV transilluminator (Gel Doc 2000 de BIO-RAD).

Low resolution DNase I footprinting

A 237-bp long DNA fragment spanning from positions -180 to +57 of the S. lividans htrB gene was incubated with the phosphorylated CssR, as described above, and subsequently treated with 0.5 units of DNase I (New England Biolabs) at 37°C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by incubating at 75°C for 10 min. The resultant DNA fragments were extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with ethanol [23]. The DNA fragments were cloned into a SmaI digested pUC19 plasmid previously dephosphorylated with alkaline phosphatase from bovine intestine (Roche) and propagated in E.coli XL1-BLUE. Fourteen pUC19-derivative plasmids were purified and their respective DNA sequenced with an automated DNA sequencer. The resulting sequences were aligned using BLAST and MEME web servers to identify possible protected regions from DNAase digestion.

A putative consensus motif, C(C/G)AGCT(G/T)CG, was derived when the equivalent regions from cssR, htrA1and htrA2 were compared to that of htrB. This putative motif was used to search the Streptomyces lividans genome using RSAT [24] with default settings.

Protein analysis and Western blot experiments

Supernatants from the HtrA-like proteases deficient strains overproducing alpha-amylase (AmlB) and from HtrA-like proteases deficient strains overproducing the different HtrA-like proteases and the AmlB protein were grown in NMMP medium [25] were processed as described [3]. Intracellular protein analysis was carried out as indicated previously [3]. For Western blot analysis, cell-associated and extracellular proteins were fractionated by SDSPAGE in 10% (w/v) acrylamide gel [26].

E. coli overexpressing His₆-CssR cell lysates were fractionated by SDSPAGE in 12% acrylamide gel (w/v). Gel-fractionated proteins were transferred onto immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Milipore), as described [27]. To perform Western blot analysis of the AmlB overproducer strains, the transferred material was incubated with polyclonal antibodies raised against S. lividans TK21 AmlB (a gift from C. Isiegas) followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated protein A (Invitrogen Laboratories) as described before [3]. Transferred His6-CssR proteins fractions were incubated with the monoclonal antibody 6xHis mAb-HRP Conjugate, Clontech (Takara ref. 631210)

Enzyme activity

To determine extracellular alpha-amylase activity, the supernatants from 20-ml aliquots of bacterial cell cultures at the indicated phases of growth were processed as previously described [3]. The alpha-amylase activity was estimated by determining the amount of reducing sugar released from starch. The assay was carried out by adding supernatant sample and starch solution 1% (w/v) treated with NaBH4, as described [28] in 20 mM phosphate buffer and was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of dinitrosalicylic acid [29]. One unit of alpha-amylase was defined as the amount of an enzyme necessary to produce reducing sugar equivalent to 1 μmol of glucose in 30 min under the assay conditions. The specific activity, measured as units per mg of protein, was the average of at least three independent determinations. The protein concentration in the different samples was determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce), as indicated by the supplier.

Results

CssR interacts with htrA1, htrA2, htrB and cssRS regulatory regions

HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrB, are HtrA-like serine proteases. The htrB gene is located immediately upstream of the cssRS two-component operon in a similar chromosomal organisation to that of B. subtilis while htrA1 and htrA2 are located far from cssRS in the bacterial genome (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Gene organization of the two-component system and the HtrA-like proteases encoding genes.

(A) Schematic representation of the E. coli chromosomal region of the cpxRA two-component system, the gene encoding the E. coli HtrA-like protease (degP) and adjacent genes. Schematic representacion of the B.subtilis (B) and S. lividans (C) chromosomal regions of the cssRS two-component system, the HtrA-like proteases encoding genes and adjacent genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.g001

The overproduction of alpha-amylase in S. lividans causes the secretion stress that activates the CssRS two-component system, which apparently regulates htrA1, htrA2 and htrB expression [3]. In E. coli and B. subtilis the phosphorylated CssR activates the expression of the HtrA-like protease genes and regulates the expression of its own operon [4, 30].

To further investigate if the S. lividans regulator CssR interacts with the respective htrA1, htrA2, htrB regulatory regions and with that of the cssRS operon, EMSA experiments were carried out using purified N-terminal His-tagged CssR protein.

The purified N-terminal His-tagged CssR protein was analysed using nano LC–MS/MS Triple Tof analysis as indicated in Material and methods. The S. lividans CssR protein has the highest Mascot protein score where 73% of the total identified peptides belonged to the CssR protein. Proteins with a significantly lower Mascot protein score are usually appearing when recombinant His-tagged proteins were expressed in E. coli and purify by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) [31,32]. Additionally, neither of them have a regulatory function (S1 Table).

The 302, 237, 549 and 535 long DNA fragments containing the potential regulatory regions of cssR, htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 respectively, and the 110 bp long fragment containing the regulatory region of degU, carried as a negative control, were amplified using the oligonucleotides described in Table 2. His-CssR was labelled in vitro with acetyl phosphate and used in the reaction mixtures to enhance binding the protein to the target sequences [5]. As expected, the phosphorylated six-histidine-tagged CssR retarded the mobility of all the DNA fragments used, except that containing the degU regulatory region (Fig 2), confirming that CssR interacts with the regulatory regions of the genes encoding the HtrA-like proteases and with that of the cssRS operon. Two smaller DNA fragments 276 and 351 bp long from the respective htrA1 and htrA2 potential regulatory regions, were not retarded in the EMSA assays (not shown) and the 549 and 535 bp long fragments were respectively used instead.

Download:

Fig 2. CssR binds to the regulatory regions of the genes encoding the three HtrA-like proteases.

DNA fragments containing the respective potential regulatory regions of the three HtrA-like protease genes and the cssSR operon were incubated with growing concentration of phosphorylated CssR (0, 4, 13, 26, 44 μM) and subjected to gel shift assay; the degU regulatory region was carried out as a negative control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.g002

Low resolution DNAase I footprinting experiments (see Material and methods) allowed the identification of a putative conserved motif C(C/G)AGCT(G/T)CG, which was absent in the non-retarded DNA fragments.

The three HtrA-like proteases are equally needed in the secretion stress response

To determine the role of the three proteases in the secretion stress response, individual mutants in each of the respective genes were constructed by disruption to generate S. lividans ΔhtrB, S. lividans ΔhtrA1 and S. lividans ΔhtrA2 mutant strains. The relative expression levels of htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 were analysed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) in each mutant strain with respect to that of the wild type strain. Thus, htrB (-3.38± 1.04), htrA1 (-5.40±2.19) and htrA2 (-3.86 ± 1.49) appeared to be downregulated in the corresponding mutant strain while the cssRS two-component system and the other two htrA-like proteases remain unaltered.

To study the role of the three HtrA-like proteases in the secretion stress response, the multicopy plasmid pAMI11 harbouring the alpha-amylase coding gene amlB, was propagated in the mutant strains. The growth rate of the HtrA-like proteases deficient strains overproducing alpha-amylase was slightly reduced when compared to that of the wild type overexpressing AmlB (not shown). AmlB was observed extracellularly in all cases when anti-AmlB serum was used in Western blot analyses. No pre-AmlB was detected in the different cellular fractions (Fig 3), as it occurs in the corresponding isogenic strains carrying plasmid pIJ486 not containing the amlB gene (not shown). The higher level of secreted alpha-amylase was observed in the exponential phase of growth in the HtrA-like protease deficient strains (Fig 3B–3D), where the enzyme degradation pattern was similar to the previously observed when the CssS- and CssR- deficient strains were analysed [3].

Download:

Fig 3. Alpha-amylase produced by S. lividans TK21(pAMI11), S. lividans ΔhtrB (pAMI11), S. lividans ΔhtrA1 (pAMI11) and S. lividans ΔhtrA2 (pAMI11).

Cell-associated and extracellular amylase present in S. lividans TK21 (pAMI11) (A), S. lividans ΔhtrB (pAMI11) (B), S. lividans ΔhtrA1 (pAMI11) (C) and S. lividans ΔhtrA2 (pAMI11) (D) were analysed at different times of growth (16, 24, 36, 48 and 60 h) by Western blot using antibodies raised against AmlB. The amount of protein loaded onto the gels was corrected by the dried weight of the bacterial cultures. Molecular size markers are indicated on the side of each panel. The arrow indicates the relative mobility of the mature AmlB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.g003

The activity of the secreted enzyme was measured and compared to that of the alpha-amylase produced by the wild type strain. The activity of the alpha-amylase secreted in the mutant strains was severely reduced (by 74%-85%) in comparison to that of the wild type. The decrease in the measured activity reflects the existence of misfolded secreted AmlB in each of the three HtrA-like protease deficient strains. This strongly suggests that the three proteases seem to be needed simultaneously in a functional manner to degrade the accumulated misfolded proteins.

Overexpression of the HtrA-like genes

To ascertain if self- and cross-complementation of each HtrA-like deficiency could take place, the different HtrA-like coding genes were propagated in multicopy plasmids compatible with the plasmid carrying the alpha-amylase gene pAMI11, as described in Materials and Methods, and alpha-amylase production analysed by Western blot assays. A similar pattern was observed in all cases consisting of numerous bands of lower molecular size than those predicted for the mature alpha-amylase (Fig 4A–4C). This pattern was different to the one observed when the secreted alpha-amylase was analysed in each of the protease-deficient strains (Fig 3B–3D). This could be attributed to an imbalance in the secretion stress response resulting from the overexpression of the proteases in the bacterium. Propagation of the multicopy plasmids harbouring the different HtrA-like coding genes in S. lividans (pAMI11) produced a similar pattern to that observed when the different proteases were overexpressed in the mutant strains (Fig 4D), strongly suggesting that the overexpression of each protease may increase alpha-amylase degradation. This is in accordance with the severely reduction (up to a 94%) of alpha-amylase activity measured in the supernatants of the strains overexpressing each protease.

Download:

Fig 4. Complementation of the alpha-amylase synthesised by the HtrB, HtrA1 and HtrA2 deficient strains by propagation in multicopy of their respective genes.

(A) Extracellular alpha-amylase present in the supernatants of the HtrB-deficient strain transformed with pFD666 derivative plasmids containing htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 (pFDB, pFDA1 and pFDA2, respectively) (B) HtrA1-deficient strain transformed with pFDB, pFDA1 and pFDA2 (C), HtrA2-deficient strain transformed with pFDB, pFDA1 and pFDA2 (D) and S. lividans TK21 transformed with pFDB, pFDA1 and pFDA2 were analysed at different times of growth (16, 24, 36, 48 and 60 h) by Western blotting assays using antibodies raised against AmlB. The amount of protein loaded onto the gels was corrected by the dried weight of the bacterial cultures. Molecular size markers are indicated on the side of each panel. The arrows indicate the relative mobility of the mature AmlB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.g004

Complementation of the HtrA-like protease deficient strains with their respective genes propagated in monocopy

Plasmids pSETB, pSETA1 and pSETA2 containing single copies of htrB, htrA1 and htrA2 respectively, were used to transform the HtrB-, HtrA1- and HtrA2-deficient strains carrying the alpha-amylase gene in multicopy to test if the homologous or heterologous single-copy complementation of the HtrB, HtrA1 and HtrA2 deficiency could take place. Alpha-amylase activity was restored exclusively when the HtrB-, HtrA1- and HtrA2-deficient strains were complemented by the htrB, htrA1, htrA2 genes respectively (30%-81% of that of the wild type in the same conditions). No alpha-amylase activity was restored by cross-complementation by any of the other two HtrA-like coding genes, thus showing that no cross-complementation of the HtrA-like proteases can take place in S. lividans

Discussion

HtrA-like proteases are widely distributed in nature, from bacteria to humans [33]. It has been shown in a wide range of bacterial pathogen species that HtrA proteases are essential for virulence and survival under environmental stress [33, 34]. The HtrA-like proteases perform essential functions acting as protein quality controllers while avoiding the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the periplasmic space.

Members of the HtrA-family are serine proteases with an Asp-His-Ser catalytic triad, where the aspartate and histidine residues increase the nucleophilicity of the serine hydroxyl group that hydrolyses peptide amide bonds. Their catalytic activity is strictly controlled and can be reversibly switched on and off, which does not occur in the case of classic Ser proteases. Additionally, the HtrA-family contains PDZ domains in the C-terminal half involved in protein-protein interactions, substrate recognition and/or regulation of protease activity [35]. HtrA proteins normally assemble into complex oligomers. Membrane-anchored HtrA-like proteases are active as trimers, and soluble HtrA-like proteases form larger active oligomers.

The number of paralogous HtrA-like proteins changes between different species and a significant number of bacterial genomes encode more than one HtrA-like protease [36], hence it is interesting to study the function of each paralogue and its implication in the protein quality control. In our work we characterise the three HtrA-like proteases previously identified in the S. lividans TK21 genome [3].

The phosphorylated regulator CssR in B. subtilis activates two HtrA-like proteases [4]. In S. lividans the phosphorylated regulator CssR binds to 302, 549 and 535 bp long DNA fragments containing the putative regulatory regions of htrB, htrA1 and htrA2, respectively. The phosphorylated regulator binds to its own operon regulatory region, suggesting that the CssR protein directly regulates the operon cssRS as it occurs with the respective regulators of the E.coli cpxAR [30, 37] and the B. subtilis cssRS [4]. The “in silico” identification of the C(C/G)AGCT(G/T)CG motif was used to search into the Streptomyces lividans genome. The search revealed the presence of this motif in 348 different entries (not shown). This is probably due to the high content G+C of the S. lividans genome (72.24%), [20]. Therefore, the real involvement, if any, of this motif in the CssR transcriptional regulation remains to be determined.

Heterologous alpha-amylase production at the B. subtilis transition phase of growth induces the synthesis of the two HtrA-like proteases (HtrB and HtrA) of this bacterium: self-regulation and reciprocal cross-regulation occurs in B. subtilis in such a way that the expression of htrB and htrA is negatively regulated both by its own gene product and by the product of the other protease gene [36].

When individual mutations in each of the three HtrA-like proteases identified in S. lividans TK21 were analysed, the overproduced alpha-amylase detected in the corresponding supernatants presented a different pattern to that of the wild type strain, and very similar to that of the CssR-or CssS-deficient strains [3]. The pattern of the extracellular alpha-amylase observed in the Western blot analyses was consistent with the alpha-amylase being incorrectly folded, resulting on the appearance of lower molecular size bands that are absent in the wild type supernatant, which is probably the result of alpha-amylase degradation by other proteases present extracellularly. The extracellular alpha-amylase activity detected in the mutant strains was significantly reduced when compared to that of the wild type strain, suggesting the need for the three proteases to be in their fully functional form for the correct cleavage of misfolded proteins.

Interestingly though, the overexpression of each HtrA-like protease in any of the deficient strains and in the wild type strain results in a distortion in the quantity and quality of functional extracellular alpha-amylase (Fig 4), suggesting that the secretion stress response must be strictly balanced, where the presence in high copy number of any protease could negatively affect the mode of action of the others, as revealed by the pattern of degradation observed in the S. lividans TK21(pAMI11) oversynthesising some of the HtrA-like proteases.

These results, strongly suggest that to improve the overproduction of secretory proteins in S. lividans, the synthesis of the three HtrA-like proteases needs to be properly balanced to avoid negative effects in the secreted protein.

Complementation of each of the HtrA-like deficient strains by propagation of its own functional gene in single copy restored the extracellular alpha-amylase activity. This complementation did not take place when any of the other two HtrA-like encoding genes were propagated in the same manner, suggesting, once again, the need for a balanced, coordinated role of the three proteases to properly cleave the secreted misfolded alpha-amylase.

A hypothetical mode of action of the three HtrA-like proteases in S. lividans is depicted in Fig 5. The analysis of the HtrA1 amino acid sequence revealed that it has a predicted signal peptide of 32 residues, a catalytic domain and a unique C-terminal PDZ domain. HtrB and HtrA2 have an N-terminal domain with a predicted membrane-spanning segment (N_in-C_out), a catalytic protease domain and only in the case of HtrA2 a C-terminal PDZ domain. Therefore, HtrA1 is presumably located outside of the membrane due to the lack of a transmembrane domain and the presence of a signal peptide in a similar manner to the E. coli DegP and B. subtilis cleaved HtrA form [38, 7]. DegP in E. coli and HtrA B. subtilis could act as chaperones [8,7]; we hypothesise that in S. lividans HtrA1 acts as a chaperone, probably recognising small hydrophobic residues at the C terminus of the misfolded proteins via its PDZ domain [35], and transports the protein to a complex formed by HtrB and HtrA2, localised in the cytoplasmic membrane. In a subsequent step, the PDZ domains of HtrA1 and HtrA2 could interact in a similar manner as in happens in the DegP case [35], turning the three proteases into an active state by forming a kind of chamber where the three catalytic protease domains constitute a central core favouring the cleavage of the misfolded extracellular proteins. Once the peptides resulting from the cleavage are released, the subunits of the complex would be disassembled as described for DegP [39]. Further research is now being conducted to ascertain if this model is indeed correct.

Download:

Fig 5. Predicted mode of action of the three HtrA-like proteases in S. lividans.

HtrA1 recognizes the misfolded protein outside of the cytoplasmic membrane while the complex formed by HtrB and HtrA2 remain localised in the cytoplasmic membrane. The HtrA1 PDZ domain could interact with the HtrA2 PDZ domain turning the three proteases into an active state favouring the cleavage of the misfolded extracellular overproduced proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.g005

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Analysis of the expression of His₆-CssR in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3).

A) E.coli cells overexpressing His₆-CssR were grown and processed as described in Material and methods. The supernatant (S) containing the cytosol fraction was loaded onto a chromatography column filled with a Cobalt-containing resin. The concentration of the (S) fraction loaded onto the SDS-PAGE was fifty times higher than that loaded onto the IPTG induce cells. The flow-through (F) contains the unbounded protein. The column was washed two times (W1,W2) before eluting the His₆CssR with a buffer containing 150 mM imidazole (E1-E6). B) The cell lysates from E. coli containing pET28a His₆-CssR (pRHIS) inducted and non-inducted by IPTG were analysed by Western blot analysis with antibodies against the His₆ tag. The cell lysates from E. coli containing pET28a inducted and non-inducted by IPTG were used as negative control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Proteins identified by nano LC–MS/MS Triple Tof analysis in the purified His₆-CssR.

The Table indicates the number of Mascot protein score and the number of peptides identified for each protein by nano mass spectrometry analysis in the eluted fraction (E2. S1 Fig).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168112.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The proteomic analysis was performed in the proteomics facility of Centro Nacional de Biotecnología that belongs to ProteoRed, PRB2-ISCIII. We wish to thank to Jose Manuel Franco-Zorrilla from the Genomic unit of the Centro Nacional de Biotecnología for his help in the search of the putative consensus motif in the S. lividans genome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: RPM.
Data curation: RLV SG SM RPM.
Formal analysis: RLV SG RPM.
Funding acquisition: RPM.
Investigation: RLV SM SG.
Methodology: RPM.
Project administration: RPM.
Resources: RPM.
Supervision: RPM.
Validation: RLV SG RPM.
Visualization: RLV SG RPM.
Writing – original draft: SG RPM.
Writing – review & editing: SG RPM.

References

1. Sarvas M, Harwood CR, Bron S, van Dijl JM. Post-translocational folding of secretory proteins in Gram-positive bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1694: 311–327. pmid:15546674
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Hyyriläinen HL, Bolhuis A, Darmon E, Muukkonen L, Koski P, Vitikainen M, et al. A novel two-component regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis for the survival of severe secretion stress. Mol Microbiol. 2001; 41: 1159–1172. pmid:11555295
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Gullón S, Vicente RL, Mellado RP. A novel two-component system involved in secretion stress response in Streptomyces lividans. PloS ONE 2012;7(11), e48987. pmid:23155440
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Darmon E, Noone D, Masson A, Bron S, Kuipers OP, Devine KM, et al. A novel class of heat and secretion stress-responsive genes is controlled by the autoregulated CssRS two-component system of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184: 5661–5671. pmid:12270824
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Lulko AT, Veening JW, Buist G, Smits WK, Blom EJ, Beekman AC, et al. Production and secretion stress caused by overexpression of heterologous α-amylase leads to inhibition of sporulation and a prolonged motile phase in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73: 5354–5362. pmid:17586671
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Krojer T, Garrido-Franco M, Huger R, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. Crystal structure of DegP (HtrA) reveals a new protease-chaperone machine. Nature 2002;416: 455–459. pmid:11919638
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Antelmann H, Darmon E, Noone D, Veening JW, Westers H, Bron S, et al. The extracellular proteome of Bacillus subtilis under secretion stress conditions. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49: 143–156. pmid:12823817
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Spiess C, Beil A and Ehrmann M. A temperature-dependent switch from chaperone to protease in a widely conserved heat shock protein. Cell 1999;97: 339–347. pmid:10319814
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Anné J, Maldonado B, Van Impe J, Van Mellaert L, Bernaerts K. Recombinant protein production and streptomycetes. J Biotechnol. 2012;158: 159–167. pmid:21777629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Hopwood DA, Bibb MJ, Chater KF, Kieser T, Bruton CJ, Kieser HM, et al. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces. A laboratory manual. Norwich UK: John Innes Foundation; 1985.
11. Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA Practical Streptomyces genetics. Norwich UK: John Innes Foundation; 2000.
12. Yanisch-Perron C, Viera J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vector. Gene 1985;33: 103–119. pmid:2985470
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Palacín A, Parro V, Geukens N, Anné J, Mellado RP. SipY is the Streptomyces lividans type I signal peptidase exerting a major effect on protein secretion. J Bacteriol. 2002;184: 4875–4880. pmid:12169613
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Bierman M, Logan R, O’Brien K, Seno ET, Rao RN, Schoner BE. Plasmid cloning vector for conjugal transfer of DNA from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces spp. Gene 1992;116: 43–49. pmid:1628843
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Denis F, Brzezinski R. A versatile shuttle cosmid vector for use in Escherichia coli and actinomycetes. Gene 1992;111:115–118. pmid:1547947
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Ward JM, Janssen GR, Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Bibb MJ. Construction and characterisation of a series of multi-copy promoter-probe vectors Streptomyces using the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene from Tn5 as indicator. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;203: 468–475. pmid:3018431
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Palomino C, Mellado RP. Influence of a Streptomyces lividans SecG functional analogue on protein secretion. Int Microbiol. 2008:11: 25–31. pmid:18683629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Nybo SE, Shepherd MD, Bosserman MA, Rohr J. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces species. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2010. Chapter 10:Unit 10E3.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Flett F, Mersinias V, Smith CP High efficiency intergeneric conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli to methyl DNA-restricting streptomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;155: 223–229. pmid:9351205
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Rückert C, Albersmeier A, Busche T, Jaenicke S, Winkler A, Friðjónsson ÓH et al. Complete genome sequence of Streptomyces lividans TK24. J Biotechnol. 2015;199: 21–22. pmid:25680930
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Jeong H, Barbe V, Lee CH, Vallenet D, Yu DS, Choi SH, et al. Genome sequences of Escherichia coli B strains REL606 and BL21(DE3). J Mol Biol. 2009;. 394:644–652. pmid:19786035
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Lukat GS, McCleary WR, Stock AM, Stock JB. Phosphorylation of bacterial response regulator proteins by low molecular weight phospho-donors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89: 718–22. pmid:1731345
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston R, Moore D, Seidman JG, Smith J, et al. Short Protocols in Molecular Biology 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & sons; 1995. pp 2–3.
24. van Helden J. Regulatory sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31: 3593–3596 pmid:12824373
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Escutia MR, Val G, Palacín A, Geukens N, Anné J, Mellado RP. Compensatory effect of the minor Streptomyces lividans type I signal peptidases on the SipY major signal peptidase deficiency as determined by extracellular proteome analysis. Proteomics 2006;6: 4137–4146. pmid:16786486
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–685. pmid:5432063
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Timmons TM, Dunbar BS. Protein blotting and immunodetection. Methods Enzymol. 1990;182: 679–688. pmid:2314263
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Strumeyer DH. A modified starch for use in amylase assays. Analytical Biochemistry 1967;19: 61–71. pmid:4963386
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Bernfeld P. Amylases, Alpha and Beta, In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO editors. Methods in Enzimology. USA: Academia Press New York NY; 1955. pp 140–146.
30. Raivio TL, Popkin DL, Silhavy TJ. The Cpx envelope stress response is controlled by amplification and feedback induction. J Bacteriol. 1999;181: 5263–5272. pmid:10464196
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Bolanos-García VM, Davies OR. Structural analysis and classification of native proteins from E. coli commonly co-purified by immobilised metal affinity chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006; 1760:1304–1313. pmid:16814929
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Robichon C, Luo J, Cuasey TB, Benner JS and Samuelson JC. Engineering Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) derivative strains to minimize E. coli protein contamination after purification by immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:4634–4646. pmid:21602383
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Pallen MJ, Wren BW. The HtrA familiy of serine proteases. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26: 209–221. pmid:9383148
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Raju RM, Goldberg AL and Rubin EJ. Bacterial proteolytic complexes as therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11: 777–789. pmid:23023677
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Clausen T, Kaiser M, Huber R, Ehrmann M. HTRA proteases: regulated proteolysis in protein quality control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:152–162. pmid:21326199
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Noone D, Howell A, Collery R, Devine KM. YdkA and YvtA, HtrA-like serine proteases in Bacillus subtilis, engage in negative autoregulation and reciprocal cross-regulation of ykdA and yvtA gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2001;183: 654–663. pmid:11133960
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. De Wulf P, Kwon O, Lin EC. The CpxRA signal transduction system of Escherichia coli: growth-related autoactivation and control of unanticipated target operons. J Bacteriol. 1999;181: 6772–6778. pmid:10542180
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Lipinska B, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C. The HtrA (DegP) protein, essential for Escherichia coli survival at high temperatures, is an endopeptidase. J Bacteriol. 1990; 172: 1791–1797. pmid:2180903
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Krojer T, Sawa J, Schäfer E, Saibil HR, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. Structural basis for the regulated protease and chaperone function of DegP. Nature 2008;453: 885–890. pmid:18496527
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Sarvas M, Harwood CR, Bron S, van Dijl JM. Post-translocational folding of secretory proteins in Gram-positive bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1694: 311–327. pmid:15546674
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Hyyriläinen HL, Bolhuis A, Darmon E, Muukkonen L, Koski P, Vitikainen M, et al. A novel two-component regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis for the survival of severe secretion stress. Mol Microbiol. 2001; 41: 1159–1172. pmid:11555295
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Gullón S, Vicente RL, Mellado RP. A novel two-component system involved in secretion stress response in Streptomyces lividans. PloS ONE 2012;7(11), e48987. pmid:23155440
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Darmon E, Noone D, Masson A, Bron S, Kuipers OP, Devine KM, et al. A novel class of heat and secretion stress-responsive genes is controlled by the autoregulated CssRS two-component system of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2002;184: 5661–5671. pmid:12270824
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Lulko AT, Veening JW, Buist G, Smits WK, Blom EJ, Beekman AC, et al. Production and secretion stress caused by overexpression of heterologous α-amylase leads to inhibition of sporulation and a prolonged motile phase in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73: 5354–5362. pmid:17586671
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Krojer T, Garrido-Franco M, Huger R, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. Crystal structure of DegP (HtrA) reveals a new protease-chaperone machine. Nature 2002;416: 455–459. pmid:11919638
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Antelmann H, Darmon E, Noone D, Veening JW, Westers H, Bron S, et al. The extracellular proteome of Bacillus subtilis under secretion stress conditions. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49: 143–156. pmid:12823817
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Spiess C, Beil A and Ehrmann M. A temperature-dependent switch from chaperone to protease in a widely conserved heat shock protein. Cell 1999;97: 339–347. pmid:10319814
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Anné J, Maldonado B, Van Impe J, Van Mellaert L, Bernaerts K. Recombinant protein production and streptomycetes. J Biotechnol. 2012;158: 159–167. pmid:21777629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Hopwood DA, Bibb MJ, Chater KF, Kieser T, Bruton CJ, Kieser HM, et al. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces. A laboratory manual. Norwich UK: John Innes Foundation; 1985.

[ref11] 11. Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA Practical Streptomyces genetics. Norwich UK: John Innes Foundation; 2000.

[ref12] 12. Yanisch-Perron C, Viera J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vector. Gene 1985;33: 103–119. pmid:2985470
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Palacín A, Parro V, Geukens N, Anné J, Mellado RP. SipY is the Streptomyces lividans type I signal peptidase exerting a major effect on protein secretion. J Bacteriol. 2002;184: 4875–4880. pmid:12169613
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Bierman M, Logan R, O’Brien K, Seno ET, Rao RN, Schoner BE. Plasmid cloning vector for conjugal transfer of DNA from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces spp. Gene 1992;116: 43–49. pmid:1628843
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Denis F, Brzezinski R. A versatile shuttle cosmid vector for use in Escherichia coli and actinomycetes. Gene 1992;111:115–118. pmid:1547947
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Ward JM, Janssen GR, Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Bibb MJ. Construction and characterisation of a series of multi-copy promoter-probe vectors Streptomyces using the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene from Tn5 as indicator. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;203: 468–475. pmid:3018431
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Palomino C, Mellado RP. Influence of a Streptomyces lividans SecG functional analogue on protein secretion. Int Microbiol. 2008:11: 25–31. pmid:18683629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Nybo SE, Shepherd MD, Bosserman MA, Rohr J. Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces species. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2010. Chapter 10:Unit 10E3.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Flett F, Mersinias V, Smith CP High efficiency intergeneric conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli to methyl DNA-restricting streptomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;155: 223–229. pmid:9351205
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Rückert C, Albersmeier A, Busche T, Jaenicke S, Winkler A, Friðjónsson ÓH et al. Complete genome sequence of Streptomyces lividans TK24. J Biotechnol. 2015;199: 21–22. pmid:25680930
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Jeong H, Barbe V, Lee CH, Vallenet D, Yu DS, Choi SH, et al. Genome sequences of Escherichia coli B strains REL606 and BL21(DE3). J Mol Biol. 2009;. 394:644–652. pmid:19786035
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Lukat GS, McCleary WR, Stock AM, Stock JB. Phosphorylation of bacterial response regulator proteins by low molecular weight phospho-donors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89: 718–22. pmid:1731345
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston R, Moore D, Seidman JG, Smith J, et al. Short Protocols in Molecular Biology 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & sons; 1995. pp 2–3.

[ref24] 24. van Helden J. Regulatory sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31: 3593–3596 pmid:12824373
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] PubMed/NCBI

[86] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Escutia MR, Val G, Palacín A, Geukens N, Anné J, Mellado RP. Compensatory effect of the minor Streptomyces lividans type I signal peptidases on the SipY major signal peptidase deficiency as determined by extracellular proteome analysis. Proteomics 2006;6: 4137–4146. pmid:16786486
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–685. pmid:5432063
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Timmons TM, Dunbar BS. Protein blotting and immunodetection. Methods Enzymol. 1990;182: 679–688. pmid:2314263
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Strumeyer DH. A modified starch for use in amylase assays. Analytical Biochemistry 1967;19: 61–71. pmid:4963386
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Bernfeld P. Amylases, Alpha and Beta, In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO editors. Methods in Enzimology. USA: Academia Press New York NY; 1955. pp 140–146.

[ref30] 30. Raivio TL, Popkin DL, Silhavy TJ. The Cpx envelope stress response is controlled by amplification and feedback induction. J Bacteriol. 1999;181: 5263–5272. pmid:10464196
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Bolanos-García VM, Davies OR. Structural analysis and classification of native proteins from E. coli commonly co-purified by immobilised metal affinity chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006; 1760:1304–1313. pmid:16814929
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Robichon C, Luo J, Cuasey TB, Benner JS and Samuelson JC. Engineering Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) derivative strains to minimize E. coli protein contamination after purification by immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:4634–4646. pmid:21602383
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Pallen MJ, Wren BW. The HtrA familiy of serine proteases. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26: 209–221. pmid:9383148
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Raju RM, Goldberg AL and Rubin EJ. Bacterial proteolytic complexes as therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11: 777–789. pmid:23023677
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Clausen T, Kaiser M, Huber R, Ehrmann M. HTRA proteases: regulated proteolysis in protein quality control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:152–162. pmid:21326199
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Noone D, Howell A, Collery R, Devine KM. YdkA and YvtA, HtrA-like serine proteases in Bacillus subtilis, engage in negative autoregulation and reciprocal cross-regulation of ykdA and yvtA gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2001;183: 654–663. pmid:11133960
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. De Wulf P, Kwon O, Lin EC. The CpxRA signal transduction system of Escherichia coli: growth-related autoactivation and control of unanticipated target operons. J Bacteriol. 1999;181: 6772–6778. pmid:10542180
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Lipinska B, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C. The HtrA (DegP) protein, essential for Escherichia coli survival at high temperatures, is an endopeptidase. J Bacteriol. 1990; 172: 1791–1797. pmid:2180903
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Krojer T, Sawa J, Schäfer E, Saibil HR, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. Structural basis for the regulated protease and chaperone function of DegP. Nature 2008;453: 885–890. pmid:18496527
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and media

Construction of gene disruption mutants

Construction of complementation strains

Quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Construction and purification of a six-His-tagged CssR protein

Protein identification by nano LC–MS/MS Triple Tof analysis

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

Low resolution DNase I footprinting

Protein analysis and Western blot experiments

Enzyme activity

Results

CssR interacts with htrA1, htrA2, htrB and cssRS regulatory regions

The three HtrA-like proteases are equally needed in the secretion stress response

Overexpression of the HtrA-like genes

Complementation of the HtrA-like protease deficient strains with their respective genes propagated in monocopy

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Analysis of the expression of His6-CssR in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3).

S1 Table. Proteins identified by nano LC–MS/MS Triple Tof analysis in the purified His6-CssR.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

S1 Fig. Analysis of the expression of His₆-CssR in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3).

S1 Table. Proteins identified by nano LC–MS/MS Triple Tof analysis in the purified His₆-CssR.