Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

E3001 Invalid or unsupported Type AWS::SageMaker::CodeRepository #1005

Closed
archgroove opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

E3001 Invalid or unsupported Type AWS::SageMaker::CodeRepository #1005

archgroove opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
spec CloudFormation Specification Bug

Comments

@archgroove
Copy link

cfn-lint version: (cfn-lint --version)

cfn-lint 0.22.1

Description of issue.

AWS::SageMaker::CodeRepository is not recognised by cfn-lint

My template gives this error:

E3001 Invalid or unsupported Type AWS::SageMaker::CodeRepository for resource NotebookCodeRepository in us-east-1

        Type: AWS::SageMaker::CodeRepository
        Properties:
          CodeRepositoryName: my_repo_name
          GitConfig:
            Branch: develop
            RepositoryUrl: a_git_repo
            SecretArn: a_secret_arn
   NotebookInstance:
        Type: AWS::SageMaker::NotebookInstance
        Properties:
          DefaultCodeRepository: NotebookCodeRepository
          DirectInternetAccess: Enabled
          InstanceType: ml.t2.medium
          LifecycleConfigName: NotebookLifecycleConfig
          NotebookInstanceName: NotebookInstance
          RoleArn: a_role_arn
          RootAccess: Disabled
          SecurityGroupIds:
            - a_security_group_id
          SubnetId: a_subnet_id
          Tags:
            -
              Key: NotebookInstance
          VolumeSizeInGB: 5

AWS CloudFormation Docs

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-sagemaker-coderepository.html
@kddejong kddejong added the spec CloudFormation Specification Bug label Jul 9, 2019
@kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

This looks like this doesn't exist in any CloudFormation spec file that is provided. So we would have to manually patch this in.

@kddejong kddejong mentioned this issue Jul 11, 2019
Merged
@kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

Released and available.

@PatMyron PatMyron mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec CloudFormation Specification Bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@archgroove @kddejong