Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative genotypic characterization related to antibiotic resistance phenotypes of clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii MTC1106 (ST2) and MTC0619 (ST25)

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 689 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii in nosocomial infections and its remarkable ability to develop antimicrobial resistance have been a critical issue in hospital settings. Here, we examined the genomic features related to resistance phenotype displayed by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) MTC1106 (ST2) and MTC0619 (ST25).

Results

Resistome analysis of both strains revealed that MTC1106 possessed higher numbers of antimicrobial resistance genes compared to MTC0619. Some of those genetic determinants were present in accordance with the susceptibility profile of the isolates. The predicted ISAba1 region upstream of blaOXA-23 gene was related to carbapenem resistance since this IS element was well-characterized to mediate overexpression of carbapenemase genes and eventually provided capability to confer resistance. Unlike MTC0619 strain, which only carried class B and D β-lactamase genes, MTC1106 strain also possessed blaTEM-1D, a class A β-lactamase. Regarding to aminoglycosides resistance, MTC0619 contained 5 related genes in which all of them belonged to three groups of aminoglycosides modifying enzyme (AME), namely, N-acetyltransferase (AAC), O-nucleotidyltransferase (ANT), and O-phosphotransferase (APH). On the other hand, MTC1106 lacked only the AAC of which found in MTC0619, yet it also carried an armA gene encoding for 16S rRNA methyltransferase. Two macrolides resistance genes, mph(E) and msr(E), were identified next to the armA gene of MTC1106 isolate in which they encoded for macrolide 2’-phosphotransferase and ABC-type efflux pump, respectively. Besides acquired resistance genes, some chromosomal genes and SNPs associated with resistance to fluoroquinolones (i.e. gyrA and parC) and colistin (i.e. pmrCAB, eptA, and emrAB) were observed. However, gene expression analysis suggested that the genetic determinants significantly contributing to low-level colistin resistance remained unclear. In addition, similar number of efflux pumps genes were identified in both lineages with only the absence of adeC, a part of adeABC RND-type multidrug efflux pump in MTC0619 strain.

Conclusions

We found that MTC1106 strain harbored more antimicrobial resistance genes and showed higher resistance to antibiotics than MTC0619 strain. Regarding genomic characterization, this study was likely the first genome comparative analysis of CARB that specifically included isolates belonging to ST2 and ST25 which were widely spread in Thailand. Taken altogether, this study suggests the importance to monitor the resistance status of circulating A. baumannii clones and identify genes that may contribute to shifting the resistance trend among isolates.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acinetobacter baumannii is the most common member of ESKAPE organisms (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), a prominent group of bacterial pathogens that primarily contribute to nosocomial infections and exhibit a concerning prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [1]. The development of resistance in ESKAPE organisms and other pathogens has been recognized as one of the major threats with multifaceted detrimental consequences on human health. Addressing this issue necessitates collaborative efforts across various disciplines [2, 3]. Moreover, the rapid emergence of resistance in some of those bacteria may give rise to “superbugs” that are resistant to most available antimicrobials, potentially resulting a crisis regarding the availability of effective treatment options. Responding to the escalating trend of resistance and the need for new antimicrobials, the World Health Organization (WHO) has included ESKAPE organisms in the global priority pathogen list, with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) being among the most critical concerns [4].

Carbapenems are the mainstay antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii. However, the increasing resistance rates to these antimicrobials has become a public health concern as such strains are getting more frequently observed to cause difficult-to-treat infections and hospital outbreaks [5]. According to the most recent Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) report in 2021, A. baumannii was prevalent among patients with blood stream infection (BSI) in 68 countries, with over 60% of the reported isolates demonstrating resistance to carbapenems [6]. It is also worth noting that CRAB isolates often display a MDR phenotype, and some are evolving toward an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotype. This evolution severely limits treatment options and potentially leading to untreatable infections [7,8,9]. Resistance to carbapenems also implicates the crtitical importance of preserving colistin as one of the last-line antimicrobials to treat CRAB-associated infections. However, colistin-resistant strains with XDR or pan drug-resistant (PDR) phenotype have been reported in various regions [10,11,12].

The development of AMR in A. baumannii is associated with its genome plasticity, which allows the acquisition of functional genetic determinants such as antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes that enhance its survival. The genomic characteristics of A. baumannii have become an intriguing area of research in understanding the epidemiology and evolutionary trajectories of this pathogen. Several studies investigating the genomic features of clinical isolates have indicated that A. baumannii possesses a large proportion of accessory genome comprising flexible gene pools that rapidly evolve through environmental selective pressure, resulting in the dynamic genome reorganization and intra-clonal diversity [13, 14]. On the other hand, the core genome itself is relatively homogenous among closely related strains. Studies on the diversity and population structure of A. baumannii have revealed that numerous MDR strains isolated from different regions around the world were spread through clonal expansion and may share common ancestors with epidemic lineages initially identified during hospital outbreaks in Europe. The global dissemination of this organism is predicted to contribute to the emergence of resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, including carbapenems, as this event can introduce various ecological niches that facilitates the selection of resistant clones. To date, three major clonal lineages have been globally distributed and at least five others have had limited dissemination in specific regions [15, 16].

Elucidating the resistance mechanism is another integral part of AMR surveillance and notably an important aspect in developing a novel strategy against drug-resistant bacteria. In A. baumannii, the presence of several intrinsic and acquired genetic determinants has been linked to multiple resistance traits. The extent to which these determinants contribute to drug resistance varies, depending on their activity and the nature of the genetic locus in which the corresponding AMR genes are found. For instance, the naturally occurring AmpC β-lactamase (blaADC) can confer resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins when its expression is enhanced by the presence of the insertion sequence ISAba1 located upstream of the gene. In contrast, the basal expression of this gene alone is insufficient to induce resistance [17, 18]. In terms of carbapenem resistance, the mechanism in A. baumannii is primarily mediated by carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases (CHDLs) and the presence of insertion sequence (IS) elements is frequently associated with clinical significance [19]. However, a single CHDL gene may not be adequate to confer resistance although it carries the IS element. This exemplified by the presence of intrinsic OXA-51 family serine-type oxacillinase (blaOXA-51-like) associated with ISAba1 in some carbapenem-susceptible isolates. In the presence of IS elements, the difference in carbapenem hydrolyzing activity between blaOXA-51-like alleles and amino acid substitution in the active site of OXA-51 were shown to underly its propensity to confer carbapenem-resistant phenotype [20]. Despite the prominence of acquired β-lactamases, several chromosomal genes, including efflux pumps and membrane porins, have been linked to carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii [21, 22]. It underlines the idea that resistance traits may not necessarily be caused by a single AMR gene but rather involve a complex mechanism due to interplay between multiple genetic determinants. Therefore, the genomic characterization of drug-resistant A. baumannii is plausible to provide a comprehensive insight into its genetic makeup and elucidate the intricate association with the resistant phenotype. In this present work, a comparative genomic analysis was carried out to identify genetic determinants related to AMR between carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii ST2 and ST25 lineages. The data is also feasible for a deeper understanding of resistance mechanisms and may eventually lead to the identification of molecular targets that can be considered in developing strategies against AMR.

Results

Genomic characteristics of clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST2 and ST25 lineages

Previous studies have highlighted that most CRAB isolates in Thailand were of ST2 lineage, but some belonged to ST25 and other types [9, 23, 24]. Here, we characterized the genomic diversity of two CRAB strains MTC1106 (ST2) and MTC0619 (ST25) spreading in tertiary hospitals in Thailand. The de novo assembly of the filtered raw reads from MTC0619 resulted 62 contigs, with an N50 length of 155,743 bp and a total genome size of 4,158,127 bp (Table 1). The longest and shortest contigs were 344,197 bp and 580 bp, respectively. Meanwhile, the assembly of MTC1106 generated 73 contigs with an N50 length of 122,336 bp and a total genome size of 3,922,423 bp. The longest and shortest contigs were 245,764 bp and 505 bp, respectively. Although the draft genome size for MTC0619 was slightly larger than that of MTC1106, both isolates exhibited nearly identical GC content (38.88% for MTC0619 and 38.94% for MTC1106). The size and GC content of the draft genomes from this study fell within the range observed in publicly available A. baumannii complete genomes deposited in the NCBI genome assembly database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/). As of September, 2023, the NCBI database contained 579 complete genomes of A. baumannii with the sizes ranging from 3.63 Mb to 4.57 Mb and GC content ranging between 38.76–39.70%. All reads were mapped to the contigs and no base mismatches were identified. The estimation of genome completeness using CheckM, with A. baumannii as the marker lineage, indicated that only a small proportion of the lineage-specific marker genes absent in both isolates. Based on the annotation of the draft genome using Prokka program, MTC0619 was predicted to have 3,918 genes, while MTC1106 was predicted to have 3,674 genes. On the other hand, the RASTtk pipeline indicated 4,018 genes in MTC0619 and 3,842 genes in MTC1106.

Table 1 General characteristics of MTC0619 and MTC1106 genomes
Full size table

In silico molecular typing

Molecular typing using both Pasteur and Oxford schemes MLST identified all seven housekeeping gene alleles with 100% coverage and identity in each respective scheme. The Pasteur MLST scheme successfully confirmed that that MTC0619 and MTC1106 belonged to ST25 and ST2, respectively. In the Oxford scheme MLST, MTC0619 was assigned to ST229. Interestingly, MTC1106 was classified into two different STs (195/1816) in the Oxford scheme owing to the presence of two gdhB alleles (gdhB_3 and gdhB_189) within its genome.

Additionally, molecular typing based on genetic loci involved in biosynthesis of capsular polysaccharides (K locus) and outer core of lipopolysaccharides (OC locus) using Kaptive database revealed that MTC0619 belonged to KL14 and OCL6, while MTC1106 belonged to KL3 and OCL1 with at least “very high” match confidence category. A linear comparison of the K locus between isolates in the present study and five A. baumannii reference strains showed that the arrangement of the genes constituting this locus was identical between MTC1106, the reference strain ATCC19606, and ATCC17978 (Fig. S1A). In the OC locus, three reference strains (i.e., ACICU, AYE, and ATCC19606) exhibited identical loci to that of MTC1106. Conversely, none of the reference strains possessed KL or OCL types similar to MTC0619 (Fig. S1B).

Resistome analysis related to antimicrobial resistance phenotype

The overall antimicrobial susceptibility profile of these CRAB isolates to sixteen antimicrobial agents revealed 100% resistance rates to aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and colistin (Table 2). Notably, both isolates remained susceptible to tigecycline. MTC0619 displayed a distinctive susceptibility pattern, as it was sensitive to levofloxacin and two other categories of antimicrobials, namely penicillins with β-lactamase inhibitors and tetracyclines.

Table 2 Antibiogram of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii MTC1106 and MTC0619
Full size table

Screening for the presence of AMR associated genes using ResFinder [25], NCBI AMRFinder Plus [26], CARD [27], and MEGARes [28] databases identified some resistance genes encoding efflux pumps and outer membrane proteins (Table 3). Moreover, several resistance-associated chromosomal mutations were discovered by aligning the corresponding genes between the isolates in this study with other A. baumannii reference strains (ATCC 17978 and SDF). Compared to MTC0619, the draft genome of isolate MTC1106 appeared to carry more AMR genes which were related to resistance against eight groups of antimicrobials. Both isolates had the intrinsic β-lactamases blaOXA-51-like and blaADC genes. In the case of blaOXA-51-like, MTC0619 harbored blaOXA-64 allele in contig 00010, while MTC1106 carried blaOXA-66 allele in contig 00002. Notably, no IS elements were found adjacent to the OXA-51-like genes (Fig. 1). Instead, they were flanked by a gene encoding N-acetyltransferase with an intergenic spacer of 68 bp in the upstream region and fsxA gene (a putative suppressor of F exclusion of phage T7) with an intergenic spacer of 398 bp in the downstream region. The blaADC-26 allele was identified in MTC0619 without any associated IS elements. In the case of MTC1106, the blaADC-73 allele was initially identified without an IS element. However, a more detailed analysis of the nucleotide sequence surrounding this gene revealed the presence of a truncated IS element in the upstream region. This IS element was predicted to belong to ISAba1 since the left inverted repeat sequence of this mobile element was observed in the upstream region, connected to the blaADC-73 gene by a 9-bp direct repeat (Fig. 2). A similar situation also observed during sequence analysis of the blaOXA-23 gene. Both MTC0619 and MTC1106 carried a single blaOXA-23 gene with partial sequence of ISAba1 and its associated inverted repeat in the upstream region. The blaTEM-1D, which belongs to the class A β-lactamase, was specifically present in MTC0619 but absent in MTC1106.

Table 3 The list of genes encoding efflux pumps and outer membrane proteins related to AMR in MTC0619 and MTC1106
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of genetic structure of blaOXA-51-like (A) and blaADC-26 (B). The β-lactamase genes are shown in yellow arrows while any characterized genes surrounding them are marked as blue arrows

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The partial sequence of ISAba1 in the upstream blaADC-73 gene of MTC0619 (A) and blaOXA-23 of MTC1106 and MTC0619 (B). The putative -35 and -10 regions of the promoter are in bold and underlined text. The left inverted repeat (IRL) of ISAba1 is marked in grey shade followed by the direct repeat sequence shown as black-shaded white text. The blaADC-73 or blaOXA-23 sequences are in italic with the start codon (M) shown in bold italic

Full size image

The occurrence of aminoglycoside resistance genes displayed some variations between the two isolates. In the case of MTC0619, five related genes were identified, all of which fell into three distinct groups of aminoglycosides modifying enzymes (AMEs): N-acetyltransferase (AAC), O-nucleotydyltransferase (ANT), and O-phosphotransferase (APH). On the other hand, isolate MTC1106 lacked the AAC genes found in MTC0619 but notably carried the armA gene, which encodes 16S rRNA methyltransferase, belonging to the category of aminoglycoside target-modifying enzymes.

In addition to acquired resistance genes, several chromosomal mutations associated with resistance to fluoroquinolone and colistin were observed in A. baumannii MTC0619 and MTC1106. Chromosomal non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to fluroquinolone resistance were identified in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR), which includes the gyrA and parC genes. Both isolates had double mutation, gyrA S81L and parC S84L, which have been demonstrated to render considerable increase in the MIC of fluroquinolones among A. baumannii isolates compared to those with only single or without mutation [29, 30]. Another parC non-synonymous substitution (A661V) was identified in MTC0619. Both isolates possessed gyrB mutations but none of these mutations have been demonstrated to influence fluroquinolone MICs. Despite MTC0619 having more nucleotide substitution in these three related genes, its MIC for the two tested fluroquinolones were lower than MTC1106, and notably, it remained susceptible to levofloxacin.

Regarding the colistin resistance, both isolates displayed low-level of resistance based on the MIC value (4 mg/L). MTC1106 appeared to have relatively more mutated genes. In particular, the nucleotide substitutions observed in the pmrB gene of MTC1106 were responsible for alterations in two amino acid positions, but none of non-synonymous pmrB mutations were found in MTC0619. It is worth noting that MTC1106 also harbored a copy of pmrC homologue denoted as eptA (92.65% sequence identity to pmrC) encoded for lipid A phosphoethanolamine (PetN) transferase. Along with acquired resistance genes, the presence of efflux pumps and outer membrane proteins that are commonly associated with antimicrobial resistance were also obtained from CARD and MEGARes databases [26, 27]. According to the summary of the results in Table 3, both MTC0619 and MTC1106 exhibited almost similar number of identified genes encoding those proteins. The difference between the two isolates was only on the absence of adeC in MTC0619, which has been known as part of adeABC RND-type multidrug efflux pump.

Predicted fragments of genomic island and plasmid harboring AMR genes

In addition to the presence of IS elements, other types of mobile genetic elements were also identified within the assembled contigs. Both isolates MTC0619 and 1106 had seven prophage regions predicted in the contigs and most of them were considered incomplete (Table S1). None of AMR genes were notably found within the prophage regions identified in this study. A segment with similar structure to Tn6180-derived fragment of resistance island AbGRI3 in XDR A. baumannii SGH0908 [31] was present in MTC1106. This segment contained two genes associated with macrolides resistance genes, mph(E) and msr(E), and also encompassed the genomic region where the armA gene is located (Fig. 3A). Another chromosomal resistance island identified in MTC1106 was the fragment of AbGRI1 which contained the two APH genes aph(3”)-Ib and aph(6)-Id (also known as strA and strB), along with tetA(B) tetracycline resistance determinant (Fig. 3B). This resistance island has notably been characterized among global clone 2 (GC2) strains of A. baumannii, and it employs comM gene as the target site of insertion, similar to the AbaR resistance island identified in GC1 isolates [32].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic illustration of Tn6180-derived fragment of AbGRI3 (A) and AbGR11-type (B) fragment in MTC1106. The resistance genes and IS elements are shown in yellow and blue arrows, respectively. The uncolored arrows indicate hypothetical proteins while the rep gene of AbGRI3 dan comM gene of AbaR insertion target are depicted grey and purple arrows

Full size image

Based on the contig alignment against the Acinetobacter Plasmid Typing database [33], two rep genes encoding for replication initiation protein were detected in isolate MTC1106 (belonged to Rep types R3-T1 and R3-T60). The R3-T1 rep gene was situated in a small contig 00051 (8,842 bp). This contig also included BrnT/BrnA type II toxin-antitoxin system but did not contain any genes related to AMR. It is worth noting that the identification of R3-T60 presented an elusive finding since it was also identified as repAciN, a component of the AbGRI3-4 in contig 00023 (66,986 bp) mentioned earlier. However, the notion of this gene as part of plasmid replicon appeared less plausible due to the presence of chromosomal genes in the contig, such as tRNA elements and Csu pili biogenesis proteins. It has also been suggested that the AbGRI3-4 may actually be part of the chromosome as repAciN does not serve as a functional replication initiation protein [31].

Conversely, isolate MTC0619 did not exhibit any rep genes. The resistome profile of MTC0619 indicated the presence of genetic cassette comprising tetA(B)-strA-strB genes but not located adjacent to comM. Further investigation revealed that this segment is possibly a region of plasmid. Specifically, the sequence was identified within a contig spanning 23,095 bp, and a Blastn analysis revealed its similarity to a segment within a plasmid known as pD46-4 (GenBank Accession MF399199.1). This particular plasmid had been obtained from an ST-25 (Pasteur) XDR A. baumannii isolate and had been characterized as a large plasmid, encompassing 207,977 bp sequence [34]. Nonetheless, some differences were observed between this predicted plasmid contig and its corresponding near-identical segment in pD46-4. Specifically, a large region constituting around 11,500 bp of the Tn6183 in pD46-4 was noticeably absent in the plasmid fragment of isolate MTC0619 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Linear comparison between a predicted plasmid contig in MTC0619 and its near-identical segment in pD46-4 (MF399199.1). The resistance genes and IS elements are in yellow and blue arrows respectively. A red-dotted box indicates the missing region of pD46-4 in MTC0619

Full size image

Pangenome analysis

Given the well-documented genomic plasticity and clonal diversity of A. baumannii, the draft genomes of MTC0619 and MTC1106 were compared with a diverse panel of A. baumannii clinical isolates [35]. Five reference strains (ATCC 19606, ATCC 17978, ACICU, AYE, and SDF) were additionally included in the analysis to represent the model strains commonly employed in experimental studies (Table S2). A total of 19,125 gene clusters were identified, comprising 2,063 genes present in more than 99% genomes (core), 403 genes found in 95–99% of the genomes (soft-core), 1,906 genes present in15-95% of the genomes (shell), and 14,753 genes in less than 15% genomes (cloud) (Fig. S2). The majority of the genes classified within the accessory genome (77.69%) were annotated as hypothetical proteins. Additionally, a limited number of genes (< 50) associated with metal resistance and iron uptake regulation were observed in the accessory genome. The inference tree of accessory genomes (Fig. S3) indicated that isolate MTC0619 was more related to strain MRSN480561, consistent with the phylogenetic tree derived from the core genome SNPs (Fig. 5). On the other hand, isolate MTC1106 showed a different pattern of genetic relatedness. Its accessory genome content was more closely related to the strain MRSN17493 (ST632), a clinical isolate that has been characterized as a PDR strain [35]. However, phylogenetic tree of the core genome SNPs demonstrated that isolate MTC1106 exhibited a close genetic relatedness to an MDR strain MRSN7421 (ST2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Phylogenetic tree based on the core genome SNPs from initial pangenome analysis involving two CRAB isolates in this study, five reference strains, and 100 publicly available genomes of diverse A. baumannii isolates. The isolates MTC0619 (ST25) and MTC1106 (ST2) were highlighted in green and blue, respectively

Full size image

Furthermore, the diversity of genomic content among A. baumannii belonging to ST2 and ST25 in Thailand was investigated. In this context, the two isolates sequenced in the present study were compared with publicly available genome data of Thai isolates. A total of 260 ST2 isolates and 14 ST25 isolates retrieved from previously published genomes [23] and the PathogenWatch database were included in this analysis (Table S3). The inclusion of these two specific STs in this study led to the construction of a pangenome comprising a total of 7,694 gene clusters, consisting of 2,722 (35.38%) core genes, 164 (2.13%) soft-core genes, 1,082 (14.06%) shell genes, and 3,726 (48.43%) cloud genes (Fig. S4). A clear distance between these two clones was indicated by the inference tree of accessory genome content (Fig. 6, Fig. S5). Notably, a consistent presence of genes encoding proteins associated with clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) was observed among ST25 isolates (n = 15). These genes included cas1, cas 1, cas3, csy1 (cas8f1), csy2 (cas5f1), csy3 (cas7f1), and cas6f. None of isolates in the ST2 lineage harbored cas genes.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Inference tree of the Thai isolates belonging to ST2 and ST25 based on the presence and absence of gene clusters in pangenome analysis. The nodes are labelled based on the BioSample accession number and ST

Full size image

Gene expression analysis related to resistance phenotype

The assessment of gene expression was conducted using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to further investigate the potential role of several antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes identified in MTC0619 and MTC1106, particularly in conferring resistance to colistin. The results revealed that nearly all of the selected genes exhibited relatively higher transcript levels in comparison to expression in the calibrator strain (ATCC 19606), as shown in Fig. 7. Notably, the isolate MTC1106 displayed at least two-fold increase in the expression of genes encoding for PetN transferases (pmrC and eptA), the inner membrane transporter protein of the EmrAB efflux pump system (emrB), and the outer membrane protein W (ompW). In contrast to the upregulation observed in other genes, the expression of the outer membrane protein A (ompA) was notably lower in both isolates.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Expression of genes related to AMR phenotype in clinical A. baumannii MTC0619 and MTC1106 relative to the reference strain ATCC 19606. The expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene rpoB. The bars indicate the means from three independent experiments and the error bars represent the standard deviations of the means. The eptA was absent in MTC0619

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, genetic characteristics of clinical carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates from two main sequence types in Thailand, namely MTC0619 and MTC1106 were investigated and revealed some important genetic determinants such as antimicrobial resistance genes and mobile genetic elements, including fragment of resistance islands and plasmid. These isolates showed considerably high level of resistance to most tested agents within those nine antimicrobial categories Generally, MTC1106 appeared to harbor relatively more antimicrobial resistance genes than MTC0619 which in accordance with susceptibility profiles of the isolates. For example, the predicted ISAba1 region upstream of blaOXA-23 gene were related to carbapenem resistance since this IS element has been well-characterized to mediate overexpression of carbapenemase gene and eventually provide capability to confer resistance. Moreover, comparative genomics analysis was also helpful to identify the presence and absence of resistance genes in those isolates relative to several reference isolates and publicly available A. baumannii genomes. The results of genome annotation depicted higher number of genes predicted in RASTtk than Prokka annotation pipelines. Similarly, the RASTtk provided more functional annotation as evidenced by the number of identified hypothetical proteins. These two annotation pipelines identified the same number of rRNA and tRNA genes in both isolates. In the Oxford classification scheme, MTC1106 was classified into two different ST195 and 1816 because of the presence of two gdhB alleles (gdhB_3 and gdhB_189) within its genome. The issue on gdhB duplication has been previously observed through a comparative evaluation of A. baumannii MLST schemes in which around 76% of tested A. baumannii strains were having duplicated gdhB gene [36]. Another study reported the failure to do Oxford-ST in one of A. baumannii strains owing to the presence of insertion sequence disrupting gdhB locus [37]. Collectively, some issues found in Oxford-MLST has been rising concern regarding its possibility to confuse the ST assignment of A. baumannii.

Molecular typing based on genetic loci involve in biosynthesis of capsular polysaccharides (K locus) and outer core of lipopolysaccharides (OC locus) using Kaptive database revealed that compared to other strains, less genes encoding proteins for capsule construction and processing were found in K locus of MTC0619 and its OC locus was shown to have more genes involving in complex sugar synthesis. The KL3 has been described as one of the most common KL types among A. baumannii strains, especially in ST2 and ST78. Meanwhile, the KL14 was shown to be the most prevalent in ST25 which is in accordance with the result in the present study [38]. The association of KL-OCL types with the virulence capability and other related phenotype of A. baumannii seems to remain elusive with relatively limited investigation has been done. However, an in vivo study using Galleria mellonella infection model reported the tendency of A. baumannii isolates with KL3 to exhibits lower virulence than those with KL14 locus [39]. This could be the basis to further evaluate the phenotype related to KL-OCL types of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates.

This study reported that the predicted ISAba1 and blaOXA-23 gene were separated by a 34-bp direct repeat in both isolates. The identified fragment of ISAba1 contained the IRL and promoter structure for expression of blaOXA-23, which closely resembled a previously documented finding. These characteristics were used to distinguish the presence of ISAba1 and ISAba4 in the upstream blaOXA-23 gene of A. baumannii isolates [40]. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that ISAba1 is located 34-bp upstream of the blaOXA-23, while ISAba4 is situated at 23-bp upstream of the gene. Both of those IS elements also displayed distinct promoter and inverted repeat sequences. Furthermore, a fragment of ISAba1 with a comparable promoter structure to a previous study was identified upstream of blaADC-73 in isolate MTC1106. The insertion of this IS element in blaADC has been shown to mediate cephalosporins resistance in A. baumannii [41]. It is important to note that the short-read sequencing used in this study may not be sufficient to resolve the complex repetitive sequences of IS elements because the predicted ISAba1 sequences associated with blaOXA-23 and blaADC were found at the region of contig boundaries. Therefore, it remains inconclusive to exclude the possibility of other types of ISAba, as there could be a nearly identical genetic arrangement between IS elements or the co-insertion of different ISAba types. For instance, the ISAba9 was found to disrupt the ISAba1 insertion in blaOXA-51 and establishing hybrid promoter responsible for overexpression of the corresponding carbapenemase [42]. The insertion of ISAba125 in blaADC has been also reported to provide a different promoter orientation and is linked to a higher expression of the AmpC cephalosporinase [41]. The limitation of contiguity level from assembly using only short-read sequences may have also contributed to the identification of incomplete sequences of resistance islands and plasmid contigs in this study. Further investigations by incorporating long-read sequence data would help to address this issue as it allows to resolve fragmented contigs and may enable the assembly of finished genome.

Additionally, some chromosomal non-synonymous SNPs related to fluroquinolone resistance were identified in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) comprising of gyrA and parC genes. Both isolates had double mutation in gyrA (S81L) and parC (S84L), a combination that has been shown to significantly elevate the MIC of fluoroquinolones in A. baumannii isolates when compared to isolates with a single mutation or those lacking these mutations [29, 30]. Another parC non-synonymous substitution (A661V) was identified in MTC0619. However, the prevalence of this mutation seems to be very rare with only one previous report describing it and there was no information regarding its significance on fluoroquinolone resistance [43]. The nucleotide substitution in gyrB have been also proposed to involve in fluoroquinolone resistance since the isolates with mutation in QRDR and several codons in gyrB were found to exhibit higher resistance to ciprofloxacin [29]. In the present study, both isolates had gyrB mutations but none of them have been demonstrated to influence the fluoroquinolone MICs. Although MTC0619 had more nucleotide substitution in those three related genes, the MIC of two tested fluoroquinolones was lower than MTC1106 and notably it was still considered susceptible to levofloxacin. Additionally, disruption of the mar operon by ISAba1 has been demonstrated to involve in fluoroquinolone resistance [44], but the corresponding operon in both MTC0619 and MTC1106 were found remain intact.

Colistin resistance in A. baumannii primarily occurs through the phosphoethanolamine (PetN) modification of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and the loss of LPS itself. These mechanisms typically result from mutations in the pmrCAB and lpxACD operons [45]. While several mutations were identified within the genes constituting these operons in the two CRAB isolates in this study, it is worth noting that most of the identified mutations have also been reported in colistin-susceptible isolates [46, 47]. In addition, MTC1106 carried a copy of pmrC homologue denoted as eptA (92.65% sequence identity to pmrC) encoding lipid A PetN transferase. This gene was flanked by a phage-related integrase, but none of IS elements were detected around it. Based on the relative expression of pmrC in both isolates and eptA in MTC1106, it can be inferred that neither mutations in the pmrCAB operon nor the presence of eptA directly contribute to the low-level of colistin resistance observed in the two isolates. Some studies have reported that specific mutations in pmrB or the insertion of IS elements in the upstream region of eptA are responsible for significant overproduction of PetN transferases, thereby promoting the development of colistin resistance in clinical isolates [48,49,50]. The EmrAB efflux pumps may potentially play a role in conferring nonsusceptibility to colistin in MTC0619 and MTC1106 since a relative higher expression of emrB was observed, similar to a previous report [51]. However, it is also important to note that gene expression analysis conducted in this study reflects the expression at basal level, as no specific growth conditions that may alter the transcriptomic profile were introduced.

In terms of efflux pump genes, the differences between two isolates were only on the absence of adeC in MTC0619, which was known as a part of adeABC RND-type multidrug efflux pump. However, the lack of adeC has been suggested to be common among A. baumannii with the estimation of only 35% isolates carrying this gene [52]. Moreover, investigation on the functionality of AdeABC indicated that expression of AdeC was not essential due to insignificant difference of resistance profile displayed between mutant with adeC deletion and the parental strain harboring intact adeABC [53].

Data from pangenome analysis revealed a close relationship between MTC1106 and MRSN17493 which were defined as PDR strain according to the previous report [35]. The strains MRSN17493 was classified as ST632 in the Pasteur MLST scheme in which this ST was actually a single locus variant of ST2 whom MTC1106 was assigned to. Moreover, all of the AMR associated genes in strain MRSN17493, except aph(3’), were also identified in MTC1106. On the other hand, MTC0619 was more related to strain MRSN480561. Both of these isolates belonged to the same ST25 and were considered XDR strains, albeit with distinct resistome profiles. The MTC0619 harbored less AMR genes and was non-susceptible to lower number of antimicrobials than the MRSN480561 strain. For example, the acquired macrolide resistance genes were absent in the MTC0619 but MRSN480561 harbored two types of this gene. The blaPER gene was also not identified in MTC0619. However, this isolate already demonstrated to be colistin non-susceptible while the strain MRSN480561 was reported susceptible to colistin.

In the analysis comparing the two CRAB isolates in this study and a total of 274 publicly available genomes of Thai isolates, a smaller number of gene clusters constituting the pangenome was observed. The core genome was particularly larger compared to the analysis involving a diverse panel of isolates representing wide range of lineages, but the number of genes classified to accessory genome was lower. This distinct proportion of pangenome structure was due to only ST2 and ST25 employed in the later analysis. Interestingly, all of the ST25 isolates possessed the genes encoding for CRISPR effector proteins, suggesting the conservation of CRISPR-Cas system among Thai isolates belonging to this lineage. According to the recent classification scheme [54], the cluster of cas genes in these strains belonged to the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system. The presence of this bacterial defense system may influence the population dynamics of ST25 since it can limit the gene flow mediated by mobile genetic elements [55, 56]. Accordingly, the Thai isolates classified to ST25 clone exhibited a lower degree of intra-clonal diversity compared to the widely distributed ST2 as shown in the inference tree of accessory genome. In a previous study, some A. baumannii isolates harboring CRISPR-Cas system have been demonstrated to contain a lower number of resistance genes than the isolates without this system [57]. The presence of CRISPR-Cas systems has been also associated with a lower number of plasmids among A. baumannii isolates [58]. However, a contig representing a plasmid fragment was identified in the isolate MTC0619. The occurrence of plasmid among A. baumannii strains belonging to ST25 is relatively common based on some previous studies [34, 59, 60]. Hence, the role of this genetic determinant in the genome flux among strains in the ST25 lineage remains unclear, especially in regard to the acquisition of genetic determinants that drive the emergence of AMR phenotypes.

The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and genomic analysis pipelines has allowed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) which contributes to the expanding number of bacterial genome data from a variety of isolates representing broad genetic traits. One valuable data set generated from sequencing-based methods is the resistome profile, which consists of comprehensive AMR genes harbored in a bacterial genome. Comparative genomics analysis using NGS data, like the pangenomic-based approach, is also becoming feasible for a deeper understanding of resistance mechanisms and may eventually lead to the identification of molecular targets that can be considered in developing AMR strategies.

Conclusion

Global spread of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clones has been regarded as one of the major public health concerns due to its increasing resistance to almost all available antimicrobials, including those belonging to last resort agents. In particular, the emergence of A. baumannii with non-susceptibility to carbapenems has been attributable to development of XDR and PDR strains. Surveillance on antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is essential to monitor the trend of antimicrobial resistance among A. baumannii isolates. Additionally, investigating genomic plasticity of this organism has been useful to provide insights regarding its propensity to easily acquire resistance determinants during clonal expansion. Genetic characteristics of clinical carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, namely MTC0619 (ST25) and MTC1106 (ST2) were investigated and revealed some important genetic determinants conferring antimicrobial resistance genes, mobile genetic elements, and fragment of resistance islands. Compared to MTC0619, MTC1106 generally seemed to harbor higher antimicrobial resistance genes. Some of those genetic determinants were present in accordance with susceptibility profiles of the isolates. Moreover, comparative genomics analysis identified the presence and absence of resistance genes in those isolates relative to several reference isolates and publicly available A. baumannii genomes. All in all, this study was likely the first comparative genomic analysis of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii that specifically included the isolates belonging to ST2 and ST25 from Thailand. The results from this study showed the importance of susceptibility testing to monitor the resistance trend among A. baumannii isolates. The inadequate surveillance of CRAB strains may lead to emergence of XDR and PDR strains which is detrimental, especially for the healthcare system. Further investigations are still required to get insights about genotype and phenotype correlation, as well as the evolutionary trajectories of those carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

Methods

Bacterial collection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

A. baumannii isolates were selected from a collection of clinical CRAB isolates obtained from 11 tertiary care hospitals across five regions in Thailand during the period of 2016 to 2017. The species identification of A. baumannii had been conducted through microbiological and biochemical testing, followed by genotypic confirmation for the presence of the blaOXA-51-like gene and the MLST using a set of housekeeping genes to characterize strains by their unique allelic profiles.

The AST was performed manually in at least two independent experiments through either disc diffusion or broth microdilution according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline [61]. Prior to AST, a bacterial suspension in Mueller Hinton Broth (HiMedia Laboratories, India) with an OD600 of approximately 0.1 (equal to 0.5 McFarland standard) was prepared. Using a sterile cotton swab, bacterial inoculum was evenly spread onto 20-mL Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) plates for the disk diffusion method. Antimicrobial disks (Oxoid, UK) were placed on the surface of the agar plate in triplicate and subsequently incubated overnight (16–18 h) at 37 °C. The zone of inhibition was measured by a digital caliper to determine susceptibility based on zone diameter breakpoints specific to each antimicrobial agent. In the broth microdilution method, the inoculum was added to 96-well plates along with a 2-fold dilution series of the tested antimicrobials in triplicates and then incubated overnight (16–18 h) at 37 °C. The MIC was determined by the lowest antimicrobial concentration at which no observable growth occurred, and the susceptibility categories were interpreted using the MIC breakpoints outlined in the CLSI guideline.

Genomic DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing

The genomic DNA of the chosen isolates was extracted using the Gentra Puregene Yeast/Bact Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s manual. The DNA concentration and purity (A260/280) were measured using a Nanodrop nucleic acid analyzer (Hercuvan Lab System, UK). Furthermore, the integrity and purity of the DNA samples were assessed by subjecting them to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis at 100 V for 40 min. The DNA samples underwent microbial whole-genome sequencing (WGS) using the Illumina Novaseq platform (Novogene Co. Ltd., China).

De novo genome assembly

The paired-end reads obtained from WGS have been filtered in which the adapter sequence, reads with Phred quality scores (QPhred) 5 or less, as well as reads with N greater than 10% were removed. To clean up the low-quality reads that might remain, a quality filtering step of the retrieved reads was done using fastp v.0.23.2 with the disabled adapter trimming function [62]. In addition, the raw reads were also checked for possible contamination by utilizing Kraken2 to assign taxonomic labels to the reads based on the miniKraken2_v2 database [63].

The reads that have been quality checked were then de novo assembled using Shovill v.1.10 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill) with the SPAdes assembler to generate contigs with a minimum sequence length of 500 bp. The Shovill assembly pipeline by default allows pre-assembly processing steps of the reads, which include estimation of the genome size and read length using KMC3 [64], subsampling reads to achieve a sensible depth of 150X, error correction of the reads with Lighter [65], and merging overlapping reads with FLASh [66] to improve the quality of genome assembly. After SPAdes assembly, the Shovill pipeline also checks for assembly errors by mapping back the reads to contigs and subsequently doing error correction using Pilon [67] until the final contigs are eventually generated in FASTA format. Contigs were reordered using Mauve v.1.13 [68] with the Mauve contig mover (MCM) algorithm in Geneious Prime. The genome assembly of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 (NCBI Accession GCF_013372085.1, downloaded in January 2022) was used as the reference sequence. The ordered contigs for each isolate were annotated using Prokka v.1.14.6 and RASTtk. Furthermore, the quality of assembled contigs was evaluated using QUAST v.5.0.2 [69] and CheckM v.1.1.3 [70]. Functional classification was performed by inferring the predicted genes from Prokka to clusters of orthologous groups (COG) in the eggNOG-Mapper webserver [71]. In addition, predicted genes involved in metabolic pathways were analyzed by mapping them to the KEGG GENES database with bi-directional best hit method in the KEGG Automated Annotation Server (KAAS) [72].

Molecular typing

Oxford scheme MLST of A. baumannii was performed using the MLST web server (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/MLST/) provided by the Center for Genomic Epidemiology with the contigs file as the input. The Pasteur scheme MLST was also carried out on the same web server to confirm the sequence type of the isolates. Additionally, Kaptive v.2.0.0 was employed to do capsular polysaccharide typing based on the A. baumannii K and OCL loci [38]. The FASTA files retrieved from Kaptive were utilized to create the annotated sequence of KL and OCL loci in Genbank format, which was then used to depict linear comparison with reference strains in Easyfig v.2.2.2 [73].

Genome analysis for antimicrobial resistance genes and mobile genetic elements

Abricate v.1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) in default parameters was used to do comprehensive screening of AMR genes with several databases, including ResFinder [25], NCBI AMRFinder Plus [26], CARD [27], and MEGARes [28]. The identified acquired AMR genes were further analyzed for the presence of associated mobile genetic elements using Mobile Element Finder web server (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/MobileElementFinder/) provided by the Center for Genomic Epidemiology, and manual screening from the annotated contigs based on IS elements identified from ISEScan [74]. Prophage regions were predicted using PHASTER [75]. Detection of the plasmid replicon was carried out using Acinetobacter Plasmid Typing scheme as previously described [33]. In addition, chromosomal point mutation associated with antimicrobial resistance were predicted by pairwise alignment in Geneious Prime using the sequence of related genes from isolates in this study and two drug-susceptible strains: A. baumannii ATCC 17978 (Genbank Accession CP053098.) and A. baumannii SDF (Genbank Accession CU468230.2).

Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis

Roary v.3.12.0 [76] was used for pangenome-based comparative genomics analysis to get insight about genetic diversity of the CRAB isolates sequenced in this study. The assembled contigs of these isolates were particularly compared with a diverse publicly available genomes of A. baumannii clinical isolates described previously [35], along with five well-characterized A. baumannii strains (ATCC 19606, ATCC 17978, ACICU, AYE, and SDF) as shown in Table S2. A final dataset comprising 107 strains was prepared by reannotating the assembly file of each strain with Prokka v.1.14.6 and compiling the GFF files (.gff) as the input for pangenome analysis. The gene clusters were aligned with PRANK [77] in Roary. Subsequently, the roary plots script (https://github.com/sangerpathogens/Roary/tree/master/ contrib/roary_plots) was epmployed to generate visualization of the pangenome and Roary matrix against a tree based on the presence or absence of the gene clusters. Additional analysis was carried out in which the draft genomes of CRAB isolates in this study were compared with publicly available genomes of Thai isolates belonging to ST2 and ST25 isolates listed in a previous study [23] and PathogenWatch database (https://pathogen.watch/, accessed on August 15, 2023) The final dataset of this analysis comprised of 276 genomes as listed in Table S3. The core genome alignment file from Roary was used to extract SNPs of the core genome with SNP-sites v.2.5.1 [78]. The core genome SNPs phylogenetic tree was built in RaxML-NG v.1.1 [79] with General Time Reversible Gamma (GTR + G) evolutionary model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The phylogenetic tree was visualized in iTOL [80].

Total RNA extraction and gene expression analysis

The bacterial isolates were cultivated in Luria Bertani (LB) broth (HiMedia Laboratories, India) until they reached the exponential growth phase, characterized by an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) ranging from 0.4 to 0.6. Subsequently, 2 mL of the culture was employed for total RNA extraction, following the FavorPrep™ Tissue Total RNA Mini Kit (Favorgen, Taiwan) manufacturer's instructions. RNase-free DNase I treatment (Qiagen, Germany) was carried out prior to elution to eliminate any potential DNA contamination. The concentration of the total RNA was determined spectrophotometrically using a Nanodrop nucleic acid analyzer. Approximately 5 µg of the RNA template was then reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the SuperScript™ IV First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Lithuania).

For quantitative gene expression analysis, the cDNA was incorporated into KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems, South Africa) in triplicate. The sequences of the primers utilized for amplification are presented in Table 4. The quantitative PCR (qPCR) was conducted using the Agilent Mx3000P qPCR system under the following conditions: an initial enzyme activation step for 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and amplification at 60 °C for 30 s. The relative expression of the target gene was determined by the comparative cycle threshold method (\({2}^{-\Delta \Delta Ct}\)). Notably, the rpoB gene was utilized for normalizing Ct values, with A. baumannii ATCC 19606 serving as the calibrator. Both the total RNA extraction and qPCR were carried out on three different occasions.

Table 4 List of primers used for RT-qPCR
Full size table

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the BioProject accession PRJNA854605 with BioSample accession SAMN29439287 (Genome accession: JAMZNM000000000) and SAMN29439938 (Genome accession: JAMZNL000000000).

References

  1. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB, et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. 2015 Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance 2015, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763. Accessed 26 Dec 2022.

  3. McEwen SA, Collignon PJ. Antimicrobial resistance: a One Health Perspective. Microbiol Spectr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0009-2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. 2017. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed 2017, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/. Accessed 26 Dec 2022.

  5. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms, and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom. 2019;5(10):e000306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. 2021. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report 2021, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027336. Accessed 26 Dec 2022.

  7. Fitzpatrick MA, Suda KJ, Poggensee L, Vivo A, Wirth M, Wilson G, et al. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes associated with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter in US Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42(3):305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao L, Lyu Y, Li Y. Trends in drug resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii over a 10-year period: nationwide data from the China Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance Program. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(6):659–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khuntayaporn P, Kanathum P, Houngsaitong J, Montakantikul P, Thirapanmethee K, Chomnawang MT. Predominance of international clone 2 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Thailand: a nationwide study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021;20(1):19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qureshi ZA, Hittle LE, O’Hara JA, Rivera JI, Syed A, Shields RK, et al. Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: beyond carbapenem resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(9):1295–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Papathanakos G, Andrianopoulos I, Papathanasiou A, Priavali E, Koulenti D, Koulouras V. Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia: A serious threat for critically ill patients. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Thadtapong N, Chaturongakul S, Soodvilai S, Dubbs P. Colistin and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Aci46 in Thailand: genome analysis and antibiotic resistance profiling. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(9):1054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Imperi F, Antunes LC, Blom J, Villa L, Iacono M, Visca P, et al. The genomics of Acinetobacter baumannii: insights into genome plasticity, antimicrobial resistance, and pathogenicity. IUBMB Life. 2011;63(12):1068–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doi Y, Murray GL, Peleg AY. Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of antimicrobial resistance-treatment options. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(1):85–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zarrilli R, Pournaras S, Giannouli M, Tsakris A. Global evolution of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clonal lineages. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;41(1):11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MA, Wisplinghoff H, Rodríguez-Valera F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4382–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Corvec S, Caroff N, Espaze E, Giraudeau C, Drugeon H, Reynaud A. AmpC cephalosporinase hyperproduction in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52(4):629–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heritier C, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Cephalosporinase over-expression resulting from insertion of ISAba1 in Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(2):123–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poirel L, Bonnin RA, Nordmann P. Genetic basis of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic Acinetobacter species. IUBMB Life. 2011;63(12):1061–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takebayashi Y, Findlay J, Heesom KJ, Warburton PJ, Avison MB, Evans BA. Variability in carbapenemase activity of intrinsic OxaAb (OXA-51-like) beta-lactamase enzymes in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(3):587–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hawkey J, Ascher DB, Judd LM, Wick RR, Kostoulias X, Cleland H, et al. Evolution of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii during a prolonged infection. Microb Genom. 2018;4(3):e000165.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Marr CM, MacDonald U, Trivedi G, Chakravorty S, Russo TA. An evaluation of BfmR-regulated antimicrobial resistance in the extensively drug resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii strain HUMC1. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:595798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chukamnerd A, Singkhamanan K, Chongsuvivatwong V, Palittapongarnpim P, Doi Y, Pomwised R, et al. Whole-genome analysis of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from clinical isolates in Southern Thailand. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:545–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Loraine J, Heinz E, Soontarach R, Blackwell GA, Stabler RA, Voravuthikunchai SP, et al. Genomic and phenotypic analyses of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from three tertiary care hospitals in Thailand. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, et al. ResFinder 40 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(12):3491–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, et al. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(11):e00483-e519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D517–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Doster E, Lakin SM, Dean CJ, Wolfe C, Young JG, Boucher C, et al. MEGARes 2.0: a database for classification of antimicrobial drug, biocide and metal resistance determinants in metagenomic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D561–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geisinger E, Vargas-Cuebas G, Mortman NJ, Syal S, Dai Y, Wainwright EL, et al. The landscape of phenotypic and transcriptional responses to ciprofloxacin in Acinetobacter baumannii: acquired resistance alleles modulate drug-induced SOS response and prophage replication. mBio. 2019;10(3):e01127-19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Park S, Lee KM, Yoo YS, Yoo JS, Yoo JI, Kim HS, et al. Alterations of gyrA, gyrB, and parC and activity of efflux pump in fluoroquinolone-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2011;2(3):164–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Blackwell GA, Holt KE, Bentley SD, Hsu LY, Hall RM. Variants of AbGRI3 carrying the armA gene in extensively antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from Singapore. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(4):1031–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamidian M, Hall RM. Origin of the AbGRI1 antibiotic resistance island found in the comM gene of Acinetobacter baumannii GC2 isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(10):2944–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lam MMC, Koong J, Holt KE, Hall RM, Hamidian M. Detection and typing of plasmids in Acinetobacter baumannii using rep genes encoding replication initiation proteins. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(1):e0247822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nigro SJ, Hall RM. A large plasmid, p D46–4, carrying a complex resistance region in an extensively antibiotic-resistant ST25 Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3496–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Galac MR, Snesrud E, Lebreton F, Stam J, Julius M, Ong AC, et al. A diverse panel of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii for research and development. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(10):e00840-e920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gaiarsa S, Batisti Biffignandi G, Esposito EP, Castelli M, Jolley KA, Brisse S, et al. Comparative analysis of the two Acinetobacter baumannii multilocus sequence typing (MLST) Schemes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tomaschek F, Higgins PG, Stefanik D, Wisplinghoff H, Seifert H. Head-to-head comparison of two multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) schemes for characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak and sporadic isolates. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wyres KL, Cahill SM, Holt KE, Hall RM, Kenyon JJ. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii loci for capsular polysaccharide (KL) and lipooligosaccharide outer core (OCL) synthesis in genome assemblies using curated reference databases compatible with Kaptive. Microb Genom. 2020;6(3):e000339.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu L, Shi Y, Xu Q, Zhang L, He J, Jiang Y, et al. Capsule thickness, not biofilm formation, gives rise to mucoid Acinetobacter baumannii phenotypes that are more prevalent in long-term infections: A study of clinical isolates from a hospital in China. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:99–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Corvec S, Poirel L, Naas T, Drugeon H, Nordmann P. Genetics and expression of the carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase gene blaOXA-23 in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(4):1530–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lopes BS, Amyes SGB. Role of ISAba1 and ISAba125 in governing the expression of blaADC in clinically relevant Acinetobacter baumannii strains resistant to cephalosporins. J MedMicrobiol. 2012;61(Pt 8):1103–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Figueiredo S, Poirel L, Papa A, Koulourida V, Nordmann P. Overexpression of the naturally occurring blaOXA-51 gene in Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by novel insertion sequence ISAba9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(9):4045–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rolain JM, Diene SM, Kempf M, Gimenez G, Robert C, Raoult D. Real-time sequencing to decipher the molecular mechanism of resistance of a clinical pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolate from Marseille. France Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(1):592–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harmer CJ, Lebreton F, Stam J, McGann PT, Hall RM. Complete genome of the extensively antibiotic-resistant GC1 Acinetobacter baumannii isolate MRSN 56 reveals a novel route to fluoroquinolone resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022;77(7):1851–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kabic J, Novovic K, Kekic D, Trudic A, Opavski N, Dimkic I, et al. Comparative genomics and molecular epidemiology of colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023;21:574–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Arroyo LA, Herrera CM, Fernandez L, Hankins JV, Trent MS, Hancock RE. The pmrCAB operon mediates polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978 and clinical isolates through phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(8):3743–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lunha K, Thet KT, Ngudsuntia A, Charoensri N, Lulitanond A, Tavichakorntrakool R, et al. PmrB mutations including a novel 10-amino acid repeat sequence insertion associated with low-level colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;85:104577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gerson S, Betts JW, Lucaßen K, Nodari CS, Wille J, Josten M, et al. Investigation of novel pmrB and eptA mutations in isogenic Acinetobacter baumannii isolates associated with colistin resistance and increased virulence in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(3):e01586-e1618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Potron A, Vuillemenot JB, Puja H, Triponney P, Bour M, Valot B, et al. ISAba1-dependent overexpression of eptA in clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to colistin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(9):2544–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Trebosc V, Gartenmann S, Totzl M, Lucchini V, Schellhorn B, Pieren M, et al. Dissecting colistin resistance mechanisms in extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. mBio. 2019;10(4):e01083-19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin MF, Lin YY, Lan CY. Contribution of EmrAB efflux pumps to colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Microbiol. 2017;55(2):130–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nemec A, Maixnerova M, van der Reijden TJ, van den Broek PJ, Dijkshoorn L. Relationship between the AdeABC efflux system gene content, netilmicin susceptibility and multidrug resistance in a genotypically diverse collection of Acinetobacter baumannii strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60(3):483–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Marchand I, Damier-Piolle L, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC in Acinetobacter baumannii is regulated by the AdeRS two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(9):3298–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J, Shmakov SA, Alkhnbashi OS, Brouns SJJ, et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(2):67–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rocha EPC, Bikard D. Microbial defenses against mobile genetic elements and viruses: Who defends whom from what? PLoS Biol. 2022;20(1):e3001514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Westra ER, Levin BR. It is unclear how important CRISPR-Cas systems are for protecting natural populations of bacteria against infections by mobile genetic elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(45):27777–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tyumentseva M, Mikhaylova Y, Prelovskaya A, Tyumentsev A, Petrova L, Fomina V, et al. Genomic and phenotypic analysis of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates carrying different types of CRISPR/Cas Systems. Pathogens. 2021;10(2):e 10020205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mangas EL, Rubio A, Alvarez-Marin R, Labrador-Herrera G, Pachón J, Pachón-Ibáñez ME, et al. Pangenome of Acinetobacter baumannii uncovers two groups of genomes, one of them with genes involved in CRISPR/Cas defence systems associated with the absence of plasmids and exclusive genes for biofilm formation. Microb Genom. 2019;5(11):e 000309.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hamidian M, Hall RM. The resistance gene complement of D4, a multiply antibiotic-resistant ST25 Acinetobacter baumannii isolate, resides in two genomic islands and a plasmid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(6):1730–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rafei R, Koong J, Osman M, Atrouni AA, Hamze M, Hamidian M, et al. Analysis of pCl107 a large plasmid carried by an ST25 Acinetobacter baumannii strain reveals a complex evolutionary history and links to multiple antibiotic resistance and metabolic pathways. FEMS Microbes. 2022;3:xtac027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In: 31th CLSI Document M100. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021.

  62. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kokot M, Dlugosz M, Deorowicz S. KMC 3: counting and manipulating k-mer statistics. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(17):2759–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Song L, Florea L, Langmead B. Lighter: fast and memory-efficient sequencing error correction without counting. Genome Biol. 2014;15(11):509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(21):2957–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1394–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernandez-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. EggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(12):5825–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Suppl_2):182–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(7):1009–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Xie Z, Tang H. ISEScan: automated identification of insertion sequence elements in prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(21):3340–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W16-21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3691–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Loytynoja A. Phylogeny-aware alignment with PRANK. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1079:155–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane JA, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom. 2016;2(4):e000056.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable, and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(21):4453–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(1):127–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lin MF, Lin YY, Tu CC, Lan CY. Distribution of different efflux pump genes in clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and their correlation with antimicrobial resistance. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50(2):224–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Rumbo C, Gato E, Lopez M, Ruiz de Alegría C, Fernández-Cuenca F, Martínez-Martínez L, et al. Contribution of efflux pumps, porins, and beta-lactamases to multidrug resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(11):5247–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank staffs in the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University for technical support and suggestion on this work. Their support and collaboration are gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This work was supported by Mahidol University, Thailand [Grant number NDFR 12/2565] and the Health Systems Research Institute, Thailand [Grant number 65–104].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance Interdisciplinary Group (AmRIG), Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Made Rai Dwitya Wiradiputra, Krit Thirapanmethee, Piyatip Khuntayaporn, Pagakrong Wanapaisan & Mullika Traidej Chomnawang

  2. Biopharmaceutical Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Made Rai Dwitya Wiradiputra

  3. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Krit Thirapanmethee, Piyatip Khuntayaporn, Pagakrong Wanapaisan & Mullika Traidej Chomnawang

Authors
  1. Made Rai Dwitya Wiradiputra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Krit Thirapanmethee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piyatip Khuntayaporn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pagakrong Wanapaisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mullika Traidej Chomnawang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.R.D.W.; Methodology, investigation, software and data curator, writing – original draft. P.W.; Study design, methodology, data analysis, and writing revision. P.K.; Study design, methodology, data interpretation, statistical analysis and visualization, and writing revision. K.T.; Study design, methodology, data interpretation, and writing revision. M.T.C.; Conceptualization, methodology, data interpretation, supervision, writing – review and editing, and funding acquisition. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mullika Traidej Chomnawang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Fig. S1. Linear comparison of gene arrangement within (A) the K locus and (B) the OC locus between CRAB and five reference A. baumannii strains. Fig. S2. The pangenome structure of two CRAB isolates compared with 100 diverse clinical isolates and five reference strains (listed in Table S2). Fig. S3. Roary matrix and inference tree based on gene presence and absence among 107 genomes of A. baumannii isolates. Fig. S4. The pangenome structure of two CRAB isolates compared with other Thai isolates as listed in Table S3. Fig. S5. Roary matrix and inference tree based on gene presence and absence among 276 A. baumannii isolates of ST2 and ST25 from Thailand.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Predicted prophage regions in MTC0619 and MTC1106. Table S2. List of A. baumannii genomes included for pangenome analysis involving a diverse A. baumannii clones. Table S3. List of A. baumannii genomes included for pangenome analysis of Thai isolates belonging to ST2 and ST25.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiradiputra, M.R.D., Thirapanmethee, K., Khuntayaporn, P. et al. Comparative genotypic characterization related to antibiotic resistance phenotypes of clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii MTC1106 (ST2) and MTC0619 (ST25). BMC Genomics 24, 689 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09734-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09734-2

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us