License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
arXiv:2402.08123v1 [astro-ph.GA] 12 Feb 2024

The Impact of an AGN on PAH Emission in Galaxies: the Case of Ring Galaxy NGC 4138

G. P. Donnelly Ritter Astrophysical Research Center, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA J.D.T. Smith Ritter Astrophysical Research Center, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA B. T. Draine Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA A. Togi Dept. of Physics, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA T. S.-Y. Lai IPAC, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA L. Armus IPAC, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA D. A. Dale Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA V. Charmandaris Dept. of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003, Greece Institute of Astrophysics, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, 70013, Greece School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Diogenes street, Engomi, 1516 Nicosia, Cyprus
Abstract

We present a focused study of radially-resolved varying PAH emission in the low-luminosity AGN-host NGC 4138 using deep Spitzer/IRS spectral maps. Using new model PAH spectra, we investigate whether these variations could be associated with changes to the PAH grain size distribution due to photodestruction by the AGN. Separately, we model the effects of the varying radiation field within NGC 4138, and we use this model to predict the corresponding changes in the PAH emission spectrum. We find that PAH band ratios are strongly variable with radius in this galaxy with short-to-long wavelength band ratios peaking in the starburst ring. The changing mix of starlight appears to have a considerable effect on the trends in these band ratios, and our radiation model predicts the shapes of these trends. However, the amplitude of observed variation is 2.5×\mathrm{\sim 2.5\times}∼ 2.5 × larger than predicted for some ratios. A cutoff of small grains in the PAH size distribution, as has been suggested for AGN, together with changes in PAH ionization fraction could explain the behavior of the shorter bands, but this model fails to reproduce longer band behaviors. Additionally, we find that short-to-long wavelength PAH band ratios increase slightly within 270pcsimilar-toabsent270pc\mathrm{\sim 270\,pc}∼ 270 roman_pc of the center, suggesting that the AGN may directly influence PAH emission there.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, AGN host galaxies, Interstellar medium, Low-luminosity active galactic nuclei, Infrared astronomy, IRSA
facilities: Spitzer/IRS (AORKEY: 18240768), Spitzer/IRAC and MIPS Super Mosaics (SSC And IRSA, 2020), GALEX (DOI: 10.17909/T9H59D) (STScI, 2013)software: Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, 2018, 2022), Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007), NumPy (Harris et al., 2020), SciPy (Virtanen et al., 2020)

1 Introduction

The presence of an active galactic nucleus (AGN) has been shown to have significant impacts on the properties of the interstellar medium (ISM) of a galaxy. Recently, particular attention has been paid to small dust grains in the ISM known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which glow as prominent emission features in the mid-infrared (MIR) of most galaxies. MIR surveys of galaxies have provided circumstantial evidence that AGN may influence the emission of these PAHs, although the mechanism responsible for this is uncertain.

It has been known for decades that PAH features are significantly suppressed or even non-existent in the spectra of galaxies with a sufficiently powerful AGN (Roche et al., 1991; Xie & Ho, 2022). Voit (1992) used observations of suppressed PAH features along with laboratory experiments to argue that the hard X-ray emission from an AGN will destroy PAH grains nearby.

In spite of this, it has become clear that PAHs are present in galaxies with low to moderate luminosity AGN, even within the central 10’s of pc (Alonso-Herrero et al., 2014; Jensen et al., 2017). Smith et al. (2007a) (hereafter S07) detected suppressed overall PAH emission in low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN), but also pointed out that the relative strengths of different PAH features are different in the inner similar-to\simkpc of LLAGN hosts compared to the galaxies with no AGN (hereafter “normal”), a result that has been confirmed several times (O’Dowd et al., 2009; Diamond-Stanic & Rieke, 2010; Sales et al., 2010). PAH emission models suggest that the relative strengths of PAH features are heavily influenced by the size distribution of PAH grains (Draine & Li, 2007; Draine et al., 2021), leading S07 to suggest that an LLAGN may be able to influence this grain size distribution (GSD) by selectively destroying smaller grains. A confirmed influence of an LLAGN on the PAH GSD would be a major result, having implications for the way that PAH features are used as diagnostics of gas, dust, and star-formation within galaxies and potentially allowing for the use of PAH observations as a diagnostic for an AGN itself.

Other factors are known to influence the relative strengths of PAH features, and these may account for the variability observed in PAH band ratios in the absence of an AGN. For example, the ionization state of PAHs is usually studied alongside PAH size because of the characteristic tendency of more ionized PAHs to emit more strongly in certain features. For the ISO and Spitzer spectra of a large sample of Milky Way and extragalactic systems of different types, Galliano et al. (2008) attributed the observed band ratio variability as primarily due to this. Similarly, band ratios are known to vary with the gas-phase metallicity of the ISM, though the exact reason for this is unknown (Sandstrom et al. (2012), Whitcomb et al. in prep.). The intensity and average photon energy of the interstellar radiation field (ISRF) incident on PAHs is also expected to have impacts on the relative strengths of PAH features by changing the temperature of PAH grains (Draine et al., 2021).

In particular, the varying ISRF has been mostly overlooked in investigations of PAH band ratios in LLAGN host galaxies. The ISRF is not uniform across a galaxy, and is linked to galaxy properties such as the presence of an AGN and the age and distribution of the predominant local stellar populations (Dale et al., 2023). Though it is usually assumed that the UV-rich ISRFs of young stellar populations are responsible for the majority of PAH excitation, observational evidence confirms that UV-poor older stellar populations are also effective for PAH excitation (Groves et al., 2012; Crocker et al., 2013; Bendo et al., 2020; Zhang & Ho, 2023). This leads to the possibility that LLAGN hosts have distinct PAH band ratios not because of direct influence on PAHs from the LLAGN, but because the classification of an AGN is associated with a lower star-formation rate and a larger bulge within a galaxy.

Can the PAH band ratios of a LLAGN host be reproduced by varying the radiation incident upon PAHs alone? If not, does LLAGN-driven small grain destruction better explain the band ratios? New models from Draine et al. (2021) (hereafter D21) predict PAH emission spectra given different incident spectra across a range of intensity and hardness. In this work, we use the D21 models to predict the radial band ratio profiles for the LLAGN host NGC 4138 for a fixed PAH GSD and ionization distribution, and we compare these to the band ratios observed in a deep Spitzer spectral map. We then discuss whether these observed band ratios could be explained by alterations to the GSD by the LLAGN.

2 PAH Band Ratios in AGN Galaxies

PAH features are complexes of emission from the discrete vibrational modes of excited PAH molecules. Thus, the relative strengths of PAH features depend on intrinsic properties of the grain population. Models suggest that the 6.2 µmµm\mathrm{\micron}roman_µm and 7.7 µmµm\mathrm{\micron}roman_µm features are primarily emitted by smaller PAHs (see Draine & Li (2007) and Draine et al. (2021)). This is the result of smaller PAH grains having smaller heat capacities; given the same incident radiation, smaller PAHs will reach the higher temperatures needed to radiate at shorter wavelengths. On the other hand, the 11.3 µmµm\micronroman_µm and 17 µmµm\micronroman_µm features are thought to arise primarily from larger PAH grains, given the larger heat capacities of the grains. The 3.3 µmµm\micronroman_µm feature is thought to be the most sensitive to PAH size (Lai et al., 2020; Draine et al., 2021; Maragkoudakis et al., 2022; Sandstrom et al., 2023), however this feature unfortunately lies outside of the range of Spitzer/IRS.

Given the dependence of different features on different parameters, it has become common for ratios of PAH feature strengths to be used as diagnostics for the grain population. Many authors have used PAH feature ratio-ratio diagrams to probe PAH size, typically using L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) as an indicator of PAH size and L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) as an indicator for both ionization and PAH size (Smith et al., 2007a; O’Dowd et al., 2009; Sales et al., 2010; Diamond-Stanic & Rieke, 2010; García-Bernete et al., 2022a). Both of these ratios are prone to some ambiguity due to a degeneracy between size and ionization, though to a different extent (see D21). In this work, we are primarily interested in studying the competing effects of a possibly changing GSD and changes in the ISRF that heats PAHs. Both of these affect the distribution of power emitted by PAHs at shorter wavelengths versus longer wavelengths. Thus, we specifically consider short-to-long wavelength PAH band ratios in this work, as each of these are necessarily affected by both the GSD and ISRF, regardless of other parameters (such as ionization).

S07 detected a suppressed L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) among LLAGN-hosts compared to normal galaxies in the SINGS sample, and proposed that an LLAGN itself could be directly responsible; in nuclear regions, radiation from the LLAGN could be hard enough to destroy smaller PAH grains while not hard enough to destroy larger grains. These observational results were confirmed by O’Dowd et al. (2009). Sales et al. (2010) and García-Bernete et al. (2022a) saw similar suppression of both L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) and L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) in the Spitzer spectra for the nuclei of AGN-hosts and noted that their results are consistent with the logic of the selective destruction by AGN hypothesis. Recently, Lai et al. (2023) showed using JWST spectra that L(3.3μm)/L(11.3μm)L3.3𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(3.3\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 3.3 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ), a sensitive tracer of PAH size, is suppressed in the nucleus of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 7469 compared to other regions in the same galaxy. However, in a Spitzer study of 35 Seyfert galaxies, Diamond-Stanic & Rieke (2010) found significant suppression of L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) but not of L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ), which is another tracer for PAH size. Based on this, they argued against AGN-driven small grain destruction as the cause.

S07 and O’Dowd et al. (2009) suggested that the usual use of a BPT diagram (Baldwin et al., 1981) to classify AGN-hosting galaxies may also be leading to the association of AGN with band ratio suppression, since the parameter space occupied by an AGN in a BPT diagram also signals a lack of nuclear star formation which is thought to be the primary source of PAH excitation. In that vein, Kaneda et al. (2008) began to address this hypothesis by studying PAH emission in elliptical galaxies with little star formation. Some of these galaxies were normal and some had LLAGN activity. Out of 14 galaxies with significant PAH emission, 12 exhibited suppressed L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ). This was attributed to a smaller fraction of ionized PAHs due to the UV-poor ISRF of the elliptical galaxies. However, the low average photon energy (hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩) ISRF produced by old stars may contribute to this suppression, and to that of all short-to-long ratios. Ogle et al. (2023) showed that observations of the inner disk of the LLAGN host M58 show an extremely low L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) in the inner disk, which they attributed to excitation from old stars emitting relatively soft radiation. Thus, the link between an AGN and low band ratios may be attributable to the relationship between an AGN and the star-formation history of a galaxy, rather than by an impact on the PAH GSD.

Finally, S07 also suggested based on observational evidence that while AGN of sufficient power will destroy PAH grains, LLAGN may be able to supply the UV photons for PAH excitation in the nucleus. Observing the central 10’s of pc for AGN-hosts with high angular resolution, Alonso-Herrero et al. (2014) and Jensen et al. (2017) showed that the surface brightness of the 11.3 µmµm\micronroman_µm feature actually increased approaching the nucleus. They argued that these results are consistent with a compact source at the nucleus (which could include the AGN or a nuclear star-forming region) exciting the PAHs.

It is unclear whether radiation effects or changes in grain properties are responsible for the low short-to-long band ratios observed in LLAGN galaxies. By selecting a target with a radiation field that can be modeled with separable components, and using modeled PAH spectra sensitive to different radiation fields, we may make progress towards quantifying the impact of radiation on band ratios. Selective destruction of small grains by an AGN likely has different impacts at different radii in a galaxy; more small PAHs surviving at radii farther from the nucleus would produce a short-to-long band ratio profile that increases with radius. An observation of this pattern, while accounting for radiation effects with a radiation model, would constitute less ambiguous evidence of AGN influence on PAH properties. Alternatively, the predicted changes in band ratios due to the radiation may be sufficient to produce the observed suppression, rendering small grain destruction unnecessary.

3 Sample and Observations

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Spitzer IRAC 8 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m image of the central star-forming ring of NGC 4138. The footprint of our spectral map is shown as a blue box, and the annular regions we extract spectra from are shown in red.

Our analysis makes use of Spitzer/IRS mapping mode observations of the LLAGN host NGC 4138 (identified by nuclear X-ray emission via Chandra LX=1041.24ergs1(210keV)subscript𝐿Xsuperscript1041.24ergsuperscripts1210keVL_{\mathrm{X}}=10^{41.24}\ \mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}\ (2-10\,\mathrm{keV})italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 41.24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_erg roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 - 10 roman_keV ) (Cappi et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2009; Asmus et al., 2015)). This galaxy offers a host of benefits for a spatially-resolved study of PAH emission; it is nearby (D=13.8Mpc𝐷13.8MpcD=13.8\,\mathrm{Mpc}italic_D = 13.8 roman_Mpc, Asmus et al. (2014)), relatively face-on (inclination=54.1inclinationsuperscript54.1\mathrm{inclination=54.1^{\circ}}roman_inclination = 54.1 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Nilson (1973)), and has an ISRF that can be modeled with simple and separable components (see § 5). Additionally, the IRS map is extensive (see Figure 1). Data from the short (5.2-14.5 µmµm\micronroman_µm) and long (14.0-38.2 µmµm\micronroman_µm) wavelength low resolution modules (SL and LL, respectively) are used, which gives an effective wavelength range of 5.2 – 38.2 µmµm\micronroman_µm. The SL module produced a similar-to\sim1′×\times×1′ square spectral map which is centered on the nucleus of NGC 4138, and is rotated by 123superscript123123^{\circ}123 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT East of North, as shown in Figure 1. Although the LL module produced a considerably larger map, we utilize only the part of the LL map which overlaps the SL map for full spectral coverage.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Observed IRS spectrum in each region from Figure 1 (black dots). PAHFIT spectra are shown as red curves. Spectra are normalized to the flux at the peak of the 11.3 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m PAH feature, then offset for clarity. PAH features of interest in this work are shaded in gray. The 17 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m feature is blended with the H22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0-0 (S1) line at 17.03 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m, indicated by the vertical dashed line. Labels along the vertical axis indicate the name of region label, with distance from the nucleus increasing upward. Spectra have been truncated for emphasis of PAH features.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Top: the average elliptical spectrum used to fit the stellar absorption features between 5.5–7.5 µm. We assume that the filled circles are within absorption features, while open circles are continuum. Over this small range of wavelengths, we have approximated the continuum as a line. The right vertical axis pertains to the absorption features (blue lines). Bottom: comparison of PAHFIT fits with and without the fitted absorption features in the stellar continuum. Note the broad “bump” centered at 6.1µmsimilar-toabsent6.1µm\sim 6.1\,\micron∼ 6.1 roman_µm.

The spectral maps were formatted as spectral cubes using CUBISM (Smith et al., 2007b). We split the galaxy into 10 annular regions which are 4″ thick along the major axis (2.arcsecond\farcsstart_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID3 along minor axis). We also include an elliptical region at the nucleus with a semi-major axis of 4″(270 pc at 13.8 Mpc). The wavelength planes of the cubes are not convolved to a common resolution to preserve the better spatial resolution at short wavelengths. As our goal is to observe the variations in PAH band ratios at small scales, the choice of a 4″ thickness is a compromise between maximizing spatial resolution and minimizing aperture effects; the point-spread function (PSF) at the red end of SL has a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 3.9similar-toabsent3arcsecond9\sim 3\farcs 9∼ 3 start_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID 9 (Pereira-Santaella et al., 2010) and the FWHM at the 17 µm PAH feature is 4.7similar-toabsent4arcsecond7\sim 4\farcs 7∼ 4 start_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID 7. In order to ensure that these small regions do not induce a systematic effect on PAH band ratios, we also test regions which are twice as thick (with the inner-most region unchanged). We do not find a significant difference in PAH band ratios between the two sets of regions (see Figure 11). All regions are projected onto the plane of the galaxy (positionangle=150positionanglesuperscript150\mathrm{position\ angle=150^{\circ}}roman_position roman_angle = 150 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT East of North (Makarov et al., 2014)) as shown in Figure 1. We extract spectra from these regions, and a scaling correction is applied to the SL spectra such that the median flux of the five longest wavelength SL data points matches the median flux of the five shortest wavelength data points of the LL spectrum. Normalized spectra for each region are shown in Figure 2. Spectral decomposition in each region is performed using PAHFIT (S07), and the fitted spectra are shown as red lines in Figure 2. PAHFIT allows us to obtain the continuum-subtracted integrated luminosity of individual PAH features.

The spectrum of our nuclear region exhibits an apparent emission feature from 5.76.5µmsimilar-toabsent5.76.5µm\sim 5.7-6.5\,\micron∼ 5.7 - 6.5 roman_µm that is not present in the spectra extracted from our other regions. This feature interferes with the extraction of PAH fluxes. We attribute this to absorption features in the starlight produced by the evolved stellar population of the bulge; a similar apparent feature was noted in the spectra of stars in Milky Way globular clusters by Sloan et al. (2010), who also suggested absorption as the cause. To account for this, we searched for archival Spitzer/IRS data of elliptical galaxies which show these absorption features in their spectra; we assume that these serve as an appropriate analog for the bulge of NGC 4138. We found five objects that show the absorption features: NGC 821, NGC 1549, NGC 3904, NGC 4621, and NGC 4660, and averaged the IRS spectra at their centers (r<1.5𝑟1arcsecond5r<1\farcs 5italic_r < 1 start_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID 5).

In addition to the absorption at 5.7similar-toabsent5.7\sim 5.7∼ 5.7 and 6.5µm6.5µm6.5\,\micron6.5 roman_µm, there is an additional feature at 7.0µm7.0µm7.0\,\micron7.0 roman_µm. We find that five Gaussian-shaped features adequately describe the observed absorption when a linear continuum is assumed. In PAHFIT, we apply these absorption features at fixed ratios to the standard assumed stellar modified black-body (T=5000K𝑇5000KT=5000\,\mathrm{K}italic_T = 5000 roman_K), with the strength of the features as a free parameter. See Figure 3 for the fit to the average elliptical galaxy spectrum and a zoom-in at the wavelengths of interest for our inner-most region.

4 PAH Emission Model

The D21 models predict PAH spectra for various sizes of PAH grains and are computed for 14 different incident starlight spectra with different population ages and parameters. In addition, each spectrum includes an extinguished version through a slab of dust with total AV=2magsubscript𝐴V2magA_{\mathrm{V}}=2\,\mathrm{mag}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 roman_mag, and each spectrum is varied across a range of intensity. We refer to the combination of the mix of starlight spectra and the intensity as an ISRF. Finally, the D21 model PAH spectra are provided for neutral and singly ionized grains. In this work, we use PAHFIT to obtain the band ratios of the modeled PAH spectra and compare to those of the observed spectra.

Real PAH populations in galaxies exist in a mix of grain sizes and ionization states. Therefore to produce realistic model PAH spectra we average the contributing spectra of many different model PAH grains, using an assumed distribution of PAH size and ionization as the weighting function. For PAH size, we adopt the double log-normal grain size distribution (GSD) described in D21:

1nHdnPAHda=j=12Bjaexp{[ln(a/a0j)]22σ2}1subscript𝑛H𝑑subscript𝑛PAH𝑑𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑗12subscript𝐵𝑗𝑎superscriptdelimited-[]𝑎subscript𝑎0𝑗22superscript𝜎2\frac{1}{n_{\mathrm{H}}}\frac{dn_{\mathrm{PAH}}}{da}=\sum_{j=1}^{2}\frac{B_{j}% }{a}\exp\left\{-\frac{\left[\ln\left(a/a_{0j}\right)\right]^{2}}{2\sigma^{2}}\right\}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_d italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PAH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_a end_ARG = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG roman_exp { - divide start_ARG [ roman_ln ( italic_a / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG } (1)

where a𝑎aitalic_a is the radius of a PAH grain. Each Bjsubscript𝐵𝑗B_{j}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, a0jsubscript𝑎0𝑗a_{0j}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ sets the amplitude, horizontal position, and width, respectively. In this work, we express PAH size as the number of carbon atoms per molecule NCsubscript𝑁CN_{\mathrm{C}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and we adopt the relationship between a𝑎aitalic_a and NCsubscript𝑁CN_{\mathrm{C}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in D21:

NC=418(a10Å)3.subscript𝑁C418superscript𝑎10Å3N_{\mathrm{C}}=418\left(\frac{a}{10\,\mathrm{\AA}}\right)^{3}\ .italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 418 ( divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 10 roman_Å end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2)

Following D21, we always fix a02subscript𝑎02a_{02}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 02 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and B2subscript𝐵2B_{2}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at 30.0Å30.0Å30.0\,\mathrm{\AA}30.0 roman_Å and 3.113×1010H13.113superscript1010superscriptH13.113\times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{H}^{-1}3.113 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, respectively, and σ=0.40𝜎0.40\sigma=0.40italic_σ = 0.40. GSDs with a larger or smaller average PAH size are produced by changing a01subscript𝑎01a_{\mathrm{01}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which shifts the log-normal for the smallest PAHs, as shown in Figure 4. For a given a01subscript𝑎01a_{\mathrm{01}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we vary B1subscript𝐵1B_{1}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that the volume of the PAHs in this log-normal is always VPAH,1=3×1028cm3H1subscript𝑉PAH13superscript1028superscriptcm3superscriptH1V_{\mathrm{PAH,1}}=3\times 10^{-28}\,\mathrm{cm^{3}\,H^{-1}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PAH , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 28 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, as in D21. Figure 4 shows the three GSDs discussed in D21, called “small” (a01=3Åsubscript𝑎013Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=3\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3 roman_Å), “standard” (a01=4Åsubscript𝑎014Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=4\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 roman_Å), and “large” (a01=5Åsubscript𝑎015Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=5\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5 roman_Å). In this work, we assume NGC 4138 has a “standard” GSD.

We wish to examine the effect that an AGN may have on the GSD, and in particular we consider the prevalent hypothesis that an AGN selectively destroys small PAH grains. To simulate this, we introduce a parameter g𝑔gitalic_g which is the minimum surviving PAH size (measured in NCsubscript𝑁CN_{\mathrm{C}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) for a given PAH population. We do not re-scale the GSD to preserve the PAH volume when a larger g𝑔gitalic_g is imposed. This is consistent with small grain destruction. The green curve in Figure 4 shows the “standard” GSD with an example lower PAH size limit at g=150𝑔150g=150italic_g = 150. In D21, g=27𝑔27g=27italic_g = 27 is used for all considered GSDs.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Example PAH grain size distributions. (See Eq. 1). The three examples given show the small, standard, and large distributions from D21 as the dashed yellow, black, and blue curves, respectively. The thick black curve emphasizes that we assume NGC 4138 to have a standard distribution. The green curve serves as an example of a standard GSD with a lower size limit of g=150𝑔150g=150italic_g = 150.

We also adopt the functional form used by D21 for PAH ionization, in which the fraction of PAH grains that are singly ionized is a function of the PAH grain size:

fion(a)=111+aμsubscript𝑓ion𝑎111𝑎𝜇f_{\mathrm{ion}}(a)=1-\frac{1}{1+\frac{a}{\mu}}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ion end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a ) = 1 - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG end_ARG (3)

for a PAH of radius a𝑎aitalic_a in a distribution where 50% of PAH grains with a=μ𝑎𝜇a=\muitalic_a = italic_μ are ionized (see Figure 5). Thus, we vary μ𝜇\muitalic_μ when we wish to vary the ionization fraction distribution.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: PAH ionization fraction distribution described by Eq. 3 with the three values discussed in D21. The dotted line represents “low” ionization, the solid line represents “standard” ionization, and the dashed line is “high” in D21.

D21 uses the dimensionless parameter U𝑈Uitalic_U to denote the intensity of starlight that PAHs are exposed to; it is the dust heating rate due to starlight relative to that of the ISRF near the Sun (Mathis et al., 1983). The U𝑈Uitalic_U and the fractional contribution of each incident starlight spectrum at each radius is determined by our radiation model of NGC 4138, as discussed in the next section. We do not apply any scaling to model PAH spectra, since we are only interested in the PAH band ratios.

5 Radiation Model of NGC 4138

The ISRF in a galaxy often includes contributions from a complicated mixture of different stellar populations and other luminous objects — such as an AGN — all of which may contribute to PAH excitation. Adding additional complexity, this radiation blend varies across the different regions of a galaxy. In order to investigate the effects of varying ISRF radiation intensity and hardness on PAH emission, the contributions of competing radiation sources must be separated and modeled independently. NGC 4138 provides a convenient environment for this, with a pronounced star-forming ring embedded in a smooth disk of older stars (Jore et al., 1996; Pizzella et al., 2014). In this section, we describe our radiation model of NGC 4138 which serves three major purposes: 1) to predict the overall radiation intensity experienced by PAHs at different radii, 2) to predict the mix of starlight spectra experienced by PAHs at different radii, and 3) to investigate the possibility of PAH excitation by an AGN.

5.1 Bulge-Disk-Ring Decomposition

Table 1: Summary of Galaxy Component Decomposition
Component Used Bandpass I0,compsubscript𝐼0compI_{\mathrm{0,comp}}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_comp end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Spatial Parameters
Bulge IRAC 3.6 µm 13.54MJysr113.54MJysuperscriptsr113.54\,\mathrm{MJy\,sr^{-1}}13.54 roman_MJy roman_sr start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Rbulge=187pcsubscript𝑅bulge187pcR_{\mathrm{bulge}}=187\,\mathrm{pc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 187 roman_pc, n=1.57𝑛1.57n=1.57italic_n = 1.57
Stellar Disk IRAC 3.6 µm 7.68MJysr17.68MJysuperscriptsr17.68\,\mathrm{MJy\,sr^{-1}}7.68 roman_MJy roman_sr start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Rdisk=992pcsubscript𝑅disk992pcR_{\mathrm{disk}}=992\,\mathrm{pc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 992 roman_pc
Ring IRAC 8 µm 3.99MJysr13.99MJysuperscriptsr13.99\,\mathrm{MJy\,sr^{-1}}3.99 roman_MJy roman_sr start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Rring=1.2kpcsubscript𝑅ring1.2kpcR_{\mathrm{ring}}=1.2\,\mathrm{kpc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.2 roman_kpc, σring=0.30kpcsubscript𝜎ring0.30kpc\sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}=0.30\,\mathrm{kpc}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.30 roman_kpc

Compare values to those from Fisher & Drory (2010): Rbulge=182pcsubscript𝑅bulge182pcR_{\mathrm{bulge}}=182\,\mathrm{pc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 182 roman_pc, n=1.65𝑛1.65n=1.65italic_n = 1.65, Rdisk=1.17kpcsubscript𝑅disk1.17kpcR_{\mathrm{disk}}=1.17\,\mathrm{kpc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.17 roman_kpc.

The scale length of the exponential component in the IRAC 8 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m filter is Rdisk,8µm=3.66kpcsubscript𝑅disk8µm3.66kpcR_{\mathrm{disk,8\,\micron}}=3.66\,\mathrm{kpc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk , 8 roman_µm end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.66 roman_kpc.

Our approach to creating a radiation model is similar to that of Draine et al. (2014), who demonstrated how dust properties in M31 vary with the changing intensity of the radiation environment. This was done by separately modeling the PAH heating due to the bulge and disk of M31. In our radiation model, NGC 4138 is idealized as four components: an AGN, a bulge, a stellar disk, and a star-forming ring embedded in the disk. Separating these is crucial for testing how each individually may influence PAH excitation. We fit luminosity distributions (via surface brightness profiles) for the bulge, stellar disk, and ring. The fitted parameters of these profiles describe the spatial distributions of the luminosity source functions for each component in the radiation model. Note that the regions we sample photometry from are different between photometric filters, and are also not the same as the regions we extract spectra from. This is done to take advantage of the varying spatial resolutions between filters.

We sample projected annular regions on a Spitzer/IRAC 3.6 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m image to obtain a surface brightness radial profile for the bulge and stellar disk, since emission in this filter is dominated by light from old stellar populations (Meidt et al., 2012). The inner diameter of the inner-most annulus was chosen to be larger than the PSF FWHM of IRAC 3.6 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m (1.arcsecond\farcsstart_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID6), to avoid contamination from the AGN. Subsequent annular regions are each 1.arcsecond\farcsstart_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID6 (similar-to\sim100 pc) thick. In addition, we do not include measurements of radius between 10–27 ″(similar-to\sim670–1800 pc) in the fit, because the star-forming ring contributes noticeably to the 3.6 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m surface brightness between these radii. We then fit the surface brightness profile as a linear combination of a Sérsic profile (Sérsic, 1963) which describes the bulge,

Ibulge(r)=I0,bulgeexp{bn[(rRbulge)1/n1]}subscript𝐼bulge𝑟subscript𝐼0bulgesubscript𝑏𝑛delimited-[]superscript𝑟subscript𝑅bulge1𝑛1I_{\mathrm{bulge}}(r)=I_{\mathrm{0,bulge}}\exp\left\{-b_{n}\left[\left(\frac{r% }{R_{\mathrm{bulge}}}\right)^{1/n}-1\right]\right\}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r ) = italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp { - italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( divide start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ] } (4)

where Rbulgesubscript𝑅bulgeR_{\mathrm{bulge}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the half-light radius of the bulge, I0,bulgesubscript𝐼0bulgeI_{\mathrm{0,bulge}}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the surface brightness at Rbulgesubscript𝑅bulgeR_{\mathrm{bulge}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and n𝑛nitalic_n is the Sérsic index. Similar to Fisher & Drory (2010), we use the approximation bn2.17n0.355subscript𝑏𝑛2.17𝑛0.355b_{n}\approx 2.17n-0.355italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 2.17 italic_n - 0.355, which applies for n>0.33𝑛0.33n>0.33italic_n > 0.33. The exponential profile describes the stellar disk of the galaxy (Freeman, 1970),

Idisk(r)=I0,diskexp{rRdisk}subscript𝐼disk𝑟subscript𝐼0disk𝑟subscript𝑅diskI_{\mathrm{disk}}(r)=I_{\mathrm{0,disk}}\exp\left\{-\frac{r}{R_{\mathrm{disk}}% }\right\}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r ) = italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp { - divide start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG } (5)

where Rdisksubscript𝑅diskR_{\mathrm{disk}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the scale length of the stellar disk, and I0,disksubscript𝐼0diskI_{\mathrm{0,disk}}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the central surface brightness of the disk. The surface brightness profile, the fitted Sérsic, and the fitted exponential profile are shown in Figure 6. The fitted Rbulgesubscript𝑅bulgeR_{\mathrm{bulge}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, n𝑛nitalic_n, and Rdisksubscript𝑅diskR_{\mathrm{disk}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are listed in Table 1.

We follow a similar procedure to describe the surface brightness profile of the star-forming ring of the galaxy. We sample projected annular regions of a Spitzer/IRAC 8 μm𝜇𝑚\mu mitalic_μ italic_m image, which traces primarily PAH emission. In this case, projected annular regions are 1.arcsecond\farcsstart_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID98 (similar-to\sim130 pc) thick, since this is the PSF FWHM of IRAC  8µm. We fit this profile as the linear combination of an exponential profile (in the form of Eq. 5) for the stellar disk of the galaxy and a Gaussian profile, which we find suitably describes the star-forming ring:

Iring(r)=I0,ringexp{(rRring)22σring2}subscript𝐼ring𝑟subscript𝐼0ringsuperscript𝑟subscript𝑅ring22superscriptsubscript𝜎ring2I_{\mathrm{ring}}(r)=I_{\mathrm{0,ring}}\exp\left\{-\frac{(r-R_{\mathrm{ring}}% )^{2}}{2\sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}^{2}}\right\}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r ) = italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp { - divide start_ARG ( italic_r - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG } (6)

where Rringsubscript𝑅ringR_{\mathrm{ring}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the radius at which the surface brightness of the ring is greatest, σringsubscript𝜎ring\sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a measure of the ring thickness, and I0,ringsubscript𝐼0ringI_{\mathrm{0,ring}}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the surface brightness of the ring at Rringsubscript𝑅ringR_{\mathrm{ring}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. See Figure 6 for the observed and fitted surface brightness profile of the ring, and Table 1 for fitted parameters.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Surface brightnesses observed at annuli of varying radius projected onto the plane of NGC 4138. Light from old stars is traced by IRAC 3.6 µm photometry as red dots, and PAH light is traced by the IRAC 8 µm photometry as blue dots. The solid red curve is the fit to the 3.6 µm photometry, as the sum of an exponential (red dotted line) and a Sérsic profile (red dashed line). The solid blue curve is fitted to the 8 µm photometry, as the sum of an exponential (dotted blue line) and a Gaussian profile (dashed blue line), which we use to describe the radial shape of ring luminosity. Open red circles within ring-dominated radii are observed 3.6 µm photometry that were not used in the fit (see § 5). Typical uncertainties are 7.6×104similar-toabsent7.6superscript104\sim 7.6\times 10^{-4}∼ 7.6 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 3.8×103MJysr1similar-toabsent3.8superscript103MJysuperscriptsr1\sim 3.8\times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{MJy\,sr^{-1}}∼ 3.8 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_MJy roman_sr start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for the 3.6 µm and 8 µm photometry, respectively.

5.2 Scaling the Luminosity Source Functions

In this work, we assume that energies between 0–13.6 eV can excite PAHs, since the D21 models are calculated for PAHs within regions where hydrogen gas is not photoionized. For each component, we choose a template spectrum to be scaled and integrated over for obtaining the luminosity in this energy range. Though the expression defining the source function for each galaxy component is different, each requires a scale factor. What follows is our method for determining these scale factors.

AGN: The D21 models do not include an AGN spectrum as one of the PAH-heating ISRFs. Thus, the AGN is assumed to have the spectrum of the Seyfert 2 composite template from Brown et al. (2019) for the purposes of luminosity scaling. We extend this spectrum with a modified black-body between 1000 and 8000 µm (T=100K𝑇100𝐾T=100\,Kitalic_T = 100 italic_K) so that it has the same range of wavelengths as the assumed spectra of the other galaxy components. The template spectrum is scaled such that the integrated 210keV210keV\mathrm{2-10\,keV}2 - 10 roman_keV X-ray luminosity of the template spectrum is equal to the observed intrinsic absorption-corrected value for the nucleus of NGC 4138, LX=1041.24ergs1subscript𝐿Xsuperscript1041.24ergsuperscripts1L_{\mathrm{X}}=10^{41.24}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 41.24 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_erg roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (2–10 keV, Asmus et al., 2015). Upon integrating the scaled spectrum from 0–13.6eVeV\,\mathrm{eV}roman_eV, we obtain the scale factor LAGNsubscript𝐿AGNL_{\mathrm{AGN}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_AGN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For the purposes of model PAH spectra, we choose the 3 Myr stellar spectrum from Bruzual & Charlot (2003) to represent PAHs irradiated by an AGN, since it is the highest hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ spectrum included in the D21 models.

Bulge: The function in our radiation model that describes the distribution of luminosity due to the bulge is the deprojection of the Sérsic profile proposed by Prugniel & Simien (1997) (see § 5.3 and Eq. 10). Since we are interested in a distribution of luminosity rather than mass, we assume a mass-to-light ratio of unity and this function is scaled by

ρbulge=Σ0,bulgeebnbnn(1pn)Γ(2n)2RbulgeΓ(n(3pn)) ,subscript𝜌bulgesubscriptΣ0bulgesuperscriptesubscript𝑏𝑛subscriptsuperscript𝑏𝑛1subscript𝑝𝑛𝑛Γ2𝑛2subscript𝑅bulgeΓ𝑛3subscript𝑝𝑛 ,\rho_{\mathrm{bulge}}=\Sigma_{\mathrm{0,bulge}}\mathrm{e}^{b_{n}}b^{n(1-p_{n})% }_{n}\frac{\Gamma(2n)}{2R_{\mathrm{bulge}}\Gamma(n(3-p_{n}))}\text{ ,}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ( 1 - italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG roman_Γ ( 2 italic_n ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Γ ( italic_n ( 3 - italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) end_ARG , (7)

where Σ0,bulgesubscriptΣ0bulge\Sigma_{\mathrm{0,bulge}}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the luminosity surface density at Rbulgesubscript𝑅bulgeR_{\mathrm{bulge}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, n𝑛nitalic_n and bnsubscript𝑏𝑛b_{n}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the same as in Table 1, and we use the calibration from Lima Neto et al. (1999) that

pn10.6097/n+0.05463/n2 .subscript𝑝𝑛10.6097𝑛0.05463superscript𝑛2 .p_{n}\approx 1-0.6097/n+0.05463/n^{2}\text{ .}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 1 - 0.6097 / italic_n + 0.05463 / italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (8)

We choose the M31 bulge spectrum from Groves et al. (2012) to represent the bulge spectrum of NGC 4138 in our radiation model, since it is included among the D21 ISRFs. This is scaled such that I0,bulgesubscript𝐼0bulgeI_{\mathrm{0,bulge}}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is recovered when the spectrum is passed through the IRAC 3.6 μm𝜇m\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m filter. This scaled spectrum is then integrated from 0–13.6eVeV\,\mathrm{eV}roman_eV to get Σ0,bulgesubscriptΣ0bulge\Sigma_{\mathrm{0,bulge}}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Stellar Disk: The stellar disk of old stars is also assumed to have the M31 bulge spectrum from Groves et al. (2012), as the color of the disk at radii past the ring is similar to that of the bulge (Richards et al., 2016). This spectrum is scaled to recover Ldisk,3.6μmsubscript𝐿disk3.6𝜇mL_{\mathrm{disk,3.6\mu m}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk , 3.6 italic_μ roman_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT when passed through the IRAC 3.6 μm𝜇𝑚\mu mitalic_μ italic_m filter, where Ldisk,3.6μmsubscript𝐿disk3.6𝜇mL_{\mathrm{disk,3.6\mu m}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk , 3.6 italic_μ roman_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the luminosity contained within the aperture corresponding to I0,disksubscript𝐼0diskI_{\mathrm{0,disk}}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 , roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We find Ldisk,3.6μm=8.23×107Lsubscript𝐿disk3.6𝜇m8.23superscript107subscriptLdirect-productL_{\mathrm{disk,3.6\mu m}}=8.23\times 10^{7}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk , 3.6 italic_μ roman_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.23 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The scaled spectrum is integrated from 0–13.6eVeV\,\mathrm{eV}roman_eV and divided by the area of the same aperture to obtain the scale factor ΣdisksubscriptΣdisk\Sigma_{\mathrm{disk}}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Star-Forming Ring: Following the method described in Gregg et al. (2022), we obtain a star formation rate (SFR) (Liu et al., 2011) from a combination of GALEX far-ultraviolet (FUV) and Spitzer/MIPS 24 μm𝜇m\,\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m images. We find SFR=0.19Myr1SFR0.19subscriptMdirect-productsuperscriptyr1\mathrm{SFR=0.19\,M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}}roman_SFR = 0.19 roman_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_yr start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. All photometry (GALEX FUV and MIPS) uses a projected annular aperture with an inner radius of 0.56 kpc and an outer radius of 2.1 kpc. This inner radius is just large enough to exclude the AGN contribution to the Spitzer/MIPS 24 μm𝜇m\,\mathrm{\mu m}italic_μ roman_m image (PSF FWHM = 5.arcsecond\farcsstart_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID9) and the outer radius is 3 σringsubscript𝜎ring\mathrm{\sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from Rringsubscript𝑅ringR_{\mathrm{ring}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We then use the GALEX FUV-SFR relation from Salim et al. (2007) to obtain an attenuation-corrected luminosity of the ring in the GALEX FUV bandpass, Lring,FUV=8.81×108Lsubscript𝐿ringFUV8.81superscript108subscriptLdirect-productL_{\mathrm{ring,FUV}}=8.81\times 10^{8}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring , roman_FUV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8.81 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The star formation contained within the ring is assumed to produce the spectrum of the 10 Myr stellar population from Bruzual & Charlot (2003), which is also included as a D21 ISRF. This spectrum is scaled such that Lring,FUVsubscript𝐿ringFUVL_{\mathrm{ring,FUV}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring , roman_FUV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is recovered when the spectrum is passed through the GALEX FUV bandpass. Thus, the scale factor ΣringsubscriptΣring\Sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is obtained by integrating the scaled spectrum from 0–13.6eVeV\,\mathrm{eV}roman_eV and dividing by the area of the aperture used to get the GALEX SFR.

5.3 Component-wise Energy Density Curves

Table 2: Summary of Radiation Model Source Functions
Component Source Function Shape Scale Factor Total 0–13.6 eV Luminosity ISRF Spectrum
AGN Point-like (Eq. 9) LAGN,013.6eV=9.718×108Lsubscript𝐿AGN013.6eV9.718superscript108subscriptLdirect-productL_{\mathrm{AGN,0-13.6\,eV}}=9.718\times 10^{8}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_AGN , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 9.718 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 9.718×108L9.718superscript108subscriptLdirect-product9.718\times 10^{8}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}9.718 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 Myr
Bulge 3-D Sérsic (Eq. 10) ρbulge,013.6eV=164.0Lpc3subscript𝜌bulge013.6eV164.0subscriptLdirect-productsuperscriptpc3\rho_{\mathrm{bulge,0-13.6\,eV}}=164.0\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}\,pc^{-3}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 164.0 roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 8.356×109L8.356superscript109subscriptLdirect-product8.356\times 10^{9}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}8.356 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT M31 Bulge
Stellar Disk 2-D Exponential (Eq. 11) Σdisk,013.6eV=1329Lpc2subscriptΣdisk013.6eV1329subscriptLdirect-productsuperscriptpc2\Sigma_{\mathrm{disk,0-13.6\,eV}}=1329\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}\,pc^{-2}}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1329 roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6.936×109L6.936superscript109subscriptLdirect-product6.936\times 10^{9}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}6.936 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT M31 Bulge
Ring 2-D Gaussian (Eq. 12) Σring,013.6eV=652.4Lpc2subscriptΣring013.6eV652.4subscriptLdirect-productsuperscriptpc2\Sigma_{\mathrm{ring,0-13.6\,eV}}=652.4\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}\,pc^{-2}}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 652.4 roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_pc start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3.707×109L3.707superscript109subscriptLdirect-product3.707\times 10^{9}\,\mathrm{L_{\odot}}3.707 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 10 Myr
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The radiation model summed along the z𝑧zitalic_z and y𝑦yitalic_y directions are shown in the left and right panels, respectively. Colors indicate the combined luminosity integrated from 0–13.6 eV from each galaxy component in a given voxel. Here, we show a lower resolution 51×51×5151515151\times 51\times 5151 × 51 × 51 voxel version of the model to accentuate plane of the disk and ring in the edge on view. This lower resolution is for visualization purposes only.

The purpose of the radiation model is to predict the energy density contributed to a region by the ISRF of each galaxy component, in order to know what kind of radiation PAHs are being exposed to. To facilitate this, we construct a 3-dimensional array of volumetric pixels (voxels) which contains the radiation model. The array has dimensions 501×501×501501501501501\times 501\times 501501 × 501 × 501 (x,y,z𝑥𝑦𝑧x,y,zitalic_x , italic_y , italic_z, origin at center), mapping to 6 kpc on a side. Thus, a single voxel has an edge length of similar-to\sim12 pc. For each of the four galaxy components, voxels are filled with a luminosity density according to their respective source functions. The AGN occupies the single voxel at the center of the cube,

AGN,013.6eV(x,y,z)=LAGN, at x,y,z=0 .formulae-sequencesubscriptAGN013.6eV𝑥𝑦𝑧subscript𝐿AGN at 𝑥𝑦𝑧0 .\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{AGN,0-13.6\,eV}}(x,y,z)=L_{\mathrm{AGN}},\text{ at }x,y,z% =0\text{ .}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_AGN , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) = italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_AGN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , at italic_x , italic_y , italic_z = 0 . (9)

Jore et al. (1996) obtained rotation curves for NGC 4138 by assuming a zero-thickness mass distribution for the stellar disk and a spherical mass distribution for the bulge. We make the same assumption, although we are distributing luminosity sources rather than mass in our model. Thus, the bulge is the single galaxy component that we model as 3-dimensional, and we fill voxels with bulge luminosity according to the approximate deprojected 3D Sérsic profile from Prugniel & Simien (1997)

bulge,013.6eV(x,y,z)=subscriptbulge013.6eV𝑥𝑦𝑧absent\displaystyle\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{bulge,0-13.6\,eV}}(x,y,z)=caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) = (10)
ρbulge(x2+y2+z2Rbulge)pnsubscript𝜌bulgesuperscriptsuperscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2superscript𝑧2subscript𝑅bulgesubscript𝑝𝑛\displaystyle\rho_{\mathrm{bulge}}\left(\frac{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}{R_{% \mathrm{bulge}}}\right)^{-p_{n}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
exp{bn[(x2+y2+z2Rbulge)1/n1]} ,subscript𝑏𝑛delimited-[]superscriptsuperscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2superscript𝑧2subscript𝑅bulge1𝑛1 ,\displaystyle\exp\left\{-b_{n}\left[\left(\frac{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}{R_{% \mathrm{bulge}}}\right)^{1/n}-1\right]\right\}\text{ ,}roman_exp { - italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ ( divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_bulge end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ] } ,

and voxels are filled with disk luminosity (in the x𝑥xitalic_x-y𝑦yitalic_y plane) via

disk,013.6eV(x,y,z)=Σdiskexp{x2+y2Rdisk}, at z=0 .subscriptdisk013.6eV𝑥𝑦𝑧subscriptΣdisksuperscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2subscript𝑅disk, at z=0 .\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{disk,0-13.6\,eV}}(x,y,z)=\Sigma_{\mathrm{disk}}\exp\left% \{-\frac{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}}{R_{\mathrm{disk}}}\right\}\text{, at $z=0$ .}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) = roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp { - divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_disk end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG } , at italic_z = 0 . (11)

The ring is also confined to the x𝑥xitalic_x-y𝑦yitalic_y plane, and it fills voxels as the Gaussian

ring,013.6eV(x,y,z)=subscriptring013.6eV𝑥𝑦𝑧absent\displaystyle\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{ring,0-13.6\,eV}}(x,y,z)=caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) = (12)
Σringexp{(x2+y2Rring)22σring2}, at z=0 .subscriptΣringsuperscriptsuperscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2subscript𝑅ring22superscriptsubscript𝜎ring2, at z=0 .\displaystyle\Sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}\exp\left\{-\frac{(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}-R_{% \mathrm{ring}})^{2}}{2\sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}^{2}}\right\}\text{, at $z=0$ .}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp { - divide start_ARG ( square-root start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG } , at italic_z = 0 .

Note that we do not include the exponential component in the ring source function to avoid double-counting the stellar disk. Additionally, Eq. 10 yields infinity at the center voxel, so we smooth this to the average of the bulge-values of adjacent voxels.

The energy density contributed by a galaxy component within a given voxel, ucomp,013.6eV(x,y,z)subscript𝑢comp013.6eV𝑥𝑦𝑧u_{\mathrm{comp,0-13.6\,eV}}(x,y,z)italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) (“comp” = component), can be expressed as

ucomp,013.6eV(x,y,z)=subscript𝑢comp013.6eV𝑥𝑦𝑧absent\displaystyle u_{\mathrm{comp,0-13.6\,eV}}(x,y,z)=italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_z ) = (13)
14πcVcomp,013.6eV(x,y,z)dxdydz(xx)2+(yy)2+(zz)2 .14𝜋𝑐subscriptdouble-integral𝑉subscriptcomp013.6eVsuperscript𝑥superscript𝑦superscript𝑧𝑑superscript𝑥𝑑superscript𝑦𝑑superscript𝑧superscriptsuperscript𝑥𝑥2superscriptsuperscript𝑦𝑦2superscriptsuperscript𝑧𝑧2 .\displaystyle\frac{1}{4\pi c}\iint_{V}\frac{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{comp,0-13.6\,% eV}}(x^{\prime},y^{\prime},z^{\prime})dx^{\prime}dy^{\prime}dz^{\prime}}{(x^{% \prime}-x)^{2}+(y^{\prime}-y)^{2}+(z^{\prime}-z)^{2}}\text{ .}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π italic_c end_ARG ∬ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_x ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_z ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG .

We make the assumption that PAHs are primarily heated by the diffuse radiation in the ISM (Aniano et al., 2012, 2020), so for each test location we exclude contributions from voxels within 15 pc, just slightly larger than our chosen voxel edge-length. This also avoids infinities when computing ucompsubscript𝑢compu_{\mathrm{comp}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In § 7, we discuss the effect that PAHs heated by nearby photodissociation regions might have on our radiation model. See Figure 7 for a visualization of the radiation model. Here, it is shown at a lower resolution so that the thin plane of the ring+stellar disk can be seen.

The attenuating effects of dust influence the way that radiation is able to propagate throughout the ISM. In NGC 4138, the dust is concentrated in the star-forming ring (see Figure 1), and we expect this to have two main consequences on the exchange of radiation between galaxy components. First, the radiation emitted by the AGN would be truncated at the inner radius of the ring upon encountering the higher concentration of dust. Second, much of the radiation that originates from the star-formation within the ring would not escape it before being reddended or absorbed. A full incorporation of this radiative transfer is outside of the scope of this work, but we do consider a high-extinction bounding case where AGN radiation is truncated at the inner radius of the ring, and radiation originating from the ring is truncated at the edges of the ring. We define the edges of the ring as the same ring region as was used to obtain Lring,FUVsubscript𝐿ringFUVL_{\mathrm{ring,FUV}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring , roman_FUV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see § 5.2).

For both cases, we compute ucompsubscript𝑢compu_{\mathrm{comp}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each galaxy component at different radii. Each resulting ucompsubscript𝑢compu_{\mathrm{comp}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the utotalsubscript𝑢totalu_{\mathrm{total}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_total end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is shown in the left panel of Figure 8. When synthesizing D21 PAH spectra, these curves determine the intensity of the radiation to which PAHs are exposed. The right panel of Figure 8 shows the fractional contribution of each galaxy component to the local energy density at each radius, which informs the relative contributions for the model PAH spectra exposed to different ISRFs. Since the bulge and stellar disk are assigned the same ISRF spectrum, we consider them as a single component for the remainder of our discussion.

Finally, the D21 model spectra for different radiation intensities are computed in terms of U𝑈Uitalic_U, so we must convert from ucompsubscript𝑢compu_{\mathrm{comp}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in order to synthesize model PAH spectra. The conversion can be found for each ISRF in D21, see their Eq. 5 and their Table 1. Our model determines a maximum value at the nucleus of U102.75𝑈superscript102.75U\approx 10^{2.75}italic_U ≈ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2.75 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. See Figure 9.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Left panel: colored lines describe the energy density u𝑢uitalic_u integrated between 0 – 13.6 eV as a function of radius for the AGN, bulge+stellar disk, and ring of NGC 4138 according to our radiation model. The black line is the total u𝑢uitalic_u profile. Solid lines represent the attenuation-free version, and dashed lines represent the attenuated version. Right panel: the fractional contributions of each galaxy component to the total ISRF at a given radius.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Same as the left panel of Figure 8, but for the PAH heating parameter U𝑈Uitalic_U. Dotted segments indicate values of U𝑈Uitalic_U that are not available in the D21 models. The dashed black line is the combined curve for resulting from the attenuated version. We do not show the component wise curves for the attenuated radiation model for clarity.

6 Results

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Band ratio profiles predicted by the radiation model when grain size and ionization distributions are held constant, and only the ISRF and U𝑈Uitalic_U values are changed. Colorful lines represent the profiles predicted from each attenuation-free galaxy component in isolation. The black curves are the weighted-average radial profiles the model predicts using the fractional contributions at each radius from Figure 8 as weights, where the solid curve is for the attenuation-free model and the dashed curve is attenuated. The fitted Rringsubscript𝑅ringR_{\mathrm{ring}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (1.2kpc1.2kpc1.2\,\mathrm{kpc}1.2 roman_kpc) appears as a vertical light blue dotted line, with the blue shaded area representing ± 1σringplus-or-minus1subscript𝜎ring\pm\ 1\,\sigma_{\mathrm{ring}}± 1 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

The D21 PAH models allow us to test the influence of four major parameters on PAH emission. Two of these are extrinsic to PAHs; the average photon energy of light that shines on them (hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩), and the intensity of that light (U𝑈Uitalic_U). Two of these parameters are intrinsic to PAHs; the size of PAH grains, and whether they are ionized or neutral. Together, these extrinsic and intrinsic parameters lend themselves to two testable scenarios. Do AGN-hosts show suppressed short-to-long PAH band ratios because the AGN has an influence on the ISRF of a galaxy? Or, are these band ratios better explained by the photodestruction of smaller PAHs by the AGN and changes to ionization? We attempt to reproduce the observed PAH band ratios at different radii in NGC 4138 through two different modeling approaches. First, we predict these ratios for a fixed PAH GSD and ionization fraction, varying only the ISRF (hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩, U𝑈Uitalic_U) according to our radiation model. Separately, we hold the ISRF constant and examine PAH band ratios for different GSDs and ionization fractions.

6.1 Modeling PAH Band Ratios in Varying Radiation Environments

The radiation model developed for NGC 4138 predicts, at each radius, the integrated 0–13.6 eV energy density contributed by the spectrum of each galaxy component, shown in Figure 8. Since the model gives a maximum U102.75𝑈superscript102.75U\approx 10^{2.75}italic_U ≈ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2.75 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we assume PAHs everywhere within NGC 4138 are under the single-photon heating regime (see D21), and therefore we treat each ucomp,013.6eVsubscript𝑢comp013.6eVu_{\mathrm{comp,0-13.6\,eV}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as separable; see § 7 for a discussion of multi-photon heating in NGC 4138. Thus, the radiation model allows us to test the relative impact of different galaxy components at each radius, for an assumed fixed PAH population. By combining each ucomp,013.6eVsubscript𝑢comp013.6eVu_{\mathrm{comp,0-13.6\,eV}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_comp , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT into utotal,013.6eVsubscript𝑢total013.6eVu_{\mathrm{total,0-13.6\,eV}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_total , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, this model predicts the observed band ratios at each radius. Both the component-wise and combined radial profiles for four modeled short-to-long PAH band ratios are shown in Figure 10. In this ISRF-only scenario, we fix the GSD (a01=4Åsubscript𝑎014Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=4\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 roman_Å) and ionization fraction (μ=10Å𝜇10Å\mu=10\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_μ = 10 roman_Å) at all radii.

For each band ratio profile in the attenuation-free case, the ring spectrum and the AGN spectrum (which we assume is similar in hardness to a 3 Myr stellar population, see § 5) produce band ratios similar to the S07 SINGS median. The bulge+stellar disk spectrum produces significantly lower short-to-long ratios than those produced by the AGN and ring spectra. This is as expected, as the greater hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ of the AGN and ring spectra will heat PAHs to higher temperatures with an individual photon than with the lower hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ of the bulge+stellar disk, and a hotter PAH will tend to emit a greater fraction of energy at shorter wavelengths than at longer wavelengths. Consequently, the bulge+stellar disk is the driver for any short-to-long band ratio suppression when PAH size and ionization distributions are fixed.

The low hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ of the bulge+stellar disk does produce relatively low short-to-long band ratios at small radii. For most band ratios, these low ratios are not low enough to account for the suppression observed in AGN-hosts. In particular, the modeled L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) profile reaches a minimum value around 3.2 at 0.4kpcsimilar-toabsent0.4kpc\mathrm{\sim 0.4\,kpc}∼ 0.4 roman_kpc, while many AGN-hosts exhibit a L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)<2.5L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m2.5\mathrm{L(7.7\mu m)/L(11.3\mu m)}<2.5roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) < 2.5 within the central few kpc, and sometimes <1absent1<1< 1 at the center (Smith et al., 2007a; O’Dowd et al., 2009; Diamond-Stanic & Rieke, 2010; García-Bernete et al., 2022a).

The shapes of our predicted combined band ratio profiles react strongly to the presence of each galaxy component, according to the changing fractional contribution to the total u𝑢uitalic_u. Within r<250pc𝑟250pcr<\mathrm{250\,pc}italic_r < 250 roman_pc, the AGN makes a significant contribution, therefore the band ratios of the predicted combined curves are partway between the AGN and bulge+stellar disk component-wise curves. Thus, our radiation model suggests that the AGN may partially power PAH emission in the nucleus. At the next radius outward, the bulge+stellar disk dominates the fractional contribution to utotal,013.6eVsubscript𝑢total013.6eVu_{\mathrm{total,0-13.6\,eV}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_total , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and band ratios are significantly suppressed here. As the radius increases, the combined band ratio profiles react to the presence of the ring, increasing in value as the fractional contribution of the ring to utotal,013.6eVsubscript𝑢total013.6eVu_{\mathrm{total,0-13.6\,eV}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_total , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases. At r>2kpc𝑟2kpcr>\mathrm{2\,kpc}italic_r > 2 roman_kpc, the bulge+stellar disk once again dominates, and band ratios fall again for most profiles.

The profiles that result from the high-extinction radiation model differ somewhat in shape from their attenuation-free counterparts in addition to slightly smaller short-to-long band ratios overall. The radiation originating from the ring does not contribute to the ISRF at small radii (r<0.57kpc𝑟0.57kpcr<0.57\,\mathrm{kpc}italic_r < 0.57 roman_kpc) for these profiles which results in moderately lower ratios here. Within the ring, band ratios are slightly lower than the unattenuated ratios as the high hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ radiation produced by the AGN does not help boost them. At radii greater than the extent of the ring (r<2.1kpc𝑟2.1kpcr<2.1\,\mathrm{kpc}italic_r < 2.1 roman_kpc), band ratios fall substantially as the bulge+stellar disk is the only galaxy component that contributes to the ISRF here.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: The observed PAH band ratio profiles for the smaller and larger apertures are shown as black squares and red diamonds, respectively. The horizontal bars on the data indicate the span of radii in each aperture. Model-predicted ratio profiles (as in Figure 10) are shown as black lines, the attenuation-free model is solid and high-extinction is dashed. The dotted blue line and blue shaded region represent the fitted location of the ring as in Figure 10. Median band ratios for the SINGS galaxies in S07 are shown as horizontal orange dotted lines.

6.2 Observed Band Ratio Profiles

In Figure 11, we present the observed short-to-long PAH band ratio profiles in NGC 4138 alongside the profiles predicted by both versions of the radiation-only model. In shape, the modeled profiles are similar to the observed profiles; they generally have the lowest values where the bulge+stellar disk dominates at 0.4kpcsimilar-toabsent0.4kpc\mathrm{\sim 0.4\,kpc}∼ 0.4 roman_kpc and smoothly climb to higher values as they approach Rringsubscript𝑅ringR_{\mathrm{ring}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where the ratios are most similar to the SINGS median in S07. As we model the radiation from the ring as being due to a younger stars, this is consistent with O’Dowd et al. (2009), who found that short-to-long ratios increase near younger stellar populations. In addition, most of the observed band ratio profiles also exhibit an upturn in the central region compared to the adjacent region at 0.4kpcsimilar-toabsent0.4kpc\sim 0.4\mathrm{\,kpc}∼ 0.4 roman_kpc. Such nuclear upturns are predicted by the combined modeled profiles. The upturn in the L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) is still apparent in the ratios from the larger apertures. For the L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) and L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) profiles, these upturns may be evident as a change in the inflection as the profile approaches the nucleus. Combined, these provide evidence that these rises in short-to-long band ratios are not an artifact of small apertures.

The modeled L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ), a ratio which is often used as a size indicator for smaller PAHs, exhibits bulge-induced ratio suppression as low as the minimum of the observed profile. For the other band ratios, the observed and modeled profiles differ in two important ways. First, the amplitude of the observed profiles is much greater than the model predicts; while they peak at ratios similar to the SINGS median, they are suppressed far lower than their modeled counterparts. For example, the lowest observed L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) is <1.5absent1.5\mathrm{<1.5}< 1.5, which would be among the lowest of the AGN-hosts in the S07 sample. Compare this to a minimum of 3.2similar-toabsent3.2\mathrm{\sim 3.2}∼ 3.2 for the predicted profiles for the same band ratio. Second, the agreement in the shapes of the modeled and observed profiles is mixed at radii larger than where the ring has its greatest influence. The shape of the attenuation-free modeled L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) profile matches the observed quite well at all radii. On the other hand, the L(7.7μm)/L(17μm)L7.7𝜇mL17𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(17\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 17 italic_μ roman_m ) and L(11.3μm)/L(17μm)L11.3𝜇mL17𝜇m\mathrm{L(11.3\,\mu m)/L(17\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 17 italic_μ roman_m ) attenuation-free modeled profiles fail to return to the low ratios seen at small radii, but the high-extinction version improves these shapes significantly. Finally, the modeled L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) profiles both decrease past this radius instead of the observed increase.

Our bulge-disk-ring decomposition of NGC 4138 yields Rring=1.2kpcsubscript𝑅ring1.2kpcR_{\mathrm{ring}}=1.2\mathrm{\,kpc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.2 roman_kpc, the radius at which the ring is the brightest. In addition, we have shown that the observed PAH band ratios in NGC 4138 appear to react to the presence of the ring; in particular, the ring appears to produce higher short-to-long band ratios. Thus, one might expect that the peak of each observed band ratio profile exists at Rring=1.2kpcsubscript𝑅ring1.2kpcR_{\mathrm{ring}}=1.2\mathrm{\,kpc}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.2 roman_kpc. However, the peak (local peak in the case of L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m )) in each observed profile is shifted outward from the centroid of the ring, closer to 1.5kpc1.5kpc\mathrm{1.5\,kpc}1.5 roman_kpc. Intriguingly, the radius at which the ring spectrum makes the greatest fractional contribution to utotal,013.6eVsubscript𝑢total013.6eVu_{\mathrm{total,0-13.6\,eV}}italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_total , 0 - 13.6 roman_eV end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is also shifted outward according to our radiation model (right panel of Figure 8), hence the modeled profiles also peak at radii >Rringabsentsubscript𝑅ring>R_{\mathrm{ring}}> italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This outward shift is an effect of the bulge mixing with the ring on its inner side.

The modeled ratios involving the 17µm17µm\mathrm{17\micron}17 roman_µm band do not agree with the observed ratios at any radius: the 17µm17µm\mathrm{17\micron}17 roman_µm band in NGC 4138 is enhanced relative to the models, and relative to the SINGS sample. Figure 11 shows that at all radii, the observed band ratios with the 17µm17µm\mathrm{17\micron}17 roman_µm band in the denominator are well below the SINGS medians. Coupled together, these indicate that the spectra from NGC 4138 have abnormally strong 17µm17µm\mathrm{17\micron}17 roman_µm features. This is in agreement with the findings from S07 and Kaneda et al. (2008) that AGN-hosts tend to have stronger 17µm17µm\mathrm{17\micron}17 roman_µm features.

6.3 Grain Size-Ionization Model Grids

Refer to caption
Figure 12: PAH band ratio model grids and the observed radial profiles. Since each galaxy region has a unique ISRF mix, each region produces a unique model grid. Here, we show the median grid from the attenuation-free radiation model in each panel as black dashed lines. For reference, we also show the g=27𝑔27g=27italic_g = 27 line for the region which is most bulge-dominated (red dashed line) and the region which is most ring-dominated (blue dashed line). Colored dots are band ratios observed at each radius in the smaller apertures (step size of 270 pc), with the gray arrows indicating the direction of increasing radius. The colors of the dots indicate the fractional bulge+stellar disk contribution to the ISRF (attenuation free). Values of μ𝜇\muitalic_μ are in ÅÅ\mathrm{\AA}roman_Å. To the right of the grid in the left panel, we include the g=27𝑔27g=27italic_g = 27 line for GSDs with smaller values of a01subscript𝑎01a_{\mathrm{01}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Å), since the observed track falls off of this side.

In the previous subsection, we fixed the PAH GSD and ionization fraction, and considered only the variations in PAH band ratios that come with a changing ISRF. We find that the ISRF-only model approximately reproduces the shapes of the observed band ratio profiles, but that varying ISRF alone is unable to produce the amplitude of the observed profiles, most of which are suppressed well below the range the ISRF-only model predicts. On the contrary, changes to PAH size and ionization are capable of producing an extremely wide range of possible band ratios. Thus, the suppressed band ratios in AGN-hosts are typically interpreted as being due to alterations of grain properties by an AGN, with the preferential destruction of smaller PAH grains commonly suggested. Here, we explore whether this, for a fixed ISRF, is a sufficient explanation for the shapes of the observed band ratio profiles in NGC 4138.

We use the D21 model PAH spectra to produce model grids in a PAH band ratio-ratio space, since certain band ratios are more sensitive to PAH ionization (L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) and L(7.7μm)/L(17μm)L7.7𝜇mL17𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(17\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 17 italic_μ roman_m )), and some are more sensitive to PAH size (L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) and L(11.3μm)/L(17μm)L11.3𝜇mL17𝜇m\mathrm{L(11.3\,\mu m)/L(17\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 17 italic_μ roman_m )). Similar grids are used by D21, and García-Bernete et al. (2022a) made comparable grids using theoretical PAH spectra computed using Density Functional Theory (Rigopoulou et al., 2021). Our grids are computed for a fixed ISRF, which we choose to be the median ISRF across all radii according to the radiation model. Each vertex in a grid is a unique combination of PAH GSD cutoff (g𝑔gitalic_g) and average ionization fraction (which is determined by μ𝜇\muitalic_μ), for a GSD with a01=4Åsubscript𝑎014Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=4\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 roman_Å. This is intended to simulate the destruction of small grains by an AGN (see § 2). Finally, we show the observed band ratio profiles, referred to as “tracks”, plotted on top of the grids. See Figure 12.

If the AGN of NGC 4138 were to be responsible for the variations observed in the band ratio profiles via small grain destruction, then it would have to do so over the multiple kpc scales that we observe these variations over. Further, if changes in g𝑔gitalic_g accurately model the effect of an AGN on the GSD, then g𝑔gitalic_g should decrease consistently (i.e. smaller PAHs can survive) as the distance from an AGN increases. In the track in the left panel of Figure 12, which includes band ratios that are better probes of smaller PAHs, this behavior of g𝑔gitalic_g is seen throughout most of the galaxy. The important exception is at the innermost region containing the nucleus (r<270pc𝑟270pcr<270\,\mathrm{pc}italic_r < 270 roman_pc), where g𝑔gitalic_g is expected to be largest, but is nearly at a minimum in this simple interpretation. Since the track in the small grain tracing ratios falls off of the model grid, we include the g=27𝑔27g=27italic_g = 27 line for other values of a01subscript𝑎01a_{\mathrm{01}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, but we emphasize that these produce GSDs with much smaller average PAH sizes than D21 considers. This behavior of g𝑔gitalic_g is not shown by the track in the right panel, which primarily probes larger PAHs. The band ratios of these larger PAHs appear to be more influenced by the proximity to the ring for a region rather than proximity to the AGN.

The motion of the observed tracks in both panels of Figure 12 are similar in the μ𝜇\muitalic_μ direction of the model grids. Near the nucleus and in the most extended regions, PAHs are more neutral. PAHs are more ionized near the ring, in both cases falling near μ=10Å𝜇10Å\mu=10\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_μ = 10 roman_Å, which is the “standard” ionization distribution in D21. Hence, the ionization fraction of PAHs appears to be a function of proximity to the ring, and the AGN does not appear to influence PAH ionization. Recent JWST observations of the AGN-host NGC 7469 also show no clear link between the AGN and PAH ionization (Lai et al., 2022).

7 Discussion

NGC 4138 shows significant variations in the observed PAH band ratios at different radii, displaying the diversity of PAH grains and the radiation fields they experience. Overall, we find suppressed short-to-long PAH band ratios near the nucleus and in the bulge for all considered ratios, regardless of whether they are more sensitive to PAH size or ionization. Thus, the apparent temperature distribution of PAHs must be changing significantly across NGC 4138. The two scenarios we consider, changes to radiation or to PAH grain properties, each have merit for explaining the observed variations in PAH emission. However, neither of the two scenarios can comprehensively explain the observed variations themselves, and a complete picture may require considering the effects of both scenarios simultaneously.

The similarity in shape between the observed band ratio profiles and those we predicted with the radiation model suggests that the changing hardness of the radiation field exciting PAH grains (hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩) plays a significant role for the variations in each ratio. We also find that the changing hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ can explain the radius where the ratio profiles peak, which falls outside of the star-forming ring peak brightness due to the differential effects of bulge heating across the ring, and is a feature not readily explained by the grain destruction hypothesis. However, this is insufficient to produce the amplitude of band ratio variations using the D21 model spectra. The sensitivity of PAHs to changing hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ in the D21 models are determined by the assumed UV-optical absorption cross-sections of PAHs. Thus, a greater amplitude in our modeled profiles could be attained if PAHs were assumed to be more selective absorbers of harder radiation.

A greater range of band ratio variation can also be achieved by changing the distributions of intrinsic PAH properties, namely the size and ionization. We see from Figure 12 that changes to the ionization distribution may supplement radiation effects to achieve the observed amplitudes of the ionization-sensitive L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) and L(7.7μm)/L(17μm)L7.7𝜇mL17𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(17\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 17 italic_μ roman_m ) profiles; a larger hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ experienced in the ring may be associated with a greater degree of ionization in PAHs.

The destruction of small PAHs by the AGN in NGC 4138 may be the cause of the trend of decreasing g𝑔gitalic_g (the lower limit of the PAH GSD) with radius for the track in the left panel of Figure 12; this is a commonly suggested mechanism for suppressed short-to-long band ratios observed at the centers of AGN-hosts (see § 2). The clustering of ring-dominated points in the g𝑔gitalic_g direction, offset towards smaller g𝑔gitalic_g, could be attributed to the increased hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩ there. However, it is unclear why the effect of small grain destruction would appear to be strongest at the largest radii, farthest from the AGN. In addition, the grain size cutoff appears to be smaller near the nucleus, where it is expected to be largest.

Jensen et al. (2017) and Alonso-Herrero et al. (2014) observed 11.3 µm PAH emission within 10’s of pc from several LLAGN-hosts, and found that PAH surface brightness was stronger toward the LLAGN. This could be evidence that the abundant UV photons emitted from an AGN may be able to photo-excite PAHs in the vicinity. This could be the mechanism causing the apparently smaller g𝑔gitalic_g and the relatively larger short-to-long band ratios observed near the nucleus compared to the adjacent region at 0.4kpcsimilar-toabsent0.4kpc\sim 0.4\,\mathrm{kpc}∼ 0.4 roman_kpc. The right panel of Figure 8 shows that the AGN contributes significantly to the total share of the 0–13.6 eV energy density at the nucleus, causing the nuclear “upturns” in the modeled profiles. If the hard radiation starburst spectrum is a good approximation of the filtered AGN light that PAHs are exposed to, then the observed upturns may be consistent with AGN-powered PAH emission.

However, we are limited by the spatial resolution of Spitzer/IRS with PSFFWHM4PSFFWHM4\mathrm{PSF\ FWHM}\approx 4\,\arcsecroman_PSF roman_FWHM ≈ 4 ″, and our central region has a radius of 270 pc. Thus, the nucleus is unresolved and this region is heavily contaminated by PAH emission in the central 0.5kpc0.5kpc0.5\,\mathrm{kpc}0.5 roman_kpc, which makes any evidence for AGN-powered PAH emission ambiguous. Indeed, an unresolved star-forming region within this radius would induce similar effect. Additionally, the spectrum of the region near the nucleus is the most challenging for quantifying PAH strengths due to dilution from the AGN continuum, absorption features in starlight, and possible emission from silicate grains.

With an angular resolution far superior to Spitzer, JWST will provide further insights into this issue. Early JWST observations of PAH band ratios in the AGN-host NGC 7469 (D=70.6Mpc𝐷70.6MpcD=70.6\,\mathrm{Mpc}italic_D = 70.6 roman_Mpc) were shown by Lai et al. (2022) to exhibit a similar trend of decreasing L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) with decreasing radius (see also: Armus et al. (2023)). Intriguingly, they too detect a much larger L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) near the nucleus analogous to the upturn in our ratio profile. In the same galaxy, Lai et al. (2023) detected an enhancement in L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) near the nucleus, another short-to-long ratio. García-Bernete et al. (2022b) also reports a larger relative L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) in the nucleus using the same observations. However, the behavior of L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) is seemingly different between the two studies; Lai et al. (2022) shows a increasing trend toward the nucleus, whereas García-Bernete et al. (2022b) reports the smallest ratio there. More JWST observations of the nuclei of closer AGN-hosts are required, and would provide an even better opportunity to observe possible PAH excitation by the AGN, in addition to probing the impact of the AGN on the PAH GSD.

The larger PAHs (NC500greater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝑁C500N_{\mathrm{C}}\gtrsim 500italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 500) tell a different story in Figure 12. Instead of a generally decreasing g𝑔gitalic_g across all radii, the tracks of L(7.7μm)/L(11.3μm)L7.7𝜇mL11.3𝜇m\mathrm{L(7.7\,\mu m)/L(11.3\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) vs. L(11.3μm)/L(17μm)L11.3𝜇mL17𝜇m\mathrm{L(11.3\,\mu m)/L(17\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 11.3 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 17 italic_μ roman_m ) for larger PAHs indicate a decrease in g𝑔gitalic_g only up to Rringsimilar-toabsentsubscript𝑅ring\sim\,R_{\mathrm{ring}}∼ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, before turning around and returning to implied values of g𝑔gitalic_g similar to near the nucleus. This behavior can not be explained via AGN grain destruction, since it implies that the AGN exerts a greater influence on the PAH GSD at >Rringabsentsubscript𝑅ring>R_{\mathrm{ring}}> italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT than it does at Rringabsentsubscript𝑅ring\approx R_{\mathrm{ring}}≈ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ring end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Rather, it suggests that the larger PAHs are reacting to conditions in the ring that are different compared to the bulge+stellar disk. These conditions may affect the GSD via grain destruction (e.g., sputtering in hot plasma), or they may involve a boost to the impact of radiation on PAH band ratios.

One such boost could come from a different treatment of U𝑈Uitalic_U in our radiation model. Aniano et al. (2020) produced spatially-resolved maps of the radiation heating intensity U𝑈Uitalic_U for the galaxies in the KINGFISH sample (Kennicutt et al., 2011), and although they were limited by the resolution of the Spitzer MIPS160 and the Herschel SPIRE250 cameras (PSFFWHM=38.8and 18.2,respectivelyPSFFWHM38arcsecond8and18arcsecond2respectively\mathrm{PSF\ FWHM}=38\farcs 8\mathrm{\ and\ }18\farcs 2\,\mathrm{,\ respectively}roman_PSF roman_FWHM = 38 start_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID 8 roman_and 18 start_ID start_POSTFIX SUPERSCRIPTOP . ′ ′ end_POSTFIX end_ID 2 , roman_respectively), they estimated that between 5–20% of the dust emission of a typical galaxy within a given pixel (MIPS160=18MIPS16018\mathrm{MIPS160}=18\,\arcsecMIPS160 = 18 ″, SPIRE250=6SPIRE2506\mathrm{SPIRE250}=6\,\arcsecSPIRE250 = 6 ″) was due to dust near photodissociation regions (PDRs), heated by U>100𝑈100U>100italic_U > 100. Above this threshold, PAHs begin to experience multi-photon heating, in which the radiative relaxation time for a PAH is less than the time between incident photons. For given incident photon energy, larger PAHs have both a larger absorption cross section and longer radiative cooling time than smaller PAHs (Draine & Li, 2007), hence larger PAHs enter the multi-photon heating regime at lower values of U compared to smaller PAHs. Consequently, short-to-long PAH band ratios become sensitive to U𝑈Uitalic_U for U>100𝑈100U>100italic_U > 100 (see, e.g., D21 Figure 19).

Refer to caption
Figure 13: Same as the right panel of Figure 12, but the size direction (previously denoted by different g𝑔gitalic_g values) has been replaced with varying fPDRsubscript𝑓PDRf_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (%).

In the absence of such a U𝑈Uitalic_U map for NGC 4138, we made the assumption that PAHs are heated primarily by radiation in the diffuse ISM, within the single-photon heating regime. A boost to U𝑈Uitalic_U provided in some regions by exposure of PAHs to nearby PDRs would not only make our radiation model more physically realistic, but it would increase the amplitudes of the modeled ratio profiles in the radiation-only scenario.

Figure 13 is similar to the right panel of Figure 12, but the g𝑔gitalic_g direction of the model grid has been replaced with fPDRsubscript𝑓PDRf_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the fraction of PAH luminosity heated by UPDRsubscript𝑈PDRU_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which we define as the ring-ISRF heating experienced by PAHs near a PDR. We set a01=7Åsubscript𝑎017Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=7\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7 roman_Å for the GSD of the model grid so that the fPDR=0%subscript𝑓PDRpercent0f_{\mathrm{PDR}}=0\,\%italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 % line has lower short-to-long ratios than the observed track; this accounts for the abnormally large 17µm17µm17\micron17 roman_µm feature observed in all regions of NGC 4138, although it describes a GSD with a substantially larger average PAH size than is discussed in D21. UPDRsubscript𝑈PDRU_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is chosen to fit the following criteria: 1) it produces a model grid which spans the data given the typical range of fPDRsubscript𝑓PDRf_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Aniano et al. (2020) (typically up to 20%) and 2) the range of the ionization parameter μ𝜇\muitalic_μ covered by the observed track is similar to that of the same track in the right panel of Figure 12. We find that UPDR=104.5subscript𝑈PDRsuperscript104.5U_{\mathrm{PDR}}=10^{4.5}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4.5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT satisfies these conditions.

Using this example, Figure 13 shows that it is possible to produce the observed range of band ratios for larger PAHs by varying only their ionization and starlight heating intensity, rather than alterations to the GSD. In this conceptual framework, the observed track in Figure 13 suggests that fPDRsubscript𝑓PDRf_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is greater in regions with a larger influence from the ring ISRF, and it is lower in bulge and stellar disk-dominated regions. The true a01subscript𝑎01a_{\mathrm{01}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and UPDRsubscript𝑈PDRU_{\mathrm{PDR}}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in NGC 4138 are unknown, but this example illustrates that the small amplitudes of the radiation-only modeled band ratio profiles for larger PAHs might be due in part to an unrealistic treatment of U𝑈Uitalic_U.

To place the model grid in Figure 13 on the observed track requires a GSD with a01=7Åsubscript𝑎017Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=7\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 7 roman_Å. For reference, the “large” GSD discussed in D21 has a01=5Åsubscript𝑎015Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=5\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 5 roman_Å. This is not necessarily of concern on its own, since our decision to consider the canonical a01=4Åsubscript𝑎014Åa_{\mathrm{01}}=4\,\mathrm{\AA}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 roman_Å for NGC 4138 was not made from any observational consideration. However, such an “extra large” GSD would exacerbate the issue for the smaller PAHs in Figure 12, which calls for a much smaller a01subscript𝑎01a_{\mathrm{01}}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 01 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to contain the observed track within the model grid; equivalently, the modeled L(6.2μm)/L(7.7μm)L6.2𝜇mL7.7𝜇m\mathrm{L(6.2\,\mu m)/L(7.7\,\mu m)}roman_L ( 6.2 italic_μ roman_m ) / roman_L ( 7.7 italic_μ roman_m ) profile would become far too suppressed compared to the observed profile. Smaller PAHs are affected by multi-photon heating, but not by enough to significantly impact ratios at UPDR=104.5subscript𝑈PDRsuperscript104.5U_{\mathrm{PDR}}=10^{4.5}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_PDR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4.5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. A U𝑈Uitalic_U map of NGC 4138, combined with the modeled variations of hνdelimited-⟨⟩𝜈\left<h\nu\right>⟨ italic_h italic_ν ⟩, might help to resolve this discrepancy.

8 Summary

As PAHs become increasingly used as indicators of star formation and the conditions in the ISM of galaxies, there is an urgency to understanding the mechanism of PAH suppression in AGN hosts. Though an interaction between the AGN and PAHs is often suggested as the cause, an alternative explanation is the rapidly varying radiation environment away from the AGN center, stellar bulge, and star-forming disk. Disentangling these potentially competing effects has proven difficult. In this study, we attempt to separate the effects of the starlight and those of the AGN by modeling the ISRF of star-forming ring galaxy NGC 4138. Drawing from the new PAH emission models of Draine et al. (2021), the radiation model is used to predict the influence of distinct ISRF components on PAH band ratios across the galaxy. We compare these predicted band ratios with those of observed spectra at many radii using a large Spitzer/IRS spectral map. The main conclusions from this work are the following:

  • The observed short-to-long PAH band ratios in NGC 4138 are variable with distance from the nucleus. These ratios are suppressed at small radii, and smoothly increase to values typical for star-forming galaxies near the star-forming ring. Outside of the ring, the ratios typically fall back to values seen at small radii, indicating that the AGN does not dictate the band ratios at greater-than-or-equivalent-to\gtrsimkpc scales.

  • Our ISRF model suggests that varying radiation environments contribute to the changing band ratios, yielding similar trends across the outer disk, star-forming ring, and central bulge. Incorporating attenuation effects further improves the agreement in these trends. However, the model under-predicts the amplitude of these variations by up to 2.5×\sim 2.5\times∼ 2.5 ×.

  • Significant changes in PAH UV-Optical opacity to increase the sensitivity of PAH grains to UV photons would be needed to reproduce the large amplitude of band ratio variations. Increased PAH heating from higher radiation intensity near PDR surfaces in the star-forming ring could boost short-to-long band ratios for larger PAHs, but this can reproduce the observed ratios only by assuming a substantially larger size distribution than is typically considered.

  • Modification of the PAH population by the AGN via small grain destruction and bulk changes in ionization state could account for some of the observed variation in band ratios, although models incorporating these changes lack consistency between short and long PAH bands. Based on central upturns in band ratios, the AGN may also directly influence PAH emission within a few hundred pc of the nucleus.

An extended analysis on a much larger sample will facilitate a more complete picture of the relationship between PAH band ratios and the radiation environments in galaxies, and the possible direct relationship between PAH emission and AGN. As it had the ability to efficiently map entire galaxies, Spitzer observations will continue to be essential for the understanding of PAHs at large spatial scales, but JWST is the first facility capable of observing the full suite of PAH features in AGN host galaxies at scales of 10’s of pc. These observations can include the grain size-sensitive 3.3µm3.3µm3.3\,\micron3.3 roman_µm PAH feature, which will likely be critical for understanding variations in grain size distributions at the smallest sizes, as well as radiation effects on PAHs. Future JWST observations of the nuclei of AGN hosts may provide the first direct confirmation of the role AGN play on the physical characteristics of PAH grains.

9 Acknowledgements

We thank the members of R. Chandar’s Paper Writing Class (2022-2023) for the constructive feedback over many iterations. We also thank B. Hensley and the attendees of the 2023 PAH Fest for helpful suggestions and conversations. We thank the anonymous referee for their insightful comments which improved this work. We gratefully acknowledge support for this project from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement through Cottrell SEED Award No. 27852. This research was supported in part by NSF grant AST-1908123. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and operated by the California Institute of Technology. JDS gratefully acknowledges support for this project from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement through Cottrell SEED Award No. 27852. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and operated by the California Institute of Technology.

References

  • Alonso-Herrero et al. (2014) Alonso-Herrero, A., Ramos Almeida, C., Esquej, P., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1293
  • Aniano et al. (2012) Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Calzetti, D., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/138
  • Aniano et al. (2020) Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Hunt, L. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fdb
  • Armus et al. (2023) Armus, L., Lai, T., U, V., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acac66
  • Asmus et al. (2015) Asmus, D., Gandhi, P., Hönig, S. F., Smette, A., & Duschl, W. J. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1950
  • Asmus et al. (2014) Asmus, D., Hönig, S. F., Gandhi, P., Smette, A., & Duschl, W. J. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 1648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu041
  • Astropy Collaboration et al. (2013) Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068
  • Astropy Collaboration et al. (2018) Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f
  • Astropy Collaboration et al. (2022) Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, apj, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74
  • Baldwin et al. (1981) Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766
  • Bendo et al. (2020) Bendo, G. J., Lu, N., & Zijlstra, A. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1393, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1589
  • Brown et al. (2019) Brown, M. J. I., Duncan, K. J., Landt, H., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 3351, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2324
  • Bruzual & Charlot (2003) Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x
  • Cappi et al. (2006) Cappi, M., Panessa, F., Bassani, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 446, 459, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053893
  • Crocker et al. (2013) Crocker, A. F., Calzetti, D., Thilker, D. A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/79
  • Dale et al. (2023) Dale, D. A., Boquien, M., Barnes, A. T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca769
  • Diamond-Stanic & Rieke (2010) Diamond-Stanic, A. M., & Rieke, G. H. 2010, ApJ, 724, 140, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/140
  • Draine & Li (2007) Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810, doi: 10.1086/511055
  • Draine et al. (2021) Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff51
  • Draine et al. (2014) Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172
  • Fisher & Drory (2010) Fisher, D. B., & Drory, N. 2010, ApJ, 716, 942, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/942
  • Freeman (1970) Freeman, K. C. 1970, ApJ, 160, 811, doi: 10.1086/150474
  • Galliano et al. (2008) Galliano, F., Madden, S. C., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Peeters, E., & Jones, A. P. 2008, ApJ, 679, 310, doi: 10.1086/587051
  • García-Bernete et al. (2022a) García-Bernete, I., Rigopoulou, D., Alonso-Herrero, A., et al. 2022a, MNRAS, 509, 4256, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3127
  • García-Bernete et al. (2022b) —. 2022b, A&A, 666, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244806
  • Gregg et al. (2022) Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., & Heyer, M. 2022, ApJ, 928, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac558a
  • Groves et al. (2012) Groves, B., Krause, O., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 892, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21696.x
  • Harris et al. (2020) Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
  • Hunter (2007) Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
  • Jensen et al. (2017) Jensen, J. J., Hönig, S. F., Rakshit, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 3071, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1447
  • Jore et al. (1996) Jore, K. P., Broeils, A. H., & Haynes, M. P. 1996, AJ, 112, 438, doi: 10.1086/118027
  • Kaneda et al. (2008) Kaneda, H., Onaka, T., Sakon, I., Matsumoto, H., & Suzuki, T. 2008, in Organic Matter in Space, ed. S. Kwok & S. Sanford, Vol. 251, 247–248, doi: 10.1017/S1743921308021674
  • Kennicutt et al. (2011) Kennicutt, R. C., Calzetti, D., Aniano, G., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 1347, doi: 10.1086/663818
  • Lai et al. (2020) Lai, T. S. Y., Smith, J. D. T., Baba, S., Spoon, H. W. W., & Imanishi, M. 2020, ApJ, 905, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc002
  • Lai et al. (2022) Lai, T. S. Y., Armus, L., U, V., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ebf
  • Lai et al. (2023) Lai, T. S. Y., Armus, L., Bianchin, M., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.15169, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.15169
  • Lima Neto et al. (1999) Lima Neto, G. B., Gerbal, D., & Márquez, I. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 481, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02849.x
  • Liu et al. (2011) Liu, G., Koda, J., Calzetti, D., Fukuhara, M., & Momose, R. 2011, ApJ, 735, 63, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/63
  • Makarov et al. (2014) Makarov, D., Prugniel, P., Terekhova, N., Courtois, H., & Vauglin, I. 2014, A&A, 570, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423496
  • Maragkoudakis et al. (2022) Maragkoudakis, A., Boersma, C., Temi, P., Bregman, J. D., & Allamandola, L. J. 2022, ApJ, 931, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac666f
  • Mathis et al. (1983) Mathis, J. S., Mezger, P. G., & Panagia, N. 1983, A&A, 128, 212
  • Meidt et al. (2012) Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., Knapen, J. H., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/17
  • Nilson (1973) Nilson, P. 1973, Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsaliensis Ser. V, 0
  • O’Dowd et al. (2009) O’Dowd, M. J., Schiminovich, D., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 885, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/885
  • Ogle et al. (2023) Ogle, P. M., Lopez, I. E., Reynaldi, V., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.01936, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.01936
  • Pereira-Santaella et al. (2010) Pereira-Santaella, M., Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2010, ApJS, 188, 447, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/188/2/447
  • Pizzella et al. (2014) Pizzella, A., Morelli, L., Corsini, E. M., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424746
  • Prugniel & Simien (1997) Prugniel, P., & Simien, F. 1997, A&A, 321, 111
  • Richards et al. (2016) Richards, E. E., van Zee, L., Barnes, K. L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 689, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1016
  • Rigopoulou et al. (2021) Rigopoulou, D., Barale, M., Clary, D. C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 5287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab959
  • Roche et al. (1991) Roche, P. F., Aitken, D. K., Smith, C. H., & Ward, M. J. 1991, MNRAS, 248, 606, doi: 10.1093/mnras/248.4.606
  • Sales et al. (2010) Sales, D. A., Pastoriza, M. G., & Riffel, R. 2010, ApJ, 725, 605, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/605
  • Salim et al. (2007) Salim, S., Rich, R. M., Charlot, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 267, doi: 10.1086/519218
  • Sandstrom et al. (2012) Sandstrom, K. M., Bolatto, A. D., Bot, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/20
  • Sandstrom et al. (2023) Sandstrom, K. M., Chastenet, J., Sutter, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb0cf
  • Sérsic (1963) Sérsic, J. L. 1963, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina, 6, 41
  • Sloan et al. (2010) Sloan, G. C., Matsunaga, N., Matsuura, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1274, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1274
  • Smith et al. (2007a) Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007a, ApJ, 656, 770, doi: 10.1086/510549
  • Smith et al. (2007b) Smith, J. D. T., Armus, L., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007b, PASP, 119, 1133, doi: 10.1086/522634
  • SSC And IRSA (2020) SSC And IRSA. 2020, Spitzer Enhanced Imaging Products, IPAC, doi: 10.26131/IRSA433
  • STScI (2013) STScI. 2013, GALEX/MCAT, STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/T9H59D
  • Virtanen et al. (2020) Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
  • Voit (1992) Voit, G. M. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 841, doi: 10.1093/mnras/258.4.841
  • Xie & Ho (2022) Xie, Y., & Ho, L. C. 2022, ApJ, 925, 218, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac32e2
  • Zhang & Ho (2023) Zhang, L., & Ho, L. C. 2023, ApJ, 943, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acab60
  • Zhang et al. (2009) Zhang, W. M., Soria, R., Zhang, S. N., Swartz, D. A., & Liu, J. F. 2009, ApJ, 699, 281, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/281