Extraplanar emission in isolated edge-on late-type galaxies.
I.
The H distribution versus to the old and young
stellar discs.ā ā thanks: Based on observations obtained at the Observatoire de
Haute Provence (OHP, France), operated by the French CNRS.
Abstract
Isolated galaxies are the ideal reference sample to study the galaxy structure minimising potential environmental effects. We selected a complete sample of 14 nearby, late-type, highly inclined (), isolated galaxies from the Catalogue of Isolated Galaxies (CIG) which offers a vertical view of their disc structure. We aim to study extraplanar Diffuse Ionized Gas (eDIG) by comparing the old and young disc components traced by near-infrared (NIR) and Ultraviolet (UV) imaging with the H emission structure. We obtained H monochromatic maps from the Fabry-Perot (FP) interferometry, while the old and young discs structures are obtained from the photometric analysis of the 2MASS K-band, and GALEX NUV and FUV images, thereby identifying the stellar disc and whether the eDIG is present. The H morphology is peculiar in CIGĀ 71, CIGĀ 183, CIGĀ 593 showing clear asymmetries. In general, geometric parameters (isophotal position angle, peak light distribution, inclination) measured from H, UV and NIR show minimal differences (e.g. 10), suggesting that interaction does not play a significant role in shaping the morphology, as expected in isolated galaxies. From H maps, the eDIG was detected vertically in 11 out of 14 galaxies. Although the fraction of eDIG is high, the comparison between our sample and a generic sample of inclined spirals suggests that the phenomenon is uncorrelated to the galaxy environment. As suggested by the extraplanar UV emission found in 13 out of 14 galaxies the star formation extends well beyond the disc defined by the H map.
keywords:
galaxies: haloes ā galaxies: evolution ā galaxies: ISM ā galaxies: photometry ā galaxies: stellar content ā galaxies: fundamental parameters1 Introduction
Galaxy interactions dramatically impact several galaxy properties, such as their morphology and star-formation history (see e.g. Rampazzo etĀ al., 2016, and references therein). The idea of gathering catalogues of isolated galaxies has been developed at least since the 1970s (e.g. the Catalogue of Isolated Galaxies (CIG), Karachentseva, 1973) as a baseline for comparison with galaxies located in denser environments subject to interaction-induced phenomena. In the last decades, catalogues of isolated galaxies, selected from very low galaxy density regions, have been either implemented or revised using redshift measurements (Verdes-Montenegro etĀ al., 2005; Karachentseva etĀ al., 2010; Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al., 2013, 2015). A recent Hāi study of isolated galaxy samples suggests a picture of "nurture free" galaxies (Jones etĀ al., 2018). Other works (see e.g. Rampazzo etĀ al., 2020) have shown that isolated elliptical galaxies suffered past interactions from which they still show the āscarsā, although they have probably not experienced gravitational influences from their close neighbours over the past billion years.
This paper concentrates on the stellar versus H components in isolated spiral galaxies seen nearly edge-on (). This galactic configuration relative to the sky plane provides more information on the vertical structure of the disc (e.g. Burstein, 1979; Fraternali & Binney, 2006; Kamphuis etĀ al., 2007; Peters etĀ al., 2017) revealing the extraplanar Diffuse Ionized Gas (eDIG), detected in galaxies with relatively high star formation rate (SFR) surface densities (Rossa & Dettmar, 2003a, b). The eDIG is usually traced at optical wavelengths using the H recombination line (e.g Rosado etĀ al., 2013). In addition, as the eDIG might be spatially correlated with the star formation (SF)-gas relations, it has been observed to trace regions of \ionHi dominance within galactic discs, especially those located outside active star-forming regions, making the 21-cm emission line a helpful tool for the eDIG detection (e.g. Zschaechner etĀ al., 2015). Ultraviolet (UV) imaging can also detect the low-intensity outer star formation disc by detecting OB stars located in very low SFR density regions (e.g. Hoopes etĀ al., 2001; Thilker etĀ al., 2002; Gil de Paz etĀ al., 2005; Thilker etĀ al., 2005, 2007; Gil de Paz etĀ al., 2007b). From the comparison between the H and the UV images of spiral galaxies with low inclination (), Thilker etĀ al. (2007) showed that the Near Ultraviolet (NUV) emitting component is radially more extended than the emission of the old stellar population in at least 30% of galaxies from the Local Universe (z0.02). In high inclined galaxies, in cases where an eDIG layer does exist, the UV haloes tend to form a thick disc having a similar morphology to the UV halo and occurring in about the same place (Hodges-Kluck etĀ al., 2016). Moreover, it has been observed that the H-UV flux ratio is lower in the eDIG than in \ionHii regions, indicating that the field OB stars, which are situated outside the star-forming regions, are important contributors to the eDIG ionization in most of the galaxies, and even in some galaxies they may be the dominant ionization source (Hoopes etĀ al., 2001; Hodges-Kluck etĀ al., 2016; Jo etĀ al., 2018).
The eDIG morphology shows a wide variety of local morphological features Rand (1998); Rossa & Dettmar (2003b); Rosado etĀ al. (2013) such as prominent layers of diffuse gas, filamentary structures, or just one or a few patches of extraplanar emission Rand (1998); Rossa & Dettmar (2003b); Rosado etĀ al. (2013). Some eDIG originating phenomena have been proposed, such as Inter Stellar Medium (ISM) activity in the galaxy disc (e.g. Heald etĀ al., 2006a, b, 2007; Rosado etĀ al., 2013; Ho etĀ al., 2016; Jones etĀ al., 2017; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2017), intergalactic medium accretion (e.g. Putman etĀ al., 2012; Putman, 2017; Levy etĀ al., 2019; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2022), satellite galaxies interaction (e.g. Walker etĀ al., 1996; Zschaechner etĀ al., 2015) and accretion or intra-cluster interaction (e.g. TomiÄiÄ etĀ al., 2021; Sardaneta etĀ al., 2022; Boselli etĀ al., 2022). In parallel, several studies have demonstrated that the UV halo emission is consistent with a reflection nebula produced by dust in the halo (e.g. Hodges-Kluck & Bregman, 2014; Shinn & Seon, 2015; Hodges-Kluck etĀ al., 2016; Jo etĀ al., 2018; Shinn, 2019). Various mechanisms have been suggested as potential sources for diffuse-and-global UV haloes, including galactic radiation, magneto-hydrodynamic phenomena, and dust accretion from the circumgalactic or intergalactic medium (see Shinn & Seon, 2015, for a comprehensive examination). The contribution of each process over cosmic time is still unclear as they both produce hot and cold components that occupy roughly the same space (e.g. Hodges-Kluck & Bregman, 2014).
Several studies from large surveys such as SAMI111Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral field spectrograph (SAMI) (Ho etĀ al., 2016), MaNGA222Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point (MaNGA) (Jones etĀ al., 2017; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2017; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2022) and CALIFA333Calar-Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) (Levy etĀ al., 2019), and from specific surveys as CHANG-ES444Continuum haloes in Nearby Galaxiesāan EVLA Survey (CHANG-ES) (Lu etĀ al., 2023) have employed various environmental definitions in the selection of their samples of edge-on galaxies, contributing to varying interpretations of the relationship between extraplanar gas properties and their host galaxies. For instance, they have either discarded major mergers with clear tidal features (Ho etĀ al., 2016; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2022), rejected galaxies that have another object in the field, including stars (Bizyaev etĀ al., 2017) or excluded galaxies with distorted discs in their H images (Lu etĀ al., 2023). Recently, two studies agreed that the eDIG could be a consequence of the accretion of the CircumGalactic Medium (CGM) (Levy etĀ al., 2019; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2022) which has also been proposed as probable UV halo origin (e.g. Hodges-Kluck & Bregman, 2014; Shinn & Seon, 2015). However, most of the literature still lacks a general agreement on the sources of ionization for eDIG. Since the eDIG may be related to the CGM, Bizyaev etĀ al. (2022) visually examined the outer regions of each galaxy of their sample aiming to locate environmental structures that might be connected to the eDIG. Their findings ranged from small satellites lacking noticeable structure to large satellites even larger than the primary object. Therefore, the consensus or discrepancy in explaining the eDIG origin is likely a consequence of the different definitions of environment adopted. As a reference study case, isolated star-forming galaxies with the possibility of edge-on observations is needed.
In order to study the environmental effects on the eDIG distribution, we selected a sample of isolated nearby late-type, high-inclined galaxies from the CIG catalogue (Karachentseva, 1973). Indeed, nearby galaxies are better resolved, late-type galaxies are those which contain the most H emission, and almost edge-on galaxies are those for which it is easier to detect the gas emission at high galactic latitude and for which the column density is higher, even in the disk outskirts. The extraplanar gas is commonly defined as the detectable H emission where the stellar continuum is not detected. This could be done from the continuum-subtracted emission-line image which delimits the stellar disc (e.g. Miller & Veilleux, 2003; Rosado etĀ al., 2013; Levy etĀ al., 2019; TomiÄiÄ etĀ al., 2021). This is typically what is done when observations with narrow- and broad-band filters around H emission are combined. Alternatively, the old stellar disk in spiral galaxies (PopulationĀ II stars) could be better defined from redder broad-band in the near-infrared (NIR, e.g. Kamphuis etĀ al., 2007; Ho etĀ al., 2016; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2017; Bizyaev etĀ al., 2022) and young stellar population from bluer broad-band, e.g. in the UV, which traces the young stellar populations of ages up to tenths of Myrs (Hoopes etĀ al., 2001; Thilker etĀ al., 2007; Bianchi, 2011; Kennicutt & Evans, 2012). We used this method in this work. We present the H emission maps of a sample of galaxies. The net H maps (i.e. continuum free) were obtained using the scanning Fabry-Perot spectroimager (FP) GHASP, providing complete two-dimensional coverage of very extended line emission regions, ideal for studying the faint diffuse gas emission. We compared H FP monochromatic maps with NIR, NUV and Far UV (FUV) images available in the literature. We defined a certain threshold in the NIR image under which the stellar density is low and consider that the eDIG is the H emission below this limit. The geometric parameters of the galaxies, such as the isophotal position angle, peak light distribution and inclination, are obtained from the photometric analysis of the UV and NIR images, and will serve as reference when studying the H kinematics in a forthcoming paper.
The paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we provide details about the sample selection. In Section 3, we describe the data acquisition and reduction processes. In Section 4, we explain how the stellar disc and the extraplanar components are identified. In Section 5, we present the individual results of the photometric analysis of each galaxy in our sample. In Section 6, we discuss our main results. Finally, in Section 7, we provide a summary and the conclusions of our results. In order to compare our results with previous surveys, throughout this work we assumed a Hubble constant of (e.g. Thilker etĀ al., 2007; Ho etĀ al., 2016; Levy etĀ al., 2019).
2 The sample selection
CIG | Other | RA (J2000) | Dec (J2000) | Distance | Type | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Name | (hh mm ss) | ( ā ā) | () | (Mpc) | (deg) | (mag) | (kpc) | (Jy) | (Jy) | () | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) |
71 | UGC 01391 | 01 55 15.8 | +10 00 49.2 | 5901 | 84.3 | 83.8 | 10.8 | 35.4 | Sc | 0.66 | 1.38 | 6.79 |
95 | UGC 01733 | 02 15 20.6 | +22 00 22.0 | 4418 | 63.1 | 86.5 | 11.6 | 33.4 | Sc-w | 0.22 | 0.64 | 1.49 |
159 | UGC 03326 | 05 39 37.1 | +77 18 44.9 | 4121 | 58.9 | 85.4 | 9.6 | 60.8 | *Scd: | 1.10 | 3.57 | 3.26 |
171 | UGC 03474 | 06 32 37.6 | +71 33 39.5 | 3634 | 51.9 | 84.0 | 10.1 | 33.8 | *Scd: | 0.57 | 1.43 | 4.40 |
183 | UGC 03791 | 07 18 31.8 | +27 09 28.7 | 5090 | 72.7 | 80.4 | 11.4 | 26.0 | *Sd : | 0.49 | 1.38 | 2.78 |
201 | UGC 03979 | 07 44 31.0 | +67 16 24.9 | 4061 | 58.0 | 80.9 | 10.6 | 31.4 | SA(rs)c | 1.18 | 2.86 | 3.39 |
329 | UGC 05010 | 09 24 55.1 | +26 46 28.8 | 4096 | 58.5 | 81.3 | 9.3 | 42.8 | SA(rs)b | 0.30 | 1.34 | 1.61 |
416 | UGC 05642 | 10 25 41.8 | +11 44 20.8 | 2322 | 33.2 | 81.1 | 11.6 | 18.0 | Sd -pec | 0.52 | 1.16 | 2.69 |
593 | UGC 08598 | 13 36 40.7 | +20 12 00.5 | 4909 | 70.1 | 83.2 | 10.8 | 35.5 | SBx(s)b: | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.53 |
847 | UGC 11132 | 18 09 26.2 | +38 47 39.9 | 2837 | 40.5 | 81.2 | 10.7 | 24.6 | *Sb | 0.59 | 1.98 | 5.74 |
906 | UGC 11723 | 21 20 17.5 | -01 41 03.6 | 4899 | 70.0 | 80.9 | 10.0 | 37.9 | Sbc | 1.97 | 5.95 | 11.51 |
922 | UGC 11785 | 21 39 26.8 | +02 49 37.6 | 4074 | 58.2 | 84.2 | 11.0 | 29.4 | Scd-w | 0.31 | 1.62 | 2.57 |
936 | UGC 11859 | 21 58 07.4 | +01 00 32.3 | 3011 | 43.0 | 85.7 | 11.4 | 38.7 | Sc: | 0.71 | 1.49 | 1.13 |
1003 | UGC 12304 | 23 01 08.3 | +05 39 15.7 | 3470 | 49.6 | 82.5 | 10.3 | 22.9 | Scd | 2.06 | 4.57 | 15.07 |
Columns: (1) CIG galaxy name; (2) UGC galaxy name; (3) and (4) wcs coordinates (J2000); (5) : systemic velocity from NED; (6) heliocentric distance to the galaxy; (7) : inclination computed using the relationĀ 1 (see the text); (8) : apparent K-band magnitude from NED; (9) : optical diameter in the -band from NED; (10) Hubble classification from Buta etĀ al. (2019) and, if not available, from NEDĀ (*); (11)āandā(12)āflux densities at 25m, 60m and 100m in Jy from Lisenfeld etĀ al. (2007); (13)āFIR luminosity computed with the equationā4 (see SectionĀ 6.2).
Isolated galaxies have been the subject of selection and study for many decades. Evidences are accumulating that over at least a few billion years the evolution of isolated galaxies has not been driven by interactions with physically associated companions (see e.g. Verdes-Montenegro etĀ al., 2005; Karachentseva etĀ al., 2010; Karachentsev etĀ al., 2011; Rampazzo etĀ al., 2020, and references therein). In this sense, isolated galaxies are the ideal reference sample to study internal galactic forces and galaxy morphological, dynamical and photometric evolution minimizing possible environmental effects.
The CIG catalogue (Karachentseva, 1973) and its more recent revisions (Verdes-Montenegro etĀ al., 2005; Verley etĀ al., 2007b; Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al., 2013) are examples of a successful attempt to compile a sample of isolated galaxies. Historically, Karachentseva (1973) obtained her catalogue from the visual inspection of the Digitized Sky Survey (DSS) images of the 27ā837 galaxies āāand of their surroundingsāā (at Galactic latitudes ) contained in the CGCG555Catalogue of galaxies and of clusters of galaxies (CGCG, Zwicky etĀ al., 1968) https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/VII/190 .. A list of 1050 galaxies were found to meet the isolation criterion she adopted (see also Karachentseva etĀ al., 2010).
Since we are looking for the incidence of eDIG among isolated galaxies we have selected a sample from the CIG catalogue (Karachentseva, 1973) of late-type galaxies (Spirals with morphologycal typeā, i.e. Sb to be checked) (see Buta etĀ al., 2019) dominated by PopulationāI stars that satisfy the following additional characteristics we derived from the NED data-base:
-
1.
galaxies with high inclination () computed with the expression
(1) where and are the apparent optical major and minor axes of the galaxy respectively;
-
2.
galaxies with redshift to ensure that the emission of the redshifted H line fits in the optical wavelength;
- 3.
A complete sample of 14 nearby isolated late-type edge-on galaxies was obtained (see FigureĀ 2). General parameters of our galaxy sample are listed in Tableā1.
Isolation degree
To be an isolated galaxy, the CIG catalogue required that no similar size neighbours were found close to the galaxy. This requirement can be described as follows: a galaxy with a standard angular diameter denoted as is classified as isolated when the angular separation between the galaxy and its -th neighbor with angular diameter , meets or exceeds a threshold of (see equations 1 and 2 in Karachentseva etĀ al., 2010). Since galaxies from the CIG catalogue were collected by visual inspection of DSS images, the companion galaxies are expected to be faint or mostly dwarf galaxies. Recently, the CIG catalogue has been refined using new quantification methods (e.g. Verley etĀ al., 2007b) and modern tools like images with higher resolution than the plates of Palomar (e.g. Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al., 2013) and new images from \ionHi emission data (e.g. Jones etĀ al., 2018). In this Section, we discuss how effectively our galaxy sample selected from the CIG catalogue meets these new isolation checks. However, even if a subset of our sample does not meet the strictest isolation criteria, all galaxies in our sample still represent a significant part of the overall isolated galaxy sample.
In the frame of the long-term AMIGA project (Analysis of the interstellar Medium of Isolated GAlaxies666Analysis of the interstellar Medium of Isolated GAlaxies (AMIGA) (http://www.iaa.es/AMIGA.html/)), Verley etĀ al. (2007a, b) revised all the positions of the CIG galaxies based upon the digitized photographic plates from POSS-1 and POSS-2 providing a quantification of the degree of isolation of CIG galaxies with the local number density of neighbour galaxies (), and the tidal strength () affecting the central galaxy by its neighbourhood. These parameters depend on the position, diameter and mass of the primary galaxy and its -th neighbour. Thus, these parameters provide a clear picture of the environment around the isolated galaxies: the presence of one single similar size neighbour at a small distance to the CIG galaxy would result in a high value of the tidal strength () estimation, while the local number density () remains quite low as it is averaged over more nearest neighbours (Verley etĀ al., 2007b). In Tableā2 we list the number of neighbours and the nearest-neighbour distance to each galaxy in our sample according to Verley etĀ al. (2007a). Then, Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al. (2013) re-evaluated the isolation criteria of AMIGA galaxies within a field radius of 1āMpc using both photometric and spectroscopic data available from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to refine the and parameters.
FigureĀ 3 shows the comparison between the local number densityĀ () and tidal strengthĀ () of the galaxies in our sample making the distinction between the results of Verley etĀ al. (2007b) and Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al. (2013). From FigureĀ 3 and Tableā2, we observe that some galaxies classified as isolated in the AMIGA sample have its nearest neighbour at an angular distance of twice or three times their optical diameters, for example CIGĀ 171 and 201. According with Verley etĀ al. (2007a), most of the neighbouring galaxies of CIG galaxies have a diameter , implying they are dwarf companions which were not took into account by Karachentseva (1973) when collecting the CIG catalogue but perhaps they can influence the evolution of the main galaxy. Therefore, if CIGĀ 171 and 201 are in region of bona fide isolated galaxies in the AMIGA sample, we may infer that the nearest neighbours are small enough to not exert significant gravitational perturbations on the main galaxy. On the other hand, Verley etĀ al. (2007b) had already determined that the galaxies of our sample, CIGā71 and CIGā936, were outside this region, excluding both galaxies from the AMIGA sample. As Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al. (2013) improved the quantification of the isolation degree, another galaxy of our sample, CIGā1003, is also out of the area of isolated galaxies in the plane. In this way, 3 out of 14 galaxies in our sample failed the isolation criteria of the AMIGA sample, probably because they have some faint companions previously undetected by Karachentseva (1973).
Later, Jones etĀ al. (2018) provided integrated \ionHi fluxes of AMIGA galaxies by presenting a catalogue of \ionHi single dish observations. With these new data, Jones etĀ al. (2018) included a review of integral features of AMIGA galaxies allowing to ensure isolation level of the AMIGA catalogue. Since the Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al. (2013) work is limited to the SDSS data, Jones etĀ al. (2018) adopted the criteria of Verley etĀ al. (2007b), and excluded all sources with heliocentric velocities below 1500ā, removed all dwarf galaxies that were in the CIG, and discarded all sources with potentially spurious spectral parameters, leaving a final sample of 544Ā CIG galaxies. In these terms, 8 out of 14 galaxies in our sample would not be considered well isolated: CIGĀ 71, 159, 171, 201, 416, 922, 936 and 1003.
While some members of our sample, selected from the CIG catalogue (Karachentseva, 1973), may not fully meet the strictest current isolation criteria, it is important to stress that all galaxies in our sample are still classified as isolated galaxies. The different arguments stated above make us aware of the different degrees of isolation of the galaxies in our sample. However, previous studies indicate that late-type galaxies are usually located in very low-density environments. In this context, we decided not to exclude any galaxy a priori but rather discuss each of them knowing their isolation properties.
CIG | Neighbours | Distance | |
Name | (arcsec) | (kpc) | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
71 | 4 | 941 | 384.6 |
95 | 71 | 362 | 110.7 |
159 | 34 | 456 | 130.2 |
171 | 91 | 152 | 38.2 |
183 | 25 | 784 | 276.3 |
201 | 57 | 109 | 30.6 |
329 | 101 | 316 | 89.6 |
416 | 168 | 362 | 58.3 |
593 | 26 | 739 | 251.2 |
847 | 79 | 644 | 126.4 |
906 | 28 | 391 | 132.7 |
922 | 97 | 197 | 55.6 |
936 | 88 | 234 | 48.8 |
1003 | 77 | 118 | 28.4 |
Columns: (1)āCIG galaxy name; (2)ānumber of neighbours in a physical radius of 0.5āMpc; (3) and (4)Ā distance to the nearest neighbour in arcseconds and kpc respectively given the heliocentric galactic distance listed in TableĀ 1.
3 The data
3.1 H observations and data reduction
Observations of the H emission line were performed using the scanning Fabry-Perot (FP) interferometer, GHASP, attached at the Cassegrain focus of the 1.93m telescope at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence (OHP, see Table 3). A GaAs Image Photon Counting System (IPCS) is used to reach low detection levels, offering a total FoV of about āarcmin with a pixel scale of 0.68Ā arcsecāpix (Gach etĀ al., 2002). Since the IPCS has no readout noise, exposures of 10Ā seconds were chosen for each of the 32 scanning steps required to cover the GHASPās free spectral range (FSR). In order to detect the eDIG emission, the scanning sequence was typically repeated 35Ā times, resulting in a total exposure time per galaxy of 180āmin. We used narrow-band interference filters (mainly FWHM15āĆ ā and in a few cases slightly larger up to 24āĆ ) enabling to select the redshifted H line of ionized hydrogen (6562.78āĆ ). The scanning Fabry-Perot interferometer we used, with an interference order of 798 and a finesse 13 at H, allowed GHASP to reach a typical spectral resolution of .
Two calibration cubes were obtained, one at the beginning and another at the end of the observation, using a neon lamp with selected narrow line at āĆ , close to the redshifted nebular wavelength in order to minimize phase shift effect (e.g. GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez etĀ al., 2019). The observation date, filterās central wavelength and FWHM, the total exposure time and the astronomical seeing of each galaxy are listed in Table 4.
For the data reduction, we used the packages based on homemade IDL777Interactive Data Language, ITT Visual Information Solutions: https://www.l3harrisgeospatial.com/Software-Technology/IDL routines, reducWizard and ComputeEverything (see e.g. Epinat etĀ al., 2008). The data reduction technique has been widely reported in Daigle etĀ al. (2006b). In summary, it consists in the following steps: (1)āintegration with guiding correction of the total data cubes obtained during the observation; (2)āapplication of a Hanning spectral smoothing on the data cube; (3)ācalibration in wavelength of the integrated data cubes through the computation of a parabolic phase map which is computed from the calibration cube in order to obtain the reference wavelength for the line profile observed inside each pixel, creating a wavelength-sorted data cube by applying the phase map correction to the interferogram data cube; (4)āsubtraction of the OH sky-lines emission; (5)āa Gaussian spatial smoothing with a FWHM selected on the wavelength data cubes; and (6)ācomputation of H monochromatic, continuum, radial velocity and velocity dispersion maps for each wavelength calibrated cube. Finally, astrometric information was attached to the processed files by using the IDL task koords from the KARMA package (Gooch, 1996). In TableĀ 4, we also listed the seeing and the final spatial resolution in kpcĀ arcsec after the spatial Gaussian smoothing of the H maps.
We performed two separate processes on the wavelength data cube. First, we applied Gaussian spatial smoothing, and then, independently, we performed adaptive spatial binning using a Voronoi tessellation with a target SNR5. To ensure a signal-to-noise ratio SNR in the Gaussian smoothed data cube, we compared the monochromatic H maps derived from both processes and set a threshold for the emission detected in the Gaussian smoothed maps. For a SNR5, the GHASP surface brightness detection limit is (see Epinat etĀ al., 2008; GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez etĀ al., 2019; Sardaneta etĀ al., 2022). As no H calibrated image of any galaxy in our sample has been previously published, we followed the calibration procedure outlined by Epinat etĀ al. (2008) to determine the total H flux for the GHASP data (see AppendixĀ B).
The data analysis was made with the program ADHOCw888āAnalyse et Depouillement Homogene des Observations Cigale for Windowsā http://cesam.lam.fr/fabryperot/index/softwares developed by J. Boulesteix at Marseille Observatory in 2005., IRAF999āImage Reduction and Analysis Facilityā http://iraf.noao.edu/ tasks, the SAO Image DS9 software101010SAO Image DS9. An image display and visualization tool for astronomical data (Joye & Mandel, 2003) https://sites.google.com/cfa.harvard.edu/saoimageds9 and our own Python scripts.
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Telescope | 1.93 m OHP |
Aperture ratio of the focal reducer | |
Instrument | GHASP |
Detector type | IPCS GaAs system |
Detector size (pix) | 512512 |
Image scale (arcsec pix) | 0.68 |
Field of view (arcmin) | 5.95.9 |
Interference order at H | 798 |
FSR at H (Ć ā / ) | 8.23 / 376 |
Finesse observed | 13 |
Resolution | 10000 |
Spectral sampling at H (Ć ā / ) | 0.26 / 11.5 |
CIG | Date | FWHM | Seeing | Resolution | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | (aaaa/mm/dd) | (Ć ) | (Ć ) | (min) | (arcsec) | (kpc arcsec) |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
71 | 2019/10/26 | 6700 | 24 | 176 | 4.4 | 2.0 |
95 | 2019/10/27 | 6665 | 15 | 192 | 2.4 | 1.0 |
159 | 2021/01/13 | 6655 | 15 | 181 | 2.6 | 1.0 |
171 | 2021/01/14 | 6645 | 15 | 187 | 2.8 | 0.9 |
183 | 2021/01/21 | 6675 | 15 | 213 | 3.0 | 1.3 |
201 | 2021/01/16 | 6655 | 15 | 187 | 3.3 | 1.1 |
329 | 2021/01/13 | 6655 | 15 | 181 | 3.8 | 1.2 |
416 | 2021/01/21 | 6615 | 15 | 187 | 4.1 | 0.7 |
593 | 2021/03/09 | 6675 | 15 | 219 | 2.9 | 1.2 |
847 | 2019/10/29 | 6630 | 20 | 187 | 2.3 | 0.6 |
906 | 2019/10/26 | 6675 | 15 | 187 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
922 | 2019/10/25 | 6655 | 15 | 192 | 2.2 | 0.8 |
936 | 2019/10/27 | 6630 | 20 | 187 | 3.0 | 0.8 |
1003 | 2019/10/26 | 6645 | 15 | 187 | 2.5 | 0.8 |
Columns: (1)Ā CIG galaxy name; (2)Ā date of observation; (3)Ā : non-tilted filter central wavelength; (4)Ā FWHM: non-tilted full width half-maximum; (5)Ā :Ā total exposure time; (6)Ā Seeing in arcs; (7)Ā Final spatial resolution in kpc per arcseconds after having applied a spatial Gaussian smoothing on the H wavelength data cubes (see SectionĀ 3.1).
3.2 Archival data
The DSS is available at the site of the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)111111The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAGāW-2166. The images of these surveys are based on photographic data obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into the present compressed digital form with the permission of these institutions. https://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_form. The DSS plates have been scanned using a modified PDS microdensitometer with a binned pixel scale of about 1.0āarcsecāpix. In this work, we use the DSS R-band images (5900-7150āĆ ) of our galaxy sample as a reference to provide a large-band optical view of the target. However, we do not calibrate these images in flux since their zero-point magnitude is currently unknown. The average seeing obtained from the image headers was 1.5Ā arcsec.
The Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS, Jarrett etĀ al., 2000) project uses two highly-automated 1.3ām telescopes, one at Mt. Hopkins, Arizona, and the other at Cerro Tololo, Chile. Each telescope is equipped with a three-channel camera, each channel consisting of a āpix array of HgCdTe detectors, capable of observing the sky simultaneously at Jā(1.24ām), Hā(1.66ām) and Kā(2.16ām) near-infrared bands with an angular resolution of 2.0āarcsec and a pixel size of 1.0āarcsecāpix. Owing to the transparency of interstellar dust within the galaxies and to the dominance of late-type stellar populations in producing galactic near-infrared flux, the 2MASS galaxy images trace the overall stellar mass distribution in these galaxies1212122MASS Data Release Documentation https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/2MASS/docs/releases/docs.html. To calibrate in flux, the zero-point conversion values are published in the Explanatory Supplement to the 2MASS All Sky Data Release and Extended Mission Products131313Section VI.4.a of the Explanatory Supplement to the 2MASS All Sky Data Release and Extended Mission Products: https://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/sec6_4a.html. In this work we use the K-band images of the nearby isolated late-type edge-on galaxies selected to sketch the stellar PopulationāII.
Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) was the first ultraviolet (UV) all-sky survey covering a field of view (FoV) of ādeg using microchannel plate detectors to obtain direct images in the NUV (āĆ ) and FUV (āĆ ) with a resolution of 4.2/5.3āarcsec (FUV/NUV) and a pixel scale of 1.5āarcsecāpixel (Bianchi, 2011)141414Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) http://www.galex.caltech.edu/index.html. Conversion values between GALEX count rates, fluxes, and AB magnitudes are available in the GALEX Guest Investigator Web Site151515Section Instrument and Calibration of the GALEX Guest Investigator Web Site: https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/galex/FAQ/counts_background.html. We use GALEX-NUV and FUV images as tracers of stellar PopulationāI in galaxies in our sample.
Thus, in this work we study H, NIR, and UV images, each one with different resolutions. In the case of the H emission data, the seeing conditions varied across the sample of galaxies, with different galaxies experiencing different levels of atmospheric turbulence due to the diversity of observational conditions during data gathering (see TableĀ 4). For example, the closest galaxy, CIGĀ 71, experienced the worst seeing conditions with a resolution of 4.4Ā arcsecĀ (1.8Ā kpc), as did the most distant galaxy, CIGĀ 416, with a resolution of 4.1Ā arcsecĀ (0.7Ā kpc). However, CIGĀ 922, a galaxy located at an average distance, had relatively average seeing conditions with a resolution of 2.2Ā arcsecĀ (0.6Ā kpc). The seeing for the NIRĀ (2Ā arcsec) and NUV/FUVĀ (4.2/5.3āarcsec) images is considered constant for the whole sample. However, it is important to be aware that the different seeing disc sizes combined with the different distances of the galaxies blur the data and impact the spatial physical resolution making it more difficult to distinguish fine details such as eDIG filaments or patches.
Finally, since the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) satellite did not cover the whole sample of CIG galaxies, Lisenfeld etĀ al. (2007) reprocessed the IRASāMIR/FIR survey data using the ADDSCAN/SCANPI utility for 1ā030 out of 1ā050 CIG galaxies as part of the AMIGA project. In this work, we use the IR flux densities at 60 and 100 from AMIGA survey (see TableĀ 1).
4 Identifying the stellar disc
To disentangle the galactic disc from the gaseous extraplanar component, we performed a photometric analysis of the 2MASSĀ 2.2m image, tracer of the old stellar population, and of the GALEX NUV and FUV images, connected to the young stellar population in the galaxy. Because of the particular characteristics of the images in each band, to derive the surface brightness profile, we used two different software packages, the ellipse task from the IRAF STSDAS package (Jedrzejewski, 1987) and the isophote package from the Python Photutils package161616Photutils is an open source Python package affiliated of Astropy that primarily provides tools for detecting and performing photometry of astronomical sources. https://photutils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html https://photutils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/photutils.isophote.Ellipse.html (Bradley etĀ al., 2020). Both programs fit an ellipse via an iterative method (devised by Jedrzejewski, 1987) as well as quantify the distortion from a perfect ellipse by means of higher-order Fourier harmonics:
(2) |
where is the surface brightness averaged over the ellipse as a function of the azimuthal angle and, and the higher order Fourier coefficients. The first- and second-order coefficients (, , , ) indicate the errors in the fitting procedure, being zero for a best-fit ellipse, while the third-order coefficients (, ) characterize the deviation of the fitted ellipse from the isophote shape. The coefficient measures symmetric distortions from pure ellipticity: when , the isophotes have a ādisc-likeā (circular) shape and, when , the isophotes have a āboxyā (rectangular) shape. The inclination angle () with respect to the sky-plane of the galactic disc can be measured through the ellipticity () of the fitted ellipse. Using diverse tracers of the stellar population serves as a crucial means to differentiate between the particular cases presenting UV extended discs or UV haloes which represent at least one-third of the galaxies in the local universe (Thilker etĀ al., 2007) and, as we will show for our sample in SectionĀ 5, approximately two-thirds of the late-type isolated high-inclined galaxies.
The analysis of edge-on galaxies is more difficult than the analysis of galaxies with lower inclination because the high inclination affects the apparent shape of the galaxy along the line of sight (LoS). In photometric analysis of low-inclination galaxies, a smooth bulge-disc transition is typically observed in the resulting plots (e.g. Marino etĀ al., 2010). However, in highly inclined galaxies, the brightness of the inner regions is dominated by the bulge with a small contribution from the thin disc. As the radius increases, the contribution from the disc becomes more important, leading to an abrupt bulge-disc transition in the resulting plots. This provides a noisier behaviour at small radii in the photometric analysis for highly inclined galaxies.
Considering that in late-type galaxies old and young stellar populations are mixed in the disc (e.g. Nersesian etĀ al., 2019), we define the stellar homogeneous disc by using the ellipse delimiting the locus of the stars belonging to the old stellar population since they trace the bulk of the mass and probe the global potential of the disc galaxy.
K-band, 1 | K-band, 3 | NUV | FUV | |||||||||
CIG | PA | PA | PA | PA | ||||||||
Name | (arcsec) | (deg) | (arcsec) | (deg) | (arcsec) | (deg) | (arcsec) | (deg) | ||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) |
71 | 33.1 | 179.1 | 0.76 | 18.7 | 178.8 | 0.77 | 61.0 | 177.9 | 0.80 | 34.6 | 177.9 | 0.84 |
95 | 25.6 | 128.8 | 0.83 | 12.0 | 126.2 | 0.71 | 73.3 | 127.3 | 0.85 | 60.2 | 126.4 | 0.90 |
159 | 74.4 | 68.9 | 0.87 | 42.0 | 66.2 | 0.860 | 114.0 | 67.0 | 0.90 | 53.1 | 71.0 | 0.90 |
171 | 59.1 | 159.9 | 0.77 | 44.4 | 159.7 | 0.858 | 110.9 | 156.9 | 0.83 | 64.9 | 160.0 | 0.90 |
183 | 28.9 | 19.8 | 0.82 | 13.5 | 16.6 | 0.74 | 66.2 | 19.8 | 0.72 | 48.8 | 18.0 | 0.73 |
201 | 36.4 | 150.9 | 0.78 | 20.5 | 151.7 | 0.79 | 85.8 | 151.2 | 0.69 | 81.6 | 151.6 | 0.86 |
329 | 63.6 | 115.1 | 0.76 | 35.9 | 115.4 | 0.77 | 86.8 | 110.0 | 0.79 | 71.3 | 113.0 | 0.80 |
416 | 23.2 | 97.9 | 0.75 | 11.9 | 95.0 | 0.63 | 59.7 | 97.8 | 0.43 | 48.3 | 97.1 | 0.78 |
593 | 27.8 | 167.0 | 0.73 | 14.1 | 165.5 | 0.67 | 73.5 | 165.0 | 0.81 | 44.8 | 168.0 | 0.75 |
847 | 33.1 | 140.8 | 0.71 | 20.5 | 140.2 | 0.77 | 87.5 | 142.0 | 0.73 | 76.7 | 142.0 | 0.87 |
906 | 45.0 | 28.3 | 0.72 | 31.3 | 32.8 | 0.80 | 60.6 | 35.0 | 0.63 | 52.3 | 31.8 | 0.88 |
922 | 34.7 | 61.1 | 0.83 | 19.6 | 60.0 | 0.84 | 72.1 | 61.5 | 0.82 | 55.4 | 61.5 | 0.88 |
936 | 19.8 | 52.3 | 0.58 | 12.3 | 61.6 | 0.64 | 111.7 | 61.0 | 0.86 | 71.4 | 61.1 | 0.90 |
1003 | 45.5 | 127.3 | 0.80 | 25.7 | 124.7 | 0.80 | 52.8 | 129.4 | 0.54 | 53.3 | 119.4 | 0.81 |
CIG galaxy name listed in column (1). Major axis length (), position angle (PA) measured from the North to the East and ellipticity () of the ellipses fitted to the K-band image at 1 level on the background are listed in columns (2), (3) and (4), respectively, and at 3 level in columns (5), (6) and (7). Same parameters determined for the NUV image are listed in columns (8), (9) and (10), and for the FUV image in columns (11), (12) and (13).
4.1 NIR emission
For the 2MASS 2.2ām image, we applied the method of elliptical isophote fitting using the task ellipse (Jedrzejewski, 1987) from the IRAF STSDAS package. As initial parameters we set the galaxy coordinates as the centre, the B-band optical diameter () as the maximum semi-major axis length, and the optical position angle (PA) and ellipticity () published in the NED (see Table 1). We used logarithmic radial sampling with an initial step of 0.5āpixel along the semimajor axis in order to derive the surface brightness profile of each galaxy in an iterative process. The centre, PA, and ellipticity of the ellipse were allowed to vary in each iteration.
Jarrett (2000) defined the isophotal aperture , derived from the K-band isophote at , as the 2MASS standard aperture, corresponding to roughly 1 of the typical background noise in the -band images. However, because of the high levels of background noise in the 1-2Ā m atmospheric windows, the 2MASS is not as sensitive to low surface brightness emission from galaxies (Jarrett, 2000). In consequence, the K-band benchmark of elliptical isophote aperture might underestimate the total flux between 10% and 20%, depending on the radial distribution according to the Hubble type (Jarrett, 2000; Jarrett etĀ al., 2003). On the other hand, discrepancies in the measurements at the level between the 2MASS and other K-band surveys (see e.g. Fingerhut etĀ al., 2010) have suggested potential errors in the 2MASS data reduction process. In fact, Jarrett (2000) explained that systematic components such as H-band airglow variations were not well understood by then and might have induced large errors in the photometry171717Explanatory Supplement to the 2MASS All Sky Data Release and Extended Mission ProductsĀ IV https://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/explsup.html. 2MASS Data Processing.Ā 5.Ā Extended Source Identification and Photometry https://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/sec4_5e.html. Consequently, the choice of a brighter isophote to define the galactic disc boundaries, beyond the 1 level at , may help to mitigate potential data reduction errors in the 2MASS data set.
To be consistent with previous optical photometric results, Jarrett etĀ al. (2003) derived some galactic properties from the 3 isophote, such as the ellipticity () and position angle (PA), in the 2MASSāLarge Galaxy Atlas (LGA) and the 2MASSĀ Extended Source Catalogue. These photometric parameters are consistent with our K-band results as well (see TableĀ 5). Furthermore, the K elliptical isophotal photometry should include the core, bulge, and disk components, capturing most of the flux from a galaxy (e.g. Jarrett etĀ al., 2000). Therefore, to ensure that a significant portion of the galaxyās light is captured and to avoid empty sky background noise, hereafter we use the ellipse at 3 on the background as reference for the disc traced by the stellar PopulationāII. Although this value may not represent the true galactic radii, it is a practical starting point to define the old population stellar disc boundaries.
The older stellar population in spiral galaxies points out internal structures such as spiral arms, bulges, warps, rings, and bars (Jarrett etĀ al., 2003). Bars play a major role in the secular evolution of galaxies and, through vertical resonances, drive stars above the plane to form peanut/box-shaped pseudo-bulges (Combes & Sanders, 1981a). The non-axisymmetry of the bars produces the gas to flow inwards fuelling SF in the central regions of their host galaxies (see e.g. Kim etĀ al., 2021, and references therein). Bottom frame of panelā(d) of FigureĀ 4, and from FiguresĀ 7 to 19, shows the variation of the parameter with respect to the galactic semi-major axis (radius). From these graphics, we found that the only one galaxy in our sample that presents a coefficient is CIGā329 (see FigureĀ 12) implying it has a āboxyā bulge.
4.2 UV emission
The ellipse task from IRAF works in an iterative manner, if there is contamination such as stars and \ionHii regions or regions of too low SNR, the program continues generating ellipses but it outputs parameters with undefined values. To overcome this difficulty, other fitting software was used to derive the surface brightness profiles of the NUV and FUV images. The isophote package from Photutils (Bradley etĀ al., 2020), provides tools to fit elliptical isophotes to a galaxy image using an iterative method described by Jedrzejewski (1987) (see equationā2) for each ellipse as well. The isophote package can also work in an iterative manner by measuring a maximum acceptable relative error in the local radial intensity gradient (typically 0.5). However, when two consecutive isophotes exceed the value specified by the parameter the program prevents ellipses either from prematurely stopping due to the stellar contamination or from growing in low SNR regions. Nonetheless, if the maximum semimajor axis is specified, the intensity gradient is set to ānoneā and the algorithm proceeds inwards to the galaxy centre. Although it is not the general case and may not be the best fit, this procedure allows to analyse data with too low SNR in the inner regions of the galaxy, such as in some GALEX NUV and FUV images of galaxies in our sample. This fit algorithm is quite sensitive to the initial guesses. The iteration begins by giving a fixed semimajor axis length selected initially to grow linearly with steps of 0.5āpix and specifying the initial value of the galactic centre, PA and , then the algorithm proceeds to fit isophotes inwards to the galaxy centre.
We initialized the fitting parameters using the galaxy coordinates as the centre, the optical PA and ellipticity obtained from the NED database, and the B-band optical diameter () as the maximum length of the semi-major axis obtained from the NED database (see Table 1). To overcome any discrepancies between the optical and UV radii, we made adjustments to the initial parameters by comparing the UV radius measured using the DS9 image analysis software with the optical radius, and modifying the corresponding initial parameter values if the optical radius was smaller than the UV radius. For most of our targets, we allowed the centre position, ellipticity and PA to vary during the fitting process. Some galaxies (CIGĀ 71, 95, 847, 906 and 1003) present the NUV/FUV brightest knots beyond Ā arcsec from the peak light distribution of the NIR emission, this last position is assumed the center of the galactic disc and it is probable that the NIR emission is shadowing the actual peak of the UV light. Hence, for these galaxies, we fixed the centre position at the NIR peak light distribution, assuming it indicates the galactic center, and we allowed the ellipticity and PA to vary during the fitting process. Thus, we ensure that the fitted ellipses accurately reflect the morphology of the target galaxies, taking into account any deviations from the ideal elliptical shapes.
We computed the isophotal radii at surface brightness levels of in NUV and FUV, which roughly correspond to the average surface brightness at the optical diameter (see e.g. Gil de Paz etĀ al., 2007a; Marino etĀ al., 2010; Cortese etĀ al., 2012), using the limit AB magnitude in NUV of 20.08āmag and in FUV of 18.82āmag181818GALEX Guest Investigator Web Site https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/archive/galex/FAQ/counts_background.html.
4.3 Photometric and geometric parameters at different wavelengths
Photometric parameters, such as the PA and galaxy inclination, are useful observational constraints to reveal galaxy peculiarities when the galaxy configuration is examined, particularly when different wavelengths are considered. In Table 5 we list the photometric parameters resulting from the ellipse fitting process. PanelĀ (g) of FigureĀ 4 and FiguresĀ 7 to 19 shows the surface brightness profiles of GALEX NUV and FUV images, while the resulting ellipses were overlaid on the NUV (panel e) and FUV (panelĀ f) images, respectively (see for example FigureĀ 4). The 1 NUV and FUV isophotes computed after applying a Gaussian spatial smoothing of 4.5āarcsecā(3āpix) on the NUV and FUV images were overlaid on the H monochromatic map (panelĀ a) in order to allow a better comparison of the morphology traced at different wavelengths.
Inclination plays a critical role in the analysis of galaxy structure as it is used to correct its main parameters as the brightness (e.g. Stone etĀ al., 2021) and the rotation velocity (e.g. Epinat etĀ al., 2010). Assuming that the image of a spiral galaxy is the projection of a disc with the shape of an oblate spheroid, the inclinations of spiral galaxies can be roughly derived from the ellipticity of apertures used for photometry. If the thickness of a disc is neglected the relation between the inclination () to the celestial plane and the apparent diameter ratio can be described using the relationĀ 1. If the thickness is taken in consideration, the inclination can be estimated using the expression:
(3) |
where is the ellipticity at the isophotal radius and is the flattening, in this case , and are the three spheroidās axes (see e.g. Barbosa etĀ al., 2015). Many works have shown that the flattening is type dependent (see e.g. Haynes & Giovanelli, 1984). In this sense, Hall etĀ al. (2012) determined an intrinsic flattening for spiral galaxies, , by studying the relationship between the axial ratios in the -band versus the galaxy colour computed at the effective radius for 871 edge-on galaxies from the SDSS. They showed that, although increases with redder, progressively bulge dominated galaxies, the distribution was rather flat for late-type galaxies only with an upturn in the transition between Sa to S0 galaxies.
Nonetheless, deriving the inclination from ellipticity may be problematic. For instance, prominent bulges can dominate the axial ratio measurement or in other cases, galaxies may not be axially symmetric owing to tidal effects or high surface brightness bars embedded in low surface brightness discs (Epinat etĀ al., 2008; Epinat etĀ al., 2010; Hall etĀ al., 2012; Kourkchi etĀ al., 2019; Stone etĀ al., 2021). All these rather common configurations can lead to large errors. Some solutions have been proposed, for example, in order to avoid contamination due to clumps of star formation, Epinat etĀ al. (2010) suggested that the inclination should be preferentially derived from broad-band images with high resolution, as in the NIR rest frame of the galaxy tracer of the old stellar disc.
In addition to photometric techniques, to compute the galaxy inclination, some studies use visual inspection to evaluate the inclinations. For example, to select the high inclined galaxies from SDSS and CALIFA surveys, Bizyaev etĀ al. (2017) and Levy etĀ al. (2019), respectively, used the visibility of the dust lane in optical images of the galaxies to confirm the edge-on nature of the galaxies, excluding galaxies with dust lanes that were not centred in the midplane or displaying any visible track of spiral arms, bars, or other features. Kourkchi etĀ al. (2019) evaluated this technique by designing an online graphical tool, achieving uncertainties of and suggesting to replace the human eye with a machine learning algorithm to compute more accurate inclinations.
In this work, the galactic inclination was one of the selection paramaters (see Sectionā2) for our sample. Firstly, the inclination of the CIG galaxies in our sample was computed by the relationĀ 1 using the galactic apparent major and minor axes from the optical wavelength published in the NED. Next, we computed the inclinations of galaxies in our sample applying the relationĀ 3, for the the 2.22ām and NUV emission images we employed the ellipticity obtained from the ellipse fitting performed to them, and for the optical wavelength image, we used the galactic apparent major and minor axes from the NED. In all cases, we used the constant flattening determined by Hall etĀ al. (2012). In the case of the NIR image we have computed the inclination of both 1 and 3 isophotal levels.
CIG | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
71 | 83.8 | ā¦ | 78.4 | 78.6 | 81.2 |
95 | 86.5 | ā¦ | 83.3 | 75.0 | 85.4 |
159 | 85.4 | ā¦ | 90.0 | 86.9 | 90.0 |
171 | 84.0 | ā¦ | 78.7 | 86.6 | 83.7 |
183 | 80.4 | 84.0 | 82.9 | 76.9 | 75.5 |
201 | 80.9 | 84.8 | 79.9 | 80.6 | 73.6 |
329 | 81.3 | 85.5 | 78.4 | 79.1 | 80.4 |
416 | 81.1 | 85.2 | 77.4 | 69.3 | 56.0 |
593 | 83.2 | ā¦ | 76.4 | 72.3 | 81.7 |
847 | 81.2 | 85.4 | 74.6 | 79.2 | 76.2 |
906 | 80.9 | 84.8 | 75.7 | 81.3 | 69.6 |
922 | 84.2 | ā¦ | 83.5 | 84.6 | 82.6 |
936 | 85.7 | ā¦ | 66.6 | 70.2 | 86.4 |
1003 | 82.5 | 89.1 | 81.1 | 81.5 | 63.5 |
Columnā(1):āCIG name. Columnā(2)Ā andĀ (3):āinclination computed assuming a flat disc (see equationĀ 1) and taking into account the galactic thickness (see equationĀ 3) respectively, using the optical ellipseās semi-axes available in NED in both cases. Columns (4), (5), (6) and (7)āinclination computed taking into account the galactic thickness (see the relation 3), using the ellipses fitted to the 1 and 3 level of the NIR image and to the one fitted to the brightness level of the NUV image. In column (3), by using the flattening constant determined by Hall etĀ al. (2012), the lower limit of ellipticity , for which equationĀ 3 is valid, is exceeded by some of the galaxies in our sample in the optical band.
In Tableā6 we compare the inclinations obtained. EquationĀ 3 has a lower threshold of effectiveness depending on the flattening value () considered. Since Hall etĀ al. (2012) determined the flattening value in the -band, in the optical band we obtained inconsistent results for some galaxies in our sample having ellipticity . Therefore, in the following we will discuss the inclination calculated considering the galaxy as infinitesimally thin only in the optical band (see relationĀ 1). Excluding particular cases, the inclination computed with the ellipse fitted to the NIR 3 isophotal level has an averaged difference of 2 with respect to the optical inclination, while the inclination from the NIR 1 isophotal level has an averaged difference of 4 and the mean difference with the inclination from the NUV emission is 3. Hence, the inclinations computed with the parameters of the ellipse fitted to the NIR image at the 3 isophotal level are the most congruent with the optical inclination, and following Epinat etĀ al. (2010), this may be the best estimation to measure the galaxy inclination.
When computing the inclination, particular cases showing 10 with respect to the optical inclination were detected. Inclinations computed with the NIR 3 isophotal level presented four particular cases: CIGā95, 416, 593 and 936, which have a bright central bulge dominating the NIR emission. In the case of the NUV emission, the particular cases are CIGā201, 416, 906 and 1003, which have the most extended UV haloes and the largest filaments above the disc. In contrast, CIGā936 is the only one particular case obtained for the NIR 1 isophotal level. The galaxy CIGā936 (Figureā18) is an extreme case in our sample displaying its NIR and H emission concentrated in the inner central 30āarcsecā(6.3ākpc) of a disc with optical diameter of āarcsecā(38.9ākpc). This galaxy might be compared with the Sombrero galaxy (NGCā4594), an S0 galaxy whose bulge governs the axial ratio (e.g. Hall etĀ al., 2012), though we cannot consider CIGā936 an early-type system whilst its disc is dominated by the UV emission, tracer of the young stellar population. The results previously described seem to indicate that the apparent discrepancies in the inclination values determined using images in different wavelengths are due to actual asymmetries of the old stellar disc and the presence of an extended UV disc and halo.
In conclusion, inclination measurement is essential for unraveling the complex structures of galactic components, in particular UV extended discs and haloes. By applying different stellar population tracers, this study allowed us to better separate these different components.
5 Results
In this section we present individual results obtained by comparing properties of the DSS R-band, the 2MASS K-band, the GALEX NUV and FUV images versus the H monochromatic map from FP GHASP data. For each galaxy we indicate the old stellar population disc using the ellipse fitting to the isophotal level at 3 on the background of the 2MASS K-band image, and we trace the young stellar population using both the ellipse corresponding to the and the 1 isophote of the GALEX NUV and FUV images. An example is shown in FigureĀ 4.
CIGā71 (UGCā1391):
The H monochromatic map shows a discontinuous disc mainly shifted Southwards from the photometric centre of the NIR-band exceeding the radius of the old stellar disc. A prominent and luminous knot is observed at 30Ā arcsec Southwards from the NIR photometric centre. The K-band image shows a symmetrical disc within the ellipse fitted to the 3Ā brightness level, but the disc becomes more extended and warped towards the South. The FUV emission is concentrated near the galactic disc centre and then spreads Southwards at lower brightness. This map also shows a FUV emission cloud in the North. The NUV emission displays a continuous disc extended along the major axis beyond the old stellar population disc. The photometric centre does not match with the H, NUV, and FUV emission maxima. The isolation criteria of Verley etĀ al. (2007b) placed CIGā71 outside the isolation plane (see FigureĀ 3), which was confirmed using \ionHi emission by Jones etĀ al. (2018). Moreover, we observed that CIGā71 has common features observed in interacting galaxies (e.g. NGCā5258 from KPGā389, Fuentes-Carrera etĀ al., 2019). Likely, this galaxy experienced an interaction despite its nearest neighbor is 384ākpc away (see Table 2).
Remaining galaxies are discussed in AppendixĀ D.
6 Discussion
In the following we discuss our findings at the light of the current literature focusing on three aspects: the stellar and warm gas emission in the disc, the detection of extraplanar warm gas emission and the extension of the UV emission with respect to NIR and H emission.
6.1 The emission in the disc
In this work, we have examined the location of both the old and young stellar population in order to determine the boundaries of the galactic disc in highly inclined galaxies to reveal the existence or lack of a gaseous extraplanar component. Since in late-type galaxies the old and young stellar populations are mixed in the disc and arms, and to be consistent with previous photometric results (see e.g. Jarrett etĀ al., 2003), we normalised the stellar disc using the ellipse fitted to the 3 on the background level of the NIR image, which delimits the region occupied by both old and young stellar populations.
Nonetheless, the definition of the galactic disc, which is used to find an extraplanar component, is not immediately obvious. In FiguresĀ 4, andĀ 7 toĀ 19, we plot the DSSĀ R-band image of galaxies in our sample to compare images in different wavelengths with the optical one. We observe that the radius of the R-band image is larger than the radius of the isophotal radius in K-band. In fact, Jarrett (2000) compared the K-band to optical-band (B-band) imaging properties (size, total flux, central surface brightness and elongation) in order to understand the stellar light coming from different components. He found that the K-band elliptical isophotal diameter corresponding to surface brightness () represents about 70% of the optical radius measured at , showing that the NIR sensitivity decreases for the later-type (i.e., āblueā) galaxies, and concluding that as late-type galaxies evolve, their cores gradually shift towards reddening and brightening, resembling early-type disks or spheroids. Certainly, the K-band predominantly traces the oldest stellar population (stars older than 4Ā Gyr, Fingerhut etĀ al., 2010, and references therein), while optical bands like R or B-band are more sensitive to the younger, bluer stars. Therefore, it is expected that K-band measurements correspond to a smaller region. Since our main goal is to study the extraplanar ionized gas component in edge-on galaxies, we use 2MASS K-band imagery looking specifically the location of the old stellar population, tracer of the galactic fundamental structure, with the aim of isolating the oldest stars from the effects of young, blue stars.
On the other hand, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) have completed a mid-infrared survey of the entire sky in bands centered at wavelengths of 3.4, 4.6, 12, and 22m. However, its angular resolution of 6.1Ā arcsec, 6.4Ā arcsec, 6.5Ā arcsec, and 12.0Ā arcsec at these bands respectively (e.g. Wright etĀ al., 2010; Jarrett etĀ al., 2012), is notably inferior compared to the higher angular resolution of 2.0Ā arcsec achieved by the 2MASS for the K-band images. Therefore, the selection of the narrow-band K-band imagery for our analysis offers a clear advantage over the DSSĀ R-band or WISE data, as it allows a more precise distinction of the galactic components we are interested in studying in the galaxies in our sample. This choice allows us to discriminate between galactic disc emission and extraplanar emission, providing us with a more solid basis for our analysis and interpretation of the eDIG in galaxies of our sample.
Considering that the mass of our galaxy sample ranges between and (see TableĀ 7), one might infer that our galaxies are dwarf galaxies with fainter emission in older stellar populations. To explore the classification of dwarf galaxies, we compare our sample with the dwarf irregular (dI) galaxies from Fingerhut etĀ al. (2010)ās survey. Firstly, it is worth noting that most of these dI galaxies were too faint to be detected by the 2MASS, implying magnitudes of Ā mag (Jarrett etĀ al., 2000; Jarrett, 2000; Jarrett etĀ al., 2003). Secondly, the mass range of their dI sample falls between to (McCall etĀ al., 2012). In contrast, our sample consists of galaxies with apparent K-band magnitude Ā mag (see selection criteria in SectionĀ 2), exhibiting masses one order magnitude higher and having been previously studied in the context of the 2MASS LGA and the 2MASS Extended Source Catalogue. This prior analysis ensures that our galaxies are indeed extended objects with bright NIR photometry. Therefore, in the context of Fingerhut etĀ al. (2010), our sample does not align with the category of dwarf galaxies. Since we are not studying dwarf galaxies, we could claim that the surface brightness isophote at 3 of the K-band image, selected to trace the stellar disc, encompasses the light of both the bulge and the disc.
Inside the ellipses fitted to the 3 level of the 2.22ām images, we observed regular discs, while the isophote at 1 level shows that the old stars at the borders follow the shape of the halo. For instance, the faintest NIR emission in CIGā71 suggests that the old stars are displaced to the South as well as the H emission, and in CIGā201 the faint old stars trace the same shape of the filamentary structure outlined by the H and UV emission. Regarding the behaviour of the parameter versus the major axis relation (see SectionĀ 4), in most galaxies the pattern of the curve changes increasing its dispersion from the radial position of the 3 level. This is more evident in CIGā71, 171, 329, 847 and 936. While a similar break in the UV surface brightness profiles is traced at the radial position of the isophote at 1 level of the K-band image, as observed in CIGā171, 201 and 906. This break in the surface brightness profiles could define the edge of the stellar disc, however, we still relay in our selection because of the better resolution of the 2MASS than the one of the GALEX images (see Sectionā3). Moreover, for some galaxies as CIGā329, 922 or 1003, if the stellar disc is defined by the the isophote enclosing (1 level), they would appear to be dominated by an old stellar disc and no extraplanar gas would have been detected. In this way, besides to the environmental criteria adopted for selecting a sample, the paradox in selecting the edge of the stellar disc might be another parameter causing discordance in the published results regarding the detection of eDIG.
We have found a variety of morphologies in different wavelengths in galaxies of our sample. With respect to the old stellar population disc, most of the K-band images (12 out of 14) showed regular discs with a central bulge and some small filaments along the disc that do not break the stellar disc symmetry in general. Two galaxies showed an asymmetric or perturbed stellar disc: CIGā416 (FigureĀ 13) presenting a tail shape drawn in its K-band image, and CIGā593 (FigureĀ 14) with a truncated old stellar disc that follows the morphology of the disturbed and faint H disc.
On the other hand, the only one galaxy in our sample reliably identified as LINER (Sabater etĀ al., 2012) and whose photometric analysis revealed a coefficient suggesting a "boxy" bulge is CIGā329 (FigureĀ 12). Although it is difficult to detect a bar in edge-on galaxies, a plausible explanation could be that there is a bar in CIGā329 which may have undergone a vertical bending instability to form this box-shaped bulge. It is well known that two-thirds of star-forming disc galaxies in the local universe are barred (e.g. Eskridge etĀ al., 2000; Whyte etĀ al., 2002; Aguerri etĀ al., 2009; Masters etĀ al., 2011). Numerical simulations of isolated galaxies have shown that a stellar bar can be formed spontaneously (see e.g. Miller etĀ al., 1970; Hohl, 1971; Combes & Sanders, 1981b; Sellwood & Wilkinson, 1993; Athanassoula, 2003; Athanassoula etĀ al., 2013; Sellwood, 2013; Saha & Elmegreen, 2018; Ghosh etĀ al., 2023), but also, that a bar can be formed by a 1:1 prograde flyby interaction and remain several Gyr after the interaction when galaxies are already separated by several Mpc (e.g. Lang etĀ al., 2014). If the stellar bar of CIGā329 was formed by a secular process, why has no bar formed in other galaxies in our sample? It might be that these galaxies are hostile to bar formation or that the bar has been destroyed in the course of their evolutionary pathways. Indeed, the presence of a massive central bulge can suppress the bar instability (e.g., see Saha & Elmegreen, 2018; Kataria & Das, 2018). Alternatively, bars can be destroyed by a massive central mass concentration and/or inflow of the interstellar gas in the central region (e.g., see Pfenniger & Norman, 1990; Shen & Sellwood, 2004; Athanassoula etĀ al., 2005; Bournaud etĀ al., 2005; Hozumi & Hernquist, 2005; Athanassoula etĀ al., 2013). Furthermore, recent study by Ghosh etĀ al. (2021) revealed that a minor merger can lead to a substantial weakening of bars, and in extreme cases, even a complete destruction of bars in galaxies.
Since most of the galaxies in our sample showed extraplanar material in both UV and H emission, in the next sections we discuss some general results from the sample in order to understand the origin of the eDIG and UV-haloes detected.
6.2 The eDIG detection
In general, not all edge-on galaxies show detectable eDIG emission, i.e. a gaseous halo above the layer of \ionHii regions associated with the disc. The presence of eDIG in late-type spirals is a direct consequence of SFR in the underlying galactic disc (e.g Rossa & Dettmar, 2000, 2003a). It has been found that the prominence of gaseous haloes correlates with tracers of star formation in the disc, such as the surface density of FIR emission, the SFR determined by H luminosity, and dust temperatures (e.g. Heald etĀ al., 2006a; Lu etĀ al., 2023). For instance, Rossa & Dettmar (2000) constructed a diagnostic DIG diagram (DDD) that shows the ratio of the flux densities at 60 and 100m expressed as versus the ratio of the FIR luminosity () divided by the optical diameter of the isophote squared (), with which they demonstrated that galaxies suggesting features associated with starburst activity as and are candidates to display eDIG layers.
In order to locate our sample in the DDD, we computed the FIR-luminosity using the expression:
(4) |
with and in Jy (obtained from Lisenfeld etĀ al. (2007) and presented in TableĀ 1) and the distance to the galaxy in Mpc (Rossa & Dettmar, 2003a). The term was expressed in .
From our maps, showed in SectionĀ 5 and in AppendixĀ E, we detected galaxies showing one or more morphological eDIG features (see e.g. Rossa & Dettmar, 2003a; Heald etĀ al., 2006a; Rosado etĀ al., 2013), summarized in TableĀ 7. The brightest \ionHii regions in Local Group galaxies have a surface brightness detection between magnitude orders of and (e.g. Hodge & Lee, 1990; Azimlu etĀ al., 2011; CedrĆ©s etĀ al., 2012), while the estimated mean sensitivity for the eDIG observed in other galaxies, such as NGCĀ 891 or NGCĀ 4565, is on the order of (e.g. Rand, 1996; Rossa & Dettmar, 2003b; Ho etĀ al., 2016; Jones etĀ al., 2017). For this work, the surface brightness detection limit of GHASP is (Epinat etĀ al., 2008; GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez etĀ al., 2019; Sardaneta etĀ al., 2022), which is shallower than needed for detection of the faintest eDIG, but still within an acceptable range of sensitivity to offer a reliable perspective for our study.
By discriminating the H emission in -direction from the galaxies displaying H emitting gas extended radially, almost all the galaxies in our sample showed H emitting gas extended radially outside from the stellar disc, CIGā1003 being the only exception, whose H emission is concentrated in the central regions drawing a cone shape and ionized gas filaments. In the vertical direction, the H monochromatic maps display eDIG configurations such as filamentary structures in CIGā71, 329, 593 and 1003; layers of diffuse gas in CIGā201, 329, 416; and patches or detached clouds of ionized gas emission in CIGā95, 159, 593, 922, 847 and 1003. In some cases, the ionized gas falls in the outskirts of the stellar disc tracing a warped structure likely from a recent interaction as in CIGā71 and 183. We have not detected any extraplanar H emission in the vertical direction in CIGā 171, 906 and 936.
As shown in the top left panel of FigureĀ 5, we compare the position in the DDD of our galaxies with those in the Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) sample which contains 62 spiral galaxies with inclination , an optical diameter of and radial velocity , all of them detected with IRAS in the FIR. We must consider that when defining extraplanar emission, Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) did not distinguish between radially or vertically extended H emission. In this case, all our galaxies would have eDIG. To ensure a more reliable comparison, in FigureĀ 5, we differentiate between galaxies in our sample with and without vertically extended H emission.
FigureĀ 5 shows that 6 out of 14 galaxies (42%) of our sample lie above the threshold of warm galaxies at (horizontal dashed line). Half of these galaxies, namely CIGā71, 936 and 1003, are located outside the region of bona fide isolated galaxies of the AMIGA sample (see FigureĀ 3). In this context, we explore the possibility that eDIG incidence is correlated with the environment. In fact, Lisenfeld etĀ al. (2007) found that the value of of the AMIGA sample is lower than the one of interacting samples from the literature indicating that the interaction can increase the dust temperature. The panelĀ (a) of FigureĀ 5 also shows that our sample and the Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) sample share a similar distribution: galaxies with eDIG from both samples populate the entire plane.
Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) rejected galaxies in compact groups but included widely spaced pairs of galaxies. We associated an environmental classification to their sample using NED and Simbad191919āThe SIMBAD astronomical databaseā, (Wenger etĀ al., 2000). databases, by distinguishing groups, galaxy pairs and relatively isolated galaxies, whereby galaxies with siblings at a distance at were included in galaxies belonging to a galactic group and, galaxies with siblings at and galaxies with no record were considered isolated (see TableĀ 10). These sub-samples are plotted in the (b), (c) and (d)Ā panels of FigureĀ 5. Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) detected eDIG in 5 out of 9 (56%) paired galaxies and in 21 out of 34 (62%) galaxies in groups: that is, in 26 out of 45 (58%) interacting galaxies, while, for the sub-sample of isolated galaxies, the eDIG was detected in 10 out of 19 (53%) targets. If we do not distinguish between radial and vertically extended emission, we detected H emission extended outside the disc in all galaxies in our sample. However, due to the inaccuracies that may exist in the definition of the stellar disc (see SectionĀ 4), we consider having detected eDIG only in 11 out of 14 galaxies (79%) where the diffuse ionized gas extends out of the disc vertically.
From the comparison with the entire sample of Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) we suggest that the environment is not connected with the presence of the eDIG. Confirming that the incidence of eDIG in late-type spirals is a direct consequence of the SFR in the underlying galactic disc as found by Rossa & Dettmar (2003a). The interaction could trigger the SFR for a short period of time. However, we also detect eDIG in a high percentage of galaxies that have been isolated for a long period of time.
MIR | NUV | FUV | H | H | Morphological | ||||
CIG | M | eDIG morphology | features | ||||||
Name | (10Ā M) | (kpc) | (kpc) | (kpc) | (kpc) | (kpc) | (kpc) | ||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
71 | 14.1 | 4.2 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 4.7 | E(r) | A, Ph, UV, |
95 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 12.1 | 1.8 | 12.1 | 1.8 | 10.4 | E(r), \ionHii-R | Ph, UV |
159 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 10.7 | ā¦ | 1.7 | 0.5 | 9.6 | E(r), \ionHii-R | W, L(H), L(FUV), T |
171 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 6.2 | ā¦ | 5.6 | ā¦ | 4.8 | E(r), \ionHii-R | A, UV |
183 | 8.1 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 8.0 | 2.8 | 8.0 | E(r)(z), \ionHii-R, P | A, W, K, Ph |
201 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 10.0 | 2.3 | 8.9 | 1.8 | 8.7 | E(r)(z), P, F | A, K |
329 | 31.8 | 3.3 | 8.1 | 1.8 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 4.1 | E(r)(z), F | B, A, UV |
416 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 7.1 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 2.9 | E(r)(z), \ionHii-R, F | A, K, UV |
593 | 12.1 | 2.5 | 13.0 | 2.1 | 11.0 | 1.6 | 9.3 | \ionHii-R | A, W, UV, L(H) |
847 | 11.9 | 0.9 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 8.6 | 0.3 | 4.3 | E(r), \ionHii-R | W, K, Ph |
906 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 8.0 | 2.9 | 8.0 | ā¦ | 1.4 | F | Ph, UV, L(H) |
922 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 9.1 | 1.5 | 9.1 | 1.0 | 4.5 | E(r), \ionHii-R | A, W, UV |
936 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 18.4 | ā¦ | 17.7 | ā¦ | 1.4 | \ionHii-R | UV, L(H), T |
1003 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ā¦ | E(z), F | A, W, K, UV |
Columns: (1)Ā CIG galaxy name; (2)Ā Stellar mass (M) computed with Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) data at MIR band (see equationĀ 5); (3)Ā andĀ (4), (5)Ā andĀ (6) and (7)Ā andĀ (8) averaged maximum radial () and vertical () distance reached by the extra-planar component at NUV, NUV and H emission, respectively; (9)Ā morphological description of the extraplanar warm gas component or eDIG: E:Ā extended emission in radialĀ (r)- or verticalĀ (z)-direction mostly, P:Ā patches, F:Ā filaments, \ionHii-R: extraplanar \ionHiiĀ region; (10)Ā morphological features in different wavelengths: B:Ā bar, A:Ā asymmetric disc, W:Ā warped disc, K:Ā multiple inner emission knots, Ph:Ā unmatching photometric maxima, UV:Ā disc dominated by the UV halo, L(): Low emission detected in the wavelength band . T: thin disc structure.
6.3 The UV-halo
From the comparison between the H and the UV imagery, Thilker etĀ al. (2007) discovered that 30% of low inclined galaxies () in the local universe present extended UV emission in the extreme outer disc where the number of \ionHii regions expected is negligible with respect to the UV emission regions. In the case of high inclined galaxies (), extended diffuse UV emission up to 15-20ākpc above the disc midplane has been detected (e.g. Hodges-Kluck & Bregman, 2014), which always coincides with the presence of the extraplanar H emission, although sometimes the ionized gas component is only detected at lower heights (Hodges-Kluck etĀ al., 2016; Jo etĀ al., 2018).
From the individual maps displayed in FigureĀ 4 and FiguresĀ 7 to 19, we found that all galaxies in our sample present radial or vertically extended NUV emission, that all galaxies have radially extended FUV emission, and that 11 out of 14 galaxies show vertically extended FUV emission. These 11 galaxies displaying UV halo agree with the galaxies in our sample showing diffuse ionized gas extended out of the disc vertically (eDIG) (see TableĀ 7). We also observed that in most galaxies in our sample presenting the ionized gas extraplanar component, the H and UV emissions have very similar morphology and the UV halo persists reaching larger heights where the ionized gas is no longer detected, as observed previously by Hoopes etĀ al. (2001) and Hodges-Kluck etĀ al. (2016). And, finally, even in galaxies where we did not observe any extraplanar (axis direction) H emission (CIGā159, 171 and 936), we still have detected an UV halo in the NUV emission.
We found that 7 out of 14 (50%) galaxies of our sample showing a radially extended UV disc presented at least one feature of what could be perceived as a recent interaction such as disturbed ionized gas disc (CIGā71, 95, 171, 183, 416, 593, 847) and/or mismatch of the gaseous and stellar maxima (CIGā71, 95, 183, 593, 847) suggesting that the environment might be a potential cause of these events, even within isolated galaxies. From studies to low-inclined galaxies, it has been proposed that the extended UV disc might be a consequence of young stars associated with low-mass stellar associations located at large galactocentric distances (Gil de Paz etĀ al., 2007b) which were likely triggered by recent/ongoing interaction events or a high specific rate of gas accretion (Thilker etĀ al., 2007). However, it is assumed that isolated galaxies have not experienced gravitational influences from its close neighbours over the past few billion years (e.g. Karachentseva etĀ al., 2010; Verdes-Montenegro etĀ al., 2005; Rampazzo etĀ al., 2016). Moreover, the lack of signals from a short-term event as a past major merger implies that the mechanism that supplies the gas needed to form the UV extension has been working for a prolonged duration to achieve this level of richness (Thilker etĀ al., 2007). Studying UV photometry of cluster galaxies, Cortese etĀ al. (2012) interpreted the extended UV emission as the result of the consumption of their \ionHi reservoir, inferring that this growth could be stopped and even reversed if the atomic hydrogen is removed via some kind of environmental effect. Therefore, the observed UV extension could potentially be the result of scattering dust particles stemming from ongoing regions of star formation (see e.g. Shinn & Seon, 2015), potentially introducing attenuation effects that shape the observed UV emission.
We observed that the UV halo (vertically extended UV emission) in galaxies CIGā201, 329 and 1003 does not trace a structured disc, these haloes are more extensive and have complex filamentary structures that match the H and NIR morphology. Moreover, the NIR, H and UV emission detected in CIGā201 and 1003 shows signs of a cone-shape suggesting the presence of a central outflow (see individual galaxy notes in the AppendixāD). From the comparison between UV and NIR imagery, it has been shown that UV halo along the major axis relative to the optical radius is unrelated to the prominence of the bulge and, therefore, the radially concentrated UV haloes are unlikely light from the bulge outskirts (Hodges-Kluck etĀ al., 2016). In the case of CIGā201, 329 and 1003, the UV diffuse emission might be expected as a result of scattered UV light that escape from the disc dust (Diffuse extraplanar Dust, eDust) or emission from hot core-helium-burning stars (Hoopes etĀ al., 2005). The simultaneity between the eDust and the extraplanar H emission suggests that a large fraction of the H emission could be originated from the galactic plane and is scattered by the eDust into the galactic halo (Hoopes etĀ al., 2005; Seon etĀ al., 2011; Jo etĀ al., 2018).
On the other hand, the existence of an UV halo does not always mean the existence of eDust (e.g. Shinn, 2019). We observed that in 10 out of 14 galaxies (71%) of our sample presenting an UV halo (CIGĀ 71, 95, 159, 171, 183, 416, 593, 847, 906, 922), the UVĀ light reveals an intense brightness and a vertical extension above the galactic centre, which gradually decreases with increasing distance from the galactic centre, rather indicating a disc extended structure. Other possible mechanisms producers of diffuse-and-global UVĀ haloes are galactic radiation, (magneto-)hydrodynamic phenomena or accretion from the CGM or ICM (Hodges-Kluck & Bregman, 2014; Shinn & Seon, 2015; Hodges-Kluck etĀ al., 2016; Shinn, 2019). Conversely, Hodges-Kluck etĀ al. (2016) observed that the UV haloes are brightest over the parts of the disc with bright H, X-ray, or radio emission, suggesting that they are connected to star formation in the disc, but not necessarily in a way that requires ionizing photons or winds to escape the disc.
Previous studies about the origin of the eDIG have found regions consistent with mixed OB and hot low-mass evolved stars (HOLMES), and OBāshock ionization as the primary driver of eDIG ionization (Flores-Fajardo etĀ al., 2011; Jones etĀ al., 2017; Levy etĀ al., 2019; Rautio etĀ al., 2022). The NUV light is dominated by stars in the turn-off point in the HR-diagram (turn-off stars), while, the FUV emission of old ānormalā stellar populations is dominated by post asymptotic giant branch (PAGB) stars (e.g. Marino etĀ al., 2011b). HOLMES, which include PAGB stars and white dwarfs, are found abundantly in the thick discs and lower haloes of galaxies. Their considerable vertical distribution compared to OB stars and their significant contribution to the UV radiation of galaxies (see e.g. Rautio etĀ al., 2022, and references therein), make them candidates to be a source of eDIG ionization and, consequently, of UV haloes.
However, while late-type galaxies in nearby groups, observed from various inclination angles (ranging from 58Ā° to 90Ā°), display FUV and NUV images practically identical (e.g. Marino etĀ al., 2010), our isolated galaxies, as previously noted in early-type galaxies, reveal that the FUV emission appears more compact and luminous compared to the NUV emission (e.g. Gil de Paz etĀ al., 2007a; Rampazzo etĀ al., 2007; Jeong etĀ al., 2007; Jeong etĀ al., 2009; Marino etĀ al., 2010, 2011a; Marino etĀ al., 2011b). Following Cortese etĀ al. (2012), if the extended UV emission arises from the conversion of atomic hydrogen gas into new stars, it suggests that the stellar population is becoming younger or more metal-poor. As a result, the turn-off stars shift to bluer colours and higher luminosity, increasing the NUV emission. Simultaneously, the contribution to the FUV from PAGB stars decrease because, despite their higher luminosity, the duration of the PAGB phase gets much shorter due to decreased available fuel Marino etĀ al. (2011b).
In summary, the nature of UV haloes in galaxies are subject to a complex interplay of factors, including SF, ionization processes, and possible CGM or ICM contributions. Further investigation of the specific mechanisms driving UV haloes is needed to fully understand their origin and importance in different galactic environments.
7 Summary and conclusions
Isolated galaxies constitute a reference model to study the environmental influence on galaxy evolution. In this work we studied the environmental impact on the incidence of eDIG in a sample of 14 nearby (0.02) isolated late-type edge-on () galaxies from the Catalogue of Isolated Galaxies (CIG, Karachentseva, 1973). We presented the H emission maps of galaxies in our sample with data obtained from the scanning Fabry-Perot interferometer, GHASP, offering a complete two-dimensional coverage of the emitting line region. We aimed to determine the galactic plane and to examine the distribution of the warm gaseous component with respect to the old and young stellar populations. Thus, we compared monochromatic H images with the NIR 2MASS K-band and UV from GALEX archive images.
We started by defining the stellar disc using the ellipse fitted to the 3 on the background level of the 2MASS K-band image, which delimits the region occupied by both old and young stellar populations. However, we are aware of selecting the boundary of the stellar disc might be another parameter causing discordance in the published results regarding the detection of eDIG. Thus, we consider having detected eDIG only in the 11 out of 14 galaxies (79%) where the diffuse ionized gas extends out of the disc vertically. If we do not distinguish between radial and vertically extended emission, we would have detected H emission extended outside the disc in all galaxies in our sample. In this case, we demonstrated that our sample is comparable to the broader sample studied by Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) when studying the incidence of eDIG.
We found that all galaxies in our sample present extraplanar NUV emission in both radial and vertical directions. While 11 out of 14 galaxies (79%) have vertically extended FUV emission, the same galaxies presenting eDIG. Because we showed that at least 79%Ā (2/3) of isolated late-type, high inclined galaxies have both extended UV discs and UV haloes, our study reinforces the observations made by Thilker etĀ al. (2007) who found that one-third of the low-inclined galaxies in the local Universe have extended UV discs. Hence, suggesting that the oldest star formation occurring between 10 and 100Ā Myrs extends well beyond the disc defined by the H map which only traces the most recent star formation (younger than 10Ā Myrs).
We find that the PA obtained with NIR, optical and NUV images varies on average PA, which is expected for galaxies that have not experienced strong interactions in the last billions of years. However, when computing the inclination, some cases showed with respect to the optical inclination as a consequence of the presence of old stellar population centralized discs and UV extended discs and haloes.
Our study suggests that the eDIG is revealed in a significant fraction of galaxies (79% of the galaxies presented H emission vertically extended) which have been isolated from a long period of time. When compared with the generic sample of highly inclined galaxies by Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) we did not find evidence that the environment plays a role in the presence of the eDIG incidence. This confirms that the presence of eDIG in late-type spirals is a direct consequence of the SFR in the underlying galactic disc as suggested by Rossa & Dettmar (2003a).
We foresee to discuss the H kinematics of the galaxies in our sample in a forthcoming paper. Furthermore, since GALEX images are quite faint we are acquiring Astrosat-UVIT (Tandon etĀ al., 2017) pointed observations of our galaxies in the FUV band.
Acknowledgements
Based on observations taken with the GHASP spectrograph at the Observatoire de Haute Provence (OHP, France), operated by the French CNRS. The authors acknowledge the technical assistance provided by the late Olivier Boissin ā ā from LAM and the OHP team before and during the observations, namely the night team: Jean Balcaen, StĆ©phane Favard, Jean-Pierre Troncin, Didier Gravallon and the day team led by FranƧois Moreau. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. M.M.S. thanks the āPrograma de Becas Posdoctorales en la UNAMā of DGAPA-UNAM. M.R. acknowledges the project CONACyTĀ CF-86367. I.F.C. acknowledges the financial support of SIP-IPN grant no.ā20232054.
Data Availability
The data used in this work can be found online on the data servers of The STScI Digitized Sky Survey202020The STScI Digitized Sky Survey https://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_form, Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)212121Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/2mass.html and the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) 222222Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) https://archive.stsci.edu/missions-and-data/galex. The FP data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
- Aguerri etĀ al. (2009) Aguerri J.Ā A.Ā L., MĆ©ndez-Abreu J., Corsini E.Ā M., 2009, A&A, 495, 491
- Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al. (2013) Argudo-FernĆ”ndez M., etĀ al., 2013, A&A, 560, A9
- Argudo-FernĆ”ndez etĀ al. (2015) Argudo-FernĆ”ndez M., etĀ al., 2015, A&A, 578, A110
- Athanassoula (2003) Athanassoula E., 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179
- Athanassoula etĀ al. (2005) Athanassoula E., Lambert J.Ā C., Dehnen W., 2005, MNRAS, 363, 496
- Athanassoula etĀ al. (2013) Athanassoula E., Machado R. E.Ā G., Rodionov S.Ā A., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1949
- Azimlu etĀ al. (2011) Azimlu M., Marciniak R., Barmby P., 2011, AJ, 142, 139
- Barbosa etĀ al. (2015) Barbosa C.Ā E., etĀ al., 2015, MNRAS, 453, 2965
- Bianchi (2011) Bianchi L., 2011, Ap&SS, 335, 51
- Bizyaev etĀ al. (2017) Bizyaev D., etĀ al., 2017, ApJ, 839, 87
- Bizyaev etĀ al. (2022) Bizyaev D., Walterbos R. A.Ā M., Chen Y.-M., Drory N., Lane R.Ā R., Brownstein J.Ā R., Riffel R.Ā A., 2022, MNRAS, 515, 1598
- Boselli etĀ al. (2010) Boselli A., etĀ al., 2010, PASP, 122, 261
- Boselli etĀ al. (2015) Boselli A., Fossati M., Gavazzi G., Ciesla L., Buat V., Boissier S., Hughes T.Ā M., 2015, A&A, 579, A102
- Boselli etĀ al. (2018) Boselli A., Fossati M., Ferrarese L., Boissier S., 2018, A&A, 614, A56
- Boselli etĀ al. (2022) Boselli A., Fossati M., Sun M., 2022, A&ARv, 30, 3
- Bournaud etĀ al. (2005) Bournaud F., Combes F., Semelin B., 2005, MNRAS, 364, L18
- Bradley etĀ al. (2020) Bradley L., etĀ al., 2020, astropy/photutils: 1.0.0, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4044744, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4044744
- Burstein (1979) Burstein D., 1979, ApJ, 234, 829
- Buta etĀ al. (2019) Buta R.Ā J., etĀ al., 2019, MNRAS, 488, 2175
- Cappellari & Copin (2003) Cappellari M., Copin Y., 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345
- CedrĆ©s etĀ al. (2012) CedrĆ©s B., Cepa J., Bongiovanni Ć., CastaƱeda H., SĆ”nchez-Portal M., Tomita A., 2012, A&A, 545, A43
- Cluver etĀ al. (2014) Cluver M.Ā E., etĀ al., 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 782, 90
- Combes & Sanders (1981a) Combes F., Sanders R.Ā H., 1981a, A&A, 96, 164
- Combes & Sanders (1981b) Combes F., Sanders R.Ā H., 1981b, A&A, 96, 164
- Cortese etĀ al. (2012) Cortese L., etĀ al., 2012, A&A, 544, A101
- Daigle etĀ al. (2006a) Daigle O., Carignan C., Amram P., Hernandez O., Chemin L., Balkowski C., Kennicutt R., 2006a, MNRAS, 367, 469
- Daigle etĀ al. (2006b) Daigle O., Carignan C., Hernandez O., Chemin L., Amram P., 2006b, MNRAS, 368, 1016
- Epinat etĀ al. (2008) Epinat B., Amram P., Marcelin M., 2008, MNRAS, 390, 466
- Epinat etĀ al. (2010) Epinat B., Amram P., Balkowski C., Marcelin M., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2113
- Eskridge etĀ al. (2000) Eskridge P.Ā B., etĀ al., 2000, AJ, 119, 536
- Eskridge etĀ al. (2002) Eskridge P.Ā B., etĀ al., 2002, ApJS, 143, 73
- Fingerhut etĀ al. (2010) Fingerhut R.Ā L., etĀ al., 2010, ApJ, 716, 792
- Flores-Fajardo etĀ al. (2011) Flores-Fajardo N., Morisset C., StasiÅska G., Binette L., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2182
- Fraternali & Binney (2006) Fraternali F., Binney J.Ā J., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 449
- Fuentes-Carrera etĀ al. (2019) Fuentes-Carrera I., etĀ al., 2019, A&A, 621, A25
- Gach etĀ al. (2002) Gach J.-L., etĀ al., 2002, PASP, 114, 1043
- Gehrels (1986) Gehrels N., 1986, ApJ, 303, 336
- Ghosh etĀ al. (2021) Ghosh S., Saha K., Di Matteo P., Combes F., 2021, MNRAS, 502, 3085
- Ghosh etĀ al. (2023) Ghosh S., Fragkoudi F., Di Matteo P., Saha K., 2023, A&A, 674, A128
- Gil de Paz etĀ al. (2005) Gil de Paz A., etĀ al., 2005, ApJ, 627, L29
- Gil de Paz etĀ al. (2007a) Gil de Paz A., etĀ al., 2007a, ApJS, 173, 185
- Gil de Paz etĀ al. (2007b) Gil de Paz A., etĀ al., 2007b, ApJ, 661, 115
- GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez etĀ al. (2019) GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez J.Ā A., etĀ al., 2019, A&A, 631, A71
- Gooch (1996) Gooch R., 1996, in Jacoby G.Ā H., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. p.Ā 80
- Hall etĀ al. (2012) Hall M., Courteau S., Dutton A.Ā A., McDonald M., Zhu Y., 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2741
- Haynes & Giovanelli (1984) Haynes M.Ā P., Giovanelli R., 1984, AJ, 89, 758
- Heald etĀ al. (2006a) Heald G.Ā H., Rand R.Ā J., Benjamin R.Ā A., Collins J.Ā A., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2006a, ApJ, 636, 181
- Heald etĀ al. (2006b) Heald G.Ā H., Rand R.Ā J., Benjamin R.Ā A., Bershady M.Ā A., 2006b, ApJ, 647, 1018
- Heald etĀ al. (2007) Heald G.Ā H., Rand R.Ā J., Benjamin R.Ā A., Bershady M.Ā A., 2007, ApJ, 663, 933
- Ho etĀ al. (2016) Ho I.Ā T., etĀ al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1257
- Hodge & Lee (1990) Hodge P., Lee M.Ā G., 1990, PASP, 102, 26
- Hodges-Kluck & Bregman (2014) Hodges-Kluck E., Bregman J.Ā N., 2014, ApJ, 789, 131
- Hodges-Kluck etĀ al. (2016) Hodges-Kluck E., Cafmeyer J., Bregman J.Ā N., 2016, ApJ, 833, 58
- Hohl (1971) Hohl F., 1971, ApJ, 168, 343
- Hoopes etĀ al. (2001) Hoopes C.Ā G., Walterbos R. A.Ā M., Bothun G.Ā D., 2001, ApJ, 559, 878
- Hoopes etĀ al. (2005) Hoopes C.Ā G., etĀ al., 2005, ApJ, 619, L99
- Hozumi & Hernquist (2005) Hozumi S., Hernquist L., 2005, PASJ, 57, 719
- HyperLEDA (2016) HyperLEDA 2016, Makarov, Dmitry and P. Prugniel and N. Terekhova and H. Courtois and I. Vauglin, http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/
- Jarrett (2000) Jarrett T.Ā H., 2000, PASP, 112, 1008
- Jarrett etĀ al. (2000) Jarrett T.Ā H., Chester T., Cutri R., Schneider S., Skrutskie M., Huchra J.Ā P., 2000, AJ, 119, 2498
- Jarrett etĀ al. (2003) Jarrett T.Ā H., Chester T., Cutri R., Schneider S.Ā E., Huchra J.Ā P., 2003, AJ, 125, 525
- Jarrett etĀ al. (2012) Jarrett T.Ā H., etĀ al., 2012, AJ, 144, 68
- Jedrzejewski (1987) Jedrzejewski R.Ā I., 1987, MNRAS, 226, 747
- Jeong etĀ al. (2007) Jeong H., Bureau M., Yi S.Ā K., KrajnoviÄ D., Davies R.Ā L., 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1021
- Jeong etĀ al. (2009) Jeong H., etĀ al., 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2028
- Jo etĀ al. (2018) Jo Y.-S., Seon K.-i., Shinn J.-H., Yang Y., Lee D., Min K.-W., 2018, ApJ, 862, 25
- Jones etĀ al. (2017) Jones A., etĀ al., 2017, A&A, 599, A141
- Jones etĀ al. (2018) Jones M.Ā G., etĀ al., 2018, A&A, 609, A17
- Joye & Mandel (2003) Joye W.Ā A., Mandel E., 2003, in Payne H.Ā E., Jedrzejewski R.Ā I., Hook R.Ā N., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII. p.Ā 489
- Kamphuis etĀ al. (2007) Kamphuis P., Peletier R.Ā F., Dettmar R.Ā J., van der Hulst J.Ā M., van der Kruit P.Ā C., Allen R.Ā J., 2007, A&A, 468, 951
- Karachentsev etĀ al. (2011) Karachentsev I.Ā D., Makarov D.Ā I., Karachentseva V.Ā E., Melnyk O.Ā V., 2011, Astrophysical Bulletin, 66, 1
- Karachentseva (1973) Karachentseva V.Ā E., 1973, Soobshcheniya Spetsialānoj Astrofizicheskoj Observatorii, 8
- Karachentseva etĀ al. (2010) Karachentseva V.Ā E., Mitronova S.Ā N., Melnyk O.Ā V., Karachentsev I.Ā D., 2010, Astrophysical Bulletin, 65, 1
- Kataria & Das (2018) Kataria S.Ā K., Das M., 2018, MNRAS, 475, 1653
- Kennicutt & Evans (2012) Kennicutt R.Ā C., Evans N.Ā J., 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531
- Kim etĀ al. (2021) Kim T., Athanassoula E., Sheth K., Bosma A., Park M.-G., Lee Y.Ā H., Ann H.Ā B., 2021, ApJ, 922, 196
- Kormendy & Illingworth (1982) Kormendy J., Illingworth G., 1982, ApJ, 256, 460
- Korsaga etĀ al. (2019) Korsaga M., Epinat B., Amram P., Carignan C., Adamczyk P., Sorgho A., 2019, MNRAS, 490, 2977
- Kourkchi etĀ al. (2019) Kourkchi E., Tully R.Ā B., Neill J.Ā D., Seibert M., Courtois H.Ā M., Dupuy A., 2019, ApJ, 884, 82
- Lang etĀ al. (2014) Lang M., Holley-Bockelmann K., Sinha M., 2014, ApJ, 790, L33
- Levy etĀ al. (2019) Levy R.Ā C., etĀ al., 2019, ApJ, 882, 84
- Lisenfeld etĀ al. (2007) Lisenfeld U., etĀ al., 2007, A&A, 462, 507
- Lu etĀ al. (2023) Lu L.-Y., etĀ al., 2023, MNRAS, 519, 6098
- Marino etĀ al. (2010) Marino A., Bianchi L., Rampazzo R., Buson L.Ā M., Bettoni D., 2010, A&A, 511, A29
- Marino etĀ al. (2011a) Marino A., Bianchi L., Rampazzo R., Thilker D., Annibali F., Bressan A., Buson L.Ā M., 2011a, Ap&SS, 335, 243
- Marino etĀ al. (2011b) Marino A., etĀ al., 2011b, MNRAS, 411, 311
- Masters etĀ al. (2011) Masters K.Ā L., etĀ al., 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2026
- McCall etĀ al. (2012) McCall M.Ā L., Vaduvescu O., Pozo Nunez F., Barr Dominguez A., Fingerhut R., Unda-Sanzana E., Li B., Albrecht M., 2012, A&A, 540, A49
- Miller & Veilleux (2003) Miller S.Ā T., Veilleux S., 2003, ApJS, 148, 383
- Miller etĀ al. (1970) Miller R.Ā H., Prendergast K.Ā H., Quirk W.Ā J., 1970, ApJ, 161, 903
- Nersesian etĀ al. (2019) Nersesian A., etĀ al., 2019, A&A, 624, A80
- Peters etĀ al. (2017) Peters S.Ā P.Ā C., van der Kruit P.Ā C., Allen R.Ā J., Freeman K.Ā C., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 65
- Pfenniger & Norman (1990) Pfenniger D., Norman C., 1990, ApJ, 363, 391
- Putman (2017) Putman M.Ā E., 2017, in Fox A., DavĆ© R., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies. p.Ā 1 (arXiv:1612.00461), doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52512-9_1
- Putman etĀ al. (2012) Putman M.Ā E., Peek J.Ā E.Ā G., Joung M.Ā R., 2012, ARA&A, 50, 491
- Rampazzo etĀ al. (2007) Rampazzo R., etĀ al., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 245
- Rampazzo etĀ al. (2016) Rampazzo R., etĀ al., 2016, in DāOnofrio M., Rampazzo R., Zaggia S., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 435, From the Realm of the Nebulae to Populations of Galaxies. p.Ā 381, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31006-0_5
- Rampazzo etĀ al. (2020) Rampazzo R., Omizzolo A., Uslenghi M., RomĆ”n J., Mazzei P., Verdes-Montenegro L., Marino A., Jones M.Ā G., 2020, A&A, 640, A38
- Rand (1996) Rand R.Ā J., 1996, ApJ, 462, 712
- Rand (1998) Rand R.Ā J., 1998, Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia, 15, 106
- Rautio etĀ al. (2022) Rautio R.Ā P.Ā V., Watkins A.Ā E., ComerĆ³n S., Salo H., DĆaz-GarcĆa S., Janz J., 2022, A&A, 659, A153
- Rosado etĀ al. (2013) Rosado M., Gabbasov R.Ā F., Repetto P., Fuentes-Carrera I., Amram P., Martos M., Hernandez O., 2013, AJ, 145, 135
- Rossa & Dettmar (2000) Rossa J., Dettmar R.-J., 2000, A&A, 359, 433
- Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) Rossa J., Dettmar R.-J., 2003a, A&A, 406, 493
- Rossa & Dettmar (2003b) Rossa J., Dettmar R.-J., 2003b, A&A, 406, 505
- Sabater etĀ al. (2012) Sabater J., Verdes-Montenegro L., Leon S., Best P., Sulentic J., 2012, A&A, 545, A15
- Saha & Elmegreen (2018) Saha K., Elmegreen B., 2018, ApJ, 858, 24
- Sardaneta etĀ al. (2022) Sardaneta M.Ā M., etĀ al., 2022, A&A, 659, A45
- Sellwood (2013) Sellwood J.Ā A., 2013, Dynamics of Disks and Warps. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 923ā983, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5612-0_18
- Sellwood & Wilkinson (1993) Sellwood J.Ā A., Wilkinson A., 1993, Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, 173
- Seon etĀ al. (2011) Seon K.-I., Witt A., Kim I.-J., Shinn J.-H., Edelstein J., Min K.-W., Han W., 2011, ApJ, 743, 188
- Shen & Sellwood (2004) Shen J., Sellwood J.Ā A., 2004, ApJ, 604, 614
- Shinn (2019) Shinn J.-H., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4690
- Shinn & Seon (2015) Shinn J.-H., Seon K.-I., 2015, ApJ, 815, 133
- Stone etĀ al. (2021) Stone C., Courteau S., Arora N., 2021, ApJ, 912, 41
- Tandon etĀ al. (2017) Tandon S.Ā N., etĀ al., 2017, AJ, 154, 128
- Thilker etĀ al. (2002) Thilker D.Ā A., Walterbos R. A.Ā M., Braun R., Hoopes C.Ā G., 2002, AJ, 124, 3118
- Thilker etĀ al. (2005) Thilker D.Ā A., etĀ al., 2005, ApJ, 619, L79
- Thilker etĀ al. (2007) Thilker D.Ā A., etĀ al., 2007, ApJS, 173, 538
- TomiÄiÄ etĀ al. (2021) TomiÄiÄ N., etĀ al., 2021, ApJ, 922, 131
- Verdes-Montenegro etĀ al. (2005) Verdes-Montenegro L., Sulentic J., Lisenfeld U., Leon S., Espada D., Garcia E., Sabater J., Verley S., 2005, A&A, 436, 443
- Verley etĀ al. (2007a) Verley S., etĀ al., 2007a, A&A, 470, 505
- Verley etĀ al. (2007b) Verley S., etĀ al., 2007b, A&A, 472, 121
- Walker etĀ al. (1996) Walker I.Ā R., Mihos J.Ā C., Hernquist L., 1996, ApJ, 460, 121
- Wenger etĀ al. (2000) Wenger M., etĀ al., 2000, A&AS, 143, 9
- Whyte etĀ al. (2002) Whyte L.Ā F., Abraham R.Ā G., Merrifield M.Ā R., Eskridge P.Ā B., Frogel J.Ā A., Pogge R.Ā W., 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1281
- Wright etĀ al. (2010) Wright E.Ā L., etĀ al., 2010, AJ, 140, 1868
- Zschaechner etĀ al. (2015) Zschaechner L.Ā K., Rand R.Ā J., Walterbos R., 2015, ApJ, 799, 61
- Zwicky etĀ al. (1968) Zwicky F., Herzog E., Wild P., 1968, Catalogue of galaxies and of clusters of galaxies
Appendix A Spatial signal enhancement
To enhance the spatial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), we employed two techniques on the wavelength data cubes. Firstly, we implemented adaptive spatial binning through Voronoi tessellation (Cappellari & Copin, 2003; Daigle etĀ al., 2006b; Daigle etĀ al., 2006a), aiming for a target SNR of approximately 5Ā orĀ 7. Additionally, we applied a Gaussian smoothing with a ā(3āpix). To maintain a SNR threshold aboveĀ 5 in the Gaussian smoothed data cube, we performed a comparison between both H monochromatic maps and we set a limit for the detected emission in the Gaussian smoothed maps. Since we aim to study the morphology of the eDIG, traced by the H line emission, we opted to utilize the H monochromatic map resulting from Gaussian smoothing. This map yields a more comprehensive representation of the morphology of the detected H emitting gas, in comparison to the map obtained through spatial binning via Voronoi tessellation. To illustrate this technique, FigureĀ 6 presents the H monochromatic map for CIGĀ 847 (UGCĀ 11132).
Appendix B Calibration of the total H flux
As indicated by Epinat etĀ al. (2008), our major scientific goal is not to use the FabryāPerot technique to make photometric studies but kinematic ones. Therefore, during the observations, we decided not to calibrate our data, saving observing time. On the other hand, there is no H calibrated images of galaxies in our sample in the literature yet to compare our targets which would provide us with a more accurate flux range. However, to obtain the total H flux of our galaxies, we can follow previous total H flux indirect calibrations made by Epinat etĀ al. (2008) and by GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez etĀ al. (2019) for large galaxy samples observed with the same instrument, GHASP.
Epinat etĀ al. (2008) calibrated the total H flux of more than 200 galaxies from the GHASP sample by making a linear regression of the comparison between monochromatic FP images of 69 galaxies and images with calibrated fluxes from narrow-band filters including H and [\ionNii] which had been already published. The coefficient of the resulting line is , the fitting was forced to pass through the origin for obvious physical reasons. Later, GĆ³mez-LĆ³pez etĀ al. (2019) studied the kinematics of a sample of 152Ā late-type galaxies from the HRS catalogue232323The Herschel Reference survey (HRS; Boselli etĀ al., 2010). In this context, they calibrated indirectly the FP monochromatic HĀ maps, this time using the calibrated fluxes from Boselli etĀ al. (2015), obtaining a similar coefficient of the resulting line fitted and a GHASP surface brightness detection limits of for 2Ā hours exposure time, resulting in objects with an average lower threshold of SNR. This value of surface brightness detection limit was also obtained by Sardaneta etĀ al. (2022) when, studying the kinematics of the eDIG in the ram-pressure stripped Virgo galaxy NGCĀ 4330, compared the GHASP HĀ monochromatic image of this galaxy with the deep CFHTĀ H image from VESTIGE survey242424A Virgo Environmental Survey Tracing Ionised Gas Emission (VESTIGE; Boselli etĀ al., 2018).
Thus, from the results obtained for galaxies observed with the FPĀ GHASP, we estimated the integrated flux of each galaxy in the sample studied in this work. We list these integrated fluxes in TableĀ 8.
CIG | Flux | ||
---|---|---|---|
Name | (ph s) | (10 W m) | (10 erg s cm) |
71 | 0.61 | 0.29 | 2.93 |
95 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 1.42 |
159 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 2.03 |
171 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 1.64 |
183 | 0.44 | 0.21 | 2.14 |
201 | 1.80 | 0.86 | 8.62 |
329 | 0.83 | 0.40 | 3.97 |
416 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 1.74 |
593 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.28 |
847 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.93 |
906 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.96 |
922 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 1.74 |
936 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.93 |
1003 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 1.23 |
Appendix C Stellar Mass from MIR
Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) is a NASA-funded Medium-Class Explorer mission that consists of a 40ācm space infrared telescope, whose science instrumentation includes āpixel arrays of Si:As and HgCdTe. WISE mapped the entire sky at 3.4ām (), 4.6ām (), 12ām (), and 22ām (). Each band covers a field-of-view of with an angular resolution of 6.0āarcsec in the short band-pass and 12.0āarcsec in the longest one and a 1.375āarcsecāpixel scale (Jarrett etĀ al., 2012). We infer the stellar mass using the mass-to-light () ratio of galaxies (e.g. Korsaga etĀ al., 2019). For low galaxies, the stellar has a linear trend with WISE colour (Cluver etĀ al., 2014):
(5) |
with , where is the absolute magnitude of the source in , āmag, and is the rest-frame colour of the source. Mid-infrared magnitudes and stellar masses are listed in TableĀ 9.
CIG | (m) | (m) | |
---|---|---|---|
Name | (mag) | (mag) | () |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
71 | 11.42 | 11.32 | 1.41 |
95 | 12.59 | 12.53 | 0.36 |
159 | 11.06 | 10.93 | 0.38 |
171 | 11.58 | 11.18 | 0.14 |
183 | 11.99 | 12.01 | 0.81 |
201 | 11.10 | 11.01 | 0.51 |
329 | 10.46 | 10.53 | 3.18 |
416 | 12.40 | 12.28 | 0.26 |
593 | 11.44 | 11.48 | 1.21 |
847 | 11.28 | 11.18 | 1.19 |
906 | 10.83 | 10.58 | 0.51 |
922 | 12.03 | 11.95 | 0.43 |
936 | 11.57 | 11.36 | 0.10 |
1003 | 11.00 | 10.75 | 0.60 |
Columns: (1)āCIG galaxy name; (2)āandā(3)āWide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) 3.4 and 4.6ām colour, respectively; (4)āstellar mass computed using the relation 5.
Appendix D Individual galaxies
We provide the individual notes as discussed in SectionĀ 5.
CIGā95 (UGCā1733).
FigureĀ 7: The H map shows a detached cloud from the disc that exceeds radially the old stellar population disc observed in the NIR-band emission. The brightest H emission region is much wider than the old stellar disc and exceeds it in the z-direction. The 2.22m image reveals a central bulge surrounded by an asymmetric warped old stellar population disc that extends Southward. The FUV emission displays an extended and warped disc. The NUV emission traces a well-bound large disc with a brighter Southeastern tip and a sharpened, fainter Northwestern tip. The H, FUV and NUV emissions match in maxima emission but it is located to the Southeastern edge of the old stellar population disc. From the SDSS optical images, Buta etĀ al. (2019) defined CIGā95 as a Sc warped (see TableĀ 1). Although the galaxy appears to be slightly pulled to the Southeast, indicating a possible interaction, CIGā95 meets all the isolation criteria of the AMIGA sample (see SectionĀ 2).
CIGā159 (UGCā3326).
FigureĀ 8: The H emission displays a discontinuous disc composed of bright clouds uniformly distributed along the major axis with a size similar to that of the K-band 1 isophote. The K-band image of the galaxy shows a large thin warped disc with a central bulge. The GALEX FUV image shows a few faint clouds mostly at the photometric centre. The NUV emission draws a warped disc brighter on the East side than on the West side. The GALEX NUV and FUV images have low SNR which may yield spurious surface brightness profiles. The location of the H emission is consistent with the NUV emission. The emission maxima of the four emissions presented in FigureĀ 8 coincide within 5Ā arcsec. Further spectral data and deeper, higher resolution UV images are required to draw a conclusion about the morphology of this apparently quiescent galaxy. However, Jones etĀ al. (2018) found that in the \ionHi emission CIGā159 is a not an isolated galaxy
CIGā171 (UGCā3474).
FigureĀ 9: The H emission is brighter in the South than the North likely shadowed by dust and stars emitting in UV. In the South the ionized gas has a dense distribution while in the North it traces detached clouds. The old stellar population disc is mostly symmetric with feathering along the edges. The NUV and FUV emissions trace a slightly warped disc brighter in the North than in the South of the NIR photometric centre. The UV surface brightness profiles are flat in the inner 60āarcsec and fall exponentially outward. There is no H emission over the stellar disc in the z-direction, but the H and UV discs are more extended radially than the old stellar population disc. The maximum emissions of NIR, H, NUV, and FUV agree within a 5āarcsec at the centre of the galaxy. Jones etĀ al. (2018) classified CIGā171 as not isolated using \ionHi emission data.
CIGā183 (UGCā3791).
FigureĀ 10: The H emission displays an asymmetric disc displaced to the Northeast outwards of the old stellar population disc. It also shows two big bright regions located at the North of the photometric centre and several remnant clouds that draw two tails in both sides of the H disc. The 2.22m emission shows a mostly symmetrical disc with a bulge and two plumes at the ends of the galactic major axis. The NUV and FUV emissions agree with the structure of the H monochromatic map. The maxima of the NUV, FUV and 2.22m emissions match within a circle of 5Ā arcsec radius in the galactic centre. No additional spectral or photometric data are available yet in the literature to allow a conclusion about the morphology of this galaxy.
CIGā201 (UGCā3979).
FigureĀ 11: The H emission map reveals a concentrated distribution of ionized gas, forming bright knots predominantly located in the central region of the galaxy. A filamentary structure displayed by the ionized gas is consistently observed across all wavelengths. The K-band image shows a small disc that is symmetric but outwardly warped, tracing a similar shape to the H and UV emission. The NUV, FUV, and H maps display extended discs that exceed more than twice the area occupied by the NIR emission. The location of the H bright knots match with the brightest knots seen in NUV and FUV emissions. The plateau shape of the NUV and FUV surface brightness profiles in the inner 40āarcsec may be due to the emission of these bright regions uniformly distributed within a specified area. All the maps of CIGĀ 201, presented in FigureĀ 11, outline the same filamentary structure and display a cone shape at the galactic centre pointing Eastwards reaching different heights above the stellar disc. From SDSS data, Buta etĀ al. (2019) classified CIGĀ 201 as a SAc galaxy and identified an inner pseudoring (see TableĀ 1). In addition, from \ionHi emission data, Jones etĀ al. (2018) determined that this galaxy is not interacting. The multi-wavelength morphology of CIGĀ 201 suggests that the galactic disc may host a galactic wind.
CIGā329 (UGCā5010).
FigureĀ 12: The H emission is distributed in a nearly symmetric ring structure. Indeed, Buta etĀ al. (2019) classified it as a SAb galaxy identifying an inner pseudoring (see TableĀ 1). The 2.22m emission displays a long and symmetric disc with a central bulge and dust lane, with filaments along the edge. Following the photometric analysis of the K-band image, this galaxy has a āboxyā bulge (). The brightest FUV emission regions agree with the H emission, while the faintest ones draw a filamentary warped disc and few detached clouds in the North. The NUV emission reveals a central dense distribution of the young stellar population, the NUV brightest clouds are consistent with the 2.22m emission and the faintest draw filaments along the disc and the Northern cloud traced by the FUV emission. Based on the SDSS spectroscopy, Sabater etĀ al. (2012) classified CIGĀ 329 as a LINER. CIGĀ 329 satisfies all the AMIGA sample isolation criteria (see SectionĀ 2).
CIGā416 (UGCā5642).
FigureĀ 13: The H emission map displays an asymmetric filamentary wide and radially extended disc with a tail-shape at the Western tip and a few detached ionized gas clouds. The K-band image of this galaxy shows a small disc dominated by a bright central bulge. Beyond the K-band isophotal perimeter of the 3 level, the old stellar population disc is asymmetric with a filamentary structure and a tail shape pointing Northwards at the West extreme. The phenomenon triggering the Western tail could be the reason for the non-linear relationship the parameter and the radius, however, neither the graphics nor the K-band image show the presence of a bar. The NUV and FUV images show even more extended asymmetric discs and larger detached clouds than the H emission image. The images of these three bands present bright knots inside the disc. The photometric centre of the H, NIR, NUV and FUV emissions match quite well. The asymmetric disc is also observed at the optical wavelength since Buta etĀ al. (2019) classified CIGā416 as Sdm peculiar using SDSS data. CIGā416 meets the isolation criteria of AMIGA sample in the optical band, nonetheless, it does not accomplish these criteria using radio band data (Jones etĀ al., 2018). Therefore, the asymmetries, removed clouds, filaments and tails may be a signature of a past interaction.
CIGā593 (UGCā8598).
FigureĀ 14: Despite of a long exposure of 223 minutes (4āhours), we only detected a few faint H clouds tracing an asymmetric and truncated ionized gas distribution only visible on the North side, slightly displaced with respect to the major axis of the old stellar population. It looks an āintegral sign armā starting from a small bar. Indeed, Buta etĀ al. (2019) classified this galaxy as a strongly barred (SB, see TableĀ 1). The stellar disc shows a central bright bulge. The most diffuse NIR emission displays an asymmetric and truncated disc. The extended NUV emission disc covers the entire galaxy and draws a warped disc as the one traced by the NIR emission. The FUV emission brightest knots at the North are located in the same position as the H clouds. The maxima of the NUV, FUV and NIR emissions are displaced by 10āarcsec in the galactic centre. CIGĀ 593 meets all the AMIGA sample isolation criteria (see SectionĀ 2).
CIGā847 (UGCā11132).
FigureĀ 15: The H emission depicts a radially extended asymmetric and warped disc more prominent and brighter towards the South than to the North along the major axis with the maximum located towards the Southeast from the NIR photometric centre. The galaxy has a ionized gas tail-shape at the Southern tip and a detached cloud at the Northern edge. The 2.22m emission reveals an almost symmetric elongated disc with small warp. The FUV emission only shows large disengaged clouds along the major axis instead of a dense disc giving as a result an inaccurate surface brightness profile. The NUV emission traces a long and warped disc with feathering along the borders of the disc, populating mainly the Northwest and with the maximum immediately to the North of the NIR photometric centre. Both H and NUV emissions trace a tail shape at the Southeastern tip. The maxima of the NUV and NIR emissions match within 5āarcsec in the galactic centre, while the FUV and H emission maxima are located 10āarcsec and 15āarcsec Southwards from them, respectively. Using the \ionHi image of CIGĀ 847, Jones etĀ al. (2018) found that this galaxy fulfils the most strict isolation criteria of AMIGA sample (see SectionĀ 2).
CIGā906 (UGCā11723).
FigureĀ 16: After an exposure of 186 minutes (3Ā hours) with FP GHASP, only faint H clouds as knots were detected along the galactic major axis. A faint ionized gas cloud is located over the Northern edge of the stellar disc. The K-band image shows an old stellar population disc elongated and symmetrical with some filaments along the disc and a plume at the Southwest edge and a well-defined dust lane. The NUV and FUV emission display wider and brighter discs than the NIR one, both show filaments all along the edges of the disc and even some detached clouds. The surface brightness profiles of NUV and FUV emission show a discontinuity between the ellipses fitted to the 1 and 3 brightness levels of the K-band image, this is from 30 and 45āarcsec. The maxima of the H, NUV and FUV emissions are displaced 10ā³Southwards from the NIR one. Despite Buta etĀ al. (2019) classified CIGĀ 906 as Sbc, our analysis to the surface brightness profile of the 2.22Ā m image showed a ādisc-likeā shape. According with Jones etĀ al. (2018), from \ionHi data, CIGĀ 906 is a well isolated galaxy.
CIGā922 (UGCā11785).
FigureĀ 17: The H emission disc is asymmetric and warped, it dominates the Northern galactic region and it is composed by large detached clouds. The ionized gas disc is wider and longer than the old stellar disc. The H cloud furthest North is faint and exceeds radially the old stellar disc tracing an arrow-shape, while to the South there are two H detached bright knots just outside of the NIR disc edge. The old stellar population disc is mostly symmetric and elongated, it has a central bulge. The faintest NIR emission shows a warp at the Northeastern and a plume outside the Southwestern tip of the stellar disc, both peculiarities are pointing to the Southeast. The FUV emission traces a wider and denser disc than the H emission disc but both match in shape: the rounded Southern tip and the Northern arrow-shaped. The NUV emission displays the most extended disc, with large plumes at one side of the disc pointing to the Northwest, and a detached cloud at the Northern tip. The maxima of the four emissions matches within the central 5āarcsec. Buta etĀ al. (2019) classified CIGā922 as Scd warped galaxy (see TableĀ 1) and, from \ionHi data, Jones etĀ al. (2018) determined that this galaxy is not strictly isolated: the morphology of CIGĀ 922 might be a result of some interaction.
CIGā936 (UGCā11859).
FigureĀ 18: The K-band and most of H emissions were detected in the central 30āarcsec of a galaxy with an optical diameter of āarcsec (see Table 1 and FigureĀ 18a). The H monochromatic image shows most of the warm gas compressed at the centre within the old stellar population disc, drawing a cone-shape. The K-band image shows an asymmetric disc with a central bulge. The FUV emission draws an extended thin disc (isophotal radius āarcsec, see Tableā5) whose tips are warped pointing to the Northwest. The NUV disc emission is wider than the FUV one, with filaments mainly along the Southeastern side of the disc with the largest and broadest filament at the galactic centre. At 70āarcsec Southwards from the galactic centre, there is a NUV bright knot on the disc matching with the DSS R-band image and a faint H cloud, which is probably a SF region because it is not detected at the NIR emission. The maxima of the four emissions matches in the galactic centre. Jones etĀ al. (2018) classified this galaxy as \ionHi-not-isolated (see SectionĀ 2).
CIGā1003 (UGCā12304).
FigureĀ 19: The ionized gas is compressed in the central region of the disc which presents three bright knots, one at the centre and the other two symmetrically placed 15āarcsec away. The H emission map displays filaments of ionized gas in all the edges, but the most prominent of them are around the central knot tracing a cone-shape pointing to the Southwest. The K-band image shows an elongated and symmetric stellar disc with a central bulge. The diffuse NIR emission displays a cone-shape at the galactic centre pointing Southwest and a hook-shaped extension at the Northern tip pointing Northeast. The NUV emission image shows a prominent filament of 15āarcsec length pointing to the Southwest; in addition, the cone-shape in the central region is more noticeable in this emission. The FUV and NUV emission maps reveal very extended asymmetric and warped discs. Also, the brightest knots in these bands, match the Southern H knot. All the photometric centres defined by the ellipse fitting lay on the central H knot agreeing within 5āarcsec. CIGā1003 displays thinner discs Northwards and wider Southwards in the NIR, FUV, and NUV emissions. CIGā1003ās multiwavelength morphology, position on the region of bona fide isolated galaxies (see FigureĀ 3) and \ionHi classification as not isolated (Jones etĀ al., 2018), suggest that it has a galactic wind, possibly due to a recent interaction.
Appendix E Individual maps
Appendix F Rossa & Dettmar (2003a) sample
Object Name | RA | Dec | Hubble | V | Log M | L | S/S | eDIG | Interact | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J2000.0 | J2000.0 | type | () | () | ||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
NGC 24 | 00h09m56.54s | -24d57m47.3s | Sc | 554 | 8.0 | 0.77 | 0.3396 | p | (i) | |
NGC 100 | 00h24m02.84s | +16d29m11.0s | Sc | 844 | 8.3 | 0.21 | 0.1971 | i | (i) | |
UGC 260 | 00h27m02.92s | +11d35m01.7s | Sc | 2134 | 9.8 | 3.30 | 0.3761 | * | p | (i) |
ESO 540ā16 | 00h42m14.69s | -18d09m42.5s | SBcd | 1559 | 10.0 | 0.64 | 0.3692 | * | i | (ii) |
NGC 360 | 01h02m51.45s | -65d36m35.9s | Sc | 2306 | 8.9 | 1.94 | 0.1609 | * | i | (iii) |
NGC 669 | 01h47m16.15s | +35d33m47.9s | Sab | 4674 | 8.0 | 1.04 | 0.2455 | g | (i) | |
NGC 891 | 02h22m33.41s | +42d20m56.9s | Sb | 528 | 5.9 | 3.19 | 0.2089 | * | g | (i) |
UGC 2082 | 02h36m16.15s | +25d25m25.8s | Sc | 708 | 5.5 | 0.35 | 0.2356 | i | (i) | |
IC 1862 | 02h51m58.80s | -33d20m24.6s | Sbc | 6395 | 7.0 | 2.48 | 0.3357 | g | (i) | |
NGC 1247 | 03h12m14.32s | -10d28m52.0s | Sab | 3947 | 8.8 | 2.92 | 0.3604 | * | g | (i) |
ESO 117ā19 | 04h02m32.13s | -62d18m56.2s | SBbc | 5335 | 6.2 | 3.51 | 0.2759 | * | g | (ii) |
IC 2058 | 04h17m54.35s | -55d55m58.4s | Sc | 1379 | 5.1 | 1.15 | 0.2982 | p | (i) | |
ESO 362ā11 | 05h16m38.80s | -37d06m09.1s | Sbc | 1345 | 7.6 | 2.63 | 0.3295 | * | g | (ii) |
IC 2135 | 05h33m12.90s | -36d23m55.8s | Sc* | 1312 | 7.3 | 7.28 | 0.4051 | * | i | (ii) |
ESO 121ā6 | 06h07m29.85s | -61d48m27.3s | Sc | 1203 | 10.2 | 7.05 | 0.3256 | * | i | (ii) |
NGC 2188 | 06h10m09.53s | -34d06m22.3s | SBcd | 747 | 8.4 | 1.63 | 0.4301 | * | i | (iii) |
ESO 209ā9 | 07h58m15.01s | -49d51m05.1s | SBc | 1126 | 9.1 | 4.56 | 0.2948 | * | i | (ii) |
UGC 4559 | 08h44m07.61s | +30d07m08.9s | Sb | 2085 | 7.8 | 0.89 | 0.2721 | i | (iii) | |
NGC 2654 | 08h49m11.87s | +60d13m16.0s | SBab | 1339 | 7.3 | 0.57 | 0.1882 | i | (i) | |
NGC 2683 | 08h52m41.33s | +33d25m18.3s | Sb | 411 | 3.7 | 1.76 | 0.1976 | i | (i) | |
NGC 3003 | 09h48m36.05s | +33d25m17.4s | SBc | 1480 | 6.7 | 1.65 | 0.3434 | g | (i) | |
NGC 3044 | 09h53m40.88s | +01d34m46.7s | Sbc* | 1289 | 9.9 | 6.72 | 0.4633 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 3221 | 10h22m19.98s | +21d34m10.5s | SBcd | 4111 | 10.5 | 13.80 | 0.3738 | * | i | (iii) |
NGC 3600 | 11h15m52.01s | +41d35m27.7s | Sab | 703 | 9.3 | 1.30 | 0.4362 | * | i | (i) |
NGC 3628 | 11h20m16.97s | +13d35m22.9s | Sb | 846 | 8.9 | 5.02 | 0.4694 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 3877 | 11h46m07.70s | +47d29m39.6s | Sc | 895 | 6.8 | 4.15 | 0.2486 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 3936 | 11h52m20.59s | -26d54m21.2s | SBbc | 2013 | 9.4 | 2.03 | 0.2447 | g | (i) | |
ESO 379ā6 | 11h53m03.27s | -36d38m19.8s | Sbc | 2944 | 8.8 | 3.67 | 0.2452 | * | i | (ii) |
NGC 4206 | 12h15m16.81s | +13d01m26.3s | Sc | 703 | 10.7 | 0.53 | 0.2054 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 4216 | 12h15m54.44s | +13d08m57.8s | SBab | 131 | 10.6 | 0.59 | 0.1221 | g | (i) | |
NGC 4235 | 12h17m09.88s | +07d11m29.7s | Sa | 2263 | 8.7 | 0.37 | 0.4896 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 4256 | 12h18m43.09s | +65d53m53.7s | Sb | 2489 | 4.6 | 0.71 | 0.1794 | g | (i) | |
NGC 4302 | 12h21m42.48s | +14d35m53.9s | Sc* | 1098 | 8.5 | 3.69 | 0.2136 | * | p | (i) |
NGC 4388 | 12h25m46.75s | +12d39m43.5s | Sb | 2524 | 10.5 | 5.53 | 0.6127 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 4402 | 12h26m07.65s | +13d06m48.0s | Sb* | 237 | 7.0 | 7.82 | 0.3320 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 4634 | 12h42m40.96s | +14d17m45.0s | Sbc* | 139 | 5.0 | 11.84 | 0.3720 | * | p | (i) |
NGC 4700 | 12h49m08.15s | -11d24m35.5s | SBc | 1409 | 8.3 | 4.99 | 0.5074 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 4945 | 13h05m27.48s | -49d28m05.6s | SBc | 563 | 4.8 | 14.79 | 0.5661 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 5170 | 13h29m48.79s | -17d57m59.1s | Sc* | 1501 | 8.8 | 0.34 | 0.2796 | g | (i) | |
NGC 5290 | 13h45m19.18s | +41d42m45.3s | Sbc | 2549 | 7.8 | 2.57 | 0.3139 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 5297 | 13h46m23.67s | +43d52m20.4s | SBbc | 2409 | 7.2 | 1.69 | 0.2714 | p | (i) | |
IC 4351 | 13h57m54.26s | -29d18m56.6s | Sb* | 2674 | 7.9 | 1.48 | 0.1947 | g | (i) | |
NGC 5775 | 14h53m57.60s | +03d32m40.0s | SBc | 1676 | 6.4 | 21.49 | 0.3415 | * | p | (i) |
ESO 274ā1 | 15h14m13.43s | -46d48m33.1s | Sd | 524 | 8.6 | 0.19 | 0.5055 | * | i | (ii) |
NGC 5965 | 15h34m02.46s | +56d41m08.2s | Sb | 3377 | 6.3 | 0.55 | 0.2769 | p | (i) | |
UGC 10288 | 16h14m24.80s | -00d12m27.1s | SABc | 2044 | 8.5 | 0.89 | 0.2370 | g | (i) | |
IC 4837 | 19h15m14.64s | -54d39m41.1s | Sab | 2668 | 8.3 | 2.42 | 0.2605 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 6875 | 20h13m12.47s | -46d09m41.9s | SBc | 3121 | 9.0 | 1.56 | 0.3048 | * | p | (i) |
MCG-01-53-012 | 20h49m52.23s | -07d01m18.5s | Sc | 6024 | 8.6 | 0.94 | 0.2067 | i | (ii) | |
IC 5052 | 20h52m05.57s | -69d12m05.9s | SBcd | 584 | 9.5 | 1.00 | 0.3112 | * | g | (i) |
IC 5071 | 21h01m19.74s | -72d38m33.8s | SABb | 3123 | 8.0 | 1.41 | 0.2472 | * | g | (i) |
IC 5096 | 21h18m21.54s | -63d45m38.4s | Sbc | 3144 | 7.4 | 1.42 | 0.2280 | g | (i) | |
NGC 7064 | 21h29m02.98s | -52d46m03.4s | SBc | 767 | 5.1 | 1.06 | 0.6250 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 7090 | 21h36m28.86s | -54d33m26.4s | SBc | 847 | 4.6 | 1.95 | 0.3287 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 7184 | 22h02m39.82s | -20d48m46.2s | SBc | 2623 | 9.6 | 1.38 | 0.2588 | i | (iii) | |
IC 5171 | 22h10m56.70s | -46d04m53.3s | SBb | 2847 | 7.8 | 1.86 | 0.3101 | * | g | (ii) |
IC 5176 | 22h14m55.93s | -66d50m57.9s | SBbc | 1748 | 5.9 | 3.51 | 0.3044 | * | g | (ii) |
NGC 7361 | 22h42m17.91s | -30d03m27.6s | Sc* | 1249 | 7.8 | 1.07 | 0.2669 | i | (i) | |
UGC 12281 | 22h59m12.80s | +13d36m24.0s | Sc | 2562 | 5.3 | 0.98 | 0.1830 | g | (i) | |
NGC 7462 | 23h02m46.49s | -40d50m06.9s | SBbc | 1064 | 10.0 | 3.34 | 0.4492 | * | g | (i) |
NGC 7640 | 23h22m06.58s | +40d50m43.5s | SBc | 369 | 8.1 | 0.45 | 0.2259 | g | (i) | |
ESO 240ā11 | 23h37m49.42s | -47d43m38.4s | Sb | 2836 | 5.9 | 1.00 | 0.1776 | g | (ii) | |
Columns: (1)Ā object name; (2)Ā andĀ (3)Ā wcsĀ coordinates (J2000); | ||||||||||
(4)Ā Hubble type from Rossa & Dettmar (2003b), when unavailable, marked by (*) from HyperLeda (HyperLEDA, 2016); | ||||||||||
(5)Ā heliocentric velocity (); (6)Ā logarithm of the stellar mass computed with MIR-band photometry (see equation 5); | ||||||||||
(7)Ā andĀ (8)Ā DDD parameters from Rossa & Dettmar (2003a): FIR luminosity () divided by the optical diameter of the | ||||||||||
isophote squared () and flux densities ratio at 60 and 100 (), respectively; | ||||||||||
(9)Ā cases where the eDIG was detected by Rossa & Dettmar (2003a); | ||||||||||
(10)Ā hierarchy reported so far in the literature: i: isolated or no records, p: pair member, g: group member; | ||||||||||
(11) hierarchy reference: (i)Ā NED, (ii)Ā SIMBAD, (iii)Ā There is no record. |