11.05.2017 Views

Computer Shopper - July 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DIGITAL<br />

VERSION<br />

Betterthan<br />

AmazonAlexa?p22<br />

Lp80<br />

REVIVE YOUR<br />

BEYOND<br />

12 SOUNDBARS & LAPTOP<br />

GRAPHICS<br />

SPEAKERS ON TEST<br />

Upgrade,<br />

HOWTHENEXTWAVEOFGPUs HIGH-QUALITY<br />

WILLBRINGAITO YOURPC p114 AUDIO FROM£119 p104<br />

04 don’treplacep128


WELCOME PAGE<br />

Welcome!<br />

I REMEMBER THE fi rst batteries, which makes it even harder to<br />

handset I owned, a bright squeeze extra life out of your handset, as<br />

yellow Nokia 5110 – I say this is often the component that will fail fi rst.<br />

‘owned’ but it was actually With this in mind, we’ve carried out a<br />

borrowed from my mum, thorough analysis and testing of the most<br />

as paying a phone<br />

recent smartphones, as well as digging out<br />

contract as a student some slightly older models that were highly<br />

teacher in the late nineties rated at launch, to identify the handsets<br />

just wasn’t going to happen. But I loved that that give you the best value and the best<br />

phone and pinched it as often as I could, and chance of longevity (page 80).<br />

it was in the family for many years.<br />

Some might salivate over the latest<br />

Fast-forward 20 years, and the idea of a fl agship models such as the Samsung Galaxy<br />

teenager not owning their own smartphone, S8 (page 42) or iPhone 7 Plus. But this is<br />

or sharing a phone with anyone, seems more about fi nding budget models that are<br />

laughable. As does the idea of using a<br />

able to package up an impressive array of<br />

handset for more than a couple of years – features at incredibly low prices – see our<br />

well, that’s if the smartphone manufacturers cover star, the Lenovo P2; older devices like<br />

have anything to do with it.<br />

the Google Nexus 5X and Samsung Galaxy<br />

Apple and Samsung might be taking S6, which have seen significant price drops<br />

steps to be more environmentally friendly since release but still offer slick performance;<br />

with their sourcing of materials and recycling and handsets that still retain the rare<br />

programmes (see Rants & Raves, page 12), swappable battery, such as the LG G4.<br />

but neither fi rm has taken the equally<br />

As an iPhone 6 user, I’m paying close<br />

important step of producing hardware that attention to the results to decide which<br />

has a more eco-friendly lifespan.<br />

phone to go for next. After all, my current<br />

Apple, for example, admits that its<br />

model came out in September 2014, meaning<br />

iPhones have only a three-year lifespan, it has less than six months left before it<br />

meaning a cost of at least £1,500 if you want conks out, based on Apple’s assertions.<br />

to equip yourself with the cheapest SE<br />

Happy reading!<br />

model for the next decade.<br />

Several readers have recently written in Madeline Bennett, Editor<br />

about the trend away from replaceable<br />

madeline@computershopper.co.uk<br />

QUESTION OF THE MONTH<br />

Which smartphone feature would you<br />

most like to see invented?<br />

Madeline Bennett<br />

A reverse-charges system<br />

for spam calls that I get a big<br />

cut from.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

A background noise generator<br />

so you can pretend you’re at<br />

work or on the train home when<br />

you’re in the pub.<br />

Nathan Spendelow<br />

Curved screens are nice and<br />

all, but it would be nice to have<br />

a battery that lasts more than a<br />

few hours.<br />

James Archer<br />

Chassis designs where<br />

the whole thing is one big<br />

fi ngerprint sensor.<br />

MEET<br />

THE<br />

TEAM<br />

Dave Neal<br />

Really, really, really long-life<br />

battery. Also a small fan for<br />

warm days. Plus a car horn.<br />

Roland Moore-Colyer<br />

A module that analyses my<br />

hangover, then injects me with<br />

all the vitamins and nutrients<br />

to remove it.<br />

Simon Handby<br />

A breathalyser I have to<br />

pass before being allowed on<br />

social media. And maybe a<br />

self-healing screen.<br />

CONTACT US<br />

Editor Madeline Bennett madeline@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Reviews Editor James Archer james@computershopper.co.uk<br />

News Editor Dave Neal daveneal@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Contributing Editor David Ludlow david@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Contributing Editor Roland Moore-Colyer<br />

roland@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Staff Writer Nathan Spendelow nathan@computershopper.co.uk<br />

DESIGN & PRODUCTION<br />

Design Bill Bagnall<br />

Production Editor Steve Haines<br />

Production Executive Maaya Mistry<br />

Network Production Manager Kerry Lambird<br />

CONTRIBUTORS<br />

Lee Bell, Jonathan Bray, Mel Croucher, Kay Ewbank,<br />

Darien Graham-Smith, Simon Handby, Vaughn Highfield,<br />

Christopher Minasians, Ben Pitt, Adam Shepherd, Clive Webster<br />

ADVERTISING<br />

Email ads.shopper@dennis.co.uk<br />

Group Advertising Manager Charlotte Milligan 020 7907 6642<br />

Senior Sales Executive Joe Teal 020 7907 6689<br />

COVER GIFT CONTACT<br />

Chris Wiles support@creativemark.co.uk<br />

SUBSCRIPTIONS<br />

Tel 0844 844 0031 / 01795 592905 Web www.subsinfo.co.uk<br />

UK £44.99, Europe £70, Rest of world £90<br />

PHOTOGRAPHY<br />

Michael Pheasant<br />

LICENSING AND SYNDICATION<br />

Ryan Chambers 020 7907 6132 Ryan_Chambers@dennis.co.uk<br />

Anj Dosaj-Halai 0207 907 6132 anj_halai@dennis.co.uk<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

Tel 020 7907 6000<br />

Managing Director John Garewal<br />

Group Advertising Director Julian Lloyd-Evans<br />

Newstrade Director David Barker<br />

Group CFO/COO Brett Reynolds<br />

Chief Executive James Tye<br />

Company Founder Felix Dennis<br />

PRINTING<br />

Printed by Wyndeham, Bicester, Oxon<br />

Distributors Seymour 020 7429 4000<br />

LIABILITY<br />

While every care was taken preparing this magazine, the publishers<br />

cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information or<br />

any consequence arising from it. All judgements are based on<br />

equipment available to <strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong> at the time of review.<br />

‘Value for money’ comments are based on UK prices at time of review.<br />

All prices include VAT unless otherwise stated. <strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong><br />

takes no responsibility for the content of external websites whose<br />

addresses are published in the magazine.<br />

COMPUTER SHOPPER INCORPORATES UPGRADE SHOPPER,<br />

GAMES SHOPPER, INTERNET SHOPPER, MOBILE SHOPPER,<br />

PC SHOPPER, PORTABLE SHOPPER AND SOFTWARE SHOPPER<br />

A DENNIS PUBLICATION<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong> is published by Dennis Publishing Ltd, 30 Cleveland<br />

Street, London W1T 4JD. Company registered in England. All material<br />

© Dennis Publishing Limited licensed by Felden <strong>2017</strong>, and may not be<br />

reproduced in whole or part without the consent of the publishers.<br />

ISSN 0955-8578<br />

© Copyright Dennis Publishing Limited<br />

SUBSCRIBE<br />

AND SAVE<br />

CALL 0844 844 0031<br />

OR SEE PAGE 122<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

3


CONTENTS<br />

Issue 353 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

Contents<br />

p22<br />

p80<br />

p114<br />

Regulars<br />

6 Letters<br />

Your monthly missives of wit and wisdom,<br />

tips and tricks, and moans and groans<br />

8 Mel’s World<br />

He was never really cut out for designing<br />

skyscrapers for rich Middle Eastern<br />

despots, but Mel Croucher believes<br />

the sky’s the limit when it comes to<br />

3D-printed buildings<br />

10 Cyber Insider<br />

As governments around the world demand<br />

ever greater access to our personal data,<br />

Cyber Insider provides some timely tips<br />

on how to maintain privacy in the face of<br />

official – and unoffi cial – snooping<br />

12 Rants & Raves<br />

Has the tech industry fi nally developed<br />

an environmental conscience? Recent<br />

announcements from Samsung and Apple<br />

would seem to suggest that it has<br />

138 Zygote<br />

You no longer have to make your bed and<br />

lie in it – well, you’ll still have to do the<br />

reclining bit yourself, but a computerised<br />

duvet can do all the hard work for you<br />

Features<br />

Learn<br />

p104<br />

p128<br />

114 Pixel Pushers<br />

Roland Moore-Colyer investigates how the<br />

next wave of graphics processing units will<br />

bring VR and artificial intelligence to your PC<br />

124 Business Help<br />

Our expert answers your soft ware queries<br />

126 Helpfile<br />

Your hardware and Windows problems solved<br />

128 Advanced Projects<br />

Give your old laptop a new lease of life with a<br />

cheap and easy upgrade and Clive Webster’s<br />

expert advice<br />

132 Multimedia Expert<br />

Everyday household items make for great<br />

percussion instruments. Ben Pitt makes some<br />

noise around the house<br />

News<br />

All the latest news and views from the<br />

technology world, including:<br />

14 Need to Know<br />

With everything from augmented-reality in-car<br />

navigation systems to intelligent pet monitors,<br />

the Wearable Technology Show is the place to<br />

be for the very latest smart devices<br />

18 Globe Trotting<br />

We round up some of the offbeat tech<br />

stories that you may have missed from<br />

around the world<br />

19 The Lowdown:<br />

State-sponsored<br />

Espionage<br />

As accusations about<br />

Russian interference<br />

in the US election<br />

and the EU<br />

referendum continue<br />

to grow, we investigate<br />

the scale of the problem<br />

20 From the Lab<br />

All the latest developments from the world of<br />

science and space<br />

21 Retro: IBM 5150<br />

With its 16KB of<br />

RAM and dual 160KB<br />

disk drives, the IBM<br />

5150 revolutionised<br />

personal computing.<br />

Join us on a trip<br />

down memory<br />

lane to celebrate the<br />

iconic PC without which<br />

we wouldn’t be heree today<br />

4 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


p80<br />

p128<br />

p132<br />

Reviews<br />

22 Hot Product<br />

Hello Google, goodbye Alexa? Google Home is the latest attempt at a<br />

digital assistant-powered smart speaker, and its clever voice responses<br />

more than make up for a lack of third-party hardware support<br />

24 PCs<br />

The powerful GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is here, and<br />

the Chillblast Fusion Portal (p26) has tamed it<br />

28 Components<br />

The Ryzen 7 1700 is another Intel-rivalling chip<br />

from a resurgent AMD, and a great candidate<br />

for overclocking<br />

30 Printers<br />

Luckily for Canon’s £150 TS8050, it delivers the<br />

quality you’d expect from such a pricey inkjet<br />

32 Laptops<br />

Asus’s ZenBook UX310UA is a pleasantly<br />

affordable ultrabook, while the Dell XPS 13<br />

2-in-1 trades power for a fl ipping touchscreen<br />

36 Displays<br />

At over £600, AOC’s curved AGON AG352QCX<br />

is a high-end monitor for high-end gaming<br />

38 Networks<br />

Google joins the mesh wars with its impressive<br />

Google Wifi system<br />

42 Handhelds<br />

Fast and beautiful, Samsung’s Galaxy S8 is the<br />

fi nest Android smartphone to date<br />

46 Storage<br />

The Kingston SSD Now UV400 Upgrade Kit is a<br />

complete and straightforward way to upgrade<br />

your PC or laptop capacity<br />

48 Video<br />

The combination of smart streaming and<br />

Freeview helps the Humax H3 Espresso,<br />

but the lack of apps hurts<br />

50 Audio<br />

Unbalanced sound and an uncomfortable fi t<br />

let down the otherwise well-made Master &<br />

Dynamic MH40 headphones<br />

52 Photography<br />

The compact Panasonic DMC-G80 triumphs at<br />

still photography and video capture alike<br />

54 Wearables<br />

Built-in 4G on the Huawei Watch 2 lets you<br />

leave your smartphone behind<br />

56 Best Buys<br />

Looking for the best kit we’ve reviewed<br />

recently? It’s all in our Best Buys section<br />

72 How We Test<br />

Our tests, ratings and awards explained<br />

Group Tests<br />

80 Smartphones<br />

Don’t get ripped off paying<br />

a fortune for a fl agship<br />

phone – follow our<br />

bargain-hunter’s buying<br />

guide and snap up one of<br />

the 16 top-spec, low-price<br />

handsets on test this month<br />

104 Soundbars and Speakers<br />

Whether you’re watching a fi lm or playing<br />

tunes, a new soundbar and speaker will<br />

transform your listening experience.<br />

We sound out 12 of<br />

the best<br />

models<br />

74 Your Software*<br />

Create your own professional-looking<br />

animations with the powerful but<br />

easy-to-use CrazyTalk Animator<br />

6 FULL<br />

PACKAGES<br />

* FREE SOFTWARE<br />

EDITION ONLY<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

5


LETTERS<br />

Letters<br />

The Windows 10 Creators Update may not be all it’s cracked up to be,<br />

if one reader’s frustrating experience is anything to go by<br />

letters@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Creator storm<br />

The Windows 10 Creators Update came<br />

on rather suddenly and, despite my<br />

natural curiosity (which would have made<br />

me install anyway), seemed to offer no<br />

way of averting installation (I<br />

knew that Microsoft account<br />

would lead to no good).<br />

So far my desktop has not<br />

seen any issues but those with<br />

laptops, and in particular with<br />

pre-Creative Cloud Adobe<br />

products, should keep well away.<br />

Immediately Photoshop CS6 (part of<br />

CS6 Production Premium) just crashed on<br />

launch. Despite uninstalling CS6 and<br />

re-installing, uninstalling and re-installing<br />

numerous Microsoft Visual C++ versions,<br />

moving various DLLs around, and<br />

uninstalling and re-installing Nvidia drivers<br />

(the laptop has a 960M GFX processor),<br />

nothing worked.<br />

Finally, after about 15 hours’ work<br />

trying to fi x it, I thought I would resort to<br />

re-installing Windows 10 Creators Update<br />

and keep my apps. It doesn’t work or isn’t<br />

available, as it comes back with<br />

the<br />

usual dumb Microsoft<br />

message saying nothing.<br />

Next stop was to roll back to<br />

a previous version of Windows<br />

10<br />

(1607, I think), which<br />

happened very quickly, and<br />

everything worked fi ne.<br />

It’s pretty clear that<br />

Microsoft needs to fi x the<br />

Creators Update as it offers little and kills<br />

much. There was no value in installing it for<br />

me. Also be warned: if you encounter error<br />

0xc000007b, then you’re banjaxed.<br />

Ian Douglas<br />

Thanks for the warning, Ian. Hopefully other<br />

readers have avoided similar problems.<br />

Network coverage needed<br />

You’ve covered anti-virus applications<br />

and given us data about the good and<br />

the bad. You’ve also covered the best cloud<br />

services and given us articles about the best<br />

backup services. I have been thinking about<br />

using a VPN to protect my privacy and to<br />

make my systems more secure, but I haven’t<br />

seen an article in <strong>Shopper</strong> about this subject.<br />

How about an article about the best VPN<br />

services, what they can and can’t do and, as<br />

home users, do we even need them? Is it<br />

worth buying into what our anti-virus<br />

vendors are trying to sell us or is it just<br />

scare-mongering? How do we set up a VPN?<br />

Stephen Hill<br />

As luck would have it, Advanced Projects in<br />

the next issue (354) will cover this very topic.<br />

We’ll be revealing some low-cost and free VPNs<br />

to keep you safer when you’re surfing, and<br />

explaining why they’re worth having.<br />

Star letter<br />

Price comparison slight<br />

I have just read the article on<br />

compact system cameras (CSCs) in<br />

<strong>Shopper</strong> 352. I am considering replacing<br />

my aged Canon G9 (not the current G9)<br />

and have been reviewing the fi eld at about<br />

the £500 mark.<br />

The reason that I am writing is to<br />

enquire as to why the Canon PowerShot<br />

SX720 HS was included. At £269, you are<br />

comparing it with a Fuji which is more than<br />

fi ve times as expensive. I realise that there<br />

has to be some price differential, but<br />

query why it should be that much.<br />

Surely a more appropriate Canon<br />

could have been included, such as the G7<br />

X Mk II at £549, the G5 at £609 or the G9<br />

Mk II at £449. Or how about the Canon<br />

M3, which offers the option of<br />

interchangeable lenses as per the Fuji?<br />

Your article has nonetheless given me<br />

food for thought, as I will now add the Best<br />

Buy-winning Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX15<br />

to my list, which is currently the Canon G7<br />

X MkII and Panasonic DMC-TZ100.<br />

Incidentally, I have<br />

only recently become a<br />

subscriber to <strong>Computer</strong><br />

<strong>Shopper</strong>, and I<br />

wondered whether it is<br />

possible to access past<br />

tests, as your article<br />

refers to the Fuji X-T1, Sony a6000<br />

and Sony RX 100 IV in previous issues.<br />

Alec Bushell<br />

Thanks for picking up the mag. You’re right<br />

that the SX720 is much cheaper than the other<br />

cameras in the group test – maybe making<br />

❱❱ Write in and win<br />

direct comparisons<br />

with it is a little<br />

cheeky, but we like to<br />

cover a range of<br />

price points, so all<br />

our readers know<br />

what to expect<br />

regardless of their<br />

budget. Of the ones you’ve mentioned,<br />

the Canon G7 X Mark II is our pick, and if<br />

you want to read the original reviews of the<br />

Fuji X-T1, Sony a6000 & Sony RX 100 IV,<br />

they’ve all been posted on our sister site,<br />

Expert Reviews (www.expertreviews.co.uk).<br />

Do you wish your computer was faster when booting and loading<br />

applications? Thanks to Crucial, you can achieve your dream<br />

of a faster PC or laptop with the MX300 SSD. The writer of<br />

our Star Lett er will be awarded one of these solid-state devices,<br />

which can be installed in a desktop PC or a laptop.<br />

This SSD is six times faster than a hard disk, and will make your<br />

computer boot incredibly quickly and your applications load faster. With<br />

525GB<br />

of storage, there’s plenty of room for Windows and all your apps, too.<br />

STAR<br />

PRIZE<br />

525GB<br />

SSD<br />

6 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


LETTERS<br />

Irreplaceable replaceables<br />

It was interesting to see the letter from<br />

Paul Morris on battery issues (<strong>Shopper</strong><br />

352). I’d been meaning to write in about this<br />

myself so he beat me to it. I did want to add,<br />

though, that in my experience phone<br />

batteries don’t really last more than a year<br />

before they rapidly degrade, and for this<br />

reason I wouldn’t even consider buying a<br />

phone without a replaceable battery.<br />

My current model is a Samsung Galaxy<br />

S4. It’s on its second battery now and I’ve<br />

owned it just over a year. My only future<br />

upgrade option is the Galaxy S5<br />

Neo, but as my needs are<br />

quite simple I’m in no rush.<br />

Looking further ahead, if<br />

there is no significant<br />

improvement in battery<br />

durability, what options will<br />

be available? I don’t believe<br />

in spending more than £600<br />

on a new unit, but the<br />

second-hand market will, as<br />

Mr Morris points out, be<br />

awash with phones whose batteries<br />

you can’t replace and therefore can’t trust.<br />

Keith Briffett<br />

We agree the trend for non-replaceable<br />

batteries makes choosing a new handset<br />

problematic. Part of the thinking behind our<br />

guide to the best-value smartphones (page 80)<br />

was to identify our pick of the current and<br />

previous-generation models that offer excellent<br />

value for money and plenty of longevity, so the<br />

battery degradation isn’t such an issue.<br />

Cracked Windows<br />

Just writing in to agree with Richard<br />

Collier’s letter regarding Windows 10<br />

and Linux (<strong>Shopper</strong> 352). I too have tried<br />

Windows 10, and do not like it, for various<br />

reasons. My fi rst frustration was with<br />

Recent Places, which I use all the time in<br />

Windows 7. It had vanished from Windows<br />

10, and Recent Items was the closest I could<br />

get back after some Googling and then<br />

Windows 10 tweaking. Why am I having to<br />

tweak something as fundamentally useful as<br />

Recent Places in a brand new operating<br />

system, I asked myself. Edge I hated, and it<br />

didn’t work with a number of websites. And<br />

a host of other things irked me. So back to<br />

Windows 7 I went, with no regrets.<br />

I wrote to you quite a while back<br />

regarding an article you had on making<br />

Windows 10 better, to which the main point<br />

of my reply was: I have, simply by reverting<br />

back to Windows 7.<br />

So, one thing’s for sure: if Windows 10 is<br />

the last operating system from Microsoft ,<br />

my relationship with it might come to an<br />

end, most likely when the date passes where<br />

Microsoft no longer supports Windows 7.<br />

I have, like Richard, been using Linux on<br />

an old machine as I start my search for a<br />

new OS, well in advance of the day Windows<br />

7 dies. I would therefore really like to see<br />

much greater coverage of Linux in <strong>Shopper</strong>.<br />

I suspect Richard and I are not alone in our<br />

dislike of Windows 10 and are thinking<br />

what next in terms of what OS we might be<br />

using in fi ve years’ time.<br />

For now, I’ve stopped dabbling with Linux,<br />

as Windows 7 is on my main machine, and<br />

it’s a hassle setting up my old desktop so I<br />

can use it. More articles in <strong>Shopper</strong> might<br />

see me setting up my old machine on<br />

another desk and getting more familiar<br />

with it. I look forward to your coverage.<br />

Jim<br />

Thanks Jim, we have some more Linux<br />

content planned for future issues.<br />

Hyper critical<br />

I read your response to Colin Walker<br />

(Helpfi le, <strong>Shopper</strong> 352) and was a bit<br />

surprised you didn’t mention before your<br />

walkthrough for using Hyper-V that it’s only<br />

available in Windows 10 Pro. You can do<br />

something similar with Oracle VM VirtualBox<br />

in Windows 10 Home, and unless Colin has<br />

made a point of buying Pro, a pre-installed<br />

Windows 10 will probably be Home.<br />

Neil Packwood<br />

You’re right, Neil - it’s only available in 64-bit<br />

versions of Windows 10 Pro and Enterprise,<br />

which we omitted to mention. As Colin<br />

upgraded his own PC, there’s a fair chance he<br />

bought Windows 10 Pro, or was upgraded to it<br />

from a qualifying earlier release, so hopefully<br />

our advice worked for his particular problem.<br />

Keep politics out of it<br />

I was a little surprised with<br />

the political comments on<br />

the Welcome Page in the June<br />

edition (<strong>Shopper</strong> 352). I thought<br />

you would be mentioning the<br />

Creators Update for Windows<br />

10. I thought magazines should<br />

be neutral in political matters.<br />

Remember the readers of the<br />

magazine are of many different persuasions.<br />

Please keep to your brief in case you offend.<br />

Always look forward to the next edition.<br />

Best computer magazine available<br />

Elvin Rose MBE<br />

Thanks for the feedback, Elvin, great to<br />

hear you’re a <strong>Shopper</strong> fan. The comments on<br />

government IT weren’t aimed at supporting<br />

or criticising a particular political party, more<br />

to highlight how the UK public sector has a<br />

pretty poor track record when it comes to<br />

big technology projects. <strong>Shopper</strong> is defi nitely<br />

party-neutral and politics-free, although we<br />

would defi nitely like to see the UK government<br />

– whoever is forming it –applying our principles<br />

of acquiring the best technology available with<br />

the best value for money.<br />

In the next issue<br />

❱❱ £500 PCs<br />

on test<br />

Sett ing up a<br />

home office, or<br />

just want some<br />

extra power out<br />

of your home<br />

PC? Don’t spend too much on a fl ashy<br />

gaming system or high-end workstation –<br />

we’ll be testing out a range of budget<br />

desktops to fi nd out how much power,<br />

memory and storage you can get for £500.<br />

❱❱ Don’t forget to pack your tech<br />

Whether your summer holidays are a British<br />

staycation or a jet-setting jaunt around the<br />

world, these are the devices to pack in your<br />

carry-on bag and the apps you should<br />

download before you depart.<br />

❱❱ Stream everything<br />

Our complete guide to the world’s biggest<br />

media streamer, Kodi, shows you how to<br />

use it – and, most importantly, how to stay<br />

within the law.<br />

COMPUTER SHOPPER ISSUE 354 ON SALE IN NEWSAGENTS FROM 15th JUNE<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

7


MEL’S WORLD<br />

Tall storeys<br />

He helped kick-start the high-rise building boom in Dubai in the 1970s, and now the<br />

visionary Mel Croucher has seen the future of construction again, and it’s in 3D<br />

MEL CROUCHER<br />

Tech pioneer and all-round good egg<br />

letters@computershopper.co.uk<br />

I BECAME AN economic migrant<br />

more than 40 years ago, when I<br />

was unable to fi nd work in my<br />

own country. My nation’s<br />

economy had collapsed, the<br />

electricity supply had failed,<br />

schools and hospitals were in<br />

chaos, piles of rotting fi lth fi lled<br />

the streets and the dead could<br />

not be buried. My country was<br />

called England. I was an architect.<br />

The country that gave me<br />

refuge was a dusty backwater in<br />

the Middle East. It was called<br />

Dubai. They had begun to extract<br />

oil from shallow-water rigs just<br />

offshore, and they needed<br />

workers to build stuff for the<br />

immigrants that were expected<br />

to come fl ooding in.<br />

My employer was an old<br />

beardy bloke with a big nose and<br />

sunglasses. He was called His<br />

Highness Sheikh Rashid bin<br />

Saeed Al Maktoum, and he was<br />

the ruler of the place. He ordered<br />

me to build him the fi rst high-rise<br />

I never did figure out how to work that computer for<br />

designing buildings, but after only a year I got it to<br />

play a pretty good version of Pong<br />

structures in his little kingdom,<br />

which he named after himself, in<br />

a street also named after himself.<br />

I had never built anything taller<br />

than a bungalow back home, but<br />

he didn’t seem to mind, as long<br />

as what I built was higher than<br />

anything his neighbouring<br />

despots had thrown up. And I<br />

didn’t mind, seeing as he was<br />

paying cash, and I was desperate.<br />

WHAT A CAD<br />

My structures started off nine<br />

storeys high, but in the<br />

boomtown that was 1970s Dubai,<br />

I was told to add a few more<br />

fl oors using the power of magic<br />

to compensate for my ignorance<br />

and inexperience. That magic was<br />

called 2DCAD, which stood for<br />

two-dimensional computer-aided<br />

design, and it ran on a machine<br />

that looked like Darth Vader’s<br />

severed head grafted on to a<br />

typewriter. I never did fi gure out<br />

how to work that computer for<br />

designing buildings, but after<br />

only a year I got it to play a<br />

pretty good version of Pong.<br />

Last month, I fl ew back into<br />

Dubai 40 years on. Everything I<br />

ever knew had gone, replaced by<br />

insane, gigantic structures. My<br />

buildings had been demolished<br />

years ago for being hopelessly<br />

ancient and insignificant. And to<br />

think, I used to worry that<br />

structures over nine storeys were<br />

hazardous, because back then<br />

the fi re brigade consisted of a<br />

Lebanese window-cleaner with a<br />

ladder and a bucket. But as my<br />

British Airways silver bird<br />

shuddered into the city of today,<br />

I could see that the buildings<br />

have become so tall only<br />

Superman could tackle a blaze.<br />

Many of today’s architectural<br />

monsters boast over 100 fl oors,<br />

and one skyscraper is 163 storeys<br />

high. And now a company called<br />

Cazza is about to dwarf the lot<br />

by constructing the world’s fi rst<br />

3D-printed skyscraper.<br />

HEIGHTS OF MADNESS<br />

The proposed megalith looks as<br />

though it’s been designed not<br />

by computers but by a billion<br />

giant termites from the planet<br />

Bonkers, on hallucinogens, in<br />

zero gravity, with knobs on.<br />

Cazza’s construction<br />

philosophy is a bit more<br />

ambitious than mine used to be,<br />

and the fi rm has recently spoken<br />

about the son and heir of my old<br />

boss in the following terms:<br />

“We admire His Highness<br />

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al<br />

Maktoum’s 10-times vision. We<br />

came here to change the world,<br />

and that’s what we’re doing.”<br />

How very true this is. In my<br />

day I had to make do with<br />

2DCAD and a basic knowledge<br />

of ALGOL programming, but<br />

thanks to modern computer<br />

technology today’s economic<br />

migrants will be using robot<br />

cranes as printers, specially<br />

adapted for building at superhigh<br />

speeds, at super-high levels,<br />

at super-high profi ts, because<br />

printing a building is vastly<br />

cheaper than getting a bunch of<br />

workers from Tamil Nadu to build<br />

it using muscle power. As well as<br />

plastics and alloys, the cranes<br />

can print concrete and steel<br />

reinforcement, all of which will<br />

sway about in the Arabian winds<br />

looking down on the miles of<br />

surrounding arid nothingness.<br />

Oh brave new world, that has<br />

such madness in it.<br />

COR BLIMEY<br />

Earlier this year, a company<br />

called Apis Cor printed a<br />

complete detached house in 24<br />

hours, using a mobile 3D rig on<br />

one of its Russian building sites.<br />

It cost £8,145, and is reckoned to<br />

have a lifespan of 175 years. I<br />

must confess that it’s a very nice<br />

little house too, miles better than<br />

the bungalow I managed to inflict<br />

on the world all those years ago.<br />

And so, from the smallest of<br />

dwellings to the most gigantic<br />

structures the planet has ever<br />

seen, this is just an indication of<br />

how robots are going to affect<br />

construction sites and the fate of<br />

those of us who used to work on<br />

them. Let alone the environment<br />

we will all inhabit. It will be a<br />

revolution far greater than the<br />

replacement of the horse and<br />

carriage by the automobile, and<br />

it has already begun.<br />

As for me, I trousered the<br />

loot and eventually made it back<br />

to England in 1977 to start up a<br />

video-games company. But that,<br />

as we high-rise experts say, is<br />

another storey.<br />

8 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


CYBER INSIDER<br />

Private principles<br />

Tough new laws and the threats from open networks can ruin your privacy.<br />

Cyber Insider is here to help<br />

DATA SECURITY USED to be<br />

easy. You’d just have to install<br />

some internet security soft ware<br />

on your computer, and you’d<br />

be done. Today, with the<br />

proliferation of smartphones,<br />

laptops and wireless hotspots,<br />

protecting your data has become<br />

incredibly hard. It’s made even<br />

harder by progressively tougher<br />

surveillance laws, both at home<br />

and abroad. It makes sense that<br />

for this Cyber Insider, I should<br />

talk about ways to legally protect<br />

your data whether you’re at<br />

home, out and about, or abroad.<br />

First, let’s look at the US.<br />

Thanks to President Donald<br />

Trump, privacy seems to be a<br />

thing of the past. Now, ISPs<br />

have the rights to sell users’<br />

browsing history without<br />

consent, and visitors can have<br />

their phones seized, with<br />

Homeland Security requesting<br />

security PINs so that all data<br />

can be copied.<br />

And it gets worse, with the<br />

US now thinking about<br />

requesting social media account<br />

names and login details so that<br />

a person can be vetted before<br />

being allowed into the country.<br />

The trick is to mitigate any potential<br />

damage. Turning on two-factor<br />

authentication is a good starting point<br />

Currently, the US is targeting<br />

people from seven Muslim<br />

countries, but you have to<br />

wonder how long this will last.<br />

Indeed, there’s already talk<br />

about the same checks being<br />

performed on visitors from the<br />

UK, France and Germany.<br />

Certainly, no visitor arriving at<br />

the US border is entirely safe<br />

from being asked to hand over<br />

their phone. Where the US leads,<br />

other countries often follow or<br />

react, so similar draconian<br />

practices may start appearing<br />

at other borders.<br />

There’s a huge legal question<br />

about whether any of this is<br />

strictly allowed. But it makes<br />

little difference if you’ve been<br />

dragged off to a little room to<br />

have a chat about your phone.<br />

So what can you do?<br />

ENTRY LEVEL<br />

There’s not much you can do<br />

about having to hand over data.<br />

Clearing your phone of data and<br />

apps is a no-go, as that’s a red<br />

fl ag to immigration and could<br />

result in you being denied entry.<br />

The trick, then, is to mitigate<br />

any potential damage. Turning<br />

on two-factor authentication is<br />

a good starting point. That way,<br />

your accounts can’t be accessed<br />

with the password alone, should<br />

you have to hand over that bit<br />

of information. Instead, you<br />

also need an automatically<br />

generated code, which can be<br />

created by an app or sent via<br />

text message to your phone.<br />

It’s easy to argue that two-factor<br />

authentication is a common<br />

technology designed for security<br />

in case of any tricky situations<br />

with immigration officials.<br />

I also recommend using a<br />

temporary password for all<br />

accounts. That way, if you have<br />

to hand over the information,<br />

you can change the password at<br />

a later date, reducing damage.<br />

Likewise, change the PIN on your<br />

phone for a temporary one for<br />

travelling: if your phone has to<br />

be searched, you can hand over<br />

the PIN, safe in the knowledge<br />

that you can change it back<br />

again later. Ultimately, that’s<br />

about all you can do, and if you<br />

really don’t want to hand over<br />

any information, the best advice<br />

is not to travel to the US.<br />

BROWSER PRESS<br />

A second threat comes from<br />

when you browse the internet.<br />

As we’ve seen, US ISPs can<br />

collect a lot of data on you, but<br />

then again so can the UK<br />

government. Even worse, Wi-Fi<br />

hotspots can be notoriously<br />

insecure, with unencrypted<br />

communication easy for hackers<br />

to spy on. There have even been<br />

cases of hackers setting up fake<br />

Wi-Fi hotspots for the sole<br />

purpose of stealing login details.<br />

You can’t take any chances. If<br />

you think you’re in a potentially<br />

insecure area, it’s best to protect<br />

your internet traffic immediately.<br />

That means using a virtual private<br />

network (VPN). With a VPN, your<br />

network traffic is securely<br />

encrypted and sent across the<br />

internet to a secure endpoint<br />

where it pops out as normal.<br />

Using a VPN has two<br />

advantages. First, your internet<br />

traffic can’t be snooped on;<br />

second, the endpoint masks<br />

your real location so any<br />

service you visit can’t work out<br />

where you’re located.<br />

EXPRESS DELIVERY<br />

With a proper VPN, such as the<br />

excellent ExpressVPN (www.<br />

expressvpn.com), you can choose<br />

which country you want to<br />

appear in. For example, if you<br />

were in the US, you could tell<br />

ExpressVPN to use one of its UK<br />

endpoints, making it look as if<br />

you’re at home. This way, you<br />

avoid any potential snooping in<br />

the place you’re currently<br />

located, and you can access local<br />

UK services, such as BBC iPlayer.<br />

There is no technology<br />

greater for protecting your<br />

security and privacy than a<br />

VPN. After security soft ware,<br />

the VPN is the next most<br />

important tool that you can<br />

have. VPNs are perfectly legal<br />

technology and have a strong<br />

security reason for being used,<br />

should you need to justify it.<br />

While we can’t completely<br />

fi ght back against governments<br />

or protect data entirely, we<br />

shouldn’t take threats to security<br />

or privacy lying down. Bigger<br />

changes need to made, and it’s<br />

worth voicing your opinion to<br />

your MP to get the government<br />

to address concerns both at<br />

home and abroad.<br />

10 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


RANTS & RAVES<br />

The tech industry is fi nally going green, but it’s not as green around the gills<br />

as the government when it comes to encryption<br />

Madeline Bennett<br />

THE TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY has not been the greatest<br />

friend to the environment. The huge global appetite for laptops,<br />

tablets, mobile phones and so on has led to electronic devices<br />

becoming cheaper and more disposable.<br />

This is bad news for the planet, as it means more plundering of<br />

the earth’s natural resources, and more discarded items being sent<br />

to overflowing landfill sites. According to a United Nations report,<br />

in 2014 less than 16% of global e-waste was recycled. The UN also<br />

revealed that e-waste volumes from small products, such as mobile<br />

phones and PCs, will rise globally to 50 million metric tons or more<br />

every year in <strong>2017</strong>, representing a huge waste of resources and a<br />

source of contamination from hazardous chemicals.<br />

But things could be about to change, as a couple of the big<br />

names in the technology industry are highlighting the sustainability<br />

issue with some eco-friendly plans.<br />

Samsung has announced it will be responsibly<br />

disposing of all the recalled Galaxy Note 7 handsets<br />

– admittedly after pressure from Greenpeace, but<br />

at least the fi rm is fi nally doing the right thing.<br />

It has committed to a number of steps, including<br />

refurbishing the recalled phones, detaching<br />

salvageable components such as semiconductors and<br />

camera modules for reuse, and extracting metals using<br />

environmentally friendly methods. Seeing as the product<br />

recall involves a whopping 4.3 million handsets, this will have a big<br />

impact on preventing a whole load of new e-waste being dumped.<br />

Not to be outdone by its arch rival, Apple has pledged to stop<br />

mining the earth for the manufacture of its devices. Rather than<br />

extracting metals and rare materials from the ground to make<br />

iPhones, iPads and MacBooks, Apple aims to produce devices<br />

entirely from recycled materials such as aluminium, copper and tin.<br />

Although Apple has yet to commit to a timetable or fl esh out<br />

concrete details of how it will achieve this green goal, the fi rm has<br />

thrown down the gauntlet to the tech sector to start including<br />

protection of the environment as part of the product development<br />

process. That in itself is to be commended.<br />

And who knows, perhaps the next step will be to make products<br />

that have a longer lifespan and are easier to repair. Here’s hoping.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

ONCE AGAIN, THE UK government has proved it has no idea<br />

how technology works and has called for the impossible or – bestcase<br />

scenario – the stupid. Following the attack on Westminster<br />

Bridge, where the terrorist was said to have used WhatsApp for<br />

communication, Amber Rudd, the home secretary, has called for a<br />

backdoor to allow government agencies to snoop on messages.<br />

“It used to be that people would steam open envelopes or just<br />

listen in on phones when they wanted to fi nd out what people were<br />

doing, legally, through warranty,” Rudd told the BBC.<br />

“But in this situation, we need to ensure our intelligence services<br />

have the ability to get into situations like encrypted WhatsApp.”<br />

Comparing communication in the real world to encryption in the<br />

virtual world is just plain stupid for many reasons. Encryption uses<br />

well-defi ned mathematics to protect communications.<br />

You just can’t change the maths to suit a government<br />

mandate: inserting a backdoor fundamentally<br />

weakens encryption, allowing other people to break<br />

it.<br />

In short, there’s no safe way to provide a master<br />

key<br />

for encryption without breaking it for all.<br />

The government also wants to ban end-to-end<br />

encryption, such as that used by WhatsApp. With<br />

this form<br />

of encryption, the service provider physically<br />

has no access to the sent messages. Banning end-to-end<br />

encryption, so the<br />

service has to store messages in the middle, would<br />

give government agencies a way to read our communications.<br />

Again, this method reduces security, as an attack on the servers<br />

in the middle can reveal information. It also doesn’t address the<br />

problem that end-to-end encryption exists, so terrorists could<br />

switch to other services or use open-source tools instead. Do the<br />

police or ISPs have the resources to check all internet traffic, PCs and<br />

smartphones to ensure no end-to-end encryption is being used?<br />

Ultimately, the government is attacking a useful technology it<br />

can’t understand. Rather than breaking encryption and eroding<br />

our privacy, traditional policing methods are the answer to<br />

stopping terrorism.<br />

12 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


The biggest stories from the tech world, and what they mean for you<br />

Wearable Technology Show<br />

London is the destination for the latest smart devices<br />

THE WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY Show brings together a diverse<br />

range of companies operating in the wearables space, from the more<br />

traditional fi tness bands and in-car navigation systems to newer<br />

products such as smart rings and intelligent pet monitors.<br />

Madeline Bennett went along to the Spring show to see which<br />

might take off and which are just a gimmick. Here, she rounds up her<br />

favourites from the dozens on display,<br />

which might just make your<br />

life that bit easier, or at least help you stand out from the crowd.<br />

Navdy<br />

£600 from www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Navdy is an in-car driving device that uses<br />

augmented reality to project information<br />

as a transparent image directly in the<br />

driver’s line of sight. You can choose to<br />

have information such as maps, calls,<br />

messages, notifications, email, music and<br />

car diagnostics data directly in front of<br />

you, so you can stay connected while<br />

keeping your eyes on the road.<br />

We had a quick test of the system in<br />

Navdy’s demonstration vehicle at the<br />

show, and can vouch for the transparent<br />

view not being too distracting from the<br />

road ahead. Navdy has a built-in GPS chip<br />

and local storage of maps, so you don’t<br />

have to worry about losing your way if you<br />

lose network coverage.<br />

You can use hand gestures to accept a<br />

phone call, so you don’t need to try to<br />

locate a certain button, and you can access<br />

Siri or Google Now through the system to<br />

take advantage of voice control. It also<br />

connects to your car with Navdy Dash to<br />

show your speed and automatically<br />

recommend nearby petrol stations when<br />

your fuel level is low.<br />

While car makers such as BMW have<br />

been offering these kinds of in-car<br />

systems for a while, Navdy has the<br />

advantage that it’s portable, and so<br />

can be carried around from car to<br />

car – ideal for business travellers, or<br />

for sharing among a family, for<br />

example. The device can be easily set up<br />

and mounted in any car with Navdy’s<br />

magnetic mounting system.<br />

Navdy is available from Amazon for £600.<br />

It’s compatible with iOS 9 and above, and<br />

Android KitKat 4.4 or newer.<br />

Tapdo<br />

€129 (around £108) from tapdo.io<br />

This mini smart button lets you control<br />

technology services with single-touch,<br />

personalised biometric interactions. The<br />

built-in fi ngerprint sensor button can hold up<br />

to 26 different functions across one hand.<br />

You just have to scan all the different parts<br />

of your fi ngers, and then give each part of<br />

each digit a function. You might set up one<br />

fi nger as a music controller, for example, with<br />

play/pause at the top of the fi nger, and up/<br />

down in the middle part. Then just press away<br />

on the button with the relevant bit of your<br />

fi nger to carry out your<br />

desired action.<br />

When the Tapdo<br />

launches in September,<br />

it will support around<br />

20 applications,<br />

including controlling<br />

Spotify, Kodi and Philips<br />

Hue bulbs, tweeting a<br />

current location, and<br />

taking a photo.<br />

You can attach the<br />

button via the included<br />

clip, attach it to your<br />

watch, or use the Tapdo<br />

rubber wristband.<br />

Tapdo is being<br />

funded via a Kickstarter<br />

campaign, which went<br />

live in March. The buttons<br />

will start shipping in September and will be<br />

available in Europe, the US and Canada.<br />

Kerv<br />

£100 from kerv.com<br />

This smart payment ring can be used<br />

anywhere that takes contactless payments<br />

– you just tap the card reader with your ring<br />

and you’ve paid, saving you getting out a<br />

credit card or your smartphone.<br />

No setting up is required, and the ring<br />

doesn’t need charging. You get an activation<br />

code once your Kerv arrives through the post<br />

and you’re ready to go. The ring only supports<br />

MasterCard though, so you need to pre-load<br />

a Kerv ring account with cash to use it.<br />

The Kerv is scratch-resistant and<br />

waterproof. It’s available in 14 different colour<br />

options and 13 sizes, all priced at £100.<br />

14 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Petcube Play<br />

£159 from petcube.com<br />

It wasn’t just us humans catered for<br />

at the show. Our beloved four-legged<br />

friends also have their own smart<br />

devices, aimed at keeping them<br />

entertained while we’re out and<br />

letting worried pet owners keep an<br />

eye on their cat or dog.<br />

Petcube Play is an indoor home<br />

pet camera that lets you check in on<br />

your pets from your smartphone via<br />

the associated app. It consists of a<br />

small cube, which contains a 360º<br />

camera with night vision and 1080p<br />

HD wide-angle video. The cube has<br />

a built-in speaker so you can call<br />

your pet to come over when you<br />

want to see what they’re up to – great<br />

for dogs, who tend to come when<br />

they’re called; get ready to have lots<br />

of blank footage, cat owners.<br />

But the company has catered for<br />

felines with the addition of a laser,<br />

which cats, as anyone who’s owned<br />

one will know, just love chasing.<br />

The camera has a motion sensor, so<br />

the sound of a dog barking or a cat jumping in<br />

front of it will trigger the camera so you can see<br />

what’s going on. You can also share the footage<br />

with friends, family or the public.<br />

Petcube also donates the cameras to animal<br />

shelters to help with rehoming unwanted animals,<br />

which gets a big thumbs up from us. The Petcube<br />

goes on sale in May, priced at £159.<br />

The company also has the Petcube Bites, which<br />

offers the same camera functions, but with the<br />

added bonus of being a treat dispenser – just click<br />

a button on the Petcube app and it will throw out<br />

a biscuit for your furry friend. This goes on sale in<br />

September for £199.<br />

Princess Cruises<br />

Ocean Medallion<br />

www.princess.com<br />

Travel company Carnival was at the event to show<br />

off its new Ocean Medallion smart token, which will<br />

launch on its Princess Cruises line later this year.<br />

The Ocean Medallion is about the size of a<br />

10 pence piece, and has no discernible technology<br />

to it – there’s no on or off switch or user interface.<br />

But once a customer has booked their cruise,<br />

Carnival hopes that the Medallion will become<br />

the only device they need to carry around while<br />

on board, replacing their smartphone, credit card<br />

and any other devices.<br />

The token can be worn on a wristband or chain<br />

or carried in a pocket or purse, and will be used<br />

for everything from checking on to the ship<br />

and unlocking the guest’s cabin door as they<br />

approach the room to paying for goods.<br />

Once on board, guests<br />

will be able to use the<br />

accompanying mobile app<br />

to make reservations or<br />

pre-order drinks for a show<br />

later – and as soon as they<br />

approach the location, the<br />

token will alert staff so they<br />

can be seamlessly checked in<br />

and served. The housekeeping team<br />

will also be alerted when guests are out of the<br />

cabin so the cleaning crew can do the daily<br />

servicing without disturbing them.<br />

Princess Cruises has installed 122km of cable,<br />

7,000 sensors and 650 readers to enable this<br />

seamless experience, but the fi rm sees this as a<br />

worthwhile investment for establishing a larger<br />

base of cruise fans.<br />

Tony Roberts, vice-president UK & Europe at<br />

Princess Cruises, told attendees: “The cruise<br />

market is about 2% of the travel market and the<br />

idea here is how do we enhance the guest<br />

experience so much that people are thinking<br />

about a cruise holiday rather than beach holiday.<br />

“We’re providing guests with the most<br />

personalised experience so they really do get<br />

to make the best of their time on holiday. We<br />

think this is how people will enjoy their holidays<br />

in the future, with that level of personalisation<br />

they’ve come to expect when they’re shopping<br />

on the internet.”<br />

▶ For the den<br />

Last year’s XPS 12 was a vexing<br />

failure – how could such a<br />

close relation to the excellent<br />

XPS 13 get it so wrong? Wisely,<br />

Dell has stuck much closer to<br />

its fi nest clamshell for the new<br />

XPS 13 9365 2-in-1, which<br />

adopts a rotating hinge in<br />

place of a detachable one.<br />

We still prefer the standard<br />

laptop version, but the XPS 13<br />

9365 is a lovely convertible,<br />

with its gorgeous InfinityEdge<br />

display, ultra-thin chassis and<br />

much-improved battery life<br />

over the XPS 12. It’s powerful<br />

enough to get some light work<br />

done, before fl ipping the<br />

screen into tablet mode for<br />

some sofa-based relaxing.<br />

(Page 34)<br />

▶ For the shelf<br />

Looks aren’t everything, as<br />

the Master & Dynamic<br />

MH40 shows perfectly.<br />

This premium set of<br />

over-ear headphones looks<br />

great, incorporating both<br />

cowhide and lambskin,<br />

but it’s hampered by an<br />

uncomfortable fi t for<br />

anyone without a<br />

sufficiently small head<br />

or ears. Sound quality<br />

isn’t very refi ned for the<br />

price, either.<br />

(Page 50)<br />

▶ For the wallet<br />

We’ve long been fans of Asus’s<br />

ZenBook ultra-portables – in<br />

fact, much of this magazine<br />

was produced on a ZenBook<br />

UX305CA. The latest ZenBook<br />

UX310UA continues the streak,<br />

offering a brilliant 13.3in<br />

display and impressive<br />

portability, all for hundreds of<br />

pounds<br />

less than<br />

most<br />

similarly<br />

slim laptops.<br />

(Page 32)<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

15


1<br />

Operating<br />

1<br />

AGA<br />

BOOTING UP<br />

system<br />

quality<br />

Microsoft has fi nally stopped supporting<br />

the much-maligned Windows Vista OS,<br />

10 years after its release.<br />

2Clean pavements<br />

The Watchdog 1 drone locates dog<br />

poo and then alerts the Patroldog 1<br />

robot, which rolls in to clean up.<br />

3 PowerPoint<br />

Celebrating its 30th birthday.<br />

Expect reams of meta-presentations<br />

on the occasion.<br />

4Russian linguists<br />

MI5 is seeking Russian speakers to<br />

help protect the UK from hackers.<br />

cookers<br />

Complicated, toast-burning,<br />

talking points, Aga ovens can be hacked.<br />

So you can forget any plans you had for<br />

perfect eggs.<br />

Samsung reveals green Galaxy Note 7<br />

recycling plans<br />

SOUTH KOREAN HARDWARE<br />

fi rm Samsung has come to<br />

agreeable terms with the<br />

environmental group<br />

Greenpeace over the massive<br />

Galaxy Note 7 product recall.<br />

Greenpeace said that the<br />

Samsung reaction followed<br />

strong public concern, and<br />

showed there was a clear<br />

interest in the need to properly<br />

dispose of electronics.<br />

“People around the world<br />

signed petitions, emailed<br />

Samsung’s CEO, demonstrated<br />

in cities around the world, and<br />

fi nally Samsung has listened.<br />

This is a major win for everyone<br />

that took action, and a step<br />

towards shifting the way we<br />

produce and dispose of<br />

electronics,” said Jude Lee,<br />

global senior campaigner at<br />

Greenpeace East Asia.<br />

Samsung has made a number of<br />

promises about tackling the kindling-like<br />

Note 7, and has recalled the whole lot of<br />

them for real safety reasons. It promised to<br />

recycle any units that can be recycled, and<br />

will strip down the rest for any usable parts<br />

and electronics.<br />

Once the handset maker has<br />

stripped the hardware for all the<br />

parts it wants, it will throw them<br />

open to any interested parties.<br />

“Regarding the Galaxy Note 7<br />

devices as refurbished phones or<br />

rental phones, applicability is<br />

dependent upon consultations<br />

with regulatory authorities and<br />

carriers as well as due<br />

consideration of local demand.<br />

The markets and release dates<br />

will be determined accordingly,”<br />

explained the fi rm.<br />

“For remaining Galaxy Note 7<br />

devices, components such as<br />

semiconductors and camera<br />

modules shall be detached by<br />

companies specialising in such<br />

services and used for test<br />

sample production<br />

purposes. Finally, for<br />

left over component<br />

recycling, Samsung shall<br />

fi rst extract precious<br />

metals, such as copper,<br />

nickel, gold and silver by<br />

utilising eco-friendly companies<br />

specialising in such processes.”<br />

Just as long as they aren’t stored near any<br />

petrol or matches, this should all go fi ne.<br />

Get packing: Vodafone kills roaming<br />

charges in 40 locations<br />

2Travelling laptops<br />

Good luck moving hardware<br />

through the air because of politics.<br />

3Watching a movie<br />

with a millennial<br />

There is a 50% chance that it’s a pirate<br />

copy, according to a recent study.<br />

4 Imagination<br />

Technologies<br />

People are putting the fi rm down<br />

following a failed Apple licensing deal.<br />

Shares fell like rotten apples.<br />

CRASHING<br />

GET OUT the beach towels and the suntan<br />

lotion once again, British people – roaming is<br />

very much back on the travel itinerary.<br />

Service provider Vodafone has got up early<br />

and rushed out to put roaming towels on<br />

sunbeds in 40 locations, providing<br />

holidaymakers and travellers overseas with<br />

no roaming charges, but exactly the same<br />

terms that they enjoy at home.<br />

The 40 locations include a number of<br />

popular European holiday destinations.<br />

including Greece, Spain and Turkey.<br />

“Customers have told us they want us<br />

and the rest of the industry to change.<br />

They want life to be simpler and for us<br />

to remove the things that make life<br />

stressful so they can live their lives,<br />

uninterrupted by these concerns,” said<br />

Nick Jeff ery, Vodafone UK CEO.<br />

“Our new programme will do that over<br />

the next few years and will prove our<br />

commitment to letting our customers<br />

talk, text or stream for a great price,<br />

wherever in the world they may be.”<br />

Ernest Doku, telecoms expert at the<br />

price comparison site uSwitch.com,<br />

congratulated Vodafone on its timing.<br />

“With EU roaming charges due to be<br />

abolished for UK customers as of 15th June<br />

and with uncertainty over what Brexit will<br />

mean for roaming charges in the longer term,<br />

Vodafone is fi ring the starting gun ahead of<br />

time, keen to steal a march on its rivals and<br />

put its current customers at ease,” he said.<br />

However, the perk is only offered to new<br />

customers or those upgrading an existing paymonthly<br />

contract, so not all users will benefi t.<br />

16 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Loyal broadband customers ripped off<br />

by huge price hikes<br />

RESEARCH FROM THE UK Citizens Advice<br />

organisation has found that consistent and<br />

reliable customers get a raw deal when it<br />

comes to renewing their broadband prices.<br />

In fact, they actually get penalised by their<br />

provider, sometimes having to face price<br />

increases of up to 43% when one contract<br />

ends and another automatically begins.<br />

The advice bureau says that this can work<br />

out as an average price rise of £113 a year,<br />

which seems iniquitous, particularly when<br />

these fi gures are culled from the average<br />

prices of the most basic packages at the big<br />

fi ve service providers.<br />

BT and Sky make the biggest hikes, treating<br />

users to 67% and 53% increases respectively.<br />

Over four years, consumers are paying a<br />

loyalty penalty of up to £594 (BT), depending<br />

on where they take their services from.<br />

Virgin Media looks the best bet, with no<br />

increases on a £32.50 monthly tariff over a<br />

four-year renewing period, and TalkTalk<br />

shuffles in at second best with a ‘mere’<br />

£132 penalty reward.<br />

Citizens Advice<br />

recommends that you shop<br />

around. “Loyal broadband<br />

customers are being stung<br />

by big price rises once<br />

their fi xed deal ends.<br />

People often choose their<br />

broadband deals based on<br />

the price that works for<br />

them – but our evidence<br />

shows that many do not<br />

realise the price will rise<br />

after the end of the fi xed<br />

deal. With people staying<br />

with their supplier for an<br />

average of four years,<br />

these extra costs can run<br />

into hundreds of pounds,”<br />

said Gillian Guy, chief<br />

executive of Citizens Advice.<br />

“Older customers and those who have less<br />

money are more likely to stay with their<br />

supplier for longer, meaning their loyalty<br />

penalty could reach over a thousand pounds.<br />

“The government has rightly put energy<br />

fi rms on warning for how they treat loyal<br />

customers – the actions of broadband fi rms<br />

warrant similar scrutiny. Extra protections for<br />

vulnerable consumers are also a must.”<br />

8%<br />

The projected decline in tablet<br />

and eReader sales by 2022<br />

2 46%<br />

MILES DRIVEN THROUGH<br />

GREENWICH BY A NEW<br />

DRIVERLESS SHUTTLE BUS<br />

UK businesses hit by acyber<br />

attack over past12months<br />

87%<br />

25- to 34-year-olds who<br />

use internet banking<br />

340<br />

The position thatcolourful anti-virus<br />

26%<br />

64%<br />

The position that colourful anti-virus<br />

OVER 65s WHO pioneer John McAfeeearnedearned in a<br />

BANK ONLINE newfamous person list<br />

50<br />

Hours of virtual-reality<br />

content watched to set a new<br />

Guinness World Record<br />

PROJECTED<br />

INCREASE IN<br />

SALES OF FITNESS<br />

BANDS AND<br />

SMARTWATCHES<br />

BY 2022<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

17


California<br />

Apple hits<br />

the road<br />

Apple is the latest<br />

company to enter<br />

the self-driving cars race. It has received a<br />

permit from the California Department of<br />

Motor Vehicles to test out autonomous<br />

vehicles on the US state’s roads.<br />

Apple has remained secretive about its<br />

plans, but told federal regulators that it had<br />

turned its attention to “machine learning and<br />

autonomous systems”.<br />

Rumours that Apple was interested in<br />

autonomous cars began two years ago, after it<br />

fi led a patent for soft ware called ‘Collision<br />

Avoidance of Arbitrary Polygonal Obstacles’.<br />

Maribor, Slovenia<br />

Rest in pixels<br />

A Slovenian cemetery has created a vandaland<br />

weather-proof digital tombstone that can<br />

stand as a testament to a life, but perhaps<br />

with some concerns<br />

about blue screens<br />

of death in death.<br />

The fi tt ing, or<br />

fl ickering, memorial,<br />

is designed to last.<br />

“The tombstone has a sensor so that when<br />

nobody is around it only shows the person’s<br />

name and the years of their birth and death.<br />

This saves energy and the screen itself, and<br />

helps extend the tombstone’s lifetime,” said<br />

the outfit behind the technology.<br />

China<br />

Government gets strict on privacy<br />

China plans to impose the world’s strictest<br />

digital privacy rights rules against fi rms such<br />

as Facebook and Google by requiring them to<br />

obtain user permission before sending any<br />

data about them outside the country.<br />

The rules oblige large data companies to<br />

go through an annual security assessment.<br />

The law also prevents the transmission of<br />

economic, scientific<br />

or technological data<br />

outside the country<br />

if the government<br />

decides it poses a<br />

threat to security or<br />

public interest.<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

I know that face<br />

UK surveillance outfit Digital Barriers has won<br />

the contract to provide facial-recognition<br />

technology to Careem, an Uber-like taxi<br />

service that dominates the Middle East and<br />

North African market, across locations<br />

including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt,<br />

Pakistan, Morocco and Kuwait.<br />

“When customers rely on a ride-hailing<br />

service or any other mode of<br />

transportation to go from<br />

point A to point B, they are<br />

also placing their trust in<br />

the service provider for<br />

their safety and security,”<br />

said Magnus Olsson,<br />

co-founder of Careem.<br />

India<br />

Watchdog welcomes e-voting hackers<br />

India’s election watchdog has invited hackers<br />

to target its e-ballot boxes, following demands<br />

for an investigation into the security of the<br />

country’s electronic voting machines.<br />

After recent elections, there were calls for<br />

the electronic voting machines to be ditched<br />

and replaced with paper ballots.<br />

While the Indian government<br />

rejected calls for a return to paper<br />

slips, the watchdog said it<br />

will organise a hackathon<br />

to probe the boxes.<br />

The 10-day competition<br />

invites anyone to subvert<br />

the voting machines and<br />

the back-end systems.<br />

Australia<br />

eBay threatens to<br />

block Oz shoppers<br />

Auction company<br />

eBay is threatening<br />

to block Australian<br />

customers if the<br />

government enacts laws to collect Goods and<br />

Services Tax (GST) from internet sales. The<br />

fi rm claimed proposals to tax all goods sold<br />

by overseas businesses were “unworkable and<br />

would harm Australian consumers”.<br />

Sales of under $1,000 currently aren’t taxed<br />

but the government plans to remove this<br />

threshold for businesses with sales of $75,000.<br />

Treasurer Scott Morrison said it would<br />

mean Australian businesses “do not continue<br />

to be unfairly disadvantaged”.<br />

18<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


State-sponsored espionage<br />

Mostly from Russia without love<br />

THE LAST YEAR has seen a swathe of political<br />

changes, some radical election results, and some<br />

scandalous talk of election manipulation. The US<br />

in particular has accused Russia of perpetrating<br />

attacks against its cyber systems, especially in<br />

the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.<br />

Buried deep in this is the problem of<br />

state-sponsored espionage, which has been a<br />

problem for industry and infrastructure for some<br />

time, and is now fi rmly on the political agenda<br />

and at the front of politicians’ minds.<br />

OH. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO<br />

WITH ME THEN…<br />

It might seem like faraway stuff, and the kind of<br />

thing that concerns the plot of modern James<br />

Bond movies, but this type of state-sponsored<br />

cyber spying is widespread and could have an<br />

impact on us lowly citizens.<br />

In the last six months of 2016, around 40%<br />

of all industrial computers faced a cyber attack<br />

of some kind, according to the Russian security<br />

fi rm Kaspersky Lab, which said that industrial<br />

systems and computers were becoming<br />

increasingly embattled.<br />

Infections were most commonly caused<br />

by internet-based attacks, removable storage<br />

devices and email attachments. These are the three evil musketeers<br />

of malware, and they could easily be used to disrupt national<br />

infrastructure and industry.<br />

Such tools are already being used for mayhem and mischief.<br />

In the US, two Russian spies, one Russian hacker and a lone<br />

Canadian have been charged with stealing the sensitive personal<br />

information of 500 million Yahoo! users. This huge attack on a<br />

massive American corporation was a real shocker and revealed<br />

a very soft security underbelly.<br />

IS THIS THREAT LEVEL MIDNIGHT?<br />

Speaking about the Yahoo! incident,<br />

Tim Matthews, vice-president at security<br />

fi rm Imperva, warned: “This case is<br />

disturbing on many levels, but enterprises<br />

should take note. Organisations may have<br />

been under the false impression that<br />

state-sponsored hacking was aimed at other<br />

governments – or at worst, political parties.<br />

Now we have learned that elite teams of<br />

state-sponsored conspirators and hackers<br />

are also seeking access to corporate data.<br />

“What’s more, the state-sponsored conspirators of this cyber war<br />

are, as in ancient times, giving the spoils of this war to their hacker<br />

combatants. In this case, after collecting the data on their political<br />

targets, which includes employees of commercial entities in<br />

transportation and fi nancial services, the hackers were given free<br />

rein with the spoils – the data from 500 million Yahoo users.”<br />

Here, we imagine Matthews will have paused for a shake of the<br />

head, before adding: “If a nation state hacked Yahoo!, who is to<br />

know what other companies may have been or will be hacked?<br />

Those who don’t carefully monitor their networks today may well<br />

regret it down the road.”<br />

“The anonymity of web-based<br />

attacks means nation states can<br />

achieve ethically questionable<br />

aims via puppet actors”<br />

HOW EASY IS IT TO PROVE GOVERNMENTS ARE BEHIND THIS?<br />

Security fi rm ThreatConnect suggests that the relationship between<br />

state and hacker works both ways, and that both make the most of<br />

the mystery of their trade. It is possible that the fi rst thing a victim<br />

will know about their own attack is when it becomes obvious that<br />

data is leaving or that traffic is unusual.<br />

“State-sponsored hackers are the big dogs. The anonymity of<br />

web-based attacks means that nation states can achieve their more<br />

ethically questionable aims via puppet actors, making it extremely<br />

difficult to prove links between individual<br />

hacks and state-sponsored campaigns,”<br />

the fi rm noted.<br />

“However, state-sponsored hackers are<br />

sometimes identifiable by their attack<br />

patterns and dedication to a specific target.<br />

They’re a tenacious breed; if you think<br />

you’re being targeted by a state-backed<br />

hacker you should be ready for a long<br />

struggle to throw them off.”<br />

HAS CYBER ESPIONAGE PEAKED?<br />

Unfortunately not. There were scandals in the US election, and talk<br />

of some manipulation in the UK’s EU referendum. And we now<br />

have a snap general election coming up in June, which could open<br />

the fl oodgates for a whole new load of cyber manipulation and<br />

interference. A lot of fi ngers get pointed at the Russian government,<br />

and perhaps with good reason. It has been found to be the source<br />

of a heap of sophisticated attacks, and to be keen on pushing<br />

forward with the development of proven tools.<br />

Turla, one of the most infamous malware groups said to be borne<br />

out of Russia, has recently updated its main attack, according to ESET,<br />

dubbing it Carbon and hurling as many as eight active versions out into<br />

the wild. <strong>2017</strong> is a bad year to be a target, that much is for sure.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

19


The F1 car is the easy-to-assemble star<br />

3D PRINTING has arrived in the<br />

fast-paced world of motor racing.<br />

McLaren has announced that it is<br />

printing Formula 1 racing car parts<br />

during the race. Quick 3D trackside<br />

printing is expected to give the<br />

fi rm an edge over the competition<br />

as it should be able to make<br />

modifications to parts on the fl y.<br />

The team produced its fi rst parts at<br />

the Bahrain Grand Prix in April.<br />

“We are consistently modifying and improving<br />

our Formula 1 car designs,” said Neil Oatley, design<br />

and development director, McLaren Racing.<br />

“So the ability to test new designs quickly is<br />

critical to making the car lighter and, more<br />

importantly, increasing the number of tangible<br />

iterations in improved car performance.<br />

“If we can bring new developments to the car one<br />

race earlier – going from new idea to new part in only<br />

a few days – this will be a key factor in making the<br />

MCL32 [car] more competitive. By expanding the use<br />

GRAPHENE, THE SEEMINGLY do-everything<br />

revolutionary technology, is helping to make salt<br />

water, which takes up most of the planet, into<br />

drinkable water where it might be most needed.<br />

The process is discussed in the Nature<br />

Nanotechnology journal, and says that a graphenebased<br />

oxide sieve could be used to form a barrier<br />

that efficiently cleans water as it passes through.<br />

The process is a new one because researchers<br />

struggled to produce large enough quantities of<br />

single-layer graphene. They turned to ‘simple<br />

oxidation’ to solve the puzzle.<br />

Dr Rahul from Manchester University explained:<br />

“Graphene oxide can be produced by simple<br />

oxidation in the lab. As an ink or solution, we can<br />

compose it on a substrate or porous material. Then<br />

of Stratasys 3D printing in our<br />

manufacturing processes, including<br />

producing fi nal car components,<br />

composite lay-up and sacrificial<br />

tools, cutting jigs, and more, we are<br />

decreasing our lead times while<br />

increasing part complexity.”<br />

McLaren is partnering with UK<br />

fi rm Stratasys and using its uPrint<br />

SE Plus machine on site.<br />

“Formula 1 is one of the world’s<br />

best proving grounds for our additive manufacturing<br />

solutions,” explained Andy Middleton of Stratasys.<br />

“As the official supplier of 3D printing solutions<br />

to the McLaren-Honda Formula 1 team, we are<br />

working closely together to solve their engineering<br />

challenges in the workshop, in the wind-tunnel, and<br />

on the track.<br />

“We believe that this, in turn, will enable us to<br />

develop new materials and applications that bring<br />

new efficiencies and capabilities to McLaren Racing<br />

and other automotive designers and manufacturers.”<br />

Graphene steps in to sieve salt from the sea<br />

BOEING IS ALSO embracing the 3D<br />

printing revolution for its latest aircraft. raft.<br />

The aerospace company has turned<br />

to Norway-based Norsk Titanium to<br />

provide it with fl ight-authorityapproved<br />

3D printed parts for its<br />

massive 787 Dreamliner.<br />

Boeing is expecting to save<br />

millions of dollars in manufacturing<br />

and material costs by adopting<br />

Norsk’s proprietary Rapid Plasma<br />

Deposition titanium production<br />

method for wire-based materials.<br />

This plan did not take fl ight overnight, and<br />

the project is only going ahead after a period of<br />

rigorous testing and inspection, which saw Norsk<br />

we can use it as a membrane. In terms of scalability<br />

and the cost of the material, graphene oxide has a<br />

potential advantage over single-layered graphene.”<br />

The paper is called ‘Tunable sieving of ions using<br />

graphene oxide membranes’, and describes the<br />

process in glorious detail. Dr Rahul told the BBC<br />

that the knack is getting the holes in the graphene<br />

small enough to stop the salt getting through.<br />

These are much simpler terms.<br />

“To make it permeable, you need to drill small<br />

holes in the membrane. But if the hole size is<br />

larger than one nanometre, the salts go through<br />

that hole,” he said.<br />

“You have to make a membrane with a very<br />

uniform less-than-one-nanometre hole size to make<br />

it useful for desalination. It’s a really challenging job.”<br />

Boeing turns to 3D printing to shave<br />

millions off the 787 Dreamliner<br />

awarded FAA certification. Boeing is<br />

confident it’s the right move.<br />

“From the outset, the 787 has<br />

been the hallmark of innovation<br />

and efficiency,” said John Byrne,<br />

vice-president, airplane materials<br />

and structures, supplier<br />

management at Boeing<br />

Commercial Airplanes.<br />

“We are always looking at the<br />

latest technologies to drive cost<br />

reduction, performance and value to<br />

our customers and Norsk Titanium’s RPD<br />

capability fi ts the bill in a new and creative way.”<br />

Boeing hopes to save between $2m and $3m off<br />

the cost of each plane by 3D printing the parts.<br />

SOUND<br />

BYTES<br />

Now I know that if<br />

you’re trying to<br />

catch terrorists it’s really<br />

tempting to demand to<br />

be able to break all that<br />

encryption, but if you<br />

break that encryption,<br />

then guess what – so<br />

could other people.<br />

And guess what – they<br />

may end up getting<br />

better at it than you are”<br />

Tim Berners-Lee offers some advice to<br />

governments looking for backdoors<br />

PowerPoint does<br />

something that<br />

many people want to do:<br />

expressing a sequence of<br />

ideas, one after another<br />

in order, using all kinds of<br />

graphics and language”<br />

PowerPoint inventor Robert Gaskins<br />

on the 30th birthday of his venerable<br />

meeting-improving soft ware<br />

We saw it as a<br />

technology to<br />

essentially punch through<br />

that fourth wall… it’s a<br />

cool way to connect<br />

directly with our guests”<br />

Burger King explains why an advert for<br />

recycled meat had to mess with Google<br />

Home in people’s homes<br />

We have now<br />

investigated an<br />

issue which meant some<br />

Virgin Media customers<br />

were intermittently not<br />

able to access Facebook<br />

and Instagram. Our fault<br />

has now been fixed and<br />

we apologise for any<br />

inconvenience caused”<br />

Virgin Media reopens the cat-pic<br />

fl oodgates after a period of downtime<br />

Over time I think<br />

we will probably<br />

see a closer merger of<br />

biological intelligence<br />

and digital intelligence…<br />

It’s mostly about the<br />

bandwidth, the speed of<br />

the connection between<br />

your brain and the digital<br />

version of yourself,<br />

particularly output”<br />

Elon Musk explains how the<br />

connected you might work in real life<br />

20 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


IBM 5150<br />

The revolutionary PC that kicked off the whole home computing boom in 1981<br />

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, what we have<br />

before us here is a dinosaur. The IBM 5150,<br />

the sort of stone-age piece of hardware that<br />

makes young people pick up sticks and start<br />

poking at it.<br />

It was born in 1981, which is eight years<br />

after this author, and has been loved ever<br />

since. The big grey box was embraced in<br />

classrooms and by early tech aficionados.<br />

Big Blue saw it as a replacement for the<br />

multimillion-dollar huge-array computing<br />

machines that industry was using, but one<br />

that was built and priced for the home.<br />

IBM remembers the thing fondly; in fact,<br />

you’d have to go some distance to fi nd<br />

anyone who doesn’t. “When the IBM Personal<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> (IBM 5150) was introduced to the<br />

world 25 years ago, it was dramatically clear<br />

to most observers that IBM had done<br />

something very new and different,” explained<br />

IBM about itself when marking the 5150’s<br />

quarter-century anniversary.<br />

“Here you had a large company, steeped<br />

in tradition, that had been willing and able to<br />

set aside its ‘business as usual’ methods to<br />

produce in volume a highly competitive, tiny<br />

computer of top quality, intended for both<br />

consumers and businesses. And IBM was<br />

able to do all that and roll out its fi rst PC in<br />

just one year.”<br />

ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM<br />

IBM might now have a reputation for being a<br />

safe pair of hands, but at the time this was<br />

revolutionary stuff. When IBM fi rst began<br />

speaking about the machine, one analyst<br />

was dismissive, saying, “IBM bringing out a<br />

personal computer would be like teaching<br />

an elephant to tap dance”.<br />

IBM did it, though, announcing the 5150<br />

on 12th August 1981. “This is the computer<br />

for just about everyone who has ever<br />

wanted a personal system at the office,<br />

on the university campus or at home,” said<br />

CB Rogers Jr, IBM vice-president.<br />

“We believe its performance, reliability and<br />

ease of use make it the most advanced,<br />

affordable personal computer in the<br />

marketplace,” he enthused.<br />

The claims at launch will have been mind<br />

blowing, but now they are less so. Even IBM<br />

admits that the machine could only store as<br />

much data as a large cookbook. IBM wasn’t<br />

really comparing like for like though, as the<br />

computers of the 1960s required two fl oors of<br />

their own just to exist on. The 5150 was<br />

perhaps best compared against the IBM<br />

5100, which came out in 1975 and had low<br />

consumer appeal, or perhaps the zippy little<br />

5322 or Datamaster, though that was more<br />

of a word processor.<br />

By 1981, however, IBM was giving a leg up<br />

to Microsoft by embracing a modified version<br />

of its Basic language for the 5150. This later<br />

became PC-DOS and then, when safely<br />

ensconced at Microsoft , MS-DOS.<br />

IBM sold the 5150 for between $1,500 and<br />

$3,000, and for the highest price tag a<br />

shopper could get a maxed-out box with a<br />

monitor, RAM options scaling up from 16KB<br />

to a maximum 256KB, an 11.5in screen, dual<br />

160KB 5.25in disk drives, and a cassette and a<br />

keyboard. Put yourself back into 1981, doesn’t<br />

that all sound so appealing? Looking at it now,<br />

we can see how its design has dated, but it<br />

remains incredibly neat. The full package,<br />

complete with everything from monitor to the<br />

brace of disk drives, still wouldn’t look out of<br />

place in some circumstances. Even if those<br />

circumstances are a shelf in a shed.<br />

FANFARE FOR THE COMMON PC<br />

We began with an intro from IBM, so we’ll<br />

allow the fi rm to play its creation out with a<br />

fanfare: “The introduction of the IBM Personal<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> a quarter of a century ago set a<br />

worldwide personal computing standard and<br />

helped establish a multibillion-dollar industry.”<br />

Let us all agree that IBM is proud of the<br />

5150, and that it did indeed begin the home<br />

computing revolution.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

21


REVIEWS<br />

YOUR TRUSTED GUIDE TO WHAT’S NEW<br />

SMART HOME ASSISTANT<br />

GOOGLE Home<br />

★★★★★<br />

£130 • From madeby.google.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A very smart home assistant that’s easy to converse with,<br />

but third-party support lags behind the Echo for now<br />

THE AMAZON ECHO (<strong>Shopper</strong> 347) and Echo<br />

Dot (<strong>Shopper</strong> 349) proved people were keen<br />

to have an always-listening voice assistant in<br />

the home, with both devices selling in droves.<br />

It’s no wonder, then, that Google has decided<br />

to get in on the act with its rival product, Home.<br />

As with the Echo, Home is a small speaker<br />

powered by a personal assistant that can<br />

answer questions, play music and control your<br />

smart home devices. Home is an attractivelooking<br />

device, looking more like a funky light<br />

than a traditional speaker. Although it ships<br />

with a basic white base, you can buy various<br />

material or metal replacement bases (from<br />

£18) to match your Home to your interior<br />

decor. In many ways, the choice of bases<br />

makes Home more fl exible than the Echo,<br />

which is available only in black or white.<br />

Home has a single button on it: a<br />

microphone button at the back that stops<br />

the device from listening to you. The top is<br />

touch sensitive, and you can press and hold to<br />

activate listening mode, if the wake-up phrase<br />

“OK Google” doesn’t work. We never had<br />

trouble with this, as the far-fi eld voice<br />

technology picked up our speech from across<br />

our biggest room. The use of a two-word<br />

wake-up phrase meant we never<br />

triggered Google Home by accident;<br />

the Echo will quite often wake up when<br />

it thinks it hears you say “Alexa”.<br />

TALKING POINTS<br />

The touch-sensitive top of the Home<br />

also lets you change volume by<br />

swirling your fi nger around. A neat<br />

graphic appears on top to show the<br />

current setting. Alternatively, you can<br />

just use your voice and ask Home to<br />

set itself to a particular volume.<br />

The big difference between<br />

Google’s and Amazon’s devices is the<br />

personal assistant. While Amazon uses its<br />

Alexa service, Home has the Google<br />

Assistant, which has appeared on several<br />

recent Android phones. As the Google<br />

Assistant ties into the company’s other<br />

services, including Maps and search, Home<br />

certainly has an advantage on paper.<br />

It’s an advantage that’s carried over in<br />

practice, too, as the Google Assistant is the<br />

smartest assistant we’ve used, as well as the<br />

most natural to interact with. Part of its<br />

beauty is that the Assistant is context aware,<br />

so you can continue a conversation with it.<br />

Ask, “What’s the weather like tomorrow?” and<br />

you get an up-to-date forecast; you can then<br />

follow up with, “And at the weekend?”, and<br />

Google understands that you want a further<br />

weather update. Alexa isn’t that smart, and<br />

each interaction has to be carefully<br />

worded to get the right answer.<br />

Likewise, you can ask Google Home<br />

where the nearest supermarket is,<br />

and then follow up by asking when<br />

it shuts. It’s a far more natural<br />

experience than dealing with other<br />

personal assistants. The Google<br />

Assistant is also better at fi nding<br />

answers than Alexa, and we found it<br />

hard to stump Home completely.<br />

Google Assistant tends to be a bit more<br />

accurate, too. Ask what the weather is like in<br />

Falmouth, for example, and Home understands<br />

that you’re talking about the UK; Alexa starts<br />

telling you what the weather is like in the US.<br />

LEARNING CURVE<br />

Google can also pull in the information that it<br />

knows about you. For example, ask what the<br />

traffic is like on the way home, and the Google<br />

Assistant gives you the correct information.<br />

Home can also provide you with details<br />

from your calendar, as well as pulling<br />

information from Gmail, such as upcoming<br />

bookings and fl ights. Sadly, however, Home<br />

can only integrate with a single Google<br />

Account at the moment. An update rolling<br />

out soon will let Home detect different<br />

voices, giving them their information from<br />

their own Google account.<br />

Google Home also ties into other services.<br />

Netflix and Chromecast support is neat, as<br />

you can use your voice to ask Home to play<br />

content on your TV. While it’s arguably more<br />

useful to browse for content on your phone,<br />

Home’s advantage is that you can use your<br />

22<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


voice to pause and resume playback, rewind, turn<br />

on captions and skip episodes. It’s a far quicker<br />

interaction than having to whip out a phone,<br />

switch to the Netflix app and hit the pause button<br />

when the phone rings.<br />

Spotify and Google Play Music support is built<br />

in, letting you play streamed music directly on the<br />

Home. There’s also TuneIn, so you can quickly play<br />

your favourite radio station, too. Unlike the Echo,<br />

though, there’s no Bluetooth support.<br />

Remove the Home’s base, and you’ll see the 2in<br />

high-excursion speaker and dual 2in passive<br />

radiators. In a high-excursion speaker, the cone<br />

moves further than on regular speakers, giving a<br />

The Google Assistant is the smartest<br />

assistant we’ve used, as well as the<br />

most natural to interact with<br />

greater frequency range. Compared to the full-size<br />

Echo, Home’s audio quality is similar: we found<br />

that Home has more bass, but the Echo goes a<br />

little louder. There’s very little in it, though, and<br />

both are capable, quality music devices.<br />

JOIN US<br />

Beyond the baked-in features, Google Home is<br />

expandable via third-party add-ons. One of the<br />

biggest uses is smart home control. For example,<br />

you can turn on, dim and control the colour of<br />

your Philips Hue lights. Home uses a similar set of<br />

commands to Alexa for smart home control, and<br />

we found little difference between the two devices.<br />

This hands Echo the advantage, as Alexa<br />

currently has far more smart home skills available<br />

for it than Home. In particular, Alexa has support<br />

for a wider range of smart thermostats and lighting<br />

systems. Google Home’s biggest support is from<br />

Nest (a Google company), SmartThings and Philips<br />

Hue. We expect Home’s support to grow in future,<br />

as more companies develop for the platform.<br />

Once you add a Home control service, found<br />

devices can be organised into Rooms. You can then<br />

control an entire Room, say turning everything off<br />

at once. It’s a similar idea to Alexa’s Groups.<br />

For smart home control, it’s likely that you’ll<br />

want more than one device so that multiple<br />

Google Homes will play nicely together. When<br />

you speak the wake word, only the closest Home<br />

will respond to your question. Home will override<br />

your Android phone, too, which isn’t always that<br />

helpful. Arguably, it would be better for Google<br />

to have different wake words for its Android and<br />

Home products so you can more easily choose<br />

which device you want to interact with.<br />

Kitting out a house can get expensive, which<br />

is where Amazon has the advantage with the tiny<br />

Echo Dot. At £50 a go, adding multiple Echo<br />

devices to your home isn’t that costly.<br />

Beyond the smart home, Home supports<br />

third-party news plug-ins, bringing you the latest<br />

news from the BBC, Daily Telegraph, Sky News<br />

and more. In particular, the BBC headlines are<br />

high-quality, with the regular news readers giving<br />

you the latest information.<br />

Home doesn’t have the same range of<br />

third-party plug-ins as Alexa. For example, on<br />

our Echo, we’ve got an Alexa Skill that can tell<br />

us the current status of a Tube line, as well as<br />

one that will tell a bedtime story. There are<br />

thousands (of varying quality) to choose from<br />

on Alexa, and it would be good to see a similar<br />

range of options available for Home. Admittedly,<br />

support for other services is starting to come,<br />

via Conversation Actions.<br />

HOME ALONE<br />

We love the My Day feature, where Home gives<br />

you an overview of your day. You can customise<br />

the information you get, although<br />

the default works well: it tells you the<br />

weather, how your commute is<br />

looking, when your next meeting is,<br />

gives you your reminders and then<br />

ends with the latest news report.<br />

It’s a neat thing to start a day with.<br />

In addition, Google Home can do<br />

all the usual things that you’d expect<br />

from a voice assistant, including acting as an<br />

alarm, setting reminders, helping you convert<br />

between different scales (great for cooking),<br />

and answering questions.<br />

Here are the big questions: is Google Home<br />

worth buying, and is it better than the Echo?<br />

The answers aren’t that straightforward, and<br />

it depends on what you want to do. As a<br />

standalone product, Google Home is cheaper<br />

than the full-size Echo, and its voice assistant is<br />

more accomplished and a little easier to interact<br />

with. That said, smart home support is more<br />

limited, and Home has fewer skills. It also works<br />

out more expensive to kit out a home with<br />

multiple speakers, as there’s no cheaper option<br />

to compete with the Amazon Echo Dot. In short,<br />

we’d pick the Echo for home control at the<br />

moment, and Google Home otherwise.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

DRIVERS 1x 2in driver, 2x 2in passive radiators • RMS<br />

POWEROUTPUT Not stated • DOCKCONNECTOR None •<br />

WIRELESS 802.11ac Wi-Fi • DIMENSIONS 143x96x96mm •<br />

WEIGHT 477g • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS<br />

madeby.google.com/home • PART CODE Home<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong>


DESKTOP GAMING PC<br />

BOX Cube Panther<br />

★★★★★<br />

£850 • From www.box.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The cheapest GTX 1060-based system we’ve seen yet is an unsurprisingly strong performer<br />

£850 MAY BE a sizable chunk of the average<br />

pay cheque, but in desktop terms, it’s a fairly<br />

middling amount – hence why it’s particularly<br />

crucial to judge where exactly the budget is<br />

being spent. High-end processor or a fast<br />

SSD? Luxury chassis or expansive<br />

motherboard? With any reasonably priced PC<br />

build, there are big component choices to be<br />

made, even if you’re not building it yourself.<br />

With the Cube Panther, Box has focused on<br />

gaming, forgoing higher-end parts elsewhere<br />

to include a GeForce GTX 1060 graphics card.<br />

It’s the 3GB VRAM version, rather than a 6GB<br />

model, but that generally only means the loss<br />

of a few frames per second – not a huge issue<br />

when you’re already getting high frame rates<br />

at both 1080p and 1440p.<br />

SMOOTH OPERATOR<br />

Indeed, Dirt Showdown running at Ultra<br />

settings was no match for the Cube Panther’s<br />

capable GPU. It returned performances of<br />

114fps at 1,920x1,080, 90fps at 2,560x1,440<br />

and even a very playable 51fps at 3,840x2,160.<br />

Dirt Showdown is a very undemanding<br />

game compared to our other test game,<br />

Metro: Last Light Redux, but even here the<br />

Cube Panther runs well. With Very High<br />

settings and SSAA enabled, it averaged 47fps<br />

at 1,920x1,080, which is perfectly fi ne without<br />

the need to tone down any textures or<br />

graphical effects. 2,560x1,440 proved a greater<br />

challenge, as the Cube Panther only managed<br />

27fps (30fps or higher is ideal), but this was<br />

easily fi xed by switching off SSAA, which<br />

doesn’t have much of a pronounced effect at<br />

this resolution anyway. Once that’s done, it<br />

jumps to a much smoother 44fps.<br />

The frame rate plummeted to 11fps at<br />

3,840x2,160, and turning off SSAA wasn’t<br />

enough this time, so we switched to Medium<br />

quality as well. This resulted in a 49fps average<br />

– not bad for a graphics card that wasn’t really<br />

intended for 4K gaming in the fi rst place.<br />

Overall, the Cube Panther is broadly on a<br />

par with the more expensive Yoyotech<br />

Warbird G2 (<strong>Shopper</strong> 351) and Chillblast Fusion<br />

Hubble (<strong>Shopper</strong> 350), making it an excellent<br />

choice for anyone primarily interested in<br />

games. It even achieved a high score of 7.5 in<br />

Valve’s punishing SteamVR Performance Test,<br />

so it’s ready for virtual reality as well.<br />

CHIP SERVICE<br />

As we said, everything else about Box’s PC is<br />

less impressive. That’s not to say it’s actually<br />

bad. Take the quad-core, 3.7GHz Intel Core<br />

i5-7500 processor – it’s non-overclockable<br />

and would likely limit the performance of<br />

more powerful GPUs, were you to upgrade<br />

in the future, but here it’s fi ne enough for<br />

home use, and evidently doesn’t bottleneck<br />

the GTX 1060. Together with 8GB of DDR4<br />

memory, it scored (amusingly) 108 in every<br />

single part of our processing benchmark,<br />

naturally including the overall score. You’ll<br />

need more muscle for things like video editing<br />

or heavy multitasking with large fi les, but it’s<br />

still a respectable performance at this price.<br />

There’s also no dedicated SSD, though at<br />

least you’re not stuck with a simple hard disk<br />

either. Storage comes in the form of a<br />

decent-sized 1TB hybrid drive – the bulk of<br />

this is traditional mechanical storage, but<br />

there’s also an 8GB cache, which can help<br />

speed up your most-used applications.<br />

We do feel it could have<br />

done with a few more full-size<br />

USB ports, mind. There are<br />

only two USB3s on the front<br />

panel plus two USB3 and four<br />

USB2 ports at the rear, which<br />

is about the minimum we’d<br />

expect from a desktop PC.<br />

There are only basic 3.5mm<br />

audio jacks as well, though<br />

some fl ashes of bonus utility<br />

do come via a single USB<br />

Type-C port and a 802.11n<br />

Wi-Fi card, which has two<br />

antenna mounts on the rear<br />

I/O panel. Credit where it’s<br />

due, this is not only a useful<br />

inclusion on its own, but if<br />

you have to go wireless<br />

instead of using the Ethernet<br />

socket, it will save one of the limited USB<br />

ports being taken up by a receiver.<br />

A more premium touch is the inclusion of<br />

two M.2 slots on the motherboard, with<br />

support for Intel’s new, ultra-fast Optane<br />

drives. Even if you eventually go for a more<br />

basic NVMe SSD, we’d defi nitely recommend<br />

it over another SATA drive, though with three<br />

3.5in, two 2.5in and two 5.25in drive bays,<br />

you’ve got a fair few options.<br />

MOODY VIEWS<br />

The interior is bathed in a moody red light,<br />

which you have a good view of through the<br />

acrylic side window. Unfortunately, the rest of<br />

the case doesn’t look quite as slick, especially<br />

the storm drain grate-looking plastic bars<br />

running across the front fan intake.<br />

Looks aside, this is a competent and quiet<br />

gaming rig that we wouldn’t mind keeping<br />

under the desk (though perhaps not on it). It<br />

may lack a huge array of exceptional features,<br />

but not everyone can stretch to the £1,000 of<br />

our current Best Buy, the Chillblast Fusion<br />

Hubble, and as long as you avoid serious<br />

data-crunching or multimedia tasks, this<br />

cheaper system will get things done just fi ne.<br />

James Archer<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 3.7GHz Intel Core i5-6500 • RAM<br />

8GB DDR4 • FRONT USB PORTS 2x USB3 • REAR USB<br />

PORTS 4x USB2, 2x USB3, 1x USB Type-C • GRAPHICS CARD<br />

3GB Asus Dual GeForce GTX 1060 • TOTAL STORAGE 1TB<br />

SSHD • DISPLAY None • OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10<br />

• WARRANTY Two years labour inc one year collect and<br />

return and one year parts • DETAILS www.box.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE CU-Pani5GTX10608Win10<br />

Windows overall<br />

Multitasking<br />

Dirt Showdown<br />

Metro: Last Light<br />

0%<br />

-50<br />

108<br />

108<br />

114fps<br />

47fps<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

24 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Scan & Win a<br />

SoundblasterX Katana!<br />

T & C apply<br />

CUSTOMIZABLE 24-BIT HI-RES GAMING UNDER-MONITOR AUDIO SYSTEM<br />

A small, beautiful-looking soundbar that<br />

delivers good audio for under £300<br />

For keen gamers who want<br />

something flexible for movies and<br />

music as well, it’s a great buy.<br />

- PC Pro (source: issue 271, May <strong>2017</strong>)<br />

16.8 MILLION<br />

REACTIVE COLORS<br />

Mid<br />

Mid<br />

Low<br />

POWERFUL 150W PEAK,<br />

HI-RES 24-BIT/96KHZ AUDIO<br />

With integrated sound card/DAC<br />

DOLBY DIGITAL<br />

DECODING<br />

For true-to-life 5.1 channel playback<br />

with clear dialog<br />

DSP POWERED<br />

5-DRIVER DESIGN<br />

2 up-firing midbass, 2 high-excursion<br />

tweeters, 1 long-throw subwoofer<br />

High<br />

Frequency<br />

R L<br />

Mid<br />

Frequency<br />

R L<br />

Low<br />

Frequency<br />

SUB<br />

Optical Aux-in<br />

FLEXIBLE CONNECTIVITY<br />

USB, Optical-in, Bluetooth 4.2, USB<br />

flash drive, Aux-in, Mic-in, Headset<br />

A<br />

A<br />

TRI-AMPLIFIED,<br />

ONE-PIECE DESIGN<br />

For uncompromised clear,<br />

well-balanced, room-filling audio<br />

A<br />

BLASTERX ACOUSTIC<br />

ENGINE FOR PC<br />

Customizable enhancements for<br />

unprecedented levels of audio realism with<br />

7.1 virtual surround and clear cues<br />

http://uk.creative.com/cs<br />

#GAMERSFORLIFE


DESKTOP GAMING PC<br />

CHILLBLAST Fusion Portal<br />

★★★★★<br />

£2,000 • From www.chillblast.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

This quirky, GTX 1080 Ti-based PC is hugely<br />

expensive, but you do get what you pay for<br />

IT’S ALWAYS NICE to see something different<br />

amidst the stream of black cuboids that<br />

usually comprise our PC coverage. Chillblast’s<br />

Fusion Portal stands out for two reasons, the<br />

fi rst of which is its form. Held aloft by thin legs<br />

on either side, the case (a BitFenix Portal,<br />

hence the name) is one of the most unusual<br />

Mini-ITX cases we’ve seen, with its rounded,<br />

pill-like shape with grooves cut into the sides,<br />

presumably lest they resemble unacceptably<br />

plain-looking panels of aluminium.<br />

It doesn’t open up at the sides either,<br />

another ditching of desktop PC convention.<br />

Instead, you loosen a couple of screws at<br />

the back and, with what is ideally no small<br />

amount of care, pull out a separate internal<br />

chassis, on to which the motherboard and<br />

other components are attached. The whole<br />

thing rolls backwards on a rail, leaving the<br />

outer shell empty until you slide it all back<br />

in again. It’s bizarre, and of questionable<br />

practicality, but we did fi nd ourselves grinning<br />

at the audacity of such a design.<br />

Topping it off (literally) is an acrylic window,<br />

which gives you a fi ne view of the Fusion<br />

Portal’s second big selling point: an Nvidia<br />

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, the new king of the<br />

Pascal-based graphics cards.<br />

CUDA, WOULDA, SHOULDA<br />

Selling for £699 by itself, this<br />

GPU dwarfs even the mighty<br />

GTX 1080 in pure specs: it<br />

has 11GB of GDDR5X RAM<br />

running at 11GB/s and a<br />

whopping 3,584 CUDA<br />

processing cores,<br />

compared to the GTX<br />

1080’s 8GB of GDDR5X<br />

RAM running at 10GB/s<br />

with 2,560 CUDA cores.<br />

The GTX 1080 has slightly<br />

faster boost and base<br />

clock speeds, but when<br />

the new model has over<br />

1,000 additional cores,<br />

that doesn’t exactly<br />

even the odds.<br />

In fact, on paper the<br />

GTX 1080 Ti is closer to<br />

Nvidia’s own Titan X, a<br />

12GB card priced at<br />

£1,179 – and intended<br />

for use in things such<br />

as machine-learning<br />

development as<br />

much as high-end<br />

gaming. This ultimately means<br />

two things: one, you probably<br />

shouldn’t spend an extra £420<br />

on a Titan X; and two, the Fusion<br />

Portal is a <strong>Shopper</strong> record-setter<br />

when it comes to real-world<br />

gaming performance.<br />

In our most demanding<br />

benchmark, Metro: Last Light<br />

Redux at Very High settings,<br />

Chillblast’s PC managed 107fps<br />

at 1,920x1,080, making it the<br />

fi rst PC we’ve used to break<br />

100fps at this resolution.<br />

Happily, it also fi nished<br />

over the golden 60fps<br />

mark at 2,560x1,440,<br />

averaging 62fps by the<br />

end of the test. Since<br />

SSAA (anti-aliasing)<br />

isn’t as useful here as it<br />

is at lower resolution, we also ran the test with<br />

it switched off, which saw an increase to a<br />

beautifully crisp and smooth 116fps.<br />

At 3,840x2,160 with SSAA back on, the<br />

Fusion Portal produced a slightly jerky 28fps,<br />

but again, disabling edge-smoothing allowed<br />

for a boost up to 59fps with a negligible effect<br />

on overall quality. Compare that to<br />

the GTX 1080-powered PC<br />

Specialist Apollo K-VR<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 352), which scored<br />

42fps under the same<br />

conditions; 17fps may<br />

not sound like much,<br />

but the difference is<br />

immediately noticeable.<br />

POWER STRUGGLE<br />

Strangely, however, the<br />

Fusion Portal’s result in<br />

the 1080p Dirt Showdown<br />

benchmark was lower<br />

than that of the Apollo<br />

K-VR: after multiple runs,<br />

it never averaged higher<br />

than 159fps, a 10fps<br />

defi cit. The Chillblast<br />

system also only managed<br />

2fps more at 1440p<br />

(157fps), fi nally pulling<br />

out a more expected<br />

lead at 4K, where it<br />

produced 113fps to<br />

the Apollo K-VR’s<br />

93fps. The Fusion<br />

Portal is absolute<br />

overkill for playing at 1080p anyway, but we’re<br />

quite baffled as to how the GTX 1080 Ti lost<br />

out to a GTX 1080 in this one instance.<br />

The bottom line, however, is that this is the<br />

better GPU (and thus the better system) for<br />

maxed-out gaming on a 4K monitor. Since you<br />

also get all the Pascal architecture’s VR<br />

optimisations, it won’t sweat when paired with<br />

an HTC Vive either. It scored 11 out of 11 in the<br />

SteamVR Performance Test, so gameplay will<br />

be as smooth in a headset as it is on a monitor.<br />

UNLOCK, STOCK AND BARREL<br />

Nvidia’s beastly GPU has been combined<br />

with an appropriately capable CPU, the<br />

quad-core, 4.2GHz Intel Core i7-7700K, as well<br />

as 16GB of DDR4 RAM. As per usual with<br />

Chillblast’s PCs, the processor doesn’t come<br />

pre-overclocked, but since it’s unlocked you<br />

can tweak the frequencies yourself if you’ve<br />

got the know-how.<br />

4K benchmark results were exactly where<br />

we’d expect for an i7-7700K system, which is<br />

to say they were very good indeed: 151 in the<br />

image test, 162 in the video test, 181 in the<br />

multitasking test and 169 overall. Besides<br />

allowing the GTX 1080 Ti to perform unabated,<br />

this shows that the CPU/RAM combo can<br />

cope well with more serious pursuits, such as<br />

video editing or livestreaming.<br />

With powerful parts crammed into a<br />

relatively small space (the BitFenix case is only<br />

411mm long and 395mm tall with the stands),<br />

we were worried about heat build-up forcing<br />

some noisy fans. However, we were pleased to<br />

26 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


e proved wrong – the Fusion Portal is<br />

amazingly quiet, barely going beyond a whisper<br />

during the heavy load of our synthetic<br />

benchmarks. Full marks to the Corsair Hydro<br />

Series H80i GT watercooler, a 120mm<br />

closed-loop system, which keeps both CPU<br />

temperatures and fan noise nice and low.<br />

Still, there are sacrifices to be made with a<br />

build of this size. Pulling out the internal<br />

chassis shows just how tightly everything – the<br />

full-size GPU, the watercooler, the power<br />

cables – has been packed in, and the Mini-ITX<br />

form factor leaves little scope for further<br />

expansion. There are no spare PCI-E or RAM<br />

slots on the motherboard, for example, and<br />

while there is one empty 3.5in drive bay, in our<br />

sample it was partly occupied by some cables.<br />

The obvious retort to this criticism would<br />

be that since most of the components<br />

included are top-of-the-line (or near enough),<br />

making upgrades is hardly an urgent concern.<br />

Indeed so – when you can already get 59fps in<br />

Metro at 4K resolution, with practically<br />

maximum settings, adding a second graphics<br />

card would be madness, and 16GB of memory<br />

is more than enough for most uses.<br />

Storage is another high point, with the<br />

huge 2TB hard disk complemented by a 256GB<br />

Samsung SM691 SSD. This is an NVMe drive,<br />

so is even faster than SATA-based SSDs, and<br />

takes up minimal space – crucial when there’s<br />

so little room to spare.<br />

CONNECT THE SLOTS<br />

There’s no real need to add dedicated sound<br />

or Wi-Fi cards, either: the rear I/O panel<br />

offers up an audiophile-friendly mix of<br />

connectors, including C/SUB and optical S/<br />

PDIF, while the Gigabyte motherboard<br />

provides dual-band 802.11ac Wi-Fi built in.<br />

We’re not sure about the bundled antenna,<br />

though – it stands on a fl imsy base and<br />

connects to the rear panel via wires, so you’ll<br />

need to fi nd somewhere accessible yet<br />

discreet for it to sit; it can’t be placed on top<br />

of the PC itself, due to the rounded top.<br />

We also wish there were a few more (and<br />

better placed) USB ports. At the back, there<br />

are just four USB3 and one USB Type-C ports<br />

(keep in mind you’ll immediately lose two of<br />

the former to a mouse and keyboard), while<br />

The Fusion Portal is a <strong>Shopper</strong> record-setter when it comes<br />

to real-world gaming performance. It’s the first PC we’ve<br />

used to break 100fps at 1,920x1,080 in Metro: Last Light<br />

there are none whatsoever at the front; the<br />

last two USB3 ports are in the middle of the<br />

right side panel instead. We assume this was a<br />

purely aesthetics-based decision, as it makes<br />

them trickier to access than if they’d just<br />

been put up front, and effectively prevents<br />

you from sitting the PC up against a wall,<br />

cupboard, shelf or bed – at least on one side.<br />

On the bright side, there’s a great<br />

assortment of video outputs, including three<br />

HDMI ports, three DisplayPorts and one<br />

dual-link DVI-D. There’s also a DVI-to-HDMI<br />

adaptor in the box.<br />

NOUVEAU RICHE<br />

Besides a couple of limitations, the Fusion<br />

Portal is a proudly lavish top-end PC, with<br />

the price to match. Is it actually worth it?<br />

We must say that a perusal around the other<br />

big PC builder sites turns up custom GTX 1080<br />

Ti/Core i7-7700K systems, with the same or<br />

similar memory, cooling and storage, from<br />

about £1,800 upwards, so it does look as<br />

though you’d be paying a premium for the<br />

conversation-starter chassis.<br />

For premium gaming, we’re also still<br />

tempted by the Apollo K-VR. Its GTX 1080 is<br />

no longer the world champion of graphics<br />

cards, but it will still handle 4K and VR<br />

admirably, and the whole system costs over<br />

£400 less with very few other drawbacks.<br />

And yet, even saying this, we can’t shake<br />

the feeling that if we were to spend £1,800<br />

on the latest tech, then £200 on top of that<br />

wouldn’t be an outright deal-breaker –<br />

especially if it pays for something a bit<br />

different and interesting.<br />

James Archer<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 4.2GHz Intel Core i7-7700K •<br />

RAM 16GB DDR4 • FRONT USB PORTS None (2x USB3 on<br />

side) • REAR USB PORTS 4x USB3, 1x USB Type-C •<br />

GRAPHICS CARD 11GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti •<br />

STORAGE 256GB SSD, 2TB hard disk • DISPLAY None •<br />

OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10 • WARRANTY Five years<br />

labour, including two years collect and return • DETAILS<br />

www.chillblast.com • PART CODE Fusion Portal<br />

Windows overall<br />

Multitasking<br />

Dirt Showdown<br />

Metro: Last Light<br />

169<br />

181<br />

159fps<br />

107fps<br />

0%<br />

-50<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

27


AM4 PROCESSOR<br />

AMD Ryzen 7 1700<br />

★★★★★<br />

£300 • From www.overclockers.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Cool, efficient and a blazingly fast multitasker,<br />

the cheapest Ryzen 7 is the one to buy<br />

TO PUT IT harshly, the Ryzen 7 1700 is the runt<br />

of AMD’s Zen architecture-based processor<br />

family: it has the lowest base and boost clocks<br />

of 3GHz and 3.7GHz respectively and, unlike<br />

the fl agship 1800X (<strong>Shopper</strong> 352) and 1700X,<br />

its Extended Frequency Range (XFR) boost<br />

– which provides a bit of extra speed when<br />

temperatures allow – is limited to just 50MHz.<br />

It also doesn’t have the 1800X’s benefi t of<br />

being an incredible bargain. Whereas that chip<br />

sells at half the price of its closest Intel<br />

competitor, the Core i7-6900K, the 1700 is<br />

only around £30 cheaper than its direct rival,<br />

the quad-core Core i7-7700K (<strong>Shopper</strong> 350).<br />

Still, for that money you’re getting twice<br />

the cores and twice the threads than the i7,<br />

which is good news considering the Intel chip’s<br />

much faster 4.2GHz base clock and 4.5GHz<br />

boost clock. In practice, it becomes clear that<br />

for everything that the 1800X doesn’t pass<br />

down to its cheaper brethren, the 1700 does<br />

at least share its best aspect: outstanding<br />

multithreaded performance.<br />

INTEL OUTDONE<br />

Its score in our imaging benchmark, 124, is 20<br />

points shy of the i7-7700K, likely due to the<br />

latter’s greater single-core strength. However,<br />

the 1700 races ahead otherwise, scoring 191 in<br />

the video test, 203 in the multitasking test and<br />

186 overall – all victories by greater margins<br />

than the i7’s image test win. As ever, we ran<br />

these tests with 8GB of RAM, swapping in a<br />

compatible Auros AX370 Gaming 5<br />

motherboard and Noctua NH-U12S air cooler.<br />

The Ryzen 7 1700 thus becomes the<br />

highest-scoring sub-£400 CPU we’ve tested<br />

yet, making it a potentially excellent candidate<br />

for home workstations and media-editing rigs.<br />

It’s a ways off the 1800X, with its overall score<br />

of 215 at stock speeds, but there’s no shame in<br />

that when it costs nearly £200 more.<br />

Conversely, the i7-7700K remains a better<br />

pick for games. As with all Ryzen chips, the<br />

1700 has no integrated graphics, so we tested<br />

our usual suite of gaming benchmarks with<br />

both our test rig’s Radeon R7 260X and a<br />

much more powerful Nvidia GTX 1080<br />

Founder’s Edition. At stock speeds with the<br />

260X, the 1700-based system averaged 84fps<br />

in Dirt Showdown running at 1080p, as well<br />

as 33fps at 4K resolution. Switching to the<br />

GTX 1080, these only rose to 107fps and<br />

85fps respectively. For comparison, we’ve<br />

recorded 169fps at 1080p and 93fps at 4K on<br />

a GTX 1080/i7-7700K system.<br />

SLOW PATROL<br />

There was less of a stark difference in Metro:<br />

Last Light Redux, where the 260X/1700<br />

configuration managed 25fps at 1080p and<br />

6fps at 4K, and the 1080/1700 configuration<br />

recorded 77fps at 1080p and 20fps at 4K.<br />

This fi nal frame rate is actually the very same<br />

as the i7-7700K achieved with the same GPU,<br />

although the Intel processor also squeezed a<br />

little more out at 1080p, scoring 84fps.<br />

There’s something peculiar about how<br />

Ryzen struggles with Dirt Showdown in<br />

particular, as the 1800X also tripped up in it<br />

when paired with the same two graphics<br />

cards. We suspect it’s because Dirt relies quite<br />

heavily on single-threaded performance,<br />

where neither the 1800X or 1700 as are<br />

strong. It’s not that the 1700 is incapable of<br />

The Ryzen 7 1700 is a potentially excellent candidate for<br />

home workstations and media-editing rigs<br />

allowing extreme frame rates in games, as a<br />

quick side-step into Tomb Raider showed that<br />

it helped the GTX 1080 produce 170fps with<br />

Ultra settings at 1080p, but it’s also proven<br />

itself inferior to the Intel alternative.<br />

That said, we did note that in every test<br />

with the 260X, the 1700 either matched or<br />

came within 1fps of the 1800X, which is<br />

clocked at considerably higher 3.6GHz<br />

base/4GHz boost speeds – a surprise, to be<br />

sure, but a welcome one.<br />

The 1700 also seems more overclockfriendly<br />

than the 1800X, as well as the<br />

i7-7700K. Using AMD’s helpful Ryzen Master<br />

utility, we tweaked core speeds and voltages<br />

up to a stable 3.9GHz – any further caused<br />

crashing during our 4K benchmarks, but this is<br />

still a bigger increase than we could safely<br />

coax out of the Intel and upper-tier AMD<br />

chips with the same Noctua air cooler.<br />

At a consistent 3.9GHz, the 1700 fi nally<br />

matched the i7-7700K’s image test score of<br />

144, and its improved video score of 204,<br />

multitasking score of 231 and overall score of<br />

208 put it within spitting distance of the<br />

mighty 1800X itself. Sadly, though, this didn’t<br />

do much for gaming; in fact, it didn’t really do<br />

anything, as every Dirt Showdown and Metro<br />

benchmark we ran returned identical (to the<br />

nearest fps) results as at stock speeds.<br />

COOL CUSTOMER<br />

More impressive is the 1700’s TDP of 65W,<br />

an absurdly low requirement for an octa-core<br />

chip; it certainly puts the quad-core i7-7700K’s<br />

91W TDP to shame. AMD’s processor also<br />

runs much, much cooler; whereas the i7<br />

fl uttered around 90-100°C during our 4K<br />

benchmarks, even with water-cooling, the<br />

air-cooled 1700 peaked at a mere 54°C at stock<br />

speeds, maxing out at 71°C when overclocked<br />

to 3.9GHz. Idle temperatures were good as<br />

well: 34°C at stock speed, 41°C at 3.9GHz.<br />

While the 1700 doesn’t offer the same<br />

value as the 1800X, it stands up to its own<br />

nemesis – the i7-7700K – admirably, claiming<br />

greater multithreading performance, cooler,<br />

more efficient running and easier overclocking.<br />

You should still stick with Intel for a premium<br />

gaming system, but for everything else, the<br />

1700 is the CPU to go for – arguably, even<br />

over the rest of the Ryzen 7 range.<br />

James Archer<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

SOCKET AM4 • CORES 8 • FREQUENCY (BOOST) 3GHz<br />

(3.7GHz) • INTEGRATED GRAPHICS None •<br />

WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.amd.com •<br />

PART CODE YD1700BBAEBOX<br />

Windows overall<br />

Multitasking<br />

Dirt Showdown<br />

0%<br />

-50<br />

186<br />

203<br />

84fps<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

28 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


INKJET MFP<br />

CANON<br />

Pixma TS8050<br />

★★★★★<br />

£150 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The Pixma TS8050 is sleek, swift, fl exible and<br />

produces great creative results – and so it<br />

should, at this price<br />

THE TS8050 IS almost the top model in<br />

Canon’s revised range of Pixma inkjet<br />

multifunction peripherals (MFPs), and it has<br />

the price to prove it. For the money you get<br />

a highly specified device with a creative bias:<br />

its scanner can stretch to 2,400 dots per inch<br />

(dpi), capturing four times as much detail as<br />

the more frequently found 1,200dpi, while its<br />

printer has a claimed maximum resolution of<br />

9,600x2,400dpi. That’s the highest you’ll fi nd<br />

among consumer inkjets.<br />

It’s well specified elsewhere, too, with two<br />

paper trays, double-sided (duplex) printing as<br />

standard, Wi-Fi and SD card support, plus a<br />

smartphone-like touchscreen on its glossy<br />

front panel. Alongside is an NFC touch-spot<br />

for easy pairing with mobile devices; we can’t<br />

think of anything Canon has left out.<br />

SHADE CONTROL<br />

It’s not uncommon for photo-focused inkjets<br />

to have six inks, but the TS8050 has a slightly<br />

unusual setup: it shares the same pigment<br />

black ink as the fi ve-colour models in the<br />

Pixma range, and supplements their dyebased<br />

black, cyan, magenta and yellow inks<br />

with a mid-grey, for better shading control in<br />

photos. Canon says that the dye-based black<br />

and grey are barely used on plain paper, but<br />

running costs still work out at a not especially<br />

competitive 7.8p per A4 page, of which the<br />

black component is a steep 2.7p.<br />

The TS8050 prints on paper held in a slim<br />

tray in its base, but photo paper can only be<br />

loaded into its pull-up rear tray. It won’t print<br />

from this until you remember to close the<br />

tiny, hinged feed lid – and it’s all too easy to<br />

forget. On plain paper, print speeds are fair.<br />

For this money you’ll fi nd plenty of other<br />

inkjets that can beat the 13.3ppm the TS8050<br />

reached on our 25-page black text test, and<br />

quite a few that will beat its 3.9ppm on our<br />

colour graphics test. Photo prints compare<br />

better for speed, with each 6x4in shot<br />

completing in well under two minutes at<br />

the highest available quality.<br />

This MFP has a fairly quick scanner.<br />

Connected via USB it could capture an A4<br />

page at 300dpi in just 14 seconds, and it<br />

completed a 1,200dpi photo scan in just<br />

under a minute. At 12 seconds, mono A4<br />

photocopies were quick, but colour copies<br />

took twice as long.<br />

We were somewhat disappointed with<br />

the TS8050’s dark photocopies, and some<br />

lines in our black text prints had a very subtle<br />

horizontal tear, but it’s unlikely you’d notice it<br />

unless you were looking very closely. Colour<br />

graphics on plain paper were just a touch less<br />

bold than we’d like, but they were otherwise<br />

extremely good. Photographs were exemplary,<br />

with extremely fi ne detailing, particularly on<br />

With two paper trays, duplex printing, Wi-Fi and SD card<br />

support, plus a smartphone-like touchscreen on its glossy<br />

front panel, we can’t think of anything Canon has left out<br />

our black and white test print. Scans were<br />

also excellent, with superb detail and about<br />

the sharpest focus we’ve seen.<br />

If your home is full of creative types and<br />

you can afford a high-end MFP, the Pixma<br />

TS8050 will more than fi t the bill. It is<br />

expensive, though, and you’ll get almost as<br />

good results from mid-range Pixma models.<br />

Unless you need its exceptional scan and<br />

photo quality we’d save some money and get<br />

one of Canon’s cheaper models, such as the<br />

Pixma TS5050 (£66 from www.amazon.co.uk).<br />

Simon Handby<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

TECHNOLOGY Thermal inkjet • MAXIMUM PRINT<br />

RESOLUTION 9,600x2,400dpi • MAXIMUM OPTICAL<br />

SCAN RESOLUTION (OUTPUT BIT DEPTH) 2,400x4,800dpi<br />

(24-bit) • DIMENSIONS 139x372x324mm • WEIGHT<br />

6.5kg • MAXIMUM PAPER SIZE A4/legal • WARRANTY<br />

One year RTB • DETAILS www.canon.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE 1369C008<br />

⬅ The Pixma<br />

TS8050 lets<br />

you print<br />

directly from<br />

an SD card<br />

Mono speed<br />

Mixed colour<br />

speed<br />

Mono page cost<br />

Colour page cost<br />

0%<br />

13.3ppm<br />

3.9ppm<br />

2.7p<br />

5.1p<br />

-50 Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

30 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Ultra Wide-Color<br />

with 4K in an immersive design<br />

Colours like you’ve never seen before. This brilliant 4K UHD<br />

resolution display with Ultra Wide-Color offers the richest<br />

and most vivid colours wrapped in an immersive curved<br />

design for a your best creations yet.<br />

UltraWideColor<br />

CurvedDisplay<br />

4K<br />

UltraClear 4K Ultra HD<br />

40" 4K curved display<br />

(BDM4037U)


Chillblast<br />

sales@chillblast.com<br />

01202 068 333<br />

ULTRAPORTABLE LAPTOP<br />

ASUS ZenBook<br />

UX310UA<br />

★★★★★<br />

£365 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

FUSION OUTLAW<br />

<br />

<br />

PROCESSOR: INTEL PENTIUM G4560<br />

CASE: CHILLBLAST F3<br />

CPU COOLER: INTEL STOCK CPU COOLER<br />

MOTHERBOARD: ASUS H110M-A/M.2<br />

MEMORY: 8GB DDR4 2133MHZ<br />

GRAPHICS CARD: NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1050Ti 4GB<br />

HARD DISK:<br />

Seagate 1TB SSHD<br />

POWER SUPPLY: AEROCOOL 80 PLUS 500W<br />

SYSTEM: WINDOWS 10 HOME 64-BIT<br />

FUSION HUBBLE<br />

PRICE FROM £579.99<br />

www.chillblast.com<br />

<br />

<br />

PROCESSOR: INTEL CORE i5-7600K<br />

CASE: CHILLBLAST SILENT<br />

CPU COOLER: CHILLBLAST 120 WATER COOLER<br />

MOTHERBOARD: GIGABYTE GA-Z270-GAMING K3<br />

MEMORY: 8GB DDR4 2133MHZ<br />

GRAPHICS CARD: NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1060 3GB<br />

HARD DISK:<br />

250GB SSD / 1TB HDD<br />

POWER SUPPLY: EVGA 80 PLUS WHITE 600W<br />

SYSTEM: WINDOWS 10 HOME 64-BIT<br />

PRICE FROM £999.99<br />

Terms and conditions are on the website.<br />

All trademarks are acknowledged.<br />

Pictures are for illustration only.<br />

Prices are correct at time of going to press (25-04-17) E&OE<br />

VERDICT<br />

It’s no powerhouse, but this highly portable laptop<br />

has a great screen and a practical battery life<br />

THE SLIM, TASTEFUL design of Asus’s ZenBook<br />

range calls to mind Apple’s now-defunct MacBook<br />

Air, but with a wider range of configurations, and<br />

much more palatable pricing. In this case, the<br />

resemblance isn’t purely aesthetic.<br />

Like the MacBook Air, the ZenBook UX310UA is<br />

designed for a specific role. It’s a lightweight<br />

travelling companion rather than a desktop<br />

replacement. That much is evident from the<br />

internals. Unlike many Windows-based ultraportables,<br />

The screen is fantastic, with a maximum<br />

luminance of 341cd/m 2<br />

the UX310UA comes with a dual-core Core<br />

i3-6100U processor rather than something from<br />

the Core m series, but the i3 still limits its<br />

multitasking capabilities. We wouldn’t call this a<br />

slow system, but with an overall score of 34 in our<br />

desktop benchmarks, plus 20 in the multitasking<br />

test, it’s not exactly overpowered either.<br />

GAME’S UP<br />

Gaming capability is limited, too. In our Dirt<br />

Showdown test, running at 720p with High settings,<br />

the ZenBook averaged a just-about playable 29fps.<br />

Note, too, that this ZenBook model comes with just<br />

4GB of RAM, and a stingy 128GB SSD. That’s fi ne<br />

for emails and spreadsheets, and a lot more than<br />

you’ll get from any Chromebook, but if you<br />

regularly deal with weighty workloads, it could<br />

prove constraining.<br />

Yet the ZenBook has some significant strengths.<br />

Let’s start with the one that shines out as soon as<br />

you open the lid: the screen<br />

is fantastic, with a maximum<br />

luminance of 341cd/m 2 .<br />

While it’s not quite the<br />

brightest laptop display<br />

around, a superb contrast<br />

ratio of 1,282:1 makes it an<br />

excellent all-round visual<br />

performer. It’s also worth<br />

mentioning that the 13.3in<br />

panel has a native resolution<br />

of 1,920x1,080, for a sharp<br />

pixel density of 165ppi.<br />

From a typical operating<br />

distance, text looks<br />

beautifully crisp, and the<br />

matt screen keeps<br />

distracting refl ections to<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PROCESSOR 2/3GHz dual-core Intel Core i3-6100U • RAM<br />

4GB DDR4 • DIMENSIONS 323x223x18.4mm • WEIGHT<br />

1.4kg • SCREEN SIZE 13.3in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

1,920x1,080 • GRAPHICSADAPTOR Intel HD Graphics 520 •<br />

TOTALSTORAGE 128GB SSD • OPERATING SYSTEM<br />

Windows 10 Home • PARTS AND LABOUR WARRANTY<br />

One year RTB • DETAILS www.asus.com/uk •<br />

PART CODE UX310UA-FC075T<br />

Windows overall<br />

Multitasking<br />

Dirt Showdown<br />

Battery life<br />

a minimum. This isn’t a touchscreen, mind you:<br />

with its conventional hinged laptop design, the<br />

ZenBook entirely rejects the hybrid vision.<br />

That’s fi ne by us, because the conventional<br />

input methods work very nicely. The backlit<br />

keyboard is comfortably sized, with a good<br />

responsive feel – if a little more spongy than we’d<br />

really like – and the touchpad is luxuriously large,<br />

so you never feel constrained by its edges.<br />

Connectivity is pretty good, too. As you’d hope,<br />

there’s 802.11ac wireless and Bluetooth 4.1. You<br />

also get a decent set of USB ports,<br />

comprising USB3, twin USB2<br />

connectors and a USB Type-C<br />

socket, for newer phones and<br />

peripherals. It would have been nice<br />

to use the faster USB3 platform<br />

exclusively, but then this probably<br />

isn’t a system that will be regularly hooked up to<br />

multiple high-bandwidth devices.<br />

BALANCING ACT<br />

As for sound, the system’s speakers are<br />

pleasingly balanced – predictably, there’s not<br />

much in the way of bass, and the maximum<br />

volume won’t fi ll a room, but watching videos at<br />

your desk is perfectly agreeable.<br />

A fi nal feather in the ZenBook’s cap is battery<br />

life. In our tests, the UX310UA delivered 8h 6m of<br />

video playback on a single charge. Yes, there are<br />

devices out there that will last longer, but those<br />

all rely on ultra-low-power Core m processors.<br />

If you’re looking for a more capable Windows<br />

system that will make it through an entire working<br />

day, the ZenBook UX310UA is your answer.<br />

Clearly, even with all this going for it, the<br />

ZenBook’s mid-table performance and old-school<br />

design mean it’s not for everyone. Yet with its<br />

excellent screen, impressive<br />

battery life and portable<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

dimensions – it’s just<br />

18.4mm thick, and weighs a<br />

mere 1.4kg – we can’t deny<br />

the ZenBook’s charms.<br />

If we have a caveat, it’s<br />

this: the UX310UA<br />

currently uses sixthgeneration<br />

Skylake<br />

processors, but a Kaby<br />

Lake update is due in the<br />

next few weeks. Any<br />

performance benefi t is<br />

likely to be modest, but if<br />

you’re not in a rush to buy,<br />

it makes sense to hold out.<br />

Darien Graham-Smith<br />

32 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353<br />

0%<br />

34<br />

20<br />

-50<br />

29fps<br />

8h 6m<br />

See page 72 for performance details


2-IN-1 LAPTOP<br />

DELL XPS 13 9365<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,449 • From www.dell.com/uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Dell’s second stab at a hybrid laptop is an<br />

expensive success<br />

BACK IN 2016, Dell inflicted upon us the XPS<br />

12, a dire laptop/tablet hybrid riddled with<br />

shortcomings ranging from battery woes to<br />

fl at-out design faults (see <strong>Shopper</strong> 341).<br />

Fortunately, the new XPS 13 9365 2-in-1 is a<br />

radical departure. For starters, it’s actually a<br />

rotating convertible, rather than a detachable<br />

2-in-1 like the XPS 12. It’s also really good.<br />

We’d certainly have hoped so, given the<br />

price: the entry-level model, with its Intel Core<br />

i5-7Y54 processor, 4GB of RAM and 128GB<br />

SSD, costs £1,349, which is £200 more than<br />

the cheapest non-convertible XPS 13 (<strong>Shopper</strong><br />

351). We tested the next model up, which has a<br />

Core i7-7Y75 processor, 8GB of RAM and<br />

256GB SSD and costs £1,449, and there are<br />

£1,499 and £1,669 models too.<br />

SPIN DOCTOR<br />

Aside from the chunky 360° hinge, the 2-in-1<br />

looks remarkably similar to the standard XPS<br />

13. The chassis is made of the same aluminium<br />

and carbon-fibre combo, although there’s<br />

something extra below the screen: a dual-lens<br />

Windows Hello camera, which lets you log in<br />

using just your face. There’s also a fi ngerprint<br />

reader, should the camera be a little fi nicky.<br />

The 2-in-1 is thinner than the regular XPS 13<br />

too. In fact, it’s the slimmest XPS ever made,<br />

measuring just 13.7mm at its thickest point<br />

and tapering down to 8mm at its thinnest.<br />

Weighing just 1.24kg, it’s ideal for commuting.<br />

However, the slimmed-down design also<br />

means that there aren’t any full-size USB<br />

ports. Instead, you get just two USB Type-C<br />

ports, one on either side. Since one port is<br />

needed for charging, it’s a meagre provision,<br />

even with the USB3-to-Type-C adaptor<br />

included in the box.<br />

One area where Dell hasn’t scrimped is the<br />

display. The familiar 13.3in InfinityEdge panel is<br />

still here, minimal screen bezels and all, and as<br />

always it’s a delight to use. No manufacturer<br />

does laptop displays quite like this, and it<br />

makes the 2-in-1 look great, especially in the<br />

fully rotated tablet mode.<br />

Our model was fi tt ed with a 1,920x1,080<br />

panel; the QHD+ version costs £50 more, and<br />

otherwise has the same specs. In our display<br />

tests, the Full HD display covered 85.4% of the<br />

sRGB colour gamut, with a contrast ratio of<br />

1,206:1. That’s a smidge below the latest XPS<br />

13 with its 91.9% coverage, but to the naked<br />

eye the difference is hard to make out.<br />

The maximum screen brightness of<br />

253cd/m 2 is also lower than the XPS 13’s<br />

289cd/m 2 output, but it’s not disastrous.<br />

Overall, it’s a beautiful display to gawk at,<br />

with wonderfully vibrant colours – just don’t<br />

try to use it in bright sunlight.<br />

RIPE TO TYPE<br />

Too often, the keyboard and touchpad on a<br />

hybrid system feel like an afterthought, but<br />

that’s not the case here. In fact, the keyboard<br />

is unchanged from the regular XPS 13. The<br />

keys are nicely spaced, and there’s just the<br />

right amount of movement and feedback with<br />

each keystroke. Backlighting still comes as<br />

standard, with adjustable brightness levels.<br />

The touchpad is well sized, too. Windows<br />

10 multitouch gestures worked without any<br />

slip-ups, and it’s easy to jump between<br />

applications with ease. We weren’t even<br />

tempted to plug in a USB mouse while working<br />

in more demanding applications. Our only<br />

criticism is that it does seem to pick up greasy<br />

fi ngerprints a little too easily.<br />

Having a Core i7 in a slimline<br />

convertible sounds great, but<br />

remember that the Kaby Lake<br />

generation merely rebranded<br />

Intel’s low-power Core m chips<br />

to have Core i prefi xes. The<br />

Core i7-7Y75 is one of these<br />

rebranded processors.<br />

Unsurprisingly, this led the<br />

2-in-1 towards the lower end<br />

of our 4K benchmark results,<br />

with an overall score of 31<br />

and multitasking score of<br />

just 8. That’s some way<br />

behind the cheaper, yet proper Core i5-<br />

powered XPS 13, which scored 33 in the<br />

multitasking test and 50 overall.<br />

Regardless, this 2-in-1 is plenty powerful<br />

enough for the usual desktop and browserbased<br />

applications, such as Word and Google<br />

Docs. Just don’t expect it to whizz through<br />

anything particularly processor-heavy.<br />

With Intel HD Graphics 615, you’re limited to<br />

very basic games as well.<br />

In theory, the low-powered chip should at<br />

least deliver a battery life benefi t: the XPS 13<br />

9365 lasted 7h 54m in our continuous video<br />

playback test, so it should more or less deliver<br />

a full day’s conservative use. The regular Dell<br />

XPS 13 was just eight minutes behind, though,<br />

so the difference is negligible.<br />

MOST IMPROVED AWARD<br />

Dell has evidently learned from criticism of its<br />

last XPS hybrid. While performance is on the<br />

lightweight side, the XPS 13 2-in-1 is a joy to<br />

use, shining a light on the potential of the<br />

hybrid design. It’s a well-balanced device for<br />

however you want to use it.<br />

The issue, as so often, is the price. When<br />

you can pick up an entry-level XPS 13 with a<br />

full-fat, Kaby Lake Core i5 for £1,149, it’s hard<br />

to justify paying an extra £200 for a bit of<br />

added versatility. Still, within the convertible<br />

market specifically, there’s nothing out there<br />

to challenge the XPS 13 9365.<br />

Nathan Spendelow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core 1.3GHz Intel Core i7-7Y75 • RAM<br />

8GB • DIMENSIONS 304x199x13.7mm • WEIGHT 1.24kg •<br />

SCREEN SIZE 13.3in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,920x1,080 •<br />

GRAPHICSADAPTOR Intel HD Graphics 615 • TOTAL<br />

STORAGE 256GB SSD • OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10<br />

• WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.dell.com/<br />

uk • PART CODE CNX36504<br />

Windows overall<br />

Multitasking<br />

Dirt Showdown FAIL<br />

Battery life<br />

0%<br />

31<br />

8<br />

-50<br />

7h 54m<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

34 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


35in CURVED MONITOR<br />

AOC AGON<br />

AG352QCX<br />

★★★★★<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

£605 • From www.ebuyer.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

With its 200Hz refresh rate and accurate<br />

colours, the AOC AG352QCX is a fantastic<br />

curved gaming monitor<br />

IN 2016, AOC released the C3583FQ (<strong>Shopper</strong><br />

342), a curved 165Hz monitor running at<br />

2,560x1,080. It had a few issues, including<br />

washed-out colours and, with certain Nvidia<br />

graphics cards, frame skipping at 165Hz.<br />

Now, there’s the AGON AG352QCX, a<br />

similar 35in curved monitor that comes<br />

equipped with an MVA panel, 200Hz<br />

maximum refresh rate and built-in support for<br />

AMD’s FreeSync technology. Can this new<br />

model fi x its predecessor’s problems?<br />

The monitor is extremely well built and<br />

looks striking with its silver and black colour<br />

scheme. Underneath and around the back,<br />

you’ll fi nd six LED strips that can be used to<br />

bathe your desk in red, green or blue. They’re<br />

a bit silly and can be disabled if you fi nd them<br />

distracting, but can work as mood lighting,<br />

especially when the lights are dimmed.<br />

The stand allows -3° to 15° of tilt and 15cm<br />

of height adjustment, while a handle at the<br />

top of the metal stand allows you to carry it<br />

around – though with a monitor this big, we’re<br />

not sure why you’d want to.<br />

NOW HOOK HERE<br />

If you’re looking to wall-mount it, you can do<br />

so via the 100x100mm VESA mounts at the<br />

back. In the top left -hand corner, you’ll fi nd a<br />

retractable headphone arm, which conveniently<br />

lets you keep your headphones or headset<br />

close to hand without cluttering up your desk.<br />

There are DisplayPort, HDMI, DVI and VGA<br />

video inputs, two sets of 3.5mm input and<br />

output audio jacks and two USB3 ports, one<br />

of which supports quick charge. There’s also a<br />

surprisingly effective 5W speaker in the chassis,<br />

which provides a loud output with great<br />

sound quality by monitor speaker standards.<br />

Physical controls are great, especially the<br />

QuickSwitch Controller – a separate dongle<br />

equipped with a series of buttons – which<br />

allows you to fl ick between colour profi les and<br />

navigate around the OSD menu. Even if you<br />

don’t use that, though, you should fi nd the<br />

on-monitor joystick controller easy to use. It<br />

provides a far more effective way of accessing<br />

settings than the touch-sensitive buttons<br />

favoured by many other manufacturers.<br />

AMD FreeSync is another fi ne inclusion. If<br />

you have a recent AMD graphics card, the<br />

AG352QCX syncs its refresh rate with the GPU’s<br />

output to prevent screen tearing in games.<br />

REFRESH PRICE<br />

The monitor uses a 2,560x1,080 resolution<br />

MVA panel with a native refresh rate of 144Hz,<br />

but through your graphics card’s settings, this<br />

can be cranked up to an ‘overclocked’ 200Hz.<br />

Unlike the C3583FQ, the AG352QCX<br />

doesn’t suffer from any frame skipping at<br />

200Hz, but we did notice a gamma shift at this<br />

refresh rate, resulting in washed-out colours.<br />

If you’re looking to use the monitor at 200Hz,<br />

you’ll have to put up with this, or calibrate it<br />

to compensate. We therefore conducted our<br />

image-quality tests at 144Hz, which in any<br />

case should be enough for most users.<br />

The AOC performs extremely well in sRGB<br />

mode. Colour accuracy is good, with an<br />

average delta-E of 0.59. Its 2,467:1 contrast<br />

ratio is also very impressive, providing<br />

excellent detail in even the darkest scenes.<br />

However, the monitor’s colour gamut<br />

coverage is rather disappointing in sRGB<br />

mode. Despite 95.4% sRGB coverage, which<br />

is good, it has below-par 67.4% Adobe RGB<br />

and 70% DCI P3 coverage.<br />

Maximum brightness reaches 260cd/m 2 ,<br />

which is fi ne for use in most environments,<br />

although brightness uniformity is<br />

disappointing. We found a dramatic variation<br />

of 27.29% between the top corners of the<br />

panel and the bottom corners, which is<br />

where the monitor’s backlight is located.<br />

That means if you’re looking at a dark scene<br />

in a fi lm or game, you might fi nd it brighter in<br />

the top corners than the bottom. Backlight<br />

bleed isn’t a deal breaker but is noticeable in<br />

very dark scenes at the top corners.<br />

One benefi t of enabling the 200Hz refresh<br />

rate is that it’s buttery smooth in fast-paced<br />

gaming, even if the improvement over 144Hz<br />

isn’t very noticeable. Nevertheless, it’s ideal for<br />

competitive gaming, and with a low perceived<br />

response time and low input lag, the monitor<br />

fl ew through our tests. Better still, when<br />

adjusting its response time settings, ghosting<br />

overshoot (which typically takes the form of<br />

shadows around objects) was barely visible.<br />

BEND OF THE LINE<br />

The curvature of the screen isn’t as deep as<br />

the Samsung CF791, which takes away from<br />

the immersion a touch, but compared with a<br />

fl at-panel ultra-wide monitor, the AG352QCX<br />

still provides a better gaming experience.<br />

Our only real complaint is that the<br />

2,560x1,080 resolution results in games not<br />

looking as crisp as they do on the admittedly<br />

more expensive 3,440x1,440 Samsung CF791.<br />

Despite both the resolution and brightness<br />

uniformity fl aws, there’s still plenty to like<br />

about the AOC AG352QCX. In fact, the high<br />

refresh rate, fast response times, low input lag,<br />

good colour accuracy and lovely overall design<br />

make it tough not to recommend.<br />

The price may look high, but there aren’t<br />

many ultra-wide monitors on the market that<br />

can provide as good all-round performance for<br />

much less. It comes warmly recommended.<br />

Christopher Minasians<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

SCREEN SIZE 35in • RESOLUTION 2,560x1,080 •<br />

SCREEN TECHNOLOGY MVA • REFRESH RATE 144Hz<br />

native (200Hz maximum) • VIDEOINPUTS HDMI, DVI,<br />

DisplayPort, VGA • WARRANTY Three years repair and<br />

replace • DETAILS www.aoc-europe.com<br />

CONNECTION PORTS<br />

USB3 x2<br />

DisplayPort<br />

HDMI<br />

VGA<br />

DVI<br />

36<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Telecoms and IP Engineering<br />

Solutions for Business since 1988<br />

Brown Hare<br />

[Lepus europaeus]<br />

The Brown Hare is Britain’s fastest<br />

land mammal, reaching speeds of<br />

up to 48 miles per hour<br />

FIBRESTREAM ® LITE<br />

FTTC ETHERNET<br />

• £99 per month for up to<br />

20 Mbps Up / 20 Mbps Down<br />

• Options for up to 80 Mbps down<br />

• For Business Quality<br />

Converged Voice / Data<br />

• Low latency and packet loss<br />

• Static IP address included<br />

• Industry Leading Support, SLAs<br />

VSTREAM ®<br />

FTTC FIBRE BROADBAND<br />

• £27 per month for up to<br />

20 Mbps Up / 80 Mbps Down<br />

• For Business Quality High<br />

Bandwidth Data<br />

• Static IP address included<br />

• Free Connection and Router*<br />

• Industry Leading Support<br />

Options<br />

The UK’s best value<br />

business Internet access<br />

Whatever your budget, we have a<br />

fast, resilient solution<br />

to suit your business needs.<br />

Ask our sales team about our<br />

range of backup options.<br />

ANALOGUE LINES<br />

• £10 per month<br />

• Competitive call charges<br />

• Industry Leading Support<br />

Options<br />

Order online at<br />

www.spitfire.co.uk<br />

Spitfire Network Services Ltd:<br />

Training TechTalks<br />

Sales 0800 319 6300 • Partner Services 0800 319 6500<br />

Innovative • Flexible • Reliable • Supportive • Cost Effective<br />

HIGHLY<br />

HIGHLY<br />

WINNER<br />

FINALIST<br />

FINALIST<br />

WINNER<br />

COMMENDED<br />

COMMENDED<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

Service<br />

Provider of<br />

the Year<br />

Inte<br />

ternet Service<br />

Provider of<br />

the Year<br />

Best t Channel<br />

ISP<br />

Best t Channel<br />

ISP<br />

SME Host<br />

sted<br />

Soluo Soluo Soluo Soluo Soluo Soluon<br />

Best t ISP<br />

WINNER<br />

FACILITIES<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

AWARDS 2016<br />

HIGHLY<br />

Best Corporate Internet<br />

COMME<br />

MMENDED<br />

Service Provider<br />

Best Hosted Platform 2015<br />

Best ISP<br />

2015<br />

SOUTH EAST ENGLAND<br />

www.spitfire.co.uk<br />

*Subject to terms and conditions


HOME WI-FI SYSTEM<br />

GOOGLE Wifi<br />

★★★★★<br />

£229 (twin pack) • From store.google.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

Staggeringly easy to configure and with some amazing configuration tools, this is wireless networking made easy<br />

THERE’S NO DOUBTING that whole-home<br />

Wi-Fi kits, which use multiple access points<br />

and a mesh network to give you a rock-solid<br />

wireless connection, are the big thing in<br />

networking. Following the Netgear Orbi<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 348), Linksys Velop and BT Whole<br />

Home Wi-Fi (both <strong>Shopper</strong> 351), Google is<br />

now getting in on the act with Google Wifi.<br />

As with the BT Whole Home Wi-Fi system,<br />

Google Wifi is not a router, instead connecting<br />

to your existing network. For the best results,<br />

then, you need to disable your router’s<br />

existing wireless, so that Google Wifi<br />

becomes your default.<br />

Google Wifi is sold as either a single unit<br />

(£129) or as a two-unit pack (£229). Given<br />

that this is a mesh networking product, it<br />

makes the most sense to buy two access<br />

points. Google Wifi is comparatively good<br />

value – BT Whole Home Wi-Fi costs £300 for<br />

three units – although adding extra access<br />

points is expensive at £129 each.<br />

NET WORTH<br />

Google has done a good job with the Wifi<br />

access point design. Each one is a small<br />

hockey puck-style unit, which you can place<br />

conveniently out of the way without having to<br />

make too much room. A single white LED<br />

shows each access point’s status, although<br />

you can dim or turn this off if the light is<br />

proving to be distracting.<br />

Each unit has two Gigabit Ethernet ports,<br />

which is a step up from BT’s single-port access<br />

points. Only one device needs to be physically<br />

connected to the network, with further access<br />

points communicating via a mesh network.<br />

Configuration is extremely simple using<br />

the Android or iOS app; there’s no web<br />

configuration option, so you’re going to need<br />

a smartphone. Following the app’s simple<br />

instructions, we soon had our dual access<br />

points placed in the ideal positions, and our<br />

network name and password set. There’s<br />

very little need for any other configuration at<br />

this point, as Google Wifi is designed to be<br />

smart and automatically configure the<br />

optimal network settings.<br />

⬆ The Family Wi-Fi option lets you set schedules<br />

for the kids’ internet access<br />

First, as with other products of this ilk,<br />

there’s band steering. This automatically<br />

assigns a client to the 2.4GHz or 5GHz band,<br />

depending on signal strength and abilities. It<br />

takes the hassle out of networking, as you<br />

know each device will get the best connection.<br />

HELPING HANDS<br />

Next, there’s Google’s client steering feature.<br />

Typically, wireless devices will connect to an<br />

access point and then stick to it until the<br />

⬆ You can choose which devices on the network<br />

your guests are able to see<br />

38 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


signal drops. With client steering, Google<br />

gently nudges devices to disconnect from<br />

one access point and reconnect to a<br />

stronger one. Indeed, monitoring via<br />

the app, we noticed our devices<br />

would switch from one access<br />

point to another, maintaining<br />

signal strength and speed.<br />

There’s no need to configure<br />

wireless channels either, as Google<br />

uses a dedicated sensing radio to<br />

monitor surrounding interference,<br />

changing settings automatically as<br />

required. Cloud-based machine<br />

learning lets Google automatically<br />

create a schedule, changing wireless<br />

channels at set times during the week.<br />

Finally, you don’t have to worry<br />

about updates, as Google will<br />

automatically download and install<br />

them for you. Really, Google Wifi is a<br />

brilliantly simple system that you can<br />

just plug in and forget about.<br />

INTERNAL OPPOSITION<br />

Internally, each access point has dual-band<br />

wireless, with 2x2 1,200Mbit/s on a single<br />

5GHz band. In comparison, BT’s Whole Home<br />

Wi-Fi has tri-band wireless, with dual<br />

1,733Mbit/s 4x4 5GHz bands. On paper, BT<br />

certainly has the advantage, with a lot more<br />

network bandwidth available.<br />

Using dual Google Wifi access points,<br />

we measured an average throughput of<br />

329.25Mbit/s at close range, 431.06Mbit/s on<br />

the fi rst fl oor and 164.6Mbit/s on the second<br />

fl oor. This is better performance than we saw<br />

from the BT Whole Home Wi-Fi, bar secondfl<br />

oor performance. BT’s higher number of<br />

access points and higher bandwidth seemed<br />

to make the difference in this test.<br />

Likewise, testing in the garden, just<br />

outside of the kitchen window – a traditional<br />

dead spot – we found BT to be the winner.<br />

We got throughputs of 153Mbit/s with<br />

Google Wifi and 185.11Mbit/s with BT Whole<br />

Home. At the bottom of the garden, BT<br />

managed to give us 56Mbit/s compared to the<br />

37.7Mbit/s from Google Wifi.<br />

MEDDLING KIDS<br />

Where Google Wifi shines is through the app<br />

and configuration options. Family Wi-Fi is the<br />

best of the bunch, letting you group together<br />

multiple devices and then set schedules for<br />

their internet access. For example, you can let<br />

an older child have more time online with<br />

their laptop and tablet, shutting down a<br />

younger child’s tablet earlier. You can also<br />

⬅ Each Wifi access point is equipped with<br />

two Gigabit Ethernet ports<br />

to your Google Wifi; however,<br />

everything connected to Google<br />

Wifi can see your entire home<br />

network. If these last couple of<br />

paragraphs have made alarming<br />

sense to you, Google Wifi won’t<br />

present any problems, but if it all<br />

sounds a bit baffling, BT Whole<br />

Home Wi-Fi might be a better fi t<br />

– it simply integrates into your<br />

existing network.<br />

The only way around Google’s<br />

configuration issue is to use a single<br />

device in Bridge mode; however, if<br />

you’re going down this route, you’re<br />

better off buying a dedicated router.<br />

There’s no option to configure<br />

the DHCP range of IP address that<br />

Google Wifi hands out, either. That<br />

shouldn’t cause too much trouble,<br />

though, and you can use the app to reserve<br />

a device an IP address; effectively, this is a<br />

quick way to give out static IP addresses.<br />

SIMPLER TIMES<br />

Aside from the slightly quirky way in which<br />

Google Wifi works, the system is rather neat,<br />

and the app (and the control it provides) is<br />

the best we’ve seen. Really, this system makes<br />

wireless networking and device control super<br />

easy. Whether or not it’s the right product for<br />

you, though, depends on what you want to do.<br />

BT’s Whole Home Wi-Fi is slightly more<br />

expensive (although that said, at the time of<br />

writing it was on sale for just £200), but its<br />

network integration is neater and long-range<br />

performance is better. For larger houses or<br />

ones with a few dead spots, BT’s system is<br />

the best choice.<br />

Google Wifi is a brilliantly simple system that you can<br />

just plug in and forget about<br />

⬆ The Google Wifi app provides plenty of<br />

configuration options<br />

manually pause internet access by group, too;<br />

it’s a brilliant way to get children’s attention.<br />

Google has a built-in guest network, which<br />

is something missing from the BT Whole<br />

Home Wi-Fi. You can select which devices<br />

people on the guest network can see. For<br />

example, you can hide your NAS, but you<br />

could make your Chromecast available so that<br />

guests can stream photos to your TV.<br />

The one downside of Google Wifi is that in<br />

mesh mode, it operates in Network Address<br />

Translation (NAT) mode. This doesn’t affect<br />

performance, but it can make configuring<br />

some port-forwarding services, such as for<br />

games, tricky. In effect, you have to set up<br />

port forwarding on your main router and the<br />

Google Wifi, which can break some services.<br />

Access from one device to another can be<br />

confusing, too. A device connected to your<br />

original router can’t see a device connected<br />

If you can get by with two access points,<br />

Google Wifi is an excellent, easy-to-manage<br />

alternative. Finally, if you want to replace<br />

your existing router, the Netgear Orbi is an<br />

expensive option, but it’s by far the fastest<br />

whole-home Wi-Fi product we’ve tested.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

MODEM Gigabit Ethernet • WI-FI STANDARD 802.11ac •<br />

STATED SPEED Not disclosed (2.4GHz), 1,200Mbit/s (5GHz)<br />

• USB PORTS 0 • WALL MOUNTABLE No •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS madeby.google.com •<br />

PART CODE Google Wifi<br />

5GHz close<br />

5GHz 1 fl oor<br />

5GHz 2 fl oors<br />

329.25Mbit/s<br />

431.06Mbit/s<br />

164.6Mbit/s<br />

0 200<br />

400<br />

600<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

39


TRI-STREAM WIRELESS ROUTER<br />

LINKSYS<br />

WRT3200ACM<br />

★★★★★<br />

£218 • From www.morecomputers.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A fast and powerful router, but you can get<br />

similar performance for less<br />

WE’VE SEEN A lot of whole-home Wi-Fi<br />

systems in recent issues of <strong>Shopper</strong>, all of<br />

which are designed to use multiple access<br />

points to give you better coverage. If you just<br />

want raw speed and don’t have a huge house, a<br />

single high-powered router, such as Linksys’s<br />

WRT3200ACM, might be a better option.<br />

This heft y router has Tri-Stream 160<br />

technology, which combines three<br />

simultaneous 867Mbit/s streams to give a<br />

total of 2,600Mbit/s on the 5GHz band. The<br />

2.4GHz band is taken care of with a 600Mbit/s<br />

throughput. As a modern router, the<br />

WRT3200ACM supports multi-user MIMO<br />

(MU-MIMO). This enables the router to split<br />

its bandwidth, giving each compatible device<br />

its own dedicated network stream. That’s the<br />

good news; the bad news is that there are few<br />

MU-MIMO devices, so you won’t necessarily<br />

see the benefi t of this technology today. Even<br />

so, on paper, this is one of the fastest routers<br />

we’ve come across.<br />

Setting up the router for the fi rst time is<br />

easy, with Linksys’s simple wizard taking you<br />

through broadband configuration and Wi-Fi<br />

setup. This router has a single Ethernet WAN<br />

port, so you’ll need to plug it into a modem to<br />

get internet access.<br />

BAND TOGETHER<br />

Wi-Fi configuration gives you the option of<br />

splitting the 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks or<br />

joining them under the same network name.<br />

With the latter option, the router uses band<br />

steering to select the best network for your<br />

connecting devices automatically. This is a<br />

good choice for simplicity, but you may want<br />

to leave the networks separated if you want<br />

to choose which band you want to use.<br />

Finally, there’s the option of a guest<br />

network. Connected to this, people who visit<br />

you can access the internet, but your other<br />

devices remain protected and hidden.<br />

Once the wizard is complete, the<br />

WRT3200ACM can be configured via the web<br />

interface. It’s one of the best, with a clear and<br />

modern look. We like the main page, which<br />

gives you an at-a-glance look at all of the<br />

router’s main settings.<br />

CHILD’S PLAY<br />

Linksys has provided all the common options<br />

you’d expect, including dynamic DNS, port<br />

forwarding and parental controls. Using the<br />

latter option, you can set schedules for when<br />

certain devices can use the internet, and you<br />

can also block access to set websites.<br />

Blocking is a manual job, which requires<br />

you to enter each blocked website’s address.<br />

As such, you’ll want to use proper parental<br />

controls for younger children. We couldn’t<br />

fi nd an option to turn on IGMP YouView<br />

support. Without this, our streamed YouView<br />

channels, such as BT Sport, wouldn’t work.<br />

Basic settings can be controlled via the<br />

Linksys smartphone<br />

app, and it’s nice to<br />

see Alexa support.<br />

Using an Amazon<br />

Echo, you can tell<br />

the WRT3200ACM<br />

to turn on its<br />

guest network or<br />

to give you your<br />

network details.<br />

If you don’t like<br />

Linksys’s fi rmware,<br />

this router officially<br />

supports DD-WRT<br />

and OpenWRT open-source fi rmware. Flashing<br />

the router with either of these opens up some<br />

more advanced features, such as full VPN<br />

support. You can also run applications, such<br />

as a BitTorrent client, directly on the opensource<br />

fi rmware, making them a good choice<br />

for more advanced users.<br />

JUST PASSING THROUGHPUT<br />

Performance was very good. Using the 5GHz<br />

band, we saw average throughputs of<br />

406.65Mbit/s at close range, 481.21Mbit/s on<br />

the fi rst fl oor and 335.89Mbit/s on the<br />

second fl oor. We found 2.4GHz performance<br />

was just as good, with throughputs of<br />

91.55Mbit/s at close range, 115.58Mbit/s on<br />

the fi rst fl oor and 107.28Mbit/s on the second<br />

fl oor. Only the Netgear Nighthawk X8<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 345) did better, although that costs<br />

£80 more. Even so, if you want the best<br />

performance and support for BT YouView, the<br />

Nighthawk X8 is the best choice.<br />

Linksys has provided all the options you’d expect, including<br />

dynamic DNS, port forwarding and parental controls<br />

⬅ The web interface is<br />

one of the best, with a<br />

clear and modern look<br />

Alternatively, the TP-Link Archer C3200<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 345) managed similar performance<br />

to the WRT3200ACM but gives you two<br />

more dedicated 1,300Mbit/s 5GHz options.<br />

The C3200 doesn’t have MU-MIMO, but it<br />

supports streamed YouView channels, and<br />

costs just £150, making it the better choice.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

MODEM Gigabit Ethernet • WI-FI STANDARD 802.11ac •<br />

STATED SPEED 600Mbit/s (2.4GHz), 2,600Mbit/s (5GHz) •<br />

USB PORTS 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0 • WALL MOUNTABLE<br />

Yes • WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.linksys.<br />

com • PART CODE WRT3200ACM<br />

5GHz 1m<br />

5GHz 1 fl oor<br />

5GHz 2 fl oors<br />

2.4GHz 1m<br />

2.4GHz 1 fl oor<br />

2.4GHz 2 fl oors<br />

335.89Mbit/s<br />

91.55Mbit/s<br />

406.65Mbit/s<br />

115.58Mbit/s<br />

107.28Mbit/s<br />

481.21Mbit/s<br />

0 200<br />

400<br />

600<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

40 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


FLAGSHIP ANDROID SMARTPHONE<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy S8<br />

★★★★★<br />

£689 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Pairing speed and power with a sophisticated and attractive<br />

design, the Galaxy S8 runs rings around the competition<br />

THE SAMSUNG GALAXY S8 is one of the<br />

most anticipated phones of all time. Not only<br />

is it the follow-up to one of 2016’s best devices,<br />

the Galaxy S7, it also has the unenviable task<br />

of winning back anyone who got burned –<br />

fi guratively or literally – by the ill-fated Note 7.<br />

The standout feature is its screen. The<br />

bezels of the display have been almost entirely<br />

shorn off, leaving a screen that extends to<br />

almost every edge of the device, save for thin<br />

slivers of black glass at the top and bottom.<br />

It thus fi lls virtually all of the S8’s front<br />

panel, with just a few millimetres of bezel<br />

banding the top and bottom edge. Curved<br />

edges now come as standard, too; there’s still<br />

a larger, pricier Galaxy S8+ model, but<br />

Samsung has dropped the fl at-screened<br />

variant and the Edge moniker with it.<br />

FULL SCREEN MODE<br />

The device is immediately arresting and the<br />

Galaxy S8 looks unlike anything else on the<br />

market. It’s essentially a fl at slab of glass, but<br />

there’s no way you’ll mistake it for any other<br />

phone. It’s an absolutely gorgeous device –<br />

instantly striking and breathtakingly beautiful.<br />

It is, without a doubt, the best example of<br />

smartphone design produced to date.<br />

As part of the great bezelpocalypse, the<br />

home button and navigation buttons below<br />

the screen have been replaced, leaving a<br />

soft ware-based navigation bar. However,<br />

Samsung has also included an ‘embedded’<br />

home button, which emulates the<br />

feel of a physical button using<br />

technology that feels similar to<br />

Apple’s Force Touch. It’s very<br />

polished, to the extent that we<br />

almost prefer this style of button<br />

to Samsung’s previous approach.<br />

As you’d expect from a<br />

Samsung phone, the display is<br />

pretty much fl awless. sRGB colour<br />

gamut coverage hits 99.9% and<br />

contrast is, unsurprisingly for a<br />

Super AMOLED panel, perfect.<br />

The QHD+ resolution is pin-sharp<br />

and the brightness, which we<br />

measured peaking at 569cd/m 2 , is<br />

absolutely blazing – the maximum<br />

setting actually carries a health<br />

warning. This is also the only<br />

smartphone screen to be certified<br />

by the UHD Alliance to the Mobile<br />

HDR Premium standard.<br />

The use of an unusual 18.5:9<br />

aspect ratio means the Galaxy S8<br />

is taller and thinner than you’d<br />

expect, which makes it much more<br />

comfortable to hold and use<br />

one-handed. It also feels a lot<br />

smaller than it actually is, in a<br />

good way. It may be a 5.8in phablet, but it<br />

actually feels more like a 5in device, easily<br />

fi tt ing into your pocket. It also feels a lot<br />

slimmer than you’d expect, given it’s 8mm<br />

thick, thanks largely to its tapered<br />

edges.<br />

One slight issue is that because the<br />

vast majority of video content is<br />

formatted to fi t the more common 16:9<br />

aspect ratio, you’ll often end up with<br />

black bars surrounding whatever you’re<br />

watching, which somewhat defeats the<br />

purpose of an edge-to-edge display.<br />

There are several viewing options, such<br />

as cropping the content to fi t your<br />

screen, but you’ll likely lose the edges<br />

of the picture in the process.<br />

THE POWER OF EIGHT<br />

Performance is spectacular. Samsung<br />

has been all but topping the charts<br />

for speed for recent generations of<br />

its smartphone range, so it’s no<br />

shock to fi nd it’s still doing the same<br />

here with the S8.<br />

⬅ The Galaxy S8’s stunning screen extends<br />

to almost every edge of the device<br />

Packing Samsung’s 10nm Exynos 8895<br />

CPU and 4GB of RAM, the Galaxy S8 scored<br />

1,994 in Geekbench’s single-core test and<br />

6,629 in the multicore test. The latter is<br />

the highest score we’ve seen on any<br />

smartphone, and the single-core result is<br />

also the highest on Android; only the<br />

iPhone 7 scored higher, with 3,489.<br />

It’s just as powerful in games, achieving a<br />

spectacular 64fps average in the GFXBench<br />

Manhattan offscreen test. By pipping the<br />

iPhone 7’s 63fps, that’s another new record<br />

for the books.<br />

Networking is similarly speedy, with<br />

Gigabit Wi-Fi and LTE support out of the box.<br />

While Gigabit routers and mobile networks<br />

are still far from widespread, they’re defi nitely<br />

on the rise, so it’s nice to know that the S8 is<br />

in a position to take advantage of all these<br />

emerging technologies.<br />

BURNING SENSATION<br />

Batt ery life is the only mild disappointment.<br />

The S8 clocked up a score of 16h 45m in our<br />

benchmark tests, and while that’s still an<br />

incredibly high score, it’s about an hour less<br />

than the S7 and about two hours less than<br />

the S7 Edge. On the other hand, this still<br />

42<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


The Galaxy S8 looks unlike anything else on<br />

the market. It is, without a doubt, the best<br />

example of smartphone design to date<br />

places the Galaxy S8 very high up in our<br />

ranking tables, and it’s more than enough to<br />

carry you through a full day.<br />

The Galaxy S8’s camera is excellent. It<br />

effectively uses the same lens as the S7<br />

(which was already fantastic), but with a<br />

host of soft ware-based enhancements such<br />

as multi-frame image processing to give it an<br />

extra edge. The most impressive of these is<br />

the selective focus feature, which allows you<br />

to fl ick between different depth-of-fi eld<br />

settings on the fl y.<br />

Watching this in action is amazing: each<br />

image takes a couple of seconds to capture,<br />

but once it does, you can switch the focus<br />

between the foreground and background at<br />

will, resulting in supremely impressive photos<br />

with virtually no effort or skill required.<br />

The ‘smart’ auto focus is also superb,<br />

capturing crystal-clear shots with lightning<br />

speed. The camera initialises almost instantly,<br />

and focuses on your subject just as fast, with<br />

facial-recognition technology to ensure you’re<br />

capturing the right parts of your subject.<br />

It has the usual suite of professional<br />

modes as well, offering fi ne-grained control<br />

over settings such as ISO, white balance,<br />

shutter speed and more. There’s a nifty<br />

manual focus mode,<br />

too, which uses green<br />

highlights to visualise<br />

exactly what will be in<br />

focus in the fi nal shot.<br />

Photos taken with<br />

the S8 almost invariably<br />

come out looking slick<br />

and attractive, even in<br />

the hands of a rank<br />

amateur. Samsung<br />

claims that its latest<br />

fl agship can serve as a<br />

backup device for<br />

photographers that use<br />

a DSLR camera, and<br />

based on the strength of<br />

our experiences, we’d<br />

say that’s not far wrong.<br />

ARTIFICIAL<br />

FLAVOURING<br />

One of the Galaxy S8’s<br />

unique features is Bixby,<br />

Samsung’s AI assistant.<br />

Similar to Alexa and the<br />

Google Assistant, Bixby<br />

will answer questions,<br />

help plan your day<br />

and interact with your<br />

device. Bixby is tied into<br />

every element of the S8,<br />

and Samsung has even<br />

included a dedicated<br />

button on the side of the device to launch it.<br />

In addition to the usual suite of calendarplanning,<br />

app-launching and phone-searching<br />

functions, Bixby also includes image-searching<br />

capabilities; take a picture of something, and<br />

Bixby can identify what it is and suggest<br />

appropriate actions. If it’s a landmark, for<br />

example, it may offer more information via<br />

an internet search. For products, it will<br />

suggest online shopping pages. There’s even<br />

a mode for identifying types of wine based<br />

on the label.<br />

Bixby’s voice-command functionality<br />

isn’t available at launch, but Bixby Vision<br />

and the Bixby app are. The Bixby app is<br />

reasonably helpful – much like Google Now, it<br />

collects useful information such as calendar<br />

entries, reminders, health data and news<br />

headlines on to one screen for easy access.<br />

Outside of this, however, we can’t see Bixby<br />

being all that useful. Voice assistants as a<br />

whole haven’t really taken off in any major<br />

sense, so it’s hard to see this as a particularly<br />

vital feature either way.<br />

Interestingly, the S8 also includes the<br />

Google Assistant – a surprising inclusion.<br />

We would have expected Samsung to shy<br />

away from including support for what is<br />

effectively a competing service, so it’s nice to<br />

see that user choice is more of a priority here.<br />

After learning its lessons with previous<br />

generations, Samsung has not skimped on<br />

fan-favourite Android features. IP68 waterand<br />

dust-proofi ng is in attendance, as is<br />

expandable storage up to a limit of 256GB.<br />

Fast-charging and wireless charging are both<br />

present and correct as well, with the fl agship<br />

range fi nally making the jump to USB Type-C.<br />

EYE EYE<br />

As with its last few devices, Samsung has<br />

packed the S8 with biometric authentication<br />

technology. Alongside the fi ngerprint scanner<br />

(now mounted on the rear of the phone),<br />

the S8 includes the same iris-scanning<br />

technology as the Note 7 and brand-new<br />

facial recognition tech, letting you unlock<br />

your phone just by looking at it.<br />

We couldn’t get the iris scanner to work<br />

with our peepers, but similarly bespectacled<br />

colleagues had no trouble using it, so it<br />

may just have been our eyes that were the<br />

problem. Regardless, however, the<br />

combination of all three technologies<br />

means that unlocking your phone should be<br />

fast and easy every time.<br />

The Samsung Galaxy S8 is the best<br />

smartphone in the world, pure and simple.<br />

It’s one of the fastest devices we’ve ever<br />

tested, the camera is incredible and it has<br />

the sleekest, snazziest design around by a<br />

country mile. By virtually every metric you’d<br />

care to name, the Galaxy S8 is the best<br />

phone on the market.<br />

You’re paying for all that quality, though.<br />

At £689 SIM-free, it’s far from cheap, and<br />

contract prices aren’t much better – the<br />

cheapest we’ve found is £46 per month<br />

with £50 up front from Vodafone. However,<br />

the Galaxy S8 justifies its price by being one<br />

of the most impressive smartphones ever<br />

built. It’s the perfect confluence of smooth<br />

elegance and raw power, and there’s no<br />

other device that comes close to matching<br />

it for capability or attractiveness.<br />

Adam Shepherd<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 2.3GHz Samsung Exynos 8895 •<br />

SCREEN SIZE 5.8in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 2,560x1,440 •<br />

REAR CAMERA 12 megapixels • STORAGE 64GB •<br />

WIRELESSDATA 4G • DIMENSIONS 68x149x8mm •<br />

WEIGHT 155g • OPERATING SYSTEM Android 7.0 Nougat •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.samsung.com/<br />

uk • PART CODE SM-G950FZKABTU<br />

Battery life<br />

0%<br />

-50<br />

16h 45m<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

43


FLAGSHIP ANDROID SMARTPHONE<br />

LG G6<br />

★★★★★<br />

£650 • From www.carphonewarehouse.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The LG G6’s sprawling display makes it a pleasure<br />

to use, but the Galaxy S8 is even more impressive<br />

THE LG G6 is the fl agship smartphone that<br />

got everyone talking at the recent MWC<br />

show. Besides ditching the G5’s modular<br />

design, its 18:9 aspect ratio and almost<br />

bezel-free design adds even more screen<br />

space to a handset that keeps the familiar<br />

dimensions of a conventional 16:9 device.<br />

LG’s initial promise of a “very competitive”<br />

price hasn’t quite come to pass, as its £650<br />

RRP isn’t vastly cheaper than the £689<br />

Samsung Galaxy S8, while both the iPhone 7<br />

and Google Pixel cost even less. Still, there’s<br />

no arguing that it oozes premium quality,<br />

with its stylish frame and Gorilla Glass 5 back<br />

panel. It’s tough as well, holding the IP68<br />

rating, meaning you can submerge it in water<br />

at a depth of 1.5m for 30 minutes.<br />

The 5.7in front display is protected by<br />

Corning’s Gorilla Glass 3 and, due to its 18:9<br />

aspect ratio, the LG G6 screen-to-body ratio is<br />

an impressive 78.6%. The phone isn’t too<br />

heavy, at 163g, and despite the size of the<br />

screen, it’s still usable one-handed.<br />

TERA OF THE DEEP<br />

The volume rocker sits on the left side, with a<br />

dual-SIM and microSD card tray on the right.<br />

The G6 comes with 32GB of onboard storage<br />

so the latter is particularly welcome, and it<br />

impressively supports cards up to 2TB in size<br />

– such huge cards aren’t even on sale yet. To<br />

charge and transfer fi les, you have a USB<br />

Type-C port on the bottom edge, and to listen<br />

to music, a 3.5mm headphone jack at the top.<br />

Of course, the main attraction is the<br />

display. Its 18:9 aspect ratio is a refreshing<br />

step forward for smartphones; it’s hard to<br />

appreciate just by looking at product shots,<br />

but the extra bit of<br />

screen genuinely<br />

makes reading the<br />

news, watching fi lms,<br />

taking pictures,<br />

multitasking and<br />

gaming more<br />

enjoyable and<br />

practical than before.<br />

There’s also Dolby<br />

Vision and HDR 10<br />

support. Previously<br />

only available on<br />

high-end TVs, HDR<br />

widens the colour<br />

range, producing<br />

blinding whites and<br />

seriously deep blacks.<br />

Obviously, your<br />

content will have to be HDR as<br />

well, but you should be able to<br />

watch both Netflix and Amazon<br />

HDR content as soon as the<br />

mobile apps have been enabled<br />

for the technology.<br />

However, there is some<br />

day-to-day benefi t, too: to meet<br />

these standards, LG has clearly<br />

worked on the screen’s contrast<br />

and brightness. We measured<br />

the screen’s contrast at a frankly<br />

astonishing 1,678:1 and 2,112:1<br />

depending on screen content,<br />

which is the best we’ve seen on<br />

a smartphone, ever.<br />

BLACK AND WHITE<br />

SITUATION<br />

With a maximum 492cd/m 2<br />

brightness, the IPS screen is<br />

readable in all but the very<br />

brightest of conditions – we<br />

had no problem viewing the<br />

phone outside – and it also<br />

delivers stunning black level<br />

response. Surprisingly, our black<br />

measurement test result of<br />

0.23cd/m 2 is a very slight<br />

downgrade on the LG G5’s (<strong>Shopper</strong> 341)<br />

0.19cd/m 2 , but it’s still up there with the<br />

very best IPS phone screens.<br />

Our only disappointment was that it<br />

covered 93.2% of the sRGB colour gamut.<br />

This is still a high fi gure, but many other<br />

smartphones – especially those with<br />

AMOLED displays – can do better.<br />

The G6 comes with Android 7.1 Nougat,<br />

along with LG’s latest<br />

UX 6 overlay. This<br />

soft ware – particularly<br />

its take on splitscreen<br />

multitasking<br />

– is a pleasure to use,<br />

and doesn’t seem to<br />

hog too much of the<br />

G6’s 4GB of RAM.<br />

That’s just as well,<br />

because LG has<br />

decided to go with the<br />

Snapdragon 821 CPU<br />

rather than the newer<br />

fl agship-standard<br />

Snapdragon 835. As<br />

such, its Geekbench<br />

single-core score of<br />

1,777 and multicore<br />

score of 4,137 fall behind those of betterspecced<br />

rivals such as the Samsung Galaxy S7<br />

and Huawei P10. The Exynos 8895-powered<br />

Galaxy S8 comprehensively beats it as well.<br />

GAMING THE SYSTEM<br />

Generally, the G6 does feel slower during<br />

strenuous multitasking than its octa-core<br />

contemporaries. Even the fi ngerprint sensor<br />

feels relatively sluggish to respond, and it<br />

doesn’t cope well with moisture, either – a<br />

tiny bit of sweat will force a PIN input instead.<br />

It is, at least, much more competitive in<br />

gaming. In the GFXBench Manhattan<br />

offscreen test, the LG G6 averaged a high<br />

49fps, which actually beats the Galaxy S7<br />

by 11fps, the P10 by 2fps and the Google<br />

Pixel XL by 1fps. You’ll have no issue with<br />

demanding 3D games here.<br />

We weren’t too thrilled by the battery life,<br />

however. Lasting 12h 53m in our video<br />

playback benchmark, the LG G6 will get you<br />

through a day of moderate use, but is still<br />

rather short-lasting by fl agship standards.<br />

Next to the Google Pixel’s 16h 23m or the<br />

Galaxy S7’s 17h 48m, it defi nitely loses out.<br />

That said, one advantage of the<br />

Snapdragon 821 is its support for Qualcomm’s<br />

44 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Quick Charge 3, which together with the<br />

included fast charger and USB Type-C cable<br />

will net you about 50% charge in 30 minutes.<br />

BETTER THAN ONE<br />

The dual-lens camera on the old G5 was great,<br />

but the G6 has changed things a little: the<br />

resolution has fallen from 16 to 13 megapixels.<br />

It still works in the same way, though, with<br />

one 125º wide-angle lens and the other with a<br />

bog-standard, 71º fi eld of view. As was the<br />

case with the LG G5, the main camera has a<br />

bright f/1.8 aperture, while its wide-angle<br />

counterpart is a smidge dimmer at f/2.4.<br />

The 18:9 FullVision display is a great<br />

companion for camera enthusiasts. You can<br />

separate the display into two squares and<br />

preview the previous shot while snapping the<br />

next one immediately above. It’s strangely<br />

satisfying, and means the whole process of<br />

capturing, previewing and taking the next<br />

shot is much quicker than normal.<br />

We were also very impressed by the LG<br />

G6’s camera app, which provides a host of<br />

different options and modes. When you<br />

open the app, you’ll notice two icons with<br />

trees in them at the top. This allows you to<br />

cycle between the wide 125º and the normal<br />

71º lenses. The transition between the<br />

lenses is seamless, allowing you to quickly<br />

capture two different perspectives at the<br />

touch of a button.<br />

Within the camera app’s settings, you<br />

can choose between several different<br />

photographic modes: panorama, 360<br />

panorama, food, popout, snap, slow-mo and<br />

time-lapse. A tap of another menu button<br />

brings up different fi lters.<br />

Then there are the manual photo and<br />

manual video modes. Manual photo mode<br />

gives you control over the white balance,<br />

focus (regular lens only), exposure<br />

compensation, ISO and shutter speed.<br />

FILM STUDIES<br />

The LG G6’s manual video mode gives you<br />

even more control, including the ability to<br />

change the mic gain, audio crossover, add a<br />

wind noise fi lter, change the white balance,<br />

manual focus (regular lens only), exposure<br />

compensation, ISO sensitivity and shutter<br />

speed. You can also set the resolution, aspect<br />

ratio and frame rate for videos, and record in<br />

4K 16:9 at 30fps, and in 1080p 16:9, 18:9 and<br />

21:9 Cinema at 60fps. Recording at 720p<br />

grants you 120fps with a 16:9 aspect ratio,<br />

and 60fps at 18:9 or 21:9 Cinema.<br />

It’s even possible to lock the exposure<br />

(AE-L) in this pro video mode, which is<br />

fantastic if you want to whack the LG G6 on<br />

a tripod and record professional-looking<br />

footage. Better still, there’s focus peaking<br />

under the manual focus option. This fringes<br />

objects in focus in green pixels, just as with a<br />

professional video camera. Unfortunately,<br />

focus peaking disappears when you hit<br />

record, which means it’s not all that useful.<br />

When it comes to quality, the LG G6’s<br />

dual 13-megapixel lenses are up there with<br />

We measured the screen’s contrast at a frankly astonishing<br />

1,678:1 and 2,112:1 depending on screen content, which is<br />

the best we’ve seen on a smartphone, ever<br />

the very best. It’s not the outright best<br />

camera on a smartphone – that accolade<br />

belongs to the Google Pixel and Google<br />

Pixel XL’s shared snapper design, closely<br />

followed by the Samsung Galaxy S7 and S8<br />

– but it’s fantastic nonetheless.<br />

Images are clear and packed with detail<br />

through both lenses. The difference<br />

between the two is most apparent indoors;<br />

low-light performance is a lot better on the<br />

f/1.8 lens because it lets in more light, so if<br />

you’re snapping photos indoors, avoid the<br />

wide-angle lens.<br />

HDR adds a considerable amount of<br />

detail to photographs, with images appearing<br />

more natural. Naturally, you’ll get more<br />

objects in your image with the wider lens, but<br />

there is a compromise on quality, with the<br />

f/2.4 lens able to capture less light. It’s a<br />

trade-off , but given you have the option to<br />

cycle between the two modes, there’s not<br />

much to complain about.<br />

We particularly appreciated the LG G6’s<br />

dual-LED fl ash, which doesn’t wash the<br />

scene in blue or pink as some phones’<br />

fl ashes are liable to do, and it manages to<br />

maintain good colour accuracy while<br />

eliminating distracting shadows.<br />

GALAXY FARING<br />

The LG G6 is a decent fl agship smartphone<br />

with a great screen, an impressive camera<br />

and a great design. We love the tall, narrow<br />

shape – it provides a slice of extra screen<br />

real estate without making the phone<br />

awkward to use one-handed – and the<br />

thin borders at the top and bottom of<br />

the phone keep its height to a minimum<br />

as well.<br />

However, at £650, the LG G6 isn’t that<br />

much cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S8,<br />

and we think that the extra £39 is worth<br />

paying for a beautifully designed smartphone<br />

with a more colourful AMOLED screen,<br />

a faster processor, more onboard storage<br />

and useful extras such as iris- and facialrecognition<br />

unlocking.<br />

Christopher Minasians<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 2.35GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 821<br />

• SCREEN SIZE 5.7in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 2,880x1,440<br />

• REAR CAMERA 13 megapixels • STORAGE 32GB •<br />

WIRELESSDATA 4G • DIMENSIONS 149x72x7.9mm •<br />

WEIGHT 163g • OPERATING SYSTEM Android 7.1 •<br />

WARRANTY Two years parts and labour •<br />

DETAILS www.lg.com/uk • PART CODE H870<br />

Battery life<br />

0%<br />

12h 53m<br />

-50<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

45


SSD UPGRADE KIT<br />

KINGSTON SSDNow UV400 Upgrade Kit 480GB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£155 • From www.ebuyer.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A great upgrade option for laptop owners, but you can get cheaper standalone drives<br />

ALTHOUGH AN SSD can make a huge<br />

difference to the speed of your PC, increasing<br />

boot speeds and application load times,<br />

installing one can be tricky. That’s doubly so<br />

if you want to upgrade a laptop. Kingston<br />

wants to make things easy with this, the<br />

SSDNow UV400 Upgrade Kit.<br />

Inside the box, you get the 2.5in SATA3<br />

drive (available in 120GB, 240GB, 480GB and<br />

960GB versions; we tested the 480GB kit),<br />

plus a full copy of Acronis True Image HD and<br />

everything you need to install the drive. For a<br />

desktop PC, this includes a mount to convert a<br />

3.5in drive bay into an SSD-compatible one,<br />

and a Molex-to-SATA power adaptor.<br />

CLAMSHELL OUT<br />

It’s laptop upgraders who really benefi t from<br />

this kit. You get an external USB hard disk<br />

caddy, designed for the SSDNow UV400.<br />

Plugging this into your laptop, you can use the<br />

simple Acronis True Image soft ware to clone<br />

your existing hard disk before you make the<br />

swap and install the SSD permanently.<br />

The height of drives can be an issue with<br />

some laptops, so Kingston also ships the drive<br />

with a foam spacer. This pads out any room<br />

inside the laptop to ensure that the SSD fi ts<br />

snuggly and doesn’t jog around. If you don’t<br />

want or need all of this, the SSDNow UV400 is<br />

available as a drive only for around £15 less.<br />

While ease of installation shouldn’t be<br />

ignored, it’s the raw speed that determines if<br />

an SSD should be bought or not. Kingston<br />

uses Triple-level cell (TLC) storage, which<br />

stores three bits per cell. TLC memory delivers<br />

the lowest-cost SSDs but has the slowest<br />

performance. That said, the SSDNow UV400<br />

is a SATA3 drive, which has a maximum<br />

throughput of 600MB/s. With the SSDNow<br />

UV400’s maximum read speed of 550MB/s<br />

and write speed of 500MB/s, the drive is<br />

pushing against the maximum bandwidth the<br />

interface offers. In other words, the fact that<br />

it’s using TLC storage should have little impact.<br />

SOLIDLY STATED<br />

Our test results showed this to be the case,<br />

too. Copying our huge fi les, we saw read<br />

speeds of 475.4MB/s and write speeds of<br />

482.21MB/s. In our large fi les test, we saw<br />

read speeds of 441.43MB/s and write speeds<br />

of 479.71MB/s. Our small fi les test, which<br />

really pushes the drive to its limits with lots<br />

and lots of fi le operations, slowed the<br />

UV400 right down, producing a read speed of<br />

321.36MB/s and write speed of 439.64MB/s.<br />

In all cases, Windows’ caching technology<br />

helps improve the real-world write<br />

performance by buffering fi les. Read speeds<br />

can’t be improved, as data has to be pulled<br />

from the drive before it can be cached.<br />

Switching to the CrystalDiskMark<br />

benchmark, sequential speeds showed that<br />

the drive was bang on the money for its<br />

quoted specs: 552.6MB/s read speeds and<br />

506.6MB/s write speeds. Switching to the 4K<br />

fi le test, which pushes SSDs by requiring<br />

thousands of random fi le operations, the<br />

UV400 slowed down considerably: 341.8MB/s<br />

read and 322.7MB/write. These speeds<br />

compare favourably with similarly specced<br />

drives from other manufacturers.<br />

GETTING LAPPED<br />

As to whether the UV400 is worth buying or<br />

not depends on what you want it for. If you’re<br />

upgrading a laptop, the entire kit is excellent<br />

value and gives you everything you need for a<br />

quick upgrade. If you just want a bare drive for<br />

a PC, the kit is overpriced and the standalone<br />

drive not quite as good value. For standalone<br />

drives, the Crucial MX300 series is slightly<br />

better value and performed a tiny bit faster in<br />

our benchmarks, making it the better choice.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

CAPACITY 480GB • COST PERGIGABYTE £0.32 •<br />

INTERFACE SATA3 • CLAIMEDREAD 550MB/s • CLAIMED<br />

WRITE 500MB/S • WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS<br />

www.kingston.com • PART CODE SUV400S37/480G<br />

Huge fi les<br />

Large fi les<br />

Small fi les<br />

0%<br />

478.80MB/s<br />

460.57MB/s<br />

-50<br />

380.5MB/s<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

46 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


MEDIA STREAMER<br />

HUMAX H3 Espresso<br />

★★★★★<br />

£80 • From www.currys.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

It’s simple to use and control, but the H3<br />

Espresso lacks the fi nesse and app variety of<br />

its main competition<br />

GIVEN THAT THE media streamer market is<br />

dominated by Apple, Amazon and Google, any<br />

competitor has to be better, cost less or do<br />

something different. Humax has decided to go<br />

with the third option and offer something a<br />

little unusual with its H3 Espresso: live TV<br />

streamed over the internet, and integration<br />

with the company’s Freeview set-top boxes.<br />

Size- and shape-wise, the H3 Espresso<br />

looks like a slimmed-down Apple TV.<br />

Humax’s player measures a similar 95x95mm,<br />

with the same curved corners. However, the<br />

H3 is considerably slimmer than the 35mm<br />

Apple TV, measuring just 18mm.<br />

WOODEN PERFORMANCE<br />

The small size means that it’s easy to tuck<br />

the media player out of the way. If you do<br />

have it on display, the wood-eff ect top at<br />

least gives the H3 a different look to its rival<br />

media streamers.<br />

Humax has kitted out the H3 with a decent<br />

range of ports. Around the back, you get<br />

HDMI 1.4, Ethernet (there’s 802.11n Wi-Fi<br />

built in, too) and an optical S/PDIF output.<br />

There’s also a USB2 port on the side for<br />

connecting external storage directly.<br />

Powering on the H3 for the fi rst time<br />

takes you through a quick setup wizard, which<br />

gets the box connected to your network.<br />

It also takes you through configuring the<br />

companion Android and iOS apps, although<br />

you can stick with the dedicated remote<br />

control. Humax has done a good job with the<br />

remote: it’s comfortable to hold and gives you<br />

all the main playback controls you need.<br />

The two main benefi ts of using the app are<br />

that you don’t need line of sight to the H3, as<br />

the app works over your network, and you<br />

can use your phone’s onscreen keyboard to<br />

enter text. The latter sounds like a good idea,<br />

but it’s a little fl aky in practice. Using our H3<br />

box, we found that text entry didn’t work<br />

with every app, which is a real shame.<br />

Humax’s main interface for the H3<br />

Espresso is a little basic, with simple<br />

thumbnails letting you select and launch<br />

apps. It works well enough, although the<br />

interface is rather functional.<br />

SURFING SEASON<br />

One of the key selling points of the H3 is the<br />

access it gives you to live TV. The easiest<br />

method is to stream from the internet using<br />

the TVPlayer app. This gives you, at the time<br />

of writing, 79 free channels, including every<br />

main terrestrial channel. You also get a<br />

number of additional channels, including QVC,<br />

Bloomberg and CNN International. Using the<br />

supplied code, you get two months of free<br />

TVPlayer Plus access (usually £5.99 a month),<br />

netting you an additional 29 premium<br />

channels – well, if you consider stations<br />

such as MTV, Gold and Cartoon Network as<br />

being premium, that is.<br />

Image quality is very good: better quality<br />

than standard-defi nition Freeview, but not as<br />

good as HD from BBC iPlayer. TVPlayer is also<br />

available on the Apple TV, Fire TV and<br />

Chromecast, though, so there’s no clear<br />

reason to buy the H3 Espresso for this app.<br />

However, the H3 has another trick up its<br />

sleeve: it can live-stream content from a<br />

Humax Freeview Play FVP-4000T. This can<br />

either be recorded shows or live TV via one of<br />

the FVP-4000T’s three tuners.<br />

While access to live TV is good, ondemand<br />

TV is disappointing. There’s no<br />

iPlayer, ITV Hub, All4 or My5. In this regard,<br />

the H3 lags behind its competition.<br />

Other content is also a little lacking, and<br />

only the Netflix and YouTube apps stand out,<br />

both of which use the same familiar interfaces<br />

as they do on other media streamers. That’s it<br />

for premium content, as there’s no Now TV,<br />

Amazon Prime Video or Spotify.<br />

SLIM PICKINGS<br />

Humax has a simple app store, but the<br />

range of available content is poor. What’s<br />

more, apps don’t have descriptions, so you<br />

have to guess what add-ons such as ‘Know<br />

Yourself’ and ‘Check Body’ do.<br />

The built-in Humax Media Player is useful<br />

for anyone with a media server on their<br />

network, though, letting you stream video,<br />

music and photos. Most formats are<br />

supported, too. If you don’t have a media<br />

server, you can just plug in a USB key directly<br />

into the H3 Espresso’s side port.<br />

As a basic media streamer or Netflix<br />

player, the H3 Espresso does a good job, but<br />

at the moment, it’s painfully lacking in<br />

content and apps. As it stands, the Amazon<br />

Fire TV with 4K Ultra HD (<strong>Shopper</strong> 350) costs<br />

the same, yet has more content and supports<br />

4K footage. If you want to save money, the<br />

Chromecast or Amazon Fire TV stick cost<br />

less than half the price of the H3 Espresso.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

VIDEOOUTPUTS HDMI 1.4 • NETWORKING 802.11n<br />

(2.4GHz) Wi-Fi • DIMENSIONS 95x95x18mm •<br />

STREAMING FORMATS UPnP, DLNA, SMB •<br />

INTERNET STREAMING SERVICES Netflix, YouTube,<br />

TVPlayer • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS<br />

⬆ Other than Netflix and YouTube, the H3 Espresso is somewhat lacking when it comes to apps<br />

uk.humaxdigital.com • PART CODE H3/UK<br />

48 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


OVER-EAR HEADPHONES<br />

MASTER & DYNAMIC MH40<br />

★★★★★<br />

£319 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

These stylish headphones don’t sound as<br />

good as they look<br />

HEADPHONES THAT BOTH look and<br />

sound good are somewhat hard to come by<br />

– a situation that Master & Dynamic is<br />

attempting to rectify with the MH40. This set<br />

of cans screams beauty, design and build<br />

quality, but ultimately it’s the sound quality<br />

that makes or breaks any audio product –<br />

including this one.<br />

At £319, the MH40 isn’t cheap, and with<br />

more affordable competition from the £280<br />

Bowers & Wilkins P7 (<strong>Shopper</strong> 348), the<br />

Sennheiser Momentum 2.0 at £200, the<br />

Sony MDR-1A at £120 and even the likes of<br />

the Creative Sound BlasterX H5 at £95, the<br />

MH40 has its work cut out.<br />

In the package, you’ll fi nd the headphones,<br />

two sets of detachable cables (a 1.25m cable<br />

with remote and mic, and a 2m standard<br />

cable), a leather cable box, a soft carrying<br />

pouch and a 6.3mm adaptor.<br />

The remote on the 1.25m cable allows<br />

you to adjust the volume on iOS devices,<br />

but unfortunately, this particular function<br />

doesn’t work on Android as well. That said,<br />

you can still play/pause tracks, answer and<br />

receive calls, and skip through tracks (by<br />

double- or triple-tapping the middle<br />

button) on both operating systems.<br />

VEGAN UNFRIENDLY<br />

These accessories, OS compatibility<br />

aside, show an attention to detail<br />

that we’re happy to say is replicated<br />

on the MH40 itself, which has a<br />

stunning look and distinctive design.<br />

There are a few colours to choose<br />

from; we received the silver<br />

metal/brown leather model for<br />

review, and it looks better in the<br />

fl esh than it does on Master &<br />

Dynamic’s website.<br />

The MH40 has “heavy grain<br />

premium cowhide” on the top<br />

of the headband, with soft<br />

lambskin on the earpads<br />

and the inner part of the<br />

headband. Grilles adorn<br />

the exterior of each cup to<br />

complete the retro ham<br />

radio look, but it’s important<br />

to note that these aren’t<br />

open-back headphones in<br />

the technical sense.<br />

The earcups are in fact<br />

closed, which is good news if<br />

you’re planning on listening to<br />

the MH40 in the office or on your<br />

daily commute,<br />

since you can do<br />

so without fear<br />

of annoying<br />

your fellow<br />

travellers.<br />

The MH40<br />

is practical in<br />

other ways,<br />

too. The<br />

earcups pivot<br />

fl at, allowing<br />

you to store<br />

them with<br />

greater ease in<br />

the included pouch.<br />

The earpads attach<br />

magnetically to the metal<br />

housing of each earcup,<br />

making it easy to replace them when they<br />

wear out. The 3.5mm cable is removable,<br />

with a jack on each earcup so you can<br />

choose which side to hang the cable and,<br />

unusually, there’s a mechanical mute button<br />

on the right earcup as well.<br />

However, it’s not the most comfortable set<br />

of headphones we’ve ever worn. The<br />

headband is adjustable, but there isn’t<br />

much range to the adjustment – if you<br />

have a large head, you might fi nd the<br />

MH40 just doesn’t fi t. We also found<br />

the narrow earpads a touch small for<br />

our ears, and with the minimal amount<br />

of padding on the headband, the total<br />

weight of 360g was immediately<br />

noticeable. We’re not sure we’d want to<br />

wear these for long periods of listening.<br />

FALLING FLAT<br />

The MH40’s other technical<br />

specifications are well up to scratch.<br />

In each earcup is a large 45mm<br />

neodymium driver, and the<br />

overall impedance of the<br />

headphones is 32 ohms.<br />

This means they’ll need a<br />

little more volume over your<br />

regular 16-ohm headphones.<br />

Sound quality, however, is<br />

lower than we’d expect from<br />

a set of headphones costing<br />

over £300. First up, there’s<br />

the bass, which we found to<br />

lack presence to the extent<br />

that the lowest of low notes<br />

didn’t have much rumble to<br />

them. For example, in Usher’s Yeah!,<br />

at each chorus the<br />

bass cuts off, leaving<br />

you wanting more.<br />

Its mid-bass slam<br />

was a little<br />

uncontrolled but<br />

did at least have<br />

plenty of oomph.<br />

There are<br />

also better<br />

headphones for<br />

listening to<br />

classical music,<br />

as there’s an<br />

over-warm<br />

presentation to the<br />

sound that muddles<br />

fi ne details in the<br />

mid-range of the sound spectrum. Certainly,<br />

compared with the excellent Sennheiser<br />

Momentum 2.0, the MH40 just isn’t as<br />

forward-sounding or as clear.<br />

To top it all off, the highs aren’t that<br />

impressive, either. For example, in The<br />

Weeknd’s Starboy, the recurring electric sound<br />

in the background isn’t delivered with quite<br />

enough sparkle for our liking. Everything just<br />

sounds a little soft and indistinct.<br />

JUST A PRETTY FACE<br />

As for soundstage, that’s not so bad. The<br />

MH40 has an intriguing soundstage, with a<br />

rather deep but narrow sound. Instrument<br />

separation is acceptable, but again, we would<br />

have liked a bit more refi nement, as when<br />

testing with games the positioning of sounds<br />

wasn’t terribly accurate.<br />

The Master & Dynamic MH40 is one of the<br />

most attractive, beautifully designed pairs of<br />

headphones we’ve laid hands – and eyes – on.<br />

Constructed entirely from aluminium and<br />

leather, they feel like they’ve been built to last.<br />

However, at £319, they simply miss the<br />

mark in terms of comfort and, most<br />

importantly, sound quality. You’d be better<br />

off considering the Sennheiser Momentum<br />

2.0 or the Creative Sound BlasterX H5, both<br />

of which offer superior sound quality and<br />

are considerably cheaper.<br />

Christopher Minasians<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

HEADPHONES SUBTYPE Over-ear • PLUG TYPE Dual<br />

3.5mm • WEIGHT 360g • CABLELENGTH 1.25m with<br />

remote and mic, 2m standard cable • WARRANTY Two<br />

years repair and replace • DETAILS www.masterdynamic.eu<br />

• PART CODE MH40S2<br />

50 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


COMPACT SYSTEM CAMERA<br />

PANASONIC<br />

Lumix DMC-G80<br />

★★★★★<br />

£799 (with 12-60mm kit lens) •<br />

From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Packed with useful features, the Lumix DMC-G80<br />

is a superb CSC for stills, and even better for video<br />

THE PANASONIC LUMIX DMC-G80 is the<br />

seventh generation in a line that stretches<br />

back to the fi rst ever compact system<br />

camera (CSC), the Panasonic G1. It may be<br />

overshadowed by the fl agship GH series, the<br />

gadget-laden GX series or the budget-friendly<br />

GH series, but then the most unassuming<br />

cameras can sometimes offer the best value,<br />

and the G80 is well placed to repeat the<br />

all-round greatness of the Panasonic G7.<br />

The G80 looks remarkably similar to the<br />

G7, both in the fl esh and in its specifications:<br />

16-megapixel photos, 4K videos, a 3in<br />

articulated touchscreen and a 2.4-million dot<br />

electronic viewfinder. Body-only, it costs £629,<br />

but it makes sense to go with the £799<br />

package, which includes a 12-60mm kit lens –<br />

a big step up from the G7’s 14-42mm. Both<br />

the lens and the body are weather-sealed,<br />

which is unusual for a sub-£1,000 camera, and<br />

indicates that Panasonic is aiming this model<br />

at a more demanding type of photographer.<br />

Another key feature is the same sensorshift<br />

optical stabilisation as seen in the GX80<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 343), something that was missing<br />

from the G7. When a stabilised lens is fi tt ed,<br />

the camera uses both sensor-shift and in-lens<br />

systems in tandem to help cope with shaky<br />

conditions or extremely slow shutter speeds.<br />

TAKE THE CONTROLS<br />

While the G80 is bigger than most CSCs<br />

(being about the same size and weight as a<br />

typical DSLR), this allows for a chunky,<br />

comfortable handgrip and plenty of dials.<br />

The SD card slot has its own compartment<br />

on the side, so is easier to access when using<br />

a tripod than on the G7, and a designed<br />

shutter makes it quieter as well.<br />

There are fi ve customisable buttons dotted<br />

around the camera, plus fi ve further virtual<br />

ones on the touchscreen. Buttons labelled Fn<br />

aren’t as quick to learn as those labelled with<br />

specific functions, but it does give you more<br />

fl exibility to set up the camera to your liking,<br />

and you can always apply your own stickers.<br />

In addition, you get dedicated buttons for<br />

ISO speed, white balance, autofocus mode<br />

and AF/AE lock, plus a lever for toggling<br />

between single auto, continuous auto and<br />

manual focus modes. There are also two<br />

chunky command dials on the top plate for<br />

direct access to shutter speed and aperture<br />

in manual exposure mode.<br />

Exposure compensation is accessed by<br />

pressing the Fn1 button on the top plate and<br />

then spinning the rear command dial. We<br />

found this a little awkward, so assigned it<br />

permanently to the rear wheel. It still reverted<br />

to shutter speed in manual exposure mode,<br />

though, with the front command dial<br />

assigned to aperture.<br />

Over on the<br />

other side of<br />

the viewfinder<br />

hump there’s a<br />

dedicated drive<br />

mode dial, which<br />

includes the usual<br />

single, burst and<br />

self-timer options,<br />

plus three more<br />

unusual ones.<br />

Interval mode,<br />

for instance,<br />

provides access<br />

to Panasonic’s<br />

time-lapse and stop-motion animation modes,<br />

while 4K Photo mode takes advantage of the<br />

8-megapixel resolution of each 4K video<br />

frame to deliver a 30fps burst mode (shots<br />

are limited to JPEG-only, but you can choose<br />

the aspect ratio).<br />

The third option is Post Focus, which<br />

works in a similar way, recording a video as it<br />

sweeps through the focus in a scene. After<br />

capture, you can tap the screen to choose<br />

which part to focus on, and even combine<br />

shots using a technique called focus stacking,<br />

so a larger area or the whole scene is in sharp<br />

focus. It produced slightly odd results when<br />

selecting a range of areas to keep sharp, but<br />

the Auto mode that keeps everything sharp<br />

worked extremely well.<br />

TOUCH AND GO<br />

The electronic viewfinder uses a 2.36-million<br />

dot OLED screen, but it’s bigger than on the<br />

G7, with 0.74x rather than 0.7x magnification.<br />

The LCD screen switches off automatically<br />

when the camera is raised to the eye, but it<br />

can still be used as a touchscreen to move<br />

the autofocus point. This feels natural and<br />

is extremely quick, and it’s only slightly<br />

upset by accidental nose nudges. Helpfully,<br />

switching it from Exact to Offset mode<br />

(which makes it behave more like a laptop<br />

touchpad) makes nose prods merely<br />

wiggle the autofocus point, rather than<br />

having it veer off course.<br />

After moving the autofocus point, the<br />

command dials can be used to adjust the<br />

autofocus area size, which varies from a<br />

tiny point to almost the entire frame height.<br />

This fl exibility is helpful generally, and<br />

particularly so in very dark conditions where<br />

the camera might struggle to focus on a very<br />

small area. What’s also useful is that face<br />

detection focuses on eyes rather than faces,<br />

and the accuracy of both face detection and<br />

52 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


touchscreen-powered subject tracking is as<br />

good as we’ve seen from any camera.<br />

Fast autofocus performance also<br />

contributes towards impressive operating<br />

speeds, with the G80 taking 0.8 seconds from<br />

powering up to capturing a shot and 0.4<br />

seconds between subsequent shots. Burst<br />

shooting was at 9.2fps in our tests, the buffer<br />

is good for over 100 JPEGs, and it showed no<br />

sign of fi lling up. Switching to Raw mode<br />

slowed it down to 7.1fps, and this rate slowed<br />

significantly after 47 frames. After enabling<br />

continuous autofocus, it ran at 6.2fps for<br />

JPEGs and 5.4fps for Raw. There are faster<br />

cameras, but the G80 is quick enough for<br />

most purposes, and the generous buffer<br />

means it has stamina as well as speed.<br />

MOVIE BUFF<br />

Panasonic has led the way for video capture<br />

in recent years, and the G80 continues this<br />

tradition. It records both 4K (3,840x2,160)<br />

and 1080p videos, both of which are packed<br />

with crisp, fi ne details. Sensor-shift, lensbased<br />

and electronic stabilisation can all<br />

be employed simultaneously to deliver<br />

impressively smooth handheld footage, which<br />

is effective enough to use while walking.<br />

Unlike the cheaper G-series cameras, the<br />

G80 also includes the Cinelike D colour profi le.<br />

This produces fl at colours, which make a good<br />

starting point for colour grading. There’s also<br />

Zebra stripe peaking, which shows which<br />

parts of the frame are overexposed. You get<br />

a 3.5mm microphone socket, too, but sadly<br />

there’s no headphone socket for monitoring.<br />

There are no slow-motion modes, but the<br />

camera’s 1080/60p videos could be slowed<br />

to 25p in editing soft ware.<br />

Video autofocus is excellent, with the same<br />

superb subject tracking as per photos and<br />

decisive refocusing when the subject or<br />

camera moves. However, it’s not quite up to<br />

professional standards, as there’s still some<br />

focus hunting and the occasional error.<br />

Panasonic CSC cameras use Micro Four<br />

Thirds sensors that measure 17.3x13mm.<br />

That’s about 40% smaller (by surface area)<br />

than the APS-C sensors found in CSCs from<br />

Sony, Fujifilm and Canon. As such, they’re<br />

always likely to be a little behind rivals for<br />

image quality. The G80 bears this out with<br />

a 16-megapixel resolution that’s lower than<br />

rival cameras’ 24 megapixels, and a little<br />

more noise at fast ISO speeds.<br />

This might be enough to put off some<br />

people, but for us it’s not a deal breaker.<br />

The 16-megapixel resolution equates to<br />

278dpi for an A3 print, which is close enough<br />

to the ideal level of 300dpi. Noise levels are<br />

more of an issue, and we’d be tempted to<br />

limit the G80 to ISO 3200 (where other<br />

cameras can be pushed to ISO 6400).<br />

However, with a wide-aperture prime lens it’s<br />

rare to need ISO speeds beyond 1600.<br />

ZOOM SERVICE<br />

Taken on their own terms, the G80’s photos<br />

are excellent. The new kit lens performed<br />

superbly and its generous 5x zoom range is<br />

much more versatile than the 3x zooms<br />

offered by rivals. Metering and automatic<br />

exposures were hard to fault, with the<br />

camera responding intelligently to moving<br />

subjects by raising the shutter and ISO speed.<br />

Colours were lifelike,<br />

with excellent handling<br />

of subtle textures.<br />

We spotted some<br />

subtle errors on dense<br />

foliage, where the<br />

demosaicing fi lter<br />

couldn’t work out what<br />

colour a particular pixel<br />

should be and thus rendered it grey, but it<br />

didn’t happen often and was hard to spot.<br />

The G80 is pricier than the G7 was at<br />

launch, but with its weather sealing, larger<br />

viewfinder, sensor-shift stabilisation<br />

and posher kit lens, this feels like a big step<br />

up. Its price puts it somewhere between<br />

entry-level CSCs such as the Canon EOS M3<br />

and high-end models such as the Fujifilm X-T2<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 351), but in most respects –<br />

ergonomics, controls, performance, features<br />

– it’s much closer to the latter, and it<br />

outperforms almost everything for video.<br />

The new Fujifilm X-T20 may be the camera<br />

to steal the show – we’ll be reviewing it soon.<br />

For now, though, the Lumix DMC-G80 is the<br />

best sub-£1,000 CSC kit on the market.<br />

Ben Pitt<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 16 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE<br />

17.3x13mm • FOCAL LENGTH MULTIPLIER 2x •<br />

VIEWFINDER Electronic (2.36 million dots) • LCDSCREEN<br />

3in (1.04 million dots) • OPTICAL ZOOM (35mm-EQUIVALENT<br />

FOCAL LENGTHS) 5x (24-120mm) • 35mm-EQUIVALENT<br />

APERTURE f/7-11.2 • LENS MOUNT Micro Four Thirds •<br />

WEIGHT 715g (with kit lens) • DIMENSIONS 79x137x130mm<br />

• WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.panasonic.<br />

com/uk • PART CODE DMC-G80MEB-K<br />

Battery life<br />

0%<br />

-50<br />

900 shots<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

See page 72 for performance details<br />

PORTABLE FOLDAWAY SEAT<br />

SITPACK<br />

★★★★★<br />

£49 • From sitpack.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A clever, compact seat that you can take (and use) practically anywhere<br />

FOLD-UP CHAIRS might be useful, but<br />

they’re a pain to carry around. Wouldn’t it<br />

be better if there was a more compact and<br />

fl exible design, giving you a seat for<br />

everything from photography to sitting in a<br />

queue? Now there is: the Sitpack.<br />

The same size as a 500ml can of beer, the<br />

Sitpack is the smallest folding seat you can<br />

get. At 600g, it’s also pretty light, although the<br />

compact dimensions make it feel weighty.<br />

When you want to relax, you just fl ip the<br />

sides out to make the base, extend the<br />

monopod leg, and you’re done. Using the<br />

Sitpack falls someway between<br />

standing and sitting: the seat’s leg should<br />

stand at a 40-degree angle to your legs.<br />

The top telescopic section can collapse, too,<br />

so the Sitpack will suit most heights.<br />

Thanks to the glass fi bre reinforced<br />

polycarbonate build (the same stuff riot<br />

shields are made of), the Sitpack is tough<br />

and durable, able to take anyone up to 100kg<br />

(15st 10lb) in weight.<br />

It’s surprisingly comfortable, too, with the<br />

seat taking a lot of stress: using it, only 30%<br />

of your body weight goes on to your coccyx.<br />

That’s the science; in actual use, the Sitpack<br />

certainly relieved our tired legs.<br />

The Sitpack is particularly handy for<br />

photographers, giving you a comfortable<br />

stance while you wait to take the perfect shot.<br />

If you’re out and about a lot, the Sitpack’s<br />

tiny dimensions and comfort make it the ideal<br />

travel companion.<br />

David Ludlow<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

DIMENSIONS 168x66x66mm • WEIGHT 0.6kg • MAXIMUM<br />

WEIGHT 100kg • DETAILS sitpack.com<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

53


4G SMARTWATCH<br />

HUAWEI Watch 2 Sport<br />

★★★★★<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

£325 • From www.vmall.eu<br />

VERDICT<br />

This 4G-ready smartwatch overcomes some<br />

fi tness foibles with the aid of a brilliant OS<br />

HUAWEI’S SECOND CRACK at a smartwatch<br />

comes in a fi tness-orientated Sport version<br />

and a more stylish Classic model. The Classic<br />

has a stainless-steel body and comes with a<br />

leather strap, while the Sport has a plastic body<br />

and strap with a ceramic bezel and stainless<br />

rear – plus the option of 4G connectivity.<br />

The Watch 2 Sport’s headline feature is<br />

very much the ability to work independently,<br />

without the need for a phone. Both versions<br />

have GPS so you can go on a run and have it<br />

track your pace and location accurately, but<br />

4G allows you to answer phone calls and reply<br />

to text messages, too. Simply install a nano-SIM<br />

beneath the bottom strap attachment, and the<br />

built-in microphone and speaker can be used<br />

to dial out and answer calls, while Android<br />

Wear 2’s new smart replies, dictation and<br />

onscreen keyboard let you answer and send<br />

texts directly from the watch face.<br />

If you’d prefer to exercise in peace, the<br />

non-4G version is cheaper and offers<br />

everything else you need for fi tness tracking,<br />

with built-in GPS and a heart-rate monitor.<br />

Both variants have a circular 1.2in, 390x390<br />

AMOLED display with an ambient light sensor<br />

– it’s sharp and colourful, although Huawei’s<br />

stock faces look unsophisticated.<br />

WEAR NECESSITIES<br />

The Watch 2 is powered by the 1.1GHz<br />

Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor,<br />

Qualcomm’s fi rst dedicated wearables chip,<br />

and its 768MB is plenty for a smartwatch.<br />

Swiping around feels responsive, other than a<br />

few brief pauses here and there. We’re hoping<br />

these will be fi xed with fi rmware updates.<br />

Battery life is fi ne: by disabling Wi-Fi and<br />

sticking to Bluetooth, we got nearly two days<br />

out of the 420mAh battery, and ultra-saving<br />

mode helps draw it out in emergencies.<br />

However, it’s not quite as good in<br />

this department as the Samsung<br />

Gear S3 (<strong>Shopper</strong> 350), which<br />

lasts for two to three days<br />

in normal use.<br />

While both the Classic<br />

and Sport models are<br />

attractive, they are quite<br />

bulky, both measuring<br />

12.6mm thick. We also<br />

wish Huawei had gone for<br />

a Gear S3-style rotating<br />

bezel control scheme;<br />

instead, there are just two<br />

push buttons on the right edge,<br />

which is an odd choice considering<br />

the Android Wear 2 OS has<br />

been designed with spinning<br />

bezels in mind.<br />

Screen size is also down,<br />

from 1.4in on the original Huawei<br />

Watch to 1.2in. The makes it harder<br />

to use one of Android Wear 2’s<br />

best features, its onscreen keyboard.<br />

Nonetheless, the operating system<br />

remains a big improvement. It’s more<br />

intuitive, accessible and user-friendly than<br />

previous versions, and the newfound ability to<br />

install standalone apps solely on the watch<br />

– so you don’t need a paired smartphone to<br />

use them – is very handy when you don’t<br />

have your phone on you.<br />

This could do with some additional<br />

support; Huawei’s fi tness app and Google<br />

Maps both work fi ne, but Gmail and Spotify<br />

still need a handset present. Still, it’s a useful<br />

inclusion, as is Android Pay support and<br />

Google Assistant implementation. The former<br />

doesn’t seem to work as fast as, say, Apple<br />

Pay on an Apple Watch, but the latter is<br />

beautifully responsive when dictating texts.<br />

NOT WORKING OUT<br />

However, we’re not entirely convinced by the<br />

Watch 2 as a fi tness aid – even the Sport<br />

model. Huawei’s fi tness app delivers<br />

everything from training plans to guided<br />

workouts, and the watch itself tracks all sorts<br />

of metrics (from heart rate to estimated VO2<br />

capacity) in conjunction with the<br />

heart-rate monitor and GPS<br />

sensor. And yet it falls short<br />

for two key reasons.<br />

First, in our two weeks<br />

of using it, we never got<br />

the watch to sync<br />

successfully with the<br />

Huawei Fit smartwatch<br />

app; hopefully this was<br />

related to the fact that<br />

we were testing it<br />

pre-release. Second, for all<br />

its fancy features, the app<br />

misses out one key thing: it<br />

doesn’t make any attempt to<br />

auto-detect fi tness activities.<br />

That’s not so much of an issue for distinct,<br />

easily defi ned activities such as going for a run,<br />

but you also want activities like brisk walks to<br />

be detected without intervention, as you<br />

never know when a light stroll will turn into<br />

something more demanding. We often found<br />

that after starting a walking activity in Huawei<br />

Fit, it wouldn’t automatically terminate after<br />

Simply install a nano-SIM and the built-in microphone and<br />

speaker can be used to dial out and answer calls<br />

we’d fi nished, and would continue to track for<br />

hours until we ended it manually. That’s bad<br />

news for both accuracy and battery life.<br />

Also, while the Watch 2 handles<br />

continuous heart-rate tracking, which it<br />

displays in a nice-looking ‘last six hours’<br />

graph onscreen, it doesn’t show you your<br />

average heart rate, just your maximum,<br />

minimum and most recent readings.<br />

SECOND LIFE<br />

There are some irritations, then, but on the<br />

whole we like the Huawei Watch 2. It’s no Gear<br />

S3, but the battery life is good, both variants<br />

are stylish (if a tad chunky), and it’s packed<br />

with all the sensors you could want – even if it<br />

doesn’t always put them to the best use.<br />

Special mention goes to Android Wear 2,<br />

which makes it simple to use and adds the<br />

ability to use Android Pay, and despite the<br />

weaknesses of the Huawei Wear app, it is<br />

undoubtedly a boon to be able to go for a<br />

run leaving your smartphone at home.<br />

Jonathan Bray<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

PEDOMETER Yes • HEART-RATE MONITOR Yes •<br />

DISPLAYSIZE 1.2in • RESOLUTION 390x390 • BATTERY<br />

LIFE Two days • WARRANTY Two years RTB • DETAILS<br />

consumer.huawei.com/uk • PART CODE Watch 2 Sport<br />

54 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


From Apple to Zeiss,<br />

and everything in between<br />

For exclusive subscription offers and trials, visit:<br />

magazinedeals.co.uk/tech<br />

Whether you’re an IT professional or a first time buyer, Dennis technology has a<br />

magazine for you, all of which are written and produced by expert editorial teams.<br />

We cover the whole spectrum of technology news, reviews and features.


Choosing a... PC system<br />

A basic PC costing around £350 will<br />

01 be able to run everyday office,<br />

multimedia and education soft ware and will<br />

easily cope with surfing the internet. It might<br />

even be able to run some modern games.<br />

Many PCs can be sold either with or<br />

without a monitor. If you don’t like the<br />

display that the manufacturer is offering,<br />

you can always use your current one, or<br />

buy another one separately.<br />

If you want to play games, you’ll<br />

02 have to upgrade the graphics card.<br />

Budget cards such as the Nvidia GeForce GTX<br />

950 will cope well with many 3D games, but<br />

to play the latest 3D games smoothly (and<br />

enjoy the best-quality graphics) it’s worth<br />

upgrading to a more powerful card such as<br />

the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970.<br />

All modern PCs come with at<br />

03 least a dual-core processor and<br />

are capable of most tasks. Anyone who<br />

regularly undertakes demanding tasks<br />

such as video editing and encoding<br />

should consider a quad-core or even a<br />

hex-core processor.<br />

There are plenty of good reasons to<br />

04 upgrade the PC’s memory or hard<br />

disk. If you’ll use your PC for gaming, video<br />

editing or other demanding tasks, you’ll<br />

need at least 8GB of RAM and a large hard<br />

disk; 1TB should suffice. Many new PCs have<br />

an SSD, which speeds up the time it takes for<br />

your PC to boot and programs to load.<br />

Having plenty of USB ports is<br />

05 always useful, as most computer<br />

peripherals attach to these ports. Most<br />

new PCs come with the latest USB3 ports,<br />

which provide faster data transfers when<br />

used with supported devices than the<br />

older USB2 standard.<br />

Most new PCs now come with<br />

06 Windows 10 pre-installed. Don’t<br />

be too easily swayed by the inclusion of<br />

other soft ware, though, as it may be that<br />

you’ll never use it.<br />

While most PCs come in cases<br />

07 of a similar size, some have more<br />

compact mini tower or mini PC cases.<br />

These smaller PCs will fi t under your TV<br />

or on your desk more easily, but bear in<br />

mind that they’re significantly harder to<br />

upgrade than full-size machines.<br />

PCs<br />

RASPBERRYPi<br />

Zero W<br />

★★★★★<br />

£10 • www.thepihut.com<br />

The Pi Foundation’s latest<br />

pocket-sized hobbyist PC is<br />

a big improvement on the<br />

original Pi Zero, thanks to integrated Wi-Fi<br />

and better performance. It’s not as fast as<br />

the more expensive Pi 3, nor as generous<br />

with connections and ports, but the bargain<br />

Zero W is perfect for low-power projects.<br />

PROCESSOR 1GHz single-core Broadcom BCM2835 • RAM 512MB • USB PORTS 1x Micro USB<br />

(power), 1x Micro USB OTG • TOTALSTORAGE MicroSD card slot • DISPLAY None •<br />

OPERATING SYSTEM Raspbian • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.raspberrypi.org •<br />

PART CODE Pi Zero W • FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

CHILLBLAST Fusion Hubble<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,000 • www.chillblast.com<br />

One of the fi rst PCs<br />

we’ve seen to take<br />

advantage of Intel’s<br />

latest Kaby Lake processors, the Fusion<br />

Hubble excels at compute tasks thanks<br />

to its overclockable Core i5-7600K.<br />

A GTX 1060 also allows for nippy games<br />

performance, and you get a good-sized<br />

SSD, watercooling and a long warranty<br />

to sweeten the deal.<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 4.6GHz Intel Core i5-7600K • RAM 8GB • FRONTUSB PORTS 2x USB2,<br />

2x USB3 • REAR USB PORTS 2x USB2, 4x USB3, 1x USB3.1, 1x USB Type-C • TOTALSTORAGE 250GB<br />

SSD, 1TB hard disk • GRAPHICSCARD 3GB Palit GeForce GTX 1060 Dual • OPERATING SYSTEM<br />

Windows 10 • WARRANTY Five years labour including two years collect and return •<br />

DETAILS www.chillblast.com • PART CODE Fusion Hubble • FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

PC SPECIALIST Apollo K-VR<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,645 • www.pcspecialist.co.uk<br />

If you’ve got the cash for a<br />

truly top-flight gaming<br />

system, look no further<br />

than the Apollo K-VR. Its 8GB GTX 1080<br />

graphics card deft ly handles 4K and VR, while<br />

an Intel Core-i7-7700K and 16GB of RAM<br />

make for swift multitasking. There’s potential<br />

for additional overclocking as well.<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 4.2GHz Intel Core i7-7700K • RAM 16GB • FRONT USB PORTS 2x USB2, 2x<br />

USB3 • REAR USB PORTS 4x USB3, 1x USB3.1, 1x USB Type-C • TOTAL STORAGE 250GB SSD, 1TB<br />

hard disk • GRAPHICSCARD 8GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 • DISPLAY None • OPERATING<br />

SYSTEM Windows 10 • WARRANTY Three years labour inc. one year parts and one month collect<br />

and return • DETAILS www.pcspecialist.com • PART CODE Apollo K-VR • FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

PALICOMP<br />

AMD Avenger<br />

★★★★★<br />

£500 • www.palicomp.co.uk<br />

It’s not the most<br />

stylish or upgradable<br />

PC, but the AMD<br />

Avenger manages astounding frame<br />

rates in 1080p games for a £500<br />

system. It has premium-grade storage,<br />

too, combining a 1TB hard disk with a<br />

speedy 240GB SSD.<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

• FRONT USB PORTS 2x USB2, 2x<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 4GHz AMD Athlon X4 880K • RAM 8GB • FRONT USB PORTS 2x USB3 •<br />

REAR USB PORTS 4x USB2, 2x USB3 • TOTAL STORAGE 240GB SSD, 1TB hard disk •<br />

GRAPHICS CARD 4GB AMD RX 460 • OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10 Home 64-bit •<br />

WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.palicomp.co.uk • PART CODE KAV3 •<br />

FULL REVIEW Aug 2016<br />

56 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Choosing a... Laptop<br />

A basic laptop costing around £300<br />

01 will run everyday office, multimedia<br />

and education soft ware, but it won’t be<br />

suitable for 3D gaming or processor-intensive<br />

tasks such as video editing. Many laptops at<br />

this price have a 15.4in screen and weigh<br />

around 2.4kg, so they’re best used around<br />

the house and for occasional journeys.<br />

If you want to play modern<br />

02 games, you’ll need a laptop with a<br />

dedicated graphics chip such as the Nvidia<br />

GeForce GTX 960M. Good gaming laptops<br />

tend to have large 17in screens and weigh<br />

around 3kg, so they’re best suited to use<br />

at home.<br />

If you want a laptop that you can<br />

03 take everywhere, look for a model<br />

that weighs less than 2kg. For the best<br />

portability, buy one that has an 11in or 13in<br />

screen. In general, the smaller and lighter the<br />

laptop, the more expensive it is, especially if<br />

it has plenty of processing power.<br />

Battery life is extremely important<br />

04 for a laptop, particularly if you’ll be<br />

carrying it around. We’d expect all but the<br />

biggest and heaviest to last for at least fi ve<br />

hours on a single charge, but for an ultraportable<br />

that you carry everywhere, eight<br />

hours and above is more desirable.<br />

Laptops use mobile versions of<br />

05 processors to conserve power,<br />

and these lag behind desktop chips when<br />

it comes to performance. For a budget<br />

Windows laptop, an Intel Core i3 processor<br />

will do the job, but if you want better<br />

performance, you should look for an<br />

Intel Core i5 or Core i7 model instead. We<br />

recommend a minimum of 4GB of RAM,<br />

although 8GB is better for multitasking.<br />

Most budget and mid-range laptops<br />

06 use a mechanical hard disk for<br />

storage. You’ll want at least 500GB, but<br />

1TB or more is better. Solid-state drives<br />

(SSDs) have faster performance, making<br />

your computer quicker to boot and more<br />

responsive. They have lower capacities,<br />

though. You’ll need at least 128GB.<br />

Netbooks are a type of small,<br />

07 low-cost ultra-portable laptop.<br />

They’re fi ne for light use, but avoid them if<br />

you want to do complicated tasks.<br />

LAPTOPS<br />

RAZER Blade Stealth<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,250 • www.razerstore.comre.com<br />

Razer has<br />

stepped away<br />

from its<br />

traditional focus on gaming devices<br />

to create the defi nitive ultra-portable laptop:<br />

it’s thin, light, has a vibrant screen and gleans<br />

good performance from its Kaby Lake processor. The Chrome<br />

backlit keyboard is also hands-down the best laptop keyboard<br />

we’ve ever used.<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core 2.7GHz Intel Core i7-7500U • RAM 16GB • DIMENSIONS 300x104x43mm<br />

• WEIGHT 1.29kg • SCREEN SIZE 12.5in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 2,560x1,600 • GRAPHICS<br />

ADAPTOR Intel HD Graphics 620 • TOTALSTORAGE 256GB SSD • OPERATING SYSTEM<br />

Windows 10 Home • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.razerone.com •<br />

PART CODE Razer Blade Stealth QHD • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

ACER<br />

Chromebook R 11<br />

★★★★★<br />

£229 • www.tesco.co.uk<br />

The Acer<br />

Chromebook<br />

R 11 is the most<br />

attractive and practical budget<br />

Chromebook you can<br />

buy, with exceptional<br />

build quality, top<br />

processing and a lovely display.<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core 1.6GHz Intel Celeron N3050 • RAM 2GB • DIMENSIONS 20x295x203mm •<br />

WEIGHT 1.2kg • SCREEN SIZE 11.6in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,366x768 • GRAPHICS ADAPTOR<br />

Intel HD Graphics • TOTAL STORAGE 16GB eMMC • OPERATING SYSTEM Chrome OS •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.acer.co.uk • PART CODE ND.20411.07Q •<br />

FULL REVIEW Apr 2016<br />

LENOVO Yoga Book<br />

★★★★★<br />

£450 (Android), £500 (Windows) • www.currys.co.uk<br />

The Yoga Book<br />

is a genuinely<br />

innovative<br />

convertible: the fully virtual<br />

keyboard can give way to a smooth, oth,<br />

fl at writing surface, perfect for<br />

drawing or digitising notes. Both<br />

the Android 6.0 and Windows 10<br />

models include an Intel Atom chip,<br />

and measure just 9.6mm thin.<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 2.4GHz Intel Atom x5-Z8550 • RAM 4GB • DIMENSIONS 256x170x9.6mm<br />

• WEIGHT 960g • SCREEN SIZE 10.1in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,920x1,200 • TOTAL STORAGE<br />

64GB SSD • OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10 Home • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS<br />

www.lenovo.com/uk • PART CODE ZG38C01299 • FULL REVIEW Feb <strong>2017</strong><br />

DELL XPS 13 (<strong>2017</strong>)<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,245 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Powered by an<br />

updated Intel Core<br />

i7-7500U, 7500U, the refreshed<br />

Dell XPS 13 goes from a tantalising<br />

purchase to an essentialential one.<br />

The 3,200x1,800 display still<br />

looks excellent, too, both in itself<br />

and surrounded<br />

by the razor-thin<br />

InfinityEdge bezels.<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 2.7GHz Intel Core i7-7500U • RAM 8GB • DIMENSIONS 304x200x15mm<br />

• WEIGHT 1.29kg • SCREEN SIZE 13.3in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 3,200x1,800 •<br />

GRAPHICSADAPTOR Intel HD Graphics 620 • TOTALSTORAGE 256GB SSD •<br />

OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10 Home • WARRANTY Three years RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.dell.com/uk • PART CODE XPS 13 9360 • FULL REVIEW May <strong>2017</strong><br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

57


Choosing a... Smartphone<br />

A smartphone’s operating system<br />

01 (OS) dictates its basic features and<br />

which third-party soft ware you can install.<br />

There are three main contenders: Apple’s<br />

iOS, which is found on the iPhone, Google’s<br />

Android, which is used by various handset<br />

manufacturers, and Windows Phone, which<br />

is mainly used on Lumia phones. Apple iOS<br />

and Google Android have the most apps<br />

available but Windows Phone is slowly<br />

catching up.<br />

All smartphones have colour screens,<br />

02but their resolutions vary. Basic<br />

models have 800x480 pixels, but text can be<br />

indistinct. Look for a display that has at least<br />

1,280x720 pixels so it’s easy to browse web<br />

pages. Don’t worry too much about built-in<br />

media players or Office document editors;<br />

you can always install apps to replace these<br />

with better versions later.<br />

The image quality of smartphone cameras<br />

has improved tremendously in recent years,<br />

and resolutions have increased to as high as<br />

20 megapixels.<br />

Very few modern smartphones have a<br />

03physical keyboard for entering text;<br />

they almost exclusively use touchscreens<br />

now. Physical keyboards can aid heavy<br />

emailing, but today’s touchscreen keyboards<br />

work just as well.<br />

Android smartphones and iPhones<br />

running iOS 9 or 10 allow you to install a<br />

variety of custom onscreen keyboards so<br />

you can fi nd one that suits you.<br />

Be careful when choosing a contract.<br />

04 Look for one that includes a large<br />

data allowance if you want to use the<br />

internet regularly or you’ve set your phone<br />

to synchronise your contacts, calendar and<br />

email through online services.<br />

Built-in Wi-Fi can help you avoid high data<br />

charges by connecting to the internet<br />

through wireless hotspots when you’re out,<br />

or your router when you’re at home. Android<br />

and iPhone handsets can operate as wireless<br />

hotspots, letting you connect your laptop to<br />

the web over your mobile data connection.<br />

There may be an extra charge for this.<br />

SMARTPHONES<br />

MOTOROLA Moto Z Play<br />

★★★★★<br />

£330 SIM-free • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Another laudable take on the<br />

modular smartphone, the Moto<br />

Z Play combines excellent<br />

attachments with great base specs, respectable<br />

performance and outstanding battery life of nearly<br />

24 hours in our tests.<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 2.0GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 • SCREEN SIZE 5.5in • SCREEN<br />

RESOLUTION 1,920x1,080 • REAR CAMERA 16 megapixels • STORAGE 32GB • WIRELESSDATA 4G<br />

• DIMENSIONS 156x76x6.9mm • WEIGHT 165g • OPERATING SYSTEM Android 6.0 • WARRANTY<br />

One year RTB • DETAILS www.motorola.co.uk • PART CODE XT1635 • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

APPLE iPhone SE<br />

★★★★★<br />

£379 SIM-free; free on £23.50-per-month contract •<br />

www.apple.com/uk (SIM-free);<br />

www.carphonewarehouse.com (contract)<br />

While it lacks the 3D Touch capabilities of<br />

the more expensive iPhone 6s, this tiny<br />

successor to the iPhone 5s exceeds all<br />

expectations. It’s fast, light and includes a lovely 12MP camera.<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core 1.8GHz Apple A9 • SCREEN SIZE 4in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,136x640 •<br />

REAR CAMERA 12 megapixels • STORAGE 32GB/128GB • WIRELESSDATA 4G • DIMENSIONS<br />

124x59x7.6mm • WEIGHT 112g • OPERATING SYSTEM iOS 10 • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.apple.com/uk • PART CODE iPhone SE • FULL REVIEW Jul 2016<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy S7<br />

★★★★★<br />

£420 SIM-free; free on £29-per-month contract •<br />

www.amazon.co.uk (SIM-free);<br />

www.carphonewarehouse.com (contract)<br />

Samsung’s latest fl agship is the best<br />

Android smartphone money can buy. It’s not cheap,<br />

but you get superb build quality, an excellent display,<br />

top-tier performance and outstanding battery life.<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 2.3GHz Samsung Exynos 8890 • SCREEN SIZE 5.1in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

2,560x1,440 • REAR CAMERA 12 megapixels • STORAGE 32GB/64GB • WIRELESSDATA 4G •<br />

DIMENSIONS 142x70x7.9mm • WEIGHT 152g • OPERATING SYSTEM Android 6.0 • WARRANTY One<br />

year RTB • DETAILS wwww.samsung.com/uk • PART CODE SM-G930F • FULL REVIEW Jun 2016<br />

ONEPLUS 3T<br />

★★★★★<br />

£399 SIM-free • oneplus.net/uk<br />

This replacement for the OnePlus 3 isn’t<br />

quite as big a bargain, but it still takes<br />

the 3’s place as the best-value handset<br />

on the market, even more capable of taking on premium<br />

fl agships with its Snapdragon 821 processor and a huge 6GB of RAM.<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 2.35GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 • SCREEN SIZE 5.5in •<br />

SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,920x1,080 • REAR CAMERA 16 megapixels • STORAGE 64GB •<br />

WIRELESSDATA 4G • DIMENSIONS 153x75x7.4mm • WEIGHT 156g • OPERATING SYSTEM<br />

OxygenOS (Android 7.0) • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS oneplus.net/uk •<br />

PART CODE A3010 • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

LENOVO P2<br />

★★★★★<br />

£200 SIM-free; free on £18-per-month contract •<br />

www.three.co.uk<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

MOTOROLA Moto G4<br />

★★★★★<br />

£145 SIM-free; free on £12-per-month contract •<br />

www.carphonewarehouse.com<br />

It’s not the fastest phone in its price<br />

range, nor does it have the best<br />

camera or design. But the P2 is a<br />

reliable jack-of-all-trades handset, with the exception<br />

of its battery life, which is the best we’ve ever seen.<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 2GHz Snapdragon 625 • SCREEN SIZE 5.5in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

1,920x,1080 • REAR CAMERA 13 megapixels • STORAGE 32GB • WIRELESSDATA 4G •<br />

DIMENSIONS 153x76x8.3mm • WEIGHT 177g • OPERATING SYSTEM Android 6.0.1 • WARRANTY<br />

One year RTB • DETAILS www.lenovo.com • PART CODE P2aH42 • FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

The best budget smartphone you<br />

can buy. From its sharp, 5.5in Full HD<br />

display to its slick performance and<br />

high-quality camera, you get much more out of this<br />

handset than its low price suggests.<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 • SCREEN SIZE 5.5in •<br />

SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,920x1,080 • REAR CAMERA 13 megapixels • STORAGE 16GB/32GB •<br />

WIRELESSDATA 4G • DIMENSIONS 153x77x7.9mm • WEIGHT 155g • OPERATING SYSTEM<br />

Android 6.0.1 • DETAILS www.motorola.co.uk • PART CODE XT1622 • FULL REVIEW Sep 2016<br />

58 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Choosing a... Tablet<br />

All tablets rely on an operating system<br />

01 (OS) to run apps. You have three main<br />

choices: Apple’s iOS, which runs on the iPad,<br />

Android, which Google licenses to various<br />

manufacturers, and Windows 10, which is<br />

slowly becoming more common in hybrid<br />

tablets and convertibles. If you own an Apple<br />

or Google smartphone, you can download<br />

your apps, music and so on to a tablet that<br />

runs the same OS, so it makes sense to stick<br />

with a compatible device.<br />

It’s important to pick a tablet that has<br />

02 a good-quality high-resolution screen.<br />

Many budget tablets have 1,280x800-<br />

resolution displays, but better tablets have<br />

Full HD 1,920x1,080 panels, and we’re<br />

starting to see tablets that have even higher<br />

screen resolutions. Some are as high as<br />

2,560x1,600 or even 4K. Entry-level tablets<br />

typically use TN panels, which don’t have<br />

particularly good viewing angles. The viewing<br />

angles of IPS panels are much better.<br />

If you want to listen to music, watch<br />

03 fi lms and play games, make sure your<br />

tablet has plenty of storage. Many tablets<br />

come with 8GB or 16GB of internal storage,<br />

although some budget models have less.<br />

You’ll typically pay more for a higher storage<br />

capacity. Many tablets also have microSD<br />

slots that let you add extra storage, although<br />

you won’t fi nd one on an iPad. This is a cheap<br />

way of boosting storage capacity.<br />

Tablets rarely include a SIM card slot.<br />

04 This means you’ll have to rely on<br />

Wi-Fi to get online, although some tablets<br />

let you access the internet through your<br />

smartphone. If you want mobile access to<br />

the internet, look for 3G- and 4G-ready<br />

devices. These almost always cost more<br />

than Wi-Fi-only models but they’re great<br />

if you use your tablet while commuting<br />

or travelling.<br />

Your choice of tablet determines the<br />

05 apps you can use on it. You may fi nd<br />

that some of the apps you want are available<br />

on iOS but not Android and vice versa.<br />

Windows 10, meanwhile, runs traditional<br />

desktop applications.<br />

TABLETS<br />

LENOVO ThinkPad X1 Tablet<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,560 • www.pcworldbusiness.co.uk<br />

The ThinkPad X1 Tablet isn’t just<br />

another Surface Pro clone; its<br />

attachable modules provide it<br />

with a huge amount of fl exibility, from addingding extra<br />

battery life and connection ports to transforming it into a portable<br />

projector. Even better, it’s a fast, attractive 2-in-1 in its own right.<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core Intel Core m7-6Y75 • SCREEN SIZE 14in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

2,560x1,440 • REAR CAMERA None • STORAGE 256GB • WIRELESSDATA 4G LTE •<br />

DIMENSIONS 291x210x8.6mm • WEIGHT 725g • OPERATING SYSTEM Windows 10 Pro •<br />

DETAILS shop.lenovo.com • PART CODE SP40G76043 • FULL REVIEW Nov 2016<br />

APPLE iPad Pro 9.7in<br />

★★★★★<br />

£549 • www.apple.com/uk<br />

A smaller, more portable form<br />

factor makes the newest iPad Pro<br />

the best yet. With the same great<br />

display and quick A9X processor as its larger<br />

predecessor, its notepad size and compatibiity<br />

with the Apple Pencil make it particularly suitable for artists.<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core 2.16GHz Apple A9X • SCREEN SIZE 9.7in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 2,048x1,536<br />

• REAR CAMERA 12 megapixels • STORAGE 32/128/256GB • WIRELESS DATA 4G (cellular version)<br />

• DIMENSIONS 240x170x6.1mm • WEIGHT 437g • OPERATING SYSTEM iOS 10 • WARRANTY One<br />

year RTB • DETAILS www.apple.com/uk • PART CODE 9.7in iPad Pro • FULL REVIEW Jul 2016<br />

AMAZON Fire HD 8<br />

★★★★★<br />

£90 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

This is the budget tablet<br />

to beat. With a build<br />

quality seemingly<br />

beyond its low-cost nature and long<br />

battery life, the Fire HD 8 has plenty<br />

to offer for a mere £90.<br />

PROCESSOR Quad-core 1.3GHz MediaTek MT8163 • SCREEN SIZE 8in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

1,200x800 • REAR CAMERA 2 megapixels • STORAGE 16GB • DIMENSIONS 214x128x9.2mm •<br />

WEIGHT 341g • OPERATING SYSTEM Fire OS • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.amazon.co.uk • PART CODE Fire HD 8 • FULL REVIEW Jan <strong>2017</strong><br />

HUAWEI MediaPad M3<br />

★★★★★<br />

£298 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

Android slates may have fallenlen out<br />

of fashion in favour of 2-in-1s, but<br />

the MediaPad M3 shows they can<br />

still be worth your cash. The Kirin 950 chip delivers<br />

massive processing power, and the sleek design<br />

and vibrant screen deserve your attention as well.<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 2.3GHz Hisilicon Kiring 950 • SCREEN SIZE 8.4in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

2,560x1,440 • REAR CAMERA 8 megapixels • STORAGE 32GB • WIRELESSDATA 4G •<br />

DIMENSIONS 124x215x7.3mm • WEIGHT 320g • OPERATING SYSTEM Android 6.0 • WARRANTY<br />

One year RTB • DETAILS www.huawei.com/uk • PART CODE BTV-DL09 • FULL REVIEW Feb <strong>2017</strong><br />

MICROSOFT Surface Pro 4<br />

★★★★★<br />

From £749 (£1,099 as reviewed) •<br />

www.microsoft store.com<br />

The most compelling ‘laptop replacement’ tablet yet.<br />

Thinner, powerful and equipped with a gorgeous<br />

screen, this is a fantastic Windows 10 tablet. The<br />

Surface Pen and optional Type Cover have been improved as well.<br />

PROCESSOR Dual-core 2.4GHz Intel Core i5-6300U • SCREEN SIZE 12.3in • SCREEN RESOLUTION<br />

2,736x1,824 • REAR CAMERA 8 megapixels • STORAGE 256GB • WIRELESSDATA No •<br />

DIMENSIONS 292x201x8mm • WEIGHT 1.37kg inc Type Cover and power brick • OPERATING<br />

SYSTEM Windows 10 • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.microsoft.com/surface •<br />

PART CODE Surface Pro 4 • FULL REVIEW Jun 2016<br />

AMAZON Kindle Oasis<br />

★★★★★<br />

£270 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

The Kindle Oasis is<br />

expensive by eReader<br />

standards, but you<br />

absolutely get what you pay for: a<br />

well-built, long-lasting device with a sharp<br />

screen and brilliant clip-on cover accessory.<br />

PROCESSOR Not stated • SCREEN SIZE 6in • SCREEN RESOLUTION 1,440x1,080 • REAR CAMERA<br />

None • STORAGE 4GB • WIRELESSDATA None • DIMENSIONS 143x122x8.5mm • WEIGHT 131g •<br />

OPERATING SYSTEM Kindle OS • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.amazon.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE Kindle Oasis • FULL REVIEW Aug 2016<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

59


Choosing a... Compact system camera<br />

If you’re ready to step beyond the<br />

01 basic controls of a compact camera,<br />

or you want greater fl exibility than an<br />

ultra-zoom can offer, a compact system<br />

camera (CSC) is the next logical upgrade.<br />

With interchangeable lenses, manual controls<br />

and stellar image quality, these cameras give<br />

proper digital SLRs a run for their money.<br />

There are three competing types of<br />

02 CSC mount, and the one you buy<br />

determines the number of compatible lenses<br />

and accessories you have available.<br />

Samsung’s NX-mount is arguably the most<br />

limited in terms of lens selection, and the<br />

company has confirmed that it’s shutting<br />

down its European camera business, so it’s<br />

best to avoid these altogether if possible.<br />

Sony’s E-Mount has a slightly wider<br />

range, but Micro Four Thirds offers the<br />

widest variety. Both Panasonic and Olympus<br />

cameras use this mount, and the lenses are<br />

interchangeable between manufacturers.<br />

Micro Four Thirds cameras are<br />

03 typically more compact than other<br />

types of CSC because the image sensor is<br />

physically smaller – with a 22mm diagonal,<br />

it’s roughly 30% smaller than an APS-C<br />

sensor. The APS-C sensors that Sony and<br />

Samsung use in their CSCs are the same size<br />

as those in traditional digital SLRs.<br />

Like digital SLRs, CSCs come at a<br />

04 wide range of prices. Available from<br />

as little as £200, there’s a CSC to suit every<br />

budget. Most come with at least one kit<br />

lens, but if you already have lenses for a<br />

particular CSC mount, you can buy the body<br />

on its own and save money.<br />

05<br />

Once you’ve settled on a particular<br />

mount, you should pay attention to a<br />

camera’s features. Articulating screens and<br />

integrated viewfinders will help you compose<br />

shots, while extra physical controls and a<br />

hotshoe mount will give you fl exibility for<br />

manual shooting.<br />

Touchscreens are great, but they’re no<br />

replacement for physical dials when it comes<br />

to changing shutter speed and aperture. An<br />

integrated fl ash is much more convenient<br />

than a detachable one, as you can never<br />

forget to take it with you.<br />

PHOTOGRAPHY<br />

SONY RX100 V<br />

★★★★★<br />

£890 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

It may be small, but the<br />

RX100 V is seriously fast,<br />

and because it also captures a surprising amount of<br />

light, image and video quality are both top-notch.<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 20 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE 13.2x8.8mm (1in) • FOCAL LENGTH<br />

MULTIPLIER 2.7x • VIEWFINDER Electronic (2,400,000 dots) • LCDSCREEN 3in (1,228,800 dots) •<br />

OPTICAL ZOOM (35mm-EQUIVALENT FOCAL LENGTHS) 2.9x (24-70mm) • 35mm-EQUIVALENT<br />

APERTURE f/4.9-7.6 • WEIGHT 298g • DIMENSIONS 60x104x41mm • WARRANTY One year RTB<br />

• DETAILS www.sony.co.uk • FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

FUJIFILM X-T2<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,399 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

The X-T2 is a mirrorless<br />

CSC capable of shooting<br />

high-quality images at incredibly high burst speeds,<br />

making it a particularly fi ne choice for wildlife and sports photography.<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 24 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE 23.6x15.6mm (APS-C) •<br />

FOCAL LENGTH MULTIPLIER 1.5x • VIEWFINDER Electronic (2.36 million dots) • LCDSCREEN 3in<br />

(1.04 million dots) • VIEWFINDER MAGNIFICATION (35mm-EQUIVALENT, COVERAGE) 0.77x,<br />

100% • LENS MOUNT Fujifilm X Mount • WEIGHT 507g • DIMENSIONS 92x143x51mm •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.fujifilm.eu/uk • FULL REVIEW May <strong>2017</strong><br />

NIKON D3400<br />

★★★★★<br />

£429 • www.johnlewis.com<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

CANON G7 X Mark II<br />

★★★★★<br />

£449 • www.e-infin.com/uk<br />

A collection of minor<br />

improvements to battery life,<br />

shooting speed and stills quality<br />

add up to make the D3400 the best entry-level DSLR available.<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 24 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE 23.5x15.6mm (APS-C) • VIEWFINDER<br />

Optical TTL • LCDSCREEN 3in (921,000 dots) • OPTICAL ZOOM (35mm-EQUIVALENT FOCAL<br />

LENGTHS) 3x (27-82.5mm) • 35mm-EQUIVALENT APERTURE f/5.25-8.4 • LENS MOUNT Nikon F<br />

Mount • WEIGHT 655g • DIMENSIONS 99x124x135mm • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.europe-nikon.com • FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

CANON G9 X<br />

★★★★★<br />

£298 • www.e-infin.com/uk<br />

A tiny compact that can keep<br />

up with heavier SLRs and CSCs when<br />

it comes to image quality, while squeezing in all the<br />

shooting settings and features you’ll need.<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 20 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE 1in • FOCAL LENGTH MULTIPLIER 2.75x •<br />

VIEWFINDER None • LCDSCREEN 3in (1,040,000 dots) • OPTICAL ZOOM (35mm-EQUIVALENT<br />

FOCAL LENGTHS) 3x (28-84mm) • 35mm-EQUIVALENT APERTURE f/5.5-13.5 • WEIGHT 207g •<br />

DIMENSIONS 62x101x31mm • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.canon.co.uk •<br />

FULL REVIEW Jun 2016<br />

The successor to our<br />

favourite camera of 2015, the<br />

G7 X Mark II is another fantastic CSC. A capable 1in<br />

sensor, a tilting touchscreen, a comfortable grip and a big 4.2x optical<br />

zoom; this has all you need to take great photos even in low light.<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 20 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE 1in • LCD SCREEN 3in (1,040,000 dots) •<br />

OPTICAL ZOOM (35mm-EQUIVALENT FOCAL LENGTHS) 4.2x (24-100mm) • 35mm-EQUIVALENT<br />

APERTURE f/5-7.7 • LENS MOUNT Canon EF-S • WEIGHT 319g • DIMENSIONS 64x108x42mm •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.canon.co.uk • FULL REVIEW Oct 2016<br />

NIKON D500<br />

★★★★★<br />

£1,299 (body only) • www.e-infin.com/uk<br />

You’ll pay a lot for the D500,<br />

the headline model in Nikon’s<br />

cropped-sensor SLR range, but with its<br />

stunning photos, long battery life and heaps of extra features<br />

(including useful wireless upload capability), it’s worth every penny.<br />

SENSOR RESOLUTION 21 megapixels • SENSOR SIZE 23.5x15.7mm (APS-C) • FOCAL LENGTH<br />

MULTIPLIER 1.5x • VIEWFINDER Optical TTL • LCD SCREEN 3.2in (2.4 million dots) • LENS<br />

MOUNT Nikon F mount • WEIGHT 860g • DIMENSIONS 115x147x81mm • WARRANTY One year<br />

RTB • DETAILS www.europe-nikon.com • FULL REVIEW Oct 2016<br />

60 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Choosing a... Display<br />

A basic 24in LCD monitor costs<br />

01 around £100. It will be fi ne for typical<br />

Windows work but is likely to have poor<br />

viewing angles, so you’ll need to sit straight<br />

on for the best picture quality. Its colour<br />

accuracy may not be very good, either.<br />

A VGA input lets you use the monitor<br />

02 with any PC, but the quality may not<br />

be as good as it is over DVI or HDMI. Both<br />

are digital connections and require a<br />

compatible graphics card but they avoid the<br />

need for digital-to-analogue or analogue-todigital<br />

conversions, which can reduce image<br />

quality. A digital connection achieves the<br />

best picture automatically, so you won’t have<br />

to adjust clock or phase settings as you do<br />

with analogue connections.<br />

Many DVI and all HDMI connections<br />

support HDCP, which lets you watch<br />

protected video content, such as Blu-ray<br />

movies. DisplayPort is becoming more<br />

popular, but you’ll need a graphics card with<br />

a DisplayPort output (mini or full-size) to<br />

use this input on your monitor.<br />

A larger monitor will be easier on the<br />

03 eye and may have a higher resolution.<br />

Most monitors have a resolution of at least<br />

1,920x1,080 (1080p), which provides lots of<br />

room for working with multiple windows at<br />

the same time. For even higher resolutions,<br />

you’ll need a larger display. Some 27in and<br />

30in screens have 2,560x1,600 or even 4K<br />

resolutions. You’ll need a graphics card with<br />

a dual-link DVI output and a dual-link DVI<br />

cable or either HDMI or DisplayPort to use a<br />

monitor at these resolutions.<br />

If you want better picture quality,<br />

04 look for a monitor with a high<br />

contrast ratio. The higher the ratio, the<br />

whiter the whites and the blacker the blacks.<br />

You’ll also be able to see more fi ne detail in<br />

images with high contrast levels. Viewing<br />

angles are important, as wider angles mean<br />

you don’t have to sit directly in front of the<br />

monitor to get the best picture. Wider<br />

viewing angles also allow more people to<br />

view the screen at the same time.<br />

Fast response times reduce ghosting,<br />

but don’t be dazzled by the numbers. A<br />

response time of 25ms or quicker is fi ne<br />

for all applications.<br />

DISPLAYS<br />

ASUS VC239H<br />

★★★★★<br />

£127 • www.box.co.uk<br />

It’s rare to see IPS<br />

panels on monitors<br />

this cheap, and in<br />

Standard mode, the VC239H<br />

delivers much better image quality<br />

than we’ve come to expect from budget displays.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 23in • RESOLUTION 1,920x1,080 • SCREEN TECHNOLOGY IPS • VIDEOINPUTS<br />

VGA, DVI, HDMI • WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.asus.com/uk • PART CODE<br />

VC239H • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

IIYAMA G-Master GB2888UHSU<br />

Gold Phoenix<br />

★★★★★<br />

£380 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

It’s unusual to consider a £380<br />

monitor a bargain, but that’s what<br />

this is: a 28in, Ultra HD display with a mere 1ms<br />

response time and support for AMD’s anti-tearing FreeSync tech.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 28in • RESOLUTION 3,840x2,160 • SCREEN TECHNOLOGY TN •<br />

VIDEO INPUTS VGA, 3x HDMI, DisplayPort • WARRANTY Two years collect and return •<br />

DETAILS www.iiyama.com • PART CODE ProLite GB2888UHSU-B1 • FULL REVIEW Aug 2016<br />

PHILIPS Brilliance 258B6QUEB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£367 • www.uk.insight.com<br />

A USB Type-C port doesn’t<br />

sound like the most thrilling<br />

feature on a monitor, but it<br />

gives the Brilliance 258B6QUEB a wonderful<br />

fl exibility, allowing you to hook up any laptop, 2-in-1 or Type-C<br />

peripheral. Picture quality is very good, too.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 25in • RESOLUTION 2,560x1,440 • SCREEN TECHNOLOGY IPS • REFRESH RATE<br />

60Hz • VIDEOINPUTS VGA, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, USB Type-C • WARRANTY Three years RTB<br />

• DETAILS www.philips.co.uk • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

AOC Q2781PQ<br />

★★★★★<br />

£315 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

While a touch of<br />

ghosting means it’s<br />

not ideal for gaming,<br />

the AOC Q2781PQ combines excellent<br />

desktop picture quality with a gorgeous<br />

thin-bezel design, plus a high resolution for clean multitasking.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 27in • RESOLUTION 2,560x1,440 • SCREEN TECHNOLOGY IPS • VIDEOINPUTS<br />

VGA, HDMI, DisplayPort • WARRANTY Two years collect and return • DETAILS aoc-europe.com •<br />

PART CODE Q2781PQ • FULL REVIEW Nov 2016<br />

AOC AGON AG271QX<br />

★★★★★<br />

£420 • www.overclockers.co.uk<br />

AOC U3477PQU<br />

★★★★★<br />

£530 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

This is the ideal 27in<br />

monitor for gaming:<br />

smoothing Adaptive Sync,<br />

a resolution that’s sharp but not too<br />

demanding, a high 144Hz refresh rate and<br />

minimal input lag. Contrast and colours are generally good as well.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 27in • RESOLUTION 2,560x1,440 • SCREEN TECHNOLOGY TN • REFRESH RATE<br />

144Hz • VIDEO INPUTS VGA, 2x HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI • WARRANTY Three years RTB •<br />

DETAILS aoc-europe.com • FULL REVIEW May <strong>2017</strong><br />

Ultra-wide monitors are<br />

best suited to those who<br />

want to multitask on<br />

two full-size windows at once, but also kick back with a fi lm or game<br />

in the evening. AOC’s U3477PQU is the best example we’ve seen so<br />

far, with an incredible panel and excellent build quality.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 34in • RESOLUTION 3,840x1,440 • SCREEN TECHNOLOGY IPS • REFRESH RATE<br />

60Hz • VIDEO INPUTS DisplayPort, DVI, HDMI, VGA • WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS<br />

www.aoc-europe.com • FULL REVIEW May 2015<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

61


Choosing a... TV<br />

A 32in Full HD TV costs around<br />

01 £200 and will suit smaller living<br />

rooms. TVs look much smaller in the shop<br />

than in your home, so measure the space<br />

available before you buy.<br />

Curved TVs are becoming increasingly<br />

more common, but bear in mind that these<br />

typically take up more fl oor space than a<br />

traditional fl at set.<br />

A 1,920x1,080-resolution TV can<br />

02 display a 1080p image. You can still<br />

buy TVs with a 720p (1,366x768) resolution,<br />

but they’re no cheaper and the image won’t<br />

be as sharp. 3,840x2,560 Ultra HD resolution,<br />

or 4K, TVs are fi nally available at reasonable<br />

prices, although you’ll still pay a premium for<br />

one over a 1080p model.<br />

Consider the number of inputs<br />

03 you’ll need to connect the rest of<br />

your equipment. Two HDMI ports should be<br />

the bare minimum, but many TV sets come<br />

with four HDMI connectors. You’ll need<br />

HDMI 2.0 if you want a future-proof 4K TV,<br />

as this is the only way to get 60fps video<br />

playback from external sources at such<br />

a high resolution.<br />

If you want to plug a PC into your TV,<br />

you’ll need to use either HDMI or VGA<br />

inputs. Be aware that some TVs only let you<br />

use a PC on an analogue input, and others<br />

won’t display the Windows desktop at the<br />

TV’s highest resolution.<br />

The contrast ratio tells you the<br />

04 difference between the darkest<br />

and the brightest shades that the screen<br />

will be able to display. The higher the<br />

number, the darker the blacks and the<br />

brighter the whites. A screen with a high<br />

contrast ratio is more likely to show a<br />

wider range of detail.<br />

HD content is now becoming fairly<br />

05 widespread, but if you want Ultra<br />

HD content your options are more limited.<br />

Most Ultra HD TVs have Netflix built into<br />

their smart TV systems, but only BT is<br />

currently providing live Ultra HD video,<br />

with BT Sport Ultra HD.<br />

Ultra HD Blu-ray players are due to arrive<br />

in 2016, but in the meantime Amazon’s Fire<br />

TV set-top box will stream its Instant Video<br />

service at Ultra HD resolutions.<br />

HOME CINEMA<br />

PANASONIC Viera TX-50DX802B<br />

★★★★★<br />

£749 • www.hillsradio.co.uk<br />

The Viera<br />

TX-50DX802B not<br />

only looks great and<br />

comes equipped with an expansive<br />

suite of smart apps, but it also has its own soundbar, allowing for<br />

clearer, boomier movie nights.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 50in • NATIVE RESOLUTION 3,840x2,160 • VIDEOINPUTS 3x HDMI (1x ARC),<br />

component, composite • TUNER Freeview HD • DIMENSIONS 895x559x203mm • WARRANTY Five<br />

years RTB • DETAILS www.panasonic.com/uk • PART CODE TX-50DX802B • FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

SAMSUNG UE49KS7000<br />

★★★★★<br />

£799 • www.cramptonandmoore.co.uk<br />

A good-quality 4K TV<br />

needn’t cost the earth,<br />

as the UE49KS7000<br />

proves. In fact, this Quantum Dot<br />

display earned the UHD Alliance’s<br />

UHD Premium badge for its rich, detailed visuals.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 49in • NATIVE RESOLUTION 3,840x2,160 • VIDEOINPUTS 4x HDMI • TUNER<br />

Freeview HD, Freesat HD • DIMENSIONS 1,445x908x295mm • WARRANTY Five years RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.samsung.com/uk • PART CODE UE49KS7000 • FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

SONY HT-XT3<br />

★★★★★<br />

£319 • www.superfi.co.uk<br />

The HT-XT3 is a classy-looking<br />

soundbase that delivers great audio,<br />

with its integrated subwoofer helping to<br />

pump out seismic bass. It also provides a degree of future-proofi ng<br />

with its 4K pass-through support, and can be linked together with<br />

other Sony speakers for a multiroom audio setup.<br />

SPEAKERS 2+2 • RMS POWER OUTPUT 350W (total) • DIMENSIONS 750x358x83mm • WEIGHT<br />

10.5kg • DOCK CONNECTOR None • NETWORKING Bluetooth (SBC, LDAC) • WARRANTY One<br />

year RTB • DETAILS www.sony.co.uk • PART CODE HT-XT3 • FULL REVIEW Mar 2016<br />

SAMSUNG UE32J6300<br />

★★★★★<br />

£425 • www.tvsandmore.co.uk<br />

It might look expensive for<br />

the screen size, but the<br />

UE32J6300 is jam-packed with<br />

features, including one of the best smart TV systems<br />

around and every major UK catch-up TV service. It’s the ideal<br />

small TV for a bedroom, kitchen or office.<br />

SCREEN SIZE 32in • NATIVE RESOLUTION 1,920x1,080 • VIDEO INPUTS 4x HDMI, component,<br />

composite • TUNER Freeview HD • DIMENSIONS 428x370x91mm • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.samsung.com/uk • PART CODE UE32J6300AK • FULL REVIEW Dec 2015<br />

PANASONIC DMP-UB900<br />

★★★★★<br />

£329 • www.johnlewis.com<br />

Together with the<br />

Samsung UBD-K8500,<br />

this forms the vanguard of a new<br />

breed of Ultra HD Blu-ray players. Samsung’s model is cheaper,<br />

but the DMP-UB900 has superior features, particularly where<br />

audio delivery is concerned.<br />

BLU-RAY PROFILE 6.0 • 3D CAPABLE Yes • DIMENSIONS 435x199x68mm •<br />

NETWORKING Ethernet, 802.11ac Wi-Fi • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.panasonic.co.uk • PART CODE DMP-UB900EB • FULL REVIEW Aug 2016<br />

PHILIPS Fidelio XS1 SoundStage<br />

★★★★★<br />

£407 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

The Fidelio XS1 SoundStageStage<br />

is a beautiful-looking<br />

soundbase with sound<br />

quality that matches its stunning design. There<br />

are plenty of connections, including Bluetooth, and the wireless<br />

subwoofer delivers the lower frequencies with aplomb.<br />

SPEAKERS 3 • RMS POWER OUTPUT 60W • DIMENSIONS 730x331x40mm • WEIGHT 5.3kg •<br />

DOCK CONNECTOR None • NETWORKING Bluetooth (SBC, aptX, AAC) • WARRANTY One year<br />

RTB • DETAILS www.philips.co.uk • PART CODE Fidelio XS1/12 • FULL REVIEW Jan 2016<br />

62 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Thesimpleway<br />

tobuyacar<br />

Buy online and we do the hard work for you<br />

Excellent<br />

monthly<br />

fi nance<br />

packages<br />

available<br />

You buy online<br />

- selecting from<br />

over 40,000 used<br />

cars nationwide<br />

We inspect the<br />

car and supplying<br />

dealer for price<br />

and quality<br />

We deliver the car<br />

to your door with<br />

a 14-day moneyback<br />

guarantee<br />

“Amazing! They are<br />

with you every step”<br />

★★★★★<br />

Lisa, 21 October<br />

SEE OUR REVIEWS ON<br />

“Very impressed and was<br />

smooth and hassle free from<br />

start to fi nish”<br />

★★★★★<br />

David, 9 September<br />

“Thank you and we would<br />

buy through you again”<br />

★★★★★<br />

Clancy, 21 August<br />

“I’m loving my new ride.<br />

I would recommend<br />

this service to anyone”<br />

★★★★★<br />

Tatiana, 8 September<br />

Dennis Buyacar Ltd, 30 Cleveland Street, London, W1T 4JD (GB09151058) (FRN:667368) Is Authorised And Regulated By The Financial Conduct Authority. Buyacar is an independent credit broker and not a lender


Choosing a... Bluetooth speaker<br />

Bluetooth speakers come in all shapes<br />

01 and sizes, so you’ll need to decide<br />

what you want to do with the speaker before<br />

you buy. If you don’t plan to take your music<br />

outdoors or around the house, look for a<br />

wired speaker. These are typically cheaper<br />

than speakers with built-in batteries.<br />

If you do want a portable speaker,<br />

however, pay particular attention to how<br />

much it weighs. Ruggedised models should<br />

be able to survive accidental drops, water<br />

spills and unexpected rain showers.<br />

Many of the cheapest Bluetooth<br />

02 speakers use the lossy A2DP<br />

Bluetooth protocol, which is prone to<br />

compressing your music and discarding<br />

detail compared with the original recording.<br />

It’s hard to tell the difference when listening<br />

to pocket-sized speakers, but if you’re<br />

looking for a speaker to fi ll a room, an<br />

aptX-compatible device is a better option.<br />

This Bluetooth protocol retains more detail<br />

than the A2DP profi le, although you’ll need<br />

to use it with a compatible smartphone in<br />

order to get the benefi ts.<br />

As with any audio product, the<br />

03 number and size of speaker drivers<br />

can have a significant impact on the quality<br />

of sound you get from a Bluetooth speaker.<br />

Typically, the presence of multiple drivers<br />

enables the manufacturer to tune each one<br />

for specific frequencies, directing high-end<br />

sounds towards a tweeter and sending the<br />

mid-range frequencies to the main driver.<br />

Single-driver speakers with larger driver<br />

cones can be just as capable of producing<br />

fantastic audio, however.<br />

04<br />

Most Bluetooth speakers have at<br />

least one auxiliary input for a wired<br />

3.5mm audio jack, in case you want to<br />

listen to music from a device that doesn’t<br />

have Bluetooth.<br />

There are other extra features to look out<br />

for, though. Speakers with built-in batteries<br />

may have a USB port for charging your<br />

smartphone, or a built-in microphone to turn<br />

it into a speakerphone when a paired<br />

smartphone receives a call. Not all speakers<br />

have physical controls; many rely on your<br />

paired device’s controls for adjusting the<br />

volume or muting playback.<br />

AUDIO<br />

BOWERS & WILKINS P7 Wireless<br />

★★★★★<br />

£320 • www.johnlewis.com<br />

Bowers & Wilkins’ second-ever<br />

pair of Bluetooth headphones<br />

are a triumph – they’re<br />

exceedingly comfortable and sound superb,<br />

even without any active noise cancelling.<br />

HEADPHONES SUBTYPE Over-ear headset • PLUG TYPE 3.5mm<br />

jack plug (optional) • WEIGHT 323g • CABLELENGTH 1.2m •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.bowers-wilkins.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE FP38954 • FULL REVIEW Feb <strong>2017</strong><br />

PANASONIC SC-All7CD<br />

★★★★★<br />

£319 • www.currys.co.uk<br />

A focus on<br />

good oldfashioned<br />

CDs,<br />

in addition to the usual digital<br />

streaming services, makes the SC-All7CD one of the most versatile<br />

multiroom speaker systems you can buy.<br />

SPEAKERS 2.1 • RMSPOWER OUTPUT 40W • WEIGHT 3.4kg • NETWORKING Bluetooth •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.panasonic.com • PART CODE SC-All7CD •<br />

FULL REVIEW Dec 2016<br />

AMAZON Echo Dot<br />

★★★★★<br />

£50 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

This shrunk-down<br />

version of the Amazon<br />

Echo loses the 360-degreee<br />

speaker, but retains all the same smart home<br />

functions and excellent Alexa digital assisstant – all<br />

for a drastically lower price.<br />

DRIVERS 1 • RMSPOWER OUTPUT Not stated • WEIGHT 163kg • NETWORKING Bluetooth,<br />

802.11a/b/g Wi-Fi • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.amazon.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE Echo Dot 2016 • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

Q ACOUSTICS M3<br />

★★★★★<br />

£300 •<br />

www.weybridge-audio.co.uk<br />

Although<br />

there’s no<br />

subwoofer or Wi-Fi here, the M3 is an awesome<br />

soundbar that looks as good as it sounds. It also improves on the old<br />

Media 4 with HDMI ARC support.<br />

LG SH5<br />

★★★★★<br />

£149 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Proof that greatsounding<br />

soundbar and<br />

subwoofer combos don’t need to<br />

cost the earth, the LG SH5 is a sleek, stylish 2.1 set<br />

with plenty of modes and features.<br />

SPEAKERS 2.1 • RMSPOWER OUTPUT 320W • DOCK CONNECTOR None • NETWORKING<br />

Bluetooth 4.0 • DIMENSIONS 945x53x85mm (soundbar), 171x320x252mm (subwoofer) • WEIGHT<br />

2.26kg • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.lg.com/uk • PART CODE SH5 • FULL<br />

REVIEW Jan <strong>2017</strong><br />

LIBRATONE One Click<br />

★★★★★<br />

£140 • www.currys.co.uk<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

SPEAKERS 4 • RMS POWER OUTPUT 80W • WEIGHT 4kg • NETWORKING Bluetooth •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.qacoustics.co.uk • PART CODE QA7440 •<br />

FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

The One Click has one of the<br />

cleverer wireless speaker designs<br />

we’ve seen; it’s surrounded by a<br />

rubber frame with both protective bumpers and a<br />

carry handle/hook. Hang it up or just let it stand, and<br />

you’ll get rich, loud sound in 360 degrees.<br />

SPEAKERS 2 • RMS POWER OUTPUT Not disclosed • DOCK CONNECTOR None • WIRELESS<br />

Bluetooth (SBC) • DIMENSIONS 120x41x205mm • WEIGHT 0.9kg • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.libratone.com • PART CODE One Click • FULL REVIEW Oct 2016<br />

64 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Choosing an... Action camera<br />

Action cameras are typically much<br />

01 smaller than a regular camcorder, as<br />

they are designed to be mounted to a bike,<br />

board or car, or worn on your person. As the<br />

name suggests, they are designed primarily<br />

for shooting action footage, but because of<br />

their small size they are ideal for strapping<br />

on to your pet’s collar or your children’s toys<br />

for a different perspective.<br />

Almost all action cameras will shoot<br />

02 Full HD video, and some will even<br />

shoot 4K, but frame rate is arguably more<br />

important than resolution when it comes to<br />

action video. Higher frame rates will mean<br />

smoother clips, and super-high frame rate<br />

videos can be played in slow motion to<br />

emphasise exciting shots.<br />

Keep an eye out for 4k/30, 1080p/60 and<br />

720p/120 models for the widest possible<br />

choice of resolutions and frame rates.<br />

Most action cameras rely on fl ash<br />

03 memory for storing your video,<br />

letting you swap out memory cards on the<br />

fl y when you fi ll one up with clips. More<br />

expensive devices can have integrated<br />

fl ash memory as well as a card slot, but<br />

it’s typically cheaper to buy the basic<br />

version of a camera and pick up memory<br />

cards separately.<br />

Not all action cameras have LCD<br />

04 displays; in fact, many deliberately<br />

don’t include a sceen in order to extend<br />

battery life.<br />

If you want to be able to see exactly<br />

what you’re pointing the lens at, keep an<br />

eye out for cameras with companion<br />

smartphone apps, or wrist-mounted<br />

viewfinders that also let you start and<br />

stop shooting remotely.<br />

05<br />

Action cameras typically have a huge<br />

range of accessories, with specific<br />

mounts and harnesses for different activities<br />

and sports. If the camera itself isn’t water<br />

resistant, a weatherproof case will protect it<br />

from the elements, while a tripod mount will<br />

let you lock it fi rmly in place.<br />

Spare batteries are essential for longer<br />

shoots, and some decent video-editing<br />

soft ware will help you to produce a more<br />

polished result.<br />

VIDEO<br />

AMAZON Fire TVStick<br />

with 4K Ultra HD<br />

★★★★★<br />

£80 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

This upgraded box has plenty of services your 4K TV<br />

might not have (much more so than the competing<br />

Chromecast Ultra), and you can play games on it, too.<br />

VIDEOOUTPUTS HDMI 2.0 • NETWORKING 802.11ac Wi-Fi, 10/100 Ethernet • DIMENSIONS<br />

115x115x17mm • STREAMINGFORMATS UPnP, AirPlay, DLNA, Plex • INTERNET STREAMING<br />

SERVICES iPlayer, Netflix, Sky News, Spotify, TuneIn Radio, Amazon Prime Instant Video, TVPlayer<br />

• WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.amazon.co.uk • PART CODE Fire TV with 4K UHD •<br />

FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

NVIDIA Shield TV (<strong>2017</strong>)<br />

★★★★★<br />

£189 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

A good media streamer/<br />

Android games console hybrid made even better by a<br />

more comfortable controller, a wider range of<br />

streaming sources and smart home integration.<br />

VIDEOOUTPUTS HDMI 1.4 • NETWORKING 802.11ac Wi-Fi, 10/100/1,000 Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1<br />

• DIMENSIONS 159x98x26mm • STREAMINGFORMATS Plex, Kodi • INTERNET STREAMING<br />

SERVICES Netflix, Amazon Instant Video, Google Play Movies and TV, Google Play Music, YouTube,<br />

BBC iPlayer • WARRANTY Two years repair and replace • DETAILS www.nvidia.co.uk • PART<br />

CODE 945-12897-2505-000 • FULL REVIEW May <strong>2017</strong><br />

PANASONIC HC-VX980<br />

★★★★★<br />

£548 • www.ukdigitalcameras.co.uk<br />

This 4K-capable camcorder<br />

lets you capture 8-megapixel<br />

stills from 4K video. It has<br />

fantastic image stabilisation and its HDR video mode can help<br />

with exposing difficult scenes. The newest model has been updated<br />

with more useful 4K cropping modes and slow-motion features, too.<br />

OPTICAL ZOOM 20x • SENSOR 1 /2.3in BSI MOS • LCD SCREEN 3in, 460,800 dots •<br />

DIMENSIONS 73x65x139mm • WEIGHT 351g • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.panasonic.com • PART CODE HC-VX980 • FULL REVIEW Apr 2016<br />

SKY Now TV Smart Box<br />

★★★★★<br />

£40 • www.nowtv.com<br />

Sky has made its fl agship<br />

media streamer even better,<br />

adding a Freeview HD tuner and a fl exible<br />

range of content passes (including movie and sport packages) to<br />

complement the usual on-demand and catch-up services.<br />

VIDEOOUTPUTS HDMI 1.4 • NETWORKING 802.11n Wi-Fi, 10/100 Ethernet • DIMENSIONS<br />

165x165x21mm • STREAMINGFORMATS None • INTERNET STREAMING SERVICES Now TV,<br />

iPlayer, ITV Hub, All4, Demand 5, TuneIn, Sky News, Spotify • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.nowtv.com • PART CODE Now TV Smart Box • FULL REVIEW Dec 2016<br />

GOPRO Hero 5 Black<br />

★★★★★<br />

£369 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

At last, GoPro’s fl agship<br />

action camera fi nally has<br />

built-in waterproofi ng.<br />

That’s the biggest in a sizable list of<br />

improvements over the Hero 4 Black, making this the superior<br />

purchase in spite of its higher price.<br />

SENSOR 1 /2.3in CMOS • SENSOR PIXELS 12,000,000 • MAXRECORDING RESOLUTION 4K (30fps)<br />

• AV CONNECTIONS Micro HDMI • DIMENSIONS 45x62x32mm • WEIGHT 117g • WARRANTY One<br />

year RTB • DETAILS www.gopro.com • PART CODE Hero 5 Black • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

SONY FDR-X1000V<br />

★★★★★<br />

£300 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Sony looks to take on GoPro with<br />

this miniscule action cam capable of<br />

recording 4K video at 30fps. The Hero4<br />

Black wins out on image quality, but image stabilisation and a fl exible<br />

range of shooting modes means Sony’s camera still has lots to offer.<br />

SENSOR 1 /2.3in CMOS • SENSOR PIXELS 8,800,000 • MAX RECORDING RESOLUTION 4K (30fps)<br />

• AV CONNECTIONS Micro HDMI, 3.5mm microphone input • DIMENSIONS 24.4x51.7x88.9mm •<br />

WEIGHT 114g • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.sony.co.uk • PART CODE<br />

FDR-X1000V • FULL REVIEW May 2016<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

65


Choosing an... Inkjet printer<br />

You should be able to buy a decent<br />

01 inkjet printer for less than £40.<br />

High-quality printing is possible on such a<br />

printer, but it will be slow. The actual print<br />

speed of an inkjet can be half the quoted<br />

(maximum) speed for text documents,<br />

and even slower when printing graphics.<br />

Budget inkjet printers such as these are<br />

designed only for light use and can be<br />

expensive to run.<br />

For £60 you can buy a much more<br />

02 capable printer that’s either faster and<br />

better built or better at reproducing photos.<br />

If documents are your priority, you’ll want a<br />

high minimum speed and low print costs.<br />

Look for inkjets that can handle all your<br />

office media, such as envelopes and labels.<br />

If photos are your priority, speed is<br />

03 less important. Choose a printer that<br />

reproduces subtle tones well. You can’t<br />

determine this by looking at the<br />

specifications – only hands-on testing will<br />

do, so remember to check our reviews<br />

before you buy.<br />

Borderless printing (up to the edge of<br />

the paper) should also be possible. Pay<br />

particular attention to running costs:<br />

photos use three times as much ink as<br />

regular colour documents.<br />

Heavy-duty office inkjets can cost<br />

04 up to £1,000 and their build quality<br />

is improving. They use large individual ink<br />

tanks, which can cut running costs.<br />

Printers with automatic duplex (doublesided)<br />

printing or A3 capabilities are now<br />

much more affordable.<br />

Pricier photo printers let you print<br />

05 from memory cards plugged straight<br />

into the printer, so you don’t need to use a<br />

PC. An LCD preview screen offers greater<br />

control for this method of printing. Many<br />

inkjet printers now have a PictBridge USB<br />

port, which you can use to print images<br />

directly from most digital cameras.<br />

06<br />

If you’re really serious about<br />

photography, consider buying an<br />

inkjet that can produce borderless prints<br />

up to A3 size. The best devices can print<br />

photos that look nearly as good as those<br />

from professional labs.<br />

PRINTERS & SCANNERS<br />

BROTHER HL-L6300DWT<br />

★★★★★<br />

£260 • www.printerland.co.uk<br />

A combination of fast<br />

printing speeds and a good<br />

mix of connectivity and<br />

hardware feature makes the HL-L6300DWT<br />

a fi ne choice for offices. It’s quieter than<br />

you might think as well.<br />

TECHNOLOGY Mono laser • MAXIMUM PRINT RESOLUTION 1,200x1,200dpi • DIMENSIONS<br />

420x400x396mm • WEIGHT 17.1kg • MAXIMUM PAPER SIZE A4/legal • WARRANTY One year<br />

RTB • DETAILS www.brother.co.uk • PART CODE HLL6300DWTZU1 • FULL REVIEW Oct 2016<br />

EPSON Expression Premium XP-530<br />

★★★★★<br />

£60 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Other than a tiny screen<br />

and slightly high running<br />

costs, the XP-530 is a<br />

welcome addition to Epson’s Expression Premium range. It prints and<br />

scans incredibly quickly, while maintaining high quality throughout.<br />

TECHNOLOGY Piezo inkjet • MAXIMUM PRINT RESOLUTION 5,760x1,440dpi • SCANNER<br />

RESOLUTION 2,400x4,800dpi • DIMENSIONS 138x390x341mm • WEIGHT 6.2kg •<br />

MAXIMUM PAPER SIZE A4/legal • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.epson.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE XP-530 • FULL REVIEW May 2016<br />

HP Officejet 250<br />

★★★★★<br />

£214 • www.pcworldbusiness.co.uk<br />

A pleasantly portable<br />

MFP, the OfficeJet Pro<br />

250 not only has more hardware features than<br />

you might expect – including a handy adjustable screen – but it<br />

runs cheaply and at respectable speeds, too.<br />

TECHNOLOGY Thermal inkjet • MAXIMUM PRINTRESOLUTION 4,800x1,200dpi •<br />

SCANNERRESOLUTION 600x600dpi • DIMENSIONS 91x380x198mm • WEIGHT 2.96kg •<br />

MAXIMUM PAPER SIZE A4/legal • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.hp.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE CZ992A#B1H • FULL REVIEW Dec 2016<br />

XYZPRINTING da Vinci Minimaker<br />

★★★★★<br />

£200 • www.toysrus.co.uk<br />

It’s not as fully featured as the da<br />

Vinci Jr 1.0w, but the Minimaker<br />

prints at identical speed and<br />

quality, and costs much, much less. In fact, it’s the<br />

most affordable 3D printer we’ve ever used.<br />

TECHNOLOGY Fused Filament Fabrication • MAXIMUM PRINTRESOLUTION 100 microns •<br />

MAXIMUM BUILD SIZE 150x150x150mm • DIMENSIONS 390x360x335mm • WEIGHT 11.5kg •<br />

FILAMENT 1.75mm PLA • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS eu.xyzprinting.com •<br />

PART CODE 3FM1XXEU00D • FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

CANON Pixma MG5750<br />

★★★★★<br />

£49 • www.currys.co.uk<br />

The MG5750 is good<br />

value with a great<br />

balance of features<br />

and quality. Its strong performance<br />

lets us forgive less-than-perfect controls.<br />

TECHNOLOGY Thermal inkjet • MAXIMUM PRINT RESOLUTION 4,800x1,200dpi •<br />

SCANNER RESOLUTION 1,200x2,400dpi • DIMENSIONS 148x455x369mm • WEIGHT 6.3kg •<br />

MAXIMUM PAPER SIZE A4/legal • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.canon.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE 0557C006 • FULL REVIEW Apr 2016<br />

RICOH SP 150SUw<br />

★★★★★<br />

£108 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

Buying a mono laser<br />

printer for your home<br />

may sound strange, but<br />

the SP 150SUw’s printing speed, quality<br />

and quietness make a lot of sense at this price.<br />

TECHNOLOGY Mono laser • MAXIMUM PRINT RESOLUTION 1,200x600 • SCANNER<br />

RESOLUTION 1,200x1,200dpi • DIMENSIONS 137x350x275mm • WEIGHT 7.5kg •<br />

MAXIMUM PAPER SIZE A4/legal • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.ricoh.co.uk •<br />

PART CODE 408005 • FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

66 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Choosing a... Wireless router<br />

Wireless routers each use a number<br />

01 of Wi-Fi standards, so you shouldn’t<br />

have any trouble connecting your computer<br />

or phone wirelessly if you get an 802.11n or<br />

802.11ac router. Nearly all routers support<br />

802.11n, so even a cheap model should<br />

provide decent performance.<br />

You can expect a transfer speed of around<br />

40Mbit/s at a distance of 10m from any<br />

modern 802.11n router. The very latest<br />

routers use the 802.11ac standard, which<br />

provides tremendously fast transfer<br />

speeds. Some devices still don’t support<br />

the 802.11ac standard, so check the<br />

specifications before you buy.<br />

If you subscribe to an ADSL<br />

02 broadband service, you should buy<br />

a wireless router that has a built-in ADSL<br />

modem. This will cost more than the<br />

equivalent cable router, but it allows you<br />

to connect your router directly to your<br />

broadband connection without having to<br />

use a separate modem.<br />

Most 802.11n wireless routers use<br />

03 the 2.4GHz frequency band. This has<br />

good range but it can be prone to<br />

interference if it’s positioned close to a lot<br />

of other 2.4GHz devices, such as other<br />

routers and baby monitors. If you have<br />

trouble getting a consistent signal or you<br />

want faster speeds for video streaming, for<br />

example, it’s worth buying a dual-band<br />

router that can use both the 2.4GHz and<br />

5GHz bands.<br />

Alternatively, a high-gain antenna can<br />

boost signals and improve ranges and<br />

throughputs to the entire house. You can<br />

also add a high-gain antenna to a PC’s<br />

network adaptor. If wired network speeds<br />

are a priority, you should look for a router<br />

with a Gigabit Ethernet connection.<br />

04<br />

Many routers come with built-in USB<br />

ports that let you connect a USB<br />

drive and use the router as a network storage<br />

device. If you want to share a USB printer<br />

over your network, look for a wireless router<br />

that has a USB print server.<br />

Finally, if you’re interested in making voice<br />

calls over the internet, buy a router with<br />

built-in VoIP support (and phone sockets)<br />

because this can save you money.<br />

NETWORKS<br />

TP-LINK Archer C3200<br />

★★★★★<br />

£150 • www.currys.co.uk<br />

Besides being quite<br />

well priced for a<br />

tri-band router, the<br />

Archer C32000 is impressively fast and<br />

has a good-looking, folding six-antenna<br />

design.<br />

WI-FI STANDARD 802.11ac • STATED SPEED 1,300Mbit/s • USB PORTS 1x USB3 •<br />

WALL MOUNTABLE Yes • WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.tp-link.com •<br />

PART CODE Archer C3200 • FULL REVIEW Jan <strong>2017</strong><br />

NEST Cam Outdoor<br />

★★★★★<br />

£169 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

The Nest Cam Outdoor<br />

allows you to set up your<br />

own home security camera<br />

without any specialist wiring knowledge.<br />

Video quality is excellent, and the simple<br />

app makes managing it even easier.<br />

VIDEORESOLUTION 720p/1080p • CLOUDSTORAGE Yes • NETWORKING 802.11n (2.4GHz) •<br />

WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.nest.com/uk • PART CODE Nest Cam Outdoor •<br />

FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

TP-LINK Archer VR2600<br />

★★★★★<br />

£200 • www.scan.co.uk<br />

While it needs<br />

thus-far-theoretical<br />

4x4 MIMO devices<br />

to reach its best speeds, this is still<br />

among the very fastest routers around,<br />

especially on the 5GHz band.<br />

MODEM VDSL/ADSL • WI-FI STANDARD 802.11ac • STATED SPEED 1,733Mbit/s • USB PORTS<br />

2x USB3 • WALL MOUNTABLE Yes • WARRANTY Three years RTB • PART CODE Archer VR2600<br />

• FULL REVIEW Nov2016<br />

NETGEAR Orbi<br />

★★★★★<br />

£370 • www.maplin.co.uk<br />

The Orbi system employs<br />

both a base router and a<br />

separate satellite router to<br />

effectively boost Wi-Fi speed and stability<br />

throughout your house – a great fi t for<br />

larger homes.<br />

MODEM Gigabit Ethernet • WI-FISTANDARD 802.11ac • STATED SPEED 866Mbit/s (5GHz),<br />

400MBit/s (2.4GHz) • USB PORTS 1x USB2 • WALL MOUNTABLE No • WARRANTY Two years<br />

RTB • PART CODE RBK50-100UKS • FULL REVIEW Feb <strong>2017</strong><br />

BT Whole Home Wi-Fi<br />

★★★★★<br />

£200 • www.shop.bt.com<br />

An excellent<br />

alternative to<br />

the Orbi, BT’s<br />

Whole Home Wi-Fi mesh system is designed to work with your<br />

existing router, spreading faster, more reliable Wi-Fi around the<br />

house with three disc-shaped access points.<br />

MODEM N/A • WI-FI STANDARD 802.11ac • STATED SPEED 1,733Mbit/s (5GHz), 800Mbit/s<br />

(2.4GHz) • USB PORTS 0 • WALL MOUNTABLE No • WARRANTY Two years RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.bt.com • PART CODE 181209 • FULL REVIEW May <strong>2017</strong><br />

NETGEAR Arlo Q<br />

★★★★★<br />

£140 • wwww.argos.co.uk<br />

1080p night-vision capability<br />

more than makes up for the<br />

Arlo Q’s lack of wireless<br />

cameras, and the system is just as easy to<br />

use as the original Arlo range.<br />

RESOLUTION 1080p 30fps full colour • ZOOM 8x digital • NIGHT VISION Yes •<br />

CONNECTIVITY 2.4GHz + 5GHz Wi-Fi • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.arlo.com/uk •<br />

PART CODE VMCC3040-100UKS • FULL REVIEW Jun 2016<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

67


Choosing an... Internal hard disk<br />

A basic 1TB internal hard disk should<br />

01 cost around £40. This will be fast<br />

enough for general use and will provide<br />

enough storage for most users.<br />

Make sure the hard disk you choose has<br />

the appropriate interface type for your PC.<br />

Some mechanical hard disks still come with<br />

SATA2 interfaces, but newer models and<br />

most solid-state drives (SSDs) have faster<br />

SATA3 interfaces. You’ll need a motherboard<br />

with a SATA3 port if you want to benefi t<br />

from SATA3’s faster speeds; SATA3 disks will<br />

work with SATA2 ports but can only transfer<br />

fi les at SATA2 speeds.<br />

SSDs can make the most of SATA3’s<br />

02 extra bandwidth for fast fi le transfers.<br />

They use fl ash memory similar to that found<br />

in USB fl ash drives, and although they tend<br />

to provide less capacity than mechanical hard<br />

disks, they’re significantly faster.<br />

Buy a hard disk that provides more<br />

03 capacity than you think you need, as<br />

your storage requirements are likely to grow.<br />

A 3TB disk strikes the best balance between<br />

capacity and low cost per gigabyte, but in<br />

general you should aim to buy the largest<br />

disk you can afford.<br />

If you want more disk space or you<br />

04 want to protect your data against<br />

disk failure, think about buying several hard<br />

disks to create a RAID array. These use<br />

multiple hard disks to create one large<br />

logical disk with better performance, or to<br />

duplicate your data for better protection.<br />

RAID arrays require hard disks of the same<br />

size. In theory, they can be from different<br />

manufacturers, but it’s better to buy identical<br />

disks if you can.<br />

A hard disk’s spindle speed<br />

05 determines how quickly it can<br />

transfer data. A spindle speed of 7,200rpm<br />

is common in desktop drives and is fast<br />

enough for most purposes. Desktop hard<br />

disks with 5,400rpm spindle speeds are<br />

quite slow but use less power and generate<br />

less heat and noise.<br />

To strike the best balance between<br />

speed and storage capacity, use an SSD as<br />

your system disk and store your fi les on a<br />

larger mechanical disk.<br />

STORAGE<br />

SAMSUNG 850 Evo 500GB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£150 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

Samsung’s 850 Evo is simply<br />

the fastest SATA SSD around,<br />

and it’s available in a wide<br />

range of capacities. The 2TB model might be<br />

expensive at around £590 (from www.ebuyer.com),<br />

but it means saying goodbye to mechanical storage for good.<br />

CAPACITY 500GB • COST PER GIGABYTE £0.30• INTERFACE SATA3 • CLAIMED READ 540MB/s<br />

• CLAIMED WRITE 520MB/s • WARRANTY Five years RTB • DETAILS www.samsung.com/uk •<br />

PART CODE MZ-75E500BW/EU • FULL REVIEW Oct 2015<br />

SYNOLOGY Diskstation DS216+<br />

★★★★★<br />

£224 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

Synology’s fast two-bay NAS is<br />

particularly ideal for small<br />

businesses and workgroups,<br />

possessing AES-NI encryption and extensive<br />

support for a range of devices and servers.<br />

3.5in HARD DISK BAYS (FREE) 2 (2) • NETWORKING 1x 10/100/1,000 Ethernet •<br />

DLNA MEDIASERVER Yes • PRINTSERVER Yes • DIMENSIONS 165x108x233mm •<br />

WEIGHT 1.25kg • WARRANTY Two years RTB • DETAILS www.synology.com •<br />

PART CODE DS216+ • FULL REVIEW Jun 2016<br />

TOSHIBA Canvio Connect II 2TB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£81 • www.currys.co.uk<br />

There’s plenty of<br />

choice when it comes to<br />

portable hard disks, but<br />

Toshiba’s Canvio Connect II has an<br />

excellent bundled soft ware package and<br />

impressive USB3 speeds. Considering the<br />

price, there’s no reason not to have one.<br />

,000 Ethernet •<br />

CAPACITY 2TB • COST PER GIGABYTE £0.04 • INTERFACE USB3 • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.toshiba.eu • PART CODE HDTC820ER3CA • FULL REVIEW Nov 2015<br />

WESTERN DIGITAL Red 6TB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£209 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

The Red 6TB<br />

combines excellent<br />

performance with a<br />

high capacity and special fi rmware to<br />

make a hard disk that’s perfect for use in NAS<br />

enclosures. It’s guaranteed for three years, too,<br />

which should provide peace of mind.<br />

CAPACITY 6TB • PRICE PER GIGABYTE £0.03 • INTERFACE SATA3 • WARRANTY Three years<br />

RTB • DETAILS www.wdc.com • PART CODE WD60EFRX • FULL REVIEW Nov 2014<br />

ADATA SV620 240GB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£102 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

If you want an<br />

external, rather than<br />

internal, SSD for your PC or<br />

laptop, the SV620 offers good value. It’s fast and<br />

compact, and it’s easy to forget about the slightly bendable plastic<br />

casing when there’s a three-year warranty.<br />

CAPACITY 240GB • COST PER GIGABYTE £0.43p • INTERFACE USB3 • CLAIMED READ 420MB/s<br />

• CLAIMED WRITE 440MB/s • WARRANTY Three years RTB • DETAILS www.adata.com •<br />

PART CODE ASV620-240GU3-CTI • FULL REVIEW Dec 2016<br />

SAMSUNG 960 Evo250GB<br />

★★★★★<br />

£129 • www.maplins.co.uk<br />

While it’s not quite as<br />

quick as the 960 Pro,<br />

the 960 Evo is still the<br />

second-fastest NVMe SSD we’ve ever<br />

tested, and since it’s much more affordable,<br />

able,<br />

it’s the one most people should go for.<br />

CAPACITY 250GB • COST PERGIGABYTE 52p • INTERFACE M.2/NVMe • CLAIMEDREAD<br />

3,200MB/s • CLAIMEDWRITE 1,500MB/s • WARRANTY Five years RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.samsung.com • PART CODE MZ-V6E250BW • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

68 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Choosing a... Graphics card<br />

You really don’t have to spend much<br />

01 to buy a decent graphics card that<br />

can drive multiple monitors. The AMD<br />

Radeon R7 250 costs less than £60, for<br />

example, and while it isn’t suited to playing<br />

the latest games in Full HD, it is perfect for<br />

watching videos, browsing the web and<br />

playing basic games.<br />

You’ll need to spend more money if<br />

02 you want to play the latest games. A<br />

good mid-range gaming graphics card is the<br />

Nvidia GTX 950, which is powerful enough to<br />

play any of the latest games.<br />

High-powered cards tend to be more<br />

expensive, so expect to pay over £300 if you<br />

want to play games in Ultra HD at the highest<br />

quality settings.<br />

Check that your chosen card has<br />

03 the graphics outputs you need.<br />

Only low-end cards now have VGA<br />

outputs, but many come with a DVI-to-VGA<br />

adaptor. Depending on your monitor, you<br />

may also want an HDMI output or even<br />

DisplayPort connection.<br />

Bear in mind that AMD’s Eyefi nity<br />

triple-monitor gaming mode requires at<br />

least one DisplayPort monitor, which<br />

means your AMD graphics card must have<br />

at least one DisplayPort output. Nvidia’s<br />

Surround three-monitor mode needs only<br />

DVI and HDMI ports.<br />

The amount of memory a card has<br />

04 is important if you want games to<br />

look their best at high resolutions. Get a<br />

card with 2GB of RAM at the very least,<br />

as this should allow you to select the<br />

highest-quality textures in games.<br />

05<br />

A card’s size, noise output and<br />

power requirements are the fi nal<br />

considerations. Make sure your PC’s case<br />

has enough room to accommodate your<br />

chosen card. Double-slot cards with large<br />

fans tend to be quieter than single-slot<br />

cards with small fans but will block other<br />

expansion slots on your motherboard.<br />

Also check that your power supply<br />

can provide the power the card needs<br />

and that it has the right connectors.<br />

Many cards require a six-pin PCI Express<br />

power connector, and some also need an<br />

additional eight-pin connector.<br />

COMPONENTS<br />

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 D5 2G<br />

★★★★★<br />

£116 • www.overclockers.co.uk<br />

Nvidia’s GTX 1050 is<br />

the best-performing<br />

entry-level GPU, and<br />

Gigabyte has made some nice tweaks<br />

to its own version, including a near-silent fan<br />

cooler. It also sips power, with a tiny TDP rating of 75W.<br />

GPU Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 • MEMORY 2GB GDDR5 • GRAPHICSCARDLENGTH 172mm •<br />

WARRANTY Three years repair and replace • DETAILS www.gigabyte.com •<br />

PART CODE GV-N1050D5-2GD • FULL REVIEW Mar <strong>2017</strong><br />

INTEL Core i5-6600K<br />

★★★★★<br />

£216 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

The Core i5-6600K is the fi rst<br />

of Intel’s latest processor<br />

generation, previously<br />

codenamed Skylake. The unlocked multiplier means you can<br />

push it further when overclocking, and energy efficiency has never<br />

been better, which means less power draw when using your PC.<br />

SOCKET LGA1151 • CORES 4 • FREQUENCY 3.5GHz • INTEGRATED GRAPHICS Intel HD Graphics<br />

530 • WARRANTY One year RTB • DETAILS www.intel.com • PART CODE BX80662I56600K •<br />

FULL REVIEW Nov 2015<br />

ASUS Prime Z270-A<br />

★★★★★<br />

£143 • www.ebuyer.com<br />

New Intel chips mean new Intel<br />

chipsets, and the Prime Z270-A is a<br />

brilliant mid-range companion to any compatible<br />

Kaby Lake processor. Great hardware (including two M.2 slots), a<br />

user-friendly BIOS, RGB LED decoration – it’s a superb package.<br />

PROCESSORSOCKET LGA 1151 • DIMENSIONS 244x305mm • CHIPSET Z270 • MEMORY SLOTS<br />

4 • PCI-E x16 SLOTS 3 • PCI-E x1 SLOTS 4 • PCI SLOTS 0 • USB PORTS 4x USB3, 1x USB3.1, 1x<br />

USB Type-C • VIDEO OUTPUTS 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x DVI-D • WARRANTY Three years RTB<br />

• DETAILS www.asus.com/uk • PART CODE Prime Z270-A • FULL REVIEW Apr <strong>2017</strong><br />

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060<br />

★★★★★<br />

£275 • www.geforce.co.uk<br />

Based on the same Pascal<br />

architecture as the fearsome<br />

GTX 1080 and GTX 1070, the<br />

mid-range GTX 1060 is unmatched when it<br />

comes to marrying price with 4K and VR-readiness.<br />

It’s surprisingly power-effi cient, too.<br />

GPU Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 • MEMORY 6GB GDDR5 • GRAPHICSCARDLENGTH 250mm •<br />

WARRANTY Three years repair and replace • DETAILS www.geforce.co.uk • PART CODE GTX 1060<br />

Founder’s Edition • FULL REVIEW Nov 2016<br />

NZXT Manta<br />

★★★★★<br />

£110 • www.scan.co.uk<br />

A brilliant basis for any Mini-ITX PC<br />

build, the Manta is a versatile case<br />

with plenty of room for fans and<br />

storage drives, plus a distinctive curvy shape. Its<br />

convex side panels leave more room to hide cables, too.<br />

CASE TYPE Mini tower • MOTHERBOARD TYPE Mini-ITX • SUPPLIED FANS 3x 120mm •<br />

MAXIMUM DRIVE BAYS 2x 3.5in, 3x 2.5in • DIMENSIONS 426x245x450mm •<br />

WEIGHT 7.2kg • WARRANTY Two years parts and labour • DETAILS www.nzxt.com •<br />

PART CODE CA-MANTW-M1 • FULL REVIEW Aug 2016<br />

CORSAIR Carbide Series Air 240<br />

★★★★★<br />

£92 • www.box.co.uk<br />

This microATX case is very well<br />

made. It’s light and compact,<br />

but its cuboid shape means<br />

there’s plenty of room inside for all your<br />

components, so it’s easy to work with.<br />

CASE TYPE microATX • MOTHERBOARD COMPATIBILITY microATX, Mini-ITX • SUPPLIED<br />

FANS 3x 120mm • MAX 3½in DRIVE BAYS 3 • MAX 5¼in DRIVE BAYS 0 • DIMENSIONS<br />

320x260x397mm • WEIGHT 5.6kg • WARRANTY Two years RTB • DETAILS www.corsair.com •<br />

PART CODE CC-9011070-WW • FULL REVIEW Apr 2016<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

69


SOFTWARE<br />

DIGITALVOLCANO SOFTWARE<br />

Duplicate Cleaner 4.0 Pro<br />

★★★★★<br />

£24 • www.digitalvolcano.co.uk<br />

Deduplicating<br />

software<br />

The free version of Duplicate Cleaner program is<br />

good, and upgrading to the Pro version makes it<br />

exceptional for ridding your PC of duplicate fi les.<br />

OS SUPPORT Windows Vista/7/8/10 • HARD DISK SPACE 20MB •<br />

DETAILS www.digitalvolcano.co.uk • FULL REVIEW Sep 2016<br />

EXPRESSVPN<br />

★★★★★<br />

£13 per month • www.expressvpn.com<br />

Virtual<br />

private network<br />

ExpressVPN allows you to easily dodge region<br />

restrictions on online content while encrypting<br />

your connection, and is fast enough to handle<br />

4K Netflix streaming. Its great soft ware support and huge number of<br />

endpoints makes it the most fl exible service, too.<br />

OS SUPPORT Windows, macOS, iOS, Android • DETAILS www.expressvpn.com •<br />

PRODUCTCODE ExpressVPN • FULL REVIEW Jan <strong>2017</strong><br />

ADOBE Premiere Elements 14<br />

★★★★★<br />

£47 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Lots of features to keep advanced users happy and<br />

even more to help new users make the most of it.<br />

It’s the consumer video editing package to buy.<br />

MICROSOFT Windows 10<br />

Anniversary Update<br />

★★★★★<br />

Free • www.microsoft .com<br />

Video<br />

editing<br />

OS SUPPORT Windows 7/8/10 • MINIMUM CPU 2GHz with SSE2 • MINIMUM GPU DirectX 9 •<br />

MINIMUM RAM 2GB • HARD DISK SPACE 5GB • DETAILS www.adobe.com/uk • PRODUCT<br />

CODE 65234288 • FULL REVIEW Jan 2016<br />

OS<br />

update<br />

This update adds UI improvments, new features and<br />

apps for stylus users, and a host of bug fi xes, making<br />

Microsoft ’s OS even more worthwhile.<br />

OS SUPPORT Windows 10 • MINIMUM CPU 1GHz • MINIMUM GPU DirectX 9 or later with WDDM 1.0<br />

driver • MINIMUM RAM 1GB (32-bit), 2GB (64-bit) • HARDDISKSPACE 16GB (32-bit), 2GB (64-bit) •<br />

DETAILS www.microsoft.com • PRODUCTCODE Windows 10 version 1607 • FULL REVIEW Nov 2016<br />

ABBYY FineReader 14<br />

★★★★★<br />

£249 • www.abbyy.com<br />

OCR<br />

software<br />

MAILBIRD Mailbird Pro 2.0<br />

★★★★★<br />

£10 per year or £36 lifetime • www.getmailbird.com<br />

Email<br />

client<br />

The more feature-rich Corporate edition is expensive,<br />

but FineReader 14 is perfect for turning paper notes<br />

and documents into digital, editable fi les using<br />

optical character recognition (OCR).<br />

OS SUPPORT Windows 7/8/8.1/10 • MINIMUM CPU 1GHz • MINIMUM GPU DirectX 10 •<br />

MINIMUM RAM 1.5GB plus 512MB per additional CPU core • HARD DISK SPACE 2.4GB •<br />

DETAILS www.abbyy.com • PRODUCTCODE FineReader 14 • FULL REVIEW May <strong>2017</strong><br />

While the free version of this email client is good,<br />

upgrading to Pro is even better – you get a unified<br />

view of all your mailboxes, loads of themes and<br />

extensive integration with other apps and productivity soft ware.<br />

OS SUPPORT Windows XP/7/8/8.1/10 • MINIMUM CPU N/A • MINIMUM GPU N/A •<br />

MINIMUM RAM N/A • HARD DISK SPACE 50MB • DETAILS www.getmailbird.com •<br />

FULL REVIEW Nov 2016<br />

GAMING<br />

XBOX One S<br />

★★★★★<br />

£199 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

HDR support is great,<br />

but it’s the 4K Blu-ray<br />

player that makes this<br />

sleeker, smaller Xbox One really stand<br />

out against the competing PS4 Slim.<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 1.75GHz Jaguar • RAM 8GB DDR3 • FRONTUSB PORTS 1x USB2 •<br />

REAR USB PORTS 2x USB2 • STORAGE 500GB/1TB/2TB • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.xbox.com • PART CODE Xbox One S • FULL REVIEW Dec 2016<br />

4K 4K gam games<br />

console console<br />

NINTENDO The Legend of Zelda:<br />

Breath of the Wild<br />

★★★★★<br />

£48 • www.amazon.co.uk<br />

NEW<br />

ENTRY<br />

Breath of the Wild’s vision of Hyrule is a beautifully<br />

intricate open world – one you have total freedom<br />

to explore right from the off. Charming and<br />

challenging, this is both a brilliant game and the single best reason<br />

to buy a Nintendo Switch.<br />

AVAILABLE FORMATS Ninetendo Switch • DISK SPACE 13.4GB (Switch), 13GB (Wii U) •<br />

DETAILS www.zelda.com • FULL REVIEW Jun <strong>2017</strong><br />

Action<br />

adventure<br />

Doom<br />

★★★★★<br />

£10 • www.cdkeys.com<br />

First-person<br />

shooter<br />

SONY PS4 Slim<br />

★★★★★<br />

£210 • www.zavvi.com<br />

Games Games<br />

console console<br />

A bloody and breathless FPS, Doom is a worthy<br />

entry into one of gaming’s most hallowed series.<br />

Open-ended levels, agile enemies and gory but<br />

satisfying takedown moves make every demon battle rewarding.<br />

AVAILABLE FORMATS PC, Xbox One, PS4 • OS SUPPORT Windows 7/8/8.1/10 • MINIMUM CPU<br />

Intel Core i3-550, AMD Phenom II X4 955 • MINIMUM GPU Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 2GB, AMD<br />

Radeon HD 7870 2GB • MINIMUM RAM 4GB • HARD DISK SPACE 55GB • DETAILS doom.com •<br />

FULL REVIEW Sep 2016<br />

Sony has made the<br />

PlayStation 4 even better<br />

with a slimmer, neater<br />

chassis and superior power efficiency. It’s as<br />

cheap as the PS4 has ever been as well.<br />

PROCESSOR Octa-core 1.6GHz AMD Jaguar • RAM 8GB GDDR5 • FRONTUSB PORTS 2x USB2 •<br />

REAR USBPORTS None • STORAGE 500GB/1TB/2TB • WARRANTY One year RTB •<br />

DETAILS www.playstation.com • PART CODE B01GVQVQH2 • FULL REVIEW Jan <strong>2017</strong><br />

70 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


REVIEWS<br />

How we test<br />

Find out how well products perform with the help of<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong>’s comprehensive tests<br />

COMPUTER SHOPPER’S REVIEWS use some<br />

of the most exhaustive testing procedures<br />

you’ll fi nd in any PC magazine. Every product<br />

is subjected to qualitative and quantitative<br />

tests that show how it performs in practical<br />

use. Graphs for performance, battery-life<br />

scores and costs are used in the Reviews<br />

section, as shown on the right. Look in the<br />

‘Summary of tests’ table (below) for details<br />

of each test we run.<br />

For PCs and laptops, we evaluate<br />

performance using our own custom<br />

benchmarking suite. See below for a brief<br />

description of our benchmarking soft ware<br />

and game tests.<br />

SUMMARY OF TESTS<br />

PC SYSTEMS & GAMING LAPTOPS<br />

Windows overall Average speed across numerous demanding tasks<br />

Multitasking Speed when running simultaneous applications<br />

Dirt Showdown Frames per second at 1,920x1,080, 4xAA,<br />

(1080p) Ultra detail<br />

Metro: Last Light Frames per second at 1,920x1,080, SSAA,<br />

Redux Very High detail<br />

LAPTOPS<br />

Windows overall Average speed across numerous demanding tasks<br />

Multitasking Processor-intensive multitasking test<br />

Dirt Showdown Frames per second at 1,280x720, 4xAA,<br />

(720p) High detail<br />

Batt ery life Run time in minutes for continuous video playback<br />

SMARTPHONES/TABLETS<br />

Battery life Run time in minutes for continuous video playback<br />

PRINTERS AND MFPs<br />

Mono text speed Pages per minute for correspondence-quality text<br />

Mixed colour speed Pages per minute for presentable text and graphics<br />

Mono page cost Running costs expressed as pence per page<br />

Colour page cost Running costs expressed as pence per page<br />

DIGITAL CAMERAS<br />

CAMCORDERS<br />

ROUTERS<br />

Battery life Number of shots from full charge<br />

Battery life Run time in minutes for recording<br />

Laptop 2.4GHz 5m Mbit/s at 5m with 802.11ac laptop on 2.4GHz band<br />

Laptop 2.4GHz 1 fl oor Mbit/s 1 floor up with 802.11ac laptop on 2.4GHz band<br />

Laptop 2.4GHz Mbit/s 2 fl oors up with 802.11ac laptop on<br />

2 fl oors 2.4GHz band<br />

Laptop 5GHz 5m Mbit/s at 5m with 802.11ac laptop on 5GHz band<br />

Laptop 5GHz 1 fl oor Mbit/s 1 floor up with 802.11ac laptop on 5GHz band<br />

Laptop 5GHz Mbit/s 2 fl oors up with 802.11ac laptop on<br />

2 fl oors 5GHz band<br />

NETWORK-ATTACHED STORAGE<br />

HARD DISKS<br />

Large fi les Average MB/s for read/write of 100MB large fi les<br />

Small fi les Average MB/s for read/write of 100MB small fi les<br />

Extra large fi les Average MB/s for read/write of a single 2.5GB fi le<br />

PROCESSORS<br />

Large fi les Average MB/s for read/write of 2.5GB of large fi les<br />

Small fi les Average MB/s for read/write of 2.5GB of small fi les<br />

Windows overall Average speed across numerous demanding tasks<br />

Multitasking Speed when running simultaneous applications<br />

Dirt Showdown Frames per second at 1,280x720, 4xAA,<br />

(720p) High detail<br />

MOTHERBOARDS<br />

Windows overall Average speed across numerous demanding tasks<br />

Multitasking Speed when running simultaneous applications<br />

Dirt Showdown Frames per second at 1,920x1,080, 4xAA,<br />

(1080p) Ultra detail<br />

Dirt Showdown Frames per second at 1,280x720, 4xAA,<br />

(720p) High detail<br />

GRAPHICS CARDS<br />

Dirt Showdown Frames per second at 1,920x1,080, 4x MSAA,<br />

(1080p) Ultra detail<br />

Tomb Raider Frames per second at 1,920x1,080, SSAA, Ultra detail<br />

Metro: Last Light Frames per second at 1,920x1,080, SSAA,<br />

Redux Very High detail<br />

Normal speed<br />

The actual scores in each test are shown<br />

inside each bar<br />

Mono costs<br />

Colour costs<br />

0%<br />

This line represents the performance of a reference product in each<br />

test. All graphs for components and systems are relative to our<br />

reference PC (see below for specifications)<br />

BENCHMARKS<br />

-50<br />

SHOPPER BENCHMARKS<br />

Our benchmark suite uses<br />

open-source soft ware that<br />

runs on Windows, Mac OS X<br />

and Linux systems. This lets<br />

us use objective results to<br />

compare PCs and laptops,<br />

no matter which operating<br />

system they run. It’s designed<br />

11ppm<br />

2.2p<br />

6.7p<br />

Reference +50 +100<br />

to test each computer to its limit, using a combination of<br />

intensive image-editing, video-encoding and multitasking tests.<br />

We ran the tests on our reference PC, which has an Intel<br />

Core i5-4670K processor, 8GB of DDR3 RAM and an AMD<br />

Radeon R7 260X graphics card. We normalised our results<br />

so this PC had a score of 100. This makes it easy to draw<br />

comparisons between test systems.<br />

The resulting overall score is shown at the bottom of<br />

every PC and laptop review. As we use the same tests in our<br />

standalone and group test reviews, you can compare the<br />

performance of any computer, whether it’s a hybrid,<br />

laptop or desktop, from both sections of the magazine.<br />

3D BENCHMARKS<br />

DIRT SHOWDOWN<br />

Dirt Showdown is a cracking racing game<br />

that makes good use of DirectX 11’s<br />

fancy graphical effects. You’ll want at<br />

least 30fps for smooth racing.<br />

TOMB RAIDER<br />

With the ultra-demanding Super-<br />

Sampling Anti-Aliasing (SSAA) enabled,<br />

2013’s Tomb Raider reboot is a great<br />

indicator of mid-range performance.<br />

METRO: LAST LIGHT REDUX<br />

Our most demanding graphics test<br />

uses tessellation, SSAA and massive<br />

textures to give even high-end cards a<br />

thorough workout.<br />

RATINGS & AWARDS<br />

Avoid<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong> rates<br />

products out of fi ve:<br />

Below average<br />

Good<br />

Bigger is better for all<br />

bars except the red<br />

ones, which show<br />

running costs<br />

A product hitting the<br />

+100 per cent mark<br />

performed twice as well<br />

as our reference<br />

Very good<br />

Excellent<br />

★★★★★<br />

★★★★★<br />

★★★★★<br />

★★★★★<br />

★★★★★<br />

The best products can win the<br />

following awards:<br />

BEST BUY<br />

Products with outstanding<br />

quality and performance for the<br />

money win our Best Buy award.<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

Products that don’t quite qualify<br />

for a Best Buy award but are still<br />

highly rated by our reviewers.<br />

BUSINESS BUY<br />

The very best products<br />

for work win our<br />

Business Buy award.<br />

72 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


PRODUCT INDEX<br />

Product Reviews<br />

Our guide to all the products reviewed<br />

in this month’s <strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong><br />

Hot Product<br />

Google Home 22<br />

Displays<br />

AOC AGON AG352QCX 36<br />

130<br />

Reviews<br />

PCs<br />

Box Cube Panther 24<br />

Chillblast Fusion Portal 26<br />

Components<br />

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 28<br />

Printers<br />

Canon Pixma TS8050 30<br />

Laptops<br />

Asus ZenBook UX310UA 32<br />

Dell XPS 13 9365 34<br />

SUBSCRIBE<br />

AND SAVE<br />

CALL 0844 844 0031<br />

OR SEE PAGE 122<br />

Networks<br />

Google Wi-Fi 38<br />

Linksys WRT3200ACM 40<br />

Handhelds<br />

Samsung Galaxy S8 42<br />

LG G6 44<br />

Storage<br />

Kingston SSD Now UV400<br />

Upgrade Kit 480GB 46<br />

Video<br />

Humax H3 Espresso 48<br />

Audio<br />

Master & Dynamic<br />

MH40 50<br />

Photography<br />

Panasonic Lumix<br />

DMC-G80 52<br />

Sitpack 53<br />

Wearables<br />

Huawei Watch 2 Sport 54<br />

Smartphones<br />

Apple iPhone SE 84<br />

Google Nexus 5X 85<br />

Honor 6X 86<br />

HTC One A9 87<br />

Huawei P8 Lite 88<br />

Lenovo P2 89<br />

LG G4 90<br />

Motorola Moto G4 91<br />

Motorola Moto G5 92<br />

Motorola Moto Z Play 93<br />

OnePlus 3T 94<br />

Samsung Galaxy A5 95<br />

Samsung Galaxy S6 96<br />

Samsung Galaxy S7 97<br />

Sony Xperia X Compact 98<br />

Vodafone Smart<br />

Platinum 7 99<br />

Soundbars<br />

Cambridge Audio<br />

TV2 (v2) 106<br />

Creative Labs Sound<br />

BlasterX Katana 106<br />

Orbitsound One P70 107<br />

Philips Fidelio SkyQuake 107<br />

Samsung HW-K850 108<br />

Steljes Audio Erato 108<br />

Speakers<br />

Audio Pro Addon T3 109<br />

Libratone Zipp 109<br />

Panasonic SC-All05 110<br />

Urbanears Baggen 110<br />

Wharfedale Diamond A1 111<br />

Yamaha MusicCast<br />

WX-010 111<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

73


Free software guide<br />

It’s easy to access your free software. Just go to www.shopperdownload.co.uk/353 and<br />

register with the code from the card insert. Please be aware that you need to have<br />

bought the ‘Free Software Edition’ and not the ‘£4.50 Edition’ to access the downloads<br />

GETTING STARTED<br />

The download instructions on the card<br />

insert (opposite) show you how to<br />

connect to the download site. Make<br />

sure you type in the web address exactly<br />

as shown. You’ll need your coupon code<br />

the fi rst time you log on to the site.<br />

ANY PROBLEMS<br />

If you need help with any of the<br />

soft ware this month, please send an<br />

email to support@creativemark.co.uk.<br />

We check this inbox regularly. Please<br />

include the issue number of the<br />

magazine and your coupon code.<br />

WHY DOWNLOADS<br />

In order to provide us with free<br />

soft ware, publishers now require us to<br />

offer the applications as a download<br />

and require online registration. You<br />

need to use the unique code printed in<br />

the box on the card insert to register<br />

and download the soft ware in this<br />

issue. The unique code means we<br />

stop the deals leaking online, so only<br />

<strong>Shopper</strong> readers get the soft ware.<br />

NO CODE?<br />

If you don’t have the card insert with the<br />

unique code, you must buy the £4.99<br />

‘Free Soft ware’ print version of the<br />

magazine. If you have this edition and<br />

still don’t have a card, please contact<br />

letters@computershopper.co.uk.<br />

REGISTER YOUR SOFTWARE<br />

BY 22nd JUNE <strong>2017</strong><br />

REQUIREMENTS Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8 or<br />

10 32/64-bit, 70MB hard disk space<br />

WEBSITE www.bitreplica.com<br />

NOTES Get your registration code at<br />

bitreplica2.disc.computershopper.co.uk<br />

CrazyTalk Animator 2<br />

Standard Edition<br />

CRAZYTALK IS A versatile<br />

animation suite with the power<br />

to create professional<br />

animations, in particular<br />

applying 3D motions and<br />

effects to 2D characters.<br />

You don’t need any artistic<br />

skill or animation experience to<br />

use the program. It comes with<br />

a library of characters and<br />

actions which you can<br />

combine in a few clicks.<br />

Customise a character, place it in your chosen<br />

environment, and make it walk, laugh, sing, applaud,<br />

dance, cry or talk. It’s just a matter of choosing the<br />

options you need from a menu, and adding and<br />

updating them as required.<br />

REQUIREMENTS Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10 32/64-bit,<br />

300MB hard disk space<br />

WEBSITE www.reallusion.com<br />

NOTES www.reallusion.com/event/CTA2Std/magazine.html<br />

It’s even possible to extract<br />

a face from a regular photo<br />

and apply it to a character.<br />

They’ll move realistically, blink,<br />

smile, laugh and talk (with<br />

automatic lip-sync), just like<br />

one of the built-in animations.<br />

You can create and share<br />

custom characters with other<br />

CrazyTalk Animator users, or if<br />

it’s just you, there’s an option<br />

to render your masterpiece at<br />

any time, exporting it as a video or a series of images.<br />

While the animation is surprisingly<br />

straightforward, CrazyTalk Animator is still a<br />

heavyweight tool. There’s a lot to learn before you’ll<br />

be producing quality work.<br />

Fortunately, the program comes with some<br />

example projects to get you started. Click File, Open<br />

Projects, browse to the demo folder and select a<br />

project. Click Control, Play to play the animation, then<br />

right-click any character to explore your options.<br />

Auslogics BitReplica 2.1<br />

AUSLOGICS BITREPLICA IS a capable and<br />

straightforward backup tool that makes it easy to<br />

protect your most important fi les from disaster.<br />

The program has a list of predefi ned backup<br />

sources, so if you want to back up your browser<br />

favourites or Documents folder, it’s as easy as ticking<br />

a box, although you can add other custom folders.<br />

BitReplica offers a good selection of backup<br />

types: simple backup, exact<br />

backup (obsolete fi les are<br />

removed from the<br />

destination folder), and full,<br />

incremental or differential<br />

backups. A scheduler lets<br />

you run the job manually,<br />

hourly, daily or weekly, and<br />

there are a few useful<br />

configuration options: you<br />

get predefi ned ‘exclude’ fi le<br />

fi lters; the program is able<br />

to back up alternate data<br />

streams; and you can have specific applications run<br />

before and after the backup job runs.<br />

Your backup can then be saved locally, but you<br />

can also store it on a local drive, upload it to Box.net<br />

or SkyDrive, or even (at extra cost) use Auslogics’<br />

own cloud storage service.<br />

There are a few downsides, though. You can only<br />

choose particular folders to back up, for instance;<br />

it’s not possible to select<br />

specific fi les within a folder.<br />

There’s no support for<br />

saving your backup to<br />

discs or an FTP server,<br />

nor can you compress,<br />

encrypt or passwordprotect<br />

your archive.<br />

Still, BitReplica is fast<br />

and easy to use, and if<br />

your needs are simple<br />

then it could make an<br />

excellent backup choice.<br />

74<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


REQUIREMENTS Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10<br />

32/64-bit, 50MB hard disk space<br />

WEBSITE www.ashampoo.com<br />

NOTES Get your registration code from<br />

within the application<br />

Ashampoo Snap 8<br />

THERE ARE A number of reasons why you might<br />

want to take a picture of the contents of your<br />

desktop. Such images can be useful when putting<br />

together a website, creating tutorials, demos or<br />

manuals, or just to record something for posterity.<br />

Windows makes it easy to create simple screen<br />

captures by pressing the Print Screen key, but<br />

Ashampoo Snap opens up a number of new options.<br />

As well as capturing precisely what you see on<br />

the screen at any given moment, Snap can be used<br />

to capture timed shots from games. These screen<br />

captures can then be joined together to create a<br />

video. Recording can be paused and resumed at any<br />

time, so you can compose your screen to get<br />

everything looking exactly as you want it to.<br />

Snap can be used with a multi-monitor setup so<br />

huge screen captures can be created as easily as<br />

capturing a single window. If you want to highlight a<br />

particular area of a screen capture, resizable shapes,<br />

text and other graphics can be added.<br />

There will be circumstances in which it isn’t<br />

possible to compose your screen to show everything<br />

you would like to include in a screen capture, such as<br />

when working with a complex website, for example.<br />

Snap enables you to perform scrolling captures so<br />

such lengthy documents can be captured in their<br />

entirety, meaning you don’t have to stitch together<br />

numerous images manually.<br />

With the ability to capture non-standard shaped<br />

parts of the screen, the option of adding voice-over<br />

recordings to your video captures and support for a<br />

range of video codecs, Ashampoo Snap is one of the<br />

most versatile screen capture tools available.<br />

PC Fresh <strong>2017</strong><br />

BUY A NEW PC and it will<br />

generally be fast, reliable, with<br />

everything working just as you<br />

would expect, at least initially.<br />

But as you use the system –<br />

installing, running and removing<br />

programs – so this begins to<br />

change. Performance tails off,<br />

your system might crash<br />

occasionally, and some features<br />

might no longer work at all.<br />

You don’t have to live with<br />

this, though. If your system<br />

seems slow, then just install PC<br />

Fresh <strong>2017</strong>, and the program will<br />

quickly help you restore your PC<br />

to its original performance.<br />

This starts with PC Fresh<br />

asking questions about your<br />

computer: whether it’s connected<br />

to a printer, if Wi-Fi is active,<br />

whether you use Windows<br />

Search, and so on. Answering<br />

these queries helps the<br />

program tailor its advice to suit<br />

your exact needs.<br />

The main PC Fresh console<br />

then allows you to optimise<br />

the system in many different<br />

ways, from configuring which<br />

programs launch on startup to<br />

optimising key Windows<br />

performance settings.<br />

This process is surprisingly<br />

easy, too. Unlike some similar<br />

tools, you’re not left alone to<br />

fi gure out what you should do.<br />

PC Fresh will highlight any<br />

problems it’s found in a<br />

particular area, and you can<br />

view its recommendations – and<br />

make the changes you need – in<br />

just a few clicks.<br />

The program doesn’t stop<br />

there, though. Once you’ve got<br />

your system running<br />

smoothly again, PC<br />

Fresh <strong>2017</strong> provides<br />

several other tools<br />

to help you tune it<br />

even further, so you<br />

can track down any<br />

large, disk-hogging<br />

fi les, reorganise<br />

your fi les or activate<br />

the Power Now!<br />

mode, which<br />

temporarily turns<br />

off every nonessential<br />

item to<br />

help deliver the best<br />

performance – very<br />

useful if, for example,<br />

you’re about to<br />

run a demanding<br />

application such<br />

as a game.<br />

REQUIREMENTS Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10<br />

32/64-bit, 40MB hard disk space<br />

WEBSITE www.abelssoft.de<br />

NOTES Get your registration code from<br />

within the application<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

75


REQUIREMENTS Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10<br />

32/64-bit, 50MB hard disk space<br />

WEBSITE www.softorbits.com<br />

NOTES Get your registration code from<br />

within the application<br />

SoftOrbits Easy Photo Unblur<br />

IF YOU HAVE a blurred photo,<br />

you can turn to your image<br />

editor’s Sharpen tool, but in most<br />

cases this isn’t smart enough to<br />

guarantee a fi x. The typical<br />

algorithm blindly applies the same<br />

fi lter right across your image, and<br />

is just as likely to cause problems<br />

as solve the original issue.<br />

Easy Photo Unblur takes a<br />

more intelligent approach.<br />

The program analyses your<br />

photos, attempts to detect the<br />

type of blur – camera shake,<br />

motion blur, simple focus issues<br />

– and applies the appropriate fi x,<br />

sometimes to the most affected<br />

areas of the image only.<br />

You don’t need to understand<br />

or even care about these<br />

low-level details. Simply open<br />

an image, click Reduce Blurring,<br />

Run, and Easy Photo Unblur will<br />

often fi nd and fi x your photo<br />

problems all on its own.<br />

There are some fi ne-tuning<br />

options available, but again the<br />

program does its best to<br />

remain easy to use. You can<br />

select presets from a list,<br />

drag sliders and watch<br />

the effects, or browse the<br />

Help fi le for explanations<br />

of how it all works.<br />

Bonus tools include an<br />

Image Correction panel<br />

where you can manually<br />

tweak brightness, contrast,<br />

saturation, temperature,<br />

tint and gamma, or tap the<br />

‘Auto correction’ button to<br />

fi x everything at once.<br />

Easy Photo Unblur<br />

even has a Batch Mode for<br />

applying the same fi xes to a<br />

group of photos, potentially<br />

saving you a lot of time.<br />

REQUIREMENTS Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10<br />

32/64-bit, 50MB hard disk space<br />

WEBSITE www.oo-software.com<br />

NOTES Get your registration code at<br />

diskimage10.disc.computershopper.co.uk<br />

O&O DiskImage 10.5<br />

Professional<br />

ANYONE WHO’S EVER experienced the shock of<br />

data loss, or had to spend hours recovering their<br />

system, will know the importance of backing up.<br />

O&O DiskImage Professional provides you with all<br />

the tools you need for backing up both individual<br />

data such as selected fi les and folders, as well as<br />

drive images of entire partitions and drives.<br />

While’s it’s not a tool for complete beginners, it<br />

does provide some hints and tips to guide you<br />

towards protecting your data, and the latest version<br />

attempts to make things even easier with a<br />

revamped, Windows 8-style interface. For<br />

much fi ner control over creating disk images,<br />

the Options menu lets you set the imaging<br />

method (used or all sectors), destination<br />

format (DiskImage or VHD), image type (full,<br />

incremental or differential), compression,<br />

encryption, exclude fi lters, and a lot more.<br />

Backups will by default be run on demand,<br />

but set them up as a job and they can be run<br />

at defi ned times, particular days of the week,<br />

at regular intervals, or when certain devices<br />

are connected. There are also options to<br />

receive email notifications, run commands<br />

before or after the job, and shut your system<br />

down when it’s fi nished.<br />

When it comes to managing your backups,<br />

DiskImage has all the options you need. You<br />

can restore entire images or select individual fi les and<br />

folders, and ‘mount’ your image fi les in Windows, so<br />

you can browse them like any other attached drive.<br />

DiskImage also allows you to convert drive<br />

images into virtual hard disks, meaning you can<br />

attach them to programs such as VirtualBox or<br />

VMWare Workstation for use as virtual PCs.<br />

DiskImage also supports Machine Independent<br />

Restoration, which lets you tweak backup images so<br />

they can be restored to different computers – a<br />

great way to migrate from an old PC to a new one.<br />

76 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


Resources<br />

Chat and Communication<br />

Evernote 6.4.2.3788 Store your<br />

notes, ideas and plans in the cloud, and<br />

synchronise them between computers.<br />

Mailbird 2.3.42<br />

A free desktop email client for Windows.<br />

UPDATED Miranda IM 0.10.68<br />

Chat with friends across multiple<br />

messaging platforms, including AIM,<br />

Facebook, IRC and MSN, all from one<br />

simple interface.<br />

UPDATED Skype for Windows 7.35.0.101 Make<br />

internet voice and video calls for free, and buy<br />

credit to make calls to mobiles and landlines.<br />

Trillian 5.6 Use all your instant-messaging<br />

accounts with one application. Supports<br />

Windows Live!, AIM, Yahoo! and Google Talk.<br />

UPDATED WhatsApp Desktop 0.2.3699 A free<br />

PC and Mac version of the popular messaging<br />

app, allowing you to chat straight from your<br />

desktop instead of using the web app.<br />

Customisation<br />

UPDATED iolo System Mechanic Free<br />

16.5.214 Speed up your system with<br />

Iolo’s PC optimisation suite.<br />

Rainmeter 4.0<br />

Customise the desktop with your choice<br />

of tools and shortcuts.<br />

Windows 8 Transformation Pack 9.1<br />

Emulate the look of Windows 8 on an<br />

earlier version of the operating system.<br />

Windows 8 UX Pack 9.1<br />

Get a glimpse of the Windows 10 UI without<br />

committing to a full OS upgrade.<br />

UPDATED Windows 10 Transformation Pack<br />

6.0 Bring some of Windows 10’s new features<br />

to your current operating system.<br />

Winstep Xtreme 17.1<br />

Freshen up your system with this suite of<br />

desktop and UI replacement applications.<br />

General<br />

Genie Timeline Free 2016 Protect your<br />

most valuable fi les with this easy-to-use<br />

backup tool.<br />

Paragon Partition Manager 14 Free<br />

Create, format, split, merge and reorganise<br />

all your hard disk’s partitions.<br />

UPDATED PeaZip 6.4.0 A tremendously<br />

powerful archive-management tool.<br />

UPDATED Screenshot Captor 4.20.1 Create<br />

and manage screenshots the easy way.<br />

SUMo 5.1.4 Quickly scan your PC’s installed<br />

applications and fi nd any updates that are<br />

available for them.<br />

ZipGenius 6.3.2.3116 A fl exible fi lecompression<br />

tool with support for a huge<br />

number of compressed fi le formats.<br />

Internet and Network<br />

CarotDAV 1.13<br />

Manage all your online storage services<br />

with one simple application.<br />

Cyberduck 5.4.0<br />

A powerful but easy-to-use FTP client for<br />

uploading and downloading your fi les.<br />

Easy WiFi 4.0<br />

Find free Wi-Fi hotspots while you’re out<br />

and about.<br />

UPDATED FileZilla 3.25.1 A fast and reliable<br />

FTP client with lots of useful features.<br />

NetBalancer 9.9.2<br />

Make the most of your internet connection<br />

by assigning download and upload priorities<br />

to web applications.<br />

UPDATED TeamViewer 12.1.10277<br />

Remote-control your computer from<br />

anywhere in the world.<br />

Tweaking and Performance<br />

CCleaner 5.28 Remove unwanted<br />

information, temporary fi les, browsing<br />

history, huge log fi les and even the settings<br />

that uninstalled soft ware leaves behind.<br />

Defraggler 2.21 Ensure your system is<br />

defragmented properly and improve its<br />

performance.<br />

Finestra Virtual Desktops 2.5.4501 Set up<br />

four or more virtual desktops on your PC.<br />

IObit Advanced SystemCare Free<br />

10.2.0.721 A complete computer security,<br />

maintenance and optimisation suite.<br />

UPDATED Revo Uninstaller Free 2.0.3 Remove<br />

installed applications completely, including all<br />

their folders, system fi les and Registry entries.<br />

Simple Performance Boost 1.0.5 Tweak the<br />

Windows Registry to give your PC a<br />

performance boost.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

77


Award winning<br />

technology, award<br />

winning systems<br />

Custom-made gaming PCs and laptops<br />

scan.co.uk/3XS • 01204 47 47 47


Performance<br />

A range of affordable overclocked gaming PCs that feature a variety of Intel Core i5 and i7 CPUs<br />

and NVIDIA GeForce GTX graphics cards.<br />

Custom<br />

options<br />

available<br />

3XS Performance GTK6<br />

• Intel Core i5 7600K Quad Core<br />

• Professionally overclocked up to 4.8GHz<br />

• 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000MHz<br />

• 6GB EVGA GTX 1060 ACX 2.0<br />

• 1TB Western Digital Blue HDD<br />

• Microsoft Windows 10 64bit<br />

£1,099.99 INC<br />

VAT<br />

3XS Performance GTX<br />

• Intel Core i7 7700K Quad Core with HT<br />

• Professionally overclocked to 4.8GHz<br />

• 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000MHz<br />

• 6GB EVGA GTX 1060 ACX 2.0<br />

• 250GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD & 1TB HDD<br />

• Microsoft Windows 10 64bit<br />

£1,349.99 INC<br />

VAT<br />

Vengeance<br />

A range of high-end overclocked gaming PCs based around the Intel Core i7 CPU and NVIDIA<br />

GeForce GTX graphics cards for the ultimate gaming experience.<br />

Custom<br />

options<br />

available<br />

3XS Vengeance<br />

• Intel Core i7 7700K Quad Core with HT<br />

• Professionally overclocked to 4.8GHz<br />

• 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000MHz<br />

• 8GB EVGA GTX 1070 SC ACX 3.0<br />

• 256GB Samsung SM961 M.2 SSD & 2TB HDD<br />

• Microsoft Windows 10 64bit<br />

3XS Vengeance 1080<br />

• Intel Core i7 7700K Quad Core with HT<br />

• Professionally overclocked to 4.8GHz<br />

• 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3000MHz<br />

• 8GB EVGA GTX 1080 SC ACX 3.0<br />

• 256GB Samsung SM961 M.2 SSD & 2TB HDD<br />

• Microsoft Windows 10 64bit<br />

£1,699.99 INC<br />

VAT<br />

£1,849.99 INC<br />

VAT<br />

Gaming laptops<br />

A gaming laptop is a great alternative to a gaming PC if you have limited space, travel frequently or<br />

go to a lot of LAN parties and gaming tournaments.<br />

Custom<br />

options<br />

available<br />

3XS LG15 Performance GTX<br />

• 15.6” Full HD IPS screen<br />

• 4GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti<br />

• Intel Core i7 7700HQ Quad Core<br />

• 8GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz<br />

• 250GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD<br />

• Microsoft Windows 10 64bit<br />

3XS LG15 Vengeance G-Sync<br />

• 15.6” Full HD or 4K screen<br />

• NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 or 1070<br />

• Intel Core i7 7700HQ Quad Core<br />

• 16GB Corsair DDR4 2133MHz<br />

• 256GB Samsung SM961 M.2 SSD<br />

• Microsoft Windows 10 64bit<br />

£1,099.99 INC<br />

VAT<br />

£1,359.99 INC<br />

VAT<br />

Scan <strong>Computer</strong>s recommends Windows<br />

Microsoft product images reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation. Prices subject to change.


POCKET<br />

MONEY<br />

VALUESMARTPHONES<br />

With flagship phone prices going through the roof, you could save hundreds of pounds by hunting for a<br />

better deal – whether it’s an up-to-date budget handset that punches above its weight, or a top-flight<br />

model from yesteryear. We round up the 16 handsets that offer high quality at a low price point<br />

80 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


CONTENT REVIEWS<br />

Page 84<br />

APPLE iPhone SE<br />

Page 85<br />

GOOGLE Nexus 5X<br />

Page 86<br />

HONOR 6X<br />

Page 87<br />

HTC One A9<br />

Page 88<br />

HUAWEI P8 Lite<br />

Page 89<br />

LENOVO P2<br />

Page 90<br />

LG G4<br />

Page 91<br />

MOTOROLA Moto G4<br />

Page 92<br />

MOTOROLA Moto G5<br />

Page 93<br />

MOTOROLA Moto Z Play<br />

Page 94<br />

ONEPLUS 3T<br />

Page 95<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy A5<br />

Page 96<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy S6<br />

Page 97<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy S7<br />

Page 98<br />

SONY Xperia X Compact<br />

Page 99<br />

VODAFONE Smart Platinum 7<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong> 81


SMARTPHONES<br />

IT SEEMS ALMOST churlish to complain that<br />

premium smartphones come with premium<br />

prices attached, especially when they do make<br />

an effort to earn it: to name just a few, there’s<br />

the new Samsung Galaxy S8, with its vast<br />

edge-to-edge display; the incredibly powerful<br />

iPhone 7; and the Google Pixel, which features<br />

the best rear camera on any handheld.<br />

And yet, for anyone who remembers<br />

being able to get the Nexus 6P for £449, the<br />

costs are hard to stomach. The iPhone 7?<br />

Yours for £599, minimum. Google Pixel?<br />

A cool £600 for the base model. The Galaxy<br />

S8 is the worst offender yet, starting at £689<br />

– that’s £120 more than the Galaxy S7 when it<br />

launched just one year ago.<br />

Fortunately, while the top end of the<br />

market is exploding, we’ve been consistently<br />

impressed by a lot of cheaper phones recently<br />

– specifically, how they deliver the kind of<br />

performance, display quality, battery life and<br />

build quality we’d expect from devices costing<br />

a lot more. For some, like the OnePlus 3T, this<br />

is a conscious design goal; others, like the<br />

Motorola Moto G4, just happen to be<br />

excellent pieces of hardware.<br />

We therefore wouldn’t hesitate to<br />

recommend a great lower- or mid-range<br />

smartphone over an overpriced fl agship, but<br />

then, that’s not your only option. Even with<br />

the never-ending churn of the annual<br />

smartphone release cycle, you can still get<br />

older high-end models new and unwrapped,<br />

and the inevitable price drops that come with<br />

their age mean that it’s possible to fi nd these<br />

premium products at heavily discounted rates.<br />

Therein lies the best thing about avoiding<br />

a smartphone rip-off : you’ve got a huge<br />

amount of choice when it comes to value<br />

handsets. Allow us to make things a bit easier<br />

with this test of 16 possible purchase<br />

candidates – we’ve skipped any duff phones<br />

and only included those that are at least very<br />

good, so you can be sure that with any of<br />

them, you’ll be getting a fair deal.<br />

CORE DRAW<br />

If pure performance is what you’re after, it’s<br />

generally better to go with an older fl agship<br />

rather than a new budget phone; they might<br />

not be the fastest any more, but the best<br />

processors of 2015 and 2016 can still easily<br />

outpace anything built to sell for peanuts,<br />

especially when it comes to games. For<br />

demanding 3D titles at their best, you’re<br />

looking at paying around £330 and up.<br />

Not that cheaper alternatives are<br />

necessarily slow. Hexa- and even octa-core<br />

processors aren’t uncommon even in the<br />

£100-£200 range, so it’s actually rather hard<br />

to fi nd something that doesn’t stay slick and<br />

responsive throughout everyday multitasking.<br />

Special mention goes to the Apple A9<br />

chip found within the iPhone SE; don’t be<br />

deceived by the fact that it’s dual-core, as<br />

Apple has somehow optimised it to run so<br />

well with iOS that it’s one of the bestperforming<br />

phones here.<br />

INCHING FORWARD<br />

It’s important that you choose a smartphone<br />

with your ideal screen size, as there’s no<br />

single ‘best’ spec here. The 4in iPhone SE is<br />

wonderfully portable but doesn’t offer nearly<br />

as much real estate as, say, the 5.5in Honor<br />

6X, which is arguably better for watching<br />

videos and web browsing but could prove<br />

uncomfortable for small hands.<br />

Many cheaper phones now deliver the kind of performance,<br />

display quality, battery life and build quality we’d expect<br />

from devices costing a lot more<br />

Otherwise, display quality can be measured<br />

in conveniently objective terms. We test for<br />

how much of the sRGB colour gamut a screen<br />

can cover (ideally, at least 90%), plus the<br />

contrast (higher is better) and peak<br />

brightness. A high brightness (over around<br />

400cd/m 2 ) will make the screen easier to read<br />

when exposed to direct daylight, though you<br />

can get away with a lower fi gure if you’ll<br />

primarily be using your phone indoors.<br />

82 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

As for resolution, 1,920x1,080 is perfectly<br />

fi ne even on larger phablets; anything higher<br />

is nice to have, but it’s harder to tell the<br />

difference on such small screens compared to<br />

Full HD vs Quad HD monitors. That said, try<br />

not to settle for anything lower unless the<br />

screen is also smaller than average, as is the<br />

case with the Sony Xperia X Compact.<br />

ELECTRIC BOOGALOO<br />

Battery life is a no-brainer: the longer, the<br />

better. Naturally, a higher milliampere hour<br />

(mAh) count is preferable, but variables<br />

including the processor power, screen size,<br />

and brightness and frequency of use mean<br />

you shouldn’t rely on hard specs alone.<br />

That’s why we run a benchmark test, which<br />

involves looping a video fi le with the screen<br />

brightness set to 170cd/m 2 and measuring<br />

how long this takes to run a full battery dry.<br />

Most phones fall around the 12-hour mark,<br />

which indicates the ability to make it through<br />

a full day of normal use on a single charge.<br />

LOST IN SPACE<br />

There was an odd period throughout late<br />

2015 and early 2016 in which smartphone<br />

manufacturers seemingly agreed that<br />

expandable storage wasn’t actually<br />

that important, and that they just<br />

wouldn’t bother with microSD slots<br />

– presumably another ‘brave’<br />

decision along the lines of the<br />

iPhone 7’s missing headphone jack.<br />

Luckily, sanity has re-asserted<br />

itself, and most handsets these days<br />

adhere to the gold standard of<br />

expandable microSD compatibility.<br />

This is good because onboard<br />

storage can fi ll up at a surprising<br />

rate, particularly if it’s a relatively<br />

low capacity such as 16GB.<br />

Our advice would be to aim for a<br />

minimum of 32GB of integrated memory,<br />

ideally with microSD support as a fallback;<br />

any lower and you’ll have to be very careful<br />

with saving music and movies.<br />

SENSOR SENSIBILITY<br />

Perhaps the most common pitfall for budget<br />

smartphones is the quality of the camera.<br />

Many models boast of having 12-megapixel,<br />

13-megapixel or even 16-megapixel rear<br />

snappers, but image size is only one aspect,<br />

and the ability to capture fi ne details and<br />

cut down on visual noise are even more<br />

important. Here, a lot of cheaper devices can<br />

struggle, especially indoors.<br />

We’ll cover each phone’s main camera in<br />

more detail in their respective reviews. To be<br />

fair, there are a few models that do manage to<br />

excel at photography: the Moto G4 is your<br />

best bet at the budget end, while the LG G4,<br />

Nexus 5X and Samsung Galaxy S7 all impress<br />

at higher price points.<br />

The best phones for…<br />

Got something specific in mind besides all-round quality? These are<br />

the great-value handsets that most effectively fi ll their niche<br />

…STYLE<br />

Samsung Galaxy S7<br />

It’s the most expensive smartphone in<br />

this group test, but not only is the<br />

Samsung Galaxy S7 still a sizable wad of<br />

cash less than the newer Galaxy S8, it’s<br />

also the most luxurious model here.<br />

From its glass and aluminium<br />

construction to its sleek, tapered edges<br />

and gorgeous display<br />

– which is almost<br />

bezel-less on the left<br />

and right edges –<br />

the S7 is a perfect<br />

show-off handset.<br />

It’s not just<br />

trading looks for<br />

practicality, either.<br />

That glass – on<br />

both sides – is<br />

highly damageresistant<br />

Corning<br />

Gorilla Glass 4,<br />

and the handset<br />

meets the IP68<br />

standard for dustand<br />

water-proofi ng,<br />

so it will survive a<br />

dunk in any puddle<br />

or sink.<br />

…CUSTOMISATION<br />

Motorola Moto Z Play<br />

The Moto Z Play’s versatility is mainly<br />

derived from its modular design. There are<br />

loads of clip-on attachments available, from<br />

simple expanded batteries to booming<br />

speakers and camera grips with added optical<br />

zoom capability. One – the Moto Insta-Share<br />

– even turns the handset into a projector.<br />

It’s all very<br />

impressive stuff,<br />

although it’s<br />

easily possible to<br />

spend more on<br />

these ‘Moto Mods’<br />

than you did on<br />

the actual phone.<br />

Luckily, you can<br />

still add a<br />

personal touch<br />

on the (relative)<br />

cheap with<br />

interchangeable<br />

backplates – these<br />

cost £16 and<br />

come in some<br />

unusual fi nishes,<br />

including nylon<br />

fabric and<br />

oak wood.<br />

…TRAVELLING<br />

Lenovo P2<br />

The P2 is great for a lot of reasons, but<br />

the headline act has to be its incredible<br />

battery life. A gigantic 5,100mAh unit<br />

provides about three days of regular use<br />

between charges, and its result in our<br />

video playback test – 28h 50m – is well<br />

over double what we normally see from<br />

Android smartphones.<br />

For long plane, train<br />

and car rides, its<br />

usefulness is obvious.<br />

Its dual SIM slot is<br />

also a handy bonus<br />

for anyone who<br />

frequently travels<br />

abroad, as it allows<br />

you to keep your main<br />

SIM installed while<br />

you switch to an<br />

international SIM to<br />

dodge roaming fees<br />

– so you don’t have to<br />

fi ddle with the tray at<br />

the beginning and end<br />

of the journey, or<br />

worry about the main<br />

SIM getting lost while<br />

you’re away.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

83


SMARTPHONES<br />

APPLE iPhone SE<br />

★★★★★<br />

£379 • From www.apple.com/uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Well built and with a top camera and great battery<br />

life, the iPhone SE is the best 4in phone out there<br />

FINDING AN AFFORDABLE iPhone is<br />

practically impossible if you stick to the main<br />

series of handsets. Even the iPhone 6, which<br />

is now two generations old (having been<br />

replaced by the iPhone 6s and, most recently,<br />

the iPhone 7), goes for about £500 SIM-free.<br />

And that’s if you can actually fi nd it new,<br />

among the far more prevalent refurbs.<br />

Hope remains with Apple’s smaller 4in<br />

models. For minimum expense, there’s the<br />

iPhone 5c, which has fallen well below the<br />

£300 mark, albeit at the cost of a plasticky<br />

build and slow performance.<br />

By contrast, the much more up-to-date<br />

iPhone SE has nailed pretty much everything:<br />

it’s got the build quality, it’s got the<br />

processing power and it’s got the camera, all<br />

packed into a neat metal chassis.<br />

What’s more, on the same day we began<br />

work on this group test, Apple announced<br />

that the 16GB and 64GB storage options<br />

would be replaced by 32GB and 128GB<br />

models respectively, addressing our previous<br />

criticism that the cheapest model’s capacity<br />

was too low. This update is accompanied by<br />

price rises of between £20 and £40, but<br />

you’re still looking at a much cheaper<br />

proposition than any iPhone 6s or 7. All other<br />

hardware remains the same.<br />

Weighing 113g and at 7.6mm thick, the<br />

iPhone SE is exactly the same size as the old<br />

iPhone 5s, and is compatible with the same<br />

range of cases and covers. While the SE is<br />

the lightest iPhone currently available, it’s<br />

actually the thickest of the current crop.<br />

This doesn’t particularly matter, as it<br />

makes the handset easier to grip, and it<br />

means that the camera sits fl ush with the<br />

rear of the case. Besides, overall the iPhone<br />

SE is comparatively tiny by today’s standards,<br />

slipping easily into any pocket.<br />

colour accuracy coverage<br />

of 94.6% of the sRGB<br />

colour gamut goes some<br />

way to make up for it.<br />

Sadly, the SE doesn’t<br />

have the fancy 3D Touch<br />

features of recent<br />

fl agship iPhones, but this<br />

cost-saving omission<br />

isn’t a deal-breaker as<br />

we could still use iOS<br />

perfectly well without<br />

feeling too hampered.<br />

Apple has fi tt ed a<br />

12-megapixel camera<br />

into the iPhone SE,<br />

the same as in the<br />

iPhone 6s. It’s a great<br />

all-rounder, ably<br />

adapting to most<br />

situations to produce<br />

well-exposed shots with<br />

plenty of detail in them.<br />

The HDR mode captures a<br />

particularly excellent dynamic range, without<br />

over-processing the fi nal shots.<br />

There’s also a True Tone LED fl ash, which<br />

measures ambient light then fi res the fl ash at<br />

the same colour temperature, reducing the<br />

tell-tale signs of a regular fl ash. You also get<br />

all the shooting modes that the iPhone 6s<br />

has, including panoramic shots and 4K video.<br />

The iPhone SE<br />

absolutely delivers on<br />

battery life, too. Its<br />

1,624mAh battery might<br />

sound pretty tiny<br />

compared to the<br />

3,000mAh+ batteries<br />

found on Android<br />

phones, but its smaller<br />

screen requires a lot less<br />

power. As a result, it<br />

lasted an incredible 16h<br />

46m at a brightness of<br />

170cd/m 2 in our battery<br />

test. This is just shy of<br />

the Galaxy S7’s run time,<br />

and 1h 48m longer than<br />

the iPhone 6s lasted.<br />

Since launching with<br />

iOS 9.3, the iPhone SE<br />

has been updated all the<br />

way up to iOS 10.2 – with<br />

10.3 coming very soon, if<br />

it’s not out already by the<br />

time you read this. This means it’s been able<br />

to benefi t from third-party integration for<br />

iMessage and Siri, redesigned Maps and<br />

Music apps and the Memories feature for<br />

The iPhone SE has nailed pretty much everything: it’s got<br />

the build quality, it’s got the processing power and it’s got<br />

the camera, all packed into a neat metal chassis<br />

sorting images in Photos. Apple Pay support<br />

remains, though the iPhone SE uses an older<br />

TouchID sensor, which isn’t quite as fast or<br />

error-proof as on pricier iPhones.<br />

DENSITY SLICKER<br />

Moving back to a 4in screen, Apple has<br />

re-used the iPhone 5s’s resolution of<br />

1,136x640. This is one of the lowest-resolution<br />

phones here, not even hitting standard HD,<br />

but the pixel density of 326ppi actually<br />

matches that of the 2015 iPhone 6s, which<br />

has a resolution of 1,334x750. Both phones<br />

are defi nitely sharp enough, and text looks<br />

clear and easy to read.<br />

Image quality isn’t quite as good as<br />

Apple’s pricier iPhones, but the iPhone SE’s<br />

screen performs better than stated: Apple<br />

claims maximum brightness of 500cd/m 2 and<br />

a contrast ratio of 800:1, but we measured it<br />

at 577cd/m 2 with a contrast ratio of 892:1.<br />

While this contrast ratio still isn’t great, its<br />

CLOUD A9<br />

Performance is excellent, thanks to the<br />

iPhone SE having the same 1.8GHz A9<br />

processor and 2GB of RAM as the 6s line-up.<br />

In Geekbench, the iPhone SE scored 2,550 in<br />

the single-core test – the same as the iPhone<br />

6s and faster than the 2,115 scored by the<br />

Samsung Galaxy S7. In the multicore test, the<br />

S7 takes the lead with a score of 6,437, but<br />

that’s a quad-core device: the iPhone SE has a<br />

dual-core processor and still scored 4,444.<br />

As with all of Apple’s phones, the slick<br />

combination of the processor, iOS and Safari<br />

makes web browsing a super-smooth<br />

experience: the Peacekeeper browser<br />

benchmark score of 4,761 is one of the best<br />

we’ve seen on a smartphone.<br />

MAKE ROOM<br />

As mentioned, the original 16GB (£359) and<br />

64GB (£439) models have been discontinued,<br />

replaced by 32GB (£379) and 128GB (£479)<br />

variants. The price bumps are a shame (bear<br />

in mind these are largely the same phones<br />

that launched back in March 2016) but<br />

otherwise, that’s fi ne by us; 16GB isn’t much<br />

space at all, especially with the lack of<br />

expandable storage.<br />

The iPhone SE surpassed our expectations<br />

when it fi rst came out, and now the minimum<br />

storage issue has been dealt with, it’s become<br />

even better. Really, the only thing it lacks<br />

compared to the iPhone 6s is 3D Touch. For<br />

anyone who still hankers after a powerful 4in<br />

smartphone, it’s an amazing choice.<br />

84 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

GOOGLE Nexus 5X<br />

★★★★★<br />

£284 • From www.ebuyer.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

It’s over a year old, but the Nexus 5X remains a<br />

superb Android handset for a reasonable price<br />

WHILE WE’RE FOND of the Pixel and Pixel<br />

XL, Google’s most recent smartphones, they<br />

both went down the ultra-premium route,<br />

abandoning the surprising affordability of the<br />

previous-generation Nexus 6P and Nexus 5X.<br />

Happily, the latter is still an excellent choice.<br />

It doesn’t make the best fi rst impression;<br />

made of plastic, it looks like a budget handset,<br />

with utterly featureless side buttons that are<br />

so simple as to appear an afterthought.<br />

It’s great to hold, though. The plastic fi nish<br />

provides plenty of grip and, at 136g, it’s among<br />

the lightest phones around. The shape is good<br />

too, with the rear panel neatly meeting the<br />

front bezels. The front-facing speakers provide<br />

better audio than any tiny port tucked away at<br />

the bottom of some fl agship smartphones.<br />

POKE’S ON YOU<br />

Underneath the unassuming exterior lies a<br />

powerful smartphone packed with features.<br />

The circular rear fi ngerprint sensor is placed<br />

just below the rear camera, so you may have<br />

to adjust your grip if you’re used to holding<br />

your phone by the edges, but otherwise it’s<br />

easily accessible. Resting your fi nger on the<br />

sensor switches on and unlocks the phone<br />

almost instantly. It’s accurate too, learning<br />

fi ngerprints even quicker than the sensors in<br />

Samsung’s fl agship phones, and recognising<br />

them more consistently as well.<br />

There’s also a USB Type-C port. It’s a little<br />

chunkier and feels sturdier than Micro USB,<br />

and the reversible design helps minimise<br />

fi ddling. However, USB Type-C cables still<br />

aren’t exactly common, and Google includes<br />

only a Type-C to Type-C cable in the box.<br />

There’s no video output, and data transfer<br />

rates are only at USB2 speeds. Wireless<br />

charging has been dropped, too, but Type-C<br />

allows for fast charging, reaching 50% from<br />

fl at in just 30 minutes.<br />

A 2,700mAh battery is par for the course,<br />

given this is a pretty slim 7.9mm handset. In<br />

our continuous video playback test, it lasted<br />

10h 14m. This is one area where the 5X hasn’t<br />

aged well, as many more recent phones beat<br />

this by miles. Lenovo’s P2, for instance, lasted<br />

almost three times as long, despite costing less.<br />

Still, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808<br />

chipset means the Nexus 5X is no slouch. It<br />

consists of two high-performance Cortex A57<br />

cores running at 1.8GHz, and four powerefficient<br />

Cortex A53 cores running at 1.44GHz.<br />

A Geekbench multicore score of 3,489<br />

puts it alongside the similarly specified LG G4.<br />

It’s not the best, but in practice everything is<br />

quick and smooth. It’s well ahead of the<br />

Moto Z Play’s Snapdragon 625, which scored<br />

only 2,599. In terms of gaming, it doesn’t run<br />

3D titles as smoothly as most high-end<br />

smartphones, but it played our usual<br />

selection of Android titles without a hitch.<br />

Amidst all that is a decent Full HD LCD<br />

screen. Even at 5.2in across it has a whopping<br />

pixel density of 424ppi and, despite higher<br />

resolutions being available, there’s no serious<br />

advantage in day-to-day use. In objective tests,<br />

In most areas, the Nexus 5X may be pretty good,<br />

but its camera is truly excellent<br />

the screen stood up well, covering 94.8% of<br />

the sRGB colour gamut, with 415cd/m 2<br />

maximum brightness, a contrast level of<br />

1,309:1 and a black level of 0.32cd/m 2 .<br />

We’ve seen brighter LCDs at this price, but<br />

the Nexus 5X nails consistency. It also has a<br />

pleasingly fl at colour output, without the<br />

boosted and garish shades seen elsewhere.<br />

In most areas, the Nexus 5X may be pretty<br />

good, but its camera is truly excellent, coming<br />

out on top against the very capable Samsung<br />

Galaxy S6. Twelve megapixels on a typically<br />

sized 1 /2.3in sensor sounds unremarkable, but<br />

each pixel is bigger than most, measuring<br />

1.55um. By comparison, the S6 reportedly has<br />

1.12um pixels on its 16-megapixel sensor.<br />

The Nexus 5X’s photos were packed with<br />

detail, compared to the more smoothed off<br />

appearance of the Galaxy S6’s efforts.<br />

Outdoors, you can see great detail in brick<br />

walls and a sharper image overall. Colour<br />

balance was spot on, too, with the camera<br />

matching the output of the S6 almost exactly.<br />

It dealt well with higher-contrast scenes,<br />

eliminating noise from large areas of colour<br />

without removing detail elsewhere. Colours<br />

remained accurate indoors, with great detail in<br />

complex textures and well-balanced exposures<br />

across our various lighting setups.<br />

The Nexus 5X was quick to shoot in HDR<br />

mode, and you can jump straight to the<br />

camera by double-clicking the power button.<br />

Google’s camera app is fi ne for basic snapping,<br />

but lacks any manual controls or fancy features.<br />

THE SWEETEST THING<br />

Being a Google device, the Nexus 5X was<br />

among the fi rst smartphones to be updated to<br />

Android 7.0 Nougat. This adds a good few<br />

improvements and new functions to the<br />

already-great Android 6.0, such as native<br />

split-screen multitasking, bundled<br />

notifications and a Data Saver mode, which<br />

can prevent certain apps from munching on<br />

your data allowance in the background.<br />

The Nexus 5X isn’t the best-looking phone,<br />

nor the best designed. It isn’t the fastest, it<br />

doesn’t have the best battery life and the<br />

screen isn’t outstanding. Don’t be fooled by<br />

the lack of standout features, however – it<br />

also has a distinct lack of weaknesses, and few<br />

handsets can claim the 5X’s comprehensive<br />

competence. As such, it’s a device that’s far<br />

greater than the sum of its parts, and it could<br />

be yours for £100 less than it cost at launch.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

85


SMARTPHONES<br />

HONOR 6X<br />

★★★★★<br />

£225 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

With fantastic performance at a great price,<br />

Honor’s 6X shouldn’t be ignored<br />

REGARDLESS OF WHETHER Honor<br />

appreciates being pigeonholed as a budget<br />

smartphone brand, its latest device – the<br />

Honor 6X – may be its fi nest work yet.<br />

It squeezes a 5.5in, Full HD screen into<br />

an all-metal body with 32GB of integrated<br />

storage and 4GB of RAM. The rear is curved,<br />

so it sits nicely in your hand, and the glass<br />

on the front also tapers slightly at the<br />

edges for a slicker look.<br />

As for connectivity, the 6X has a dual SIM<br />

slot, perfect for travelling abroad or using it<br />

as a dual work/leisure device. There’s no USB<br />

Type-C connector for fast charging, with<br />

Honor opting for an older Micro USB port<br />

instead, but you do get an extremely<br />

fast-acting fi ngerprint sensor on the back,<br />

nestled below the twin-lens camera.<br />

The Honor 6X’s screen itself isn’t an<br />

AMOLED model, but instead a good-quality<br />

LCD unit. It measures pretty well, with a<br />

contrast ratio of 1,694:1 helping it produce<br />

wonderfully impactful images. Its peak<br />

brightness of 502cd/m 2 also means you’ll<br />

only have problems reading it in the very<br />

brightest of conditions.<br />

SHOO BLUE<br />

Its colour reproduction isn’t quite so good,<br />

unfortunately. The screen covers only 89% of<br />

the sRGB colour gamut, which is far from<br />

brilliant. However, thanks to Honor’s new ‘eye<br />

comfort mode’, which fi lters out blue light in<br />

the evenings, and automatically adjusts<br />

brightness and colour temperature according<br />

to ambient light, it is easy on your eyes.<br />

The Honor 6X is the only phone we’ve<br />

seen in this price range to include a twin-lens<br />

camera, in this case a 12-megapixel unit with<br />

a 2-megapixel secondary sensor. This allows<br />

it to take wide-aperture shots similar to the<br />

iPhone 7 Plus’s bokeh mode, blurring<br />

everything beyond the point of focus. The<br />

effect quality isn’t quite on a par with Apple’s<br />

phablet (as you’d expect, considering the 6X<br />

is a fraction of the price), but it’s still good<br />

enough to give your shots a handy facelift.<br />

There’s also the usual suite of shooting<br />

modes, with the rear camera producing some<br />

decent shots packed with detail. Outdoors,<br />

the rear camera produces good-looking shots,<br />

capturing details such as the brickwork on<br />

buildings particularly well.<br />

Indoor image quality isn’t so good, with<br />

photos losing vibrancy and gaining graininess,<br />

but generally the 6X still manages balanced,<br />

well-judged exposures in low light, and has a<br />

single LED fl ash to help cut through the<br />

darkness when conditions get really tricky.<br />

It’s certainly got a<br />

better rear camera<br />

than that of the<br />

similarly priced<br />

Huawei P9 Lite, as<br />

well as the cheaper<br />

P8 Lite, which we<br />

cover later in this<br />

group test.<br />

If you do feel the<br />

need to tweak your<br />

images, you do get<br />

both Pro still and<br />

video modes for<br />

fi ne-grained control<br />

over every aspect of<br />

your images, allowing<br />

you to tinker with<br />

ISO and exposure<br />

values to your<br />

heart’s content.<br />

KIRIN IN THE NAME<br />

The Honor 6X is no slouch in everyday use,<br />

either. There’s a 2.1GHz Kirin 655 octa-core<br />

processor inside, joining forces with 4GB of<br />

RAM. With a Geekbench single-core score<br />

of 784 and 3,319 for multicore, the 6X gets<br />

close to the Moto Z Play in terms of<br />

smoothness and responsiveness.<br />

Multitasking also feels surprisingly stable –<br />

Honor claims that its smart fi le system<br />

reduces fi le fragmentation for faster response<br />

times, and it certainly feels that way – though<br />

notably, it still loses out to the ageing Google<br />

Nexus 5X in the Geekbench multicore test.<br />

Nonetheless, the 6X is a great performer<br />

once you crack open some Android games.<br />

The Honor 6X scored an average frame rate of<br />

8.4fps in the GFXBench Manhattan 3 test,<br />

which is perfectly respectable for a phone<br />

at this price, and both Threes! and Angry<br />

Birds 2 ran without a hitch.<br />

A comparatively large 3,340mAh battery is<br />

fi tt ed, and the phone didn’t do too badly in<br />

our test, lasting 11h 18m while playing back<br />

video continuously in fl ight mode. For context,<br />

that’s roughly an hour longer than both its<br />

predecessor, 2016’s Honor 5X, and the Nexus<br />

5X. That said, it lags behind the Moto G4 by<br />

about two hours, and the Lenovo P2 remains<br />

untouchable at 28h 50m.<br />

It’s rare to see a<br />

non-Google Android<br />

phone without a bit<br />

of overlay tinkering,<br />

and the Honor 6X<br />

is no exception.<br />

Usually, this is the<br />

point at which we<br />

castigate Honor<br />

for insisting on<br />

preloading its own<br />

onerous launcher<br />

soft ware, but<br />

Honor’s EMUI is<br />

nowhere near as bad<br />

as it used to be.<br />

While there’s<br />

still quite a bit<br />

of superfluous<br />

pre-installed<br />

soft ware – namely<br />

a handful of naff<br />

games and unnecessary apps – you can at<br />

least get rid of them. The downside is that<br />

the Honor 6X doesn’t ship with Android 7.0,<br />

but Honor is promising an over-the-air<br />

update in the coming months.<br />

THE JOY OF 6X<br />

This price bracket is chock full of high-quality<br />

budget smartphones, but the Honor 6X<br />

stands above most of them. Its design,<br />

outdoor camera quality and performance<br />

are great for the money, and battery life<br />

isn’t bad either.<br />

The Moto G4 delivers more bang for your<br />

buck, having both better battery life and a<br />

more-pleasant-to-use camera, all while costing<br />

The Honor 6X is the only phone we’ve seen in this price<br />

range to include a twin-lens camera<br />

less. The Nexus 5X has also price-dropped<br />

into the Honor 6X’s territory, and offers<br />

superior processing power. That said, when it<br />

comes to physical design, we do prefer the<br />

6X’s bodywork – and getting a dual-lens<br />

camera on to a cheap handset is no small feat.<br />

Still, much like the Moto G4, what’s really<br />

impressive about the Honor 6X is that it<br />

holds its own against smartphones that cost<br />

two or three times as much as its £225<br />

asking price. In short, Honor has created a<br />

fantastically capable budget smartphone at<br />

a very tempting price, and it’s impossible<br />

not to recommend it.<br />

86 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

HTC One A9<br />

★★★★★<br />

£310 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Beautifully designed and with a highly<br />

customisable UI, the One A9 is great value<br />

MUCH OF THE HTC One A9’s appeal lies<br />

in its stunning design. Its clean lines and<br />

simple metal chassis may be eerily<br />

reminiscent of Apple’s recent iPhones, but<br />

it’s a winning combination, particularly<br />

since the subtle ridge on the back of the<br />

handset actually makes it easier to hold<br />

than Apple’s phone. The A9 is also very<br />

light for its size, weighing just 143g.<br />

It’s a beautiful smartphone, and<br />

immediately more appealing than the<br />

fl agship One M9, not least because of its 5in,<br />

1,920x1,080 AMOLED display. The M9’s<br />

display didn’t score very highly on colour<br />

accuracy, but the A9’s AMOLED panel<br />

rectifies this instantly, covering the full 100%<br />

of the sRGB colour gamut and producing<br />

perfect 0.00cd/m 2 blacks. Its contrast ratio of<br />

infinity:1 also ensures there’s plenty of detail<br />

in darker images. Whites are admittedly a<br />

little yellow, but we didn’t fi nd it particularly<br />

bothersome. The screen’s peak brightness is<br />

also low at 347.19cd/m 2 , but this isn’t too<br />

unusual for an AMOLED display.<br />

JUST GOOD SENSE<br />

The One A9 comes with Android 7.0 Nougat,<br />

but it’s running HTC’s Sense 7 UI on top, so<br />

its overall appearance isn’t quite the same as<br />

the vanilla version. This isn’t much of a<br />

problem, though, as Sense 7 is one of the<br />

most customisable versions of Android<br />

we’ve seen. Its Theme Generator is excellent,<br />

as you can change the appearance of your<br />

phone right down to individual app icons,<br />

fonts and the caller ID logo, using either one<br />

of the handful of themes that come preinstalled<br />

or one you’ve made yourself using<br />

images from your gallery.<br />

Once you’ve chosen an image, the Theme<br />

Generator analyses the colours present in<br />

the picture and then suggests different<br />

colour combinations for your home screen,<br />

Blinkfeed hub and settings menu, which you<br />

can then tweak to your liking. It’s a brilliant<br />

touch, and even photos we took that only<br />

had a few main colours present still gave us<br />

plenty of colour options.<br />

Sense Home is another useful feature, as<br />

this learns which apps you use most in<br />

certain locations, and automatically promotes<br />

them to your main homescreen when you<br />

need them. For instance, it would show Mail,<br />

Google Drive, Calendar and HTC’s note-taking<br />

Scribble apps when we were in the office, but<br />

swap those for Google Maps and HTC’s<br />

Music and Car apps on the way home.<br />

HTC has included a fi ngerprint sensor on<br />

the One A9 for added security. Located at the<br />

bottom of the handset,<br />

underneath the display,<br />

it’s fast and rarely made<br />

mistakes when we used<br />

it to unlock the phone.<br />

Alternatively, the<br />

grooved power button<br />

is another great touch<br />

in the One A9’s design.<br />

It sits at an ideal thumb<br />

height and its machined<br />

fi nish makes it easy to<br />

fi nd by touch alone.<br />

On the other side of<br />

the phone, you’ll fi nd a<br />

microSD card slot to<br />

expand the phone’s<br />

default 16GB of internal<br />

storage, of which<br />

around 10GB is available<br />

to the user.<br />

SNAP HAPPY<br />

The One A9 is powered by an octa-core<br />

1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 processor<br />

and 2GB of RAM. In our benchmark suite, it<br />

showed a significant increase in speed over<br />

older Snapdragon 615 handsets, as its<br />

Geekbench 3 scores of 732 in the single-core<br />

test and 3,050 in the multicore test were on<br />

average around 100 and 800 points faster<br />

respectively. As a result, Android felt silky<br />

smooth and apps were very quick to load.<br />

It’s worth noting, however, that even at<br />

this lower price (it launched in late 2015 at<br />

£470), it can be outpaced by the competition;<br />

the Nexus 5X handily beats it on multicore<br />

performance, for instance, as does the latest<br />

Samsung Galaxy A5.<br />

Gaming performance is also lacklustre for<br />

something which once near cost half a grand,<br />

as it only managed an offscreen Manhattan<br />

test score of 411 frames in GFXBench GL,<br />

which equates to roughly 6.6fps. This is by no<br />

means bad, but complex 3D games such as<br />

Hearthstone aren’t quite as smooth as they<br />

could be. The same goes for web browsing,<br />

as its Peacekeeper score of 793 is a long<br />

way behind the Galaxy S6’s 1,257. As a result,<br />

web pages were often<br />

quite jerky at times,<br />

particularly if they<br />

contained lots of images<br />

or embedded videos.<br />

Battery life is also<br />

underwhelming, but it<br />

does at least scrape into<br />

double fi gures, as its<br />

2,150mAh battery lasted<br />

10h 2m in our video<br />

playback test with the<br />

screen set to 170cd/m 2 .<br />

This should be enough<br />

to get you through the<br />

day, but it’s a long way<br />

behind the Galaxy A5<br />

and Lenovo P2.<br />

STRAIGHT SHOT<br />

Thankfully, the A9’s rear<br />

camera has received<br />

several improvements over the famously poor<br />

M9. Despite only having a 13-megapixel<br />

sensor (down from the M9’s 20-megapixel<br />

snapper), its overall picture quality is much<br />

better, particularly its exposure levels.<br />

Photos are still a fraction dark in places, but<br />

switching on HDR quickly sorts this out.<br />

Indoor photos look great, too. Object edges<br />

can be a tad grainy and over-processed at<br />

times, but colours look nice and punchy, and<br />

there’s plenty of contrast. The only major<br />

disappointment was the fl ash, which has a<br />

tendency to turn images rather green.<br />

You can change the appearance of your phone right down to<br />

individual app icons, fonts and the caller ID logo, using one<br />

of the pre-installed themes or one you’ve made yourself<br />

As a whole, the HTC One A9 looks and<br />

feels like a fi rst-class handset. Sense 7 is a<br />

great interface, and its beautiful design<br />

makes it by far one of the most pleasing and<br />

attractive smartphones at this price.<br />

Speaking of which, time has been kind<br />

to the One A9’s overall value. Having shed<br />

£160, it no longer has to compete at the<br />

higher end of the smartphone market, and<br />

so its shortcomings (particularly its<br />

performance and battery life) don’t look<br />

so bad next to more modest rivals. More<br />

importantly, the things we liked about it in<br />

the fi rst place still hold up today.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

87


SMARTPHONES<br />

HUAWEI P8 Lite <strong>2017</strong><br />

★★★★★<br />

£182 • From www.csmobiles.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

The updated P8 Lite is a good budget<br />

smartphone but it has stiff competition<br />

IF SUB-£200 smartphones are on your<br />

agenda, Huawei’s £185 P9 Lite (<strong>Shopper</strong> 350)<br />

is worth a look, but we’ve been more taken<br />

with the <strong>2017</strong> remake of the P8 Lite – it has<br />

a slightly better processor (a Kirin 655 to the<br />

P9 Lite’s 650) and, while it originally came<br />

with a higher price, we’ve actually found the<br />

P8 Lite for less cash post-launch.<br />

That’s not all that’s good about it, either.<br />

The P8 Lite is a dual-SIM smartphone that<br />

features a 5.2in Full HD display, a fi ngerprint<br />

reader and an octa-core processor, and it runs<br />

on Android 7.0 – not bad for £182, which is<br />

around the same price as the Moto G5.<br />

Speaking of which, competition at this<br />

price is fi erce, from older handsets like the G4<br />

to newer alternatives such as the Honor 6X<br />

and the Lenovo P2. Fortunately for the P8<br />

Lite, it gets off to a good start with its design.<br />

The rounded corners and balanced weight<br />

make it easy to hold, and we appreciate how<br />

the fi ngerprint scanner is placed on the rear<br />

rather than the front, so it’s easier to use with<br />

your index fi nger. It’s not as slick as the<br />

iPhone 7 it’s so obviously emulating, but it’s<br />

certainly nice enough for a budget phone.<br />

SCUFF LUCK<br />

It’s also good to see Huawei retaining the<br />

3.5mm headphone socket, found here on the<br />

top edge of the phone, with the volume<br />

rocker and power buttons on the right-hand<br />

side, a dual-SIM slot on the left (the second<br />

SIM slot can also take a 256GB microSD card),<br />

and a Micro USB charging port and a single<br />

downward-firing speaker on the bottom.<br />

However, there are some practical issues<br />

as well. The plastic frame surrounding the<br />

screen, for instance, lowers the tone, as does<br />

the standard glass, which appears not to have<br />

been treated with an oleophobic coating,<br />

meaning it picks up fi ngerprints like crazy, and<br />

is shockingly quick to pick up scratches.<br />

We’d suggest a case or protector for<br />

the IPS display, which works out to a<br />

respectable pixel density of 424ppi. An even<br />

bigger strength is its brightness – its test<br />

score of 700cd/m 2 is among the highest<br />

we’ve seen, and it stays readable in even the<br />

sunniest conditions.<br />

Contrast ratio is pretty high, too, at<br />

1,553:1, with deep blacks and bright whites<br />

contributing to<br />

dynamic images and<br />

video. We’d have liked<br />

to have been able to<br />

disable dynamic<br />

contrast, though: this<br />

boosts brightness<br />

levels when displaying<br />

white or light content<br />

onscreen, which could<br />

hurt battery life.<br />

The display’s main<br />

weakness is its colour<br />

representation. With<br />

86% sRGB coverage,<br />

images look slightly<br />

dull and murky<br />

when compared<br />

with the Lenovo<br />

P2’s 99.9% sRGB<br />

coverage display.<br />

SPRING CLEANING<br />

Unlike the P2, however, the P8 Lite runs the<br />

latest version of Android, 7.0 Nougat, which is<br />

a fantastic mobile OS, even with Huawei’s<br />

Emotion 5 UI (EMUI) skin. This uses extra<br />

RAM, which isn’t ideal, but it’s far from the<br />

annoyance it once was. We particularly like<br />

its storage cleaner, which quickly frees up<br />

space and wipes your phone’s cache, as well<br />

as its added power-management tools.<br />

This refreshed P8 Lite is powered by an<br />

octa-core (four 2.1GHz Cortex-A53 and four<br />

The P8 Lite’s screen is among the brightest we’ve seen,<br />

and it stays readable in even the sunniest conditions<br />

1.7GHz Cortex-A53) Kirin 655 processor.<br />

It also has 3GB of RAM, which was plenty<br />

for our everyday needs.<br />

Looking at synthetic benchmarks, the P8<br />

Lite performs well when compared with its<br />

budget competitors. In Geekbench 4, it scored<br />

3,237 in the multicore test and 780 in the<br />

single-core test, putting it very slightly ahead<br />

of the Moto G4, slightly behind the Honor 6X<br />

and roughly on a par with the Lenovo P2.<br />

Honestly, you’d struggle to see a big<br />

difference in day-to-day use.<br />

Huawei’s handset is similarly capable of<br />

gaming. It didn’t struggle with any of the titles<br />

we tried, and in the GFXBench Manhattan<br />

synthetic benchmark, it managed 8.4fps.<br />

That’s far behind the high-end fl agships, but<br />

is dead even with the Honor 6X.<br />

Battery life,<br />

however, is less<br />

impressive. The<br />

non-removable<br />

3,000mAh unit<br />

lasted a mediocre<br />

10h 24m in our<br />

continuous video<br />

playback test, which<br />

is close to a third of<br />

the Lenovo P2’s<br />

superlative 28h<br />

50m. It couldn’t<br />

even beat the Honor<br />

6X’s 11h 18m.<br />

The phone’s<br />

12-megapixel<br />

rear-facing camera<br />

with an aperture of<br />

f/2.0 isn’t bad for a<br />

£141 smartphone.<br />

The P8 Lite doesn’t<br />

come with phase-detect autofocus or optical<br />

image stabilisation, but that’s only to be<br />

expected for a phone at this price point.<br />

It holds its own in low-light conditions,<br />

producing images that aren’t riddled with<br />

noise or oversaturation.<br />

White balance is good as well, with<br />

automatic exposures being well judged.<br />

The fl ash doesn’t add a blue tinge to photos,<br />

either, which is a common problem with<br />

smartphone cameras.<br />

GOING PRO<br />

Sadly, the camera is also prone to losing detail<br />

at a medium distances, and the HDR mode<br />

proved of limited benefi t, with only minor<br />

improvements in indoor shots and barely any<br />

differences when comparing outdoor HDR<br />

shots with non-HDR shots.<br />

You can help things along by tinkering in<br />

Pro mode, which grants control over white<br />

balance, exposure compensation, ISO and<br />

shutter speed, as well as various metering<br />

and autofocus modes. Still, it’s nowhere near<br />

the overall quality of our favourite cheap<br />

smartphone camera, that of the Moto G4.<br />

This captures images that are sharper, have<br />

less image noise in low-light conditions and<br />

look more vibrant.<br />

Ultimately, while the P8 Lite is a very<br />

capable and affordable smartphone (even<br />

more so since we fi rst reviewed it, in the latter<br />

case), it’s hard to fully recommend when less<br />

fl awed alternatives exist. If you want the very<br />

best battery life, choose the Lenovo P2; if you<br />

want the best all-rounder with the best<br />

camera, the Moto G4 is the one for you.<br />

88 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

LENOVO P2<br />

★★★★★<br />

£200 • From www.three.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

With its monster battery life, the Lenovo P2<br />

will keep on going long after others have died<br />

REMEMBER THE DAYS when your phone<br />

lasted more than a day on a single charge?<br />

As great as it is to have smartphones with<br />

enormous processing power and crisp,<br />

high-res screens, there’s no denying these<br />

advancements have made our handhelds<br />

thirstier for juice than ever.<br />

The Lenovo P2, however, heralds at least a<br />

partial return to those glory days: it lasted a<br />

staggering 28h 50m in our continuous video<br />

test. That’s a full fi ve hours longer than our<br />

previous longest-lasting smartphone on<br />

record, Motorola’s Moto Z Play, and just over<br />

11 hours longer than the top-end Galaxy S7.<br />

It shows some serious stamina in everyday<br />

use, too – anecdotally, after a heavy<br />

weekend’s sightseeing fi lled with Google<br />

Maps, selfies and the odd game of Mini<br />

Metro, the P2 never dipped below 70%.<br />

Lenovo achieves this by squeezing a<br />

5,100mAh battery into the P2’s metal body<br />

(most current phones are around the<br />

3,000mAh mark), but this still isn’t a bulky<br />

phone. It does feel a little fatt er than<br />

super-svelte fl agships such as the Galaxy<br />

S7 Edge, but at 8.3mm thick and weighing<br />

177g, the P2 is only 0.6mm thicker and 20g<br />

heavier than the Samsung.<br />

SCRIMP AND SAVE<br />

A fi ngerprint reader sits below the screen,<br />

with a volume rocker and power button on<br />

the right edge of the device, while the left<br />

side treats you to a dual SIM slot and an<br />

intriguing battery-saving switch. Flick it up<br />

and your P2 enters Ultimate Power Saver<br />

mode, switching off data and disabling apps.<br />

It could be a handy ‘Defcon 1’ function, but<br />

given the already impressive battery life, it’s<br />

unlikely to see much use.<br />

Up front, we’re treated to a Full HD, 5.5in<br />

AMOLED display, covering 99.9% of the<br />

sRGB colour gamut. As with all AMOLED<br />

displays, its contrast ratio is effectively<br />

perfect. Some of the darker tones, such as<br />

deeper reds and dark blues, were<br />

oversaturated under the scrutiny our colour<br />

calibrator, but you won’t spot this day to day.<br />

One sticking point is the P2’s peak<br />

brightness, which sits at a lowly 326cd/m 2 .<br />

While that’s fi ne for gloomy days, you’ll be<br />

squinting at your phone once the sun fi nally<br />

pokes through the clouds. The Honor 6X is<br />

much better suited to such conditions, with a<br />

peak brightness of 502cd/m 2 .<br />

For the price, the P2 is a surprisingly nippy<br />

performer. Powered by Qualcomm’s octa-core<br />

2GHz Snapdragon 625 chip and 4GB of RAM,<br />

overall responsiveness was good. With a<br />

Geekbench 4 multicore<br />

score of 3,130, the P2<br />

bettered the Moto G4<br />

by almost 700 points,<br />

and the new Moto G5<br />

by over 750. It wasn’t<br />

far behind the Honor<br />

6X’s 3,319, either.<br />

Switching to games,<br />

the phone scored a<br />

10fps average in the<br />

onscreen GFXBench<br />

Manhattan benchmark,<br />

beating the Honor 6X<br />

(8.4fps), Moto G5 (7fps)<br />

and Moto G4 (7.7fps).<br />

Sky Force: Reloaded, a<br />

game that grinds to a<br />

halt on lower-powered<br />

devices, ran without a<br />

single frame drop, even<br />

during those actionpacked<br />

enemy encounters.<br />

KEEP OUT<br />

So far, the P2 has scored near-enough full<br />

marks, but then we come to the camera.<br />

It’s not that the P2’s 13-megapixel rear<br />

camera is bad; it’s just that it loses out<br />

compared with the Moto G4. Outdoor test<br />

shots picked up plenty of colour even under<br />

grey skies, with noise kept at bay reasonably<br />

effectively. Flicking on HDR gave mixed<br />

results, with oversaturation on the orange<br />

bricks in our test shot, but it did help to<br />

balance out exposure levels.<br />

Where it falls down is indoors, especially<br />

in low light. Under close inspection, our test<br />

subjects looked grainy and, while colours<br />

were vibrant enough, noise was apparent.<br />

Try to use the P2’s camera outside with<br />

plenty of natural light, if you can.<br />

Lenovo’s camera soft ware is also a tad<br />

clumsier to use than its rivals. Navigating<br />

through tedious menus isn’t ideal for<br />

on-the-fly photography, and the P2 would<br />

have benefi tt ed from Huawei’s one-handfriendly<br />

left and right swipes. At least<br />

Lenovo’s Pro mode allows you to delve into<br />

settings such as ISO and white balance.<br />

The fi nal and<br />

relatively minor con is<br />

that there’s no Android<br />

7.0 Nougat here; the<br />

phone’s operating<br />

system is currently<br />

stuck on Android 6.0<br />

Marshmallow, which<br />

feels a little dated in<br />

comparison. We were<br />

told some weeks ago<br />

that an over-the-air<br />

update is coming in the<br />

very near future, but<br />

such an update still<br />

hadn’t rolled out at the<br />

time of going to press.<br />

Either way, our few<br />

criticisms of the<br />

Lenovo P2 fade into<br />

insignificance when<br />

considering what it<br />

does well. That absurd battery life alone is<br />

well worth the price: we repeat, this is the<br />

longest-lasting smartphone we’ve ever seen.<br />

And it doesn’t stop there: the P2’s display,<br />

performance and build quality are all top<br />

notch given the price, and it’s a worthy<br />

competitor to much more expensive<br />

mid-range phones.<br />

P2 ONE<br />

There is competition; you can buy the Moto<br />

G4 for less, and in return get a rear camera<br />

that’s a better performer in low light, while the<br />

Honor 6X is a thinner and arguably betterlooking<br />

handset which costs just £25 more.<br />

We were hoping the Moto G5 would be<br />

The P2 lasted a staggering 28h 50m in our continuous<br />

video test – a full five hours longer than our previous<br />

longest-lasting smartphone on record<br />

another addition to this list of cheap-yet-highquality<br />

handsets, but at best it makes only<br />

very minor improvements to the beloved<br />

Moto G4; at worst, it’s measurably inferior,<br />

particularly when it comes to performance.<br />

With that in mind, there’s nothing else that<br />

combines the P2’s all-round performance with<br />

such amazing battery life. If you want a good<br />

deal on a phone that also ensures you’ve got<br />

a bang-up-to-date device, rather than an older<br />

model, look no further: this is the newest and<br />

current king of budget smartphones.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

89


SMARTPHONES<br />

LG G4<br />

★★★★★<br />

£319 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

With its vibrant screen, versatile camera and surprisingly<br />

comfy leather rear, the LG G4 still holds its own<br />

ALTHOUGH LG DIDN’T stick with the G4’s<br />

leather backing for its G5 and G6 handsets, it<br />

was still a fantastic fl agship smartphone when<br />

it launched in 2015 – and now that it’s over<br />

£200 cheaper than on release, it makes a<br />

great alternative to newer mid-rangers.<br />

Measuring 149x75x8.9mm, it’s not the<br />

slimmest of phones, but the leather cladding<br />

adds a real premium feel. The same goes for<br />

the 5.5in display, which has a 2,560x1,440<br />

resolution producing a crisp 534ppi. LG’s IPS<br />

Quantum panel helps out here, showing lovely<br />

rich, vibrant colours and eye-searingly bright<br />

whites. We measured peak brightness as<br />

505.66cd/m 2 , so colours look just as punchy<br />

out in the sun as they do indoors.<br />

Blacks were deep at 0.27cd/m 2 , and the<br />

huge contrast ratio of 1,715:1 stands up to<br />

<strong>2017</strong> standards. Its sRGB colour gamut<br />

coverage of 96.3% is also respectable for an<br />

IPS screen, though this does point to LG<br />

overstating the G4’s capabilities somewhat –<br />

it was supposedly able to reach 98% of the<br />

wider Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI) colour<br />

gamut, which equates to about 120% sRGB<br />

coverage. This, evidently, was not backed up<br />

by our testing.<br />

The G4’s other headline feature is the<br />

16-megapixel camera, which makes it the<br />

fi rst to have a colour spectrum sensor on<br />

the back, which LG says is able to read and<br />

interpret colours in exactly the same way as<br />

your own eyeballs. Indeed, colours looked<br />

very natural in outdoor shots – more so<br />

than its contemporary, the Samsung Galaxy<br />

S6 – and while at times it struggled to<br />

correctly expose some areas of particularly<br />

bright cloud, switching to HDR mode quickly<br />

sorted this out.<br />

ABLE SETTINGS<br />

Manual mode is the star here, though. This<br />

gives you control over white balance, manual<br />

focus, shutter speed and ISO live onscreen,<br />

giving you plenty of fl exible controls to be a<br />

little more creative with your photography.<br />

Photo enthusiasts will also appreciate the<br />

ability to save photos as Raw fi les.<br />

LG has also included a quick launch mode,<br />

so you can take instant snapshots without<br />

having to unlock the phone fi rst. It’s certainly<br />

very handy, but we wish it hadn’t been<br />

mapped to the rear<br />

lower volume<br />

button, as this is<br />

possibly one of the<br />

least accessible<br />

buttons on the<br />

entire phone,<br />

particularly if you’re<br />

trying to shoot in<br />

landscape mode.<br />

Rather than<br />

the Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 810<br />

favoured by other<br />

2015 fl agship<br />

phones, the G4<br />

contains the slightly<br />

slower hexa-core<br />

1.8GHz Snapdragon<br />

808 chip, plus 3GB<br />

of RAM. This<br />

showed in our benchmarks: in Geekbench 3,<br />

the multicore result of 2,547 is a long way<br />

behind both old and new high-end<br />

smartphones, from the Galaxy S6 to the<br />

OnePlus 3T. Likewise, the G4’s single-core<br />

result of just 692 has even been surpassed<br />

by budget phones such as the Honor 6X –<br />

hardly a ringing endorsement for something<br />

that cost £530 on its release.<br />

The G4 has a colour spectrum sensor, which LG says is able<br />

to interpret colours in the same way as your own eyeballs<br />

However, benchmarks are only part of<br />

the story, and the G4 feels beautifully<br />

smooth when multitasking with different<br />

apps or browsing media-heavy web pages.<br />

It also coped well with games, as it ran<br />

Hearthstone, Threes! and Alphabear perfectly<br />

well, despite its somewhat average<br />

benchmarking results: it only produced 921<br />

frames in the offscreen GFXBench GL<br />

Manhattan test, which equates to 15fps.<br />

SWAP MEET<br />

The G4 has a few more advantages as well: it<br />

actually has removable storage (microSD<br />

support up to 128GB), which the Galaxy S6<br />

and Nexus 5X neglected to include, and the<br />

battery can be removed and replaced,<br />

something you can’t do on metal unibody<br />

handsets. The G4’s battery benchmark result<br />

of 11h 58m isn’t amazing when compared to<br />

more recent alternatives, but you could carry<br />

around spares. We can also see the fi rst<br />

glimpses of the LG<br />

G5 modularity in the<br />

G4’s ability to take<br />

larger, third-party<br />

battery packs.<br />

Following an<br />

update from<br />

Android 5.1, the G4<br />

currently runs<br />

Android 6.0 – 7.0 (or<br />

more likely, 7.1) isn’t<br />

expected to roll out<br />

on this older model<br />

until later in <strong>2017</strong>,<br />

which is a shame.<br />

Whatever Android<br />

version is installed,<br />

it comes with LG’s<br />

UX interface over<br />

the top. Unlike most<br />

custom skins, we<br />

quite like this one; its Knock Code feature<br />

offers an effective alternative way to unlock<br />

your smartphone, by tapping out a specific<br />

pattern on the screen, while the Smart<br />

Settings menu can enable things such as<br />

changing the sound profi le once you get<br />

home, or automatically opening Spotify<br />

when you plug in headphones.<br />

Meanwhile, Smart Power Saving will warn<br />

you when apps are using too much power,<br />

and create a Smart Notice prompt to let you<br />

shut them down in order to help save battery.<br />

Likewise, the G4 will put the CPU to sleep<br />

when there’s nothing happening on the<br />

display, helping you squeeze a few more hours<br />

out of it when the phone is locked.<br />

AGE BEFORE BEAUTY<br />

The G4 may not be as powerful as other<br />

fl agship smartphones – especially those that<br />

have been released in the past two years – but<br />

it certainly has a wealth of features to help it<br />

stand out from the competition. The leather<br />

back is surprisingly elegant, and we defi nitely<br />

prefer it to the slippery glass of the Samsung<br />

Galaxy range. The G4 camera’s unique colour<br />

spectrum sensor also puts it neck-and-neck<br />

with the camera on the back of the S6, and its<br />

display looks just as sharp and punchy as<br />

Samsung’s Super AMOLED panels.<br />

It’s also an unusually fl exible smartphone;<br />

not to the extent of modular devices such as<br />

the Moto Z Play (nor indeed its successor, the<br />

G5), but the inclusion of a microSD slot and a<br />

removable battery makes the G4 a very<br />

accommodating handset indeed. There are<br />

many faster and longer-lasting alternatives,<br />

but at £319 this is absolutely worth the cash.<br />

90 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

MOTOROLA Moto G4<br />

★★★★★<br />

£145 • From www.carphonewarehouse.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

Fast speeds, an excellent camera, long battery<br />

life – the Moto G4 is a budget masterpiece<br />

WE’LL GET TO the newer Moto G5 soon, but<br />

it’s worth noting that for over a year now, the<br />

Moto G4 has been the yardstick by which all<br />

other budget smartphones have been judged.<br />

It’s only recently that genuine alternatives<br />

such as the Lenovo P2 have arrived, such is its<br />

phenomenal balance of quality and thriftiness.<br />

In particular, its octa-core 1.5GHz<br />

Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 processor and<br />

2GB of RAM give it serious power. In<br />

Geekbench 3, the Moto G4 scored 717 in the<br />

single-core test and a massive 3,107 in the<br />

multicore test, about what we’d expect from<br />

a good mid-range device. Indeed, these<br />

scores are on a par with those of the HTC<br />

One A9, which costs twice as much.<br />

It’s lovely to use on a day-to-day basis, and<br />

it’s even a pretty capable gaming machine,<br />

too. While its GFXBench GL offscreen<br />

Manhattan 3.0 score of 412 frames (around<br />

6.6fps) can’t match, say, the Nexus 5X, we<br />

still managed to play Hearthstone without<br />

too much stutter, and simpler games such as<br />

Threes! worked like a dream.<br />

Web browsing has also been significantly<br />

improved over the 3rd Gen Moto G, its direct<br />

predecessor. Despite a curiously lower<br />

Peacekeeper score (632 to the Moto G’s 731),<br />

scrolling through media-heavy pages was<br />

much smoother on the G4, and images,<br />

videos and adverts all loaded faster too.<br />

HOUR SURGE<br />

All this power doesn’t come at the cost of<br />

battery life, either, as the Moto G4’s large<br />

3,000mAh battery lasted an impressive 13h<br />

39m in our continuous video test. That’s<br />

fantastic for a budget smartphone, beating<br />

the much more expensive LG G4 and<br />

Samsung Galaxy S6 (although only by two<br />

minutes in the latter’s case).<br />

Be mindful, however, that the Moto G4 is<br />

very much in phablet territory, with its screen<br />

measuring 5.5in diagonally. That makes it<br />

quite a handful, and the fl at back makes it<br />

slightly less comfortable than the previous<br />

Moto G, at least in our hands. Fortunately,<br />

though, it didn’t take long to get used to.<br />

Still, the overall design could be better:<br />

the subtle crosshatch pattern on the rear<br />

isn’t particularly elegant and it’s lost the<br />

3rd Gen Moto G’s IP67 waterproofi ng,<br />

though its water-repellent coating should<br />

still provide adequate protection from<br />

splashes or a light rain shower.<br />

Those who like to customise their handset<br />

using Motorola’s Moto Maker service might<br />

also be a little disappointed, as the G4’s<br />

options are decidedly less fun than those<br />

of its predecessors. It<br />

doesn’t cost any extra to<br />

change the colour of the<br />

back panel, but the<br />

shades on offer are rather<br />

more muted than the<br />

bright yellows and searing<br />

limes of yesteryear.<br />

The choice of metallic<br />

accents around the<br />

camera are also rather<br />

uninspiring, but<br />

considering it’s free, you<br />

may as well personalise it<br />

as much as you can to get<br />

the look you want.<br />

The only thing you do<br />

have to pay extra for on<br />

Moto Maker is if you<br />

want to upgrade the<br />

Moto G4’s storage to<br />

32GB. This costs an extra<br />

£30, but when the G4<br />

comes with a microSD<br />

slot that takes cards up<br />

to 128GB anyway, this<br />

seems like a bit of a waste of money.<br />

VISION ACCOMPLISHED<br />

It’s a shame the display (and by extension, the<br />

whole handset) isn’t a bit smaller, but at least<br />

Motorola has provided it with a 1,920x1,080<br />

resolution, giving it a sharp pixel density of<br />

401ppi. Our colour-calibration tests showed it<br />

was displaying a respectable 90% of the sRGB<br />

colour gamut, and its contrast ratio of 1,693:1<br />

is most impressive as well. It’s also<br />

considerably brighter than its predecessor,<br />

as it’s able to reach a peak brightness of<br />

539.51cd/m 2 , making it much easier to see<br />

outdoors in direct sunshine. These are, again,<br />

brilliant results for a budget smartphone, and<br />

its punchy colours look great regardless of<br />

whether you’re browsing the web or looking<br />

at photos in your gallery.<br />

Speaking of which, the G4’s rear<br />

13-megapixel camera remains our favourite<br />

budget smartphone snapper – and that<br />

includes the one on the Moto G5. Despite<br />

sharing the same resolution as the 3rd Gen<br />

Moto G, the difference<br />

in quality is plain to see,<br />

as the Moto G4 captures<br />

far more detail, and<br />

everything looks that<br />

much sharper.<br />

Outdoors, for instance,<br />

colours looked accurate<br />

and its exposure was<br />

expertly judged. It blurred<br />

the occasional bit of<br />

brickwork, but overall it<br />

produced truly excellent<br />

photos. It looks as if<br />

Motorola has toned<br />

down its HDR mode this<br />

year as well, as rather<br />

than make images<br />

appear overly artificial,<br />

it simply makes them<br />

look richer and more<br />

vibrant, so you’ll probably<br />

want to leave it on to get<br />

the best exposures.<br />

CUT TO THE QUICK<br />

Motorola also simplified the camera app’s UI<br />

– an action reversed for the G5, in some ways<br />

– to give it a dedicated onscreen shutter<br />

button and easy shortcuts to toggle the<br />

fl ash, HDR and timer on and off. Tap the<br />

screen to focus, and you can easily adjust the<br />

lens aperture using the onscreen slider as<br />

well, which works brilliantly and shows you<br />

your results in real-time.<br />

The camera was also an excellent<br />

performer indoors, as noise was kept to a<br />

Its octa-core processor and 2GB of RAM give the G4<br />

serious power – it’s lovely to use on a day-to-day basis,<br />

and it’s even a pretty capable gaming machine<br />

minimum even in low-light conditions, and<br />

detail levels were still pleasingly high. Some of<br />

the objects in our still-life arrangement were a<br />

touch grainy in places, but switching on the<br />

excellent LED fl ash quickly sorted this out.<br />

We’ve covered the G5 in more detail on<br />

the next page, but in short we’d rather stick<br />

with the G4. That a smartphone can achieve<br />

so much for so little is as astounding today as<br />

it was in 2016, and while the Lenovo P2 is as<br />

powerful (with a much, much longer battery<br />

life), we can’t bring ourselves to take away<br />

the G4’s well-deserved Best Buy award.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

91


SMARTPHONES<br />

MOTOROLA Moto G5<br />

★★★★★<br />

£180 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The heir to the king of budget smartphones<br />

isn’t as good as we’d hoped<br />

THIS SHOULD BE an exciting occasion: the<br />

follow-up to 2016’s best budget phone by a<br />

mile, the Moto G4, updated with stylish metal<br />

bodywork and the latest Android 7.0 Nougat.<br />

Sadly, though, the new Moto G5 is a device<br />

we can only appreciate with caveats.<br />

Let’s start with the good. As mentioned,<br />

both this and the larger Moto G5 Plus (which<br />

we’ll cover in more detail in a future issue)<br />

have ditched the plastic backplates of<br />

previous Moto G handsets in favour of a<br />

sleeker, slinkier metal design. Although there’s<br />

the risk that this will scuff, scratch and dent<br />

rather more easily than the textured plastic<br />

rear of previous generations, out of the box<br />

the Moto G5 looks very fi ne indeed.<br />

In fact, this is a lovely phone to hold –<br />

not slippery, and with just the right amount<br />

of grip – and the fi ne-grained matt fi nish on<br />

the rear is a big step forward in terms of<br />

sophistication. Note, however, that the<br />

phone isn’t all metal – only the rear panel is.<br />

The edges are constructed from plastic just<br />

as they were before.<br />

DOWNSIZING MEASURES<br />

The Moto G5 is also a little more practical<br />

than its pricier brother, with a removable<br />

battery, microSD card support (up to 128GB)<br />

and dual-SIM support. The Moto G5 Plus has<br />

both a microSD slot and dual-SIM support,<br />

but you can’t replace the battery.<br />

Both phones now include a new frontmounted<br />

fi ngerprint reader and, thankfully,<br />

have Android 7.0 Nougat pre-installed.<br />

There’s also NFC, so you can fi nally use<br />

Moto’s cheapest handset to pay for goods in<br />

place of a contactless credit card.<br />

One key thing to note with the Moto G5,<br />

however, is that the screen is 0.5in smaller<br />

than on the Moto G4. It’s a surprising<br />

downgrade but on the plus side there’s no<br />

denying the Moto G5 is more pocketable and<br />

easier to use one-handed than before.<br />

Since the resolution has stayed the same,<br />

at 1,920x1,080, it also looks just as sharp. Alas,<br />

along with the reduction in size, our testing<br />

reveals the Moto G5’s screen has also taken a<br />

hit on quality. Peak brightness is down from<br />

the G4’s 539.51cd/m 2 to 471cd/m 2 , and sRGB<br />

colour coverage is also down to 85.8%. The<br />

result is a slightly duller, less vibrant display,<br />

and while the difference between the two<br />

phones isn’t night and day, it’s still<br />

disappointing that the Moto G5 is inferior.<br />

Under the hood, it’s a similar story. The<br />

base Moto G5 comes with a Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 430 and 2GB of RAM; we tested<br />

the slightly higher-spec 3GB version, but this<br />

didn’t prevent it landing<br />

slightly behind the<br />

Moto G4 in Geekbench<br />

benchmarks, with<br />

scores of 578 in the<br />

single-core test and<br />

2,379 in the multicore<br />

test. It also merely<br />

matches the G4’s 7fps<br />

average in both GFX<br />

Manhattan’s onscreen<br />

and offscreen tests, so<br />

it’s no better for gaming.<br />

So, not only does the<br />

Moto G5 fail to improve<br />

on its predecessor, but<br />

it lags even further<br />

behind newer budget<br />

challengers, namely<br />

the Honor 6X and<br />

Lenovo P2.<br />

We were hoping that<br />

the trade-off for this would be improved<br />

battery life, but in our video test, the Moto G5<br />

achieved a time of 11h 51m, which is 1h 48m<br />

short of the Moto G4. This isn’t disastrous,<br />

of course, but heavy users may well fi nd<br />

that they need to top up the phone’s<br />

charge more often that they would the G4<br />

– another disappointment.<br />

FOCUS POCUS<br />

Motorola says it has improved the camera<br />

over the G4, though, adding phase-detect<br />

autofocus to speed up capture. However, the<br />

snapper’s core specifications remain the<br />

same, with an aperture of f/2 and resolution<br />

of 13 megapixels.<br />

These look to be impressive specifications<br />

on a sub-£200 phone. They were last year,<br />

and the Moto G4’s camera was very good<br />

indeed at the price. However, on the evidence<br />

of our tests the new camera module in the<br />

G5 isn’t all that wonderful.<br />

Outdoors, in brightly lit conditions, the<br />

Moto G5’s rear camera does perform<br />

splendidly, capturing photographs with even<br />

crisper details and richer colours than the G4.<br />

Exposures are balanced and focus assured.<br />

It’s an accomplished<br />

snapper and the<br />

improved camera<br />

soft ware is a bonus, too.<br />

We particularly like its<br />

ability to automatically<br />

detect hand shake and<br />

snap multiple frames,<br />

upon which it offers<br />

you the choice between<br />

two frames, the second<br />

of which is often<br />

sharper than the fi rst<br />

you fi red off.<br />

In the low light of<br />

indoor scenes, however,<br />

images aren’t great.<br />

Photographs of our<br />

still-life scene exhibited<br />

significantly higher<br />

levels of noise, smearing<br />

and hand-shake induced<br />

blur than on the Moto G4, and enabling the<br />

fl ash doesn’t help much either. Although it<br />

doesn’t wash out the image, it does add an<br />

unnatural orangey-pink tinge to the whole<br />

scene that looks far from attractive.<br />

ECONOMIC WARFARE<br />

One thing we can’t fault is the price. This<br />

£180, 3GB variant is only £10 more than the<br />

standard 2GB version, which is in turn the<br />

same as what the Moto G4 cost when it fi rst<br />

launched. It still packs a punch for that kind<br />

of money, and as it turns out, you can take<br />

Not only does the Moto G5 fail to improve on its<br />

predecessor, but it lags even further behind newer budget<br />

challengers, namely the Honor 6X and Lenovo P2<br />

a few steps back from something as<br />

excellent as the Moto G4 and still be left<br />

with a pretty good handset.<br />

That, however, is also the issue. The Moto<br />

G5 only makes improvements in a few minor<br />

ways, and has got worse in others. That’s not<br />

a recipe for a must-have device when the<br />

Honor 6X, Lenovo P2 and, yes, the Moto G4,<br />

are readily available as alternatives.<br />

As such, the only way we can recommend<br />

the Moto G5 is if you’re utterly determined<br />

to have the very latest product – and even<br />

then, remember that the Lenovo P2 is just a<br />

few weeks older.<br />

92 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

MOTOROLA Moto Z Play<br />

★★★★★<br />

£370 • From www.motorola.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The Moto Z Play’s stupendous battery life<br />

and modular design make it a great buy<br />

LIKE THE ONEPLUS 3T, the Moto Z Play<br />

aims to provide fl agship-quality features<br />

while undercutting them on price. Take, for<br />

example, the big 3,510mAh battery inside –<br />

that even dwarfs the 2,600mAh of its own<br />

bigger brother, the Moto Z (<strong>Shopper</strong> 348).<br />

It thus lasted almost twice as long in our<br />

continuous video loop benchmark, clocking<br />

in at an outstanding 23h 45m. Only the<br />

Lenovo P2 can top that.<br />

It’s clear where Motorola has stashed all<br />

those extra milliampere hours in the Moto Z<br />

Play. Measuring a sizable 6.9mm at its<br />

thinnest point, the phone feels positively<br />

behemoth-like compared with the svelte<br />

5.2mm Moto Z, and its lightly chamfered<br />

edges are sharper and harder against your<br />

palm. That’s not to say the Moto Z Play is<br />

uncomfortable to hold, but it defi nitely feels<br />

a little gawky compared to its luxuriously<br />

slim stablemate.<br />

Girth aside, however, the Moto Z Play<br />

looks every bit the top-end smartphone.<br />

Its front-facing fi ngerprint sensor is every bit<br />

as quick when it comes to unlocking your<br />

phone, and its glass rear and metal frame<br />

represent a huge leap forward in overall build<br />

quality compared to the rubberised rear of<br />

last year’s Moto X Play.<br />

It also shares the Moto Z’s main party<br />

trick: its modularity. While its rear connection<br />

point might not look quite as elegant as its<br />

big brother’s, it supports all the same<br />

Moto Mod accessories, allowing you to<br />

augment your smartphone with stereo<br />

speakers, an upgraded camera or just even<br />

more battery life.<br />

RULE THE BOOST<br />

It’s all easily done – each mod simply snaps<br />

on to the back of the phone with strong<br />

connecting magnets. You might need to dig<br />

your nails in to prise them off, but it’s<br />

defi nitely less hassle than the system on the<br />

modular LG G5. Motorola is also planning on<br />

making these mods compatible with at least<br />

two more generations of Moto Z phones, so<br />

you should be able to carry on using them<br />

even if you upgrade. Our favourite mod so far<br />

is the JBL SoundBoost speaker, which is a<br />

massive improvement<br />

on the handset’s own<br />

tinny speaker, and<br />

includes its own<br />

1,000mAh battery.<br />

Where the Moto Z<br />

Play starts to deviate<br />

from the Moto Z is its<br />

internal hardware; the<br />

former has to make do<br />

with the mid-tier<br />

octa-core 2GHz<br />

Snapdragon 625. It also<br />

has 3GB of RAM, rather<br />

than the Moto Z’s 4GB.<br />

This is still a pretty<br />

potent combination for<br />

everyday tasks, but<br />

the difference showed<br />

in our benchmarks. In<br />

Geekbench 4, the Moto<br />

Z Play scored only 798<br />

in the single-core test and 2,599 in the<br />

multicore test, making it almost half as fast<br />

as the Moto Z overall.<br />

To be fair, this is to be somewhat<br />

expected for a mid-range phone, but when<br />

you consider the OnePlus 3T also has a<br />

Snapdragon 821 chip, the Moto Z Play starts<br />

to look slightly less special.<br />

The same goes for graphics performance:<br />

it achieved a mere 636 frames (an average of<br />

The Moto Mod accessories allow you to augment your<br />

smartphone with stereo speakers, an upgraded camera<br />

or even more battery life<br />

10fps) in GFXBench GL’s onscreen Manhattan<br />

3.0 test. The OnePlus 3T, by comparison,<br />

achieved a 47fps average. That said, the<br />

Moto Z Play will run most current titles<br />

perfectly smoothly; it just might not be as<br />

nippy a few years down the line.<br />

BLANKET COVERAGE<br />

The Moto Z Play shares the Moto Z’s 5.5in<br />

AMOLED panel, but with a 1,920x1,080<br />

resolution, rather than 2,560x1,440. In the<br />

cheaper phone’s defence, we were hardpressed<br />

to tell the difference in terms of<br />

overall sharpness. The Moto Z Play’s vanilla<br />

version of Android 6.0 looks just as crisp<br />

as it does on the Moto Z.<br />

More importantly, the quality of the<br />

Moto Z Play’s display hasn’t diminished in the<br />

slightest: it still covers a<br />

fantastic 100% of the<br />

sRGB colour gamut,<br />

produces perfect blacks<br />

and has superb contrast.<br />

Its maximum brightness<br />

only peaks at 355cd/m 2 ,<br />

but this will only be a<br />

problem on the very<br />

sunniest of days.<br />

The Moto Z Play<br />

actually has a higherresolution<br />

camera than<br />

the Moto Z, producing<br />

16-megapixel images<br />

rather than 12. You won’t<br />

fi nd any optical image<br />

stabilisation here, sadly,<br />

but you do get a hybrid<br />

laser and phase<br />

detection autofocus, a<br />

wide f/2.0 aperture and<br />

a colour-balancing dual LED fl ash. Shots<br />

turned out sharper and more defi ned on the<br />

Moto Z Play; there was perhaps a fraction<br />

more grain and noise than on the Moto Z,<br />

but we’d rather have a bit of grit than have<br />

everything smoothed over.<br />

Colour reproduction was top notch, even<br />

in gloomy, overcast weather conditions.<br />

Enabling HDR had a tendency to make<br />

pictures look a little artificial, exhibiting<br />

strong halo effects around objects and<br />

buildings on the horizon, but generally it did a<br />

great job of brightening up muted scenes.<br />

Indoors, shots were once again a little<br />

grainy and mottled in places, but there was<br />

very little noise, and artefacts were kept to a<br />

minimum. Colours were pleasingly punchy<br />

and contrast levels remained solid across all<br />

lighting conditions. We’d recommend sparing<br />

use of the fl ash, however, as this tended to<br />

turn everything rather warm and orange<br />

rather than correctly balancing out white.<br />

PLAY TIME<br />

As with last year’s Moto X Play and Moto X<br />

Style, it’s Motorola’s mid-range phone that<br />

takes the crown here. The Moto Z might be<br />

faster, slimmer and have a higher-resolution<br />

display, but the Moto Z Play is better value.<br />

You not only get stonking battery life, but<br />

also a great camera and equal access to<br />

Lenovo and Motorola’s new Moto Mods.<br />

It’s arguably worth paying extra for the<br />

OnePlus 3T’s superior performance, but if<br />

you’re looking for something a bit different<br />

that can turn its hand to any task, you won’t<br />

be disappointed with the Moto Z Play.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

93


SMARTPHONES<br />

ONEPLUS 3T<br />

★★★★★<br />

£399 • From oneplus.net/uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The OnePlus 3T is a small upgrade with a big<br />

price increase, but it’s still fantastic value<br />

THE ARRIVAL OF the OnePlus 3T at the end<br />

of 2016 was a bittersweet occasion. This was<br />

an update to one of our favourite high-end<br />

phones, the OnePlus 3, and made several<br />

small but welcome changes to the processor<br />

and battery – yet these incremental<br />

improvements came with a steep £70 price<br />

increase, which seemed antithetical to the<br />

OnePlus ethos of creating fl agship-standard<br />

devices at knockdown prices. You couldn’t<br />

even get the older model for less, as it was<br />

canned with such remarkable speed and<br />

force that it disappeared from all but the<br />

shadiest of grey market stores.<br />

That said, by any reasonable measure<br />

the OnePlus 3T is still a bargain. Going in at<br />

£399 for the 64GB model, or £439 for the<br />

128GB model, it packs a 2.35GHz Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 821 processor, which is a<br />

straight upgrade from the OnePlus 3’s<br />

Snapdragon 820, and a convincing<br />

statement that the 3T is still looking to<br />

compete with top-tier smartphones on<br />

performance while severely undercutting<br />

them on cost.<br />

Battery size has also grown from<br />

3,000mAh to 3,400mAh, complemented by<br />

the new Dash Charge system, which promises<br />

“a day’s charge in half an hour”.<br />

SNAP HAPPY<br />

Along with the processor upgrade, the<br />

OnePlus 3T inherits its predecessor’s<br />

impressive list of core specifications.<br />

Namely, that Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 is<br />

backed up by 6GB of RAM and includes<br />

Qualcomm’s Adreno 530 graphics<br />

processing unit. As you’d imagine, these<br />

top-of-the-range specifications result in a<br />

smartphone that’s an absolute pleasure to<br />

use, and one that comfortably handles<br />

anything you throw its way.<br />

In Geekbench 4, it scored 1,903 in the<br />

single-core test and 4,273 in the multicore<br />

test. Besides being clear – if moderate –<br />

improvements over the OnePlus 3, which<br />

scored 1,689 and 4,026 respectively, these<br />

also show the OnePlus 3T holding its own<br />

against the Samsung Galaxy S7, which<br />

remains significantly more expensive even<br />

now that the Galaxy S8 has arrived.<br />

Graphics performance is unchanged from<br />

the 3, as you’d expect from the two OnePlus<br />

handsets sharing a GPU. The OnePlus 3T<br />

matches its predecessor with a superb 47fps<br />

average in the GFXBench GL onscreen<br />

Manhattan 3.0 test. That’s actually 9fps<br />

better than the Galaxy S7, so you’ll have no<br />

problems running intensive 3D titles.<br />

Weirdly, however,<br />

the larger 3,400mAh<br />

battery actually fared<br />

worse in our video<br />

loop test (running at<br />

the usual 170cd/m 2<br />

brightness). The<br />

OnePlus 3T lasted<br />

13h 22m, compared<br />

to the OnePlus 3’s<br />

16h 56m. That said,<br />

anecdotally we<br />

seemed to get slightly<br />

better longevity out<br />

of the newer phone<br />

in normal day-today<br />

use.<br />

DASH BLAST<br />

The Dash Charge tech<br />

is also impressive,<br />

though the claims of “a day’s power in half an<br />

hour” need a little extra scrutiny. While it’s<br />

true we were able to jump from 49% to 92%<br />

battery in 30 minutes (it took another 24<br />

minutes to hit 100%), not everyone would<br />

fi nd 43% capacity enough to get them<br />

through a day – especially if they’re a power<br />

user. Your mileage may vary.<br />

The OnePlus 3T’s rear camera is great as<br />

well. It’s a 16-megapixel snapper with an f/2.0<br />

aperture, phase-detect autofocus and optical<br />

image stabilisation. It’s short of laser<br />

autofocus for optimal low-light performance,<br />

but it’s generally solid.<br />

You might think that bringing the front<br />

camera up to the same 16-megapixel count<br />

would produce similarly good selfies, but<br />

sadly that isn’t the case. We found that<br />

shots taken on the front-facing camera had<br />

a nasty combination of overexposure and<br />

unimpressive colour balance, whether they<br />

were taken in or outdoors. It’s not a patch on<br />

the Google Pixel XL’s 8-megapixel snapper,<br />

proving that pixel count isn’t everything.<br />

That’s about it for the new additions; now<br />

we turn to the design and display, which<br />

remain largely unchanged from the OnePlus 3.<br />

Technically the 3T’s rear panel is slightly<br />

fl atter, but only hardcore OnePlus fans are<br />

likely to notice that at a glance. The anodised<br />

metal chassis looks the same, and it still feels<br />

comfortably secure<br />

in the hand, even<br />

one-handed. It has<br />

support for dual<br />

SIMs, meaning this<br />

can be your work<br />

and home phone,<br />

and it still charges<br />

via USB Type-C.<br />

PIXEL OF HEALTH<br />

At 5.5in, it remains a<br />

big beast of a phone,<br />

although that screen<br />

is still a 1,080x1,920<br />

AMOLED panel.<br />

That’s a lower<br />

resolution than some<br />

of its pricier peers,<br />

and undoubtedly<br />

where some of the<br />

cost savings are made, but unless you plan<br />

on using this for virtual reality, then it’s a<br />

sacrifice worth making. On a screen this size,<br />

diminishing returns tends to kick in, so most<br />

1080p content is tough to tell apart from that<br />

shown on a QHD or 4K display.<br />

For everyday usage, the OnePlus 3T’s<br />

screen is just fi ne. We measured a good<br />

maximum brightness of 421cd/m 2 and perfect<br />

contrast. Switch to sRGB mode and the<br />

screen covers 93.2% of the colour gamut,<br />

and it does so while looking sharp and vibrant.<br />

The OnePlus 3’s display wasn’t broke, so<br />

OnePlus has wisely declined to fi x it.<br />

Top-of-the-range specifications result in a smartphone<br />

that’s an absolute pleasure to use<br />

The OnePlus 3T is a brilliant smartphone,<br />

and objectively improves upon the amazingly<br />

good OnePlus 3 in a couple of small but<br />

significant ways: namely the processing<br />

performance and charging speed. It’s not<br />

ideal that these tweaks have resulted in a £70<br />

price rise, especially since one of the other<br />

hardware upgrades – the bigger battery – has<br />

such mixed results, but that’s not to say that<br />

the OnePlus 3T is a rip-off .<br />

In fact, while it’s not quite as incredible a<br />

bargain as the OnePlus 3, it still gives you<br />

demonstrably more bang for your buck than<br />

anything in and above its price range. It is,<br />

once again, a fl agship-killer. With the OnePlus<br />

3 having vanished from mainstream sellers,<br />

the OnePlus 3T is an easy endorsement.<br />

94 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy A5 (<strong>2017</strong>)<br />

★★★★★<br />

£332 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Samsung heads in the right direction with the<br />

keenly priced Galaxy A5<br />

THIS ISN’T NEARLY the cheapest Samsung<br />

handset around, but the latest Galaxy A5 is<br />

appealing as a value purchase because it has<br />

much more in common with the Galaxy S7<br />

than it does the budget Galaxy J series.<br />

For starters, there’s the fl agship-bothering<br />

build quality. The Galaxy A5’s clean metal<br />

frame and all-glass front are incredibly<br />

handsome for a sub-£350 smartphone, and<br />

its tapered back helps it fi t snugly into the<br />

palm of your hand. It’s also the fi rst iteration<br />

of the A5 where the rear camera is totally<br />

fl ush with the body.<br />

It’s a lovely phone to hold and behold,<br />

then, but then last year’s Galaxy A5 was<br />

pretty nice, too. The key differences lie<br />

beneath the phone’s glossy exterior, with a<br />

new processor, more RAM and a higherresolution<br />

camera.<br />

GLASS WITH FLYING COLOURS<br />

More similarly to last year’s model, the new<br />

A5 comes equipped with a 5.2in, Full HD,<br />

Super AMOLED display, racking up a pixel<br />

density of 424ppi. That’s not sharp enough<br />

for it to be compatible with Samsung’s Gear<br />

VR headset, but there’s nothing stopping<br />

you using Google Cardboard instead.<br />

More importantly, it looks superb in<br />

everyday use. Colours are striking, covering a<br />

perfect 100% of the sRGB gamut, and while<br />

our X-Rite colour calibrator did spot some<br />

slight inaccuracies in some of the darker<br />

shades of green, it’s so marginal that you<br />

won’t spot this with the naked eye.<br />

It’s also a reasonably bright Super<br />

AMOLED screen, too, with the calibrator<br />

picking up a peak brightness of 355cd/m 2 .<br />

It’s not as dazzling as, say, the Sony Xperia X<br />

Compact or OnePlus 3T, and you’ll need to<br />

shade the screen to read it in really bright<br />

conditions, but for the most part it’s<br />

adequate for outdoor viewing. The adaptive<br />

light sensor on the top of the phone also<br />

bumps up brightness to a maximum of<br />

451cd/m 2 , should the need arise.<br />

When it comes to performance, the Galaxy<br />

A5’s octa-core Exynos 7880 (clocked at<br />

1.9GHz) and 3GB of RAM keeps Android<br />

feeling snappy. It does fall behind the OnePlus<br />

3T in our benchmarks, scoring 767 in the<br />

Geekbench single-core test and 4,054 in<br />

multicore (compared to the 3T’s 1,903 and<br />

4,274), but since the A5 is nearly £70 cheaper,<br />

that’s a fair compromise. The multicore score<br />

in particular is a great showing.<br />

The phone’s graphics performance is<br />

somewhat less impressive. Running<br />

GFXBench’s onscreen Manhattan 3.0 test, it<br />

gained an average<br />

frame rate of 14fps,<br />

which is 33fps slower<br />

than the OnePlus 3T.<br />

It’s not so bad in<br />

practice – Sky Force:<br />

Reloaded ran with<br />

minimal hiccups, even<br />

when there was lots<br />

happening on the<br />

screen, but we’re<br />

concerned about how it<br />

might handle more<br />

intensive games that<br />

might come out in the<br />

next couple of years.<br />

ALL-NIGHTER<br />

Battery life is much<br />

better. This year’s<br />

Galaxy A5 ships with a<br />

3,000mAh power pack,<br />

and it put in a sterling<br />

performance in our<br />

video playback tests.<br />

With the phone in fl ight mode and the<br />

screen calibrated to 170cd/m 2 , the Galaxy A5<br />

lasted 22h 5m before giving up and shutting<br />

down, handily beating the Galaxy S7 and<br />

OnePlus 3T and coming fairly close to the<br />

Motorola Moto Z Play. There’s fast charging<br />

via USB Type-C, too.<br />

As for soft ware, we were more than a little<br />

disappointed to fi nd that Samsung Galaxy A5<br />

isn’t powered by Android 7.0 Nougat straight<br />

out of the box. While we’ve been assured<br />

there’ll be an over-the-air update in the near<br />

future, you’ll have to wait a little longer for the<br />

latest, greatest version of Google’s OS.<br />

Returning our attention to that newly fl ush<br />

rear camera, Samsung has boosted the<br />

resolution to 16 megapixels, and done the<br />

same to the front-facing camera – that’s a<br />

sizable improvement over the 2016 Galaxy<br />

A5’s 13- and 5-megapixel cameras. Using the<br />

rear camera, we were able to capture some<br />

very detail-rich shots of the streets outside<br />

our office on a clear day. Switching on HDR<br />

didn’t yield massive improvements, even if<br />

the image was already well exposed to begin<br />

with. A tad more cloud detail could be spotted<br />

in the HDR shot, but not much else.<br />

Indoor snaps weren’t<br />

a problem, with shots<br />

of our low-light still-life<br />

arrangement picking<br />

up an abundance of<br />

vibrant colour.<br />

Visual noise is kept<br />

at bay as well, and<br />

there’s no muddying<br />

of the fi ner details.<br />

Samsung’s camera<br />

soft ware has seen a<br />

bit of an update, too.<br />

In a similar move to<br />

Huawei’s slick Camera<br />

app, specific shooting<br />

modes can be accessed<br />

via quick swipes to the<br />

left and right, rather<br />

than having to navigate<br />

through convoluted<br />

menus. It’s the<br />

almost-perfect<br />

one-handed experience<br />

– especially with the<br />

new movable virtual shutter button, and<br />

especially handy for selfie enthusiasts.<br />

FOOD FOR THOUGHT<br />

There’s also Samsung’s new Food Filter, which<br />

applies a basic depth-of-fi eld effect and some<br />

colour tinkering to supposedly make your<br />

food photos look their Instagram-worthy best.<br />

Photos with this fi lter applied were a tad<br />

The A5 is just the ticket if you’re not fond of handing over<br />

flagship-sized sums of cash but want something sleek<br />

oversaturated, though, and we weren’t keen<br />

on the extreme background blur. It’s a<br />

frivolous and ultimately ignorable inclusion.<br />

The Samsung Galaxy S8 might be<br />

grabbing all the headlines at the moment,<br />

but that doesn’t mean the Galaxy A5 should<br />

be overlooked. It’s just the ticket if you’re<br />

not fond of handing over fl agship-sized sums<br />

of cash but want something that looks and<br />

feels just as sleek.<br />

The OnePlus 3T looms large as an<br />

alternative, but it’s more expensive and its<br />

battery life isn’t nearly as good. As such, the<br />

Galaxy A5 takes a well-deserved place as one<br />

of the best mid-range handsets you can buy<br />

today, and has enough premium touches to<br />

make it worth considering alongside older<br />

fl agships that have come down in price.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

95


SMARTPHONES<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy S6<br />

★★★★★<br />

£374 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

What was an impressive step forward in 2015<br />

is still a highly competitive smartphone today<br />

EVEN AT THE ripe old age of two years old,<br />

the Galaxy S6 still impresses – after all, it was<br />

the fi rst Samsung smartphone to look and<br />

feel like a truly premium product, without the<br />

plasticky panels of what came before.<br />

It’s not as eye-catching as the S6 Edge,<br />

with its tapered screen, and also doesn’t feel<br />

as grippy in the hand, due to the S6 having<br />

smoother, more rounded edges. Still, these<br />

are minor quibbles, and there’s much more to<br />

like about the design than not. It only weighs<br />

138g, for starters – that’s a good 17g less than<br />

the LG G4, which is also 1.9mm fatt er – and<br />

while the glass backplate attracts fi ngerprints,<br />

it and the aluminium frame make for a vastly<br />

better-looking device than the old Galaxy S5.<br />

There’s also the matter of the stunning<br />

5.1in Super AMOLED display. The 2,560x1,440<br />

resolution gives it a pixel density of 577ppi,<br />

which remains among the highest you’ll see<br />

on any smartphone outside of certain 4K<br />

outliers. Colour accuracy and contrast were<br />

through the roof, with sRGB colour gamut<br />

coverage of 100% and an Infinity:1 contrast<br />

ratio. We measured a so-so peak brightness<br />

of 346.49cd/m 2 indoors, but the Galaxy S6<br />

has the same automatic brightness mode as<br />

later Galaxy phones, allowing it to reach a<br />

massive 577cd/m 2 outside.<br />

CARDS NOT ACCEPTED<br />

Unlike the S5, the S6 doesn’t have a<br />

replaceable battery. To be fair, this is<br />

something that could be said of the vast<br />

majority of fl agships (as well as most<br />

mid-range and cheaper handsets), but it’s<br />

still a mild shame. As some recompense, the<br />

S6 supports WPC (Qi) and PMA (Powermat)<br />

wireless charging. The Micro USB port on<br />

the bottom of the phone also supports<br />

fast-charging, which gave us about four<br />

hours of use from 10 minutes attached to<br />

the mains. We do prefer the reversible USB<br />

Type-C port on the Galaxy S8, for<br />

convenience’s sake, though it should be<br />

easier to fi nd spare cables for the S6.<br />

Battery size is also down from the S5,<br />

but this shouldn’t be too much of an issue.<br />

The Galaxy S6 lasted 13h 37m in our battery<br />

benchmark, a performance which may have<br />

been thoroughly<br />

outdone by the Galaxy<br />

S7, but still translates<br />

into a good day’s worth<br />

of regular use.<br />

There’s a decently<br />

fast, thumb-oriented<br />

fi ngerprint scanner built<br />

into the home button –<br />

you can use this with<br />

Samsung Pay, to make<br />

payments with the<br />

phone instead of having<br />

to pull out a contactless<br />

bank card – but sadly<br />

other creatures<br />

comforts, such as<br />

waterproofi ng and a<br />

microSD slot, are<br />

missing as well.<br />

You’re therefore<br />

limited to whatever<br />

amount of onboard<br />

storage you choose,<br />

from 32GB, 64GB and<br />

128GB fl avours.<br />

WIZ KID<br />

On the plus side, Samsung’s 64-bit, octa-core<br />

Samsung Exynos 7420 processor makes the<br />

S6 very snappy indeed. It scored 1,427 in the<br />

Geekbench single-core test and 4,501 in the<br />

multicore test, so remains among the best of<br />

the best even in <strong>2017</strong>, and while the S7 and<br />

OnePlus 3T are more future-proofed for<br />

We hear a lot about ‘flagship killers’. Well, here’s a<br />

genuine flagship that costs even less than the<br />

best ‘killer’ on the market<br />

gaming performance, you can still run any<br />

intensive 3D title on the S6 with ease.<br />

TouchWiz, Samsung’s Android skin, is<br />

more streamlined than it has been in<br />

previous versions; there are still about two<br />

screens’ worth of pre-installed apps, but<br />

it’s cut back on the bloatware. The main<br />

issue is that, like most custom skins, it seems<br />

to delay Android updates. The S6 has long<br />

been running 6.1 Marshmallow, having<br />

launched with 5.0 Lollipop, but a timeframe<br />

for the supposedly upcoming 7.0 Nougat<br />

update has been left vague.<br />

The Galaxy S6 includes a 16-megapixel rear<br />

camera, which protrudes slightly outwards<br />

from the back of the<br />

handset. This is the<br />

same resolution as the<br />

Galaxy S5’s camera, but<br />

there’s now a brighter<br />

f/1.9 aperture lens,<br />

which Samsung claims<br />

lets in 34% more light<br />

than the S5’s f/2.2<br />

lens. Optical image<br />

stabilisation reduces<br />

blur in low-light<br />

shooting, and a<br />

double-click of the<br />

home button activates<br />

the camera in under a<br />

second, ensuring you’ll<br />

never miss a shot.<br />

We were pleased<br />

with the quality of our<br />

test photos, as colours<br />

were bright and vibrant<br />

with plenty of fi ne<br />

detail on show. A few<br />

patches of bright sky<br />

were overexposed,<br />

but turning on HDR<br />

mode instantly fi xed the problem. HDR also<br />

left the rest of the picture intact, keeping the<br />

high level of detail and accurate colours we<br />

saw in Auto mode without making it seem<br />

unnaturally harsh or artificial.<br />

RETURN OF THE KING<br />

There’s no doubting that the Galaxy S6 is a<br />

much better phone, both in terms of features<br />

and build quality, than the Galaxy S5 – and,<br />

more pertinently, it remains a great device by<br />

more recent standards.<br />

There is the question, however, of whether<br />

it’s worth opting for a two-generations-old<br />

handset when not only is there a newer, even<br />

better model available, but that the later<br />

version – the Galaxy S7 – has benefi ted from<br />

a big price drop thanks to the Galaxy S8. The<br />

most obvious answer to that is, of course,<br />

that the Galaxy S6 is even cheaper – we found<br />

a new and unboxed 32GB unit for just £374,<br />

which is quite a bit less than both the Galaxy<br />

S7 and the OnePlus 3T (not to mention less<br />

than half of what Samsung wants for the<br />

most basic Galaxy S8).<br />

We hear a lot about ‘flagship killers’,<br />

phones that make a few compromises here<br />

and there to offer premium performance at<br />

a mid-range price. Well, here’s a genuine<br />

fl agship that costs even less than the best<br />

‘killer’ on the market – and there’s defi nitely<br />

some appeal in that.<br />

96 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

SAMSUNG Galaxy S7<br />

★★★★★<br />

£420 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

The Samsung Galaxy S7 is still one of the best smartphones<br />

out there, now with Android Nougat and a lower price<br />

YOU MIGHT BE wondering what the Galaxy<br />

S7 is doing here – aren’t we meant to be<br />

looking at more affordable current phones<br />

and older classics? Well, you’d be right in<br />

that the S7 isn’t exactly chump change,<br />

but then by the time you read this, the<br />

Galaxy S8 will have arrived to replace it as<br />

Samsung’s premier smartphone. That means<br />

price drops for last year’s model, and we’ve<br />

already found the S7 for nearly £150 less<br />

than its original RRP.<br />

This is great news for bargain hunters, as<br />

the S7 quickly became our favourite-ever<br />

Android handset when we fi rst reviewed it.<br />

Not that fi rst impressions were that great:<br />

our testing sample had fi ne scratches in<br />

numerous places on the display and the<br />

fi ngerprint sensor, and while the glass back<br />

was in better conditions, it was and remains<br />

an absolute fi ngerprint magnet.<br />

RESISTANCE MOVEMENT<br />

The S7 is 1.1mm thicker than the Galaxy S6<br />

and, at 152g, is 20g heavier, but neither are<br />

things you’ll notice in everyday use. Samsung<br />

has also made some big improvements in the<br />

form of IP68 waterproofi ng and a microSD<br />

slot for expandable storage. The S6 was<br />

sorely missing both, and the S7 is far more<br />

fl exible and durable for it.<br />

Our only major quibble is with the<br />

front-mounted fi ngerprint sensor. It’s much<br />

lower down than where our thumbs and<br />

fi ngers would normally rest, and it will only<br />

unlock the phone once you’ve pressed the<br />

home button or woken it up with the power<br />

button. It didn’t always recognise our<br />

fi ngerprints successfully, either.<br />

Samsung’s Super AMOLED displays have<br />

always been one of the highlights of its<br />

S-series smartphones, and the S7’s screen is<br />

no exception. It may not have the curved sides<br />

of the S7 Edge, but this 5.1in, 2,560x1,440-<br />

resolution display has a super-sharp pixel<br />

density of 577ppi and its quality is top notch.<br />

Covering a full 100% of the sRGB colour<br />

gamut, it can produce pitch perfect 0.00cd/m 2<br />

blacks, and a super-high contrast ratio makes<br />

it lovely to look at, whatever the task.<br />

With a peak brightness of 353.74cd/m 2 ,<br />

it’s not as bright as most LCD-based<br />

smartphones, but switch to Auto brightness<br />

and shine a torch on its<br />

adaptive light sensor and<br />

the brightness will shoot<br />

up to around 470cd/m 2 .<br />

It’s the same thing<br />

Samsung did with the S6,<br />

and it makes using the S7<br />

in sunshine much easier<br />

than some of its other<br />

Super AMOLED handsets.<br />

It also has the added<br />

benefi t of Samsung’s<br />

Always On Display<br />

technology, which can<br />

be used to display<br />

information such as the<br />

date, time and the phone’s<br />

battery status when the<br />

screen is turned off. It can<br />

also show calendar<br />

information, but it’s a<br />

shame this widget isn’t<br />

actionable like traditional<br />

Android notifications.<br />

This drains a little<br />

under 1% of the battery per hour, but<br />

you won’t have to worry about the S7’s<br />

overall stamina – it lasted 17h 48m in our<br />

continuous video playback test, an<br />

exceptional performance which puts the S6’s<br />

The Galaxy S7 is far more flexible and durable than the S6<br />

thanks to IP68 waterproofing and a microSD slot<br />

13h 37m to shame. Fast-charging has also<br />

been improved, allowing us to regain 50%<br />

charge in just 10 minutes, and it supports<br />

wireless charging via the usual Qi standard.<br />

DRAGON SLAYER<br />

In some territories, the S7 runs off<br />

Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 820, but in the UK<br />

and Europe this is replaced by Samsung’s own<br />

octa-core Exynos 8890 processor. This makes<br />

it one of the slickest and most responsive<br />

smartphones around, scoring a massive 2,115<br />

in Geekbench’s single-core test and 6,437 in<br />

the multicore test. Samsung’s TouchWiz<br />

interface (laid over Android 7.0 Nougat)<br />

simply fl ies, and apps loaded almost instantly.<br />

Web browsing is similarly quick, with the S7<br />

scoring an impressive 1,882 in Peacekeeper<br />

and coping extremely well when scrolling<br />

through media-heavy pages.<br />

The Exynos 8890’s graphics capabilities<br />

are equally impressive. In the offscreen<br />

Manhattan test of<br />

GFXBench GL 3.0, the S7<br />

managed a score of 2,336<br />

frames, which equates to<br />

around 38fps. The cheaper<br />

OnePlus 3T beats it with<br />

47fps, but this still<br />

demonstrates the S7’s<br />

ability to run demanding<br />

games without hitches.<br />

Samsung’s added Game<br />

Launcher comes in handy<br />

as well, as it can disable<br />

notifications, capture<br />

footage and screenshots or<br />

lock the Back and Recents<br />

buttons while you play.<br />

The Galaxy S6 came<br />

with an excellent camera,<br />

but for the S7, Samsung<br />

took a risk in order to<br />

improve image quality<br />

further, reducing the main<br />

snapper’s resolution to 12<br />

megapixels instead of<br />

sticking with the S6’s 16-megapixel sensor.<br />

That may sound like a step backwards,<br />

but each individual pixel is bigger, up from<br />

1.12um on the S6 to 1.4um on the S7. This,<br />

combined with the wider f/1.7 lens and<br />

dual-pixel sensor, means that pixels receive<br />

more light, enhancing image quality.<br />

LUCKY NUMBER SEVEN<br />

As a result, the S7 takes very similarly<br />

high-quality shots to the S6, both indoors<br />

and outdoors. Detailing is excellent, there’s<br />

plenty of contrast, and colours are lovely and<br />

bright. It tends toward a slight overexposure<br />

in shots with a challenging dynamic range,<br />

but that’s preferable to the alternative of<br />

darker shots, and we could rectify it by<br />

switching to HDR mode when possible.<br />

It’s mainly in the shutter speed that the<br />

S7 proves itself superior. For instance, in a<br />

low-light shot, the S7 took the photo at 1 /25<br />

sec, whereas the S6 shot at 1 /15 sec. This<br />

means the S7 will be more reliable in low-light<br />

situations and less likely to blur moving<br />

subjects, making it the better camera overall.<br />

Our only remaining issue with the Galaxy<br />

S7 was its price – £579 was a lot of money,<br />

even for a fl agship – but now it can be picked<br />

up for not much more than a OnePlus 3T.<br />

It’s certainly better value than the Galaxy S8,<br />

which will leave a £689-sized crater in your<br />

bank account. Proof, as if more was necessary,<br />

that a bit of patience can net you a top-tier<br />

smartphone at middling prices.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

97


SMARTPHONES<br />

SONY Xperia X Compact<br />

★★★★★<br />

£324 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Sony’s 4.6in handset both improves on and<br />

steps back from the luxury Z5 Compact<br />

SINCE THE NEXT cheapest option in Sony’s<br />

smartphone range is the rubbish Xperia XA<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 344), the dinky Xperia X Compact<br />

looks like the family’s best balance of<br />

affordability and quality.<br />

It is, however, something of a<br />

Frankenphone, combining some features<br />

from the top-of-the-line XZ with some from<br />

the older Xperia X, all in its 4.6in chassis.<br />

So instead of the octa-core Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 820 processor from the XZ, the<br />

X Compact has the hexa-core Snapdragon<br />

650 from the X – yet it inherits its camera<br />

lock, stock and barrel from the XZ.<br />

Honestly, this is a slightly disappointing<br />

departure from Sony’s previous Compact<br />

models, which were typically just as powerful<br />

as their fl agship brethren, just in a smaller<br />

body. Physical design has also taken a hit:<br />

compared to the old Z5 Compact, the newer<br />

model looks positively frumpy, with its plastic,<br />

wraparound frame and glossy plastic back<br />

comparing rather poorly with the sharp lines<br />

of its predecessor.<br />

SQUARE’S BREADTH<br />

The fi t-and-finish isn’t great either, with<br />

unsightly gaps at the top and bottom of the<br />

rear panel ready to gobble up unsightly<br />

pocket fl uff. It might be less fragile than the<br />

Z5 Compact – we were never terribly<br />

confident in the Z5’s frosted-glass rear panel<br />

– but surely Sony could have found a way to<br />

make its replacement look nicer than this.<br />

There’s no dust- or water-proofi ng, either.<br />

The phone does at least fulfil its principal<br />

raison d’être: it’s both more pocketable and<br />

easier to use one-handed than most of the<br />

5.5in-plus behemoths favoured by<br />

manufacturers for their mid-range and higher<br />

smartphones these days. It’s also good to see<br />

that Sony has kept both the dedicated<br />

camera shutter button and the fi ngerprint<br />

reader, which is once again integrated with<br />

the side-mounted power button.<br />

As for the main camera, the sensor size,<br />

pixel count and aperture all remain unchanged<br />

from the Z5 Compact, but Sony has made a<br />

few minor improvements. First up is ‘laserassisted’<br />

infrared autofocus, which Sony says<br />

helps the camera to focus more accurately in<br />

low light. In good light, the hybrid phase and<br />

contrast-detect<br />

autofocus system<br />

(again, copied from the<br />

Z5 Compact) takes<br />

over. This seems to<br />

work reasonably well,<br />

but then we didn’t<br />

particularly have any<br />

problems with the way<br />

the focus worked on<br />

the Z5 Compact, so<br />

we’re not convinced it’s<br />

a huge leap forward.<br />

Next up is a colour<br />

sensor, similar to the<br />

one introduced by the<br />

LG G4. This is supposed<br />

to deliver more accurate<br />

colours under a wider<br />

variety of lighting<br />

conditions, and does<br />

indeed seem to work<br />

pretty well. Under<br />

fl uorescent office strip<br />

lights, halogen and LED lighting, the X<br />

Compact’s camera always seemed to get the<br />

colour balance spot on where others, even the<br />

Samsung Galaxy S7, would veer a little off base.<br />

BLAME TO FRAME<br />

Despite these improvements, Sony’s<br />

smartphones continue to be plagued by the<br />

same old problems. Even with the camera’s<br />

manual mode enabled – which is the only way<br />

of getting 23-megapixel images out of the<br />

camera, by the way – fi ne details are lost in a<br />

storm of grain and JPEG compression.<br />

The screen is only a Standard HD panel, but that’s sharp<br />

enough considering its size. Photos and video look superb<br />

We’re not huge fans of the X Compact’s<br />

wide-angle 24mm lens, either. On the positive<br />

side, it lets you cram much more into your<br />

photographs than most smartphones, whose<br />

lenses are typically closer to 28mm. But the<br />

downside is noticeable – not to mention<br />

distracting – optical distortion, where<br />

buildings and straight lines look warped at<br />

the edges of the frame.<br />

Fortunately, the move to a Snapdragon<br />

650 CPU hasn’t had too much of an adverse<br />

effect on performance. It’s no slowpoke, that<br />

much is clear from using the phone from day to<br />

day – launching apps, fl icking between them<br />

and navigating around feels slick and quick.<br />

The fact that the<br />

screen is limited to a<br />

resolution of 1,280x720,<br />

rather than the Full HD<br />

favoured by most other<br />

mid-range devices, might<br />

be off-putting to some,<br />

but it does have the<br />

positive effect of helping<br />

games to run better.<br />

Here, the X Compact<br />

performs well, even with<br />

demanding games such<br />

as Sky Force Reloaded.<br />

Indeed, in the<br />

GFXBench Manhattan 3<br />

onscreen test, which is<br />

run at the phone’s<br />

native resolution, the<br />

X Compact’s Adreno 510<br />

GPU gains an average<br />

frame rate of 32fps,<br />

which is only a little<br />

less than what the<br />

Galaxy S7 managed. Sadly, though, this is<br />

one area in which the older Z5 Compact<br />

trounces it, scoring 47fps in the same test.<br />

At least the X Compact puts up more of a<br />

fi ght in Geekbench, scoring 1,445 in the<br />

single-core test and 3,778 in the multicore<br />

test – competitive with the Z5 Compact’s<br />

respective scores of 1,369 and 3,795. These<br />

also put it ahead of Google’s Nexus 5X and<br />

the Moto Z Play, though it’s still some way off<br />

the OnePlus 3T in terms of horsepower.<br />

SMALL WONDER<br />

The screen is, as mentioned, only a Standard<br />

HD panel, but that’s sharp enough considering<br />

its small size. What’s more, photos and video<br />

look superb on it, whether you have Sony’s<br />

X-Reality image turned on or not, and<br />

measurements with our colourimeter<br />

suggest that it’s an excellent screen as well.<br />

Contrast, maximum brightness, and colour<br />

reproduction are all top notch. Indeed, the X<br />

Compact manages to outdo the Z5 Compact,<br />

with a maximum brightness of 535cd/m 2 to<br />

the Z5 Compact’s 461cd/m 2 .<br />

Battery life has improved as well. In our<br />

video benchmark, the X Compact lasted a<br />

strong 14h 41m, which is a full 1h 20m longer<br />

than the Z5 Compact.<br />

It may be a disappointment in some areas,<br />

then, but with its enhanced camera, longer<br />

battery life and still-respectable performance,<br />

the Xperia X Compact is still a good phone<br />

overall, and will particularly suit Android fans<br />

who want to stick to a smaller form factor.<br />

98 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

VODAFONE<br />

Smart Platinum 7<br />

★★★★★<br />

£280 • From shop.vodafone.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

It’s fast and has a great screen, but the Smart<br />

Platinum 7’s camera falls short of perfection<br />

VODAFONE MAY NOT be thought of as a<br />

prolific maker of quality smartphones, but it<br />

has been on a bit of a roll. In the past couple<br />

of years we’ve had such genuinely great<br />

devices as the Smart Ultra 6, the Smart Prime<br />

7 and this: the Smart Platinum 7, a high-spec/<br />

low-cost handset in a similar vein to the<br />

OnePlus range or the Moto Z Play.<br />

It certainly makes a good fi rst impression.<br />

With its glossy, glass back, there’s something<br />

very reminiscent of the Samsung Galaxy S7<br />

in the Smart Platinum 7’s design, but its<br />

angular, chamfered edges actually make it<br />

much easier to hold. The textured power and<br />

volume buttons are also nice touches, while<br />

the dual front-facing speakers are another<br />

welcome addition to the Platinum’s rather<br />

impressive set of specs.<br />

The Platinum 7 runs vanilla Android 6.0,<br />

not 7.0, but at least it’s presented on a<br />

stunning 5.5in, 2,560x1,440 AMOLED display.<br />

Covering a full 100% of the sRGB colour<br />

gamut, the Platinum’s screen looks fantastic,<br />

producing rich, vibrant colours that look<br />

much more true to life than those on the<br />

OnePlus 3T. Likewise, its high contrast ratio<br />

and perfect 0.00cd/m 2 black levels give<br />

images plenty of depth, and it’s easily one of<br />

the better smartphone displays you can buy<br />

for under £300. It’s certainly one of the<br />

sharpest, as both the Moto Z Play and Nexus<br />

5X only have 1,920x1,080 resolution displays.<br />

LIGHTEN UP<br />

The only slight downside is that it’s not<br />

particularly bright, with a peak brightness of<br />

just 358.20cd/m 2 . This is fairly typical of<br />

AMOLED displays, but when some AMOLED<br />

panels such as the one on the OnePlus 3T can<br />

hit over 400cd/m 2 on its maximum setting,<br />

you do start to wonder if Vodafone could<br />

have done a little more to help increase the<br />

phone’s overall practicality. Still, it’s a small<br />

complaint overall, as it’s just about bright<br />

enough to see clearly outside when you’re<br />

standing in direct sunlight.<br />

The octa-core 1.8GHz Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 652 processor also gives it a<br />

significant speed boost compared to similarly<br />

priced smartphones, as it scored 1,535 in<br />

Geekbench 3’s single-core test and an<br />

impressive 4,926 in the multicore test. It’s not<br />

quite as quick as the OnePlus 3T, which has<br />

an even more powerful Snapdragon 821 to<br />

justify its higher cost, but it’s miles in front of<br />

the Nexus 5X and the Moto Z Play, and beats<br />

the more expensive HTC One A9 as well.<br />

Android 6.0 certainly<br />

feels extremely<br />

responsive during<br />

everyday use, and apps<br />

and games are very<br />

quick to load as well.<br />

Web browsing is<br />

smooth, too, although<br />

there were occasional<br />

hiccups here and there<br />

when it was loading<br />

pages with lots of images<br />

and adverts. Still, scrolling<br />

up and down sites at<br />

speed was largely free of<br />

juddering interruptions,<br />

and its Peacekeeper score<br />

of 1,160 puts it miles<br />

ahead of the One A9.<br />

The Platinum 7’s<br />

graphics performance is pretty impressive as<br />

well. Again, the OnePlus 3T is streets ahead<br />

here thanks to its more powerful processor<br />

and built-in GPU, but the Platinum’s score of<br />

923 frames (around 15fps) in GFXBench GL’s<br />

offscreen Manhattan 3.0 test still provides<br />

enough grunt for most types of games.<br />

Hearthstone was a little jerky in places, but it<br />

was far from unplayable, and 2D titles ran<br />

perfectly well without any hitches whatsoever.<br />

DON’T SHOOT<br />

The Smart Platinum 7’s 3,000mAh battery<br />

lasted a commendable 13h 16m in our<br />

continuous video playback test. That’s three<br />

hours longer than the Nexus 5X and just six<br />

minutes behind the OnePlus 3T, though when<br />

it comes to stamina, none of these can touch<br />

the Moto Z Play and Lenovo P2.<br />

The Platinum 7’s main downfall is its<br />

16-megapixel camera. While our shots indoors<br />

were relatively bright and colourful, outdoor<br />

shots were on the dingy side, with darker<br />

objects in the frame having almost no detail<br />

whatsoever. This wasn’t the only area where<br />

the camera struggled, either, as the rest of<br />

our shots were also very grainy and lacking in<br />

texture. Paving stones blurred into one<br />

another and brickwork was almost nonexistent<br />

when viewed at full resolution.<br />

Even our indoor shots<br />

were quite smeary when<br />

viewed up close, both in<br />

low light and with our<br />

studio lights turned on.<br />

Objects in our still-life<br />

arrangement were very<br />

soft around the edges,<br />

for example, and textures<br />

showed a distinct lack of<br />

sharpness and defi nition.<br />

It’s a shame, but this<br />

just isn’t up to the<br />

same standard of<br />

many other sub-£300<br />

cameras, particularly<br />

that of the Nexus 5X.<br />

We also had issues<br />

with the rear-facing<br />

fi ngerprint sensor.<br />

It’s quite small, for starters, and its almost<br />

fl ush design makes it difficult to fi nd when<br />

you’re in a hurry. Even when we did, it’s not<br />

particularly fast – we eventually stopped<br />

using it, in favour of a traditional swipe.<br />

PRECIOUS METAL<br />

The Smart Platinum 7 doesn’t quite reach the<br />

same heady heights as some of Vodafone’s<br />

other own-brand smartphones, then, but it’s<br />

also got some pretty tough competition to<br />

deal with as well, namely the excellent Moto<br />

Z Play and the newly cheap Nexus 5X.<br />

There’s also the OnePlus 3T to consider,<br />

though in the Platinum 7’s favour, it’s not<br />

competing as closely as it did with the old<br />

The stunning 2,560x1,440 AMOLED display is easily one of<br />

the better smartphone displays you can buy for under £300<br />

OnePlus 3. This did everything the Platinum 7<br />

did and more, for just £15 extra, making<br />

Vodafone’s offering seem like the losing<br />

choice. That’s no longer the case now that<br />

the OnePlus 3 has disappeared from retailers<br />

and its replacement, the OnePlus 3T, is a full<br />

£120 more expensive.<br />

Thus, it’s a much closer battle in the<br />

£200-£300 range. The Moto Z Play is<br />

perhaps better overall (and there’s no<br />

disparaging that 23h 45m result in our<br />

battery benchmarks), but the Smart<br />

Platinum 7 remains worthy, mainly owing to<br />

its performance and display quality.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

99


SMARTPHONES<br />

Award RECOMMENDED BEST BUY RECOMMENDED<br />

Manufacturer APPLE GOOGLE HONOR HTC<br />

Model iPhone SE Nexus 5X 6X One A9<br />

Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★<br />

HARDWARE<br />

Processor<br />

Dual-core 1.8GHz<br />

Apple A9<br />

Hexa-core 1.8GHz<br />

Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 808<br />

Octa-core 2.1GHz<br />

Kirin 655<br />

Octa-core 1.5GHz<br />

Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 617<br />

RAM 2GB 2GB 4GB 2GB<br />

Screen size 4in 5.2in 5.5in 5in<br />

Screen resolution 1,136x640 1,920x1,080 1,920x1,080 1,920x1,080<br />

Screen type IPS IPS IPS AMOLED<br />

Front camera 5 megapixels 5 megapixels 8 megapixels 4 megapixels<br />

Rear camera 12 megapixels 12.3 megapixels 12 megapixels 13 megapixels<br />

Flash LED (True Tone) Dual LEDs Yes LED<br />

GPS Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Compass Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Storage 16GB/64GB 32GB/128GB 64GB 16GB/32GB<br />

Memory card slot None None MicroSD MicroSD<br />

Wi-Fi 802.11ac 802.11n 802.11b/g/n 802.11ac<br />

Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.0 Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.1<br />

NFC Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Wireless data 4G 4G 4G 4G<br />

Dimensions 124x59x7.6mm 147x73x7.9mm 151x76x8.2mm 146x71x7.3mm<br />

Weight 112g 136g 162g 143g<br />

FEATURES<br />

Operating system iOS 10 Android 7.0 Android 6.0 Android 7.0<br />

Battery size 1,624mAh 2,700mAh 3,340mAh 2,150mAh<br />

BUYING INFORMATION<br />

Price £379 £284 £225 £310<br />

Prices correct at time of going to press<br />

Warranty One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB<br />

Supplier www.apple.com/uk www.ebuyer.com www.amazon.co.uk www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Details www.apple.com/uk www.google.co.uk www.hihonor.com www.htc.com/uk<br />

Part code iPhone SE LG H791 BLN-L24 One A9<br />

100 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

BEST BUY RECOMMENDED BEST BUY<br />

HUAWEI LENOVO LG MOTOROLA<br />

P8 Lite <strong>2017</strong> P2 G4 Moto G4<br />

★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★<br />

Octa-core 2.1GHz Kirin 655<br />

Octa-core 2.0GHz<br />

Snapdragon 625<br />

Hexa-core 1.8GHz<br />

Qualcomm Snapdragon<br />

808<br />

Octa-core 1.5GHz<br />

Qualcomm Snapdragon 617<br />

3GB 4GB 3GB 2GB<br />

5.2in 5.5in 5.5in 5.5in<br />

1,920x1,080 1,920x1,080 2,560x1,440 1,920x1,080<br />

IPS AMOLED IPS Quantum IPS<br />

8 megapixels 5 megapixels 8 megapixels 5 megapixels<br />

12 megapixels 13 megapixels 16 megapixels 13 megapixels<br />

LED Dual LED LED LED<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

16GB 32GB 32GB 16GB/32GB<br />

MicroSD MicroSD MicroSD MicroSD<br />

802.11n 802.11ac 802.11ac 802.11ac<br />

Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.0 Bluetooth 4.2<br />

Yes Yes Yes No<br />

4G 4G 4G 4G<br />

147x73x7.6mm 153x76x8.3mm 149x75x8.9mm 153x77x7.9mm<br />

147g 177g 155g 155g<br />

Android 7.0 Android 6.0 Android 7.0 Android 6.0<br />

3,000mAh 5,100mAh 3,000mAh 3,000mAh<br />

£182 £200 £319 £145<br />

Two years RTB One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB<br />

www.csmobiles.com www.three.co.uk www.amazon.co.uk www.carphonewarehouse.<br />

co.uk<br />

consumer.huawei.com/uk www.lenovo.com www.lg.com www.motorola.co.uk<br />

PRA-LA1 P2aH42 LG-F500L XT1622<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

101


SMARTPHONES<br />

Award RECOMMENDED BEST BUY RECOMMENDED<br />

Manufacturer MOTOROLA MOTOROLA ONEPLUS SAMSUNG<br />

Model Moto G5 Moto Z Play 3T Galaxy A5 (<strong>2017</strong>)<br />

Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★<br />

HARDWARE<br />

Processor<br />

Octa-core 1.4GHz<br />

Snapdragon 430<br />

Octa-core 2.0GHz<br />

Snapdragon 625<br />

Quad-core 2.45GHz<br />

Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 821<br />

Octa-core 1.9GHz<br />

Samsung Exynos<br />

7880<br />

RAM 2GB/3GB 3GB 6GB 3GB<br />

Screen size 5in 5.5in 5.5in 5.2in<br />

Screen resolution 1,920x1,080 1,920x1,080 1,920x1,080 1,920x1,080<br />

Screen type IPS Super AMOLED AMOLED Super AMOLED<br />

Front camera 5 megapixels 5 megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels<br />

Rear camera 13 megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels<br />

Flash LED Dual LED LED LED<br />

GPS Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Compass Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Storage 16GB/32GB 32GB 64GB 32GB<br />

Memory card slot MicroSD MicroSD No Yes<br />

Wi-Fi 802.11n 802.11n 802.11ac 802.11ac<br />

Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2 Bluetooth 4.0 Bluetooth 4.2 Bluetooth 4.2<br />

NFC Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Wireless data 4G 4G 4G 4G<br />

Dimensions 144x73x9.5mm 156x76x6.9mm 153mmx75x7.4mm 146x71x7.9mm<br />

Weight 145g 165g 158g 157g<br />

FEATURES<br />

Operating system Android 7.0 Android 6.0 Android 7.0 Android 6.0<br />

Battery size 2,800mAh 3,510mAh 3,400mAh 3,000mAh<br />

BUYING INFORMATION<br />

Price £180 £370 £399 £332<br />

Prices correct at time of going to press<br />

Warranty One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB<br />

Supplier www.amazon.co.uk www.motorola.co.uk oneplus.net/uk www.amazon.co.uk<br />

Details www.motorola.co.uk www.motorola.co.uk oneplus.net/uk www.samsung.com/<br />

uk<br />

Part code XT1672 XT1635 A3010 SM-A520FZKABTU<br />

102 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SMARTPHONES<br />

RECOMMENDED<br />

BEST BUY<br />

SAMSUNG SAMSUNG SONY VODAFONE<br />

Galaxy S6 Galaxy S7 Xperia X Compact Smart Platinum 7<br />

★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★<br />

Octa-core 2.1GHz<br />

Samsung Exynos<br />

7420<br />

Octa-core 2.3GHz<br />

Samsung Exynos<br />

8890<br />

Hexa-core 1.8GHz<br />

Snapdragon 650<br />

3GB 4GB 3GB 3GB<br />

5.1in 5.1in 4.6in 5.5in<br />

Octa-core 1.8GHz<br />

Qualcomm<br />

Snapdragon 652<br />

2,560x1,440 2,560x1,440 1,280x720 2,560x1,440<br />

Super AMOLED Super AMOLED IPS AMOLED<br />

5 megapixels 5 megapixels 5 megapixels 8 megapixels<br />

16 megapixels 12 megapixels 23 megapixels 16 megapixels<br />

LED LED LED LED<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

32GB/64GB/128GB 32GB 32GB 32GB<br />

N/A MicroSD MicroSD MicroSD<br />

802.11ac 802.11ac 802.11ac 802.11n<br />

Bluetooth 4.0 Bluetooth 4.2 Bluetooth 4.2 Bluetooth 4.0<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

4G 4G 4G 4G<br />

143x70x6.8mm 142x70x7.9mm 129x65x9.5mm 154x76x6.9mm<br />

132g 152g 135g 155g<br />

Android 6.1 Android 7.0 Android 7.0 Android 6.0<br />

2,550mAh 3,000mAh 2,700mAh 3,000mAh<br />

£374 £420 £324 £280<br />

One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB<br />

www.amazon.co.uk www.amazon.co.uk www.amazon.co.uk shop.vodafone.co.uk<br />

www.samsung.com/<br />

uk<br />

www.samsung.com/<br />

uk<br />

www.sonymobile.<br />

com<br />

SM-G920F SM-G930F F5321 VFD-900<br />

www.vodafone.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Every single device<br />

here will serve you well,<br />

even the comparatively<br />

disappointing Moto G5.<br />

Still, a few models stand<br />

out as particularly<br />

great-value buys.<br />

The Lenovo P2 is<br />

our pick of the<br />

more recent,<br />

budget-conscious<br />

smartphones. It’s not<br />

as cheap as our other<br />

favourite, the Moto G4,<br />

but is comparatively<br />

powerful (squeezing a<br />

few more frames per<br />

second out of intensive<br />

games), and has a<br />

so-far-untouchable<br />

battery life. Only the<br />

Moto Z Play comes<br />

close – and this has<br />

nippy performance<br />

and a useful modular<br />

design to boot.<br />

Google’s Nexus 5X,<br />

released in 2015, also<br />

distinguishes itself as a<br />

powerful mid-range<br />

phone with a great<br />

camera, now at a price<br />

that makes it an even<br />

better choice. We can<br />

say something similar<br />

about the LG G4,<br />

which offers true<br />

fl agship credentials<br />

for only £319. We’d<br />

have liked another<br />

price drop for the<br />

iPhone SE, but<br />

considering it’s been<br />

upgraded with superior<br />

storage, it remains the<br />

best Apple smartphone<br />

for the money.<br />

Creeping further up<br />

the price brackets, the<br />

OnePlus 3T is a superb<br />

combination of value,<br />

newness and genuine<br />

top-end hardware,<br />

though if you don’t<br />

mind an older model,<br />

the Samsung Galaxy S6<br />

performs as well or<br />

better for a few pounds<br />

less. Speaking of<br />

Samsung, it’s worth<br />

mentioning the Galaxy<br />

S7, 2016’s most capable<br />

Android phone, which<br />

is now about a third<br />

less expensive than the<br />

one replacing it.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

103


LOUD AND CLEAR<br />

Soundbars and speakers<br />

Don’t compromise movie night with tinny TV speakers or settle for an<br />

underpowered smartphone dock for music – upgrade to a proper soundbar<br />

and speaker and enjoy true audio excellence around the house and outdoors<br />

EVEN IF YOU’RE not an outright, bitrateconscious<br />

audiophile, you don’t need more<br />

than one functioning ear to know when sound<br />

quality isn’t as good as it could be. It could be<br />

when you’re watching a fi lm or TV show, with<br />

action scenes being derived of their impact, or<br />

simply when playing certain songs; unbalanced<br />

CONTENT REVIEWS<br />

Page 106<br />

CAMBRIDGE AUDIO TV2 (v2)<br />

CREATIVE LABS Sound BlasterX Katana<br />

Page 107<br />

ORBITSOUND One P70<br />

PHILIPS Fidelio SkyQuake<br />

Page 108<br />

SAMSUNG HW-K850<br />

STELJES AUDIO Erato<br />

Page 109<br />

AUDIO PRO Addon T3<br />

LIBRATONE Zipp<br />

Page 110<br />

PANASONIC SC-All05<br />

URBANEARS Baggen<br />

Page 111<br />

WHARFEDALE Diamond A1<br />

YAMAHA MusicCast WX-010<br />

bass/treble levels, muddied instruments and<br />

fl at vocals can all ruin the fun.<br />

This is rarely the fault of the media itself<br />

– fi lms are produced with literal cinema-quality<br />

audio, and professional musicians seldom put<br />

out a genuinely duff mix. We can therefore<br />

point the fi nger at our own hardware: as TVs<br />

get thinner, the output of their integrated<br />

drivers declines, and while proper hi-fi systems<br />

have fallen out of favour, listening via a cheap<br />

smartphone dock or bundled Bluetooth<br />

speaker is hardly a fi tt ing alternative.<br />

That’s why we recommend giving your fi lm<br />

collection and music library the sound they<br />

deserve, by switching to a dedicated soundbar<br />

(or soundbase) for your TV, and/or a quality<br />

wireless speaker for playback from handheld<br />

devices or streaming. As luck would have it,<br />

we’ve tested six of each right here.<br />

TUNE UP<br />

A soundbar or speaker can have as many<br />

fancy features as the manufacturer wants, but<br />

ultimately, sound quality is paramount.<br />

You’ll want a good balance of high-pitched<br />

trebles, low, forceful bass and… well, mid-range<br />

mids. For music speakers in particular, these<br />

ranges should complement each other, with<br />

no element overpowering the rest, though<br />

with TV soundbars you can crank up the bass<br />

to give action scenes some extra physicality.<br />

Big bonus points if the soundbar comes with a<br />

separate subwoofer unit, which can really get<br />

the room shaking much more effectively than<br />

those with integrated subwoofers.<br />

With music, all audio hardware should be<br />

able to let you distinctly hear each instrument<br />

or vocal track in an arrangement, as this<br />

produces a more rich, detailed sound than if<br />

they blur together. It’s also ideal, for music and<br />

video, if quality remains high as you move from<br />

sitting straight in front of the speaker to either<br />

side; the extent to which quality is maintained<br />

at such angles is referred to as a soundstage.<br />

This also applies to how well a soundbar<br />

can place audio in a scene – so if an explosion<br />

happens on the left side of the screen, the<br />

resulting noise should originate from the left<br />

side of the soundstage.<br />

STREAM TEAM<br />

Since this is <strong>2017</strong>, everything we’ve covered<br />

here supports at least Bluetooth connectivity,<br />

making it easy to play music from a tablet or<br />

smartphone; some support the aptX codec,<br />

for slightly better playback quality. Wi-Fi<br />

104 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SOUNDBARS & SPEAKERS<br />

capability, however, opens up many more<br />

possibilities, from enabling the setup of<br />

multiroom networks (where several synced<br />

speakers can be controlled simultaneously) to<br />

streaming directly from Spotify’s premium<br />

Connect service, or Apple’s lossless AirPlay.<br />

Since a soundbar will be permanently<br />

parked near your TV, physical connectivity is<br />

important, too. Optical and/or coaxial S/PDIF<br />

inputs are great, and many soundbars include<br />

an HDMI ARC (audio return channel) port as<br />

an alternative. This is preferable to basic HDMI,<br />

which requires separate video and audio cables<br />

running between the TV and soundbar. With<br />

ARC, both are piped through a single cable.<br />

GOING PLACES<br />

There are a number of other hardware<br />

considerations, too. Good physical controls are<br />

important; soundbars often come with a<br />

remote, and speakers (multiroom speakers<br />

especially) can be controlled via mobile apps,<br />

but the latter aren’t always reliable. You’ll<br />

generally need to get hands-on with a speaker<br />

to connect to it via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi anyway.<br />

With portable, battery-powered wireless<br />

speakers, such as the Libratone Zipp or<br />

Panasonic SC-All05, it’s also worth considering<br />

how durable it is, including whether it has any<br />

water-proofi ng. These are perfect speakers for<br />

a garden party or barbecue, but if the weather<br />

takes a turn for the worse, you’ll need to know<br />

if it can handle a drop of rain.<br />

The best for…<br />

…bargain hunters: Steljes Audio Erato<br />

£130 isn’t much for a soundbar, but for a soundbar and a<br />

well-designed subwoofer as well? That’s serious value.<br />

You’d be forgiven for thinking the Erato would sound<br />

rubbish next to more expensive alternatives, even those with integrated subwoofers<br />

such as the Orbitsound One P70 and the Cambridge Audio TV2 (v2) soundbase. In fact,<br />

it sounds great, and while the total output of 90W means it won’t reach overwhelming<br />

levels of loudness, there’s a very respectable amount of tonal richness and bass rumble.<br />

…taking outside: Libratone Zipp<br />

We’re going against our own advice here: the Zipp isn’t built to endure a sudden<br />

downpour, let alone an accidental drop in a pool. Yet there’s plenty about it that<br />

makes a great outdoor speaker: its eight-hour battery life, its low weight, and best of<br />

all, its 360° sound output. That’s perfect for parties and gatherings where everyone<br />

may be spread out, but can enjoy the music at its best quality regardless. It’s also<br />

Wi-Fi and multiroom-enabled, so if you have more than one Zipp (and a strong<br />

enough router), you can fi ll both the garden and the house with seamless sound.<br />

…upgrading a PC:<br />

Creative Labs Sound BlasterX Katana<br />

Why should TVs get all the fun? The Katana is a compact<br />

soundbar/subwoofer combo designed for use with a PC<br />

rather than a telly. The soundbar sits beneath your monitor and<br />

connects via USB, and if you play games with a mic-equipped headset, it can plug right in.<br />

There’s an RGB strip to match any lighting inside your PC, but the main attraction is the<br />

sound put out by the four internal speakers and the subwoofer’s 5.25in driver. For games<br />

and videos, audio is loud and detailed, and you can even set up virtual 7.1 surround sound.


SOUNDBARS<br />

CAMBRIDGE AUDIO<br />

TV2 (v2)<br />

★★★★★<br />

£200 • From shop.cambridgeaudio.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

Big sound, solid bass and a great price; if you want to<br />

improve your TV’s sound on a budget, look no further<br />

TECHNICALLY THIS IS a soundbase rather<br />

than a soundbar, but the added depth isn’t<br />

just so your TV can sit on top of it; the TV2<br />

(v2) has room for larger drivers, potentially<br />

meaning a bigger sound, as well as a 6.5in<br />

subwoofer driver on the underside, so you<br />

don’t need to make room for a separate unit.<br />

The design is elegantly simple: a mediumsized,<br />

squat box, clad in matt black, with a<br />

simple cloth grille covering the front. It’s not<br />

ostentatious or even particularly eye-catching,<br />

but it’s smart in an understated way.<br />

A small status LED gleams from behind the<br />

grille, glowing different colours to show which<br />

input is selected. On the rear, between the<br />

TV2 (v2)’s twin bass refl ex ports, is a limited<br />

array of physical connections. There’s one pair<br />

of stereo phono jacks, a 3.5mm input jack, one<br />

optical S/PDIF input and a single HDMI<br />

ARC-enabled port so you can pass audio from<br />

your smart TV apps back to the soundbase.<br />

Aside from aptX-enabled Bluetooth, that’s<br />

your lot. There’s no Wi-Fi, so no multiroom<br />

capability, Spotify Connect, Google Cast or<br />

Apple AirPlay, which limits fl exibility. Still, if<br />

you’re already using your TV as an audio hub,<br />

these connections should be adequate.<br />

In keeping with the simple design, the TV2<br />

(v2) itself has no buttons on it. Everything is<br />

controlled via the remote control, which you<br />

can use to switch it on and off, adjust the<br />

volume, tweak the bass, mute the sound,<br />

switch sources and select sound profi les.<br />

Despite the simplicity of the Cambridge<br />

Audio TV2 (v2), however, there’s much to be<br />

said for the sound quality. It’s simply superb.<br />

What’s most impressive about it is that<br />

whatever the material, be it explosion-heavy<br />

movie soundtracks or quiet piano jazz, the<br />

audio output is balanced, agile and detailed.<br />

Not once did we feel the need to boost the<br />

mid-range so we could hear dialogue better, yet<br />

it’s capable of wall-shaking levels of volume<br />

and rumble. The audio isn’t as all-enveloping as<br />

a full surround-sound system, but the breadth<br />

of the soundstage is impressive, seeming to<br />

extend well beyond the confines of the<br />

soundbase itself. The bass delivered by the<br />

subwoofer driver never feels as though it’s<br />

overwhelming the rest of the sound, either.<br />

When playing music, the TV2 (v2)<br />

produces a fullness, body and richness to the<br />

mid-range that most soundbars lack, and it<br />

balances this with an airy, open top-end that’s<br />

a pleasure to listen to. Everything from hi-hats<br />

and rim shots to the upper reaches of the<br />

piano keyboard are delivered with delicacy,<br />

atmosphere and impressive separation.<br />

So, while it might be limited in terms of<br />

its connectivity, and altogether chunkier<br />

than a soundbar, the TV2 (v2) is well worth<br />

the compromise. If anything, that’s selling it<br />

short – it’s an excellent TV speaker.<br />

CREATIVE LABS Sound BlasterX Katana<br />

★★★★★<br />

£228 • From www.ebuyer.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A small yet beautiful-looking soundbar that<br />

delivers good sound for PCs as well as TVs<br />

WHILE MOST SOUNDBARS are aimed at<br />

living room TVs, the Katana has an extra trick:<br />

it can connect to a Windows PC via USB,<br />

augmenting the audio output of your desktop.<br />

For £228, you get a dedicated subwoofer, a<br />

remote and two wall-mount brackets. Its build<br />

quality and looks refl ect the price, too: the<br />

brushed-aluminium design couples well with<br />

the RGB light strip under the speaker, which<br />

can be customised with different colours.<br />

The Katana can be used as a standalone<br />

speaker – either via Bluetooth with your<br />

smartphone or a fl ash drive plugged into the<br />

USB port – but to get the most out of it, you’ll<br />

need a Windows PC, connected via USB and<br />

controlled through the Sound Blaster Connect<br />

soft ware. This offers a plethora of options. For<br />

example, you can select preconfigured settings<br />

designed by professionals in the music, fi lm<br />

and game industry, or quickly toggle settings.<br />

The Sound section is the most interesting.<br />

Here, you can play around with effects, enable<br />

Dolby Digital or, if you’re using a microphone,<br />

reduce background noise with a simple toggle.<br />

Conveniently, the Katana itself features a<br />

mic-in jack for this very purpose.<br />

The Katana is a relatively small soundbar,<br />

since it’s designed to sit under your monitor<br />

instead of a TV. Don’t let its size fool you,<br />

though. There are four drivers crammed inside<br />

– two upward-firing 2.5in mid-bass drivers<br />

and two front-facing 34mm tweeters – plus a<br />

5.25in driver in the separate subwoofer.<br />

With a peak power of 150W, the setup<br />

proved impressively capable of delivering<br />

large-room sound without distortion.<br />

24-bit 96kHz audio is supported through a<br />

Dolby Digital decoder (via PC connection), and<br />

when connected via optical or USB the Katana<br />

doubles up as a sound card, bypassing the<br />

audio processing on your PC. Connected to a<br />

computer with Creative’s soft ware, you can<br />

even enable virtual 7.1 surround sound.<br />

There are limitations, though. We found the<br />

Katana capable of producing great sub-bass<br />

frequencies, where the lows extend well; the<br />

downside was that it cut off the lower sub-bass<br />

regions. Given the small size of the subwoofer<br />

and driver (5.25in), this wasn’t a surprise.<br />

Still, its mid-bass has fantastic control, and<br />

explosions in movies and gunfire in games are<br />

accurate and not too bloated. This soundbar<br />

also shines at instrument separation, thanks<br />

to the DSP-controlled amplifier, which assigns<br />

the right frequencies to the fi ve drivers and<br />

handles the crossover between them.<br />

However, due to the relatively small size of the<br />

drivers, you don’t get the thumping feeling<br />

you do with the Cambridge Audio TV2 (v2).<br />

Otherwise, the Katana is a great soundbar,<br />

and its PC-focused capabilities make it very<br />

fl exible for anyone who wants to play games at<br />

their PC as well as watch fi lms or play music.<br />

106 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SOUNDBARS<br />

ORBITSOUND One P70<br />

★★★★★<br />

£300 • From shop.orbitsound.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A capable all-in-one soundbar that ensures<br />

everyone in the room gets high-quality audio<br />

AT A MODEST 817x123x223mm, the One P70<br />

soundbar can be placed under a TV, stashed in<br />

an AV cabinet or fi xed to a wall via the 200mm<br />

VESA mounts. Despite the size, it’s been<br />

packed with an integrated 5.25in subwoofer<br />

plus four 2in drivers: two at the front and one<br />

at each side, angled away from the centre.<br />

This setup enables the airSOUND system,<br />

which blasts proper stereo sound out to the<br />

left and right, rather than just straight on.<br />

In practice, this delivers an impressively wide<br />

soundstage; we could park ourselves at a fairly<br />

severe angle to the TV and still get rich, clear<br />

audio, with discernible left /right separation,<br />

so it was always apparent in movie scenes<br />

where diegetic sound was coming from.<br />

Dialogue sounds slightly crisper in the<br />

middle, but overall, volume and clarity were<br />

consistently good wherever we chose to sit.<br />

Distortion at higher volumes is minimal, and<br />

cranking up the bass level helps make<br />

explosions and roaring car engines sound<br />

satisfyingly deep – not to the extent that<br />

you’d get with a dedicated subwoofer, but for<br />

an integrated unit, it performs well.<br />

Bass and treble can be tweaked with the<br />

matt fi nish remote, though one of this<br />

soundbar’s neatest tricks is the ability to<br />

‘learn’ your TV’s infrared remote. This is easily<br />

done through a few button presses, and while<br />

it’s only really good for changing the volume,<br />

it does mean that once you’ve settled on<br />

bass and treble levels, you can bung the<br />

Orbitsound remote in a drawer and just use<br />

one for both the soundbar and TV.<br />

A more detailed display would have been<br />

useful, though. There’s no actual readout, just<br />

a line of LEDs to denote volume or tone levels.<br />

Using the (wisely side-mounted) fi ve-button<br />

control panel will also require a fl ick through<br />

the manual, as some actions – such as<br />

learning a new remote or changing speaker<br />

orientation – involves some button press<br />

combinations that aren’t readily apparent.<br />

Connecting a Bluetooth device is easy,<br />

but there’s no aptX support, and listening<br />

closely can reveal a touch of that telltale<br />

Bluetooth fuzziness. Still, this can otherwise<br />

act as a very competent music speaker.<br />

Bass presence in pop and hip-hop tracks<br />

was uniformly well judged, while vocals were<br />

clear and classical tracks suitably detailed.<br />

Heavy rock is the only slight weakness – songs<br />

with multiple layered guitar tracks don’t have as<br />

much separation between them as we’d like.<br />

There’s no Wi-Fi either, which means no<br />

native multiroom capability, and you’ll need a<br />

smart TV or connected mobile device to<br />

stream songs. The One P70 is also a bit short<br />

on physical connectors, with just one optical<br />

and 3.5mm aux jack apiece and no HDMI ARC.<br />

It’s not the most fl exible soundbar in the<br />

world, then, but the built-in subwoofer and<br />

ability to sit, stand or be mounted in different<br />

orientations earn it back some versatility<br />

points. Most importantly, it sounds good for<br />

the price, with a distinctively wide, room-filling<br />

soundstage. This makes it worthy of a<br />

recommendation, despite a few limitations.<br />

PHILIPS Fidelio SkyQuake<br />

★★★★★<br />

£899 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Atmos without the atmosphere – the Fidelio<br />

SkyQuake is expensive and disappointing<br />

DOLBY’S ATMOS surround-sound tech is<br />

getting steadily cheaper, but any Atmos-ready<br />

soundbar is still an investment. Philips’ Fidelio<br />

SkyQuake will set you back £900, and that’s<br />

just for the soundbar, subwoofer and remote<br />

control, with no satellite speakers included.<br />

There’s a reason Atmos costs so much. By<br />

bouncing sound off the ceiling with upwardfi<br />

ring speakers, Atmos soundbars can add a<br />

vertical dimension to surround-sound audio,<br />

more clearly defi ning the origins of sound in a<br />

scene than just placing it on a left -right plane.<br />

The SkyQuake offers a similar Atmos<br />

configuration to Samsung’s HW-K850, with a<br />

pair of upward-firing drivers providing the two<br />

height channels in a 5.1.2 setup. But despite its<br />

total of 18 drivers in the soundbar (powered<br />

by 180W of amplification) and an 8in driver in<br />

the subwoofer, this three-dimensional quality<br />

isn’t as pronounced as on the HW-K850.<br />

Sound effects also lacked Samsung’s accuracy.<br />

That said, it has some advantages, mainly<br />

native compatibility with DTS Digital Surround<br />

signals, and a sleeker design. The SkyQuake is<br />

also better equipped with connections: you<br />

get two HDMI ports with support for 30fps<br />

4K passthrough (including an ARC-enabled<br />

output, so your TV can pipe audio to the<br />

soundbar), two S/PDIF outputs, a 3.5mm input<br />

and a USB port. There’s also NFC for easy<br />

pairing, and Bluetooth support for the aptX,<br />

AAC and SBC codecs. Surprisingly, though,<br />

you don’t get any kind of Wi-Fi connectivity.<br />

Music is presented in an engaging manner,<br />

and the system delivers fi lm soundtracks with<br />

plenty of energy, power and drive. You can<br />

even add fake height to non-Atmos content<br />

by choosing between low, medium and high<br />

levels on the remote control – this gives live<br />

music recordings a touch more ambience.<br />

Unfortunately, even without the Height<br />

effect applied, the soundbar has a tendency to<br />

over-accentuate higher frequencies. With<br />

Height enabled, the SkyQuake sounds harsh at<br />

the top-end and sound effects such as gunfire<br />

often overpower speech in the centre channel.<br />

The subwoofer, although powerful, can’t<br />

match the promise of its large size. It simply<br />

doesn’t reach down that low, rolling off as it<br />

does at 40Hz, and although it delivers movie<br />

sound effects with plenty of impact, deep<br />

bass rumble evades it entirely.<br />

The biggest issue remains the Samsung<br />

HW-K850. It costs the same as the SkyQuake,<br />

yet produces audio that’s infinitely superior,<br />

delivering a richer, more balanced sound, with<br />

far sweeter-sounding treble and a much more<br />

convincing Atmos effect. Both are extremely<br />

expensive considering they don’t include any<br />

satellite speakers, but in simple sound quality<br />

terms, the SkyQuake doesn’t come close.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

107


SOUNDBARS<br />

SAMSUNG HW-K850<br />

★★★★★<br />

£900 • From www.currys.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

Supreme sound quality, but expensive for a<br />

single soundbar and subwoofer combination<br />

THE SAMSUNG HW-K850 soundbar is an<br />

odd product. It effectively takes the HW-K950<br />

(<strong>Shopper</strong> 350) and ditches the two satellite<br />

speakers. This leaves the soundbar, subwoofer<br />

and Dolby Atmos support all intact, but does<br />

mean the HW-K850 is merely half a surround<br />

system, and an expensive one at that.<br />

First, the positives: the soundbar remains<br />

superb for non-surround uses, mainly<br />

streaming and music listening. It sounds just<br />

as good as the HW-K950, which makes it the<br />

joint-best soundbar we’ve ever heard, and it’s<br />

still not half bad for movies and TV.<br />

It doesn’t process DTS-HD in anything but<br />

stereo, so you need a player that will process<br />

the signal and spoon-feed it to the soundbar<br />

for you, but with Atmos soundtracks it<br />

sounds fabulous. There’s a convincing sense<br />

of height to the sound, and a decent sense of<br />

width and directionality, too. Clearly, it’s not<br />

as good as the HW-K950 at creating the 3D<br />

bubble of sound, but as single soundbar and<br />

subwoofer combos go, it’s exceptional.<br />

If you really do need true surround sound,<br />

Samsung’s R3, R5 or R7 speakers can be<br />

added as optional satellites, but these won’t<br />

deliver the Atmos height that the HW-K950’s<br />

rear speakers do. Disappointingly, you can’t<br />

buy a pair of Atmos rears and add them to<br />

the system at a later date, either.<br />

To be clear, the soundbar and subwoofer<br />

are exactly the same as in the HW-K950. The<br />

soundbar has 11 drivers in total, three each for<br />

the left , centre and right channels, plus a pair<br />

of upward-firing drivers for the upper-left and<br />

upper-right Dolby Atmos channels. The latter<br />

is a huge box nearly two feet high, two feet<br />

deep and a foot wide, with a single 8in driver<br />

mounted on the side.<br />

With so many drivers packed in, it’s not<br />

surprising this is a pretty big soundbar. At<br />

121cm long, it’s best suited to TVs at least 49in<br />

in size, and it’s also worth bearing in mind<br />

that, at a height of 81mm, it’s tall enough to<br />

block the infrared sensor on many TVs. Even<br />

so, it’s a good-looking set, and we particularly<br />

like the white OLED display behind the metal<br />

grille that tells you which mode you’re in.<br />

You don’t get many physical connections<br />

for the price – there’s only one HDMI input<br />

and output apiece, although these are both<br />

4K-passthrough enabled, and the output is<br />

ARC-ready. There are also optical S/PDIF<br />

and 3.5mm analogue inputs, but no coaxial<br />

S/PDIF or stereo inputs, which is a fairly<br />

disappointing lack of fl exibility for a<br />

soundbar that costs £900.<br />

Wireless connectivity is much better, with<br />

multiroom support and extensive streaming<br />

support, from DLNA servers to services like<br />

Spotify Connect, Tidal, TuneIn and Amazon<br />

Music. The only thing lacking is AirPlay.<br />

The Samsung HW-K850 is a cracking<br />

soundbar, and better at simulating surround<br />

sound than any other standalone model – but<br />

the issue remains that it’s just simulating it.<br />

Since it’s so expensive regardless, we’d<br />

suggest going the whole hog and getting the<br />

fully equipped HW-K950 instead.<br />

STELJES AUDIO Erato<br />

★★★★★<br />

£130 • From www.zavvi.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A great budget soundbar gains a great budget<br />

subwoofer; at this price, it’s a peerless bargain<br />

WE WERE BIG fans of the Steljes Audio<br />

Calliope (<strong>Shopper</strong> 342) – a cheap standalone<br />

soundbar that nonetheless sounded great<br />

and offered loads of connections. The Erato<br />

is basically a Calliope with a wireless 5in<br />

subwoofer. Considering our only major<br />

complaint (aural-wise) with the Calliope was<br />

its weak bass, this seems like a great idea.<br />

Sure enough, it is. The subwoofer looks<br />

superb: its dimensions of 290x280x180mm<br />

are manageable, and its painted wood fi nish is<br />

miles ahead of the soundbar’s black plastic.<br />

There’s a noticeable performance<br />

improvement as well. With 30W of power<br />

behind it, it’s not going to shake the house<br />

down, but onscreen explosions and crashes<br />

are beefed up with a much greater sense of<br />

physicality, and a tangible rumble kicks in<br />

during particularly action-heavy scenes.<br />

As for the soundbar itself – well, it’s a<br />

Calliope. That means its two 2.75in mid-high<br />

ferrite magnet drivers and two 2.75in<br />

bass ferrite drivers combine to produce<br />

brilliantly rich, balanced sound, whether<br />

you’re watching fi lms or listening to music.<br />

There’s no way to fi ne-tune bass, mid or<br />

treble levels, but we had no real qualms with<br />

the default Movie preset right out of the box.<br />

The second preset, Music, is the only other<br />

one we used much; it sharpens up the higher<br />

end and seems to make instrument<br />

separation a bit clearer. The fi nal preset,<br />

Voice, is supposed to bring dialogue to the<br />

foreground, but the effect isn’t that strong.<br />

Being a Calliope, it delivers on connectivity,<br />

too. There are three HDMI outputs, one of<br />

which is ARC-enabled, a 3.5mm aux jack and<br />

optical S/PDIF output. We also appreciated<br />

the inclusion of Bluetooth for smartphone<br />

playback, and there’s even aptX support.<br />

The only thing missing is Wi-Fi, though you<br />

can get around the resulting lack of streaming<br />

services with a smart TV that supports them.<br />

Of course, the Erato’s soundbar inherits<br />

the Calliope’s fl aws as well. As mentioned,<br />

it’s a bit basic-looking, and the uneven<br />

backlighting on the LCD display partially<br />

illuminates its plastic casing, so you can see<br />

the electronics beneath. It’s a good thing the<br />

screen powers down after a few seconds,<br />

otherwise it’d get very distracting indeed.<br />

Sound quality is high, but only if you sit in<br />

front of the Erato’s soundbar. The soundstage<br />

is quite narrow, so richness and detail<br />

deteriorate quickly as you move to either side.<br />

The physical controls stick to the basics,<br />

with buttons for volume, source, preset mode<br />

and power. This is the case for both the<br />

soundbar and the included remote, the latter<br />

adding a mute button as well.<br />

Frankly, though, basic controls and a dodgy<br />

backlight are easy trade-off s to make for a<br />

soundbar that sounds this good for this little<br />

money. The standard RRP is £230, which<br />

makes it a great-value package on par with<br />

the excellent LG SH5 (<strong>Shopper</strong> 347), though<br />

it’s currently on sale at a few reputable<br />

outlets for just £130. For a quality soundbar/<br />

subwoofer combo, that’s a phenomenal deal.<br />

108 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SPEAKERS<br />

AUDIO PRO Addon T3<br />

★★★★★<br />

£170 • From www.superfi.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

A Bluetooth speaker with a delightful design<br />

and the sound quality to match<br />

WHILE THE ADDON T3 is smaller and<br />

lighter than both the Addon T5 and Addon<br />

T10 Gen 2, it’s not quite the kind of<br />

Bluetooth speaker you’d want to carry<br />

around all day; at 2kg, it’s still pretty heft y.<br />

However, as a speaker you can move<br />

freely around the house or take down to the<br />

end of the garden, it’s a comfortable weight.<br />

Measuring 215x135x115mm, it’s not overly<br />

large, either, and takes up less space on a<br />

shelf or sideboard than many of its rivals.<br />

On top, you’ll fi nd a row of control buttons<br />

in an attractive, metallic rose gold. It’s a slightly<br />

odd selection, though: there are separate<br />

buttons for switching to Bluetooth and to the<br />

speaker’s auxiliary connection, which could<br />

easily be combined into one, while media<br />

playback controls are completely missing.<br />

Control niggles aside, it does have a handy<br />

USB port on the back, which you can use to<br />

charge your smartphone. However, it only<br />

outputs at 5V/1A, so it won’t charge it<br />

particularly quickly, and you can’t use it for<br />

playing tracks off a USB stick either. That said,<br />

you could use it to neatly power a Chromecast<br />

Audio, letting you cast your tunes to the<br />

speaker without an additional power adaptor.<br />

Inside, the T3 has a Digital Class D<br />

amplifier that delivers 2x5W to the two 2.75in<br />

textile dome tweeters, and 15W to the 3.5in<br />

woofer. A bass refl ex port is found on the<br />

back of the cabinet, and the speaker has a<br />

frequency range of 60-20,000Hz.<br />

The T3 delivers a sound that is confident<br />

and powerful for a speaker of this size and<br />

price. However, it’s not the most detail-driven<br />

speaker, as its low frequencies become a little<br />

boomy on certain tracks. We noticed it on<br />

First Aid Kit’s My Silver Lining, where some<br />

of the violins became a bit lost amidst the<br />

other instruments, but otherwise there<br />

wasn’t a lot to complain about, especially<br />

considering the reasonably low price.<br />

Its audio quality has a rather warm sound<br />

to it, which some people might fi nd preferable,<br />

but we prefer our songs with a slightly more<br />

transparent sound. Still, there’s certainly a lot<br />

to like about the T3’s sound signature, and the<br />

well-weighted cabinet keeps what could have<br />

otherwise been some rather unruly bass in<br />

check without any reverberation. There’s no<br />

hint of any distortion, either.<br />

Battery life is rated at an excellent 30<br />

hours on medium volume, or 12 hours with<br />

music blaring at full volume, so it should<br />

provide more than enough longevity to get<br />

you through a party or barbecue. Mind you,<br />

the speaker isn’t water-resistant in any way,<br />

so you’ll need to bring it indoors if the Great<br />

British weather strikes.<br />

Overall, the Addon T3 is a capable,<br />

affordable and good-looking home speaker. It<br />

maintains a charming design heritage and the<br />

inclusion of a battery makes it more versatile<br />

than the T10 Gen2. Likewise, its sound quality<br />

is more than respectable for the price, and its<br />

battery life is excellent to boot.<br />

LIBRATONE Zipp<br />

★★★★★<br />

£249 • From www.johnlewis.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

The Libratone Zipp can extend multiroom music<br />

even into your garden, and the 360° sound is great<br />

THIS UPDATED VERSION of the Zipp isn’t<br />

just about Bluetooth; it also adds support for<br />

Libratone’s multiroom-focused SoundSpace<br />

Link, plus Wi-Fi, Apple AirPlay, Spotify<br />

Connect and internet radio.<br />

Otherwise, the new Zipp range looks the<br />

same: a cylindrical speaker with a detachable<br />

cover from which it derives its name. Unzip<br />

the cover and you can replace it with a<br />

different colour, either to customise the look<br />

or to distinguish one speaker from another.<br />

The built-in battery lets you carry the Zipp<br />

around, but other than its humidity resistance<br />

it’s not been ruggedised, so don’t leave it out in<br />

the rain. The battery is rated at 8 to 10 hours.<br />

The top of the Zipp has a circular touch<br />

interface; by dragging your fi nger around the<br />

circumference it emulates a volume dial, with<br />

a light effect that follows your fi nger. It’s both<br />

satisfying and slick. Tap the touch surface to<br />

play and pause, skip tracks, turn on the<br />

SoundSpace Link function and access your<br />

favourite internet radio stations.<br />

If you pair a phone over<br />

Bluetooth, you can use the Zipp<br />

as a hands-free speakerphone<br />

thanks to the microphone. In a<br />

small room the microphone<br />

could pick up our voice from<br />

3-4m away, making the Zipp one<br />

of the best conference speakers<br />

we’ve used. Bluetooth range is<br />

around 10m, and we didn’t have any problems<br />

maintaining a connection even when the Zipp<br />

was on one fl oor and our phone on another.<br />

The Libratone mobile app can be used to<br />

group different Zipp speakers into groups, or<br />

SoundSpaces. This is done by dragging<br />

together fl oating bubbles representing each<br />

speaker. This can also be done manually, by<br />

playing a track on the fi rst Zipp, then pressing<br />

the SoundSpace Link button on it and on<br />

subsequent Zipp speakers. SoundSpace Link<br />

allows up to six speakers per group, eight<br />

different groups and a maximum of 16<br />

speakers on a single wireless network.<br />

Libratone has packed in a 4in<br />

neodymium woofer and two 1in<br />

soft dome neodymium tweeters,<br />

supported by two 4in lowfrequency<br />

radiators, positioned<br />

to evenly disperse sound in every<br />

direction in what Libratone calls<br />

360º FullRoom sound.<br />

Bass is delivered with more<br />

punch than you’d expect for a speaker of its<br />

size. The mids and trebles, while not the<br />

crispest, aren’t lost among lower frequencies,<br />

either. The Zipp outputs 100W and can easily<br />

fi ll a medium- to large-sized room. Position<br />

the Zipp in the middle of the room and it will<br />

disperse the audio evenly, thanks to its speaker<br />

arrangement. All in all, the Zipp sounds great.<br />

There’s a lot to like about the Libratone<br />

Zipp. It takes multiroom principles and applies<br />

true portability with its built-in battery and<br />

design. Its ability to synchronise audio from a<br />

multitude of sources also makes it versatile,<br />

and its sound quality doesn’t disappoint.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

109


SPEAKERS<br />

PANASONIC SC-All05<br />

★★★★★<br />

£120 • From www.currys.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

A portable, waterproof multiroom speaker you can use almost<br />

anywhere, but its sound won’t be to everyone’s tastes<br />

THE SC-ALL05 IS a small speaker that seems<br />

to do it all. It’s portable, battery-powered,<br />

waterproof up to 1m, multiroom-capable and<br />

has a unique quirk in its Voice mode: this cuts<br />

down on bass to boost vocals, and is intended<br />

for easier listening while you’re in the shower.<br />

It’s a small touch, but it gives the SC-All05 a<br />

degree of versatility that other speakers of its<br />

ilk struggle to match, especially if you like to<br />

warble in the bathroom.<br />

Even more useful is the internal battery,<br />

which lasts around nine hours. You can just<br />

leave it plugged in, but it’s easy to take<br />

around the house or into the garden as well.<br />

The LED indicator is almost impossible<br />

to decipher without the manual, but once<br />

we had the SC-All05 up and running<br />

(admittedly following a factory reset), we<br />

were soon playing tunes via Panasonic’s<br />

excellent Music Streaming app.<br />

There are a few backlit buttons on the<br />

speaker itself, though they tend to pick up<br />

unsightly fi ngerprints. This is a shame, as<br />

you’ll be using them a lot,<br />

whether it’s enabling Bluetooth<br />

mode or assigning up to six radio<br />

station presets to dedicated buttons.<br />

Switching to multiroom mode can be done<br />

by either tapping the Net button or going<br />

through the app. With the latter, you can play<br />

music from your phone or other online<br />

streaming services such as Spotify Premium,<br />

Napster, AllPlay Radio or the Aupeo Personal<br />

Radio. You can also create your own playlists,<br />

view your upcoming queue of music, reorder<br />

tracks to your liking, and give each speaker a<br />

different name, such as ‘Living Room’, to give<br />

your music system a more personal touch.<br />

Pairing the SC-All05 with other speakers<br />

on the network, and subsequently creating<br />

groups, couldn’t be simpler: from the full list<br />

of speakers, simply drag and drop one onto<br />

another, and it creates a group for you.<br />

We could change each speaker’s volume<br />

independently of the others, too, which was<br />

handy when switching rooms.<br />

Such fl exibility means<br />

nothing if the speaker<br />

doesn’t sound good, and the<br />

SC-All05’s pair of stereo speakers<br />

coped well with most of our test tracks.<br />

Acoustic guitar tracks and piano music<br />

sounded superb, and pop and rock songs had<br />

a welcome sense of depth to them.<br />

However, we feel Panasonic went slightly<br />

too far in pursuit of crystal clear sound: vocals<br />

sometimes sounded overly clinical, and while<br />

bass was a tad boomy at times, this was<br />

compounded by some thin-sounding mids<br />

and trebles. Film soundtracks were hampered<br />

by muddled mid-ranges, and the app’s built-in<br />

equaliser didn’t do much to help.<br />

On the whole, though, we enjoyed listening<br />

to the SC-All05. It’s clearly better suited to<br />

some musical genres more than others, and<br />

thus shouldn’t really take pride of place at the<br />

centre of a living room sound system, but it<br />

could be a worthy addition to a garden,<br />

bathroom, bedroom or home office.<br />

URBANEARS Baggen<br />

★★★★★<br />

£399 • From www.urbanears.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

This loud and proud speaker entertains, providing you<br />

can live with the cost and its hidden connections<br />

URBANEARS HAS FINALLY expanded<br />

beyond headphones by launching the<br />

Stammen and the Baggen, two multiroom<br />

speakers developed with the help of legendary<br />

amp maker, Marshall. We tested the Baggen,<br />

the bigger, more expensive brother.<br />

There’s support for streaming via Spotify<br />

Connect and AirPlay, and Google Chromecast<br />

is built in. Multiroom prowess comes in the<br />

ability to form a network with up to four other<br />

Baggens or Stammens.<br />

Up to seven presets can be assigned to<br />

one of the two knob switches on top, which<br />

also switches between Bluetooth, aux and<br />

Wi-Fi inputs. The other knob is dedicated to<br />

volume. That’s almost it in terms of controls;<br />

pressing the volume knob will switch between<br />

solo and multiroom modes, and the preset<br />

knob can assign a currently played playlist or<br />

station with a long press, but you’ll need the<br />

Urbanears Connect app for everything else.<br />

This isn’t the best designed speaker app<br />

we’ve used. Volume and equaliser controls are<br />

present but hidden on<br />

separate menus, and<br />

you have to spin through a<br />

lengthy carousel of inputs and<br />

presets to select the one you want.<br />

The Baggen comprises one 50W 6.5in<br />

woofer and two 16mm 20W drivers. This is<br />

where it wins back our favour – sound quality<br />

is truly fantastic. Exquisite detail, excellent<br />

instrument separation, punchy bass, balanced<br />

mids, shining trebles and clear vocals – every<br />

track we played, even low-bit-rate MP3s,<br />

sounded like they were being played at their<br />

best. It also has the potential to go incredibly<br />

intimidatingly loud, and we experienced no<br />

issues with skipping on Bluetooth, as we did<br />

on the Yamaha MusicCast WX-010.<br />

If we had a complaint about the sound, it’s<br />

that it’s only blasted in one direction: straight<br />

out the front. Even on the comparatively tiny<br />

WX-010, there was a sense it was producing a<br />

much wider soundstage; with the Baggen, you<br />

might be more limited in where you can place<br />

the speaker to ensure<br />

everyone in the room<br />

gets the full benefi t.<br />

Further complications arise from<br />

the connections. The selection of ports is fi ne<br />

– there’s a 3.5mm aux jack and a 5V powered<br />

USB2 connector, so you could charge your<br />

phone while playing from it – but they’re both<br />

on the bottom of the speaker, so you have to<br />

tip the whole thing over to plug anything in.<br />

There’s also the aesthetics. We appreciate<br />

the attempt at something different but it<br />

does, as a passing colleague put it, “look like<br />

a chunk of MDF with some fabric stretched<br />

over it”. There’s little of the luxury we’d<br />

expect from a £399 speaker.<br />

That said, it’s not that bad a deal even by<br />

single speaker standards (consider the B&O<br />

BeoPlay A6, which doesn’t do much more<br />

despite costing £729), and it’s easy to forget<br />

most of its fl aws while enjoying its sound and<br />

sheer volume. An aspirational purchase,<br />

perhaps, but not necessarily a bad one.<br />

110 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SPEAKERS<br />

WHARFEDALE Diamond A1<br />

★★★★★<br />

£699 • From www.amazon.co.uk<br />

VERDICT<br />

With an attractive design, handy wireless hub and great<br />

sound quality, the A1 is a superb set of desktop speakers<br />

WHARFEDALE IS ONE of the classic names<br />

in the world of traditional hi-fi, but its new<br />

Diamond A1 speakers bring the marque bang<br />

up to date with Wi-Fi streaming, dedicated<br />

50W amplifiers and a modern-looking design.<br />

The A1 speakers are a bit chunkier than<br />

most PC speakers, standing about 320mm tall<br />

and 186mm wide, so you’ll need a fair amount<br />

of space on your desk if you want to sit them<br />

beside your PC monitor. However, the A1’s<br />

ingenious wireless design makes it easy to<br />

move the speakers up on to a shelf – you’re<br />

not restricted by cables as you are with<br />

traditional desktop speakers.<br />

Each speaker is completely self-contained<br />

and has its own power supply, but while you’ll<br />

need to connect each to a mains socket, there<br />

are no other cables used with the speakers,<br />

which means that you’re free to place them<br />

pretty much anywhere you want.<br />

The separate hub is shaped like a little<br />

square coff ee coaster and includes analogue<br />

RCA and two digital inputs for wired<br />

connections, along with aptX-compatible<br />

Bluetooth for mobile devices. The digital<br />

inputs can handle high-res audio too – well, up<br />

to 24-bit 96KHz signals at least – so those<br />

with collections of HD audio recordings won’t<br />

feel left out. There are no audio cables<br />

included, though, so you’ll have to supply<br />

those yourself, and it’s a shame there’s no<br />

standard 3.5mm connector available as well.<br />

All your music devices can connect to the<br />

hub, which can then stream your music to the<br />

A1 speakers via its own Wi-Fi network, which<br />

uses the 5.8GHz frequency to avoid clashing<br />

with your 2.4GHz or 5GHz home network. The<br />

wireless connection has a range of about 20m,<br />

and you can even switch the speakers into<br />

mono mode, which allows you to separate<br />

them and use them in two different rooms.<br />

It’s the sound quality that really matters,<br />

and the Diamond A1 speakers certainly live up<br />

to Wharfedale’s hi-fi standards. Each speaker<br />

has its own 50W amplifier, and the 13cm main<br />

mid-range/bass driver is made out of Kevlar<br />

(the bullet-proof stuff). That rock-solid<br />

combination produces a dynamic, expansive<br />

sound – and thanks to the bass refl ex port at<br />

the rear of each speaker, the Diamond A1’s<br />

are capable of producing the sort of fullbodied,<br />

room-filling sound that you’d expect<br />

from a much larger pair of speakers.<br />

The sturdy cabinets keep distortion down<br />

to a minimum, and the crisp-sounding<br />

tweeters mean that even the guitar overload<br />

of heavy rock tracks remains clear and<br />

detailed as you ramp up the volume.<br />

They’re not harsh to listen to at all, however.<br />

The detailed, luxurious sound quality works<br />

really well with everything from classic rock<br />

to classical strings.<br />

The Wharfedale Diamond A1 set is<br />

anything but cheap, but these speakers<br />

combine high-tech versatility with the kind of<br />

refi ned, enjoyable sound quality that can deal<br />

with the most eclectic of tastes. If you want to<br />

cut the cables without compromising on<br />

audio quality, then this is a great choice.<br />

YAMAHA MusicCast WX-010<br />

★★★★★<br />

£119 • From www.richersounds.com<br />

VERDICT<br />

A capable, compact multiroom speaker, but<br />

it’s not without some playback issues<br />

THIS LITTLE CUBOID belongs to the same<br />

family as the Yamaha MusicCast YAS-306<br />

soundbar (<strong>Shopper</strong> 350), and as you’d expect<br />

of anything with ‘Cast’ in the name, the<br />

WX-010 has some fi ne wireless credentials,<br />

despite being exclusively mains-powered.<br />

You can stream from your own DLNA<br />

server, use Spotify Connect, AirPlay and<br />

Quboz or simply beam from a Bluetooth<br />

device; there’s SBC and AAC codec support,<br />

but no aptX. There’s also no remote, but you’ll<br />

need to install the MusicCast app on your<br />

phone or tablet, as this acts as the control hub<br />

for the WX-010’s multiroom capabilities.<br />

The app is very adept at this – it’s easy to<br />

link devices and set up individual ‘rooms’,<br />

which offer fi ner control over which parts of<br />

the house are fi lled with music.<br />

Sadly, it’s not so good at playing music. The<br />

app offers no way to jump to a specific point<br />

in a track, and it wouldn’t detect WMA fi les on<br />

our phone. Most concerningly, at one point it<br />

stopped playing mid-song, and wouldn’t start<br />

again until we chose a different<br />

track. We also found that<br />

locking then unlocking our<br />

phone caused the volume<br />

slider to stop working.<br />

Using the app is a safer bet than Bluetooth,<br />

though. Little skips of at least a few milliseconds<br />

were frustratingly regular occurrences, even<br />

when the phone was right next to the speaker.<br />

There’s a lot of good hardware here, though.<br />

The WX-010 is about the size and weight of a<br />

bag of fl our, but feels well made and sturdy.<br />

The glossy piano-black control panel provides<br />

a single button for both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth<br />

pairing, one each for raising and lowering<br />

volume, and a combined play/pause button. At<br />

the back, a little extra fl exibility comes in the<br />

form of a Micro USB port and Ethernet jack.<br />

Inside, the WX-010 contains a two-way<br />

speaker system with a 2.5cm tweeter, 9cm<br />

woofer and two passive bass radiators. Sound<br />

output is thick and robust – we don’t usually<br />

expect much bass from a speaker this size, but<br />

low-end is actually its strong<br />

suit, and it delivered plenty of<br />

punch across all our test<br />

tracks, regardless of genre.<br />

Conversely, trebles could<br />

be a bit sharper and cleaner, and while<br />

podcasts are no problem, musical vocals (and<br />

high-pitched notes from pianos, strings and<br />

some guitars) don’t shine through too<br />

effectively. The soundstage isn’t particularly<br />

wide, either, though this is forgivable<br />

considering the size. In any case, it can go<br />

pretty loud without distortion, making it good<br />

for anything short of a raucous house party.<br />

Besides, it’s always possible to tweak mids and<br />

trebles with the app’s 3-band equaliser.<br />

The WX-010’s combination of feature set<br />

and sound quality makes it a good buy – and if<br />

you already have MusicCast hardware in the<br />

house, it’s a very suitable addition to the set.<br />

Its qualities outweigh its faults in general,<br />

even if the Bluetooth skipping and MusicCast<br />

app issues take the sheen off of it.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

111


SOUNDBARS & SPEAKERS<br />

SOUNDBARS<br />

Award BEST BUY RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED BEST BUY<br />

Manufacturer<br />

CAMBRIDGE<br />

AUDIO<br />

CREATIVE<br />

LABS<br />

ORBITSOUND PHILIPS SAMSUNG STELJES<br />

AUDIO<br />

Model TV2 (v2) Sound<br />

BlasterX<br />

Katana<br />

One P70<br />

Fidelio<br />

SkyQuake<br />

HW-K850<br />

Erato<br />

Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★<br />

HARDWARE<br />

Total<br />

speakers<br />

Total RMS<br />

power output<br />

3 5 5 18 12 5<br />

150W 150W 200W 400W 350W 90W<br />

Subwoofer Integrated Dedicated Integrated Dedicated Dedicated Dedicated<br />

Rear speakers No No No No No No<br />

Dimensions 100x500x333mm 60x600x79mm<br />

77x700x173mm<br />

52x1,058x120mm<br />

81x1,209x129mm<br />

89x850x80mm<br />

(soundbar),<br />

(soundbar),<br />

(soundbar),<br />

(soundbar),<br />

333x130x299mm<br />

510x240x302mm<br />

398x203x414mm<br />

290x280x180mm<br />

(subwoofer)<br />

(subwoofer)<br />

(subwoofer)<br />

(subwoofer)<br />

Weight Not stated 1.5kg (soundbar),<br />

5.1kg<br />

12.08kg (individual<br />

6.67kg (soundbar),<br />

3.5kg (soundbar),<br />

4kg (subwoofer)<br />

weights not stated)<br />

9.57kg (subwoofer)<br />

subwoofer weight<br />

not stated<br />

Audio ports 1x 3.5mm aux, 1x RCA 1x C/SUB, 1x mic<br />

in, 1x headphone<br />

out, 1x 3.5mm aux<br />

1x 3.5mm aux 1x 3.5mm aux 1x RCA 1x 3.5mm aux<br />

Video ports<br />

HDMI ARC, 1x optical<br />

1x optical S/PDIF 1x optical S/PDIF 2x HDMI, 1x HDMI<br />

1x HDMI, 1x HDMI<br />

2x HDMI, 1x HDMI<br />

S/PDIF<br />

ARC, optical<br />

ARC, 1x optical<br />

ARC, optical S/PDIF<br />

S/PDIF, coaxial<br />

S/PDIF<br />

S/PDIF<br />

Dock<br />

connector<br />

None None None None None None<br />

USB ports None 2x USB2 None 1x USB2 1x USB2 (updates<br />

only)<br />

None<br />

Networking Bluetooth (aptX) Bluetooth (SBC) Bluetooth Bluetooth (aptX,<br />

SBC)<br />

Bluetooth (aptX,<br />

SBC), 802.11n Wi-Fi<br />

Bluetooth (aptX,<br />

SBC)<br />

NFC Yes No No Yes No No<br />

FEATURES<br />

Streaming<br />

services<br />

None None None None DLNA, Spotify<br />

Connect, Tidal,<br />

TuneIn, Amazon<br />

Music<br />

None<br />

BUYING INFORMATION<br />

Price £200 £228 £300 £899 £900 £130<br />

Prices correct at time of going to press<br />

Warranty Two years repair and One year RTB Two years RTB One year repair and One year RTB One year RTB<br />

replace<br />

replace<br />

Supplier shop.cambridgeaudio.com www.ebuyer.com shop.orbitsound. www.amazon.co.uk www.currys.co.uk www.zavvi.com<br />

com<br />

Details www.cambridgeaudio.com uk.creative.com shop.orbitsound.<br />

com<br />

www.philips.co.uk www.samsung.com www.steljesaudio.<br />

com<br />

Part code TV2 (v2) 51MF8245AA000 ONE P70 B8/12 HW-K850 Erato<br />

112 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


SOUNDBARS & SPEAKERS<br />

SPEAKERS<br />

Award RECOMMENDED BEST BUY RECOMMENDED<br />

Manufacturer AUDIO PRO LIBRATONE PANASONIC URBANEARS WHARFEDALE YAMAHA<br />

Model Addon T3 Zipp SC-All05 Baggen Diamond A1 MusicCast<br />

WX-010<br />

Rating ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★ ★★★★★<br />

HARDWARE<br />

Speakers 2 5 2 3 2 2<br />

RMS power output 25W 100W 20W 60W 100W 25W<br />

Audio inputs 1x 3.5mm aux 1x 3.5mm aux None 1x 3.5mm aux 1x RCA, 1x coaxial<br />

S/PDIF, 1x optical<br />

S/PDIF<br />

None<br />

Audio outputs None None None None None None<br />

Dock connector None None None None None None<br />

Wireless Bluetooth (SBC) Bluetooth (aptX),<br />

Bluetooth, 802.11a<br />

Bluetooth, 802.11ac<br />

Bluetooth (aptX),<br />

Bluetooth (SBC),<br />

802.11n Wi-Fi<br />

Wi-Fi<br />

Wi-Fi<br />

802.11ac Wi-Fi<br />

802.11n Wi-Fi<br />

NFC No No No No No No<br />

Streaming services None Spotify Connect,<br />

Spotify Connect,<br />

Spotify Connect,<br />

Spotify Connect<br />

Spotify Connect,<br />

AirPlay, DLNA<br />

Napster, Aupeo,<br />

AirPlay,<br />

AirPlay, Quboz<br />

AllPlay Radio<br />

Chromecast Audio<br />

App support None iOS, Android iOS, Android iOS, Android iOS, Android iOS, Android<br />

Battery capacity 2,200mAh 2,400mAh 2,950mAh N/A N/A N/A<br />

Dimensions 215x135x115mm 261x122x122mm 170x179x77mm 301x301x213mm 320x186x230mm 160x120x130mm<br />

Weight 2kg 1.5kg 1.5kg 6.6kg 11kg (2x 5.5kg) 1.7kg<br />

BUYING INFORMATION<br />

Price £170 £249 £120 £399 £699 £119<br />

Warranty One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB One year RTB Two years RTB Two years RTB<br />

Prices correct at time of going to press<br />

Supplier www.superfi.co.uk www.johnlewis.com www.currys.co.uk www.urbanears.<br />

com<br />

www.amazon.co.uk www.richersounds.<br />

com<br />

Details www.audiopro.com www.libratone.com www.panasonic. www.urbanears. www.wharfedale. uk.yamaha.com<br />

com/uk<br />

com<br />

co.uk<br />

Part code Addon T3 LH0032010EU2001 SC-ALL05 Baggen Diamond A1 WX-010<br />

VERDICT<br />

Our pick of the soundbars isn’t actually a soundbar. Even with an<br />

integrated subwoofer (not a separate unit), the Cambridge Audio<br />

TV2 (v2) is an exceptional-sounding soundbase at a very fair price,<br />

and short of Wi-Fi, it comes with all the connectivity you could want.<br />

As long as you weren’t dead set on wall-mounting, it’s a fantastic<br />

choice for bolstering your TV’s sound.<br />

As far as actual soundbars go, it’s hard to go wrong with the<br />

Steljes Audio Erato. A capable row of speakers with a dedicated<br />

subwoofer in the same package, the Erato proves once again<br />

that cheap doesn’t have to mean bad – we’d rather have this<br />

than the £899 Philips Fidelio SkyQuake, which manages to create<br />

an impressive multidimensional soundstage but otherwise doesn’t<br />

quite justify the expense.<br />

The somewhat more diverse nature of speakers means there<br />

are a few worth recommending. The Addon T3 sounds and looks<br />

lovely, though the Libratone Zipp’s ability to fi ll a room with 360<br />

degrees of music makes it slightly better in our book. Wharfedale’s<br />

Diamond A1 is expensive – even more so than the Urbanears<br />

Baggen – but its combination of modern wireless versatility and<br />

classic hi-fi sound quality makes it a winner as well.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

113


ROLAND MOORE-COLY ER EXPLORES<br />

CURRENT-GENERATION GPUs AND<br />

THE FUTURE OF GRAPHICS CARDS<br />

114<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


ushing polished pixels on to a display<br />

relies upon the compute power of the<br />

graphics processing unit (GPU), either<br />

found integrated with the central<br />

processing unit (CPU) or given its own spot on<br />

a motherboard. If a CPU is the logical part of a<br />

PC, the GPU is the creative part. And they have<br />

been evolving at a rapid pace.<br />

There are two major players in the dedicated<br />

graphics processing world: Nvidia and AMD.<br />

These two graphics giants have been slugging it<br />

out for years, both pushing out high-end cards as<br />

pseudo-vanity projects to showcase how much<br />

GPU fi repower they can bring to bear, as well as<br />

creating cards that compete on fi nding the<br />

sweet spot between power and price.<br />

RESOLUTION REVOLUTION<br />

Heavy-duty video and photo editing, as well as<br />

running graphics-heavy applications, often require<br />

a dedicated graphics card to carry out tasks at<br />

speed. But it’s the world of PC gaming that fuels<br />

the appetite for and innovation in graphics cards.<br />

Currently, the de facto standard target for<br />

modern gaming is the 1080p resolution running at<br />

a minimum of 30 frames per second (fps), but for<br />

PC gaming a smooth 60fps is the desired goal.<br />

That target has resulted in powerful graphics<br />

cards able to deliver silky-smooth performance<br />

with all the graphical bells and whistles, such as<br />

detailed textures and anti-aliasing to reduce<br />

jagged lines. Mid-range and lower-end cards<br />

deliver the same results but with the graphics<br />

settings in games reduced by a notch or two.<br />

However, the debut of 4K ultra high-defi nition<br />

(UHD) displays, which deliver roughly four times<br />

the number of pixels than the 1,920x1,080<br />

resolution, has resulted in the need for GPUs that<br />

have a lot more power to render smooth games at<br />

that resolution at playable frame rates, without<br />

surrendering graphical decoration.<br />

Until very recently, hitting 60fps at 4K in<br />

visually intensive games – such as The Witcher 3<br />

or Rise of the Tomb Raider – was an almost<br />

unreachable target.<br />

A middle ground exists with the 2,560x1,440<br />

resolution, often referred to as quad high<br />

defi nition, which is four times the number of<br />

pixels of 1,280x720. Hitting 60fps at 1440p is a<br />

lot more attainable at more affordable prices<br />

for PC enthusiasts than at 4K.<br />

The trio of resolutions have resulted in distinct<br />

tiers in the graphics card world, and is mildly<br />

complicated by the advent of monitors with<br />

refresh rates of 120 and 144Hz, which demand<br />

enough graphics power to push pixels at a frame<br />

rate beyond 60fps. What we are left with are GPU<br />

options that are not simply separated by steps in<br />

power but their suitability for specific resolutions.<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 343<br />

115


IN THE GREEN CORNER<br />

Nvidia’s latest Pascal architecture made its<br />

debut with three cards: the GeForce GTX<br />

1080 for chasing 30fps at 4K or 60fps at<br />

1440p for around £550; the slightly less<br />

powerful but cheaper £400 GTX 1070 for<br />

30fps-plus at 1440p in demanding games; and<br />

the GTX 1060, which is designed for maxing<br />

out graphical settings in games at 1080p at<br />

60fps for a little over £200.<br />

But Pascal has been expanded over the<br />

past 10 months, notably with the crazily<br />

powerful and expensive Titan X. At more than<br />

£1,000, the GPU was the fastest on the block<br />

for around seven months, yet only really<br />

attainable by the wealthiest PC gamers.<br />

To put the cat among its own pigeons,<br />

Nvidia recently revealed the GeForce GTX<br />

1080 Ti. Despite the name, the GPU is not a<br />

tweaked GTX 1080, but more a reworked<br />

Titan X, with high-end silicon sporting 3,584<br />

CUDA cores, 11GB of fast GDDRX RAM and<br />

a base clock speed of 1.6GHz. These specs<br />

pretty much match the Titan X, although<br />

the 1080 Ti has 1GB less of RAM and<br />

features a smaller 352-bit aggregated memory<br />

bus that allows for a bandwidth of 484GB/s,<br />

which is 4GB/s less than the Titan X.<br />

TOP LEFT: Metal Gear Solid V at 1080p<br />

RIGHT: The graphically intense Rise of the Tomb Raider<br />

BELOW: The powerful but pricey Nvidia Titan X<br />

At around £700 the GTX 1080 Ti isn’t<br />

cheap, but it can hit 60fps in games running at<br />

4K with graphics settings ramped up for a<br />

smaller wad of cash than the Titan X, rendering<br />

Nvidia’s pricey fl agship moot for the moment.<br />

Nvidia also added the GeForce GTX 1050<br />

and GTX 1050 Ti to its range, which are<br />

squarely aimed at PC builders with budgets of<br />

around £100 looking for a GPU to game at<br />

1080p with the graphical settings turned down.<br />

Pascal has not only yielded a broad range of<br />

desktop GPUs but has also seen Nvidia introduce<br />

mobile versions of its standard cards.<br />

Normally, mobile GPUs are very much the<br />

poor cousins of their desktop counterparts,<br />

delivering expensive gaming laptops that<br />

can’t match the power of a similarly specced<br />

desktop. But the energy efficiency of Pascal<br />

has changed that. The mobile versions of<br />

the GeForce 1080, 1070 and 1060 offer<br />

performance that is pretty close to their<br />

desktop counterparts.<br />

We recently tried out an Asus GL702VM<br />

gaming laptop, which has a mobile version of<br />

the GeForce 1060, and were suitably impressed<br />

with its ability to deliver between 30fps and<br />

60fps at 1080p in demanding games with<br />

pretty much all graphics settings pumped up.<br />

Nvidia is so confident in the ability of its<br />

mobile chips it has dropped the ‘M’ suffix that<br />

separated the previous-generation Maxwell<br />

mobile GPUs from their desktop counterparts.<br />

Thomas Bradley, head of the Nvidia<br />

developer team and technology in Europe,<br />

tells us that this minor breakthrough in<br />

performance was down to Nvidia developing a<br />

GPU architecture that spans all its products<br />

from mobile graphics to server GPUs, allowing<br />

innovations in power and efficiency to be<br />

shared across the company’s portfolio.<br />

“That has huge advantages on a number<br />

of fronts, one of which is that we are<br />

116<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


UNTIL VERY RECENTLY, HITTING 60FPS AT 4K<br />

IN VISUALLY INTENSIVE GAMES – SUCH AS<br />

THE WITCHER 3 OR RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER<br />

– WAS AN ALMOST UNREACHABLE TARGET<br />

ABOVE: Nvidia’s new GeForce GTX 1080 Ti<br />

RIGHT: AMD’s top Polaris GPU, the Radeon RX 480<br />

optimising not only for performance but<br />

also for power consumption at every level,<br />

because you can imagine at the embedded<br />

level with the Tegra product line, power<br />

consumption is paramount. But not only that,<br />

in the higher-end GPUs, including the data<br />

centre, performance is essentially power<br />

efficiency as well because you’re limited to<br />

how much power you can draw into one of<br />

these cards,” he says.<br />

“So if you want to improve the<br />

performance in each generation, the only way<br />

to do that is by improving power efficiency.”<br />

That’s a pretty good hint at where Nvidia is<br />

taking its next-generation GPU architecture,<br />

the forthcoming Volta.<br />

Not much had been revealed about Volta at<br />

the time of writing – we’re expecting to hear<br />

more about it at the Graphics Technology<br />

Conference in May – but no doubt Nvidia’s<br />

pursuit of power and efficiency will be the<br />

main driver. The GTX 1080 Ti would suggest<br />

high-end Volta GPUs will be very capable<br />

cards at handling 4K gaming and video<br />

encoding, particularly if they make use of<br />

GDDR6 RAM, which is touted to have a data<br />

transfer speed of 16GB/s.<br />

Volta cards could also take inspiration<br />

from Nvidia’s professional GPU, the Tesla<br />

P100, which uses high-bandwidth memory<br />

delivering 540GB/s to process data-heavy<br />

workloads such as scientific modelling.<br />

Either way, Volta is set to usher in<br />

desktop cards, likely around 2018, that will<br />

offer at least a solid hike in<br />

performance and see laptop<br />

GPUs become more capable<br />

than ever before. A GPU<br />

revolution may not be literally<br />

on the cards, but a notable<br />

evolution in GeForce GPUs<br />

can be expected.<br />

SEEING RED<br />

AMD – previously ATI until the<br />

former bought the latter in 200606<br />

– has long kept competitive in<br />

both high- and low-end GPUs.<br />

However, over recent years, Nvidia has been<br />

the frontrunner in pure power. With its<br />

latest Polaris architecture, though, AMD<br />

ducked out of the sheer graphics horsepower<br />

race and instead looked to gain ground in the<br />

mid- to lower-end arena.<br />

Its current top Polaris GPU, the Radeon RX<br />

480, is a card that comes with 2,304 stream<br />

processors, 8GB of GDDR5 RAM and a 1.1GHz<br />

base clock speed, all for a price of around<br />

£200. The card has the chops to hit the sweet<br />

spot of 1080p at 60fps and can push up to the<br />

1440p resolution with a few tweaks to graphics<br />

settings. It’s also virtual reality (VR)-ready,<br />

making it one of the cheapest cards with the<br />

certification to power headsets such as the<br />

Oculus Rift and HTC Vive.<br />

For anyone looking to build a solid 1080p<br />

gaming machine, the Radeon RX 480 is pretty<br />

much the desktop card to go for.<br />

Joining it in the Polaris line-up are the<br />

Radeon 470 and 460, both lesser-specced<br />

cards designed for budget-conscious PC<br />

gamers and those who want to run eSports<br />

games such as League of Legends and Dota 2<br />

smoothly, but have little ambition to run<br />

cutting-edge games.<br />

AMD also offers mobile variants of its<br />

GPUs, but unfortunately they can’t offer the<br />

level of performance that Nvidia’s<br />

mobile cards can, meaning the<br />

latest slew of gaming laptops<br />

generally tout GPUs from the<br />

green (Nvidia) corner.<br />

However, AMD does have<br />

an ace up its sleeve in the form<br />

of its Jaguar custom chipset,<br />

comprising a CPU and Radeon<br />

GPU that can be found in the<br />

Xbox One and PlayStation 4.<br />

Arguably the most popular<br />

non-casual gaming platforms,<br />

AMD’s tech is being used to<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 343 117


drive the latest console games, while Nvidia is<br />

left behind in the console market. That is, if<br />

you don’t count the Tegra X1 mobile chip<br />

found in the Nintendo Switch (see <strong>Shopper</strong><br />

352), which is a different beast altogether.<br />

This presence across the two main gaming<br />

consoles means AMD can benefi t from<br />

developers making games designed to run on<br />

its hardware, which should mean PC versions<br />

of the same game perform well on AMD cards.<br />

And with its forthcoming Vega architecture,<br />

AMD looks to be making a major comeback in<br />

the high-end GPU world.<br />

Like Nvidia and its Volta architecture, AMD<br />

has kept pretty quiet about the specification<br />

of Vega, but one thing we do know is the next<br />

generation of GPUs from the company will<br />

feature a cache of second-generation high<br />

bandwidth memory (HBM2,) which AMD<br />

used in its last high-end card, the Fury X.<br />

This memory has a significantly higher data<br />

throughput than even the nippy GGDR5X,<br />

potentially offering around 512GB/s, making<br />

for a very fast card indeed.<br />

Jason Megit, technical marketing manager<br />

at AMD’s Radeon Technologies Group, tells us<br />

that the real power of Vega comes from its<br />

High Bandwidth Cache Controller (HBCC),<br />

which aims to shake up how GPUs handle data.<br />

Traditionally developers would need to<br />

squeeze all the textures, polygons and shaders<br />

for the image being rendered into a frame<br />

buffer in the GPU’s onboard memory.<br />

Obviously this means the GPU is limited to the<br />

amount of video memory it has on the card.<br />

But with HBCC, Vega can stream the data<br />

needed to render graphics for games and other<br />

visually intensive applications from all manner<br />

of memory sources in a PC, potentially being<br />

able to draw from up to 512TB of virtualised<br />

memory. That dwarfs the memory bandwidth<br />

of even the best GPUs on the market.<br />

“What the HBCC lets us do is treat all<br />

memory in a system, whether it be system<br />

SDRAM, VRAM, network storage, all the<br />

memory off the GPU. We’re able to stream<br />

data in real time into the GPU and efficiently<br />

manage it on the GPU,” explains Megit.<br />

“If we’re able to access a larger data set in<br />

real time on the GPU we can potentially build<br />

virtual worlds that are massive in comparison<br />

to what we currently utilise in a game.”<br />

ANATOMY OF A<br />

GRAPHICS CARD<br />

Graphics cards can be confusing beasts, with several interplaying<br />

components that determine whether a GPU can crunch through the<br />

latest games with ease or end up all hot and bothered, as well as the<br />

resolutions it can hit and quality of image that get piped to a monitor<br />

CORES<br />

Much like a CPU, GPUs have processing<br />

cores, only they number in the thousands in<br />

the<br />

latest graphics cards rather than in<br />

quad- or octa-core configurations in CPUs.<br />

These cores act as stream processors to<br />

produce the textures, shaders and polygons<br />

that make up parts of an image.<br />

While AMD sticks with the term stream<br />

processors, Nvidia calls them CUDA cores;<br />

in<br />

general AMD’s cores are smaller and less<br />

complex, while Nvidia’s are larger and more<br />

complex. AMD cores do more optimisation<br />

on the tasks that cores are assigned, while<br />

Nvidia lets the GPU assign the cores<br />

according to the task at hand. What this<br />

means is that the number of cores doesn’t<br />

necessarily dictate the overall performance<br />

of a GPU, the real results being seen in<br />

how well it carries out certain tasks.<br />

MEMORY<br />

The level of data needed to render graphics<br />

in very visual applications and games is ever<br />

118<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


LEFT: Nvidia’s next-gen GPU<br />

architecture, Volta<br />

RIGHT: Microsoft ’s Xbox One<br />

uses AMD’s Jaguar chipset<br />

AMD’S TECH IS BEING<br />

USED TO DRIVE THE<br />

LATEST CONSOLE<br />

GAMES, WHILE<br />

NVIDIA IS LEFT<br />

BEHIND IN<br />

THE CONSOLE<br />

MARKET<br />

This combination of a fast memory cache<br />

with a memory controller that can be<br />

configured on the fl y to suit specific<br />

applications has a very strong chance of<br />

putting AMD and the Radeon line back in pole<br />

position in the graphics race. When Vega<br />

makes its proper debut later this year, we will<br />

expect it to deliver monstrous performance<br />

at 4K resolutions. But that will depend on<br />

whether developers can get their heads around<br />

programming to suit graphics streaming on<br />

an architecture that is a departure from<br />

traditional GPUs. Either way, AMD looks to be<br />

bringing its big guns to the next GPU fi ght.<br />

DEEPER THAN HARDWARE<br />

Squeezing graphics performance out of silicon<br />

happens at more than a hardware level for<br />

Nvidia and AMD. They both have technology<br />

that enables their graphics cards to be run in<br />

pairs or trios – SLI for the former and<br />

CrossFire for the latter. Doubling the number<br />

of graphics cards in a PC doesn’t equal double<br />

the pixel-crunching capabilities, but both<br />

companies have been pushing the soft ware<br />

and drivers for their GPUs to make such<br />

multi-card arrays more effective.<br />

Both offer a comprehensive soft ware<br />

suite for developers and gamers to eke out<br />

the best from their graphics cards. Standouts<br />

for AMD include its OverDrive soft ware for<br />

easy overclocking of GPUs, while its work<br />

on its Mantle and Vulkan application<br />

programming interfaces (APIs) give developers<br />

better access to the bare performance at a<br />

GPU’s heart without requiring a CPU to act<br />

as a form of computational middle-man<br />

between an application and GPU.<br />

Nvidia’s ace soft ware is the GeForce<br />

Experience, which ensures GPU drivers are<br />

kept up to date, and intelligently detects and<br />

adjusts game settings to deliver the best<br />

performance and visuals a PC’s GPU can offer.<br />

increasing, so GPUs need a sizable pool of<br />

memory to draw upon. Most modern<br />

graphics cards have at least several<br />

gigabytes of GDDR5 video RAM, configured<br />

to have higher bandwidth than the DDR4<br />

RAM plugged in the motherboards of PCs<br />

and laptops, but at the expense of latency.<br />

GDDR5X is used in Nvidia’s GTX 1080,<br />

1080 Ti and Titan X GPUs, and offers a very<br />

high bandwidth for high-end graphics<br />

processing. But the debut of high<br />

bandwidth memory (HBM), fi rst seen in<br />

AMD’s Fury X GPUs and set to be the star<br />

in its next wave of GPUs, looks to raise the<br />

bandwidth even higher and deliver<br />

blisteringly fast graphics cards.<br />

CONNECTIONS<br />

Around the back of a graphics card you’ll<br />

fi nd a collection of video outputs.<br />

Traditionally the domain of the VGA and<br />

DVI ports, the advent of HDMI and Full HD<br />

resolutions means most modern GPUs have<br />

at least one HDMI output, which also<br />

means PCs can play nicely with modern TVs<br />

and be used as a powerful<br />

games console if so desired.<br />

COOLING<br />

Arguably the most<br />

visually captivating part<br />

of a GPU, the fan cooler<br />

is an essential part of a<br />

graphics card to preventent<br />

the silicon from frying<br />

under heavy loads.<br />

Graphics cards<br />

created by third-party<br />

providers of GPUs such<br />

as MSI and Asus often<br />

feature fancy cooling<br />

arrays, which offer a<br />

bigger boost in cooling<br />

than standard reference<br />

design cards released by Nvidia and AMD.<br />

This has the knock-on effect of enabling<br />

the GPU to have its processor and memory<br />

clock speed ramped up, allowing for more<br />

performance to be extracted out of a<br />

graphics card.<br />

Nvidia, AMD and third-party companies<br />

offer their own overclocking tools to let PC<br />

enthusiasts keen for more power and not<br />

afraid of pushing their graphics card to the<br />

limit eke out more GPU horsepower and<br />

achieve higher frame rates in graphicsheavy<br />

games.<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 343 119


Both companies have their sights set on<br />

features such as multisampling for reducing<br />

jagged lines and frame synchronisation<br />

between GPUs and monitors, all of which aim<br />

to make viewing videos and playing games a<br />

smoother, sharper experience.<br />

Neither AMD or Nvidia appear to be<br />

slowing down on the soft ware side, either,<br />

with both companies currently working<br />

away in consortiums or alone to produce<br />

tools and features that unlock the power of<br />

their graphics tech.<br />

ABOVE: Nvidia’s GeForce Experience in action<br />

BELOW: The Best Buy-winning Nvidia Shield console<br />

DITCHING DESKTOPS<br />

While GPUs will keep getting more powerful<br />

and render games with sumptuous visuals at<br />

massive resolutions, they have a role to play<br />

beyond the desktop PC.<br />

Nvidia recently debuted its GeForce Now, a<br />

service that uses cloud computing backed up<br />

by server racks equipped with GTX 1080s to<br />

stream games to desktops, laptops and TVs,<br />

the latter via Nvidia’s Shield console. GeForce<br />

Now fl ips Nvidia’s traditional place in PC<br />

gaming on its head: you can stream high-end<br />

games to a MacBook Air, a laptop that’s about<br />

as far away from a gaming PC as possible.<br />

There are caveats, though. You need to be<br />

in the US and have a 25Mbit/s broadband<br />

connection. Yet GeForce Now serves as an<br />

example of how the future of graphics may<br />

not be reliant on powerful gaming desktops.<br />

VR tech is also another area that Dr<br />

Wendy Powell, senior member of the IEEE<br />

and reader in virtual reality at the University<br />

of Portsmouth, tells us is driving the evolution<br />

of graphics technology.<br />

“On the surface, the graphics requirements<br />

for games and VR might seem similar, with<br />

both demanding increasing levels of realism,<br />

high resolutions and good frame rates. The<br />

difference is that poor graphics performance<br />

in a game is annoying, but in VR it could be<br />

the difference between a comfortable<br />

experience and losing your lunch,” she explains.<br />

“Because VR immerses us into the<br />

experience, we expect the graphics<br />

performance to mimic real life, so when we<br />

turn our head and the graphics display<br />

doesn’t keep up, it can trigger instant nausea.<br />

While games are generally running at 60fps,<br />

both the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive demand<br />

90fps at a resolution of 2,160x1,200, and below<br />

this there will be lag and jitter, leading to<br />

increasing levels of simulator sickness.”<br />

Powell adds that as top-end displays move<br />

towards 4K per eye – 8K in total – there will<br />

need to be a significant hike in<br />

graphics performance in order<br />

to deliver not just realism,<br />

but an enjoyable and<br />

nausea-free experience.<br />

“The race is on with<br />

GPU manufacturers such<br />

as AMD and Nvidia to<br />

refi ne techniques such<br />

as multi-resolution<br />

shading and image<br />

warping in order to<br />

deliver a comfortable<br />

high-fidelity graphics<br />

experience within a<br />

head-mounted display<br />

120<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER |<br />

ISSUE 353


(HMD). We are likely to start seeing PCs<br />

supporting multi-GPU rendering, allowing a<br />

separate GPU to output to each eye.”<br />

GPUs also have a role to play outside of<br />

gaming. Training artificial intelligence (AI)<br />

systems and machine-learning<br />

algorithms for driverless cars or<br />

automatic image recognition<br />

requires the use of deep-learning<br />

artificial neural networks –<br />

essentially a computer’s take<br />

on how the human brain<br />

picks apart and makes sense<br />

of information. Serial<br />

processing in CPUs is great<br />

for completing complex<br />

logical tasks, s, but in systems<br />

that need a large amount of<br />

data to be piped through and<br />

computed, CPUs simply don’t<br />

have the throughput.<br />

GPUs, on the other hand,<br />

have parallel processing, a<br />

much betterer method for<br />

pushing data through an<br />

artificial neural network.<br />

This is best explained with<br />

an example. e. If you think of<br />

a CPU as a large pipe<br />

pouring water into a<br />

collection of pots, it can do<br />

so one at a time at a rapid<br />

speed. But with parallel<br />

BECAUSE VR<br />

IMMERSES US INTO<br />

THE EXPERIENCE,<br />

WE EXPECT<br />

THE GRAPHICS<br />

PERFORMANCE TO<br />

MIMIC REAL LIFE<br />

processing you have a larger collection of<br />

pipes, which although they’re not as big are<br />

capable of fi lling up all the pots at once.<br />

This higher throughput means GPUs are<br />

effectively critical components for powering<br />

future AIs and smart systems. Nvidia has been<br />

pushing the AI line for some time, and the<br />

fi rm’s Bradley reckons Volta will enable Nvidia<br />

ABOVE: Deep-learning networks are used in AI<br />

BELOW: VR poses a new challenge for graphics fi rms<br />

users to tap into their GPU’s capabilities and<br />

program AI systems from their own PCs.<br />

“One of the things I think we will see more<br />

and more is that AI is not a segment of<br />

programing but rather a fundamental<br />

programming paradigm, which will<br />

span not only multiple industries<br />

but also right the way through<br />

to gaming as an industry as<br />

well, but also hobbyists and<br />

so on,” he says.<br />

“Anybody with an Nvidia<br />

GPU can pick up any of the<br />

main deep-learning<br />

frameworks and start to<br />

experiment with those.<br />

And they are all GPU<br />

accelerates so they can<br />

get that performance<br />

advantage out of the box.”<br />

Not keen on being left<br />

out, AMD’s Radeon<br />

Instinct GPU family is<br />

designed to power deep<br />

learning, with cards such<br />

as the MI8 featuring no<br />

video output, instead<br />

being designed exclusively<br />

for use in server racks set<br />

up for training AIs.<br />

So while graphics<br />

cards could be thought of<br />

as the tools of gamers, they<br />

are now becoming the core<br />

parts of machines designed to<br />

usher in smarter technology and<br />

perhaps one day a fully fl edged AI.<br />

At the same time, the competition<br />

for the adoration of gamers is pushing<br />

AMD and Nvidia to produce better slices<br />

of graphics-pushing silicon and soft ware.<br />

And with the next wave of GPU architectures<br />

on the horizon, PC gaming fans can look<br />

forward to graphics that creep ever closer<br />

to the ultimate goal of photorealism.<br />

JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 343<br />

121


SUBSCRIPTION OFFER<br />

5 ISSUES OF<br />

COMPUTER SHOPPER<br />

FOR ONLY £5<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong> provides you with more reviews, expert<br />

advice and in-depth technical features than any other monthly<br />

technology magazine, making it your indispensable one-stop<br />

guide to computing and home entertainment.<br />

THE PRINT PACKAGE<br />

Get 5 print issues for just £5<br />

THE COMPLETE PACKAGE<br />

Get 5 print + digital issues for just £5<br />

PLUS:<br />

P FREE 26-piece Toolkit<br />

P Save 26% on the shop price<br />

P FREE delivery to your door<br />

P Get every issue before it hits the shops<br />

Visit dennismags.co.uk/computershopper<br />

and enter offer code D1707P now!<br />

PLUS:<br />

P FREE 26-piece Toolkit<br />

P Save 26% on the print edition shop price<br />

P Save 83% on digital access<br />

P FREE delivery to your door<br />

P Get every issue before it hits the shops<br />

Visit dennismags.co.uk/computershopper<br />

and enter offer code D1707B now!


SUBSCRIPTION OFFER<br />

Plus receive a FREE<br />

26-piece Toolkit<br />

Start your subscription today for 5 issues for £5 and we’ll<br />

send <strong>Computer</strong> <strong>Shopper</strong> directly to your door at no extra<br />

cost, plus we’ll also send you a FREE 26-piece toolkit<br />

YOUR TOOLKIT INCLUDES:<br />

P 9 assorted bits (Phillips,<br />

Slotted and Torx)<br />

P Adaptor<br />

P Magnetic tip handle<br />

P Mini long nose pliers<br />

P Stainless steel tweezers<br />

P Sockets, ¼” Drive (7mm,<br />

8mm, 9mm & 10mm)<br />

P Extension bar<br />

P 6 precision screwdrivers<br />

(2 phillips and 4 slotted)<br />

YOUR<br />

FREE<br />

GIFT<br />

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!<br />

Visit dennismags.co.uk/computershopper<br />

Calls will cost 7p per minute plus your telephone company’s access charge.<br />

Or call 0844 844 0031<br />

Gifts limited to the fi rst 50 subscribers. Please allow 28 days for delivery. Gifts available to UK subscribers only.


Business Help<br />

If you have database, office application or macro issues,<br />

Kay Ewbank is here to help<br />

Send your problems to businesshelp@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Save it for the morning after<br />

I tend to check my emails late at night,<br />

sometimes into the early hours of the<br />

morning. Often, I’ll want to reply to an<br />

email, but I don’t want my answer to be<br />

sent straight away. If I’m sending a routine<br />

reply, I don’t want to risk waking my<br />

recipient at 2am because they sleep with<br />

their smartphone by their bed, and it<br />

doesn’t look very professional either.<br />

My problem is that while I know I can<br />

use Outlook’s facility to defer the delivery<br />

by choosing Options, Defer Delivery, the<br />

default delivery time is set to 17:00. This<br />

means I have to remember to change the<br />

time, as I’d like my reply to be sent at 8am,<br />

to be there for the start of the working<br />

day. This works fi ne when I remember to<br />

change it, but is another element where<br />

tired fi ngers can cause havoc. Where can I<br />

change the default delay delivery time?<br />

I’m using Outlook 2010.<br />

Jenny Allsopp<br />

The irritating thing is that you can’t change<br />

the default delay sending time as a setting,<br />

but you can do it on a message-by-message<br />

basis using a macro.<br />

I’ve got two macros, the fi rst for creating<br />

a new message that will have a default send<br />

time of 8am, the second for replying to an<br />

incoming email, again with a default send<br />

time of 8am. If you assign them to a button<br />

on your Outlook toolbar, you should fi nd<br />

they do what you want. If you want to<br />

choose a time other than 8am as the default<br />

send time, all you need to do is to alter the<br />

0.33333 to be whatever fraction of 24 hours<br />

you want. So for 9am, for example, you’d<br />

work out that 9/24 is 0.375.<br />

One word of caution:<br />

while your message won’t be<br />

delivered until 8am, the time<br />

it is shown as being sent<br />

might or might not be shown<br />

as the original time you<br />

created it. I’ve seen both<br />

effects on different Outlook<br />

systems, and I can’t see<br />

where this is activated.<br />

What I can promise is that<br />

your message at least won’t<br />

be delivered until 8am.<br />

Public Sub<br />

EmailInMorning()<br />

Dim objMsg As MailItem<br />

Dim SendTime As Date<br />

Set objMsg = Application.<br />

CreateItem(olMailItem)<br />

SendTime = DateSerial(Year(Now),<br />

Month(Now), Day(Now)) + 0.33333<br />

objMsg.DeferredDeliveryTime = SendTime<br />

objMsg.Display<br />

End Sub<br />

This macro creates a new blank message<br />

for you to complete; the only thing that is set<br />

is the default time the message will be sent<br />

and delivered. The macro below takes the<br />

email you’ve selected in your Inbox and creates<br />

a reply, with the recipient’s email address being<br />

set to the original sender’s address, and the<br />

contents of the original email within your reply.<br />

It also sets the delivery time to 8am:<br />

Sub ReplyInMorning()<br />

Dim objMsg As MailItem<br />

Dim objReplyMsg As MailItem<br />

⬆ You can alter the delayed delivery time, but you can’t set the default<br />

to anything other than 17:00 in Outlook<br />

Dim SendTime As Date<br />

Set objMsg = Application.ActiveWindow.<br />

Selection.Item(1)<br />

Set objReplyMsg = Application.<br />

CreateItem(olMailItem)<br />

objReplyMsg.Subject = objMsg.Subject<br />

objReplyMsg.To = objMsg.Sender<br />

objReplyMsg.CC = objMsg.CC<br />

SendTime = DateSerial(Year(Now),<br />

Month(Now), Day(Now)) + 0.33333<br />

objReplyMsg.DeferredDeliveryTime =<br />

SendTime<br />

objReplyMsg.HTMLBody = objReplyMsg.<br />

HTMLBody & objMsg.Reply.HTMLBody<br />

objReplyMsg.Display<br />

End Sub<br />

Disclaimer alert<br />

We’re creating an Access report, and we<br />

want to add disclaimer pages in between the<br />

‘detail’ pages of the report. Can you merge<br />

text pages into a report in Access?<br />

Peter Lamb<br />

This is more fi ddly than you might expect.<br />

One non-technical option would be to use a<br />

commercial printing service to print your<br />

company disclaimers on one side of blank<br />

paper, then use that for printing your reports,<br />

so that on the ‘front’ of a page you get report<br />

data, and on the back you get ‘disclaimer’ data.<br />

If you don’t want to use a commercial service,<br />

just print the disclaimer yourself on one side of<br />

a ream of paper (or however many sheets<br />

make sense), then run it through the printer<br />

again for your report.<br />

If you don’t want to do that, experiment<br />

with the page footer on your report. Stretch<br />

the footer so it’s long enough to hold not only<br />

the page footer information, but also your<br />

disclaimer information. When you print the<br />

report, your report data should show on one<br />

page, while the next page has the ‘slipped’<br />

disclaimer information. The only problem is<br />

that this could be quite fi ddly to achieve.<br />

124 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


BUSINESS HELP<br />

Flush out the system<br />

I’ve fi nally been forced away from<br />

WordPerfect to Microsoft Word, and it lacks<br />

some of the features that made my life easy.<br />

In particular, I can’t fi nd any way of doing<br />

what WordPerfect calls Flush-Right, where I<br />

can have text at the very left of the page,<br />

and text at the very right of the page, and<br />

nothing in between – like you’d get in a<br />

table of contents, say. Is Word capable of<br />

doing this, and if so, how?<br />

Jess Baldwin<br />

You can do this in Word, but it’s not as<br />

convenient as in WordPerfect, where all you<br />

had to do was type the text you wanted to<br />

have placed at the margins, put the cursor at<br />

the point you wanted the text to split, and<br />

then choose Format, Line, Flush Right.<br />

In Word, there are two ways to do this,<br />

neither of which is ideal. The fi rst option is to<br />

use a right-aligned tab at the right-hand<br />

margin of your page. To do this, make sure the<br />

Ruler is visible by choosing the View tab of the<br />

Word ribbon, and click in the checkbox for<br />

Ruler. Click on the ruler as close as you can<br />

achieve to the right-hand margin. You’ll see a<br />

small L appear on the ribbon signifying that<br />

you’ve inserted a tab. If you’re good at<br />

⬆ You can use a right-aligned tab in Word to have text right<br />

and left aligned on the same line<br />

selecting, you can now double-click the L to<br />

open the Tabs dialog, and set the alignment to<br />

Right. If you have difficulty, open the Paragraph<br />

dialog by choosing the Home tab of the Word<br />

ribbon and clicking the ‘more’ arrow at<br />

the bottom-right of the Paragraph group.<br />

You’ll then see the Paragraph dialog.<br />

Click the Tabs button to show the<br />

Tabs dialog box, and set the right-most<br />

tab to be Right aligned.<br />

If you now enter your text, you<br />

should be able to click Tab at the point<br />

you want the text to be fl ushed, and it<br />

will move to the right. How well it is<br />

aligned with the right-hand margin will<br />

depend on where you put the tab mark.<br />

If you need more than one line of<br />

text, or you want a more perfect<br />

alignment with the margin, the other<br />

alternative is to use a two-column table.<br />

Create one column on the left that is left<br />

justified, and the other column on the<br />

right that is right justified, and that will<br />

give you the effect you want. The trick<br />

here is to remember to turn off borders<br />

for the table, so you don’t get the lines<br />

around and between the cells appearing.<br />

To do this, right-click on the table,<br />

choose Borders and Shading, and set the<br />

Setting to None. One tip: put some text into<br />

your table before doing this or you stand a<br />

good chance of losing it as it will turn invisible.<br />

Source of all knowledge<br />

I have an Excel workbook that shows data that originally came<br />

from an external source over which I have no control. The data<br />

arrives once a week, and is quite extensive. It’s also in the wrong<br />

format for my workbook. It comes in formatted like this:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

This data is repeated many times. I need to display it like this:<br />

seen by on <br />

Is it possible to automate this?<br />

Mahood Rahman<br />

You could automate it using a macro, but have you considered using<br />

a new sheet to display just the data you’re interested in? If your<br />

imported data is on Sheet1 and starts in cell A1, then on a new sheet<br />

in cell A1 you could use the OffSet function in a formula to take the<br />

data you need and display it:<br />

=OFFSET(Sheet1!$A$1,(ROW()-1)*3,) & " seen by " & OFFSET(Sheet1!<br />

$A$1,(ROW()-1)*3+1,) & " on " & OFFSET(Sheet1!$A$1,(ROW()-1)*3+2,)<br />

If you copy that formula down the sheet, you’ll get the information<br />

you want to display without needing to use a macro to delete cells and<br />

move things around. The formula is actually fairly simple, just a bit<br />

long-winded. The OffSet function can be used to refer to a cell or range<br />

of cells that are a specific number of rows and columns away from the<br />

cell reference. So you enter the cell for the reference (in this case,<br />

$A$1). The next parameter is the row offset. You can specify a row and<br />

a column offset, but we only need a row offset.<br />

The formula we’re entering is more complicated because you’re<br />

going to copy it down the page, so it needs to work whether it’s the<br />

copy in row 1, row 8, 17, or wherever. So to get the correct row offset,<br />

⬆ Use an OffSet function to retrieve data from cells in different rows in Excel<br />

you take the row number of the current row (using the ROW()<br />

function), and subtract 1 from it. This means if you’re in row 1, you get<br />

0; if you’re in row 2, you get 1, and so on. This is then multiplied by 3.<br />

Again, for the copy of the formula in row 1, this returns 0 (0*3 is 0). If<br />

you’re in row 1, this returns 3 (3*1 is 3).<br />

The second OffSet in the formula does the same thing, but adds 1<br />

to the fi nal row calculation to get the data from one row onwards, and<br />

the third copy adds 2. The only tricky bit about the third row is that it<br />

contains a date. Depending on how the data was originally entered, and<br />

how it was treated when it was imported into Excel, you might fi nd that<br />

instead of getting a result of ‘The Larches seen by Fred Bloggs on<br />

12/03/17’, you instead get ‘The Larches seen by Fred Bloggs on 42806’.<br />

If this is the case, the date was imported as an actual date, and you<br />

need to show the text representation, so the whole formula is:<br />

=OFFSET(Sheet1!$A$1,(ROW()-1)*3,) & " seen by " & OFFSET(Sheet1!<br />

$A$1,(ROW()-1)*3+1,) & " on " & TEXT(OFFSET(Sheet1!$A$1,(ROW()-<br />

1)*3+2,),"dd/mm/yy")<br />

If you copy this formula down the page, you’ll fi nd it returns the<br />

values from each set of three rows as required.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

125


Helpfile<br />

Whatever your general PC, hardware and software<br />

woes, Simon Handby is here to help<br />

Send your problems to help@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Hitting the buff ers<br />

Last year TalkTalk upgraded my ADSL<br />

broadband and phone package to<br />

include TV services as well.<br />

I was given a YouView box and a Super<br />

Router, which turned out to give better<br />

coverage and speeds than my old one.<br />

At Christmas I bought an iPad Pro.<br />

Although it connected to my router,<br />

web pages timed out while “awaiting<br />

response from server”. After digging<br />

around on the internet, I followed a<br />

suggestion to change the iPad’s DNS<br />

settings from 192.168.1.1 (my router) to<br />

8.8.8.8 (Google). Normal service<br />

seemed to be restored.<br />

TalkTalk gave me a free fi lm, which I<br />

decided to try and watch, but the<br />

YouView box kept stopping to re-buffer<br />

every 90 seconds. Again an internet<br />

search suggested I change the box’s DNS<br />

settings, which fi xed both this problem<br />

and a similar one with iPlayer.<br />

I raised these issues with TalkTalk,<br />

which said that the DNS settings should<br />

make no difference to the service, and<br />

that I should perform a factory reset on<br />

the router (on which I’ve also changed<br />

the DNS settings), and change the DNS<br />

on my devices back to automatic. As the<br />

default settings caused the issues, I’m not<br />

sure how restoring them will help.<br />

Our two iPads use the 5GHz network,<br />

while we have two Android phones and a<br />

Now TV box on the 2.4GHz band. We also<br />

have two PCs connected via Ethernet, but<br />

these are rarely turned on. Would turning<br />

off Quality of Service (QoS) help?<br />

Phil Harrison<br />

A DNS issue could certainly explain the fi rst<br />

problem you describe with internet pages<br />

timing out, but it’s less likely to be to blame<br />

for buffering issues. There should only be<br />

any DNS lookups when the stream of<br />

content is being established or if it needs<br />

to be re-established because of another,<br />

non-DNS failure. Still, the differing<br />

performance you’re getting might happen if<br />

the providers’ content delivery networks are<br />

returning different content server addresses<br />

depending on the DNS server through<br />

which you’re making the request – in other<br />

words, they’re trying to serve you fi lms from<br />

the ‘nearest’ content server, based on the<br />

DNS server you’re using. If this is the case,<br />

however, sticking with TalkTalk’s own DNS<br />

servers ought to be the best option.<br />

In your setup, you can configure the DNS<br />

addresses in three places: in the router’s own<br />

WAN (wide area network) settings; in the<br />

router’s DHCP settings; and manually on<br />

individual devices themselves. Changing either<br />

of the latter two options will cause your<br />

devices to bypass the router’s built-in DNS<br />

server and send queries directly to the address<br />

you provide. This usually isn’t ideal as it<br />

creates a small amount of extra traffic on your<br />

broadband connection, and it may be slightly<br />

slower. That said, it seems that some people<br />

have had DNS issues with the TalkTalk Super<br />

Routers, so it might be that bypassing its DNS<br />

server is fi xing the problem.<br />

We’d recommend you log into the router<br />

and make sure its Remote Management<br />

feature is enabled from the Maintain menu. If<br />

it already is, or if you enable it and the router<br />

doesn’t receive new fi rmware within a week or<br />

so, you may need to perform a factory reset<br />

to trigger an update – that’s possibly why<br />

TalkTalk suggested it. In theory, doing this –<br />

and resetting your devices so that they obtain<br />

a DNS server automatically – should leave you<br />

with the latest router fi rmware and the ‘ideal’<br />

DNS settings on your network.<br />

⬅ Adding DNS<br />

servers here<br />

causes network<br />

devices to<br />

make direct<br />

DNS lookups,<br />

bypassing<br />

your router<br />

If that doesn’t cure the streaming<br />

problem, navigate to the router’s WAN<br />

connection page, scroll down, tick the<br />

Static DNS box, enter two DNS server<br />

addresses of your choosing, save the<br />

changes and restart the router. If the<br />

problem remains, try bypassing the router<br />

by manually adding DNS servers on the<br />

DHCP page. As an aside, remember that<br />

using third-party DNS servers such as<br />

Google’s allows that third party to see the<br />

websites and services you’re visiting.<br />

If neither of those steps works, assume<br />

that DNS isn’t the problem and return the<br />

router to its ‘ideal’, post-reset settings. As<br />

your network is unlikely to be congested,<br />

QoS is unlikely to be an issue, but there’s no<br />

harm in switching this off to see if it<br />

improves things.<br />

If not, try a further test: on one of<br />

your two PCs, open the Start menu, type<br />

cmd and run Command Prompt, then<br />

type ping www.computershopper.co.uk -t<br />

and hit Enter. You should see regular<br />

replies from our web server. Leaving this<br />

running, try watching something on iPlayer.<br />

When you experience re-buffering, quickly<br />

switch to the Command Prompt and see if<br />

you’re no longer getting replies. If so, it<br />

suggests a generic connection problem,<br />

which you’ll probably need to discuss<br />

further with TalkTalk.<br />

126 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


HELPFILE<br />

A land down under<br />

I am tearing my hair out because the picture<br />

from my webcam is always upside down,<br />

whatever I do to correct it. I learnt from one<br />

local helper that if I deleted and reinstalled<br />

the driver that would cure the problem, so I<br />

did and it did: for about a week. I only use<br />

the webcam in Skype, but it’s very annoying<br />

for my friends around the world to have to<br />

view me inverted. I’m running Windows 10<br />

Home on an Asus laptop. Can you help?<br />

Brian Deller<br />

There’s a known problem with some Asus<br />

laptops, where having the wrong webcam<br />

driver causes the image to be inverted. It<br />

shouldn’t happen with models that came<br />

with Windows 8 or later, but as you don’t<br />

mention your exact model there’s a chance<br />

you’ve upgraded from Windows 7.<br />

Assuming that’s the case, you should be<br />

able to fi x the problem by opening the Start<br />

menu, searching for ‘device’, running Device<br />

Manager, and then expanding the Imaging<br />

Devices section. In here, double-click the<br />

webcam entry, select the Details tab and<br />

select Hardware IDs from the Property list<br />

box. Select the lower, shorter value, use<br />

Ctrl-C to copy it to the clipboard, then open<br />

a text document and use Ctrl-V to paste in<br />

the value for safe-keeping.<br />

Now visit www.asus.com/uk/support, use<br />

the search box to fi nd your laptop model and<br />

select Driver & Tools. Select your version of<br />

Windows 10 from the operating systems list,<br />

Steaming Java<br />

I am running Windows 7 on a desktop,<br />

which seems infected with the malware<br />

‘javaws*32’. It fi lls the Processes tab in<br />

Task Manager, and on the Performance tab<br />

the CPU activity rapidly reaches 100%.<br />

I have run Kaspersky <strong>2017</strong>, Malwarebytes<br />

Anti-Malware and the free edition of<br />

SUPERAntispyware, but they fi nd nothing.<br />

Searching Google suggests that I might use<br />

SuperRegPro or SpyHunter. Are these safe?<br />

Colin Walker<br />

The most likely issue isn’t a malware infection,<br />

which would explain why the programs you’ve<br />

tried haven’t picked up anything. Javaws.exe is<br />

a component of Java, so it’s legitimate, but a<br />

bug sometimes surfaces and causes many<br />

instances of it to run. The best plan is to<br />

uninstall Java, then re-install it only if you need<br />

it. First you might need to disable Javaws.exe.<br />

⬆ We’ve never been more sure of anything<br />

⬆ Make a note of your webcam’s hardware ID to be<br />

sure of getting the right driver<br />

or if unavailable choose the version of<br />

Windows 7 that matches your Windows 10<br />

installation (32- or 64-bit). Find and expand<br />

the Camera entry, where you’ll see more than<br />

one driver; download the one which matches<br />

the hardware ID you copied earlier.<br />

Now, from the Start menu, search for<br />

‘control’, run Control Panel, open Programs<br />

and Features, uninstall the current soft ware<br />

for your camera, then reboot the computer.<br />

On restarting, right-click the zipped driver<br />

you downloaded, select Extract all and click<br />

Extract. Depending on the type of camera you<br />

have, you’ll need to double-click the PNPINST,<br />

setup or install executable fi le to start the<br />

installation. After rebooting you should fi nd<br />

that the camera works properly again.<br />

Reboot the computer and hit F8 on startup<br />

to get the boot menu, then select Safe Mode.<br />

After booting into Safe Mode, open Explorer<br />

and navigate to C:\Program Files\Java. Here<br />

you’ll see one or more sub-folders, named for<br />

different versions of Java that may have been<br />

installed on your PC. Go into the top one, open<br />

the \bin folder within it, fi nd javaws.exe and<br />

rename it by adding ‘bak’ or ‘old’ so it becomes<br />

javaws.exe.old or similar. Repeat this in any<br />

other sub-folders of C:\Program Files\Java.<br />

Now reboot the PC normally, open the<br />

Start menu, type uninstall and click Uninstall<br />

a program. Select each entry for Java (there<br />

may only be one) and uninstall them one by<br />

one. You should now fi nd that the problem<br />

is cured. You’ll probably fi nd you can do<br />

without Java, but if needed you can reinstall<br />

it from java.com/en/download.<br />

Regarding the additional programs you<br />

mentioned, we’ve never heard of<br />

SuperRegPro and we haven’t used<br />

and can’t recommend SpyHunter.<br />

In Kaspersky, you already have<br />

our favourite anti-virus soft ware,<br />

while we often turn to<br />

Malwarebytes Anti-Malware for<br />

additional checks and cleaning.<br />

Clever<br />

booking<br />

I want to catalogue my collection of<br />

books, but it would take weeks to do<br />

manually. Is there a way I can use the<br />

webcam on my Dell N5040 laptop,<br />

which runs Windows 7, to scan the<br />

books’ barcodes? I want to produce a<br />

list of titles and other information,<br />

which I can then print out; I could add<br />

any books without barcodes manually.<br />

Brian Carter<br />

There are a few programs that might help<br />

you in a couple of ways. You can fi nd<br />

multi-purpose barcode scanner soft ware,<br />

but how these programs would handle<br />

the resulting ISBN number varies.<br />

It would be better to try a book library<br />

program with an integrated barcode<br />

scanner, such as Book Collector, available<br />

from www.collectorz.com/book. This<br />

soft ware has a free trial so you can see<br />

if it meets your needs. After a brief test<br />

it appears that the soft ware may be<br />

quite good, but that it’s difficult to<br />

position the book well enough to<br />

successfully scan the barcode; you can<br />

always type in the ISBN manually.<br />

You don’t mention a smartphone, but<br />

if you have one you might fi nd the actual<br />

scanning easier. There are several Android<br />

and iOS apps that might fi t the bill, such<br />

as My Library (Android), which is free and<br />

seems straightforward. Some soft ware<br />

lets you use both a smartphone and your<br />

computer – Book Connect, also from<br />

www.collectorz.com, is one. In all three<br />

cases the soft ware looks up the book<br />

from its ISBN number, so you only need<br />

to fi ll in any personal fi elds such as notes<br />

or whether you’ve lent it to someone.<br />

⬆ My Library is a free, simple book cataloguer<br />

for Android smartphones<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

127


Advanced<br />

Projects<br />

Clive Webster has been tinkering with computers ever since<br />

Windows 98 forced him to manually install his drivers<br />

clive@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Upgrade your laptop<br />

There are a whole host of ways you can extend the life of an old laptop,<br />

from hardware upgrades for less than £100 to free software and<br />

maintenance. Clive Webster reveals your options<br />

128 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


ADVANCED PROJECTS<br />

A NEW LAPTOP might be shinier, thinner,<br />

lighter and faster than your current one, but it<br />

will also set you back a good few hundred<br />

quid. If your laptop is still largely serviceable,<br />

you might be tempted to upgrade it rather<br />

than shell out for a whole new machine. But<br />

is it possible to upgrade a laptop and, if so,<br />

which upgrades are worth paying for and<br />

which aren’t? We have the answers.<br />

TESTING TIMES<br />

There are many ways to make an old laptop<br />

more usable, from upgrading the hardware<br />

to cleaning out unneeded soft ware. You<br />

could even ditch Windows and install a<br />

more streamlined operating system that<br />

runs quicker. We’re going to analyse each<br />

option with an old <strong>Shopper</strong> laptop to see<br />

which yields the best results, and which<br />

aren’t worth the cash or the hassle. First,<br />

we’ll concentrate on hardware upgrades,<br />

then we’ll look at free soft ware changes.<br />

For each test we compared the laptop in<br />

its original state (after six years’ hard use)<br />

with a single change. After each test we<br />

restored our Sony Vaio laptop to its original<br />

condition. We analysed the change for pure<br />

speed, and also for ‘experience’ – in other<br />

words, how quickly apps loaded and how<br />

pleasant the laptop was to use.<br />

upgrade<br />

this!<br />

PROCESSOR<br />

Unless your laptop is as<br />

thick as a novel, its processor is probably<br />

soldered to the motherboard. This saves<br />

space in thin laptops but means you can’t<br />

(or at least, shouldn’t attempt to) upgrade<br />

the processor.<br />

Even in laptops that do use a conventional<br />

processor socket, you’re severely limited on<br />

your upgrade options. The potential upgrade<br />

not only has to physically fi t the socket, it has<br />

to have the same thermal design power (TDP,<br />

or maximum heat output) as your current<br />

CPU, and the laptop’s BIOS must recognise it.<br />

Should you by some miracle fi nd a<br />

compatible processer for your laptop,<br />

you can predict the speed boost easily.<br />

Processors of the same family and number<br />

of cores perform in proportion to their<br />

⬆ Crucial’s memory compatibility tool gives you a blessedly short list of options<br />

⬆ You should be able to buy any SATA SSD to<br />

replace your laptop’s hard disk<br />

frequency: if your current processor is a<br />

2GHz model, the 2.2GHz upgrade will make<br />

your laptop 10% faster. That upgrade<br />

could cost you a few hundred quid,<br />

however, at which point a whole new<br />

laptop looks pretty attractive.<br />

upgrade<br />

this!<br />

MEMORY<br />

You’ll probably have to<br />

replace you memory rather than upgrade it,<br />

as SODIMM slots on laptops are rare. You’ll<br />

⬆ Pull the two retaining clips of your laptop’s memory apart and the SODIMM memory module should pop up<br />

probably have to buy older DDR3 memory,<br />

rather than the newer and faster DDR4 spec,<br />

and your processor might limit<br />

the amount of memory you can install<br />

(unless your laptop is very old, the<br />

memory controller will be embedded in<br />

the processor). To check your maximum<br />

memory complement, either consult Intel’s<br />

excellent ark.intel.com or AMD’s less useful<br />

products.amd.com websites.<br />

Thankfully, many memory companies<br />

take the hassle out of fi nding compatible<br />

memory. Head to uk.crucial.com and you’ll<br />

fi nd an upgrade tool, for example. For our<br />

six-year-old Sony Vaio, we were offered an<br />

8GB (2x 4GB) kit rated at 1,600MHz that<br />

costs £60. On paper, this is a decent upgrade<br />

on the 4GB (2x 2GB), 1,066MHz RAM<br />

installed in our Sony laptop.<br />

We didn’t see much improvement in<br />

outright speed from the new 1,600MHz<br />

MEMORY RESULTS<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

Image editing<br />

Video encoding<br />

Multitasking<br />

EXPERIENCE<br />

Boot<br />

Load Gimp<br />

Wake from<br />

Sleep<br />

28<br />

29<br />

39<br />

39<br />

55<br />

55<br />

0 15 30 45 60<br />

8GB memory 4GB memory<br />

18.9 secs<br />

36.8 secs<br />

2.5 secs<br />

7.5 secs<br />

71 secs<br />

83 secs<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

8GB memory<br />

Old 1080p <strong>Shopper</strong> benchmarks<br />

4GB memory<br />

LOWER IS BETTER<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

129


ADVANCED PROJECTS<br />

memory, but that was no surprise as our<br />

lowly Pentium U5400’s memory controller<br />

only runs at 800MHz; the extra frequency of<br />

both sets of memory is essentially redundant.<br />

It was in the experiential tests that we<br />

saw the advantage of the extra memory<br />

capacity: the laptop booted 12 seconds<br />

quicker and woke from Sleep mode (which<br />

saved our current session of having 1GB of<br />

photos open to memory) in 2.5 seconds<br />

rather than 7.5 seconds. The extra memory<br />

even helped to load complex apps quicker:<br />

Gimp was ready to go in 18.9 seconds<br />

rather than the ponderous 36.8 seconds<br />

with 4GB of memory installed.<br />

Upgrading the memory defi nitely made<br />

our old laptop more usable, if not actually<br />

quicker. To upgrade the memory in your<br />

laptop, unscrew the rear hatch and carefully<br />

push apart the two clips holding the<br />

SODIMM module. The SODIMM module<br />

should fl ip up, and you can then take it out.<br />

Push the new memory into the SODIMM slot<br />

– there’s a notch, so it will only go in one way<br />

round; turn the module over if the notches<br />

don’t match up – and then push it down past<br />

the two clips. The module shouldn’t be loose<br />

at all; if it is, pry the clips apart and push the<br />

module into the slot a little more fi rmly<br />

before pushing down into place.<br />

upgrade<br />

this!<br />

HARD DISK<br />

You should be able to buy<br />

any SATA SSD to replace the hard disk, but<br />

if your laptop is particularly thin you might<br />

need to consider the thickness of the SSD.<br />

You should also check that your laptop uses<br />

the standard SATA connector. If your laptop<br />

already uses an SSD, you won’t see much<br />

difference by swapping to another SSD.<br />

Again, Crucial has a tool to check for<br />

compatible upgrades: head to uk.crucial.com<br />

and enter your laptop’s details. The site<br />

⬆ The standard SATA connection groups the data and power connectors into one integrated connection<br />

HARD DISK RESULTS<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

Image editing<br />

Video encoding<br />

Multitasking<br />

0 15 30 45 60<br />

SSD Hard disk<br />

Old 1080p <strong>Shopper</strong> Benchmarks<br />

recommended a 275GB MX300 for £91.<br />

While that’s 45GB smaller than our existing<br />

320GB hard disk, the data transfer speeds are<br />

500-530MB/s, which should be much more<br />

than our six-year-old hard disk. However, the<br />

specs of our hard disk (ludicrously) claim a<br />

data transfer speed of 300MB/s.<br />

28<br />

29<br />

39<br />

39<br />

55<br />

57<br />

EXPERIENCE<br />

Boot<br />

Load Gimp<br />

Wake from<br />

Hibernate<br />

37 secs<br />

9.8 secs<br />

36.8 secs<br />

60 secs<br />

71 secs<br />

83 secs<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

SSD<br />

Hard disk<br />

LOWER IS BETTER<br />

We put this claim to the test with HD<br />

Tune (see www.hdtune.com). The laptop<br />

hard disk managed a reasonable 64.5MB/s<br />

average speed; the Crucial SSD more than<br />

doubled this with a score of 151.2MB/s.<br />

We therefore expected a big performance<br />

boost by upgrading to an SSD.<br />

⬅ ⬇ You’ll need special soft ware to clone<br />

your current installation on to a new SSD,<br />

such as Acronis True Image<br />

130 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


ADVANCED PROJECTS<br />

Again, our upgrade didn’t affect outright<br />

speed much – our images and video fi les<br />

opened a little quicker, giving a small boost to<br />

the scores – but the laptop felt much more<br />

sprightly. Gimp was ready to use in under 10<br />

seconds rather than 36.8, and the laptop<br />

booted 46 seconds quicker. The laptop woke<br />

from Hibernate (which saved our session with<br />

1GB of photos open to main storage) 11<br />

seconds quicker. However, the biggest jump<br />

was when opening those 20 high-res images:<br />

using the hard disk we had to wait 10m 55s;<br />

with the SSD we only had to wait 6m 44s.<br />

As with memory, swapping a hard disk for<br />

an SSD makes an old laptop much more<br />

pleasant to use. Launch an application and<br />

it’s ready to use in a reasonable time; open a<br />

load of images or videos and they’ll be ready<br />

within standard tea-making time.<br />

To upgrade to an SSD you’ll have to<br />

transfer your current data to it. Some SSDs<br />

are sold as either a plain drive or a kit that<br />

includes a SATA-to-USB adaptor and<br />

data-transfer soft ware to clone the contents<br />

of your old hard disk on to your new SSD.<br />

Crucial’s MX300 came with the latter but not<br />

the former, but SATA-to-USB adaptors cost<br />

as little as £6 (see shop.pimoroni.com).<br />

Merely copying your data from your hard<br />

disk to the SSD won’t work as the SSD won’t<br />

be ‘bootable’; this is why you need cloning<br />

soft ware. To start, plug your SSD into your<br />

laptop with the adaptor and then run the<br />

cloning soft ware; the options should be<br />

obvious, or else you can refer to the<br />

soft ware’s instructions online.<br />

Once done, power down the laptop and<br />

unscrew its back panel to gain access to the<br />

hard disk. It might be installed in a caddy, in<br />

which case you’ll have to remove the disk<br />

from this, screw in the SSD and then plug<br />

the whole assembly into the laptop’s SATA<br />

port. Replace the back panel, fi re up the<br />

laptop and your laptop should look exactly<br />

as it did when the hard disk was installed,<br />

but it should feel a lot quicker to use.<br />

upgrade<br />

this!<br />

BATTERY<br />

The only other hardware<br />

item to upgrade is the battery; items such as<br />

the Wi-Fi, USB ports, keyboard, trackpad<br />

and screen are either soldered into the<br />

motherboard or else too tightly integrated<br />

into the laptop’s casing.<br />

If you’re getting awful battery life, there<br />

are replacements available. For example,<br />

Sony partners with EET Europarts (see<br />

uk.eetgroup.com) where a replacement<br />

5,000mAh battery costs £219. Other outlets<br />

sell compatible batteries of even higher<br />

capacity (for longer battery life) for as little<br />

as £52. You can draw your own conclusions,<br />

but we’d worry about using a cheap battery<br />

when even some manufacturer-approved<br />

batteries prove explosive.<br />

upgrade<br />

this!<br />

OPERATING SYSTEM<br />

Windows has never had a<br />

great reputation for efficiency of code and<br />

Windows cleaning<br />

Most computer experts believe that<br />

Windows just needs a good cleanout every<br />

couple of years; many will even say you<br />

should reinstall Windows every couple of<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

Image editing<br />

55<br />

56<br />

years to keep your PC running well. Our old<br />

39<br />

Video encoding<br />

Sony laptop runs Windows 7, so we tested<br />

39<br />

the laptop in its current clogged and abused<br />

28<br />

state, and then reinstalled Windows and<br />

Multitasking<br />

32<br />

tested the laptop ‘box-fresh’.<br />

Considering the hassle of installing<br />

Windows from scratch – including the 1GB<br />

Fresh Windows install<br />

Windows Update update, the 7.4GB Service<br />

Pack 1 (see tinyurl.com/353projects), further<br />

Windows updates and all your favourite applications and essential data – the marginal<br />

increases in speed aren’t worth it.<br />

⬇ Replacement laptop batteries<br />

aren’t cheap, but if you do<br />

buy one make sure you get a<br />

manufacturer-approved model<br />

hardware use, so we compared a fresh<br />

Windows 7 install against a fresh Linux Mint<br />

install (see linuxmint.com). We used the<br />

64-bit Xfce version of Mint as it’s designed<br />

for slow and old hardware. We’ve covered<br />

how to install and use Mint before in<br />

Advanced Projects, <strong>Shopper</strong> 341, so we’ll<br />

move straight on to our fi ndings.<br />

We’re unimpressed by Mint’s Hibernation<br />

feature in all respects: there’s no visual<br />

feedback that the system is even attempting<br />

to hibernate – it just freezes and then turns<br />

off after a while, and then takes too long to<br />

wake back up. However, Sleep mode is<br />

excellent, as the laptop quickly shuts down<br />

and wakes in two seconds rather than the<br />

6.8-second wait for Windows to wake.<br />

However, it’s when using soft ware that<br />

Mint really excels: Gimp loaded in 8.2<br />

seconds and opened our 20 high-res<br />

images in a further 3m 10s; on Windows we<br />

OS RESULTS<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

Boot<br />

Load Gimp<br />

Wake from<br />

Hibernate<br />

Wake from<br />

Sleep<br />

8.2 secs<br />

32.2 secs<br />

2.1 secs<br />

6.8 secs<br />

48 secs<br />

52 secs<br />

76 secs<br />

67 secs<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Linux Mint Windows 7<br />

LOWER IS BETTER<br />

had to wait 32.2s for Gimp to load and then a<br />

further 10m 31s for the same images to open.<br />

Considering that Mint is free and provides a<br />

very similar look and feel to Windows, it’s a<br />

great option to squeeze the last few years of<br />

life from an old laptop.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Ditching Windows<br />

for an Xfce fl avour<br />

of Linux is an<br />

excellent way<br />

to make an<br />

old laptop<br />

more useful.<br />

If you’re not quite<br />

ready for Linux, we’ve found that<br />

4GB of memory isn’t really enough for<br />

Windows. Upgrading to 8GB of memory<br />

makes an old laptop more bearable to use,<br />

with fewer slowdowns and quicker<br />

application load times.<br />

An SSD provides a more noticeable<br />

all-round boost, and with 120GB SSDs<br />

costing as little as £50, it’s a great upgrade.<br />

Our 275GB Crucial MX300 only costs £91 if<br />

you need more storage.<br />

NEXT MONTH<br />

0 15 30 45 60<br />

Old Windows install<br />

Old 1080p <strong>Shopper</strong> Benchmarks<br />

BE MORE SECURE ONLINE<br />

We reveal some low-cost and free VPNs<br />

to keep you safer when you’re surfing<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

131


Multimedia<br />

Expert<br />

Photographer, musician, sound engineer, designer and video<br />

producer Ben Pitt guides you through a multimedia project<br />

ben@computershopper.co.uk<br />

Create drum<br />

loops from<br />

household<br />

objects<br />

Why settle for samey<br />

drum sounds when your<br />

house is full of stuff to<br />

hit, shake, rattle and<br />

roll? Ben Pitt reveals<br />

how to make music<br />

from everyday objects<br />

132 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


MULTIMEDIA EXPERT<br />

⬆ Keep the microphone close to the sound source to minimise background noises and try different angles to see what sounds best<br />

MUSIC PRODUCERS TAKE drum sounds<br />

very seriously. Many modern musical genres<br />

are defi ned by their drum production: the<br />

speeded-up samples of drum’n’bass or the<br />

electronic thuds and clicks of techno.<br />

Ultimately, though, a drum kit is a collection<br />

of objects that make a thud, crack or pinging<br />

noise when hit with a stick. Most objects<br />

make similar noises when hit with a stick, so<br />

why limit yourself? From saucepans and wine<br />

glasses to foot stamps and fi nger clicks,<br />

there’s no shortage of source material in your<br />

own home. It may not sound as polished as an<br />

expertly recorded drum kit, but it’s a lot less<br />

expensive, more fun and might be just the<br />

thing to liven up your recordings.<br />

It’s also very much in vogue to create drum<br />

recordings from unconventional sources. Listen<br />

to today’s chart music and you’ll notice a lot<br />

of songs use abstract sounds that serve the<br />

same function as a conventional drum kit but<br />

have been created by more experimental means.<br />

PICK YOUR INSTRUMENTS<br />

Hitting a block of concrete with a mallet will<br />

produce a bone-shaking thud, but by the<br />

time you’ve recorded it and played it back<br />

on speakers, it will probably sound more<br />

like a nondescript clunk.<br />

A mallet on concrete sounds loud because<br />

it is physically very loud. That’s irrelevant<br />

when recording because you can make sounds<br />

as loud or as quiet as you like, up to the<br />

chosen volume of the listener’s speakers.<br />

What we need here are sounds that are<br />

full-bodied and rich with resonance.<br />

Concrete sounds boring because a slab of<br />

concrete doesn’t have much internal structure<br />

– it’s just a solidified soup of cement and<br />

broken rocks. Wood, on the other hand, has<br />

a grain that makes it more rigid in some<br />

directions than others. That means sound<br />

waves tend to travel up and down wood in a<br />

more organised fashion, and that’s what gives<br />

it more of a pitched ‘thonk’ rather than a<br />

lifeless thud when hit. The wooden bars of a<br />

xylophone have been carefully carved to have<br />

a specific pitch. They ring out for about a<br />

second because they’re suspended on metal<br />

pins. The less contact there is between the<br />

wooden bar and the thing that’s supporting it,<br />

the less sound energy is soaked up. Put your<br />

hand on a xylophone bar and the energy is<br />

quickly absorbed, deadening the sound.<br />

A wine glass has a highly structured<br />

shape, and if you hold it by the base, there’s<br />

very little to soak up the sound vibrations<br />

as they cycle around the top of glass. That’s<br />

why a wine glass has a very clear pitch that<br />

rings for a few seconds.<br />

Objects that are hollow will have a<br />

discernible pitch, as the sound waves<br />

bounce from side to side in the hollow<br />

interior. The contents of kitchen cupboards<br />

are a great resource for this, but vases, toys<br />

and even cardboard boxes can work as well.<br />

The sound of an object will vary greatly<br />

depending on how you hold it, where you hit<br />

it and with what. For example, tapping a<br />

saucepan with a teaspoon will give a highfrequency<br />

‘ping’, whereas using a wooden<br />

spoon or rolling pin will give a fuller-bodied<br />

‘bong’. Moving your makeshift beater around<br />

the pan will give varying results, too.<br />

This is useful for fi nding the most<br />

interesting noise, but it’s also worth capturing<br />

this variety for its own sake. Using eight subtly<br />

different sounds in your four-bar drum loop<br />

will bring it to life compared to repeating the<br />

same sample over and over again.<br />

RECORDING<br />

The real challenge isn’t so much what to use<br />

as makeshift instruments, but how to record<br />

them. The aim is to record these sounds with<br />

as much clarity as possible and without any<br />

extraneous sounds, but there are lots of<br />

pitfalls to contend with.<br />

First, you’ll need a decent quality<br />

microphone. A single microphone is OK, but<br />

a stereo pair is better as it will help your<br />

recordings fi ll the speakers for a larger-thanlife<br />

sound. Most musicians already own a<br />

microphone that plugs into a computer. If you<br />

don’t have something suitable, consider a<br />

handheld standalone recorder. These devices<br />

cost from around £70 and include stereo<br />

microphones, precise level metering, an SD<br />

card slot and headphone socket. Tascam,<br />

Zoom and Olympus are respected brands in<br />

this fi eld. Having a portable device makes it<br />

much easier to wander around the home and<br />

elsewhere looking for sounds. The downside<br />

is that you can’t build up multitrack<br />

performances as you record. For that, you’ll<br />

need to use a regular microphone and audio<br />

interface, and record directly into your<br />

music-production soft ware.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

133


MULTIMEDIA EXPERT<br />

⬅ Zoom right into the waveform to<br />

trim the start of each hit<br />

⬇ Arranging each sound on its own<br />

track means you can give each one<br />

different mixer settings<br />

It’s essential to monitor with<br />

headphones as you record so you<br />

can hear how changing the<br />

microphone and beater positions<br />

varies the sound. It’s also important<br />

to make sure your recordings aren’t<br />

being spoiled by background sounds.<br />

Recording percussive sounds is<br />

tricky because the initial part of the<br />

sound, known as the transient, is<br />

very loud compared to the tail of<br />

the sound, known as the decay.<br />

When you come to use these<br />

recordings, you’ll probably want to<br />

use compressor effects to make the<br />

transients quieter and the decays<br />

louder. However, that will also mean<br />

you’ll make any other sounds in the<br />

room louder too. Once you put on<br />

headphones, you’ll soon realise just how noisy<br />

the average home is: distant traffic, central<br />

heating, fridges, other people in the house and<br />

your own breathing are all there to spoil your<br />

recordings. Sound refl ections in the room can<br />

be a problem, and the recording device itself<br />

will also produce a certain amount of noise.<br />

To minimise sound refl ections, record in a<br />

room with soft furnishings such as a sofa or<br />

mattress. Kitchens tend to be full of hard,<br />

shiny objects, and the resulting room<br />

acoustics are very lively and recordings sound<br />

very much like they were made in a kitchen. It<br />

might not be that noticeable, but move to the<br />

living room and you’ll fi nd that the recordings<br />

become much cleaner and drier.<br />

To minimise other noises, you’ll need to<br />

record the object nice and loud so you can<br />

turn down the recording level. If the unwanted<br />

noises are at a fi xed level, the lower the<br />

recording volume, the lower those noises<br />

appear in the recording. You can make the<br />

desired sound louder either by hitting it harder<br />

or moving it closer to the microphone. Turn<br />

down the volume and then move the object as<br />

close to the microphone as it will reasonably<br />

go. This works particularly well for stereo<br />

microphones, as the close proximity will<br />

ensure that the left and right microphones will<br />

pick up significantly different sounds, helping<br />

the recording to fi ll the stereo stage.<br />

Strike the object and look at the recording<br />

level meters. They should peak at about -6dB,<br />

ensuring you’re not distorting the transient<br />

but capturing the decay with plenty of detail.<br />

Most standalone recorders, audio interfaces<br />

and soft ware support 24-bit recording, and it’s<br />

well worth using this to capture lots of detail.<br />

Create a separate fi le for each object you<br />

record, and verbally introduce each one at the<br />

start of the recording. This makes it easier to<br />

organise your fi les later. Try lots of ideas, but<br />

once you fi nd something that really works, get<br />

lots of variety for that particular sound.<br />

EDITING<br />

Now you have lots of raw material, the next<br />

challenge is to organise it into something<br />

resembling music. It’s useful to rename the<br />

fi les so you can quickly fi nd what you need.<br />

There are various ways to convert raw<br />

recordings into drum patterns. The simplest<br />

is to drop them directly into your musicproduction<br />

soft ware, use the Split or Scissor<br />

tool to chop them into individual beats and<br />

drag them into place to create a rhythm.<br />

Arrange each type of sound on its own track<br />

so you can give them different mixer settings.<br />

If you’re using Cubase and want to save<br />

some time, check out the Hitpoints feature in<br />

the Sample Editor, which automatically slices<br />

audio objects into individual percussive<br />

sounds and creates Regions from them. It can<br />

save time but is a little fi ddly to get to grips<br />

with, so use the manual to get up and running.<br />

Snapping functions will help you lock<br />

individual drum hits to the tempo. Most<br />

editors’ snapping functions offer a choice of<br />

absolute or relative modes. Absolute means<br />

the beginning of an audio object will snap to<br />

the downbeats or whatever resolution you<br />

choose; 8th or 16th beats is usually best for<br />

drum patterns. Relative mode will move<br />

objects by fi xed amounts, so if it’s slightly in<br />

front or behind the beat, it will stay in front<br />

134 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


MULTIMEDIA EXPERT<br />

Once you put on some<br />

headphones, you’ll soon<br />

realise just how noisy the<br />

average home is<br />

or behind by the same amount when it’s<br />

moved to a different beat. Keeping everything<br />

neatly arranged on the quantise grid can work<br />

well, but it may sound more natural and<br />

interesting to add a little variety to the timing.<br />

As we mentioned earlier, it’s also worth using<br />

variations of the same sound rather than one<br />

sample repeatedly in a drum loop.<br />

However successfully you’ve managed to<br />

minimise background noise, there will always<br />

be a little. If your recording soft ware lets you<br />

fade individual audio objects in and out, use<br />

these controls to fade out at the end of the<br />

decay so it fades to complete silence.<br />

Another method is to use a gate effect.<br />

This mutes the track when the volume is<br />

below a certain level, only letting the louder<br />

sounds through. Set the Threshold control to<br />

allow the sounds you want and mute the noise<br />

in the gaps. Adjust the Release control to set<br />

how quickly the gate closes, giving a natural<br />

decay rather than an abrupt stop. The Attack<br />

control sets how quickly it opens, and for<br />

percussion sounds it should be zero unless you<br />

want to soft en the attack as a creative effect.<br />

MANIC COMPRESSION<br />

Compression effects reduce the volume of<br />

louder parts of a sound, so when you turn the<br />

whole thing up again, the loud transients are<br />

back where they were and the decays are<br />

louder and fuller sounding. Compressors have<br />

Threshold, Ratio, Attack and Release controls;<br />

the threshold should be set to catch just the<br />

transients – typically around -12dB – the<br />

attack should be zero and the release should<br />

be around 100ms. The Ratio control sets how<br />

much the sound is attenuated by, with higher<br />

values giving a stronger effect.<br />

Cubase’s Channel Strip controls include a<br />

compressor, and also has something called an<br />

Envelope Shaper. This works on a similar<br />

principle but offers simpler controls, allowing<br />

you to adjust the attack and decay using a<br />

single control for each.<br />

EQ is likely to see a lot of use. Because<br />

these sounds aren’t designed to be<br />

instruments, they’re likely to need some<br />

significant tweaking to sit in the mix. Kick<br />

sounds tend to benefi t from a big boost at<br />

around 80Hz to give them punch and weight.<br />

Apply a boost at around 200Hz to fi ll out<br />

snare sounds, and cut the middle frequencies<br />

to thin out hi-hat sounds.<br />

Another handy trick is to add a bit of<br />

distortion. You might not want the abrasive<br />

sound of full-on distortion, but tube emulation<br />

and tape saturation effects are great for<br />

adding some extra oomph and presence to<br />

sounds. These effects aren’t so common in<br />

Do try this at home<br />

Percussion tracks don’t have to be based on kicks, snares and<br />

hi-hats, but it’s often useful to have sounds broadly in these<br />

territories. Here are a few ideas to replicate these sounds with<br />

objects you’ll fi nd around the home<br />

KICK DRUM<br />

This should have a sharp, clearly defi ned<br />

initial transient followed by a deep,<br />

full-bodied decay.<br />

Stamping feet on a wooden fl oor<br />

Slamming a door<br />

Banging table or chair legs on the fl oor<br />

Hitting a cavity wall with the palm of<br />

your hand<br />

Bouncing a football or basketball<br />

Punching a sofa or bean bag<br />

Hitting a large, empty plastic box with a<br />

rolling pin<br />

SNARE DRUM<br />

Real snare drums vary widely depending<br />

on what they’re made of and how they’re<br />

tuned, but broadly speaking they’re a<br />

wide-frequency, non-pitched burst of<br />

noise. This is relatively tricky to replicate,<br />

but various household objects can make<br />

viable stand-ins.<br />

Striking a baking tray with a<br />

wooden spoon<br />

Quickly crushing a plastic packaging tray<br />

Popping bubble wrap (a sharp twist will<br />

pop lots at the same time)<br />

Claps and fi nger clicks<br />

Slapping yourself on the tummy gives a<br />

similar sound to a clap but with a<br />

fuller-bodied decay<br />

Rattling jewellery emulates the snares<br />

(the thin springs) on the underside of<br />

a snare drum<br />

HI-HAT<br />

Real hi-hats are short, non-pitched ticks,<br />

but you could go for something more<br />

like the pitched ring of a triangle.<br />

Tapping cutlery together<br />

Clinking bottles together<br />

Tapping crockery and glassware<br />

with cutlery<br />

Slapping a drinks coaster on to a table<br />

or work surface<br />

CRASH CYMBAL<br />

Crashes are a long, bright blast of noise.<br />

Please be careful when working with<br />

electricity, water and boiling oil!<br />

Putting food into a hot frying pan<br />

Opening a bottle of fi zzy drink<br />

Quickly emptying a bucket of water<br />

into a bath<br />

A running tap (the sound is constant<br />

but you can turn it into a percussive<br />

decay in soft ware)<br />

TAMBOURINE<br />

The unsung hero of the percussion<br />

section, a tambourine performance<br />

can really lift a track and give it<br />

groove and swing. It’s best to<br />

perform a loop rather than capture<br />

single shakes in isolation. on.<br />

Pepper grinder<br />

Jar of dried seeds (nutmeg,<br />

juniper berries)<br />

Jam jar fi lled with dried pasta<br />

Plastic bottle fi lled with gravel<br />

Scraping a hairbrush<br />

or comb<br />

Metal chain<br />

Children’s toy cupboards are a rich<br />

resource, both for toy instruments and<br />

random objects that make an interesting<br />

sound. Don’t neglect your beatbox skills –<br />

your mouth can produce an incredible<br />

array of noises, so just make a racket and<br />

choose the best ones later.<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

135


MULTIMEDIA EXPERT<br />

⬅ Enthusiastic use of EQ will give sounds<br />

more presence and power<br />

⬇ Cubase’s Channel Strip has lots of useful<br />

tools for strengthening the mix<br />

consumer-oriented recording soft ware but<br />

they do appear in Cubase’s (including the<br />

entry-level Cubase Elements) Channel Strip.<br />

SAMPLING<br />

You can get extra mileage from sounds by<br />

pitching them up or down. Sounds become<br />

bigger and boomier when slowed down<br />

and snappier when pitched up. If you<br />

have sounds with a clearly defi ned pitch,<br />

adjusting them so they’re in tune with the<br />

track can make a huge difference.<br />

Most recording soft ware will let you adjust<br />

the pitch of recordings on the timeline, but<br />

they tend to use pitch-shift algorithms to<br />

change the pitch while maintaining the original<br />

timing. That is useful when you’re working<br />

with rhythmic performances, but for single<br />

percussive hits it’s<br />

not so important to<br />

maintain the timing.<br />

Simply playing the<br />

recording slower or<br />

faster will change the<br />

pitch and timing<br />

together, and this gives<br />

cleaner results than<br />

pitch-shift algorithms.<br />

The best way to achieve this is to load the<br />

sounds into a sampler and trigger them using<br />

MIDI notes. Cubase Elements comes with a<br />

drum sampler instrument called Groove Agent<br />

One. It includes various off-the-shelf sampled<br />

kits, but you can use your own samples too.<br />

Trim the samples to size, either on the timeline<br />

or by creating Regions in the Sample Editor<br />

module, and drag and drop them directly on to<br />

Groove Agent One’s drum pads. Click a drum<br />

pad to select it and use the control marked<br />

Coarse to adjust the pitch. There are various<br />

other functions available here too, such as to<br />

fi lter the frequencies, and trim the start and<br />

end points of the sample. You can then perform<br />

the drum pattern with a MIDI keyboard or<br />

draw MIDI notes using the MIDI editor.<br />

⬆ Groove Agent One is a sampling drum machine that lets you perform your sounds with a MIDI keyboard<br />

136 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


MULTIMEDIA EXPERT<br />

⬆ Sampler Tracks are new to Cubase 9 (Elements, Artist and Pro), and make it easy to turn any recording into a MIDI instrument<br />

Groove Agent One is designed for drums,<br />

so it has a different sample for each MIDI key.<br />

Other samplers are designed for pitched<br />

instruments, and lay a single sample out<br />

across the keyboard so you can play it at<br />

different pitches.<br />

Cubase’s new Sampler Track function,<br />

introduced in version 9, makes this easy.<br />

Right-click the track header area and select<br />

Add Track, Sampler, and drop an audio<br />

recording on to the sampler instrument that<br />

appears. The only snag is that pre-trimmed<br />

audio objects will need to be trimmed again,<br />

as this instrument reverts to the full audio fi le.<br />

CREATIVE DECISIONS<br />

It’s up to you how far you want to go in<br />

emulating a real drum kit. Experimental<br />

musicians often throw convention out of the<br />

window and let the sounds live in their own<br />

sonic space. Matthew Herbert’s album Plat Du<br />

Jour and Matmos’s The Rose Has Teeth in the<br />

Mouth of a Beast are extreme examples of this.<br />

Compare this to many tracks on recent albums<br />

by Beyoncé, which sound as if they contain<br />

kick, snare and hi-hat patterns but rarely use<br />

real drums to create the sounds in question.<br />

Consider combining both DIY drum sounds<br />

and conventional kits. It’s often helpful to mix<br />

a real kick drum in with a homemade sound<br />

to give it a bit more welly. Roll off the high<br />

frequencies of the real kick drum so it sits<br />

behind your DIY sound in the mix.<br />

Don’t overcrowd the timeline with too<br />

many events. We have a bad habit of<br />

creating a single element that stands on its<br />

own rhythmically, and then layering other<br />

elements that compete for space in the mix.<br />

It’s better to start with an idea for a rhythm<br />

and then use four or fi ve sounds that fi t<br />

together to perform that rhythm. Try to<br />

create loops of four, eight or 16 bars rather<br />

than short cycles of one or two bars. You<br />

might even just throw some sounds together<br />

at random and see what works. Sometimes<br />

it’s the idea that you’d never have thought of<br />

that is the most interesting.<br />

Everyone has their own preferred way of<br />

making music, but we fi nd it’s often helpful<br />

to separate composition from production.<br />

While it’s useful to experiment to hone your<br />

production skills, a drum pattern made from<br />

household objects won’t necessarily be a great<br />

piece of music. Write a song or come up with<br />

a musical idea fi rst, and then use these<br />

techniques to bring that idea to life.<br />

NEXT MONTH<br />

⬆ Cubase’s Hitpoints feature will automatically split audio fi les into individual percussion hits<br />

MACRO PHOTOGRAPHY<br />

Discover life in miniature as we look<br />

at the equipment and techniques<br />

involved in macro photography<br />

ISSUE 353 | COMPUTER SHOPPER | JULY <strong>2017</strong><br />

137


PARTING SHOTS<br />

Zygote<br />

There’s a real buzz of excitement in the air this month, as Zygote investigates<br />

the privacy reverberations of a Bluetooth-enabled sex toy<br />

INSIDE INFORMATION<br />

Zygote often wonders why folk<br />

singers stick a fi nger in their ear<br />

when they perform. Perhaps they<br />

are waxing lyrical. Now, thanks<br />

to some juvenile entrepreneurs,<br />

we can use our index fi nger to<br />

make a phone call.<br />

Innomdle is a Korean fi rm<br />

founded by 10 young enthusiasts,<br />

so young in fact that their<br />

company name means ‘dudes’ in<br />

their language. To develop their<br />

fi nger-phone idea they needed<br />

$50,000, and thanks to the<br />

crowd-funding site Kickstarter<br />

they have not only reached their<br />

goal but far exceeded it. In fact,<br />

they’ve managed to raise a<br />

million and a half bucks. Their<br />

gizmo is embedded in a smart<br />

watchstrap and it uses the bones<br />

of a human wrist and index fi nger<br />

to amplify a phone call from<br />

Bluetooth-enabled devices. So<br />

next time you see someone<br />

babbling with their fi nger in their<br />

ear, they may not be entirely mad.<br />

On the other hand, an<br />

example of sticking your oar in<br />

where it’s not wanted can be<br />

found with the We-Vibe sex toy.<br />

The 4-Plus Vibrator is controlled<br />

by an app that “allows couples to<br />

keep their fl ame ignited, together<br />

or apart”. Unfortunately the app<br />

has little or no security, which<br />

means anyone within range can<br />

seize control of the delinquent<br />

dildo and launch what amounts<br />

to a sexual assault. What’s more,<br />

the We-Vibe 4-Plus collects user<br />

data and transmits it to the<br />

Standard Innovation Corporation,<br />

at 1130 Morrison Drive, Ottawa,<br />

Canada. This inside information<br />

includes location, frequency of<br />

use, vibration intensity and the<br />

temperature of the anatomy<br />

involved. But Zygote is most<br />

reassured to learn that lawyers<br />

are “looking into it”.<br />

humans. After watching hours of<br />

BBC talking heads on programmes<br />

like Newsnight and Question Time,<br />

the automaton now instantly<br />

recognises thousands of silent<br />

words and phrases with an<br />

accuracy four times greater than<br />

professional lip-readers.<br />

Unlike its human counterparts,<br />

it also benefi ts from predictive<br />

text soft ware. For example, it<br />

knows the exact frequency that<br />

the word ‘Brexit’ is likely to be<br />

followed by the word ‘chaos’, so<br />

is one jump ahead of the<br />

televised speaker before the<br />

words have even been uttered.<br />

And the soft ware can only get<br />

smarter. Soon it will progress from<br />

supplying subtitles for televised<br />

speech, and be able to tackle live<br />

situations. This will be extremely<br />

useful to the security services<br />

weeding out wrong ’uns in<br />

crowded places, not to mention<br />

trying to order a round of drinks<br />

on pension day at Wetherspoons.<br />

INVISIBLE INK<br />

Charmaine Sharp herds cows for<br />

a living near Melbourne, in the<br />

Australian state of Victoria. She<br />

uses a simple inkjet printer so<br />

infrequently that it can take her<br />

10 months to get through a<br />

single ink cartridge.<br />

Two years ago, Mrs Sharp<br />

started to get sales calls from a<br />

local printer company called<br />

Corporate Office Supplies. They<br />

became so frequent and so<br />

insistent that for the sake of a<br />

quiet life she eventually agreed<br />

to buy 56 cartridges. And that’s<br />

when things spiralled totally out<br />

of control. Corporate Office<br />

Supplies forced another 1,984 ink<br />

cartridges on her, which at her<br />

rate of consumption will last for<br />

the next 1,650 years. They then<br />

sent in the debt collectors for the<br />

equivalent of fi ft y thousand quid.<br />

Zygote is pleased to report<br />

that the Victorian Civil Tribunal<br />

has just ordered the rogues to<br />

pay out a substantial amount of<br />

compensation and for the<br />

company to be investigated by<br />

the consumer affairs watchdog,<br />

stating that “any business that<br />

sells over 2,000 cartridges to<br />

someone who owns one printer<br />

has acted unlawfully. They may<br />

as well have said Mrs Sharp<br />

agreed to buy the Sydney<br />

Harbour Bridge.”<br />

BEDDY BUYS<br />

Shipments of the world’s fi rst<br />

self-making bed are about to<br />

arrive, and it’s a bargain at only<br />

£225 plus delivery charges.<br />

Actually, it’s not the entire bed<br />

that makes itself, just the<br />

computerised duvet, which is<br />

probably why it’s called the<br />

Smartduvet. And it’s not really a<br />

computerised duvet, just a<br />

plastic inflatable grid that slips<br />

inside your existing duvet cover.<br />

There’s a little blower, which can<br />

be controlled by a timer app, in<br />

case you need to talk to your<br />

duvet from a distance and tell it<br />

to prepare for beddy-byes.<br />

Anyway, the marketing<br />

information says it is ideal for<br />

people suffering from a<br />

physical or mental condition<br />

that leaves them incapable of<br />

working out how to spread<br />

out a duvet on their own.<br />

Otherwise known as ‘men’.<br />

HAPPY CLAPPY<br />

<strong>Computer</strong>ised bog-roll dispensers<br />

have been installed in China’s<br />

biggest public toilet, at the<br />

Temple of Heaven in Beijing.<br />

The Chinese Poo Police have<br />

become increasingly concerned<br />

that visitors are nicking vast<br />

quantities of arse-wipes from the<br />

municipal facility for use in the<br />

privies of their own home.<br />

Now, before defecation can<br />

take place, they have to remove<br />

head coverings and glasses, and<br />

undergo a facial scan. If the<br />

machine doesn’t match their<br />

mugshot with a previous scan in<br />

its data fi les, then it grudgingly<br />

dispenses six statutory squares<br />

of loo paper. But if the machine<br />

does spot a persistent plopper,<br />

then they must turn the other<br />

cheek for nine minutes before<br />

they can get another six sheets.<br />

Which will wipe the smile off<br />

their face, if nothing else.<br />

REED BY LIMPS<br />

Watch your language, because<br />

deep in the bowels of Oxford<br />

University’s Department of<br />

Engineering there’s a computer<br />

that can lip-read better than<br />

138 JULY <strong>2017</strong> | COMPUTER SHOPPER | ISSUE 353


ENTER ANEW DIMENSION IN GAMING<br />

SILVER CROW<br />

Silver Crow G-Master GB2783QSU<br />

2560<br />

x<br />

1440<br />

Panel<br />

Response time<br />

Features<br />

Inputs<br />

Audio<br />

Height adjustment<br />

TN LED / 2560x1440, QHD<br />

1 ms, 60Hz<br />

FreeSync, OverDrive, Black Tuner,<br />

Blue Light Reducer, Predefined and<br />

Custom Gaming Modes<br />

DVI-D, HDMI, DisplayPort<br />

speakers and headhpone connector<br />

13 cm<br />

gmaster.iiyama.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!