16.11.2012 Views

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Association for Medical Education in Europe<br />

Medical Education<br />

and Standards at a<br />

Time of Change<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong><br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

and<br />

2001<br />

Abstracts<br />

2-5 September 2001<br />

Charité, Humboldt University<br />

BERLIN, GERMANY<br />

Humbolt University<br />

Zu <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Gesellschaft für Medizinische<br />

Ausbildung (GMA)<br />

President:<br />

Professor M Barón-Maldonado<br />

General Secretary:<br />

Professor R M Harden<br />

Administrator:<br />

Mrs Pat Lilley<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Office<br />

University of Dundee<br />

Tay Park House<br />

484 Perth Road<br />

Dundee DD2 1LR<br />

Scotland, UK<br />

Tel: +44 (0)1382 631953<br />

Fax: +44 (0)1382 645748<br />

E-mail: amee@dundee.ac.uk


Contents<br />

Welcome from the <strong>Berlin</strong> students to visiting students .. iii<br />

Local Organising Committee .. .. .. iii<br />

Welcome from Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado,<br />

President of <strong>AMEE</strong> .. .. .. .. iv<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Executive Committee .. .. .. v<br />

List of sponsors .. .. .. .. v<br />

Section 1: General Information about <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

and the Conference Venue<br />

General information about <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> and how to get there .. .. .. .. 1.1<br />

Some local information .. .. .. 1.1<br />

General information about the Conference<br />

How to get to Campus Virchow Klinikum .. .. 1.4<br />

Some general information .. .. .. 1.4<br />

Registration information .. .. .. 1.8<br />

Information about the Academic <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Plenary presentations .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Large group sessions .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Short communications .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Information for presenters .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Audio-visuals .. .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Information for the chairperson .. .. 1.10<br />

Information for the opening discussant .. .. 1.10<br />

Poster presentations.. .. .. .. 1.11<br />

Information for presenters .. .. .. 1.11<br />

Information for the chairperson .. .. 1.12<br />

Medical Teacher Poster Prize .. .. .. 1.12<br />

Workshops .. .. .. .. 1.12<br />

Pre-Conference .. .. .. .. 1.12<br />

Conference .. .. .. .. 1.12<br />

<strong>Programme</strong> Overview .. .. .. 1.13<br />

Personal Diary .. .. .. .. 1.15<br />

List of Exhibitors .. .. .. .. 1.16<br />

- i -


Section 2: The Academic <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Saturday 1 September .. .. .. 2.1<br />

Sunday 2 September .. .. .. 2.2<br />

Monday 3 September .. .. .. 2.4<br />

Tuesday 4 September .. .. .. 2.15<br />

Wednesday 5 September .. .. .. 2.28<br />

Section 3: Conference Social <strong>Programme</strong>, Tours<br />

and Accommodation<br />

Section 4: Abstracts<br />

- ii -


Welcome from Students<br />

We, the students of the Charité, Medical Faculty of the Humboldt-University in <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

look forward to welcoming you to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Conference. We want you to enjoy your<br />

stay in <strong>Berlin</strong> and will do all we can to help.<br />

We invite you to join us for a free dinner on Monday night in our beautiful ‘lecture-hall<br />

ruin’. This is the old pathology lecture-hall that was partly destroyed during WW II,<br />

has been rebuilt and is now being used for social events. This is intended as an alternative<br />

to the River Cruise in the official social programme and we hope that it will be a good<br />

opportunity to get to know each other and to make new friends. Places are limited, and<br />

we need to know in advance who is interested in joining in (students only, please!).<br />

We are also planning to organize a pub-crawl on Saturday night for all the people who<br />

arrive early. Please contact us if you’re interested in a guided tour of the <strong>Berlin</strong> nightlife.<br />

We are trying hard to find inexpensive accommodation with local students or - if there<br />

are not enough places available - in youth hostels. At the moment we are searching for<br />

local students, who are able to accommodate you and offer you a breakfast during the<br />

conference for a small contribution of 50 DM (about 15£). However we cannot guarantee<br />

that we will be able to place everybody. Therefore, if you decide to attend the conference<br />

and want to be placed in private accommodation, please let us know as early as possible<br />

(email: below), so that we can add you to the accommodation list. Please tell us your<br />

name, sex, email, address, the day of arrival and departure and if you want to attend the<br />

dinner on Monday (free of charge!)!! Please send your e-mail to:<br />

student.amee@charite.de and note: “<strong>AMEE</strong> Accommodation application” in the reference.<br />

We look forward to meeting you.<br />

Local Organising Committee<br />

Professor Joachim Dudenhausen Professor Gerhard Gaedicke<br />

Professor Ingrid Reisinger Professor Ulrich Schwantes<br />

Professor Walter Burger Dr Bernd-Dieter Bohne<br />

Professor Dieter Scheffner Professor Florian Eitel (Munich)<br />

Local Administration:<br />

Dipl. phil. Burkhard Danz<br />

Charité<br />

Referat Studienangelegenheiten<br />

KW: <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Schumannstraße 20/21 Tel.: 49 30 450 57 60 91 (42)<br />

10098 <strong>Berlin</strong> Fax: 49 30 450 57 69 21<br />

Germany Email: burkhard.danz@charite.de<br />

- iii -


Welcome from President of <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Dear <strong>AMEE</strong> Members and Conference Participants:<br />

On behalf of <strong>AMEE</strong> I should like to welcome you to the <strong>Berlin</strong> 2001 Conference. The<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> annual conference is a focal point of the year, where members and non-members<br />

alike can meet to share ideas and to discuss problems and challenges facing them in<br />

their efforts to develop and improve medical and health care professions education in<br />

their institution. This year we have over 650 participants from 45 countries, more than<br />

ever before. Many are regular <strong>AMEE</strong> conference attendees, but every year we are<br />

pleased to see so many new faces who are keen to participate in what has become a<br />

major meeting in the medical education calendar.<br />

The main topic of this Conference “Medical Education and Standards at a Time of<br />

Change” fits very much in time and space. The international community devoted to<br />

improving medical education is looking for standards that could guarantee the training<br />

of professionals to meet health and social needs across country boundaries; therefore to<br />

find ways of overviewing those standards from a transnational standpoint, without<br />

losing sight of local needs, is more than timely at the beginning of the third millennium.<br />

The city of <strong>Berlin</strong> has undergone spectacular changes in just a few short years and is<br />

still adapting to new times, new roles and new circumstances. <strong>Berlin</strong> offers a suitable<br />

context in which to present views and experiences on medical educational changes and<br />

reminds us of the ever-adapting attitude that we all should demonstrate in order to<br />

advance and progress in the field.<br />

The Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum of the prestigious Humboldt University of<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> Medical School will be our meeting point and our inspiration to continue the<br />

work of the many important scientists on which the foundations of Medicine have been<br />

built. On behalf of us all I want to express my gratitude to the University for hosting<br />

the Conference.<br />

The <strong>Berlin</strong> Conference programme holds exciting plenary sessions; workshops for<br />

innovation and learning how to think about strategies to achieve our goals; all led by<br />

well-known and respected educators in Medicine and health care. Large group sessions<br />

will focus on specific issues and challenges. Short communications and posters, close<br />

to 400 in total, will give us the opportunity to present our views and work, to discuss<br />

them and finally to interact.<br />

Your attendance at the <strong>AMEE</strong> 2001 <strong>Berlin</strong> Conference is your own success and I wish<br />

you, <strong>AMEE</strong> friends, a most productive and enjoyable meeting.<br />

Margarita Barón-Maldonado<br />

President of <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

- iv -


Executive Committee<br />

List of Sponsors<br />

President: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado (Spain)<br />

Secretary/Treasurer: Professor Ronald Harden (UK)<br />

Committee Members: Professor Ralph Bloch (Switzerland)<br />

Professor Ioan Bocsan (Romania)<br />

Professor Florian Eitel (Germany)<br />

Dr Madalena Patrício (Portugal)<br />

Professor Dominique Perrotin (France)<br />

Professor Herman van Rossum (Netherlands)<br />

Ex-officio Members: Professor Hans Karle<br />

(World Federation for Medical Education)<br />

Dr Jørgen Nystrup (Past President of <strong>AMEE</strong>)<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Administrator: Mrs Pat Lilley<br />

p.m.lilley@dundee.ac.uk<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Secretary: Miss Tracey Martin<br />

t.r.martin@dundee.ac.uk<br />

Association for Medical Education in Europe<br />

University of Dundee, 484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Tel: +44 (0)1382 631953; Fax: +44 (0)1382 645748;<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>@dundee.ac.uk; http://www.amee.org<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> and the Local Organising Committee are most grateful to the Municipality of<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> for their generosity in hosting the reception at the Opening Ceremony. We would<br />

also like to acknowledge the generous support of the Founder Sponsors:<br />

Siemens AG – Medical Solutions<br />

Schering AG<br />

Freunde und Förderer der Charité<br />

Medical Faculty of Humboldt University<br />

- v -


SECTION 1<br />

Information about <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

and the Conference Venue


Conference Venue<br />

General Information<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong><br />

How to reach <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Weather<br />

Banks and Post Offices<br />

Currency Exchange<br />

A simplified map of <strong>Berlin</strong> and a plan of the campus showing the conference buildings<br />

and rooms appear on pages 1.5 and 1.6. A detailed map will be included in your<br />

registration pack.<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> has a wide range of attractions. Annual highlights include theatre weeks,<br />

international concert performances and film festivals. Multiple theatres offer a range<br />

of performances from classic to modern drama, opera, ballet and light comedy. <strong>Berlin</strong>´s<br />

artistic treasures and museums, palaces, galleries and archives have earned high reputation<br />

all over the world. A great number of monuments bear witness to the history of <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

and Prussian culture. Leisure time may be used for shopping downtown around the<br />

‘Kurfürstendamm’ and the ‘Friedrichstraße’. There are opportunities for every taste<br />

and purse. Shopping hours are from 9.00-20.00 hrs Monday to Friday and from 0900<br />

hrs to 1600 hrs on Saturday. All shops are closed on Sunday.<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> can be reached easily by all means of transportation. Most airlines offer direct<br />

flights to <strong>Berlin</strong> Tegel airport, some also fly to <strong>Berlin</strong> Tempelhof or <strong>Berlin</strong> Schönefeld.<br />

A taxi from <strong>Berlin</strong> Tegel to the city centre (main hotel district) costs approx. DEM<br />

30,00. There is also a bus service (line no. 109) between <strong>Berlin</strong> Tegel airport and the<br />

city centre. The fare is DEM 4,00. Main railway stations are <strong>Berlin</strong> Bahnhof Zoo,<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>-Ostbahnhof, Bahnhof <strong>Berlin</strong> Lichtenberg. As the main airports are quite close<br />

to the city centre, no special arrangements have been made to transfer participants to<br />

the Conference hotels.<br />

The congress takes place during the late summer/beginning of autumn where the<br />

temperatures are around 19°C (66°F) during the day and 10°C (50°F) at night. It may<br />

be useful to bring a sweater and raincoat.<br />

Banks are open Monday-Friday between 0800-1800. Post Offices are open Monday-<br />

Friday between 0800-1800, and on Saturday between 0800-1200.<br />

The unit of currency is the DeutscheMark (DEM). 1 DEM comprises 100 Pfennig .The<br />

rate of exchange at the time of going to press is £1 = DM 3.2; US$1 = DM 2.3;<br />

Euro 1 = DM 2. Major credit cards are widely accepted in hotels, restaurants and shops.<br />

- 1.1 -


Restaurants/Bars<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> is famous for its wide variety of 7,000 restaurants serving international or German<br />

cuisine and for its countless pubs called “Kneipen“ with their unique atmosphere. Some<br />

suggestions are:<br />

First-class gourmet restaurants<br />

Borchardt District/address: (Mitte) Französische Str. 47<br />

Subway station: Französische Str.<br />

Telephone: 20 38 71 10<br />

Open: daily 1100 to 2400 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa<br />

Café Einstein District/address: (Tiergarten) Kurfürstenstr. 58<br />

Subway station: Nollendorfplatz<br />

Telephone: 2 61 50 96<br />

Open: Daily 1000 to 0200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Euro<br />

Paris Bar District/address: (Charlottenburg) Kantstr. 152<br />

Subway station: Zoo<br />

Telephone: 3 13 80 52<br />

Open: Daily 1200-0200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex<br />

Luther und Wegner District/address: (Mitte) Charlottenstr. 56<br />

Subway station: Französische Str.<br />

Telephone: 2 02 95 40<br />

Open: Daily 0900-0200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Euro<br />

German cooking<br />

Vau District/address: (Mitte) Jägerstr. 54-55<br />

Subway station: Hausvogteiplatz<br />

Telephone: 2 02 97 30<br />

Open: Monday-Saturday from 1200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Diners, Euro<br />

Altes Zollhaus District/address: (Kreuzberg) Carl-Hertz-Ufer 30<br />

Subway station Prinzenstrasse<br />

Telephone: 6 92 33 00<br />

Open: Tuesday-Saturday 1800-0100 hrs<br />

Cards: All credit cards<br />

Italian cooking<br />

Trattoria Lappeggi District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Kollwitzstr. 56<br />

Subway station: Senefelder Platz<br />

Telephone: 4 42 63 47<br />

Open: Daily from 12 noon<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Euro<br />

XII Apostel District/address: (Charlottenburg) Bleibtreustr. 49<br />

S-Bahn-station: Savignyplatz<br />

Telephone: 3 12 14 33<br />

Open: Daily 24 hours<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

- 1.2 -


Greek cooking<br />

Ypsilon District/address: (Schöneberg) Hauptstr. 163<br />

Subway station: Kleistpark<br />

Telephone: 7 82 45 39<br />

Open: Daily from 1700 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Hip, for young people<br />

Anita Wronski District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Knaackstr. 26-28<br />

Subway station: Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 42 84 83<br />

Open: Daily 1000 to 0200 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Ali Baba District/address: (Charlottenburg) Bleibtreustr. 45<br />

S-Bahn-station: Savignyplatz<br />

Telephone: 8 81 13 50<br />

Open: Daily 1130 to 0300 hrs<br />

Live music scene<br />

Kalkscheune District/address: (Mitte) Johannisstr. 2<br />

Subway station Oranienburger Straße<br />

Telephone: 28 39 00 65<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Kulturbrauerei District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Knaackstr. 97<br />

Subway station Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 41 92 69<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Schlot District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Kastanienallee 29<br />

Subway station Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 48 21 60<br />

Open: Daily from 1930 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Beer garden<br />

Prater Garten District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Kastanienallee 7-9<br />

Subway station Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 48 56 88<br />

Open: Daily from 1400 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Café am Neuen See (District/address: Tiergarten) in the middle of Tiergarten<br />

Telephone: 2 54 49 30<br />

Open: Daily 1000 to 2300 hrs<br />

Cards: All credit cards<br />

- 1.3 -


Information about the Conference Venue<br />

Transport in <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Parking Facilities on Campus<br />

Dress Code<br />

Smoking Policy for Conference<br />

Charité is the Medical Faculty of Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>. There are three separate<br />

campuses (Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Campus Mitte and Campus <strong>Berlin</strong>-Buch). Please<br />

note that our Conference, including the Pre-conference Workshops, will take place at:<br />

Campus Virchow-Klinikum<br />

Charité, Medical Faculty of Humboldt-University<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>-Wedding<br />

Augustenburger Platz 1<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> D-13353<br />

Germany<br />

The Charité web page (German only) can be accessed as follows: http://www.charite.de/<br />

index/allginfo.html<br />

Registration and most of the Conference sessions take place in the Teaching Building<br />

(Lehrgebaude), marked on the plan on page 1.5.<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> is well served by a wide bus, tram, underground (U-Bahn) and city train<br />

(S-Bahn) network, operating from 0400 until midnight. On the reverse of your<br />

Conference name-badge in your registration pack is stamped the <strong>Berlin</strong> Transport Service<br />

logo and this badge also serves as a 4-day travel pass which can be used for local buses<br />

and trains.<br />

The Campus Virchow-Klinikum is in the north west of the city, about 15 minutes by<br />

U-bahn from the city centre and can be reached by the following transport:<br />

Underground (U-Bahn): line U9: Station: ‘Amrumer Straße’ (or line U6 to<br />

‘Leopoldplatz’ and change to line U9)<br />

Bus lines: X26, 126 stop: ‘Virchow-Klinikum’<br />

221, 248 stop: ‘Amrumer Straße’<br />

Tram: line 23 or 24, stop: ‘Virchow-Klinikum’<br />

If travelling by U-Bahn, exit to the right. You will see signs to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Conference.<br />

It is about 5 minutes’ walk from the station to the Teaching Building.<br />

Parking Spaces in the vicinity of the Virchow-Klinikum campus are hard to find. Oncampus<br />

parking is possible (DEM 3 per hour), but spaces are very limited. There is a<br />

parking garage at the entrance Seestraße, where <strong>AMEE</strong> participants can park for a<br />

special fee of 15 DEM per day. Tickets are available at the conference desk.<br />

Access to the campus for loading and unloading is free of charge for up to one hour.<br />

Dress is informal for both day and evening sessions.<br />

Smoking is not permitted in the University buildings, and you are asked to smoke<br />

outside only.<br />

- 1.4 -


Map - Charité Virchow-Klinikum<br />

- 1.5 -


Map of <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

- 1.6 -


Campus Virchow-Klinikum – Teaching Building<br />

- 1.7 -


Conference Noticeboard and Messages<br />

Email Contact<br />

The Noticeboard is located by the Registration Desk. Messages and conference updates<br />

will be posted on the board and an adjacent board will be provided for messages for<br />

individuals. Phone and fax messages can be sent to you at the Registration Desk. Numbers<br />

will be available on the <strong>AMEE</strong> website from 27 August, or by contacting the <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Office.<br />

Please note that the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office will be closed from 1800 hrs on Thursday 30 August<br />

until 0900 hrs on Friday 7 September. Whilst in <strong>Berlin</strong> we can be contacted at the<br />

Registration Desk.<br />

Participants are welcome to use the Computer Room (Teaching Building, 2 nd floor,<br />

room 2.0103) for email contact at all times except during scheduled workshops: Saturday<br />

1345-1700; Sunday 0915-1230; Monday 1345-1600; Tuesday 1345-1700).<br />

CME Accreditation and Certificates of Attendance<br />

Abstracts<br />

Conference Evaluation<br />

Registration<br />

The Conference has been approved by the Royal College of Physicians of London for<br />

21 CME credits for attending the full Conference. Certificates of attendance, conforming<br />

to the guidelines provided by the Royal College of Physicians, will be available on<br />

Wednesday 5 September from 1200 hrs and a register will be available for signature at<br />

the same time.<br />

Abstracts will appear on the Conference web site soon after the conference. If there are<br />

any changes to be made to your abstract as it appears in the programme/abstract book,<br />

please contact the Registration Desk or the <strong>AMEE</strong> Secretariat in Dundee.<br />

We welcome feedback on which aspects of the Conference you have enjoyed, and the<br />

things you have found less satisfactory. Suggestions for speakers and workshop organisers<br />

for future conferences are also much appreciated. Please complete the evaluation form<br />

in your conference pack and either leave it in the box on the registration desk or send<br />

it to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office.<br />

The registration desk is open in the Teaching Building (Lehrgebaude), Campus Virchow-<br />

Klinikum, (see plan of Campus on page 1.5) at the following times:<br />

Saturday 1 September: 1200-1730<br />

Sunday 2 September: 0800-1700<br />

Monday 3 September: 0745-1730<br />

Tuesday 4 September: 0800-1715<br />

Wednesday 5 September: 0800-1630<br />

Please use the appropriate registration point:<br />

Point A: Registered participants with family names beginning with A-F<br />

Point B: Registered participants with family names beginning with G-N<br />

Point C: Registered participants with family names beginning with O-Z<br />

Point D: Unregistered participants, late registrants who have not paid, and<br />

those requiring further assistance<br />

- 1.8 -


Tours/Accommodation Registration<br />

DER-CONGRESS will have a representative available at the Registration Desk at the<br />

following times:<br />

Saturday 1 September: 1200-1730<br />

Sunday 2 September: 0800-1700<br />

Monday 3 September: 1200-1400<br />

Tuesday 4 September: 1200-1400<br />

Wednesday 5 September: 1200-1400<br />

If you have reserved hotel accommodation, tours or social events through DER you<br />

should collect vouchers from them. All participants making hotel reservations through<br />

DER will need a voucher to present to the hotel on departure so that the pre-paid<br />

deposit may be deducted from the final hotel bill.<br />

Information on the Academic <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Plenary Presentations<br />

Large Group Sessions<br />

Short Communications<br />

An overview of the programme is shown on pages 1.13 and 1,14. On page 1.15 is a<br />

personal diary form on which you may like to note the presentations you particularly<br />

want to attend.<br />

These are scheduled for Sessions 1 and 9 and will take place in Hörsaal 1 and 2.<br />

Hörsaal 3 is linked by video to provide additional seating if necessary.<br />

Three simultaneous large groups are scheduled in Session 4. After the presentations the<br />

chairperson will open up an interactive discussion between presenters and audience.<br />

These are scheduled for Sessions 2, 5, and 8. In Sessions 2 and 5 there are 13 simultaneous<br />

groups of short communications each with a theme and in Session 8 there are 12<br />

simultaneous groups. The room in which each group will take place is indicated in the<br />

grid on page X. This year we have tried very carefully to group relevant presentations<br />

together and encourage you to stay for a whole session and take part in the discussion<br />

at the end. Please feel free, however, to move between sessions. We have asked the<br />

Chairpersons to ensure that all sessions follow the time scheduled in the programme. If<br />

you do choose to move between sessions, please do so as quietly as possible. Each<br />

presenter has been allocated a ten minute presentation followed by five minutes for<br />

discussion. A 15 minute period has been allocated at the end of most sessions for a<br />

general discussion, led by an opening discussant. Each session will also have a<br />

chairperson.<br />

Information for Presenters of Short Communications<br />

Slide viewing area: The Mediothekraum (Teaching Building, first floor) may be used<br />

for testing audio-visuals and spare carousels will be available for slides. Please do not<br />

take these earlier than during the session prior to yours and return them as soon as<br />

possible afterwards. PowerPoint presentations can also be tried out in advance (see<br />

below).<br />

- 1.9 -


OHP and slides: An OHP and a 35 mm slide projector are available in every room.<br />

Computer projection: A data projector/beamer is available on request. If you are<br />

planning to use a computer presentation it is essential we know this in advance, either<br />

on the form supplied when your presentation was accepted or by email. This year we<br />

ask that you bring your presentation on a CD-ROM or zip disk clearly marked with<br />

your name and session number, as your own laptop may not be suitable for use with<br />

the in-house system. Laptop computers will be supplied in every room. Presentations<br />

made using the PC version of PowerPoint 1997 and 2000 are compatible with the inhouse<br />

system. Mac users should ensure that their presentations are saved on PC formatted<br />

disks. Please see the technician in the Mediothekraum preferably on Sunday, or at least<br />

one day before your session in order that your presentation may be loaded up on the<br />

appropriate computer. If you are a Mac user and wish to have more specific information,<br />

or if there is a video incorporated into your presentation please contact Pat Lilley<br />

(p.m.lilley@dundee.ac.uk)<br />

Technical assistance during the sessions: A technician will be available in each of the<br />

large lecture theatres, and students familiar with use of the equipment will be available<br />

in each of the smaller rooms. Each room is equipped with a telephone by which help<br />

may be requested if necessary.<br />

Your presentation: The following guidelines will help ensure the smooth-running of<br />

sessions.<br />

• Please arrive at least ten minutes before the scheduled start of the session and<br />

introduce yourself to the chairperson.<br />

• Keep strictly to the time allotted for your presentation. This is essential. The<br />

Chairperson will remind you when your time limit has expired and will then<br />

ask the audience for questions.<br />

• Please speak slowly and clearly.<br />

• Ensure your overheads and slides are clear, that there is not too much text to<br />

read in the limited time available and that the type is large enough to be<br />

legible for those sitting at the back of the room.<br />

• Whilst not obligatory, a single page hand-out, giving the key messages from<br />

your presentation, is always appreciated. As a rough indication you could<br />

expect between 40-60 participants in the audience.<br />

Role of the Chairperson in the Short Communications Sessions<br />

1 Before the session starts, check that the speakers and opening discussant are present;<br />

2 Introduce each speaker according to the programme. Tell him/her when the allotted<br />

10 minute presentation period is over (a timer will be provided) and ask the speaker<br />

to stop his/her presentation;<br />

3 Allow 5 minutes for discussion between presentations;<br />

4 If a speaker is not present, arrange for the 15 minute period to be used for further<br />

discussion; the next presentation should not start until the scheduled time;<br />

5 Ask the opening discussant to lead off the discussion at the end of the session;<br />

6 Draw the session to a close and thank participants;<br />

7 Follow strictly the time schedule in the programme to allow participants to move<br />

between sessions.<br />

Role of the Opening Discussant in the Short Communications Sessions<br />

Introduce the topic in the context of the papers presented and highlight the key points<br />

for discussion arising from the papers. This should take no more than 5 minutes.<br />

- 1.10 -


Posters<br />

There will be twelve themed groups of posters on show throughout the Conference in<br />

the areas listed below. Please see pages 2.27 to 2.37 for details of presentations in each<br />

session and see below for the locations of the posters which are all in the Teaching<br />

Building on either floor 1 or floor 2:<br />

Session No Title Location<br />

7A New Learning Technologies Floor 2<br />

7B Problem-Based Learning Floor 2<br />

7C Curriculum Planning and Change Floor 2<br />

7D Curriculum Evaluation/Staff Development Floor 1<br />

7E Postgraduate Education Floor 2<br />

7F Assessment Floor 1<br />

7G Teaching & Learning 1 Floor 2<br />

7H Teaching & Learning 2 Floor 2<br />

7I Continuing Professional Development 1 Floor 1<br />

7J Continuing Professional Development 2 Floor 1<br />

7K International Medical Education Floor 1<br />

7L Special Subjects Floor 1<br />

Poster presentations will take place on Wednesday 5 September from 0830-1000 hrs.<br />

The sessions will start in the room designated for the presentations (see page 1.13),<br />

where each presenter will have two minutes to highlight the key points to look out for<br />

in the poster. Two overheads or slides are allowed for the presentation. Computer<br />

projection is not available. A chairperson will introduce each presenter. Following the<br />

short presentations the group will move to the relevant poster area for a group discussion.<br />

Information for Presenters of Posters<br />

Posters may be mounted at the following times:<br />

Saturday 1 September between1200-1730 hrs<br />

Sunday 2 September between 0830-1700 hrs<br />

Monday 3 September between 0745-1730 hrs<br />

Posters will be grouped in themes, and the identification number, name(s) of the author(s)<br />

and title of the poster will be clearly labelled on each poster board. Poster boards are<br />

120 cm wide and 150 cm high, fixed with pins. A supply of pins will be available but<br />

you may find it useful to bring your own.<br />

To Help the Poster Sessions run Smoothly<br />

1 Poster presenters should meet in the room allocated to the session at 0820 hrs on<br />

Wednesday 5 September, and make themselves known to the chairperson.<br />

2 Presenters must keep strictly to the 2 minutes allowed for initial presentation of the<br />

poster, and may used one or two overheads or slides (no data projection). No time is<br />

allowed for discussion at this stage. This time should be used to highlight key points<br />

to look for in the poster, not to summarise the poster<br />

3 After all the short presentations have been made, the group will go to the poster<br />

area allocated.<br />

4 Presenters should stand by their posters, and be prepared to answer questions. It is<br />

useful to have some photocopied handouts (approximately 40-80) for distribution,<br />

with the key messages of the poster.<br />

5 It is helpful if the presenter can indicate on his/her poster board an alternative time<br />

when he/she will be available (eg a lunch or coffee break) in case anyone who<br />

cannot attend the session would like to discuss the poster.<br />

- 1.11 -


Role of the Chairperson in the Poster Sessions<br />

Medical Teacher Poster Prize<br />

Workshops<br />

1 Before the sessions starts, check that the presenters have arrived;<br />

2 Introduce each presenter and allow two minutes for the presentations. Do not allow<br />

any time for discussion between presentations, which should take up to 30 minutes,<br />

depending on the number in the group.<br />

3 At the end of the presentations lead the group to the poster area;<br />

4 Allow the group to look at all the posters (it is suggested that between 15-30 minutes<br />

is allowed for this activity);<br />

5 Invite questions for discussion.<br />

Taylor and Francis Ltd, the publisher of Medical Teacher, has generously agreed once<br />

again to sponsor a prize of £150 to be awarded for the best poster at the Conference.<br />

Posters will be judged, by a Committee, on the following criteria:<br />

• How well are the key messages communicated through the poster?<br />

• Does the poster arouse the interest of the viewer?<br />

• Is the poster attractive?<br />

The winner will be announced at the end of the final plenary session on Wednesday 5<br />

September. In addition to the prize money, the winner will receive one year’s individual<br />

membership of <strong>AMEE</strong>, which includes a personal copy of Medical Teacher.<br />

Pre-Conference Workshops: Pre-booking of Pre-Conference Workshops via the<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Secretariat is essential, and a charge is made. At the time of going to press<br />

almost all the pre-conference workshops are full.<br />

Conference Workshops: Workshops in Session 3 are listed on pages 2.13 to 2.14<br />

and those in Session 6 on pages 2.25 to 2.27. A full description of the workshop content<br />

is given in the Abstracts section (pages 4.23 and 4.51).<br />

Enclosed with this programme is a Selection Form. One of the items relates to workshop<br />

choice. Pre-booking of conference workshops offers a better chance of attending your<br />

first choice of workshops in Sessions 3 and 6. Please complete the information requested<br />

and either return the form to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office or email your choices to<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>@dundee.ac.uk There is no charge for attending conference workshops. A list<br />

of workshops and attendees will appear on the notice board adjacent to the Registration<br />

area with an indication of the number of places remaining. Depending on the format,<br />

some organisers wish to limit participation in their workshops, and we regret that you<br />

might not be able to attend your first choice on each occasion.<br />

- 1.12 -


<strong>Programme</strong> Overview - Short communications,<br />

Poster, Large Group Sessions<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

����������������<br />

��������<br />

��<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

����<br />

� � � �<br />

� � � � � � � �<br />

�<br />

Video link to<br />

Plenary Hall<br />

PLENARY<br />

Achieving standards<br />

in the curriculum<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

Student Support/<br />

Psychiatry and<br />

the Curriculum<br />

Multiprofessional<br />

Education<br />

Student and<br />

Curriculum<br />

Evaluation<br />

Simulation and<br />

Clinical Skills<br />

Training<br />

Educating the<br />

Educators 1<br />

Selection<br />

Continuing<br />

Professional<br />

Development<br />

Peer<br />

Assessment<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education -<br />

the Early Years<br />

OSCE/<br />

Standardised<br />

Patients in<br />

Assessment<br />

Curriculum<br />

database<br />

PBL and<br />

the Curriculum<br />

A Virtual<br />

Learning<br />

Environment<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

Workshops - Please see details on next page<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

LGS 3<br />

Standards and<br />

the curriculum<br />

LGS 2<br />

International<br />

aspects of<br />

standards<br />

LGS 1<br />

Standards &<br />

professionalism in<br />

medical education<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������<br />

- 1.13 -<br />

Teaching about<br />

EBM, Critical<br />

Thinking and<br />

Research<br />

Evaluation of<br />

Multiprofessional<br />

Education<br />

Contexts<br />

for Learning<br />

Education and<br />

Cultural<br />

Diversity<br />

Educating the<br />

Educators 2<br />

Educational<br />

Strategies/<br />

Curriculum<br />

Planning<br />

Outcome-based<br />

Education<br />

Assessment<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education for Gen<br />

Practice/Family<br />

Medicine<br />

Assessing<br />

Communication<br />

Skills/Patients<br />

as Examiners<br />

Curriculum<br />

Evaluation<br />

Evaluation of<br />

Problem-based<br />

Learning<br />

Learning and<br />

the Internet<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������<br />

Workshops - Please see details on next page<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������<br />

Special<br />

Subjects<br />

International<br />

Medical<br />

Education<br />

Continuing<br />

Professional<br />

Development 2<br />

Continuing<br />

Professional<br />

Development 1<br />

Teaching and<br />

Learning 2<br />

Teaching and<br />

Learning 1<br />

Assessment<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education<br />

Curriculum<br />

Evaluation/Staff<br />

Development<br />

Curriculum<br />

Planning and<br />

Change<br />

Problem-based<br />

Learning<br />

New Learning<br />

Technologies<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

Special<br />

Subjects<br />

International<br />

Aspects of<br />

Medical Education<br />

Clinical<br />

Teaching<br />

Communication<br />

Skills Training<br />

Curriculum<br />

Change<br />

Assessment in<br />

Postgraduate and<br />

Continuing<br />

Education<br />

Teaching and<br />

Learning<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education/<br />

Career Choice<br />

The Final<br />

Examination<br />

Curriculum<br />

Planning<br />

Implementation of<br />

Problem-based<br />

Learning<br />

Computer<br />

Mediated<br />

Learning and<br />

Assessment<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

Video Link to<br />

Plenary Hall<br />

PLENARY<br />

Different views of<br />

medical education<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

���������


<strong>Programme</strong> Overview - Workshops<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

�����������������<br />

������������<br />

�������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

�����������������<br />

������������<br />

�������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

����<br />

��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ���� ����<br />

���<br />

What can a general<br />

medical journal do<br />

for education in<br />

medicine?<br />

The assessment of<br />

poorly performing<br />

doctors<br />

A bachelor master<br />

structure of medical<br />

education in Europe<br />

Effective student<br />

assessment:<br />

something old,<br />

something new<br />

Concept<br />

mapping<br />

Making feedback<br />

during clerkships<br />

meaningful and<br />

effective<br />

East European<br />

Task Force<br />

Best Evidence<br />

Medical Education:<br />

Progress Report<br />

Feedback and<br />

evaluation: essential<br />

activities in the<br />

learning process<br />

From MD to<br />

academic<br />

teacher<br />

The quality of<br />

medical education<br />

and teaching - thema<br />

can variatione<br />

The roles of<br />

the teacher<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

- 1.14 -<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

�<br />

�����������<br />

�������������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

�����������������<br />

������������<br />

�������������<br />

������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

����<br />

��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ���� ���� ����<br />

Bedside Cardiology<br />

An Introduction Nordic Federation<br />

Risk management<br />

Developing<br />

Learning needs<br />

Skills Training,<br />

Professional and Students teaching<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>/<br />

to Clinical for Medical<br />

in medical<br />

professional attitudes:<br />

Problem-based Portfolio<br />

featuring ‘Harvey’<br />

organisational culture communication<br />

Ibero-American<br />

assessment in A European<br />

Judgement Analysis Education<br />

education<br />

theory, practice and<br />

Learning Assessment<br />

& UMedic<br />

of medical eduaction skills<br />

Network Workshop<br />

u/grad and p/grad core curriculum?<br />

evaluation<br />

medical education<br />

���<br />

Basic Skills<br />

Faculty Development<br />

Workshop<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������


Personal Diary<br />

TIME MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY TIME<br />

0830 Plenary 1 Large Group Sessions Posters<br />

0830<br />

0845 0845<br />

0900 0900<br />

0915 0915<br />

0930 0930<br />

0945 0945<br />

1000<br />

1015<br />

Coffee<br />

1000<br />

1015<br />

1030<br />

1045<br />

Coffee Coffee<br />

Short Communications 3 1030<br />

1045<br />

1100 Short Communications 1 Short Communications 2<br />

1100<br />

1115 1115<br />

1130 1130<br />

1145 1145<br />

1200 1200<br />

1215 1215<br />

1230 1230<br />

1245<br />

1300<br />

Lunch<br />

1245<br />

1300<br />

1315<br />

1330<br />

Lunch Lunch<br />

Plenary 2<br />

1315<br />

1330<br />

1345 Posters<br />

1345<br />

1400 Workshop Session 1 Workshop Session 2<br />

1400<br />

1415 1415<br />

1430 1430<br />

1445 Break<br />

1445<br />

1500 Special Presentation 1500<br />

1515 1515<br />

1530 1530<br />

1545<br />

Coffee<br />

1545<br />

1600 Coffee<br />

Workshops Continued<br />

Close of Meeting 1600<br />

1615 General Assembly<br />

1615<br />

1630 1630<br />

1645 1645<br />

1700 1700<br />

Note: While you are free to move between short communication and poster sessions, we hope you<br />

will stay in one session and join in the discussion.<br />

- 1.15 -


List of Exhibitors<br />

Association for Medical Education in Europe<br />

Association for the Study of Medical Education, UK<br />

Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, UK<br />

Croatian Association for Medical Education<br />

Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

IAMSE<br />

Kaplan Medical, USA<br />

Medical Teacher<br />

National Association of Clinical Tutors (NACT), UK<br />

Netherlands Association for Medical Education<br />

Nordic Federation for Medical Education - NFME<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, UK<br />

Ottawa Conference<br />

Spanish Association for Medical Education - SEDEM<br />

Taylor & Francis Ltd, UK<br />

Teaching & Learning Support Network, UK<br />

- 1.16 -


SECTION 2<br />

The Academic <strong>Programme</strong>


Saturday 1 September<br />

Saturday 1 September<br />

Pre-conference tours – see page 3.4 for details<br />

1200-1730 Registration Desk open at Campus Virchow-Klinikum and setting up of Posters<br />

and Exhibits.<br />

1400-1700 Pre-conference workshop PCW1: Web-based learning (Part 1).<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

Coffee for workshop participants in Studentencafé at 1530.<br />

1400-1700 <strong>AMEE</strong> Executive Committee Meeting<br />

Teaching Building Room 2.0214 (2 nd floor) (closed meeting)<br />

- 2.1 -


Sunday 2 September<br />

Sunday 2 September<br />

0800-1700 Registration Desk open at Campus Virchow-Klinikum and setting up of Posters and<br />

Exhibits.<br />

0930-1230 Pre-conference workshops<br />

Please note: it is essential to reserve a place on these workshops, for which a charge is<br />

made. Coffee for workshop participants in Studentencafé at 1100. Lunch is not<br />

provided.<br />

PCW1 Web-based learning (Part 2). (Part 1 on Saturday afternoon)<br />

Dr Martin Fischer, University of Munich, Germany, and Dr Raphael Bonvin,<br />

University of Basel, Switzerland<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW2 Faculty rewards and incentives in medical education: the challenges<br />

and the promise<br />

Dr Sharon Krackov, New York University School of Medicine, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW3 Strategies for sustaining change in medical education<br />

Dr Stewart Mennin, and Dr Scott Obenshain, University of New Mexico School of<br />

Medicine, Albuquerque, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW4 Assessing the reliability of mastery-level decisions in OSCE and<br />

Standardized Patient examinations: an overview of common<br />

methods and practical applications<br />

Dr André De Champlain, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia,<br />

USA, and Dr John Boulet, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical<br />

Graduates, Philadelphia, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW5 Consultant appraisal<br />

Dr Steven Wilkinson, Centre for Organisational Research, Anglia Polytechnic<br />

University, UK, and Dr Kwee Matheson, West Suffolk Hospital, UK<br />

Room: Research Building, 2.0026 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW6 Developing competence in lifelong learning<br />

Hajo Schmidt-Traub and colleagues: Medical Students from Charité, Medical<br />

Faculty of the Humboldt-University, <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0105 (1 st floor)<br />

PCW7 Curriculum change in a traditional medical school<br />

Professor Herman van Rossum and Dr Janke Cohen-Schotanus, Groningen<br />

University, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0107 (1st floor)<br />

- 2.2 -


Sunday 2 September<br />

0930-1100 BEME Steering Group Meeting<br />

Teaching Building, Room 2.0214 (2nd floor) (closed meeting)<br />

1115-1245 Medical Teacher Editorial Board Meeting<br />

Teaching Building, Room 2.0214 (2nd floor) (closed meeting)<br />

1400-1700 City coach tour<br />

Included in registration fee for registered participants and registered accompanying<br />

persons - see page 3.1 for details.<br />

1930-2130 Opening Ceremony and Reception at Red Town Hall (Rotes Rathaus)<br />

Included in registration fee for registered participants and registered accompanying<br />

persons - see page 3.1 for details.<br />

- 2.3 -


Monday 3 September<br />

0745-1730 Registration desk open at Campus Virchow-Klinikum<br />

0830-1030 Session 1: Plenary<br />

1<br />

Achieving standards in the curriculum<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 and 2<br />

(Note: there will be a video link to Hörsaal 3 to provide additional seating)<br />

Chairperson: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado, Spain<br />

0830-0855 1/1 Towards global standards for medical education<br />

Dr Jordan Cohen – President, Association of American Medical Colleges,<br />

Washington DC, USA<br />

0900-0925 1/2 New times, new standards: the social accountability of health<br />

systems and medical schools<br />

Dr Charles Boelen – Coordinator, Human Resources for Health Program,<br />

World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland<br />

0930-0955 1/3 Death of the course<br />

Professor Ronald Harden – Director, Centre for Medical Education, University<br />

of Dundee, and Director – Education Development Unit, Scottish Council for<br />

Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, UK<br />

1000-1030 Discussion<br />

1030-1100 Coffee served in the foyers of the Teaching and the Research Buildings<br />

1100-1300 Session 2: Short Communications<br />

2A<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

13 simultaneous themed sessions on a range of topics:<br />

A Virtual Learning Environment<br />

Chairperson: Professor Rein Zwierstra<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Virtual learning environments - a learner centred review<br />

Megan Quentin-Baxter* and Suzanne Hardy; Learning and Teaching Support<br />

Network, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Impact of a digital learning environment on the efficiency of teachers<br />

Peter G M de Jong* and Hermiette E Idenburg; Leiden University Medical Center,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

- 2.4 -


1130-1145 3 Building blocks in a new curriculum: the role of the library in<br />

educational innovation<br />

Magriet Lee and Maureen Brassel*; University of Pretoria, South Africa<br />

1145-1200 4 IT learning environment: more structure or more room for<br />

manoeuvre? Centrally guided norm path or absolute freedom?<br />

J Degryse*, A Roex and W Renier; K U Leuven, Belgium<br />

1200-1215 5 Innovation in self-directed learning (SDL) in CME: Virtual Internet<br />

Patient Simulation<br />

M A Raetzo*, R L Thivierge, R J Gagnon, V Loroch and A Bonneau; University<br />

of Montreal, Canada<br />

1215-1230 6 Real learning through virtual presentation: an Internet based work<br />

environment course for medical students at Uppsala University<br />

Klas <strong>Berlin</strong>*, Kerstin Graffman and Anna Rask-Andersen; University Hospital,<br />

Uppsala, Sweden<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ian Hart]<br />

2B<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

PBL and the Curriculum<br />

Chairperson: Dr Michael Schmidts<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The birth of a new species - squirrums: towards equal collaboration<br />

in innovation in medical education<br />

Peter McCrorie* and David Prideaux*; St George’s Hospital Medical School,<br />

London, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Broadening learning with PBL in a Pathophysiology course<br />

Antonio Rendas* and Bernardo Correia; Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Portugal<br />

1130-1145 3 The implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) into a<br />

traditional Radiology Clerkship<br />

U Keske, U K M Teichgräber, R Schröder, J Berger, S Venz and R Felix; Humboldt<br />

University, Germany<br />

1145-1200 4 Medical education innovations in Dresden, Germany: Reformed<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of<br />

Technology<br />

Peter Dieter; Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Problem-Based Learning in Immunology and Infectious Disease<br />

(IMID). The Dresden Experience<br />

S Weber*, G Baretton, S Bergmann, J Graeszler, E Jacobs, H Kunath, I Nitsche,<br />

U Ravens, A Rethwilm and P Rieber; Dresden Medical School, Germany<br />

1215-1230 6 From case-based reasoning to problem-based learning<br />

Haim Eshach* and Haim Bitterman; Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,<br />

Haifa, ISRAEL<br />

1230-1245 7 A new approach to PBL in CME; using script concordance tests (SCT)<br />

M Labelle*, C Maille, R L Thivierge and B Charlin; University of Montreal,<br />

Canada<br />

- 2.5 -


1245-1300 8 Discovering versus covering: a new PBL in Behavioural Sciences<br />

Ala’Aldin Al-Hussaini and Harith Ghassany; Sultan Qaboos University,<br />

Al-Khod, Sultanate of Oman<br />

2C<br />

Curriculum Database<br />

Chairperson: Dr Ed Peile<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (Ground Floor).<br />

1100-1115 1 Aiding the reform - development of a curriculum information<br />

system<br />

Patrick Merl*, Paolo Petta and Richard Marz University of Vienna Medical School,<br />

Austria<br />

1115-1130 2 How effective is project management software in implementing a<br />

new course?<br />

Katharine Grundy; St George’s Hospital Medical School, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 MESMIS – Medical School Staff/Student Management Information<br />

System: Towards the electronic curriculum<br />

D A Levison and W M Williamson; University of Dundee Medical School,<br />

Dundee, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 SIMON - Student Information and Management Online Network<br />

P Wagner*, D Zeiss*, S König*, P M Markus and H Becker: University of<br />

Gottingen, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Portfolio-based Dermatology internship - one year’s experience<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann and F Ochsendorf; Universitats-Hautklinik, Germany<br />

1215-1230 6 Profile of the consultations made by fifth year medical students in<br />

the integrated program of Pediatrics and Public Health<br />

Claudia Astudillo, Roció Arenas, Mariá Bustamante*, Mariá De La Fuente and<br />

Gladys Yentzen; Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr David Davies]<br />

2D<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

OSCE/Standardised Patients in Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Dr Gerald Whelan<br />

Room: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 “Check it, rate it, palm it or leave it” - handheld computers replace<br />

checklists in OSCEs and provide automated feedback<br />

Michael Schmidts*, Markus Kemmerling, Ruth Willnauer and Martin Lischka;<br />

Institute für med. Aus-und Weiterbildung, Vienna, Austria<br />

1115-1130 2 Evaluation of the undergraduate surgery course: effect of OSCE<br />

Marco Bustamante Z*, Carlos Carvajal H, Fernando Quevedo R, María<br />

Bustamante C and Claudia Astudillo M; Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1130-1145 3 OSCE: are many different stations necessary for each evaluation?<br />

Carlos Carvajal*, Marco Bustamante and Ilse López; Universidad de Chile,<br />

Santiago, Chile<br />

- 2.6 -


1145-1200 4 Assessing ‘attitude awareness’ as part of an OSCE<br />

Nicholas P Fenlon*, Maureen Kelly, Andrew W Murphy and Gerard Loftus;<br />

National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland<br />

1200-1215 5 Is the assessment of clinical skills affected by the choice and<br />

characteristics of the standardized patients?<br />

T Errichetti*, J Boulet, G Whelan and D McKinley; ECFMG, Philadelphia, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Use of standardized patients to assess medical response to a<br />

natural disaster<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Marguerite Hawkins, Heidi Worth-Dickstein, Eric Marks,<br />

Ralph Jones, Gilbert Muniz and Richard E Hawkins; Uniformed Services<br />

University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA<br />

1230-1245 7 The weakest link? Performance factors and degrees of influence in<br />

an interactive long-station general practice examination (VOICEs)<br />

C M Wiskin*, T Allan and J Skelton, University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Stewart Petersen]<br />

2E<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Postgraduate Education – the Early Years<br />

Chairperson: Dr John Nicholls<br />

Room: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 New PRHO: “I am not sure what I am supposed to do”. Can we<br />

improve on PRHO induction? An evaluation of a new induction<br />

process<br />

Dason Evans*, Mike Roberts and Diana Wood; St Bartholomew’s and the<br />

Royal London Medical and Dental School, London, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 A comparison of Pre-registration House Officers’ (PRHOs) and<br />

Senior House Officers’ (SHOs) experience in general practice<br />

Jan Illing*, Tim van Zwanenberg, Bill Cunningham, George Taylor, Richard<br />

Prescott and Cath O’Halloran; University of Newcastle, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Pre-registration experience in general practice: results of a national<br />

evaluation<br />

Janet Grant*, Lesley Southgate, Rodney Gale, George Freeman, Alison Hill,<br />

Neil Johnson, Frank Smith, Mairead Beirne and Heather Owen; Open University<br />

Centre for Education in Medicine, Milton Keynes, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Family Medicine Month: a human life cycle approach for first year<br />

residents<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Rebecca Gladu, Thelma Jean Goodrich, Janet Groff and<br />

Mary M Velasquez; UT Houston Health Science Center, Houston, USA<br />

1200-1215 5 Making and sharing decisions about management with patients: the<br />

views and experiences of Pre-Registration House Officers<br />

Jill Thistlethwaite; University of Leeds, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Teaching the forgotten tribe: tutor views on a generic curriculum for<br />

SHOs<br />

Lesley Pugsley* and Janet MacDonald; University of Wales College of Medicine,<br />

Cardiff, UK<br />

- 2.7 -


1230-1245 7 General professional training (GPT) for dental graduates in the UK<br />

Alison Bullock*, Vickie Firmstone and John Frame; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Jon Dowell]<br />

2F<br />

Peer Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Waltraud Georg<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Peer- and co-assessment leads to shared responsibility for test results<br />

Caro Brumsen and Peter G M de Jong*; Leiden University Medical Center,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

1115-1130 2 Student self-marking as an assessment approach to developing<br />

professionalism<br />

G J Mires* and M Friedman Ben-David; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Comprehensive Assessment: value for learning<br />

Elaine F Dannefer; University of Rochester Medical Center, USA<br />

1145-1200 4 Attributes of the excellent physician: a third year student survey<br />

A V Carneiro*, M F Patrício and J Fernandes e Fernandes; University of Lisbon<br />

School of Medicine, Portugal<br />

1200-1215 5 The Medical Student Peer Evaluation Initiative: assessment of<br />

performance in small group settings<br />

Steven L Kanter*, Kathleen Ryan, John Mahoney and Joan Harvey; University<br />

of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Reliability of a multidimensional questionnaire to assess attitudes<br />

of medical students towards their future profession: the UNI Project<br />

G L Werneck*, E C O Ribeiro, A C Aguiar and V M B Ribeiro; Nucleo de<br />

Estudos de Saude Coletiva, Ala Sul, Brazil<br />

1230-1245 7 Narrowing the gap in the assessment process<br />

Nicolas Karlsson, University of Goteborg, Sweden<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ara Tekian]<br />

2G<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Continuing Professional Development<br />

Chairperson: Dr Peder Charles<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Learning and partnering: bringing pharmaceutical representatives<br />

into the educational loop<br />

Jane Tipping*, Craig Campbell, Jean Claude Dairon, Paul Davis, Francois Goulet,<br />

Gilles Lachance, Celine Monette, Joan Sargeant, Linda Snell and Robert Thivierge,<br />

Canada<br />

- 2.8 -


1115-1130 2 CME with a combination of standardised patients and a CBT<br />

programme<br />

S Schewe*, A Schewe and J Loohs; Medizinische Poliklinik, Munich, Germany<br />

1130-1145 3 The impact of continuing professional development (CPD): 30 case<br />

studies of dentists<br />

Vickie Firmstone*, Alison Bullock and John Frame; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Global trends in continuing medical education<br />

Lewis A Miller; Global Alliance for Medical Education, Darien, USA<br />

1200-1215 5 Do we need consultant appraisal?<br />

K H Matheson; West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 When should clinicians be trained in management?<br />

J Clark*, R Palmer and P Spurgeon; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 Evaluation of ‘Distance Interactive Learning in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology (DIALOG)’<br />

Vikram Jha*, Sean McAleer and Sean Duffy; St James’s University Hospital,<br />

Leeds and University of Dundee, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Brendan Hicks]<br />

2H<br />

Selection<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Chairperson: Professor David Wiegman<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Selecting aboriginal students to health professional courses<br />

I E Rolfe and G Garvey*; University of Newcastle, Australia<br />

1115-1130 2 Demographic and scholastic correlates of scores in the Australian<br />

Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT)<br />

Peter Tutton*, Chris Browne, Margot Story and Michael Lewenberg; Monash<br />

University, Australia<br />

1130-1145 3 Can we make the interview add something new?<br />

P Hughes, S Miller*, P McCrorie and A Kent; St George’s Hospital Medical<br />

School, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Relative effects of learning style, MCAT and prior academic record<br />

on performance in medical school<br />

Stephen Aaron* and Ernest Skakun; University of Alberta, Canada<br />

1200-1215 5 The selection of GP trainees in the West Midlands: audit of<br />

assessment centre scores by ethnic background and country of<br />

qualification<br />

Celia Brown*, Sarah Wakefield and Alison Bullock; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 The selection of GP trainees: perceptions of the new regional<br />

system<br />

Sarah Wakefield*, Celia Brown and Alison Bullock; University of Birmingham,<br />

UK<br />

- 2.9 -


1230-1245 7 “I want to become a doctor.” Analysis of first year students’<br />

motivations<br />

M F Patrício* and J Gomes-Pedro; University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Miss Gill Clack]<br />

2I<br />

Educating the Educators (1)<br />

Chairperson: Professor Olle ten Cate<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0104 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Evaluation of a Train the Trainers program in quality improvement<br />

and cost-effectiveness<br />

Antoinette S Peters*, Maryjoan Ladden and Robert Fletcher; Harvard Medical<br />

School, Boston, USA<br />

1115-1130 2 Teaching the medical teachers - Beyond ‘TIPS’<br />

Jane Richardson* and Jonathan D Cartledge; University College London, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Formal courses in further training of medical teachers<br />

M Vrcic-Keglevic*, Z Jaksic, G Pavlekovic, N Pokrajac, A Smalcelj and B Vrhovac;<br />

“A.Stampar” School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia<br />

1145-1200 4 Supporting Clinicians on Training in Scotland<br />

Rose Martin, on behalf of Supporting Clinicians on Training in Scotland Working<br />

Group; Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,<br />

Dundee, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 Improving own teaching skills identified as a top priority by<br />

Registrars<br />

Iwona Stolarek; Hutt Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand<br />

1215-1230 6 Dissemination of teaching of medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination in Japan<br />

N Ban*, M Hatao, J Ohtaki, M Fujisaki, C Nakamura, T Tsuda, T Matsumura<br />

and M Shimo; Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan<br />

1230-1245 7 Transformational learning in a peer teaching programme<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alexandra Blanco and Soledad Campos; Austral University,<br />

Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Clair DuBoulay]<br />

2J<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Simulation and Clinical Skills Training<br />

Chairperson: Professor Andrzej Wojtczak<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0107 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Teaching clinical skills to medical students using the clinical skills<br />

laboratory with a new simulator and new tools<br />

I Yoshida*, T Ueno, M Hotta, H Abe, I Kubara, S Kono, Y Ogo, S Watanabe,<br />

A Hayashi, T Akagi, S Okuda and M Sata (Working Group on Teaching Basic<br />

Clinical Skills); Kurume University, Japan<br />

- 2.10 -


1115-1130 2 Training in vaginal examination technique using the ‘epelvis’<br />

C M Pugh* and M S Marsh; GKT Medical School, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Training medical students to perform vaginal examination using the<br />

‘epelvis’<br />

M S Marsh* and C M Pugh; GKT Medical School, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Procedural failures - when is enough enough?<br />

Michael Harrison; Auckland Hospital, New Zealand<br />

1200-1215 5 Approaches and advancements; Integrating simulation center<br />

activities into 3rd year medical school clerkship curricula<br />

Aileen E Zanoni*, Graceanne Adamo, Christoph R Kaufmann and Richard E<br />

Hawkins; Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Using scenario based teaching to deliver feedback on technical and<br />

communication skills<br />

R L Kneebone*, J Kidd, D Nestel, B Paraskeva, S Asvall and A Darzi; College<br />

School of Medicine, Imperial London, UK<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Paul Bradley]<br />

2K<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Students and Curriculum Evaluation<br />

Chairperson: Professor Juan Perez-Gonzalez<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0105 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Teaching quality questionnaire: students’ evaluations of standard<br />

learning activities in an integrated curriculum<br />

Øyvind Ellingsen*, Kristin Wigen and Are Holen; Norwegian University of Science<br />

& Technology, Trondheim, Norway<br />

1115-1130 2 The retrospective view - formative programme evaluation of<br />

preclinical courses by final year medical students<br />

C Schirlo*, W Vetter and P Groscurth; Studiendekanat der Medizinischen Fakultat,<br />

Zurich, Switzerland<br />

1130-1145 3 Students’ attitudes towards evaluation of teaching programmes - do<br />

they fib?<br />

Richard Phillips* and Alison Hooper; GKT School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Student evaluation of educational quality: the construction of a<br />

multidimensional questionnaire<br />

Volkhard Fischer; Hannover Medical School, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Evaluation of lectures in medical teaching based on focal groups<br />

and a survey of opinion to formulate a guide of practical<br />

recommendations<br />

Juan Cristóbal Maass*, Lorena Tapia, Marcela Jacard, and Teresa Millán;<br />

University of Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1215-1230 6 Use of a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) model to enhance<br />

curriculum evaluation and integration<br />

Nehad El-Sawi; University of Health Sciences, Kansas City, USA<br />

- 2.11 -


1230-1245 7 New faculty-level self-evaluation instruments<br />

K Lonka*, N Paganus, T Hätönen, A Heikkilä, J Vainio and J Nieminen;<br />

University of Helsinki, Finland<br />

1245-1300 8 The doctors’ opinion - a national evaluation of Swedish medical<br />

education<br />

Anders Bengtsson, Kerstin Johansson and Sara Engström*; Swedish Medical<br />

Association, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

2L<br />

Multiprofessional Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Anna Bukovinszky<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Interprofessional learning: the New Generation Project<br />

Debra Humphris* and Chris Stephens*; University of Southampton, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 “Walking in the moccasins of others”: reflections on a new initiative<br />

to bring the real world of the patient into the medical curriculum<br />

Lyn Brown; University of Liverpool, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Multiprofessional education in health care ethics in Germany<br />

Jochen Vollmann; Freie Universitat <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1145-1200 4 Dilemmas in resuscitation: nursing and medical students’<br />

responses to ethical professional issues related to resuscitation of<br />

patients<br />

C Edward*, J Crosby and P E Preece*; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 Promoting the use of clinical guidelines in Scotland<br />

Bernice West* and Peter Wimpenny*; Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Can Neuropsychiatry training be successfully delivered in a multiprofessional<br />

setting?<br />

Andrew Parkin* and Nisha Dogra; University of Leicester, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 The CURATA Partnership: linking CHE to patient care<br />

R L Thivierge*, M Labelle, M Beaulieu and L Bessette; University of Montreal,<br />

Canada<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Janke Cohen-Schotanus]<br />

2M<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Student Support/Psychiatry and the Curriculum<br />

Chairperson: Dr Jadwiga Mirecka<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0105 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 An evaluation of student support systems at the Medical School at<br />

Queen’s University Belfast<br />

Nicola Wilson, David McCluskey and Mairead Boohan*; Queen’s University of<br />

Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK<br />

- 2.12 -


1115-1130 2 Is student abuse a problem in our medical school?<br />

Ana Maida*, Alicia Vasquez, José Calderon, Viviana Herskovic, Marcela Jacard,<br />

Ana Pereira and Lars Widdel; University of Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1130-1145 3 First year medical nursing and pharmacy students’ approaches to study<br />

R J Lamdin* and I Martin; University of Auckland, New Zealand<br />

1145-1200 4 Changing medical students’ attitudes towards homosexuality<br />

Itzchak Levi* and Tsvi Fischel; Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel<br />

1200-1215 5 The attitudes to Psychiatry of first year medical students<br />

R K Day; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Psychology basic and applied knowledge<br />

Agnete Langagergaard* and Berit Eika; University of Aarhus, Denmark<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Jorgen Nystrup and Ms Mei-Ling Ball]<br />

1300-1400 Lunch – self-service buffet in the Marquee<br />

1400-1600 Session 3: Workshops<br />

3<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Please see the Abstracts section pages 4.23 to 4.26 for details of these workshops.<br />

Attendance at Conference workshops is free of charge but you are asked to preregister<br />

on the form included with the programme. Lists of participants who have preregistered<br />

and places available will be posted by the registration desk.<br />

3/1 The roles of the teacher<br />

Organisers: Jennifer Laidlaw and Anne Hesketh, SCPMDE Education<br />

Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0105 (1 st floor)<br />

3/2 The quality of medical education and teaching – thema con<br />

variatione<br />

Organiser: Professor Peter Nippert, University of Muenster, Germany<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0107 (1 st floor)<br />

3/3 From MD to academic teacher<br />

Organiser: Professor Reinhard Putz, University of Munich, Germany<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 5 (lower ground floor)<br />

3/4 Feedback and evaluation: essential activities in the learning process<br />

Organiser: Dr Charles D Puglia, MCP Hahnemann School of Medicine,<br />

Philadelphia, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/5 Best Evidence Medical Education: progress report<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ian Hart, BEME Collaboration. Contributions from<br />

representatives of BEME Topic Review Groups<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (ground floor)<br />

- 2.13 -


Monday 3 September<br />

3/6 East European Task Force<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ioan Bocsan, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine &<br />

Pharmacy, Romania<br />

Room: Research Building, Besprechungsraum 2.0026 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/7 Making feedback during clerkships meaningful and effective: a<br />

workshop for students and teachers<br />

Organiser: Dr Paul Hemmer, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences,<br />

Bethesda, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/8 Concept mapping<br />

Organiser: Dr Gonul Peker, Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova-Izmir,<br />

Turkey<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/9 Effective student assessment: something old, something new<br />

Organiser: Dr Geoff Norman, McMaster University Medical School, Hamilton,<br />

Canada<br />

Room: Teaching Building 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/10 A bachelor-master structure of medical education in Europe?<br />

Organisers: Professor Olle ten Cate, University Medical Centre Utrecht and<br />

Professor Herman van Rossum, University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

3/11 The assessment of poorly performing doctors: experiences from the<br />

first three years of the Performance Procedures within the UK<br />

General Medical Council<br />

Organisers: Professor Lesley Southgate, University College London Medical School,<br />

and Dr Peter McCrorie, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London UK<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 6 (lower ground floor)<br />

3/12 What can a general medical journal do for education in medicine?<br />

Sandy Goldbeck-Wood and Dr Ed Peile, University of Oxford, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

1600-1615 Coffee served in the foyers of the Teaching and Research Buildings<br />

1615-1715 <strong>AMEE</strong> General Assembly<br />

(Non-members of <strong>AMEE</strong> are also welcome to attend this business meeting of the Association)<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal1 (ground floor)<br />

1930-2300 River Cruise with buffet and entertainment<br />

(Optional – not included in Conference registration fee – please see page 3.2 for details)<br />

1930 til late Alternative evening for students only!<br />

Dinner and entertainment in the “Lecture Hall Ruin” (see page 3.2 for details)<br />

- 2.14 -


Tuesday 4 September<br />

0800-1715 Registration Desk open<br />

0830-1030 Session 4: Large Group Sessions<br />

4A<br />

Standards and professionalism in medical education<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ian Hart, Canada<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (ground floor)<br />

0830 4A/1 Attempto! Instilling mindful teaching<br />

Dr Maria Lammerding-Köppel, University of Tubingen, Germany<br />

0855 4A/2 Who is afraid of the didactic wolf? A plea for professionalism in<br />

medical education and specialist training<br />

Professor Rein Zwierstra, University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

0920 4A/3 What’s good about ‘Best Evidence Medical Education’ (BEME)<br />

Professor Ralph Bloch, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern,<br />

Switzerland<br />

0945 Discussion<br />

4B<br />

International aspects of standards<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ronald Harden, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

0830 4B/1 The challenge of developing international standards in medical<br />

education<br />

Dr Andrzej Wojtczak, Institute for International Medical Education, New York,<br />

USA, and Dr M Roy Schwarz, China Medical Board of New York<br />

0855 4B/2 Globalisation of medical education: the concept of international<br />

standards<br />

Dr Hans Karle, World Federation for Medical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark<br />

0920 Discussion<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 2.15 -


4C<br />

Standards and the curriculum<br />

Chairperson: Professor Herman van Rossum, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

0830 4C/1 Learning can be fun! The student’s experience of standards in a new<br />

curriculum<br />

Anke Neuwirth and Johannes Meier, 2 nd year students in the Reformed Medical<br />

Curriculum, Charité, Medical Faculty of the Humboldt-University, <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

0855 4C/2 The advantages of longitudinal evaluation of the medical<br />

curriculum<br />

Professor Reinhard Pabst, Medical School of Hannover, Germany<br />

0920 4C/3 Standards and assessment<br />

Professor Miriam Friedman Ben-David, University of Dundee, UK<br />

0945 Discussion<br />

1030-1100 Coffee served in the foyers of the Teaching and Research Buildings<br />

1100-1300 Session 5: Short Communications<br />

5A<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

13 simultaneous themed sessions on a range of topics:<br />

Learning and the Internet<br />

Chairperson: Professor Dieter Scheffner<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The “dos and don’ts” of e-learning in medicine: experiences of a<br />

CD-ROM production<br />

P Langkafel*, A Oehlsen, U Arnold and J W Dudenhausen; Humboldt University<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1115-1130 2 Online guide to basic surgical skills: http://olc.chirurgiegoettingen.de<br />

S Koenig*, P Wagner, D Zeiss, P M Markus and H Becker; Georg-August-<br />

University Goettingen, Germany<br />

1130-1145 3 Standards for an international distributed online case repository<br />

Chris Candler*, Colin Melville and Dave Collins; University of Oklahoma,<br />

Oklahoma City, USA<br />

1145-1200 4 Digital study of medicine<br />

U Arnold*, P Langkafel, L Peppel, I Reisinger and J W Dudenhausen; Humboldt<br />

University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Electronic learning objects and resource discovery<br />

David A Davies; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

- 2.16 -


1215-1230 6 Filling a curriculum map with Reusable Learning Objects<br />

N K McManus *, R M Harden, D Davidson, S Khogali and J M Laidlaw;<br />

SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ralph Bloch]<br />

5B<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Evaluation of Problem-based Learning<br />

Chairperson: Professor Reinhard Pabst<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Changing to PBL: does it have an effect on junior doctors’<br />

conceptualisation of communication skills?<br />

P A O’Neill*, S C Willis and A Jones; University of Manchester, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 How do medical students characterize good problem-based<br />

learning (PBL) tutoring after a year’s experience?<br />

Gillian Maudsley; University of Liverpool, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Predicting outcome by behaviour in PBL groups?<br />

Kristin Wigen*, Are Holen, Øyvind Ellingsen and Hansjørg Hohr; Norwegian<br />

University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway<br />

1145-1200 4 Student evaluation of a problem-based learning module into an<br />

occupational therapy course<br />

Deirdre Connolly* and Morag Donovan; Trinity College Dublin, Dun Laoghaire,<br />

Ireland<br />

1200-1215 5 Evaluation of student performance in the problem based learning<br />

(PBL) group<br />

David C M Taylor, The Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Crown<br />

Street, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Influence of tutor qualification on test achievement and student<br />

evaluation in a problem-based course of basic pharmacology<br />

J Matthes*, B Marxen, R-M Linke, W Antepohl, W Lehmacher and S Herzig;<br />

University of Cologne, Germany<br />

1230-1245 7 Individual perceptions of group learning and functioning in a<br />

problem-based learning programme<br />

Janet MacDonald; University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Jacques Des Marchais]<br />

- 2.17 -


5C<br />

Curriculum Evaluation<br />

Chairperson: Dr Kirsti Lonka<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 A course programme evaluation: contribution of students’ selfevaluation<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Jorge Lima and Joao Martins-Silva; Institute of Biochemistry,<br />

University of Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

1115-1130 2 A national evaluation of the reforms to higher specialist training in<br />

the UK: methodological issues<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and Heather Owen; Open University<br />

Centre for Education in Medicine, Milton Keynes, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Evaluation of PME courses in General Practice in Germany<br />

S Wilm*, R Jahromi, S Krause and B Hemming; Heinrich-Heine University,<br />

Duesseldorf, Germany<br />

1145-1200 4 The Matrix: a visual presentation of registrar term evaluation<br />

Richard Tarala and Alistair Vickery; Royal Perth Hospital, Australia<br />

1200-1215 5 Site visits as a method to assess the educational quality of<br />

clerkships<br />

Janke Cohen-Schotanus* and Rein P Zwierstra; University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

1215-1230 6 Impact of a new curriculum on the clinical competence of medical<br />

students at the University of Barcelona Medical School (UBMS)<br />

Ramon Pujol*, Frederic Manresa, Francesc Gudial, Eduard Kranfly, Josep Ma<br />

Martinez Carsetera; University of Barcelona, Spain<br />

1230-1245 7 Lessons learnt in designing and implementing a curriculum<br />

evaluation<br />

Helen Graham* and Mary Seabrook; GKT School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Geoff Norman and Ms Susanne Pruskil]<br />

5D<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Assessing Communication Skills/Patients as Examiners<br />

Chairperson: Dr Andre de Champlain<br />

Room: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Detecting rater bias on a measure of spoken English proficiency<br />

Marta van Zanten*, Danette McKinley, John Boulet and Gerald Whelan;<br />

ECFMG, Philadelphia, USA<br />

1115-1130 2 Comparison of communication skills in residency with performance<br />

on ECFMG Clinical Skills Assessment<br />

W Burdick*, J Boulet, S Peitzman, G Whelan and D Brody; ECFMG, Philadelphia,<br />

USA<br />

1130-1145 3 ACT: a new computer-assisted assessment (CAA) method for<br />

communication-skills of medical students<br />

R L Hulsman* and J D Donnison-Speijer; Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam,<br />

Netherlands<br />

- 2.18 -


1145-1200 4 How accurate is lay person assessment of clinical competence of<br />

student doctors? Comparison of the assessment of medical<br />

students by Faculty and Standardized Patients during the Objective<br />

Structured Clinical Examination<br />

P Heasman*, K Pitkala and N Paganus; University of Helsinki, Finland<br />

1200-1215 5 Do Simulated Patients grade inter-personal skills as well as<br />

Faculty?<br />

A S Arora*, N Natt, S Kluck and R Tiegs; Mayo Foundation, Rochester, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 The contribution of non medical assessors to the assessment of<br />

poorly performing doctors<br />

Lesley Southgate* and Peter McCrorie; University College London Medical School,<br />

London, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 Assessment in the elective clinical rotation: centrally reviewed case<br />

reports<br />

W M Molenaar*, S A Koopmans, M D Talsma and L H van Essen: University of<br />

Groningen, Netherlands<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Wolfram Antepohl]<br />

5E<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Postgraduate Education for General Practice/<br />

Family Medicine<br />

Chairperson: Dr Kwee Matheson<br />

Room: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 An educational approach to significant event auditing in primary care<br />

J McKay* and P Bowie; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Postgraduate education for generalist physicians<br />

J F Perez Gonzalez* and M Requena; Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas,<br />

Venezuela<br />

1130-1145 3 Barriers to change in postgraduate medical education in General<br />

Practice<br />

B W McGuinness; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Swaffham, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 The use of video in General Practice Registrar training and assessment<br />

C M Wiskin, Stephen Field* and John Skelton; West Midland GP Unit,<br />

Birmingham, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 The consultation styles of female GP Registrars with male and<br />

female patients<br />

Sarah Hillman* and John Skelton; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 The development, implementation and evaluation of a ‘concordance’<br />

training course<br />

Jon Dowell*, Claudia Pagliari and Sean McAleer; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 A linguistic study of information-giving in 30 doctor-patient<br />

consultations<br />

Andy Shanks* and John Skelton; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Graham Buckley]<br />

- 2.19 -


5F<br />

Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Dr Robert Galbraith<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Objective Structured Preclinical Exams (OSPE): a new test format of<br />

summative student assessment in the Problem-Based Learning (PBL)<br />

curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Bern<br />

Barbara Stadelmann*, R Hofer, Urs Brodbeck and Ara Tekian; University of<br />

Bern, Switzerland<br />

1115-1130 2 The quality of an extended-matching multiple choice examination<br />

J Beullens*, B Van Damme, H Jaspaert, E Struyf and P J Janssen; K.U.Leuven,<br />

Belgium<br />

1130-1145 3 Evaluation of a five-dimensional assessment strategy within a<br />

problem-based learning medical curriculum<br />

Paul Julian*, Scott Reeves* and Alistair Lumb*; Barts & The London School of<br />

Medicine & Dentistry, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 A preclinical exam to assess the networked structure of knowledge<br />

on basic science in the Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina)<br />

Ana Maria Reta*, Maria del Carmen Montbrun and Maria José Lopez;<br />

Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina<br />

1200-1215 5 Predictive value for academic performance of two assessment<br />

devices applied to medical students<br />

Ma Eugenia Ponce de León C*, Armando Ortiz and M del Carmen Ruiz Alcocer;<br />

National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico<br />

1215-1230 6 Self-assessed clinical skills levels of newly graduated physicians in<br />

relation to an intended curriculum<br />

A M Moercke* and B Eika; University of Aarhus, Denmark<br />

1230-1245 7 The dynamics of knowledge structure of graduating medical<br />

students based on results of the Medical Licensing Examination<br />

M Mrouga*, Y Bogachkov and L Artemchuk; Testing Board, Kyiv, UKRAINE<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor John Cookson]<br />

5G<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Outcome-based Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Jordan Cohen<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The Scottish Learning Outcomes Project Phase II - Assessment:<br />

“the proof of the pudding”<br />

Jacqueline Furnace* and John Simpson*, on behalf of Scottish Deans’ Medical<br />

Curriculum Group; University of Aberdeen, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Recent developments in an outcome-led curriculum<br />

Nick Ross; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

- 2.20 -


1130-1145 3 A New Instrument of curriculum development: Curriculum as a<br />

function of professional outcomes<br />

I Bulakh*, Y Voronenko and I Filonchuk; Testing Board and National Medical<br />

University, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

1145-1200 4 Focusing on learning outcomes for the Preregistration House<br />

Officer (PRHO) year<br />

E A Hesketh* and M S Allan; Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 The ACGME Outcome Project: a model resident assessment system<br />

Susan Swing; ACGME, Chicago, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Development of an outcome-based clinical curriculum at<br />

International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan, K H Ong, C M K<br />

Patrick and Q Akhtar; International Medical University, Selangor, Malaysia<br />

1230-1245 7 An evaluation of the internal validity of specific learning outcomes<br />

in phase II of a revised undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

F J Cilliers* and E M Bitzer; University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Miriam Friedman]<br />

5H<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Educational Strategies/Curriculum Planning<br />

Chairperson: Professor G Gaedicke<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Structural changes approaching medical education in The<br />

Netherlands<br />

Olle Th.J. ten Cate*, Herman J M van Rossum and Albert J J A Scherpbier;<br />

Utrecht University, Netherlands<br />

1115-1130 2 Implementation of PBL-Based Curriculum<br />

Maria Montbrun* and Enrique Guntsche; Universidad Nacional de Cuyo,<br />

Mendoza, Argentina<br />

1130-1145 3 An overview of the implementation of curriculum 2001 at Nelson R<br />

Mandela School of Medicine, University of Natal<br />

Veena Singaram*, Jacqueline van Wyk, Michelle McLean and Peter Olmesdahl;<br />

University of Natal, South Africa<br />

1145-1200 4 Self-directed, self-organized case-based-learning in final year<br />

students<br />

Jana Junger, Christiane Roth, Stephan Zipfel, Wolfgang Eich and Wolfgang Herzog;<br />

University of Heidelberg, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Changing to ‘self-induced learning’ in a speech therapy department<br />

Martin Peleman; Arteveldehogeschool, Gent, Belgium<br />

1215-1230 6 Student participation in the organization of education at a medical<br />

school - a comparison of two South African cases<br />

B G Lindeque and Pierre L Bredenkamp*; Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg,<br />

South Africa<br />

- 2.21 -


1230-1245 7 Preparing the way: encouraging clinical tutors to be co-producers in<br />

the learning process<br />

Peter Barton* and Jillian Morrison; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Peter McCrorie]<br />

5I<br />

Educating the Educators<br />

Chairperson: Professor Hywel Thomas<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0104 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 How to help clinical and multimedia staff develop joint programs<br />

Eleanor Flynn; University of Melbourne, Australia<br />

1115-1130 2 “Getting Started in Clinical Teaching” - a staff development initiative<br />

J A Dent* and P E Preece; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Governance in medical teaching: pilot study<br />

Iain Robbé; University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 The role of an education unit in health professional education:<br />

proactive or responsive<br />

Margaret Horsburgh* and Rain Lamdin; University of Auckland, New Zealand<br />

1200-1215 5 Beyond teacher training; the construction of a faculty development<br />

strategy<br />

Patricia Rosado Pinto* and Ramiro Avila; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lisbon,<br />

Portugal<br />

1215-1230 6 The profile of the perfect teaching professor<br />

F Scheele*, J Th M van der Schoot and A J Goverde; St Lucas Andreas Hospital,<br />

Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />

1230-1245 7 Evidence retrieval in medical education: obstructions and<br />

opportunities<br />

Alex Haig; SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr John Nicholls]<br />

5J<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Education and Cultural Diversity<br />

Chairperson: Dr Brigitte Grether<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0107 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The development and evaluation of a programme to teach cultural<br />

diversity to medical undergraduate students<br />

Nisha Dogra; University of Leicester, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Aboriginal health: a tool in the process of reconciliation?<br />

G Garvey* and I E Rolfe*; University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia<br />

- 2.22 -


1130-1145 3 Valuing diversity: The effectiveness of a roleplay workshop as part<br />

of a newly introduced community based diversity module<br />

Sue Conning*, Alison Hooper, Margot Turner and Val Wass; GKT School of<br />

Medicine, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Using negative role models positively<br />

S E Gull* and K H Matheson; Bury St Edmunds, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 What factors influence underrepresented minority (URM) students in<br />

their choice of medical schools?<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Mark Urosev; University of Illinois at Chicago,<br />

Chicago IL 60612, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Education for professionalism in medicine<br />

Geoffrey Westwood* and Barbara Westwood; Bankstown Health Service, Australia<br />

1230-1245 7 Characteristics of students admitted for the medical course at<br />

Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo,<br />

Brazil<br />

A R L Cianflone*, M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo, M L V Rodrigues and L E de<br />

A Troncon; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, Brazil<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Angel Centeno]<br />

5K<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Contexts for Learning<br />

Chairperson: Dr Abdulwahab Telmesani<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0105 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Clinical education in the health care professions: a critical analysis<br />

of the literature<br />

Alison Rushton; Coventry University, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 “Contracts for Learning”: project to improve the quality of<br />

attachments at a District General Hospital<br />

Richard Ayres*, Henry Averns and Lin Sanders; Northern Devon Healthcare<br />

Trust, Barnstaple, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Does the dedicated teaching environment in ambulatory care<br />

improve acquisition of learning outcomes?<br />

Clare I L Stewart*, Paul E Preece and John A Dent; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Could we improve on what patients our pediatrics students saw in<br />

outpatient clinics?<br />

Pedro Herskovic*, Alicia Vasquez, Cristian Breinbauer, Patricia Gomez, Viviana<br />

Herskovic, Marcela Jacard, Claudio Missarelli and Erika Troncoso; University of<br />

Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1200-1215 5 Using the ward round for teaching and learning: how do junior<br />

doctors learn from consultants through ward-based teaching?<br />

Alan Bleakley; Cornwall Postgraduate Education Centre, Truro, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Clinical skills training needs of final year medical students and<br />

PRHOs - A comparison<br />

D MacLeod*, E Gill, J Gate and J Rees; University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK<br />

- 2.23 -


1230-1245 7 The impact of a precepted diabetic foot care program<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Lewis E Foxhall*, Frank Sifuentes and Lee Cheng; University of<br />

Texas Houston Health Science Center, USA<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Amanda Howe]<br />

5L<br />

Evaluation of Multiprofessional Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Pia Forsberg<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The benefits of a multiprofessional education programme can be<br />

sustained<br />

G J Mires*, F L R Williams, R M Harden and P W Howie; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Self-directed multiprofessional continuing medical education with<br />

facilitators: an experiment in four European countries. The Belgian<br />

story<br />

J Goedhuys*, C Geens, N Mathers, K Billingham, G Maso and O Solas-Gaspar;<br />

Catholic University Leuven, Belgium<br />

1130-1145 3 Interprofessional education in a clinical and non-clinical<br />

environment: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives<br />

John Jenkins and Sue Morison*; Queen’s University Belfast, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Interprofessional education: experiences of students<br />

J Agsteribbe*, R M H Schaub and J Cohen-Schotanus; University of Groningen,<br />

Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 5 “Capturing the learning”: the development of interprofessional<br />

education in the Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological<br />

Sciences, University of Southampton<br />

D Humphris* and S Colly; University of Southampton, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Learning interprofessionally: a review of experiences<br />

A Le May*, F Kitsell, I Giles and C Stephens; University of Southampton, UK<br />

1230-1245 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Gary Mires]<br />

5M<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Teaching about EBM, Critical Thinking and Research<br />

Chairperson: Professor Florian Eitel<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0105 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Questions as the key to knowledge: teaching medical students in<br />

Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

Jonna Skov Madsen*, Birgitta Wallstedt, Carl Joakim Brandt and Mogens Horder;<br />

Odense University Hospital, Denmark<br />

1115-1130 2 Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine to healthcare professionals:<br />

implementing and evaluating the programme<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, UK<br />

- 2.24 -


1130-1145 3 Impact of a short interactive curriculum on medical students’<br />

appreciation of EBM and CAM<br />

Samuel N Forjuoh*, Robert A Henry, Terry G Rascoe, Barb Symm and Janine C<br />

Edwards; Texas A & M University, Temple, USA<br />

1145-1200 4 Annual Students-Congress of Medicine (SCM): a tool for scientific<br />

education in the medical curriculum<br />

E J M van Gils*, M H J Maathuis, G J Navis and R H Henning; University of<br />

Groningen, Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 5 What do medical graduates think about their earlier research<br />

projects now?<br />

Saeed Asefzadeh; Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran<br />

1215-1230 6 Research and the use of computers in the new curriculum of the<br />

University of Vienna Medical School<br />

Richard Marz* and Robert Trappl; University of Vienna, Austria<br />

1230-1245 7 Experimental courses in Biochemistry - initiation to scientific<br />

research in undergraduate medicine<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Rui Mesquita and J Martins-Silva; University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Sharon Krackov]<br />

1300-1400 Lunch in the Marquee<br />

1400-1700 Session 6: Workshops<br />

6<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Please see the Abstracts section pages 4.51 to 4.55 for details of these workshops.<br />

Attendance at Conference workshops is free of charge but you are asked to preregister<br />

on the form included with the programme. Lists of participants who have preregistered<br />

and places available will be posted by the registration desk.<br />

Note: coffee will be available between 1530-1600 hrs in the foyers of the Teaching<br />

and Research Buildings<br />

6/1 Basic Skills Faculty Development Workshop<br />

Dr Anita Duhl Glicken, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 6 (lower ground floor)<br />

6/2 An Introduction to Clinical Judgment Analysis<br />

Dr Anthony LaDuca, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room, 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

6/3 Nordic Federation for Medical Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Eivind Drange<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 1<br />

- 2.25 -


Tuesday 4 September<br />

Note: all participants welcome at the Plenary and the Workshop<br />

Plenary (1400-1445 ): Reform in a Medical School – needed, wanted,<br />

possible?<br />

Dr Kirsti Lonka, Director, Development and Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

University of Helsinki/ Professor in Medical Education Karolinska Institutet, Sweden<br />

Workshop (1500-1545): NFME and <strong>AMEE</strong> – do we need them both?<br />

A discussion of the future role of NFME and possible co-operation with <strong>AMEE</strong>. The<br />

workshop will start with a closed debate among the panel followed by an open discussion.<br />

Panel: Dr Jørgen Nystrup, Dr Dagfinn Øgreid (chair NFME), Dr Kirsti Lonka,<br />

Professor Jörgen Nordenström<br />

Moderator: Eivind Drange<br />

Closed meeting (1600-1700): Extraordinary General Assembly, NFME<br />

6/4 Bedside Cardiology Skills Training, featuring “Harvey”, The<br />

Cardiology Patient Simulator and the UMedic Computer System<br />

Organisers: Dr Michael S. Gordon, University of Miami School of Medicine, and<br />

Dr Joel M Felner, Emory University School of Medicine, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

6/5 Risk management in medical education<br />

Directors of Research in Postgraduate Medical Education Group<br />

Organisers: Dr Kwee Matheson, West Suffolk Hospital, UK, Dr Alistair Thomson<br />

and Dr Andrew Long<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0105 (1 st floor)<br />

6/6 The professional and organisational culture of medical education –<br />

an exploratory workshop in the context of an interactive exhibition<br />

Organisers: Dr Elizabeth Krajic Kachur, Medical Education Development, New<br />

York, USA, Dr Nobaturo Ban and Hannah Kedar<br />

Room: Research Building Horsaal 4 (ground floor)<br />

The exhibition linked to this workshop will be set up in Research Building, 1.0020 1st floor<br />

6/7 Students teaching communication skills<br />

Organisers: Students from Charité, Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Room: Building 8, Seminarraum 2 (1 st floor)<br />

6/8 Developing professional attitudes: theory, practice and evaluation<br />

Organiser: Professor Amanda Howe, University of East Anglia, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0107 (1 st floor)<br />

6/9 <strong>AMEE</strong>/IberoAmerican Network<br />

Chairperson: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado, <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

6/10 Problem-based Learning<br />

Organisers: Dr Stewart Mennin and Dr Scott Obenshain, University of New<br />

Mexico, Albuquerque, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

- 2.26 -


Tuesday 4 September<br />

6/11 Portfolio as a Method of Student Assessment<br />

Organiser: Dr Miriam Friedman Ben-David, University of Dundee, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

6/12 Learning Needs Assessment in undergraduate and postgraduate<br />

medical education<br />

Organiser: Professor Janet Grant, Open University, UK<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 5 (lower ground floor)<br />

6/13 A European core curriculum?<br />

Organiser: Professor Lennart Bouman, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

1930-2230 Gala Dinner at the Aquarium (Zoologischer Garten Aquarium)<br />

(Not included in the registration fee – see page X for details)<br />

- 2.27 -


Wednesday 5 September<br />

0830-1000 Session 7: Poster presentations<br />

7A<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

12 simultaneous themed sessions. Please meet in the rooms listed below. Participants<br />

each have two minutes to introduce themselves and their posters. The groups will<br />

then move to the poster location where a discussion will take place.<br />

New Learning Technologies<br />

Chairperson: DrNick Ross<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7A1 An International web-based Master’s degree in Primary Care<br />

Peter Toon* and Trish Greenhalgh; University College London, UK<br />

7A2 Can practical courses on interpreting blood smears be substituted<br />

by an interactive, web-based learning programme?<br />

U Woermann*, A Tobler and M Montandon; University of Bern,<br />

SWITZERLAND<br />

7A3 The management of student feedback using the World Wide Web<br />

Stephanie Cobb* and Helen Graham; Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of<br />

Medicine, London, UK<br />

7A4 Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it<br />

compare with traditional paper methods?<br />

Helen Graham* and Stephanie Cobb; Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of<br />

Medicine, London, UK<br />

7A5 Reflection on experiences by using trigger movies<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan H Bolk and Peter G M de Jong;<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

7A6 Provision of IT learning facilities for healthcare education<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, UK<br />

7A7 Development and evaluation of an interactive Computer Assisted<br />

Learning (CAL) programme on vaginal hysterectomy<br />

Vikram Jha*, Shelley Widdowson, Sean Duffy and Keith Allenby; St James’s<br />

University Hospital, Leeds, UK<br />

7A8 Links from ultrasound to anatomy - how is a multimedia teacher<br />

accepted?<br />

Dietmar Borchert*, Gunnar Schley, Edda Klotz, Peter Rauh, Clemens Reisinger<br />

and Thomas Medveczky; Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7A9 Development of a Computer-Based Simulation; the Dynamic<br />

Patient Simulator<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, J M van Baalen, E M Schoonderwaldt;<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, NETHERLANDS<br />

- 2.28 -


7B<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7A10 Introduction of laptop computers in Leiden Medical School<br />

Peter G M de Jong*, Hermiette E Idenburg and Henk L Hendrix; Leiden University<br />

Medical Center LUMC, Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

Problem-based Learning<br />

Chairperson: Dr Stewart Mennin<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7B1 Measuring success: partnership in evaluation (work in progress<br />

report)<br />

P O’Neill, D Graham, A Garden, S. Watmough*, J Brown; Universities of<br />

Liverpool, Manchester and Mersey Deanery, UK<br />

7B2 A new PBL course with an examination with standardised patients<br />

at the end<br />

S Schewe*, C Mueller and R Putz; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7B3 Training the Problem-Based Learning tutor: implementation issues<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, UK<br />

7B4 PBL in Psychiatry - the Holocaust. A unique experience<br />

T Fischel*, T Weizman and G Zalsman; Geha Psychiatric Center, Ramat Gan,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

7B5 Clinical skills of medical students participating in lecture-based<br />

versus problem-oriented training<br />

W Rimpau; Park-Klinik Weissensee, <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7B6 Systematic observations of problem-based study groups - what do<br />

they reveal?<br />

K Lonka*, P Sauri and N Paganus; University of Helsinki, FINLAND<br />

7B7 “Pathomechanisms” - a 9-week integrative and problem-based<br />

learning oriented course within the 3rd year of the curriculum at the<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden<br />

Oliver Tiebel*, Ines Nitsche and Andreas Deussen for the Core Planning Group;<br />

Medical Faculty, Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, GERMANY<br />

7B8 Characteristics of tutors’ assessment by students when PBL is<br />

being implemented<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Marcela Lopez-Cabrera; National Autonomous<br />

University of Mexico, MEXICO<br />

7B9 From traditional teachers to PBL tutors: how to start the change?<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Lizbeth Mendoza-Morales; National Autonomous<br />

University of Mexico, MEXICO<br />

7B10 Development of a problem-based curriculum leads to enhancement<br />

in faculty development - The Dresden experience<br />

N Lorenz*, T Aretz, E Armstrong and the Harvard-Dresden Medical Education<br />

Alliance; Technical University, Dresden, GERMANY<br />

- 2.29 -


7C<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7B11 An orientation programme for 1st year students in a problemorientated<br />

MBChB curriculum - the Pretoria experience<br />

Pierre L Bredenkamp; Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

Curriculum Planning and Change<br />

Chairperson: Dr Reg Dennick<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7C1 A model of curriculum management in an integrated medical<br />

curriculum<br />

Gregory J S Tan* and B E Mustaffa; International Medical University, Kuala<br />

Lumpur, MALAYSIA<br />

7C2 The University of Rochester’s Double Helix Curriculum<br />

Elaine F Dannefer; University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA<br />

7C3 Academic administration and mixed programmes<br />

S Sharma Khanal* and S Koirala; B P Koirala Institute, Dharan, NEPAL<br />

7C4 Learning responsibly - implementing written guidelines for medical<br />

students<br />

Richard Phillips*, Ann Wylie and Anne Stephenson; Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’<br />

Medical School, London, UK<br />

7C5 HEICUMED - a novel approach to student medical education at the<br />

Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Germany<br />

Hubert J Bardenheuer* on behalf of the HEICUMED Group; University of<br />

Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />

7C6 Enhancing curriculum renewal through a “clinical presentation”<br />

approach to undergraduate medical education<br />

Nehad El-Sawi; University of Health Sciences, Kansas City, USA<br />

7C7 Continuous training in General Practice as an integral part of an<br />

undergraduate medical curriculum - the Witten/Herdecke Model<br />

(Germany)<br />

W Kunstmann*, Dieter Wollgarten, René Vollenbroich and Markus Gschwind;<br />

University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, GERMANY<br />

7C8 Developing sense of ownership for curriculum changes within all<br />

teaching faculty of an Asian medical school<br />

C B Hazlett*, T F Fok, S S C Chung and J C Y Cheng; Chinese University of<br />

Hong Kong, Shatin, HONG KONG<br />

7C9 Sci45: Framework for the implementation of a career guidance<br />

instrument<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and Heather Owen; Open University<br />

Centre for Education in Medicine, MILTON KEYNES, UK<br />

7C10 The facilitation process in a problem-based curriculum at the<br />

Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine<br />

Jacqueline van Wyk, Peter Olmesdahl, Veena Singaram* and Michelle McLean;<br />

University of Natal, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

- 2.30 -


7D<br />

7E<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Curriculum Evaluation/Staff Development<br />

Chairperson: Professor Miriam Friedman<br />

Meet in: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7D1 Students’ feedback: a Public Health course in medical education<br />

Eva Rasky*, Wolfgang Freidl; Willibald-Julius Stronegger; Karl-Franzens-<br />

University, Graz, AUSTRIA<br />

7D2 Action Research Methodology: a possible framework for course<br />

evaluations<br />

Alison Rushton* and Gill James; Coventry University, Coventry, UK<br />

7D3 The opinion of the graduates of the Faculty of Medicine of the<br />

University of Barcelona on the new medical curriculum<br />

J Palés*, A Gual, A Vallés, Ma T Estrach, F Climent, X Gasull, R Gilabert, A Llobet,<br />

Y Compta, L Peri and J A Bombi; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

7D4 Comenius University Quality Assurance System (CUQAS) and<br />

students’ participation in graduate medical education evaluation<br />

L Plank*, J Danko, E Rozborilova, P Galajda and K Dokus; Jessenius Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Martin, SLOVAK REPUBLIC<br />

7D5 Research in medical education: constructing an ethical framework<br />

E B Peile* and A Slowther; Dept of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford, UK<br />

7D6 Students’ perceptions of the Physiology course in a traditional<br />

medical school<br />

F Riggione*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez; Centro de Investigacion y<br />

Desarrollo de la Educacion Medica, El Hatillo 1083A, VENEZUELA<br />

7D7 Students’ perceptions of a traditional undergraduate course in<br />

Microbiology<br />

Z Uzcategui*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez; Universidad Central de<br />

Venezuela, Caracas, VENEZUELA<br />

7D8 Faculty development in General Practice - the German experience<br />

M Ehrhardt, P Engeser, M Herrmann, T Lichte, N Donner-Banzhoff and S<br />

Wilm*, on behalf of the participants; Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7D9 Medicine and ethnic issues; do our tutors reflect their community?<br />

D Reeves, R Loudon and J Parle*; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

Postgraduate Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Charlotte Ringsted<br />

Meet in: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7E1 Exploring the views of basic surgical trainees on their training<br />

programme and their future in Surgery<br />

Jeremy Brown*, Linda de Cossart and Charmian Wiltshire; Mersey Deanery,<br />

Liverpool, UK<br />

- 2.31 -


7F<br />

7E2 An assessment of the skills base and attainments of Senior House<br />

Officer on a regional Basic Surgical Training <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Linda de Cossart, Charmian Wiltshire and Jeremy Brown*; Mersey Deanery,<br />

Liverpool, UK<br />

7E3 Personal and professional development groups for Junior Hospital<br />

Doctors<br />

Alan Naftalin and Peter Bruggen; Newham General Hospital, London, UK<br />

7E4 The educational needs of doctors with English as a second language<br />

when consulting in General Practice in the United Kingdom<br />

Sylvia Chudley and John Skelton; West Midlands Dept of Postgraduate Education<br />

for General Practice, Birmingham, UK<br />

7E5 “No such thing as a free lunch”: how free are bleep-free sessions?<br />

Jane Ross* and Rose Martin; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

7E6 The SHO RITA and portfolio<br />

Rose Martin* and R W Newton; Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK<br />

7E7 General Practice Registrar audit and implementation of change<br />

J McKay*, J R M Lough and T S Murray; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

7E8 The Senior Registrar - a new development in higher professional<br />

training in General Practice<br />

C T O’ Dubhghaill; NUI Galway, Co Galway, IRELAND<br />

7E9 Psychosocial training in the Family Residency in Spain:<br />

present situation and proposals for the future<br />

José Ramón Loayssa Lara; Servicio Navarro de Salud, Noaín, SPAIN<br />

7E10 Step by step to methodological exam; report on first year<br />

experiences with the new introduced GP Licence Examination<br />

in Austria<br />

R Willnauer*, M Schmidts, M Lischka; University of Vienna, Wien, AUSTRIA<br />

7E11 Development of professional doctorates in healthcare disciplines<br />

Alan Castle*, Graham A Mills and Valda Bunker; University of Portsmouth,<br />

Portsmouth, UK<br />

7E12 The appointment process for Anaesthetic Registrars in<br />

South Thames<br />

J Clarke* and J Pateman; St George’s Hospital London, UK<br />

Assessment<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Dr William Burdick<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (1 st floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7F1 Validity of assessment techniques: students’ views differ from<br />

observed outcomes<br />

W Colin Duncan; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK<br />

- 2.32 -


7G<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7F2 Assessment reliability in an MSc programme in Diabetes<br />

J Huber*, N Munro, A Felton, C Parker, P Delaney and C McIntosh; University<br />

of Surrey Roehampton and Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK<br />

7F3 Two years of progress-testing at the Charité<br />

A Mertens*, J Hoffmann, S Kölbel, R Raschke, K Duske, J Berger and U<br />

Hennewig; HU <strong>Berlin</strong> Medical Faculty, <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7F4 OSCE for Paediatric trainee internship examination multicentric<br />

experience<br />

M Aldunate, A Lopez, A Mena, M Varas, X Trivino, A Vasquez*, R Lillo, T<br />

Miranda and E Mandiola; University of Chile, Santiago, CHILE<br />

7F5 Third year medical student written history and physicals: how many<br />

is enough?<br />

Paul A Hemmer*, Thomas Jamieson, Kim Gibson, Lisa Moores, Andy Donato,<br />

Margaret Gaglione, Steven Durning, Alan Wimmer, Bonnie Cary-Freitas and<br />

Louis Pangaro; Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, USA<br />

7F6 Student fitness to practise procedures<br />

Chris Stephens; University of Southampton, UK<br />

7F7 Deriving the assessment framework for the Three Royal Colleges<br />

Diploma in Prison Medicine<br />

Lesley J Southgate*, Jon H Fuller and Jaz Bihku; University College Medical School<br />

London, London, UK<br />

7F8 Assessment in an outcome-based curriculum at the International<br />

Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan, K H Ong, C M K<br />

Patrick and AKH Wong; International Medical University, Selangor, MALAYSIA<br />

7F9 Psychosocial profile of medical students as a predictor of the<br />

academic success in medical school in Mexico<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-R, Victoria Bermudez,<br />

Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio;<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEXICO<br />

7F10 Psychometric data for Jefferson Medical College’s non-cognitive<br />

questionnaire in Mexican medical students<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-R, Victoria Bermudez,<br />

Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio;<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEXICO<br />

7F11 Portfolio based assessment of students during their internship<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Soledad Campos, Isabel Fernández and Alfredo Olivieri;<br />

Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

Teaching & Learning 1<br />

Chairperson: Mr John Dent<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7G1 What do first year medical students value in a learning situation?<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alejandra Blanco, Soledad Campos and Amelia Cabrera;<br />

Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

- 2.33 -


7H<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7G2 Application of Schon’s model for small-group teaching<br />

Francine Borduas* and Réjean Laprise; Association des médecins omnipraticiens de<br />

Québec, Québec, CANADA<br />

7G3 Teaching and learning about case presentations; the need for early<br />

intervention<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd; Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

7G4 Master teacher, master learner<br />

M P Oosthuizen; University of Pretoria, Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

7G5 Hemisphericity in medical students<br />

N E Fernandez-Garza*, I A Benitez-Trejo, C Salinas-Guerra, A Davila-Flores<br />

and J A Castellanos-Lopez; Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey,<br />

MEXICO<br />

7G6 Medical student preferences for an “ideal textbook” of Obstetrics<br />

and Gynaecology<br />

M S Marsh* and D Katopi; GKT Medical School, London, UK<br />

7G7 What can be learnt from medical atlases? Expert and novice visual<br />

schemata in breast sonography<br />

R Pauli* and J Huber; University of Surrey Roehampton, London, UK<br />

7G8 Community-based Public Health Education in Healthy City Project<br />

Yosuke Yamane*, Kuninori Shiwaku, Keiko Kitashima and Anuurad Erdembileg;<br />

Shimane Medical University, Izumo, JAPAN<br />

7G9 Two different types of professor authority, results in a traditional<br />

faculty of medicine<br />

Carlos E. de la Garza-Gonzalez*, Norberto Lopez-Serna and Ma Esthela Morales-<br />

Perez; Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEXICO<br />

7G10 The “excellent teacher” seen by mid-course students<br />

M Patrício, A V Carneiro and J Fernandes e Fernandes; University of Lisbon,<br />

Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

7G11 Underrepresented minority (URM) students’ perception of<br />

mentoring, advising and role modelling in medical school<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Jorge Girotti; University of Illinois at Chicago,<br />

Chicago, USA<br />

Teaching & Learning 2<br />

Chairperson: Dr Richard Ayres<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7H1 “Project Carrapato (*tick)”: a psychological focus in medical training<br />

I R P Scavariello, M S V M Silveira, E H V Celeri*, S L Brenelli and R S Cassorla;<br />

UNICAMP, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL<br />

7H2 Evaluating of videotape sessions for learning communication skills<br />

A Nogueras*, M Bernaus, X Claries and J de Nadal; Universitari Parc Tauli,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

- 2.34 -


7I<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7H3 Acting up? The recruitment and maintenance of a professional role<br />

play team for undergraduate and postgraduate medical training and<br />

assessment<br />

C M Wiskin* and P Croft; The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK<br />

7H4 Analysis of clinical competence at pre-graduate level<br />

Gitte Wichmann-Hansen* and Berit Eika; Aarhus University, Aarhus,<br />

DENMARK<br />

7H5 Use of paper-cases in undergraduate clinical Dermatology<br />

education in Germany<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann, W H Boehnke and F Ochsendorf; Universitats-Hautklinik<br />

Frankfurt/M, Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY<br />

7H6 Development of a Learning Resource Centre for healthcare<br />

professionals: an example of an innovative enterprise<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, London, UK<br />

7H7 Legal theories of recourse for failed medical students in the United<br />

States<br />

Thomas Jamieson; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda,<br />

USA<br />

7H8 An evaluation of organising student participation in curriculum<br />

reform using a mentoring programme at the Nelson R Mandela<br />

School of Medicine, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa<br />

Dorothy Appalasamy, Michelle McLean* and Jacqueline van Wyk; University of<br />

Natal, Durban, South Africa<br />

7H9 Medical education – more than learning?<br />

Thomas Eichholz and Catharina Crolow; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

Germany<br />

Continuing Professional Development 1<br />

Chairperson: Dr Richard Smith<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7I1 The roles of hospital consultants: more than just patients and students<br />

Patsy Stark; University of Leeds, Leeds, UK<br />

7I2 Continuing medical education X indexation? Authors’ opinions<br />

about editorial policies of a Brazilian academic journal<br />

Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues*, Valderes Aparecida Coelho Falaschi and<br />

Julio Cesar Voltarelli; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto,<br />

BRAZIL<br />

7I3 Learning HSR by doing: forming parallel learning groups<br />

Saeed Asefzadeh; Qazvin University of Medical Science & Health Services, Qazvin,<br />

IRAN<br />

7I4 Towards a flexible workforce - a basis for change<br />

F French*, M Awramenko, A Scott, C Ubach, L Leighton-Beck, G Needham, J<br />

Mollison and H Coutts; SCPMDE, Aberdeen, UK<br />

- 2.35 -


7J<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7I5 Ensuring cost-effective CPD: perspectives, problems and policy<br />

Clive Belfield and Celia Brown*; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK<br />

7I6 Improving your skills in preventive medicine: this CME workshop<br />

works!<br />

François Goulet*, André Jacques* and Danielle Saucier; Collège des Médecins du<br />

Québec, Montréal, CANADA<br />

7I7 CME program in Kuwait<br />

K Al-Jarallah and I G Premadasa*; Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization,<br />

Safat, KUWAIT<br />

7I8 The theory of perspective transformation and its applicability to<br />

CME<br />

Jill Donahue*, Stephen Hotz and Réjean Laprise*; Aventis Pharma, Laval,<br />

Québec, CANADA<br />

7I9 The Transtheoretical Model of behaviour change: does it apply to<br />

clinical practices?<br />

Réjean Laprise*, Jill Donahue and Stephen Hotz; Aventis Pharma, Laval, Québec,<br />

CANADA<br />

Continuing Professional Development 2<br />

Chairperson: Dr Alistair Thomson<br />

Meet in: Building 10, Room Kursraum 5 (Lower ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7J1 Sharing visions: working with CPD coordinators in General Practice<br />

Simon Smail* and Paul Hocking; University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff,<br />

UK<br />

7J2 The “Advanced Training Practice”: a questionnaire and interviewbased<br />

study of their role<br />

John Skelton and Steve Field*; West Midlands GP Unit, Birmingham, UK<br />

7J3 Does gender make a difference? CME for the female physician<br />

Jane Tipping* and Jill Donahue; Markham, Ontario, CANADA<br />

7J4 Strategic planning for effective partnerships<br />

Jane Tipping* and Danielle Deslauriers; Markham, Ontario, CANADA<br />

7J5 Integrating practice reflection and practice adjustment planning into<br />

the design of a CME meeting<br />

R L Thivierge*, L Samson and J V Patenaude; University of Montreal, Montreal,<br />

CANADA<br />

7J6 The Catalan Council of Physicians’ Colleges Accreditation Diploma<br />

in Continuing Medical Education<br />

A Ramos*, J Aliaga, A Gual and H Pardell; College of Physicians of Barcelona,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

7J7 Breaking bad news: how to learn in a CME workshop<br />

Francois Goulet*, André Jacques* and Robert Carrier; Collège des Médecins du<br />

Québec, Montréal, CANADA<br />

- 2.36 -


7K<br />

7L<br />

International Medical Education<br />

Chairperson: Professor Lennart Bouman<br />

Meet in: Building10 , Kursraum 6 (lower ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1 st floor<br />

7K1 Differences in learning style and satisfaction with Residency<br />

training for United States and internationally trained students<br />

Steven R Daugherty; Kaplan Medical, Chicago, USA<br />

7K2 Crossing borders - The <strong>Berlin</strong> Biomedical Exchange Office<br />

U Arnold* and J W Dudenhausen; Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7K3 Academic medical education in developing countries: an analysis of<br />

papers presented at medical education conferences in Argentina<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Gustavo Amestoy and Amelia Cabrera; Universidad Austral,<br />

Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

7K4 Communication skills training in Germany - results of a survey<br />

Jan Schildmann* and Ulrich Schwantes; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7K5 Reform of the medical educational system in Georgia<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilasonia and A Telia*; Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi,<br />

GEORGIA<br />

7K6 Results and main objectives of the first stage of education reform at<br />

the TSMU<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia and N Pruidze*; Tbilisi State Medical University,<br />

Tbilisi, GEORGIA<br />

7K7 First international Integrated Surgery course at the Charité, <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Hajo Schmidt-Traub; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7K8 Counting the uncounted: estimating the number of overseas doctors<br />

in training grades in the UK currently not employed in the NHS<br />

Janet Grant, Mairead Beirne* and Heather Owen; Open University Centre for<br />

Education in Medicine, MILTON KEYNES, UK<br />

Special Subjects<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Professor John Simpson<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (1st floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7L1 Illegible notes - do tomorrow’s doctors need teaching on how to<br />

write more clearly?<br />

E Westcott, A Kontoyannis*, N Murch, T Reid and K Sixsmith; University of<br />

Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

7L2 An active method to prepare students to lead medical interviews: an<br />

experience at Xavier Bichat Medical School<br />

Corinne Pieters; Dominique Maillard*, Françoise Blanchet-Benque; Hôpital Louis<br />

Mourier, Colombes, FRANCE<br />

- 2.37 -


7L3 Teaching medical students patient advocacy skills; an<br />

interdisciplinary intervention using Standardized Patients/Families<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Virginia Randall, Janice Hanson, William Sykora, Aileen E<br />

Zanoni, Elizabeth Jeppson and Richard E Hawkins; Uniformed Services University<br />

of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA<br />

7L4 The parameters affecting attitudes to death among students in a<br />

Medical College in Taiwan<br />

Ming-Liang Lai; National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, TAIWAN<br />

7L5 Evaluation of practical sessions in Clinical Anatomy: a strategy for<br />

educational improvement<br />

M A F Tavares* and M C Silva; Medical School of Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

7L6 Towards a more effective teaching of Gross Anatomy: introducing<br />

new integrated clinical concepts and improving peer presentations/<br />

evaluation techniques<br />

Ameed Raoof*, Thomas Gest, William Burkel and Tamara Stein; University of<br />

Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA<br />

7L7 Putting the salutogenic orientation into practice: the life cycle<br />

course at the Technion<br />

H Eshach*, R Van-Raalte, L Dolev, H Bitterman and D Hermoni; Technion, Haifa,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

7L8 ASAMANS (Ask Students About Medicine And National Socialism)<br />

T Drewes*, P Langkafel* and S Muller*; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7L9 Stress among medical doctors<br />

J Agsteribbe* and J Cohen-Schotanus; University of Groningen, Groningen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

7L10 Introducing changes in medical education: the “strategy” of Clinical<br />

Anatomy at the Medical School of Porto<br />

M A F Tavares; Medical School of Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

1000-1030 Coffee in foyers of Teaching and Research Buildings<br />

1030-1230 Session 8: Short Communications<br />

8A<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Computer Mediated Learning and Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Dr Joel Feiner<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Preparing clinical small group sessions by using digital video in CBE<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan A Gevers Leuven and Peter G M de<br />

Jong; Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands<br />

1045-1100 2 Inter-physician communication training through computer-based<br />

patient simulations<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, E Schoonderwaldt and J D Donnison-Speyer;<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands<br />

- 2.38 -


1100-1115 3 Computer Assisted Learning: using and doing research in primary<br />

care<br />

Linda Leighton-Beck*, Philip Hannaford, Neil Hamilton, Sara Shaw and Yvonne<br />

Carter; Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education, Aberdeen,<br />

UK<br />

1115-1130 4 Extracting core competencies “bottom up” from case histories by<br />

an online consensus seeking process in family medicine<br />

Peter Schlaeppi* and Ralph Bloch; University of Bern, Switzerland<br />

1130-1145 5 A new era of teaching. An innovative resource for continuing<br />

medical education and evidence based management<br />

K El-Hayes, B McElhinney, B Adams, E Boyd and K McKinney; Co Down,<br />

Northern Ireland<br />

1145-1200 6 Evaluating medical student and resident education: a CME software<br />

program<br />

J C Edwards*, P Ogden and A A Stricker; Texas A & M University, USA<br />

1200-1215 7 Metabolic challenges on CD-ROMs<br />

Marie-Paule Van Damme*, Jonathan Gould, Bruce Livett, Janet Macaulay, Ron<br />

Maxwell and Graham Parslow; Monash University, Clayton, Australia<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Megan Quentin-Baxter]<br />

8B<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Implementation of Problem-based Learning<br />

Chairperson: Professor Arcadi Gual<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Problem-based learning for trainees in Anaesthesiology<br />

Sigrid Adam* and Jan Klein; Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands<br />

1045-1100 2 Communicating with students in a problem-based curriculum:<br />

experiences with WebCT<br />

Michelle McLean and Kathy Murrell; Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine,<br />

Congella, South Africa<br />

1100-1115 3 Faculty members and senior students as facilitators in PBL-groups<br />

- similarities and differences<br />

Are Holen*, Kristin Wigen and Øyvind Ellingsen; Norwegian University of Science<br />

and Technology, Trondheim, Norway<br />

1115-1130 4 Tutors’ perspectives of problem-based learning<br />

Diana Kelly; Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 5 The E.D.I.T. project in Linköping: using web-based scenarios for PBL<br />

Wolfram Antepohl*, Anne-Christine Persson, Margareta Bachrach-Lindström and<br />

Björn Bergdahl; Division of Medical Education, Linköping University, SWEDEN<br />

1145-1200 6 How to promote success in a PBL tutorial session<br />

N Paganus*, K Lonka and T Hätönen; University of Helsinki, FINLAND<br />

1200-1215 7 Evaluation of the student staff in the experience of PBL in the<br />

- 2.39 -


Federal University of Roraima - Brasil<br />

Álvaro Tulio Fortes*, César Ferreira Penna de Faria, Ruy Guilherme de Souza and<br />

Fernado Menezes da Silva; University of Roraima, Brazil<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Anne Garden]<br />

8C<br />

Curriculum Planning<br />

Chairperson: Dr Frank Smith<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Priorities in the content of the curriculum from the standpoint of the<br />

academic staff<br />

E Nagle*, R Velins and V Pirags; Latvian Medical Academy, Riga, Latvia<br />

1045-1100 2 Reforming the core curriculum of the Reformstudiengang in <strong>Berlin</strong> -<br />

a Delphi study<br />

B Huenges*, W Burger, J W Dudenhausen, U Frei, C Frömmel, H-P Lemmens, U<br />

Schwantes and D Scheffner; Arbeitsgruppe Reformstudiengang Medizin, <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

Germany<br />

1100-1115 3 Early clinical clerkship - does it make a difference?<br />

Berit Eika* and Ole Sonne; University of Aarhus, Denmark<br />

1115-1130 4 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) as a tool in curriculum<br />

development<br />

B Grether; University of Zurich, Switzerland<br />

1130-1145 5 The continuum of professional development<br />

H M R Meier; University of Toronto, Canada<br />

1145-1200 6 Evaluating ethics seminars<br />

Gerald Neitzke; Hannover Medical School, Germany<br />

1200-1215 7 A tool to evaluate medical ethics seminars<br />

Mareike Moeller* and Gerald Neitzke; Hannover Medical School, Germany<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ala’aldin Al Hussaini]<br />

8D<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

The Final Examination<br />

Chairperson: Dr Jack Boulet<br />

Room: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Consistency of examination marks<br />

T Vik*, K H Karlsen and S Westin; Norwegian University of Science & Technology,<br />

Trondheim, Norway<br />

1045-1100 2 Identifying threshold competence in an undergraduate qualifying<br />

clinical examination<br />

John Cookson* and Stewart Petersen; Leicester Warwick Medical School, Leicester,<br />

UK<br />

- 2.40 -


1100-1115 3 The validity of performance standards on a certification examination<br />

for occupational therapists<br />

Ernest N Skakun; University of Alberta, Canada<br />

1115-1130 4 Reliability of a sequential clinical examination<br />

Stewart Petersen* and John Cookson; Leicester Warwick Medical School, Leicester,<br />

UK<br />

1130-1145 5 Consideration of legal, ethical and organizational aspects of clinical<br />

competence in a National Licensing Examination: evaluation at the<br />

Medical Council of Canada<br />

Jacques E. Des Marchais*, Dale W. Dauphinée and David Blackmore; Medical<br />

Council of Canada, Montreal, Canada<br />

1145-1200 6 Combining different components of an assessment procedure<br />

J Degryse*, J Goedhuys, A Roex and A Dermine; K U Leuven, Belgium<br />

1200-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Diana Wood]<br />

8E<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Postgraduate Education/Career Choice<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ope Adekunle<br />

Room: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Teaching with patients: moving beyond ‘learning by osmosis’<br />

Kath Green; South Thames Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental<br />

Education, London, UK<br />

1045-1100 2 The effect of an interactive postgraduate education programme on<br />

parenteral treatment in Macedonia<br />

M Ivanovski, P D Toon*, K Zafirovska, F Tozija and B Gomes; University College<br />

London, UK<br />

1100-1115 3 Promoting innovation in postgraduate education through the<br />

accreditation process<br />

Judith Armbruster; Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education,<br />

Chicago, USA<br />

1115-1130 4 A new development in postgraduate surgical education: the<br />

Intermediate Breast Course - a distance learning course<br />

H M Sweetland*, E Hoadley-Maidment and M Galea; University of Wales College<br />

of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

1130-1145 5 Attitude change in neonatologists-in-training by participation in the<br />

neuropediatric follow-up of former premature infants<br />

J B Hentschel; Universitaets – frauenklinik des Inselspitals, Bern, Switzerland<br />

1145-1200 6 Factors that influence the career choice of medical specialization<br />

M B M Soethout* and G van der Wal; Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre,<br />

Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 7 Personality differences in doctors affect the factors associated with<br />

their medical specialty choice<br />

Gillian B Clack*, Derek Cooper and John O Head; Kings College London, UK<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Janet Grant]<br />

- 2.41 -


8F<br />

Teaching and Learning<br />

Chairperson: Professor Clarke Hazlett<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (First Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Impact of peer tutoring on the patient-centered interviewing skills of<br />

first-year medical students<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd; Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1045-1100 2 Peer assisted learning - a teaching strategy for the new millennium?<br />

Joy R Crosby and H Mei-Ling Ball*; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1100-1115 3 An insight into how students learn about a cardiovascular problem<br />

using study guides<br />

Shihab E O Khogali*, Jennifer M Laidlaw, Stuart D Pringle and R M Harden;<br />

University of Dundee, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 Study guides in an outcome-based medical curriculum at the<br />

International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

M I Nurjahan*, J C Ramesh, S Raman, A Radhakrishnan, C L Teng, K H Ong, C M<br />

K Patrick and Q Akhtar; International Medical University, Negri Sembilan, Malaysia<br />

1130-1145 5 How authors of an extensive distance learning programme for<br />

surgical trainees differed in their use of the specified template<br />

Jennifer M Laidlaw*, Ronald M Harden, Lorraine J Robertson and E Anne<br />

Hesketh; SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Context-dependent memory in a meaningful environment: in the<br />

classroom and at the bedside<br />

Franciska Koens*, Olle Th.J. ten Cate and Eugène J F M Custers; Universitair<br />

Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 7 Continuous Interactive Class (C.I.C)<br />

J Medrano*, R Calpena, A Compañ, M T Pérez Vázquez, J Lacueva and M Díez;<br />

Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor David Prideaux]<br />

8G<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Assessment in Postgraduate and Continuing Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Michael Tunbridge<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (Second Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 A computerized adaptive test as an element of the final assessment of<br />

general practitioners in Flanders. Possibilities, difficulties, dilemmas…<br />

A Roex* and J Degryse; K.U. Leuven, Belgium<br />

1045-1100 2 Insight 360: a tool for looking at doctors’ performance<br />

E B Peile* and R Conradt; University of Oxford, UK<br />

1100-1115 3 Impact on non-principals in General Practice of the summative<br />

assessment audit project<br />

P Bowie, A Garvie and J Oliver; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

- 2.42 -


1115-1130 4 The difference between the ability to apply consultation guidelines<br />

and the routine of application: A relevant distinction?<br />

Myrra Vernooij-Dassen*, Ben Bottema and Cees van der Vleuten; University of<br />

Nijmegen, Netherlands<br />

1130-1145 5 What do SHO Educational Supervisors REALLY think of appraisal?<br />

Ann Cadzow*, Helen Coutts, Fiona French, Linda Leighton-Beck and Ken<br />

McHardy; SCPMDE, Aberdeen, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Visual-spatial ability and the objective assessment of technical<br />

skills<br />

K R Wanzel*, S J Hamstra, D J Anastakis, E D Matsumoto and M D Cusimano;<br />

Centre for Research in Education, Toronto, Canada<br />

1200-1215 7 Validity of MIST-VR in the assessment of laparoscopic skill<br />

A M Paisley*, P Baldwin and S Paterson Brown; University of Edinburgh, UK<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr John Pitts]<br />

8H<br />

Curriculum Change<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Dr Johan Ponten<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (Second Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Innovation and reform of medical education: evaluating the UNI<br />

Program in Latin America<br />

E C Ribeiro*, G Werneck, A Aguiar and V Brant; Universidade Federal do Rio de<br />

Janeiro, Brazil<br />

1045-1100 2 Promoting responsive curriculum change within the 21st Century<br />

Cam Enarson; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA<br />

1100-1115 3 Improving the University and NHS Teaching Hospital Trust<br />

Partnership to identify SIFT spending<br />

Andrea J Bolshaw; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 Assessment of medical student attitudes toward relevant aspects of<br />

medical practice<br />

M L V Rodrigues*, L E de A Troncon, M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo, A R L<br />

Cianflone, C E Piccinato, L C Peres and J A Dela-Coleta; Faculty of Medicine of<br />

Ribeirao Preto, Brazil<br />

1130-1145 5 Effect of a curriculum reform on graduating student performance<br />

M L V Rodrigues*, J F C Figueiredo, L E A Troncon, C E Piccinato, L C Peres, A R<br />

L Cianflone and M F A Colares; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Brazil<br />

1145-1200 6 A developmental approach to reduce the long term risk of rejection<br />

of curricular changes<br />

Jamsheer Talati* and Camer Vellani; The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan<br />

1200-1215 7 The final year in undergraduate medical education: key position<br />

between theory and daily routine<br />

K Muller; University of Bonn, Germany<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Ms Brownell Anderson]<br />

- 2.43 -


8I<br />

Communication Skills Training<br />

Chairperson: Professor Knut Aspegren<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0104 (Second Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Which interviewing skills must be actively taught at medical<br />

school?<br />

K Aspegren*, P Henriksen, P Lønberg-Madsen and M Strømming; Copenhagen<br />

University Hospital, Denmark<br />

1045-1100 2 Implementing communication skills training at the Charité - a<br />

project by students and doctors<br />

Jan Schildmann*, Carsten Schwarz, Eva Herrmann, Heiderose Ortwein, Amelie<br />

Klambeck, Andreas Brunklaus and Ulrich Schwantes; Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

(Charite), Horn, Germany<br />

1100-1115 3 Teaching sexual history-taking to health care professionals in<br />

primary care<br />

J R Skelton* and P M Matthews; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 SEX SEX SEX, oh yes, and how’s your knee?<br />

Annie Cushing* and Dason Evans; St. Bartholomews & The Royal London Queen<br />

Mary’s, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 5 Training of the systemic approach in doctor patient communication<br />

I: history taking from a third party<br />

K P M van Spaendonck* and E M van Weel-Baumgarten; University of Nijmegen,<br />

Netherlands<br />

1145-1200 6 Training of the systemic approach in doctor patient communication<br />

II: history taking with a patient and a third party<br />

E M van Weel-Baumgarten* and K P M van Spaendonck; University of Nijmegen,<br />

Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 7 Breaking bad news - evaluation of courses run by students and<br />

young doctors<br />

H Ortwein*, E Herrmann, A Brunklaus, A Kreutz, C Schwarz and J Schildmann;<br />

Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Amindra Arora]<br />

8J<br />

Clinical Teaching<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Dr Ioan Bocsan<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 5 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Increasing student awareness of strengths and weaknesses using a<br />

Standardized Patient case<br />

Devra Cohen*, Jerry Colliver, Mark Swartz and Randal Robbs; Mt Sinai School of<br />

Medicine, New York, USA<br />

1045-1100 2 Clinical dermatology: prospective randomized comparison of a<br />

traditional, a personal bed-side teaching (PBST) and a problemoriented-practical<br />

(POP) course<br />

F R Ochsendorf*, H Boehncke, R Hovelmann, A Boer and R Kaufmann; Klinikum<br />

der J.W. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/M, Germany<br />

- 2.44 -


1100-1115 3 Clinical skills training - a new curriculum between BEME and reality<br />

Peter Frey; University of Bern, Department of Instructional Media (AUM),<br />

Inselspital 38, CH - 3010 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

1115-1130 4 The effects of student gender on patients’ willingness to be<br />

examined by medical students<br />

William P Metheny*, Roxanne Jamshidi and Kara Pitt; Brown University School of<br />

Medicine/Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, USA<br />

1130-1145 5 Reality shock among medical students attending first clinical rotation<br />

I Levi* and T Fischel; Sackler Medical School, Ramat Gan, Israel<br />

1145-1200 6 Experiential clinical learning in a horizontally-integrated, problembased<br />

curriculum<br />

Tim Dornan*, Arno Muijtjens and Henny Boshuizen; Universities of Manchester<br />

and Maastricht, UK and Netherlands.<br />

1200-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Paul Hemmer]<br />

8K<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

International Aspects of Medical Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr M Roy Schwarz<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 6 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Influence of Studying on Students’ Health (ISSH)<br />

T Schweickert*, P Hodzic, V Jurkovic, J Seitz*, O Onur* and T Shiozawa*;<br />

German Medical Students’ Association, Aachen, Germany<br />

1045-1100 2 A comparison of undergraduate medical curricula in various countries<br />

J Mirecka*, Paola Binetti, Jan Heijlman, Roy Remmen and K Lipinski; Department<br />

of Medical Education, Krakow, Poland<br />

1100-1115 3 International differences in medical content preparation<br />

Steven R Daugherty* and Rochelle Rothstein; Kaplan Medical, Chicago, USA<br />

1115-1130 4 New trends at TSMU: elaboration of medical education conception<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia, Z Avaliani* and G Simonia; Tbilisi State Medical<br />

University, Georgia<br />

1130-1145 5 Learning needs assessments for refugee doctors; establishing<br />

baseline data about medical knowledge and experience<br />

Lesley J Southgate* and Joan F Fuller; University College London, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Helping refugee doctors back to work<br />

M J Bannon*, E Paice, G MacFadden, G Cowan, S Cheeroth and Y H Carter;<br />

London Deanery, Harrow, UK<br />

1200-1215 7 New York University Master Scholars Program<br />

Sharon K Krackov; New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Charles Boelen]<br />

- 2.45 -


8L<br />

Special Subjects<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ester Mateluna<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (First Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 And now for something completely different … reflective style<br />

learning of the Arts in medicine<br />

Paul Lazarus; University of Leicester, UK<br />

1045-1100 2 Seamless humanities: on integrating medical humanities into<br />

medical education: the Witten project<br />

C Hick*, B Matzke, B Strahwald, A Weymann and W Vermaasen; Universität<br />

Witten/Herdecke, Germany<br />

1100-1115 3 Improving clinical reasoning in novice clinicians: a diagnostic<br />

training aid to support clinical reasoning in student<br />

physiotherapists<br />

Gill James; Coventry University, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 The culture of criticism and argument in health education<br />

Barbara Westwood* and Geoffrey Westwood; University of Western Sydney,<br />

Australia<br />

1130-1145 5 Development and interim evaluation of a new postgraduate course<br />

in community gynaecology and reproductive health care<br />

A Parsons, B Olowokure* and M Walzman; University of Warwick, Coventry, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Palliative medicine education for Internal Medicine Resident<br />

Physicians<br />

Marcos Montagnini*, Edmund Duthie and Basil Varkey; Medical College of<br />

Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA<br />

1200-1215 7 Teaching stress management and empathic communication to<br />

medical students<br />

Ray Melmed and Hannah Kedar*; The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Paul O’Neill]<br />

1230-1330 Lunch in Marquee<br />

1330-1600 Session 9: Plenary<br />

9<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Different views of medical education<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 and 2<br />

(Note: there will be a video link to Hörsaal 3 to provide additional seating)<br />

Chairperson: Dr Madalena Patrício, Portugal<br />

1330-1355 9/1 The role of clinical experience in the acquisition of clinical<br />

reasoning: Implications for education<br />

Professor Geoff Norman, McMaster University, Canada<br />

- 2.46 -


1355-1420 9/2 Keeping standards up to date<br />

Ms Susanne Pruskil, Medical Student from Charité, Medical Faculty of the<br />

Humboldt-University, <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

1420-1445 Discussion<br />

1445-1500 Short break<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

1500-1550 Special presentation:<br />

Humour in medical education is like a box of chocolates …<br />

Dr Ron Berk, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA<br />

1550-1610 Close of Conference, and presentation of Medical Teacher Poster Prize<br />

Please remember to hand in your Conference Evaluation Form at the Registration<br />

Desk. (Spare copies are available if required). We value your feedback, together with<br />

your suggestions for future speakers and workshop organisers.<br />

- 2.47 -


SECTION 3<br />

Conference Social <strong>Programme</strong>,<br />

Tours and Accommodation


Tours, Optional Conference Social Events<br />

and Accommodation<br />

Please address all bookings and queries relating to the above to DER-CONGRESS:<br />

DER-CONGRESS<br />

Bundesallee 56 Tel: +49 30 857 9030<br />

D-10715 <strong>Berlin</strong> Fax: +49 30 85 79 03 26<br />

Germany Email: der@der-congress.de<br />

Bookings for accommodation/tours/optional social programme should be submitted on<br />

Form C, included in the provisional conference programme or available from the <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Office. Please return Form C direct to DER-CONGRESS and not to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office.<br />

Conference Social <strong>Programme</strong><br />

The following two social events are included in the registration fee:<br />

Sunday 2 September 1400-1700 hrs<br />

Sightseeing tour of <strong>Berlin</strong> by coach, starting at The Forum Hotel,<br />

Alexanderplatz, <strong>Berlin</strong> (see map on page 1.6)<br />

Please make your own way to the Forum Hotel to meet your coach. On the tour you<br />

will see the most attractive and historic sights of <strong>Berlin</strong>: Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial<br />

Church; Europa Center; Bauhaus Archives; New National Gallery; the Philharmonic<br />

Concert Hall; the “Anhalter” railway station; the “Alexanderplatz”; the<br />

“Gendarmenmarkt” with its twin French and German cathedrals; Nikolai District;<br />

Television Tower; Red City Hall (which houses the <strong>Berlin</strong> Senate, and is the location<br />

for the Opening Ceremony on Sunday evening); “Zeughaus”; German State Opera;<br />

the magnificent boulevard “Unter den Linden”; Brandenburgh Gate; the “Reichstag”;<br />

Congress Hall; the “Tiergarten”; “Schloss Bellevue”; Victory Column; German Opera<br />

House, and Charlottenburg Palace. The tour will terminate at the Forum Hotel.<br />

Sunday 2 September 1930-2130 hrs<br />

Welcome Reception in the “Red Town Hall” (Rotes Rathaus), Rathausstraße<br />

(see map on page 1.6)<br />

You are invited by the Senate of <strong>Berlin</strong> to the Red Town Hall, which is the<br />

headquarters of <strong>Berlin</strong> City Council built in neo-Renaissance style between 1861<br />

and 1870. The evening is the opportunity to meet colleagues and friends; musical<br />

entertainment by Musici Medici Quartet who will play some pieces by Schubert;<br />

drinks and snacks provided. Please note that you should make your own way to and<br />

from the Red Town Hall.<br />

- 3.1 -


Optional Social Events<br />

Student Social Events<br />

The following Conference Social Events are not included in the registration fee and<br />

can be booked through DER-CONGRESS, using Form C available from DER or from<br />

the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office.<br />

Monday 3 September 1930-2300 hrs<br />

River Cruise, starting at Jannowitzbrücke<br />

- 3.2 -<br />

Price: DM 100 per person<br />

This river cruise on the Spree presents the historic centre of the city with its most<br />

important sights from a completely different angle. You will pass such buildings as<br />

the Reichstag, the <strong>Berlin</strong> Cathedral, the castle Charlottenburg etc. from the waterfront.<br />

The tour will be guided in English and will start from the landing stage<br />

Jannowitzbrücke. It will end at <strong>Berlin</strong> Cathedral (see map on page X). Buffet dinner<br />

and two drinks are included. Tickets may be collected from DER on registration and<br />

please remember to take these with you to the event as they entitle you to two free<br />

drinks!<br />

Tuesday 4 September 1930-2230 hrs<br />

Gala-Dinner at the Aquarium, Budapester Straße 32,<br />

10787 <strong>Berlin</strong> (see map on page 1.6) Price: DM 130.00 per person<br />

The location for our Conference Dinner is the Aquarium, situated in the western<br />

city centre and part of the famous Zoological Gardens. The Aquarium houses the<br />

greatest variety of species in the world and you are free to look around. A dinner<br />

buffet and drinks are provided, with musical entertainment from the Brass Brothers<br />

– from Bach to the Beatles and, by popular request, Foetus ex Ore, the Norwegian<br />

medical students’ choir that has amused and amazed us in previous years. We must<br />

vacate the building by 2300 hrs which is bedtime for the fish – they suffer distress<br />

and higher mortality rates if deprived of their rest! Please make your own way to<br />

and from the Aquarium.<br />

Saturday 1 September<br />

If there is sufficient demand, there will be a pub crawl for all the students who<br />

arrive early (they may not object to a few non-students tagging along if anyone else<br />

is interested!). Please contact them if you would like a guided tour of the <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

nightlife: student.amee@charite.de<br />

Monday 3 September 1930 hrs until late<br />

An alternative to the River Cruise, for students only! The local students invite visiting<br />

students to a free dinner in the ‘Lecture-hall Ruin’. This is the old pathology lecturehall<br />

that was partly destroyed during WW II, has been rebuilt and is now being used<br />

for social events. All students registering for the Conference will be contacted by<br />

the <strong>Berlin</strong> students and asked if they would like to attend the dinner. As numbers are<br />

limited they can’t promise that places will be available for everyone. Please contact<br />

student.amee@charite.de for further information.


Accompanying Persons <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Tours leave from and return to the Forum Hotel, Alexanderplatz (see map on page 1.6).<br />

All tours are guided in English. Lunches do not include drinks.<br />

Monday 3 September 0830-1630 hrs<br />

Impressions of the Spreewald Price: DM 150.00 per person<br />

This day-tour to the Spreewald offers an unparalleled experience of nature. The<br />

area, which was originally settled by the Sorbs, is traversed by numerous tributaries<br />

of the River Spree, these often being the only links between houses and fields. The<br />

tour will take you to Burg and Leipe, two small idyllic towns in a romantic setting.<br />

Spreewald specialities will be served at lunch. Enjoy a trip along the network of<br />

waterways on one of the traditional Spreewald punts.<br />

Tuesday 4 September 0830-1630 hrs<br />

Neuruppin & Rheinsberg Palace Price: DM 150,00 per person<br />

This is a Coach trip to the little town of Neuruppin, which is situated on the lake<br />

”Ruppiner See”. During a sightseeing tour you will get to know the home town of<br />

Theodor Fontane and Karl Friedrich Schinkel. After lunch the trip continues to<br />

Rheinsberg, ”picture book for lovers” as Tucholsky called it. The town, which is<br />

situated on the east bank of the ”Griebericksee”, is famous in particular for its<br />

palace, Schloß Rheinsberg. It was built in 1566 as a moated castle and in 1737/40<br />

Knobelsdorff reconstructed it into a major architectural work during Friedrich the<br />

Great’s reign. The Rheinsberg Palace houses a museum, which is open to the public.<br />

The tour also includes a walk through the palace gardens, which were originally<br />

designed in Baroque-style and changed into English-style gardens at the end of the<br />

18th century.<br />

Wednesday 5 September 1000-1400 hrs<br />

Potsdam/Sanssouci Price: DM 70,00 per person<br />

This tour shows old and modern Potsdam. You will visit the well-preserved, worldfamous<br />

Rococo Palace Sanssouci with its art treasures and beautiful park. A city<br />

tour through Potsdam will follow.<br />

- 3.3 -


Pre-Conference Tours<br />

All tours are guided in English. Tours leave from and return to the Forum Hotel,<br />

Alexanderplatz (see map on page 1.6). <strong>Programme</strong> is subject to change. Lunches do<br />

not include drinks.<br />

Saturday 1 and Sunday 2 September (1.5 days)<br />

Dresden<br />

Depart <strong>Berlin</strong> 0900 hrs on 1 September, return to <strong>Berlin</strong> 1200 hrs on 2 September<br />

(one overnight stay)<br />

1 September: Start of the tour in <strong>Berlin</strong>. On the way to Dresden you will pass by<br />

the lake “Teupitzer See”, some distant parts of the Spreewald and the coal mining<br />

area of Niederlausitz. Dresden is one of the most beautiful baroque towns in Europe.<br />

During a sightseeing tour through the city you will visit the most important sights<br />

such as the Zwinger, Taschenberg-Palace, the famous Semper Opera House, picture<br />

gallery ”Old Masters” with the famous painting ”Sixtinische Madonna” or the<br />

dazzling jewellery exhibition in the ”Green Vault”.<br />

2 September: At 0900 hrs your return journey to <strong>Berlin</strong> will start. The tour ends<br />

also at the Forum-Hotel, Alexanderplatz.<br />

Rate per person in a double room: DM 305,00<br />

Rate per person in a single room: DM 375,00<br />

Rates include following services: de luxe coach, 1 overnight stay including breakfast<br />

in a Hotel of 4-Stars category, all entrance fees.<br />

Saturday 1 September 0900-2000 hrs (one day)<br />

Mecklenburg countryside<br />

The excursion will take you to Schwerin, an old town “up North”. In this “City of<br />

Seven Lakes” you can admire the magnificent palace, situated on a charming island,<br />

which no lesser than Tsar Alexander enthused over. After lunch you will be driven<br />

past the lake “Schwerin” towards Wismar, the first record of which dates back to<br />

1229. The buildings still testify to its former glory as a hanseatic city. The historic<br />

centre has been restored and the whole area is now protected by a conservation<br />

order.<br />

Rate per person: DM 175,00 (including transportation in de luxe coach, lunch<br />

and entrance fees)<br />

- 3.4 -


Post-Conference Tour<br />

Cancellation Policy<br />

Accommodation<br />

All tours are guided in English. Tours leave from and return to the Forum Hotel,<br />

Alexanderplatz (see map on page X). <strong>Programme</strong> is subject to change. Lunches do not<br />

include drinks.<br />

Thursday 6 September 0830-1800 hrs (one day)<br />

Potsdam’s Parks and Palaces<br />

A visit of the palaces and gardens of Sanssouci will be followed by a guided tour to<br />

the Cecilienhof, the place where the Potsdam Agreement was signed in 1945. After<br />

lunch a city tour through the former garrison town with its Dutch Quarters and<br />

Russian Colony will follow.<br />

Rate per person: DM 150,00 (including transportation in de luxe coach, lunch<br />

and entrance fees)<br />

In case of cancellation of the accompanying persons’ tours and one-day pre- and postconference<br />

tours after 15 June 2001 the full fee is payable. There will be no refunds.<br />

After 15 June 2001 the following cancellation fees will be charged for the overnight<br />

tour:<br />

Dresden cancellation fee per person (single room) DM 330,00<br />

cancellation fee per person (double room) DM 260,00<br />

Rooms are now subject to availability. Please book using Form C, available from DER<br />

or the <strong>AMEE</strong> office. All the hotels of categories A, B, C have fitness-centres; category<br />

A hotels also have swimming-pools. Some of the hotels in categories C and D also have<br />

fitness-centres and swimming-pools. All the rooms are equipped with telephone, TV,<br />

shower and WC. In price categories B and C breakfast buffet, service and VAT are<br />

included. The rates in price category A do not include breakfast. A deposit of DM<br />

500,00 per room will be charged and will be deducted from the final bill on checking<br />

out of the hotel on presentation of the voucher which will be given to you at the<br />

Conference registration desk. Hotel reservations can only be processed if this payment<br />

and the booking form have been received Requests by telephone cannot be considered.<br />

Should the requested category be booked out, DER-CONGRESS will make reservations<br />

in another category. We ask for your understanding that only written changes in<br />

reservations can be accepted.<br />

Reserved rooms will be kept until 18.00 hrs on the scheduled day of arrival, unless late<br />

arrival has been marked on the booking form.<br />

In case you have to cancel your room reservation the cancellation fee charged by DER-<br />

CONGRESS is DM 50,00 per single room and DM 100,00 per double room. Should<br />

the cancellation be received after June 1, 2001 you may be charged with the relevant<br />

cancellation or no-show-fee by the hotel, in addition to the corresponding cancellation<br />

fee payable to DER-CONGRESS. A handling fee of DM 20,00 will be charged for<br />

changes in registration. Administration costs cannot be reimbursed in any case.<br />

- 3.5 -


Student Accommodation<br />

DER-CONGRESS does not deal with allocation of student accommodation.<br />

Local students have a few rooms available in their own homes for visiting students.<br />

Please contact student.amee@charite.de for information.<br />

The hostels listed below may also have rooms available:<br />

Jugendgästehaus Nordufer Phone: +49-30-451 70 30<br />

Nordufer 28 Fax: +49-30-452 41 00<br />

D-13351 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: Nordufer@t-online.de<br />

BDP-Gäste-Etage Phone: +49-30-493 10 70<br />

Osloer Str. 12 Fax: +49-30-493 60 01<br />

D-13359 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: gaeste-etage@snafu.de<br />

Hostel „Die Etage“ Phone: +49-30-89 09 08 20<br />

Katharinenstraße 14 Fax: +49-30-89 09 08 27<br />

D-10117 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: dieetage@aol.com<br />

Globetrotter Hostel “Odyssee” Phone: +49-30-29 00 00 81<br />

Grünberger Straße 23 Fax: +49-30-29 00 00 81<br />

D-10243 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: odyssee@hostel-berlin.de<br />

The rates are between DM 24,00 and DM 65,00 per night.<br />

- 3.6 -


SECTION 4<br />

Abstracts


Contents<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Session 1 – Plenary 1:Achieving standards in the curriculum 4.1<br />

Session 2 – Short Communications 1<br />

2A A virtual learning environment .. .. 4.2<br />

2B PBL and the curriculum .. .. .. 4.3<br />

2C Curriculum database .. .. .. 4.5<br />

2D OSCE/Standardised patients in assessment .. 4.7<br />

2E Postgraduate education – the early years .. 4.8<br />

2F Peer assessment .. .. .. 4.10<br />

2G Continuing Professional Development .. .. 4.12<br />

2H Selection .. .. .. .. 4.13<br />

2I Educating the educators (1) .. .. .. 4.15<br />

2J Simulation and clinical skills training .. .. 4.17<br />

2K Students and curriculum evaluation .. .. 4.18<br />

2L Multiprofessional education .. .. .. 4.20<br />

2M Student support/Psychiatry and the curriculum .. 4.21<br />

Session 3 – Workshops 1 .. .. .. 4.23<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Session 4 – Large Group Sessions<br />

4A Standards and professionalism in medical education 4.27<br />

4B The challenge of developing international standards<br />

in medical education .. .. .. 4.27<br />

4C Standards and the curriculum .. .. 4.28<br />

Session 5 – Short Communications 2<br />

5A Learning and the Internet .. .. .. 4.29<br />

5B Evaluation of PBL .. .. .. 4.30<br />

5C Curriculum evaluation .. .. .. 4.32<br />

5D Assessing communication skills/Patients as examiners 4.33<br />

5E Postgraduate education for General Practice/Family Medicine 4.35<br />

5F Assessment .. .. .. .. 4.37<br />

5G Outcome-based education .. .. .. 4.38<br />

5H Educational strategies/curriculum planning .. 4.40<br />

5I Educating the educators (2) .. .. .. 4.42<br />

5J Education and cultural diversity .. .. 4.43<br />

5K Contexts for learning .. .. .. 4.45<br />

5L Evaluation of multiprofessional education .. 4.47<br />

5M Teaching about EBM, critical thinking and research .. 4.48<br />

Session 6 – Workshops 2 .. .. .. 4.51<br />

- i -<br />

Page


Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 7 – Posters<br />

7A New learning technologies .. .. .. 4.56<br />

7B Problem-based learning .. .. .. 4.58<br />

7C Curriculum planning and change .. .. 4.60<br />

7D Curriculum evaluation/staff development .. 4.63<br />

7E Postgraduate education .. .. .. 4.65<br />

7F Assessment .. .. .. .. 4.68<br />

7G Teaching and learning (1) .. .. .. 4.70<br />

7H Teaching and learning (2) .. .. .. 4.73<br />

7I Continuing Professional Development (1) .. 4.75<br />

7J Continuing Professional Development (2) .. 4.77<br />

7K International medical education .. .. 4.78<br />

7L Special subjects .. .. .. .. 4.80<br />

Session 8 – Short Communications 3<br />

8A Computer mediated learning and assessment .. 4.83<br />

8B Implementation of PBL .. .. .. 4.84<br />

8C Curriculum planning .. .. .. 4.86<br />

8D The final examination .. .. .. 4.87<br />

8E Postgraduate education/Career choice .. .. 4.89<br />

8F Teaching and learning .. .. .. 4.90<br />

8G Assessment in postgraduate and continuing education 4.92<br />

8H Curriculum change .. .. .. 4.94<br />

8I Communication skills training .. .. 4.96<br />

8J Clinical teaching .. .. .. .. 4.97<br />

8K International aspects of medical education .. 4.99<br />

8L Special subjects .. .. .. .. 4.100<br />

Session 9 – Plenary 2: Different views of medical education 4.103<br />

- ii -


Session 1 Plenary<br />

1/1 Towards global standards for<br />

medical education<br />

Jordan J Cohen<br />

President, Association of American Medical Colleges, 2450 N<br />

Street N.W., Washington DC 20037-1126, USA<br />

Jordan Cohen has had a longstanding interest in<br />

standards in medical education from the perspective<br />

of a Dean of a medical school and Professor of<br />

Medicine, a Chair of the American Board of Internal<br />

Medicine and the Accreditation Council for Graduate<br />

Medical Education, and President and Chief Executive<br />

Officer of AAMC. In this session he will share his views<br />

about standards in medical education. Why are<br />

standards important? To what extent should we aim for<br />

global standards? How might this be achieved?<br />

1/2 New times, new standards: the<br />

social accountability of health<br />

systems and medical schools<br />

Charles Boelen<br />

Coordinator, Human Resources for Health Program, World<br />

Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland<br />

Health systems worldwide face the challenge of<br />

providing evidence to various stakeholders, including<br />

the public, of their capacity to meet priority health needs<br />

and expectations of individuals and society at large.<br />

Medical schools alike, to ensure continuous support,<br />

will increasingly be expected to demonstrate how their<br />

educational, research and service delivery activities best<br />

contribute to meet requirements for improved quality,<br />

equity, relevance and cost-effectiveness in health care.<br />

These requirements and conformity to new standards<br />

should not just be seen as constraints but as<br />

opportunities for expansion and renewed leadership in<br />

the health sector.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.1 -<br />

1/3 Death of the course<br />

R M Harden<br />

Centre for Medical Education and SCPMDE Education<br />

Development Unit, University of Dundee, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Traditionally, curricula were made up of a series of<br />

courses based on disciplines such as anatomy,<br />

pathology, surgery or medicine. These have evolved to<br />

courses based on body systems or other topics. Such<br />

courses are usually described in terms of a timetable<br />

or syllabus with the number and topics of lectures, small<br />

group, practical, or clinical sessions specified. This<br />

paper argues that we will see a revolution in curriculum<br />

and instructional design in response to real needs such<br />

as the need for more flexible training programmes,<br />

more multiprofessional learning opportunities and<br />

greater cooperation between education providers. These<br />

changes will be achieved through the application of<br />

new technologies and a fresh approach to educational<br />

thinking. Contributing to this fundamental change will<br />

be:<br />

1 The move to outcome-based education;<br />

2 The development of electronic curriculum maps<br />

accompanied by appropriate study guides;<br />

3 A dynamic adaptive approach to learning based on<br />

reusable learning objects with an appropriate<br />

learning management system.<br />

The course as we know it today may not be already<br />

dead, but it is dying.


Session 2A A virtual learning environment<br />

2A1 Virtual learning environments –<br />

a learner centred review<br />

Megan Quentin-Baxter* and Suzanne Hardy<br />

Learning and Teaching Support Network, Medicine, Dentistry<br />

and Veterinary Medicine (LTSN-01), Faculty of Medicine,<br />

University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK<br />

The findings of a study to investigate approaches to<br />

Virtual (Managed) Learning Environments which the<br />

United Kingdom’s National Health Service might take<br />

in implementing a ‘virtual classroom’ are reported. The<br />

brief was to assess current strategies in Internet-based<br />

learning and teaching via a review of current known<br />

VMLE products/projects in relation to NHS needs; to<br />

consider the suitability for transfer to a UK-wide<br />

learner centred continuing professional development<br />

environment (the NHS) based on an adult learning<br />

model, incorporating sophisticated portable reflection/<br />

recording tools; to examine the conceptual models of<br />

‘teacher’ and ‘learner’, and how these definitions might<br />

affect the assessment/construction of a VMLE based<br />

on the required model and applied to the NHS<br />

workforce. The methodologies employed, a brief<br />

analysis of some of the representative VMLEs<br />

identified, and the need for new or integration of<br />

existing technologies to support a learner centred<br />

approach will be discussed.<br />

2A2 Impact of a digital learning<br />

environment on the efficiency<br />

of teachers<br />

Peter G M de Jong* and Hermiette E Idenburg<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

In September 1999 a digital learning environment for<br />

students was introduced at the Leiden University<br />

Medical Center. The environment supplies students<br />

with additional organizational information as well as<br />

course-related content. In May 2000, the influence of<br />

this environment was evaluated by means of a<br />

questionnaire among all students and teachers in the<br />

first year of study. Teachers use the environment mostly<br />

for schedules (66%) and changes in schedule (56%),<br />

formative questions (56%) and publication of the right<br />

answers on the final examination (44%). Images,<br />

pictures and articles are hardly published due to<br />

possible violation of copyrights. However, almost<br />

unanimously teachers declare that from their point of<br />

view, students now have more rapid access to much<br />

more information and that for themselves, publishing<br />

information is much more time-efficient than before.<br />

In May 2001 the same questionnaire will be conducted<br />

and the results will be compared with the 2000<br />

questionnaire.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.2 -<br />

2A3 Building blocks in a new<br />

curriculum: the role of the library in<br />

educational innovation<br />

Margriet Lee and Maureen Brassel*<br />

University of Pretoria, Medical Library, P O Box 667, Pretoria<br />

0001, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

In support of the University of Pretoria’s aim of<br />

providing a virtual campus by means of telematic<br />

teaching and web-based training, the Medical Library<br />

began a virtual information service on the Internet. This<br />

service is integrated into the curriculum of the Faculty<br />

of Medicine by the information specialists by creating<br />

webpages to support the study programmes. Using<br />

block books of specific courses, a spectrum of<br />

information sources is put together on webpages. These<br />

sources include fulltext articles, CD-ROM, videos,<br />

websites, etc. Students work interactively by doing their<br />

searches on various databases, access the library<br />

catalogue and fulltext journals. Webpages differ in<br />

content according to individual courses. Students are<br />

exposed to a wider variety of information, enabling<br />

them to make informed decisions, to make more use<br />

of the library material, to work from home - not bound<br />

geographically, and also to prepare themselves for the<br />

virtual information world of the future.<br />

2A4 IT learning environment: more<br />

structure or more room for<br />

manoeuvre? Centrally guided norm<br />

path or absolute freedom?<br />

J Degryse*, A Roex and W Renier<br />

ACHG K U Leuven, Department of General Practice,<br />

Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J, B3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

Various typologies and taxonomies for IT learning<br />

environments are already described in literature. A<br />

central element is the principle of navigation. Is there<br />

an imposed “norm path” or, on the contrary, can an<br />

absolute freedom of movement be provided for, that<br />

will allow the student to study flexibly according to<br />

his own style of learning? ICHO is in the process of<br />

developing a new electronic learning environment.<br />

Since 1 September 1999, every student has access to<br />

his or her own ‘workplace’ on the website. With the<br />

introduction of the Internet-based iTOL further<br />

progress has been made. More than just the latest<br />

software package, iTOL is a new approach to teaching.<br />

The model that forms the basis of the iTOL is essentially<br />

a hybrid. Individual study and self-guided learning are<br />

central features. Within the discussion forum group<br />

learning is of uppermost importance. The focus of the<br />

case studies is problem-oriented thinking and problemsolving<br />

learning. The iTOL project closely follows the<br />

constructivist vision of learning and teaching<br />

(Grabinger 1996, White 1992, Dufy & Cunningham<br />

1996, Harel & Papert 1991). Strictly speaking, no norm<br />

path is imposed in an iTOL. However, the aim is to


exploit the role of periodic and modularly organised<br />

tests and navigation, which is directed by explicitly<br />

formulated learning goals.<br />

2A5 Innovation in self-directed learning<br />

(SDL) in CME: Virtual Internet<br />

Patient Simulation<br />

M A Raetzo*, R L Thivierge, R J Gagnon, V Loroch and<br />

A Bonneau<br />

721 Hartland, Montreal H2V 2X5, CANADA<br />

SDL in CME has been mainly driven by the use of<br />

published written material and also now the growing<br />

use of the Internet. Unfortunately, reading material is<br />

still a rather passive activity. We have developed a<br />

computer software built with clinical vignettes in which<br />

each participant will simulate real encounters with<br />

virtual patients. To do so, the user will have to follow<br />

each step of the basic clinical approach: 1 – finding<br />

the problem: open-questions system; 2 – fixing the<br />

problem; 3 – at each step: each question or decision<br />

has to be justified (exploring the clinical reasoning);<br />

4 – an ongoing feedback can be given upon request at<br />

each level (EBM content already included); 5 - a final<br />

feedback and report is given at the end of each case.<br />

This paper will present the main features of VIPS and<br />

will cover a qualitative evaluation conducted with a<br />

group of 20 family practitioners.<br />

Session 2B PBL and the curriculum<br />

2B1 The birth of a new species –<br />

squirrums: towards equal<br />

collaboration in innovation in<br />

medical education<br />

Peter McCrorie* and David Prideaux*<br />

St George’s Hospital Medical School, Department of Medical &<br />

Health Care Education, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London<br />

SW17 ORE, UK<br />

In September 2000, St George’s Hospital Medical<br />

School in London began a new problem-based medical<br />

course for graduates. Initially St George’s purchased<br />

problem-based cases and tutor training expertise from<br />

Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia, where a<br />

similar course had been introduced in 1996. The<br />

resulting collaboration began as a predominantly onesided<br />

affair with a net information flow from Adelaide<br />

to London. But it did not remain that way for long.<br />

There is now an active exchange of existing, new and<br />

revised cases, sharing of web-based resources, regular<br />

staff visits, student bulletin boards, joint workshops<br />

through video-conferencing and collaborations on<br />

evaluation and research. We liken the resultant curricula<br />

to a new species – squirrums – a cross between squirrels<br />

and possums. This paper will outline and analyse the<br />

essential features of the collaboration and draw out<br />

issues and ideas that could be applied to other such<br />

partnerships.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.3 -<br />

2A6 Real learning through virtual<br />

presentation: an Internet based<br />

work environment course for<br />

medical students at Uppsala<br />

University<br />

Klas <strong>Berlin</strong>*, Kerstin Graffman and Anna Rask-Andersen<br />

Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and<br />

Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Entrance 91, SE<br />

751 85 Uppsala, SWEDEN<br />

Internet based learning in occupational and<br />

environmental medicine in Uppsala Medical School<br />

was introduced during the spring term 1999. A<br />

homepage was constructed which contained schedule,<br />

handouts, message area and quality assessed links. The<br />

written exam was omitted for Internet assignments. The<br />

project was evaluated by a questionnaire. Sixty-six<br />

percent of the 113 students answered the questionnaire.<br />

The teaching stimulated students to reflect about<br />

possible relationships between the patients’ symptoms<br />

and their occupations as well as the environment. The<br />

students also knew where to find information about<br />

such relationships. The Internet project had made it<br />

easier for the students to control their time. The course<br />

had a positive effect upon student interest in the field<br />

and encouraged integrating earlier knowledge.<br />

Occupational and environmental medicine may be<br />

especially suitable for Internet based learning but it is<br />

likely that this kind of teaching would be useful even<br />

in other classes.<br />

2B2 Broadening learning with PBL in a<br />

pathophysiology course<br />

Antonio Rendas* and Bernardo Correia<br />

Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Campo dos Martires da Patria<br />

130, 1200 Lisboa, PORTUGAL<br />

Based on our experience of PBL in a pathophysiology<br />

course from a traditional curriculum, we developed a<br />

computer simulation to register the tasks performed<br />

by the students. These records allowed us to identify,<br />

in three consecutive years, the following elements;<br />

learning needs (ln) – expressed in PBL sessions;<br />

learning resources (lr) – used during the self-learning<br />

periods. Six cases were analysed every year covering<br />

different body systems (digestive, circulatory, blood,<br />

respiratory, kidney and endocrine). Each case, based<br />

on a complete patient history, was analysed by a small<br />

group of students (an average of 10), in five tutorial<br />

sessions, lasting for two hours and occurring twice a<br />

week. Despite the single discipline nature of the course<br />

we found a wide range of ln and lr, from basic sciences,<br />

especially physiology and histopathology, to clinical<br />

medicine, especially internal medicine. In our<br />

experience PBL proved to be a useful method to<br />

broaden learning beyond the boundaries of<br />

pathophysiology.


2B3 The implementation of problembased<br />

learning (PBL) into a<br />

traditional Radiology clerkship<br />

U Keske, U K M Teichgraber, R Schroder, J Berger, S Venz<br />

and R Felix<br />

Humboldt University, Gr. Hamburger Str. 36, 10115 <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the<br />

implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) into<br />

a traditional Radiology clerkship. In addition to the<br />

reformed medical curriculum which is running as a<br />

parallel track, PBL is also applied as a teaching method<br />

in the traditional curriculum. The core radiology<br />

clerkship was taught as a two week block course with<br />

PBL sessions every morning followed by clinical<br />

rotations in radiology. Continuous end of block<br />

evaluation was performed applying a questionnaire.<br />

Based on students’ feedback, changes in the course<br />

structure were made. After four years it is obvious that<br />

radiology is suitable for the use of PBL, because of its<br />

interdisciplinary character. Based on both student and<br />

faculty feedback the group dynamics, student and<br />

faculty satisfaction, course effectiveness and role of<br />

the tutor were rated positively. A set of standard cases<br />

was adapted according to comments from a mandatory<br />

review session at the end of the clerkship. It is<br />

concluded that the introduction of problem-based<br />

learning in radiology had a positive impact on faculty<br />

development. Five faculty members were educated in<br />

becoming PBL tutors and tutored later students of the<br />

reformed medical curriculum of the Charité.<br />

2B4 Medical education innovations in<br />

Dresden, Germany: Reformed<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus,<br />

Dresden University of Technology<br />

Peter Dieter<br />

Medical Faculty, Carl Gustav Carus, Office of the Dean of<br />

Student Affairs, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307 Dresden,<br />

GERMANY<br />

The new curriculum in Dresden is based on the<br />

principle of Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The<br />

curriculum is developed in collaboration with Harvard<br />

Medical School. All teachers are professionally trained<br />

in specific courses. The PBL program will integrate<br />

elements of medical ethics, quality management, health<br />

economics and evidence-based medicine. At present,<br />

five multidisciplinary courses have been introduced<br />

into Year 3 and 4. The focal point of each course is a<br />

tutorial with eight participating students and one PBLtrained<br />

tutor. Students and tutors discuss a particular<br />

patient´s case, related to the theme of the course.<br />

Lectures, laboratory courses and “bed-side learning”<br />

complete the curriculum. The Dresden program plans<br />

the integration of further PBL courses into Years 4 to<br />

6. Multidisciplinary courses in basic sciences in Years<br />

1 and 2 will complete the program. Every aspect of the<br />

PBL program is regularly evaluated by an external<br />

institution.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.4 -<br />

2B5 Problem-based Learning in<br />

Immunology and Infectious<br />

Disease (IMID): the Dresden<br />

experience<br />

S T Weber*, G Baretton, S Bergmann, J Graeszlear, E Jacobs,<br />

H Kunath, I Nitsche, U Ravens, A Rethwilm and P Rieber<br />

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Dresden Medical<br />

School, Fiedlerstr. 42, 01307 Dresden, GERMANY<br />

IMID are underrepresented in the curriculum of<br />

German medical students. In the final exam, less than<br />

ten out of more than 500 questions are related to<br />

immunology. IMID are scheduled early in the medical<br />

curriculum when most students have not seen patients<br />

regularly. This situation does not reflect the medical<br />

development where immunology and infectious<br />

diseases are becoming increasingly important. Based<br />

on the principles of problem-oriented learning, we<br />

conducted an eleven-week-multi-disciplinary course in<br />

IMID. The schedule included morning-lectures, two<br />

laboratory sessions and three tutorials (8-10 students)<br />

per week. Eleven cases were presented covering major<br />

issues in the field. Due to the clinical background of<br />

the cases the students were able to learn the principles<br />

in infectious diseases from a “real life story”. Lectures,<br />

tutorials and lab sessions were evaluated permanently<br />

by a questionnaire. Students reported a higher<br />

motivation to learn and to self-study. We think that a<br />

more profound insight into IMID will be a benefit for<br />

their professional careers.<br />

2B6 From case-based reasoning to<br />

problem-based learning<br />

Haim Eshach* and Haim Bitterman<br />

Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, PO Box 9649, Bat<br />

Galim, Haifa 31096, ISRAEL<br />

Many medical schools question whether they should<br />

implement a problem-based learning (PBL)<br />

curriculum. Educators raise some serious questions<br />

regarding the efficiency of PBL and therefore<br />

recommend learning more about the cognitive<br />

processes developed by PBL before broadly<br />

implementing it. In addition, it is important to<br />

determine whether PBL best matches the human<br />

reasoning processes. In this theoretical article we<br />

examine the relationships between the case-based<br />

reasoning (CBR) model and PBL. CBR indicates that<br />

the source of knowledge one uses while solving a new<br />

problem is not only generalized rules or general cases,<br />

but often a memory of stored cases recording specific<br />

prior episodes. CBR allows the reasoner to propose<br />

solutions to problems quickly and to propose solutions<br />

in domains that are not completely understood, such<br />

as medicine. Our analysis reveals strong association<br />

between CBR and PBL. We conclude that PBL is a<br />

successful teaching method that should be encouraged<br />

by medical schools.


2B7 A new approach to PBL in CME;<br />

using script concordance tests (SCT)<br />

M Labelle*, C Maille, R L Thivierge and B Charlin<br />

University of Montreal, CME Office, Faculty of Medicine, P O<br />

Box 6128, Centre-Ville Station, Montreal, CANADA H3C 3J7<br />

Traditionally the PBL material for CME is prepared<br />

with the help of clinical cases to be discussed between<br />

peers while answering specific questions. A prior needs<br />

assessment is done to ensure that the material and its<br />

content will respond to the learning needs of the<br />

participants. In order to be more tied to the learners’<br />

needs, we have designed a new model (SCT) for<br />

building each case where the answer to each question<br />

can be displayed and compared to the responses of a<br />

group of expert physicians (previously obtained) on<br />

the same topic. Similarities and discrepancies between<br />

the responses (participants vs experts) become overtly<br />

obvious when revealed on the overhead screen during<br />

the running of the workshop. This PBL model using<br />

SCT has a primary effect of obtaining an ongoing needs<br />

assessment of the learners while the workshop is<br />

actually being delivered.<br />

Session 2C Curriculum database<br />

2C1 Aiding the reform – development of<br />

a curriculum information system<br />

Patrick Merl*, Paolo Petta and Richard Marz<br />

Institute of Medical Chemistry, University of Vienna Medical<br />

School, Wahringerstr. 10, A-1090 Vienna, AUSTRIA<br />

Curriculum information systems have been discussed<br />

in the literature since the early 1970s. Most systems in<br />

existence deliver structural information, and little is<br />

known about systems that have been designed to<br />

successfully serve as planning tools. We explore<br />

possible reasons for this phenomenon. The University<br />

of Vienna Medical School is currently reforming its<br />

curriculum from strictly subject based to one with an<br />

integrative approach. Such a process generates large<br />

amounts of data and a great need for information and<br />

coordination. At the same time the systemic shift<br />

stimulates a climate of uncertainty for individuals and<br />

departments. Our school has therefore funded the<br />

design of an information system to fill the needs of<br />

exchange and coordination in the reform process. The<br />

presentation will discuss how this information system<br />

supports the planning process: it represents information<br />

in several structured formats, aids in decision making,<br />

and provides orientation for stakeholders.<br />

2C2 How effective is project<br />

management software in<br />

implementing a new course?<br />

Katharine Grundy<br />

St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting,<br />

London SW17 0RE, UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.5 -<br />

2B8 Discovering versus covering: a<br />

new PBL in Behavioural Sciences<br />

Ala’Aldin Al-Hussaini and Harith Ghassany<br />

College of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University, Post Box: 35,<br />

Postal Code: 123, Al-Khod, Sultanate of Oman<br />

During the initial decade since its establishment in<br />

1986, the Department of Behavioural Medicine at<br />

Sultan Qaboos University had placed more weight on<br />

teaching at the expense of learning. As with most<br />

teacher-centred learning, the implicit assumption has<br />

always been that a good teacher must necessarily<br />

produce good students regardless of the fact that student<br />

learning is active or passive. Over the last 5 years the<br />

Department has initiated student-centered learning<br />

teams while reducing the lecture format to the<br />

minimum. The shift is essentially a move away from a<br />

culture of rote teaching and learning to a more<br />

interactive culture of critical reading, thinking, and<br />

reading material, which can be made relevant to the<br />

culture of the students and the common problems of<br />

their communities. Following initial problems of<br />

adjustment and reluctance by both teachers and<br />

students, it has been found that there is more value in<br />

the balance between the discovery approach to learning<br />

and the covering of material approach to teaching.<br />

Planning and implementing a new graduate entry<br />

programme in medicine presented many challenges. A<br />

management system was required to assist in the<br />

administration of the project and to generate<br />

communications tailored to the needs of the individual<br />

teachers and administrators. We decided to use<br />

Microsoft Project, the most widely used project<br />

management software. It assists in the organisation of<br />

administrative tasks such as identifying key milestones,<br />

scheduling activities, assigning resources and tracking<br />

progress. An invaluable feature of the software is its<br />

ability to publish reports e.g. filtering information to<br />

ensure individuals only receive details relevant to<br />

themselves. This information can be distributed either<br />

on paper, by email or published on the Intranet. For a<br />

project to succeed, however, it requires more than good<br />

software. Critical factors for successful project<br />

administration include rigorous planning, realistic timescales,<br />

effective communication, clearly defined<br />

responsibilities, commitment from senior management<br />

and regular monitoring.<br />

2C3 MESMIS – Medical School Staff/<br />

Student Management Information<br />

System: Towards the electronic<br />

curriculum<br />

D A Levison and W M Williamson<br />

University of Dundee Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

MESMIS is a comprehensive web-based management<br />

information system developed at Dundee Medical<br />

School to provide communication; resource


management; staff and student support mechanisms;<br />

course information inclusive of personal (staff and<br />

student) timetables; e-learning and now outcome based<br />

enquiries for each learning opportunity. Access to the<br />

system is secure and only accessible by registered<br />

medical students and staff, including internal and<br />

external honorary clinical staff involved with the<br />

delivery of the medical course. Registration is achieved<br />

on-line and permits access to information by students<br />

and staff from anywhere in the world. It provides a<br />

comprehensive Managed Learning Environment<br />

(MLE) with a number of active links providing the basis<br />

of a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). This is<br />

complemented by an outcome-based assessment<br />

process that is enhanced by the components of<br />

“outcome-mapping”, significantly strengthening its<br />

already generic application.<br />

2C4 SIMON – Student Information and<br />

Management Online Network<br />

P Wagner*, D Zeiss*, S Konig*, P M Markus and H Becker<br />

Klinik fur Allgemeinchirurgie, Universitat Goettingen, Robert<br />

Koch Str. 40, D-37075 Gottingen, GERMANY<br />

We have developed a web-based administration and<br />

information system to improve both student and faculty<br />

facilities through enhancement of the online<br />

experience. SIMON offers a central starting point for<br />

students and teachers alike and allows direct interaction<br />

between them. Registration for courses may take place<br />

online. Lists and information are generated<br />

automatically and are always up to date. Curriculum<br />

evaluation may occur via a web interface. SIMON<br />

provide teachers the opportunity to contact students<br />

prior to the start of a course and distribute instructions,<br />

help or hints. Furthermore, SIMON is an ideal forum<br />

for discussion, problems and reflection on case studies<br />

outside the classroom environment. Integration of<br />

additional teaching modules has been allowed for, such<br />

as online guides for specific courses. Individual<br />

departments may employ variable programming<br />

structures, allowing this project to be extended and<br />

adjusted accordingly and as their future needs arise.<br />

2C5 Portfolio-based Dermatology<br />

internship – one year’s experience<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann and F Ochsendorf<br />

Universitats-Hautklinik Frankfurt/M, Theodor Stern Kai-7,<br />

60590 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.6 -<br />

The last year (practical year) of medical education in<br />

Germany is not very systematized. In order to improve<br />

student learning during the dermatology internship we<br />

introduced a portfolio to clarify which components are<br />

considered important within dermatology: 25<br />

qualifications divided into “general basics”,<br />

“dermatology-basics” and “special-dermatology” were<br />

listed in a student’s portfolio with a theory, supervision<br />

and clinical practice part. The individual achievements<br />

were documented in the portfolio by the educating<br />

residents. Since May 1999 15 students participated in<br />

the portfolio-program, they completed in the mean 70%<br />

of the listed activities; general basics were fully<br />

completed by all the students, 75% of dermatology<br />

basics and 46% of special dermatology were completed.<br />

The students welcomed the portfolio as it provided a<br />

useful overview of learning opportunities and<br />

achievements. This is the first use of portfolio-based<br />

medical education in a dermatology internship in<br />

Germany. Students strongly requested implementation<br />

of portfolio-based learning in other faculties.<br />

2C6 Profile of the consultations made<br />

by fifth year medical students in the<br />

integrated program of pediatrics<br />

and public health<br />

Claudia Astudillo, Rocio Arenas, Maria Bustamante*,<br />

Maria De La Fuente and Gladys Yentzen<br />

Universidad de Chile, Walter Scott 1115, Vitacura, Santiago,<br />

CHILE<br />

During the 5th year of medical school, the students<br />

participate in an integrated program of pediatrics and<br />

public health, which includes a visit to a primary care<br />

clinic where the students are able to apply the<br />

knowledge acquired in the theoretical course of<br />

pediatrics and learn the abilities that will help them<br />

participate in actions of promotion, protection and<br />

recovery of health. The objective of this study is to<br />

know which were the most common diagnoses they<br />

made and verify if they are the same they will see in<br />

the future. We analyzed 609 consultations, with a total<br />

of 795 diagnoses, which were classified according to<br />

the ICD 10. The three most frequently found diagnoses<br />

were respiratory, infectious and cutaneous diseases,<br />

which are the same found in the literature. It is<br />

concluded that to prepare medical students to recognise<br />

and treat the most common diseases, the primary care<br />

clinics are a necessary instrument that can easily be<br />

inserted in the curriculum.


Session 2D OSCE/Standardised patients in assessment<br />

2D1 “Check it, rate it, palm it or leave it”<br />

– handheld computers replace<br />

checklists in OSCEs and provide<br />

automated feedback<br />

Michael Schmidts*, Markus Kemmerling, Ruth Willnauer<br />

and Martin Lischka<br />

Studienzentrum - AKH, P O B 10, A-1097 Vienna, AUSTRIA<br />

We recently developed software that enables PalmOS<br />

powered handheld computers to replace checklists in<br />

an OSCE. Each observer is now provided with a mobile<br />

handheld device to record mistakes, incomplete or<br />

missing actions by striking with a pen on a touchscreen.<br />

Additionally, the examiner can enter new items during<br />

the test, which serve as suggestions when the item<br />

database is updated. At the end of the examination the<br />

data of all participating candidates are synchronised<br />

(by “beaming”) and transferred to a desktop computer<br />

for further processing (like statistical item analysis or<br />

immediate candidate feedback printouts). Based on 18<br />

months’ experience with our new assessment system<br />

we see clear advantages in the speed of data gathering,<br />

the ease of data evaluation and the quick and highly<br />

elaborated feedback. Observers familiarised well with<br />

the device, which also turned out to be less intrusive<br />

than checklists. So far the program worked failsafe.<br />

2D2 Evaluation of the undergraduate<br />

surgery course: effect of OSCE<br />

Marco Bustamante Z*, Carlos Carvajal H, Fernando<br />

Quevedo R, María Bustamante C and Claudia Astudillo M<br />

Universidad de Chile, Depto de Cirugía, Avenida Salvador 368,<br />

Providencia, Santiago, CHILE<br />

Two different methods, a guideline of evaluation<br />

applied by different teachers and OSCE, have been used<br />

to estimate knowledge, attitudes and dexterities in<br />

undergraduate medical students of the 4th year in the<br />

subject of surgery. The objective of this communication<br />

is to compare the results on the final grades of the class<br />

before and after the introduction of OSCE. In the year<br />

1997-1998, the final grade was composed of theoretical<br />

exams 40%, evaluation guidelines 60%. In the 1999-<br />

2000 period, this grade was composed of theoretical<br />

exams 40%, OSCE 40%, evaluation guidelines 20%.<br />

The final grades averages, standard deviation and<br />

variation coefficients were compared during the two<br />

periods. Period 1997-1998 final grades average was<br />

6.15, st dev 0.23, var coeff 3.7. Period 1999-2000 final<br />

grades average was 5.62, st dev 0.66, var coeff 11.7. It<br />

is concluded that establishing a type of examination<br />

that measures skills objectively increases the dispersion<br />

of the grades threefold. This allows us to conclude that,<br />

with OSCE, a more valid document is obtained,<br />

assuring better discrimination amongst students.<br />

2D3 OSCE: are many different stations<br />

necessary for each evaluation?<br />

Carlos Carvajal*, Marco Bustamante and Ilse López<br />

Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Camino De La<br />

Laguna 13452, Lo Barneclen, Santiago, CHILE<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.7 -<br />

One of the objections about the Objective Standardised<br />

Clinical Examination (OSCE) is the need for many<br />

different stations for each evaluation. The supposition<br />

is that early consciousness of OSCE stations may<br />

increase the OSCE score. At the Medical School of<br />

Chile University, we used OSCE evaluation<br />

consecutively in 4 groups of medical students, all of<br />

these with the same stations; groups 1 and 2 in 1999;<br />

groups 3 and 4 in 2000. There were no statistically<br />

significant differences among the mean score between<br />

groups 1 and 2. The mean score in group 1 was greater<br />

than group 3 (p values


ecoming more common. Here, it is imperative that<br />

scores are reliable and valid. To accomplish this task,<br />

great care must be taken in the training and monitoring<br />

of SPs. For the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA),<br />

administered by the Educational Commission for<br />

Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG), SP performance<br />

is continually scrutinized. In addition, surveys are<br />

administered to collect data on SP demographics and<br />

opinions regarding exam logistics and training. The<br />

purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship<br />

between SP-related variables (e.g., work history,<br />

training, conditions portrayed) and the adequacy of<br />

candidate scores. Initial results suggest that some, albeit<br />

small, variation in candidate scores can be attributed<br />

to some characteristics of the SP. Fortunately,<br />

continuous quality control, combined with periodic<br />

training and re-training of SPs, ensures that decisions<br />

regarding candidate competence are accurate, fair, and<br />

unbiased.<br />

2D6 Use of standardized patients to<br />

assess medical response to a<br />

natural disaster<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Marguerite Hawkins, Heidi Worth-<br />

Dickstein, Eric Marks, Ralph Jones, Gilbert Muniz and<br />

Richard E Hawkins<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, National<br />

Capital Area Medical Simulation Center, 4301 Jones Bridge<br />

Road, Bethesda MD 20814, USA<br />

We describe the feasibility and advantages of utilizing<br />

Standardized Patients (SPs) to train and assess the<br />

ability of military medical teams to provide<br />

international health care following natural disasters.<br />

The real-time simulation took place aboard ship after<br />

a hurricane in Belize. Cases were based upon<br />

geographic and natural disaster-related epidemiology.<br />

Moulage, radiographs, computerized laboratory and<br />

imaging reports were provided. Analytic methods<br />

included surveys, structured medical record review, SP<br />

- 4.8 -<br />

checklists, and direct observation. Crew rated the<br />

exercise as more realistic and significantly better than<br />

a previous exercise without SPs in assessing and<br />

preparing them to triage and care for casualties. Medical<br />

record audits and SP checklists were complementary<br />

in evaluating quality of care for individuals. Observers<br />

yielded important data regarding patient flow,<br />

communication, equipment function, supply use, and<br />

ancillary support. The simulation and inclusion of a<br />

variety of assessment measures allowed for high quality<br />

evaluation of complex care delivery.<br />

2D7 The weakest link? Performance<br />

factors and degrees of influence in<br />

an interactive long-station general<br />

practice examination (VOICEs)<br />

C M Wiskin*, T Allan and J Skelton<br />

The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

Passing a six-station Primary Care OSCE examination<br />

is compulsory. In 2 tasks students improvise<br />

consultations with ‘patients’ portrayed by our role-play<br />

team. Clinical performance is marked by a clinical<br />

examiner. Communication scores (professionalism,<br />

competence, attitude) are awarded by negotiation<br />

between examiner and role-player. This paper is part<br />

of a study evaluating reliability and bias across<br />

examination variables. Data about role-players, students<br />

and examiners; the dynamics and score-awards,<br />

demographics and the logistics of exam days were<br />

collected. Results from over 1,000 assessed<br />

consultations were collated on SPSSv.10. Preliminary<br />

data suggest variables such as question selection, order<br />

in which students are seen, age/experience of examiners<br />

and relationship between role-player and examiner<br />

assessment are not significant. Despite the apparent<br />

subjectivity of the format, interactive examinations are<br />

an appropriate means of testing the communication<br />

skills of medical students.<br />

Session 2E Postgraduate education – the early years<br />

2E1 New PRHO: “I am not sure what I<br />

am supposed to do”. Can we<br />

improve on PRHO induction? An<br />

evaluation of a new induction<br />

process<br />

Dason Evans*, Mike Roberts and Diana Wood<br />

St Bartholomew’s and the Royal London, Department of Medical<br />

Educational Research & Innovation, Robin Brook Centre, School<br />

of Medicine & Dentistry, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE,<br />

UK<br />

We conducted a controlled study involving 48 PRHOs.<br />

We compared a traditional, one-day induction with a<br />

newer process principally involving five days of<br />

shadowing before the commencement of the PRHO<br />

post. Clinical responsibility was taken in a safe<br />

environment with full support from the outgoing teams.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

We assessed feelings of anxiety, preparedness and<br />

confidence in clinical skills via questionnaire, and<br />

ability in clinical skills via an OSCE, before and after<br />

induction and at one month. We audited prescribing<br />

errors, radiology request errors, note keeping and<br />

adverse events in both groups. Pre-induction levels of<br />

anxiety and uncertainty were high, with almost half<br />

having biological symptoms of anxiety. Clinical skills<br />

improved during the longer induction, and 21/22 of<br />

intervention PRHOs felt more prepared for their post<br />

(cf 13/22 controls with 7/22 controls feeling less<br />

prepared after a traditional induction). We will discuss<br />

the induction process and statistical analysis of results<br />

in depth.


2E2 A comparison of Pre-registration<br />

House Officers’ (PRHOs) and<br />

Senior House Officers’ (SHOs)<br />

experience in general practice<br />

Jan Illing*, Tim van Zwanenberg, Bill Cunningham,<br />

George Taylor, Richard Prescott and Cath O’Halloran<br />

University of Newcastle, Postgraduate Institute for Medicine &<br />

Dentistry, 10-12 Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2<br />

4AB, UK<br />

The aim was to compare the experiences of SHOs and<br />

PRHOs spending four months training in general<br />

practice. While government funding has been provided<br />

for PRHOs, similar schemes for SHOs remain rare and<br />

experimental. A case study approach was used<br />

employing various sources of data. The study involved<br />

nine SHOs, twelve PRHOs, nine GP trainers and sixteen<br />

hospital consultants. Data were collected from PRHOs,<br />

SHOs, GP trainers and hospital consultants. Interview<br />

data were tape-recorded and analysed using thematic<br />

analysis and grounded theory to identify important<br />

themes and patterns in the data. SHOs and PRHOs were<br />

unanimous about the value of the experience in general<br />

practice. They reported learning skills not covered in<br />

hospital posts. GP trainers and hospital consultants<br />

valued the rotations for all doctors irrespective of final<br />

career destination. SHOs were considered better<br />

equipped for general practice and required less<br />

supervision. However, PRHOs felt able to cope with<br />

the demands of general practice.<br />

2E3 Pre-registration experience in<br />

general practice: results of a<br />

national evaluation<br />

Janet Grant*, Lesley Southgate, Rodney Gale, George<br />

Freeman, Alison Hill, Neil Johnson, Frank Smith, Mairead<br />

Beirne and Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK<br />

A national pilot project to give pre-registration house<br />

officers experience in primary care [with 4 months in<br />

each of medicine, surgery and primary care] was<br />

conducted from August 1998 – August 1999. A national<br />

evaluation was commissioned involving all 96 PRHOs<br />

and their supervisors, and a reference group from the<br />

traditional scheme [6 months medicine, 6 months<br />

surgery]. Tailored survey questionnaires were<br />

completed by trainees and supervisors at the end of<br />

each 4- or 6-month post. The areas evaluated included<br />

costs, governance, content and process of learning,<br />

outcomes of learning, and assessment, quality<br />

assurance and monitoring.<br />

Main findings were:<br />

• the three posts make a balanced, coherent package.<br />

• the scheme produced no detriment for the PRHOs.<br />

• there were no detrimental effects on hospital<br />

supervisors’ time commitment<br />

• the time impact on the general practices was<br />

significant<br />

• the new scheme has some effect on PRHOs’ career<br />

plans.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.9 -<br />

2E4 Family Medicine Month: a human<br />

life cycle approach for first year<br />

residents<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Rebecca Gladu, Thelma Jean Goodrich,<br />

Janet Groff and Mary M Velasquez<br />

UT Houston Health Science Center, Family Practice and<br />

Community Medicine, 6431 Fannin, Suite JJL324, Houston, TX<br />

77030, USA<br />

We designed “Family Medicine Month,” a rotation for<br />

first year residents, to provide a contextual, lifecycle<br />

approach to medical care and related family practice<br />

skills. Individual daily sessions related to a particular<br />

stage of the lifecycle (e.g., adolescence) and related<br />

behavioural and technical skills (e.g., interviewing the<br />

adolescent patient and casting skills for common sport<br />

injuries). We intended that our residents would integrate<br />

this inclusive approach into their professional<br />

behaviour. Twenty residents who participated in the<br />

rotation in 1999 and 2000 were satisfied with the<br />

rotation’s usefulness. They also reported greater selfefficacy<br />

in performing family practice skills after the<br />

rotation (8.1 ± 0.7) as compared to before the rotation<br />

(6.2 ± 1.4) (p


2E6 Teaching the forgotten tribe: tutor<br />

views on a generic curriculum<br />

for SHOs<br />

Lesley Pugsley* and Janet MacDonald<br />

School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Academic<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff,<br />

CF4 4XN, UK<br />

A consortium of postgraduate centres has developed<br />

as a pilot, a generic programme for the SHOs in South<br />

East Wales. It is designed to run for an initial eight<br />

week period commencing in the Spring of this year,<br />

with an evaluation in July and a report on the<br />

programme in August 2001. The core curriculum has<br />

been resource led, its design predicated on the various<br />

skills and topics which individual consortium members<br />

felt able to contribute. This paper complements the<br />

initial phase of a research study which focused on the<br />

perceived needs of SHOs and VTS and takes as its focus<br />

the core tutor team. It seeks to identify emergent themes<br />

of congruence and dissonance between the groups of<br />

learners and teachers in order to assist in the<br />

identification of a compatible curriculum addressing<br />

the perceived needs of the SHO grade within the<br />

limitations of resources and service commitments.<br />

Session 2F Peer assessment<br />

2F1 Peer- and co-assessment leads to<br />

shared responsibility for test results<br />

Caro Brumsen and Peter G M de Jong*<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, P O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

During the clerkship in Internal Medicine, an<br />

introductory test is taken every 3 weeks by a group of<br />

10 students. A pool of correctors corrects the test.<br />

Usually there is a lot of discussion concerning the test<br />

results. Therefore a new correction procedure was<br />

introduced. In duos, students do the first correction on<br />

copied versions of the test, with the aid of a standard<br />

answer sheet. Discussion is encouraged and students<br />

can put down their comment in writing, preferably with<br />

references added. This comment is sent to the second<br />

corrector together with the original version of the test<br />

answers. On evaluation, most of the students<br />

commented positively, especially on the possibility to<br />

gain insight into the correct answers. The method of<br />

peer- and co-assessment appears to have led to an<br />

improved acceptance of test results, reflected by a<br />

dramatic decrease in complaints.<br />

2F2 Student self-marking as an<br />

assessment approach to<br />

developing professionalism<br />

G J Mires* and M Friedman Ben-David<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.10 -<br />

2E7 General professional training (GPT)<br />

for dental graduates in the UK<br />

Alison Bullock*, Vickie Firmstone and John Frame<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

This presentation reports on GPT in UK dentistry.<br />

Comparison is made with senior house officer training<br />

for medical graduates which is currently under review<br />

in the UK. The study gained information on the GPT<br />

undertaken by recent graduates in dentistry and their<br />

views on it. A questionnaire was sent to those registered<br />

(since 1997) for Membership of the Faculty of Dental<br />

Surgery (MFDS) Distance Learning Course (Royal<br />

College of Surgeons of England). A 55% (n=342)<br />

response rate was achieved. Widespread support was<br />

found amongst trainees for a period of GPT. However<br />

there was consensus that this period should be<br />

voluntary. There was support for both formal, integrated<br />

2-year programmes and self-constructed versions that<br />

can offer greater flexibility. A qualification marking<br />

the successful completion of GPT was favoured. GPT<br />

that provides experience of primary and secondary care<br />

forms a broad basis for future careers.<br />

Dundee University Medical School has adopted an<br />

outcome-based curriculum in which personal<br />

development is one of the defined outcomes. Selflearning<br />

and self-awareness are important attributes of<br />

this outcome. A study was undertaken to evaluate the<br />

feasibility and reliability and to survey student opinion<br />

regarding the value of undergraduate medical student<br />

self-marking of written examinations as a means of<br />

developing these attributes. The correlation between<br />

student and staff marks, and the reliability of marking<br />

was high. The majority of students considered there<br />

was value in the exercise as a learning and feedback<br />

opportunity, but found it stressful. We believe that this<br />

approach, as well as being reliable, provides a powerful<br />

feedback and self-learning opportunity. It also provides<br />

a mechanism to identify individuals who over or under<br />

mark or who feel threatened by feedback or are unable<br />

to receive negative feedback, with whom Faculty can<br />

work.<br />

2F3 Comprehensive assessment: value<br />

for learning<br />

Elaine F Dannefer<br />

University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue,<br />

Box 601, Rochester NY 14642, USA<br />

The University of Rochester School of Medicine and<br />

Dentistry has implemented a two-week long<br />

comprehensive assessment of second year medical<br />

students for purposes of providing formative feedback.<br />

Multiple assessment techniques, including standardized<br />

clinical encounters and peer assessments, provide


feedback that identifies specific learning needs as well<br />

as problematic patterns of behaviour. Students work<br />

with their advisory deans to interpret the feedback and<br />

construct individualized learning plans. An overview<br />

of the various components will be presented as well as<br />

examples of different types of feedback and learning<br />

plans. The value of this comprehensive assessment for<br />

student learning and for curricular planning will be<br />

discussed with attention given to the resources required<br />

for implementation.<br />

2F4 Attributes of the excellent physician:<br />

a third year student survey<br />

A V Carneiro*, M F Patrício and J Fernandes e Fernandes<br />

University of Lisbon School of Medicine, Rua Sousa Lopes, Lote<br />

KL - 8 E, 1600-207 Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

Role-modeling is a basic part of medical education.<br />

Sixty-six third year medical students were asked – using<br />

questionnaires with open and closed (Likert scale type)<br />

questions – to indicate their opinions on the attributes<br />

of a good doctor. The students favoured good<br />

humanistic qualities in the relationship with patients<br />

and families (96% good or very good), ability to look<br />

for help when needed in clinical practice (97%),<br />

diagnostic abilities (97%) and honesty and ethical<br />

behaviour (94%). The least important attributes<br />

included leadership (68% little or no importance),<br />

research abilities (71%) and a good general culture<br />

(67%). It is concluded that third year medical students<br />

can define a set of attributes of what they consider to<br />

be a good doctor: these include professional behaviour,<br />

ethics, knowledge and leadership. We will recheck these<br />

results at graduation time (within 3 years).<br />

2F5 The Medical Student Peer<br />

Evaluation Initiative: assessment<br />

of performance in small group<br />

settings<br />

Steven L Kanter*, Kathleen Ryan, John Mahoney and<br />

Joan Harvey<br />

University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, M-240 Scaife Hall,<br />

3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh PA 15261, USA<br />

Experience with student assessment at the University<br />

of Pittsburgh School of Medicine led to the observation<br />

that, although a faculty facilitator was not identifying<br />

early a student experiencing difficulty in small group,<br />

the student’s peers were generally aware of the problem.<br />

This led to the development of the Medical Student<br />

Peer Evaluation Initiative (PEI), which aims to provide<br />

feedback to students on performance in small group<br />

sessions; recognize students who demonstrate<br />

excellence; identify poorly functioning students and<br />

offer counseling. Each student rates each other group<br />

member on the member’s ability to help the student<br />

learn. If a score pattern indicates a problem, a faculty<br />

overseer meets with the student. Results of the PEI<br />

reveal excellent participation, early identification of<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.11 -<br />

students with a range of difficulties, and rapid<br />

remediation of most problems. In conclusion, peer<br />

evaluation is a feasible and useful measure of student<br />

small group performance.<br />

2F6 Reliability of a multidimensional<br />

questionnaire to assess attitudes of<br />

medical students towards their<br />

future profession: the UNI Project<br />

G L Werneck*, E C O Ribeiro, A C Aguiar and V M B Ribeiro<br />

Nucleo de Estudos de Saude Coletiva, NESC/UFRJ, Av. Brig.<br />

Trompovsky s/n - HUCFF, 5o andar - Ala Sul, BRAZIL<br />

The objective of this study was to assess the reliability<br />

of answers to questions concerning attitudes of medical<br />

students towards their future profession. We developed<br />

a self-administered questionnaire including 52<br />

questions covering attitudes expected to be developed<br />

by students during medical school. A test-retest design<br />

was used as a preliminary evaluation of the<br />

questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed twice<br />

within a one-week interval by students of the major<br />

university of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The test-retest<br />

reliability was estimated by kappa statistics (K).<br />

Twenty-four questions (46%) had K greater than 0.6<br />

(substantial agreement); 13 questions (25%) had K<br />

between 0.4 and 0.6 (moderate agreement); and 15<br />

questions (29%) had K below 0.4 (fair agreement).<br />

Considering the complexity of assessing attitudes, we<br />

judge these preliminary results as satisfactory. The next<br />

step will be to revise and test those questions showing<br />

low agreement.<br />

2F7 Narrowing the gap in the<br />

assessment process<br />

Nicolas Karlsson<br />

Villa Medici, Hogasplatsen 6, 412 56 Goteborg, SWEDEN<br />

The problem with assessment processes in the past has<br />

been to motivate the participants to take an active and<br />

creative part in the process. This requires a narrowing<br />

of the gap between different groups and that the process<br />

stimulates each individual participating. On the<br />

initiative of the student organisation, the Faculty of<br />

Medicine in Göteborg implemented the Course<br />

Committee in year 2000 after three succesful pilot<br />

projects. The Course Committee is the motor in the<br />

assessment process, creating a suitable environment for<br />

communication in close connection to the reality of<br />

each participant. As a meeting point between the<br />

different parts in the educational process it improves<br />

not only the democracy of the organisation necessary<br />

for continuous improvement, but the course committee<br />

also facilitates the translation from the student’s<br />

descriptional language into the defined language of the<br />

manager of the course. A protocol published on the<br />

www preserves the productive dialogue and the<br />

suggestions made.


Session 2G Continuing professional development<br />

2G1 Learning and partnering: bringing<br />

pharmaceutical representatives<br />

into the educational loop<br />

Jane Tipping*, Craig Campbell, Jean Claude Dairon, Paul<br />

Davis, Francois Goulet, Gilles Lachance, Celine Monette,<br />

Joan Sargeant, Linda Snell and Robert Thivierge<br />

10987 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario L6C 1M9,<br />

CANADA<br />

Pharmaceutical representatives play a key role in<br />

upholding high standards for CME in Canada.<br />

Representatives receive many opportunities to upgrade<br />

knowledge of disease states and management; however<br />

very little is offered for the practice of CME. A group<br />

of dedicated professionals from across Canada<br />

representing academia, industry and the Council for<br />

Continuing Pharmaceutical Education has created a<br />

training module specifically for pharmaceutical<br />

representatives. The outcome has been a quality<br />

program that includes a method of training and<br />

evaluation unique in format and congruent with the<br />

philosophy of adult education. The coalition of three<br />

stakeholder groups represents an example of<br />

partnership that promises to offer a means of raising<br />

and maintaining standards of CME across the country.<br />

A method of education and evaluation is presented that<br />

will evoke critical discussion in the issues of industry<br />

CME and the meaning of partnership. Methods of<br />

conducting research on efficacy will also be discussed.<br />

2G2 CME with a combination of<br />

standardised patients and a CBT<br />

programme<br />

S Schewe*, A Schewe and J Loohs<br />

Medizinische Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universitat, Ludwig-<br />

Maximilians-Universitat, Pettenkoferstr 8a, D-80336 Munich,<br />

GERMANY<br />

A new approach to continuous medical education CME<br />

concerns teaching and knowledge assessing of general<br />

practitioners in musculoskeletal diseases sponsored by<br />

Aventis Pharma. The three elements of the CMEseminar<br />

were an interactive tutorial with a CBTprogramme,<br />

the assessment and discussion of problem<br />

solving strategies including three standardized patients<br />

with frequent musculoskeletal diseases and finally a<br />

lecture on innovative therapeutic possibilities. The new<br />

form of CME was welcomed by nearly all of the 26<br />

physicians (with the exception of 1); their opinion about<br />

this kind of training was very positive. Individual<br />

deficits in problem solving were obvious to each of<br />

the physicians so that immediate improvement was<br />

possible. The three educational elements of the CME<br />

were judged almost equally with a slight advantage for<br />

the part with the standardised patients. The CBT<br />

programme was considered an integral and important<br />

part of the rheumatology seminar.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.12 -<br />

2G3 The impact of continuing<br />

professional development (CPD):<br />

30 case studies of dentists<br />

Vickie Firmstone*, Alison Bullock and John Frame<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

This presentation reports on a key part of a Department<br />

of Health funded study whose principal aim was to<br />

explore the impact of CPD on the practice of GDPs.<br />

Thirty dentists were interviewed before and after<br />

undertaking a self-chosen educational activity.<br />

Discussion focussed on the specific activity and on their<br />

experience of CPD more generally. Factors affecting<br />

the impact of CPD on practice include:<br />

1 the process by which CPD is selected. Much is<br />

undertaken on an ad hoc/ opportunistic basis rather<br />

than an analysis of learning needs. This can lead to<br />

CPD which ‘confirms’ current practice rather than<br />

introduces new learning;<br />

2 barriers to undertaking CPD (access, time,<br />

financial); and<br />

3 constraints to implementing change.<br />

There was broad support for the importance of CPD<br />

for personal and professional development, but there<br />

are significant factors which affect the impact of CPD<br />

in general dental practice.<br />

2G4 Global trends in continuing medical<br />

education<br />

Lewis A Miller<br />

Global Alliance for Medical Education, 90 Goodwives River<br />

Road, Darien, CT 06820-5921, USA<br />

Patterns of Continuing Medical Education (CME) are<br />

changing rapidly worldwide. Accreditation systems are<br />

being adopted rapidly in Europe and Latin America,<br />

but are not yet well recognized. At the same time some<br />

countries and medical specialties are changing from<br />

CME to CPD (Continuous Professional Development)<br />

despite failure of earlier CPD experiments. Methods<br />

of delivering CME are also changing. Lectures are<br />

regarded as less useful than newer forms of interactive<br />

learning. The use of the Internet and CD-ROMs is<br />

increasing. CME of the future will take place at the<br />

point of care. Two new and critical issues are emerging<br />

as CME becomes mandatory for many physicians:<br />

1 Who regulates CME? Government or the<br />

profession?<br />

2 Who pays for CME? Government? Physicians?<br />

Health insurance? Pharmaceutical Industry?<br />

Medical educators in Europe have a major opportunity<br />

to take a leadership role.


2G5 Do we need consultant appraisal?<br />

K H Matheson<br />

West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 2QZ,<br />

UK<br />

There are societal and political demands for<br />

accountability by the medical profession in a world of<br />

rapid technological advances, and with better-educated<br />

and sophisticated consumers. No longer does “doctor<br />

know best”. In the UK the profession has been suffering<br />

from some high profile cases and a hostile media. As a<br />

result the government has now made consultant (senior<br />

medical staff) appraisal compulsory from 2001 and the<br />

General Medical Council will make revalidation<br />

compulsory for all doctors to allay public fears about<br />

poorly performing doctors.<br />

This paper will explore what is meant by “appraisal”,<br />

whether it is the correct mechanism to support<br />

revalidation, and whether it is possible to prove that<br />

appraisal will support doctors in improving their<br />

professional development and performance. There is<br />

tension between the formative and summative<br />

processes, and between a demanding public and a<br />

sceptical profession.<br />

2G6 When should clinicians be trained<br />

in management?<br />

J Clark*, R Palmer and P Spurgeon<br />

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham,<br />

Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2RT,<br />

UK<br />

The involvement of clinicians in management is an<br />

objective pursued increasingly by most health systems.<br />

In part this reflects a concern to control costs but also<br />

a need to provide a proper integration of clinical and<br />

managerial perspectives. Many senior clinicians arrive<br />

in managerial roles with relatively little managerial<br />

Session 2H Selection<br />

2H1 Selecting aboriginal students to<br />

health professional courses<br />

I E Rolfe* and G Garvey<br />

University of Newcastle, Discipline of Aboriginal Health, Level<br />

1 MSB, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University Drive,<br />

Callaghan 2308, AUSTRALIA<br />

Aboriginal students are greatly under-represented in<br />

health professional courses in Australia. The reasons<br />

for this are a complex interplay of historical, social,<br />

cultural, economic and political factors resulting in the<br />

inequity of access to higher education. There is an<br />

imperative to develop culturally appropriate methods<br />

which will increase the numbers of applicants to health<br />

professional courses and then the candidates most likely<br />

to succeed at these University courses. The Faculty of<br />

Medicine & Health Sciences has a long and successful<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.13 -<br />

training. Subsequent provision can often feel urgent<br />

and remedial. In a more planned sense, there is a need<br />

to address the clinical educational curriculum to<br />

examine how best the ‘what’ and ‘when’ of managerial<br />

teaching might be incorporated. This paper reports the<br />

findings of a survey of a range of clinical staff<br />

(undergraduates, junior doctors and consultants) and<br />

health service managers about the key content areas of<br />

management training and their varying perceptions of<br />

where within the educational spectrum the most<br />

appropriate and relevant time for training might be. It<br />

also explores how such training could be provided.<br />

2G7 Evaluation of ‘Distance Interactive<br />

Learning in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology (DIALOG)’<br />

Vikram Jha*, Sean McAleer and Sean Duffy<br />

St James’s University Hospital, Academic Department of<br />

Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 9, Gledhow Wing, St James’s<br />

Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK<br />

In recent years, there has been an increase in the<br />

production of computer assisted learning programmes.<br />

‘DIALOG’ is a distance learning programme, available<br />

on CD-ROM, developed by the Royal College of<br />

Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for continuing<br />

professional development. The aim of the study was to<br />

determine if DIALOG was achieving its educational<br />

objective and to receive feedback from its users. A<br />

literature review was carried out to select a suitable<br />

model for evaluation. The CIPP model (Context, Input,<br />

Process and Product) was used to design a<br />

questionnaire. This was posted out to 150 users selected<br />

by systematic randomisation. A response rate of 60%<br />

was achieved. There has been a positive response from<br />

users in terms of content, design, presentation,<br />

interactivity and outcome. The educational objectives<br />

of DIALOG are being achieved.<br />

history of admitting Aboriginal medical students. The<br />

medical school has graduated approximately 60% of<br />

the nations’ Aboriginal doctors. Given the Faculty<br />

incorporates now a range of other health professional<br />

courses, we revised our selection method to meet four<br />

broad aims:<br />

1 Suitability for selecting students to all health<br />

professional courses,<br />

2 Incorporation of best evidence literature,<br />

3 Determination in large part by Aboriginal peoples<br />

and,<br />

4 Cultural appropriateness of the selection process.


2H2 Demographic and scholastic<br />

correlates of scores in the<br />

Australian Undergraduate Medical<br />

and Health Sciences Admission<br />

Test (UMAT)<br />

Peter Tutton*, Chris Browne, Margot Story and Michael<br />

Lewenberg<br />

Monash University, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology,<br />

Post Office Box 13C, Victoria 3800, AUSTRALIA<br />

The UMAT is an aptitude test used for selection of<br />

medical students. It is an MCQ with three components<br />

– Book 1, logical reasoning & problem solving – Book<br />

2, human interaction skills and Book 3, non-verbal<br />

reasoning (a group embedded figure test measuring<br />

field independent cognitive style). Despite its wide use,<br />

little is known about the demographic or scholastic<br />

attributes of candidates scoring well on the UMAT. In<br />

this study correlations between UMAT scores and both<br />

family demographic variables and concurrent scholastic<br />

achievements are analysed. UMAT Book 1 scores were<br />

weakly associated with duration of family residence in<br />

Australia and with managerial and professional parental<br />

occupation: they were more strongly associated with<br />

concurrent scholastic achievement, particularly in<br />

biology. UMAT Book 2 scores had no conspicuous<br />

association with any of our demographic or scholastic<br />

variables, nor with selection interview scores. UMAT<br />

Book 3 scores most strongly associated with scholastic<br />

achievement in physics.<br />

2H3 Can we make the interview add<br />

something new?<br />

P Hughes, S Miller*, P McCrorie and A Kent<br />

Department of Psychiatry, St George’s Hospital Medical School,<br />

Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK<br />

There is evidence that in selecting for complex task<br />

performance the best predictor is some measure of IQ.<br />

A structured interview may add a useful degree of<br />

prediction. It is important, however, to ensure that the<br />

interview does not simply re-assess intelligence. We<br />

used a two-stage process to select for our Graduate<br />

Entry <strong>Programme</strong>. The GAMSAT assesses reasoning<br />

in sciences and humanities and writing ability. Highest<br />

scoring applicants were invited for interview. We<br />

devised an interview with high face-validity and<br />

reduced opportunity for bias by blinding interviewers<br />

to social and academic variables, and by introducing<br />

structured objective criteria. The interview appeared<br />

acceptable to interviewers and candidates. We<br />

demonstrated that performance at interview did not<br />

correlate with recent or previous academic performance<br />

so was adding something to academic assessment.<br />

Follow up of successful candidates will address the<br />

important question of the predictive validity of this<br />

selection process.<br />

2H4 Relative effects of learning style,<br />

MCAT and prior academic record<br />

on performance in medical school<br />

Stephen Aaron* and Ernest Skakun<br />

Department of Rheumatology, 562 Heritage Medical Research<br />

Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta,<br />

Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, CANADA<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.14 -<br />

Several studies have demonstrated that previous<br />

academic record does not fully predict success in<br />

medical school. We hypothesized that student learning<br />

styles would also correlate with medical school grades,<br />

independently of MCAT or prior academic record. We<br />

correlated learning style to marks in our largest and<br />

most integrated first year course (in Cardiology,<br />

Pulmonology and Nephrology, CPN), using the ASSIST<br />

instrument. Negative correlation was found between<br />

CPN and surface learning style (SL) assessed after the<br />

course was completed (r = -.247, p = .038). Significant<br />

correlation was also found between CPN and student<br />

MCAT results (r = .263, p = .027), but not to grades<br />

prior to medical school admission (GPA). There was<br />

no correlation between SL and MCAT (r = .053).<br />

Correlation between SL and CPN was independent of<br />

MCAT or GPA. We conclude that learning style is<br />

predictive of medical school grades independently of<br />

prior academic record.<br />

2H5 The selection of GP trainees in<br />

the West Midlands: audit of<br />

assessment centre scores by<br />

ethnic background and country<br />

of qualification<br />

Celia Brown*, Sarah Wakefield and Alison Bullock<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

The new centralised system of selecting GP trainees in<br />

the West Midlands aims to be fair and nondiscriminatory<br />

in the processes of recruiting the most<br />

suitable candidates, and allocating the successful<br />

candidates to their preferred posts. This paper provides<br />

an audit of the achievements of all the candidates in<br />

the October 2000 selection round. The data are<br />

examined with respect to candidates’ ethnic<br />

background and their country of qualification. Two<br />

levels of analysis are possible, based on average<br />

‘success’ or placement rates, and average scores<br />

achieved at each stage of the selection process. The<br />

analysis suggests that white candidates, and those<br />

qualifying in the UK, are more likely to succeed in the<br />

selection process. Possible explanations are offered<br />

from a more detailed interrogation of the selection<br />

criteria. Finally, the implications for the next selection<br />

round are discussed in the light of these findings.<br />

2H6 The selection of GP trainees:<br />

perceptions of the new regional<br />

system<br />

Sarah Wakefield*, Celia Brown and Alison Bullock<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

A new regional system of selecting GP trainees has<br />

been introduced in the West Midlands, replacing<br />

selection by individual GP practices. Perceptions of the<br />

regional system amongst key stakeholders were<br />

explored as part of a larger study evaluating the West<br />

Midlands selection procedures in October 2000. Data<br />

were collected by interview (with organisers, GP<br />

trainers, assessors and candidates) and questionnaire


(to candidates: 46% response rate). The analysis<br />

revealed that the new process was viewed positively,<br />

with particular praise for the role-play assessment and<br />

the inclusion of a lay-person on the interview panels.<br />

Many thought that the new system was fairer than the<br />

old. Concerns were expressed that the process was<br />

impersonal, and that candidates had less control over<br />

their choice of practice location. The implications for<br />

future selection rounds, and for other regions<br />

considering regional selection systems, will be explored<br />

in the presentation.<br />

2H7 “I want to become a doctor.”<br />

Analysis of first year students’<br />

motivations<br />

M F Patrício* and J Gomes-Pedro<br />

Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, University of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, Piso 1, 1649-028 Lisboa Codex, PORTUGAL<br />

The psychological and cultural basis for career choice<br />

is a poorly researched subject. The objectives of the<br />

present study were to identify, after 6 months in Medical<br />

School, the reasons why students decided to be a doctor<br />

and whether they would make the same choice again<br />

Session 2I Educating the educators (1)<br />

2I1 Evaluation of a Train the Trainers<br />

program in quality improvement<br />

and cost-effectiveness<br />

Antoinette S Peters*, Maryjoan Ladden and Robert<br />

Fletcher<br />

Department of Ambulatory Care & Prevention, Harvard Medical<br />

School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, 126 Brookline Avenue,<br />

Boston, MA 02215, USA<br />

A 4-month program was developed to teach community<br />

and academic physicians how to teach “managing care”<br />

competencies, especially quality improvement and<br />

cost-effectiveness. Interactive and didactic methods<br />

were used to teach the competencies, learning theory,<br />

and evaluation; different pedagogical methods were<br />

also modeled. Participants submitted a project plan,<br />

attended two 2-day workshops with a partner, revised<br />

their plans, and practised new methods at their home<br />

institutions. Ratings of their own knowledge of quality<br />

improvement and cost-effectiveness increased<br />

significantly. Knowledge of traditionally taught<br />

content, such as prevention and patient-doctor<br />

communication, was not affected. Participants’ ratings<br />

of their skill in teaching using different methods and<br />

in developing and evaluating teaching innovations<br />

increased significantly. There was smaller change in<br />

self-ratings of skill in giving a lecture, precepting in<br />

the office, and teaching at the bedside than in leading<br />

interactive large groups, giving feedback, or tutoring<br />

small groups.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.15 -<br />

given a second opportunity. First year students (n=153)<br />

were asked to complete an open-ended questionnaire.<br />

Protocols were treated through content analysis<br />

technique. The study found that students made their<br />

professional choice mainly for:<br />

• altruistic motivation or social desirability: help<br />

people 75% / useful to society 24%;<br />

• self motivations: loving medicine 29%, safe career<br />

22%, personal achievement 17%, lack of routine<br />

8%, prestige/status 7%, child dream 4%, family<br />

tradition 3%.<br />

After 6 months when asked if they confirm their initial<br />

choice:<br />

• 39% confirm it enthusiastically<br />

• 51% just confirm<br />

• 8% hesitate<br />

• 2% do not confirm.<br />

Correlations between the reasons underlying the<br />

professional option and the degree of enthusiasm will<br />

be explored. Implications for the student selection<br />

process will be presented.<br />

2I2 Teaching the Medical Teachers<br />

Beyond ‘TIPS’<br />

Jane Richardson* and Jonathan D Cartledge<br />

University College London, 4th Floor, Holburn Union Building,<br />

The Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

Since 1999, 30 ‘TIPS’ courses have been run at<br />

RF&UCMS. The results of post course questionnaires<br />

obtained from 256 (70%) of 366 participants informed<br />

the development of further courses. Participant<br />

identified areas for further training were: Clinical and<br />

bedside teaching; One to one teaching; Teaching larger<br />

groups; Presentation skills; Group dynamics and small<br />

groups. As a result of this feedback three follow up<br />

courses have been designed and piloted. The “TIPS”<br />

name was maintained because of the positive<br />

association. “TIPS 2” focuses on clinical/bedside<br />

teaching and student and course factors affecting<br />

learning. “TIPS 3” focuses on large group teaching and<br />

presentation skills. “TIPS 4” focuses on small group<br />

teaching and facilitation skills. “Microteaching”, voted<br />

the most helpful aspect of TIPS 1, has been retained as<br />

an opportunity for individualised feedback and putting<br />

theory into practice. Full details of objectives, content,<br />

teaching plans and feedback for these courses will be<br />

presented.


2I3 Formal courses in further training<br />

of medical teachers<br />

M Vrcic-Keglevic*, Z Jaksic, G Pavlekovic, N Pokrajac, A<br />

Smalcelj and B Vrhovac<br />

“A.Stampar” School of Public Health, Medical School, University<br />

of Zagreb, Rockefellerova 4, 10000 Zagreb, CROATIA<br />

The Croatian Association of Medical Education has<br />

been organising two types of attitudes aimed at further<br />

training of medical teachers; interactive workshops for<br />

experienced and formal courses for less experienced<br />

teachers of one week duration. The main aim of the<br />

formal courses is to help young teachers acquire basic<br />

pedagogical knowledge, skills and attitudes. Therefore,<br />

the following items have been covered: a psychology<br />

of learning; the principles of adult learning; curriculum<br />

development; giving a lecture, clinical teaching and<br />

tutorials; working in a small group; use of educational<br />

tools; and current developments in medical education.<br />

Special interest is paid on development of education<br />

methods, planning a timetable, defining the methods<br />

of evaluation and assessment. Since active learning is<br />

the most important, work in a small group, on individual<br />

projects and at plenary discussions occupy most of the<br />

time. Assessment consists of three parts: pre-course,<br />

written essay and MCQ, post-course MCQ, and<br />

preparation and presentation of an educational module.<br />

The participants are provided with a CME diploma in<br />

medical education - an important prerequisite for a<br />

teacher’s advancement.<br />

2I4 Supporting Clinicians on Training<br />

in Scotland<br />

Rose Martin, on behalf of Supporting Clinicians on<br />

Training in Scotland Working Group<br />

SCPMDE, Postgraduate Office, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and<br />

Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK<br />

A successful collaboration between Scottish Council<br />

for Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education<br />

(SCPMDE) and the Scottish Royal Colleges has<br />

resulted in the development of a Scottish based course<br />

to support clinical trainers. The SCOTS Course<br />

(Supporting Clinicians on Training in Scotland) is<br />

unique in its content, providing instruction on<br />

assessment and appraisal, skills training, teaching and<br />

training method, reflective practice, objective setting<br />

and a strategy to manage poor performance, delivered<br />

using many teaching styles. This two-day intensive<br />

course is aimed primarily at Consultant Educational<br />

Supervisors, and it is hoped that it will be delivered to<br />

Specialist Registrars in early 2001 in a modular format.<br />

It is designed to enable trainers to provide an effective<br />

educational experience for their trainees. The positive<br />

evaluations of the course and the plan to run ten SCOTS<br />

Courses in Scotland in 2001 will ensure its position in<br />

the innovative field of Medical Education. The initiative<br />

and its evaluation will be presented in depth and its<br />

effectiveness in relation to practice will be discussed.<br />

2I5 Improving own teaching skills<br />

identified as a top priority by<br />

Registrars<br />

Iwona Stolarek<br />

Hutt Hospital, Private Bag, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.16 -<br />

In order to ascertain the educational needs of Medical<br />

Registrars, a questionnaire study was carried out at Hutt<br />

Hospital. This was to allow the development of an<br />

educational programme to address these specifically.<br />

The 12 registrars were sent a 7-point questionnaire. 11/<br />

12 (92%) responded with the non-responder being a<br />

locum UK doctor. Ninety percent of the respondents<br />

were aiming at a hospital consultant career and 82%<br />

were currently sitting higher exams. None had<br />

educational supervisors though 82% felt these would<br />

be useful and were keen to develop log-books or<br />

learning diaries. In terms of learning need priorities,<br />

help with teaching skills was ranked the number one<br />

priority along with both exam practice and presentation<br />

skills by 82% of the registrars. This small pilot study<br />

has shown that junior doctors rate help in improving<br />

their teaching skills as highly as exam passes.<br />

2I6 Dissemination of teaching of<br />

medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination in Japan<br />

N Ban*, M Hatao, J Ohtaki, M Fujisaki, C Nakamura, T<br />

Tsuda, T Matsumura and M Shimo<br />

Nagoya University School of Medicine, Department of General<br />

Medicine, Place 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-<br />

8560, JAPAN<br />

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects<br />

of the nationwide faculty development workshop,<br />

sponsored by the Japan Society of Medical Education,<br />

on the teaching of medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination in Japanese medical schools. A<br />

questionnaire was sent to all 94 medical educators from<br />

54 of the 80 Japanese medical schools that participated<br />

in the workshop in 1996, 1997 and 1998. The response<br />

rate was 77.8%. Thirty schools (71.4%) reported<br />

substantial curriculum changes in interviewing and 29<br />

schools (69.1%) in physical examination courses. Out<br />

of 25 Japanese medical schools where standardized<br />

patients (SP) are currently used, 16 (64%) started to<br />

use SP as a result of the workshop. Among 24 schools<br />

that currently use Objective Structured Clinical<br />

Examination (OSCE), 18 (75%) initiated OSCE after<br />

the workshop. The faculty development workshop on<br />

teaching medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination is helping to change undergraduate<br />

medical education in Japan.<br />

2I7 Transformational learning in a peer<br />

teaching programme<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alexandra Blanco and Soledad Campos<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Students’ personal attitudes towards learning after their<br />

participation in a programme of teaching skills for 21<br />

medical students acting as peer teachers are described.<br />

After completing the program we analysed data from<br />

four different areas: identification of teaching<br />

difficulties, perceived personal changes, change in<br />

studying approaches and the ability to understand<br />

faculty’s actions. The difficulty in facing their peer<br />

students, and to adapt to the role of a teacher with their


peers; the increased ability to work successfully in a<br />

team, and to become self confident, and improve their<br />

own learning skills (which led to better grades in their<br />

exams); and an increased understanding of their own<br />

faculty’s actions were the more important changes they<br />

- 4.17 -<br />

mentioned. These data, despite the small number of<br />

students, show that our students have not only acquired<br />

pedagogical skills, but they have gone through a<br />

personal transformational learning experience.<br />

Session 2J Simulation and clinical skills training<br />

2J1 Teaching clinical skills to medical<br />

students using the clinical skills<br />

laboratory with a new simulator and<br />

new tools<br />

I Yoshida*, T Ueno, M Hotta, H Abe, I Kubara, S Kono, Y<br />

Ogo, S Watanabe, A Hayashi, T Akagi, S Okuda and M<br />

Sata (Working Group on teaching basic clinical skills)<br />

Office of Medical Education, Kurume University, School of<br />

Medicine, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume 830 0011, JAPAN<br />

The objective of the study was to evaluate the usefulness<br />

of the clinical skills laboratory (CSL) to learn basic<br />

clinical skills. The CSL was introduced to medical<br />

students to learn the medical interview, physical<br />

examination, resuscitation and X-ray film reading. A<br />

questionnaire was sent to the students. The results<br />

showed that the CSL was useful to 61% of the students;<br />

especially the new cardiology patient simulator “Ichiro”<br />

was appreciated by 90% of the medical students.<br />

2J2 Training in vaginal examination<br />

technique using the ‘epelvis’<br />

C M Pugh* and M S Marsh<br />

GKT Medical School, Academic Department of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynaecology, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, King’s College Hospital,<br />

Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK<br />

Undergraduate medical students find it increasingly<br />

difficult to learn the technique of vaginal examination<br />

(VE) using real patients. A pelvic mannequin has been<br />

developed which incorporates pressure sensors over<br />

important points within the pelvis, eg. the uterine<br />

fundus, cervix and ovaries. These sensors enable the<br />

duration and magnitude of pressure applied to parts of<br />

the pelvic organs during a pelvic examination to be<br />

measured and stored electronically. The data can be<br />

represented visually and may be seen by the student<br />

during the examination as an aid to teaching. A large<br />

database of “epelvis” examinations from vaginal<br />

examinations by undergraduates and postgraduates has<br />

been collected. The epelvis has considerable potential<br />

for the training and assessment of vaginal examination.<br />

2J3 Training medical students to<br />

perform vaginal examination using<br />

the ‘epelvis’<br />

M S Marsh* and C M Pugh<br />

GKT Medical School, Academic Department of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynaecology, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, King’s College Hospital,<br />

Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK<br />

We have examined medical student training in vaginal<br />

examination (VE) using a pelvic mannequin (“epelvis”)<br />

incorporating pressure transducers, enabling online<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

visual feedback of the pelvic areas examined. 74<br />

students underwent a test of VE using three pelvic<br />

models, followed by epelvis training, followed by<br />

testing using two other pelvic models. Before testing<br />

33% had performed >5 VEs on subjects and 55% had<br />

used a pelvic mannequin. The number of previous VEs<br />

or mannequin training was unrelated to the ability to<br />

estimate the size of the uterus correctly in pre-training<br />

tests. There was no improvement in ability to determine<br />

the size of the uterus after training in the whole group.<br />

However, in those students that had performed >5 VEs<br />

prior to testing, those able to judge uterine size correctly<br />

rose from 66% to 92% (P


programmatic evaluations. More innovative approaches<br />

such as incorporating both technological and human<br />

simulation in a multi-modal learning experience, and<br />

implementing an OSCE that serves both a needs and<br />

outcome assessment purpose (measuring consistency<br />

in learning across multiple clerkship sites in order to<br />

direct specific educational interventions) will be<br />

described.<br />

2J6 Using scenario based teaching to<br />

deliver feedback on technical and<br />

communication skills<br />

R L Kneebone*, J Kidd, D Nestel, B Paraskeva, S Asvall<br />

and A Darzi<br />

Academic Surgical Unit and, Department of Cognitive<br />

Neuroscience & Behaviour, Imperial College School of Medicine,<br />

10th Floor QEQM, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK<br />

- 4.18 -<br />

Technical skills and communication skills are<br />

inseparable in clinical practice but are often taught in<br />

isolation. Skills labs commonly use benchtop models<br />

for teaching core skills, but often away from their<br />

clinical context. Our solution bridges this gap by linking<br />

standardised patients (SPs) and inanimate models<br />

within a structured learning framework. Students work<br />

within a ‘safe zone’ to practise technical skills without<br />

jeopardising patient safety. They talk and listen to their<br />

‘patient’ (the SP) while carrying out procedures (e.g.<br />

wound closure, urinary catheterisation) in realistic<br />

clinical scenarios. Procedures are observed by tutors<br />

and simultaneously videotaped. After each procedure,<br />

the student writes down personal reflections, then tutors<br />

and SPs provide verbal feedback on salient points. Each<br />

student reviews their videotape, using formative rating<br />

scales to assess technical and communication skills.<br />

Qualitative data from 35 undergraduate medical<br />

students will be presented to outline the development<br />

of this approach to giving feedback.<br />

Session 2K Students and curriculum evaluation<br />

2K1 Teaching quality questionnaire:<br />

students’ evaluations of standard<br />

learning activities in an integrated<br />

curriculum<br />

Øyvind Ellingsen*, Kristin Wigen and Are Holen<br />

Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Department of<br />

Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Medical Technical<br />

Center, NO-7489 Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

Sound evaluation routines are important to improve the<br />

standard of medical education. In an integrated<br />

curriculum it is often useful to evaluate individual<br />

clinics, seminars or lectures rather than large blocks of<br />

learning activities. We therefore developed a<br />

questionnaire to assess the quality of standard learning<br />

activities such as clinics, lectures, seminars and<br />

workshops. The students rated all presentations on five<br />

items, including structure and illustrations, oral<br />

presentation, dialog with students, relevance according<br />

to stage of study and future profession and inspiration<br />

for further studying, using a 1-5-9 scale. In evaluations<br />

of 125 learning activities by 43 first year medical<br />

students the five items clustered into one single factor,<br />

representing overall teaching quality. The teaching<br />

quality score identified 6 learning activities that<br />

required revision (mean score


placement. 13% of students are concerned that their<br />

evaluation will affect their grades. We will discuss the<br />

implication of these findings on the procedures for<br />

collecting attributable evaluation material.<br />

2K4 Student evaluation of educational<br />

quality: the construction of a<br />

multidimensional questionnaire<br />

Volkhard Fischer<br />

Hannover Medical School, OE 9103, Rectors Office, 30623<br />

Hannover, GERMANY<br />

Educational quality is a complex construct. Marsh has<br />

developed a differentiated questionnaire for student<br />

evaluations of educational quality which is widely<br />

accepted. Our 37-item questionnaire is a localized<br />

version of this general questionnaire (SEEQ) adapted<br />

for the evaluation of medical courses in Germany. The<br />

items concerning the factor work load were formulated<br />

as bipolar questions on seven-point scales. The<br />

midpoint was labeled “appropriate”. The other items<br />

had a unipolar format with six grades from “not true”<br />

to “true” and an extra checkbox “does not apply”. The<br />

global rating of the course had to be made on a 16point<br />

Likert scale. The theoretical model was tested in<br />

a confirmatory factor analysis for the whole sample<br />

and several evaluative factor analyses for selected<br />

courses. Discrepancies between the theoretical model<br />

and the empirical results were discussed and integrated<br />

into an exploratory model.<br />

2K5 Evaluation of lectures in medical<br />

teaching based on focal groups<br />

and a survey of opinion to<br />

formulate a guide of practical<br />

recommendations<br />

Juan Cristóbal Maass, Lorena Tapia, Marcela Jacard, and<br />

Teresa Millán<br />

Depto. de Pediatría y Cirugía Infantil, Facultad de Medicina,<br />

Universidad de Chile<br />

In spite of new tendencies, in Chile lectures are mainly<br />

used in medical teaching. Our objective was to find<br />

out students’ opinions about aspects that influence<br />

quality of lectures, with the purpose of formulating a<br />

guide of practical recommendations (GPR). A survey<br />

was designed based on focal groups and applied to 181<br />

5th year students. We evaluated different aspects of<br />

lectures (teacher; content, dynamics and structure;<br />

support material; and atmosphere). Of 113 students<br />

interviewed, 96.4% think that it would be useful to have<br />

a GPR for lecturers. Positive practical aspects of lectures<br />

highlighted were: delivery of lecture notes (93.8%); to<br />

give practical details (98.2%); and to give a summary<br />

(94.5%). Among negatives: that lectures were carried<br />

out in the afternoon (94.6%); lasted longer than<br />

foreseen (94.7%); and small fonts were used in<br />

projection (92.9%). We intend to discuss this guide<br />

based on the opinions obtained, showing aspects not<br />

traditionally considered.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.19 -<br />

2K6 Use of a Continuous Quality<br />

Improvement (CQI) model to<br />

enhance curriculum evaluation and<br />

integration<br />

Nehad El-Sawi<br />

University of Health Sciences, 1750 Independence Avenue,<br />

Kansas City, MO 64106, USA<br />

Course evaluation is one of the corner stones for the<br />

documentation of the educational process quality. CQI<br />

is a process of constructive self study that encourages<br />

participation of all students and faculty in order to<br />

maximize the benefit of the evaluation process. Eight<br />

essential activities involved in course delivery are<br />

identified. A written survey is designed to evaluate<br />

these activities. The survey is administered at the end<br />

of each course and the entire class results are tabulated<br />

as the comprehensive evaluation. Students are assigned<br />

to CQI teams before each course begins and are<br />

responsible for reviewing the comprehensive<br />

evaluation, drafting a one-page consensus report,<br />

prioritizing improvements that could enhance student<br />

learning and presenting the report to faculty and<br />

curriculum committee. The CQI evaluation model<br />

produced a more effective, meaningful and constructive<br />

evaluation while building interdisciplinary team skills<br />

and professional behavior among medical students.<br />

2K7 New faculty-level self-evaluation<br />

instruments<br />

K Lonka*, N Paganus, T Hatonen, A Heikkila, J Vainio<br />

and J Nieminen<br />

University of Helsinki, Leiviskatie 2 E 64, Fin-00440 Helsinki,<br />

FINLAND<br />

The Faculty of Medicine at the University of Helsinki<br />

began to evaluate and reform its curriculum of medical<br />

studies in 1994. This process resulted in Helsinki 2000,<br />

a hybrid-PBL curriculum, which was introduced in<br />

1998. A systematic programme was also integrated to<br />

support students’ personal growth and to advance their<br />

communication and thinking skills, called Professional<br />

Growth of Medical Students.<br />

In order to see how well these reforms have been<br />

implemented, we developed a set of evaluation<br />

instruments. Questionnaires and observation methods<br />

were applied for both students and teachers. The data<br />

are extensive, and some examples are presented here.<br />

The final goal is to finish a self-evaluation report for<br />

the international evaluation of all studies and<br />

programmes of the University of Helsinki, which will<br />

take place in the years 2001-<strong>2002</strong>.<br />

2K8 The doctors’ opinion - a national<br />

evaluation of Swedish medical<br />

education<br />

Anders Bengtsson, Kerstin Johansson and Sara Engstrom*<br />

Swedish Medical Association, Sveriges Lakarforbund, PO Box<br />

5610, S-11486 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN<br />

In autumn 2000, the Swedish Medical Association sent<br />

out a questionnaire in order to evaluate Swedish medical<br />

education. Junior doctors were asked to assess medical<br />

education in relation to the declared objectives. They


were also asked whether they thought the objectives<br />

were relevant. The questionnaire was sent to all 743<br />

members who had been registered in 1999 (they had<br />

been working for approximately 3-4 years). More than<br />

90% replied to the questionnaire. This is the first time<br />

a survey including all doctors from all six universities<br />

Session 2L Multiprofessional education<br />

2L1 Interprofessional learning: the New<br />

Generation Project<br />

Debra Humphris* and Chris Stephens*<br />

The Department of Medical Education, Office of School of<br />

Medicine, University of Southampton, MP 801 Level C, South<br />

Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton,<br />

SO16 6DY, UK<br />

At the University of Southampton the undergraduate<br />

BM course takes place within a multiprofessional<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences,<br />

which includes the School of Nursing and Midwifery,<br />

the School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation<br />

Sciences and the School of Biological Sciences. The<br />

rich mix of professional programmes within the Faculty<br />

has led over the past decade to numerous developments<br />

in interprofessional learning and practice. The Faculty’s<br />

commitment to building on its experience of<br />

interprofessional learning is reflected in its strategic<br />

plan, and the establishment of the New Generation<br />

Project. This bold project will enable the Faculty to<br />

demonstrate its contribution to the modernisation of<br />

education and training for the health and social care<br />

workforce. The process of these changes within a large<br />

educational organisation will be explored and<br />

discussed.<br />

2L2 “Walking in the moccasins of<br />

others”: reflections on a new<br />

initiative to bring the real world of the<br />

patient into the medical curriculum<br />

Lyn Brown<br />

University of Liverpool, Community Studies Unit, Department<br />

of Primary Care, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill,<br />

Liverpool L59 3GB, UK<br />

Community Placements are an essential feature of the<br />

Liverpool University Undergraduate Medical<br />

Curriculum. They are designed to give students contact<br />

with all aspects of health and medicine outside the<br />

immediate confines of hospital and general practice.<br />

During second year, placement in community health<br />

services, statutory and voluntary social work agencies,<br />

and supervised University based groups, provide<br />

excellent learning opportunities that complement other<br />

aspects of the students’ learning. Without diminishing<br />

the bio-medical approach to health-care, placements<br />

enhance the students’ learning by developing a broader<br />

view of health and disease that includes psychological<br />

and socio-economic factors. This would seem to offer<br />

students wider options in management of ill-health and<br />

disability; effecting involvement with, and better long<br />

term care of, their patients. This paper describes the<br />

methods, evaluations and outcomes set in place to<br />

achieve the above.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.20 -<br />

has been carried out. The survey is intended to be<br />

carried out annually, thus providing a series of results<br />

at national level, as well as an impact assessment of<br />

the new curricula which are being implemented in<br />

Swedish medical schools. The results will be presented<br />

at the conference.<br />

2L3 Multiprofessional education in<br />

health care ethics in Germany<br />

Jochen Vollmann<br />

Freie Universitat <strong>Berlin</strong>, Arbeitsgruppe Ethik in der Medizin,<br />

Institut fur Geschichte der Medizin, Klingsorstr. 119, D-12203<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

In Germany only very limited practical experience and<br />

knowledge in teaching of medical ethics and ethics of<br />

health care is available. German medical schools do<br />

not offer regular ethics teaching, whereas the<br />

“Reformstudiengang Medizin” at the Charité in <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

provides some teaching blocks in medical ethics.<br />

Graduate ethics training in nursing sciences, public<br />

health and social work varies widely. Since 1995 the<br />

author teaches ethics to medical students as well as<br />

students in public health, nursing and social work at<br />

various universities in <strong>Berlin</strong> and the U.S. In this short<br />

communication preliminary data from a 5 year pilot<br />

study are presented. Different demands, approaches and<br />

evaluation results of ethics teaching in the different<br />

professional graduate courses are presented. Pro and<br />

cons of ethics teaching in the various professional<br />

programs are compared with the multiprofessional<br />

approaches in the <strong>Berlin</strong> program of public health and<br />

at the Evangelische Fachhochschule <strong>Berlin</strong>.<br />

2L4 Dilemmas in resuscitation: nursing<br />

and medical students’ responses to<br />

ethical professional issues related<br />

to resuscitation of patients<br />

C Edward*, J Crosby and P E Preece*<br />

University of Dundee, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tayside<br />

Campus, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

At the University of Dundee a three hour teaching<br />

session involving 280+ nursing and medical students<br />

took place in 1999. The aim was to enable the students<br />

to explore and debate, together, the ethical/professional<br />

issues inherent within resuscitation. An automated<br />

audience response test containing 5 set questions was<br />

given to the students immediately pre/post the session.<br />

Two significantly different responses were related to:<br />

• Who should have the major say in advanced<br />

decisions of resuscitation? (Doctor, Nurse, Patient,<br />

Relatives, Team). Team-Pre: Nursing 66% Medical<br />

78%. Post: Nursing 97% Medical 89%.<br />

• Should close relatives be permitted to witness<br />

resuscitation? Permit-Pre: Nursing 63% Medical<br />

12%; Post: Nursing 55% (still permit) Medical 29%<br />

(now in favour).


Analyses were by Wilcoxon and Mann-U-Whitney<br />

tests. Written comments from students were<br />

encouraging and in 2000 the topic of resuscitation was<br />

established as part of each student programme for third<br />

year nursing/medical students.<br />

2L5 Promoting the use of clinical<br />

guidelines in Scotland<br />

Bernice West* and Peter Wimpenny*<br />

Robert Gordon University, Centre for Nurse Practice Research<br />

and Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Northern<br />

College, E Block, Hilton Drive, Aberdeen AB24 4FP, UK<br />

The initiative was funded by the National Board for<br />

Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting for Scotland<br />

and jointly managed by the Centre for Nurse Practice<br />

Research and Development at the Robert Gordon<br />

University, Aberdeen and The Royal College of Nursing<br />

Institute. The initiative’s aims were to increase nurses’<br />

knowledge and skills in using clinical guidelines. The<br />

initiative clearly demonstrated the need for<br />

multiprofessional involvement in all aspects of clinical<br />

guidelines. The educational approach comprised:<br />

• Identifying a Local Facilitator;<br />

• Introducing key skills for multiprofessional<br />

guideline implementation through five Open/<br />

Distance Learning modules covering guideline<br />

choice, appraisal, implementation strategies and<br />

evaluation;<br />

• Supporting Local Facilitators by: (1) regular contact<br />

with education providers, (2) problem solving group<br />

work at workshops, (3) provision of a buddy who<br />

has clinical and/or change management expertise.<br />

Implementing clinical guidelines is a complex activity<br />

that demands multiprofessional education and<br />

intervention. Recommendations for such provision will<br />

be presented.<br />

2L6 Can Neuropsychiatry training be<br />

successfully delivered in a multiprofessional<br />

setting?<br />

Andrew Parkin* and Nisha Dogra<br />

University of Leicester, Greenwood Institute of Child Health,<br />

Westcotes House, Westcotes Drive, Leicester LE2 1SF, UK<br />

Session 2M Student support/psychiatry and the curriculum<br />

2M1 An evaluation of student support<br />

systems at the Medical School at<br />

Queen’s University Belfast<br />

Nicola Wilson, David McCluskey and Mairead Boohan*<br />

Queen’s University of Belfast, Medical Education Unit, Room<br />

145 Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9<br />

7DL, UK<br />

The Faculty Tutorial Scheme at the Medical School at<br />

Queen’s University Belfast was established in 1984 to<br />

provide pastoral support for students. During 1999<br />

qualitative and quantitative research techniques were<br />

used to evaluate this support mechanism. Questionnaire<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.21 -<br />

A half-day training course on epilepsy in child mental<br />

health was devised for a multi-professional audience.<br />

Evaluation included delegates’ self-reported<br />

knowledge, attitudes, and perception of the course. 83<br />

professionals attended, representing related disciplines.<br />

81 completed a pre-, 73 a feedback, 65 a post-, and 18<br />

an eight-month follow-up questionnaire. Most reported<br />

the learning objectives to be clear (85%) and met (80%),<br />

the course was structured to facilitate learning (78%),<br />

links were made with clinical practice (78%), and they<br />

had questioned their own practice as a result (72%).<br />

Correct responses to knowledge questions rose (56%<br />

to 91%), incorrect (7% to


suggest that while this scheme was seen as innovative<br />

it still has limitations.<br />

2M2 Is student abuse a problem in our<br />

medical school?<br />

Ana Maida*, Alicia Vasquez, José Calderon, Viviana<br />

Herskovic, Marcela Jacard, Ana Pereira and Lars Widdel<br />

University of Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile,<br />

Departamento de Pediatría, Campus Oriente, Casilla 16117,<br />

Correo 9, Providencia, Santiago, CHILE<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine the<br />

incidence, and the consequences, of abusive situations<br />

as perceived by students during the course of their<br />

Medical training. A descriptive study was made<br />

surveying the entire 2000 fifth year class in the Medical<br />

School of the University of Chile. The questionnaire<br />

was answered by 144 students. Results showed that<br />

91.7% of the students had suffered at least one episode<br />

of abuse while enrolled in Medical School. Main<br />

offenders were teachers and peers. Verbal abuse was<br />

the most common (85.4%), followed by psychological<br />

(79.9%), sexual (26.4%) and physical (23.6%) abuse.<br />

Students reported that abuse had effects on their mental<br />

health, social life and the image they had of physicians;<br />

17% considered dropping out of school as a<br />

consequence of this experience. The high proportion<br />

of teachers involved in situations perceived as abusive<br />

by students should prompt educators to reflect on their<br />

role.<br />

2M3 First year medical, nursing and<br />

pharmacy students’ approaches to<br />

study<br />

R J Lamdin* and I Martin<br />

9A Sentinel Road, Herne Bay, Auckland, NEW ZEALAND<br />

The Approaches to Study Inventory (ASI) was<br />

administered to first year health sciences students prior<br />

to course commencement at the University of<br />

Auckland.This was to aid understanding of approaches<br />

to study in a large multi-professional first year<br />

programme. Prior to 1999 medical students in the<br />

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences were taught a<br />

unique course but as of 2000, nursing and pharmacy<br />

students were admitted to new nursing and pharmacy<br />

programmes. In the first year, medical, nursing,<br />

pharmacy and general health science students share<br />

common courses. Each group of students is admitted<br />

via different admission systems and goes on to complete<br />

different programmes of study. This project describes<br />

the learning styles of the first year students using the<br />

ASI and considers the importance of this knowledge<br />

in teaching. Consideration of gender and age<br />

differences and the possible effect of different<br />

admission systems will be undertaken.<br />

2M4 Changing medical students’<br />

attitudes towards homosexuality<br />

Itzchak Levi* and Tsvi Fischel<br />

Sackler Medical School, 13/2 Tsel Hagivaa, Ramat Gan, ISRAEL<br />

In many surveys it is found that many physicians hold<br />

negative attitudes towards homosexuality. In addition,<br />

due to negative experience many gay people feel<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.22 -<br />

uncomfortable to report to their physician about their<br />

sexual orientation. As well as the fact that gays have<br />

unique health conditions, they do not tend to share with<br />

their physician even their general health problems, and<br />

not even problems concerning preventive medicine. In<br />

view of the above, it is interesting that most medical<br />

schools do not include in their curriculum a place to<br />

teach “homosexuality”. Attitudes towards<br />

homosexuality can be changed through workshops and<br />

active learning. Two case studies were discussed and<br />

processed by medical students in their pre clinical<br />

studies as part of the behavioral sciences course. The<br />

students showed a high level of satisfaction. Case<br />

studies could be a useful tool to teach and experience<br />

attitudes towards gays and homosexuality in medical<br />

schools.<br />

2M5 The attitudes to Psychiatry of first<br />

year medical students<br />

R K Day<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Psychiatry, Level 5,<br />

Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

For over thirty years there has been evidence that<br />

psychiatry is viewed negatively by medical students.<br />

A number of self-report questionnaires of attitudes to<br />

psychiatry have been constructed, of which the most<br />

widely used is the ATP-30. The ATP-30 was<br />

administered to first year medical students on their first<br />

day of medical school to assess their initial attitudes. It<br />

was also administered to a first year science class. The<br />

ATP-30 was also modified to inquire about attitudes<br />

to gynaecology and this was completed by the new<br />

medical students. The attitudes of new medical students<br />

to psychiatry do not differ from those of science<br />

students. However, medical students view gynaecology<br />

more positively than they do psychiatry. Further studies<br />

are required to determine how this initially negative<br />

view of psychiatry is affected by the medical<br />

curriculum.<br />

2M6 Psychology basic and applied<br />

knowledge<br />

Agnete Langagergaard* and Berit Eika<br />

Unit of Medical Education, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst<br />

Boulevard 9, DK 8000 Aarhus, DENMARK<br />

In a new medical curriculum an innovative course of<br />

psychology was introduced, consisting of: (1) a short<br />

(20 hour) 3rd term course giving a factual knowledge<br />

base within the domain of psychology, and (2) a longer<br />

(4 weeks) 7th term course where the application of<br />

knowledge previously acquired is trained. The short<br />

course is lecture based and within the framework of<br />

developmental psychology. Each double lecture covers<br />

an age span thereby making sure that students become<br />

aware of general as well as of age specific psychological<br />

issues. In the latter course a case based teaching format<br />

helps students develop a systematic approach to<br />

psychological themes relevant to the medical<br />

profession. Clinical psychologists introduce students<br />

to themes such as anxiety, minority problems, and<br />

psychosomatic problems. Finally, in conjunction with<br />

the Department of Philosophy, a topic (eg. the dying<br />

patient) is chosen as a returning theme covered from<br />

different angles.


Session 3 Workshops 1<br />

3/1 The roles of the teacher<br />

Jennifer Laidlaw and E Anne Hesketh<br />

SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Background<br />

All doctors are teachers. It is a role that is constantly<br />

changing and is often a challenge for today’s doctors -<br />

especially with the many other tasks they have to carry<br />

out. This workshop gives the opportunity to explore<br />

the teaching roles and tasks that doctors might have to<br />

adopt whether they are doctors at the start of their<br />

postgraduate training or fully trained with a formal<br />

teaching responsibility.<br />

Aims<br />

The workshop aims to give insight into:<br />

the roles that today’s doctors, as clinical educators,<br />

have to adopt<br />

the associated tasks that they have to carry out<br />

the approaches to these tasks and the<br />

professionalism required of today’s educator .<br />

Who should attend<br />

Those involved in teaching in any capacity eg<br />

having to look after juniors, being a contributor to<br />

a course or a departmental teaching session, having<br />

formal supervision responsibilities, being a course<br />

organiser<br />

Those involved in identifying generic skills for the<br />

postgraduate training of doctors<br />

Note: This workshop is very similar to last year’s workshop<br />

‘12 roles of the teacher’ which was oversubscribed. Due to<br />

interest expressed it is being repeated in an extended format.<br />

Those attending last year would not gain further significant<br />

benefit from attending.<br />

Content and structure<br />

1 Introduction to roles (25 min): Ice breaker activity<br />

and short plenary with hand out;<br />

2 Tasks associated with roles (35 min): Group activity<br />

with feedback;<br />

3 A framework for identifying the competencies<br />

required by the clinical educator (15 min): Short<br />

plenary with time to study grid and make link to<br />

findings of previous group activity;<br />

4 Using the grid (35 min):Group activity with<br />

feedback;<br />

5 Courses in teaching from Dundee(10 min): Display<br />

of material from a ‘taster’ course through to a<br />

Diploma/Masters in Medical Education.<br />

3/2 The quality of medical education and<br />

teaching – thema con variatione<br />

Professor Peter Nippert<br />

University of Muenster, Germany<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.23 -<br />

3/3 From MD to academic teacher<br />

Professor Reinhard Putz<br />

University of Munich, Germany<br />

Background<br />

Medical education focusses on knowledge and abilities.<br />

Students are faced with a lot of information including<br />

general understanding of processes, differential<br />

diagnosis and therapeutic consequences. In most<br />

European universities, lectures, courses and practical<br />

exercises on patients are the preferred teaching<br />

elements. Some medical schools have changed to<br />

problem based learning (PBL). The effectiveness of the<br />

teaching depends on many aspects. One is the student/<br />

teacher ratio; another is the structure of the program.<br />

However, the education of the teacher is the last in this<br />

list. On the other hand, many studies show that the<br />

performance and personality of the teacher has the<br />

highest impact on the learning effect. This is especially<br />

true for lectures and teacher-guided courses, but also<br />

in PBL the tutor plays a crucial role in the learning<br />

process. In light of this it is surprising that academic<br />

teachers are not forced to undergo any kind of didactic<br />

training. Only few institutions offer a structured training<br />

program for young assistants.<br />

Aim<br />

One of the goals of the workshop is the preparation of<br />

participants for the role of academic teacher. The<br />

participants should leave the workshop with the insight<br />

that academic teaching can become an attractive<br />

challenge especially for scientific educated people.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The report of good and bad experiences should<br />

contribute to a picture of the present personal situation<br />

of teaching staff in many schools. Next, the needs for<br />

improvement will be addressed. Then a period of<br />

discussion in small groups is planned. In this part a<br />

particular teaching situation will be designed and<br />

structured: lecture for a large class (more than 100),<br />

lecture for a small class (ca. 40–80), seminar (10–20),<br />

course, PBL group. Back in the plenary, the results of<br />

the sections will be presented and discussed. The<br />

preparation for the requirements of an academic teacher<br />

should be the goal of this part followed by some<br />

suggestions for the structure of a training course for<br />

academic teachers.<br />

1 Plenary (ca. 20‘): Reflection on the personal state<br />

of teaching ability (advantages and shortcomings)<br />

2 Plenary (ca. 20‘): Description of necessary teaching<br />

abilities<br />

3 Groups (ca. 20‘): Structure of particular teaching<br />

situations (large lecture, small lecture, course,<br />

practical exercise, POL-group)<br />

4 Plenary (ca. 20‘): How to prepare an M.D. for<br />

education as an academic teacher<br />

5 Plenary (ca. 30‘): Elements of a training course for<br />

academic teachers .


3/4 Feedback and evaluation: essential<br />

activities in the learning process<br />

(helping students learn to seek<br />

continuing improvement - as<br />

students and career professionals)<br />

Dr Charles D Puglia,<br />

MCP Hahnemann School of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane,<br />

Philadelphia PA 19129, USA<br />

Background<br />

Fear, anxiety, and panic are common reactions to the<br />

suggestion that an individual is to receive feedback or<br />

evaluation of their work. Often, the perception that selfesteem<br />

is about to be threatened elicits a defensive<br />

barrier that interferes with communication of<br />

information which is intended to improve performance.<br />

This view of feedback, perceived as a painful process,<br />

has developed because of injurious methods of delivery<br />

of evaluative information beginning in childhood and<br />

in many cases continuing throughout a student’s formal<br />

educative experience. Feedback and evaluative<br />

information must be recognized as essential for an<br />

individual to succeed at self-directed learning. The<br />

learner must be encouraged to seek evaluative comment<br />

as a means of continuing intellectual growth and<br />

thereby enhancing self-esteem.<br />

Achievement of the objectives of all learning systems<br />

such as medical school curricula is dependent upon<br />

formative evaluation and feedback as well as summative<br />

evaluation. Evaluative methods are especially important<br />

in times when curricular change is introduced.<br />

Feedback and evaluation is necessary to aid faculty as<br />

well as students to clearly define the objectives of the<br />

change in terms of the ultimate goal of the curriculum.<br />

Aim of workshop<br />

This workshop will identify attitudes and techniques<br />

which faculty can adopt to enable feedback and<br />

evaluation to be delivered in a constructive, esteembuilding<br />

manner. Students will begin to actively seek<br />

feedback as an opportunity to continually improve and<br />

grow.<br />

3/5 Best Evidence Medical Education<br />

(BEME): progress report<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ian Hart<br />

BEME Collaboration (www.bemecollaboration.org)<br />

Background<br />

BEME is defined as: “The implementation by teachers<br />

and educational bodies in their practice, of methods<br />

and approaches to education based on the best evidence<br />

available.” In the three years since the <strong>AMEE</strong> Prague<br />

Conference, when the topic of BEME was raised, there<br />

has been much activity, leading to the formation of the<br />

BEME Collaboration in 1999. The Collaboration aims<br />

to promote a culture of the use of best evidence in<br />

medical and healthcare professions education, to carry<br />

out systematic reviews of the evidence and to<br />

dissemination information on best practice. A<br />

systematic review is defined as “A review of the<br />

evidence on a clearly formulated question that uses<br />

systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.24 -<br />

critically appraise relevant primary research, and to<br />

extract and analyse data from the studies that are<br />

included in the review. “ (NHS Centre for Reviews and<br />

Dissemination 2001).<br />

Several international Topic Review Groups have<br />

recently been formed to carry out pilot studies, prior<br />

to the commencement of systematic reviews of the<br />

evidence, in the following areas:<br />

1 The use of feedback in assessment;<br />

2 The use of high fidelity simulators as an aid to<br />

student learning<br />

3 Faculty development<br />

4 The use of computers in clinical education.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be conducted in plenary. First there<br />

will be a short introduction to familiarise participants<br />

with the issues. Presentations from each of the Topic<br />

Review Groups will follow, reporting on issues raised<br />

in the early stages of the pilot studies. These involve<br />

setting up the review groups, deciding on the research<br />

question to be examined, finding and judging the<br />

evidence and the format in which the evidence is to be<br />

presented. Where appropriate, an insight will be given<br />

by the group into the impressions of the data collected<br />

to date in each of the areas. The session will finish<br />

with an interactive discussion with the audience and it<br />

is envisaged that methodological issues will form a<br />

major part of the discussions.<br />

Prospective participants might like to refer to the BEME<br />

website to gain some insight into the project:<br />

www.bemecollaboration.org<br />

3/6 East European Task Force<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ioan Bocsan<br />

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine & Pharmacy, 13 Emil<br />

Isac St , RO-3400 Cluj-Napoca, Romania<br />

A review of some of the issues facing medical education<br />

in East and Central Europe, with contributions from<br />

participants.<br />

3/7 Making feedback during clerkships<br />

meaningful and effective: a workshop<br />

for students and teachers<br />

Dr Paul Hemmer<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones<br />

Bridge Road, Bethesda MD 20814, USA<br />

Background<br />

Medical students have concerns that the feedback they<br />

receive during clinical clerkships is sporadic, and that<br />

it varies in quality. Teachers are not always comfortable<br />

providing feedback, and may be uncertain of clerkship<br />

goals and expectations.<br />

Aims<br />

Participants will a) gain familiarity with the RIME<br />

descriptors, b) improve their ability to solicit and<br />

provide feedback, and c) discuss the potential for<br />

educational research.


Content and structure<br />

In this workshop, we will seek input from students and<br />

teachers about feedback during a clinical clerkship.<br />

From this discussion, we will present a framework of<br />

goals and expectations for medical students on clinical<br />

clerkships, known as RIME for Reporter-Interpreter-<br />

Manager/Educator. Using this framework, we will<br />

explore how students can self-assess their performance,<br />

and to use this as a means to solicit feedback from<br />

teachers. Teachers will be introduced to using RIME<br />

for evaluating students and subsequently providing<br />

feedback. We will use interactive discussion, role-play,<br />

and teaching cases.<br />

3/8 Concept mapping<br />

Dr Gonul Peker<br />

Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova 35100 Izmir, Turkey<br />

3/9 Effective student assessment:<br />

something old, something new<br />

Dr Geoff Norman<br />

McMaster University Medical School, Health Sciences Centre,<br />

1200 Main Street West, Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5, Canada<br />

Aims<br />

• To familiarise participants with reliability/validity<br />

of various tools;<br />

• To introduce some new promising approaches to<br />

assessment : Reasoning Exercise;<br />

• Key features; Clinical Work Sampling.<br />

Who should attend<br />

This workshop will be of interest to both clinical and<br />

pre-clinical teachers.<br />

Content and structure:<br />

1 Plenary session (1 hour): Ground rules; Review of<br />

various traditional methods; Introduction of new<br />

approaches<br />

2 Practice designing new approaches (1/2 hour)<br />

3 Discussion and conclusions (1/2 hour)<br />

Handouts will be provided.<br />

3/10 A bachelor-master structure of<br />

medical education in Europe?<br />

Professor Olle ten Cate<br />

University Medical Centre Utrecht and Professor Herman van<br />

Rossum, University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

University Medical Centre Utrecht, P O Box 85060, 3508 AB<br />

Utrecht, Netherlands<br />

Background<br />

In 1999 the Ministers of Education of the European<br />

Union countries agreed upon the so-called Bologna<br />

Declaration. This agreement concerns the<br />

harmonization of higher education. One element is the<br />

restructuring education into two phases: a bachelor<br />

(undergraduate) phase of three years and a master<br />

(graduate) phase of one or two years. Major reasons to<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.25 -<br />

harmonize higher education include international<br />

comparability and enhancing exchange possibilities.<br />

In the Netherlands, several universities and vocational<br />

schools have started curricular changes to implement<br />

the new structure, preferably in 2003. Medical schools<br />

have been hesitant to adapt their curricula. A national<br />

project on The Continuum of Medical Training has been<br />

asked to first investigate the possibilities and<br />

desirability of this new structure. It may be contrary to<br />

current medical curriculum developments, as in<br />

innovative schools clinical education is gradually<br />

moving to early years of education and being integrated<br />

with basic sciences. The BaMa-structure may throw<br />

medical education back to a separation of basic and<br />

clinical sciences. However, medical education could<br />

become too isolated within the universities and and too<br />

little harmonized internationally, if is does not<br />

implement the structure.<br />

Content and structure<br />

In this workshop participants from different countries<br />

will be invited to (a) briefly discuss the current structure<br />

of medical training in their country in a structured<br />

format and (b) generate arguments pro and/or contra<br />

harmonization of medical education in Europe<br />

according to the Bologna Declaration.<br />

3/11 The assessment of poorly<br />

performing doctors: experiences<br />

from the first three years of the<br />

Performance Procedures within the<br />

UK General Medical Council<br />

Professor Lesley Southgate, CHIME, London<br />

Dr Peter McCrorie, St George’s Hospital Medical School<br />

CHIME, University College London Medical School, Archway<br />

Campus, Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

The assessment of poorly performing doctors:<br />

experiences from the first three years of the<br />

Performance Procedures within the UK General<br />

Medical Council.<br />

Aim<br />

This workshop will inform participants about the UK<br />

programme to assess doctors whose competence to hold<br />

a medical licence has been questioned. This is carried<br />

out in two phases: peer review of performance in the<br />

workplace and tests of knowledge and skills in a clinical<br />

skills lab.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be divided into three sections, each<br />

of one hour. The first section will describe the<br />

programme and the assessment principles on which it<br />

is based. The second section will examine the methods<br />

of assessment used in both phases and will also include<br />

presentation of data from actual assessments. The third<br />

section will describe the recruitment, training and<br />

assessment of the performance assessors. Each section<br />

will be introduced by an interactive lecture for 20<br />

minutes, followed by group work for 20 minutes and<br />

plenary discussion for 20 minutes. Throughout the three<br />

hours examples from surgery, anaesthetics, ob&gyn,<br />

general practice and psychiatry will be used.


No preparation is needed in advance and handouts will<br />

be available.<br />

3/12 What can a general medical journal<br />

do for education in medicine?<br />

Sandy Goldbeck-Wood, Assistant Editor BMJ and Dr Ed<br />

Peile, Research Fellow in Medical Education, University of<br />

Oxford and Editorial Advisor, BMJ<br />

Dept of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford, Chiltern<br />

Waters, 1 Stablebridge Road, Aston Clinton, Bucks HP22 5ND,<br />

UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.26 -<br />

Background<br />

The BMJ is considering new ventures in medical<br />

education and we will put forward some ideas for future<br />

ventures in publication. We would like participants’<br />

reactions and ideas for how medical education themes<br />

may be developed in a general medical journal.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Anyone with an interest in medical education; graduates<br />

or undergraduates, particularly those who read general<br />

medical journals.


Session 4 Large Group Sessions<br />

4A Standards and professionalism in<br />

medical education<br />

1 Attempto! Instilling mindful teaching<br />

Dr Maria Lammerding-Köppel<br />

Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Geissweg 5/1, D-<br />

72076 Tübingen, Germany<br />

The need for staff development programmes and the<br />

training of medical teachers in education have been<br />

recognized. The areas to be covered in such<br />

programmes and the specific teacher competencies and<br />

attitudes are often a matter of debate. Intended<br />

outcomes and standards of quality must relate to the<br />

professional roles of the medical teacher and to the<br />

culture of good teaching practice based on consensus.<br />

The task for the future is to ensure that we address<br />

outcomes that expand the scope of the medical teacher<br />

and that are deeply relevant to an optimal professional<br />

development.<br />

2 Who is afraid of the didactic wolf? A plea for<br />

professionalism in medical education and<br />

specialist training<br />

Professor Rein Zwierstra<br />

Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences,<br />

University of Groningen, Ant. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV<br />

Groningen, Netherlands<br />

In the present era there is no longer a need for expert<br />

doctors who can talk enthusiastically about their subject<br />

in a teaching setting. Changes in health care<br />

organisation and curriculum design call for effective<br />

teaching by teachers who operate in a team. Whilst in<br />

the world of research peer review is accepted as a<br />

standard, it is remarkable that in medical education<br />

practice peer opinions about each other’s teaching is<br />

regarded as patronising or even threatening. The quality<br />

of teaching and of curricula will improve significantly<br />

if teachers, trained in didactic principles, were to<br />

prepare their contribution as a team and reflect with<br />

mutual respect upon each other’s participation. Why<br />

are medical teachers and trainers afraid of the didactic<br />

wolf?<br />

3 What’s good about “Best Evidence Medical<br />

Education (BEME)”?<br />

Professor Ralph Bloch<br />

Institute for Medical Education, Inselspital 37a, University of<br />

Bern, H-3010 Bern, Switzerland<br />

BEME, like its older cousin “Evidence Based Medicine<br />

(EBM)” is likely to meet supporters and detractors.<br />

EBM and BEME are often depicted as new religions.<br />

The simile is quite apt. Both movements encompass a<br />

core philosophy, a set of prescribed rituals and a<br />

supporting, hierarchical organization. The central<br />

dogmata of both activities derive from logical<br />

positivism with the utilitarian goal of doing more good<br />

than harm - one in the practice of medicine, the other<br />

in the training of medical practitioners. The rituals<br />

pertain to the efficient extraction of valid (both internal<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.27 -<br />

and external) evidence from the published literature.<br />

The hierarchical organizations, finally, serve the<br />

purpose of optimizing economies of scale and fostering<br />

consensus on standards of quality within the academic<br />

community. Not unlike established religions, EBM and<br />

BEME run the risk of blind adherence and of assuming<br />

the cloak of infallibility. The way we develop and<br />

implement BEME will ultimately determine whether<br />

it will do more good than harm.<br />

4B International aspects of standards<br />

1 International standards in medical education:<br />

what are they and do we really need them?<br />

Dr Andrzej Wojtcjak and Dr M Roy Schwarz<br />

Institute for International Medical Education, 106 Corporate<br />

Park Drive, Suite 100, White Plains, New York NY 10604-3817,<br />

USA<br />

Physicians are now members of the global community.<br />

Created by interlocking economies, a global language,<br />

informatics networks and rapid travel, globalization has<br />

penetrated science, public health, the environment, law<br />

and religion, as well as medicine. Hence, minimal<br />

physician competencies must be defined and<br />

mechanisms developed to ensure that all medical school<br />

graduates possess these essential requirements.<br />

Established by a grant from the China Medical Board<br />

of New York, the Institute for International Medical<br />

Education (IIME) has undertaken the responsibility of<br />

defining “global minimum essential requirements”<br />

(GMER) for undergraduate medical programs.<br />

Developed by international medical experts, GMER<br />

consist of knowledge, clinical skills, professional<br />

attitudes, behaviour and ethical values. Since GMER<br />

alone are not likely to change graduates’ competencies<br />

unless they are linked to assessment, evaluation tools<br />

for educational outcomes are also being developed. The<br />

lessons learned from the pilot implementation of<br />

GMER in selected medical schools will be available to<br />

the global medical education community.<br />

2 Globalisation of Medical Education: The<br />

concept of international standards<br />

Dr. Hans Karle<br />

President, World Federation for Medical Education, Faculty of<br />

Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute,<br />

Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, DENMARK<br />

The increasing internationalisation of the medical<br />

profession raises the question of safeguarding the<br />

practice of medicine and medical manpower utilisation<br />

through well-defined international standards in medical<br />

education. Evaluation of educational institutions and<br />

programmes based on internationally adopted standards<br />

is an important incentive for institutional improvements<br />

and for generally raising the quality of medical<br />

education. Furthermore, such standards can serve as<br />

guidelines for national or regional agencies dealing<br />

with recognition and accreditation of medical schools


and postgraduate training institutions and educational<br />

programmes. In 1998, the World Federation for Medical<br />

Education (WFME) launched its project on<br />

”International standards in medical education”<br />

(Medical Education 1998;32,549-558). A WFME<br />

Working Party defined a set of international standards<br />

in basic medical education dealing with the structure,<br />

process, conditions and outcome, and specified at two<br />

levels of attainment: (a) basic standards (or minimal<br />

requirements), and (b) standards for quality<br />

development (Medical Education 2000;34,665-675).<br />

In the light of comments received from an international<br />

panel of advisors and from a number of conferences<br />

around the world, the standard document has now been<br />

refined and further developed, including guidelines for<br />

the implementation of the standards at the institutional,<br />

national and regional levels. The concept, and the<br />

purpose and rationale for the WFME Standards in Basic<br />

Medical Education will be presented. Pilot studies on<br />

the value of these standards are now being prepared in<br />

the six WFME Regions. WFME is now planning a<br />

similar process concerning international standards in<br />

postgraduate medical education covering both<br />

specialist training and continuing medical education/<br />

personal development.<br />

4C Standards and the curriculum<br />

1 Learning can be fun! The student’s<br />

experience in a new curriculum<br />

Anke Neuwirth and Johannes Meier<br />

Second year students in the Reformed Medical Curriculum,<br />

Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Two years ago 63 students at the Humboldt-University<br />

began studying medicine in a reformed parallel track.<br />

This is the first attempt in Germany at changing a<br />

traditional curriculum. Basic sciences are combined<br />

with clinical practice right from the beginning: PBL as<br />

the main learning format plus one day per week with a<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.28 -<br />

general practitioner, practical and communication skills<br />

training and theoretical seminars. Students from the<br />

first class will share their personal experiences of new<br />

standards in learning, teaching and assessment. A large<br />

part of the presentation will be reserved for discussion<br />

with the audience.<br />

2 The advantages of longitudinal evaluation of<br />

the medical curriculum<br />

Prof. Dr. Reinhard Pabst<br />

Medical School of Hannover, Centre of Anatomy – 4120, Care<br />

Neuberg Strasse 1, D30625 Hannover, GERMANY<br />

After implementing modifications in the undergraduate<br />

medical curriculum, the outcome should be evaluated.<br />

Questionnaires answered by medical students at the end<br />

of a term are helpful, but of even greater relevance are<br />

evaluations at different times during and after the<br />

undergraduate phase. Some examples will be presented<br />

to show why and for whom these data are relevant, as<br />

well as how the questionnaire should be designed. It<br />

will be proposed to perform similar evaluations in<br />

different European countries, and also to ask in<br />

particular those doctors who have studied medicine in<br />

different countries to evaluate their medical curriculum<br />

retrospectively.<br />

3 Standards and assessment<br />

Professor Miriam Friedman Ben-David<br />

Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Tay Park<br />

House, 484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

The important effect of assessment on students’<br />

behaviour and pattern of learning is well documented.<br />

The assessment process has a key effect on establishing<br />

standards within the medical school. This presentation<br />

looks at the relationship between standards and<br />

assessment. It explores the links between the two and<br />

looks at issues relating to standard setting procedures<br />

as part of the assessment process.


Session 5A Learning and the internet<br />

5A1 The “dos and don’ts” of e-learning<br />

in medicine: experiences of a CD-<br />

ROM production<br />

P Langkafel*, A Oehlsen, U Arnold and J W Dudenhausen<br />

Charité, Department of Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

In November 2000 the Department of Obstetrics<br />

published the CD-ROM “Digital Obstetrics”. After<br />

almost 2 years of work we were glad to publish this<br />

piece of software with a well known editor in Medicine.<br />

We will focus in our presentation on the process of<br />

conception and the production of this CD-ROM and<br />

other Internet-based courses. What are our experiences?<br />

What are - in our opinion - the “musts” of a good<br />

production, what are the “nevers”? What did we learn<br />

from this process? What are our “golden rules” from<br />

this experience to be learnt for different topics of elearning<br />

in medicine? There will be the possibility for<br />

a continuous virtual discussion via the<br />

Internet:(www.golden-rules.de) The audience and<br />

interested people will have the opportunity to add their<br />

opinions and to share in the discussion with others<br />

digitally.<br />

5A2 Online guide to basic surgical<br />

skills: http://olc.chirurgiegoettingen.de<br />

S Koenig*, P Wagner, D Zeiss, P M Markus and H Becker<br />

Georg-August-University Goettingen, Department of General<br />

Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Robert-<br />

Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, GERMANY<br />

The emphasis of medical education in Germany lies in<br />

the imparting of theoretical knowledge. During their<br />

clinical studies, medical students increasingly have to<br />

deal with the major problem of how to gain experience<br />

in clinical practice and learn the relevant skills. With<br />

this in mind, an online guide is being developed as a<br />

teaching aid demonstrating basic skills in surgery to<br />

accompany the existing curriculum. The guide is<br />

presented as a website, centred around a series of<br />

digitised video sequences, photographs and illustrations<br />

highlighting the basic clinical skills required in the field<br />

of surgery. Examples include blood sampling, IV line<br />

management, suture techniques, wound management<br />

and general practice in theatre such as scrubbing up,<br />

aseptic procedures and use of specific instruments.<br />

Student feedback to date is exceptionally encouraging<br />

for the further development of the platform, including<br />

integration of other fields in medical education.<br />

5A3 Standards for an international<br />

distributed online case repository<br />

Chris Candler*, Colin Melville and Dave Collins<br />

University of Oklahoma, Science Centre, 941 Stanton L. Young<br />

Blvd, BSEB 115A, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA<br />

Teaching cases have been used by medical schools for<br />

years as a means to simulate the patient encounter,<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.29 -<br />

provide early exposure to clinical problems, and to<br />

ensure a consistent educational experience. Recently,<br />

many schools have developed online cases to<br />

supplement existing coursework. Through the use of<br />

emerging technologies, cases may display high-quality<br />

multimedia, track student reasoning, facilitate facultystudent<br />

collaboration, and even adapt to the student’s<br />

educational needs. While schools have created online<br />

cases for a variety of purposes, development costs are<br />

rarely trivial. Unfortunately, medical schools have not<br />

employed the same technologies to share and reuse<br />

these costly resources. New technologies could be used<br />

to develop case banks that house cases independent of<br />

purpose or pedagogy. The authors propose the<br />

development of an international case repository and<br />

suggest a technical implementation based on distributed<br />

systems and open standards such as the eXtensible<br />

Markup Language.<br />

5A4 Digital study of medicine<br />

U Arnold*, P Langkafel, L Peppel, I Reisinger and<br />

J W Dudenhausen<br />

Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, <strong>Berlin</strong> Biomedical<br />

Exchange Office, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger<br />

Platz 1, D-13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Digital media becomes more and more a major force<br />

in medicine and medical education. This representative<br />

study among students of medicine demonstrates the<br />

big differences between varying student samples<br />

concerning the use of and the expectations on new<br />

media and e-learning. In a sample survey (n=282) using<br />

machine readable questionnaires students of the first<br />

pre-clinic and the first clinic semester were questioned<br />

about their current and future computer and internet<br />

use as well as their attitude as regards these subjects.<br />

57.8 % of the beginners use a PC and the internet more<br />

than once a week while 12.6% do not use computers at<br />

all. More than half of the beginners (55%) do not know<br />

internet based learning at all. While only 0.6% of the<br />

beginners claim to use CD-ROM for learning purposes<br />

this number increases to 23.9% among the students<br />

from the first clinic semester. Nearly half of the students<br />

wish to see an amount of 16 to 30% for new media<br />

based learning in the curriculum of the future. The<br />

detailed results will be discussed focussing on their<br />

consequences for e-learning in the field of medical<br />

education.<br />

5A5 Electronic learning objects and<br />

resource discovery<br />

David A Davies<br />

University of Birmingham, Medical Education Unit, School of<br />

Medicine, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

A challenge facing many institutions engaged in<br />

teaching is to find electronic learning resources to meet<br />

the requirements of the curriculum. Electronic learning<br />

resources may be clinical images, digital video clips,<br />

case scenarios, MCQs, etc. These ‘learning objects’ may<br />

be viewed as the building blocks for new web-based


teaching packages. There are opportunities for the<br />

development of new learning objects both within an<br />

institution but also by sharing existing resources with<br />

other institutions. A central issue therefore becomes<br />

how does any individual know what resources are<br />

available either locally or remotely? We have developed<br />

an internet-based system that greatly facilitates<br />

resources discovery. Our system uses open standards<br />

and does not rely upon any specific hardware or<br />

software platform. By using our Electronic Curriculum<br />

as an example, which we first demonstrated to <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

two years ago, we will show, using real examples, how<br />

institutions can collaboratively share learning objects.<br />

5A6 Filling a curriculum map with<br />

Reusable Learning Objects<br />

N K McManus*, R M Harden, D Davidson, S Khogali and<br />

J M Laidlaw<br />

SCPMDE, Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Session 5B Evaluation of PBL<br />

5B1 Changing to PBL: does it have<br />

an effect on junior doctors’<br />

conceptualisation of<br />

communication skills?<br />

P A O’Neill*, S C Willis and A Jones<br />

University of Manchester, Research and Teaching Building, South<br />

Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Nell Lane, Manchester<br />

M2O 2LR, UK<br />

In 1994 Manchester Medical School introduced a<br />

learner-centred, problem based learning course, which<br />

involves more emphasis on acquisition of effective<br />

communication skills. This study explored how<br />

Manchester graduates conceptualise communication<br />

skills. Twenty-four traditional course graduates and 23<br />

new course graduates were interviewed 3 months into<br />

their first job. Graduates were asked to reflect on how<br />

well the course had prepared them for being an effective<br />

communicator. Interviews were tape-recorded,<br />

transcribed, coded and analysed. Traditional course<br />

graduates conceptualised communication as ‘talking<br />

to people’. Being an effective communicator was<br />

described as ‘a personal thing’ rather than something<br />

which could be taught or learned. New course graduates<br />

conceptualised communication skills as being<br />

important for patient outcomes; and as something<br />

which could be both taught and learned. A comparison<br />

between traditional and PBL course graduates suggests<br />

that there are some differences in their<br />

conceptualisation of communication skills.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.30 -<br />

For a computer-based learning system to be widely<br />

usable, it must be possible to tailor the information<br />

presented to the learner to match the level of study and<br />

topic of interest. To achieve this, it is necessary to<br />

describe the content in a way that makes it reusable in<br />

a variety of contexts. By applying a standard template<br />

to describe structure within topics, specifying<br />

associations between concepts, and describing the<br />

content using a standard coding scheme, it is possible<br />

to produce standalone ‘Reusable Learning Objects’.<br />

These can then be filtered by the system to match the<br />

learner’s requirements. In an experimental<br />

implementation to investigate methods for creating<br />

these electronic curriculum maps, a prototype system<br />

is being produced covering three areas in neurology,<br />

cardiology and dermatology. A web interface allows<br />

these sections to be developed concurrently, then<br />

delivered to a wide audience.<br />

5B2 How do medical students<br />

characterize good problem-based<br />

learning (PBL) tutoring after a<br />

year’s experience?<br />

Gillian Maudsley<br />

University of Liverpool, Department of Public Health, Whelan<br />

Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK<br />

In 1996, Liverpool’s 5-year undergraduate medical<br />

(MBChB) curriculum became problem-based.<br />

Students’ initial experiences of problem-based learning<br />

(PBL) and PBL tutors could influence subsequent<br />

progress. Empirical evidence on students’ perceptions<br />

of PBL tutors’ role is developing. The aim was to<br />

explore how medical students conceptualize good PBL<br />

tutors (and learning) in a problem-based curriculum.<br />

The subjects were 224 medical students at end of Year<br />

1. A cross-sectional (self-completed questionnaire)<br />

survey of mostly open-ended questions explored, e.g.:<br />

main advantage/disadvantage of PBL; characteristics<br />

of a good PBL tutor. Qualitative data-themes<br />

formulated inductively and iteratively. 137/224 (61.2%)<br />

responded. Despite diverse views, students mostly<br />

highlighted that, e.g.: good tutors should be<br />

approachable, ‘knowledgeable’ (without imposing<br />

knowledge), encourage participation; and PBL is good<br />

for acquiring, retaining, and applying knowledge (yet<br />

lack of ‘structure’ can cause concern). The implications<br />

of the results will be related to previous literature.


5B3 Predicting outcome by behaviour in<br />

PBL groups?<br />

Kristin Wigen*, Are Holen, Øyvind Ellingsen and<br />

Hansjørg Hohr<br />

Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Department<br />

of Community Medicine & General Practice, MTFS, N-7489<br />

Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

In the fall of 1999 and 2000, new medical students at<br />

the Norwegian University of Science and Technology<br />

were asked to complete these questionnaires: (1)<br />

Entwistle’s Learning Style Inventory - 30 items, (2)<br />

Braithwaite’s shortened neuroticism scale - 15 items,<br />

and (3) Craig’s Locus of Control of Behaviour Scale -<br />

17 items. Additionally, variables included the admission<br />

scores and gender of the students. Behaviour in PBL<br />

groups was assessed by peers on Holen’s Group Process<br />

Evaluation Scale once each term for each student. The<br />

aim was to study the correlations between these<br />

variables and the academic achievements of the students<br />

at their first exams by the end of the first year in June<br />

2000 and 2001. Preliminary findings will be presented<br />

and briefly discussed.<br />

5B4 Student evaluation of a problembased<br />

learning module into an<br />

occupational therapy course<br />

Deirdre Connolly* and Morag Donovan<br />

Trinity College Dublin, School of Occupational Therapy,<br />

Rochestown Avenue, Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin, IRELAND<br />

“ I’m very satisfied with this course. The method of<br />

continuous assessment was very helpful and beneficial.<br />

I wonder how this volume of material could be covered<br />

in any other way”.<br />

“Tiring, inflexible and inconsistent marking”.<br />

These are contrasting opinions of two third year<br />

occupational therapy students on their experience of<br />

Problem Based Learning (PBL). As PBL encourages<br />

open-minded, reflective and active learning<br />

(Margetson, 1991), qualities that are highly valued from<br />

a university education, it was decided to introduce a<br />

PBL module into the four-year honours degree course<br />

in occupational therapy. Students were then asked to<br />

evaluate the first semester of using the PBL approach.<br />

This paper presents the process involved in setting up<br />

the module and the quantitative and qualitative results<br />

of the initial evaluation.<br />

5B5 Evaluation of student performance<br />

in the problem based learning<br />

(PBL) group<br />

David C M Taylor<br />

The Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Crown<br />

Street, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK<br />

During the course of each semester, students in years<br />

one and two of the medical course at Liverpool<br />

University complete a self assessment form which<br />

relates to their performance in the PBL Group. A form<br />

is also completed independently for students by their<br />

PBL tutor, and the two forms are compared. If there<br />

are differences between the perceptions of student and<br />

tutor, then an informal conversation takes place to<br />

identify possible explanations. We originally used a<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.31 -<br />

form similar to that developed in Hong Kong, where<br />

there are five descriptors for each of five domains;<br />

participation, communication, preparation, critical<br />

thinking and group skills. It rapidly became apparent<br />

that we needed to add two other domains – “Evaluation<br />

Skills” and “Cross Curricular Links”. This change<br />

means that students and staff are required to reflect on<br />

what we believe to be the key skills for problem-based<br />

learning.<br />

5B6 Influence of tutor qualification on<br />

test achievement and student<br />

evaluation in a problem-based<br />

course of basic pharmacology<br />

J Matthes*, B Marxen, R-M Linke, W Antepohl,<br />

W Lehmacher and S Herzig<br />

Gleueler Str.24, 50931 Koln, GERMANY<br />

Increased demand on staff when using problem-based<br />

learning (PBL) necessitates involvement of tutors at<br />

different stages of medical or non-medical (under-,<br />

post-,) graduate education. To address whether such<br />

differences in qualification affect evaluation of PBL<br />

by participants or their outcome (test results), we<br />

analysed data of a 3½ year longitudinal study<br />

performed with 3rd year medical students taking a PBLcourse<br />

in basic pharmacology. We compared student<br />

tutors (undergraduate, >3rd year; n=30), nonspecialized<br />

professional tutors (physicians, pharmacists<br />

or natural scientists during postgraduate education;<br />

n=38) and specialized professional tutors (completed<br />

postgraduate education; n=26). While evaluation and<br />

outcome of student-led groups did not differ from staffled<br />

groups, tutor experience with PBL inproved<br />

evaluation scores. Interestingly, student tutors as well<br />

as non-specialized professional tutors came off badly<br />

in some evaluation parameters, however their groups´<br />

test achievement equalled that of specialized<br />

professional tutors.<br />

5B7 Individual perceptions of group<br />

learning and functioning in a<br />

problem-based learning programme<br />

Janet MacDonald<br />

Academic Departmentt, Postgraduate Medical & Dental<br />

Education, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park,<br />

Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK<br />

Drawing on data from a cohort of BSc Occupational<br />

Therapy students on a PBL programme, this paper<br />

reports on students’ individual perceptions of their own<br />

and others’ participation and performance within small<br />

group learning. Students were asked to rate the<br />

contributions and performance of themselves, other<br />

group members and the group as a whole with factors<br />

influencing functioning being considered.<br />

Questionnaires were completed by students who were<br />

then involved in group discussion and subsequently<br />

completed individual action plans with the intention<br />

of enhancing future group involvement and personal<br />

development. Initial findings explore issues such as<br />

group development and cohesion, use of ground rules,<br />

contextual learning and the role of the group in personal<br />

development. Difficulties involved in conducting this<br />

type of inquiry will also be briefly discussed.


Session 5C Curriculum evaluation<br />

5C1 A course programme evaluation:<br />

contribution of students’ selfevaluation<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Jorge Lima and Joao Martins-Silva<br />

Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

A course programme evaluation (CPE) is useful to<br />

highlight issues for introducing further changes. The<br />

aim of this work was to compare the results of the CPE<br />

performed in the discipline of Cellular Biochemistry<br />

in three consecutive years. The first year students in<br />

1999 (n=199), in 2000 (n=189) and in 2001 (n=173)<br />

of the Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon were required to<br />

answer a questionnaire anonymously with 19 closed<br />

questions. Phi and Cramer’s VC statistical analysis were<br />

used. The answers profile for the majority of the<br />

questions was similar in the three consecutive years.<br />

The main differences were those related to the influence<br />

of the teaching process in the assessment methods and<br />

in students’ self-confidence. The majority of students<br />

were not motivated with their self-evaluation. It is<br />

concluded that the course programme evaluation<br />

depends on the student population and not exclusively<br />

on the changes introduced by the teaching staff.<br />

5C2 A national evaluation of the reforms<br />

to higher specialist training in the<br />

UK: methodological issues<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and<br />

Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK<br />

Over the past 5 years, wholesale reform of higher<br />

specialist training in the UK has occurred with changes<br />

in training structure, processes, infrastructure,<br />

assessment, records, post types, endpoint qualification,<br />

curricula, selection, standard setting, and monitoring.<br />

The Department of Health commissioned a national<br />

evaluation, conducted over three years. The evaluation<br />

was designed and conducted as policy research,<br />

involving 15 researchers with expertise in postgraduate<br />

medical education, qualitative and quantitative research<br />

methods, management, selection, public sector<br />

economics, assessment, and pedagogy. Data collection<br />

methods included surveys, consultative groups,<br />

interviews, site visits, case studies, documentary<br />

analysis and in-depth reference studies. Seven focal<br />

specialties were studied. Data for the 20 separate reports<br />

of the evaluation were gathered from upwards of 5,000<br />

participants. The evaluation covered costs, organisation,<br />

management, funding, change management,<br />

assessment, appraisal, educational processes and<br />

outcomes, new roles and responsibilities, selection, and<br />

effects on service and workload. Methodological issues<br />

will be discussed.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.32 -<br />

5C3 Evaluation of PME courses in<br />

General Practice in Germany<br />

S Wilm*, R Jahromi, S Krause and B Hemming<br />

Heinrich-Heine University, Department of General Practice,<br />

PO Box 10 10 07, D-40001 Duesseldorf, GERMANY<br />

Vocational training in general practice in Germany<br />

requires 240 hours of accompanying courses, aiming<br />

at reinforcing professional knowledge, problem solving<br />

abilities and at training in interdisciplinary teamwork<br />

and audit. For the participants it has the character of an<br />

expensive obligation, with possibly negative effects on<br />

intrinsic motivation and demands. The continuous builtin<br />

evaluation of courses in Duesseldorf/North-Rhine<br />

covers written interviews with participants and teachers,<br />

participatory observation, oral interviews and focus<br />

groups. In 1999 and 2000 71 seminars were evaluated.<br />

935 questionnaires of participants (response rate 70%),<br />

46 data sheets for participatory observation, 33<br />

questionnaires of 29 teachers and 10 focus groups show<br />

that the educational quality increased, while the overall<br />

satisfaction of the trainees decreased. Possible reasons<br />

for this complex phenomenon are discussed.<br />

Organizational aspects influence participants’<br />

satisfaction much more than content of seminars.<br />

5C4 The Matrix: a visual presentation of<br />

registrar term evaluation<br />

Richard Tarala and Alistair Vickery<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Royal Perth<br />

Hospital, GPO Box X2213, Perth, Western Australia 6847,<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Evaluation of junior medical officer posts can be<br />

hindered by the need to distribute questionnaires, the<br />

time required for their completion and by low response<br />

rates. Collation and assessment can be time-consuming<br />

and the resultant evaluation difficult to interpret. We<br />

used a simple evaluation tool for the assessment of<br />

registrar terms. Trainees were asked to assess on a fivepoint<br />

scale the workload and the training/teaching value<br />

of each rotation they had experienced over the previous<br />

two years. We have undertaken a pilot to provide a<br />

‘snapshot’ or audit of the trainees’ perception of the<br />

rotations. The evaluation can be performed quickly and<br />

the collated results when plotted in a graphical<br />

(“matrix”) form provide a powerful visual assessment<br />

of the trainee’s perspective of each post. This evaluation<br />

can be used to assess the workload of each position to<br />

assist in reallocation of workload and to optimise<br />

training in each post.<br />

5C5 Site visits as a method to assess the<br />

educational quality of clerkships<br />

Janke Cohen-Schotanus* and Rein P Zwierstra<br />

Institute for Medical Education (OWI-OK), Faculty of Medical<br />

Sciences, University of Groningen, Ant.Deusinglaan 1, 9713<br />

AV Groningen, NETHERLANDS<br />

Clerkships, as part of the training of medical students,<br />

are organized in several hospitals. In general, students<br />

are content with this training. However, what do we


know about the educational quality of the clerkships?<br />

To answer this question we developed a procedure for<br />

structured site visits. The visits were conducted by a<br />

Visitation Committee on the basis of an assignment of<br />

the director of the Institute for Medical Education.<br />

Before the actual visit, the committee sent out<br />

questionnaires and gathered written information about<br />

the clerkships. During the site visit, the committee<br />

discussed the educational topics with the groups<br />

involved in the programme.<br />

After the procedure the committee concluded that in<br />

general the students were trained satisfactorily.<br />

However, in the clerkships more educational structure<br />

is necessary. Students need to receive feedback on the<br />

way they practise their skills and on attitudinal aspects<br />

much more frequently and on a structured basis.<br />

5C6 Impact of a new curriculum on the<br />

clinical competence of medical<br />

students at the University of<br />

Barcelona Medical School (UBMS)<br />

Ramon Pujol*, Frederic Manresa, Francesc Gudial,<br />

Eduard Kranfly, Josep Ma Martinez Carsetera<br />

Bellvitge Unit, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Hospital, Dept<br />

of Internal Medicine, c/Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de<br />

Llibregat, SPAIN<br />

UBMS has recently modified its undergraduate<br />

curriculum. A group (A) of 44 students belonging to<br />

the first cohort (1999-2000) of the new curriculum was<br />

compared with another group (B) of 51 students<br />

belonging to the last cohort (1998-1999) of the<br />

traditional curriculum. The assessment was performed<br />

at the end of licensure by means of a multistation OSCE<br />

of 17 cases with 22 stations including 10 common cases<br />

for both cohorts. Statistical analysis included Cronbach<br />

Alpha test to analyse reliability and the result was 0.79,<br />

- 4.33 -<br />

and for comparability t-student test was used. Group A<br />

showed better scores, particularly in interprofessional<br />

relationships (mean values A vs B: 59.5 vs. 48.6;<br />

p=0.001); attitudes (59.7 vs. 41.6; p=0.001); technical<br />

skills (70 vs 61.6; p=0.01); clinical knowledge (62.9<br />

vs. 56.6; p=0.001), and clinical judgement (47.2 vs.<br />

42; p=0.001). The new curriculum has improved the<br />

clinical competence of last year’s students assessed by<br />

a multistation OSCE examination.<br />

5C7 Lessons learnt in designing and<br />

implementing a curriculum<br />

evaluation<br />

Helen Graham* and Mary Seabrook<br />

Department of Medical and Dental Education, Guys, Kings &<br />

St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, Sherman<br />

Education Centre, 4th floor, Thomas Guy House, London SE1<br />

9RT, UK<br />

Evaluation is particularly important when a new course<br />

is established. The new year 4 medical curriculum at<br />

Kings College, London was introduced in 1999. It<br />

teaches reproductive and sexual health; child health,<br />

development and ageing; and trauma, locomotion and<br />

rehabilitation to 360 students across 4 main campuses.<br />

Since inception, an evaluation strategy has gradually<br />

been developed by the year head and the course<br />

management committee. Feedback was collected from<br />

students and teachers within the teaching hierarchy<br />

during the year using a range of methods. These<br />

included meetings, facilitated discussions, written and<br />

computer-based questionnaires, teacher reports and email.<br />

In this presentation we will discuss how the<br />

various methods worked, the advantages and<br />

disadvantages of each and the problems encountered.<br />

We shall also describe the mechanisms used to ensure<br />

teacher participation in the evaluation and course<br />

development process.<br />

Session 5D Assessing communication skills/patients as examiners<br />

5D1 Detecting rater bias on a measure<br />

of spoken English proficiency<br />

Marta van Zanten*, Danette McKinley, John Boulet and<br />

Gerald Whelan<br />

ECFMG, Test Development and Research/CSA, 4th floor, 3624<br />

Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA<br />

Rater severity can affect the validity of scores and<br />

introduce bias that will impact the measurement of<br />

examinee ability. Few studies, especially in the area of<br />

clinical skills assessment, have examined the effect of<br />

rater demographics on rater severity. In this study,<br />

standardized patient (SP) ratings of spoken English<br />

proficiency were contrasted by SP and examinee<br />

characteristics. Two analyses were conducted. In the<br />

first analysis, least square mean scores were calculated<br />

based on whether English was the native language of<br />

the examinee and the SP. Examinees whose native<br />

language was not English received significantly lower<br />

ratings from the SPs, regardless of the SP’s native<br />

language. In the second analysis, data were analyzed<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

based on SP and examinee gender. Female examinees<br />

received higher ratings than male examinees from SPs<br />

of both genders. The results suggest that the SP<br />

characteristics studied had no effect on ratings of<br />

spoken English proficiency.<br />

5D2 Comparison of communication<br />

skills in residency with<br />

performance on ECFMG Clinical<br />

Skills Assessment<br />

W Burdick*, J Boulet, S Peitzman, G Whelan and D Brody<br />

ECFMG, 3624 Market Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia,<br />

Pennsylvania 19104-2685, USA<br />

The Education Commission for Foreign Medical<br />

Graduates assesses graduates of foreign medical<br />

schools for readiness to enter US residencies using a<br />

ten station standardized patient examination. The<br />

Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) tests data gathering,


clinical reasoning, written communication, and oral<br />

communication skills, including spoken English. We<br />

assessed the communication skills of first year internal<br />

medicine residents using trained observers and postencounter<br />

patient surveys in an outpatient clinic setting<br />

and compared these results with performance on CSA.<br />

Over 250 encounters from about 60 residents who had<br />

graduated from foreign medical schools were scored<br />

by observers and patients. Moderate correlation with<br />

communication skills as assessed by CSA was found.<br />

This evidence suggests that CSA is a valid predictor of<br />

performance in the first year of residency.<br />

5D3 ACT: a new computer-assisted<br />

assessment (CAA) method for<br />

communication-skills of medical<br />

students<br />

R L Hulsman* and J D Donnison-Speijer<br />

Academic Medical Centre, Department of Medical Psychology,<br />

J4, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

CAA of communication skills is innovative and has<br />

several advantages: a broad range of communication<br />

problems can be covered in one assessment; both the<br />

testing and judgement procedures are highly<br />

standardised; students can be assessed in large groups<br />

without a complex organisation. ACT, developed in our<br />

medical school, was used for the first time in April and<br />

May 2001. More than 200 third year students were<br />

assessed. ACT presents three short movies of doctorpatient<br />

encounters. Topics are: history taking, breaking<br />

bad news, shared decision making. Each topic is<br />

covered by 5 to 10 questions; 20 questions in total.<br />

The assessment model of ACT is based on Miller’s<br />

pyramid (Acad Med 1990; 65:S63-67) yielding four<br />

types of essay questions: 1. knowledge, 2.<br />

understanding, 3. skill phrasing, 4. integration of skills.<br />

Presented will be: the adapted assessment model,<br />

examples of questions, the program design, and results<br />

about the feasibility and reliability of ACT.<br />

5D4 How accurate is lay person<br />

assessment of clinical competence<br />

of student doctors? The<br />

comparison of the assessment of<br />

medical students by faculty and<br />

standardized patients during the<br />

Objective Structured Clinical<br />

Examination<br />

P Heasman*, K Pitkala and N Paganus<br />

University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, P O Box 63, 00014<br />

Helsinki, FINLAND<br />

This paper discusses the results of two types of<br />

assessment of the students carried out during the OSCE,<br />

a performance-based assessment of clinical<br />

competence. For the first time in the history of the<br />

Medical School in Helsinki a comprehensive OSCE<br />

was arranged in December 2000. All participants (n=<br />

80) were sixth year undergraduate medical students.<br />

The exam consisted of ten stations where simulated<br />

consultations with standardized patients (SPs) took<br />

place. Professional actors were used as patients to<br />

guarantee a similar experience to all students. During<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.34 -<br />

the consultation a faculty member assessed the clinical<br />

performance of the student and the doctor-patient<br />

interaction using a checklist for the assessment of the<br />

clinical skills and a communication skills questionnaire.<br />

The students were also evaluated by the actors with an<br />

assessment form. While some students with low ratings<br />

in clinical skills by the faculty scored high on the actors<br />

evaluations, none of the students to whom the SPs gave<br />

the maximum scores, failed. Inter-station reliability of<br />

the SP ratings was considerably higher than clinician<br />

rating of communication skills. Also there was a poor<br />

correlation between SP and clinician ratings, equaling<br />

0.22. The scores of a single student varied depending<br />

on the clinical situation he or she was confronted with.<br />

Results and their implications for the future<br />

development of the medical students’ integrated<br />

competence assessment will be discussed.<br />

5D5 Do simulated patients grade interpersonal<br />

skills as well as Faculty?<br />

A S Arora*, N Natt, S Kluck and R Tiegs<br />

Mayo Foundation, Department of GIH, 200 First Street SW,<br />

Rochester MN 55905, USA<br />

Simulated patients (SPs) are being used to assess a<br />

number of skills in medical students. The SP may grade<br />

students with regard to history taking, physical exam<br />

and inter-personal skills (IPS) according to a checklist.<br />

Using SPs to grade student performance has been<br />

shown to be reliable though it is difficult to assess<br />

validity of this method. The aim of this study was to<br />

determine the validity of SPs’ scoring of student IPS at<br />

Mayo Medical School. Third year medical students<br />

undertaking a Clinical Skill Assessment had IPS<br />

evaluated by SPs and faculty observers. Identical 5section<br />

IPS checklists were completed following each<br />

student encounter by the SP and the faculty. There were<br />

8 clinical encounters for each student. The agreement<br />

between faculty and SP was very high in most of the<br />

sections in the IPS checklist. In conclusion, SPs are<br />

able to evaluate students' interpersonal skills as<br />

effectively as faculty.<br />

5D6 The contribution of non-medical<br />

assessors to the assessment of<br />

poorly performing doctors<br />

Lesley Southgate* and Peter McCrorie<br />

Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education,<br />

University College London Medical School, Archway Campus,<br />

Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

The UK Medical (Professional Performance) Act 1995<br />

gives the General Medical Council powers to assess<br />

any doctor on the register whose performance in<br />

practice may be seriously deficient, and below the<br />

standard for fitness to practise. The Council has stated<br />

its commitment to involve members of the public<br />

equally in all stages of the development and<br />

implementation of the assessment programmes, which<br />

comprise peer review of performance in the workplace<br />

by a team of three assessors, followed by tests of<br />

competence. More than 35 doctors from several<br />

disciplines have now been assessed within the<br />

procedures. The non-medical assessors contribute<br />

equally to the database assembled during the


assessments. We will present the background to their<br />

participation; data from actual assessments in general<br />

practice, surgery and psychiatry, and conclude with a<br />

discussion of the implications for partnership within<br />

professional regulation between the profession and<br />

members of the public.<br />

5D7 Assessment in the elective clinical<br />

rotation: centrally reviewed case<br />

reports<br />

W M Molenaar*, S A Koopmans, M D Talsma and<br />

L H van Essen<br />

Institute of Medical Education, University of Groningen, Ant.<br />

Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, NETHERLANDS<br />

The performance of medical students in clinical<br />

rotations is usually assessed by supervising clinicians.<br />

- 4.35 -<br />

Students at the University of Groningen in addition have<br />

to write a case report during their elective clinical<br />

rotation. Since students are widely scattered for their<br />

elective rotations individual clinicians supervise only<br />

a few of them, which tends to bias their judgements.<br />

Accordingly, the assessments of the students’ clinical<br />

performances by the supervising clinicians were<br />

skewed towards ‘excellent’. To overcome this problem<br />

all case reports are centrally graded by one of three<br />

medical specialists using criteria known to the students<br />

and their supervisors. The major criterion is the<br />

relevance of the ‘lesson’ to be learned from the patient’s<br />

history. This study analyzes the scores over the years<br />

1998 through 2000 (714 reports). The distributions of<br />

given grades were relatively balanced and very similar<br />

in each year and the reviewers showed comparable<br />

patterns.<br />

Session 5E Postgraduate education for general practice/<br />

family medicine<br />

5E1 An educational approach to<br />

significant event auditing in<br />

primary care<br />

J McKay* and P Bowie<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of<br />

Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK<br />

Little is known about the content and educational value<br />

of significant event audits (SEA) in primary care.<br />

General practitioners (GPs) in the west of Scotland are<br />

encouraged to submit a SEA as part of their<br />

postgraduate education. Two trained assessors<br />

independently mark SEAs and educational feedback<br />

is offered to the GP. Of 132 SEAs submitted, 47%<br />

involved primarily clinical issues, 29% practice<br />

administration and 17% involved both. Main areas of<br />

analysis were in disease management (36%), drug<br />

prescribing (20%) and communication (32%).<br />

Complaints (14%) are not a major factor in prompting<br />

SEAs. 68% of SEAs were judged educationally<br />

satisfactory by both assessors; 24% satisfactory by one<br />

assessor only; and 9% unsatisfactory by both assessors.<br />

SEAs judged satisfactory by both assessors were more<br />

likely to have involved the implementation of change<br />

(P


5E4 The use of video in General Practice<br />

Registrar training and assessment<br />

C M Wiskin, Stephen Field* and John Skelton<br />

West Midland GP Unit, 27 Highfield Road, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 3DP, UK<br />

In 1994 a questionnaire-based evaluation was<br />

conducted among training practices in the West<br />

Midlands. A 2000 comparative study identified changes<br />

in the use of and attitude towards video as a training<br />

and assessment tool in General Practice. Areas of<br />

interest are future application to GP trainer reaccreditation<br />

and the MRCGP examination, and issues<br />

of informed consent. Questionnaires combined Likert<br />

scales, evaluation scales for levels of statement<br />

agreement/disagreement, demographic information<br />

and free text comments. Greater frequency of use across<br />

most targeted areas was reported, in particular obtaining<br />

appropriate consent. Relationships between the general<br />

practice trainers’ personal and practice uses of video<br />

with their registrars and their opinions about other postgraduate<br />

uses of videos are positively correlated. Rank<br />

order lists of perceived vulnerable patient groups<br />

remained identical over the six-year period. Video for<br />

teaching, testing and developing self-awareness is<br />

increasingly acceptable to GP Trainers.<br />

5E5 The consultation styles of female<br />

GP Registrars with male and female<br />

patients<br />

Sarah Hillman* and John Skelton<br />

Dept of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical School,<br />

University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT,<br />

UK<br />

It is acknowledged that there are differences between<br />

men and women in conversation – it is often argued<br />

for example that men communicate competitively and<br />

women co-operatively. Yet male and female registrars,<br />

with patients of both sexes, are trained similarly, and<br />

assessed with the same criteria for their Summative<br />

Assessment examination. Ten western-dressing female<br />

GP Registrars in the South Birmingham area (UK) were<br />

videod with male and female patients, and data analysed<br />

using language concordancing software and discourse<br />

analysis techniques. Preliminary results suggest that<br />

the sex of the patient may be one factor which<br />

constrains consultation style, and that the speech-style<br />

of participating Registrars is both characteristically<br />

“feminine” and co-operative.The fact that key<br />

characteristics of co-operative language are both valued<br />

in the patient-centred methodology and regarded as<br />

typical of female speech has implications for the<br />

training and assessment of registrars of both sexes.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.36 -<br />

5E6 The development, implementation<br />

and evaluation of a ‘concordance’<br />

training course<br />

Jon Dowell*, Claudia Pagliari and Sean McAleer<br />

University of Dundee, Tayside Centre for General Practice, Kirsty<br />

Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4AD, UK<br />

We report the development and assessment of a<br />

‘concordance’ course. The four day course included<br />

building relationships, assessing beliefs, identifying<br />

barriers, considering these with patients, formal<br />

decision sharing process and agreeing treatment goals.<br />

Change in knowledge, attitude and skills was assessed<br />

using a written exam and double marked simulated<br />

surgeries. The eight General Practitioners attending<br />

rated the course highly (30/35 Range 27-33).<br />

Knowledge improved with True/False scores increasing<br />

from 13 to 17 out of 22 (P=0.005), Short Essay from<br />

20.4 to 25.1 out of 45 (P=0.062). Patients’ rating<br />

increased from 26.5 to 28.1 out of 35 (ns). Blinded<br />

scoring of 48 consultations rose from 14.3 to 16.1 out<br />

of 26 (p=0.04 Inter-rater reliability: rho = 0.59 p <<br />

0.001, Internal consistency: a = 83). This work shows<br />

that concordance skills can be taught and measured.<br />

5E7 A linguistic study of informationgiving<br />

in 30 doctor-patient<br />

consultations<br />

Andy Shanks* and John Skelton<br />

Department of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical<br />

School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

The need for patient-centred consultations is wellestablished.<br />

However few linguistic studies have<br />

analysed what kind of communication makes patients<br />

more proactive. This paper employs a type of discourse<br />

analysis developed at Birmingham University for<br />

educational settings, now widely used for analysis of<br />

organisational language. 30 consultations were<br />

analysed according to the IRF (initiation, follow-up,<br />

response) model. Eight different types of exchange<br />

were identified including the ‘doctor-inform’ exchange,<br />

which is used when the doctor passes on facts, opinions<br />

and ideas about treatment to the patient. Patient<br />

interruptions of doctor-inform exchanges are often met<br />

with short answers and little response. However, when<br />

doctors responded at length to patients’ questions and<br />

checked understanding, patients initiated questions<br />

more frequently. The evidence suggests that patients<br />

are more likely to initiate exchanges if the doctor checks<br />

frequently for understanding and concordance.<br />

Secondly, a more informative style of consultation<br />

creates more proactive patients.


Session 5F Assessment<br />

5F1 Objective Structured Preclinical<br />

Exams (OSPE): a new test format of<br />

summative student assessment in<br />

the Problem-Based Learning (PBL)<br />

curriculum at the Faculty of<br />

Medicine of the University of Bern<br />

Barbara Stadelmann*, R Hofer, Urs Brodbeck and Ara Tekian<br />

Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of<br />

Bern, Buehlstrasse 28, CH-3012 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

In October 1999, the Faculty of Medicine of the<br />

University of Bern implemented a new system of<br />

summative student assessment in the preclinical PBL<br />

curriculum of medical education. It is interdisciplinary<br />

or at least multi-disciplinary, and allows assessment of<br />

knowledge, skills and attitudes. About half of the exam<br />

consists of traditional multiple choice questions<br />

(MCQ). The other half has been replaced by the OSPE,<br />

a new test format allowing assessment of how well<br />

students understand, apply and integrate their<br />

knowledge, and how well their data interpretation and<br />

communication skills are developed. It is analogous to<br />

the clinical counterpart, the OSCE. During 2 – 2 1/2<br />

hours students rotate through a series of stations<br />

consisting of interdisciplinary oral, structured oral and<br />

written exams. Evaluation of the first cycle of<br />

assessment revealed high reliability for both the<br />

traditional MCQ-exam and the new OSPE (Cronbachalpha<br />

> 0.8).<br />

5F2 The quality of an extendedmatching<br />

multiple choice<br />

examination<br />

J Beullens*, B Van Damme, H Jaspaert, E Struyf and<br />

P J Janssen<br />

Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine K.U.<br />

Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 17, B-3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

Last year we reported the development of an extendedmatching<br />

multiple choice test for final year medical<br />

students at K.U. Leuven. Extended-matching questions<br />

(EMQs) start from a case and have one correct answer<br />

within a list of 7 to 26 alternatives. Indications were<br />

given for the reliability and validity of the test. This<br />

year two parallel exams of 200 EMQs were constructed<br />

and solved on separate occasions by respectively 168<br />

and 178 students. In contrast with the test, which lasted<br />

half a day, the exam took a whole day and the students<br />

were prepared for question format and content.<br />

Feasibility, reliability and validity seemed to be<br />

indicated and will be reported. In the discussion of<br />

feasibility attention will be paid to the possible<br />

influence of fatigue and growing familiarity with the<br />

question format on the scores. Face, content and<br />

criterion validity will be evaluated.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.37 -<br />

5F3 Evaluation of a five-dimensional<br />

assessment strategy within a<br />

problem-based learning medical<br />

curriculum<br />

Paul Julian*, Scott Reeves* and Alistair Lumb*<br />

Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Dept of<br />

General Practice, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End<br />

Road, London E1, UK<br />

This paper reports findings from an evaluation of a<br />

problem-based learning (PBL) assessment strategy<br />

within a new medical curriculum. As there is little<br />

published material on PBL assessment for medical<br />

students, it was decided to develop a new strategy. As a<br />

result, a five dimensional assessment strategy was<br />

developed. The five areas used to assess learning were:<br />

student attendance; the production of learning<br />

objectives; input into group work; an individual written<br />

assignment and a verbal assessment of progress. To<br />

obtain a comprehensive understanding of issues linked<br />

to this assessment strategy a multi-method evaluation<br />

was undertaken. Questionnaire and interview data were<br />

collected with students and tutors to explore their views<br />

and experiences of this assessment strategy. Findings<br />

from this work indicate that, although students and<br />

tutors consider this assessment strategy to be of value,<br />

problems around assessment inconsistency and the<br />

weighing of these different dimensions need further<br />

development.<br />

5F4 A preclinical exam to assess the<br />

networked structure of knowledge<br />

of basic science in the Universidad<br />

Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina)<br />

Ana Maria Reta*, Maria del Carmen Montbrun and<br />

Maria Jose Lopez<br />

Asesoria Pedagogica, Facultad de Ciencias Medicas, Universidad<br />

Nacional de Cuyo, Centro Universitario, Parque General San<br />

Martin, 5500 Mendoza, ARGENTINA<br />

The new curriculum promotes the acquisition of a<br />

networked structure of knowledge. Students must pass<br />

a Preclinical Exam in Basic Sciences before going into<br />

clerkships. This exam has been administered twice<br />

already. Its format was as follows: Four complex clinical<br />

cases in 2000 and eight cases in 2001 were followed<br />

by a number of questions dealing with the basic science<br />

subjects. Results showed that: 97.1% (2000) and 94.5%<br />

(2001) of the students passed. Reliability, measured<br />

by the Cronbach alpha coefficient: 0.867 and 0.830;<br />

mean scores: 73.27% and 70.20%; standard deviations:<br />

8.77 and 8.08. The results allow the following<br />

conclusions: 1) The format of the exam seems adequate<br />

to assess the acquisition of a networked structure of<br />

knowledge. 2) The new curriculum promotes this kind<br />

of knowledge. 3) Further research must be done,<br />

including a control group educated in a traditional<br />

curriculum.


5F5 Predictive value for academic<br />

performance of two assessment<br />

devices applied to medical<br />

students<br />

Ma Eugenia Ponce de León C*, Armando Ortiz and<br />

M del Carmen Ruiz Alcocer, Camino Santa Teresa<br />

277 Casa 15, Bosques del Pedregal, Delegación Tlalpán, CP<br />

14010, MEXICO D F<br />

872 students admitted in 1998 to the National<br />

Autonomous University of México Medical School<br />

answered a learning strategies and study habits<br />

questionnaire, as well as a diagnostic exam testing for<br />

background knowledge on Physics, Chemistry,<br />

Mathematics, Biology, Spanish, English, and General<br />

Knowledge. Our aim was to follow up their academic<br />

performance during their first two years (basic<br />

sciences) at Medical School, and to compare their<br />

average grade score with the results obtained on the<br />

questionnaire and the diagnostic exam (predictive<br />

value). Results showed a weak but positive association<br />

with three of the ten areas of the questionnaire: learning<br />

strategies, preparation for the exams and problemsolving<br />

skills. A statistical significance and a positive<br />

correlation were found in the diagnostic exam with<br />

General Knowledge, Spanish, Biology and Chemistry.<br />

5F6 Self-assessed clinical skills levels<br />

of newly graduated physicians in<br />

relation to an intended curriculum<br />

A M Moercke* and B Eika<br />

University of Aarhus, Enhed for Medicinsk Uddannelse, Det<br />

Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Universitetsparken, Bygning<br />

611, 8000 Aarhus, DENMARK<br />

We have explored the degree of overlap between an<br />

intended curriculum and the learned curriculum<br />

concerning clinical skills. In 1999 we conducted a<br />

Delphi-study in which 52 experts reached consensus<br />

Session 5G Outcome-based education<br />

5G1 The Scottish Learning Outcomes<br />

Project Phase II - Assessment: “the<br />

proof of the pudding”<br />

Jacqueline Furnace* and John Simpson*, on behalf of<br />

Scottish Deans’ Medical Curriculum Group<br />

Cottar House, Meddens, Newmachar, Aberdeenshire AB21 0QJ,<br />

UK<br />

Following the successful completion of Phase I of the<br />

Learning Outcomes Project the Scottish Deans’<br />

Medical Curriculum Group (SDMCG) sought to<br />

maintain the momentum created by this collaborative<br />

work and in addition, we considered it essential to<br />

demonstrate our assertion that the Learning Outcomes<br />

are a useful and practical tool in undergraduate<br />

medicine rather than purely theoretical. With this in<br />

mind we decided to test the robustness of the outcomes<br />

by looking at their assessment. We established several<br />

working groups - each assigned different outcomes -<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.38 -<br />

on skills levels for 210 practical clinical skills to be<br />

attained during undergraduate medical education. In<br />

summer 2000 we mailed a questionnaire listing these<br />

210 skills to the 226 just graduated Danish physicians.<br />

They were asked if they could meet the minimum skills<br />

level for each of the skills listed. None of the responders<br />

met the minimum of all the 210 skills. On average the<br />

responders met the minimum of 74% (155) of the skills.<br />

We concluded that newly graduated Danish physicians<br />

have gaps in their clinical skills. Making checklists and<br />

stating learning objectives is recommended as a<br />

necessary but not sufficient step. Therefore we are<br />

trying to develop a bottom up strategy for the<br />

curriculum design process.<br />

5F7 The dynamics of knowledge<br />

structure of graduating medical<br />

students based on results of the<br />

Medical Licensing Examination<br />

M Mrouga*, Y Bogachkov and L Artemchuk<br />

Testing Board, 5 Estonska St, Apt. 85, Kyiv 03190, UKRAINE<br />

The licensing examination for medical doctors (MLE)<br />

in Ukraine is undergoing its last year of piloting.<br />

However, MLE results are already taken into<br />

consideration during final exams, thus providing a<br />

certain motivation for the students. They are also used<br />

as part of medical schools’ rating, providing motivation<br />

for schools as well. For better preparation and selfassessment<br />

of students, the pretest is administered prior<br />

to MLE using the actual test MLE materials from<br />

previous years. Based upon pretest results students can<br />

build their intensive training to MLE in 1-2 weeks.<br />

Current research investigates the difference in<br />

knowledge structure between pretest and actual test<br />

results and possible sources of influence on such<br />

difference and dynamics of knowledge structure<br />

between the two parts of the licensing examination.<br />

to consider the overall implications for assessment,<br />

identify assessment tools, develop guidelines and<br />

establish the cost of required resources. The groups<br />

began work at the beginning of October 2000 and have<br />

until the end of May 2001 to complete their task.<br />

Already there has been an unprecedented exchange of<br />

knowledge and ideas and some useful and practical<br />

suggestions have emerged.<br />

5G2 Recent developments in an<br />

outcome-led curriculum<br />

Nick Ross<br />

The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B17 8HN, UK<br />

This paper reports on current developments in the<br />

MBChB at the University of Birmingham and discusses


the relationship between the outcome structure of the<br />

course and current change drivers, which include<br />

preparation of a programme specification for QAA.<br />

The nested outcomes that have been a feature of the<br />

current curriculum since its inception in 1996 are<br />

currently being reviewed. In addition to revalidation<br />

of outcome content at course and module level, this<br />

will involve fundamental restructuring of the outcome<br />

set. The current ‘tree’ structure (in which a number of<br />

detailed module outcomes contribute to a single year<br />

outcome and thence to a single endpoint outcome) is<br />

to be replaced by a ‘net’ structure, enabling crosscontribution<br />

and emphasising horizontal as well as<br />

vertical integration. Links between formal teaching and<br />

outcomes will be supplemented by links from learning<br />

opportunities. The benefits and potential pitfalls for<br />

learning and assessment will be discussed.<br />

5G3 A new instrument of curriculum<br />

development: curriculum as a<br />

function of professional outcomes<br />

I Bulakh*, Y Voronenko and I Filonchuk<br />

Testing Board and National Medical University, 22 Pushkinska<br />

St, Suite 304, Kyiv, 01004, UKRAINE<br />

Under a national program of development of new<br />

standards for higher education, medical educators face<br />

the need to work out the new professional descriptions,<br />

new curriculum and new diagnostic tools for Ukrainian<br />

medical schools. In the first phase an expert team has<br />

developed the professional description of a doctor<br />

expressed in terms of outcome skills that should be<br />

possessed by the medical graduate and in terms of<br />

relevant lists of pathologies, emergencies and<br />

laboratory investigations. Also, earlier there was<br />

developed the test blueprint for the medical licensing<br />

examination that describes the medical professional in<br />

terms of knowledge which was structured by<br />

pathologies, by subject and by medical tasks<br />

(prevention, diagnostic, treatment, etc). In the second<br />

phase, the curriculum is being constructed as a function<br />

of professional description and test blueprint,<br />

demonstrating the misfit between the scope of desirable<br />

final outcomes and regulated time for their mastering.<br />

5G4 Focusing on learning outcomes for<br />

the Preregistration House Officer<br />

(PRHO) year<br />

E A Hesketh* and M S Allan<br />

Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484 Perth Road,<br />

Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

The General Medical Council’s document ‘ The New<br />

Doctor’ outlines areas in which new medical graduates<br />

can expect to develop during PRHO training. The<br />

document not only emphasises the development of<br />

clinical skills and knowledge, but also the wider aspects<br />

of communication, disease prevention and the role of<br />

the doctor within the health service. Are PRHOs being<br />

given the opportunity to develop in all these areas? This<br />

paper describes the perceptions on this issue from those<br />

closely associated with the delivery of PRHO training.<br />

The study is part of a larger project which aims to<br />

specify the expected outcomes for the PRHO year. This<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.39 -<br />

paper focuses on a questionnaire which was used to<br />

explore the views of doctors in training, consultants<br />

and nurses on the importance given in reality and ‘best<br />

practice’ PRHO training to key learning outcomes.<br />

Findings showed that there was a desire for more<br />

emphasis on all the outcomes in PRHO training,<br />

although some need to be given more prominence if<br />

‘The New Doctor’ is to be properly implemented.<br />

5G5 The ACGME Outcome Project: a<br />

model resident assessment system<br />

Susan Swing<br />

ACGME, 515 N State St, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610, USA<br />

As a part of its Outcome Project, the Accreditation<br />

Council for Graduate Medical Education is developing<br />

conceptual models of dependable assessment systems<br />

for residency programs. The models are intended as<br />

guidelines to assist programs in meeting new<br />

accreditation standards for evaluating residents’<br />

attainment of the ACGME’s general competencies. This<br />

presentation will describe the development process for<br />

the models and an example model. Development steps<br />

include Outcome Project Advisory Group work and<br />

feedback from experts and residency program directors.<br />

The model consists of general principles and features,<br />

assessment approaches for each competency, and<br />

example assessment methods. The recommended<br />

assessment approaches include: (a) tracking of learning<br />

objectives attainment; (b) focused assessment of patient<br />

care by supervisors; (c) ratings of professionalism and<br />

communication skills by patients and professional<br />

associates; (d) standardized test assessment of medical<br />

knowledge; and (e) portfolio assessment of practicebased<br />

learning and improvement and systems-based<br />

practice.<br />

5G6 Development of an outcome-based<br />

clinical curriculum at International<br />

Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan,<br />

K H Ong, C M K Patrick and Q Akhtar<br />

International Medical University, 33 A Jalan 17/1, Block A-4,<br />

Condo 3A, Astana Damansara, 46400 Petaling Jaya, Selangor,<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

Eight major outcomes were identified for our new<br />

clinical School. The outcomes form the basis to reflect<br />

the competencies expected of the IMU graduate. This<br />

paper evaluates how our undergraduate curriculum was<br />

developed with the aim of achieving these objectives.<br />

One hundred and thirteen study-guides, the community<br />

and family case study (CFCS) and the learning portfolio<br />

formed our core curriculum. The “selectives”<br />

complimented the core. The IMU curriculum has<br />

adopted task-based learning, which is a continuum of<br />

PBL undertaken in the earlier phase. The study-guides<br />

based on various tasks identify how the 8 outcomes<br />

can be achieved and the outcome measures. The CFCS<br />

consists of students adopting and visiting a family in<br />

the community for two years. Specific objectives<br />

guided by “themes” have been identified for each visit.<br />

The students are required to develop a portfolio<br />

consisting of case summaries, case reports, projects and<br />

maintain a logbook.


5G7 An evaluation of the internal<br />

validity of specific learning<br />

outcomes in phase II of a revised<br />

undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

F J Cilliers* and E M Bitzer<br />

University of Stellenbosch, Division for University Education,<br />

P O Box 19063, Tygerberg 7505, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

The objective was to undertake a formative evaluation<br />

of part of a revised undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

by determining the degree of congruence between<br />

specific and exit outcomes. A cross sectional case-study<br />

utilising document analysis was carried out. 1510<br />

specific outcomes from 13 modules were compared<br />

- 4.40 -<br />

for congruence with each of 32 exit outcomes. 1495<br />

specific outcomes were considered congruent with exit<br />

outcomes. Between 0-68.9% of all specific outcomes<br />

were considered congruent with any given exit<br />

outcome. Three exit outcomes were addressed by<br />

>=15% of specific outcomes: two addressed lower<br />

order cognitive outcomes. 27 exit outcomes were<br />

addressed by


5H4 Self-directed, self-organized casebased-learning<br />

in final year<br />

students<br />

Jana Junger, Christiane Roth, Stephan Zipfel,<br />

Wolfgang Eich and Wolfgang Herzog<br />

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg,<br />

Bergheimerstr. 58, 69115 Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />

The objective is to promote self-directed learning and<br />

to train interdisciplinary teamwork in final year<br />

students. Final year students from different medical<br />

departments meet to discuss a self-selected case on their<br />

ward with a modified case based method.The roles of<br />

tutor and presenter are played by students of the same<br />

peer-group. New tutors are trained by their<br />

predecessors. One teacher supervises the process.<br />

Because of the different background of students,<br />

everybody contributes his own experience of the<br />

respective internistic department. The close relationship<br />

to everyday work and active involvement of students<br />

increases the motivation to learn. The students realize<br />

the advantages of well-prepared and presented cases<br />

for the whole learning group. Evaluation of the tutorials<br />

showed good results concerning engagement of tutors<br />

and learning-atmosphere. It is concluded that selforganized<br />

peer group learning might be an additional<br />

model of case-based learning in advanced students.<br />

5H5 Changing to ‘self-induced learning’<br />

in a speech therapy department<br />

Martin Peleman<br />

Arteveldehogeschool, Campus Sint-Lievenspoortstraat, Sint-<br />

Lievenspoortstraat 143, 9000 Gent, BELGIUM<br />

The Speech Department of the Arteveldehogeschool<br />

changed its curriculum from a traditional teachercentered<br />

towards a more student-centered educational<br />

system. Because of the apparent differences with PBL,<br />

we prefer to define our new system as ‘self-induced<br />

learning’. One third of the content of the original<br />

theoretical courses was transformed into different types<br />

of tasks which are dealt with by the students in group<br />

sessions and under the supervision of a teacher. This<br />

supervision is mainly focused on the process of working<br />

and studying together in an efficient way. The project<br />

is gradually implemented over the three years of the<br />

curriculum. Students themselves as well as staff<br />

members and external professionals and organisations<br />

were consulted during the whole process of this<br />

curricular change. All of them also took part in the<br />

continuous evaluation of the project during the first<br />

year.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.41 -<br />

5H6 Student participation in the<br />

organization of education at a<br />

medical school - a comparison of<br />

two South African cases<br />

B G Lindeque and Pierre L Bredenkamp*<br />

Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, P O Box<br />

19063, Tygerberg 7505, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

The political democratization of South Africa caused<br />

the international community to open up - trends and<br />

innovations in education worldwide had therefore a<br />

significant impact on training in South Africa, resulting<br />

in curricular reform. Pretoria and Stellenbosch were<br />

the first medical schools to change - student<br />

participation became a key element to drive this change.<br />

The Pretoria medical school implemented a problemorientated<br />

integrated model and Stellenbosch<br />

emphasized a core curriculum with certain key<br />

elements (integration, clinical relevance, stated<br />

outcomes). At both schools, students were utilized as<br />

important participants in all committee structures. Both<br />

schools went along the route of implementing the early<br />

years while developing the later years at the same time.<br />

Thus students played a major role in the continuous<br />

improving of the standards of training, as well as the<br />

effectiveness of the changes. This led to students<br />

becoming an integral part of the management of the<br />

faculty as a whole.<br />

5H7 Preparing the way: encouraging<br />

clinical tutors to be co-producers in<br />

the learning process<br />

Peter Barton* and Jillian Morrison<br />

Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow,<br />

4 Lancaster Crescent, Glasgow G12 0RR, UK<br />

In year 3 of Glasgow University’s new student-centred<br />

problem-based curriculum, students receive 20 days,<br />

one day per week, of structured “Clinical Practice”.<br />

GPs and hospital tutors provide this on alternate weeks.<br />

Clinical Practice in the Community (CPC), an<br />

innovative course of community based education,<br />

comprises:<br />

1 Student Consultation Surgery: supervised personal<br />

consulting;<br />

2 Signs and Symptoms Surgery: history taking and<br />

examination practice;<br />

3 Longitudinal Care Project (LCP): students<br />

undertake detailed assessments of patients with<br />

chronic illness. The LCP contributes 20% to<br />

summative assessment.<br />

From CPC’s earliest iterations, 80 GP tutors have been<br />

involved as co-producers. Using small group<br />

workshops, questionnaire surveys, telephone<br />

discussions, and a 2-day staff development programme,<br />

academic staff and tutors have worked together to<br />

design and develop the course. The course and its<br />

clinical tutors are highly evaluated by students and<br />

external examiners alike. We believe co-production is<br />

an essential part of curriculum design.


Session 5I Educating the educators (2)<br />

5I1 How to help clinical and multimedia<br />

staff develop joint programs<br />

Eleanor Flynn<br />

Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentisty and Health<br />

Sciences, Level 7, Medical Building, University of Melbourne,<br />

Victoria 3010, AUSTRALIA<br />

As medical education courses use multimedia based<br />

modes of delivery more, it becomes vital that clinical<br />

and multimedia staff understand each other’s frames<br />

of reference. They need to work effectively together to<br />

produce programs which meet the needs of students in<br />

a timely manner by recognising, defining and<br />

overcoming the problems that occur. The project being<br />

used as an illustration of how to manage these problems<br />

is the development of a web based program to teach<br />

Rational Test Ordering to postgraduate year 1 & 2<br />

doctors for the Postgraduate Medical Council of New<br />

South Wales. The particularly useful techniques were<br />

the development of a detailed storyboard preceded by<br />

an exhaustive needs analysis, especially to the project<br />

manager who was a clinician moving into multimedia<br />

education. The presentation will give examples of the<br />

problems and their solutions especially those relating<br />

to improving communication between clinicians and<br />

multimedia staff.<br />

5I2 “Getting Started in Clinical<br />

Teaching” - a staff development<br />

initiative<br />

J A Dent* and P E Preece<br />

Clinical Skills Centre, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital<br />

& Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Enabling clinicians to fulfil their clinical teaching role<br />

necessitates support mechanisms which facilitate<br />

linking enthusiasm for student-teaching to the<br />

requirements of a structured curriculum. ”Getting<br />

Started in Clinical Teaching” comprises instructional<br />

booklets supplemented by a two-day course providing<br />

a combination of educational theory and practical<br />

instruction. It aims to support clinical teachers in wards,<br />

out-patient clinics and the Clinical Skills Centre.<br />

Information on curriculum construction, adult learning<br />

and curriculum outcomes is provided, together with<br />

practical experience of learning resources available in<br />

these venues. The course includes content-preparation,<br />

delivery mechanisms, models for organising student/<br />

patient interactions and the role of constructive<br />

feedback. Workshops are used to construct clinical<br />

teaching sessions using the approaches described<br />

including simulation, role-play and self-video. Selfcritique<br />

and peer review are encouraged. Areas of<br />

potential resistance to change are discussed. The<br />

“Getting Started” booklets summarising keypoints are<br />

suitable for wider dissemination.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.42 -<br />

5I3 Governance in medical teaching:<br />

pilot study<br />

Iain Robbé<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, Temple of Peace &<br />

Health, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NW, UK<br />

Quality in tertiary teaching is increasingly important<br />

(McLean, 2001) and it can be linked to the government<br />

policy of improving medical practices through<br />

governance (Scally & Donaldson, 1998). A checklist<br />

for governance was developed to investigate its<br />

theoretical validity (Cohen & Manion, 1989) for<br />

medical educators. Random sample [20%, n=12] of<br />

postgraduate educators in a medical college completed<br />

the checklist using a five point Likert scale and<br />

discussed its validity compared to the literature, their<br />

experiences and governance issues. Respondents<br />

judged the checklist to assess governance had high<br />

construct and content validity. They easily identified<br />

tasks they aimed to achieve to provide quality teaching.<br />

Checklist issues of infrastructure, coherence, culture,<br />

appropriateness of tasks, and systems to assess<br />

performance were evaluated positively. There was high<br />

theoretical validity in this setting. Further research is<br />

needed to test the validity and reliability of these results.<br />

5I4 The role of an education unit in<br />

health professional education:<br />

proactive or responsive<br />

Margaret Horsburgh* and Rain Lamdin<br />

Faulty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland,<br />

Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand<br />

The teaching of health professions at The University<br />

of Auckland has undergone significant change in the<br />

last few years. The transformation has been from a<br />

medical school to a multi-professional Faculty of<br />

Medical and Health Sciences. At an undergraduate level<br />

medical, nursing, medical science and health science<br />

students now share learning opportunities. In order to<br />

support learning and teaching across the Faculty and<br />

establish best practice for curriculum, learning,<br />

teaching and assessment a multi-professional unit has<br />

been established. This presentation describes the goals<br />

of the Unit and identifies the tension between being<br />

responsive to individuals and groups and being<br />

proactive through setting an agenda for educational<br />

development within the Faculty. Potential conflict<br />

between the roles of curriculum management,<br />

monitoring and appraisal, leadership for change and<br />

research are discussed. Conclusions are drawn about<br />

the purpose and value of such centres in a multiprofessional<br />

environment.


5I5 Beyond teacher training; the<br />

construction of a faculty<br />

development strategy<br />

Patricia Rosado Pinto* and Ramiro Avila<br />

Department of Medical Education, Faculdade de Ciencias<br />

Medicas, Campo de Santana, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa,<br />

PORTUGAL<br />

In Portuguese medical schools the pedagogical<br />

preparation of faculty members has been a neglected<br />

enterprise. Furthermore faculty are constantly being<br />

asked to assume new educational roles for which they<br />

have received no specific training. Thus formal faculty<br />

development programmes are becoming more and more<br />

vital. The aim of this presentation is to describe the<br />

institutional strategy of our Medical Education<br />

Department, established in 1996, concerning: teacher<br />

training workshops for junior and for senior lecturers;<br />

Journal clubs and sharing good practice sessions;<br />

Working sessions with the teachers - rethinking the<br />

teachers’ assumptions about teaching and learning;<br />

discussing curricular issues; designing and developing<br />

specific educational and evaluation materials, providing<br />

educational feedback. More than isolated courses on<br />

“teaching how to teach” we aim at a real,<br />

comprehensive and structured staff development<br />

strategy in which subject matter and educational experts<br />

can work together avoiding isolated discipline<br />

knowledge and contributing to a systematic<br />

improvement of teaching.<br />

5I6 The profile of the perfect teaching<br />

professor<br />

F Scheele*, J Th M van der Schoot and A J Goverde<br />

St Lucas Andreas Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE<br />

Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

The aim of the study was to assess the characteristics<br />

of the perfect teaching professor from the perspective<br />

of postgraduate trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology.<br />

A written interview was sent to 120 trainees. The<br />

interview contained 3 questions such as: ‘What is your<br />

Session 5J Education and cultural diversity<br />

5J1 The development and evaluation of<br />

a programme to teach cultural<br />

diversity to medical undergraduate<br />

students<br />

Nisha Dogra<br />

University of Leicester, Greenwood Institute of Child Health,<br />

Westcotes House, Westcotes Drive, Leicester LE3 3TP, UK<br />

The study aimed to assess any attitudinal change in<br />

students following teaching on cultural/racial diversity<br />

using a previously developed questionnaire and whether<br />

the teaching enabled the learning objectives to be met<br />

in a measurable way. Students completed a<br />

questionnaire designed in a previous study at two<br />

stages; the first before the component on cultural<br />

diversity was delivered and the second after the sessions<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.43 -<br />

advice to improve your teaching professor?’ The<br />

answers were subsequently divided in three categories:<br />

knowledge (the head), practical skills (the hands) and<br />

attitude (the heart). 74 trainees responded. 74% of the<br />

answers given fell in the heart category, 23% in the<br />

head category and 3% in the hand category. From the<br />

perspective of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology<br />

the perfect teaching professor is the king of positive<br />

feedback and has personal interest in the trainee. The<br />

perfect teacher has good knowledge and average skills.<br />

It is recommended that the teaching professor should<br />

appoint a stimulating tutor with interest in the social<br />

aspects surrounding the trainee.<br />

5I7 Evidence retrieval in medical<br />

education: obstructions and<br />

opportunities<br />

Alex Haig<br />

SCPMDE, Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

With the ever-increasing emphasis on best evidence in<br />

medical education it is imperative that researchers and<br />

practitioners have full access to the evidence in order<br />

to reduce bias. The various factors impeding evidence<br />

retrieval in medical education will be outlined, and the<br />

problems inherent with database indexing will be<br />

highlighted with the results of a study of comparative<br />

search strategies. By examining the search strategies’<br />

rates of precision, sensitivity, and specificity it can be<br />

shown that the major databases containing relevant<br />

peer-reviewed studies (Medline, Embase, ERIC) are<br />

not indexed for effective searches in medical education.<br />

Presently there is no existing database or search tool<br />

that provides the conceptual context required for<br />

evidence retrieval for medical education. Alternative<br />

approaches to compensate for current inadequate<br />

indexing will be outlined, as will possible future models<br />

that could resolve existing problems and provide<br />

analytical tools for the evidence-based research and<br />

decision-making of tomorrow.<br />

on cultural diversity. The time interval between stage<br />

one and two was one week. The cultural diversity<br />

component was developed using a range of sources.<br />

140 out of 181 (77.3%) students completed the<br />

questionnaire at both stages. The findings include<br />

statistically significant changes that reflect more<br />

“positive” attitudes about cultures coming together and<br />

about specific cultures. The study indicates that<br />

attitudes changed over the period of teaching. There<br />

is, however, scope for further development of measures<br />

to enable attitudinal shifts to be measured.


5J2 Aboriginal health: a tool in the<br />

process of reconciliation?<br />

G Garvey* and I E Rolfe*<br />

University of Newcastle, Faculty of Medicine and Health<br />

Sciences, University Drive, Callaghan 2308, AUSTRALIA<br />

The inclusion of culturally appropriate, relevant and<br />

academically sound content and practical experience<br />

in Aboriginal Health is an important tool in the process<br />

of reconciliation in Australia. The inclusion of<br />

Aboriginal Health content also serves several other<br />

purposes. It recognises the importance of Aboriginal<br />

Health in Australian society and also provides<br />

Aboriginal students with a sense of belonging. It can<br />

also assist in attracting and retaining health<br />

professionals to work in Aboriginal communities and<br />

provides all students with an understanding of cultural<br />

practices and beliefs of patients from other cultures.<br />

We aim to outline the Aboriginal Health content for<br />

health professional students at the Faculty of Medicine<br />

and Health Sciences, Newcastle, Australia. We will<br />

present an innovative, specifically designed multimedia<br />

resource that is used to orientate students to<br />

Aboriginal History, Cultural Awareness, Aboriginal<br />

Health and working with Aboriginal organisations.<br />

5J3 Valuing diversity: the effectiveness<br />

of a roleplay workshop as part of a<br />

newly introduced communitybased<br />

diversity module<br />

Sue Conning*, Alison Hooper, Margot Turner and Val Wass<br />

Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Department<br />

of General Practice, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe<br />

Road, London SE5 3PJ<br />

Learning about the diverse needs of people with<br />

disabilities, deprivation, homosexuality or minority<br />

ethnicity is challenging. We run a “diversity” course<br />

where students interview individuals, visit community<br />

organisations and explore issues raised in seminars.<br />

Evaluation showed that some viewed these issues as<br />

common sense. A workshop using trained, standardised<br />

patients was introduced into the module. Specific<br />

diversity scenarios were enacted and students then<br />

reflected on their personal reactions to these in small<br />

groups. Students completed a questionnaire evaluating<br />

the impact of this workshop. A cultural discourse<br />

analyst observed the scenarios and group interaction.<br />

197 (60%) students completed the questionnaire (20%<br />

non-attendance). Students rated the workshop very<br />

positively. It proved an innovative experience, which<br />

challenged their own prejudices and added further<br />

personal reality to their community experiences.<br />

Reasons for this will be discussed. This interactive<br />

learning model proved most effective in encouraging<br />

students to explore their personal approaches to<br />

diversity issues.<br />

5J4 Using negative role models<br />

positively<br />

S E Gull* and K H Matheson<br />

Cambridge, 42 Southgate Street, Bury St Edmunds IP33 2AZ,<br />

Suffolk, UK<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.44 -<br />

The influence of the negative role model will be<br />

presented. The main aim of the study was to consider<br />

the issue of gender and role models for women in<br />

medical education. One investigator (SEG) carried out<br />

semi-structured interviews with 8 undergraduate<br />

students and 10 female doctors. A question asked was<br />

“what characteristics of role models influenced you<br />

during your medical education?”. The importance of<br />

role models was acknowledged. The positive and<br />

negative attributes of role models will be discussed with<br />

particular reference to the positive effect of negative<br />

role models. Role models appear to be related to the<br />

self-identity of the student, and negative attributes may<br />

be influential in a positive as well as a negative way.<br />

5J5 What factors influence<br />

underrepresented minority (URM)<br />

students in their choice of medical<br />

schools?<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Mark Urosev<br />

University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Medical<br />

Education (m/c 591), 808 S. Wood St, CME 986, Chicago IL<br />

60612, USA<br />

This study investigates specific factors influencing<br />

underrepresented minority students’ (URMs) choice<br />

among medical schools. Quantitative and qualitative<br />

pre-matriculate data were gathered from all applicants<br />

to the University of Illinois at Chicago College of<br />

Medicine (1999/2000-2000/2001). Applicants were<br />

classified both by ethnicity and student groups listed<br />

as follows: interviewed and denied (ID); interviewed,<br />

accepted and matriculated (AM); and interviewed,<br />

accepted but declined the offer (AD). A series of Chisquare<br />

tests of independence and t-test were performed.<br />

MCAT scores were significantly higher for the AD<br />

group, whereas GPA was statistically different only<br />

between the ID and AD students. Particular choices<br />

such as the prestige and affiliation of undergraduate<br />

institutions and medical schools, multiple acceptances,<br />

and choices among multiple acceptances were also<br />

statistically dependent on student groups and ethnicity.<br />

Distinguishable trends exist regarding the selection of<br />

a medical school that follow either student ethnicity,<br />

or entrance categorization.<br />

5J6 Education for professionalism in<br />

medicine<br />

Geoffrey Westwood* and Barbara Westwood<br />

Bankstown Health Service, Locked Mail Bag 1600, Bankstown<br />

NSW 2200, AUSTRALIA<br />

One of the themes for this conference is professionalism<br />

in medical education. The concept of professionalism<br />

in medical practice as distinct from medical education<br />

is discussed along with what constitutes<br />

professionalism in current medical practice in Australia.<br />

The question is proposed that unless medical education<br />

addresses the issues of professionalism then it is<br />

unrealistic to expect young doctors to exhibit so-called<br />

professional behaviour in their practice of medicine.<br />

The authors draw on their long experience in health<br />

administration and health education.


5J7 Characteristics of students admitted<br />

for the medical course at the Faculty<br />

of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto,<br />

University of Sao Paulo, Brazil<br />

A R L Cianflone*, M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo,<br />

M L V Rodrigues and L E de A Troncon<br />

Faculty of Medicine or Ribeirao Preto, Rua Dom Luiz Amaral<br />

Mousinho, 1662-ap.2, 14090-180 Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

In order to determine some characteristics of the<br />

medical students, a standardized questionnaire was<br />

applied to 96 students admitted in 1994 and to 98<br />

students admitted in 2000. The results were: age at<br />

admission: 18 years or less (62.8%); number of<br />

Session 5K Contexts for learning<br />

5K1 Clinical education in the health care<br />

professions: a critical analysis of<br />

the literature<br />

Alison Rushton<br />

Coventry University, School of Health & Social Sciences, Priory<br />

Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK<br />

Clinical education is an integral component of medical<br />

education, providing an essential bridge between the<br />

academic and clinical environments. A soft systems<br />

methodology provided a conceptual framework for<br />

structuring an analysis of clinical education. The search<br />

encompassed all major databases and manual searching<br />

of key journals for healthcare professions. Content<br />

analysis identified emerging themes, and informed the<br />

sub-divisions of the analysis. Key themes included:<br />

balance between theoretical and clinical course<br />

components, timing of placements, assessment, models<br />

of placement, supervisory process, and roles of the<br />

clinical educator and the university tutor. The analysis<br />

identified a paucity of good quality research, with both<br />

theory-practice and literature-practice gaps in<br />

existence. The literature also highlighted the necessity<br />

for change and the need to develop theory and research.<br />

The findings reflect that a structured approach to<br />

address the issues raised by clinical education at<br />

individual profession and interdisciplinary levels is<br />

perhaps required.<br />

5K2 “Contracts for Learning”: project to<br />

improve the quality of attachments<br />

at a District General Hospital<br />

Richard Ayres*, Henry Averns and Lin Sanders<br />

Northern Devon Healthcare Trust, Medical Education Centre,<br />

North Devon District Hospital, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 4JB,<br />

UK<br />

Our District Hospital serves a mainly rural population<br />

of 160,000 and has good links with local GPs and<br />

community hospitals. Undergraduate medical students<br />

come for various attachments, mostly from Bristol<br />

University. Often they have no clear idea what they<br />

want from the attachment, and sometimes we have no<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.45 -<br />

previous applications: 1(64.9%) and >1 (13.4%);<br />

previous experience in other university courses: 5.1%;<br />

father with university degree: 76.8%; mother with<br />

university degree: 53.1%; students who have parent<br />

physicians: 19.5% (other relatives physicians: 39.5%).<br />

38.5% of the students decided to apply for medicine<br />

between the ages of 14 and 16 years and 30.5% decided<br />

between 10 and 13 years. The disciplines of better<br />

performance during the high school were Biology<br />

(91.5%), Chemistry (78.2%), Physics (77.5%) and<br />

Mathematics (77.5%). The reasons given for<br />

application to Medicine were: liking Biology (45%);<br />

personal achievement (30%); to help people (23%).<br />

clear idea what to teach them. “Contracts for Learning”<br />

is a new project based on a model already used here<br />

for nursing students. We email students four weeks<br />

before their attachment. We provide detailed profiles<br />

of teaching staff in the hospital and primary care; also<br />

particular departments, GP surgeries and community<br />

hospitals. This amounts to an extensive menu of choices<br />

(including multidisciplinary modules offered to<br />

healthcare students). Students then submit a form<br />

detailing their learning requirements. We then produce<br />

a “Learning Contract” specifying what learning<br />

experiences we will provide. We will be presenting our<br />

early experience of this project.<br />

5K3 Does the dedicated teaching<br />

environment in ambulatory care<br />

improve acquisition of learning<br />

outcomes?<br />

Clare I L Stewart*, Paul E Preece and John A Dent<br />

Dundee University, Clinical Skills Centre, Ninewells Hospital<br />

and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Current trends in undergraduate medical education are<br />

away from traditional ward-based learning to<br />

ambulatory care teaching. We wanted to know whether<br />

students gain more learning outcomes from a dedicated<br />

ambulatory teaching environment than a conventional<br />

outpatient clinic. A comparative evaluation study using<br />

a semi-structured student questionnaire and a structured<br />

patient questionnaire was performed. Surprisingly,<br />

results indicated the learning environment and<br />

organisation of the teaching were rated equally.<br />

However, more learning outcomes were achieved<br />

utilising the Ambulatory Care Teaching Centre<br />

(ACTC), but each venue demonstrated particular<br />

strengths with regard to individual outcomes. The level<br />

of patient satisfaction in the ACTC was high, implying<br />

patient care was not adversely affected utilising this<br />

setting. This information will inform practice for the<br />

content of future teaching sessions.


5K4 Could we improve on what patients<br />

our pediatrics students saw in<br />

outpatient clinics?<br />

Pedro Herskovic*, Alicia Vasquez, Cristian Breinbauer,<br />

Patricia Gomez, Viviana Herskovic, Marcela Jacard,<br />

Claudio Missarelli and Erika Troncoso<br />

Pediatrics Department, University of Chile, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Campus Oriente, Casilla 16117, Correo 9, Providencia,<br />

Santiago, CHILE<br />

For the last two years we have registered every contact<br />

of fifth year medical students with pediatric outpatients.<br />

In 1999 we found that exposure to pathologies included<br />

in the contents for the rotation ranged from 43.5% to<br />

71.7%. In year 2000 an intervention was made with<br />

the students’ tutors to increase their awareness about<br />

the need of contact with more pathologies. Our<br />

objective was to check if such intervention would<br />

improve on the deficiencies detected in 1999. In year<br />

2000 six student groups attended 50 sessions in<br />

outpatient clinics. Patients were registered with up to<br />

three diagnoses, which were compared with the 46<br />

pathologies included in our learning objectives. Patient<br />

encounters ranged from 38 to 127 per group. Exposure<br />

to pathologies ranged from 43.0% to 80.4%, which was<br />

similar to what was observed in 1999. Correlation was<br />

found between the number of patients seen and contact<br />

with more pathologies. A briefing session for tutors<br />

did not improve the completion of the rotation<br />

objectives. We have to keep assessing what is going on<br />

in clinical rotations.<br />

5K5 Using the ward round for teaching<br />

and learning: how do junior<br />

doctors learn from consultants<br />

through ward-based teaching?<br />

Alan Bleakley<br />

Cornwall Postgraduate Education Centre, Royal Cornwall<br />

Hospital, Truro Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK<br />

Traditional psychological models of knowledge and<br />

skills transmission fail to tell the entire story of how<br />

junior doctors are effectively taught on ward rounds,<br />

moving from novice to expert status through<br />

‘professional adhesion’. This paper presentation reports<br />

an ongoing combined qualitative methods research<br />

project with a mixed speciality group of twenty-five<br />

consultants in a large rural hospital in Britain. Data<br />

analysis of semi-structured interviews responding to<br />

examples of videotaped ward practice, has led to a more<br />

anthropological, rather than the conventional<br />

psychological, exploration of the working modes of<br />

specific communities of practice in a complex teaching<br />

and learning context. Contemporary models of<br />

constructed, distributed and situated learning, of<br />

cognitive apprenticeship, of adaptation to a ‘habitus’<br />

(informal rules and regulations of a community of<br />

practice) and of the construction of practitioner<br />

identities, are used as an exploratory, and in some cases<br />

explanatory, framework for the data collected from the<br />

study.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.46 -<br />

5K6 Clinical skills training needs of final<br />

year medical students and PRHOs -<br />

a comparison<br />

D MacLeod*, E Gill, J Gate and J Rees<br />

NHS, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool<br />

L9 4EL, UK<br />

We compared the clinical skills training needs of final<br />

year medical students and PRHOs. We surveyed 257<br />

final year medical students undergoing clinical skills<br />

training, including a ‘Harvey’ cardiac patient simulator<br />

and communication training. Then, 22 PRHOs<br />

completed a questionnaire assessing training needs to<br />

plan clinical skills teaching. The most frequent student<br />

revision requests were all commonly encountered<br />

OSCE stations; catheterization, suturing,<br />

ophthalmoscopy, IV fluid management and breast<br />

examination (100%, 95%, 79% and 58% of student<br />

sessions respectively). By contrast, PRHOs requested<br />

training on infrequently performed skills (joint<br />

aspiration, pneumothorax aspiration, central vein<br />

cannulation) or common but complex skills. Selfassessed<br />

training needs of final year medical students<br />

reflect impending OSCE assessment, whilst degree of<br />

exposure and skill complexity drive training needs for<br />

the PRHOs. This suggests some adjustment in student<br />

skills training and the need for further skills training<br />

sessions for PRHOs.<br />

5K7 The impact of a precepted diabetic<br />

foot care program<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Lewis E Foxhall*, Frank Sifuentes and<br />

Lee Cheng<br />

UT Houston Health Science Center, Family Practice and<br />

Community Medicine, 6431 Fannin, Suite JJL324, Houston TX<br />

77030, USA<br />

Diabetes is a growing international health problem that<br />

too often leads to foot amputation. Over a two summer<br />

period, 156 preclinical students in the Texas Statewide<br />

Family Practice Preceptors hip Program screened the<br />

feet of more than 300 diabetics, 30% of whom had<br />

loss of pedal sensation. Screening was accomplished<br />

with the Semmes Weinstein 5.07/10g, monofilament.<br />

Students also taught these patients diabetic foot care.<br />

From the analysis of the copies of the patient<br />

evaluations submitted to us, we found that patients<br />

whose age was greater than 60 years and patients who<br />

received their care in rural settings were more likely to<br />

have a greater number of foot problems than those<br />

patients who were younger and those who received care<br />

in metropolitan areas. The students’ participation in<br />

diabetic screening and patient education has saved<br />

preceptors time and is considered helpful by patients.<br />

This program is transferable to other settings.


Session 5L Evaluation of multiprofessional education<br />

5L1 The benefits of a multiprofessional<br />

education programme can be<br />

sustained<br />

G J Mires*, F L R Williams, R M Harden and P W Howie<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee,<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Improved understanding by third year medical students<br />

about the professional roles of doctors and midwives<br />

in the care of labouring women following a<br />

multiprofessional education programme have<br />

previously been reported (Mires et al, 1999). Following<br />

a clinical attachment in the fourth year, the previously<br />

observed changes in awareness of professional<br />

responsibilty were maintained in the same group of<br />

students and in some areas enhanced. We believe that<br />

a short multiprofessional course early in the medical<br />

curriculum can change awareness of professional<br />

responsibility. Further, we have evidence that these<br />

attitude changes were maintained and enhanced<br />

following a clinical attachment later in the educational<br />

programme. This reinforcement of multiprofessional<br />

experiences may enhance working practice after<br />

graduation.<br />

(Mires GJ, Williams FLR, Harden RM, Howie PW, McCarey M,<br />

Robertson A. Multiprofessional education in undergraduate<br />

curricula can work. Medical Teacher 1999;21:281-285)<br />

5L2 Self-directed multiprofessional<br />

continuing medical education with<br />

facilitators: an experiment in four<br />

European countries. The Belgian<br />

story<br />

J Goedhuys*, C Geens, N Mathers, K Billingham, G Maso<br />

and O Solas-Gaspar<br />

Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 J,<br />

Minderbroedersstraat 17, 3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

In order to further implement fundamental options like<br />

self-directed learning, multiprofessional education and<br />

case-based learning, Continuing Medical Education has<br />

to provide a model that integrates the values of these<br />

options into daily practice. The aim of our project was<br />

to try out such a model in UK, Belgium, Italy and Spain.<br />

In this paper the Belgian experience is reported. Six<br />

general practice/family medicine group practices were<br />

selected, with at least two GPs and at least one extra<br />

discipline attached to the practice. Two facilitators<br />

(young GPs) were appointed to three practices each.<br />

They facilitated the group in constructing a common<br />

learning agenda and made sure the group found the<br />

methods to realise it. All processes and outcomes were<br />

registered and all participants were interviewed<br />

afterwards. Results show a high satisfaction, perceived<br />

relevance and enhanced teamspirit. The balance<br />

between task-oriented and group-oriented facilitation<br />

will be discussed.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.47 -<br />

5L3 Interprofessional education in a<br />

clinical and non-clinical<br />

environment: teachers’ and<br />

learners’ perspectives<br />

John Jenkins and Sue Morison*<br />

Queen’s University Belfast, School of Nursing & Midwifery,<br />

Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL,<br />

UK<br />

This paper presents the results of the evaluation of an<br />

interprofessional education (IPE) pilot programme for<br />

undergraduate medical and nursing students. The pilot<br />

involved 136 students in the specialist areas of<br />

paediatrics and Children’s Nursing. Three groups, with<br />

a maximum of 44 students per group undertook the<br />

project during 2000-01. Experts from both professions,<br />

University and Health Service, delivered the<br />

programme and assessed student learning. Qualitative<br />

and quantitative evaluation techniques were employed<br />

to compare the success of classroom-based (lectures,<br />

problem-based learning (PBL), case discussion) and<br />

clinical placement (tutorials, ward rounds, teamwork)<br />

teaching and learning. The views of both teachers and<br />

learners will be presented. Initial results suggest that<br />

both students and teachers identify PBL as the most<br />

successful classroom-based teaching and learning<br />

strategy but that clinical placement learning was<br />

preferred overall. That teaching staff demonstrated a<br />

positive attitude to IPE was also important.<br />

5L4 Interprofessional education:<br />

experiences of students<br />

J Agsteribbe*, R M H Schaub and J Cohen-Schotanus<br />

University of Groningen, Department of Education, Faculty of<br />

Medical Sciences, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

The courses of the undergraduate dental and dental<br />

hygienist training at Groningen University are partially<br />

shared. The concept of this educational programme is<br />

that dentists and dental hygienists join forces within<br />

their workfield. The students therefore should get<br />

acquainted with the concept of working together. The<br />

research question is: how do students experience this<br />

concept? In order to answer this question we used the<br />

critical incidents method. We asked the students<br />

(n=300) to answer the following question: “ During<br />

which event in the course did you personally experience<br />

the team concept and did it work out well for you, or<br />

did it not work out at all?” 85 forms were returned to<br />

us. The students’ opinions towards their professional<br />

colleagues became increasingly critical. In particular<br />

the dental hygienist students did not have the feeling<br />

they were taken seriously by the teachers and the dental<br />

students.


5L5 “Capturing the learning”: the<br />

development of interprofessional<br />

education in the Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Health and Biological Sciences,<br />

University of Southampton<br />

D Humphris* and S Colly<br />

New Generation Project, Building 67, University of<br />

Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, Hants SO17 1BJ, UK<br />

The Faculty of Medicine, Health & Biological Sciences,<br />

University of Southampton have a track record of<br />

developing a number of successful small<br />

interprofessional teaching and learning projects. This<br />

paper reports the findings of a study designed to<br />

‘Capture the Learning’ emerging from the experience<br />

of the last decade of inter-professional education<br />

activity in the Faculty. This small-scale qualitative study<br />

involved interviews with 16 key informants from a<br />

range of professional backgrounds, from across the<br />

Faculty and service. This paper reports the key emergent<br />

themes from the analysis of data. This includes a<br />

reflection on the conditions necessary for the<br />

development of interprofessional education and<br />

learning in the Faculty. The outcomes of this study will<br />

be related to the development of the Faculty’s<br />

commitment to the establishment of the New<br />

Generation Project.<br />

- 4.48 -<br />

5L6 Learning interprofessionally: a<br />

review of experiences<br />

A Le May*, F Kitsell, I Giles and C Stephens<br />

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Building 67, University of<br />

Southampton, Southampton, Hants SO17 1BJ, UK<br />

This paper details the educational approaches used in<br />

a programme of interprofessional education within the<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences<br />

at the University of Southampton. This initiative<br />

focussed on 1,000 first year undergraduate students<br />

undertaking courses in medicine, midwifery, nursing,<br />

occupational therapy, physiotherapy and podiatry.<br />

Students were split into 100 facilitated learning groups<br />

and asked to construct a scenario, from a selection of<br />

clinical topics, against which they answered 3 clinically<br />

focussed questions and critically appraised their<br />

experiences of team working. Assessment was through<br />

an oral presentation of their work to peers and<br />

facilitators. The entire experience has been evaluated<br />

from both the students’ and the facilitators’ view points<br />

– salient issues raised in this evaluation will be<br />

presented and discussed in the light of planned future<br />

interprofessional exercises during the second and third<br />

years of these students’ programmes. Conclusions<br />

surrounding the opportunities and barriers to<br />

interprofessional education will be drawn.<br />

Session 5M Teaching about EBM, critical thinking and research<br />

5M1 Questions as the key to knowledge:<br />

teaching medical students in<br />

Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

Jonna Skov Madsen*, Birgitta Wallstedt, Carl Joakim<br />

Brandt and Mogens Horder<br />

Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical<br />

Biochemistry, DK-5000 Odense C, DENMARK<br />

There is a focus on teaching Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

(EBM) but until recently EBM training was not<br />

incorporated in our undergraduate curriculum. We<br />

introduced an EBM course in the 9th semester (out of<br />

13) in the subject matter ‘clinical biochemistry’. The<br />

course consisted of seven (1-hour) lectures during three<br />

weeks. First an introduction to the EBM method was<br />

given after which students in small groups chose and<br />

focused their own question, undertook a structured<br />

search and selected one article. The process and results<br />

were subsequently presented to and discussed within<br />

the entire group of students. The course was evaluated<br />

using a questionnaire. Students improved in the<br />

evaluation of scientific articles and in seeking<br />

information and reported that they had been stimulated<br />

to understand concepts instead of memorising details.<br />

In our opinion medical students should be introduced<br />

to EBM at an early stage to be able to practice EBM<br />

throughout their education.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

5M2 Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

to healthcare professionals:<br />

implementing and evaluating the<br />

programme<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

Many papers have described the importance of<br />

exposing healthcare professionals to the ‘new<br />

paradigm’ of evidence-based medicine (EBM) as one<br />

of the best ways to improve patient care. To this end,<br />

we developed and evaluated short courses in EBM for<br />

health professionals from 1998 to 2000 at the United<br />

Medical Education Consortium, London. Each of the<br />

courses lasts for four weeks. The aims of the course<br />

are to enable participants to learn how to go through<br />

logical laid questions, search on-line databases, review<br />

articles critically and apply information from the<br />

literature to specific clinical questions. All the<br />

participants were surveyed immediately before and<br />

after the short course to assess changes in reading,<br />

critical evaluation and literature search in medical<br />

decision making. The results showed that on-line<br />

database search and critical appraisal skills increased<br />

significantly in the participants, as did their tendency<br />

to use MEDLINE, BIDS and original research articles<br />

to solve clinical problems.


5M3 Impact of a short interactive<br />

curriculum on medical students’<br />

appreciation of EBM and CAM<br />

Samuel N Forjuoh*, Robert A Henry, Terry G Rascoe,<br />

Barb Symm and Janine C Edwards<br />

Department of Family & Community Medicine, Scott & White<br />

Memorial Hospital, Texas A & M University, System Health<br />

Science Center, College of Medicine, Scott & White Santa Fe<br />

Center, Temple, TX 76504, USA<br />

To evaluate the impact of a short, interactive curriculum<br />

on students’ appreciation of evidence-based medicine<br />

(EBM) and complementary/alternative medicine<br />

(CAM), a one-page anonymous questionnaire was<br />

distributed to all third-year students during their sixweek<br />

family medicine clerkship before/after a new<br />

curriculum, comprising interactive sessions on<br />

principles of epidemiology, biostatistics, EBM/CAM.<br />

The majority reported that the new instruction in<br />

epidemiology (83%), biostatistics (88%), EBM (95%),<br />

and CAM (100%) would help their future work. Even<br />

though the increase in their mean response on<br />

appropriateness of integrating EBM/CAM from 3.79<br />

to 4.05 on a 5-point Likert scale was not statistically<br />

significant (p=.095), significant changes were reported<br />

in the areas of “critiquing the medical literature”<br />

(p=.030) and “appraising a clinical trial” (p


5M7 Experimental courses in<br />

Biochemistry - initiation to<br />

scientific research in<br />

undergraduate medicine<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Rui Mesquita and J Martins-Silva<br />

Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

Experimental courses in biochemistry have been<br />

carried out in order to develop critical thinking,<br />

autonomy and decision-making capacity in first year<br />

students. To determine the students’ outcomes in terms<br />

of learning success and satisfaction, an anonymous<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.50 -<br />

questionnaire with 15 questions based on a Likert scale<br />

(bad, insufficient, sufficient, good, very good) was<br />

applied to the 14 students that attended the course in<br />

1998/1999, at the beginning and the end of the course.<br />

At the end of the course there was an increase in the<br />

number of students who responded ‘very good’ to: the<br />

stay in the lab, to using bibliographic search, to what is<br />

the quality control, to doing statistical analysis and to<br />

making oral results presentations. There was an increase<br />

in the students’ interest in research, practical skills in<br />

the lab and their knowledge in different areas of<br />

biomedical research.


Session 6 Workshops 2<br />

6/1 Basic Skills Faculty Development<br />

Workshop<br />

Dr Anita Duhl Glicken<br />

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Box C219, 4200 E<br />

9th Avenue Denver, Colorado 60262, USA<br />

Background<br />

Medical faculty are often recruited directly from<br />

clinical practice and while clinical expertise is<br />

invaluable to an applied educational process, these<br />

individuals may feel unprepared for the expectations<br />

and demands of academic teaching.<br />

Aims<br />

The purpose of this workshop is to provide new faculty<br />

with participatory learning experiences designed to<br />

enhance basic skills that contribute to success in the<br />

academic environment. The workshop will also benefit<br />

senior faculty who wish to improve their skills or<br />

mentor new faculty in their program. Materials will be<br />

provided to enable participants to replicate this<br />

workshop at their own institution.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Faculty interested in improving their own teaching skills<br />

or mentoring new faculty<br />

Content and structure<br />

Two faculty development modules, designed to increase<br />

awareness of active teaching strategies, will engage<br />

participants in an interactive exploration of ways to<br />

enhance didactic teaching through the creation of a<br />

complete course syllabus that serves as a contract for<br />

partnership in learning. In addition, participants will<br />

explore strategies to improve student-faculty<br />

communication and feedback. These model workshops<br />

illustrate two components of an existing integrated<br />

program for faculty development. As a final exercise,<br />

time permitting, participants will review an existing<br />

integrated framework for faculty development and<br />

generate a strategic plan for developing a framework<br />

within their program. This plan will address issues of<br />

needs assessment, identification of educational<br />

components, models and strategies for course delivery,<br />

and assessment.<br />

This workshop will include several interactive<br />

exercises. Participants will work together to apply<br />

principles presented in class and to generate new<br />

information to share with the larger group. Brief<br />

computer-generated presentations will be used to share<br />

information and guide discussions in the larger group.<br />

Handouts will be distributed.<br />

6/2 An Introduction to Clinical<br />

Judgment Analysis<br />

Dr Anthony LaDuca<br />

National Board of Medical Examiners, 3750 Market Street,<br />

Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.51 -<br />

Background<br />

Medical school faculty and practising physicians place<br />

great importance on clinical judgment. Frequently, it<br />

is cited as a crucial element of a clinician’s proficiency.<br />

For some, judgment encompasses the “art” of medicine<br />

and the prospect of teaching it is seen as daunting if<br />

not impossible. But expert judgment has been studied<br />

for decades and clinical judgment has been the object<br />

of many investigations in Europe and North America<br />

for more than 30 years. Despite this lengthy history,<br />

few clinician educators are familiar with the concepts<br />

underlying judgment theory and judgment analysis.<br />

This workshop is intended to address that need.<br />

Aims<br />

• To introduce participants to the theory and practice<br />

of judgment analysis in clinical applications;<br />

• To engage participants in a systematic judgment<br />

analysis exercise;<br />

• To encourage participants to locate places for CJA<br />

in their instructional program;<br />

• To familiarize participants with the principal<br />

features of judgment theory as formulated by<br />

Brunswik and Hammond.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Post-graduate clinical education teaching faculty and<br />

administrators; clerkship directors; members of student<br />

progress committees; medical education support<br />

professionals; other medical school faculty and<br />

administrators.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The presenter will lead participants in a CJA exercise,<br />

such as diagnosing pneumonia. This exercise will use<br />

a Web-based CJA system developed by the NBME. The<br />

CJA system produces a graphical representation of the<br />

participant’s judgment “policy” and statistical feedback<br />

comparing that policy with a criterion policy. The<br />

participant is permitted to complete a second block of<br />

“cases” after which further feedback is provided. This<br />

latter feature illustrates the powerful instructional<br />

potential for CJA technology.<br />

1 [20 m] Participants engage a Web-based CJA<br />

Tutorial on chest pain. Presenter leads discussion<br />

of the meaning of graphical and statistical feedback<br />

2 [20 m] Participants complete exercise on diagnosis<br />

of pneumonia in 30 patients presenting in an<br />

emergency department. Feedback is discussed.<br />

3 [20 m] Participants complete the second block of<br />

30 pneumonia cases and discuss the feedback.<br />

4 [45 m] Presenter leads discussion of theoretical<br />

foundations of judgment analysis.<br />

5 [45 m] Working in small groups, participants begin<br />

to construct an original CJA problem as a means of<br />

addressing the potential utility of a computer-based<br />

CJA system in their instructional programs.<br />

6 [30 m] Small groups report on their products.


6/3 Norwegian Federation for Medical<br />

Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Eivind Drange<br />

The workshop consists of three parts. All participants<br />

are welcome to attend parts 1 and 2. Part 3 is an<br />

Extraordinary General Assembly of the NFME.<br />

Part 1: 14.00-14.45<br />

Plenary: Reform in a medical school –<br />

needed, wanted, possible?<br />

Kirsti Lonka, Ph.D. Director, Development and Research<br />

Unit, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

University of Helsinki, Finland/Professor in Medical Education,<br />

Karolinska Institutet, Sweden<br />

Medical education is in the constant process of change,<br />

which makes it a dynamic field of study. Typical<br />

proposals for the improvement of undergraduate<br />

medical education have involved teaching the practical<br />

skills needed in general practice and closer integration<br />

of theoretical and clinical studies. Movement towards<br />

problem-based curricula is taking place all over the<br />

world. Also communication studies and professional<br />

growth are emphasized. In Finland, curriculum reforms<br />

have been frequent. Probably the most radical one took<br />

place in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of<br />

Tampere in 1994, when a pure PBL (problem-based<br />

learning) curriculum was started. Faculty of Medicine<br />

at the University of Helsinki began to evaluate and<br />

reform its curriculum of medical studies in 1994. This<br />

process resulted in Helsinki 2000, a hybrid-PBL<br />

curriculum, which was introduced in 1998. In this<br />

program, a systematic programme was also integrated<br />

to support students’ personal growth and to advance<br />

their communication and thinking skills. The main<br />

challenges for such a change process are not economic<br />

or technical, but rather, social and psychological. Most<br />

teachers lack educational training, and their<br />

understanding of the learning process is rather modest.<br />

A new approach to teaching requires medical teachers<br />

to view students as active constructors of knowledge.<br />

However, even though reforms may look good on paper,<br />

their implementation is the main challenge of medical<br />

education. Successful reforms are not possible without<br />

serious scientific research on medical education.<br />

Part 2: 1500-1545<br />

Workshop: NFME and <strong>AMEE</strong> – do we need<br />

them both?<br />

A discussion on the future role of NFME and possible<br />

co-operation with <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

The workshop will start with a closed debate among<br />

the panel followed by an open discussion.<br />

NFME and <strong>AMEE</strong> pursue similar objectives, and in<br />

many ways they fulfil them using the same means.<br />

Because of this, some Nordic institutions have claimed<br />

that there no longer is a need for NFME. At the<br />

workshop we want to challenge this claim and discuss<br />

if and how the two organisations can work side by side<br />

and together.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.52 -<br />

6/4 Bedside Cardiology Skills Training,<br />

featuring “Harvey”, the Cardiology<br />

Patient<br />

Simulator and the UMedic Computer System<br />

Dr Michael S. Gordon, University of Miami School of<br />

Medicine, USA<br />

Dr Joel M Felner, Emory University School of Medicine, USA<br />

Center for Research in Medical Education, P O Box 01690 (D-<br />

41), Miami, FL 33101, USA<br />

Background<br />

As changes in medical care reduce the faculty time and<br />

patients available for teaching, simulation and<br />

multimedia systems are becoming a required<br />

component of medical curricula. The requirement for<br />

the faculty is leadership and a willingness to accept<br />

and implement change.<br />

Aim<br />

The objective of this workshop is to demonstrate the<br />

effective use of simulation to teach and assess bedside<br />

cardiology skills.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The presentation will be interactive, with full audience<br />

participation in the “patient” evaluation through video<br />

projection and audio for impulses, heart sounds and<br />

murmurs. Examples will be presented using the<br />

UMedic multimedia computer system. UMedic features<br />

“Harvey”, a life-sized manikin capable of simulating<br />

the bedside findings of 27 cardiac diseases, including<br />

blood pressure, venous, arterial and precordial impulses<br />

and auscultation. The UMedic system provides a<br />

comprehensive standardized multimedia curriculum in<br />

cardiology that includes the history, bedside findings,<br />

laboratory evaluation and therapy, and measures learner<br />

performance.<br />

6/5 Risk Management in Medical<br />

Education<br />

Directors of Research in Postgraduate Medical<br />

Education Group<br />

Presenters: Dr Kwee Matheson, Dr Alistair Thomson and<br />

Dr Andrew Long<br />

West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 2QZ,<br />

UK<br />

Background<br />

There is worldwide interest in risk management. Studies<br />

in the USA and Australia quote that up to 16% of<br />

hospital admissions suffer adverse events. Costs are<br />

estimated at £2 billion in the UK alone and are<br />

escalating. Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME)<br />

may help doctors prepare to manage and minimise risk,<br />

but medical education itself may need risk<br />

management.<br />

Aims<br />

This workshop aims to identify the issues and to<br />

develop a model for good practice to guide Directors<br />

of PGME (DPGME).


Content and structure<br />

Plenary 30 mins., Group work 1 hour, Report back and<br />

discussion 1 hour.<br />

Participants will explore the relevance of risk<br />

management to PGME by discussing the following<br />

subjects through plenary and small group work, under<br />

the guidance of experienced facilitators:<br />

Why errors occur; How we can learn from mistakes;<br />

Risk management and the learning cycle; Clinical/<br />

critical incident reporting and links with audit; How<br />

can PGME contribute to a safer environment; Trainers<br />

and trainees: both angels and devils; Educational<br />

governance: Standards, Assessment and Poor<br />

Performers; Validity and reliability of current<br />

assessment methods; Culture versus curriculum; The<br />

risks to DPGME; What can the DPGME do to<br />

encourage a pro-active approach to risk management?<br />

Conclusions from this workshop should be a template<br />

to help medical educators fulfill their key role in risk<br />

management.<br />

6/6 The professional and<br />

organisational culture of medical<br />

education – an exploratory<br />

workshop in the context of an<br />

interactive exhibition*<br />

Dr Elizabeth Krajic Kachur, Dr Nobaturo Ban and Hannah<br />

Kedar<br />

Medical Education Development, 201 East 21st Street, Suite<br />

2E, New York, New York 10010, USA<br />

(There will be an exhibition linked to this workshop in<br />

Research Building Seminar Room 1.0020 1st floor<br />

throughout the Conference)<br />

Aims<br />

This session will provide an opportunity to explore and<br />

reflect upon the professional and organizational<br />

environment of medical education as it currently exists<br />

and as it might develop in the future. This increased<br />

awareness should help participants better understand<br />

their current study/work situation and empower them<br />

to move the field into a direction that will assure<br />

progress.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Education professionals, teachers, administrators,<br />

trainees involved in medical education.<br />

Content and structure<br />

• 15min Welcome and introductions<br />

• 15min Exhibition background and orientation<br />

• 30min Individual exploration of exhibition areas<br />

with the help of a worksheet that asks for the<br />

completion of specific questions (e.g., identify what<br />

exhibition area/item makes you feel most “at home,”<br />

list what objects/images you would have expected<br />

to see)<br />

• 30min Discussion of individual experience (first<br />

in pairs and then in a large group format, a list of<br />

adjectives that describe the current cultural climate<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.53 -<br />

will be generated) 30min Medical education in the<br />

future (participants work alone or in pairs, they pick<br />

an exhibition area and draw on a flip chart sheet<br />

what this area would look like in 20 years)<br />

• 30min Presentation and discussion of individual<br />

drawings that get posted on the wall and<br />

incorporated in future exhibitions (at the end of this<br />

discussion a list of adjectives describing the<br />

predicted future culture of medical education is<br />

generated by the group and the two lists are<br />

juxtaposed for an additional debate)<br />

• 15min Strategies for strengthening or changing<br />

culture - What can you do to be an active participant<br />

in your culture? (a list will be generated and a tips<br />

sheet based on the literature will be disseminated)<br />

• 15 min Generation of Take-Home-Points from the<br />

session.<br />

6/7 Students teaching communication<br />

skills<br />

Organisers: Diana Mitter, Heiderose Ortwein, Jan<br />

Schildmann & Gunda Siemssen<br />

Students from Charité, Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Aims<br />

At German medical schools there is a long tradition of<br />

students teaching communication skills in peer groups.<br />

We therefore would like to invite you to experience<br />

different methods we use at the Charité, Medical<br />

Faculty at the Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>. Two options<br />

are available to participants: one session will<br />

demonstrate the work of history taking groups<br />

(Anamnesegruppe) led by student tutors. In parallel<br />

there will be a training for future student tutors of<br />

breaking bad news courses.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Invited are persons interested in teaching<br />

communication skills (professors, students and<br />

administration professionals).<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be divided in two sessions - a<br />

practical part with experimental methods and a second<br />

part including discussion of the following topics:<br />

advantages and disadvantages of student tutors (from<br />

our experience students can learn a lot as tutors of<br />

communication skills courses), quality management<br />

(e.g. training and supervision of future tutors),<br />

comparison of student recruitment in different<br />

countries. A summary of results will be sent to all<br />

participants after the conference.<br />

6/8 Developing professional attitudes<br />

in medical training: theory, practice<br />

and evaluation<br />

Professor Amanda Howe<br />

Dept of Primary Care, University of East Anglia Medical School,<br />

Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK


Aims<br />

To examine the evidence base for effective learning of<br />

professional attitudes in medicine, and to evaluate the<br />

methods through which this aspect of learning can best<br />

be evaluated.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Any educators or researchers interested, particularly<br />

those involved in creating or evaluating the ways in<br />

which professional attitudes can be influenced through<br />

education & training.<br />

Content and structure<br />

Each participant should come prepared to join in by<br />

providing a single overhead, outlining their contribution<br />

to this field (what they do), its evidence base or<br />

theoretical framework (why they do it), and how they<br />

evaluate the impact on professional attitudes. These will<br />

be shared at introduction, and followed by a keynote<br />

of about 20 minutes. We will then work in small groups<br />

to consider a) the level of consensus b) the strengths of<br />

different approaches c) key questions which remain and<br />

how these might be addressed. These will be shared in<br />

plenary at the end.<br />

6/9 <strong>AMEE</strong>-IberoAmerican Network<br />

Workshop<br />

Organiser: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado, <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Background<br />

Over the past few years, participation by teachers and<br />

students from Latin American countries at <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Conferences has been growing steadily. A discussion<br />

forum has been set up to allow them to discuss areas of<br />

particular relevance and interest to them. Because of<br />

the close links that exist between universities in Spain<br />

and Latin America, a new group has been set up,<br />

facilitated by <strong>AMEE</strong>, which will be known as the<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>-IberoAmerican Network for Medical<br />

Education, chaired by Professor Margarita Barón-<br />

Maldonado, President of <strong>AMEE</strong>.<br />

Who should attend<br />

The workshop is open to anyone who wishes to attend.<br />

Comments and suggestions for further topics for<br />

discussion can be Emailed to: amee@dundee.ac.uk<br />

Content and structure<br />

The following topics have been suggested by<br />

participants for initial discussions:<br />

1 What are <strong>AMEE</strong> expectations from the group<br />

function? What are IberoAmerican group<br />

expectations from <strong>AMEE</strong>?<br />

2 Presentations from each country relating to the<br />

current state of medical education, new<br />

developments and challenges;<br />

3 Accreditation of Medical Schools, particularly in<br />

relation to Mercosur;<br />

4 Potential collaboration both within the Network and<br />

with other organisations.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.54 -<br />

6/10 Problem-based Learning<br />

Dr Stewart Mennin, and Dr Scott Obenshain<br />

Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, BMSB, Box 507,<br />

School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque,<br />

New Mexico 87131-5134, USA<br />

6/11 Portfolios as a method of student<br />

assessment<br />

Dr Miriam Friedman Ben-David<br />

Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Tay Park<br />

House, 484 Perth Road, Dundee, DD2 1LR UK<br />

Aim<br />

This workshop aims at informing medical educators<br />

about portfolios.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Medical educators who are interested in innovative<br />

methods of assessing professional behaviours will<br />

benefit from this workshop.<br />

Content and structure<br />

It will contain a review of the use of portfolios,<br />

psychometric aspects unique to portfolio assessment,<br />

selection of portfolio material and guidelines for<br />

implementation. Participants will work in small groups<br />

to design, implement and evaluate administration of<br />

portfolios. Half of the time will be devoted to plenary<br />

presentation and discussions and the other half to small<br />

group work.<br />

6/12 Learning Needs Assessment in<br />

undergraduate and postgraduate<br />

medical education<br />

Professor Janet Grant<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, Walton Hall,<br />

Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK<br />

Aims<br />

• To consider the role of needs assessment in<br />

undergraduate and postgraduate medical education<br />

• To consider and evaluate methods of needs<br />

assessment<br />

• To identify how needs assessment is and can be done<br />

efficiently and effectively<br />

• To consider and evaluate the consequences of needs<br />

assessment for educational planning and review<br />

Who should attend<br />

The workshop concerns only undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate medical education, but participants from<br />

other health care disciplines will be welcome.<br />

Objectives<br />

By the end of the meeting, participants should be able<br />

to:<br />

• State the roles of needs assessment in undergraduate<br />

and postgraduate medical education


• Describe and evaluate the available methods of<br />

educational needs assessment<br />

• Advise about practical needs assessment methods<br />

• Plan the stages that follow on from educational<br />

needs assessment in undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate medical education.<br />

• Offer a critical appreciation of needs assessment in<br />

education.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will consist of a series of short<br />

presentations, with comprehensive handouts. Integrated<br />

with this will be participative group exercises which<br />

will enable participants to review each of the objectives<br />

stated above and make practical plans for their own<br />

situations.<br />

6/13 A European core curriculum?<br />

Prof. dr. Lennart N. Bouman<br />

MedEducad Consultancy, In de Korenmolen 17, 1115 GN<br />

Duivendrecht , The Netherlands<br />

Aim<br />

The aim of the workshop is to produce a set of global<br />

aims and objectives that could act as a common<br />

framework for the medical schools in the European<br />

Community. This framework must fit into the directives<br />

of the European Council on the mutual recognition of<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.55 -<br />

formal qualifications. Secondly it must be adapted to<br />

the profound changes that the professional roles of the<br />

doctor will undergo in the near future.<br />

Who should attend<br />

The workshop will help participants to become familiar<br />

with European legislation on the requirements for<br />

primary medical education and its continuation into<br />

residency and continuing education afterwards. This<br />

may be beneficially to those who will be involved in<br />

future curriculum planning on a local or national scale.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be based on two key papers:<br />

1 European Council Directive 93/16/EEC, from<br />

Internet available as:<br />

http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1993/<br />

en_393L0016.html<br />

2 Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education<br />

from the American Association of Medical Colleges<br />

(AAMC), available as:<br />

http://www.aamc.org/meded/msop/report1.htm<br />

In the first hour we will discuss content and significance<br />

of these two papers (participants are requested to<br />

download these papers and read them prior to the<br />

workshop). In the second hour elements for a core<br />

curriculum will be selected in small group discussions.<br />

The outcomes will be discussed in plenary in the last<br />

hour.


Session 7A New learning technologies<br />

7A1 An international web-based<br />

Master’s degree in Primary Care<br />

Peter Toon* and Trish Greenhalgh<br />

University College London, 137 Roding Road, London E5 0DR,<br />

UK<br />

Worldwide, the academic basis of primary care needs<br />

strengthening. In the UK, Masters’ degrees, usually<br />

part-time over three years, have become important in<br />

this process. Since 1999 University College London<br />

(UCL) has offered a multidisciplinary MSc in Primary<br />

Care, largely through web-based distance learning.<br />

Students, mostly UK based, follow a structured<br />

programme of reading, with exercises to help them<br />

relate their study to previous learning and their<br />

professional life, and work together in virtual group<br />

discussions and seminars using computer conferencing.<br />

As a pilot for the proposed UK “e-university”, we are<br />

now developing a similar course for an international<br />

audience. The scope, methods and content of the<br />

existing course and our qualitative evaluations will be<br />

described, and the issues involved in devising a course<br />

for an international audience in a discipline which has<br />

strong culturally and organisationally specific elements<br />

will be considered.<br />

7A2 Can practical courses on<br />

interpreting blood smears be<br />

substituted by an interactive, webbased<br />

learning programme?<br />

U Woermann*, A Tobler and M Montandon<br />

Division for Instructional Media, Institute of Medical Education,<br />

University of Bern, Inselspital 38, CH-3010 Bern,<br />

SWITZERLAND<br />

In Bern, medical students learn to interpret blood<br />

smears in two practical courses. Because students felt<br />

very unsure in this skill, the web-based programme<br />

HemoSurf was developed. Some students suggested<br />

replacing the course by HemoSurf. How much of their<br />

sureness in interpreting blood smears would students<br />

attribute to HemoSurf? In a questionnaire students<br />

indicated that 61% used HemoSurf, 72% printed<br />

materials, and 11% did not prepare. Students using<br />

HemoSurf invested on average less than an hour, but<br />

attributed 49% of their sureness to HemoSurf and only<br />

30% to the practical courses (six hours). The students<br />

using printed materials spent on average more than an<br />

hour, but attributed only 19% of their sureness to these<br />

materials. We conclude that HemoSurf is an efficient<br />

tool to learn interpretation of blood smears. We will<br />

replace the practical courses by a small group format<br />

discussing the impact of haematological investigations<br />

on clinical medicine.<br />

7A3 The management of student<br />

feedback using the World Wide Web<br />

Stephanie Cobb* and Helen Graham<br />

King’s College, Room 4.14 Henriette Raphael House, Guy’s<br />

Campus, London SE1 9RT, UK<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.56 -<br />

This poster will outline the introduction of web-based<br />

student feedback for large group clinical teaching to<br />

undergraduate medical students. In a pilot study at the<br />

GKT School of Medicine, London, a system for<br />

implementing web-based feedback to replace<br />

traditional paper-based methods was set-up, and the<br />

potential for this method explored. The steps taken in<br />

this process will be illustrated and explained. These<br />

include:<br />

1 The recruitment of teachers and students to an<br />

electronic method of student feedback.<br />

2 The briefing of teachers and students in use of the<br />

system.<br />

3 The implementation of the pilot study.<br />

4 The evaluation of the method.<br />

7A4 Web-based student feedback on<br />

large group teaching: how does it<br />

compare with traditional paper<br />

methods?<br />

Helen Graham* and Stephanie Cobb<br />

Department of Medical and Dental Education, Guys, Kings &<br />

St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, Sherman<br />

Education Centre, 4th floor, Thomas Guy House, London SE1<br />

9RT, UK<br />

Quality assurance is integral to good teaching. It<br />

requires a commitment from students to provide regular<br />

feedback, and from teachers to analyze and act on<br />

information received. The organisation and analysis of<br />

student feedback is time-consuming and difficult to<br />

co-ordinate for a complex clinical course. Web-based<br />

feedback using a dedicated school web-site offers the<br />

advantage of ease of collation of student assessment<br />

ratings and comments. In Year 4 of the undergraduate<br />

course at Guys, Kings and St Thomas’ School of<br />

Medicine, Kings College London, web-based student<br />

feedback of large group teaching was compared with<br />

traditional paper based methods using response rates<br />

and quality of assessments. The preference of teachers<br />

for both methods was assessed and their comments<br />

sought. The advantages and disadvantages of both<br />

methods will be presented.<br />

7A5 Reflection on experiences by using<br />

trigger movies<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan H Bolk and<br />

Peter G M de Jong<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Onderwijscentrum IG, kamer<br />

C5-54, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

During clerkships, students encounter a lot of new<br />

impressive, and sometimes frightening or sad<br />

experiences. At the Leiden University Medical Center,<br />

an obvious need for reflection on this subject becomes<br />

apparent during small group sessions in which case<br />

histories are discussed. Unfortunately no structural<br />

attention is paid to these experiences during the first<br />

few months of clinical education. From the small group


sessions, difficult situations encountered by students<br />

during practice were collected. Situations occurring the<br />

most frequently were translated into script and recorded<br />

on video using actors. Subsequently, these materials<br />

are used as a trigger for discussion in small group<br />

settings under supervision of an experienced physician.<br />

The use of the trigger movies improved the capability<br />

of students to cope with emotions and helped them to<br />

handle difficult situations better during practical work.<br />

7A6 Provision of IT learning facilities for<br />

healthcare education<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

In recent years there has been an increase in the use of<br />

information technology in medical education. This is<br />

in response to a growing recognition of the need to<br />

promote computer literacy among healthcare<br />

professionals. Our main objective was to design and<br />

implement Computer Aided Learning (CAL)<br />

applications, which can be integrated into the healthcare<br />

education curriculum. Hence a logical approach to CAL<br />

was developed by building a team of professionals<br />

which forms a CAL Unit, using existing expertise and<br />

by implementing a process to ensure that the CAL had<br />

a maximum impact upon healthcare education. The<br />

CAL resources include: multimedia learning facilities,<br />

learning guides, computer aided assessment, model<br />

patients, anatomical models, statistical models, IT<br />

interactive learning facilities, teaching and learning<br />

facilities via the Internet, diagnostic and treatment<br />

models. We have now implemented over 27 IT based<br />

learning resources and course evaluations have showed<br />

that these have been well received by users.<br />

7A7 Development and evaluation of an<br />

interactive Computer Assisted<br />

Learning (CAL) programme on<br />

vaginal hysterectomy<br />

Vikram Jha*, Shelley Widdowson, Sean Duffy and<br />

Keith Allenby<br />

St James’s University Hospital, Academic Department of<br />

Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 9, Gledhow Wing, St James’s<br />

Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK<br />

In Gynaecology,understanding of anatomy and surgical<br />

principles involved in vaginal surgery such as vaginal<br />

hysterectomy is often confusing to students and junior<br />

trainees. The aim was to develop a CAL programme in<br />

CD-ROM form combining video, illustrations and<br />

three-dimensional images for better understanding of<br />

vaginal hysterectomy. We used Macromedia’s ‘Director’<br />

to develop the CD-ROM. This allows text, graphics,<br />

video and sound to be combined to create interactive<br />

material. The video was filmed and edited at the<br />

Hospital. The illustrations were resized and exported<br />

as quick time. The three-dimensional images were<br />

created using anatomical models and True Space<br />

programme. The CD-ROM has been piloted amongst<br />

fourth year students. It has received a positive response.<br />

It is intended to demonstrate the CD-ROM and present<br />

the evaluation results at the meeting.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.57 -<br />

7A8 Links from ultrasound to anatomy -<br />

how is a multimedia teacher<br />

accepted?<br />

Dietmar Borchert*, Gunnar Schley, Edda Klotz,<br />

Peter Rauh, Clemens Reisinger and Thomas Medveczky<br />

Humboldt - University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Medical Faculty, Department<br />

of Study Organisation, Schumanstrasse 20-21, 10117 <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Since Spring 1998 a group of students has tried to<br />

establish a multimedia teacher existing of ultrasound<br />

machines, computer, specialized monitors and<br />

additional mulitmedia tools. Students from the first<br />

course were educated in ultrasound in parallel with the<br />

normal anatomy curriculum. In small groups of 4<br />

students they learned to handle ultrasound machines<br />

and to integrate their knowledge of anatomy with<br />

practical experience. The multimedia teacher was<br />

equipped with ultrasound software, videos and weblinks.<br />

The computer can be driven via wireless, handheld<br />

mouse menus. Pictures of special interest with<br />

hyperlink-explanation can be loaded and structures on<br />

the ultrasound images can be compared and identified.<br />

Students are able to save and edit their own images.<br />

We tried to estimate how web-based and multimedia<br />

learning is accepted by students and if early handling<br />

of ultrasound machines improves knowledge in<br />

anatomy.<br />

7A9 Development of a computer-based<br />

simulation: the Dynamic Patient<br />

Simulator<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, J M van Baalen,<br />

E M Schoonderwaldt<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Heelkunde Onderwijs K6-R,<br />

Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

For obvious ethical and legal reasons it is not allowed<br />

for students to practise medicine on patients without<br />

supervision. At Leiden University Medical Center a<br />

computer-based simulation program, the Dynamic<br />

Patient Simulator (DPS), was developed to overcome<br />

this restriction. DPS provides medical students with<br />

the opportunity to practise medicine on a virtual patient,<br />

offering all the possible diagnostic and therapeutic<br />

actions as in real life. Students can practise making<br />

decisions autonomously, considering the state of the<br />

patient and accepting responsibility for the<br />

consequences. Students therefore acquire clinical<br />

experience in an early stage of their studies and are<br />

encouraged to fill gaps in their knowledge. DPS can<br />

be used in the absence of a teacher because a built-in<br />

assistance system attempts to help students on request,<br />

depending on the student’s preceding actions. The<br />

system provides feedback, gives a final score and can<br />

therefore be used as a self-test.<br />

7A10 Introduction of laptop computers in<br />

Leiden Medical School<br />

Peter G M de Jong*, Hermiette E Idenburg and<br />

Henk L Hendrix<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, P O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS


In 1998, the board of the Leiden University Medical<br />

Center decided to introduce information and<br />

communication technology (ICT) in the medical<br />

curriculum to prepare students for their professional<br />

life as a medical doctor. To attain this goal, special<br />

facilities for students have been created in 2000 to buy<br />

a laptop computer. For students, participation in the<br />

laptop-project is voluntary and only first-year students<br />

are allowed to join. Participants pay only one-third of<br />

Session 7B Problem-based learning<br />

7B1 Measuring success: partnership in<br />

evaluation (work in progress report)<br />

P O’Neill, D Graham, A Garden, S. Watmough*, J Brown<br />

University of Liverpool, Curricular Development Unit,<br />

Department of Primary Care, 2nd Floor Thornley Building,<br />

Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK<br />

An innovative collaborative evaluation project is taking<br />

place between the Universities of Liverpool and<br />

Manchester and the Mersey Deanery. The goal is to<br />

assess whether the new problem-based learning<br />

curricula at Liverpool and Manchester are producing<br />

Pre-registration House Officers who are capable of<br />

meeting the competencies expected by the General<br />

Medical Council and the National Health Service.<br />

Preliminary work at Liverpool has involved<br />

questionnaire surveys of Educational Supervisors and<br />

Pre-registration House Officers. Mersey Deanery has<br />

delivered questionnaires to Pre-registration House<br />

Officers in the area. University of Manchester has<br />

compiled data on cohorts from the old curriculum<br />

whilst continuing to work with Pre-registration House<br />

Officers who have graduated from the new curriculum.<br />

Further questionnaires, focus groups and interviews<br />

will be held to gauge differences between old and new<br />

curricula cohorts and assess the educational aspects of<br />

the PRHO year.<br />

7B2 A new PBL course with an<br />

examination with standardised<br />

patients at the end<br />

S Schewe*, C Mueller and R Putz<br />

Medizinische Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universitat, Ludwig-<br />

Maximilians-Universitat, Pettenkoferstr 8a, D-80336 Munich,<br />

GERMANY<br />

A new problem-based learning (PBL) course dealing<br />

with disorders of the musculoskeletal system (MuSkel)<br />

was introduced at Ludwig-Maximilians University<br />

(LMU) Medical School lasting 4 weeks. All 234 4th year students were enrolled in the summer term 2000.<br />

For the first time at the LMU an examination with<br />

standardised patients has been carried out at the end of<br />

this course. MuSkel followed 3 other PBL-courses<br />

successively implemented at the LMU. With the new<br />

form of this examination other insights into correctable<br />

deficits of medical education could be found, e.g. the<br />

demand of teaching a more structured clinical<br />

examination, of teaching problem-solving strategies,<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.58 -<br />

the total costs, the Medical Center pays for all other<br />

costs. Insurance of the laptop is included, as well as<br />

access to a specially designed wireless network. Effects<br />

of introducing laptops have been evaluated by a<br />

questionnaire performed in January 2001 among all<br />

first-year students. This questionnaire shows that the<br />

use of Internet and Microsoft Office has increased<br />

enormously, but teachers do not take advantage of the<br />

possibilities presented.<br />

considering cost-effectiveness and time constraints of<br />

ambulatory medicine. The opinion of the students about<br />

this type of examination was very positive. Focussing<br />

on practical skills assessment gave further insights in<br />

deficits which could be partially corrected in the second<br />

MuSkel course in the winter term 2000/2001.<br />

7B3 Training the problem-based<br />

learning tutor: implementation<br />

issues<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

Problem-based learning (PBL) is widely regarded as a<br />

useful strategy to improve students’ learning in Medical<br />

School and to prepare graduates for the informational<br />

challenges of the years to come. This has led to many<br />

medical schools adopting this educational approach,<br />

which increases the need to train tutors to facilitate PBL<br />

groups. Therefore, we developed a PBL training<br />

programme for medical teachers. The training<br />

programme, which lasts for four weeks, is devoted to<br />

acquainting teachers with the key elements of PBL.<br />

The principles, the seven steps, the tutorial sessions,<br />

group interaction, information management, critical<br />

analysis skills, assessment and evaluation of PBL group<br />

sessions were also dealt with during this period. The<br />

role of the group tutor to facilitate and not to lecture<br />

was emphasised, as well as the goals of PBL. The tutors<br />

practised acting as PBL tutor, scribe and group member.<br />

Evaluation of the course showed that it has wide appeal<br />

and has been well received by the teachers. The<br />

strongest influence for any modifications made have<br />

come from the teachers who have participated in the<br />

course and they had recommended for the programme<br />

to continue. We therefore recommend it as a realistic<br />

way of training teachers as PBL facilitators.<br />

7B4 PBL in Psychiatry - the Holocaust:<br />

a unique experience<br />

T Fischel*, T Weizman and G Zalsman<br />

Geha Psychiatric Center, 13 Tsel Hagiva, Ramat Gan 52374,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

Planning a rotation in psychiatry meets a major<br />

problem: whether and how to incorporate an inner touch


in the student’s soul. Group dynamic and projective<br />

“games” are some of the possible methods. Teaching<br />

and learning about the holocaust and its emotional<br />

implications, is another challenging problem. We aim<br />

not to be reductive by teaching psychiatric diagnoses.<br />

In order to meet those two difficulties we constructed<br />

a PBL session. The goal was to produce a learning<br />

experience, which involved a controlled emotional<br />

touch. The case was about a “child survivor”, who<br />

organized his life and personality as a stiff and<br />

demanding character, and appeared in the emergency<br />

room with somatic complains. Besides theoretical<br />

subjects such as PTSD, somatization disorders and<br />

obsessive-compulsive personality, the students learned<br />

about “child survivor” “survivors` guilt” “second<br />

generation”. The presentation includes the case, the<br />

emotional response and the students’ feedback to this<br />

unique experience.<br />

7B5 Clinical skills of medical students<br />

participating in lecture-based<br />

versus problem-oriented training<br />

W Rimpau<br />

Park-Klinik Weissensee, Abteilung fur Neurologie, Schonstrasse<br />

80, 13086 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Medical education in Germany is theory-oriented. New<br />

methods to improve and evaluate skills are needed.The<br />

study was designed to determine whether students with<br />

lecture-based versus problem oriented training in<br />

neurology have different clinical skills. A prospective<br />

cohort study was carried out. The outcomes of a<br />

modified version of the objective structured long<br />

examination record (OSLER) were compared between<br />

two groups of students. Group I (n=20): Students of<br />

the Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, with a 4-month<br />

reform-elective in their final (sixth) year of medical<br />

training. Their previous training has been lecture-based.<br />

Group II (n=25): Students with a 6 week neurology<br />

training in their fourth year at the University Witten-<br />

Herdecke, who have a problem oriented curriculum<br />

throughout their entire training. Students of the lecturebased<br />

group showed satisfying but significantly worse<br />

outcomes.<br />

7B6 Systematic observations of<br />

problem-based study groups - what<br />

do they reveal?<br />

K Lonka*, P Sauri and N Paganus<br />

University of Helsinki, Leiviskatie 2 E 64, Fin-00440 Helsinki,<br />

FINLAND<br />

The curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine at the<br />

University of Helsinki was changed towards PBL in<br />

1998. The aims of the present study are: 1) To see how<br />

the new approach to teaching and learning works, and<br />

whether something should be done to improve it, and<br />

2) to see whether group functioning is related to<br />

students’ study success. A systematic observation of<br />

tutorial groups was carried out during Spring term<br />

2001. A closing session of all 14 first-year tutorial<br />

groups (10-12 students in each) was observed once.<br />

All students and their tutors were given questionnaires<br />

which were filled in after a tutorial session. A specific<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.59 -<br />

observation sheet was also developed and an external<br />

observer was hired. The observer also gave feedback<br />

to the group. Data are presented that consist of the<br />

questionnaire data, a summary of observation forms,<br />

and study success of each group.<br />

7B7 “Pathomechanisms” - a 9-week<br />

integrative and problem-based<br />

learning oriented course within the<br />

3rd year of the curriculum at the<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus,<br />

Technical University Dresden<br />

Oliver Tiebel*, Ines Nitsche and Andreas Deussen for the<br />

Core Planning Group<br />

Institute of Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine, Medical<br />

Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr 74, 01307<br />

Dresden, GERMANY<br />

To prepare physicians for the changing demands of<br />

future developments in medicine the Dresden Medical<br />

Faculty is restructuring its curriculum implementing<br />

problem-based learning elements. The changes start<br />

from the 3rd year of the curriculum. This year -<br />

equivalent to the first clinical year - consists of 4 PBLcourses:<br />

“Pathomechanisms” (9 weeks), “Basics of<br />

Pharmacotherapy” (6 weeks), “Infectiology” (11<br />

weeks) and “Emergency Medicine” (3 weeks). In this<br />

presentation we will focus on the structure and<br />

organization of the “Pathomechanisms” course which<br />

has been organized as an interdisciplinary enterprise<br />

including pathology, laboratory medicine,<br />

pathophysiology and pathobiochemistry. Cases<br />

discussed in small groups of students and tutored by<br />

experienced mentors are supplemented by lectures<br />

specifically related to the case topic and course<br />

objectives. Additionally students have two practical<br />

classes each week focussing on pathology and clinical<br />

pathology. A clinical examination class which extends<br />

over the entire study year supplements the course.<br />

7B8 Characteristics of tutors’<br />

assessment by students when PBL<br />

is being implemented<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Marcela Lopez-Cabrera<br />

National Autonomous University of Mexico, Porto Alegre 259,<br />

“A-402”. Col. San Andres Tetepilco, Delegacion Iztapalapa, DF<br />

09440, MEXICO<br />

The students’ perception regarding the performance of<br />

the tutor has particular characteristics when PBL is<br />

being implemented, since they are going through a<br />

transitional process from a traditional to a studentcentered<br />

approach. Thus, the tutor’s performance must<br />

be adequately monitored, given that the students are<br />

adapting to the teacher´s new role. In order to assess<br />

the tutor’s performance, we selected the functions that<br />

are most significant of the change in their new role,<br />

and that are directly related to the tasks of the students,<br />

that is, those functions the students might have an<br />

opinion about whether they are being adequately<br />

accomplished, and if the tutor’s performance is<br />

facilitating their learning. The elements of the tutor’s<br />

performance that were selected to be evaluated are:<br />

support in knowledge elaboration; directing the


learning process; promoting knowledge integration;<br />

stimulating group member interaction; respect for the<br />

students; warmth and accountability.<br />

7B9 From traditional teachers to PBL<br />

tutors: how to start the change?<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Lizbeth Mendoza-Morales<br />

National Autonomous University of Mexico, Porto Alegre 259,<br />

“A-402”. Col. San Andres Tetepilco, Delegacion Iztapalapa, DF<br />

09440, MEXICO<br />

One of the most difficult elements to change for<br />

achieving successful implementation of PBL, in<br />

traditional curriculum schools, is the acceptance of the<br />

teachers’ new role as tutors. In this project a program<br />

is presented, whose main challenge has been to<br />

demonstrate the advantages of PBL over the traditional<br />

teaching system. To do so, a 60-hour workshop was<br />

designed in which sceptical teachers are presented with<br />

the theoretical and methodological basis of PBL, so<br />

that they themselves can find the answers to their many<br />

questions.This workshop has been developed<br />

throughout 6 years, working with teachers from the<br />

basic and clinical sciences. Included are the educational<br />

theories that are the basis of PBL components, the<br />

“How to” apply it to the students’ learning process,<br />

evaluation methods and some of the methodological<br />

approaches important for educational research<br />

development.<br />

7B10 Development of a problem-based<br />

curriculum leads to enhancement<br />

in faculty development - the<br />

Dresden experience<br />

N Lorenz*, T Aretz, E Armstrong and the Harvard-<br />

Dresden Medical Education Alliance<br />

Technical University, Dresden Carl Gustav Carus, Children’s<br />

Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Session 7C Curriculum planning and change<br />

7C1 A model of curriculum management<br />

in an integrated medical curriculum<br />

Gregory J S Tan* and B E Mustaffa<br />

International Medical University, Sesama Centre, Plaza<br />

Komanwel, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA<br />

Curriculum management is an integral component of<br />

any curriculum. The success of curriculum<br />

development and implementation to a certain extent<br />

depends on how well the curriculum is being managed.<br />

Creation of tiers of responsibilities to provide the<br />

management structure and a well-defined line of<br />

communication and standing operating procedures<br />

allow “checks and balances” to be instituted to the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.60 -<br />

Medical education in Germany needs innovative<br />

approaches to face the challenges of medicine in the<br />

21st century. Therefore, an educational alliance<br />

between Harvard Medical International and the<br />

Technical University of Dresden (TUD) is restructuring<br />

TUD’s undergraduate medical curriculum by using an<br />

interdisciplinary approach since 1999. Problem-based<br />

learning is incorporated in integrated classes consisting<br />

of lectures, tutorials and practical training. To foster<br />

the new curriculum, to establish a high quality of<br />

education, and to train faculty members in PBLmethods<br />

a faculty training program was developed<br />

simultaneously. A tutor-training group educated 120<br />

faculty members in an 18-month period. When the<br />

development of the curriculum after the 2nd state<br />

examination led to a demand for new and more complex<br />

teaching and assessment methods a transition of the<br />

“tutor-training group” to a working group for faculty<br />

development was made. The process and methods will<br />

be described in detail.<br />

7B11 An orientation programme for 1st<br />

year students in a problemorientated<br />

MBChB curriculum - the<br />

Pretoria experience<br />

Pierre L Bredenkamp<br />

Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, P O Box<br />

19063, Tygerberg 7505, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

Because the Pretoria medical school changed its model<br />

of teaching and training from a traditional to a problemorientated<br />

integrated one, an orientation programme<br />

(which lasts two weeks) was introduced before the first<br />

block. Five aims were set for the programme, focusing<br />

on information, support, motivation, opportunity and<br />

exposure. Detail regarding these objectives, as well as<br />

the outline of the programme as a whole, will be given.<br />

Every student received a block book, and the 35<br />

learning sessions, as well as the 10 visits, were<br />

evaluated. The method of this evaluation and the results<br />

will be made available. The recommendations which<br />

had been made, will also be shown.<br />

management of the curriculum. This paper describes<br />

how the International Medical University (IMU) utilises<br />

the above principles to manage its medical curriculum<br />

in a 3-tier management structure. The structure is<br />

dynamic and it allows an exposition of the curriculum<br />

philosophy and monitoring of the curriculum (an<br />

internal audit) through its structural linkage. Its<br />

dynamism is further reflected in the coherent<br />

participation and ownership of the curriculum by all<br />

Faculty members as one would expect in the<br />

management of a modern medical curriculum.


7C2 The University of Rochester’s<br />

Double Helix Curriculum<br />

Elaine F Dannefer<br />

University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue,<br />

Box 601, Rochester NY 14642, USA<br />

Beginning in 1999, a fourth-year, interdisciplinary<br />

curriculum has been phased in at the University of<br />

Rochester. Called the Double Helix Curriculum, this<br />

curriculum integrates basic science and clinical<br />

medicine throughout the four years of undergraduate<br />

education with the clinical strand comprising<br />

approximately 30 of curricular time in years one and<br />

two and 70% in years three and four, with the basic<br />

science strand representing the converse. An 18-month<br />

ambulatory clerkship in years 1 and 2 is followed by<br />

inpatient clerkships and electives. Students begin their<br />

education with a course that provides the foundation<br />

for the practice of evidence based medicine and<br />

includes biostatistics, epidemiology and skills related<br />

to searching and evaluating the scientific literature.<br />

Two-week long comprehensive assessments at the end<br />

of years 2 and 3 provide feedback for students as well<br />

as a means of assessing the curriculum.<br />

7C3 Academic administration and<br />

mixed programmes<br />

S Sharma Khanal* and S Koirala<br />

B P Koirala Institute, Dharan, NEPAL<br />

The B.P. Koirala Institute is a Health Sciences<br />

University in Nepal with undergraduate courses in<br />

medicine, nursing, dentistry and allied health sciences<br />

plus postgraduate courses to PhD level. This poses an<br />

overwhelming challenge for maintaining harmonious<br />

and positive administrative approaches. It becomes<br />

further intensified as trained manpower is scarce in<br />

Nepal and the potential danger of manpower leaving<br />

the Institute has led to new approaches to retain<br />

teachers. These will be presented in the poster.<br />

7C4 Learning responsibly -<br />

implementing written guidelines for<br />

medical students<br />

Richard Phillips*, Ann Wylie and Anne Stephenson<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy’s King’s<br />

and St Thomas’ Medical School, King’s College London, Weston<br />

Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK<br />

Contemporary medical undergraduate curricula include<br />

early patient contact in community settings. Whilst<br />

there may be concurrent teaching in ethics, the focus<br />

of this may be on the behaviour of a qualified doctor;<br />

what of the students’ responsibilities to patients and<br />

each other? As a department, we have 1,800 students<br />

placed in hundreds of community settings during the<br />

year, and we are concerned about student awareness of<br />

their current ethical responsibilities. We prepared<br />

written guidelines for students about responsible<br />

learning. Questionnaire follow-up in 1999-2000<br />

showed only 121 of 263 students definitely had read<br />

the booklet (of these 121, the majority found it helpful),<br />

and 20% said they had lost it altogether. For 2000-2001<br />

modifications were made in delivery and highlighting<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.61 -<br />

the material, and the questionnaire repeated. This<br />

presentation reports on more detailed results of both<br />

questionnaires and will discuss the modifications and<br />

the implications.<br />

7C5 HEICUMED - a novel approach to<br />

student medical education at the<br />

Medical Faculty of the University of<br />

Heidelberg, Germany<br />

Hubert J Bardenheuer* on behalf of the HEICUMED<br />

Group<br />

Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld<br />

346, 69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />

Heidelberg Medical Faculty developed “HEICUMED“,<br />

in which the clinical years are completely reorganized<br />

into organ-related block courses (“modules”). Modules<br />

are taught multiple times during the year in small<br />

student groups. A multidisciplinary planning group<br />

redesigned the original plan and combined the modules<br />

into interdisciplinary “clusters”, such as surgery and<br />

medicine. Strong connections between the various<br />

disciplines are guaranteed by lectures and cases related<br />

to leading symptoms. Subjects like pathology,<br />

radiology, clinical laboratory, etc are all integrated into<br />

the topics of the week and taught alongside. This novel<br />

approach of student education is directed to<br />

significantly improve:<br />

• students’ clinical and practical instructions and<br />

keeping training of medical facts at a high level;<br />

• the personal interactions with faculty members;<br />

• case-related problems in which all pieces of<br />

knowledge in clinical medicine have to be<br />

connected; and<br />

• teamwork by encouraging studying in groups and<br />

establishing PBL group learning.<br />

7C6 Enhancing curriculum renewal<br />

through a “clinical presentation”<br />

approach to undergraduate medical<br />

education<br />

Nehad El-Sawi<br />

University of Health Sciences, 1750 Independence Avenue,<br />

Kansas City, MO 64106, USA<br />

UHSCOM has revised its ‘discipline based’ curriculum<br />

and adopted the ‘integrative clinical presentation<br />

curriculum’ modelled, in part, after the Calgary<br />

curriculum. The discipline-based curriculum<br />

emphasized traditional basic sciences but lacked<br />

integration throughout disciplines, and across the four<br />

years. The integrative Clinical Presentation curriculum<br />

combined a strong knowledge base of basic and clinical<br />

sciences where clinical instruction guides basic science<br />

learning. Each clinical presentation began with a<br />

decision tree review, demonstration of its use, and a<br />

series of lectures covering the related basic and clinical<br />

sciences, ending with opportunities to practice<br />

diagnostic reasoning. The integration of subject matter<br />

created a coherent foundation for students` subsequent<br />

efforts at organizing the relationships between various<br />

basic and clinical science concepts.


7C7 Continuous training in General<br />

Practice as an integral part of an<br />

undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

- the Witten/Herdecke Model<br />

(Germany)<br />

W Kunstmann*, Dieter Wollgarten, René Vollenbroich<br />

and Markus Gschwind<br />

University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, GERMANY<br />

Changes in the demographic composition of our<br />

population as well as changes in health care delivery<br />

will strengthen the role of general practitioners in the<br />

future. However, undergraduate medical education has<br />

not yet appropriately responded to the outlined secular<br />

trends, and training for students in respective settings<br />

is broadly missing. At the University of Witten/<br />

Herdecke (Germany) a course for continuous training<br />

in general practice has been established as a mandatory<br />

part of its undergraduate medical curriculum.<br />

Beginning in year 1 and ending in year 5, students will<br />

perform 6 training units in general practice, each of 14<br />

days’ length. Each unit is structured by a training<br />

manual, containing specific tasks to be performed by<br />

students under supervision of their doctors. Tasks cover<br />

areas such as communication, history taking, physical<br />

examination, long-term patient care, prevention as well<br />

as economic and management aspects of health care<br />

delivery. The course design and its learning objectives<br />

will be presented.<br />

7C8 Developing sense of ownership for<br />

curriculum changes within all<br />

teaching faculty of an Asian<br />

medical school<br />

C B Hazlett*, T F Fok, S S C Chung and J C Y Cheng<br />

Office of Educational Services, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese<br />

University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New<br />

Territories, HONG KONG<br />

Major curriculum changes are difficult, and prove to<br />

be eventually ineffective if there is no wide<br />

endorsement among the teaching staff. At the Chinese<br />

University of Hong Kong a curriculum change designed<br />

to enhanced skills (clinical, communication, and life<br />

long learning), as well as for enhancing integration of<br />

basic, social and clinical skills throughout the entire<br />

five years of its medical undergraduate programme<br />

were proposed by the Faculty’s leaders. Initially, many<br />

teaching staff regarded such a change to be of dubious<br />

need and of low priority, particularly in comparison to<br />

other work obligations in clinical service and/or in their<br />

basic or clinical research. The steps taken and methods<br />

used to effect changes in attitude towards, to build<br />

support for and to develop a sense of ownership of the<br />

changes within the entire teaching staff are given in<br />

this presentation. The process of introducing the<br />

curriculum change is still ongoing, but the approaches<br />

used to date have successfully co-opted a reasonably<br />

high level of willingness and cooperation in at least<br />

designing and beginning the implementation of change.<br />

Mechanisms for securing this cooperation within an<br />

Asian medical school context are compared and<br />

contrasted with methods frequently proposed and used<br />

in medical schools operating in Western societies.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.62 -<br />

7C9 Sci45: Framework for the<br />

implementation of a career<br />

guidance instrument<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and<br />

Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, MILTON KEYNES MK7 6AA, UK<br />

The rigorous psychometric development of the<br />

Specialty Choice Inventory [Sci45] was reported at the<br />

1999 <strong>AMEE</strong> meeting. This 130-item instrument<br />

matches respondents to 45 specialties. The successful<br />

implementation of Sci45 depends on its flexibility to<br />

respond to many different needs. To date, six potential<br />

uses for Sci45 are being developed:<br />

• Availability on CD-ROM for individual use;<br />

• Use for final year medical students to assist them<br />

in their career choice: about 20% of career choices<br />

are made at this stage;<br />

• For hospital clinical tutors to offer to all doctors in<br />

training;<br />

• Development of Sci45 to include subspecialty<br />

profiles so that selection panels can ensure a wide<br />

range of trainees for a range of subspecialty posts;<br />

• For research into variables that might impinge on<br />

successful progress through the training grades;<br />

• To provide independent feedback to selection panels<br />

to help them reflect on their decisions.<br />

7C10 The facilitation process in a<br />

problem-based curriculum at the<br />

Nelson R. Mandela School of<br />

Medicine<br />

Jacqueline van Wyk, Peter Olmesdahl, Veena Singaram*<br />

and Michelle McLean<br />

University of Natal, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education<br />

Development, Private Bag 7, PBX Congella, 4013, SOUTH<br />

AFRICA<br />

The Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine’s studentcentred,<br />

5-year, problem-based curriculum greatly<br />

emphasizes the role of students as self-directed learners.<br />

Large group resource sessions are scheduled with the<br />

objective of introducing students to concepts and<br />

principles. Students are expected to use a variety of<br />

resources to solve their cases/problems, hopefully<br />

engendering deep learning strategies. Groups of<br />

students from diverse cultural and social backgrounds<br />

meet twice weekly (2 x 2h sessions) for small group<br />

sessions. Problem identification and resolution are two<br />

phases monitored by facilitators in order to guide and<br />

check whether learning outcomes (as identified by<br />

module designers) are achieved by students. This report<br />

describes various aspects of facilitation within the<br />

Faculty, including selection of facilitators, training, their<br />

role, perceptions of facilitators prior to and after a<br />

module and their experiences during the module.<br />

Student perceptions of the role of facilitators are also<br />

discussed.


Session 7D Curriculum evaluation/staff development<br />

7D1 Students’ feedback: a public health<br />

course in medical education<br />

Eva Rasky*, Wolfgang Freidl; Willibald-Julius Stronegger<br />

Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Karl-Franzens-<br />

University Graz, Universitaetsstrasse 6/I, A-8010 Graz,<br />

AUSTRIA<br />

Since 1999 Austrian universities have been required<br />

by law to evaluate the teaching competence of their<br />

faculty. The Institute of Social Medicine and<br />

Epidemiology, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, started<br />

evaluating its courses in 1998. Public health is a<br />

required one-week course within the medical school<br />

curriculum. We used a standardized questionnaire<br />

developed by an expert committee of this university<br />

including five sections with ratings on 5-point scales.<br />

The students answered the questionnaire at the end of<br />

the module, therefore the response rate was nearly<br />

100%. The performance of three teachers in the time<br />

period from 1998 to 2000 was analysed by descriptive<br />

analysis of 240 questionnaires. Around 60% of the<br />

students were female and 40% were male. The results<br />

and the relevance of evaluating public health courses<br />

will be discussed.<br />

7D2 Action Research Methodology: a<br />

possible framework for course<br />

evaluations<br />

Alison Rushton* and Gill James<br />

Coventry University, School of Health & Social Sciences, Priory<br />

Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK<br />

The process of curriculum design incorporates<br />

evaluation of existing courses. This paper describes a<br />

possible methodology for such evaluations. A<br />

conceptual framework, based upon action research<br />

methodology, was developed; combining diagnosis<br />

with reflection. This framework was used in the<br />

evaluation of a physiotherapy undergraduate course in<br />

the UK. The course was structured around a thematic<br />

approach, whereby the core areas of physiotherapy<br />

practice informed the course design. The diagnostic<br />

phase identified all aspects impinging upon the success<br />

of the programme. All stakeholders (including students,<br />

tutors and funding bodies) were targeted for the data<br />

collection phase. Reflection is seen as an important<br />

component of the action research cycle, facilitating<br />

prescription of data collection methods (which included<br />

focus groups, questionnaires, module evaluations and<br />

analysis of existing documentation). These data were<br />

analysed and triangulated and the results provided a<br />

reasoned justification for maintaining and<br />

strengthening the thematic approach of this course.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.63 -<br />

7D3 The opinion of graduates of the<br />

Faculty of Medicine of the<br />

University of Barcelona on the new<br />

medical curriculum<br />

J Palés*, A Gual, A Vallés, Ma T Estrach, F Climent,<br />

X Gasull, R Gilabert, A Llobet, Y Compta, L Peri and<br />

J A Bombi<br />

Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Medicina, Departmento<br />

de Ciencias Fisiologicas I., Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona,<br />

SPAIN<br />

Our Faculty introduced in 1994 a new curriculum that<br />

has represented a significant change from the old one.<br />

To evaluate the results of this curriculum in order to<br />

facilitate appropriate future development, a<br />

questionnaire was administered to the graduates, asking<br />

about their opinion on the following aspects:<br />

accomplishment of the curriculum objectives, the<br />

quality of medical education offered by the Faculty,<br />

the influence of the national board examination on the<br />

development of the curriculum, the effort that the new<br />

curriculum requires of the students and the strong and<br />

weak points of the program. 120 students (80% of total<br />

students) answered the questionnaire. In general, the<br />

acceptance of the new curriculum by the students was<br />

high although some deficiencies have been detected.<br />

The information furnished by the graduates will be<br />

useful in introducing the necessary modifications to<br />

improve our educational program in the coming years.<br />

7D4 Comenius University Quality<br />

Assurance System (CUQAS) and<br />

students’ participation in graduate<br />

medical education evaluation<br />

L Plank*, J Danko, E Rozborilova, P Galajda and K Dokus<br />

Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Dean’s Office, Comenius<br />

University, Zaborskeho 2, SVK 036 45 MARTIN, SLOVAK<br />

REPUBLIC<br />

We believe that students should take an active part in<br />

the process of education evaluation applied at the<br />

Jessenius Medical Faculty. Students in the 11th and 12th<br />

semester were asked to answer an anonymous<br />

questionnaire on education quality in four basic clinical<br />

subjects (four-grade-quality-system). Questions related<br />

to the structure and content of lectures, teachers´<br />

approach towards students, contacts with patients and<br />

others. In contrast to prevailing positive evaluations<br />

within the scale of “fully”, “partially satisfied” and<br />

“more satisfied than unsatisfied”, less than 1/5 of<br />

students were “not satisfied” with at least one of the<br />

evaluated education components. The education quality<br />

evaluation system helps the faculty management to<br />

improve educational standards and to identify its weak<br />

and strong components. In the future, this is planned<br />

to be applied annually for the whole graduate education<br />

within the uniform CUQAS system and database.


7D5 Research in medical education:<br />

constructing an ethical framework<br />

E B Peile* and A Slowther<br />

Department of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford,<br />

Chiltern Waters, 1 Stablebridge Road, Aston Clinton, Bucks<br />

HP22 5ND, UK<br />

Proposals for research in medical education are<br />

frequently submitted to UK medical research ethics<br />

committees, which are more accustomed to considering<br />

the implications of research on patients than research<br />

on learners. After reviewing relevant codes for<br />

educational research, we propose an adaptation to a<br />

framework of medical research ethics for use in medical<br />

education research. Key issues in our suggested<br />

framework include:<br />

• Scientific validity of the research on medical<br />

education<br />

• Safety aspects, including<br />

- risk to the students’ psychological well-being<br />

- risk to patients from exposure to learners<br />

• Consent procedure:<br />

- are students fully informed about the study and<br />

the implications for their education?<br />

- is consent voluntary and without coercion?<br />

• Confidentiality issues, including whether examiners<br />

or assessors will have access to research<br />

information.<br />

We discuss some ethics considerations, which may help<br />

to inform the critical appraisal of research projects in<br />

medical education and thereby encourage good<br />

practice.<br />

7D6 Students’ perceptions of the<br />

Physiology course in a traditional<br />

medical school<br />

F Riggione*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez<br />

Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Educacion Medica,<br />

Escuela de Medicina “Luis Razetti”, Facultad de Medicina,<br />

Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Apartado de<br />

Correos No 90.350, El Hatillo 1083A, VENEZUELA<br />

Students’ perceptions of learning experiences<br />

contribute to a better understanding of the need for<br />

curricular reform. We explored the opinion of 2nd year<br />

medical students after their 36 week Physiology course<br />

of lectures and laboratory sessions. 166 students<br />

received a 25 item survey and 146 responses (88%)<br />

were evaluated. 76% of the respondents attended 50%<br />

or less of the lectures. 64% considered the course to be<br />

detailed and 57% to be complex. 34% considered it<br />

relevant and 34% difficult. Teachers were considered<br />

competent by 56%, accessible by 51% and rigid by<br />

48%. On a 5 point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 5 = very<br />

much) their experience of the course was defined as<br />

significant (mean score = 3.65), pleasurable (2.51) and<br />

stressing (2.28), while it lacked “feeling of discovery”<br />

(0.55) and motivation (0.37). 41% of respondents<br />

indicated to have learnt 50% or less of the course<br />

contents, and only 9% indicated learning >70%.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.64 -<br />

7D7 Students’ perceptions of a<br />

traditional undergraduate course in<br />

Microbiology<br />

Z Uzcategui*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez<br />

Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Educacion Medica,<br />

Escuela de Medicina “Luis Razetti”, Facultad de Medicina,<br />

Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Apartado de<br />

Correos No 90.350, El Hatillo 1083A, VENEZUELA<br />

Microbiology can be an abstruse subject for medical<br />

students. We explored the opinion of our students after<br />

their 36 week traditional Microbiology course of<br />

lectures and laboratory sessions in the 2nd year. 187<br />

students completed a 25 item survey of their<br />

experiences in the course. 71% of respondents attended<br />

50% or less of the lectures and 100% attended >85%<br />

of the compulsory laboratory sessions. 68% thought<br />

the course was relevant, 41% found it detailed and 24%<br />

excessive. Teachers were considered competent (79%),<br />

accessible (69%), interested (66%) and stimulating<br />

(41%). The students defined their learning experience<br />

by grading items on a 5 point Likert scale (0 = not at<br />

all, 5 = very much), as significant (mean score = 4.15),<br />

creating a “feeling of discovery” (4.08), leading to new<br />

questions (3.88), pleasurable (3.7) and stimulating<br />

(3.63). 88% of respondents indicated to have learnt<br />

>50% of the course’s contents.<br />

7D8 Faculty development in General<br />

Practice - the German experience<br />

M Ehrhardt, P Engeser, M Herrmann, T Lichte, N Donner-<br />

Banzhoff and S Wilm*, on behalf of the participants<br />

Heinrich-Heine University, Department of General Practice, PO<br />

Box 10 10 07, D-40001 Duesseldorf, GERMANY<br />

Since 1978 General Practice has been a required subject<br />

of the undergraduate curriculum in Germany. However,<br />

only about one third of all 33 medical schools have<br />

established academic departments. At the remaining<br />

schools, GP teachers are often working in isolation and<br />

without adequate support. In 1999 the National Society<br />

of General Practice started a programme to help GP<br />

teachers develop their academic skills. Six weekends<br />

spanning 1 1/2 years are being offered covering<br />

teaching, clinical work, quality issues, research and<br />

academic survival skills. Participants are expected to<br />

work together in small groups on projects during<br />

intervals and to complete an international practicum<br />

of at least one week duration. There is also an intranet<br />

platform to facilitate the exchange of ideas and<br />

materials.<br />

While in the beginning the learner-centered philosophy<br />

created tension and uncertainty, the group has now<br />

found a working identity that participants find<br />

enjoyable and productive.<br />

7D9 Medicine and ethnic issues; do our<br />

tutors reflect their community?<br />

D Reeves, R Loudon and J Parle*<br />

Department of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical<br />

School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 3QR, UK<br />

We conducted an audit of primary care teaching<br />

practices in order to determine the characteristics of


doctors providing different elements of the extensive<br />

Birmingham community based curriculum. 185<br />

questionnaires (concerning gender, ethnicity, languages<br />

spoken) were distributed. 540 doctors from 163<br />

practices responded (practice response rate 88%).<br />

Ethnic and gender differences were clear across<br />

different practice types. The 2001 Amendment to the<br />

1976 UK Race Relations Act will mean for the first<br />

time that providers of services to the public will have<br />

Session 7E Postgraduate education<br />

7E1 Exploring the views of Basic<br />

Surgical Trainees on their training<br />

programme and their future in<br />

Surgery<br />

Jeremy Brown*, Linda de Cossart and Charmian Wiltshire<br />

Mersey Deanery, 1st Floor, Hamilton House, 24 Pall Mall,<br />

Liverpool L3 6AL, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to explore views of Basic<br />

Surgical Trainees (Senior House Officers) on a training<br />

scheme for Basic Surgical Training that complies with<br />

college requirements. A quantitative study postal<br />

questionnaire devised in liaison with UK Medical<br />

Careers Research Group was distributed to 115 Mersey<br />

Basic Surgical Trainees. Qualitative data were collected<br />

from free-text responses. Questions focused on career<br />

choices, views on the scheme, and assessment. 93<br />

(81%) questionnaires were returned. 51 (54%) were<br />

graduates from local university, 49 (52.7%) came<br />

directly onto the Mersey BST scheme from PRHO<br />

posts, 4 (4.3 %) had more than 1 year’s UK SHO<br />

experience. 26 (27.9%) changed their surgical specialty<br />

intention since medical school; factors influencing<br />

change were: - PRHO/SHO experience; teachers;<br />

departments. A young, parochial and inexperienced<br />

cohort of trainees who have strong convictions were<br />

identified. Many issues raised have one common<br />

denominator: the strong influence of teachers on<br />

trainees.<br />

7E2 An assessment of the skills base<br />

and attainments of Senior House<br />

Officers on a regional Basic<br />

Surgical Training <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Linda de Cossart, Charmian Wiltshire and Jeremy Brown*<br />

Mersey Deanery, 1st Floor, Hamilton House, 24 Pall Mall,<br />

Liverpool L3 6AL, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to assess the skills base and<br />

achievements of trainees on a Basic Surgical Training<br />

<strong>Programme</strong>. All trainees on the 3-year Basic Surgical<br />

Training <strong>Programme</strong> insituted in 1996/7 were given a<br />

questionnaire designed to find out their aspirations and<br />

opinions about the programme and design. The findings<br />

related to the trainees’ logbook for the general surgical<br />

operations of abscess drainage, appendisectomy,<br />

inguinal hernia repair, upper and lower GI endoscopy,<br />

varicose vein surgery and small bowel anastomosis. The<br />

results were analysed by year of training and whether<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.65 -<br />

to demonstrate they are working for equality rather than<br />

merely avoiding discrimination. This audit, experience<br />

with attempts to collaborate with secondary care<br />

teachers plus our larger curriculum development project<br />

stimulate a wider debate about whether, when<br />

commissioning teaching practices, we should assess<br />

other aspects of quality of service provision; and<br />

whether, in the absence of an appropriate environment,<br />

learning outcomes are achievable.<br />

performed independently or supervised. 84 (73%) of<br />

trainees returned analysable forms. Abscess drainage<br />

and appendisectomy are acquired most often as the<br />

three years progress but a few still do not achieve<br />

independence by year three. The Profession should<br />

insist on ‘Protected Operative Teaching’ for surgical<br />

trainees.<br />

7E3 Personal and Professional<br />

Development Groups for Junior<br />

Hospital Doctors<br />

Alan Naftalin and Peter Bruggen<br />

Newham General Hospital, 22 Mackeson Road, London NW3<br />

2LT, UK<br />

You were a junior doctor. In personal and professional<br />

development groups at Newham General Hospital in<br />

East London, UK, the valued experience was often<br />

discovering that each was not alone. Others had<br />

‘strange’ thoughts and feelings. The figure of a junior<br />

doctor will be surrounded by radiating lines labelled:<br />

blushing, feeling faint, losing 3D thought, frozen<br />

memory, challenged by consultants, dreaming of<br />

patients, psychosomatic symptoms, unable to stop eye<br />

contact, erections, impulse to touch too much, being<br />

told off, feeling embarrassed, needing to rescue the<br />

deprived, fostering special relationships, scoring PR<br />

and PV examinations, enjoying power, etc. Pens or<br />

labels will be provided for participants to add ideas or<br />

experiences. In the corners will be background to the<br />

group, and references; details and email addresses of<br />

both authors; invitation to mailing list or web site; and<br />

invitation for suggestions.<br />

7E4 The educational needs of doctors<br />

with English as a second language<br />

when consulting in General<br />

Practice in the United Kingdom<br />

Sylvia Chudley and John Skelton<br />

West Midlands Dept of Postgraduate Education for General<br />

Practice, 16 Ashmore Road, Cotteridge, Birmingham, B30 2HA,<br />

UK<br />

Results of the consulting skills component of the<br />

national summative assessment procedure in the United<br />

Kingdom, (assessment of videotaped consultations),<br />

indicate that the failure rate is significantly higher in<br />

those doctors who have had undergraduate medical


training abroad. Preliminary observations suggest that<br />

these doctors have specific difficulties that relate not<br />

only to linguistic problems, but to cultural differences<br />

in 1) communication in general, 2) communication<br />

within the medical consultation, and 3) the nature of<br />

the teacher/pupil relationship. This research explores<br />

these 3 issues through in-depth interviews with such<br />

doctors who are currently training in general practice.<br />

A better understanding of the educational needs of<br />

doctors from abroad should enable educators to provide<br />

appropriate training and preparation for work in general<br />

practice in the United Kingdom.<br />

7E5 “No such thing as a free lunch” -<br />

how free are bleep-free sessions?<br />

Jane Ross* and Rose Martin<br />

Postgraduate Office, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical<br />

School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Bleep-free weekly educational sessions have been<br />

identified as an essential requirement in the clinical<br />

training of PRHOs. A GMC review supported by<br />

anecdotal evidence identified this issue as a concern.<br />

A three phase prospective audit to evaluate the effect<br />

of implementing a trust-wide bleeping policy in the<br />

provision of bleep-free weekly educational sessions for<br />

PRHOs was evaluated.<br />

Phase 1: 6 weeks: a researcher intercepted all bleep<br />

interruptions during weekly PRHO teaching.<br />

Bleeping reasons were logged into a coding<br />

grid.<br />

Phase 2: Implementation of Trust Bleeping Policy.<br />

Phase 3: 6 weeks (repeat of phase 1).<br />

Bleeping incidents were logged and coded pre and post<br />

policy implementation. Results showed improved<br />

negotiated bleep responsibility to colleague, a decrease<br />

in bleeping incidents during teaching sessions and<br />

decrease in non-essential bleep interruptions.<br />

Implementation of a bleeping policy improved bleepfree<br />

sessions for PRHOs.<br />

7E6 The SHO Record of In-Service<br />

Training and Achievement (RITA)<br />

and Portfolio<br />

Rose Martin* and R W Newton<br />

SCPMDE, Postgraduate Office, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and<br />

Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Documentation will be required to support the new<br />

SHO RITA process; models are currently being<br />

developed and tested. The SHO Portfolio and Record<br />

of In–Service Training and Achievement has been<br />

developed in the East Region and is currently being<br />

piloted in Tayside and Edinburgh amongst all SHOs<br />

within medicine and its sub-specialties. The SHO<br />

Portfolio aims to promote a more structured approach<br />

to SHO training, appraisal and assessment. It is based<br />

on the concept of a partnership between SHO and<br />

Educational Supervisor; the documentation includes a<br />

training agreement which emphasises the<br />

responsibilities on both sides in ensuring that learning<br />

opportunities are maximised. It enables a continuum<br />

of training, incorporating a strategy for the management<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.66 -<br />

of poor performance which can be passed from the<br />

initial Educational Supervisor to the next, if the training<br />

plan is not completed. Split between five sections and<br />

based on the GMC’s Good Medical Practice booklet,<br />

the final section is designed to enhance the CV and<br />

detail critical incident analysis, audit projects, record<br />

interesting cases and provide a platform for promoting<br />

clinical and educational achievement at interview.<br />

Specific Royal College documentation can be inserted<br />

and the portfolio itself should be used to inform the<br />

Revalidation process.<br />

7E7 General Practice Registrar audit<br />

and implementation of change<br />

J McKay*, J R M Lough and T S Murray<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of<br />

Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK<br />

General practice registrars (GPRs), submit an audit<br />

project as part of the summative assessment process.<br />

Assessment of these projects does not require the<br />

registrar to implement change nor collect a second data<br />

set. From 1988 west of Scotland GPRs were required<br />

to submit a completed audit cycle (CAC), which<br />

included implementing change and a second data<br />

collection. Audit submissions in the 3 years before and<br />

after the introduction of CAC were compared. Projects<br />

submitted after the introduction of CAC were<br />

significantly more likely to have 3 or less criteria<br />

(p


7E9 Psychosocial training in the Family<br />

Residency in Spain: present<br />

situation and proposals for the<br />

future<br />

José Ramón Loayssa Lara<br />

Servicio Navarro de Salud, Centro de Salud de Noaín, 31110<br />

Noaín, SPAIN<br />

The psychosocial training in the family practice<br />

residency in Spain, despite the increasing interest and<br />

the growing number of educational activities, is not<br />

obtaining the desired results. In order to formulate a<br />

proposal for curriculum development, a study of the<br />

programme in the different teaching units was<br />

undertaken. Based on the suggestions of the faculty<br />

and on the analysis of experiences in different countries,<br />

a series of recommendations and possible lines of<br />

development are discussed.<br />

7E10 Step by step to methodological<br />

exam: report on first year<br />

experiences with the new<br />

introduced GP Licence<br />

Examination in Austria<br />

R Willnauer*, M Schmidts, M Lischka<br />

Institute for Medical Education, University of Vienna, Wahringer<br />

Gurtel 18-20, Postfach 10, A-1097 Wien, AUSTRIA<br />

There are three prerequisites for being granted a licence<br />

as a GP: 3-year-inhouse rotational training,<br />

accompanied by a certification process (longitudinal<br />

evaluation) and a summative examination at the end of<br />

the training period. This exam was introduced in<br />

November 1999 and is held three times a year. The<br />

exam is made up of 20-25 case vignettes followed by<br />

1-5 questions in SAQ format. The cases are developed<br />

by GPs and are thoroughly reviewed. Required answers<br />

are predetermined by GP experts. Answers are<br />

corrected by specialists on machine readable sheets,<br />

providing PC-based item analysis and scoring. We will<br />

report on:<br />

• our attempts to meet quality criteria (objectivity,<br />

reliability, validity)<br />

• results of four examinations (total of 372<br />

candidates)<br />

• institutional and organisational experience with the<br />

instruction of examination methodology.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.67 -<br />

7E11 Development of professional<br />

doctorates in healthcare disciplines<br />

Alan Castle*, Graham A Mills and Valda Bunker<br />

University of Portsmouth, Centre for Radiography Education,<br />

St George’s Building, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2HY, UK<br />

Originally, the PhD was a qualification for an academic<br />

career. Recently the appropriateness of this<br />

qualification has been questioned as it is not necessarily<br />

relevant to industry or professional interests.<br />

Consequently universities are re-shaping Doctoral level<br />

learning by providing flexible, part-time, work-based<br />

‘Professional Doctorates’ (PD). These are “equal in<br />

rigour but different in substance” to a PhD. The<br />

University of Portsmouth has recently developed an<br />

innovative PD programme supporting multidisciplinary<br />

learning in biomedical sciences,<br />

chiropractic, medical imaging, nursing and pharmacy.<br />

Entry to the programme is at Master’s level, with<br />

Doctoral level learning in two parts. A ‘taught’ Part 1<br />

(1-2 years) includes advanced research techniques,<br />

professional review and publication and dissemination<br />

units. Part 2 (2-3 years) comprises the work-based<br />

professional research and development project<br />

submitted as a portfolio. This curriculum model,<br />

facilitating continuing professional development, is<br />

appropriate for all healthcare disciplines and suitable<br />

for adoption by other higher education institutions.<br />

7E12 The appointment process for<br />

Anaesthetic Registrars in South<br />

Thames<br />

J Clarke* and J Pateman<br />

St George’s Hospital London, Department of Anaesthesia,<br />

Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK<br />

Each 6 months we appoint approximately 25 registrars<br />

to our training scheme from about 100 applicants.<br />

Historically we used the classical large panel, roundtable,<br />

15 minute interview technique. For the last 18<br />

months we have employed an OSCE style interview<br />

process using 4 ‘tables’. Candidates rotate through all<br />

tables, where they undergo targeted questioning on<br />

different aspects of the person specification that cannot<br />

be obtained from their paper application. The<br />

advantages are that each candidate is now interviewed<br />

for 32 minutes and we are able to explore in greater<br />

detail desirable attributes. Furthermore because we are<br />

now able to interview up to 50 candidates in one day,<br />

the short listing has become a less important part of<br />

the process and we can interview a more diverse group.<br />

Audits carried out have shown a marked preference<br />

for this technique amongst both interviewers and<br />

interviewees.


Session 7F Assessment<br />

7F1 Validity of assessment techniques:<br />

students’ views differ from<br />

observed outcomes<br />

W Colin Duncan<br />

University of Edinburgh, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre<br />

for Reproductive Biology, 37 Chalmers Street, Edinburgh EH3<br />

9ET, UK<br />

We assess medical students in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology using a combination of four assessment<br />

techniques: continuous assessment (CA), multiple<br />

essay questions (MEQ), OSCE exam and clinical exam.<br />

This study aimed to compare the students’ perception<br />

(n=75) of validity of these assessment techniques with<br />

actual validity. Validity of each component was assessed<br />

by correlation with the final mark. Students’ perception<br />

was obtained by asking students what they felt they<br />

deserved and what they felt they got in each assessment.<br />

In predicting final mark, CA performed worst<br />

(r=0.667), followed by MEQ (r=0.791), Clinical<br />

(r=0.861) and finally OSCE (r=0.877). In the students’<br />

perception, CA performed best (-3.8% difference),<br />

followed by MEQ (-4.9%), Clinical (-5.4%) and finally<br />

OSCE (-11%). There is a clear inverse relationship<br />

(r=0.705) between the students’ perception of<br />

assessment validity and the actual validity in this<br />

assessment scenario.<br />

7F2 Assessment reliability in an MSc<br />

programme in Diabetes<br />

J Huber*, N Munro, A Felton, C Parker, P Delaney and<br />

C McIntosh<br />

School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West<br />

Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK<br />

Reliability within examinations is a precondition to<br />

validity. In order to confirm internal reliability in<br />

assessment instruments, a range of measures can be<br />

employed. This study aimed to establish the reliability<br />

of assessments used in a Diabetes Masters programme.<br />

Percentage scores from the attendance cohort (1999/<br />

00) for the four assessments in a ‘management of<br />

diabetes’ module were analysed, resulting in an alpha<br />

coefficient of .75. Correlations between individual<br />

assessments and the total assessment scores (corrected<br />

for the individual assessment) were .58, .41, .64 and<br />

.57. Both the alpha and item-total correlations indicate<br />

a satisfactory level of internal reliability. The figures<br />

indicate that all assessments evaluate a common skills<br />

range. Alphas greater than .8 are recognised as<br />

achievable in professional examinations. In order to<br />

attain this it will be necessary to evaluate assessment<br />

two further to understand why this essay has a lower<br />

correlation with the overall grade achieved.<br />

7F3 Two years of progress-testing at<br />

the Charité<br />

A Mertens*, J Hoffmann, S Kölbel, R Raschke, K Duske, J<br />

Berger and U Hennewig<br />

HU <strong>Berlin</strong> Medical Faculty, Charité, AG Reformstudiengang,<br />

Medizinische Fakultat, Schumannstr 20-21, 10117 <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.68 -<br />

The Humboldt-University Progress-Test is based on the<br />

principles for Progress-Testing developed in the<br />

Netherlands. It will be shown that the format works<br />

also within a traditional German medical faculty. The<br />

results of the four tests organized in <strong>Berlin</strong> so far will<br />

be presented, including a summary of our subsequently<br />

performed test-evaluation programme. Special<br />

attention will be payed to the comparison of the students<br />

in the reformed curriculum vs. the students in the<br />

traditional curriculum in all respects.<br />

7F4 OSCE for a Paediatric Trainee<br />

Internship examination:<br />

multicentric experience<br />

M Aldunate, A Lopez, A Mena, M Varas, X Trivino,<br />

A Vasquez*, R Lillo, T Miranda and E Mandiola<br />

ESC Medicina - Officina de Educacion Medica, Fac Medicina,<br />

Universidad de Chile, La Siembra 8952 Vitacura Santiago,<br />

CHILE<br />

The University of Chile and the Catholic University,<br />

the main Chilean Universities, started in 2000 a joint<br />

program in order to consolidate and improve the<br />

assessment system for the paediatric training period<br />

(internship 6th year). The objective of the program was<br />

to improve the quality of the final assessment of clinical<br />

competences of the Paediatric trainee (internship) in<br />

two Chilean Universities. Members of both Schools of<br />

Medicine have developed, organized, implemented and<br />

run an identical, simultaneous, multicentric and interuniversity<br />

20 station OSCE in order to assess 124<br />

students; to analyze the results and statistically compare<br />

them to other traditional assessment methods.<br />

Questionnaires were used for considering the results<br />

and opinions as well as academic opinions before and<br />

after the OSCE. The OSCE allowed the measurement<br />

of main objectives in all domains and the components<br />

of predetermined clinical competences. Statistical<br />

analysis of results showed the advantages of this method<br />

in relation to the traditional exam. The results of the<br />

questionnaire analysis are presented and discussed.<br />

Results permit the recommendation of the OSCE as a<br />

clinical examination of the Paediatric trainee at the end<br />

of the internship period in both Schools of Medicine.<br />

7F5 Third year medical student written<br />

history and physicals: how many is<br />

enough?<br />

Paul A Hemmer*, Thomas Jamieson, Kim Gibson, Lisa<br />

Moores, Andy Donato, Margaret Gaglione, Steven Durning,<br />

Alan Wimmer, Bonnie Cary-Freitas and Louis Pangaro<br />

USUHS - EDP, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda MD 20814,<br />

USA<br />

The aim was to determine when students can reliably<br />

write a history and physical. In 1998-99, faculty ranked<br />

20 specific aspects of 10 student write-ups, using a<br />

validated, 4-point Likert scale rating form. We assessed<br />

intra-write up reliability/correlation and inter-write up<br />

reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Data were available for<br />

240 students (1998-1999). The table summarizes the


number of write-ups necessary to achieve a specific<br />

level of agreement for seven of the 20 rated categories.<br />

Write-up Variable a � 0.7 a � 0.8<br />

Chief Complaint<br />

HPI (degree that history<br />

Never Never<br />

differentiates possible etiologies) 9 10<br />

PE (precision)<br />

Problem List (specificity of<br />

Never Never<br />

problem) 4 Never<br />

Analysis (level/depth) 8 9<br />

Scholarship (level/depth) 3 9<br />

Overall 2 10<br />

Items most correlated with the overall score:<br />

Assessment and Plan (.83), Level of Analysis (.7), HPI<br />

(.64), and Level of Scholarship (.6). It is concluded<br />

that fostering a student’s transition from “Reporter” to<br />

“Interpreter” requires 8-10 written H&Ps.<br />

7F6 Student fitness to practise<br />

procedures<br />

Chris Stephens<br />

The Department of Medical Education, Office of School of<br />

Medicine, University of Southampton, MP 801 Level C, South<br />

Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton,<br />

SO16 6DY, UK<br />

Students can be suspended from their course for a<br />

number of reasons such as health, conduct and<br />

academic progress. These three do not cover specific<br />

professional areas related to medicine and so the School<br />

of Medicine University of Southampton developed<br />

student fitness to practise procedures. These procedures<br />

are based on a number of GMC documents and link<br />

into the University’s regulations and have been used<br />

on a number of occasions. The presentation will explore<br />

a number of case scenarios to illustrate that there is<br />

often overlap between the different areas, how the<br />

fitness to practise procedures need to reflect current<br />

GMC professional conduct guidance and why the<br />

system needs to be fair, transparent and open.<br />

7F7 Deriving the assessment<br />

framework for the Three Royal<br />

Colleges Diploma in Prison<br />

Medicine<br />

Lesley J Southgate*, Jon H Fuller and Jaz Bihku<br />

Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education,<br />

University College London Medical School, Archway Campus,<br />

Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

Prisoners suffer from high levels of mental health<br />

problems, substance misuse, communicable diseases<br />

and chronic physical illness. But health services for<br />

UK prisoners have been isolated from the wider health<br />

community in the NHS. Improving the health and health<br />

care of prisoners has not been a priority for either the<br />

Prison Service or the NHS. As a result, despite patches<br />

of good practice, services overall have fallen short of<br />

collective aspirations. As a contribution to CPD for<br />

prison medical officers, three UK Royal Colleges<br />

(General Practice, Physicians, Psychiatry) have<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.69 -<br />

established a Diploma in Prison Medicine. The Diploma<br />

is delivered by the University of Nottingham, but the<br />

assessment and quality assurance framework was<br />

developed and is implemented by the Examination<br />

Board from the Royal Colleges. We describe here the<br />

derivation of the assessment framework, both content<br />

and methods, and present data from the first three years<br />

of the Diploma.<br />

7F8 Assessment in an outcome-based<br />

curriculum at the International<br />

Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan,<br />

K H Ong, C M K Patrick and A K H Wong<br />

International Medical University, 33 A Jalan 17/1, Block A-4,<br />

Condo 3A, Astana Damansara, 46400 Petaling Jaya, Selangor,<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

Eight major outcomes were identified for the clinical<br />

programme of the International Medical University<br />

(IMU). The outcomes form the basis to reflect the<br />

competencies expected of our graduates. Task-based<br />

study-guides, a community and family case study<br />

(CFCS) and the learning portfolio form our core<br />

curriculum. We employ a variety of assessment tools<br />

to assess the competencies achieved in the eight IMU<br />

outcomes. These include end of posting examinations<br />

as well as the portfolio. Both OSPE and OSCE are used<br />

in the professional examinations to assess the various<br />

outcomes. An OSCE grid has been developed to<br />

evaluate the effectiveness of our assessment in<br />

measuring all the IMU outcomes. Issues related to<br />

community and health are assessed in the CFCS. The<br />

final semester is for senior clerkship and a structured<br />

exit viva at the end will be used to assess the<br />

competency in the outcomes before the students<br />

graduate.<br />

7F9 Psychosocial profile of medical<br />

students as a predictor of the<br />

academic success in medical<br />

school in Mexico<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-<br />

R, Victoria Bermudez, Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-<br />

Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, 1815 JFK Blvd. Apt #<br />

1606, Philadelphia PA 19103, USA<br />

We examined the contribution of psychosocial<br />

measures in predicting academic success among<br />

Mexican medical students. Participants were 694<br />

medical students at the Autonomous University of<br />

Nuevo Leon, in Mexico. A set of psychosocial scales,<br />

including Jefferson Medical College’s noncognitive<br />

questionnaire, was administered. Data supported the<br />

psychometrics of the instruments. Participants were<br />

divided into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of those who<br />

succeeded in the first and second years of medical<br />

school (n=277). Group 2 included those students who<br />

were put on probation (n=339). Group 3 comprised<br />

those who were dismissed (n=78). We compared these<br />

3 groups on a number of psychosocial measures, and<br />

found significant differences among the groups on the<br />

following scales: Depression, Stress Life Events,<br />

Terman Merrill IQ, Self-esteem, Cognitive Process or


Thinking Problems, Family Structure and Function.<br />

Findings have implications in admission decisions and<br />

in academic and professional counselling.<br />

7F10 Psychometric data for Jefferson<br />

Medical College’s Non Cognitive<br />

Questionnaire in Mexican medical<br />

students<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-<br />

R, Victoria Bermudez, Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-<br />

Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, 1815 JFK Blvd. Apt #<br />

1606, Philadelphia PA 19103, USA<br />

A Spanish version of the Jefferson Medical College’s<br />

Noncognitive Questionnaire was administered to 700<br />

first year medical students at the Autonomous<br />

University of Nuevo Leon, in Mexico. Factor analysis<br />

resulted in a factor matrix that was comparable to that<br />

obtained between noncognitive scale scores and<br />

external criterion measures. Results of this study<br />

support the construct validity, criterion-related validity,<br />

and internal consistency aspect of reliability<br />

(Cronbach’s alpha) of the noncognitive measures<br />

(general anxiety, test anxiety, loneliness, self-esteem,<br />

extroversion, stressful life events, neuroticism and locus<br />

of control) in Mexican medical students. We concluded<br />

that the noncognitive questionnaire, in general, is a valid<br />

and reliable instrument for Mexican medical students<br />

to investigate the contribution of personal qualities,<br />

Session 7G Teaching and learning (1)<br />

7G1 What do first year medical students<br />

value in a learning situation?<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alejandra Blanco, Soledad Campos<br />

and Amelia Cabrera<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Lack of appropriate learning skills when entering<br />

medical school is one the major obstacles our students<br />

face during their first year at medical school. We used<br />

the critical incident technique to determine which<br />

elements in a learning episode during high school were<br />

highly valued as most effective by students admitted<br />

to medical school. Incidents were coded for learning<br />

characteristics, and for disciplines mentioned. Seventyone<br />

medical students recently admitted were included<br />

in the study. Faculty personal aptitudes was the most<br />

frequently cited element (34%), followed by practical<br />

teaching (22%), students’ personal growth or<br />

transformation (13%), influence of the evaluation<br />

(12%), team working (8%), and good teaching<br />

resources (8%). Sciences related to medicine were the<br />

most influential (65%), while humanistic disciplines<br />

(23%), and exact sciences (9%) were mentioned too.<br />

These data permit the design of educational activities<br />

using those elements in order to improve their efficacy.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.70 -<br />

personality factors and psychosocial characteristics in<br />

predicting academic success in medical school, and<br />

professional success in medical practice, which is the<br />

broader goal of this project.<br />

7F11 Portfolio based assessment of<br />

students during their internship<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Soledad Campos, Isabel Fernández<br />

and Alfredo Olivieri<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Portfolio is an assessment tool that allows students to<br />

record and reflect on key events of their daily activities.<br />

Our sixth year (internship) students record their daily<br />

activities, their reactions to their real life work, they<br />

identify their learning needs, and their studying<br />

strategies, including self evaluation. The faculty gives<br />

student feedback, helps her/him to apply her/his<br />

learning in a practical context, and challenges and<br />

motivates the intern to advance in their learning.<br />

Thirteen students and four faculties were involved in<br />

this project. Despite the lack of previous experience<br />

with the instrument, students and faculties found it<br />

useful. Faculty development activities directed towards<br />

improving the use of the portfolio, and protecting time<br />

(minimum 2 hours/week) to meet with the students are<br />

changes we are planning to perfect its use. Portfolio is<br />

not used for promotion but for developing and<br />

consolidating adult and life-long learning strategies.<br />

7G2 Application of Schon’s model for<br />

small-group teaching<br />

Francine Borduas* and Réjean Laprise<br />

Association des médecins omnipraticiens de Québec, Clinique<br />

médicale de Neufchatel, 2350 boul Bastien #2, Québec G2B<br />

1B5, CANADA<br />

Schon proposed that physicians acquire expertise<br />

through a process of reflection in and on action. This<br />

process is triggered by abnormal cases seen in the<br />

clinic, which cause ‘surprises’. These surprises lead to<br />

the investigation of the new phenomena and<br />

experimentation of new course of actions, which are,<br />

ultimately, integrated into practice. We present an<br />

application of Schon’s model for small-group teaching.<br />

An interactive workshop, based on the study of a real<br />

patient followed by her doctor for 15 years, was<br />

designed to cause ‘surprises’ among participants and<br />

make them go through the process described by Schon.<br />

This method was assessed during a CME event. Results<br />

from the administration of a multiple choice<br />

questionnaire pre- and post-intervention showed a<br />

significant improvement in knowledge following the<br />

event (p


7G3 Teaching and learning about case<br />

presentations: the need for early<br />

intervention<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd<br />

Imperial College School of Medicine, Connaught House,<br />

Apartment 17, Davies Street, London W1K 3DA, UK<br />

At Imperial College School of Medicine, students are<br />

introduced to case presentations during their second<br />

year. During a three-hour session, the content and<br />

context of case presentations are discussed and students<br />

participate in a brainstorming activity to identify<br />

characteristics of effective presentations. Students then<br />

work in small groups to prepare and deliver a case<br />

presentation based on a videotaped interview.<br />

Approximately five presentations are made in each<br />

session. In addition to the content of the presentation,<br />

students receive feedback on their presentation skills.<br />

Data will be presented from an assessment conducted<br />

three-months after the session and a clinical attachment.<br />

The assessment examines students’ knowledge in<br />

relation to the content and context of presentations and<br />

the features of effective presentations. Students are also<br />

asked about their experiences of case presentations<br />

during their clinical attachments and if there is anything<br />

else they would like to have addressed in the session.<br />

7G4 Master teacher, master learner<br />

M P Oosthuizen<br />

University of Pretoria, P O Box 1266, Tand en Mond Hospital,<br />

Pretoria 0001, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

The aim of this study was to make use of a whole brain<br />

teaching and learning model for the study-unit of toothmorphology<br />

in a 3rd year dental curriculum to<br />

accommodate and develop students’ knowledge, skills<br />

and attitudes.The Herrmann Whole Brain Model on<br />

teaching and learning was used to stimulate a learningcentred<br />

approach. His instrument was used to determine<br />

thinking style preferences of the individual students<br />

and the group as a whole. Whole brain teaching<br />

interventions were designed to accommodate and<br />

develop diverse thinking style preferences during<br />

learning activities. The results of this study indicated a<br />

significant improvement of students’ retention,<br />

participation and attitudes toward the content and<br />

learning as well as group interaction and problem<br />

solving. The impact of this pre-clinical intervention in<br />

the third year is still evident and contributing to the<br />

students’ performances in their clinical work during<br />

the fourth year. This success had a major impact on the<br />

decision of the faculty to incorporate whole brain<br />

teaching and learning in the new outcomes-based<br />

learning-centred curriculum for dentistry.<br />

7G5 Hemisphericity in medical students<br />

N E Fernandez-Garza*, I A Benitez-Trejo, C Salinas-<br />

Guerra, A Davila-Flores and J A Castellanos-Lopez<br />

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon,<br />

Nuno de Guzman 309, Col. Cumbres, 3er Sector, Monterrey,<br />

N.L., c.p. 64610, MEXICO<br />

From Sperry studies, attention has been focused on<br />

brain dominance or hemisphericity. Left hemisphere<br />

(LH) is considered better for verbal tasks and right (RH)<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.71 -<br />

for visual. For the teaching-learning process, it is<br />

important to consider which learning style (verbal or<br />

visual) is more used by students. In this project, nine<br />

medicine students were tested in five cognitive<br />

paradigms; reaction time was measured. Paradigms<br />

were: (1) simple reaction time (SRT) to familiarize with<br />

the procedure; (2) memory using letters (LS); (3)<br />

memory using patterns (PM); (4) patterns recognition<br />

using letters (LTM); and (5) patterns recognition using<br />

patterns (PC). All subjects had the lowest reaction time<br />

in the SRT, in second were LS and PM, third LTM and<br />

fourth PC. These suggest that the cognitive process in<br />

which memory is involved are well developed (LH),<br />

but the same is not true for the cognitive processes<br />

involved in pattern recognition (RH).<br />

7G6 Medical student preferences for an<br />

“ideal textbook” of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology<br />

M S Marsh* and D Katopi<br />

GKT Medical School, Academic Dept of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynaecology, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, King’s College Hospital,<br />

Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK<br />

Although medical students increasingly use CAL and<br />

the internet for their medical education, and much effort<br />

is put into the presentation of this information, the<br />

textbook still remains the chief tool for self directed<br />

learning. There is surprisingly little data concerning<br />

student opinion of the form and content of textbooks.<br />

We surveyed 88 (of approximately 100) 4th year<br />

medical students undergoing a course in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology (O & G) about their “ideal textbook” for<br />

O & G. 46% of students wanted a book of A5 size,<br />

80% wanted some coloured content, 83% wanted the<br />

type in a medium size, 75% wished it to be made up of<br />

lists and short notes and 67% with one topic per page<br />

or double page. 79% of students wanted space for notes<br />

within the text pages. It appears there is consensus<br />

amongst medical students about the content and form<br />

of textbooks of O & G.<br />

7G7 What can be learnt from medical<br />

atlases? Expert and novice visual<br />

schemata in breast sonography<br />

R Pauli* and J Huber<br />

School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West<br />

Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK<br />

Medical education in the visual domain focuses on<br />

teaching diagnostic processes verbally, usually by<br />

discussion between expert and trainee. A problem with<br />

this approach is that visual medical information may<br />

not be easily or efficiently transmitted in this mode.<br />

Our research aims to address the degree to which<br />

observers are able to extract visual features of breast<br />

sonograms, which are diagnostically significant. The<br />

first study compared expert and novice interpretations<br />

of breast sonograms taken from medical atlases. It was<br />

found that novices do not trail far behind experts in<br />

accuracy. The second study aimed to investigate the<br />

overlap between diagnostic categories and visual<br />

characteristics in breast sonograms by examining<br />

novices’ image categorisation strategies. This further<br />

confirmed that readily available visual information


lends itself to making diagnostic classifications. The<br />

evidence shows that medical atlases aimed at illustrating<br />

typical appearances are useful, but should perhaps cover<br />

less typical appearances.<br />

7G8 Community-based Public Health<br />

Education in Healthy City Project<br />

Yosuke Yamane*, Kuninori Shiwaku, Keiko Kitashima and<br />

Anuurad Erdembileg<br />

Department of Environmental Medicine, Shimane Medical<br />

University, Enya 89, Izumo 693-8501, JAPAN<br />

The drastic changes in the field of public health require<br />

educational innovation in the university. The<br />

development of a new learning strategy should be<br />

problem-solving; student autonomy; holistic approach<br />

to the complicated physical-mental-social<br />

phenomenon. We have performed community-based<br />

public health education integrating family health,<br />

school health, occupational health and community<br />

health since 1979. The persistent exposure of the<br />

student into the community dynamics is useful to<br />

understand the health promotion strategy. The<br />

education in the healthy city model is especially<br />

effective to recognize community empowerment,<br />

collaboration with the inhabitants, care workers,<br />

researchers and policy makers, the partnership between<br />

the community and the academic, social support<br />

networking and policy making for amenity community.<br />

7G9 Two different types of professorial<br />

authority: results in a traditional<br />

faculty of medicine<br />

Carlos E. de la Garza-Gonzalez*, Norberto Lopez-Serna<br />

and Ma Esthela Morales-Perez<br />

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon,<br />

Administracion de Correos no 3, Apartado postal no 712, 64460<br />

Monterrey N.L., MEXICO<br />

We compare the results of the final examination of four<br />

groups of students. Two of them had the Embryology<br />

course on an annual, and the other on a semi-annual<br />

basis. All groups had the same professor during the<br />

entire course. In one of the groups in each term, the<br />

examination was performed on a highly authoritarian<br />

basis, for example: seat assignment in alphabetical<br />

order; once the professor was in the lecture hall, the<br />

students have to use only one of the access doors; five<br />

minutes after the scheduled start time re-entry was<br />

forbidden, students were not allowed to talk to each<br />

other, among others. In the other groups none of the<br />

above conditions was demanded. A z test on the final<br />

exam results at a level of confidence of 95% was done.<br />

We did not find a significant difference.<br />

7G10 The “excellent teacher” seen by<br />

mid-course students<br />

M Patrício, A V Carneiro and J Fernandes e Fernandes<br />

Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, University of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, Piso 1, 1649-028 Lisboa Codex, PORTUGAL<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.72 -<br />

The importance of a role model in the teaching-learning<br />

process is well accepted. The objective of the study<br />

was to identify perceptions of mid-course students on<br />

the characteristics of an “excellent teacher”. Third year<br />

students (n=66) completed a semi-structured<br />

questionnaire on the profile of an excellent teacher<br />

(open questions followed by 32 specific characteristics<br />

- Likert scale). Quantitative analysis reveals a teacher<br />

is perceived as:<br />

• information provider (selection of topics to be<br />

taught 99%; transmission of clear information 97%;<br />

distinguishing essential from non-essential<br />

knowledge 97%).<br />

• facilitator (creating the opportunities for practical<br />

training 95%; available to students 90%)<br />

• assessor (fair when assessing 94%)<br />

• nice person (agreeable when dealing with students<br />

94%), and<br />

• planner (organizing the program 90%; integration<br />

of the discipline in other course areas 83%)<br />

Qualitative analysis confirms, in general, these results.<br />

Curiously enough, 21% of the students state as nonimportant<br />

qualities: being a role model, having a broad<br />

culture, good leadership and good research abilities.<br />

A discussion will take place on the implications for<br />

the teaching-learning process.<br />

7G11 Underrepresented minority (URM)<br />

students’ perception of mentoring,<br />

advising and role modelling in<br />

medical school<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Jorge Girotti<br />

University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Medical<br />

Education (m/c 591), 808 S. Wood St, CME 986, Chicago IL<br />

60612, USA<br />

This study investigates the underrepresented minority<br />

(URM) students’ perception of particular characteristics<br />

and functions associated with their mentor, adviser, or<br />

role models. A two-part brief questionnaire was given<br />

to 56 URM and non-URM first and second year<br />

medical students studying at the University of Illinois<br />

at Chicago College of Medicine. Paired t-test revealed<br />

significant results among all levels of comparisons that<br />

include opinion differences between URM and non-<br />

URMs, mentor, role model and advisor functions and<br />

characteristics like empathy, maturity, resourcefulness,<br />

providing resources, and availability. The results show<br />

a clear differentiation among the perceived<br />

characteristics and expected functions of mentors,<br />

advisors and role models between URMs and non-<br />

URMs. Results from the first part of the questionnaire<br />

are reinforced by an evaluation of the second part that<br />

includes open responses from students emphasizing<br />

particular qualities and responsibilities for each role.


Session 7H Teaching and learning (2)<br />

7H1 “Project Carrapato (*Tick)”: a<br />

psychological focus in medical<br />

training<br />

I R P Scavariello, M S V M Silveira, E H V Celeri*,<br />

S L Brenelli and R S Cassorla<br />

Group for Psychopedagogic Assistance to Medical/Nursing<br />

Students and Resident Doctors - UNICAMP, Faculty of Medical<br />

Sciences, Tessalia Vieira de Camargo St 126/6111, Barao<br />

Geraldo District, Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970, BRAZIL<br />

The separation of the basic course from the clinical<br />

course can be a cause of anguish and conflict in medical<br />

students. With the aim of reducing this conflict, the<br />

teaching body at the medical school developed the<br />

“Project Carrapato(*Tick)” during the reception for the<br />

year 2000 freshmen. This project familiarised the<br />

freshmen with the medical reality. The students<br />

accompanied the hospital activities of the medical staff<br />

for a week. After this, they were divided into 5 reflection<br />

groups which were coordinated by the GRAPEME<br />

professionals and FCM docents. The project was seen<br />

as a possible preventive action because it helped<br />

students to: reflect and expose their expectations,<br />

anguish and fears; question their fantasies; experience<br />

limitations. This can help to avoid or reduce the<br />

development of inadequate defence mechanisms that<br />

hinder personal and professional growth.<br />

* next to (jargon)<br />

7H2 Evaluating of videotape sessions<br />

for learning communication skills<br />

A Nogueras*, M Bernaus, X Claries and J de Nadal<br />

I. Universitari Parc Tauli, Parc Tauli s/n,0820 Sabadell,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

Evaluating training systems to develop and assess<br />

communication skills is not easy. We report an<br />

extension of our experience. Since 1997, we have<br />

carried out a short training program in doctor-patient<br />

communication for first year residents; it incorporates<br />

simulated patients, role-play techniques and each<br />

participant is videotaped. 81 residents have taken part.<br />

Before and after the course, a validated video showing<br />

a questionable doctor-patient interview is presented to<br />

the students for evaluation of the doctor’s<br />

communication skills, scored on a scale from 0 to 10.<br />

The first day 25-percentile of the video interview score<br />

varied every year and sometimes did not show a normal<br />

distribution, nevertheless, the number of students that<br />

scored high the first day always fell down notoriously<br />

on the last day’s evaluation: in 1997 from 27% to 14%;<br />

in 1998 from 39% to 6%; in 1999 from 50% to 37%<br />

and in 2000 from 24% to 6%. It is concluded that videos<br />

of validated simulations of clinical interviews can help<br />

to evaluate the usefulness of courses such as the one<br />

reported.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.73 -<br />

7H3 Acting up? The recruitment and<br />

maintenance of a professional role<br />

play team for undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate medical training and<br />

assessment<br />

C M Wiskin* and P Croft<br />

The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

Role play is widely used in medical education.<br />

Professional role players provide constructive teaching<br />

for participant development. The recruitment of<br />

individuals with the aptitude for professional role play<br />

is key. Theatrical sourcing may have its uses, but other<br />

attributes need consideration. Our role play team has<br />

10 years’ experience. Its role players are consistently<br />

involved in undergraduate and specialist postgraduate<br />

training. Demographics, educational/vocational<br />

qualifications, professional experience and educational<br />

interests of role players were collected. Supporting<br />

evaluation comes from postgraduate delegates (all<br />

specialties), facilitators and students. Not all actors can<br />

role play, not all role players can act. Personal skills,<br />

articulacy, intellectual involvement, improvisation and<br />

teaching skills are crucial. Results, skills lists,<br />

recruitment criteria and recommendations are<br />

presented. Training role players is less of an issue than<br />

the initial recruitment of individuals capable of<br />

developing as medical educators.<br />

7H4 Analysis of clinical competence at<br />

pre-graduate level<br />

Gitte Wichmann-Hansen* and Berit Eika<br />

Enhed for Medicinsk Uddannelse, SVF, Universitetsparken,<br />

Bygning 611, 8000 Aarhus C, DENMARK<br />

The overall objective of this study is to explore what<br />

opportunities the clinical clerkship offers medical<br />

students to develop their clinical competence, and how<br />

these opportunities can be maximized. The study takes<br />

its theoretical starting point in a semantic analysis of<br />

the term ‘clinical competence’, showing that it means<br />

both the ability and right to act adequately in clinical<br />

situations. A general aim of clinical clerkships is to<br />

train medical students in acting adequately in a clinical<br />

situation. Data from our pilot field observations<br />

indicate that it is difficult to reach this aim, since the<br />

students are only rarely given the right to act. Often<br />

they are passive observers or performing isolated<br />

repetitive tasks without feedback from trainers.<br />

Therefore, our working hypothesis is that learning<br />

clinical competence requires that students participate<br />

as legitimate members of the community. This<br />

hypothesis is described in a set of ideal criteria.


7H5 Use of paper-cases in<br />

undergraduate clinical<br />

Dermatology education in Germany<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann, W H Boehnke and F Ochsendorf<br />

Universitats-Hautklinik Frankfurt/M, Theodor Stern Kai-7,<br />

60590 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY<br />

In Germany practical dermatology teaching is primarily<br />

performed as a bedside course. Large numbers of<br />

students made it increasingly difficult to find<br />

appropriate patients for demonstration. In recent years<br />

we developed paper-cases (short story and photo<br />

material), which were tried over 2.5 years in PBLseminars<br />

with voluntary and randomly assigned<br />

students. In each group the students matched the<br />

intended teaching goals in 75% (mean). After a tutortraining<br />

our residents were allowed to use the papercases<br />

individually to substitute patients when necessary.<br />

Last semester 14% of the patients needed were replaced<br />

by paper cases. A third of the residents used this<br />

opportunity and evaluated it as a good alternative. 80%<br />

of the students received paper-case teaching, 77% of<br />

them evaluated this type of education either good (55%)<br />

or very good (22%). We conclude that paper-cases are<br />

a useful alternative if there are not enough patients.<br />

7H6 Development of a Learning<br />

Resource Centre for healthcare<br />

professionals: an example of an<br />

innovative enterprise<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Dept of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

In 1998, the need to develop a learning skill centre<br />

arose at United Medical Education Consortium<br />

(UMEC) in London with resources for multiprofessional<br />

teaching and learning in healthcare<br />

educational approaches, administration, research,<br />

clinical and computer skills. Logs of all the users of<br />

the centre between 25 February 1998 and 28 February<br />

2001 were kept. All the courses run by the centre were<br />

monitored and evaluated using standardised evaluation<br />

forms. Data about activities were analysed to compare<br />

the usage of the centre’s resources by different groups<br />

in different years (25 February 1998 and 27th February<br />

2001) and their needs for skill facilities. The evaluation<br />

results show that availability of flexible skills training<br />

facilities for UMEC members and visitors have created<br />

an effective teaching and learning environment. Our<br />

future plan involves investigating how to provide more<br />

informed multidisciplinary teaching using new<br />

technology and extending the services to a wider<br />

audience.<br />

7H7 Legal theories of recourse for failed<br />

medical students in the United<br />

States<br />

Thomas Jamieson<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones<br />

Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-4712, USA<br />

Medical students aggrieved by a failing grade(s) or<br />

disenrollment sometimes consider legal action. In the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.74 -<br />

United States students typically cite an institutional<br />

breach of the constitutional right to procedural<br />

propriety (“procedural due process”) and/or arbitrary<br />

motivation (“substantive due process”). Caselaw has<br />

established that constitutional protections are owed<br />

medical students, but courts have consistently offered<br />

a presumption of legitimacy to institutions’ decisions<br />

and students have seldom prevailed when alleging<br />

inadequate due process. Although minimally exercised<br />

to date, prospective medical student plaintiffs may<br />

begin to consider alternative premise(s) for a legal<br />

challenge. Increasingly, courts view students as<br />

consumers with expectations for acceptable<br />

institutional performance of services based on “implied<br />

contract.” Medical schools should be cognizant of the<br />

concept of “contract” and of stipulations in their own<br />

handbooks. If these documents can be read as “implied<br />

contracts” institutions must ensure they are actually<br />

doing what they say they are doing.<br />

7H8 An evaluation of organising student<br />

participation in curriculum reform<br />

using a mentoring programme at the<br />

Nelson R Mandela School of<br />

Medicine, University of Natal,<br />

Durban, South Africa<br />

Dorothy Appalasamy, Michelle McLean* and<br />

Jacqueline van Wyk<br />

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Private Bag X7,<br />

Congella 4013, South Africa<br />

In implementing (January 2001) a student-centred<br />

curriculum at the Nelson R Mandela School of<br />

Medicine, an already successful (re: addressing student<br />

needs) mentoring programme involving 4th and 5th<br />

year students, was modified to assist 1st year students<br />

cope with the new learning paradigm. First year<br />

students enrolled for Curriculum 2001 were organised<br />

into twenty tutorial groups (n = ± 200) for Module 1,<br />

each group being allocated a trained facilitator. Twenty<br />

senior students underwent training to work with these<br />

tutorial groups, with the aim to provide peer support<br />

for group members. Mentors meet regularly with their<br />

groups and with the year co-ordinator for input,<br />

clarification and for evaluation of student progress and<br />

needs. Preliminary results indicate that 1st year students<br />

have embraced the concept of PBL. Issues, for example,<br />

relating to the small group process and timetabling,<br />

have been addressed by the mentors and the year coordinator.<br />

7H9 Medical education – more than<br />

learning?<br />

Thomas Eichholz and Catharina Crolow<br />

Charité, Zeppelinplatz 6, 13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

For most medical students, medical education is mainly<br />

an instrument to acquire the knowledge to treat the<br />

patients. In our poster we want to discuss chances<br />

existing in medical education in Germany. Does<br />

medical education offer alternatives an an extra<br />

qualification, as a field of research and as a basis for a<br />

career?


Session 7I Continuing professional development (1)<br />

7I1 The roles of hospital consultants:<br />

more than just patients and<br />

students<br />

Patsy Stark<br />

University of Leeds, Clinical Skills Learning Centre, The General<br />

Infirmary at Leeds, A Floor Gilbert Scott Building, Leeds LS1<br />

3EX, UK<br />

Hospital consultants undertake roles extending beyond<br />

clinical medicine and undergraduate teaching. In most<br />

healthcare systems they are increasingly required to<br />

do more. How do they identify and prioritise roles and<br />

cope with increasing pressures? A study carried out at<br />

University of Leeds School of Medicine and the Leeds<br />

Teaching Hospitals Trust aimed to discover the range<br />

of consultants’ roles, how they prioritise activities and<br />

their perceptions of change. Semi-structured interviews<br />

with hospital consultants were conducted. Analysis of<br />

the data was performed using qualitative methods. The<br />

participants revealed wide-ranging roles inside and<br />

outside the employing organisation, strong allegiances<br />

to aspects of their work and frustrations about<br />

increasing demands. In general this was not reflected<br />

in job plans or contracts. It was concluded that<br />

consultant contracts and job plans must recognise not<br />

only the obvious clinical and undergraduate teaching<br />

roles but also those which have impact on professional<br />

organisations multiprofessional groups and other<br />

institutions.<br />

7I2 Continuing medical education X<br />

indexation? Authors’ opinions<br />

about editorial policies of a<br />

Brazilian academic journal<br />

Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues*, Valderes<br />

Aparecida Coelho Falaschi and Julio Cesar Voltarelli<br />

Hospital das Clínicas - Oftalmologia, Faculdade de Medicina de<br />

Ribeirao Preto, 12 andar - Campus Universitario, 14048-900<br />

Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

The main objective of this investigation was to find<br />

out authors’ opinions about some aspects of editorial<br />

policies of an academic journal, published by a<br />

Brazilian Medical School/University Hospital. This<br />

journal emphasizes Continuing Medical Education,<br />

publishing mainly review papers and topic symposia,<br />

and it is not indexed in MEDLINE. The instrument used<br />

was a self-administered, non-identified questionnaire<br />

answered by 28 members of the scientific community,<br />

authors of some papers published by the journal, in the<br />

last three years. On a three points scale (3 - definitely<br />

agree, or high level of adequacy; 1 - definitely disagree,<br />

or inadequate), participants rated the quality of different<br />

aspects of editorial policies adopted by Revista<br />

Medicina-Ribeirão Preto (Brazil). Most authors agreed<br />

with the policy “emphasis in continuing medical<br />

education” (mean = 2.39, s = 1.22) even if it prevents<br />

indexation in MEDLINE.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.75 -<br />

7I3 Learning HSR by doing: forming<br />

parallel learning groups<br />

Saeed Asefzadeh<br />

Qazvin University of Medical Science & Health Services, Qazvin,<br />

IRAN<br />

Health Systems Research (HSR) is a necessary<br />

approach for resolving health problems. We assessed<br />

the educational needs of the health workers for HSR<br />

through focused group discussions in order to develop<br />

a module that can enable them to participate actively<br />

in HSR. A module for the health workers has been<br />

designed in 10 steps as a practical guide for problem<br />

solving – from finding problems to evaluating the<br />

solution. The focus of our work is a change from<br />

traditional workshops to continuous in-the-field<br />

training workshops using learning by doing method.<br />

At least two hours a week, the health workers as a<br />

learning group come together and one step of the<br />

module is taught and practised on the real identified<br />

problems. The participants track and work on the step<br />

during the week. In this way the learning group makes<br />

up a parallel learning group which works continuously<br />

and learns autonomously to develop the health<br />

organisation.<br />

7I4 Towards a flexible workforce - a<br />

basis for change<br />

F French*, M Awramenko, A Scott, C Ubach, L Leighton-<br />

Beck, G Needham, J Mollison and H Coutts<br />

SCPMDE, Dept of Postgraduate Medicine, Room 25, Westburn<br />

Centre, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2XG, UK<br />

The Scottish Executive seeks increased flexiblity<br />

among healthcare professionals. The Scottish Council<br />

for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education has<br />

commissioned a study of perceptions of flexible<br />

working among non-training grade doctors and<br />

dentists. Hospital consultants have been selected as the<br />

first group for study and this will be the first<br />

comprehensive study of hospital consultants in<br />

Scotland. The aims of the study are:<br />

• to elicit the views of non-training grade doctors and<br />

dentists regarding flexible working;<br />

• to assess the implications of increased flexibility<br />

on continuing professional development;<br />

• to ascertain levels of job satisfaction and<br />

occupational stress.<br />

Focus groups and/or interviews will be used to inform<br />

the design of a questionnaire. Follow-up interviews will<br />

be conducted to clarify/expand on issues arising from<br />

the survey. Selected results from the survey of hospital<br />

consultants will be presented.


7I5 Ensuring cost-effective CPD:<br />

perspectives, problems and policy<br />

Clive Belfield and Celia Brown*<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

CPD must be cost-effective if the optimal quantity is<br />

to be funded within health care systems burdened by<br />

resource constraints. This paper details the<br />

requirements for ensuring effective and cost-effective<br />

CPD established as part of an investigation into CPD<br />

funding, provision and participation in the UK NHS.<br />

The perspectives for ensuring cost-effective CPD are<br />

framed within a taxonomy that describes an educational<br />

intervention (Bullock and Thomas, 1997). Thus issues<br />

pertinent to both provider and participant: access,<br />

management and planning, curriculum and pedagogy,<br />

setting, assessment and evaluation are addressed. There<br />

are however a number of constraints that hinder the<br />

adoption of cost-effective CPD strategies. Empirical<br />

and primary evidence that suggests current practice<br />

fails to meet the requirements is presented and the<br />

implications for CPD policy in the UK are discussed.<br />

7I6 Improving your skills in preventive<br />

medicine: this CME workshop works!<br />

François Goulet*, André Jacques* and Danielle Saucier<br />

College des Médecins du Québec, 2170 René-Levesque Ouest,<br />

Montréal QC H3H 2T8, CANADA<br />

A 90-minute workshop offered to small groups has been<br />

developed to help family physicians to include<br />

evidence-based intervention to their periodic health<br />

examination (PHE). After the workshop, participants<br />

completed a questionnaire with opened and closed<br />

questions. Between September 1996 and December<br />

1997, 40 workshops were held reaching 667<br />

participants (16.7 participants/workshop) in all regions<br />

of the province of Quebec. The evaluations (98.5%<br />

response rate) showed that participants have reached<br />

the workshop objectives (2.05 on the Likert scale –3 to<br />

+3). The most important messages retained were a<br />

better choice of tests (34.9%) and physician’s self<br />

involvement (27.2%). Changes anticipated in their<br />

practice were: better screening of tests (38.9%),<br />

enhancement of knowledge (18.9%) and to insist on<br />

counselling (12.8%). Role playing and discussion with<br />

peers were effective methods used to produce<br />

anticipated changes in the practice of family physicians.<br />

7I7 CME program in Kuwait<br />

K Al-Jarallah and I G Premadasa*<br />

Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Behbehani Bldg, 10th<br />

Floor, PO Box 1793, Al-Sharq, Safat 13018, KUWAIT<br />

The Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization is the<br />

designated authority for implementing a unified<br />

continuing medical education scheme. The CME<br />

Center administers the scheme, which commenced in<br />

September 2000. The current phase covers medical and<br />

dental practitioners. Participation in CME activities is<br />

optional, but includes reinforcement policies. The<br />

program operates in 5-year cycles, with practitioners<br />

expected to acquire a minimum of 250 credit points<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.76 -<br />

within the cycle. CME activities fall into one of two<br />

categories. The web site of the CME Center at<br />

www.kims.org.kw/cme provides details of the scheme,<br />

and an online facility for participants to register, and<br />

for CME providers to apply for accreditation of<br />

activities. Program implementation is monitored by<br />

reviewing random samples of organizers and<br />

participants. Peer review by an external evaluator has<br />

led to quality assurance. International recognition has<br />

been received via accreditation by Royal Colleges in<br />

North America and Europe.<br />

7I8 The theory of perspective<br />

transformation and its applicability<br />

to CME<br />

Jill Donahue*, Stephen Hotz and Réjean Laprise*<br />

Aventis Pharma, 49 Fallingbrook Street, Whitby, Ontario L1R<br />

1M4, CANADA<br />

In the field of adult education, Jack Mezirow published<br />

his theory of Perspective Transformation which has<br />

become one of the most important contributions to the<br />

recent adult education literature. He identified 10<br />

phases a learner goes through before he/she<br />

incorporates a new perspective. There are many lessons<br />

from this theory that we can apply to our work in CME.<br />

After interacting with the poster, the participant will<br />

be able to:<br />

1 identify parallels between issues faced by<br />

practitioners in CME and contributions of the theory<br />

of Perspective Transformation;<br />

2 assess the application of key concepts of the theory<br />

to needs assessment, design and evaluation<br />

The key point of the presentation is that when designing<br />

CME one should consider that in order to incorporate<br />

a new perspective, a learner may go through ten phases<br />

that begin with a disorienting dilemma.<br />

7I9 The transtheoretical model of<br />

behaviour change: does it apply to<br />

clinical practices?<br />

Réjean Laprise*, Jill Donahue and Stephen Hotz<br />

Aventis Pharma, Department of Professional Education, 2150<br />

St Elzear Boulevard West, Laval, Quebec H7L 4A8, CANADA<br />

The transtheoretical model (TTM) proposes that people<br />

go through a series of 5 different stages of readiness<br />

when adopting new behaviours. Stage-specific<br />

educational interventions based on this model were<br />

shown to facilitate adoption of healthy behaviours in<br />

patients. In this presentation, we show evidence that<br />

the TTM may also be useful with physicians. A study<br />

was carried out on a convenient sample of 195 general<br />

practioners attending continuing medical education in<br />

cardiology. Physicians were asked to stage themselves<br />

according to their readiness to prescribe an ACE<br />

inhibitor to a high risk cardiac patient, to rate the<br />

importance they put on this medical practice and to<br />

indicate their degree of confidence in overcoming<br />

barriers associated with the performance of this clinical<br />

behaviour. The relationship between readiness to<br />

change behaviour on one hand, and self-confidence and<br />

importance on the other hand, were consistent with<br />

predictions made from the TTM.


Session 7J Continuing professional development (2)<br />

7J1 Sharing visions: working with CPD<br />

coordinators in General Practice<br />

Simon Smail* and Paul Hocking<br />

Dept of Postgraduate Education for General Practice, School of<br />

Postgraduate Studies, University of Wales College of Medicine,<br />

Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK<br />

During 2000, twenty general practitioners were<br />

recruited to work part-time with the Dept of<br />

Postgraduate Education for General Practice in Wales<br />

as ‘CPD co-ordinators’. Each general practitioner was<br />

employed to work one day a week to develop a managed<br />

programme of CPD in the locality for which they were<br />

responsible, drawing on local resources and supported<br />

with an operational budget. Since all these staff were<br />

facing new challenges in working as educational<br />

managers, a two-day workshop was held to assist them<br />

in developing a vision for their future work. This<br />

workshop used a variety of methods, including an<br />

‘imaginisation’ exercise in which the participants were<br />

asked to draw graphical representations of the ideals<br />

they wished to pursue in their work. The concepts were<br />

then discussed and developed into themes. This<br />

presentation describes the methods used in the<br />

workshop and presents the outcome in summary form.<br />

7J2 The “Advanced Training Practice”:<br />

a questionnaire and interviewbased<br />

study of their role<br />

John Skelton and Steve Field*<br />

West Midland GP Unit, 27 Highfield Road, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 3DP, UK<br />

In the West Midlands Region, UK, 6 practices have<br />

been designated “Advanced Training Practices” (ATPs).<br />

They offer specialised, often remedial, training to GP<br />

Registrars who, for example, have failed summative<br />

assessment. Registrars, trainers and other stakeholders<br />

have previously been studied to assess support offered<br />

for communication skills: this study extends this work<br />

by questionnaire and interview with trainers, to assess<br />

the perceived value of ATPs. Many Registrars at ATPs<br />

are overseas graduates. Major issues are poor English<br />

language and communication, (eg from doctors<br />

accustomed to a doctor-centred environment), poor<br />

cross-cultural understanding, poor study skills and<br />

defective knowledge. For trainers, a major issue is the<br />

extent to which Registrars are “trainable”: however,<br />

they have confidence in their ability to train and assess.<br />

The specialised needs of Registrars are adequately met,<br />

but the level of additional support, particularly through<br />

commercially available materials, requires expansion.<br />

7J3 Does gender make a difference?<br />

CME for the female physician<br />

Jane Tipping* and Jill Donahue<br />

10987 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario L6C 1M9,<br />

CANADA<br />

The population of female physicians in Canada is<br />

growing such that the percentage of female primary<br />

care physicians in practice is equal to males. CME is<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.77 -<br />

still designed and conducted based on the learning<br />

needs of a population that has been predominantly<br />

male. This research questions the assumption that the<br />

two genders are the same in their approaches to<br />

learning. The research identifies ways in which learning<br />

differs for female physicians in terms of preferred<br />

activity, motivation and participation. In addition, the<br />

particular challenges female physicians encounter in<br />

CME will be discussed along with strategies that may<br />

better meet the needs of this group.<br />

7J4 Strategic planning for effective<br />

partnerships<br />

Jane Tipping* and Danielle Deslauriers<br />

10987 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario L6C 1M9,<br />

CANADA<br />

We have reached a point in the evolution of CME<br />

whereby the creation of true partnerships between<br />

stakeholders and the effective pooling of resources is<br />

becoming a necessity. Within the past several years,<br />

the role of the pharmaceutical industry in Canada as a<br />

credible partner and provider of CME has become<br />

evident. Without dialogue between the stakeholder,<br />

duplication of efforts, territorial issues and<br />

miscommunication can arise resulting in less value for<br />

the learner. Ways to align mutual goals are sorely<br />

needed. This presentation will discuss the directions in<br />

which CME is growing and describe attempts of Merck<br />

Frosst Canada to align itself with the developing needs<br />

of the field. The presentation will critique a needs<br />

assessment technique used with 36 Canadian CME<br />

leaders; discuss results; the implications of<br />

pharmaceutical involvement in CME; and help<br />

determine ways in which partnership between<br />

academia, industry and others responsible for CME can<br />

grow.<br />

7J5 Integrating practice reflection and<br />

practice adjustment planning into<br />

the design of a CME meeting<br />

R L Thivierge*, L Samson and J V Patenaude<br />

721 Hartland, Montreal H2V 2X5, CANADA<br />

The new context of Continuing Professional<br />

Development (CPD) and of the Maintenance of<br />

Certification (MOC) of the Royal College of Physicians<br />

in Canada, brings an important pathway to ensure one’s<br />

CPD: the development of Personal Learning Projects<br />

(PLP). At the end of each half-day of a scientific<br />

meeting, periods of “reflection on my practice” (called<br />

CPD modules) are conducted by a facilitator as an<br />

integrated part of the program. Module 1 serves as an<br />

introduction to CPD, PLP and practice reflection<br />

generalities. Module 2 will help the participants to<br />

select specific key-messages derived from educational<br />

sessions to be applied to their practice environment<br />

(selecting own PLP). Module 3 helps to plan the<br />

validation and the implementation of their PLP once<br />

they are back to work. This model of intervention in<br />

CME meetings facilitates the linking between theory<br />

and practice.


7J6 The Catalan Council of Physicians’<br />

Colleges Accreditation Diploma in<br />

Continuing Medical Education<br />

A Ramos*, J Aliaga, A Gual and H Pardell<br />

College of Physicians of Barcelona, Centre of Studies, P Bonanova<br />

47, 08017 Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

The Catalan Council of Physicians’ Colleges has<br />

initiated an individual accreditation system, based on<br />

accredited Continuing Medical Education (CME). The<br />

system is voluntary and physicians can opt to obtain<br />

the Diploma of College Accreditation if the following<br />

prerequisites are achieved: a minimum of 10 credits<br />

obtained from the CME, accumulated to a minimum<br />

of 3 training activities carried out within the two<br />

previous years. The system includes a Technical<br />

Accreditation Office which deals with technical and<br />

administrative aspects and the Accreditation<br />

Commission which determines the accreditation system<br />

and grants the credits to be endorsed by the Governing<br />

Boards of the 4 Physicians’ Colleges in Catalonia<br />

(Barcelona, Girona, and Tarragona). This paper<br />

contains the first 100 accreditation requests, the<br />

percentages of concessions and denials, as well as the<br />

average of credits obtained, the activities presented, and<br />

a description of age and gender among other parameters<br />

of interest.<br />

- 4.78 -<br />

7J7 Breaking bad news: how to learn in<br />

a CME workshop<br />

François Goulet*, André Jacques* and Robert Carrier<br />

College des Médecins du Québec, 2170 René-Levesque Ouest,<br />

Montréal QC H3H 2T8, CANADA<br />

A 90-minute workshop offered to small groups was<br />

developed to help physicians to break bad news to their<br />

clientele. After the workshop and six months later,<br />

participants were asked to complete opened-question<br />

questionnaires. Between September 1997 and June<br />

1998, 50 workshops were held, reaching 706<br />

participants. From this number, 520 participants could<br />

be reached six months later. 207 participants (40%)<br />

completed the second questionnaire and 74% of them<br />

were identified from the first questionnaire to estimate<br />

the correlation. After six months, the key-messages<br />

retained were: never be overwhelmed, always have hope<br />

to offer, be prepared, find the right moment. The<br />

barriers still existing are: bad news is bad news,<br />

discomfort, and difficulty in taking the time. The<br />

participants found the workshop extremely helpful.<br />

Role playing and discussions with peers were effective<br />

methods used to produce changes in the practice.<br />

Session 7K International medical education<br />

7K1 Differences in learning style and<br />

satisfaction with Residency training<br />

for United States and<br />

internationally trained students<br />

Steven R Daugherty<br />

Kaplan Medical, 820 West Jackson, Suite 550, Chicago IL 60612,<br />

USA<br />

A national sample of medical residents training in the<br />

United States was surveyed about their residency<br />

experience. 3,604 returned usable surveys for a 64%<br />

response rate. Analyses examined ratings of satisfaction<br />

and what contributed most to learning experience for<br />

US trained students compared with the respondents<br />

who completed undergraduate medical education<br />

outside the US (IMGs). Results show that IMGs<br />

reported less time with attending physicians (5.61 vs.<br />

4.94, 7-point scale) and were overall less satisfied with<br />

their residency experience (5.14 vs. 4.78). US trained<br />

students rated contact with attending physicians and<br />

other residents as contributing most to their learning<br />

experience, while IMGs rated reading, patient rounds<br />

and lectures as the most important elements. These<br />

results suggest important differences both as to how<br />

IMGs learn and the structure of their residency training<br />

programs. Results are discussed with an eye towards<br />

students’ expectations and specialty selection.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7K2 Crossing borders - The <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Biomedical Exchange Office<br />

U Arnold* and J W Dudenhausen<br />

Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, <strong>Berlin</strong> Biomedical<br />

Exchange Office, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger<br />

Platz 1, D-13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

“To promote international education and qualification<br />

of medical students” is the mission of the <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Biomedical Exchange Office (BBEO), which was<br />

initially founded in 1996 as a cooperation project<br />

between the medical faculties of Humboldt-Universität<br />

(Charité) and Freie Universität <strong>Berlin</strong> (University<br />

Hospital Benjamin Franklin). The activities of the<br />

BBEO are:<br />

International Exchange<br />

• ERASMUS/SOKRATES<br />

• Biomedical Sciences Exchange Program between<br />

North America and Europe (BMEP)<br />

• Bilateral Cooperation<br />

• International Courses in English<br />

New Technologies in Education<br />

• Medic@l Deutsch<br />

• MedVoice<br />

• IMIPPP<br />

• Other projects


Service for Students. The BBEO<br />

• provides extensive personal consulting;<br />

• writes letters of recommendation for applications<br />

at foreign medical schools;<br />

• hands out various information regarding study<br />

abroad, and provides up-to-date information on the<br />

website;<br />

• shows poster exhibitions, extended by lectures and<br />

discussions, on the subject;<br />

• offers special medical language courses for<br />

incoming and outgoing students.<br />

7K3 Academic medical education in<br />

developing countries: an analysis<br />

of papers presented at medical<br />

education conferences in Argentina<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Gustavo Amestoy and<br />

Amelia Cabrera<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Globalization of medical education, including some<br />

agencies’ proposals of defining a universal curriculum,<br />

make it necessary to define what kind of activities are<br />

conducted in different regions. In order to determine<br />

what aspects of medical education were of interest in<br />

our country, what kind of methods were used and which<br />

disciplines were the most active in medical education,<br />

228 papers presented at two consecutive medical<br />

education conferences in Argentina were analyzed.<br />

Curriculum design (11%), problem based learning<br />

(10%), faculty development (10%), program evaluation<br />

(8%), teaching methods (8%), disciplines integration<br />

(7%), informatics and multimedia (5%), community<br />

service (5%), evaluation methods (5%), continuing<br />

medical education (5%), and admissions (5%), were<br />

the most frequently cited.<br />

Thirty percent of the papers were research based, and<br />

70% were narrative descriptions of programs in<br />

progress. Basic and clinical sciences were equally<br />

represented, the latter mainly in postgraduate education.<br />

These results are similar to those reported in developed<br />

countries.<br />

7K4 Communication skills training in<br />

Germany - results of a survey<br />

Jan Schildmann* and Ulrich Schwantes<br />

Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong> (Charite), Department of General<br />

Practice, Vogelsang 16, 78343 Horn, GERMANY<br />

The training of communication skills has become an<br />

important part of the curricula at many medical schools<br />

in Europe. In Germany however a lot of universities<br />

do not offer regular communication skills courses. To<br />

find out more about the actual situation regarding<br />

education in this field of medical education we<br />

conducted a survey among medical students who took<br />

part in seminars and lectures organised by the<br />

department of General Practice at different Medical<br />

Schools in Germany. The aim of our survey was to<br />

explore the existing learning opportunities offered by<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.79 -<br />

the medical faculties. Furthermore we asked the<br />

students about their needs regarding this aspect of<br />

medical training. In our presentation we will show the<br />

data of the survey and our conclusions for the future<br />

development of communication skills training as part<br />

of the training at German Medical Schools.<br />

7K5 Reform of the medical educational<br />

system in Georgia<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilasonia and A Telia*<br />

Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Ave, Tbilisi<br />

380077, GEORGIA<br />

Tbilisi Medical State University prepares annually 500<br />

specialists in medicine and pharmacy. Ten years ago<br />

our country moved to a new economic formation under<br />

difficult social and economical conditions and faced<br />

the necessity for reforms in the medical educational<br />

system. Following the Soviet era, and without central<br />

financing, medical education tries to fill the vacuum<br />

with “European air”. At the Medical University reform<br />

has been partially implemented. The learning process<br />

consists of three stages:<br />

1 Two years – basic course – examination<br />

2 Three years – clinical course – examination<br />

3 Two years – specialization – state examination<br />

certification (specialty – medical affairs,<br />

qualification – physician).<br />

A net of University clinics has been created as well as<br />

a rectorial post. The second step of the reform involved<br />

the establishment of outcome-based education,<br />

development and optimization of the learning process,<br />

translation of standard educational programs and<br />

textbooks, and acquaintance with the European<br />

educational system and standards. Realization of this<br />

goal is fairly difficult without support from the<br />

international community.<br />

7K6 Results and main objectives of the<br />

first stage of education reform at<br />

the TSMU<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia and N Pruidze*<br />

Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Ave, Tbilisi<br />

380077, GEORGIA<br />

Based on the tradition of European medical education,<br />

a high medical school was founded in Georgia in 1918;<br />

its successor is Tbilisi State Medical University. A new<br />

period of this high school started in 1992, when total<br />

autonomy was given to the high schools in independent<br />

Georgia. Since this time it has become possible to<br />

implement the cardinal changes in medical education<br />

and to engage highly qualified pedagogical and medical<br />

staff, which was quite difficult during the period of<br />

transition from one politico-economic system to<br />

another. In that period, well-known medical schools in<br />

the USA, Austria, Germany, France, Spain, Turkey,<br />

Egypt, etc. became our partners. At Tbilisi State<br />

Medical University there are departments of General<br />

Practice, Pediatrics, Preventive Medicine and<br />

Healthcare Management, Stomatology, Military<br />

Medicine, Medical Biology, Psychosomatic Medicine,


Psychotherapy and Pharmacy. Studies in the faculty of<br />

General Practice consist of 14 semesters, in total 8800<br />

academic hours. In our opinion, the curriculum is<br />

overloaded and a revision of the teaching methodology<br />

is needed. We aim to have close integration with<br />

European medical schools, which will give us an<br />

opportunity of reciprocal recognition of qualifications.<br />

7K7 First international integrated<br />

surgery course at the Charité,<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Hajo Schmidt-Traub<br />

Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Isländische Str. 11, <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

In cooperation with the Karolinska Institutet,<br />

Stockholm, Sweden, a 16 week surgery course took<br />

place in <strong>Berlin</strong>. It included surgery, orthopaedics,<br />

anaesthesia, radiology and urology. The course was<br />

mainly planned and organised by students who had<br />

taken part in the Stockholm international surgery<br />

course. The aim of the course was to mediate both<br />

practical and theoretical skills. The students were<br />

integrated into the daily routine of a general hospital<br />

and participated in practical and problem based<br />

seminars. Half of the students came from foreign<br />

countries. Language of instruction was English. The<br />

students’ learning experiences in seminars and hospital<br />

departments were evaluated. Feedback from both<br />

students and teachers was very positive. This project<br />

proved to be a good example of a different way of<br />

teaching. Therefore it may have a positive impact on<br />

the future structure of the medical curriculum at the<br />

Charité.<br />

Session 7L Special subjects<br />

7L1 Illegible notes - do tomorrow’s<br />

doctors need teaching on how to<br />

write more clearly?<br />

E Westcott, A Kontoyannis*, N Murch, T Reid and<br />

K Sixsmith<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, 9 Connaught Road,<br />

Roath, Cardiff CF24 3PT, UK<br />

Hand-written entries by doctors in patient notes aim to<br />

communicate information to other team members. It<br />

is important that these entries can be easily read and<br />

understood. 205 patient clerkings were read by medical<br />

students (fourth year) to asses the percentage of illegible<br />

words and unrecognisable abbreviations, and the<br />

absence of date, time, patient details and doctor’s<br />

identification. Whereas the recording of patient<br />

identification was good (due to the use of patient<br />

‘addressograph’ stickers), the recording of the doctor’s<br />

identification (name, position, bleep number), was<br />

incomplete in over half the entries. This poster discusses<br />

the implications of poorly written patient notes and<br />

suggests methods for improvement. These results call<br />

for improved teaching on handwriting legibility, the<br />

appropriate use of abbreviations and the recording of<br />

doctor identification. The use of doctor ‘identograph’<br />

stickers is suggested.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.80 -<br />

7K8 Counting the uncounted:<br />

estimating the number of overseas<br />

doctors in training grades in the UK<br />

currently not employed in the NHS<br />

Janet Grant, Mairead Beirne* and Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, MILTON KEYNES MK7 6AA, UK<br />

The main aims of this project were to:<br />

• Estimate the size of the pool of unemployed<br />

overseas doctors in the UK and to indicate its<br />

distribution across specialties and subspecialties;<br />

• Determine the career and job-seeking strategies of<br />

these doctors;<br />

• Describe the scope for improving these doctors’<br />

prospects of employment;<br />

• Estimate the background availability of posts.<br />

Because of their unemployment, there are no records<br />

of unemployed overseas doctors in the UK. This project<br />

therefore addressed the challenge of counting the<br />

uncounted. An approach to estimation was therefore<br />

selected which involved adopting a variety of methods<br />

and triangulating these to reach an overall view of the<br />

magnitude of the pool, its distribution and the reasons<br />

behind it. The methods adopted included:<br />

• Survey of Senior House Officer applicants<br />

• Documentary analysis<br />

• Secondary analysis of GMC and DoH statistics<br />

• Survey of competition for posts.<br />

7L2 An active method to prepare<br />

students to lead medical<br />

interviews: an experience at Xavier<br />

Bichat Medical School<br />

Corinne Pieters; Dominique Maillard*, Françoise<br />

Blanchet-Benqué<br />

Hopital Louis Mourier, Explorations Fonctionnelles, 178, rue<br />

des Renouillers, 92700 Colombes, FRANCE<br />

This study describes a series of two active trainings,<br />

teaching basic communication skills in the pre-clinical<br />

curriculum. In the first intervention, of a one-day<br />

duration, students had to reformulate in a popular radiostyle,<br />

different messages from a scientific paper, in front<br />

of 20 students. In the second intervention of a threehour<br />

duration, students working in small groups of 10,<br />

had to (from a video extract): observe behaviours of a<br />

patient meeting several doctors, analyse the styles of<br />

verbal and non-verbal communication and expose to<br />

other students the communication gap between the<br />

patient and the doctors he/she met. Each presentation<br />

is followed by a group discussion and a synthesis done<br />

by the teacher. Formative assessment will allow the<br />

students to master their own abilities to conduct medical<br />

interviews.


7L3 Teaching medical students patient<br />

advocacy skills; An<br />

interdisciplinary intervention using<br />

Standardized Patients/Families<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Virginia Randall, Janice Hanson,<br />

William Sykora, Aileen E Zanoni, Elizabeth Jeppson and<br />

Richard E Hawkins<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, National<br />

Capital Area Medical Simulation Center, 4301 Jones Bridge<br />

Road, Bethesda MD 20814, USA<br />

We describe an innovative medical education<br />

intervention, designed by interdisciplinary faculty<br />

collaborators, to teach and evaluate patient advocacy<br />

skills. The intervention is integrated into the required<br />

Family Medicine Clerkship within a comprehensive<br />

clinical experience in a simulation center. The goals of<br />

this educational intervention are to instill in medical<br />

students the appropriate knowledge, skills and attitudes<br />

to advocate effectively for their patients in a managed<br />

care environment. Intervention activities evolve around<br />

encounters with standardized patients/families. The<br />

specific clinical challenges focus on discharge planning<br />

for patients with significant home-health care needs.<br />

Related instructional activities include: individual<br />

feedback from standardized patients and faculty, an<br />

interactive teaching session featuring an advocacy<br />

contact workbook, interviews with real patients, and<br />

an opportunity to practice advocating to a standardized<br />

attending physician on behalf of a patient or family.<br />

Outcome measures include participant satisfaction and<br />

performance on the final clinical examination.<br />

7L4 The parameters affecting attitudes<br />

to death among students in a<br />

Medical College in Taiwan<br />

Ming-Liang Lai<br />

Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University<br />

Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, TAIWAN<br />

The parameters affecting the attitude to death and dying<br />

(anxiety, avoiding, philosophical thinking, and reality<br />

facing) were evaluated through a questionnaire to<br />

students at the Medical College of National Cheng<br />

Kung University. The anxiety response was more<br />

frequently noted in the female gender, in more<br />

pessimistic students, in those who consider religion to<br />

be important in their life, particularly Daoism and<br />

Buddhism, and in students not in the Department of<br />

Medicine. The avoiding response was noted more in<br />

the male, with AB blood type, and in students in the<br />

Department of Medicine. Interesting enough, the<br />

sophomore and higher-grade medical students seemed<br />

more avoiding than freshman. The pessimists, and those<br />

who had considered their own death, who had read<br />

books on thalantology, seen movies or read novels with<br />

death or dying as the main theme, presented a<br />

significantly stronger tendency towards philosophical<br />

thinking. Finally the reality facing response was more<br />

frequently noted in those who had read books on<br />

thalantology.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.81 -<br />

7L5 Evaluation of practical sessions in<br />

Clinical Anatomy: a strategy for<br />

educational improvement<br />

M A F Tavares* and M C Silva<br />

Institute of Anatomy, Medical School of Porto, Alameda Hernani<br />

Monteiro, 4200-319- Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

We have evaluated the students’ response to practical<br />

teaching sessions in Clinical Anatomy in our Medical<br />

School using action-research. The aim was to identify<br />

problems and to introduce changes which might<br />

improve the program and the performance of the<br />

teaching staff. At the end of each section of the program,<br />

each student completed a “target type” questionnaire<br />

with eight different components. As each quarter of<br />

the whole class had its own teacher, an analysis of<br />

variance was used to evaluate the target questions in<br />

the various sections of the program, and the<br />

performance of the four teachers. This research method<br />

gave us feedback on the students’ responses while the<br />

program was in progress. The results emphasize the<br />

importance of action-research in assessing and<br />

improving a developing program in a basic discipline<br />

of the medical curriculum.<br />

(Supported by Project PRAXIS XXI PCSH/C/CED/157/96)<br />

7L6 Towards a more effective teaching<br />

of Gross Anatomy: introducing new<br />

integrated clinical concepts and<br />

improving peer presentations/<br />

evaluation techniques<br />

Ameed Raoof*, Thomas Gest, William Burkel and<br />

Tamara Stein<br />

University of Michigan Medical School, Department. of<br />

Anatomical Sciences, Office of Medical Education, 3808 Med<br />

Sci Bldg II, Ann Arbor MI 48109-0608, USA<br />

Relevance and teaching methods of gross anatomy<br />

remains one of the most frequently assessed subjects<br />

among basic medical sciences. The medical gross<br />

anatomy course is taught at the University of Michigan<br />

to an average of 170 students. Measures to enhance<br />

effectiveness and promote relevance and learning<br />

opportunities included the introduction of new<br />

integrated clinical teaching concepts. These included<br />

clinical tutorials, clinical vignettes and modified<br />

practical exam questions. Students’ opinions about<br />

these techniques were assessed at the end of the<br />

semester. An interesting array of responses was<br />

obtained. Also, plans were laid down on providing<br />

students with clinical data related to the cadavers they<br />

dissect during the next semester. In addition, the peer<br />

presentation/evaluation technique that has been applied<br />

for a few years witnessed some further improvements.<br />

Students’ opinion about the new measures showed a<br />

significant improvement in the effectiveness of the<br />

technique in promoting the relevance of anatomical<br />

knowledge.


7L7 Putting the salutogenic orientation<br />

into practice: the life cycle course<br />

at the Technion<br />

H Eshach*, R Van-Raalte, L Dolev, H Bitterman and<br />

D Hermoni<br />

Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, PO Box 9649, Bat<br />

Galim, Haifa 31096, ISRAEL<br />

The salutogenic orientation, which focuses on origins<br />

of health, poses that we study the location of each<br />

person, at any time, in the ‘health ease/disease’<br />

continuum rather than dichotomize between healthy<br />

and sick people. The Life Cycle course at the Technion<br />

presents human social development from birth to death.<br />

Students, equipped with the salutogenic and<br />

biopsychosocial model, learn that patients’ “stories”<br />

reveal etiologically significant data that is often missed<br />

by clinicians. The aim is to identify a shift in students’<br />

perspectives regarding data about psychosocial aspects<br />

of the “patient story”. Before and after the Life Cycle<br />

course, students were provided with cases that required<br />

knowledge of the psychosocial aspects surrounding<br />

patients’ lives in order to treat them. Students were<br />

asked to rank contributing factors, including<br />

psychosocial and pathological factors, according to<br />

their relevance to the intended treatments. Results are<br />

pending and will be presented at the conference.<br />

7L8 ASAMANS (Ask Students About<br />

Medicine And National Socialism)<br />

T Drewes*, P Langkafel* and S Muller*<br />

Charité, Department of Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Medicine during National Socialism (1933-1945) in<br />

Germany and the consequences for medical practice<br />

nowadays are the topic of this presentation. Focus of<br />

the study is the knowledge, assessment and attitudes<br />

of medical students towards medicine and National<br />

Socialism. We asked in which way medical education<br />

at the Charité/<strong>Berlin</strong> promotes the discussion of this<br />

subject among students. We asked about general basic<br />

topics such as euthanasia, medical experiments in<br />

concentration camps and the role of German doctors<br />

during National Socialism. A sample of 300 students<br />

at the start, middle and end of the studies (first, fifth,<br />

tenth semester) answered a questionnaire of 35<br />

questions between April and May 2001. The team<br />

consisted of one physician and two medical students.<br />

The results will be discussed and presented at the<br />

conference. Further information will be posted at<br />

www.asamans.de<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.82 -<br />

7L9 Stress among medical doctors<br />

J Agsteribbe* and J Cohen-Schotanus<br />

University of Groningen, Department of Education, Faculty of<br />

Medical Sciences, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

While interviewing medical doctors we noticed quite<br />

a number of complaints concerning job load and lack<br />

of leisure time. The overwhelming amount of<br />

complaints surprised us since one of the objectives for<br />

medical training is to learn to deal with stress and to<br />

become aware of the mutual influences of work and<br />

private life. Our research question is therefore: are<br />

workers in the medical profession more susceptible to<br />

stress than those in other occupations? 235 medical<br />

doctors were interviewed by phone and asked to fill<br />

out the General Health questionnaire (GQH-12); 150<br />

responded. The results indicated that: i) medical doctors<br />

were more stressed than their age group with the same<br />

educational level; ii) female doctors were much more<br />

stressed than their male colleagues; iii) female doctors<br />

are at a greater risk of experiencing stress than male<br />

doctors. It therefore seems necessary to pay more<br />

attention to this phenomenon during medical training.<br />

7L10 Introducing changes in medical<br />

education: the “Strategy” of<br />

Clinical Anatomy at the Medical<br />

School of Porto<br />

M A F Tavares<br />

Institute of Anatomy, Medical School of Porto, Alameda Hernani<br />

Monteiro, 4200-319- Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

The discipline of Clinical Anatomy, as introduced in<br />

the Medical School of Porto in academic year 1995/<br />

1996, involved big changes in the way we teach<br />

anatomy to medical students, by adopting a clinically<br />

oriented approach. The teaching/learning program has<br />

been developed over the last 5 years through an actionresearch<br />

project: (1) organisation of a new approach in<br />

Sections (regional approach) divided into different<br />

Units (physical examination, sectional and imaging<br />

anatomy sessions, malformations and anatomical<br />

variations, case-studies); (2) development of<br />

instructional materials (study guides, handouts, casestudies)<br />

and (3) introduction of interactive audiovisuals.<br />

This program involved all the staff and students as<br />

active researchers in this project. Its full implementation<br />

is providing medical students with a solid anatomical<br />

competence through the acquisition of an “anatomical<br />

reasoning” that aims to provide skilled clinical<br />

performance.<br />

(Supported by Project PRAXIS XXI PCSH/C/CED/157/96)


Session 8A Computer mediated learning and assessment<br />

8A1 Preparing clinical small group<br />

sessions by using digital video in<br />

CBE<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan A Gevers<br />

Leuven and Peter G M de Jong<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Onderwijscentrum IG, Kamer<br />

C5-54, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

Small-group patient demonstrations form an important<br />

part of the Internal Medicine clerkship in Leiden. The<br />

purpose of these meetings is to discuss symptoms, signs<br />

and management of common health problems and<br />

diseases. In practice it is often difficult to get a patient<br />

with the required diagnosis at the right time and place.<br />

As a result, most cases have to be presented in written<br />

text. In order to make better use of the available patient<br />

material several patients were recorded on digital video<br />

at a time that was more convenient for them. The images<br />

were used in a computer based educational program.<br />

Students are requested to study this program on the<br />

evening before the small-group discussion takes place.<br />

During the session the students can discuss the case<br />

under supervision of a clinician. The use of this new<br />

teaching method has improved the educational value<br />

of the already highly appreciated patient<br />

demonstrations.<br />

8A2 Inter-physician communication<br />

training through computer-based<br />

patient simulations<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, E Schoonderwaldt and<br />

J D Donnison-Speyer<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Heelkunde Onderwijs K6-R,<br />

Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

Communication between physicians is essential in<br />

modern medicine; therefore communication training<br />

should be integrated in medical curricula. A joint<br />

project of the Leiden University Medical Center and<br />

the Amsterdam Medical Center, will result in twenty<br />

computer-based cases, developed in the Dynamic<br />

Patient Simulator (DPS). DPS is a computer program<br />

for creating and running patient simulations. In such a<br />

simulation several students treat one virtual patient<br />

asynchronously, enabling them to practise clear and<br />

adequate communication by training the transfer of the<br />

patient’s medical record. For this purpose we created a<br />

model of the inter-physician communication. With this<br />

model we can differentiate between multiple types of<br />

communication with different modalities, such as<br />

transfer of collected evidence, consultancy and<br />

strategies for further evidence collection, assessment<br />

and intervention. In our presentation we will explain<br />

the communication model and demonstrate its<br />

implementation in DPS.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.83 -<br />

8A3 Computer Assisted Learning: using<br />

and doing research in primary care<br />

Linda Leighton-Beck*, Philip Hannaford, Neil Hamilton,<br />

Sara Shaw and Yvonne Carter<br />

Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education,<br />

Postgraduate Medical Department, University of Aberdeen,<br />

Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK<br />

Development of CAL for research in primary care<br />

resulted from practitioners’ expressed needs, and the<br />

policy agenda. National collaboration achieved funding<br />

for a demonstration model. The project will:<br />

• design an innovative educational intervention to<br />

support staff in health settings, nationally and<br />

internationally;<br />

• develop a comprehensive course on research -<br />

Understanding Research and, Learning to do<br />

Research - utilising, initially, CD-ROM;<br />

• develop applications facilitating web access;<br />

• evaluate the concept through a pilot CD-ROM.<br />

The CD-ROM has been developed as a demonstration<br />

model through a collaboration of researchers and Medi-<br />

CAL technologists. Evaluation of its educational value<br />

and technological robustness will utilise questionnaire<br />

and interview of a defined sample of General<br />

Practitioners and healthcare professionals. Evidence of<br />

usefulness, effectiveness and accessibility will inform<br />

development. Successful outcomes will facilitate<br />

progress from demonstration model to platform support<br />

tools, customised to the needs of specialities.<br />

8A4 Extracting core competencies<br />

“bottom up” from case histories by<br />

an online consensus seeking<br />

process in family medicine<br />

Peter Schlaeppi* and Ralph Bloch<br />

Institute of Medical Education IAWF, University of Bern,<br />

Inselspital 37A, CH-3010 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

This project responds to the need for a clear and detailed<br />

definition of the required competencies for future<br />

family physicians in Switzerland. The aim of the project<br />

is to demonstrate that a web-based platform is a feasible<br />

and comfortable means to define relevant core<br />

competencies based on case histories. The practitioners<br />

of an expert panel had to write case histories based on<br />

their daily work. The panel outlined core problems and<br />

core criteria to solve core problems. Thus, a core<br />

competence is defined as a bundle of the criteria<br />

necessary to solve a core problem. In a first step 82<br />

core competencies consisting of 348 criteria could be<br />

identified. Online work was well accepted by the panel.<br />

Working together online seems to be a feasible means<br />

to seek relevant consensus in the continuing process<br />

of developing and updating core competencies in<br />

family medicine.


8A5 A new era of teaching: an<br />

innovative resource for continuing<br />

medical education and evidencebased<br />

management<br />

K El-Hayes, B McElhinney, B Adams, E Boyd and<br />

K McKinney<br />

1 Oakridge, Castlewellan Road, Banbridge, Co Down BT32<br />

4RT, NORTHERN IRELAND<br />

The aim of the project was to use and develop the skills<br />

of existing personnel to create a unique educational<br />

resource suitable for use by the multiprofessional team<br />

and adaptable to any setting. Using standard Microsoft<br />

Office software, resources from established Obstetric<br />

and Gynaecology texts and RCOG publications were<br />

used as references and incorporated with commercially<br />

available CD ROMs and pre-existing protocols and<br />

procedures into an interactive format. The result is an<br />

educational, multimedia computerised shell adaptable<br />

to any speciality. It forms a huge, informative teaching<br />

source that includes:<br />

• Case Based Learning<br />

• Evidence Based Protocols<br />

• All-encompassing hospital directory<br />

• Animated presentations of common procedures<br />

• Enormous database for self-assessment including<br />

MCQs, essay questions etc.<br />

• User-friendly site.<br />

There is no doubt that the result is an unfolding journey<br />

of extreme magnitude. We believe that the<br />

incorporation of this concept is essential for personal<br />

development in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the new<br />

Millennium. Forget the WWW: meet the Obs and<br />

Gynae Wide Web.<br />

8A6 Evaluating medical student and<br />

resident education: a CME software<br />

J C Edwards*, P Ogden and A A Stricker<br />

Department of Family & Community Medicine, Texas A & M<br />

University, 810 Southern Hills, College Station, Texas 77843-<br />

1114, USA<br />

The software CME program titled “Evaluating Medical<br />

Student and Resident Education” delivers an interactive<br />

multimedia application on CD-ROM. Designed as an<br />

interactive tutorial, it requires only 30 to 45 minutes<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8B Implementation of PBL<br />

8B1 Problem-based learning for<br />

trainees in Anaesthesiology<br />

Sigrid Adam* and Jan Klein<br />

University Hospital Rotterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology,<br />

Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015<br />

GD Rotterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

In order to increase the efficiency of learning during<br />

postgraduate training we educate our residents in a<br />

programme which is problem-based. Weekly tutorials<br />

- 4.84 -<br />

for a busy doctor to complete. Objectives are: (1)<br />

understand and apply the concept of judge/<br />

diagnostician in evaluating student/resident<br />

performance; (2) understand and apply defined<br />

standards to evaluate reliably. The content, new in<br />

medical education, addresses the physician tendency<br />

to nurture trainees. The outcome - ability to change<br />

roles from teacher to judge/diagnostician. Brief<br />

instruction and four videotaped interactions between<br />

attending physicians and trainees provide self-diagnosis<br />

and practice. The program incorporates two published<br />

examples of defined standards. Print materials can be<br />

downloaded from the CD-ROM. MPEG-1 compressed<br />

videos provide exceptional quality, closely matching<br />

movie industry standards at 30 frames/second. This<br />

high quality video prevents use of the internet, which<br />

would lessen quality.<br />

8A7 Metabolic challenges on CD-ROMs<br />

Marie-Paule Van Damme*, Jonathan Gould, Bruce Livett,<br />

Janet Macaulay, Ron Maxwell and Graham Parslow<br />

Monash University, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular<br />

Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Clayton 3800, Victoria,<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

As a way of engaging students more actively in their<br />

learning process, we have created multimedia<br />

presentations that offer:<br />

• “Self-Directed Learning” using interactive tutorials<br />

on various aspects of metabolism, nutrition and<br />

diabetes;<br />

• “Problem-solving exercises” requiring students to<br />

think logically and integrate information drawn<br />

from a variety of sources;<br />

• “Case studies” to teach students to apply their<br />

knowledge to specific clinical cases, such as “The<br />

Effects of Alcohol on Metabolism” and “Dietary<br />

Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes”.<br />

These programs have been compiled as two CD-ROMs:<br />

“Biochemistry-A Metabolic Challenge” and<br />

“Nutritional and Hormonal Aspects of Diabetes”. They<br />

challenge students to acquire a wide understanding of<br />

the interdependence of metabolic processes occurring<br />

in the major tissues of the body under different<br />

nutritional and hormonal states. Surveys have shown<br />

that the use of these teaching tools improves student<br />

understanding and enjoyment of the subject compared<br />

to conventional teaching methods.<br />

involve 9 trainees per group. Since active learning is<br />

known to improve knowledge and recall, the specific<br />

learning objectives of a fictive patient case are worked<br />

out by the group and discussed with the support of a<br />

tutor. Self-studies are an integral part of the programme<br />

which also involves questions and instructions<br />

distributed by the tutor via internet. According to the<br />

concept of iterative integration the learning issues of<br />

the cases gradually get more difficult and are


longitudinally related to what has already been learned.<br />

Residents find this form of learning very encouraging<br />

and stimulating. Besides improvement of knowledge,<br />

problem-based learning also improves the quality of<br />

teamwork and communicative skills.<br />

8B2 Communicating with students in a<br />

problem-based curriculum:<br />

experiences with WebCT<br />

Michelle McLean and Kathy Murrell<br />

University of Natal, Department of Physiology, Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Private Bag X7, Congella 4013, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

A problem-based curriculum was introduced at the<br />

Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine (University of<br />

Natal, Durban, South Africa) in January 2001. Several<br />

factors required that the year co-ordinator be able to<br />

communicate with students on a daily basis. After<br />

evaluating several packages, WebCT (Web Course<br />

Tools) was chosen as the front-end product for the<br />

delivery of Internet material because of e-mail and<br />

bulletin board facilities, its ability to handle high quality<br />

graphics and streaming video, as well as the integration<br />

of student records and student tracking. Accessing<br />

WebCT from sites outside the campus was considered<br />

important, in the light of the community work senior<br />

students would be undertaking. Results from the<br />

preliminary evaluation of WebCT by first year students<br />

(after Module 1) are encouraging. This presentation<br />

will discuss the development of module course material<br />

in WebCT, as well as how students of differing<br />

educational background have embraced the technology.<br />

8B3 Faculty members and senior<br />

students as facilitators in PBLgroups<br />

- similarities and differences<br />

Are Holen*, Kristin Wigen and Oyvind Ellingsen<br />

Institute of Community Medicine and General Practice,<br />

Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, Norwegian University of<br />

Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

Both faculty members and senior students may serve<br />

as facilitators (tutors) in PBL-groups at the Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and<br />

Technology. Each group has two alternating facilitators;<br />

one only may be a senior student. A scale has been<br />

developed to assess central dimensions of the<br />

facilitators’ group behaviour. Once each term, the<br />

students complete the scale. Along with general<br />

feedback, the results are given to the facilitators. The<br />

aim is to improve facilitators’ contributions to group<br />

interaction and learning processes in PBL-groups.<br />

Findings about similarities and differences between<br />

faculty members and senior students as facilitators will<br />

be presented and discussed. Also, some reflections on<br />

senior students as facilitators in PBL-groups will be<br />

discussed.<br />

8B4 Tutors’ perspectives of problembased<br />

learning<br />

Diana Kelly<br />

Department of Education for Medicine & Dentistry, 4th Floor,<br />

Henrietta Raphael House, Guy’s Campus, St Thomas Street,<br />

London SE1 9RT, UK<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.85 -<br />

While PBL has been widely written about, there is<br />

limited research concerning PBL tutors’ perspectives.<br />

This study set out to explore teachers’ viewpoints in a<br />

context where PBL was introduced part way through<br />

the undergraduate curriculum, and as one of several<br />

teaching methods. The aim was to investigate the<br />

question: how do teachers perceive and experience their<br />

role as PBL tutors? Research was conducted during<br />

1999/2000 at King’s campus of Guy’s, King’s and St.<br />

Thomas’ School of Medicine. Qualitative methods of<br />

data collection and analysis were used, with interviews<br />

being conducted with tutors from the newly established<br />

PBL programme. From the findings it emerged that<br />

tutors faced challenges as they grappled with the<br />

complexities of their role. These challenges were<br />

located within personal understandings and external<br />

perceptions of PBL, as well as tutors’ own experiences.<br />

Discussion of the findings will be the focus of this<br />

presentation.<br />

8B5 The E.D.I.T. project in Linköping:<br />

using web-based scenarios for PBL<br />

Wolfram Antepohl*, Anne-Christine Persson, Margareta<br />

Bachrach-Lindström and Björn Bergdahl<br />

Division of Medical Education, Linköping University, University<br />

Hospital, S-581 85 Linköping, SWEDEN<br />

In the spring term of 2001, the Faculty of Health<br />

Sciences, inspired by the Graduate Medical <strong>Programme</strong><br />

at the University of Sydney, started to implement its<br />

E.D.I.T. (Educational Development using Information<br />

and Communication Technology)-project. The idea<br />

behind the project is to increase the reality aspects of<br />

scenarios (cases or problems) used to facilitate learning<br />

in a problem-based curriculum. Apart from text<br />

documents, web-based scenarios may contain video<br />

clips, digital images of high quality (plain photographs,<br />

x-ray, microscopy, etc.), sound, graphics and other<br />

media formats. In the fifth semester of the medical<br />

curriculum, EDIT was implemented as a pilot project.<br />

Twenty-five patient scenarios were designed and put<br />

on an intranet-server using the media formats<br />

mentioned above. PBL groups worked in rooms<br />

equipped with a computer connected to the intranet, a<br />

projector and an interactive whiteboard. Students’ and<br />

tutors’ experiences with the new scenario format were<br />

evaluated using qualitative and quantitative approaches.<br />

Group sessions were observed and analysed concerning<br />

potential effects on the PBL-process. The project and<br />

results of the evaluation will be presented during the<br />

conference.<br />

8B6 How to promote success in a PBL<br />

tutorial session<br />

N Paganus*, K Lonka and T Hatonen<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Learning Centre/Development & Resource<br />

Unit, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014 Helsinki,<br />

FINLAND<br />

The present study examines the effects of students’<br />

attitudes towards PBL on study behaviour and learning<br />

outcomes. The quality and functioning of the tutorials<br />

in relation to learning outcomes were looked at. The<br />

participants were 17 second-year medical students. Six<br />

PBL-tutorial sessions were videotaped. Of the total of


540 minutes of videotape, “brainstorming”, “setting<br />

learning goals”, and “evaluation” were analysed. The<br />

participants filled in Likert-type questionnaires. After<br />

the last session, the students also answered open-ended<br />

questions. The relations among students’ attitudes, time<br />

spent on individual study, student behaviour in tutorials,<br />

and their academic achievement were analysed. It was<br />

found that students with a positive attitude used more<br />

time for individual study and concentrated more on<br />

medical knowledge than on irrelevant comments during<br />

tutorials. It appeared that the positive attitude, study<br />

time spent, and an active role in tutorial sessions were<br />

all related to good exam grades.<br />

8B7 Evaluation of the student staff in the<br />

experience of PBL in the Federal<br />

University of Roraima - Brasil<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8C Curriculum planning<br />

8C1 Priorities in the content of the<br />

curriculum from the standpoint of<br />

the academic staff<br />

E Nagle*, R Velins and V Pirags<br />

Latvian Medical Academy, Department of Medical Biology, Riga<br />

Stradina University, Dzirciema Str. 16, Riga LV-1007, LATVIA<br />

A questionnaire of academic staff has been conducted<br />

to ascertain opinion about the most important aims and<br />

essential elements of the curriculum highlighted in the<br />

National Concept “Tomorrow`s Doctors in Latvia”.<br />

Teachers were asked to arrange the aims of a curriculum<br />

in order of relevance. The sequence was as follows:<br />

knowledge as a basis for medical practice, health<br />

promotion and prevention, independent learning and<br />

life long learning. This questionnaire highlights also<br />

that the most essential elements of the curriculum are<br />

the compulsory amount of theoretical knowledge<br />

defined for each study term, mastering of appropriate<br />

practical skills and introduction of optional study<br />

modules. Analysis of these results could be used for<br />

further curriculum planning at the Faculty of General<br />

Medicine.<br />

8C2 Reforming the core curriculum of<br />

the Reformstudiengang in <strong>Berlin</strong> - a<br />

Delphi study<br />

B Huenges*, W Burger, J W Dudenhausen, U Frei,<br />

C Frommel, H-P Lemmens, U Schwantes and D Scheffner<br />

Arbeitsgruppe Reformstudiengang Medizin, Charité, Campus<br />

Virchow-Klinikum, Lehrgebaude, 2 Stock, Augustenburger Platz<br />

1, 13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

After experiences with three semesters in the new<br />

reformed curriculum we realised the necessity to<br />

reconstruct our core content. To do this, about 1400<br />

topics, derived by different health and disease surveys,<br />

were reviewed. Out of these our interdisciplinary core<br />

group identified 376 ‘health problems’ (123 patients’<br />

- 4.86 -<br />

Alvaro Tulio Fortes*, Cesar Ferreira Penna de Faria,<br />

Ruy Guilherme de Souza and Fernado Menezes da Silva<br />

UFRR Brasil, Rua Irineu Lucena 50, Mecejana, Boa Vista<br />

Roraima, 6930-4210, BRAZIL<br />

From the history of Medicine, and particularly in the<br />

area of Medical Education, can be observed prominent<br />

aspects in its secular evolution. The first one, classical<br />

medicine, comes from Ancient Greece and the other,<br />

clinical medicine, originates in Occidental Europe,<br />

which today constitutes the basis of modern scientific<br />

medicine. This work intends, through an evaluation on<br />

the part of the student staff, to demonstrate the<br />

developed activities, the experiences and the results of<br />

the introduction of a model of problem-based medical<br />

education in the Medicine course of the Federal<br />

University of Roraima. A total of 128 evaluations<br />

relating to the organization and content of the program,<br />

the system of evaluation, the physical structure and the<br />

human factors, have been carried out on the learning<br />

of 1st and 4th years.<br />

symptoms and signs, 205 diseases and diagnoses, and<br />

48 general aspects of medicine) which appeared crucial<br />

for modern medical education. Topics were selected<br />

according to their frequency, urgency and exemplarity.<br />

This corpus represents the basis for a faculty wide<br />

Delphi survey, started in April 2001. In the first round,<br />

463 faculty members from 63 different departments<br />

were contacted and asked to review our proposal from<br />

the point of view of their area of practice. This<br />

procedure was chosen to promote faculties’<br />

involvement and feeling of ownership of the<br />

‘Reformstudiengang Medizin’.<br />

8C3 Early clinical clerkship - does it<br />

make a difference?<br />

Berit Eika* and Ole Sonne<br />

Enhed for Medicinsk Uddannelse, SVF, Universitetsparken,<br />

Bygning 611, DK 8000 Aarhus C, DENMARK<br />

The effects of an early (2nd year) 8 week long clinical<br />

clerkship were investigated. Students with clinical<br />

exposure were compared to students without clinical<br />

experience on: 1) attitudes towards medical education,<br />

and 2) performance on a short essay examination in<br />

physiology. More students with clinical exposure felt<br />

they had insight into the medical profession. When<br />

compared to students with no clinical experience, the<br />

early clinical exposure induced a more favourable<br />

attitude towards the significance of early patient<br />

contact. No differences were found in the two groups’<br />

study motivation, feelings for having chosen the right<br />

study, or sense of belonging to the profession. The<br />

students with clinical exposure performed slightly<br />

better on the physiology examination, but other<br />

differences in study population could account for this.<br />

In conclusion, despite very positive evaluations of early<br />

clinical clerkships it is difficult to document that the<br />

clerkship changes students’ attitudes or performance.


8C4 ECTS (European Credit Transfer<br />

System) as a tool in curriculum<br />

development<br />

B Grether<br />

Veterinarmedizinische Fakultat der, Universitat Zurich,<br />

Winterthurerstr. 252, CH 8057 Zurich, SWITZERLAND<br />

The European credit transfer system is based on the<br />

total study workload of an average student. The “lecture<br />

per week” is no longer the measure for study workload;<br />

credits also allow the reflection of student time devoted<br />

to other learning activities such as e-learning, group<br />

work, directed self-study and time spent in skills labs.<br />

Whereas transferring an already existing curriculum<br />

into credits may be very difficult, ECTS can be a helpful<br />

tool when planning a new curriculum. The total amount<br />

of study workload will be defined for each course,<br />

including contact hours, pre- and post- course<br />

assignment, preparation for examinations and time<br />

necessary for various learning activities other than<br />

lectures. By attributing credits for this a balance of<br />

study workload over the whole course of study can be<br />

found. A credit system may also create an environment<br />

adequate for introducing new self-directed learning<br />

methods.<br />

8C5 The continuum of professional<br />

development<br />

H M R Meier<br />

University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University<br />

Avenue, Department of Psychiatry, Room 929, Toronto ON<br />

M5G 1X5, CANADA<br />

The first Elective provides the first step on the lifelong<br />

journey of professional development. This<br />

teaching-learning relationship offers additional<br />

dimensions for student and Tutor. Appropriate support<br />

for the Tutor’s professional contribution, including<br />

educational credits, enhances the spirit of the Electives<br />

programme and encourages experience in areas underrepresented<br />

or not yet represented in the core<br />

curriculum. Collaboration with CME and rural medical<br />

education includes conceptualisation of faculty<br />

development applicable beyond the Electives<br />

programme, as changes in core curriculum increasingly<br />

involve off-campus Tutors.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8D The final examination<br />

8D1 Consistency of examination marks<br />

T Vik*, K H Karlsen and S Westin<br />

Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Department of<br />

Community Medicine, Medical Faculty, Olav Kyrres gt 3, N-<br />

7489 Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

To assess the consistency of examination marks, four<br />

examiners marked two cases given to 69 graduating<br />

medical students as part of the final board examination.<br />

- 4.87 -<br />

8C6 Evaluating ethics seminars<br />

Gerald Neitzke<br />

Department of History, Ethics & Theory of Medicine, Hannover<br />

Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg - Str 1, D30623<br />

Hannover, GERMANY<br />

Teaching medical ethics involves teaching aims and<br />

objectives on different levels. On a cognitive level facts<br />

are taught to extend students’ knowledge. On an<br />

affective level emotions and conscience are dealt with<br />

to foster students’ attitudes and conduct. On the<br />

practical level skills are exercised to achieve sound<br />

moral judgement and decision-making, teamqualifications,<br />

and communication skills. If the<br />

effectiveness of ethics seminars is to be evaluated, all<br />

levels of teaching objectives have to be considered.<br />

Changes of attitudes and behaviour are key qualities<br />

of successful moral education. How can they be<br />

measured and what are fundamental conditions of such<br />

tests? Results should not be biased by students’ moral<br />

convictions. Behavioural changes should be<br />

distinguished from changes of attitudes only. A control<br />

group in a strict statistical sense has to be found. This<br />

presentation scrutinises the prerequisites of a standard<br />

of best evidence in ethics education.<br />

8C7 A tool to evaluate medical ethics<br />

seminars<br />

Mareike Moeller* and Gerald Neitzke<br />

Geibelplatz 4, 30173 Hannover, GERMANY<br />

The development and testing-phase of a survey to<br />

evaluate ethics seminars are presented. At Hannover<br />

Medical School one third of first year medical students<br />

get the chance to attend ethics classes. This offers the<br />

opportunity of an ideal study design with a randomised<br />

control group. The questionnaire is designed to test<br />

affective and practical components related to specific<br />

teaching aims. Attitudes like moral conscientiousness<br />

and empathy, and abilities like argumentation skills and<br />

decision-making are detected. The rationale is to<br />

measure students’ development in the handling of moral<br />

dilemmas before and after attending ethics classes.<br />

Students are confronted with two case histories which<br />

pose moral problems. A total of 16 statements (4 on<br />

each teaching objective) are to be approved/disapproved<br />

on a ratio scale. The pre-test took place already; the<br />

post-test will be carried out in July 2001. The<br />

questionnaire and preliminary results are presented.<br />

The marks were scored from 5 (failed) to 12 (excellent)<br />

and grouped in four categories: Failed, acceptable,<br />

good, and excellent. No student failed. Mean score<br />

given by one examiner (7.9; SD: 1.6) was significantly<br />

lower than that given by the other three (9.4; SD: 1.2).<br />

Correlation coefficients between examiners’ scores<br />

varied from 0.61 to 0.72 (p < 0.001). Agreement in<br />

classifying a student’s knowledge as acceptable, good<br />

or excellent varied from no (kappa: 0.04; 95% CI: -


0.05 - 0.13) to moderate (kappa: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 -<br />

0.70) between various pairs of examiners. Agreement<br />

between two endocrinologists assessing a case in<br />

endocrinology was only fair (kappa: 0.21; 95% CI:<br />

0.02-0.40). The results suggest unreliable (inter-rater)<br />

grading in written clinical case examinations.<br />

8D2 Identifying threshold competence<br />

in an undergraduate qualifying<br />

clinical examination<br />

John Cookson* and Stewart Petersen<br />

Leicester Warwick Medical School, Division of Medical<br />

Education, Faculty of Medicine, P O Box 138, Leicester LE1<br />

9HN, UK<br />

Undergraduate qualifying examinations seek to identify<br />

those who are competent to proceed to house officer<br />

training. This requires definition of the standard of<br />

competence required of the new graduate, and its<br />

conversion to a threshold within an examination. We<br />

have attempted to define the concept of the ‘minimally<br />

competent’ practitioner – one who is just able to<br />

proceed. The final professional clinical examination<br />

at LWMS is graded in terms of five ‘categories of<br />

competence’, with precise grade descriptors. We asked<br />

consultants who train house officers to define the<br />

minimally competent new graduate in terms of the<br />

proportions of patients where they would not perform<br />

satisfactorily in each category of competence.<br />

Proportions ranged from 0% to 50%. There was a clear<br />

tendency for history and examination skills to be<br />

considered more important. The findings have<br />

implications for setting examination thresholds.<br />

8D3 The validity of performance<br />

standards on a certification<br />

examination for occupational<br />

therapists<br />

Ernest Skakun<br />

Division of Studies in Medical Education, 2 J3000 WMC, Faculty<br />

of Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, University of Alberta,<br />

EDMONTON, Alberta, T6G 2R7, CANADA<br />

This study investigated the validity of passing scores<br />

set by the Nedelsky and Angoff methods for an<br />

occupational therapy national certification exam. Eight<br />

judges rendered Nedelsky and Angoff judgments for<br />

302 multiple choice items. Judges used a five-point<br />

scale to rate the competence of examinees selecting<br />

each alternative as an answer. Judges’ decisions were<br />

correlated with scores of examinees near the passing<br />

scores. Item difficulties were computed for examinees<br />

with scores just above (higher) and just below (lower)<br />

the passing scores for each method. The number of<br />

alternatives rated as “significant concerns about<br />

competence” and selected as possible answers was<br />

compared for higher and lower scoring examinees. The<br />

correlation between judges’ decisions and examinee<br />

scores around the passing score was 0.34 and 0.23 for<br />

the Angoff and Nedelsky methods respectively.<br />

Comparisons of proportion correct for higher and lower<br />

candidates showed more consistency for the Angoff<br />

method.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.88 -<br />

8D4 Reliability of a sequential clinical<br />

examination<br />

Stewart Petersen* and John Cookson<br />

Leicester Warwick Medical School, Division of Medical<br />

Education, Faculty of Medicine, P O Box 138, Leicester LE1<br />

9HN, UK<br />

Clinical competence of students at Leicester Warwick<br />

Medical School is assessed by direct observation of<br />

consultations with a series of patients. Summative<br />

assessments are sequential. All students are observed<br />

with 2 or 4 patients, (depending on stage in the course),<br />

and those whose competence remains in doubt are<br />

observed with a further 3 or 4. In each consultation, a<br />

different pair of examiners observes students<br />

continuously. Examiners grade independently<br />

performance in five categories of competence defined<br />

by precise descriptors. There are precise grade<br />

descriptors. All examiners are trained. In a full, final<br />

examination, therefore, each student has 16 grades for<br />

each of five categories of competence. Analysis of data<br />

from three full cycles of assessment demonstrates that:<br />

(i) there is a high degree of inter-examiner reliability;<br />

(ii) eight cases are sufficient to mitigate case specificity;<br />

(iii) students vary in the relationship between<br />

performance in different categories of competence.<br />

8D5 Considerations of Legal, Ethical,<br />

Organizational Aspect of Clinical<br />

Competence in a National<br />

Licencing Examination, Evaluation<br />

at the Medical Council of Canada<br />

Jacques E. Des Marchais*, Dale W. Dauphinee and<br />

David Blackmore<br />

12420 rue Joseph-Edouard-Samson, Montreal Quebec H4K<br />

2N9, CANADA<br />

Organizations responsible for development and<br />

administration of national licensing examinations are<br />

becoming major partners in responding to evolution<br />

of emerging new social needs, such as Considerations<br />

of Legal, Ethical and Organizational aspects of medical<br />

practice(CLEO).The Medical Council of Canada<br />

(MCC) has been responsible for developing an<br />

examination process which leads to licensure to practise<br />

in the Canadian provinces. The study presents the<br />

decision-making process which has resulted in the<br />

development of the CLEO content of the Medical<br />

Council of Canada Qualifying Examination. The<br />

validation process of this new content is demonstrated<br />

as well as specific objectives in each of the three CLEO<br />

components. Results are presented from the first<br />

mandatory implementation, in May 2000, for about<br />

2000 candidates. Comparison with the MCQ scientific<br />

component is presented and discussed. Integration of<br />

CLEO disciplines into the second component (OSCE)<br />

of the MCC Qualifying examinations is also<br />

demonstrated.<br />

8D6 Combining different components of<br />

an assessment procedure<br />

J Degryse*, J Goedhuys, A Roex and A Dermine<br />

ACHG K U Leuven, Department of General Practice,<br />

Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J, B3000 Leuven, BELGIUM


In Flanders the Departments of General Practice in<br />

different universities worked together to organise a<br />

common final assessment procedure. This takes place<br />

at the end of the vocational training period in General<br />

Practice and takes the form of a certification exam.<br />

This assessment procedure is built out of four different<br />

components: a well-designed written knowledge test,<br />

a structured oral exam, a large scale OSCE type exam<br />

and a structured report from the trainers. A pass-fail<br />

standard is defined for each separate module using<br />

appropriate procedures. A final pass-fail decision is<br />

based on a combination of the scores obtained from<br />

the different modules. This presentation discusses the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.89 -<br />

different approaches that can be used to combine the<br />

different component scores. From a pure reliability<br />

perspective the reliability analysis of composite scores<br />

can be computed using a multivariate reliability<br />

analysis. The discussion is illustrated with data collected<br />

from the final assessment procedure in 1996-2000. The<br />

impact of using different approaches and computation<br />

methods is simulated and discussed. The choice for a<br />

specific combination method should be inspired by the<br />

psychometric characteristics of the assessment tools<br />

but the final decision is made on an empirical basis.<br />

Session 8E Postgraduate education/career choice<br />

8E1 Teaching with patients: moving<br />

beyond ‘learning by osmosis’<br />

Kath Green<br />

South Thames Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental<br />

Education, 33 Millman Street, London WC1N 3EJ, UK<br />

Teaching with patients in everyday workplace contexts<br />

(such as ward rounds, clinics, theatre etc.) provides a<br />

unique opportunity for postgraduate doctors to gain<br />

insight into the complex thinking that lies at the heart<br />

of professional practice in medical education. It is easy<br />

to assume, however, that these inexperienced doctors<br />

will ‘pick up’ a range of important generic skills (e.g.<br />

communicating with patients, working in multiprofessional<br />

teams, understanding patient anxiety etc.)<br />

merely by accompanying a more experienced clinician<br />

in one of the above contexts. Could it be that some of<br />

the excellent role models of good practice being<br />

provided by experienced colleagues are going largely<br />

unnoticed by postgraduate doctors whose personal<br />

agendas may be narrowly focused on exam preparation?<br />

Some ideas for raising the status of this kind of<br />

‘teaching by example’ will be outlined and opened up<br />

for further discussion.<br />

8E2 The effect of an interactive<br />

postgraduate education<br />

programme on parenteral treatment<br />

in Macedonia<br />

M Ivanovski, P D Toon*, K Zafirovska, F Tozija and B Gomes<br />

University College London, 137 Roding Road, London E5 0DR,<br />

UK<br />

Macedonia has no formal system of postgraduate or<br />

continuing education for doctors working in primary<br />

care. These doctors are poorly equipped and have little<br />

access to current medical information. Treatment is<br />

therefore often inappropriate; overuse of antibiotics and<br />

injected drugs, and high referral rates are particular<br />

problems. To improve matters the Chamber of<br />

Physicians encouraged the Ministry of Health to<br />

support a programme of continuing education using<br />

World Bank funds and foreign technical assistance.<br />

Evidence-based guidelines were customised and<br />

translated, and an 18 day course based around these<br />

was developed. This was piloted in the Prilep region in<br />

1999. It was well received by participants, and is now<br />

being extended throughout the country. We will present<br />

details of the course and data demonstrating a fall in<br />

the cost of injectable drugs in the Prilep region by 26%<br />

in the four months following the course, compared with<br />

the previous year.<br />

8E3 Promoting innovation in<br />

postgraduate education through<br />

the accreditation process<br />

Judith Armbruster<br />

ACGME, 5555 N Sheridan, Apt 601, Chicago IL 60640, USA<br />

U.S. residency programs and their institutions are<br />

subject to many destabilizing influences, eg, economic<br />

pressures for clinical productivity, shortened<br />

hospitalizations, decentralization of patient care, all of<br />

which may negatively impact teaching. The ACGME,<br />

the U.S. accrediting agency for postgraduate medical<br />

education, has initiated a project to help programs meet<br />

these challenges. An invitation was issued to programs<br />

and institutions to submit proposals for innovative<br />

approaches to teaching and evaluation. The proposals,<br />

which must also ensure the training quality is not<br />

compromised, should result in initiatives that may be<br />

adopted by other institutions. Principal benefits of the<br />

RFP (request for proposals) approach are that it will<br />

stimulate creativity and flexibility in teaching<br />

institutions, recognize and reward viable innovation,<br />

and promote the sharing of information among<br />

programs. Over 100 proposals were received. This<br />

presentation will explain future plans for the project<br />

and describe some of the most promising proposals.<br />

8E4 A new development in<br />

postgraduate surgical education:<br />

the Intermediate Breast Course - a<br />

distance learning course<br />

H M Sweetland*, E Hoadley-Maidment and M Galea<br />

Raven Dept of Education, Royal College of Surgeons of England<br />

(RCS), University of Wales College of Medicine, University<br />

Department of Surgery, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, UK


In the UK there have recently been significant changes<br />

in Postgraduate Surgical training. The RCS has been<br />

instrumental in developing new courses for surgical<br />

trainees. In 1999 a Committee of breast surgeons set<br />

out to plan and develop a Distance Learning course<br />

for breast trainees. The aims of the course were to<br />

present breast disease as an interesting specialty area,<br />

provide basic knowledge but stimulate learning ‘on the<br />

job’, and ultimately to encourage more trainees into<br />

breast surgery. The curriculum was planned together<br />

with a distance learning study guide and 3 study days<br />

to teach practical skills and to discuss what has been<br />

learnt from the study guide and the clinical situation.<br />

The course has run from October 2000 to April 2001,<br />

and it is currently being evaluated from participant<br />

feedback. The rationale, curriculum and evaluation of<br />

the course will be presented. It is proposed that this<br />

course will be a model for further courses to be<br />

organised by the RCS.<br />

8E5 Attitude change in neonatologistsin-training<br />

by participation in the<br />

neuropediatric follow-up of former<br />

premature infants<br />

J B Hentschel<br />

Department of Neonatology, Universitaets-Frauenklinik des<br />

Inselspitals, Schanzeneckstr 1, CH 3012 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

Attitudes among neonatologists towards resuscitation<br />

of premature infants at the limit of viability (range 22-<br />

26 weeks gestation) differ. Many families of immature<br />

infants are burdened by varying degrees of disability<br />

of their child. Participation in neuropediatric followup<br />

of premature infants is part of neonatology training,<br />

but not every neonatologist-in-training is exposed to<br />

such a program. It is unknown whether changes in<br />

attitude occur in neonatologists exposed to outcomes<br />

of prematures; the hypothesis is that active participation<br />

in a follow-up program is likely to influence attitudes<br />

indicated by an opinion change regarding resuscitation<br />

of infants at the limits of viability. A research design is<br />

proposed containing a pre- and post-training<br />

questionnaire administered to pediatric residents in<br />

neonatology training before and after participation in<br />

a neuropediatric follow-up program of prematures,<br />

compared to questionnaire results in residents who do<br />

not participate in such a follow-up.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8F Teaching and learning<br />

8F1 Impact of peer tutoring on the<br />

patient-centered interviewing skills<br />

of first-year medical students<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd<br />

Imperial College School of Medicine, Connaught House,<br />

Apartment 17, Davies Street, London W1K 3DA, UK<br />

- 4.90 -<br />

8E6 Factors that influence the career<br />

choice of medical specialization<br />

M B M Soethout* and G van der Wal<br />

Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Department of Social<br />

Medicine, EMGO-Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081<br />

BT. Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

To identify factors that influence the career choice for<br />

medical specialization, a review of the literature was<br />

carried out, based on a qualitative and quantitative study<br />

design. Altogether 24 studies were analyzed. The results<br />

showed that most studies were of good quality. A<br />

quantitative assessment showed that many factors, like<br />

‘hours and working conditions’, ‘domestic<br />

circumstances’ and ‘enthusiasm for specialty’ played a<br />

role in the medical career choice. Nowadays more<br />

women than men study medicine. The majority of<br />

doctors with a first choice of general practice at the<br />

time of qualification achieved this. Women, who<br />

wanted a clinical specialization, could not accomplish<br />

or continue this career sufficiently. Social Medicine<br />

was not very popular for qualified doctors, but some<br />

years after qualification a substantial amount of doctors,<br />

especially women, worked in this field. The method of<br />

this review and the results will be presented.<br />

8E7 Personality differences in doctors<br />

affect the factors associated with<br />

their medical specialty choice<br />

Gillian B Clack*, Derek Cooper and John O Head<br />

51 Burbage Road, Herne Hill, London SE24 9HB, UK<br />

Attention has been drawn in the literature to the change<br />

in focus over the years on factors associated with<br />

medical specialty choice, ranging from personality,<br />

attitudes and values, socio-economic factors, the effect<br />

of medical education, to the influence of debt, expected<br />

earning and anticipated working conditions. 313 out<br />

of 464 doctors surveyed (68% response rate) completed<br />

a questionnaire, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator<br />

(MBTI), which measures normal personality<br />

differences. They also gave details of factors which<br />

most influenced them in their choice of medical<br />

specialty from 30 options, e.g. experience on the course,<br />

opportunities for research, need for security, etc.<br />

Analysis of this data resulted in significant differences<br />

being found between the factors which were most<br />

important to the different personality types. These<br />

results will be presented which will be of interest to<br />

those involved in recruitment to the different<br />

specialities.<br />

In medical education, peer tutoring is most frequently<br />

used for knowledge-based subjects. There are no<br />

published accounts of peer tutoring in relation to the<br />

acquisition of patient-centred interviewing skills. At<br />

Imperial College, 23 third-year medical students<br />

participated in a project in which they facilitated<br />

sessions for their first-year colleagues in the skills of


patient-centred interviewing. In each session, two thirdyear<br />

students co-facilitated a group of six first-year<br />

students as they practised the skills of patient-centred<br />

interviewing. Each first-year student interviewed a<br />

simulated patient and then received feedback from the<br />

actor, facilitators and fellow students on their<br />

interviewing skills. Two months after the sessions, the<br />

patient-centred interviewing skills of the first-year<br />

students were assessed. In this presentation, the<br />

interviewing skills of first-year students are compared<br />

with those of students who worked in groups facilitated<br />

by medical teachers.<br />

8F2 Peer Assisted Learning - a teaching<br />

strategy for the new millennium?<br />

Joy R Crosby and H Mei-Ling Ball*<br />

Curriculum Office, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School,<br />

Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) is a key learning tool<br />

and increasingly being used in medical education. For<br />

2 years, a voluntary PAL system has been run in Dundee<br />

Medical School using 4th and 5th year students to tutor<br />

2nd and 3rd years. Tutee evaluation of each session<br />

was performed using a brief questionnaire of tutee<br />

satisfaction and motivation for attendance. 626<br />

responses were returned and analysed showing a highly<br />

favourable response to PAL, with 95% rating sessions<br />

as useful / very useful and 93% as a good / very good<br />

learning aid. Particular focus on why students attended<br />

PAL sessions showed a diverse range of motivation,<br />

with an emphasis on enhancing exam performance. The<br />

effect of attending PAL reflected in exam performance<br />

was also examined. These data have been used to devise<br />

a tutee profile which will be used to make the scheme<br />

more accessible and beneficial to all students.<br />

8F3 An insight into how students learn<br />

about a cardiovascular problem<br />

using study guides<br />

Shihab E O Khogali*, Jennifer M Laidlaw, Stuart D<br />

Pringle and R M Harden<br />

Dept of Cardiology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital<br />

& Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK<br />

A study guide is a useful tool to help students manage<br />

their learning more effectively, but to what extent does<br />

the format of these guides play a part in the learning<br />

process? One hundred and fifty-one second year<br />

medical students were given three different formats of<br />

guides covering the topic of hypertension. The guides<br />

were timetable-based; problem-based; outcome-based.<br />

Although the content for all three types was the same,<br />

the weighting on the different components of the guides<br />

differed. Students were asked to select the guide of their<br />

choice to learn about the topic. From our study, we<br />

concluded that:<br />

1 In general students find study guides helpful in<br />

managing their learning;<br />

2 The guide which adopted a timetable approach to<br />

learning was the preferred choice;<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.91 -<br />

3 The guide which adopted an outcome-based<br />

approach was the least preferred choice;<br />

4 Of all the components of guides, the incorporation<br />

of a clinical problem was deemed the most helpful.<br />

8F4 Study guides in an outcome-based<br />

medical curriculum at the<br />

International Medical University<br />

(IMU), Malaysia<br />

M I Nurjahan*, J C Ramesh, S Raman, R Ammu,<br />

K H Ong, C M K Patrick and Q Akhtar<br />

International Medical University, Clinical School, Jalan Rasah,<br />

70300 Seremban, Negri Sembilan, MALAYSIA<br />

An outcome-based undergraduate curriculum with<br />

eight major outcomes was developed for our clinical<br />

school. The core curriculum consists of 113 studyguides<br />

among others. This paper describes how the<br />

study guides were developed with the aim of facilitating<br />

task-based and independent learning. These guides<br />

were prepared and reviewed utilizing a “study guide<br />

matrix” by a multidisciplinary faculty; and these form<br />

a key learning resource throughout the clinical years.<br />

A study guide was prepared for each key clinical<br />

problem. They identified learning issues in the 8<br />

outcomes including basic medical sciences in each of<br />

the problems and specific themes like ethics, which<br />

run through the curriculum. The IMU adopts a spiral<br />

curriculum and revisiting basic sciences in solving<br />

clinical problems is one of our outcomes. The guides<br />

help the students manage their own learning and obtain<br />

the maximum from each clinical attachment in<br />

accordance with the major outcomes.<br />

8F5 How authors of an extensive<br />

distance learning programme for<br />

surgical trainees differed in their<br />

use of the specified template<br />

Jennifer M Laidlaw*, Ronald M Harden, Lorraine J<br />

Robertson and E Anne Hesketh<br />

SCPMDE, Education Development Unit, Tay Park House,<br />

484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

The development of new technologies has resulted in<br />

an increased use of and interest in distance learning.<br />

The production of effective distance learning materials<br />

is time consuming and requires the skills of content,<br />

educational, and technical experts. A wide range of<br />

content experts may contribute to a programme, but<br />

often they are based at a distance from each other, and<br />

frequently with no previous educational expertise in<br />

producing distance learning materials. This was the<br />

situation encountered by the Centre for Medical<br />

Education Dundee when commissioned by The Royal<br />

College of Surgeons of Edinburgh to produce 42<br />

distance learning modules to prepare Basic Surgical<br />

Trainees for the AFRC examination. To tackle this<br />

initiative, a template was developed which defined the<br />

educational strategies to be adopted in the programme,<br />

and to help authors to structure their content. This paper<br />

examines the use made of the template by the authors,<br />

and in particular, the extent to which they utilised the<br />

various educational strategies which were built in to<br />

the programme’s design.


8F6 Context-dependent memory in a<br />

meaningful environment: in the<br />

classroom and at the bedside<br />

Franciska Koens*, Olle Th.J. ten Cate and Eugene J F M<br />

Custers<br />

School of Medical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Universitair<br />

Medisch Centrum, Stratenum 0.303, Onderwijsinstituut, Postbus<br />

85060, 3508 AB Utrecht, NETHERLANDS<br />

Godden and Baddeley (1975) showed that divers who<br />

learned words under water or on land, recalled these<br />

words better when the recall condition matched the<br />

original learning environment, a finding often cited in<br />

the medical education literature. Because the ecological<br />

validity of this experiment for medical education can<br />

be questioned, we replicated the Godden and Baddeley<br />

study, but now contrasting a clinical with an educational<br />

environment. Besides that, we added medically<br />

meaningful subject matter (clinical case description and<br />

biomedical words) to the non-medical type of common<br />

words used in the G&B study. Preliminary results<br />

indicate no significant differences. However, there does<br />

appear to be a slight tendency towards better recall of<br />

the case description if the encoding took place in the<br />

clinical environment.<br />

Godden D, Baddeley A. Context-dependent memory in two natural<br />

environments: on land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology<br />

66[3], 325-331. 1975<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8G Assessment in postgraduate and<br />

continuing education<br />

8G1 A computerized adaptive test as an<br />

element of the final assessment of<br />

general practitioners in Flanders.<br />

Possibilities, difficulties, dilemmas…<br />

A Roex* and J Degryse<br />

K.U. Leuven, ACHG - Department of General Practice,<br />

Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok j, B3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

The many advantages of CAT make it very attractive<br />

for use in the final assessment procedure for general<br />

practitioners in Flanders. The actual written test is based<br />

on a 3 dimensional blueprint. The item response theory,<br />

which is essential for the development of a CAT, is<br />

based upon the assumption that the test scores reflect<br />

the amount of one latent trait possessed by the<br />

individual. Is the general practitioner’s competency<br />

unidimensional and how can our blueprint be adapted<br />

to take account of this assumption? Subdividing the<br />

test in different modules and working with testlets are<br />

some of the solutions we will discuss in order to solve<br />

the problem of case-specificity as described by Elstein<br />

et al. (1978), Norman and Newble (1985) and van der<br />

Vleuten (1988). Several mathematical constructs (1, 2<br />

and 3 parameter models) can be used to make a CAT.<br />

Each of these has implications on the size of the item<br />

database software choice.<br />

- 4.92 -<br />

8F7 Continuous Interactive Class (C.I.C)<br />

J Medrano*, R Calpena, A Compan, M T Pérez Vázquez,<br />

J Lacueva and M Díez<br />

Miguel Hernandez University, Facultad de Medicina, Carretera<br />

Alicante-Valencia, km 87, 03550 San Juan, Alicante, SPAIN<br />

In 1999 we initiated a pedagogical project in teaching<br />

called Continuous Interactive Class. Consisting of a<br />

technical card comprising objectives and contents of a<br />

theme to learn, 6 students with a tutor, after consulting<br />

the bibliography, discuss a theme that is outlined on<br />

the web. An electronic mailbox is opened so that any<br />

student may consult his/her tutor. Finally, an interactive<br />

“seminary” takes place to discuss the mail received and<br />

the problems that have arisen, elaborating a new<br />

version. Educational contents are better explained and<br />

brought up to date and the active participation of the<br />

group increases student motivation. There was low<br />

participation by the students through e-mail and lack<br />

of interest in the change of pedagogical methodology.<br />

The reasons for this were considered to be too many<br />

exams and classes, fear of change and possibly low<br />

availability of personal computers.<br />

8G2 Insight 360: a tool for looking at<br />

doctors’ performance<br />

E B Peile* and R Conradt<br />

Department of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford,<br />

Chiltern Waters, 1 Stablebridge Road, Aston Clinton, Bucks<br />

HP22 5ND, UK<br />

Researching effectiveness of GP registrar education,<br />

we needed to develop proxy measures of performance<br />

in trained doctors in order to look at the outcome of<br />

training. We adapted a tool which is used in<br />

developmental work with general practices. Insight 360<br />

contrasts the perceptions of a doctor’s patients and<br />

colleagues with self perception in relevant areas of<br />

performance. We encourage groups of trained<br />

practitioners to take part in this exercise. Each<br />

respondent is asked to rate both the importance of a<br />

particular item of performance, and how well the doctor<br />

performs on this item. Individual reports are prepared<br />

for each doctor taking part, and we also prepare group<br />

reports, if requested. This feedback material can be very<br />

useful towards the doctor’s personal development. The<br />

database provides us with valuable indicators of a<br />

doctor’s perceived performance, enabling us to look<br />

for influences of education and training.


8G3 Impact on non-principals in<br />

General Practice of the summative<br />

assessment audit project<br />

P Bowie, A Garvie and J Oliver<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of<br />

Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK<br />

General practice registrars (trainees) must pass an audit<br />

project as part of summative assessment (SA). Its<br />

impact after training on audit knowledge, ability to<br />

recognise audit criteria and standards, and attitudes<br />

towards audit is unknown. 200 GP non-principals in<br />

the west of Scotland were surveyed (79% response rate)<br />

to assess these factors. 67 respondents (42%) underwent<br />

SA and 91 (58%) had not. Respondents rated their<br />

knowledge of different areas of audit method.<br />

Significantly higher mean scores were recorded for the<br />

SA group in every area (P


complex four-flap Z-plasty, suggesting a lesser ability<br />

to transfer learned principles to a novel and more<br />

complex task. The ability to mentally manipulate threedimensional<br />

objects is related to initial performance<br />

on a spatially complex surgical procedure. Subjects<br />

with lesser visual-spatial abilities achieve satisfactory<br />

levels of performance following practice and feedback.<br />

8G7 Validity of MIST-VR in the<br />

assessment of laparoscopic skill<br />

A M Paisley*, P Baldwin and S Paterson Brown<br />

University of Edinburgh, University Department of Surgery, Royal<br />

Infirmary, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to determine whether MIST-<br />

VR laparoscopic simulation correlates with<br />

performance in theatre. Error, economy and time taken<br />

for 36 surgical trainees, 37 surgically naïve students<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8H Curriculum change<br />

8H1 Innovation and reform of medical<br />

education: evaluating the UNI<br />

program in Latin America<br />

E C Ribeiro*, G Werneck, A Aguiar and V Brant<br />

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Nucleo de Tecnologia<br />

Educacional para a Saude, Centro de Ciencias da Saude<br />

SubsoloBloco A Sala 33, Cidade Universitaria - Ilha do Fundao,<br />

Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-590, BRAZIL<br />

The UNI program is a Kellogg Foundation initiative in<br />

the field of human health resources development in<br />

Latin America, based on the idea that partnership<br />

between university, local health services and<br />

community should be the cornerstone for innovation<br />

of professional training and health practices. The study<br />

evaluates the achievement of UNI schools students of<br />

a set of expected and consistent professional attitudes<br />

according to principles guiding the UNI Program. The<br />

study includes comparison with non-UNI schools of<br />

the eight countries involved so that inference of<br />

program results can be performed. The design includes<br />

a categorization of schools according to variables<br />

referenced to the concepts of innovation and reform<br />

defined in a theoretical model in which the medical<br />

school is considered as a space of transformation and<br />

reproduction of social practices. The methodological<br />

pathway is discussed, particularly the study design and<br />

instrument construction, its limits and possibilities.<br />

8H2 Promoting responsive curriculum<br />

change within the 21st century<br />

Cam Enarson<br />

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center<br />

Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA<br />

The process of curriculum change is complex, political<br />

and dynamic. The curriculum reform process includes:<br />

1) identification of the rationale for curricular change;<br />

2) managing the change process; 3) development of<br />

- 4.94 -<br />

and 16 surgical consultants to complete 2 tasks on<br />

MIST-VR were recorded. 26 trainees and 36 students<br />

underwent repeat assessment after 6 months. A<br />

validated in-theatre technical assessment form was<br />

completed by each trainee’s consultant. Trainee MIST-<br />

VR performance did not correlate significantly with<br />

consultant assessment and was not significantly<br />

different from that of consultants or students. A<br />

significant but weak correlation was found between<br />

MIST VR time score and duration of surgical<br />

experience (p=0.036, rho=-0.242 Spearman). Trainees<br />

showed significant improvement in time and economy<br />

after 6 months (median (IQR) time 0 to time 6 months:<br />

time (seconds): 217(176-291) to 184(157-215)<br />

p=0.003; economy score: 26(19-32) to 21(16-25)<br />

p=0.002 Wilcoxon); however, similar improvement was<br />

also seen in the student group. Further work into this<br />

area is needed.<br />

the new curriculum model/plan; 4) curricular<br />

implementation. The curriculum renewal process at the<br />

Wake Forest University School of Medicine will be<br />

used to illustrate the curriculum planning process noted<br />

above. Wake Forest University embarked on a 3 year<br />

curriculum planning process in 1995. During the first<br />

year of planning, ten principles were identified to serve<br />

as the foundation for the new curriculum. A curriculum<br />

model was developed during the second- and thirdyears<br />

which showed the 46 month educational program<br />

as a continuum. Implementation of the new Prescription<br />

for Excellence: A Physician’s Pathway to Lifelong<br />

Learning curriculum is occurring over a 4 year period.<br />

A program evaluation plan has been developed linked<br />

specifically to curricular goals and objectives.<br />

8H3 Improving the University and NHS<br />

Teaching Hospital Trust<br />

Partnership to identify SIFT<br />

spending<br />

Andrea J Bolshaw<br />

University of Birmingham, Medical School, Medical Education<br />

Unit, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

The perceived underspend of SIFT on Undergraduate<br />

teaching is widely acknowledged throughout UK<br />

medical schools and NHS teaching hospitals. In order<br />

to monitor the provision of services under the SIFT<br />

contracts, the University of Birmingham Medical<br />

School has developed a vehicle in the form of a<br />

Framework Agreement to strengthen links with the<br />

NHS and ensure the highest quality clinical care,<br />

teaching and research. In collaboration, a system has<br />

been developed to monitor compliance with the<br />

Agreement in the form of Undergraduate Clinical<br />

Education Monitoring Visits. This paper sets out how<br />

such a mechanism has been developed, and as a result,<br />

offers guidelines for the design and implementation of<br />

a framework for quality monitoring of undergraduate


teaching activities within NHS hospital trusts. A<br />

thorough insight will be given into how this practical<br />

strategy works in real terms to effectively meet high<br />

standards in university medical education.<br />

8H4 Assessment of medical student<br />

attitudes toward relevant aspects of<br />

medical practice<br />

Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues*, L E de A Troncon,<br />

M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo, ARL Cianflone,<br />

CE Piccinato, LC Peres and JA Dela-Coleta<br />

Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, Department of Clinical<br />

Medicine, Hospital das Clinicas, Campus Universitário, 14048-<br />

900 Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

At the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto<br />

(University of São Paulo, Brazil), a 5-point Likert scale<br />

containing 52 items was developed for measurement<br />

of medical student attitudes toward 6 relevant aspects<br />

of medical practice. Preliminary tests determined the<br />

scale’s apparent and content validity and showed high<br />

internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86).<br />

Attitudes of graduating classes of medical students were<br />

measured for 4 consecutive years. Pooled results from<br />

317 students showed predominantly positive attitudes<br />

toward: 1) psychological issues in organic diseases; 2)<br />

primary care; 3) aspects of medical work in the<br />

community; and either conflicting or undefined<br />

attitudes were detected toward the following aspects:<br />

4) mental diseases; 5) physician roles in medical<br />

research and 6) death-related situations. Data obtained<br />

are likely to represent deeper medical school values<br />

and have to be taken into consideration for further<br />

improvements in medical student education.<br />

8H5 Effect of a curriculum reform of<br />

graduating student performance<br />

M L V Rodrigues*, J F C Figueiredo, L E A Troncon,<br />

C E Piccinato, L C Peres, A R L Cianflone and M F A Colares<br />

Hospital das Clínicas - Oftalmologia, Faculdade de Medicina de<br />

Ribeirao Preto, 12 andar - Campus Universitario, 14048-900<br />

Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

Aiming at evaluating the efficacy of a new curriculum<br />

implemented at the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão<br />

Preto, a yearly objective assessment of graduating (6th<br />

year) students was performed. Shortly before<br />

graduation, all students underwent sets of multiplechoice<br />

questions (MCQs) and groups of 18-20 students/<br />

year were randomly assigned to OSCEs for either<br />

clinical (real and standardised patients) or procedure<br />

(mannequins) skills. The average MCQs score for the<br />

new curriculum (63.1, SD=8.9, n=261) was<br />

significantly higher (p


Session 8I Communication skills training<br />

8I1 Which interviewing skills must be<br />

actively taught at medical school?<br />

K Aspegren*, P Henriksen, P Lonberg-Madsen and<br />

M Stromming<br />

Laboratorium for Kliniske Faerdigheder, Rigshospitalet, Afsnit<br />

5404, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Kobenhavn O, DENMARK<br />

The study looked at which interviewing skills must be<br />

actively taught at medical school. 29 and 60 students<br />

from the last semester in their studies, and from two<br />

different years, were randomly selected in a medical<br />

school where there is little systematic training of<br />

interviewing skills. They were videotaped as they<br />

performed an interview with a standardised patient. The<br />

interviews were rated using the Arizona Clinical<br />

Medical Interview Rating Scale. Interrater reliability<br />

was controlled. The students rated high on 6 of the 14<br />

items of the scale, low on 2 and very low on 6. The<br />

strengths were such as characterize civil conversation.<br />

The weaknesses were important interviewing skills<br />

such as summarizing, using open ended questions, etc.<br />

There was good agreement between years, indicating<br />

a systematic trait in strengths and weaknesses. We<br />

believe our results can be used for planning<br />

interviewing skills courses in medical schools.<br />

8I2 Implementing communication skills<br />

training at the Charité - a project by<br />

students and doctors<br />

Jan Schildmann*, Carsten Schwarz, Eva Herrmann,<br />

Heiderose Ortwein, Amelie Klambeck, Andreas Brunklaus<br />

and Ulrich Schwantes<br />

Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong> (Charite), Department of General<br />

Practice, Vogelsang 16, 78343 Horn, GERMANY<br />

A lack of formal training in communication skills<br />

during the time as medical students combined with the<br />

impression that the ability to talk with patients is<br />

essential for our practical work was the motivation for<br />

us (3 doctors and 3 students) to organise optional<br />

courses in this field at the medical faculty of the<br />

Humboldt University in <strong>Berlin</strong>. Within the last 1½ years<br />

courses about how to break bad news, a communication<br />

skills course for students during their first clinical year<br />

and a role play session as part of a course in paediatrics<br />

for fifth year students have been the preliminary results<br />

of our work which is supported by the medical faculty.<br />

In this short communication we will describe our<br />

experiences so far and discuss our plans to implement<br />

the training of communication skills as part of the<br />

curriculum at our faculty within the next few years.<br />

8I3 Teaching sexual history-taking to<br />

health care professionals in<br />

primary care<br />

J R Skelton* and P M Matthews<br />

Department of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical<br />

School, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, BIRMINGHAM<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

History-taking is essential to diagnosis, yet little work<br />

has been done on the development of sexual history-<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.96 -<br />

taking, nor on how to train people to undertake it<br />

adequately. Courses designed to assist healthprofessionals<br />

in sexual history-taking were delivered<br />

in a variety of formats, and evaluations collected from<br />

participants. 114 participants took part in 9 teaching<br />

interventions. All courses were very positively<br />

evaluated (89.95% for quality: 91% for relevance).<br />

Role-play, which was a feature of all courses, was<br />

particularly valued as a methodology. Free text<br />

comments centred on the power of such courses as<br />

consciousness-raisers, and as helping to overcome<br />

embarrassment, and the need to develop and change<br />

communication strategies. Good sexual history-taking<br />

should be part of the health professional’s armoury. It<br />

can be taught, and courses designed to teach it are<br />

highly acceptable to participants.<br />

8I4 SEX SEX SEX, oh yes, and how’s<br />

your knee?<br />

Annie Cushing* and Dason Evans<br />

St. Bartholomews & The Royal London Queen Mary’s, School<br />

of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Human Science &<br />

Medical Ethics, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, UK<br />

Our study shows that, with the exception of the<br />

specialities of O&G and sexual health, medical students<br />

rarely ask patients questions about sex, even when they<br />

think this might be an issue. A workshop using roleplay<br />

was introduced to address this shortfall in general<br />

medical history taking. One hundred and ninety two<br />

students completed pre- and post- workshop<br />

questionnaires comprising 12 attitudinal statements.<br />

Subsequent cohorts completed a questionnaire to assess<br />

future intentions to ask patients about sexual health<br />

issues. Results showed a statistically significant<br />

improvement in all the attitudinal statements. After the<br />

workshop 84% of students stated they were now likely<br />

to ask patients about sex when they thought it was<br />

relevant. Moreover one-third intended to include such<br />

questions as part of their review of systems. There<br />

remains a group who do not think they will be asking<br />

patients questions about sexual health.<br />

8I5 Training of the systemic approach<br />

in doctor patient communication I:<br />

history taking from a third party<br />

K P M van Spaendonck* and E M van Weel-Baumgarten<br />

University of Nijmegen, 300 Med Psych Neuro, PO Box 9101,<br />

6500 HB Nijmegen, NETHERLANDS<br />

The format of the usual training of communication<br />

skills is derived from the conversation of the doctor<br />

with an individual patient. However, when a patient<br />

does or cannot speak for himself (for instance because<br />

the patient is too young or too ill), the patient is<br />

represented by somebody else. This is generally a<br />

parent, a partner or an adult child, who in turn speaks<br />

on behalf of the family to which the patient belongs.<br />

Moreover, doctors have to deal increasingly with<br />

patients who are accompanied by a third person. In<br />

both cases, doctors have to face so-called systemic


dynamics, a term derived from family therapy, and<br />

which focuses on relations, coalitions, behavioural<br />

codes etc within the core family. Systemic dynamics<br />

may have a strong impact on diagnosis and treatment.<br />

In the first part of this double presentation, we will<br />

show a video of a training, which involves the major<br />

sources of information distortion, which might result<br />

from history taking from a third party.<br />

8I6 Training of the systemic approach<br />

in doctor patient communication II:<br />

history taking with a patient and a<br />

third party<br />

E M van Weel-Baumgarten* and K P M van Spaendonck<br />

University of Nijmegen, Hermelynstraat 50, 6531 JZ Nijmegen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

The next part of this double presentation focuses on a<br />

training of a consultation with a patient and a third party.<br />

In such cases the doctor is confronted with two people<br />

who usually have a long history of intimate life in<br />

common, which has resulted in a specific pattern of<br />

interaction and behavioural codes. Any remark of the<br />

doctor addressed to one of them, also has implications<br />

for the other, and may disrupt the mentioned pattern of<br />

interaction and behavioural codes. This type of<br />

consultation involves a number of skills: to be in control<br />

of the consultation, to negotiate, to give both parties<br />

equal attention. Training also focuses on how to avoid<br />

pitfalls, such as choosing sides, arbitrating, allowing<br />

Session 8J Clinical teaching<br />

8J1 Increasing student awareness of<br />

strengths and weaknesses using a<br />

standardized patient case<br />

Devra Cohen*, Jerry Colliver, Mark Swartz and Randal Robbs<br />

The Morchand Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One<br />

Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1127, New York NY 10029, USA<br />

Two classes of seond-year medical students (n=105,<br />

class of 1999; n=107, class of 2000) rated awareness<br />

of their strengths and weaknesses in performing a<br />

physical examination, taking a history, and<br />

communicating with a patient before and after an<br />

interaction and feedback session with an SP. The ratings<br />

were on a 5-point scale; 1-not at all; 2-a little; 3moderately;<br />

4-very; 5-extremely. The results showed<br />

that students were “moderately” aware of their strengths<br />

and weaknesses before the encounter and “very” aware<br />

following the encounter. The ratings increased from<br />

pre to post on average 1.0 standard deviation (ranging<br />

from .69 to 1.21 DSs) showing increased awareness of<br />

strengths and weaknesses as a result of the whole<br />

interactive session. Changes in awareness of strengths<br />

and weaknesses for each of the three outcomes<br />

separately as well as relationships between changes in<br />

awareness and performance on the SP case will be<br />

discussed.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.97 -<br />

the dominant party to overrule the other etc. A tripartite<br />

consultation requires different communication skills<br />

than a patient-centred interview. In our presentation<br />

we will also show a video of how students can be trained<br />

in this type of consultation.<br />

8I7 Breaking bad news - evaluation of<br />

courses run by students and young<br />

doctors<br />

H Ortwein*, E Herrmann, A Brunklaus, A Kreutz,<br />

C Schwarz and J Schildmann<br />

Department of Anaesthesiology, Charité, Humboldt University<br />

of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Lychener Str 60, 10437 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Breaking bad news is one of the most challenging tasks<br />

in medical communication. At German medical schools<br />

communication skills training is usually not part of the<br />

curriculum. A group of experienced students and young<br />

doctors started a breaking bad news course for medical<br />

students in their fourth year of medical training. During<br />

a weekend course, participants receive excessive<br />

training of the subject in role-plays in small groups.<br />

Every student is able to play the role of the doctor as<br />

well as the patient’s part in different situations which<br />

are handed out as paper cases. We evaluated these<br />

course with questionnaires, one before and one after<br />

the course. The values of self-rating regarding the<br />

capability to break bad news improved. Teaching<br />

methods like peer group learning and role-plays were<br />

judged positive for the subject.<br />

8J2 Clinical dermatology: prospective<br />

randomized comparison of a<br />

traditional, a personal bed-side<br />

teaching (PBST) and a problemoriented-practical<br />

(POP) course<br />

F R Ochsendorf*, H Boehncke, R Hovelmann, A Boer and<br />

R Kaufmann<br />

Zentrum Dermatologie und Venerologie, Klinikum der J W<br />

Goethe-Universitat, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt/<br />

M, GERMANY<br />

To assess satisfaction, practicability and knowledge<br />

gain, students were randomly allocated to a traditional<br />

course (lectures and bed-side teaching; evaluable<br />

n=137), bed-side teaching groups always with the same<br />

teacher (PBST, n=37) and POP groups only using<br />

“paper-cases” (n=36) over two terms. For evaluation,<br />

a questionnaire and multiple-choice tests, written<br />

anonymously at start and end of the course, were used.<br />

The PBST-course (1.7 ± 0.7; mean ± SD) and the POPcourse<br />

(1.6 ± 0.8) were rated significantly better<br />

(p


8J3 Clinical skills training - a new<br />

curriculum between BEME and<br />

reality<br />

Peter Frey<br />

University of Bern, Department of Instructional Media (AUM),<br />

Inselspital 38, CH - 3010 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

Clinical skills like history taking and physical<br />

examination are basic skills for clinical reasoning and<br />

the right decisions in patient management. How should<br />

a curriculum be planned and implemented to get the<br />

best evidence medical education? At the Medical<br />

School of Berne Switzerland fundamental changes in<br />

the third year curriculum (first clinical year) allows<br />

the establishment of a new state-of-the art curriculum.<br />

The presentation describes the needs and the change<br />

management, how the goals and objectives were<br />

formulated, the instructional strategies (small group<br />

work, standardization of the training, instruction of<br />

tutors, use of guidelines), the credit system, the use of<br />

information technologies and the barriers of the new<br />

curriculum. Homepage: http://studmed.unibe.ch<br />

8J4 The effects of student gender on<br />

patients’ willingness to be<br />

examined by medical students<br />

William P Metheny*, Roxanne Jamshidi and Kara Pitt<br />

Brown University School of Medicine/Women and Infants<br />

Hospital, 101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905, USA<br />

Gender discrimination by patients can affect the clinical<br />

experiences medical students get. Excluding male<br />

medical students from the gynecologic exam or the<br />

prenatal visit may directly affect their clinical<br />

performance. We hypothesized that patients who were<br />

told the student’s gender (males in particular) prior to<br />

the examination were more likely to reject the student<br />

than patients who were not told the student’s gender in<br />

advance. Our experiment tested this hypothesis by<br />

assigning students to one of two female residents in an<br />

ob/gyn clinic who in asking permission of the patient<br />

would either refer to the student as a medical student<br />

(gender neutral) or identify the student’s gender.<br />

Patients (n=66) did not differ (p> .05) in responding to<br />

the two conditions; however they rejected only males<br />

in the gender specific situation. The way students are<br />

presented to patients can affect patient receptivity to<br />

them.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.98 -<br />

8J5 Reality shock among medical<br />

students attending first clinical<br />

rotation<br />

I Levi* and T Fischel<br />

Sackler Medical School, 13/2 Tsel Hagivaa, Ramat Gan, ISRAEL<br />

Discrepancy between fantasy that is perceived during<br />

preclinical studies, and reality as met during clinical<br />

rotation may cause difficulties and frustration, a state<br />

that can be defined as “reality shock”. An open<br />

interview was conducted with 40 students attending<br />

their first clinical rotation in an internal medicine<br />

department. Main difficulties described by the students<br />

were their position within the department staff, and their<br />

right to disturb patients while taking their history and<br />

making a physical examination. Significant gaps in<br />

“doctor–patient relationship” as met in real life opposed<br />

to what was learned at school, and gaps in “success<br />

rates” in medical treatment between real life and fantasy<br />

contributed also to “reality shock”. Reality shock is<br />

common in medical students attending their first<br />

clinical experience and can contribute to students’<br />

frustration and burnout. Medical schools should take<br />

this into consideration in planning the preclinical and<br />

clinical curriculum.<br />

8J6 Experiential clinical learning in a<br />

horizontally-integrated, problembased<br />

curriculum<br />

Tim Dornan*, Arno Muijtjens and Henny Boshuizen<br />

Universities of Manchester and Maastricht, 10 Raynham Avenue,<br />

Didsbury, Manchester M20 6BW, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to test whether better<br />

horizontal integration was achievable in the clerkship<br />

phase of a problem-based curriculum. Eight first<br />

clerkship students using a learning portfolio and<br />

attending weekly group tutorials to support selfdirected<br />

reflective clinical learning were compared with<br />

16 historical and 16 contemporary controls. Results<br />

revealed mean agreement with: ‘I was able to see the<br />

types of patients I needed to see’ rose from 3.5 ± 1.1 to<br />

4.4 ± 0.7; 0.1>p>0.05. Historical controls commented<br />

on the inappropriateness of casemix whereas<br />

experimental subjects commented positively about<br />

casemix, and outpatient learning. Mean rating of<br />

outpatient learning rose: 3.6 ± 0.8 to 4.6 ± 0.5 (p=<br />

0.001). Mean rating for inpatient learning was<br />

unchanged. Despite those improvements, learning<br />

remained strongly influenced by the clerkship’s<br />

specialty interest. It was concluded that some measures<br />

of experiential clinical learning improved; other<br />

interventions are needed to help students cross specialty<br />

boundaries.


Session 8K International aspects of medical education<br />

8K1 Influence of Studying on Students’<br />

Health (ISSH)<br />

T Schweickert*, P Hodzic, V Jurkovic, J Seitz*, O Onur*<br />

and T Shiozawa*<br />

German Medical Students’ Association, Gringelsbach 61, 52080<br />

Aachen, GERMANY<br />

The aim of the project is to find out if there is a<br />

correlation between studying and students´ health,<br />

especially if there is a significant correlation between<br />

the students´ health and the various medical education<br />

systems. This study is part of an international project<br />

organized by the IFMSA (international student<br />

organization). Croatian Students developed a<br />

questionnaire for students, which consists of 27<br />

questions divided into four sections – General<br />

information, General health information, Studying,<br />

Health and Lifestyle. In our analysis we focus on three<br />

aspects: 1) education system 2) educational level 3)<br />

medical/non medical students. The first steps of the<br />

study have shown that students’ health has deteriorated<br />

since the beginning of their studies. They consider their<br />

health to be worse compared to the peer population.<br />

About one third suffer from vision deterioration,<br />

headaches and digestion problems and they sleep less,<br />

drink much more coffee and take less care of<br />

themselves.<br />

8K2 A comparison of curricula – a cross<br />

country approach<br />

J Mirecka*, Paola Binetti, Jan Hijlman, Roy Remmen,<br />

K Lipinski<br />

Department of Medical Education, Medical College of<br />

Jagiellonian University, Str. Kopernika 19E/1, 31-501 Krakow,<br />

POLAND<br />

Comparison of undergraduate medical curricula in<br />

various countries was undertaken within the JEP-<br />

Tempus project and involved four medical schools . It<br />

was found that:<br />

• The total number of hours varied from 3500 to<br />

6500;<br />

• The lists of courses were not compatible because<br />

of their different names and content;<br />

• The content of courses could be compared after<br />

identifying the topics according to the traditional<br />

disciplines;<br />

• When viewed from this perspective the essential<br />

content of four curricula appeared quite similar;<br />

• The accents underlying importance of particular<br />

subjects were distributed differently;<br />

• The structure of curricula reflected by percentage<br />

of lectures, small group sessions, laboratories,<br />

varied considerably;<br />

• Other components of the curricula such as<br />

clerkship, electives, bed-side teaching, research,<br />

revealed also school specificity.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.99 -<br />

8K3 International differences in medical<br />

content preparation<br />

Steven R Daugherty* and Rochelle Rothstein<br />

Kaplan Medical, 820 West Jackson, Suite 550, Chicago IL 60612,<br />

USA<br />

Scores of medical students from eight regions of the<br />

world were compared by means of a standardized,<br />

content-focused exam targeted to the United States<br />

Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE, Step 1). The<br />

diagnostic exam was offered in English to participants<br />

studying at Kaplan Medical Centers in the United<br />

States. Analyses examined differences in scores in<br />

traditional medical subject area and by organ system<br />

knowledge. Results show that students trained outside<br />

the US averaged significantly lower scores in most<br />

areas, with the largest differences found in<br />

Biochemistry, Behavioral Sciences, and General<br />

Principles. Scores on Microbiology were most similar<br />

to US students across all groups. Students trained in<br />

South America had the lowest scores, while students<br />

from Asia show the most similarity to US trained<br />

students. Results are discussed with reference to the<br />

role of language fluency in determining test scores and<br />

international differences in medical education.<br />

8K4 New trends at TSMU: elaboration of<br />

medical education conception<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia, Z Avaliani* and G Simonia<br />

Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Avenue,<br />

Tbilisi 380077, GEORGIA<br />

In Georgia, as in other post-Soviet countries, a<br />

necessary condition for success of the current reform<br />

in healthcare is a basic reorganization of the medical<br />

education system, which first of all means introduction<br />

of the optimal model of teaching. The Outcome-based<br />

Model of medical education has been considered as<br />

the most acceptable method of teaching at TSME. This<br />

means the introduction of a flexible, integrated teaching<br />

frame-plan and appropriate study programs, that enable<br />

us to align professional activity of the graduates with<br />

the knowledge accepted at the University. The aims of<br />

the teaching process and main criteria, which should<br />

correspond to each grade of the study process, will be<br />

defined according to the last outcome. For optimization<br />

of the teaching process at TSMU some problems must<br />

be solved. First of all it is necessary to take part in the<br />

important process of inter-recognition and interacknowledgement<br />

of recognised medical schools,<br />

which, through international experiences and with<br />

support from <strong>AMEE</strong> and the other educational<br />

organizations and international programs, will give us<br />

the opportunity to improve the qualifications of our<br />

university professors at other medical schools through<br />

visits and training courses. In addition, it is very<br />

important to extend the existing practice of student<br />

exchanges with leading university clinics (more than<br />

100 students are being trained abroad annually).


8K5 Learning Needs Assessments for<br />

Refugee Doctors; establishing<br />

baseline data about medical<br />

knowledge and experience<br />

Lesley J Southgate* and Joan F Fuller<br />

Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education,<br />

University College London Medical School, Archway Campus,<br />

Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

The profound and all embracing sense of loss<br />

experienced by refugees may be compounded for<br />

professionals, many of whom feel their special skills<br />

and knowledge are unused. Dependence on welfare and<br />

charity, loss of pride and socio-economic standing<br />

contribute further to low self-esteem and lack of<br />

confidence. We organised a learning needs assessment<br />

workshop for refugee doctors as part of a wider<br />

programme. Participants took a knowledge test in the<br />

same format as the new GMC PLAB test. Next, doctors<br />

working in the NHS interviewed refugee doctors to<br />

ascertain their experiences and expectations. Feedback<br />

from the interviewers and the refugee doctors was<br />

systematically recorded. We present here the outline<br />

of the wider programme, the themes from the<br />

interviews, the results of the knowledge test and plans<br />

for future work.<br />

8K6 Helping refugee doctors back to work<br />

M J Bannon*, E Paice, G MacFadden, G Cowan,<br />

S Cheeroth and Y H Carter<br />

London Deanery, Medical Education Department, Level 6V,<br />

Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex<br />

HA1 3UJ, UK<br />

It is estimated that there may be as many as 2,000<br />

refugee doctors living in the UK. They face a variety<br />

of hurdles (including loss of professional<br />

documentation and status, separation from family/<br />

friends, financial hardship and language difficulties).<br />

To date, a minority has succeeded in gaining clinical<br />

employment in the NHS. In November 2000, a project<br />

was initiated by London Deanery with the following<br />

aims:<br />

• To offer refugee doctors support, career advice and<br />

help with obtaining clinical attachments;<br />

• To directly place them as appropriate in specially<br />

arranged supervised senior house officer posts.<br />

Session 8L Special subjects<br />

8L1 And now for something completely<br />

different… reflective style learning<br />

of the Arts in medicine<br />

Paul Lazarus<br />

University of Leicester, Department of General Practice and<br />

Primary Health Care, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen<br />

Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK<br />

There is an increasing trend towards including a study<br />

of the Arts in undergraduate medical curricula, and the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.100 -<br />

To date 20 doctors have been seen; 6 have been directly<br />

placed in clinical posts; 4 have clinical attachments that<br />

will lead to clinical posts. As a result of these efforts a<br />

network of support has begun for refugee doctors in<br />

West London. By listening to their stories, we have<br />

gained an enhanced appreciation of the difficulties<br />

faced by them.<br />

8K7 New York University School of<br />

Medicine Master Scholars Program<br />

Sharon K. Krackov<br />

Master Scholars Program, Dean’s Office, New York University<br />

School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA<br />

New York University School of Medicine’s new and<br />

unique Master Scholars<br />

Program was launched in June 2000. The overall<br />

mission is the creation of a fabric of learning that<br />

promotes the principles of humanism and<br />

professionalism throughout all aspects of the education<br />

of physicians. A second mission is that the Master<br />

Scholars Program serves as a center for the<br />

development of ideas on contemporary social and<br />

ethical issues. It achieves these missions in a variety of<br />

ways through:<br />

1 The medical student curriculum where humanism<br />

and professionalism are interwoven with the study<br />

of science;<br />

2 Student mentoring activities;<br />

3 Seminars where students and faculty discuss topics<br />

of relevance;<br />

4 Development of joint degree programs with the<br />

other schools of New York University;<br />

5 Monthly colloquia on topics of public interest;<br />

6 Scholarly publications;<br />

7 A planned international symposium in London in<br />

Spring <strong>2002</strong>.<br />

This broad program is implemented through five<br />

theme-based Societies (biomedical and health sciences;<br />

medical informatics and technology; health policy and<br />

public health; bioethics and human rights; and arts and<br />

humanities in medicine in which both students and<br />

faculty participate. [www.MasterScholars.med.nyu.edu]<br />

Leicester-Warwick Medical School has set up a module<br />

using the study of literature, drama, music and visual<br />

art to enhance students’ understanding of the human<br />

experience in health and sickness. As well as marking<br />

a departure from the study of more traditional scientific<br />

and clinical subjects, new ground is broken in using<br />

multi-disciplinary tutoring and in introducing students<br />

to a more reflective style of learning in the form of<br />

personal learning journals. This presentation describes<br />

why and how the module was set up and how reflective


learning practice is useful to students and doctors. An<br />

evaluation of the module’s success so far will also be<br />

given.<br />

8L2 Seamless humanities: on integrating<br />

medical humanities into medical<br />

education: the Witten project<br />

C Hick*, B Matzke, B Strahwald, A Weymann and<br />

W Vermaasen<br />

Universitat Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str.50, 58448<br />

Witten, GERMANY<br />

We report on the curricular development and first year<br />

experience with the “seamless” integration of medical<br />

humanities into a medical reform curriculum at Witten<br />

/ Herdecke University, Germany, aiming at enhancing<br />

the communicative and ethical competences of medical<br />

students. Specifically addressed will be the strategies<br />

employed for opening up problem-based learning and<br />

simulated patients to topics in medical ethics,<br />

philosophy of medicine and medical history. We will<br />

stress the importance of overcoming traditional<br />

disciplinary orientations in the medical humanities and<br />

argue for a topical, hands-on approach seeking to<br />

develop the “humanistic skills” of medical students in<br />

clinical contexts.<br />

8L3 Improving clinical reasoning in<br />

novice clinicians: a diagnostic<br />

training aid to support clinical<br />

reasoning in student<br />

physiotherapists<br />

Gill James<br />

Coventry University, School of Health and Social Sciences, Priory<br />

Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK<br />

Medicine and physiotherapy (PT) are two health care<br />

professions to identify difficulties in Clinical Reasoning<br />

(CR). CR comprises cognition, knowledge and metareasoning,<br />

with research suggesting that knowledge is<br />

the key to expertise. This paper describes the testing of<br />

a diagnostic training aid, designed to support<br />

knowledge. Two groups of PT students (halfway<br />

through their clinical education hours) were recruited.<br />

Using a standardised case study, they verbally reasoned<br />

about the diagnosis and treatment plan. One group used<br />

the training aid. Content analysis and the Mann-<br />

Whitney test were used to analyse these data. Subjects<br />

using the diagnostic training aid (n=8) recruited<br />

significantly more knowledge (p


symptom control (nausea, vomiting, anorexia,<br />

constipation, bowel obstruction, dyspnea, cough,<br />

delirium, depression, anxiety). Residents complete a<br />

pre-post knowledge assessment questionnaire at the end<br />

of their rotation. Statistical analysis (n=28<br />

questionnaires) demonstrated a significant increase in<br />

knowledge for each educational domain taught during<br />

this experience. This teaching format can be considered<br />

when implementing Palliative Care education into<br />

Internal Medicine residency programs.<br />

8L7 Teaching stress management and<br />

empathic communication to<br />

medical students<br />

Ray Melmed and Hannah Kedar*<br />

The Hebrew University, Hadassah Faculty of Medicine, Centre<br />

for Medical Education, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.102 -<br />

A workshop based on principles of neuro-psychoimmunology<br />

combined with skills of empathic<br />

communication was designed as a 2-week elective for<br />

6 th year medical students. The workshop included topics<br />

such as the psycho-neuro-physiological basis of stressinduced<br />

syndromes (e.g., panic disorder, chronic pain)<br />

and of behavioural interventions in these situations;<br />

the use of relaxation, meditation and guided imagery<br />

in medical practice; principles of empathic<br />

communication and their application to difficult<br />

interpersonal situations (e.g., angry, depressed, or<br />

anxious patients); breaking bad news; truth telling; and<br />

difficulties around sex-related issues in medical<br />

practice. Teaching methods were mostly experiential,<br />

including role-plays, videotapes, exercises of<br />

relaxation, and encounters with patients. Feedback data<br />

presented reflect high appreciation of this workshop<br />

and emphasise the need to include these topics in the<br />

curriculum.


Session 9 Plenary<br />

1 The role of clinical experience in<br />

the acquisition of clinical<br />

reasoning: Implications for<br />

education<br />

Geoff Norman<br />

McMaster University Medical School, Dept of Clinical<br />

Epidemiology, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5,<br />

CANADA<br />

An extensive body of research in psychology and<br />

medicine indicates that many diagnostic problems aRe<br />

solved by recognizing their similiarity to a previously<br />

encountered specific example. This “exemplar-based”<br />

reasoning is both efficient and effective. However, if<br />

this is a critical component of expertise, we must give<br />

serious consideration to how students can obtain<br />

sufficient clinical exposure. The talk will review some<br />

of the research evidence in support of exemplar-based<br />

reasoning, and describe experimental tests of alternate<br />

instructional strategies.<br />

2 Keeping standards up to date<br />

Susanne Pruskil<br />

Medical Student, Charité, Medical Faculty of Humboldt-<br />

University, <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.103 -<br />

Medical knowledge is expanding and changing rapidly.<br />

Consequently standards in medical education should<br />

be adapted continuously. However our learning<br />

objectives are largely overstuffed, reflect specialty/<br />

departmental interests and their relevance is often<br />

unclear. The aim of a modern medical school should<br />

be to include a manageable, ever-adapting,<br />

interdisciplinary core curriculum. Relevant standards<br />

are of crucial importance for the self-directed<br />

undergraduate learner as well as for the lifelong<br />

postgraduate learner.<br />

3 Humour in medical education is<br />

like a box of chocolates …<br />

Ron Berk<br />

The Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore<br />

MD 21205-2110, USA<br />

This session will present research-based teaching<br />

techniques for integrating humour into your course<br />

handouts, examples, case studies, discussion questions,<br />

problems, tests, wedding invitations and parking tickets.<br />

Examples include quotations, cartoons, multiple-choice<br />

items, top 10 lists, anecdotes and skits/dramatizations<br />

with music. This presentation “boldly goes where no<br />

medical educator has gone before,” maybe!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!