16.11.2012 Views

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

AMEE Berlin 2002 Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Association for Medical Education in Europe<br />

Medical Education<br />

and Standards at a<br />

Time of Change<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong><br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

and<br />

2001<br />

Abstracts<br />

2-5 September 2001<br />

Charité, Humboldt University<br />

BERLIN, GERMANY<br />

Humbolt University<br />

Zu <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Gesellschaft für Medizinische<br />

Ausbildung (GMA)<br />

President:<br />

Professor M Barón-Maldonado<br />

General Secretary:<br />

Professor R M Harden<br />

Administrator:<br />

Mrs Pat Lilley<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Office<br />

University of Dundee<br />

Tay Park House<br />

484 Perth Road<br />

Dundee DD2 1LR<br />

Scotland, UK<br />

Tel: +44 (0)1382 631953<br />

Fax: +44 (0)1382 645748<br />

E-mail: amee@dundee.ac.uk


Contents<br />

Welcome from the <strong>Berlin</strong> students to visiting students .. iii<br />

Local Organising Committee .. .. .. iii<br />

Welcome from Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado,<br />

President of <strong>AMEE</strong> .. .. .. .. iv<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Executive Committee .. .. .. v<br />

List of sponsors .. .. .. .. v<br />

Section 1: General Information about <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

and the Conference Venue<br />

General information about <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> and how to get there .. .. .. .. 1.1<br />

Some local information .. .. .. 1.1<br />

General information about the Conference<br />

How to get to Campus Virchow Klinikum .. .. 1.4<br />

Some general information .. .. .. 1.4<br />

Registration information .. .. .. 1.8<br />

Information about the Academic <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Plenary presentations .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Large group sessions .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Short communications .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Information for presenters .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Audio-visuals .. .. .. .. 1.9<br />

Information for the chairperson .. .. 1.10<br />

Information for the opening discussant .. .. 1.10<br />

Poster presentations.. .. .. .. 1.11<br />

Information for presenters .. .. .. 1.11<br />

Information for the chairperson .. .. 1.12<br />

Medical Teacher Poster Prize .. .. .. 1.12<br />

Workshops .. .. .. .. 1.12<br />

Pre-Conference .. .. .. .. 1.12<br />

Conference .. .. .. .. 1.12<br />

<strong>Programme</strong> Overview .. .. .. 1.13<br />

Personal Diary .. .. .. .. 1.15<br />

List of Exhibitors .. .. .. .. 1.16<br />

- i -


Section 2: The Academic <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Saturday 1 September .. .. .. 2.1<br />

Sunday 2 September .. .. .. 2.2<br />

Monday 3 September .. .. .. 2.4<br />

Tuesday 4 September .. .. .. 2.15<br />

Wednesday 5 September .. .. .. 2.28<br />

Section 3: Conference Social <strong>Programme</strong>, Tours<br />

and Accommodation<br />

Section 4: Abstracts<br />

- ii -


Welcome from Students<br />

We, the students of the Charité, Medical Faculty of the Humboldt-University in <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

look forward to welcoming you to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Conference. We want you to enjoy your<br />

stay in <strong>Berlin</strong> and will do all we can to help.<br />

We invite you to join us for a free dinner on Monday night in our beautiful ‘lecture-hall<br />

ruin’. This is the old pathology lecture-hall that was partly destroyed during WW II,<br />

has been rebuilt and is now being used for social events. This is intended as an alternative<br />

to the River Cruise in the official social programme and we hope that it will be a good<br />

opportunity to get to know each other and to make new friends. Places are limited, and<br />

we need to know in advance who is interested in joining in (students only, please!).<br />

We are also planning to organize a pub-crawl on Saturday night for all the people who<br />

arrive early. Please contact us if you’re interested in a guided tour of the <strong>Berlin</strong> nightlife.<br />

We are trying hard to find inexpensive accommodation with local students or - if there<br />

are not enough places available - in youth hostels. At the moment we are searching for<br />

local students, who are able to accommodate you and offer you a breakfast during the<br />

conference for a small contribution of 50 DM (about 15£). However we cannot guarantee<br />

that we will be able to place everybody. Therefore, if you decide to attend the conference<br />

and want to be placed in private accommodation, please let us know as early as possible<br />

(email: below), so that we can add you to the accommodation list. Please tell us your<br />

name, sex, email, address, the day of arrival and departure and if you want to attend the<br />

dinner on Monday (free of charge!)!! Please send your e-mail to:<br />

student.amee@charite.de and note: “<strong>AMEE</strong> Accommodation application” in the reference.<br />

We look forward to meeting you.<br />

Local Organising Committee<br />

Professor Joachim Dudenhausen Professor Gerhard Gaedicke<br />

Professor Ingrid Reisinger Professor Ulrich Schwantes<br />

Professor Walter Burger Dr Bernd-Dieter Bohne<br />

Professor Dieter Scheffner Professor Florian Eitel (Munich)<br />

Local Administration:<br />

Dipl. phil. Burkhard Danz<br />

Charité<br />

Referat Studienangelegenheiten<br />

KW: <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Schumannstraße 20/21 Tel.: 49 30 450 57 60 91 (42)<br />

10098 <strong>Berlin</strong> Fax: 49 30 450 57 69 21<br />

Germany Email: burkhard.danz@charite.de<br />

- iii -


Welcome from President of <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Dear <strong>AMEE</strong> Members and Conference Participants:<br />

On behalf of <strong>AMEE</strong> I should like to welcome you to the <strong>Berlin</strong> 2001 Conference. The<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> annual conference is a focal point of the year, where members and non-members<br />

alike can meet to share ideas and to discuss problems and challenges facing them in<br />

their efforts to develop and improve medical and health care professions education in<br />

their institution. This year we have over 650 participants from 45 countries, more than<br />

ever before. Many are regular <strong>AMEE</strong> conference attendees, but every year we are<br />

pleased to see so many new faces who are keen to participate in what has become a<br />

major meeting in the medical education calendar.<br />

The main topic of this Conference “Medical Education and Standards at a Time of<br />

Change” fits very much in time and space. The international community devoted to<br />

improving medical education is looking for standards that could guarantee the training<br />

of professionals to meet health and social needs across country boundaries; therefore to<br />

find ways of overviewing those standards from a transnational standpoint, without<br />

losing sight of local needs, is more than timely at the beginning of the third millennium.<br />

The city of <strong>Berlin</strong> has undergone spectacular changes in just a few short years and is<br />

still adapting to new times, new roles and new circumstances. <strong>Berlin</strong> offers a suitable<br />

context in which to present views and experiences on medical educational changes and<br />

reminds us of the ever-adapting attitude that we all should demonstrate in order to<br />

advance and progress in the field.<br />

The Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum of the prestigious Humboldt University of<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> Medical School will be our meeting point and our inspiration to continue the<br />

work of the many important scientists on which the foundations of Medicine have been<br />

built. On behalf of us all I want to express my gratitude to the University for hosting<br />

the Conference.<br />

The <strong>Berlin</strong> Conference programme holds exciting plenary sessions; workshops for<br />

innovation and learning how to think about strategies to achieve our goals; all led by<br />

well-known and respected educators in Medicine and health care. Large group sessions<br />

will focus on specific issues and challenges. Short communications and posters, close<br />

to 400 in total, will give us the opportunity to present our views and work, to discuss<br />

them and finally to interact.<br />

Your attendance at the <strong>AMEE</strong> 2001 <strong>Berlin</strong> Conference is your own success and I wish<br />

you, <strong>AMEE</strong> friends, a most productive and enjoyable meeting.<br />

Margarita Barón-Maldonado<br />

President of <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

- iv -


Executive Committee<br />

List of Sponsors<br />

President: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado (Spain)<br />

Secretary/Treasurer: Professor Ronald Harden (UK)<br />

Committee Members: Professor Ralph Bloch (Switzerland)<br />

Professor Ioan Bocsan (Romania)<br />

Professor Florian Eitel (Germany)<br />

Dr Madalena Patrício (Portugal)<br />

Professor Dominique Perrotin (France)<br />

Professor Herman van Rossum (Netherlands)<br />

Ex-officio Members: Professor Hans Karle<br />

(World Federation for Medical Education)<br />

Dr Jørgen Nystrup (Past President of <strong>AMEE</strong>)<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Administrator: Mrs Pat Lilley<br />

p.m.lilley@dundee.ac.uk<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Secretary: Miss Tracey Martin<br />

t.r.martin@dundee.ac.uk<br />

Association for Medical Education in Europe<br />

University of Dundee, 484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Tel: +44 (0)1382 631953; Fax: +44 (0)1382 645748;<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>@dundee.ac.uk; http://www.amee.org<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> and the Local Organising Committee are most grateful to the Municipality of<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> for their generosity in hosting the reception at the Opening Ceremony. We would<br />

also like to acknowledge the generous support of the Founder Sponsors:<br />

Siemens AG – Medical Solutions<br />

Schering AG<br />

Freunde und Förderer der Charité<br />

Medical Faculty of Humboldt University<br />

- v -


SECTION 1<br />

Information about <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

and the Conference Venue


Conference Venue<br />

General Information<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong><br />

How to reach <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Weather<br />

Banks and Post Offices<br />

Currency Exchange<br />

A simplified map of <strong>Berlin</strong> and a plan of the campus showing the conference buildings<br />

and rooms appear on pages 1.5 and 1.6. A detailed map will be included in your<br />

registration pack.<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> has a wide range of attractions. Annual highlights include theatre weeks,<br />

international concert performances and film festivals. Multiple theatres offer a range<br />

of performances from classic to modern drama, opera, ballet and light comedy. <strong>Berlin</strong>´s<br />

artistic treasures and museums, palaces, galleries and archives have earned high reputation<br />

all over the world. A great number of monuments bear witness to the history of <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

and Prussian culture. Leisure time may be used for shopping downtown around the<br />

‘Kurfürstendamm’ and the ‘Friedrichstraße’. There are opportunities for every taste<br />

and purse. Shopping hours are from 9.00-20.00 hrs Monday to Friday and from 0900<br />

hrs to 1600 hrs on Saturday. All shops are closed on Sunday.<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> can be reached easily by all means of transportation. Most airlines offer direct<br />

flights to <strong>Berlin</strong> Tegel airport, some also fly to <strong>Berlin</strong> Tempelhof or <strong>Berlin</strong> Schönefeld.<br />

A taxi from <strong>Berlin</strong> Tegel to the city centre (main hotel district) costs approx. DEM<br />

30,00. There is also a bus service (line no. 109) between <strong>Berlin</strong> Tegel airport and the<br />

city centre. The fare is DEM 4,00. Main railway stations are <strong>Berlin</strong> Bahnhof Zoo,<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>-Ostbahnhof, Bahnhof <strong>Berlin</strong> Lichtenberg. As the main airports are quite close<br />

to the city centre, no special arrangements have been made to transfer participants to<br />

the Conference hotels.<br />

The congress takes place during the late summer/beginning of autumn where the<br />

temperatures are around 19°C (66°F) during the day and 10°C (50°F) at night. It may<br />

be useful to bring a sweater and raincoat.<br />

Banks are open Monday-Friday between 0800-1800. Post Offices are open Monday-<br />

Friday between 0800-1800, and on Saturday between 0800-1200.<br />

The unit of currency is the DeutscheMark (DEM). 1 DEM comprises 100 Pfennig .The<br />

rate of exchange at the time of going to press is £1 = DM 3.2; US$1 = DM 2.3;<br />

Euro 1 = DM 2. Major credit cards are widely accepted in hotels, restaurants and shops.<br />

- 1.1 -


Restaurants/Bars<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> is famous for its wide variety of 7,000 restaurants serving international or German<br />

cuisine and for its countless pubs called “Kneipen“ with their unique atmosphere. Some<br />

suggestions are:<br />

First-class gourmet restaurants<br />

Borchardt District/address: (Mitte) Französische Str. 47<br />

Subway station: Französische Str.<br />

Telephone: 20 38 71 10<br />

Open: daily 1100 to 2400 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa<br />

Café Einstein District/address: (Tiergarten) Kurfürstenstr. 58<br />

Subway station: Nollendorfplatz<br />

Telephone: 2 61 50 96<br />

Open: Daily 1000 to 0200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Euro<br />

Paris Bar District/address: (Charlottenburg) Kantstr. 152<br />

Subway station: Zoo<br />

Telephone: 3 13 80 52<br />

Open: Daily 1200-0200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex<br />

Luther und Wegner District/address: (Mitte) Charlottenstr. 56<br />

Subway station: Französische Str.<br />

Telephone: 2 02 95 40<br />

Open: Daily 0900-0200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Euro<br />

German cooking<br />

Vau District/address: (Mitte) Jägerstr. 54-55<br />

Subway station: Hausvogteiplatz<br />

Telephone: 2 02 97 30<br />

Open: Monday-Saturday from 1200 hrs<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Diners, Euro<br />

Altes Zollhaus District/address: (Kreuzberg) Carl-Hertz-Ufer 30<br />

Subway station Prinzenstrasse<br />

Telephone: 6 92 33 00<br />

Open: Tuesday-Saturday 1800-0100 hrs<br />

Cards: All credit cards<br />

Italian cooking<br />

Trattoria Lappeggi District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Kollwitzstr. 56<br />

Subway station: Senefelder Platz<br />

Telephone: 4 42 63 47<br />

Open: Daily from 12 noon<br />

Cards: Amex, Visa, Euro<br />

XII Apostel District/address: (Charlottenburg) Bleibtreustr. 49<br />

S-Bahn-station: Savignyplatz<br />

Telephone: 3 12 14 33<br />

Open: Daily 24 hours<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

- 1.2 -


Greek cooking<br />

Ypsilon District/address: (Schöneberg) Hauptstr. 163<br />

Subway station: Kleistpark<br />

Telephone: 7 82 45 39<br />

Open: Daily from 1700 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Hip, for young people<br />

Anita Wronski District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Knaackstr. 26-28<br />

Subway station: Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 42 84 83<br />

Open: Daily 1000 to 0200 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Ali Baba District/address: (Charlottenburg) Bleibtreustr. 45<br />

S-Bahn-station: Savignyplatz<br />

Telephone: 8 81 13 50<br />

Open: Daily 1130 to 0300 hrs<br />

Live music scene<br />

Kalkscheune District/address: (Mitte) Johannisstr. 2<br />

Subway station Oranienburger Straße<br />

Telephone: 28 39 00 65<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Kulturbrauerei District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Knaackstr. 97<br />

Subway station Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 41 92 69<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Schlot District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Kastanienallee 29<br />

Subway station Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 48 21 60<br />

Open: Daily from 1930 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Beer garden<br />

Prater Garten District/address: (Prenzlauer Berg) Kastanienallee 7-9<br />

Subway station Eberswalder Str.<br />

Telephone: 4 48 56 88<br />

Open: Daily from 1400 hrs<br />

Cards: No credit cards<br />

Café am Neuen See (District/address: Tiergarten) in the middle of Tiergarten<br />

Telephone: 2 54 49 30<br />

Open: Daily 1000 to 2300 hrs<br />

Cards: All credit cards<br />

- 1.3 -


Information about the Conference Venue<br />

Transport in <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Parking Facilities on Campus<br />

Dress Code<br />

Smoking Policy for Conference<br />

Charité is the Medical Faculty of Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>. There are three separate<br />

campuses (Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Campus Mitte and Campus <strong>Berlin</strong>-Buch). Please<br />

note that our Conference, including the Pre-conference Workshops, will take place at:<br />

Campus Virchow-Klinikum<br />

Charité, Medical Faculty of Humboldt-University<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>-Wedding<br />

Augustenburger Platz 1<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> D-13353<br />

Germany<br />

The Charité web page (German only) can be accessed as follows: http://www.charite.de/<br />

index/allginfo.html<br />

Registration and most of the Conference sessions take place in the Teaching Building<br />

(Lehrgebaude), marked on the plan on page 1.5.<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong> is well served by a wide bus, tram, underground (U-Bahn) and city train<br />

(S-Bahn) network, operating from 0400 until midnight. On the reverse of your<br />

Conference name-badge in your registration pack is stamped the <strong>Berlin</strong> Transport Service<br />

logo and this badge also serves as a 4-day travel pass which can be used for local buses<br />

and trains.<br />

The Campus Virchow-Klinikum is in the north west of the city, about 15 minutes by<br />

U-bahn from the city centre and can be reached by the following transport:<br />

Underground (U-Bahn): line U9: Station: ‘Amrumer Straße’ (or line U6 to<br />

‘Leopoldplatz’ and change to line U9)<br />

Bus lines: X26, 126 stop: ‘Virchow-Klinikum’<br />

221, 248 stop: ‘Amrumer Straße’<br />

Tram: line 23 or 24, stop: ‘Virchow-Klinikum’<br />

If travelling by U-Bahn, exit to the right. You will see signs to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Conference.<br />

It is about 5 minutes’ walk from the station to the Teaching Building.<br />

Parking Spaces in the vicinity of the Virchow-Klinikum campus are hard to find. Oncampus<br />

parking is possible (DEM 3 per hour), but spaces are very limited. There is a<br />

parking garage at the entrance Seestraße, where <strong>AMEE</strong> participants can park for a<br />

special fee of 15 DEM per day. Tickets are available at the conference desk.<br />

Access to the campus for loading and unloading is free of charge for up to one hour.<br />

Dress is informal for both day and evening sessions.<br />

Smoking is not permitted in the University buildings, and you are asked to smoke<br />

outside only.<br />

- 1.4 -


Map - Charité Virchow-Klinikum<br />

- 1.5 -


Map of <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

- 1.6 -


Campus Virchow-Klinikum – Teaching Building<br />

- 1.7 -


Conference Noticeboard and Messages<br />

Email Contact<br />

The Noticeboard is located by the Registration Desk. Messages and conference updates<br />

will be posted on the board and an adjacent board will be provided for messages for<br />

individuals. Phone and fax messages can be sent to you at the Registration Desk. Numbers<br />

will be available on the <strong>AMEE</strong> website from 27 August, or by contacting the <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Office.<br />

Please note that the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office will be closed from 1800 hrs on Thursday 30 August<br />

until 0900 hrs on Friday 7 September. Whilst in <strong>Berlin</strong> we can be contacted at the<br />

Registration Desk.<br />

Participants are welcome to use the Computer Room (Teaching Building, 2 nd floor,<br />

room 2.0103) for email contact at all times except during scheduled workshops: Saturday<br />

1345-1700; Sunday 0915-1230; Monday 1345-1600; Tuesday 1345-1700).<br />

CME Accreditation and Certificates of Attendance<br />

Abstracts<br />

Conference Evaluation<br />

Registration<br />

The Conference has been approved by the Royal College of Physicians of London for<br />

21 CME credits for attending the full Conference. Certificates of attendance, conforming<br />

to the guidelines provided by the Royal College of Physicians, will be available on<br />

Wednesday 5 September from 1200 hrs and a register will be available for signature at<br />

the same time.<br />

Abstracts will appear on the Conference web site soon after the conference. If there are<br />

any changes to be made to your abstract as it appears in the programme/abstract book,<br />

please contact the Registration Desk or the <strong>AMEE</strong> Secretariat in Dundee.<br />

We welcome feedback on which aspects of the Conference you have enjoyed, and the<br />

things you have found less satisfactory. Suggestions for speakers and workshop organisers<br />

for future conferences are also much appreciated. Please complete the evaluation form<br />

in your conference pack and either leave it in the box on the registration desk or send<br />

it to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office.<br />

The registration desk is open in the Teaching Building (Lehrgebaude), Campus Virchow-<br />

Klinikum, (see plan of Campus on page 1.5) at the following times:<br />

Saturday 1 September: 1200-1730<br />

Sunday 2 September: 0800-1700<br />

Monday 3 September: 0745-1730<br />

Tuesday 4 September: 0800-1715<br />

Wednesday 5 September: 0800-1630<br />

Please use the appropriate registration point:<br />

Point A: Registered participants with family names beginning with A-F<br />

Point B: Registered participants with family names beginning with G-N<br />

Point C: Registered participants with family names beginning with O-Z<br />

Point D: Unregistered participants, late registrants who have not paid, and<br />

those requiring further assistance<br />

- 1.8 -


Tours/Accommodation Registration<br />

DER-CONGRESS will have a representative available at the Registration Desk at the<br />

following times:<br />

Saturday 1 September: 1200-1730<br />

Sunday 2 September: 0800-1700<br />

Monday 3 September: 1200-1400<br />

Tuesday 4 September: 1200-1400<br />

Wednesday 5 September: 1200-1400<br />

If you have reserved hotel accommodation, tours or social events through DER you<br />

should collect vouchers from them. All participants making hotel reservations through<br />

DER will need a voucher to present to the hotel on departure so that the pre-paid<br />

deposit may be deducted from the final hotel bill.<br />

Information on the Academic <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Plenary Presentations<br />

Large Group Sessions<br />

Short Communications<br />

An overview of the programme is shown on pages 1.13 and 1,14. On page 1.15 is a<br />

personal diary form on which you may like to note the presentations you particularly<br />

want to attend.<br />

These are scheduled for Sessions 1 and 9 and will take place in Hörsaal 1 and 2.<br />

Hörsaal 3 is linked by video to provide additional seating if necessary.<br />

Three simultaneous large groups are scheduled in Session 4. After the presentations the<br />

chairperson will open up an interactive discussion between presenters and audience.<br />

These are scheduled for Sessions 2, 5, and 8. In Sessions 2 and 5 there are 13 simultaneous<br />

groups of short communications each with a theme and in Session 8 there are 12<br />

simultaneous groups. The room in which each group will take place is indicated in the<br />

grid on page X. This year we have tried very carefully to group relevant presentations<br />

together and encourage you to stay for a whole session and take part in the discussion<br />

at the end. Please feel free, however, to move between sessions. We have asked the<br />

Chairpersons to ensure that all sessions follow the time scheduled in the programme. If<br />

you do choose to move between sessions, please do so as quietly as possible. Each<br />

presenter has been allocated a ten minute presentation followed by five minutes for<br />

discussion. A 15 minute period has been allocated at the end of most sessions for a<br />

general discussion, led by an opening discussant. Each session will also have a<br />

chairperson.<br />

Information for Presenters of Short Communications<br />

Slide viewing area: The Mediothekraum (Teaching Building, first floor) may be used<br />

for testing audio-visuals and spare carousels will be available for slides. Please do not<br />

take these earlier than during the session prior to yours and return them as soon as<br />

possible afterwards. PowerPoint presentations can also be tried out in advance (see<br />

below).<br />

- 1.9 -


OHP and slides: An OHP and a 35 mm slide projector are available in every room.<br />

Computer projection: A data projector/beamer is available on request. If you are<br />

planning to use a computer presentation it is essential we know this in advance, either<br />

on the form supplied when your presentation was accepted or by email. This year we<br />

ask that you bring your presentation on a CD-ROM or zip disk clearly marked with<br />

your name and session number, as your own laptop may not be suitable for use with<br />

the in-house system. Laptop computers will be supplied in every room. Presentations<br />

made using the PC version of PowerPoint 1997 and 2000 are compatible with the inhouse<br />

system. Mac users should ensure that their presentations are saved on PC formatted<br />

disks. Please see the technician in the Mediothekraum preferably on Sunday, or at least<br />

one day before your session in order that your presentation may be loaded up on the<br />

appropriate computer. If you are a Mac user and wish to have more specific information,<br />

or if there is a video incorporated into your presentation please contact Pat Lilley<br />

(p.m.lilley@dundee.ac.uk)<br />

Technical assistance during the sessions: A technician will be available in each of the<br />

large lecture theatres, and students familiar with use of the equipment will be available<br />

in each of the smaller rooms. Each room is equipped with a telephone by which help<br />

may be requested if necessary.<br />

Your presentation: The following guidelines will help ensure the smooth-running of<br />

sessions.<br />

• Please arrive at least ten minutes before the scheduled start of the session and<br />

introduce yourself to the chairperson.<br />

• Keep strictly to the time allotted for your presentation. This is essential. The<br />

Chairperson will remind you when your time limit has expired and will then<br />

ask the audience for questions.<br />

• Please speak slowly and clearly.<br />

• Ensure your overheads and slides are clear, that there is not too much text to<br />

read in the limited time available and that the type is large enough to be<br />

legible for those sitting at the back of the room.<br />

• Whilst not obligatory, a single page hand-out, giving the key messages from<br />

your presentation, is always appreciated. As a rough indication you could<br />

expect between 40-60 participants in the audience.<br />

Role of the Chairperson in the Short Communications Sessions<br />

1 Before the session starts, check that the speakers and opening discussant are present;<br />

2 Introduce each speaker according to the programme. Tell him/her when the allotted<br />

10 minute presentation period is over (a timer will be provided) and ask the speaker<br />

to stop his/her presentation;<br />

3 Allow 5 minutes for discussion between presentations;<br />

4 If a speaker is not present, arrange for the 15 minute period to be used for further<br />

discussion; the next presentation should not start until the scheduled time;<br />

5 Ask the opening discussant to lead off the discussion at the end of the session;<br />

6 Draw the session to a close and thank participants;<br />

7 Follow strictly the time schedule in the programme to allow participants to move<br />

between sessions.<br />

Role of the Opening Discussant in the Short Communications Sessions<br />

Introduce the topic in the context of the papers presented and highlight the key points<br />

for discussion arising from the papers. This should take no more than 5 minutes.<br />

- 1.10 -


Posters<br />

There will be twelve themed groups of posters on show throughout the Conference in<br />

the areas listed below. Please see pages 2.27 to 2.37 for details of presentations in each<br />

session and see below for the locations of the posters which are all in the Teaching<br />

Building on either floor 1 or floor 2:<br />

Session No Title Location<br />

7A New Learning Technologies Floor 2<br />

7B Problem-Based Learning Floor 2<br />

7C Curriculum Planning and Change Floor 2<br />

7D Curriculum Evaluation/Staff Development Floor 1<br />

7E Postgraduate Education Floor 2<br />

7F Assessment Floor 1<br />

7G Teaching & Learning 1 Floor 2<br />

7H Teaching & Learning 2 Floor 2<br />

7I Continuing Professional Development 1 Floor 1<br />

7J Continuing Professional Development 2 Floor 1<br />

7K International Medical Education Floor 1<br />

7L Special Subjects Floor 1<br />

Poster presentations will take place on Wednesday 5 September from 0830-1000 hrs.<br />

The sessions will start in the room designated for the presentations (see page 1.13),<br />

where each presenter will have two minutes to highlight the key points to look out for<br />

in the poster. Two overheads or slides are allowed for the presentation. Computer<br />

projection is not available. A chairperson will introduce each presenter. Following the<br />

short presentations the group will move to the relevant poster area for a group discussion.<br />

Information for Presenters of Posters<br />

Posters may be mounted at the following times:<br />

Saturday 1 September between1200-1730 hrs<br />

Sunday 2 September between 0830-1700 hrs<br />

Monday 3 September between 0745-1730 hrs<br />

Posters will be grouped in themes, and the identification number, name(s) of the author(s)<br />

and title of the poster will be clearly labelled on each poster board. Poster boards are<br />

120 cm wide and 150 cm high, fixed with pins. A supply of pins will be available but<br />

you may find it useful to bring your own.<br />

To Help the Poster Sessions run Smoothly<br />

1 Poster presenters should meet in the room allocated to the session at 0820 hrs on<br />

Wednesday 5 September, and make themselves known to the chairperson.<br />

2 Presenters must keep strictly to the 2 minutes allowed for initial presentation of the<br />

poster, and may used one or two overheads or slides (no data projection). No time is<br />

allowed for discussion at this stage. This time should be used to highlight key points<br />

to look for in the poster, not to summarise the poster<br />

3 After all the short presentations have been made, the group will go to the poster<br />

area allocated.<br />

4 Presenters should stand by their posters, and be prepared to answer questions. It is<br />

useful to have some photocopied handouts (approximately 40-80) for distribution,<br />

with the key messages of the poster.<br />

5 It is helpful if the presenter can indicate on his/her poster board an alternative time<br />

when he/she will be available (eg a lunch or coffee break) in case anyone who<br />

cannot attend the session would like to discuss the poster.<br />

- 1.11 -


Role of the Chairperson in the Poster Sessions<br />

Medical Teacher Poster Prize<br />

Workshops<br />

1 Before the sessions starts, check that the presenters have arrived;<br />

2 Introduce each presenter and allow two minutes for the presentations. Do not allow<br />

any time for discussion between presentations, which should take up to 30 minutes,<br />

depending on the number in the group.<br />

3 At the end of the presentations lead the group to the poster area;<br />

4 Allow the group to look at all the posters (it is suggested that between 15-30 minutes<br />

is allowed for this activity);<br />

5 Invite questions for discussion.<br />

Taylor and Francis Ltd, the publisher of Medical Teacher, has generously agreed once<br />

again to sponsor a prize of £150 to be awarded for the best poster at the Conference.<br />

Posters will be judged, by a Committee, on the following criteria:<br />

• How well are the key messages communicated through the poster?<br />

• Does the poster arouse the interest of the viewer?<br />

• Is the poster attractive?<br />

The winner will be announced at the end of the final plenary session on Wednesday 5<br />

September. In addition to the prize money, the winner will receive one year’s individual<br />

membership of <strong>AMEE</strong>, which includes a personal copy of Medical Teacher.<br />

Pre-Conference Workshops: Pre-booking of Pre-Conference Workshops via the<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong> Secretariat is essential, and a charge is made. At the time of going to press<br />

almost all the pre-conference workshops are full.<br />

Conference Workshops: Workshops in Session 3 are listed on pages 2.13 to 2.14<br />

and those in Session 6 on pages 2.25 to 2.27. A full description of the workshop content<br />

is given in the Abstracts section (pages 4.23 and 4.51).<br />

Enclosed with this programme is a Selection Form. One of the items relates to workshop<br />

choice. Pre-booking of conference workshops offers a better chance of attending your<br />

first choice of workshops in Sessions 3 and 6. Please complete the information requested<br />

and either return the form to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office or email your choices to<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>@dundee.ac.uk There is no charge for attending conference workshops. A list<br />

of workshops and attendees will appear on the notice board adjacent to the Registration<br />

area with an indication of the number of places remaining. Depending on the format,<br />

some organisers wish to limit participation in their workshops, and we regret that you<br />

might not be able to attend your first choice on each occasion.<br />

- 1.12 -


<strong>Programme</strong> Overview - Short communications,<br />

Poster, Large Group Sessions<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

����������������<br />

��������<br />

��<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

����<br />

� � � �<br />

� � � � � � � �<br />

�<br />

Video link to<br />

Plenary Hall<br />

PLENARY<br />

Achieving standards<br />

in the curriculum<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

Student Support/<br />

Psychiatry and<br />

the Curriculum<br />

Multiprofessional<br />

Education<br />

Student and<br />

Curriculum<br />

Evaluation<br />

Simulation and<br />

Clinical Skills<br />

Training<br />

Educating the<br />

Educators 1<br />

Selection<br />

Continuing<br />

Professional<br />

Development<br />

Peer<br />

Assessment<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education -<br />

the Early Years<br />

OSCE/<br />

Standardised<br />

Patients in<br />

Assessment<br />

Curriculum<br />

database<br />

PBL and<br />

the Curriculum<br />

A Virtual<br />

Learning<br />

Environment<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

Workshops - Please see details on next page<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

LGS 3<br />

Standards and<br />

the curriculum<br />

LGS 2<br />

International<br />

aspects of<br />

standards<br />

LGS 1<br />

Standards &<br />

professionalism in<br />

medical education<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������<br />

- 1.13 -<br />

Teaching about<br />

EBM, Critical<br />

Thinking and<br />

Research<br />

Evaluation of<br />

Multiprofessional<br />

Education<br />

Contexts<br />

for Learning<br />

Education and<br />

Cultural<br />

Diversity<br />

Educating the<br />

Educators 2<br />

Educational<br />

Strategies/<br />

Curriculum<br />

Planning<br />

Outcome-based<br />

Education<br />

Assessment<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education for Gen<br />

Practice/Family<br />

Medicine<br />

Assessing<br />

Communication<br />

Skills/Patients<br />

as Examiners<br />

Curriculum<br />

Evaluation<br />

Evaluation of<br />

Problem-based<br />

Learning<br />

Learning and<br />

the Internet<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������<br />

Workshops - Please see details on next page<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������<br />

Special<br />

Subjects<br />

International<br />

Medical<br />

Education<br />

Continuing<br />

Professional<br />

Development 2<br />

Continuing<br />

Professional<br />

Development 1<br />

Teaching and<br />

Learning 2<br />

Teaching and<br />

Learning 1<br />

Assessment<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education<br />

Curriculum<br />

Evaluation/Staff<br />

Development<br />

Curriculum<br />

Planning and<br />

Change<br />

Problem-based<br />

Learning<br />

New Learning<br />

Technologies<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

Special<br />

Subjects<br />

International<br />

Aspects of<br />

Medical Education<br />

Clinical<br />

Teaching<br />

Communication<br />

Skills Training<br />

Curriculum<br />

Change<br />

Assessment in<br />

Postgraduate and<br />

Continuing<br />

Education<br />

Teaching and<br />

Learning<br />

Postgraduate<br />

Education/<br />

Career Choice<br />

The Final<br />

Examination<br />

Curriculum<br />

Planning<br />

Implementation of<br />

Problem-based<br />

Learning<br />

Computer<br />

Mediated<br />

Learning and<br />

Assessment<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

Video Link to<br />

Plenary Hall<br />

PLENARY<br />

Different views of<br />

medical education<br />

���������<br />

���������<br />

���������


<strong>Programme</strong> Overview - Workshops<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

�����������������<br />

������������<br />

�������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

�����������������<br />

������������<br />

�������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

����<br />

��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ���� ����<br />

���<br />

What can a general<br />

medical journal do<br />

for education in<br />

medicine?<br />

The assessment of<br />

poorly performing<br />

doctors<br />

A bachelor master<br />

structure of medical<br />

education in Europe<br />

Effective student<br />

assessment:<br />

something old,<br />

something new<br />

Concept<br />

mapping<br />

Making feedback<br />

during clerkships<br />

meaningful and<br />

effective<br />

East European<br />

Task Force<br />

Best Evidence<br />

Medical Education:<br />

Progress Report<br />

Feedback and<br />

evaluation: essential<br />

activities in the<br />

learning process<br />

From MD to<br />

academic<br />

teacher<br />

The quality of<br />

medical education<br />

and teaching - thema<br />

can variatione<br />

The roles of<br />

the teacher<br />

���������<br />

������<br />

���������<br />

- 1.14 -<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

�<br />

�����������<br />

�������������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

�����������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

������<br />

��������<br />

��������<br />

������������<br />

���������<br />

�����������������<br />

������������<br />

�������������<br />

������<br />

�����������<br />

�����<br />

������������<br />

����������<br />

����<br />

��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ���� ���� ���� ����<br />

Bedside Cardiology<br />

An Introduction Nordic Federation<br />

Risk management<br />

Developing<br />

Learning needs<br />

Skills Training,<br />

Professional and Students teaching<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>/<br />

to Clinical for Medical<br />

in medical<br />

professional attitudes:<br />

Problem-based Portfolio<br />

featuring ‘Harvey’<br />

organisational culture communication<br />

Ibero-American<br />

assessment in A European<br />

Judgement Analysis Education<br />

education<br />

theory, practice and<br />

Learning Assessment<br />

& UMedic<br />

of medical eduaction skills<br />

Network Workshop<br />

u/grad and p/grad core curriculum?<br />

evaluation<br />

medical education<br />

���<br />

Basic Skills<br />

Faculty Development<br />

Workshop<br />

���������<br />

�������<br />

���������


Personal Diary<br />

TIME MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY TIME<br />

0830 Plenary 1 Large Group Sessions Posters<br />

0830<br />

0845 0845<br />

0900 0900<br />

0915 0915<br />

0930 0930<br />

0945 0945<br />

1000<br />

1015<br />

Coffee<br />

1000<br />

1015<br />

1030<br />

1045<br />

Coffee Coffee<br />

Short Communications 3 1030<br />

1045<br />

1100 Short Communications 1 Short Communications 2<br />

1100<br />

1115 1115<br />

1130 1130<br />

1145 1145<br />

1200 1200<br />

1215 1215<br />

1230 1230<br />

1245<br />

1300<br />

Lunch<br />

1245<br />

1300<br />

1315<br />

1330<br />

Lunch Lunch<br />

Plenary 2<br />

1315<br />

1330<br />

1345 Posters<br />

1345<br />

1400 Workshop Session 1 Workshop Session 2<br />

1400<br />

1415 1415<br />

1430 1430<br />

1445 Break<br />

1445<br />

1500 Special Presentation 1500<br />

1515 1515<br />

1530 1530<br />

1545<br />

Coffee<br />

1545<br />

1600 Coffee<br />

Workshops Continued<br />

Close of Meeting 1600<br />

1615 General Assembly<br />

1615<br />

1630 1630<br />

1645 1645<br />

1700 1700<br />

Note: While you are free to move between short communication and poster sessions, we hope you<br />

will stay in one session and join in the discussion.<br />

- 1.15 -


List of Exhibitors<br />

Association for Medical Education in Europe<br />

Association for the Study of Medical Education, UK<br />

Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, UK<br />

Croatian Association for Medical Education<br />

Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

IAMSE<br />

Kaplan Medical, USA<br />

Medical Teacher<br />

National Association of Clinical Tutors (NACT), UK<br />

Netherlands Association for Medical Education<br />

Nordic Federation for Medical Education - NFME<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, UK<br />

Ottawa Conference<br />

Spanish Association for Medical Education - SEDEM<br />

Taylor & Francis Ltd, UK<br />

Teaching & Learning Support Network, UK<br />

- 1.16 -


SECTION 2<br />

The Academic <strong>Programme</strong>


Saturday 1 September<br />

Saturday 1 September<br />

Pre-conference tours – see page 3.4 for details<br />

1200-1730 Registration Desk open at Campus Virchow-Klinikum and setting up of Posters<br />

and Exhibits.<br />

1400-1700 Pre-conference workshop PCW1: Web-based learning (Part 1).<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

Coffee for workshop participants in Studentencafé at 1530.<br />

1400-1700 <strong>AMEE</strong> Executive Committee Meeting<br />

Teaching Building Room 2.0214 (2 nd floor) (closed meeting)<br />

- 2.1 -


Sunday 2 September<br />

Sunday 2 September<br />

0800-1700 Registration Desk open at Campus Virchow-Klinikum and setting up of Posters and<br />

Exhibits.<br />

0930-1230 Pre-conference workshops<br />

Please note: it is essential to reserve a place on these workshops, for which a charge is<br />

made. Coffee for workshop participants in Studentencafé at 1100. Lunch is not<br />

provided.<br />

PCW1 Web-based learning (Part 2). (Part 1 on Saturday afternoon)<br />

Dr Martin Fischer, University of Munich, Germany, and Dr Raphael Bonvin,<br />

University of Basel, Switzerland<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW2 Faculty rewards and incentives in medical education: the challenges<br />

and the promise<br />

Dr Sharon Krackov, New York University School of Medicine, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW3 Strategies for sustaining change in medical education<br />

Dr Stewart Mennin, and Dr Scott Obenshain, University of New Mexico School of<br />

Medicine, Albuquerque, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW4 Assessing the reliability of mastery-level decisions in OSCE and<br />

Standardized Patient examinations: an overview of common<br />

methods and practical applications<br />

Dr André De Champlain, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia,<br />

USA, and Dr John Boulet, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical<br />

Graduates, Philadelphia, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW5 Consultant appraisal<br />

Dr Steven Wilkinson, Centre for Organisational Research, Anglia Polytechnic<br />

University, UK, and Dr Kwee Matheson, West Suffolk Hospital, UK<br />

Room: Research Building, 2.0026 (2 nd floor)<br />

PCW6 Developing competence in lifelong learning<br />

Hajo Schmidt-Traub and colleagues: Medical Students from Charité, Medical<br />

Faculty of the Humboldt-University, <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0105 (1 st floor)<br />

PCW7 Curriculum change in a traditional medical school<br />

Professor Herman van Rossum and Dr Janke Cohen-Schotanus, Groningen<br />

University, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0107 (1st floor)<br />

- 2.2 -


Sunday 2 September<br />

0930-1100 BEME Steering Group Meeting<br />

Teaching Building, Room 2.0214 (2nd floor) (closed meeting)<br />

1115-1245 Medical Teacher Editorial Board Meeting<br />

Teaching Building, Room 2.0214 (2nd floor) (closed meeting)<br />

1400-1700 City coach tour<br />

Included in registration fee for registered participants and registered accompanying<br />

persons - see page 3.1 for details.<br />

1930-2130 Opening Ceremony and Reception at Red Town Hall (Rotes Rathaus)<br />

Included in registration fee for registered participants and registered accompanying<br />

persons - see page 3.1 for details.<br />

- 2.3 -


Monday 3 September<br />

0745-1730 Registration desk open at Campus Virchow-Klinikum<br />

0830-1030 Session 1: Plenary<br />

1<br />

Achieving standards in the curriculum<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 and 2<br />

(Note: there will be a video link to Hörsaal 3 to provide additional seating)<br />

Chairperson: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado, Spain<br />

0830-0855 1/1 Towards global standards for medical education<br />

Dr Jordan Cohen – President, Association of American Medical Colleges,<br />

Washington DC, USA<br />

0900-0925 1/2 New times, new standards: the social accountability of health<br />

systems and medical schools<br />

Dr Charles Boelen – Coordinator, Human Resources for Health Program,<br />

World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland<br />

0930-0955 1/3 Death of the course<br />

Professor Ronald Harden – Director, Centre for Medical Education, University<br />

of Dundee, and Director – Education Development Unit, Scottish Council for<br />

Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, UK<br />

1000-1030 Discussion<br />

1030-1100 Coffee served in the foyers of the Teaching and the Research Buildings<br />

1100-1300 Session 2: Short Communications<br />

2A<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

13 simultaneous themed sessions on a range of topics:<br />

A Virtual Learning Environment<br />

Chairperson: Professor Rein Zwierstra<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Virtual learning environments - a learner centred review<br />

Megan Quentin-Baxter* and Suzanne Hardy; Learning and Teaching Support<br />

Network, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Impact of a digital learning environment on the efficiency of teachers<br />

Peter G M de Jong* and Hermiette E Idenburg; Leiden University Medical Center,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

- 2.4 -


1130-1145 3 Building blocks in a new curriculum: the role of the library in<br />

educational innovation<br />

Magriet Lee and Maureen Brassel*; University of Pretoria, South Africa<br />

1145-1200 4 IT learning environment: more structure or more room for<br />

manoeuvre? Centrally guided norm path or absolute freedom?<br />

J Degryse*, A Roex and W Renier; K U Leuven, Belgium<br />

1200-1215 5 Innovation in self-directed learning (SDL) in CME: Virtual Internet<br />

Patient Simulation<br />

M A Raetzo*, R L Thivierge, R J Gagnon, V Loroch and A Bonneau; University<br />

of Montreal, Canada<br />

1215-1230 6 Real learning through virtual presentation: an Internet based work<br />

environment course for medical students at Uppsala University<br />

Klas <strong>Berlin</strong>*, Kerstin Graffman and Anna Rask-Andersen; University Hospital,<br />

Uppsala, Sweden<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ian Hart]<br />

2B<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

PBL and the Curriculum<br />

Chairperson: Dr Michael Schmidts<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The birth of a new species - squirrums: towards equal collaboration<br />

in innovation in medical education<br />

Peter McCrorie* and David Prideaux*; St George’s Hospital Medical School,<br />

London, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Broadening learning with PBL in a Pathophysiology course<br />

Antonio Rendas* and Bernardo Correia; Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Portugal<br />

1130-1145 3 The implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) into a<br />

traditional Radiology Clerkship<br />

U Keske, U K M Teichgräber, R Schröder, J Berger, S Venz and R Felix; Humboldt<br />

University, Germany<br />

1145-1200 4 Medical education innovations in Dresden, Germany: Reformed<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of<br />

Technology<br />

Peter Dieter; Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Problem-Based Learning in Immunology and Infectious Disease<br />

(IMID). The Dresden Experience<br />

S Weber*, G Baretton, S Bergmann, J Graeszler, E Jacobs, H Kunath, I Nitsche,<br />

U Ravens, A Rethwilm and P Rieber; Dresden Medical School, Germany<br />

1215-1230 6 From case-based reasoning to problem-based learning<br />

Haim Eshach* and Haim Bitterman; Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,<br />

Haifa, ISRAEL<br />

1230-1245 7 A new approach to PBL in CME; using script concordance tests (SCT)<br />

M Labelle*, C Maille, R L Thivierge and B Charlin; University of Montreal,<br />

Canada<br />

- 2.5 -


1245-1300 8 Discovering versus covering: a new PBL in Behavioural Sciences<br />

Ala’Aldin Al-Hussaini and Harith Ghassany; Sultan Qaboos University,<br />

Al-Khod, Sultanate of Oman<br />

2C<br />

Curriculum Database<br />

Chairperson: Dr Ed Peile<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (Ground Floor).<br />

1100-1115 1 Aiding the reform - development of a curriculum information<br />

system<br />

Patrick Merl*, Paolo Petta and Richard Marz University of Vienna Medical School,<br />

Austria<br />

1115-1130 2 How effective is project management software in implementing a<br />

new course?<br />

Katharine Grundy; St George’s Hospital Medical School, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 MESMIS – Medical School Staff/Student Management Information<br />

System: Towards the electronic curriculum<br />

D A Levison and W M Williamson; University of Dundee Medical School,<br />

Dundee, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 SIMON - Student Information and Management Online Network<br />

P Wagner*, D Zeiss*, S König*, P M Markus and H Becker: University of<br />

Gottingen, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Portfolio-based Dermatology internship - one year’s experience<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann and F Ochsendorf; Universitats-Hautklinik, Germany<br />

1215-1230 6 Profile of the consultations made by fifth year medical students in<br />

the integrated program of Pediatrics and Public Health<br />

Claudia Astudillo, Roció Arenas, Mariá Bustamante*, Mariá De La Fuente and<br />

Gladys Yentzen; Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr David Davies]<br />

2D<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

OSCE/Standardised Patients in Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Dr Gerald Whelan<br />

Room: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 “Check it, rate it, palm it or leave it” - handheld computers replace<br />

checklists in OSCEs and provide automated feedback<br />

Michael Schmidts*, Markus Kemmerling, Ruth Willnauer and Martin Lischka;<br />

Institute für med. Aus-und Weiterbildung, Vienna, Austria<br />

1115-1130 2 Evaluation of the undergraduate surgery course: effect of OSCE<br />

Marco Bustamante Z*, Carlos Carvajal H, Fernando Quevedo R, María<br />

Bustamante C and Claudia Astudillo M; Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1130-1145 3 OSCE: are many different stations necessary for each evaluation?<br />

Carlos Carvajal*, Marco Bustamante and Ilse López; Universidad de Chile,<br />

Santiago, Chile<br />

- 2.6 -


1145-1200 4 Assessing ‘attitude awareness’ as part of an OSCE<br />

Nicholas P Fenlon*, Maureen Kelly, Andrew W Murphy and Gerard Loftus;<br />

National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland<br />

1200-1215 5 Is the assessment of clinical skills affected by the choice and<br />

characteristics of the standardized patients?<br />

T Errichetti*, J Boulet, G Whelan and D McKinley; ECFMG, Philadelphia, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Use of standardized patients to assess medical response to a<br />

natural disaster<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Marguerite Hawkins, Heidi Worth-Dickstein, Eric Marks,<br />

Ralph Jones, Gilbert Muniz and Richard E Hawkins; Uniformed Services<br />

University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA<br />

1230-1245 7 The weakest link? Performance factors and degrees of influence in<br />

an interactive long-station general practice examination (VOICEs)<br />

C M Wiskin*, T Allan and J Skelton, University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Stewart Petersen]<br />

2E<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Postgraduate Education – the Early Years<br />

Chairperson: Dr John Nicholls<br />

Room: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 New PRHO: “I am not sure what I am supposed to do”. Can we<br />

improve on PRHO induction? An evaluation of a new induction<br />

process<br />

Dason Evans*, Mike Roberts and Diana Wood; St Bartholomew’s and the<br />

Royal London Medical and Dental School, London, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 A comparison of Pre-registration House Officers’ (PRHOs) and<br />

Senior House Officers’ (SHOs) experience in general practice<br />

Jan Illing*, Tim van Zwanenberg, Bill Cunningham, George Taylor, Richard<br />

Prescott and Cath O’Halloran; University of Newcastle, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Pre-registration experience in general practice: results of a national<br />

evaluation<br />

Janet Grant*, Lesley Southgate, Rodney Gale, George Freeman, Alison Hill,<br />

Neil Johnson, Frank Smith, Mairead Beirne and Heather Owen; Open University<br />

Centre for Education in Medicine, Milton Keynes, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Family Medicine Month: a human life cycle approach for first year<br />

residents<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Rebecca Gladu, Thelma Jean Goodrich, Janet Groff and<br />

Mary M Velasquez; UT Houston Health Science Center, Houston, USA<br />

1200-1215 5 Making and sharing decisions about management with patients: the<br />

views and experiences of Pre-Registration House Officers<br />

Jill Thistlethwaite; University of Leeds, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Teaching the forgotten tribe: tutor views on a generic curriculum for<br />

SHOs<br />

Lesley Pugsley* and Janet MacDonald; University of Wales College of Medicine,<br />

Cardiff, UK<br />

- 2.7 -


1230-1245 7 General professional training (GPT) for dental graduates in the UK<br />

Alison Bullock*, Vickie Firmstone and John Frame; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Jon Dowell]<br />

2F<br />

Peer Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Waltraud Georg<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Peer- and co-assessment leads to shared responsibility for test results<br />

Caro Brumsen and Peter G M de Jong*; Leiden University Medical Center,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

1115-1130 2 Student self-marking as an assessment approach to developing<br />

professionalism<br />

G J Mires* and M Friedman Ben-David; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Comprehensive Assessment: value for learning<br />

Elaine F Dannefer; University of Rochester Medical Center, USA<br />

1145-1200 4 Attributes of the excellent physician: a third year student survey<br />

A V Carneiro*, M F Patrício and J Fernandes e Fernandes; University of Lisbon<br />

School of Medicine, Portugal<br />

1200-1215 5 The Medical Student Peer Evaluation Initiative: assessment of<br />

performance in small group settings<br />

Steven L Kanter*, Kathleen Ryan, John Mahoney and Joan Harvey; University<br />

of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Reliability of a multidimensional questionnaire to assess attitudes<br />

of medical students towards their future profession: the UNI Project<br />

G L Werneck*, E C O Ribeiro, A C Aguiar and V M B Ribeiro; Nucleo de<br />

Estudos de Saude Coletiva, Ala Sul, Brazil<br />

1230-1245 7 Narrowing the gap in the assessment process<br />

Nicolas Karlsson, University of Goteborg, Sweden<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ara Tekian]<br />

2G<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Continuing Professional Development<br />

Chairperson: Dr Peder Charles<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Learning and partnering: bringing pharmaceutical representatives<br />

into the educational loop<br />

Jane Tipping*, Craig Campbell, Jean Claude Dairon, Paul Davis, Francois Goulet,<br />

Gilles Lachance, Celine Monette, Joan Sargeant, Linda Snell and Robert Thivierge,<br />

Canada<br />

- 2.8 -


1115-1130 2 CME with a combination of standardised patients and a CBT<br />

programme<br />

S Schewe*, A Schewe and J Loohs; Medizinische Poliklinik, Munich, Germany<br />

1130-1145 3 The impact of continuing professional development (CPD): 30 case<br />

studies of dentists<br />

Vickie Firmstone*, Alison Bullock and John Frame; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Global trends in continuing medical education<br />

Lewis A Miller; Global Alliance for Medical Education, Darien, USA<br />

1200-1215 5 Do we need consultant appraisal?<br />

K H Matheson; West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 When should clinicians be trained in management?<br />

J Clark*, R Palmer and P Spurgeon; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 Evaluation of ‘Distance Interactive Learning in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology (DIALOG)’<br />

Vikram Jha*, Sean McAleer and Sean Duffy; St James’s University Hospital,<br />

Leeds and University of Dundee, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Brendan Hicks]<br />

2H<br />

Selection<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Chairperson: Professor David Wiegman<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Selecting aboriginal students to health professional courses<br />

I E Rolfe and G Garvey*; University of Newcastle, Australia<br />

1115-1130 2 Demographic and scholastic correlates of scores in the Australian<br />

Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT)<br />

Peter Tutton*, Chris Browne, Margot Story and Michael Lewenberg; Monash<br />

University, Australia<br />

1130-1145 3 Can we make the interview add something new?<br />

P Hughes, S Miller*, P McCrorie and A Kent; St George’s Hospital Medical<br />

School, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Relative effects of learning style, MCAT and prior academic record<br />

on performance in medical school<br />

Stephen Aaron* and Ernest Skakun; University of Alberta, Canada<br />

1200-1215 5 The selection of GP trainees in the West Midlands: audit of<br />

assessment centre scores by ethnic background and country of<br />

qualification<br />

Celia Brown*, Sarah Wakefield and Alison Bullock; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 The selection of GP trainees: perceptions of the new regional<br />

system<br />

Sarah Wakefield*, Celia Brown and Alison Bullock; University of Birmingham,<br />

UK<br />

- 2.9 -


1230-1245 7 “I want to become a doctor.” Analysis of first year students’<br />

motivations<br />

M F Patrício* and J Gomes-Pedro; University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Miss Gill Clack]<br />

2I<br />

Educating the Educators (1)<br />

Chairperson: Professor Olle ten Cate<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0104 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Evaluation of a Train the Trainers program in quality improvement<br />

and cost-effectiveness<br />

Antoinette S Peters*, Maryjoan Ladden and Robert Fletcher; Harvard Medical<br />

School, Boston, USA<br />

1115-1130 2 Teaching the medical teachers - Beyond ‘TIPS’<br />

Jane Richardson* and Jonathan D Cartledge; University College London, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Formal courses in further training of medical teachers<br />

M Vrcic-Keglevic*, Z Jaksic, G Pavlekovic, N Pokrajac, A Smalcelj and B Vrhovac;<br />

“A.Stampar” School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia<br />

1145-1200 4 Supporting Clinicians on Training in Scotland<br />

Rose Martin, on behalf of Supporting Clinicians on Training in Scotland Working<br />

Group; Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,<br />

Dundee, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 Improving own teaching skills identified as a top priority by<br />

Registrars<br />

Iwona Stolarek; Hutt Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand<br />

1215-1230 6 Dissemination of teaching of medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination in Japan<br />

N Ban*, M Hatao, J Ohtaki, M Fujisaki, C Nakamura, T Tsuda, T Matsumura<br />

and M Shimo; Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan<br />

1230-1245 7 Transformational learning in a peer teaching programme<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alexandra Blanco and Soledad Campos; Austral University,<br />

Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Clair DuBoulay]<br />

2J<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Simulation and Clinical Skills Training<br />

Chairperson: Professor Andrzej Wojtczak<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0107 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Teaching clinical skills to medical students using the clinical skills<br />

laboratory with a new simulator and new tools<br />

I Yoshida*, T Ueno, M Hotta, H Abe, I Kubara, S Kono, Y Ogo, S Watanabe,<br />

A Hayashi, T Akagi, S Okuda and M Sata (Working Group on Teaching Basic<br />

Clinical Skills); Kurume University, Japan<br />

- 2.10 -


1115-1130 2 Training in vaginal examination technique using the ‘epelvis’<br />

C M Pugh* and M S Marsh; GKT Medical School, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Training medical students to perform vaginal examination using the<br />

‘epelvis’<br />

M S Marsh* and C M Pugh; GKT Medical School, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Procedural failures - when is enough enough?<br />

Michael Harrison; Auckland Hospital, New Zealand<br />

1200-1215 5 Approaches and advancements; Integrating simulation center<br />

activities into 3rd year medical school clerkship curricula<br />

Aileen E Zanoni*, Graceanne Adamo, Christoph R Kaufmann and Richard E<br />

Hawkins; Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Using scenario based teaching to deliver feedback on technical and<br />

communication skills<br />

R L Kneebone*, J Kidd, D Nestel, B Paraskeva, S Asvall and A Darzi; College<br />

School of Medicine, Imperial London, UK<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Paul Bradley]<br />

2K<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Students and Curriculum Evaluation<br />

Chairperson: Professor Juan Perez-Gonzalez<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0105 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Teaching quality questionnaire: students’ evaluations of standard<br />

learning activities in an integrated curriculum<br />

Øyvind Ellingsen*, Kristin Wigen and Are Holen; Norwegian University of Science<br />

& Technology, Trondheim, Norway<br />

1115-1130 2 The retrospective view - formative programme evaluation of<br />

preclinical courses by final year medical students<br />

C Schirlo*, W Vetter and P Groscurth; Studiendekanat der Medizinischen Fakultat,<br />

Zurich, Switzerland<br />

1130-1145 3 Students’ attitudes towards evaluation of teaching programmes - do<br />

they fib?<br />

Richard Phillips* and Alison Hooper; GKT School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Student evaluation of educational quality: the construction of a<br />

multidimensional questionnaire<br />

Volkhard Fischer; Hannover Medical School, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Evaluation of lectures in medical teaching based on focal groups<br />

and a survey of opinion to formulate a guide of practical<br />

recommendations<br />

Juan Cristóbal Maass*, Lorena Tapia, Marcela Jacard, and Teresa Millán;<br />

University of Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1215-1230 6 Use of a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) model to enhance<br />

curriculum evaluation and integration<br />

Nehad El-Sawi; University of Health Sciences, Kansas City, USA<br />

- 2.11 -


1230-1245 7 New faculty-level self-evaluation instruments<br />

K Lonka*, N Paganus, T Hätönen, A Heikkilä, J Vainio and J Nieminen;<br />

University of Helsinki, Finland<br />

1245-1300 8 The doctors’ opinion - a national evaluation of Swedish medical<br />

education<br />

Anders Bengtsson, Kerstin Johansson and Sara Engström*; Swedish Medical<br />

Association, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

2L<br />

Multiprofessional Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Anna Bukovinszky<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Interprofessional learning: the New Generation Project<br />

Debra Humphris* and Chris Stephens*; University of Southampton, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 “Walking in the moccasins of others”: reflections on a new initiative<br />

to bring the real world of the patient into the medical curriculum<br />

Lyn Brown; University of Liverpool, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Multiprofessional education in health care ethics in Germany<br />

Jochen Vollmann; Freie Universitat <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1145-1200 4 Dilemmas in resuscitation: nursing and medical students’<br />

responses to ethical professional issues related to resuscitation of<br />

patients<br />

C Edward*, J Crosby and P E Preece*; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 Promoting the use of clinical guidelines in Scotland<br />

Bernice West* and Peter Wimpenny*; Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Can Neuropsychiatry training be successfully delivered in a multiprofessional<br />

setting?<br />

Andrew Parkin* and Nisha Dogra; University of Leicester, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 The CURATA Partnership: linking CHE to patient care<br />

R L Thivierge*, M Labelle, M Beaulieu and L Bessette; University of Montreal,<br />

Canada<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Janke Cohen-Schotanus]<br />

2M<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Student Support/Psychiatry and the Curriculum<br />

Chairperson: Dr Jadwiga Mirecka<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0105 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 An evaluation of student support systems at the Medical School at<br />

Queen’s University Belfast<br />

Nicola Wilson, David McCluskey and Mairead Boohan*; Queen’s University of<br />

Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK<br />

- 2.12 -


1115-1130 2 Is student abuse a problem in our medical school?<br />

Ana Maida*, Alicia Vasquez, José Calderon, Viviana Herskovic, Marcela Jacard,<br />

Ana Pereira and Lars Widdel; University of Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1130-1145 3 First year medical nursing and pharmacy students’ approaches to study<br />

R J Lamdin* and I Martin; University of Auckland, New Zealand<br />

1145-1200 4 Changing medical students’ attitudes towards homosexuality<br />

Itzchak Levi* and Tsvi Fischel; Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel<br />

1200-1215 5 The attitudes to Psychiatry of first year medical students<br />

R K Day; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Psychology basic and applied knowledge<br />

Agnete Langagergaard* and Berit Eika; University of Aarhus, Denmark<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Jorgen Nystrup and Ms Mei-Ling Ball]<br />

1300-1400 Lunch – self-service buffet in the Marquee<br />

1400-1600 Session 3: Workshops<br />

3<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Please see the Abstracts section pages 4.23 to 4.26 for details of these workshops.<br />

Attendance at Conference workshops is free of charge but you are asked to preregister<br />

on the form included with the programme. Lists of participants who have preregistered<br />

and places available will be posted by the registration desk.<br />

3/1 The roles of the teacher<br />

Organisers: Jennifer Laidlaw and Anne Hesketh, SCPMDE Education<br />

Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0105 (1 st floor)<br />

3/2 The quality of medical education and teaching – thema con<br />

variatione<br />

Organiser: Professor Peter Nippert, University of Muenster, Germany<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0107 (1 st floor)<br />

3/3 From MD to academic teacher<br />

Organiser: Professor Reinhard Putz, University of Munich, Germany<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 5 (lower ground floor)<br />

3/4 Feedback and evaluation: essential activities in the learning process<br />

Organiser: Dr Charles D Puglia, MCP Hahnemann School of Medicine,<br />

Philadelphia, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/5 Best Evidence Medical Education: progress report<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ian Hart, BEME Collaboration. Contributions from<br />

representatives of BEME Topic Review Groups<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (ground floor)<br />

- 2.13 -


Monday 3 September<br />

3/6 East European Task Force<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ioan Bocsan, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine &<br />

Pharmacy, Romania<br />

Room: Research Building, Besprechungsraum 2.0026 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/7 Making feedback during clerkships meaningful and effective: a<br />

workshop for students and teachers<br />

Organiser: Dr Paul Hemmer, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences,<br />

Bethesda, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/8 Concept mapping<br />

Organiser: Dr Gonul Peker, Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova-Izmir,<br />

Turkey<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/9 Effective student assessment: something old, something new<br />

Organiser: Dr Geoff Norman, McMaster University Medical School, Hamilton,<br />

Canada<br />

Room: Teaching Building 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

3/10 A bachelor-master structure of medical education in Europe?<br />

Organisers: Professor Olle ten Cate, University Medical Centre Utrecht and<br />

Professor Herman van Rossum, University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

3/11 The assessment of poorly performing doctors: experiences from the<br />

first three years of the Performance Procedures within the UK<br />

General Medical Council<br />

Organisers: Professor Lesley Southgate, University College London Medical School,<br />

and Dr Peter McCrorie, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London UK<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 6 (lower ground floor)<br />

3/12 What can a general medical journal do for education in medicine?<br />

Sandy Goldbeck-Wood and Dr Ed Peile, University of Oxford, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

1600-1615 Coffee served in the foyers of the Teaching and Research Buildings<br />

1615-1715 <strong>AMEE</strong> General Assembly<br />

(Non-members of <strong>AMEE</strong> are also welcome to attend this business meeting of the Association)<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal1 (ground floor)<br />

1930-2300 River Cruise with buffet and entertainment<br />

(Optional – not included in Conference registration fee – please see page 3.2 for details)<br />

1930 til late Alternative evening for students only!<br />

Dinner and entertainment in the “Lecture Hall Ruin” (see page 3.2 for details)<br />

- 2.14 -


Tuesday 4 September<br />

0800-1715 Registration Desk open<br />

0830-1030 Session 4: Large Group Sessions<br />

4A<br />

Standards and professionalism in medical education<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ian Hart, Canada<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (ground floor)<br />

0830 4A/1 Attempto! Instilling mindful teaching<br />

Dr Maria Lammerding-Köppel, University of Tubingen, Germany<br />

0855 4A/2 Who is afraid of the didactic wolf? A plea for professionalism in<br />

medical education and specialist training<br />

Professor Rein Zwierstra, University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

0920 4A/3 What’s good about ‘Best Evidence Medical Education’ (BEME)<br />

Professor Ralph Bloch, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern,<br />

Switzerland<br />

0945 Discussion<br />

4B<br />

International aspects of standards<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ronald Harden, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

0830 4B/1 The challenge of developing international standards in medical<br />

education<br />

Dr Andrzej Wojtczak, Institute for International Medical Education, New York,<br />

USA, and Dr M Roy Schwarz, China Medical Board of New York<br />

0855 4B/2 Globalisation of medical education: the concept of international<br />

standards<br />

Dr Hans Karle, World Federation for Medical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark<br />

0920 Discussion<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 2.15 -


4C<br />

Standards and the curriculum<br />

Chairperson: Professor Herman van Rossum, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

0830 4C/1 Learning can be fun! The student’s experience of standards in a new<br />

curriculum<br />

Anke Neuwirth and Johannes Meier, 2 nd year students in the Reformed Medical<br />

Curriculum, Charité, Medical Faculty of the Humboldt-University, <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

0855 4C/2 The advantages of longitudinal evaluation of the medical<br />

curriculum<br />

Professor Reinhard Pabst, Medical School of Hannover, Germany<br />

0920 4C/3 Standards and assessment<br />

Professor Miriam Friedman Ben-David, University of Dundee, UK<br />

0945 Discussion<br />

1030-1100 Coffee served in the foyers of the Teaching and Research Buildings<br />

1100-1300 Session 5: Short Communications<br />

5A<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

13 simultaneous themed sessions on a range of topics:<br />

Learning and the Internet<br />

Chairperson: Professor Dieter Scheffner<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The “dos and don’ts” of e-learning in medicine: experiences of a<br />

CD-ROM production<br />

P Langkafel*, A Oehlsen, U Arnold and J W Dudenhausen; Humboldt University<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1115-1130 2 Online guide to basic surgical skills: http://olc.chirurgiegoettingen.de<br />

S Koenig*, P Wagner, D Zeiss, P M Markus and H Becker; Georg-August-<br />

University Goettingen, Germany<br />

1130-1145 3 Standards for an international distributed online case repository<br />

Chris Candler*, Colin Melville and Dave Collins; University of Oklahoma,<br />

Oklahoma City, USA<br />

1145-1200 4 Digital study of medicine<br />

U Arnold*, P Langkafel, L Peppel, I Reisinger and J W Dudenhausen; Humboldt<br />

University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Electronic learning objects and resource discovery<br />

David A Davies; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

- 2.16 -


1215-1230 6 Filling a curriculum map with Reusable Learning Objects<br />

N K McManus *, R M Harden, D Davidson, S Khogali and J M Laidlaw;<br />

SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1230-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ralph Bloch]<br />

5B<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Evaluation of Problem-based Learning<br />

Chairperson: Professor Reinhard Pabst<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Changing to PBL: does it have an effect on junior doctors’<br />

conceptualisation of communication skills?<br />

P A O’Neill*, S C Willis and A Jones; University of Manchester, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 How do medical students characterize good problem-based<br />

learning (PBL) tutoring after a year’s experience?<br />

Gillian Maudsley; University of Liverpool, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Predicting outcome by behaviour in PBL groups?<br />

Kristin Wigen*, Are Holen, Øyvind Ellingsen and Hansjørg Hohr; Norwegian<br />

University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway<br />

1145-1200 4 Student evaluation of a problem-based learning module into an<br />

occupational therapy course<br />

Deirdre Connolly* and Morag Donovan; Trinity College Dublin, Dun Laoghaire,<br />

Ireland<br />

1200-1215 5 Evaluation of student performance in the problem based learning<br />

(PBL) group<br />

David C M Taylor, The Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Crown<br />

Street, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Influence of tutor qualification on test achievement and student<br />

evaluation in a problem-based course of basic pharmacology<br />

J Matthes*, B Marxen, R-M Linke, W Antepohl, W Lehmacher and S Herzig;<br />

University of Cologne, Germany<br />

1230-1245 7 Individual perceptions of group learning and functioning in a<br />

problem-based learning programme<br />

Janet MacDonald; University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Jacques Des Marchais]<br />

- 2.17 -


5C<br />

Curriculum Evaluation<br />

Chairperson: Dr Kirsti Lonka<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 A course programme evaluation: contribution of students’ selfevaluation<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Jorge Lima and Joao Martins-Silva; Institute of Biochemistry,<br />

University of Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

1115-1130 2 A national evaluation of the reforms to higher specialist training in<br />

the UK: methodological issues<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and Heather Owen; Open University<br />

Centre for Education in Medicine, Milton Keynes, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Evaluation of PME courses in General Practice in Germany<br />

S Wilm*, R Jahromi, S Krause and B Hemming; Heinrich-Heine University,<br />

Duesseldorf, Germany<br />

1145-1200 4 The Matrix: a visual presentation of registrar term evaluation<br />

Richard Tarala and Alistair Vickery; Royal Perth Hospital, Australia<br />

1200-1215 5 Site visits as a method to assess the educational quality of<br />

clerkships<br />

Janke Cohen-Schotanus* and Rein P Zwierstra; University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

1215-1230 6 Impact of a new curriculum on the clinical competence of medical<br />

students at the University of Barcelona Medical School (UBMS)<br />

Ramon Pujol*, Frederic Manresa, Francesc Gudial, Eduard Kranfly, Josep Ma<br />

Martinez Carsetera; University of Barcelona, Spain<br />

1230-1245 7 Lessons learnt in designing and implementing a curriculum<br />

evaluation<br />

Helen Graham* and Mary Seabrook; GKT School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Geoff Norman and Ms Susanne Pruskil]<br />

5D<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Assessing Communication Skills/Patients as Examiners<br />

Chairperson: Dr Andre de Champlain<br />

Room: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Detecting rater bias on a measure of spoken English proficiency<br />

Marta van Zanten*, Danette McKinley, John Boulet and Gerald Whelan;<br />

ECFMG, Philadelphia, USA<br />

1115-1130 2 Comparison of communication skills in residency with performance<br />

on ECFMG Clinical Skills Assessment<br />

W Burdick*, J Boulet, S Peitzman, G Whelan and D Brody; ECFMG, Philadelphia,<br />

USA<br />

1130-1145 3 ACT: a new computer-assisted assessment (CAA) method for<br />

communication-skills of medical students<br />

R L Hulsman* and J D Donnison-Speijer; Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam,<br />

Netherlands<br />

- 2.18 -


1145-1200 4 How accurate is lay person assessment of clinical competence of<br />

student doctors? Comparison of the assessment of medical<br />

students by Faculty and Standardized Patients during the Objective<br />

Structured Clinical Examination<br />

P Heasman*, K Pitkala and N Paganus; University of Helsinki, Finland<br />

1200-1215 5 Do Simulated Patients grade inter-personal skills as well as<br />

Faculty?<br />

A S Arora*, N Natt, S Kluck and R Tiegs; Mayo Foundation, Rochester, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 The contribution of non medical assessors to the assessment of<br />

poorly performing doctors<br />

Lesley Southgate* and Peter McCrorie; University College London Medical School,<br />

London, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 Assessment in the elective clinical rotation: centrally reviewed case<br />

reports<br />

W M Molenaar*, S A Koopmans, M D Talsma and L H van Essen: University of<br />

Groningen, Netherlands<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Wolfram Antepohl]<br />

5E<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Postgraduate Education for General Practice/<br />

Family Medicine<br />

Chairperson: Dr Kwee Matheson<br />

Room: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 An educational approach to significant event auditing in primary care<br />

J McKay* and P Bowie; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Postgraduate education for generalist physicians<br />

J F Perez Gonzalez* and M Requena; Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas,<br />

Venezuela<br />

1130-1145 3 Barriers to change in postgraduate medical education in General<br />

Practice<br />

B W McGuinness; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Swaffham, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 The use of video in General Practice Registrar training and assessment<br />

C M Wiskin, Stephen Field* and John Skelton; West Midland GP Unit,<br />

Birmingham, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 The consultation styles of female GP Registrars with male and<br />

female patients<br />

Sarah Hillman* and John Skelton; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 The development, implementation and evaluation of a ‘concordance’<br />

training course<br />

Jon Dowell*, Claudia Pagliari and Sean McAleer; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1230-1245 7 A linguistic study of information-giving in 30 doctor-patient<br />

consultations<br />

Andy Shanks* and John Skelton; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Graham Buckley]<br />

- 2.19 -


5F<br />

Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Dr Robert Galbraith<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Objective Structured Preclinical Exams (OSPE): a new test format of<br />

summative student assessment in the Problem-Based Learning (PBL)<br />

curriculum at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Bern<br />

Barbara Stadelmann*, R Hofer, Urs Brodbeck and Ara Tekian; University of<br />

Bern, Switzerland<br />

1115-1130 2 The quality of an extended-matching multiple choice examination<br />

J Beullens*, B Van Damme, H Jaspaert, E Struyf and P J Janssen; K.U.Leuven,<br />

Belgium<br />

1130-1145 3 Evaluation of a five-dimensional assessment strategy within a<br />

problem-based learning medical curriculum<br />

Paul Julian*, Scott Reeves* and Alistair Lumb*; Barts & The London School of<br />

Medicine & Dentistry, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 A preclinical exam to assess the networked structure of knowledge<br />

on basic science in the Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina)<br />

Ana Maria Reta*, Maria del Carmen Montbrun and Maria José Lopez;<br />

Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina<br />

1200-1215 5 Predictive value for academic performance of two assessment<br />

devices applied to medical students<br />

Ma Eugenia Ponce de León C*, Armando Ortiz and M del Carmen Ruiz Alcocer;<br />

National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico<br />

1215-1230 6 Self-assessed clinical skills levels of newly graduated physicians in<br />

relation to an intended curriculum<br />

A M Moercke* and B Eika; University of Aarhus, Denmark<br />

1230-1245 7 The dynamics of knowledge structure of graduating medical<br />

students based on results of the Medical Licensing Examination<br />

M Mrouga*, Y Bogachkov and L Artemchuk; Testing Board, Kyiv, UKRAINE<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor John Cookson]<br />

5G<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Outcome-based Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Jordan Cohen<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The Scottish Learning Outcomes Project Phase II - Assessment:<br />

“the proof of the pudding”<br />

Jacqueline Furnace* and John Simpson*, on behalf of Scottish Deans’ Medical<br />

Curriculum Group; University of Aberdeen, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Recent developments in an outcome-led curriculum<br />

Nick Ross; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

- 2.20 -


1130-1145 3 A New Instrument of curriculum development: Curriculum as a<br />

function of professional outcomes<br />

I Bulakh*, Y Voronenko and I Filonchuk; Testing Board and National Medical<br />

University, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

1145-1200 4 Focusing on learning outcomes for the Preregistration House<br />

Officer (PRHO) year<br />

E A Hesketh* and M S Allan; Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 The ACGME Outcome Project: a model resident assessment system<br />

Susan Swing; ACGME, Chicago, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Development of an outcome-based clinical curriculum at<br />

International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan, K H Ong, C M K<br />

Patrick and Q Akhtar; International Medical University, Selangor, Malaysia<br />

1230-1245 7 An evaluation of the internal validity of specific learning outcomes<br />

in phase II of a revised undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

F J Cilliers* and E M Bitzer; University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Miriam Friedman]<br />

5H<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Educational Strategies/Curriculum Planning<br />

Chairperson: Professor G Gaedicke<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Structural changes approaching medical education in The<br />

Netherlands<br />

Olle Th.J. ten Cate*, Herman J M van Rossum and Albert J J A Scherpbier;<br />

Utrecht University, Netherlands<br />

1115-1130 2 Implementation of PBL-Based Curriculum<br />

Maria Montbrun* and Enrique Guntsche; Universidad Nacional de Cuyo,<br />

Mendoza, Argentina<br />

1130-1145 3 An overview of the implementation of curriculum 2001 at Nelson R<br />

Mandela School of Medicine, University of Natal<br />

Veena Singaram*, Jacqueline van Wyk, Michelle McLean and Peter Olmesdahl;<br />

University of Natal, South Africa<br />

1145-1200 4 Self-directed, self-organized case-based-learning in final year<br />

students<br />

Jana Junger, Christiane Roth, Stephan Zipfel, Wolfgang Eich and Wolfgang Herzog;<br />

University of Heidelberg, Germany<br />

1200-1215 5 Changing to ‘self-induced learning’ in a speech therapy department<br />

Martin Peleman; Arteveldehogeschool, Gent, Belgium<br />

1215-1230 6 Student participation in the organization of education at a medical<br />

school - a comparison of two South African cases<br />

B G Lindeque and Pierre L Bredenkamp*; Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg,<br />

South Africa<br />

- 2.21 -


1230-1245 7 Preparing the way: encouraging clinical tutors to be co-producers in<br />

the learning process<br />

Peter Barton* and Jillian Morrison; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Peter McCrorie]<br />

5I<br />

Educating the Educators<br />

Chairperson: Professor Hywel Thomas<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0104 (Second Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 How to help clinical and multimedia staff develop joint programs<br />

Eleanor Flynn; University of Melbourne, Australia<br />

1115-1130 2 “Getting Started in Clinical Teaching” - a staff development initiative<br />

J A Dent* and P E Preece; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Governance in medical teaching: pilot study<br />

Iain Robbé; University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 The role of an education unit in health professional education:<br />

proactive or responsive<br />

Margaret Horsburgh* and Rain Lamdin; University of Auckland, New Zealand<br />

1200-1215 5 Beyond teacher training; the construction of a faculty development<br />

strategy<br />

Patricia Rosado Pinto* and Ramiro Avila; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lisbon,<br />

Portugal<br />

1215-1230 6 The profile of the perfect teaching professor<br />

F Scheele*, J Th M van der Schoot and A J Goverde; St Lucas Andreas Hospital,<br />

Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />

1230-1245 7 Evidence retrieval in medical education: obstructions and<br />

opportunities<br />

Alex Haig; SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr John Nicholls]<br />

5J<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Education and Cultural Diversity<br />

Chairperson: Dr Brigitte Grether<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0107 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The development and evaluation of a programme to teach cultural<br />

diversity to medical undergraduate students<br />

Nisha Dogra; University of Leicester, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Aboriginal health: a tool in the process of reconciliation?<br />

G Garvey* and I E Rolfe*; University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia<br />

- 2.22 -


1130-1145 3 Valuing diversity: The effectiveness of a roleplay workshop as part<br />

of a newly introduced community based diversity module<br />

Sue Conning*, Alison Hooper, Margot Turner and Val Wass; GKT School of<br />

Medicine, London, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Using negative role models positively<br />

S E Gull* and K H Matheson; Bury St Edmunds, UK<br />

1200-1215 5 What factors influence underrepresented minority (URM) students in<br />

their choice of medical schools?<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Mark Urosev; University of Illinois at Chicago,<br />

Chicago IL 60612, USA<br />

1215-1230 6 Education for professionalism in medicine<br />

Geoffrey Westwood* and Barbara Westwood; Bankstown Health Service, Australia<br />

1230-1245 7 Characteristics of students admitted for the medical course at<br />

Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo,<br />

Brazil<br />

A R L Cianflone*, M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo, M L V Rodrigues and L E de<br />

A Troncon; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, Brazil<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Angel Centeno]<br />

5K<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Contexts for Learning<br />

Chairperson: Dr Abdulwahab Telmesani<br />

Room: Building 10, Room 1.0105 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Clinical education in the health care professions: a critical analysis<br />

of the literature<br />

Alison Rushton; Coventry University, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 “Contracts for Learning”: project to improve the quality of<br />

attachments at a District General Hospital<br />

Richard Ayres*, Henry Averns and Lin Sanders; Northern Devon Healthcare<br />

Trust, Barnstaple, UK<br />

1130-1145 3 Does the dedicated teaching environment in ambulatory care<br />

improve acquisition of learning outcomes?<br />

Clare I L Stewart*, Paul E Preece and John A Dent; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Could we improve on what patients our pediatrics students saw in<br />

outpatient clinics?<br />

Pedro Herskovic*, Alicia Vasquez, Cristian Breinbauer, Patricia Gomez, Viviana<br />

Herskovic, Marcela Jacard, Claudio Missarelli and Erika Troncoso; University of<br />

Chile, Santiago, Chile<br />

1200-1215 5 Using the ward round for teaching and learning: how do junior<br />

doctors learn from consultants through ward-based teaching?<br />

Alan Bleakley; Cornwall Postgraduate Education Centre, Truro, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Clinical skills training needs of final year medical students and<br />

PRHOs - A comparison<br />

D MacLeod*, E Gill, J Gate and J Rees; University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK<br />

- 2.23 -


1230-1245 7 The impact of a precepted diabetic foot care program<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Lewis E Foxhall*, Frank Sifuentes and Lee Cheng; University of<br />

Texas Houston Health Science Center, USA<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Amanda Howe]<br />

5L<br />

Evaluation of Multiprofessional Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Pia Forsberg<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 The benefits of a multiprofessional education programme can be<br />

sustained<br />

G J Mires*, F L R Williams, R M Harden and P W Howie; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1115-1130 2 Self-directed multiprofessional continuing medical education with<br />

facilitators: an experiment in four European countries. The Belgian<br />

story<br />

J Goedhuys*, C Geens, N Mathers, K Billingham, G Maso and O Solas-Gaspar;<br />

Catholic University Leuven, Belgium<br />

1130-1145 3 Interprofessional education in a clinical and non-clinical<br />

environment: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives<br />

John Jenkins and Sue Morison*; Queen’s University Belfast, UK<br />

1145-1200 4 Interprofessional education: experiences of students<br />

J Agsteribbe*, R M H Schaub and J Cohen-Schotanus; University of Groningen,<br />

Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 5 “Capturing the learning”: the development of interprofessional<br />

education in the Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological<br />

Sciences, University of Southampton<br />

D Humphris* and S Colly; University of Southampton, UK<br />

1215-1230 6 Learning interprofessionally: a review of experiences<br />

A Le May*, F Kitsell, I Giles and C Stephens; University of Southampton, UK<br />

1230-1245 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Gary Mires]<br />

5M<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Teaching about EBM, Critical Thinking and Research<br />

Chairperson: Professor Florian Eitel<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0105 (First Floor)<br />

1100-1115 1 Questions as the key to knowledge: teaching medical students in<br />

Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

Jonna Skov Madsen*, Birgitta Wallstedt, Carl Joakim Brandt and Mogens Horder;<br />

Odense University Hospital, Denmark<br />

1115-1130 2 Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine to healthcare professionals:<br />

implementing and evaluating the programme<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, UK<br />

- 2.24 -


1130-1145 3 Impact of a short interactive curriculum on medical students’<br />

appreciation of EBM and CAM<br />

Samuel N Forjuoh*, Robert A Henry, Terry G Rascoe, Barb Symm and Janine C<br />

Edwards; Texas A & M University, Temple, USA<br />

1145-1200 4 Annual Students-Congress of Medicine (SCM): a tool for scientific<br />

education in the medical curriculum<br />

E J M van Gils*, M H J Maathuis, G J Navis and R H Henning; University of<br />

Groningen, Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 5 What do medical graduates think about their earlier research<br />

projects now?<br />

Saeed Asefzadeh; Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran<br />

1215-1230 6 Research and the use of computers in the new curriculum of the<br />

University of Vienna Medical School<br />

Richard Marz* and Robert Trappl; University of Vienna, Austria<br />

1230-1245 7 Experimental courses in Biochemistry - initiation to scientific<br />

research in undergraduate medicine<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Rui Mesquita and J Martins-Silva; University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

1245-1300 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Sharon Krackov]<br />

1300-1400 Lunch in the Marquee<br />

1400-1700 Session 6: Workshops<br />

6<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Please see the Abstracts section pages 4.51 to 4.55 for details of these workshops.<br />

Attendance at Conference workshops is free of charge but you are asked to preregister<br />

on the form included with the programme. Lists of participants who have preregistered<br />

and places available will be posted by the registration desk.<br />

Note: coffee will be available between 1530-1600 hrs in the foyers of the Teaching<br />

and Research Buildings<br />

6/1 Basic Skills Faculty Development Workshop<br />

Dr Anita Duhl Glicken, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 6 (lower ground floor)<br />

6/2 An Introduction to Clinical Judgment Analysis<br />

Dr Anthony LaDuca, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Computer Room, 2.0103 (2 nd floor)<br />

6/3 Nordic Federation for Medical Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Eivind Drange<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Horsaal 1<br />

- 2.25 -


Tuesday 4 September<br />

Note: all participants welcome at the Plenary and the Workshop<br />

Plenary (1400-1445 ): Reform in a Medical School – needed, wanted,<br />

possible?<br />

Dr Kirsti Lonka, Director, Development and Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

University of Helsinki/ Professor in Medical Education Karolinska Institutet, Sweden<br />

Workshop (1500-1545): NFME and <strong>AMEE</strong> – do we need them both?<br />

A discussion of the future role of NFME and possible co-operation with <strong>AMEE</strong>. The<br />

workshop will start with a closed debate among the panel followed by an open discussion.<br />

Panel: Dr Jørgen Nystrup, Dr Dagfinn Øgreid (chair NFME), Dr Kirsti Lonka,<br />

Professor Jörgen Nordenström<br />

Moderator: Eivind Drange<br />

Closed meeting (1600-1700): Extraordinary General Assembly, NFME<br />

6/4 Bedside Cardiology Skills Training, featuring “Harvey”, The<br />

Cardiology Patient Simulator and the UMedic Computer System<br />

Organisers: Dr Michael S. Gordon, University of Miami School of Medicine, and<br />

Dr Joel M Felner, Emory University School of Medicine, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

6/5 Risk management in medical education<br />

Directors of Research in Postgraduate Medical Education Group<br />

Organisers: Dr Kwee Matheson, West Suffolk Hospital, UK, Dr Alistair Thomson<br />

and Dr Andrew Long<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0105 (1 st floor)<br />

6/6 The professional and organisational culture of medical education –<br />

an exploratory workshop in the context of an interactive exhibition<br />

Organisers: Dr Elizabeth Krajic Kachur, Medical Education Development, New<br />

York, USA, Dr Nobaturo Ban and Hannah Kedar<br />

Room: Research Building Horsaal 4 (ground floor)<br />

The exhibition linked to this workshop will be set up in Research Building, 1.0020 1st floor<br />

6/7 Students teaching communication skills<br />

Organisers: Students from Charité, Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Room: Building 8, Seminarraum 2 (1 st floor)<br />

6/8 Developing professional attitudes: theory, practice and evaluation<br />

Organiser: Professor Amanda Howe, University of East Anglia, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 1.0107 (1 st floor)<br />

6/9 <strong>AMEE</strong>/IberoAmerican Network<br />

Chairperson: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado, <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

6/10 Problem-based Learning<br />

Organisers: Dr Stewart Mennin and Dr Scott Obenshain, University of New<br />

Mexico, Albuquerque, USA<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

- 2.26 -


Tuesday 4 September<br />

6/11 Portfolio as a Method of Student Assessment<br />

Organiser: Dr Miriam Friedman Ben-David, University of Dundee, UK<br />

Room: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

6/12 Learning Needs Assessment in undergraduate and postgraduate<br />

medical education<br />

Organiser: Professor Janet Grant, Open University, UK<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 5 (lower ground floor)<br />

6/13 A European core curriculum?<br />

Organiser: Professor Lennart Bouman, Netherlands<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

1930-2230 Gala Dinner at the Aquarium (Zoologischer Garten Aquarium)<br />

(Not included in the registration fee – see page X for details)<br />

- 2.27 -


Wednesday 5 September<br />

0830-1000 Session 7: Poster presentations<br />

7A<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

12 simultaneous themed sessions. Please meet in the rooms listed below. Participants<br />

each have two minutes to introduce themselves and their posters. The groups will<br />

then move to the poster location where a discussion will take place.<br />

New Learning Technologies<br />

Chairperson: DrNick Ross<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7A1 An International web-based Master’s degree in Primary Care<br />

Peter Toon* and Trish Greenhalgh; University College London, UK<br />

7A2 Can practical courses on interpreting blood smears be substituted<br />

by an interactive, web-based learning programme?<br />

U Woermann*, A Tobler and M Montandon; University of Bern,<br />

SWITZERLAND<br />

7A3 The management of student feedback using the World Wide Web<br />

Stephanie Cobb* and Helen Graham; Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of<br />

Medicine, London, UK<br />

7A4 Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it<br />

compare with traditional paper methods?<br />

Helen Graham* and Stephanie Cobb; Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of<br />

Medicine, London, UK<br />

7A5 Reflection on experiences by using trigger movies<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan H Bolk and Peter G M de Jong;<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

7A6 Provision of IT learning facilities for healthcare education<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, UK<br />

7A7 Development and evaluation of an interactive Computer Assisted<br />

Learning (CAL) programme on vaginal hysterectomy<br />

Vikram Jha*, Shelley Widdowson, Sean Duffy and Keith Allenby; St James’s<br />

University Hospital, Leeds, UK<br />

7A8 Links from ultrasound to anatomy - how is a multimedia teacher<br />

accepted?<br />

Dietmar Borchert*, Gunnar Schley, Edda Klotz, Peter Rauh, Clemens Reisinger<br />

and Thomas Medveczky; Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7A9 Development of a Computer-Based Simulation; the Dynamic<br />

Patient Simulator<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, J M van Baalen, E M Schoonderwaldt;<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, NETHERLANDS<br />

- 2.28 -


7B<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7A10 Introduction of laptop computers in Leiden Medical School<br />

Peter G M de Jong*, Hermiette E Idenburg and Henk L Hendrix; Leiden University<br />

Medical Center LUMC, Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

Problem-based Learning<br />

Chairperson: Dr Stewart Mennin<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7B1 Measuring success: partnership in evaluation (work in progress<br />

report)<br />

P O’Neill, D Graham, A Garden, S. Watmough*, J Brown; Universities of<br />

Liverpool, Manchester and Mersey Deanery, UK<br />

7B2 A new PBL course with an examination with standardised patients<br />

at the end<br />

S Schewe*, C Mueller and R Putz; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7B3 Training the Problem-Based Learning tutor: implementation issues<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, UK<br />

7B4 PBL in Psychiatry - the Holocaust. A unique experience<br />

T Fischel*, T Weizman and G Zalsman; Geha Psychiatric Center, Ramat Gan,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

7B5 Clinical skills of medical students participating in lecture-based<br />

versus problem-oriented training<br />

W Rimpau; Park-Klinik Weissensee, <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7B6 Systematic observations of problem-based study groups - what do<br />

they reveal?<br />

K Lonka*, P Sauri and N Paganus; University of Helsinki, FINLAND<br />

7B7 “Pathomechanisms” - a 9-week integrative and problem-based<br />

learning oriented course within the 3rd year of the curriculum at the<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden<br />

Oliver Tiebel*, Ines Nitsche and Andreas Deussen for the Core Planning Group;<br />

Medical Faculty, Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, GERMANY<br />

7B8 Characteristics of tutors’ assessment by students when PBL is<br />

being implemented<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Marcela Lopez-Cabrera; National Autonomous<br />

University of Mexico, MEXICO<br />

7B9 From traditional teachers to PBL tutors: how to start the change?<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Lizbeth Mendoza-Morales; National Autonomous<br />

University of Mexico, MEXICO<br />

7B10 Development of a problem-based curriculum leads to enhancement<br />

in faculty development - The Dresden experience<br />

N Lorenz*, T Aretz, E Armstrong and the Harvard-Dresden Medical Education<br />

Alliance; Technical University, Dresden, GERMANY<br />

- 2.29 -


7C<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7B11 An orientation programme for 1st year students in a problemorientated<br />

MBChB curriculum - the Pretoria experience<br />

Pierre L Bredenkamp; Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

Curriculum Planning and Change<br />

Chairperson: Dr Reg Dennick<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7C1 A model of curriculum management in an integrated medical<br />

curriculum<br />

Gregory J S Tan* and B E Mustaffa; International Medical University, Kuala<br />

Lumpur, MALAYSIA<br />

7C2 The University of Rochester’s Double Helix Curriculum<br />

Elaine F Dannefer; University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA<br />

7C3 Academic administration and mixed programmes<br />

S Sharma Khanal* and S Koirala; B P Koirala Institute, Dharan, NEPAL<br />

7C4 Learning responsibly - implementing written guidelines for medical<br />

students<br />

Richard Phillips*, Ann Wylie and Anne Stephenson; Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’<br />

Medical School, London, UK<br />

7C5 HEICUMED - a novel approach to student medical education at the<br />

Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Germany<br />

Hubert J Bardenheuer* on behalf of the HEICUMED Group; University of<br />

Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />

7C6 Enhancing curriculum renewal through a “clinical presentation”<br />

approach to undergraduate medical education<br />

Nehad El-Sawi; University of Health Sciences, Kansas City, USA<br />

7C7 Continuous training in General Practice as an integral part of an<br />

undergraduate medical curriculum - the Witten/Herdecke Model<br />

(Germany)<br />

W Kunstmann*, Dieter Wollgarten, René Vollenbroich and Markus Gschwind;<br />

University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, GERMANY<br />

7C8 Developing sense of ownership for curriculum changes within all<br />

teaching faculty of an Asian medical school<br />

C B Hazlett*, T F Fok, S S C Chung and J C Y Cheng; Chinese University of<br />

Hong Kong, Shatin, HONG KONG<br />

7C9 Sci45: Framework for the implementation of a career guidance<br />

instrument<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and Heather Owen; Open University<br />

Centre for Education in Medicine, MILTON KEYNES, UK<br />

7C10 The facilitation process in a problem-based curriculum at the<br />

Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine<br />

Jacqueline van Wyk, Peter Olmesdahl, Veena Singaram* and Michelle McLean;<br />

University of Natal, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

- 2.30 -


7D<br />

7E<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Curriculum Evaluation/Staff Development<br />

Chairperson: Professor Miriam Friedman<br />

Meet in: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7D1 Students’ feedback: a Public Health course in medical education<br />

Eva Rasky*, Wolfgang Freidl; Willibald-Julius Stronegger; Karl-Franzens-<br />

University, Graz, AUSTRIA<br />

7D2 Action Research Methodology: a possible framework for course<br />

evaluations<br />

Alison Rushton* and Gill James; Coventry University, Coventry, UK<br />

7D3 The opinion of the graduates of the Faculty of Medicine of the<br />

University of Barcelona on the new medical curriculum<br />

J Palés*, A Gual, A Vallés, Ma T Estrach, F Climent, X Gasull, R Gilabert, A Llobet,<br />

Y Compta, L Peri and J A Bombi; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

7D4 Comenius University Quality Assurance System (CUQAS) and<br />

students’ participation in graduate medical education evaluation<br />

L Plank*, J Danko, E Rozborilova, P Galajda and K Dokus; Jessenius Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Martin, SLOVAK REPUBLIC<br />

7D5 Research in medical education: constructing an ethical framework<br />

E B Peile* and A Slowther; Dept of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford, UK<br />

7D6 Students’ perceptions of the Physiology course in a traditional<br />

medical school<br />

F Riggione*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez; Centro de Investigacion y<br />

Desarrollo de la Educacion Medica, El Hatillo 1083A, VENEZUELA<br />

7D7 Students’ perceptions of a traditional undergraduate course in<br />

Microbiology<br />

Z Uzcategui*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez; Universidad Central de<br />

Venezuela, Caracas, VENEZUELA<br />

7D8 Faculty development in General Practice - the German experience<br />

M Ehrhardt, P Engeser, M Herrmann, T Lichte, N Donner-Banzhoff and S<br />

Wilm*, on behalf of the participants; Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7D9 Medicine and ethnic issues; do our tutors reflect their community?<br />

D Reeves, R Loudon and J Parle*; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

Postgraduate Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Charlotte Ringsted<br />

Meet in: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7E1 Exploring the views of basic surgical trainees on their training<br />

programme and their future in Surgery<br />

Jeremy Brown*, Linda de Cossart and Charmian Wiltshire; Mersey Deanery,<br />

Liverpool, UK<br />

- 2.31 -


7F<br />

7E2 An assessment of the skills base and attainments of Senior House<br />

Officer on a regional Basic Surgical Training <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Linda de Cossart, Charmian Wiltshire and Jeremy Brown*; Mersey Deanery,<br />

Liverpool, UK<br />

7E3 Personal and professional development groups for Junior Hospital<br />

Doctors<br />

Alan Naftalin and Peter Bruggen; Newham General Hospital, London, UK<br />

7E4 The educational needs of doctors with English as a second language<br />

when consulting in General Practice in the United Kingdom<br />

Sylvia Chudley and John Skelton; West Midlands Dept of Postgraduate Education<br />

for General Practice, Birmingham, UK<br />

7E5 “No such thing as a free lunch”: how free are bleep-free sessions?<br />

Jane Ross* and Rose Martin; Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

7E6 The SHO RITA and portfolio<br />

Rose Martin* and R W Newton; Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK<br />

7E7 General Practice Registrar audit and implementation of change<br />

J McKay*, J R M Lough and T S Murray; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

7E8 The Senior Registrar - a new development in higher professional<br />

training in General Practice<br />

C T O’ Dubhghaill; NUI Galway, Co Galway, IRELAND<br />

7E9 Psychosocial training in the Family Residency in Spain:<br />

present situation and proposals for the future<br />

José Ramón Loayssa Lara; Servicio Navarro de Salud, Noaín, SPAIN<br />

7E10 Step by step to methodological exam; report on first year<br />

experiences with the new introduced GP Licence Examination<br />

in Austria<br />

R Willnauer*, M Schmidts, M Lischka; University of Vienna, Wien, AUSTRIA<br />

7E11 Development of professional doctorates in healthcare disciplines<br />

Alan Castle*, Graham A Mills and Valda Bunker; University of Portsmouth,<br />

Portsmouth, UK<br />

7E12 The appointment process for Anaesthetic Registrars in<br />

South Thames<br />

J Clarke* and J Pateman; St George’s Hospital London, UK<br />

Assessment<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Dr William Burdick<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (1 st floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7F1 Validity of assessment techniques: students’ views differ from<br />

observed outcomes<br />

W Colin Duncan; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK<br />

- 2.32 -


7G<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7F2 Assessment reliability in an MSc programme in Diabetes<br />

J Huber*, N Munro, A Felton, C Parker, P Delaney and C McIntosh; University<br />

of Surrey Roehampton and Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK<br />

7F3 Two years of progress-testing at the Charité<br />

A Mertens*, J Hoffmann, S Kölbel, R Raschke, K Duske, J Berger and U<br />

Hennewig; HU <strong>Berlin</strong> Medical Faculty, <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7F4 OSCE for Paediatric trainee internship examination multicentric<br />

experience<br />

M Aldunate, A Lopez, A Mena, M Varas, X Trivino, A Vasquez*, R Lillo, T<br />

Miranda and E Mandiola; University of Chile, Santiago, CHILE<br />

7F5 Third year medical student written history and physicals: how many<br />

is enough?<br />

Paul A Hemmer*, Thomas Jamieson, Kim Gibson, Lisa Moores, Andy Donato,<br />

Margaret Gaglione, Steven Durning, Alan Wimmer, Bonnie Cary-Freitas and<br />

Louis Pangaro; Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, USA<br />

7F6 Student fitness to practise procedures<br />

Chris Stephens; University of Southampton, UK<br />

7F7 Deriving the assessment framework for the Three Royal Colleges<br />

Diploma in Prison Medicine<br />

Lesley J Southgate*, Jon H Fuller and Jaz Bihku; University College Medical School<br />

London, London, UK<br />

7F8 Assessment in an outcome-based curriculum at the International<br />

Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan, K H Ong, C M K<br />

Patrick and AKH Wong; International Medical University, Selangor, MALAYSIA<br />

7F9 Psychosocial profile of medical students as a predictor of the<br />

academic success in medical school in Mexico<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-R, Victoria Bermudez,<br />

Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio;<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEXICO<br />

7F10 Psychometric data for Jefferson Medical College’s non-cognitive<br />

questionnaire in Mexican medical students<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-R, Victoria Bermudez,<br />

Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio;<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEXICO<br />

7F11 Portfolio based assessment of students during their internship<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Soledad Campos, Isabel Fernández and Alfredo Olivieri;<br />

Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

Teaching & Learning 1<br />

Chairperson: Mr John Dent<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (2 nd floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7G1 What do first year medical students value in a learning situation?<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alejandra Blanco, Soledad Campos and Amelia Cabrera;<br />

Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

- 2.33 -


7H<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7G2 Application of Schon’s model for small-group teaching<br />

Francine Borduas* and Réjean Laprise; Association des médecins omnipraticiens de<br />

Québec, Québec, CANADA<br />

7G3 Teaching and learning about case presentations; the need for early<br />

intervention<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd; Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

7G4 Master teacher, master learner<br />

M P Oosthuizen; University of Pretoria, Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

7G5 Hemisphericity in medical students<br />

N E Fernandez-Garza*, I A Benitez-Trejo, C Salinas-Guerra, A Davila-Flores<br />

and J A Castellanos-Lopez; Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey,<br />

MEXICO<br />

7G6 Medical student preferences for an “ideal textbook” of Obstetrics<br />

and Gynaecology<br />

M S Marsh* and D Katopi; GKT Medical School, London, UK<br />

7G7 What can be learnt from medical atlases? Expert and novice visual<br />

schemata in breast sonography<br />

R Pauli* and J Huber; University of Surrey Roehampton, London, UK<br />

7G8 Community-based Public Health Education in Healthy City Project<br />

Yosuke Yamane*, Kuninori Shiwaku, Keiko Kitashima and Anuurad Erdembileg;<br />

Shimane Medical University, Izumo, JAPAN<br />

7G9 Two different types of professor authority, results in a traditional<br />

faculty of medicine<br />

Carlos E. de la Garza-Gonzalez*, Norberto Lopez-Serna and Ma Esthela Morales-<br />

Perez; Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEXICO<br />

7G10 The “excellent teacher” seen by mid-course students<br />

M Patrício, A V Carneiro and J Fernandes e Fernandes; University of Lisbon,<br />

Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

7G11 Underrepresented minority (URM) students’ perception of<br />

mentoring, advising and role modelling in medical school<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Jorge Girotti; University of Illinois at Chicago,<br />

Chicago, USA<br />

Teaching & Learning 2<br />

Chairperson: Dr Richard Ayres<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (2 nd floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 2 nd floor<br />

7H1 “Project Carrapato (*tick)”: a psychological focus in medical training<br />

I R P Scavariello, M S V M Silveira, E H V Celeri*, S L Brenelli and R S Cassorla;<br />

UNICAMP, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL<br />

7H2 Evaluating of videotape sessions for learning communication skills<br />

A Nogueras*, M Bernaus, X Claries and J de Nadal; Universitari Parc Tauli,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

- 2.34 -


7I<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7H3 Acting up? The recruitment and maintenance of a professional role<br />

play team for undergraduate and postgraduate medical training and<br />

assessment<br />

C M Wiskin* and P Croft; The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK<br />

7H4 Analysis of clinical competence at pre-graduate level<br />

Gitte Wichmann-Hansen* and Berit Eika; Aarhus University, Aarhus,<br />

DENMARK<br />

7H5 Use of paper-cases in undergraduate clinical Dermatology<br />

education in Germany<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann, W H Boehnke and F Ochsendorf; Universitats-Hautklinik<br />

Frankfurt/M, Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY<br />

7H6 Development of a Learning Resource Centre for healthcare<br />

professionals: an example of an innovative enterprise<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke; University of London, London, UK<br />

7H7 Legal theories of recourse for failed medical students in the United<br />

States<br />

Thomas Jamieson; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda,<br />

USA<br />

7H8 An evaluation of organising student participation in curriculum<br />

reform using a mentoring programme at the Nelson R Mandela<br />

School of Medicine, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa<br />

Dorothy Appalasamy, Michelle McLean* and Jacqueline van Wyk; University of<br />

Natal, Durban, South Africa<br />

7H9 Medical education – more than learning?<br />

Thomas Eichholz and Catharina Crolow; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

Germany<br />

Continuing Professional Development 1<br />

Chairperson: Dr Richard Smith<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, 2.0104 (2 nd floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7I1 The roles of hospital consultants: more than just patients and students<br />

Patsy Stark; University of Leeds, Leeds, UK<br />

7I2 Continuing medical education X indexation? Authors’ opinions<br />

about editorial policies of a Brazilian academic journal<br />

Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues*, Valderes Aparecida Coelho Falaschi and<br />

Julio Cesar Voltarelli; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto,<br />

BRAZIL<br />

7I3 Learning HSR by doing: forming parallel learning groups<br />

Saeed Asefzadeh; Qazvin University of Medical Science & Health Services, Qazvin,<br />

IRAN<br />

7I4 Towards a flexible workforce - a basis for change<br />

F French*, M Awramenko, A Scott, C Ubach, L Leighton-Beck, G Needham, J<br />

Mollison and H Coutts; SCPMDE, Aberdeen, UK<br />

- 2.35 -


7J<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7I5 Ensuring cost-effective CPD: perspectives, problems and policy<br />

Clive Belfield and Celia Brown*; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK<br />

7I6 Improving your skills in preventive medicine: this CME workshop<br />

works!<br />

François Goulet*, André Jacques* and Danielle Saucier; Collège des Médecins du<br />

Québec, Montréal, CANADA<br />

7I7 CME program in Kuwait<br />

K Al-Jarallah and I G Premadasa*; Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization,<br />

Safat, KUWAIT<br />

7I8 The theory of perspective transformation and its applicability to<br />

CME<br />

Jill Donahue*, Stephen Hotz and Réjean Laprise*; Aventis Pharma, Laval,<br />

Québec, CANADA<br />

7I9 The Transtheoretical Model of behaviour change: does it apply to<br />

clinical practices?<br />

Réjean Laprise*, Jill Donahue and Stephen Hotz; Aventis Pharma, Laval, Québec,<br />

CANADA<br />

Continuing Professional Development 2<br />

Chairperson: Dr Alistair Thomson<br />

Meet in: Building 10, Room Kursraum 5 (Lower ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7J1 Sharing visions: working with CPD coordinators in General Practice<br />

Simon Smail* and Paul Hocking; University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff,<br />

UK<br />

7J2 The “Advanced Training Practice”: a questionnaire and interviewbased<br />

study of their role<br />

John Skelton and Steve Field*; West Midlands GP Unit, Birmingham, UK<br />

7J3 Does gender make a difference? CME for the female physician<br />

Jane Tipping* and Jill Donahue; Markham, Ontario, CANADA<br />

7J4 Strategic planning for effective partnerships<br />

Jane Tipping* and Danielle Deslauriers; Markham, Ontario, CANADA<br />

7J5 Integrating practice reflection and practice adjustment planning into<br />

the design of a CME meeting<br />

R L Thivierge*, L Samson and J V Patenaude; University of Montreal, Montreal,<br />

CANADA<br />

7J6 The Catalan Council of Physicians’ Colleges Accreditation Diploma<br />

in Continuing Medical Education<br />

A Ramos*, J Aliaga, A Gual and H Pardell; College of Physicians of Barcelona,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

7J7 Breaking bad news: how to learn in a CME workshop<br />

Francois Goulet*, André Jacques* and Robert Carrier; Collège des Médecins du<br />

Québec, Montréal, CANADA<br />

- 2.36 -


7K<br />

7L<br />

International Medical Education<br />

Chairperson: Professor Lennart Bouman<br />

Meet in: Building10 , Kursraum 6 (lower ground floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1 st floor<br />

7K1 Differences in learning style and satisfaction with Residency<br />

training for United States and internationally trained students<br />

Steven R Daugherty; Kaplan Medical, Chicago, USA<br />

7K2 Crossing borders - The <strong>Berlin</strong> Biomedical Exchange Office<br />

U Arnold* and J W Dudenhausen; Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7K3 Academic medical education in developing countries: an analysis of<br />

papers presented at medical education conferences in Argentina<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Gustavo Amestoy and Amelia Cabrera; Universidad Austral,<br />

Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA<br />

7K4 Communication skills training in Germany - results of a survey<br />

Jan Schildmann* and Ulrich Schwantes; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7K5 Reform of the medical educational system in Georgia<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilasonia and A Telia*; Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi,<br />

GEORGIA<br />

7K6 Results and main objectives of the first stage of education reform at<br />

the TSMU<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia and N Pruidze*; Tbilisi State Medical University,<br />

Tbilisi, GEORGIA<br />

7K7 First international Integrated Surgery course at the Charité, <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Hajo Schmidt-Traub; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

7K8 Counting the uncounted: estimating the number of overseas doctors<br />

in training grades in the UK currently not employed in the NHS<br />

Janet Grant, Mairead Beirne* and Heather Owen; Open University Centre for<br />

Education in Medicine, MILTON KEYNES, UK<br />

Special Subjects<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Professor John Simpson<br />

Meet in: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (1st floor)<br />

Poster location: Teaching Building, 1st floor<br />

7L1 Illegible notes - do tomorrow’s doctors need teaching on how to<br />

write more clearly?<br />

E Westcott, A Kontoyannis*, N Murch, T Reid and K Sixsmith; University of<br />

Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

7L2 An active method to prepare students to lead medical interviews: an<br />

experience at Xavier Bichat Medical School<br />

Corinne Pieters; Dominique Maillard*, Françoise Blanchet-Benque; Hôpital Louis<br />

Mourier, Colombes, FRANCE<br />

- 2.37 -


7L3 Teaching medical students patient advocacy skills; an<br />

interdisciplinary intervention using Standardized Patients/Families<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Virginia Randall, Janice Hanson, William Sykora, Aileen E<br />

Zanoni, Elizabeth Jeppson and Richard E Hawkins; Uniformed Services University<br />

of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA<br />

7L4 The parameters affecting attitudes to death among students in a<br />

Medical College in Taiwan<br />

Ming-Liang Lai; National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, TAIWAN<br />

7L5 Evaluation of practical sessions in Clinical Anatomy: a strategy for<br />

educational improvement<br />

M A F Tavares* and M C Silva; Medical School of Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

7L6 Towards a more effective teaching of Gross Anatomy: introducing<br />

new integrated clinical concepts and improving peer presentations/<br />

evaluation techniques<br />

Ameed Raoof*, Thomas Gest, William Burkel and Tamara Stein; University of<br />

Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA<br />

7L7 Putting the salutogenic orientation into practice: the life cycle<br />

course at the Technion<br />

H Eshach*, R Van-Raalte, L Dolev, H Bitterman and D Hermoni; Technion, Haifa,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

7L8 ASAMANS (Ask Students About Medicine And National Socialism)<br />

T Drewes*, P Langkafel* and S Muller*; Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

7L9 Stress among medical doctors<br />

J Agsteribbe* and J Cohen-Schotanus; University of Groningen, Groningen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

7L10 Introducing changes in medical education: the “strategy” of Clinical<br />

Anatomy at the Medical School of Porto<br />

M A F Tavares; Medical School of Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

1000-1030 Coffee in foyers of Teaching and Research Buildings<br />

1030-1230 Session 8: Short Communications<br />

8A<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Computer Mediated Learning and Assessment<br />

Chairperson: Dr Joel Feiner<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Preparing clinical small group sessions by using digital video in CBE<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan A Gevers Leuven and Peter G M de<br />

Jong; Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands<br />

1045-1100 2 Inter-physician communication training through computer-based<br />

patient simulations<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, E Schoonderwaldt and J D Donnison-Speyer;<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands<br />

- 2.38 -


1100-1115 3 Computer Assisted Learning: using and doing research in primary<br />

care<br />

Linda Leighton-Beck*, Philip Hannaford, Neil Hamilton, Sara Shaw and Yvonne<br />

Carter; Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education, Aberdeen,<br />

UK<br />

1115-1130 4 Extracting core competencies “bottom up” from case histories by<br />

an online consensus seeking process in family medicine<br />

Peter Schlaeppi* and Ralph Bloch; University of Bern, Switzerland<br />

1130-1145 5 A new era of teaching. An innovative resource for continuing<br />

medical education and evidence based management<br />

K El-Hayes, B McElhinney, B Adams, E Boyd and K McKinney; Co Down,<br />

Northern Ireland<br />

1145-1200 6 Evaluating medical student and resident education: a CME software<br />

program<br />

J C Edwards*, P Ogden and A A Stricker; Texas A & M University, USA<br />

1200-1215 7 Metabolic challenges on CD-ROMs<br />

Marie-Paule Van Damme*, Jonathan Gould, Bruce Livett, Janet Macaulay, Ron<br />

Maxwell and Graham Parslow; Monash University, Clayton, Australia<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Megan Quentin-Baxter]<br />

8B<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Implementation of Problem-based Learning<br />

Chairperson: Professor Arcadi Gual<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 2 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Problem-based learning for trainees in Anaesthesiology<br />

Sigrid Adam* and Jan Klein; Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands<br />

1045-1100 2 Communicating with students in a problem-based curriculum:<br />

experiences with WebCT<br />

Michelle McLean and Kathy Murrell; Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine,<br />

Congella, South Africa<br />

1100-1115 3 Faculty members and senior students as facilitators in PBL-groups<br />

- similarities and differences<br />

Are Holen*, Kristin Wigen and Øyvind Ellingsen; Norwegian University of Science<br />

and Technology, Trondheim, Norway<br />

1115-1130 4 Tutors’ perspectives of problem-based learning<br />

Diana Kelly; Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 5 The E.D.I.T. project in Linköping: using web-based scenarios for PBL<br />

Wolfram Antepohl*, Anne-Christine Persson, Margareta Bachrach-Lindström and<br />

Björn Bergdahl; Division of Medical Education, Linköping University, SWEDEN<br />

1145-1200 6 How to promote success in a PBL tutorial session<br />

N Paganus*, K Lonka and T Hätönen; University of Helsinki, FINLAND<br />

1200-1215 7 Evaluation of the student staff in the experience of PBL in the<br />

- 2.39 -


Federal University of Roraima - Brasil<br />

Álvaro Tulio Fortes*, César Ferreira Penna de Faria, Ruy Guilherme de Souza and<br />

Fernado Menezes da Silva; University of Roraima, Brazil<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Anne Garden]<br />

8C<br />

Curriculum Planning<br />

Chairperson: Dr Frank Smith<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 3 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Priorities in the content of the curriculum from the standpoint of the<br />

academic staff<br />

E Nagle*, R Velins and V Pirags; Latvian Medical Academy, Riga, Latvia<br />

1045-1100 2 Reforming the core curriculum of the Reformstudiengang in <strong>Berlin</strong> -<br />

a Delphi study<br />

B Huenges*, W Burger, J W Dudenhausen, U Frei, C Frömmel, H-P Lemmens, U<br />

Schwantes and D Scheffner; Arbeitsgruppe Reformstudiengang Medizin, <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

Germany<br />

1100-1115 3 Early clinical clerkship - does it make a difference?<br />

Berit Eika* and Ole Sonne; University of Aarhus, Denmark<br />

1115-1130 4 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) as a tool in curriculum<br />

development<br />

B Grether; University of Zurich, Switzerland<br />

1130-1145 5 The continuum of professional development<br />

H M R Meier; University of Toronto, Canada<br />

1145-1200 6 Evaluating ethics seminars<br />

Gerald Neitzke; Hannover Medical School, Germany<br />

1200-1215 7 A tool to evaluate medical ethics seminars<br />

Mareike Moeller* and Gerald Neitzke; Hannover Medical School, Germany<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Ala’aldin Al Hussaini]<br />

8D<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

The Final Examination<br />

Chairperson: Dr Jack Boulet<br />

Room: Research Building, Hörsaal 4 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Consistency of examination marks<br />

T Vik*, K H Karlsen and S Westin; Norwegian University of Science & Technology,<br />

Trondheim, Norway<br />

1045-1100 2 Identifying threshold competence in an undergraduate qualifying<br />

clinical examination<br />

John Cookson* and Stewart Petersen; Leicester Warwick Medical School, Leicester,<br />

UK<br />

- 2.40 -


1100-1115 3 The validity of performance standards on a certification examination<br />

for occupational therapists<br />

Ernest N Skakun; University of Alberta, Canada<br />

1115-1130 4 Reliability of a sequential clinical examination<br />

Stewart Petersen* and John Cookson; Leicester Warwick Medical School, Leicester,<br />

UK<br />

1130-1145 5 Consideration of legal, ethical and organizational aspects of clinical<br />

competence in a National Licensing Examination: evaluation at the<br />

Medical Council of Canada<br />

Jacques E. Des Marchais*, Dale W. Dauphinée and David Blackmore; Medical<br />

Council of Canada, Montreal, Canada<br />

1145-1200 6 Combining different components of an assessment procedure<br />

J Degryse*, J Goedhuys, A Roex and A Dermine; K U Leuven, Belgium<br />

1200-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Diana Wood]<br />

8E<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Postgraduate Education/Career Choice<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ope Adekunle<br />

Room: Building 10, Hörsaal 6 (Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Teaching with patients: moving beyond ‘learning by osmosis’<br />

Kath Green; South Thames Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental<br />

Education, London, UK<br />

1045-1100 2 The effect of an interactive postgraduate education programme on<br />

parenteral treatment in Macedonia<br />

M Ivanovski, P D Toon*, K Zafirovska, F Tozija and B Gomes; University College<br />

London, UK<br />

1100-1115 3 Promoting innovation in postgraduate education through the<br />

accreditation process<br />

Judith Armbruster; Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education,<br />

Chicago, USA<br />

1115-1130 4 A new development in postgraduate surgical education: the<br />

Intermediate Breast Course - a distance learning course<br />

H M Sweetland*, E Hoadley-Maidment and M Galea; University of Wales College<br />

of Medicine, Cardiff, UK<br />

1130-1145 5 Attitude change in neonatologists-in-training by participation in the<br />

neuropediatric follow-up of former premature infants<br />

J B Hentschel; Universitaets – frauenklinik des Inselspitals, Bern, Switzerland<br />

1145-1200 6 Factors that influence the career choice of medical specialization<br />

M B M Soethout* and G van der Wal; Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre,<br />

Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 7 Personality differences in doctors affect the factors associated with<br />

their medical specialty choice<br />

Gillian B Clack*, Derek Cooper and John O Head; Kings College London, UK<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Janet Grant]<br />

- 2.41 -


8F<br />

Teaching and Learning<br />

Chairperson: Professor Clarke Hazlett<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Mikroscopierraum (First Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Impact of peer tutoring on the patient-centered interviewing skills of<br />

first-year medical students<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd; Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK<br />

1045-1100 2 Peer assisted learning - a teaching strategy for the new millennium?<br />

Joy R Crosby and H Mei-Ling Ball*; University of Dundee, UK<br />

1100-1115 3 An insight into how students learn about a cardiovascular problem<br />

using study guides<br />

Shihab E O Khogali*, Jennifer M Laidlaw, Stuart D Pringle and R M Harden;<br />

University of Dundee, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 Study guides in an outcome-based medical curriculum at the<br />

International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

M I Nurjahan*, J C Ramesh, S Raman, A Radhakrishnan, C L Teng, K H Ong, C M<br />

K Patrick and Q Akhtar; International Medical University, Negri Sembilan, Malaysia<br />

1130-1145 5 How authors of an extensive distance learning programme for<br />

surgical trainees differed in their use of the specified template<br />

Jennifer M Laidlaw*, Ronald M Harden, Lorraine J Robertson and E Anne<br />

Hesketh; SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Dundee, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Context-dependent memory in a meaningful environment: in the<br />

classroom and at the bedside<br />

Franciska Koens*, Olle Th.J. ten Cate and Eugène J F M Custers; Universitair<br />

Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 7 Continuous Interactive Class (C.I.C)<br />

J Medrano*, R Calpena, A Compañ, M T Pérez Vázquez, J Lacueva and M Díez;<br />

Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor David Prideaux]<br />

8G<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Assessment in Postgraduate and Continuing Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Michael Tunbridge<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0102 (Second Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 A computerized adaptive test as an element of the final assessment of<br />

general practitioners in Flanders. Possibilities, difficulties, dilemmas…<br />

A Roex* and J Degryse; K.U. Leuven, Belgium<br />

1045-1100 2 Insight 360: a tool for looking at doctors’ performance<br />

E B Peile* and R Conradt; University of Oxford, UK<br />

1100-1115 3 Impact on non-principals in General Practice of the summative<br />

assessment audit project<br />

P Bowie, A Garvie and J Oliver; University of Glasgow, UK<br />

- 2.42 -


1115-1130 4 The difference between the ability to apply consultation guidelines<br />

and the routine of application: A relevant distinction?<br />

Myrra Vernooij-Dassen*, Ben Bottema and Cees van der Vleuten; University of<br />

Nijmegen, Netherlands<br />

1130-1145 5 What do SHO Educational Supervisors REALLY think of appraisal?<br />

Ann Cadzow*, Helen Coutts, Fiona French, Linda Leighton-Beck and Ken<br />

McHardy; SCPMDE, Aberdeen, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Visual-spatial ability and the objective assessment of technical<br />

skills<br />

K R Wanzel*, S J Hamstra, D J Anastakis, E D Matsumoto and M D Cusimano;<br />

Centre for Research in Education, Toronto, Canada<br />

1200-1215 7 Validity of MIST-VR in the assessment of laparoscopic skill<br />

A M Paisley*, P Baldwin and S Paterson Brown; University of Edinburgh, UK<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr John Pitts]<br />

8H<br />

Curriculum Change<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Dr Johan Ponten<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0101 (Second Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Innovation and reform of medical education: evaluating the UNI<br />

Program in Latin America<br />

E C Ribeiro*, G Werneck, A Aguiar and V Brant; Universidade Federal do Rio de<br />

Janeiro, Brazil<br />

1045-1100 2 Promoting responsive curriculum change within the 21st Century<br />

Cam Enarson; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA<br />

1100-1115 3 Improving the University and NHS Teaching Hospital Trust<br />

Partnership to identify SIFT spending<br />

Andrea J Bolshaw; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 Assessment of medical student attitudes toward relevant aspects of<br />

medical practice<br />

M L V Rodrigues*, L E de A Troncon, M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo, A R L<br />

Cianflone, C E Piccinato, L C Peres and J A Dela-Coleta; Faculty of Medicine of<br />

Ribeirao Preto, Brazil<br />

1130-1145 5 Effect of a curriculum reform on graduating student performance<br />

M L V Rodrigues*, J F C Figueiredo, L E A Troncon, C E Piccinato, L C Peres, A R<br />

L Cianflone and M F A Colares; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Brazil<br />

1145-1200 6 A developmental approach to reduce the long term risk of rejection<br />

of curricular changes<br />

Jamsheer Talati* and Camer Vellani; The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan<br />

1200-1215 7 The final year in undergraduate medical education: key position<br />

between theory and daily routine<br />

K Muller; University of Bonn, Germany<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Ms Brownell Anderson]<br />

- 2.43 -


8I<br />

Communication Skills Training<br />

Chairperson: Professor Knut Aspegren<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 2.0104 (Second Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Which interviewing skills must be actively taught at medical<br />

school?<br />

K Aspegren*, P Henriksen, P Lønberg-Madsen and M Strømming; Copenhagen<br />

University Hospital, Denmark<br />

1045-1100 2 Implementing communication skills training at the Charité - a<br />

project by students and doctors<br />

Jan Schildmann*, Carsten Schwarz, Eva Herrmann, Heiderose Ortwein, Amelie<br />

Klambeck, Andreas Brunklaus and Ulrich Schwantes; Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

(Charite), Horn, Germany<br />

1100-1115 3 Teaching sexual history-taking to health care professionals in<br />

primary care<br />

J R Skelton* and P M Matthews; University of Birmingham, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 SEX SEX SEX, oh yes, and how’s your knee?<br />

Annie Cushing* and Dason Evans; St. Bartholomews & The Royal London Queen<br />

Mary’s, London, UK<br />

1130-1145 5 Training of the systemic approach in doctor patient communication<br />

I: history taking from a third party<br />

K P M van Spaendonck* and E M van Weel-Baumgarten; University of Nijmegen,<br />

Netherlands<br />

1145-1200 6 Training of the systemic approach in doctor patient communication<br />

II: history taking with a patient and a third party<br />

E M van Weel-Baumgarten* and K P M van Spaendonck; University of Nijmegen,<br />

Netherlands<br />

1200-1215 7 Breaking bad news - evaluation of courses run by students and<br />

young doctors<br />

H Ortwein*, E Herrmann, A Brunklaus, A Kreutz, C Schwarz and J Schildmann;<br />

Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Amindra Arora]<br />

8J<br />

Clinical Teaching<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Chairperson: Dr Ioan Bocsan<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 5 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Increasing student awareness of strengths and weaknesses using a<br />

Standardized Patient case<br />

Devra Cohen*, Jerry Colliver, Mark Swartz and Randal Robbs; Mt Sinai School of<br />

Medicine, New York, USA<br />

1045-1100 2 Clinical dermatology: prospective randomized comparison of a<br />

traditional, a personal bed-side teaching (PBST) and a problemoriented-practical<br />

(POP) course<br />

F R Ochsendorf*, H Boehncke, R Hovelmann, A Boer and R Kaufmann; Klinikum<br />

der J.W. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/M, Germany<br />

- 2.44 -


1100-1115 3 Clinical skills training - a new curriculum between BEME and reality<br />

Peter Frey; University of Bern, Department of Instructional Media (AUM),<br />

Inselspital 38, CH - 3010 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

1115-1130 4 The effects of student gender on patients’ willingness to be<br />

examined by medical students<br />

William P Metheny*, Roxanne Jamshidi and Kara Pitt; Brown University School of<br />

Medicine/Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, USA<br />

1130-1145 5 Reality shock among medical students attending first clinical rotation<br />

I Levi* and T Fischel; Sackler Medical School, Ramat Gan, Israel<br />

1145-1200 6 Experiential clinical learning in a horizontally-integrated, problembased<br />

curriculum<br />

Tim Dornan*, Arno Muijtjens and Henny Boshuizen; Universities of Manchester<br />

and Maastricht, UK and Netherlands.<br />

1200-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Paul Hemmer]<br />

8K<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

International Aspects of Medical Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr M Roy Schwarz<br />

Room: Building 10, Kursraum 6 (Lower Ground Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 Influence of Studying on Students’ Health (ISSH)<br />

T Schweickert*, P Hodzic, V Jurkovic, J Seitz*, O Onur* and T Shiozawa*;<br />

German Medical Students’ Association, Aachen, Germany<br />

1045-1100 2 A comparison of undergraduate medical curricula in various countries<br />

J Mirecka*, Paola Binetti, Jan Heijlman, Roy Remmen and K Lipinski; Department<br />

of Medical Education, Krakow, Poland<br />

1100-1115 3 International differences in medical content preparation<br />

Steven R Daugherty* and Rochelle Rothstein; Kaplan Medical, Chicago, USA<br />

1115-1130 4 New trends at TSMU: elaboration of medical education conception<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia, Z Avaliani* and G Simonia; Tbilisi State Medical<br />

University, Georgia<br />

1130-1145 5 Learning needs assessments for refugee doctors; establishing<br />

baseline data about medical knowledge and experience<br />

Lesley J Southgate* and Joan F Fuller; University College London, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Helping refugee doctors back to work<br />

M J Bannon*, E Paice, G MacFadden, G Cowan, S Cheeroth and Y H Carter;<br />

London Deanery, Harrow, UK<br />

1200-1215 7 New York University Master Scholars Program<br />

Sharon K Krackov; New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Dr Charles Boelen]<br />

- 2.45 -


8L<br />

Special Subjects<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ester Mateluna<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Room 1.0107 (First Floor)<br />

1030-1045 1 And now for something completely different … reflective style<br />

learning of the Arts in medicine<br />

Paul Lazarus; University of Leicester, UK<br />

1045-1100 2 Seamless humanities: on integrating medical humanities into<br />

medical education: the Witten project<br />

C Hick*, B Matzke, B Strahwald, A Weymann and W Vermaasen; Universität<br />

Witten/Herdecke, Germany<br />

1100-1115 3 Improving clinical reasoning in novice clinicians: a diagnostic<br />

training aid to support clinical reasoning in student<br />

physiotherapists<br />

Gill James; Coventry University, UK<br />

1115-1130 4 The culture of criticism and argument in health education<br />

Barbara Westwood* and Geoffrey Westwood; University of Western Sydney,<br />

Australia<br />

1130-1145 5 Development and interim evaluation of a new postgraduate course<br />

in community gynaecology and reproductive health care<br />

A Parsons, B Olowokure* and M Walzman; University of Warwick, Coventry, UK<br />

1145-1200 6 Palliative medicine education for Internal Medicine Resident<br />

Physicians<br />

Marcos Montagnini*, Edmund Duthie and Basil Varkey; Medical College of<br />

Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA<br />

1200-1215 7 Teaching stress management and empathic communication to<br />

medical students<br />

Ray Melmed and Hannah Kedar*; The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel<br />

1215-1230 Discussion [Opening Discussant: Professor Paul O’Neill]<br />

1230-1330 Lunch in Marquee<br />

1330-1600 Session 9: Plenary<br />

9<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Different views of medical education<br />

Room: Teaching Building, Hörsaal 1 and 2<br />

(Note: there will be a video link to Hörsaal 3 to provide additional seating)<br />

Chairperson: Dr Madalena Patrício, Portugal<br />

1330-1355 9/1 The role of clinical experience in the acquisition of clinical<br />

reasoning: Implications for education<br />

Professor Geoff Norman, McMaster University, Canada<br />

- 2.46 -


1355-1420 9/2 Keeping standards up to date<br />

Ms Susanne Pruskil, Medical Student from Charité, Medical Faculty of the<br />

Humboldt-University, <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

1420-1445 Discussion<br />

1445-1500 Short break<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

1500-1550 Special presentation:<br />

Humour in medical education is like a box of chocolates …<br />

Dr Ron Berk, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA<br />

1550-1610 Close of Conference, and presentation of Medical Teacher Poster Prize<br />

Please remember to hand in your Conference Evaluation Form at the Registration<br />

Desk. (Spare copies are available if required). We value your feedback, together with<br />

your suggestions for future speakers and workshop organisers.<br />

- 2.47 -


SECTION 3<br />

Conference Social <strong>Programme</strong>,<br />

Tours and Accommodation


Tours, Optional Conference Social Events<br />

and Accommodation<br />

Please address all bookings and queries relating to the above to DER-CONGRESS:<br />

DER-CONGRESS<br />

Bundesallee 56 Tel: +49 30 857 9030<br />

D-10715 <strong>Berlin</strong> Fax: +49 30 85 79 03 26<br />

Germany Email: der@der-congress.de<br />

Bookings for accommodation/tours/optional social programme should be submitted on<br />

Form C, included in the provisional conference programme or available from the <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Office. Please return Form C direct to DER-CONGRESS and not to the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office.<br />

Conference Social <strong>Programme</strong><br />

The following two social events are included in the registration fee:<br />

Sunday 2 September 1400-1700 hrs<br />

Sightseeing tour of <strong>Berlin</strong> by coach, starting at The Forum Hotel,<br />

Alexanderplatz, <strong>Berlin</strong> (see map on page 1.6)<br />

Please make your own way to the Forum Hotel to meet your coach. On the tour you<br />

will see the most attractive and historic sights of <strong>Berlin</strong>: Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial<br />

Church; Europa Center; Bauhaus Archives; New National Gallery; the Philharmonic<br />

Concert Hall; the “Anhalter” railway station; the “Alexanderplatz”; the<br />

“Gendarmenmarkt” with its twin French and German cathedrals; Nikolai District;<br />

Television Tower; Red City Hall (which houses the <strong>Berlin</strong> Senate, and is the location<br />

for the Opening Ceremony on Sunday evening); “Zeughaus”; German State Opera;<br />

the magnificent boulevard “Unter den Linden”; Brandenburgh Gate; the “Reichstag”;<br />

Congress Hall; the “Tiergarten”; “Schloss Bellevue”; Victory Column; German Opera<br />

House, and Charlottenburg Palace. The tour will terminate at the Forum Hotel.<br />

Sunday 2 September 1930-2130 hrs<br />

Welcome Reception in the “Red Town Hall” (Rotes Rathaus), Rathausstraße<br />

(see map on page 1.6)<br />

You are invited by the Senate of <strong>Berlin</strong> to the Red Town Hall, which is the<br />

headquarters of <strong>Berlin</strong> City Council built in neo-Renaissance style between 1861<br />

and 1870. The evening is the opportunity to meet colleagues and friends; musical<br />

entertainment by Musici Medici Quartet who will play some pieces by Schubert;<br />

drinks and snacks provided. Please note that you should make your own way to and<br />

from the Red Town Hall.<br />

- 3.1 -


Optional Social Events<br />

Student Social Events<br />

The following Conference Social Events are not included in the registration fee and<br />

can be booked through DER-CONGRESS, using Form C available from DER or from<br />

the <strong>AMEE</strong> Office.<br />

Monday 3 September 1930-2300 hrs<br />

River Cruise, starting at Jannowitzbrücke<br />

- 3.2 -<br />

Price: DM 100 per person<br />

This river cruise on the Spree presents the historic centre of the city with its most<br />

important sights from a completely different angle. You will pass such buildings as<br />

the Reichstag, the <strong>Berlin</strong> Cathedral, the castle Charlottenburg etc. from the waterfront.<br />

The tour will be guided in English and will start from the landing stage<br />

Jannowitzbrücke. It will end at <strong>Berlin</strong> Cathedral (see map on page X). Buffet dinner<br />

and two drinks are included. Tickets may be collected from DER on registration and<br />

please remember to take these with you to the event as they entitle you to two free<br />

drinks!<br />

Tuesday 4 September 1930-2230 hrs<br />

Gala-Dinner at the Aquarium, Budapester Straße 32,<br />

10787 <strong>Berlin</strong> (see map on page 1.6) Price: DM 130.00 per person<br />

The location for our Conference Dinner is the Aquarium, situated in the western<br />

city centre and part of the famous Zoological Gardens. The Aquarium houses the<br />

greatest variety of species in the world and you are free to look around. A dinner<br />

buffet and drinks are provided, with musical entertainment from the Brass Brothers<br />

– from Bach to the Beatles and, by popular request, Foetus ex Ore, the Norwegian<br />

medical students’ choir that has amused and amazed us in previous years. We must<br />

vacate the building by 2300 hrs which is bedtime for the fish – they suffer distress<br />

and higher mortality rates if deprived of their rest! Please make your own way to<br />

and from the Aquarium.<br />

Saturday 1 September<br />

If there is sufficient demand, there will be a pub crawl for all the students who<br />

arrive early (they may not object to a few non-students tagging along if anyone else<br />

is interested!). Please contact them if you would like a guided tour of the <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

nightlife: student.amee@charite.de<br />

Monday 3 September 1930 hrs until late<br />

An alternative to the River Cruise, for students only! The local students invite visiting<br />

students to a free dinner in the ‘Lecture-hall Ruin’. This is the old pathology lecturehall<br />

that was partly destroyed during WW II, has been rebuilt and is now being used<br />

for social events. All students registering for the Conference will be contacted by<br />

the <strong>Berlin</strong> students and asked if they would like to attend the dinner. As numbers are<br />

limited they can’t promise that places will be available for everyone. Please contact<br />

student.amee@charite.de for further information.


Accompanying Persons <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Tours leave from and return to the Forum Hotel, Alexanderplatz (see map on page 1.6).<br />

All tours are guided in English. Lunches do not include drinks.<br />

Monday 3 September 0830-1630 hrs<br />

Impressions of the Spreewald Price: DM 150.00 per person<br />

This day-tour to the Spreewald offers an unparalleled experience of nature. The<br />

area, which was originally settled by the Sorbs, is traversed by numerous tributaries<br />

of the River Spree, these often being the only links between houses and fields. The<br />

tour will take you to Burg and Leipe, two small idyllic towns in a romantic setting.<br />

Spreewald specialities will be served at lunch. Enjoy a trip along the network of<br />

waterways on one of the traditional Spreewald punts.<br />

Tuesday 4 September 0830-1630 hrs<br />

Neuruppin & Rheinsberg Palace Price: DM 150,00 per person<br />

This is a Coach trip to the little town of Neuruppin, which is situated on the lake<br />

”Ruppiner See”. During a sightseeing tour you will get to know the home town of<br />

Theodor Fontane and Karl Friedrich Schinkel. After lunch the trip continues to<br />

Rheinsberg, ”picture book for lovers” as Tucholsky called it. The town, which is<br />

situated on the east bank of the ”Griebericksee”, is famous in particular for its<br />

palace, Schloß Rheinsberg. It was built in 1566 as a moated castle and in 1737/40<br />

Knobelsdorff reconstructed it into a major architectural work during Friedrich the<br />

Great’s reign. The Rheinsberg Palace houses a museum, which is open to the public.<br />

The tour also includes a walk through the palace gardens, which were originally<br />

designed in Baroque-style and changed into English-style gardens at the end of the<br />

18th century.<br />

Wednesday 5 September 1000-1400 hrs<br />

Potsdam/Sanssouci Price: DM 70,00 per person<br />

This tour shows old and modern Potsdam. You will visit the well-preserved, worldfamous<br />

Rococo Palace Sanssouci with its art treasures and beautiful park. A city<br />

tour through Potsdam will follow.<br />

- 3.3 -


Pre-Conference Tours<br />

All tours are guided in English. Tours leave from and return to the Forum Hotel,<br />

Alexanderplatz (see map on page 1.6). <strong>Programme</strong> is subject to change. Lunches do<br />

not include drinks.<br />

Saturday 1 and Sunday 2 September (1.5 days)<br />

Dresden<br />

Depart <strong>Berlin</strong> 0900 hrs on 1 September, return to <strong>Berlin</strong> 1200 hrs on 2 September<br />

(one overnight stay)<br />

1 September: Start of the tour in <strong>Berlin</strong>. On the way to Dresden you will pass by<br />

the lake “Teupitzer See”, some distant parts of the Spreewald and the coal mining<br />

area of Niederlausitz. Dresden is one of the most beautiful baroque towns in Europe.<br />

During a sightseeing tour through the city you will visit the most important sights<br />

such as the Zwinger, Taschenberg-Palace, the famous Semper Opera House, picture<br />

gallery ”Old Masters” with the famous painting ”Sixtinische Madonna” or the<br />

dazzling jewellery exhibition in the ”Green Vault”.<br />

2 September: At 0900 hrs your return journey to <strong>Berlin</strong> will start. The tour ends<br />

also at the Forum-Hotel, Alexanderplatz.<br />

Rate per person in a double room: DM 305,00<br />

Rate per person in a single room: DM 375,00<br />

Rates include following services: de luxe coach, 1 overnight stay including breakfast<br />

in a Hotel of 4-Stars category, all entrance fees.<br />

Saturday 1 September 0900-2000 hrs (one day)<br />

Mecklenburg countryside<br />

The excursion will take you to Schwerin, an old town “up North”. In this “City of<br />

Seven Lakes” you can admire the magnificent palace, situated on a charming island,<br />

which no lesser than Tsar Alexander enthused over. After lunch you will be driven<br />

past the lake “Schwerin” towards Wismar, the first record of which dates back to<br />

1229. The buildings still testify to its former glory as a hanseatic city. The historic<br />

centre has been restored and the whole area is now protected by a conservation<br />

order.<br />

Rate per person: DM 175,00 (including transportation in de luxe coach, lunch<br />

and entrance fees)<br />

- 3.4 -


Post-Conference Tour<br />

Cancellation Policy<br />

Accommodation<br />

All tours are guided in English. Tours leave from and return to the Forum Hotel,<br />

Alexanderplatz (see map on page X). <strong>Programme</strong> is subject to change. Lunches do not<br />

include drinks.<br />

Thursday 6 September 0830-1800 hrs (one day)<br />

Potsdam’s Parks and Palaces<br />

A visit of the palaces and gardens of Sanssouci will be followed by a guided tour to<br />

the Cecilienhof, the place where the Potsdam Agreement was signed in 1945. After<br />

lunch a city tour through the former garrison town with its Dutch Quarters and<br />

Russian Colony will follow.<br />

Rate per person: DM 150,00 (including transportation in de luxe coach, lunch<br />

and entrance fees)<br />

In case of cancellation of the accompanying persons’ tours and one-day pre- and postconference<br />

tours after 15 June 2001 the full fee is payable. There will be no refunds.<br />

After 15 June 2001 the following cancellation fees will be charged for the overnight<br />

tour:<br />

Dresden cancellation fee per person (single room) DM 330,00<br />

cancellation fee per person (double room) DM 260,00<br />

Rooms are now subject to availability. Please book using Form C, available from DER<br />

or the <strong>AMEE</strong> office. All the hotels of categories A, B, C have fitness-centres; category<br />

A hotels also have swimming-pools. Some of the hotels in categories C and D also have<br />

fitness-centres and swimming-pools. All the rooms are equipped with telephone, TV,<br />

shower and WC. In price categories B and C breakfast buffet, service and VAT are<br />

included. The rates in price category A do not include breakfast. A deposit of DM<br />

500,00 per room will be charged and will be deducted from the final bill on checking<br />

out of the hotel on presentation of the voucher which will be given to you at the<br />

Conference registration desk. Hotel reservations can only be processed if this payment<br />

and the booking form have been received Requests by telephone cannot be considered.<br />

Should the requested category be booked out, DER-CONGRESS will make reservations<br />

in another category. We ask for your understanding that only written changes in<br />

reservations can be accepted.<br />

Reserved rooms will be kept until 18.00 hrs on the scheduled day of arrival, unless late<br />

arrival has been marked on the booking form.<br />

In case you have to cancel your room reservation the cancellation fee charged by DER-<br />

CONGRESS is DM 50,00 per single room and DM 100,00 per double room. Should<br />

the cancellation be received after June 1, 2001 you may be charged with the relevant<br />

cancellation or no-show-fee by the hotel, in addition to the corresponding cancellation<br />

fee payable to DER-CONGRESS. A handling fee of DM 20,00 will be charged for<br />

changes in registration. Administration costs cannot be reimbursed in any case.<br />

- 3.5 -


Student Accommodation<br />

DER-CONGRESS does not deal with allocation of student accommodation.<br />

Local students have a few rooms available in their own homes for visiting students.<br />

Please contact student.amee@charite.de for information.<br />

The hostels listed below may also have rooms available:<br />

Jugendgästehaus Nordufer Phone: +49-30-451 70 30<br />

Nordufer 28 Fax: +49-30-452 41 00<br />

D-13351 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: Nordufer@t-online.de<br />

BDP-Gäste-Etage Phone: +49-30-493 10 70<br />

Osloer Str. 12 Fax: +49-30-493 60 01<br />

D-13359 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: gaeste-etage@snafu.de<br />

Hostel „Die Etage“ Phone: +49-30-89 09 08 20<br />

Katharinenstraße 14 Fax: +49-30-89 09 08 27<br />

D-10117 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: dieetage@aol.com<br />

Globetrotter Hostel “Odyssee” Phone: +49-30-29 00 00 81<br />

Grünberger Straße 23 Fax: +49-30-29 00 00 81<br />

D-10243 <strong>Berlin</strong> e-mail: odyssee@hostel-berlin.de<br />

The rates are between DM 24,00 and DM 65,00 per night.<br />

- 3.6 -


SECTION 4<br />

Abstracts


Contents<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

Session 1 – Plenary 1:Achieving standards in the curriculum 4.1<br />

Session 2 – Short Communications 1<br />

2A A virtual learning environment .. .. 4.2<br />

2B PBL and the curriculum .. .. .. 4.3<br />

2C Curriculum database .. .. .. 4.5<br />

2D OSCE/Standardised patients in assessment .. 4.7<br />

2E Postgraduate education – the early years .. 4.8<br />

2F Peer assessment .. .. .. 4.10<br />

2G Continuing Professional Development .. .. 4.12<br />

2H Selection .. .. .. .. 4.13<br />

2I Educating the educators (1) .. .. .. 4.15<br />

2J Simulation and clinical skills training .. .. 4.17<br />

2K Students and curriculum evaluation .. .. 4.18<br />

2L Multiprofessional education .. .. .. 4.20<br />

2M Student support/Psychiatry and the curriculum .. 4.21<br />

Session 3 – Workshops 1 .. .. .. 4.23<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

Session 4 – Large Group Sessions<br />

4A Standards and professionalism in medical education 4.27<br />

4B The challenge of developing international standards<br />

in medical education .. .. .. 4.27<br />

4C Standards and the curriculum .. .. 4.28<br />

Session 5 – Short Communications 2<br />

5A Learning and the Internet .. .. .. 4.29<br />

5B Evaluation of PBL .. .. .. 4.30<br />

5C Curriculum evaluation .. .. .. 4.32<br />

5D Assessing communication skills/Patients as examiners 4.33<br />

5E Postgraduate education for General Practice/Family Medicine 4.35<br />

5F Assessment .. .. .. .. 4.37<br />

5G Outcome-based education .. .. .. 4.38<br />

5H Educational strategies/curriculum planning .. 4.40<br />

5I Educating the educators (2) .. .. .. 4.42<br />

5J Education and cultural diversity .. .. 4.43<br />

5K Contexts for learning .. .. .. 4.45<br />

5L Evaluation of multiprofessional education .. 4.47<br />

5M Teaching about EBM, critical thinking and research .. 4.48<br />

Session 6 – Workshops 2 .. .. .. 4.51<br />

- i -<br />

Page


Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 7 – Posters<br />

7A New learning technologies .. .. .. 4.56<br />

7B Problem-based learning .. .. .. 4.58<br />

7C Curriculum planning and change .. .. 4.60<br />

7D Curriculum evaluation/staff development .. 4.63<br />

7E Postgraduate education .. .. .. 4.65<br />

7F Assessment .. .. .. .. 4.68<br />

7G Teaching and learning (1) .. .. .. 4.70<br />

7H Teaching and learning (2) .. .. .. 4.73<br />

7I Continuing Professional Development (1) .. 4.75<br />

7J Continuing Professional Development (2) .. 4.77<br />

7K International medical education .. .. 4.78<br />

7L Special subjects .. .. .. .. 4.80<br />

Session 8 – Short Communications 3<br />

8A Computer mediated learning and assessment .. 4.83<br />

8B Implementation of PBL .. .. .. 4.84<br />

8C Curriculum planning .. .. .. 4.86<br />

8D The final examination .. .. .. 4.87<br />

8E Postgraduate education/Career choice .. .. 4.89<br />

8F Teaching and learning .. .. .. 4.90<br />

8G Assessment in postgraduate and continuing education 4.92<br />

8H Curriculum change .. .. .. 4.94<br />

8I Communication skills training .. .. 4.96<br />

8J Clinical teaching .. .. .. .. 4.97<br />

8K International aspects of medical education .. 4.99<br />

8L Special subjects .. .. .. .. 4.100<br />

Session 9 – Plenary 2: Different views of medical education 4.103<br />

- ii -


Session 1 Plenary<br />

1/1 Towards global standards for<br />

medical education<br />

Jordan J Cohen<br />

President, Association of American Medical Colleges, 2450 N<br />

Street N.W., Washington DC 20037-1126, USA<br />

Jordan Cohen has had a longstanding interest in<br />

standards in medical education from the perspective<br />

of a Dean of a medical school and Professor of<br />

Medicine, a Chair of the American Board of Internal<br />

Medicine and the Accreditation Council for Graduate<br />

Medical Education, and President and Chief Executive<br />

Officer of AAMC. In this session he will share his views<br />

about standards in medical education. Why are<br />

standards important? To what extent should we aim for<br />

global standards? How might this be achieved?<br />

1/2 New times, new standards: the<br />

social accountability of health<br />

systems and medical schools<br />

Charles Boelen<br />

Coordinator, Human Resources for Health Program, World<br />

Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland<br />

Health systems worldwide face the challenge of<br />

providing evidence to various stakeholders, including<br />

the public, of their capacity to meet priority health needs<br />

and expectations of individuals and society at large.<br />

Medical schools alike, to ensure continuous support,<br />

will increasingly be expected to demonstrate how their<br />

educational, research and service delivery activities best<br />

contribute to meet requirements for improved quality,<br />

equity, relevance and cost-effectiveness in health care.<br />

These requirements and conformity to new standards<br />

should not just be seen as constraints but as<br />

opportunities for expansion and renewed leadership in<br />

the health sector.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.1 -<br />

1/3 Death of the course<br />

R M Harden<br />

Centre for Medical Education and SCPMDE Education<br />

Development Unit, University of Dundee, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Traditionally, curricula were made up of a series of<br />

courses based on disciplines such as anatomy,<br />

pathology, surgery or medicine. These have evolved to<br />

courses based on body systems or other topics. Such<br />

courses are usually described in terms of a timetable<br />

or syllabus with the number and topics of lectures, small<br />

group, practical, or clinical sessions specified. This<br />

paper argues that we will see a revolution in curriculum<br />

and instructional design in response to real needs such<br />

as the need for more flexible training programmes,<br />

more multiprofessional learning opportunities and<br />

greater cooperation between education providers. These<br />

changes will be achieved through the application of<br />

new technologies and a fresh approach to educational<br />

thinking. Contributing to this fundamental change will<br />

be:<br />

1 The move to outcome-based education;<br />

2 The development of electronic curriculum maps<br />

accompanied by appropriate study guides;<br />

3 A dynamic adaptive approach to learning based on<br />

reusable learning objects with an appropriate<br />

learning management system.<br />

The course as we know it today may not be already<br />

dead, but it is dying.


Session 2A A virtual learning environment<br />

2A1 Virtual learning environments –<br />

a learner centred review<br />

Megan Quentin-Baxter* and Suzanne Hardy<br />

Learning and Teaching Support Network, Medicine, Dentistry<br />

and Veterinary Medicine (LTSN-01), Faculty of Medicine,<br />

University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK<br />

The findings of a study to investigate approaches to<br />

Virtual (Managed) Learning Environments which the<br />

United Kingdom’s National Health Service might take<br />

in implementing a ‘virtual classroom’ are reported. The<br />

brief was to assess current strategies in Internet-based<br />

learning and teaching via a review of current known<br />

VMLE products/projects in relation to NHS needs; to<br />

consider the suitability for transfer to a UK-wide<br />

learner centred continuing professional development<br />

environment (the NHS) based on an adult learning<br />

model, incorporating sophisticated portable reflection/<br />

recording tools; to examine the conceptual models of<br />

‘teacher’ and ‘learner’, and how these definitions might<br />

affect the assessment/construction of a VMLE based<br />

on the required model and applied to the NHS<br />

workforce. The methodologies employed, a brief<br />

analysis of some of the representative VMLEs<br />

identified, and the need for new or integration of<br />

existing technologies to support a learner centred<br />

approach will be discussed.<br />

2A2 Impact of a digital learning<br />

environment on the efficiency<br />

of teachers<br />

Peter G M de Jong* and Hermiette E Idenburg<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

In September 1999 a digital learning environment for<br />

students was introduced at the Leiden University<br />

Medical Center. The environment supplies students<br />

with additional organizational information as well as<br />

course-related content. In May 2000, the influence of<br />

this environment was evaluated by means of a<br />

questionnaire among all students and teachers in the<br />

first year of study. Teachers use the environment mostly<br />

for schedules (66%) and changes in schedule (56%),<br />

formative questions (56%) and publication of the right<br />

answers on the final examination (44%). Images,<br />

pictures and articles are hardly published due to<br />

possible violation of copyrights. However, almost<br />

unanimously teachers declare that from their point of<br />

view, students now have more rapid access to much<br />

more information and that for themselves, publishing<br />

information is much more time-efficient than before.<br />

In May 2001 the same questionnaire will be conducted<br />

and the results will be compared with the 2000<br />

questionnaire.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.2 -<br />

2A3 Building blocks in a new<br />

curriculum: the role of the library in<br />

educational innovation<br />

Margriet Lee and Maureen Brassel*<br />

University of Pretoria, Medical Library, P O Box 667, Pretoria<br />

0001, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

In support of the University of Pretoria’s aim of<br />

providing a virtual campus by means of telematic<br />

teaching and web-based training, the Medical Library<br />

began a virtual information service on the Internet. This<br />

service is integrated into the curriculum of the Faculty<br />

of Medicine by the information specialists by creating<br />

webpages to support the study programmes. Using<br />

block books of specific courses, a spectrum of<br />

information sources is put together on webpages. These<br />

sources include fulltext articles, CD-ROM, videos,<br />

websites, etc. Students work interactively by doing their<br />

searches on various databases, access the library<br />

catalogue and fulltext journals. Webpages differ in<br />

content according to individual courses. Students are<br />

exposed to a wider variety of information, enabling<br />

them to make informed decisions, to make more use<br />

of the library material, to work from home - not bound<br />

geographically, and also to prepare themselves for the<br />

virtual information world of the future.<br />

2A4 IT learning environment: more<br />

structure or more room for<br />

manoeuvre? Centrally guided norm<br />

path or absolute freedom?<br />

J Degryse*, A Roex and W Renier<br />

ACHG K U Leuven, Department of General Practice,<br />

Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J, B3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

Various typologies and taxonomies for IT learning<br />

environments are already described in literature. A<br />

central element is the principle of navigation. Is there<br />

an imposed “norm path” or, on the contrary, can an<br />

absolute freedom of movement be provided for, that<br />

will allow the student to study flexibly according to<br />

his own style of learning? ICHO is in the process of<br />

developing a new electronic learning environment.<br />

Since 1 September 1999, every student has access to<br />

his or her own ‘workplace’ on the website. With the<br />

introduction of the Internet-based iTOL further<br />

progress has been made. More than just the latest<br />

software package, iTOL is a new approach to teaching.<br />

The model that forms the basis of the iTOL is essentially<br />

a hybrid. Individual study and self-guided learning are<br />

central features. Within the discussion forum group<br />

learning is of uppermost importance. The focus of the<br />

case studies is problem-oriented thinking and problemsolving<br />

learning. The iTOL project closely follows the<br />

constructivist vision of learning and teaching<br />

(Grabinger 1996, White 1992, Dufy & Cunningham<br />

1996, Harel & Papert 1991). Strictly speaking, no norm<br />

path is imposed in an iTOL. However, the aim is to


exploit the role of periodic and modularly organised<br />

tests and navigation, which is directed by explicitly<br />

formulated learning goals.<br />

2A5 Innovation in self-directed learning<br />

(SDL) in CME: Virtual Internet<br />

Patient Simulation<br />

M A Raetzo*, R L Thivierge, R J Gagnon, V Loroch and<br />

A Bonneau<br />

721 Hartland, Montreal H2V 2X5, CANADA<br />

SDL in CME has been mainly driven by the use of<br />

published written material and also now the growing<br />

use of the Internet. Unfortunately, reading material is<br />

still a rather passive activity. We have developed a<br />

computer software built with clinical vignettes in which<br />

each participant will simulate real encounters with<br />

virtual patients. To do so, the user will have to follow<br />

each step of the basic clinical approach: 1 – finding<br />

the problem: open-questions system; 2 – fixing the<br />

problem; 3 – at each step: each question or decision<br />

has to be justified (exploring the clinical reasoning);<br />

4 – an ongoing feedback can be given upon request at<br />

each level (EBM content already included); 5 - a final<br />

feedback and report is given at the end of each case.<br />

This paper will present the main features of VIPS and<br />

will cover a qualitative evaluation conducted with a<br />

group of 20 family practitioners.<br />

Session 2B PBL and the curriculum<br />

2B1 The birth of a new species –<br />

squirrums: towards equal<br />

collaboration in innovation in<br />

medical education<br />

Peter McCrorie* and David Prideaux*<br />

St George’s Hospital Medical School, Department of Medical &<br />

Health Care Education, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London<br />

SW17 ORE, UK<br />

In September 2000, St George’s Hospital Medical<br />

School in London began a new problem-based medical<br />

course for graduates. Initially St George’s purchased<br />

problem-based cases and tutor training expertise from<br />

Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia, where a<br />

similar course had been introduced in 1996. The<br />

resulting collaboration began as a predominantly onesided<br />

affair with a net information flow from Adelaide<br />

to London. But it did not remain that way for long.<br />

There is now an active exchange of existing, new and<br />

revised cases, sharing of web-based resources, regular<br />

staff visits, student bulletin boards, joint workshops<br />

through video-conferencing and collaborations on<br />

evaluation and research. We liken the resultant curricula<br />

to a new species – squirrums – a cross between squirrels<br />

and possums. This paper will outline and analyse the<br />

essential features of the collaboration and draw out<br />

issues and ideas that could be applied to other such<br />

partnerships.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.3 -<br />

2A6 Real learning through virtual<br />

presentation: an Internet based<br />

work environment course for<br />

medical students at Uppsala<br />

University<br />

Klas <strong>Berlin</strong>*, Kerstin Graffman and Anna Rask-Andersen<br />

Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and<br />

Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Entrance 91, SE<br />

751 85 Uppsala, SWEDEN<br />

Internet based learning in occupational and<br />

environmental medicine in Uppsala Medical School<br />

was introduced during the spring term 1999. A<br />

homepage was constructed which contained schedule,<br />

handouts, message area and quality assessed links. The<br />

written exam was omitted for Internet assignments. The<br />

project was evaluated by a questionnaire. Sixty-six<br />

percent of the 113 students answered the questionnaire.<br />

The teaching stimulated students to reflect about<br />

possible relationships between the patients’ symptoms<br />

and their occupations as well as the environment. The<br />

students also knew where to find information about<br />

such relationships. The Internet project had made it<br />

easier for the students to control their time. The course<br />

had a positive effect upon student interest in the field<br />

and encouraged integrating earlier knowledge.<br />

Occupational and environmental medicine may be<br />

especially suitable for Internet based learning but it is<br />

likely that this kind of teaching would be useful even<br />

in other classes.<br />

2B2 Broadening learning with PBL in a<br />

pathophysiology course<br />

Antonio Rendas* and Bernardo Correia<br />

Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Campo dos Martires da Patria<br />

130, 1200 Lisboa, PORTUGAL<br />

Based on our experience of PBL in a pathophysiology<br />

course from a traditional curriculum, we developed a<br />

computer simulation to register the tasks performed<br />

by the students. These records allowed us to identify,<br />

in three consecutive years, the following elements;<br />

learning needs (ln) – expressed in PBL sessions;<br />

learning resources (lr) – used during the self-learning<br />

periods. Six cases were analysed every year covering<br />

different body systems (digestive, circulatory, blood,<br />

respiratory, kidney and endocrine). Each case, based<br />

on a complete patient history, was analysed by a small<br />

group of students (an average of 10), in five tutorial<br />

sessions, lasting for two hours and occurring twice a<br />

week. Despite the single discipline nature of the course<br />

we found a wide range of ln and lr, from basic sciences,<br />

especially physiology and histopathology, to clinical<br />

medicine, especially internal medicine. In our<br />

experience PBL proved to be a useful method to<br />

broaden learning beyond the boundaries of<br />

pathophysiology.


2B3 The implementation of problembased<br />

learning (PBL) into a<br />

traditional Radiology clerkship<br />

U Keske, U K M Teichgraber, R Schroder, J Berger, S Venz<br />

and R Felix<br />

Humboldt University, Gr. Hamburger Str. 36, 10115 <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the<br />

implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) into<br />

a traditional Radiology clerkship. In addition to the<br />

reformed medical curriculum which is running as a<br />

parallel track, PBL is also applied as a teaching method<br />

in the traditional curriculum. The core radiology<br />

clerkship was taught as a two week block course with<br />

PBL sessions every morning followed by clinical<br />

rotations in radiology. Continuous end of block<br />

evaluation was performed applying a questionnaire.<br />

Based on students’ feedback, changes in the course<br />

structure were made. After four years it is obvious that<br />

radiology is suitable for the use of PBL, because of its<br />

interdisciplinary character. Based on both student and<br />

faculty feedback the group dynamics, student and<br />

faculty satisfaction, course effectiveness and role of<br />

the tutor were rated positively. A set of standard cases<br />

was adapted according to comments from a mandatory<br />

review session at the end of the clerkship. It is<br />

concluded that the introduction of problem-based<br />

learning in radiology had a positive impact on faculty<br />

development. Five faculty members were educated in<br />

becoming PBL tutors and tutored later students of the<br />

reformed medical curriculum of the Charité.<br />

2B4 Medical education innovations in<br />

Dresden, Germany: Reformed<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus,<br />

Dresden University of Technology<br />

Peter Dieter<br />

Medical Faculty, Carl Gustav Carus, Office of the Dean of<br />

Student Affairs, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307 Dresden,<br />

GERMANY<br />

The new curriculum in Dresden is based on the<br />

principle of Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The<br />

curriculum is developed in collaboration with Harvard<br />

Medical School. All teachers are professionally trained<br />

in specific courses. The PBL program will integrate<br />

elements of medical ethics, quality management, health<br />

economics and evidence-based medicine. At present,<br />

five multidisciplinary courses have been introduced<br />

into Year 3 and 4. The focal point of each course is a<br />

tutorial with eight participating students and one PBLtrained<br />

tutor. Students and tutors discuss a particular<br />

patient´s case, related to the theme of the course.<br />

Lectures, laboratory courses and “bed-side learning”<br />

complete the curriculum. The Dresden program plans<br />

the integration of further PBL courses into Years 4 to<br />

6. Multidisciplinary courses in basic sciences in Years<br />

1 and 2 will complete the program. Every aspect of the<br />

PBL program is regularly evaluated by an external<br />

institution.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.4 -<br />

2B5 Problem-based Learning in<br />

Immunology and Infectious<br />

Disease (IMID): the Dresden<br />

experience<br />

S T Weber*, G Baretton, S Bergmann, J Graeszlear, E Jacobs,<br />

H Kunath, I Nitsche, U Ravens, A Rethwilm and P Rieber<br />

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Dresden Medical<br />

School, Fiedlerstr. 42, 01307 Dresden, GERMANY<br />

IMID are underrepresented in the curriculum of<br />

German medical students. In the final exam, less than<br />

ten out of more than 500 questions are related to<br />

immunology. IMID are scheduled early in the medical<br />

curriculum when most students have not seen patients<br />

regularly. This situation does not reflect the medical<br />

development where immunology and infectious<br />

diseases are becoming increasingly important. Based<br />

on the principles of problem-oriented learning, we<br />

conducted an eleven-week-multi-disciplinary course in<br />

IMID. The schedule included morning-lectures, two<br />

laboratory sessions and three tutorials (8-10 students)<br />

per week. Eleven cases were presented covering major<br />

issues in the field. Due to the clinical background of<br />

the cases the students were able to learn the principles<br />

in infectious diseases from a “real life story”. Lectures,<br />

tutorials and lab sessions were evaluated permanently<br />

by a questionnaire. Students reported a higher<br />

motivation to learn and to self-study. We think that a<br />

more profound insight into IMID will be a benefit for<br />

their professional careers.<br />

2B6 From case-based reasoning to<br />

problem-based learning<br />

Haim Eshach* and Haim Bitterman<br />

Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, PO Box 9649, Bat<br />

Galim, Haifa 31096, ISRAEL<br />

Many medical schools question whether they should<br />

implement a problem-based learning (PBL)<br />

curriculum. Educators raise some serious questions<br />

regarding the efficiency of PBL and therefore<br />

recommend learning more about the cognitive<br />

processes developed by PBL before broadly<br />

implementing it. In addition, it is important to<br />

determine whether PBL best matches the human<br />

reasoning processes. In this theoretical article we<br />

examine the relationships between the case-based<br />

reasoning (CBR) model and PBL. CBR indicates that<br />

the source of knowledge one uses while solving a new<br />

problem is not only generalized rules or general cases,<br />

but often a memory of stored cases recording specific<br />

prior episodes. CBR allows the reasoner to propose<br />

solutions to problems quickly and to propose solutions<br />

in domains that are not completely understood, such<br />

as medicine. Our analysis reveals strong association<br />

between CBR and PBL. We conclude that PBL is a<br />

successful teaching method that should be encouraged<br />

by medical schools.


2B7 A new approach to PBL in CME;<br />

using script concordance tests (SCT)<br />

M Labelle*, C Maille, R L Thivierge and B Charlin<br />

University of Montreal, CME Office, Faculty of Medicine, P O<br />

Box 6128, Centre-Ville Station, Montreal, CANADA H3C 3J7<br />

Traditionally the PBL material for CME is prepared<br />

with the help of clinical cases to be discussed between<br />

peers while answering specific questions. A prior needs<br />

assessment is done to ensure that the material and its<br />

content will respond to the learning needs of the<br />

participants. In order to be more tied to the learners’<br />

needs, we have designed a new model (SCT) for<br />

building each case where the answer to each question<br />

can be displayed and compared to the responses of a<br />

group of expert physicians (previously obtained) on<br />

the same topic. Similarities and discrepancies between<br />

the responses (participants vs experts) become overtly<br />

obvious when revealed on the overhead screen during<br />

the running of the workshop. This PBL model using<br />

SCT has a primary effect of obtaining an ongoing needs<br />

assessment of the learners while the workshop is<br />

actually being delivered.<br />

Session 2C Curriculum database<br />

2C1 Aiding the reform – development of<br />

a curriculum information system<br />

Patrick Merl*, Paolo Petta and Richard Marz<br />

Institute of Medical Chemistry, University of Vienna Medical<br />

School, Wahringerstr. 10, A-1090 Vienna, AUSTRIA<br />

Curriculum information systems have been discussed<br />

in the literature since the early 1970s. Most systems in<br />

existence deliver structural information, and little is<br />

known about systems that have been designed to<br />

successfully serve as planning tools. We explore<br />

possible reasons for this phenomenon. The University<br />

of Vienna Medical School is currently reforming its<br />

curriculum from strictly subject based to one with an<br />

integrative approach. Such a process generates large<br />

amounts of data and a great need for information and<br />

coordination. At the same time the systemic shift<br />

stimulates a climate of uncertainty for individuals and<br />

departments. Our school has therefore funded the<br />

design of an information system to fill the needs of<br />

exchange and coordination in the reform process. The<br />

presentation will discuss how this information system<br />

supports the planning process: it represents information<br />

in several structured formats, aids in decision making,<br />

and provides orientation for stakeholders.<br />

2C2 How effective is project<br />

management software in<br />

implementing a new course?<br />

Katharine Grundy<br />

St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting,<br />

London SW17 0RE, UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.5 -<br />

2B8 Discovering versus covering: a<br />

new PBL in Behavioural Sciences<br />

Ala’Aldin Al-Hussaini and Harith Ghassany<br />

College of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University, Post Box: 35,<br />

Postal Code: 123, Al-Khod, Sultanate of Oman<br />

During the initial decade since its establishment in<br />

1986, the Department of Behavioural Medicine at<br />

Sultan Qaboos University had placed more weight on<br />

teaching at the expense of learning. As with most<br />

teacher-centred learning, the implicit assumption has<br />

always been that a good teacher must necessarily<br />

produce good students regardless of the fact that student<br />

learning is active or passive. Over the last 5 years the<br />

Department has initiated student-centered learning<br />

teams while reducing the lecture format to the<br />

minimum. The shift is essentially a move away from a<br />

culture of rote teaching and learning to a more<br />

interactive culture of critical reading, thinking, and<br />

reading material, which can be made relevant to the<br />

culture of the students and the common problems of<br />

their communities. Following initial problems of<br />

adjustment and reluctance by both teachers and<br />

students, it has been found that there is more value in<br />

the balance between the discovery approach to learning<br />

and the covering of material approach to teaching.<br />

Planning and implementing a new graduate entry<br />

programme in medicine presented many challenges. A<br />

management system was required to assist in the<br />

administration of the project and to generate<br />

communications tailored to the needs of the individual<br />

teachers and administrators. We decided to use<br />

Microsoft Project, the most widely used project<br />

management software. It assists in the organisation of<br />

administrative tasks such as identifying key milestones,<br />

scheduling activities, assigning resources and tracking<br />

progress. An invaluable feature of the software is its<br />

ability to publish reports e.g. filtering information to<br />

ensure individuals only receive details relevant to<br />

themselves. This information can be distributed either<br />

on paper, by email or published on the Intranet. For a<br />

project to succeed, however, it requires more than good<br />

software. Critical factors for successful project<br />

administration include rigorous planning, realistic timescales,<br />

effective communication, clearly defined<br />

responsibilities, commitment from senior management<br />

and regular monitoring.<br />

2C3 MESMIS – Medical School Staff/<br />

Student Management Information<br />

System: Towards the electronic<br />

curriculum<br />

D A Levison and W M Williamson<br />

University of Dundee Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

MESMIS is a comprehensive web-based management<br />

information system developed at Dundee Medical<br />

School to provide communication; resource


management; staff and student support mechanisms;<br />

course information inclusive of personal (staff and<br />

student) timetables; e-learning and now outcome based<br />

enquiries for each learning opportunity. Access to the<br />

system is secure and only accessible by registered<br />

medical students and staff, including internal and<br />

external honorary clinical staff involved with the<br />

delivery of the medical course. Registration is achieved<br />

on-line and permits access to information by students<br />

and staff from anywhere in the world. It provides a<br />

comprehensive Managed Learning Environment<br />

(MLE) with a number of active links providing the basis<br />

of a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). This is<br />

complemented by an outcome-based assessment<br />

process that is enhanced by the components of<br />

“outcome-mapping”, significantly strengthening its<br />

already generic application.<br />

2C4 SIMON – Student Information and<br />

Management Online Network<br />

P Wagner*, D Zeiss*, S Konig*, P M Markus and H Becker<br />

Klinik fur Allgemeinchirurgie, Universitat Goettingen, Robert<br />

Koch Str. 40, D-37075 Gottingen, GERMANY<br />

We have developed a web-based administration and<br />

information system to improve both student and faculty<br />

facilities through enhancement of the online<br />

experience. SIMON offers a central starting point for<br />

students and teachers alike and allows direct interaction<br />

between them. Registration for courses may take place<br />

online. Lists and information are generated<br />

automatically and are always up to date. Curriculum<br />

evaluation may occur via a web interface. SIMON<br />

provide teachers the opportunity to contact students<br />

prior to the start of a course and distribute instructions,<br />

help or hints. Furthermore, SIMON is an ideal forum<br />

for discussion, problems and reflection on case studies<br />

outside the classroom environment. Integration of<br />

additional teaching modules has been allowed for, such<br />

as online guides for specific courses. Individual<br />

departments may employ variable programming<br />

structures, allowing this project to be extended and<br />

adjusted accordingly and as their future needs arise.<br />

2C5 Portfolio-based Dermatology<br />

internship – one year’s experience<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann and F Ochsendorf<br />

Universitats-Hautklinik Frankfurt/M, Theodor Stern Kai-7,<br />

60590 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.6 -<br />

The last year (practical year) of medical education in<br />

Germany is not very systematized. In order to improve<br />

student learning during the dermatology internship we<br />

introduced a portfolio to clarify which components are<br />

considered important within dermatology: 25<br />

qualifications divided into “general basics”,<br />

“dermatology-basics” and “special-dermatology” were<br />

listed in a student’s portfolio with a theory, supervision<br />

and clinical practice part. The individual achievements<br />

were documented in the portfolio by the educating<br />

residents. Since May 1999 15 students participated in<br />

the portfolio-program, they completed in the mean 70%<br />

of the listed activities; general basics were fully<br />

completed by all the students, 75% of dermatology<br />

basics and 46% of special dermatology were completed.<br />

The students welcomed the portfolio as it provided a<br />

useful overview of learning opportunities and<br />

achievements. This is the first use of portfolio-based<br />

medical education in a dermatology internship in<br />

Germany. Students strongly requested implementation<br />

of portfolio-based learning in other faculties.<br />

2C6 Profile of the consultations made<br />

by fifth year medical students in the<br />

integrated program of pediatrics<br />

and public health<br />

Claudia Astudillo, Rocio Arenas, Maria Bustamante*,<br />

Maria De La Fuente and Gladys Yentzen<br />

Universidad de Chile, Walter Scott 1115, Vitacura, Santiago,<br />

CHILE<br />

During the 5th year of medical school, the students<br />

participate in an integrated program of pediatrics and<br />

public health, which includes a visit to a primary care<br />

clinic where the students are able to apply the<br />

knowledge acquired in the theoretical course of<br />

pediatrics and learn the abilities that will help them<br />

participate in actions of promotion, protection and<br />

recovery of health. The objective of this study is to<br />

know which were the most common diagnoses they<br />

made and verify if they are the same they will see in<br />

the future. We analyzed 609 consultations, with a total<br />

of 795 diagnoses, which were classified according to<br />

the ICD 10. The three most frequently found diagnoses<br />

were respiratory, infectious and cutaneous diseases,<br />

which are the same found in the literature. It is<br />

concluded that to prepare medical students to recognise<br />

and treat the most common diseases, the primary care<br />

clinics are a necessary instrument that can easily be<br />

inserted in the curriculum.


Session 2D OSCE/Standardised patients in assessment<br />

2D1 “Check it, rate it, palm it or leave it”<br />

– handheld computers replace<br />

checklists in OSCEs and provide<br />

automated feedback<br />

Michael Schmidts*, Markus Kemmerling, Ruth Willnauer<br />

and Martin Lischka<br />

Studienzentrum - AKH, P O B 10, A-1097 Vienna, AUSTRIA<br />

We recently developed software that enables PalmOS<br />

powered handheld computers to replace checklists in<br />

an OSCE. Each observer is now provided with a mobile<br />

handheld device to record mistakes, incomplete or<br />

missing actions by striking with a pen on a touchscreen.<br />

Additionally, the examiner can enter new items during<br />

the test, which serve as suggestions when the item<br />

database is updated. At the end of the examination the<br />

data of all participating candidates are synchronised<br />

(by “beaming”) and transferred to a desktop computer<br />

for further processing (like statistical item analysis or<br />

immediate candidate feedback printouts). Based on 18<br />

months’ experience with our new assessment system<br />

we see clear advantages in the speed of data gathering,<br />

the ease of data evaluation and the quick and highly<br />

elaborated feedback. Observers familiarised well with<br />

the device, which also turned out to be less intrusive<br />

than checklists. So far the program worked failsafe.<br />

2D2 Evaluation of the undergraduate<br />

surgery course: effect of OSCE<br />

Marco Bustamante Z*, Carlos Carvajal H, Fernando<br />

Quevedo R, María Bustamante C and Claudia Astudillo M<br />

Universidad de Chile, Depto de Cirugía, Avenida Salvador 368,<br />

Providencia, Santiago, CHILE<br />

Two different methods, a guideline of evaluation<br />

applied by different teachers and OSCE, have been used<br />

to estimate knowledge, attitudes and dexterities in<br />

undergraduate medical students of the 4th year in the<br />

subject of surgery. The objective of this communication<br />

is to compare the results on the final grades of the class<br />

before and after the introduction of OSCE. In the year<br />

1997-1998, the final grade was composed of theoretical<br />

exams 40%, evaluation guidelines 60%. In the 1999-<br />

2000 period, this grade was composed of theoretical<br />

exams 40%, OSCE 40%, evaluation guidelines 20%.<br />

The final grades averages, standard deviation and<br />

variation coefficients were compared during the two<br />

periods. Period 1997-1998 final grades average was<br />

6.15, st dev 0.23, var coeff 3.7. Period 1999-2000 final<br />

grades average was 5.62, st dev 0.66, var coeff 11.7. It<br />

is concluded that establishing a type of examination<br />

that measures skills objectively increases the dispersion<br />

of the grades threefold. This allows us to conclude that,<br />

with OSCE, a more valid document is obtained,<br />

assuring better discrimination amongst students.<br />

2D3 OSCE: are many different stations<br />

necessary for each evaluation?<br />

Carlos Carvajal*, Marco Bustamante and Ilse López<br />

Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Camino De La<br />

Laguna 13452, Lo Barneclen, Santiago, CHILE<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.7 -<br />

One of the objections about the Objective Standardised<br />

Clinical Examination (OSCE) is the need for many<br />

different stations for each evaluation. The supposition<br />

is that early consciousness of OSCE stations may<br />

increase the OSCE score. At the Medical School of<br />

Chile University, we used OSCE evaluation<br />

consecutively in 4 groups of medical students, all of<br />

these with the same stations; groups 1 and 2 in 1999;<br />

groups 3 and 4 in 2000. There were no statistically<br />

significant differences among the mean score between<br />

groups 1 and 2. The mean score in group 1 was greater<br />

than group 3 (p values


ecoming more common. Here, it is imperative that<br />

scores are reliable and valid. To accomplish this task,<br />

great care must be taken in the training and monitoring<br />

of SPs. For the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA),<br />

administered by the Educational Commission for<br />

Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG), SP performance<br />

is continually scrutinized. In addition, surveys are<br />

administered to collect data on SP demographics and<br />

opinions regarding exam logistics and training. The<br />

purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship<br />

between SP-related variables (e.g., work history,<br />

training, conditions portrayed) and the adequacy of<br />

candidate scores. Initial results suggest that some, albeit<br />

small, variation in candidate scores can be attributed<br />

to some characteristics of the SP. Fortunately,<br />

continuous quality control, combined with periodic<br />

training and re-training of SPs, ensures that decisions<br />

regarding candidate competence are accurate, fair, and<br />

unbiased.<br />

2D6 Use of standardized patients to<br />

assess medical response to a<br />

natural disaster<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Marguerite Hawkins, Heidi Worth-<br />

Dickstein, Eric Marks, Ralph Jones, Gilbert Muniz and<br />

Richard E Hawkins<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, National<br />

Capital Area Medical Simulation Center, 4301 Jones Bridge<br />

Road, Bethesda MD 20814, USA<br />

We describe the feasibility and advantages of utilizing<br />

Standardized Patients (SPs) to train and assess the<br />

ability of military medical teams to provide<br />

international health care following natural disasters.<br />

The real-time simulation took place aboard ship after<br />

a hurricane in Belize. Cases were based upon<br />

geographic and natural disaster-related epidemiology.<br />

Moulage, radiographs, computerized laboratory and<br />

imaging reports were provided. Analytic methods<br />

included surveys, structured medical record review, SP<br />

- 4.8 -<br />

checklists, and direct observation. Crew rated the<br />

exercise as more realistic and significantly better than<br />

a previous exercise without SPs in assessing and<br />

preparing them to triage and care for casualties. Medical<br />

record audits and SP checklists were complementary<br />

in evaluating quality of care for individuals. Observers<br />

yielded important data regarding patient flow,<br />

communication, equipment function, supply use, and<br />

ancillary support. The simulation and inclusion of a<br />

variety of assessment measures allowed for high quality<br />

evaluation of complex care delivery.<br />

2D7 The weakest link? Performance<br />

factors and degrees of influence in<br />

an interactive long-station general<br />

practice examination (VOICEs)<br />

C M Wiskin*, T Allan and J Skelton<br />

The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

Passing a six-station Primary Care OSCE examination<br />

is compulsory. In 2 tasks students improvise<br />

consultations with ‘patients’ portrayed by our role-play<br />

team. Clinical performance is marked by a clinical<br />

examiner. Communication scores (professionalism,<br />

competence, attitude) are awarded by negotiation<br />

between examiner and role-player. This paper is part<br />

of a study evaluating reliability and bias across<br />

examination variables. Data about role-players, students<br />

and examiners; the dynamics and score-awards,<br />

demographics and the logistics of exam days were<br />

collected. Results from over 1,000 assessed<br />

consultations were collated on SPSSv.10. Preliminary<br />

data suggest variables such as question selection, order<br />

in which students are seen, age/experience of examiners<br />

and relationship between role-player and examiner<br />

assessment are not significant. Despite the apparent<br />

subjectivity of the format, interactive examinations are<br />

an appropriate means of testing the communication<br />

skills of medical students.<br />

Session 2E Postgraduate education – the early years<br />

2E1 New PRHO: “I am not sure what I<br />

am supposed to do”. Can we<br />

improve on PRHO induction? An<br />

evaluation of a new induction<br />

process<br />

Dason Evans*, Mike Roberts and Diana Wood<br />

St Bartholomew’s and the Royal London, Department of Medical<br />

Educational Research & Innovation, Robin Brook Centre, School<br />

of Medicine & Dentistry, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE,<br />

UK<br />

We conducted a controlled study involving 48 PRHOs.<br />

We compared a traditional, one-day induction with a<br />

newer process principally involving five days of<br />

shadowing before the commencement of the PRHO<br />

post. Clinical responsibility was taken in a safe<br />

environment with full support from the outgoing teams.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

We assessed feelings of anxiety, preparedness and<br />

confidence in clinical skills via questionnaire, and<br />

ability in clinical skills via an OSCE, before and after<br />

induction and at one month. We audited prescribing<br />

errors, radiology request errors, note keeping and<br />

adverse events in both groups. Pre-induction levels of<br />

anxiety and uncertainty were high, with almost half<br />

having biological symptoms of anxiety. Clinical skills<br />

improved during the longer induction, and 21/22 of<br />

intervention PRHOs felt more prepared for their post<br />

(cf 13/22 controls with 7/22 controls feeling less<br />

prepared after a traditional induction). We will discuss<br />

the induction process and statistical analysis of results<br />

in depth.


2E2 A comparison of Pre-registration<br />

House Officers’ (PRHOs) and<br />

Senior House Officers’ (SHOs)<br />

experience in general practice<br />

Jan Illing*, Tim van Zwanenberg, Bill Cunningham,<br />

George Taylor, Richard Prescott and Cath O’Halloran<br />

University of Newcastle, Postgraduate Institute for Medicine &<br />

Dentistry, 10-12 Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2<br />

4AB, UK<br />

The aim was to compare the experiences of SHOs and<br />

PRHOs spending four months training in general<br />

practice. While government funding has been provided<br />

for PRHOs, similar schemes for SHOs remain rare and<br />

experimental. A case study approach was used<br />

employing various sources of data. The study involved<br />

nine SHOs, twelve PRHOs, nine GP trainers and sixteen<br />

hospital consultants. Data were collected from PRHOs,<br />

SHOs, GP trainers and hospital consultants. Interview<br />

data were tape-recorded and analysed using thematic<br />

analysis and grounded theory to identify important<br />

themes and patterns in the data. SHOs and PRHOs were<br />

unanimous about the value of the experience in general<br />

practice. They reported learning skills not covered in<br />

hospital posts. GP trainers and hospital consultants<br />

valued the rotations for all doctors irrespective of final<br />

career destination. SHOs were considered better<br />

equipped for general practice and required less<br />

supervision. However, PRHOs felt able to cope with<br />

the demands of general practice.<br />

2E3 Pre-registration experience in<br />

general practice: results of a<br />

national evaluation<br />

Janet Grant*, Lesley Southgate, Rodney Gale, George<br />

Freeman, Alison Hill, Neil Johnson, Frank Smith, Mairead<br />

Beirne and Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK<br />

A national pilot project to give pre-registration house<br />

officers experience in primary care [with 4 months in<br />

each of medicine, surgery and primary care] was<br />

conducted from August 1998 – August 1999. A national<br />

evaluation was commissioned involving all 96 PRHOs<br />

and their supervisors, and a reference group from the<br />

traditional scheme [6 months medicine, 6 months<br />

surgery]. Tailored survey questionnaires were<br />

completed by trainees and supervisors at the end of<br />

each 4- or 6-month post. The areas evaluated included<br />

costs, governance, content and process of learning,<br />

outcomes of learning, and assessment, quality<br />

assurance and monitoring.<br />

Main findings were:<br />

• the three posts make a balanced, coherent package.<br />

• the scheme produced no detriment for the PRHOs.<br />

• there were no detrimental effects on hospital<br />

supervisors’ time commitment<br />

• the time impact on the general practices was<br />

significant<br />

• the new scheme has some effect on PRHOs’ career<br />

plans.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.9 -<br />

2E4 Family Medicine Month: a human<br />

life cycle approach for first year<br />

residents<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Rebecca Gladu, Thelma Jean Goodrich,<br />

Janet Groff and Mary M Velasquez<br />

UT Houston Health Science Center, Family Practice and<br />

Community Medicine, 6431 Fannin, Suite JJL324, Houston, TX<br />

77030, USA<br />

We designed “Family Medicine Month,” a rotation for<br />

first year residents, to provide a contextual, lifecycle<br />

approach to medical care and related family practice<br />

skills. Individual daily sessions related to a particular<br />

stage of the lifecycle (e.g., adolescence) and related<br />

behavioural and technical skills (e.g., interviewing the<br />

adolescent patient and casting skills for common sport<br />

injuries). We intended that our residents would integrate<br />

this inclusive approach into their professional<br />

behaviour. Twenty residents who participated in the<br />

rotation in 1999 and 2000 were satisfied with the<br />

rotation’s usefulness. They also reported greater selfefficacy<br />

in performing family practice skills after the<br />

rotation (8.1 ± 0.7) as compared to before the rotation<br />

(6.2 ± 1.4) (p


2E6 Teaching the forgotten tribe: tutor<br />

views on a generic curriculum<br />

for SHOs<br />

Lesley Pugsley* and Janet MacDonald<br />

School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Academic<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff,<br />

CF4 4XN, UK<br />

A consortium of postgraduate centres has developed<br />

as a pilot, a generic programme for the SHOs in South<br />

East Wales. It is designed to run for an initial eight<br />

week period commencing in the Spring of this year,<br />

with an evaluation in July and a report on the<br />

programme in August 2001. The core curriculum has<br />

been resource led, its design predicated on the various<br />

skills and topics which individual consortium members<br />

felt able to contribute. This paper complements the<br />

initial phase of a research study which focused on the<br />

perceived needs of SHOs and VTS and takes as its focus<br />

the core tutor team. It seeks to identify emergent themes<br />

of congruence and dissonance between the groups of<br />

learners and teachers in order to assist in the<br />

identification of a compatible curriculum addressing<br />

the perceived needs of the SHO grade within the<br />

limitations of resources and service commitments.<br />

Session 2F Peer assessment<br />

2F1 Peer- and co-assessment leads to<br />

shared responsibility for test results<br />

Caro Brumsen and Peter G M de Jong*<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, P O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

During the clerkship in Internal Medicine, an<br />

introductory test is taken every 3 weeks by a group of<br />

10 students. A pool of correctors corrects the test.<br />

Usually there is a lot of discussion concerning the test<br />

results. Therefore a new correction procedure was<br />

introduced. In duos, students do the first correction on<br />

copied versions of the test, with the aid of a standard<br />

answer sheet. Discussion is encouraged and students<br />

can put down their comment in writing, preferably with<br />

references added. This comment is sent to the second<br />

corrector together with the original version of the test<br />

answers. On evaluation, most of the students<br />

commented positively, especially on the possibility to<br />

gain insight into the correct answers. The method of<br />

peer- and co-assessment appears to have led to an<br />

improved acceptance of test results, reflected by a<br />

dramatic decrease in complaints.<br />

2F2 Student self-marking as an<br />

assessment approach to<br />

developing professionalism<br />

G J Mires* and M Friedman Ben-David<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.10 -<br />

2E7 General professional training (GPT)<br />

for dental graduates in the UK<br />

Alison Bullock*, Vickie Firmstone and John Frame<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

This presentation reports on GPT in UK dentistry.<br />

Comparison is made with senior house officer training<br />

for medical graduates which is currently under review<br />

in the UK. The study gained information on the GPT<br />

undertaken by recent graduates in dentistry and their<br />

views on it. A questionnaire was sent to those registered<br />

(since 1997) for Membership of the Faculty of Dental<br />

Surgery (MFDS) Distance Learning Course (Royal<br />

College of Surgeons of England). A 55% (n=342)<br />

response rate was achieved. Widespread support was<br />

found amongst trainees for a period of GPT. However<br />

there was consensus that this period should be<br />

voluntary. There was support for both formal, integrated<br />

2-year programmes and self-constructed versions that<br />

can offer greater flexibility. A qualification marking<br />

the successful completion of GPT was favoured. GPT<br />

that provides experience of primary and secondary care<br />

forms a broad basis for future careers.<br />

Dundee University Medical School has adopted an<br />

outcome-based curriculum in which personal<br />

development is one of the defined outcomes. Selflearning<br />

and self-awareness are important attributes of<br />

this outcome. A study was undertaken to evaluate the<br />

feasibility and reliability and to survey student opinion<br />

regarding the value of undergraduate medical student<br />

self-marking of written examinations as a means of<br />

developing these attributes. The correlation between<br />

student and staff marks, and the reliability of marking<br />

was high. The majority of students considered there<br />

was value in the exercise as a learning and feedback<br />

opportunity, but found it stressful. We believe that this<br />

approach, as well as being reliable, provides a powerful<br />

feedback and self-learning opportunity. It also provides<br />

a mechanism to identify individuals who over or under<br />

mark or who feel threatened by feedback or are unable<br />

to receive negative feedback, with whom Faculty can<br />

work.<br />

2F3 Comprehensive assessment: value<br />

for learning<br />

Elaine F Dannefer<br />

University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue,<br />

Box 601, Rochester NY 14642, USA<br />

The University of Rochester School of Medicine and<br />

Dentistry has implemented a two-week long<br />

comprehensive assessment of second year medical<br />

students for purposes of providing formative feedback.<br />

Multiple assessment techniques, including standardized<br />

clinical encounters and peer assessments, provide


feedback that identifies specific learning needs as well<br />

as problematic patterns of behaviour. Students work<br />

with their advisory deans to interpret the feedback and<br />

construct individualized learning plans. An overview<br />

of the various components will be presented as well as<br />

examples of different types of feedback and learning<br />

plans. The value of this comprehensive assessment for<br />

student learning and for curricular planning will be<br />

discussed with attention given to the resources required<br />

for implementation.<br />

2F4 Attributes of the excellent physician:<br />

a third year student survey<br />

A V Carneiro*, M F Patrício and J Fernandes e Fernandes<br />

University of Lisbon School of Medicine, Rua Sousa Lopes, Lote<br />

KL - 8 E, 1600-207 Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

Role-modeling is a basic part of medical education.<br />

Sixty-six third year medical students were asked – using<br />

questionnaires with open and closed (Likert scale type)<br />

questions – to indicate their opinions on the attributes<br />

of a good doctor. The students favoured good<br />

humanistic qualities in the relationship with patients<br />

and families (96% good or very good), ability to look<br />

for help when needed in clinical practice (97%),<br />

diagnostic abilities (97%) and honesty and ethical<br />

behaviour (94%). The least important attributes<br />

included leadership (68% little or no importance),<br />

research abilities (71%) and a good general culture<br />

(67%). It is concluded that third year medical students<br />

can define a set of attributes of what they consider to<br />

be a good doctor: these include professional behaviour,<br />

ethics, knowledge and leadership. We will recheck these<br />

results at graduation time (within 3 years).<br />

2F5 The Medical Student Peer<br />

Evaluation Initiative: assessment<br />

of performance in small group<br />

settings<br />

Steven L Kanter*, Kathleen Ryan, John Mahoney and<br />

Joan Harvey<br />

University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, M-240 Scaife Hall,<br />

3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh PA 15261, USA<br />

Experience with student assessment at the University<br />

of Pittsburgh School of Medicine led to the observation<br />

that, although a faculty facilitator was not identifying<br />

early a student experiencing difficulty in small group,<br />

the student’s peers were generally aware of the problem.<br />

This led to the development of the Medical Student<br />

Peer Evaluation Initiative (PEI), which aims to provide<br />

feedback to students on performance in small group<br />

sessions; recognize students who demonstrate<br />

excellence; identify poorly functioning students and<br />

offer counseling. Each student rates each other group<br />

member on the member’s ability to help the student<br />

learn. If a score pattern indicates a problem, a faculty<br />

overseer meets with the student. Results of the PEI<br />

reveal excellent participation, early identification of<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.11 -<br />

students with a range of difficulties, and rapid<br />

remediation of most problems. In conclusion, peer<br />

evaluation is a feasible and useful measure of student<br />

small group performance.<br />

2F6 Reliability of a multidimensional<br />

questionnaire to assess attitudes of<br />

medical students towards their<br />

future profession: the UNI Project<br />

G L Werneck*, E C O Ribeiro, A C Aguiar and V M B Ribeiro<br />

Nucleo de Estudos de Saude Coletiva, NESC/UFRJ, Av. Brig.<br />

Trompovsky s/n - HUCFF, 5o andar - Ala Sul, BRAZIL<br />

The objective of this study was to assess the reliability<br />

of answers to questions concerning attitudes of medical<br />

students towards their future profession. We developed<br />

a self-administered questionnaire including 52<br />

questions covering attitudes expected to be developed<br />

by students during medical school. A test-retest design<br />

was used as a preliminary evaluation of the<br />

questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed twice<br />

within a one-week interval by students of the major<br />

university of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The test-retest<br />

reliability was estimated by kappa statistics (K).<br />

Twenty-four questions (46%) had K greater than 0.6<br />

(substantial agreement); 13 questions (25%) had K<br />

between 0.4 and 0.6 (moderate agreement); and 15<br />

questions (29%) had K below 0.4 (fair agreement).<br />

Considering the complexity of assessing attitudes, we<br />

judge these preliminary results as satisfactory. The next<br />

step will be to revise and test those questions showing<br />

low agreement.<br />

2F7 Narrowing the gap in the<br />

assessment process<br />

Nicolas Karlsson<br />

Villa Medici, Hogasplatsen 6, 412 56 Goteborg, SWEDEN<br />

The problem with assessment processes in the past has<br />

been to motivate the participants to take an active and<br />

creative part in the process. This requires a narrowing<br />

of the gap between different groups and that the process<br />

stimulates each individual participating. On the<br />

initiative of the student organisation, the Faculty of<br />

Medicine in Göteborg implemented the Course<br />

Committee in year 2000 after three succesful pilot<br />

projects. The Course Committee is the motor in the<br />

assessment process, creating a suitable environment for<br />

communication in close connection to the reality of<br />

each participant. As a meeting point between the<br />

different parts in the educational process it improves<br />

not only the democracy of the organisation necessary<br />

for continuous improvement, but the course committee<br />

also facilitates the translation from the student’s<br />

descriptional language into the defined language of the<br />

manager of the course. A protocol published on the<br />

www preserves the productive dialogue and the<br />

suggestions made.


Session 2G Continuing professional development<br />

2G1 Learning and partnering: bringing<br />

pharmaceutical representatives<br />

into the educational loop<br />

Jane Tipping*, Craig Campbell, Jean Claude Dairon, Paul<br />

Davis, Francois Goulet, Gilles Lachance, Celine Monette,<br />

Joan Sargeant, Linda Snell and Robert Thivierge<br />

10987 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario L6C 1M9,<br />

CANADA<br />

Pharmaceutical representatives play a key role in<br />

upholding high standards for CME in Canada.<br />

Representatives receive many opportunities to upgrade<br />

knowledge of disease states and management; however<br />

very little is offered for the practice of CME. A group<br />

of dedicated professionals from across Canada<br />

representing academia, industry and the Council for<br />

Continuing Pharmaceutical Education has created a<br />

training module specifically for pharmaceutical<br />

representatives. The outcome has been a quality<br />

program that includes a method of training and<br />

evaluation unique in format and congruent with the<br />

philosophy of adult education. The coalition of three<br />

stakeholder groups represents an example of<br />

partnership that promises to offer a means of raising<br />

and maintaining standards of CME across the country.<br />

A method of education and evaluation is presented that<br />

will evoke critical discussion in the issues of industry<br />

CME and the meaning of partnership. Methods of<br />

conducting research on efficacy will also be discussed.<br />

2G2 CME with a combination of<br />

standardised patients and a CBT<br />

programme<br />

S Schewe*, A Schewe and J Loohs<br />

Medizinische Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universitat, Ludwig-<br />

Maximilians-Universitat, Pettenkoferstr 8a, D-80336 Munich,<br />

GERMANY<br />

A new approach to continuous medical education CME<br />

concerns teaching and knowledge assessing of general<br />

practitioners in musculoskeletal diseases sponsored by<br />

Aventis Pharma. The three elements of the CMEseminar<br />

were an interactive tutorial with a CBTprogramme,<br />

the assessment and discussion of problem<br />

solving strategies including three standardized patients<br />

with frequent musculoskeletal diseases and finally a<br />

lecture on innovative therapeutic possibilities. The new<br />

form of CME was welcomed by nearly all of the 26<br />

physicians (with the exception of 1); their opinion about<br />

this kind of training was very positive. Individual<br />

deficits in problem solving were obvious to each of<br />

the physicians so that immediate improvement was<br />

possible. The three educational elements of the CME<br />

were judged almost equally with a slight advantage for<br />

the part with the standardised patients. The CBT<br />

programme was considered an integral and important<br />

part of the rheumatology seminar.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.12 -<br />

2G3 The impact of continuing<br />

professional development (CPD):<br />

30 case studies of dentists<br />

Vickie Firmstone*, Alison Bullock and John Frame<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

This presentation reports on a key part of a Department<br />

of Health funded study whose principal aim was to<br />

explore the impact of CPD on the practice of GDPs.<br />

Thirty dentists were interviewed before and after<br />

undertaking a self-chosen educational activity.<br />

Discussion focussed on the specific activity and on their<br />

experience of CPD more generally. Factors affecting<br />

the impact of CPD on practice include:<br />

1 the process by which CPD is selected. Much is<br />

undertaken on an ad hoc/ opportunistic basis rather<br />

than an analysis of learning needs. This can lead to<br />

CPD which ‘confirms’ current practice rather than<br />

introduces new learning;<br />

2 barriers to undertaking CPD (access, time,<br />

financial); and<br />

3 constraints to implementing change.<br />

There was broad support for the importance of CPD<br />

for personal and professional development, but there<br />

are significant factors which affect the impact of CPD<br />

in general dental practice.<br />

2G4 Global trends in continuing medical<br />

education<br />

Lewis A Miller<br />

Global Alliance for Medical Education, 90 Goodwives River<br />

Road, Darien, CT 06820-5921, USA<br />

Patterns of Continuing Medical Education (CME) are<br />

changing rapidly worldwide. Accreditation systems are<br />

being adopted rapidly in Europe and Latin America,<br />

but are not yet well recognized. At the same time some<br />

countries and medical specialties are changing from<br />

CME to CPD (Continuous Professional Development)<br />

despite failure of earlier CPD experiments. Methods<br />

of delivering CME are also changing. Lectures are<br />

regarded as less useful than newer forms of interactive<br />

learning. The use of the Internet and CD-ROMs is<br />

increasing. CME of the future will take place at the<br />

point of care. Two new and critical issues are emerging<br />

as CME becomes mandatory for many physicians:<br />

1 Who regulates CME? Government or the<br />

profession?<br />

2 Who pays for CME? Government? Physicians?<br />

Health insurance? Pharmaceutical Industry?<br />

Medical educators in Europe have a major opportunity<br />

to take a leadership role.


2G5 Do we need consultant appraisal?<br />

K H Matheson<br />

West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 2QZ,<br />

UK<br />

There are societal and political demands for<br />

accountability by the medical profession in a world of<br />

rapid technological advances, and with better-educated<br />

and sophisticated consumers. No longer does “doctor<br />

know best”. In the UK the profession has been suffering<br />

from some high profile cases and a hostile media. As a<br />

result the government has now made consultant (senior<br />

medical staff) appraisal compulsory from 2001 and the<br />

General Medical Council will make revalidation<br />

compulsory for all doctors to allay public fears about<br />

poorly performing doctors.<br />

This paper will explore what is meant by “appraisal”,<br />

whether it is the correct mechanism to support<br />

revalidation, and whether it is possible to prove that<br />

appraisal will support doctors in improving their<br />

professional development and performance. There is<br />

tension between the formative and summative<br />

processes, and between a demanding public and a<br />

sceptical profession.<br />

2G6 When should clinicians be trained<br />

in management?<br />

J Clark*, R Palmer and P Spurgeon<br />

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham,<br />

Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2RT,<br />

UK<br />

The involvement of clinicians in management is an<br />

objective pursued increasingly by most health systems.<br />

In part this reflects a concern to control costs but also<br />

a need to provide a proper integration of clinical and<br />

managerial perspectives. Many senior clinicians arrive<br />

in managerial roles with relatively little managerial<br />

Session 2H Selection<br />

2H1 Selecting aboriginal students to<br />

health professional courses<br />

I E Rolfe* and G Garvey<br />

University of Newcastle, Discipline of Aboriginal Health, Level<br />

1 MSB, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University Drive,<br />

Callaghan 2308, AUSTRALIA<br />

Aboriginal students are greatly under-represented in<br />

health professional courses in Australia. The reasons<br />

for this are a complex interplay of historical, social,<br />

cultural, economic and political factors resulting in the<br />

inequity of access to higher education. There is an<br />

imperative to develop culturally appropriate methods<br />

which will increase the numbers of applicants to health<br />

professional courses and then the candidates most likely<br />

to succeed at these University courses. The Faculty of<br />

Medicine & Health Sciences has a long and successful<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.13 -<br />

training. Subsequent provision can often feel urgent<br />

and remedial. In a more planned sense, there is a need<br />

to address the clinical educational curriculum to<br />

examine how best the ‘what’ and ‘when’ of managerial<br />

teaching might be incorporated. This paper reports the<br />

findings of a survey of a range of clinical staff<br />

(undergraduates, junior doctors and consultants) and<br />

health service managers about the key content areas of<br />

management training and their varying perceptions of<br />

where within the educational spectrum the most<br />

appropriate and relevant time for training might be. It<br />

also explores how such training could be provided.<br />

2G7 Evaluation of ‘Distance Interactive<br />

Learning in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology (DIALOG)’<br />

Vikram Jha*, Sean McAleer and Sean Duffy<br />

St James’s University Hospital, Academic Department of<br />

Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 9, Gledhow Wing, St James’s<br />

Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK<br />

In recent years, there has been an increase in the<br />

production of computer assisted learning programmes.<br />

‘DIALOG’ is a distance learning programme, available<br />

on CD-ROM, developed by the Royal College of<br />

Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for continuing<br />

professional development. The aim of the study was to<br />

determine if DIALOG was achieving its educational<br />

objective and to receive feedback from its users. A<br />

literature review was carried out to select a suitable<br />

model for evaluation. The CIPP model (Context, Input,<br />

Process and Product) was used to design a<br />

questionnaire. This was posted out to 150 users selected<br />

by systematic randomisation. A response rate of 60%<br />

was achieved. There has been a positive response from<br />

users in terms of content, design, presentation,<br />

interactivity and outcome. The educational objectives<br />

of DIALOG are being achieved.<br />

history of admitting Aboriginal medical students. The<br />

medical school has graduated approximately 60% of<br />

the nations’ Aboriginal doctors. Given the Faculty<br />

incorporates now a range of other health professional<br />

courses, we revised our selection method to meet four<br />

broad aims:<br />

1 Suitability for selecting students to all health<br />

professional courses,<br />

2 Incorporation of best evidence literature,<br />

3 Determination in large part by Aboriginal peoples<br />

and,<br />

4 Cultural appropriateness of the selection process.


2H2 Demographic and scholastic<br />

correlates of scores in the<br />

Australian Undergraduate Medical<br />

and Health Sciences Admission<br />

Test (UMAT)<br />

Peter Tutton*, Chris Browne, Margot Story and Michael<br />

Lewenberg<br />

Monash University, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology,<br />

Post Office Box 13C, Victoria 3800, AUSTRALIA<br />

The UMAT is an aptitude test used for selection of<br />

medical students. It is an MCQ with three components<br />

– Book 1, logical reasoning & problem solving – Book<br />

2, human interaction skills and Book 3, non-verbal<br />

reasoning (a group embedded figure test measuring<br />

field independent cognitive style). Despite its wide use,<br />

little is known about the demographic or scholastic<br />

attributes of candidates scoring well on the UMAT. In<br />

this study correlations between UMAT scores and both<br />

family demographic variables and concurrent scholastic<br />

achievements are analysed. UMAT Book 1 scores were<br />

weakly associated with duration of family residence in<br />

Australia and with managerial and professional parental<br />

occupation: they were more strongly associated with<br />

concurrent scholastic achievement, particularly in<br />

biology. UMAT Book 2 scores had no conspicuous<br />

association with any of our demographic or scholastic<br />

variables, nor with selection interview scores. UMAT<br />

Book 3 scores most strongly associated with scholastic<br />

achievement in physics.<br />

2H3 Can we make the interview add<br />

something new?<br />

P Hughes, S Miller*, P McCrorie and A Kent<br />

Department of Psychiatry, St George’s Hospital Medical School,<br />

Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK<br />

There is evidence that in selecting for complex task<br />

performance the best predictor is some measure of IQ.<br />

A structured interview may add a useful degree of<br />

prediction. It is important, however, to ensure that the<br />

interview does not simply re-assess intelligence. We<br />

used a two-stage process to select for our Graduate<br />

Entry <strong>Programme</strong>. The GAMSAT assesses reasoning<br />

in sciences and humanities and writing ability. Highest<br />

scoring applicants were invited for interview. We<br />

devised an interview with high face-validity and<br />

reduced opportunity for bias by blinding interviewers<br />

to social and academic variables, and by introducing<br />

structured objective criteria. The interview appeared<br />

acceptable to interviewers and candidates. We<br />

demonstrated that performance at interview did not<br />

correlate with recent or previous academic performance<br />

so was adding something to academic assessment.<br />

Follow up of successful candidates will address the<br />

important question of the predictive validity of this<br />

selection process.<br />

2H4 Relative effects of learning style,<br />

MCAT and prior academic record<br />

on performance in medical school<br />

Stephen Aaron* and Ernest Skakun<br />

Department of Rheumatology, 562 Heritage Medical Research<br />

Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta,<br />

Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, CANADA<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.14 -<br />

Several studies have demonstrated that previous<br />

academic record does not fully predict success in<br />

medical school. We hypothesized that student learning<br />

styles would also correlate with medical school grades,<br />

independently of MCAT or prior academic record. We<br />

correlated learning style to marks in our largest and<br />

most integrated first year course (in Cardiology,<br />

Pulmonology and Nephrology, CPN), using the ASSIST<br />

instrument. Negative correlation was found between<br />

CPN and surface learning style (SL) assessed after the<br />

course was completed (r = -.247, p = .038). Significant<br />

correlation was also found between CPN and student<br />

MCAT results (r = .263, p = .027), but not to grades<br />

prior to medical school admission (GPA). There was<br />

no correlation between SL and MCAT (r = .053).<br />

Correlation between SL and CPN was independent of<br />

MCAT or GPA. We conclude that learning style is<br />

predictive of medical school grades independently of<br />

prior academic record.<br />

2H5 The selection of GP trainees in<br />

the West Midlands: audit of<br />

assessment centre scores by<br />

ethnic background and country<br />

of qualification<br />

Celia Brown*, Sarah Wakefield and Alison Bullock<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

The new centralised system of selecting GP trainees in<br />

the West Midlands aims to be fair and nondiscriminatory<br />

in the processes of recruiting the most<br />

suitable candidates, and allocating the successful<br />

candidates to their preferred posts. This paper provides<br />

an audit of the achievements of all the candidates in<br />

the October 2000 selection round. The data are<br />

examined with respect to candidates’ ethnic<br />

background and their country of qualification. Two<br />

levels of analysis are possible, based on average<br />

‘success’ or placement rates, and average scores<br />

achieved at each stage of the selection process. The<br />

analysis suggests that white candidates, and those<br />

qualifying in the UK, are more likely to succeed in the<br />

selection process. Possible explanations are offered<br />

from a more detailed interrogation of the selection<br />

criteria. Finally, the implications for the next selection<br />

round are discussed in the light of these findings.<br />

2H6 The selection of GP trainees:<br />

perceptions of the new regional<br />

system<br />

Sarah Wakefield*, Celia Brown and Alison Bullock<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

A new regional system of selecting GP trainees has<br />

been introduced in the West Midlands, replacing<br />

selection by individual GP practices. Perceptions of the<br />

regional system amongst key stakeholders were<br />

explored as part of a larger study evaluating the West<br />

Midlands selection procedures in October 2000. Data<br />

were collected by interview (with organisers, GP<br />

trainers, assessors and candidates) and questionnaire


(to candidates: 46% response rate). The analysis<br />

revealed that the new process was viewed positively,<br />

with particular praise for the role-play assessment and<br />

the inclusion of a lay-person on the interview panels.<br />

Many thought that the new system was fairer than the<br />

old. Concerns were expressed that the process was<br />

impersonal, and that candidates had less control over<br />

their choice of practice location. The implications for<br />

future selection rounds, and for other regions<br />

considering regional selection systems, will be explored<br />

in the presentation.<br />

2H7 “I want to become a doctor.”<br />

Analysis of first year students’<br />

motivations<br />

M F Patrício* and J Gomes-Pedro<br />

Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, University of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, Piso 1, 1649-028 Lisboa Codex, PORTUGAL<br />

The psychological and cultural basis for career choice<br />

is a poorly researched subject. The objectives of the<br />

present study were to identify, after 6 months in Medical<br />

School, the reasons why students decided to be a doctor<br />

and whether they would make the same choice again<br />

Session 2I Educating the educators (1)<br />

2I1 Evaluation of a Train the Trainers<br />

program in quality improvement<br />

and cost-effectiveness<br />

Antoinette S Peters*, Maryjoan Ladden and Robert<br />

Fletcher<br />

Department of Ambulatory Care & Prevention, Harvard Medical<br />

School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, 126 Brookline Avenue,<br />

Boston, MA 02215, USA<br />

A 4-month program was developed to teach community<br />

and academic physicians how to teach “managing care”<br />

competencies, especially quality improvement and<br />

cost-effectiveness. Interactive and didactic methods<br />

were used to teach the competencies, learning theory,<br />

and evaluation; different pedagogical methods were<br />

also modeled. Participants submitted a project plan,<br />

attended two 2-day workshops with a partner, revised<br />

their plans, and practised new methods at their home<br />

institutions. Ratings of their own knowledge of quality<br />

improvement and cost-effectiveness increased<br />

significantly. Knowledge of traditionally taught<br />

content, such as prevention and patient-doctor<br />

communication, was not affected. Participants’ ratings<br />

of their skill in teaching using different methods and<br />

in developing and evaluating teaching innovations<br />

increased significantly. There was smaller change in<br />

self-ratings of skill in giving a lecture, precepting in<br />

the office, and teaching at the bedside than in leading<br />

interactive large groups, giving feedback, or tutoring<br />

small groups.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.15 -<br />

given a second opportunity. First year students (n=153)<br />

were asked to complete an open-ended questionnaire.<br />

Protocols were treated through content analysis<br />

technique. The study found that students made their<br />

professional choice mainly for:<br />

• altruistic motivation or social desirability: help<br />

people 75% / useful to society 24%;<br />

• self motivations: loving medicine 29%, safe career<br />

22%, personal achievement 17%, lack of routine<br />

8%, prestige/status 7%, child dream 4%, family<br />

tradition 3%.<br />

After 6 months when asked if they confirm their initial<br />

choice:<br />

• 39% confirm it enthusiastically<br />

• 51% just confirm<br />

• 8% hesitate<br />

• 2% do not confirm.<br />

Correlations between the reasons underlying the<br />

professional option and the degree of enthusiasm will<br />

be explored. Implications for the student selection<br />

process will be presented.<br />

2I2 Teaching the Medical Teachers<br />

Beyond ‘TIPS’<br />

Jane Richardson* and Jonathan D Cartledge<br />

University College London, 4th Floor, Holburn Union Building,<br />

The Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

Since 1999, 30 ‘TIPS’ courses have been run at<br />

RF&UCMS. The results of post course questionnaires<br />

obtained from 256 (70%) of 366 participants informed<br />

the development of further courses. Participant<br />

identified areas for further training were: Clinical and<br />

bedside teaching; One to one teaching; Teaching larger<br />

groups; Presentation skills; Group dynamics and small<br />

groups. As a result of this feedback three follow up<br />

courses have been designed and piloted. The “TIPS”<br />

name was maintained because of the positive<br />

association. “TIPS 2” focuses on clinical/bedside<br />

teaching and student and course factors affecting<br />

learning. “TIPS 3” focuses on large group teaching and<br />

presentation skills. “TIPS 4” focuses on small group<br />

teaching and facilitation skills. “Microteaching”, voted<br />

the most helpful aspect of TIPS 1, has been retained as<br />

an opportunity for individualised feedback and putting<br />

theory into practice. Full details of objectives, content,<br />

teaching plans and feedback for these courses will be<br />

presented.


2I3 Formal courses in further training<br />

of medical teachers<br />

M Vrcic-Keglevic*, Z Jaksic, G Pavlekovic, N Pokrajac, A<br />

Smalcelj and B Vrhovac<br />

“A.Stampar” School of Public Health, Medical School, University<br />

of Zagreb, Rockefellerova 4, 10000 Zagreb, CROATIA<br />

The Croatian Association of Medical Education has<br />

been organising two types of attitudes aimed at further<br />

training of medical teachers; interactive workshops for<br />

experienced and formal courses for less experienced<br />

teachers of one week duration. The main aim of the<br />

formal courses is to help young teachers acquire basic<br />

pedagogical knowledge, skills and attitudes. Therefore,<br />

the following items have been covered: a psychology<br />

of learning; the principles of adult learning; curriculum<br />

development; giving a lecture, clinical teaching and<br />

tutorials; working in a small group; use of educational<br />

tools; and current developments in medical education.<br />

Special interest is paid on development of education<br />

methods, planning a timetable, defining the methods<br />

of evaluation and assessment. Since active learning is<br />

the most important, work in a small group, on individual<br />

projects and at plenary discussions occupy most of the<br />

time. Assessment consists of three parts: pre-course,<br />

written essay and MCQ, post-course MCQ, and<br />

preparation and presentation of an educational module.<br />

The participants are provided with a CME diploma in<br />

medical education - an important prerequisite for a<br />

teacher’s advancement.<br />

2I4 Supporting Clinicians on Training<br />

in Scotland<br />

Rose Martin, on behalf of Supporting Clinicians on<br />

Training in Scotland Working Group<br />

SCPMDE, Postgraduate Office, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and<br />

Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK<br />

A successful collaboration between Scottish Council<br />

for Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education<br />

(SCPMDE) and the Scottish Royal Colleges has<br />

resulted in the development of a Scottish based course<br />

to support clinical trainers. The SCOTS Course<br />

(Supporting Clinicians on Training in Scotland) is<br />

unique in its content, providing instruction on<br />

assessment and appraisal, skills training, teaching and<br />

training method, reflective practice, objective setting<br />

and a strategy to manage poor performance, delivered<br />

using many teaching styles. This two-day intensive<br />

course is aimed primarily at Consultant Educational<br />

Supervisors, and it is hoped that it will be delivered to<br />

Specialist Registrars in early 2001 in a modular format.<br />

It is designed to enable trainers to provide an effective<br />

educational experience for their trainees. The positive<br />

evaluations of the course and the plan to run ten SCOTS<br />

Courses in Scotland in 2001 will ensure its position in<br />

the innovative field of Medical Education. The initiative<br />

and its evaluation will be presented in depth and its<br />

effectiveness in relation to practice will be discussed.<br />

2I5 Improving own teaching skills<br />

identified as a top priority by<br />

Registrars<br />

Iwona Stolarek<br />

Hutt Hospital, Private Bag, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.16 -<br />

In order to ascertain the educational needs of Medical<br />

Registrars, a questionnaire study was carried out at Hutt<br />

Hospital. This was to allow the development of an<br />

educational programme to address these specifically.<br />

The 12 registrars were sent a 7-point questionnaire. 11/<br />

12 (92%) responded with the non-responder being a<br />

locum UK doctor. Ninety percent of the respondents<br />

were aiming at a hospital consultant career and 82%<br />

were currently sitting higher exams. None had<br />

educational supervisors though 82% felt these would<br />

be useful and were keen to develop log-books or<br />

learning diaries. In terms of learning need priorities,<br />

help with teaching skills was ranked the number one<br />

priority along with both exam practice and presentation<br />

skills by 82% of the registrars. This small pilot study<br />

has shown that junior doctors rate help in improving<br />

their teaching skills as highly as exam passes.<br />

2I6 Dissemination of teaching of<br />

medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination in Japan<br />

N Ban*, M Hatao, J Ohtaki, M Fujisaki, C Nakamura, T<br />

Tsuda, T Matsumura and M Shimo<br />

Nagoya University School of Medicine, Department of General<br />

Medicine, Place 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-<br />

8560, JAPAN<br />

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects<br />

of the nationwide faculty development workshop,<br />

sponsored by the Japan Society of Medical Education,<br />

on the teaching of medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination in Japanese medical schools. A<br />

questionnaire was sent to all 94 medical educators from<br />

54 of the 80 Japanese medical schools that participated<br />

in the workshop in 1996, 1997 and 1998. The response<br />

rate was 77.8%. Thirty schools (71.4%) reported<br />

substantial curriculum changes in interviewing and 29<br />

schools (69.1%) in physical examination courses. Out<br />

of 25 Japanese medical schools where standardized<br />

patients (SP) are currently used, 16 (64%) started to<br />

use SP as a result of the workshop. Among 24 schools<br />

that currently use Objective Structured Clinical<br />

Examination (OSCE), 18 (75%) initiated OSCE after<br />

the workshop. The faculty development workshop on<br />

teaching medical interviewing and physical<br />

examination is helping to change undergraduate<br />

medical education in Japan.<br />

2I7 Transformational learning in a peer<br />

teaching programme<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alexandra Blanco and Soledad Campos<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Students’ personal attitudes towards learning after their<br />

participation in a programme of teaching skills for 21<br />

medical students acting as peer teachers are described.<br />

After completing the program we analysed data from<br />

four different areas: identification of teaching<br />

difficulties, perceived personal changes, change in<br />

studying approaches and the ability to understand<br />

faculty’s actions. The difficulty in facing their peer<br />

students, and to adapt to the role of a teacher with their


peers; the increased ability to work successfully in a<br />

team, and to become self confident, and improve their<br />

own learning skills (which led to better grades in their<br />

exams); and an increased understanding of their own<br />

faculty’s actions were the more important changes they<br />

- 4.17 -<br />

mentioned. These data, despite the small number of<br />

students, show that our students have not only acquired<br />

pedagogical skills, but they have gone through a<br />

personal transformational learning experience.<br />

Session 2J Simulation and clinical skills training<br />

2J1 Teaching clinical skills to medical<br />

students using the clinical skills<br />

laboratory with a new simulator and<br />

new tools<br />

I Yoshida*, T Ueno, M Hotta, H Abe, I Kubara, S Kono, Y<br />

Ogo, S Watanabe, A Hayashi, T Akagi, S Okuda and M<br />

Sata (Working Group on teaching basic clinical skills)<br />

Office of Medical Education, Kurume University, School of<br />

Medicine, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume 830 0011, JAPAN<br />

The objective of the study was to evaluate the usefulness<br />

of the clinical skills laboratory (CSL) to learn basic<br />

clinical skills. The CSL was introduced to medical<br />

students to learn the medical interview, physical<br />

examination, resuscitation and X-ray film reading. A<br />

questionnaire was sent to the students. The results<br />

showed that the CSL was useful to 61% of the students;<br />

especially the new cardiology patient simulator “Ichiro”<br />

was appreciated by 90% of the medical students.<br />

2J2 Training in vaginal examination<br />

technique using the ‘epelvis’<br />

C M Pugh* and M S Marsh<br />

GKT Medical School, Academic Department of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynaecology, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, King’s College Hospital,<br />

Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK<br />

Undergraduate medical students find it increasingly<br />

difficult to learn the technique of vaginal examination<br />

(VE) using real patients. A pelvic mannequin has been<br />

developed which incorporates pressure sensors over<br />

important points within the pelvis, eg. the uterine<br />

fundus, cervix and ovaries. These sensors enable the<br />

duration and magnitude of pressure applied to parts of<br />

the pelvic organs during a pelvic examination to be<br />

measured and stored electronically. The data can be<br />

represented visually and may be seen by the student<br />

during the examination as an aid to teaching. A large<br />

database of “epelvis” examinations from vaginal<br />

examinations by undergraduates and postgraduates has<br />

been collected. The epelvis has considerable potential<br />

for the training and assessment of vaginal examination.<br />

2J3 Training medical students to<br />

perform vaginal examination using<br />

the ‘epelvis’<br />

M S Marsh* and C M Pugh<br />

GKT Medical School, Academic Department of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynaecology, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, King’s College Hospital,<br />

Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK<br />

We have examined medical student training in vaginal<br />

examination (VE) using a pelvic mannequin (“epelvis”)<br />

incorporating pressure transducers, enabling online<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

visual feedback of the pelvic areas examined. 74<br />

students underwent a test of VE using three pelvic<br />

models, followed by epelvis training, followed by<br />

testing using two other pelvic models. Before testing<br />

33% had performed >5 VEs on subjects and 55% had<br />

used a pelvic mannequin. The number of previous VEs<br />

or mannequin training was unrelated to the ability to<br />

estimate the size of the uterus correctly in pre-training<br />

tests. There was no improvement in ability to determine<br />

the size of the uterus after training in the whole group.<br />

However, in those students that had performed >5 VEs<br />

prior to testing, those able to judge uterine size correctly<br />

rose from 66% to 92% (P


programmatic evaluations. More innovative approaches<br />

such as incorporating both technological and human<br />

simulation in a multi-modal learning experience, and<br />

implementing an OSCE that serves both a needs and<br />

outcome assessment purpose (measuring consistency<br />

in learning across multiple clerkship sites in order to<br />

direct specific educational interventions) will be<br />

described.<br />

2J6 Using scenario based teaching to<br />

deliver feedback on technical and<br />

communication skills<br />

R L Kneebone*, J Kidd, D Nestel, B Paraskeva, S Asvall<br />

and A Darzi<br />

Academic Surgical Unit and, Department of Cognitive<br />

Neuroscience & Behaviour, Imperial College School of Medicine,<br />

10th Floor QEQM, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK<br />

- 4.18 -<br />

Technical skills and communication skills are<br />

inseparable in clinical practice but are often taught in<br />

isolation. Skills labs commonly use benchtop models<br />

for teaching core skills, but often away from their<br />

clinical context. Our solution bridges this gap by linking<br />

standardised patients (SPs) and inanimate models<br />

within a structured learning framework. Students work<br />

within a ‘safe zone’ to practise technical skills without<br />

jeopardising patient safety. They talk and listen to their<br />

‘patient’ (the SP) while carrying out procedures (e.g.<br />

wound closure, urinary catheterisation) in realistic<br />

clinical scenarios. Procedures are observed by tutors<br />

and simultaneously videotaped. After each procedure,<br />

the student writes down personal reflections, then tutors<br />

and SPs provide verbal feedback on salient points. Each<br />

student reviews their videotape, using formative rating<br />

scales to assess technical and communication skills.<br />

Qualitative data from 35 undergraduate medical<br />

students will be presented to outline the development<br />

of this approach to giving feedback.<br />

Session 2K Students and curriculum evaluation<br />

2K1 Teaching quality questionnaire:<br />

students’ evaluations of standard<br />

learning activities in an integrated<br />

curriculum<br />

Øyvind Ellingsen*, Kristin Wigen and Are Holen<br />

Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Department of<br />

Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Medical Technical<br />

Center, NO-7489 Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

Sound evaluation routines are important to improve the<br />

standard of medical education. In an integrated<br />

curriculum it is often useful to evaluate individual<br />

clinics, seminars or lectures rather than large blocks of<br />

learning activities. We therefore developed a<br />

questionnaire to assess the quality of standard learning<br />

activities such as clinics, lectures, seminars and<br />

workshops. The students rated all presentations on five<br />

items, including structure and illustrations, oral<br />

presentation, dialog with students, relevance according<br />

to stage of study and future profession and inspiration<br />

for further studying, using a 1-5-9 scale. In evaluations<br />

of 125 learning activities by 43 first year medical<br />

students the five items clustered into one single factor,<br />

representing overall teaching quality. The teaching<br />

quality score identified 6 learning activities that<br />

required revision (mean score


placement. 13% of students are concerned that their<br />

evaluation will affect their grades. We will discuss the<br />

implication of these findings on the procedures for<br />

collecting attributable evaluation material.<br />

2K4 Student evaluation of educational<br />

quality: the construction of a<br />

multidimensional questionnaire<br />

Volkhard Fischer<br />

Hannover Medical School, OE 9103, Rectors Office, 30623<br />

Hannover, GERMANY<br />

Educational quality is a complex construct. Marsh has<br />

developed a differentiated questionnaire for student<br />

evaluations of educational quality which is widely<br />

accepted. Our 37-item questionnaire is a localized<br />

version of this general questionnaire (SEEQ) adapted<br />

for the evaluation of medical courses in Germany. The<br />

items concerning the factor work load were formulated<br />

as bipolar questions on seven-point scales. The<br />

midpoint was labeled “appropriate”. The other items<br />

had a unipolar format with six grades from “not true”<br />

to “true” and an extra checkbox “does not apply”. The<br />

global rating of the course had to be made on a 16point<br />

Likert scale. The theoretical model was tested in<br />

a confirmatory factor analysis for the whole sample<br />

and several evaluative factor analyses for selected<br />

courses. Discrepancies between the theoretical model<br />

and the empirical results were discussed and integrated<br />

into an exploratory model.<br />

2K5 Evaluation of lectures in medical<br />

teaching based on focal groups<br />

and a survey of opinion to<br />

formulate a guide of practical<br />

recommendations<br />

Juan Cristóbal Maass, Lorena Tapia, Marcela Jacard, and<br />

Teresa Millán<br />

Depto. de Pediatría y Cirugía Infantil, Facultad de Medicina,<br />

Universidad de Chile<br />

In spite of new tendencies, in Chile lectures are mainly<br />

used in medical teaching. Our objective was to find<br />

out students’ opinions about aspects that influence<br />

quality of lectures, with the purpose of formulating a<br />

guide of practical recommendations (GPR). A survey<br />

was designed based on focal groups and applied to 181<br />

5th year students. We evaluated different aspects of<br />

lectures (teacher; content, dynamics and structure;<br />

support material; and atmosphere). Of 113 students<br />

interviewed, 96.4% think that it would be useful to have<br />

a GPR for lecturers. Positive practical aspects of lectures<br />

highlighted were: delivery of lecture notes (93.8%); to<br />

give practical details (98.2%); and to give a summary<br />

(94.5%). Among negatives: that lectures were carried<br />

out in the afternoon (94.6%); lasted longer than<br />

foreseen (94.7%); and small fonts were used in<br />

projection (92.9%). We intend to discuss this guide<br />

based on the opinions obtained, showing aspects not<br />

traditionally considered.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.19 -<br />

2K6 Use of a Continuous Quality<br />

Improvement (CQI) model to<br />

enhance curriculum evaluation and<br />

integration<br />

Nehad El-Sawi<br />

University of Health Sciences, 1750 Independence Avenue,<br />

Kansas City, MO 64106, USA<br />

Course evaluation is one of the corner stones for the<br />

documentation of the educational process quality. CQI<br />

is a process of constructive self study that encourages<br />

participation of all students and faculty in order to<br />

maximize the benefit of the evaluation process. Eight<br />

essential activities involved in course delivery are<br />

identified. A written survey is designed to evaluate<br />

these activities. The survey is administered at the end<br />

of each course and the entire class results are tabulated<br />

as the comprehensive evaluation. Students are assigned<br />

to CQI teams before each course begins and are<br />

responsible for reviewing the comprehensive<br />

evaluation, drafting a one-page consensus report,<br />

prioritizing improvements that could enhance student<br />

learning and presenting the report to faculty and<br />

curriculum committee. The CQI evaluation model<br />

produced a more effective, meaningful and constructive<br />

evaluation while building interdisciplinary team skills<br />

and professional behavior among medical students.<br />

2K7 New faculty-level self-evaluation<br />

instruments<br />

K Lonka*, N Paganus, T Hatonen, A Heikkila, J Vainio<br />

and J Nieminen<br />

University of Helsinki, Leiviskatie 2 E 64, Fin-00440 Helsinki,<br />

FINLAND<br />

The Faculty of Medicine at the University of Helsinki<br />

began to evaluate and reform its curriculum of medical<br />

studies in 1994. This process resulted in Helsinki 2000,<br />

a hybrid-PBL curriculum, which was introduced in<br />

1998. A systematic programme was also integrated to<br />

support students’ personal growth and to advance their<br />

communication and thinking skills, called Professional<br />

Growth of Medical Students.<br />

In order to see how well these reforms have been<br />

implemented, we developed a set of evaluation<br />

instruments. Questionnaires and observation methods<br />

were applied for both students and teachers. The data<br />

are extensive, and some examples are presented here.<br />

The final goal is to finish a self-evaluation report for<br />

the international evaluation of all studies and<br />

programmes of the University of Helsinki, which will<br />

take place in the years 2001-<strong>2002</strong>.<br />

2K8 The doctors’ opinion - a national<br />

evaluation of Swedish medical<br />

education<br />

Anders Bengtsson, Kerstin Johansson and Sara Engstrom*<br />

Swedish Medical Association, Sveriges Lakarforbund, PO Box<br />

5610, S-11486 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN<br />

In autumn 2000, the Swedish Medical Association sent<br />

out a questionnaire in order to evaluate Swedish medical<br />

education. Junior doctors were asked to assess medical<br />

education in relation to the declared objectives. They


were also asked whether they thought the objectives<br />

were relevant. The questionnaire was sent to all 743<br />

members who had been registered in 1999 (they had<br />

been working for approximately 3-4 years). More than<br />

90% replied to the questionnaire. This is the first time<br />

a survey including all doctors from all six universities<br />

Session 2L Multiprofessional education<br />

2L1 Interprofessional learning: the New<br />

Generation Project<br />

Debra Humphris* and Chris Stephens*<br />

The Department of Medical Education, Office of School of<br />

Medicine, University of Southampton, MP 801 Level C, South<br />

Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton,<br />

SO16 6DY, UK<br />

At the University of Southampton the undergraduate<br />

BM course takes place within a multiprofessional<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences,<br />

which includes the School of Nursing and Midwifery,<br />

the School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation<br />

Sciences and the School of Biological Sciences. The<br />

rich mix of professional programmes within the Faculty<br />

has led over the past decade to numerous developments<br />

in interprofessional learning and practice. The Faculty’s<br />

commitment to building on its experience of<br />

interprofessional learning is reflected in its strategic<br />

plan, and the establishment of the New Generation<br />

Project. This bold project will enable the Faculty to<br />

demonstrate its contribution to the modernisation of<br />

education and training for the health and social care<br />

workforce. The process of these changes within a large<br />

educational organisation will be explored and<br />

discussed.<br />

2L2 “Walking in the moccasins of<br />

others”: reflections on a new<br />

initiative to bring the real world of the<br />

patient into the medical curriculum<br />

Lyn Brown<br />

University of Liverpool, Community Studies Unit, Department<br />

of Primary Care, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill,<br />

Liverpool L59 3GB, UK<br />

Community Placements are an essential feature of the<br />

Liverpool University Undergraduate Medical<br />

Curriculum. They are designed to give students contact<br />

with all aspects of health and medicine outside the<br />

immediate confines of hospital and general practice.<br />

During second year, placement in community health<br />

services, statutory and voluntary social work agencies,<br />

and supervised University based groups, provide<br />

excellent learning opportunities that complement other<br />

aspects of the students’ learning. Without diminishing<br />

the bio-medical approach to health-care, placements<br />

enhance the students’ learning by developing a broader<br />

view of health and disease that includes psychological<br />

and socio-economic factors. This would seem to offer<br />

students wider options in management of ill-health and<br />

disability; effecting involvement with, and better long<br />

term care of, their patients. This paper describes the<br />

methods, evaluations and outcomes set in place to<br />

achieve the above.<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.20 -<br />

has been carried out. The survey is intended to be<br />

carried out annually, thus providing a series of results<br />

at national level, as well as an impact assessment of<br />

the new curricula which are being implemented in<br />

Swedish medical schools. The results will be presented<br />

at the conference.<br />

2L3 Multiprofessional education in<br />

health care ethics in Germany<br />

Jochen Vollmann<br />

Freie Universitat <strong>Berlin</strong>, Arbeitsgruppe Ethik in der Medizin,<br />

Institut fur Geschichte der Medizin, Klingsorstr. 119, D-12203<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

In Germany only very limited practical experience and<br />

knowledge in teaching of medical ethics and ethics of<br />

health care is available. German medical schools do<br />

not offer regular ethics teaching, whereas the<br />

“Reformstudiengang Medizin” at the Charité in <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

provides some teaching blocks in medical ethics.<br />

Graduate ethics training in nursing sciences, public<br />

health and social work varies widely. Since 1995 the<br />

author teaches ethics to medical students as well as<br />

students in public health, nursing and social work at<br />

various universities in <strong>Berlin</strong> and the U.S. In this short<br />

communication preliminary data from a 5 year pilot<br />

study are presented. Different demands, approaches and<br />

evaluation results of ethics teaching in the different<br />

professional graduate courses are presented. Pro and<br />

cons of ethics teaching in the various professional<br />

programs are compared with the multiprofessional<br />

approaches in the <strong>Berlin</strong> program of public health and<br />

at the Evangelische Fachhochschule <strong>Berlin</strong>.<br />

2L4 Dilemmas in resuscitation: nursing<br />

and medical students’ responses to<br />

ethical professional issues related<br />

to resuscitation of patients<br />

C Edward*, J Crosby and P E Preece*<br />

University of Dundee, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tayside<br />

Campus, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

At the University of Dundee a three hour teaching<br />

session involving 280+ nursing and medical students<br />

took place in 1999. The aim was to enable the students<br />

to explore and debate, together, the ethical/professional<br />

issues inherent within resuscitation. An automated<br />

audience response test containing 5 set questions was<br />

given to the students immediately pre/post the session.<br />

Two significantly different responses were related to:<br />

• Who should have the major say in advanced<br />

decisions of resuscitation? (Doctor, Nurse, Patient,<br />

Relatives, Team). Team-Pre: Nursing 66% Medical<br />

78%. Post: Nursing 97% Medical 89%.<br />

• Should close relatives be permitted to witness<br />

resuscitation? Permit-Pre: Nursing 63% Medical<br />

12%; Post: Nursing 55% (still permit) Medical 29%<br />

(now in favour).


Analyses were by Wilcoxon and Mann-U-Whitney<br />

tests. Written comments from students were<br />

encouraging and in 2000 the topic of resuscitation was<br />

established as part of each student programme for third<br />

year nursing/medical students.<br />

2L5 Promoting the use of clinical<br />

guidelines in Scotland<br />

Bernice West* and Peter Wimpenny*<br />

Robert Gordon University, Centre for Nurse Practice Research<br />

and Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Northern<br />

College, E Block, Hilton Drive, Aberdeen AB24 4FP, UK<br />

The initiative was funded by the National Board for<br />

Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting for Scotland<br />

and jointly managed by the Centre for Nurse Practice<br />

Research and Development at the Robert Gordon<br />

University, Aberdeen and The Royal College of Nursing<br />

Institute. The initiative’s aims were to increase nurses’<br />

knowledge and skills in using clinical guidelines. The<br />

initiative clearly demonstrated the need for<br />

multiprofessional involvement in all aspects of clinical<br />

guidelines. The educational approach comprised:<br />

• Identifying a Local Facilitator;<br />

• Introducing key skills for multiprofessional<br />

guideline implementation through five Open/<br />

Distance Learning modules covering guideline<br />

choice, appraisal, implementation strategies and<br />

evaluation;<br />

• Supporting Local Facilitators by: (1) regular contact<br />

with education providers, (2) problem solving group<br />

work at workshops, (3) provision of a buddy who<br />

has clinical and/or change management expertise.<br />

Implementing clinical guidelines is a complex activity<br />

that demands multiprofessional education and<br />

intervention. Recommendations for such provision will<br />

be presented.<br />

2L6 Can Neuropsychiatry training be<br />

successfully delivered in a multiprofessional<br />

setting?<br />

Andrew Parkin* and Nisha Dogra<br />

University of Leicester, Greenwood Institute of Child Health,<br />

Westcotes House, Westcotes Drive, Leicester LE2 1SF, UK<br />

Session 2M Student support/psychiatry and the curriculum<br />

2M1 An evaluation of student support<br />

systems at the Medical School at<br />

Queen’s University Belfast<br />

Nicola Wilson, David McCluskey and Mairead Boohan*<br />

Queen’s University of Belfast, Medical Education Unit, Room<br />

145 Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9<br />

7DL, UK<br />

The Faculty Tutorial Scheme at the Medical School at<br />

Queen’s University Belfast was established in 1984 to<br />

provide pastoral support for students. During 1999<br />

qualitative and quantitative research techniques were<br />

used to evaluate this support mechanism. Questionnaire<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.21 -<br />

A half-day training course on epilepsy in child mental<br />

health was devised for a multi-professional audience.<br />

Evaluation included delegates’ self-reported<br />

knowledge, attitudes, and perception of the course. 83<br />

professionals attended, representing related disciplines.<br />

81 completed a pre-, 73 a feedback, 65 a post-, and 18<br />

an eight-month follow-up questionnaire. Most reported<br />

the learning objectives to be clear (85%) and met (80%),<br />

the course was structured to facilitate learning (78%),<br />

links were made with clinical practice (78%), and they<br />

had questioned their own practice as a result (72%).<br />

Correct responses to knowledge questions rose (56%<br />

to 91%), incorrect (7% to


suggest that while this scheme was seen as innovative<br />

it still has limitations.<br />

2M2 Is student abuse a problem in our<br />

medical school?<br />

Ana Maida*, Alicia Vasquez, José Calderon, Viviana<br />

Herskovic, Marcela Jacard, Ana Pereira and Lars Widdel<br />

University of Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile,<br />

Departamento de Pediatría, Campus Oriente, Casilla 16117,<br />

Correo 9, Providencia, Santiago, CHILE<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine the<br />

incidence, and the consequences, of abusive situations<br />

as perceived by students during the course of their<br />

Medical training. A descriptive study was made<br />

surveying the entire 2000 fifth year class in the Medical<br />

School of the University of Chile. The questionnaire<br />

was answered by 144 students. Results showed that<br />

91.7% of the students had suffered at least one episode<br />

of abuse while enrolled in Medical School. Main<br />

offenders were teachers and peers. Verbal abuse was<br />

the most common (85.4%), followed by psychological<br />

(79.9%), sexual (26.4%) and physical (23.6%) abuse.<br />

Students reported that abuse had effects on their mental<br />

health, social life and the image they had of physicians;<br />

17% considered dropping out of school as a<br />

consequence of this experience. The high proportion<br />

of teachers involved in situations perceived as abusive<br />

by students should prompt educators to reflect on their<br />

role.<br />

2M3 First year medical, nursing and<br />

pharmacy students’ approaches to<br />

study<br />

R J Lamdin* and I Martin<br />

9A Sentinel Road, Herne Bay, Auckland, NEW ZEALAND<br />

The Approaches to Study Inventory (ASI) was<br />

administered to first year health sciences students prior<br />

to course commencement at the University of<br />

Auckland.This was to aid understanding of approaches<br />

to study in a large multi-professional first year<br />

programme. Prior to 1999 medical students in the<br />

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences were taught a<br />

unique course but as of 2000, nursing and pharmacy<br />

students were admitted to new nursing and pharmacy<br />

programmes. In the first year, medical, nursing,<br />

pharmacy and general health science students share<br />

common courses. Each group of students is admitted<br />

via different admission systems and goes on to complete<br />

different programmes of study. This project describes<br />

the learning styles of the first year students using the<br />

ASI and considers the importance of this knowledge<br />

in teaching. Consideration of gender and age<br />

differences and the possible effect of different<br />

admission systems will be undertaken.<br />

2M4 Changing medical students’<br />

attitudes towards homosexuality<br />

Itzchak Levi* and Tsvi Fischel<br />

Sackler Medical School, 13/2 Tsel Hagivaa, Ramat Gan, ISRAEL<br />

In many surveys it is found that many physicians hold<br />

negative attitudes towards homosexuality. In addition,<br />

due to negative experience many gay people feel<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.22 -<br />

uncomfortable to report to their physician about their<br />

sexual orientation. As well as the fact that gays have<br />

unique health conditions, they do not tend to share with<br />

their physician even their general health problems, and<br />

not even problems concerning preventive medicine. In<br />

view of the above, it is interesting that most medical<br />

schools do not include in their curriculum a place to<br />

teach “homosexuality”. Attitudes towards<br />

homosexuality can be changed through workshops and<br />

active learning. Two case studies were discussed and<br />

processed by medical students in their pre clinical<br />

studies as part of the behavioral sciences course. The<br />

students showed a high level of satisfaction. Case<br />

studies could be a useful tool to teach and experience<br />

attitudes towards gays and homosexuality in medical<br />

schools.<br />

2M5 The attitudes to Psychiatry of first<br />

year medical students<br />

R K Day<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Psychiatry, Level 5,<br />

Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

For over thirty years there has been evidence that<br />

psychiatry is viewed negatively by medical students.<br />

A number of self-report questionnaires of attitudes to<br />

psychiatry have been constructed, of which the most<br />

widely used is the ATP-30. The ATP-30 was<br />

administered to first year medical students on their first<br />

day of medical school to assess their initial attitudes. It<br />

was also administered to a first year science class. The<br />

ATP-30 was also modified to inquire about attitudes<br />

to gynaecology and this was completed by the new<br />

medical students. The attitudes of new medical students<br />

to psychiatry do not differ from those of science<br />

students. However, medical students view gynaecology<br />

more positively than they do psychiatry. Further studies<br />

are required to determine how this initially negative<br />

view of psychiatry is affected by the medical<br />

curriculum.<br />

2M6 Psychology basic and applied<br />

knowledge<br />

Agnete Langagergaard* and Berit Eika<br />

Unit of Medical Education, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst<br />

Boulevard 9, DK 8000 Aarhus, DENMARK<br />

In a new medical curriculum an innovative course of<br />

psychology was introduced, consisting of: (1) a short<br />

(20 hour) 3rd term course giving a factual knowledge<br />

base within the domain of psychology, and (2) a longer<br />

(4 weeks) 7th term course where the application of<br />

knowledge previously acquired is trained. The short<br />

course is lecture based and within the framework of<br />

developmental psychology. Each double lecture covers<br />

an age span thereby making sure that students become<br />

aware of general as well as of age specific psychological<br />

issues. In the latter course a case based teaching format<br />

helps students develop a systematic approach to<br />

psychological themes relevant to the medical<br />

profession. Clinical psychologists introduce students<br />

to themes such as anxiety, minority problems, and<br />

psychosomatic problems. Finally, in conjunction with<br />

the Department of Philosophy, a topic (eg. the dying<br />

patient) is chosen as a returning theme covered from<br />

different angles.


Session 3 Workshops 1<br />

3/1 The roles of the teacher<br />

Jennifer Laidlaw and E Anne Hesketh<br />

SCPMDE Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Background<br />

All doctors are teachers. It is a role that is constantly<br />

changing and is often a challenge for today’s doctors -<br />

especially with the many other tasks they have to carry<br />

out. This workshop gives the opportunity to explore<br />

the teaching roles and tasks that doctors might have to<br />

adopt whether they are doctors at the start of their<br />

postgraduate training or fully trained with a formal<br />

teaching responsibility.<br />

Aims<br />

The workshop aims to give insight into:<br />

the roles that today’s doctors, as clinical educators,<br />

have to adopt<br />

the associated tasks that they have to carry out<br />

the approaches to these tasks and the<br />

professionalism required of today’s educator .<br />

Who should attend<br />

Those involved in teaching in any capacity eg<br />

having to look after juniors, being a contributor to<br />

a course or a departmental teaching session, having<br />

formal supervision responsibilities, being a course<br />

organiser<br />

Those involved in identifying generic skills for the<br />

postgraduate training of doctors<br />

Note: This workshop is very similar to last year’s workshop<br />

‘12 roles of the teacher’ which was oversubscribed. Due to<br />

interest expressed it is being repeated in an extended format.<br />

Those attending last year would not gain further significant<br />

benefit from attending.<br />

Content and structure<br />

1 Introduction to roles (25 min): Ice breaker activity<br />

and short plenary with hand out;<br />

2 Tasks associated with roles (35 min): Group activity<br />

with feedback;<br />

3 A framework for identifying the competencies<br />

required by the clinical educator (15 min): Short<br />

plenary with time to study grid and make link to<br />

findings of previous group activity;<br />

4 Using the grid (35 min):Group activity with<br />

feedback;<br />

5 Courses in teaching from Dundee(10 min): Display<br />

of material from a ‘taster’ course through to a<br />

Diploma/Masters in Medical Education.<br />

3/2 The quality of medical education and<br />

teaching – thema con variatione<br />

Professor Peter Nippert<br />

University of Muenster, Germany<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.23 -<br />

3/3 From MD to academic teacher<br />

Professor Reinhard Putz<br />

University of Munich, Germany<br />

Background<br />

Medical education focusses on knowledge and abilities.<br />

Students are faced with a lot of information including<br />

general understanding of processes, differential<br />

diagnosis and therapeutic consequences. In most<br />

European universities, lectures, courses and practical<br />

exercises on patients are the preferred teaching<br />

elements. Some medical schools have changed to<br />

problem based learning (PBL). The effectiveness of the<br />

teaching depends on many aspects. One is the student/<br />

teacher ratio; another is the structure of the program.<br />

However, the education of the teacher is the last in this<br />

list. On the other hand, many studies show that the<br />

performance and personality of the teacher has the<br />

highest impact on the learning effect. This is especially<br />

true for lectures and teacher-guided courses, but also<br />

in PBL the tutor plays a crucial role in the learning<br />

process. In light of this it is surprising that academic<br />

teachers are not forced to undergo any kind of didactic<br />

training. Only few institutions offer a structured training<br />

program for young assistants.<br />

Aim<br />

One of the goals of the workshop is the preparation of<br />

participants for the role of academic teacher. The<br />

participants should leave the workshop with the insight<br />

that academic teaching can become an attractive<br />

challenge especially for scientific educated people.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The report of good and bad experiences should<br />

contribute to a picture of the present personal situation<br />

of teaching staff in many schools. Next, the needs for<br />

improvement will be addressed. Then a period of<br />

discussion in small groups is planned. In this part a<br />

particular teaching situation will be designed and<br />

structured: lecture for a large class (more than 100),<br />

lecture for a small class (ca. 40–80), seminar (10–20),<br />

course, PBL group. Back in the plenary, the results of<br />

the sections will be presented and discussed. The<br />

preparation for the requirements of an academic teacher<br />

should be the goal of this part followed by some<br />

suggestions for the structure of a training course for<br />

academic teachers.<br />

1 Plenary (ca. 20‘): Reflection on the personal state<br />

of teaching ability (advantages and shortcomings)<br />

2 Plenary (ca. 20‘): Description of necessary teaching<br />

abilities<br />

3 Groups (ca. 20‘): Structure of particular teaching<br />

situations (large lecture, small lecture, course,<br />

practical exercise, POL-group)<br />

4 Plenary (ca. 20‘): How to prepare an M.D. for<br />

education as an academic teacher<br />

5 Plenary (ca. 30‘): Elements of a training course for<br />

academic teachers .


3/4 Feedback and evaluation: essential<br />

activities in the learning process<br />

(helping students learn to seek<br />

continuing improvement - as<br />

students and career professionals)<br />

Dr Charles D Puglia,<br />

MCP Hahnemann School of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane,<br />

Philadelphia PA 19129, USA<br />

Background<br />

Fear, anxiety, and panic are common reactions to the<br />

suggestion that an individual is to receive feedback or<br />

evaluation of their work. Often, the perception that selfesteem<br />

is about to be threatened elicits a defensive<br />

barrier that interferes with communication of<br />

information which is intended to improve performance.<br />

This view of feedback, perceived as a painful process,<br />

has developed because of injurious methods of delivery<br />

of evaluative information beginning in childhood and<br />

in many cases continuing throughout a student’s formal<br />

educative experience. Feedback and evaluative<br />

information must be recognized as essential for an<br />

individual to succeed at self-directed learning. The<br />

learner must be encouraged to seek evaluative comment<br />

as a means of continuing intellectual growth and<br />

thereby enhancing self-esteem.<br />

Achievement of the objectives of all learning systems<br />

such as medical school curricula is dependent upon<br />

formative evaluation and feedback as well as summative<br />

evaluation. Evaluative methods are especially important<br />

in times when curricular change is introduced.<br />

Feedback and evaluation is necessary to aid faculty as<br />

well as students to clearly define the objectives of the<br />

change in terms of the ultimate goal of the curriculum.<br />

Aim of workshop<br />

This workshop will identify attitudes and techniques<br />

which faculty can adopt to enable feedback and<br />

evaluation to be delivered in a constructive, esteembuilding<br />

manner. Students will begin to actively seek<br />

feedback as an opportunity to continually improve and<br />

grow.<br />

3/5 Best Evidence Medical Education<br />

(BEME): progress report<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ian Hart<br />

BEME Collaboration (www.bemecollaboration.org)<br />

Background<br />

BEME is defined as: “The implementation by teachers<br />

and educational bodies in their practice, of methods<br />

and approaches to education based on the best evidence<br />

available.” In the three years since the <strong>AMEE</strong> Prague<br />

Conference, when the topic of BEME was raised, there<br />

has been much activity, leading to the formation of the<br />

BEME Collaboration in 1999. The Collaboration aims<br />

to promote a culture of the use of best evidence in<br />

medical and healthcare professions education, to carry<br />

out systematic reviews of the evidence and to<br />

dissemination information on best practice. A<br />

systematic review is defined as “A review of the<br />

evidence on a clearly formulated question that uses<br />

systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.24 -<br />

critically appraise relevant primary research, and to<br />

extract and analyse data from the studies that are<br />

included in the review. “ (NHS Centre for Reviews and<br />

Dissemination 2001).<br />

Several international Topic Review Groups have<br />

recently been formed to carry out pilot studies, prior<br />

to the commencement of systematic reviews of the<br />

evidence, in the following areas:<br />

1 The use of feedback in assessment;<br />

2 The use of high fidelity simulators as an aid to<br />

student learning<br />

3 Faculty development<br />

4 The use of computers in clinical education.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be conducted in plenary. First there<br />

will be a short introduction to familiarise participants<br />

with the issues. Presentations from each of the Topic<br />

Review Groups will follow, reporting on issues raised<br />

in the early stages of the pilot studies. These involve<br />

setting up the review groups, deciding on the research<br />

question to be examined, finding and judging the<br />

evidence and the format in which the evidence is to be<br />

presented. Where appropriate, an insight will be given<br />

by the group into the impressions of the data collected<br />

to date in each of the areas. The session will finish<br />

with an interactive discussion with the audience and it<br />

is envisaged that methodological issues will form a<br />

major part of the discussions.<br />

Prospective participants might like to refer to the BEME<br />

website to gain some insight into the project:<br />

www.bemecollaboration.org<br />

3/6 East European Task Force<br />

Chairperson: Professor Ioan Bocsan<br />

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine & Pharmacy, 13 Emil<br />

Isac St , RO-3400 Cluj-Napoca, Romania<br />

A review of some of the issues facing medical education<br />

in East and Central Europe, with contributions from<br />

participants.<br />

3/7 Making feedback during clerkships<br />

meaningful and effective: a workshop<br />

for students and teachers<br />

Dr Paul Hemmer<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones<br />

Bridge Road, Bethesda MD 20814, USA<br />

Background<br />

Medical students have concerns that the feedback they<br />

receive during clinical clerkships is sporadic, and that<br />

it varies in quality. Teachers are not always comfortable<br />

providing feedback, and may be uncertain of clerkship<br />

goals and expectations.<br />

Aims<br />

Participants will a) gain familiarity with the RIME<br />

descriptors, b) improve their ability to solicit and<br />

provide feedback, and c) discuss the potential for<br />

educational research.


Content and structure<br />

In this workshop, we will seek input from students and<br />

teachers about feedback during a clinical clerkship.<br />

From this discussion, we will present a framework of<br />

goals and expectations for medical students on clinical<br />

clerkships, known as RIME for Reporter-Interpreter-<br />

Manager/Educator. Using this framework, we will<br />

explore how students can self-assess their performance,<br />

and to use this as a means to solicit feedback from<br />

teachers. Teachers will be introduced to using RIME<br />

for evaluating students and subsequently providing<br />

feedback. We will use interactive discussion, role-play,<br />

and teaching cases.<br />

3/8 Concept mapping<br />

Dr Gonul Peker<br />

Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova 35100 Izmir, Turkey<br />

3/9 Effective student assessment:<br />

something old, something new<br />

Dr Geoff Norman<br />

McMaster University Medical School, Health Sciences Centre,<br />

1200 Main Street West, Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5, Canada<br />

Aims<br />

• To familiarise participants with reliability/validity<br />

of various tools;<br />

• To introduce some new promising approaches to<br />

assessment : Reasoning Exercise;<br />

• Key features; Clinical Work Sampling.<br />

Who should attend<br />

This workshop will be of interest to both clinical and<br />

pre-clinical teachers.<br />

Content and structure:<br />

1 Plenary session (1 hour): Ground rules; Review of<br />

various traditional methods; Introduction of new<br />

approaches<br />

2 Practice designing new approaches (1/2 hour)<br />

3 Discussion and conclusions (1/2 hour)<br />

Handouts will be provided.<br />

3/10 A bachelor-master structure of<br />

medical education in Europe?<br />

Professor Olle ten Cate<br />

University Medical Centre Utrecht and Professor Herman van<br />

Rossum, University of Groningen, Netherlands<br />

University Medical Centre Utrecht, P O Box 85060, 3508 AB<br />

Utrecht, Netherlands<br />

Background<br />

In 1999 the Ministers of Education of the European<br />

Union countries agreed upon the so-called Bologna<br />

Declaration. This agreement concerns the<br />

harmonization of higher education. One element is the<br />

restructuring education into two phases: a bachelor<br />

(undergraduate) phase of three years and a master<br />

(graduate) phase of one or two years. Major reasons to<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.25 -<br />

harmonize higher education include international<br />

comparability and enhancing exchange possibilities.<br />

In the Netherlands, several universities and vocational<br />

schools have started curricular changes to implement<br />

the new structure, preferably in 2003. Medical schools<br />

have been hesitant to adapt their curricula. A national<br />

project on The Continuum of Medical Training has been<br />

asked to first investigate the possibilities and<br />

desirability of this new structure. It may be contrary to<br />

current medical curriculum developments, as in<br />

innovative schools clinical education is gradually<br />

moving to early years of education and being integrated<br />

with basic sciences. The BaMa-structure may throw<br />

medical education back to a separation of basic and<br />

clinical sciences. However, medical education could<br />

become too isolated within the universities and and too<br />

little harmonized internationally, if is does not<br />

implement the structure.<br />

Content and structure<br />

In this workshop participants from different countries<br />

will be invited to (a) briefly discuss the current structure<br />

of medical training in their country in a structured<br />

format and (b) generate arguments pro and/or contra<br />

harmonization of medical education in Europe<br />

according to the Bologna Declaration.<br />

3/11 The assessment of poorly<br />

performing doctors: experiences<br />

from the first three years of the<br />

Performance Procedures within the<br />

UK General Medical Council<br />

Professor Lesley Southgate, CHIME, London<br />

Dr Peter McCrorie, St George’s Hospital Medical School<br />

CHIME, University College London Medical School, Archway<br />

Campus, Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

The assessment of poorly performing doctors:<br />

experiences from the first three years of the<br />

Performance Procedures within the UK General<br />

Medical Council.<br />

Aim<br />

This workshop will inform participants about the UK<br />

programme to assess doctors whose competence to hold<br />

a medical licence has been questioned. This is carried<br />

out in two phases: peer review of performance in the<br />

workplace and tests of knowledge and skills in a clinical<br />

skills lab.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be divided into three sections, each<br />

of one hour. The first section will describe the<br />

programme and the assessment principles on which it<br />

is based. The second section will examine the methods<br />

of assessment used in both phases and will also include<br />

presentation of data from actual assessments. The third<br />

section will describe the recruitment, training and<br />

assessment of the performance assessors. Each section<br />

will be introduced by an interactive lecture for 20<br />

minutes, followed by group work for 20 minutes and<br />

plenary discussion for 20 minutes. Throughout the three<br />

hours examples from surgery, anaesthetics, ob&gyn,<br />

general practice and psychiatry will be used.


No preparation is needed in advance and handouts will<br />

be available.<br />

3/12 What can a general medical journal<br />

do for education in medicine?<br />

Sandy Goldbeck-Wood, Assistant Editor BMJ and Dr Ed<br />

Peile, Research Fellow in Medical Education, University of<br />

Oxford and Editorial Advisor, BMJ<br />

Dept of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford, Chiltern<br />

Waters, 1 Stablebridge Road, Aston Clinton, Bucks HP22 5ND,<br />

UK<br />

Monday 3 September<br />

- 4.26 -<br />

Background<br />

The BMJ is considering new ventures in medical<br />

education and we will put forward some ideas for future<br />

ventures in publication. We would like participants’<br />

reactions and ideas for how medical education themes<br />

may be developed in a general medical journal.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Anyone with an interest in medical education; graduates<br />

or undergraduates, particularly those who read general<br />

medical journals.


Session 4 Large Group Sessions<br />

4A Standards and professionalism in<br />

medical education<br />

1 Attempto! Instilling mindful teaching<br />

Dr Maria Lammerding-Köppel<br />

Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Geissweg 5/1, D-<br />

72076 Tübingen, Germany<br />

The need for staff development programmes and the<br />

training of medical teachers in education have been<br />

recognized. The areas to be covered in such<br />

programmes and the specific teacher competencies and<br />

attitudes are often a matter of debate. Intended<br />

outcomes and standards of quality must relate to the<br />

professional roles of the medical teacher and to the<br />

culture of good teaching practice based on consensus.<br />

The task for the future is to ensure that we address<br />

outcomes that expand the scope of the medical teacher<br />

and that are deeply relevant to an optimal professional<br />

development.<br />

2 Who is afraid of the didactic wolf? A plea for<br />

professionalism in medical education and<br />

specialist training<br />

Professor Rein Zwierstra<br />

Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences,<br />

University of Groningen, Ant. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV<br />

Groningen, Netherlands<br />

In the present era there is no longer a need for expert<br />

doctors who can talk enthusiastically about their subject<br />

in a teaching setting. Changes in health care<br />

organisation and curriculum design call for effective<br />

teaching by teachers who operate in a team. Whilst in<br />

the world of research peer review is accepted as a<br />

standard, it is remarkable that in medical education<br />

practice peer opinions about each other’s teaching is<br />

regarded as patronising or even threatening. The quality<br />

of teaching and of curricula will improve significantly<br />

if teachers, trained in didactic principles, were to<br />

prepare their contribution as a team and reflect with<br />

mutual respect upon each other’s participation. Why<br />

are medical teachers and trainers afraid of the didactic<br />

wolf?<br />

3 What’s good about “Best Evidence Medical<br />

Education (BEME)”?<br />

Professor Ralph Bloch<br />

Institute for Medical Education, Inselspital 37a, University of<br />

Bern, H-3010 Bern, Switzerland<br />

BEME, like its older cousin “Evidence Based Medicine<br />

(EBM)” is likely to meet supporters and detractors.<br />

EBM and BEME are often depicted as new religions.<br />

The simile is quite apt. Both movements encompass a<br />

core philosophy, a set of prescribed rituals and a<br />

supporting, hierarchical organization. The central<br />

dogmata of both activities derive from logical<br />

positivism with the utilitarian goal of doing more good<br />

than harm - one in the practice of medicine, the other<br />

in the training of medical practitioners. The rituals<br />

pertain to the efficient extraction of valid (both internal<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.27 -<br />

and external) evidence from the published literature.<br />

The hierarchical organizations, finally, serve the<br />

purpose of optimizing economies of scale and fostering<br />

consensus on standards of quality within the academic<br />

community. Not unlike established religions, EBM and<br />

BEME run the risk of blind adherence and of assuming<br />

the cloak of infallibility. The way we develop and<br />

implement BEME will ultimately determine whether<br />

it will do more good than harm.<br />

4B International aspects of standards<br />

1 International standards in medical education:<br />

what are they and do we really need them?<br />

Dr Andrzej Wojtcjak and Dr M Roy Schwarz<br />

Institute for International Medical Education, 106 Corporate<br />

Park Drive, Suite 100, White Plains, New York NY 10604-3817,<br />

USA<br />

Physicians are now members of the global community.<br />

Created by interlocking economies, a global language,<br />

informatics networks and rapid travel, globalization has<br />

penetrated science, public health, the environment, law<br />

and religion, as well as medicine. Hence, minimal<br />

physician competencies must be defined and<br />

mechanisms developed to ensure that all medical school<br />

graduates possess these essential requirements.<br />

Established by a grant from the China Medical Board<br />

of New York, the Institute for International Medical<br />

Education (IIME) has undertaken the responsibility of<br />

defining “global minimum essential requirements”<br />

(GMER) for undergraduate medical programs.<br />

Developed by international medical experts, GMER<br />

consist of knowledge, clinical skills, professional<br />

attitudes, behaviour and ethical values. Since GMER<br />

alone are not likely to change graduates’ competencies<br />

unless they are linked to assessment, evaluation tools<br />

for educational outcomes are also being developed. The<br />

lessons learned from the pilot implementation of<br />

GMER in selected medical schools will be available to<br />

the global medical education community.<br />

2 Globalisation of Medical Education: The<br />

concept of international standards<br />

Dr. Hans Karle<br />

President, World Federation for Medical Education, Faculty of<br />

Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute,<br />

Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, DENMARK<br />

The increasing internationalisation of the medical<br />

profession raises the question of safeguarding the<br />

practice of medicine and medical manpower utilisation<br />

through well-defined international standards in medical<br />

education. Evaluation of educational institutions and<br />

programmes based on internationally adopted standards<br />

is an important incentive for institutional improvements<br />

and for generally raising the quality of medical<br />

education. Furthermore, such standards can serve as<br />

guidelines for national or regional agencies dealing<br />

with recognition and accreditation of medical schools


and postgraduate training institutions and educational<br />

programmes. In 1998, the World Federation for Medical<br />

Education (WFME) launched its project on<br />

”International standards in medical education”<br />

(Medical Education 1998;32,549-558). A WFME<br />

Working Party defined a set of international standards<br />

in basic medical education dealing with the structure,<br />

process, conditions and outcome, and specified at two<br />

levels of attainment: (a) basic standards (or minimal<br />

requirements), and (b) standards for quality<br />

development (Medical Education 2000;34,665-675).<br />

In the light of comments received from an international<br />

panel of advisors and from a number of conferences<br />

around the world, the standard document has now been<br />

refined and further developed, including guidelines for<br />

the implementation of the standards at the institutional,<br />

national and regional levels. The concept, and the<br />

purpose and rationale for the WFME Standards in Basic<br />

Medical Education will be presented. Pilot studies on<br />

the value of these standards are now being prepared in<br />

the six WFME Regions. WFME is now planning a<br />

similar process concerning international standards in<br />

postgraduate medical education covering both<br />

specialist training and continuing medical education/<br />

personal development.<br />

4C Standards and the curriculum<br />

1 Learning can be fun! The student’s<br />

experience in a new curriculum<br />

Anke Neuwirth and Johannes Meier<br />

Second year students in the Reformed Medical Curriculum,<br />

Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Two years ago 63 students at the Humboldt-University<br />

began studying medicine in a reformed parallel track.<br />

This is the first attempt in Germany at changing a<br />

traditional curriculum. Basic sciences are combined<br />

with clinical practice right from the beginning: PBL as<br />

the main learning format plus one day per week with a<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.28 -<br />

general practitioner, practical and communication skills<br />

training and theoretical seminars. Students from the<br />

first class will share their personal experiences of new<br />

standards in learning, teaching and assessment. A large<br />

part of the presentation will be reserved for discussion<br />

with the audience.<br />

2 The advantages of longitudinal evaluation of<br />

the medical curriculum<br />

Prof. Dr. Reinhard Pabst<br />

Medical School of Hannover, Centre of Anatomy – 4120, Care<br />

Neuberg Strasse 1, D30625 Hannover, GERMANY<br />

After implementing modifications in the undergraduate<br />

medical curriculum, the outcome should be evaluated.<br />

Questionnaires answered by medical students at the end<br />

of a term are helpful, but of even greater relevance are<br />

evaluations at different times during and after the<br />

undergraduate phase. Some examples will be presented<br />

to show why and for whom these data are relevant, as<br />

well as how the questionnaire should be designed. It<br />

will be proposed to perform similar evaluations in<br />

different European countries, and also to ask in<br />

particular those doctors who have studied medicine in<br />

different countries to evaluate their medical curriculum<br />

retrospectively.<br />

3 Standards and assessment<br />

Professor Miriam Friedman Ben-David<br />

Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Tay Park<br />

House, 484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

The important effect of assessment on students’<br />

behaviour and pattern of learning is well documented.<br />

The assessment process has a key effect on establishing<br />

standards within the medical school. This presentation<br />

looks at the relationship between standards and<br />

assessment. It explores the links between the two and<br />

looks at issues relating to standard setting procedures<br />

as part of the assessment process.


Session 5A Learning and the internet<br />

5A1 The “dos and don’ts” of e-learning<br />

in medicine: experiences of a CD-<br />

ROM production<br />

P Langkafel*, A Oehlsen, U Arnold and J W Dudenhausen<br />

Charité, Department of Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

In November 2000 the Department of Obstetrics<br />

published the CD-ROM “Digital Obstetrics”. After<br />

almost 2 years of work we were glad to publish this<br />

piece of software with a well known editor in Medicine.<br />

We will focus in our presentation on the process of<br />

conception and the production of this CD-ROM and<br />

other Internet-based courses. What are our experiences?<br />

What are - in our opinion - the “musts” of a good<br />

production, what are the “nevers”? What did we learn<br />

from this process? What are our “golden rules” from<br />

this experience to be learnt for different topics of elearning<br />

in medicine? There will be the possibility for<br />

a continuous virtual discussion via the<br />

Internet:(www.golden-rules.de) The audience and<br />

interested people will have the opportunity to add their<br />

opinions and to share in the discussion with others<br />

digitally.<br />

5A2 Online guide to basic surgical<br />

skills: http://olc.chirurgiegoettingen.de<br />

S Koenig*, P Wagner, D Zeiss, P M Markus and H Becker<br />

Georg-August-University Goettingen, Department of General<br />

Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Robert-<br />

Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, GERMANY<br />

The emphasis of medical education in Germany lies in<br />

the imparting of theoretical knowledge. During their<br />

clinical studies, medical students increasingly have to<br />

deal with the major problem of how to gain experience<br />

in clinical practice and learn the relevant skills. With<br />

this in mind, an online guide is being developed as a<br />

teaching aid demonstrating basic skills in surgery to<br />

accompany the existing curriculum. The guide is<br />

presented as a website, centred around a series of<br />

digitised video sequences, photographs and illustrations<br />

highlighting the basic clinical skills required in the field<br />

of surgery. Examples include blood sampling, IV line<br />

management, suture techniques, wound management<br />

and general practice in theatre such as scrubbing up,<br />

aseptic procedures and use of specific instruments.<br />

Student feedback to date is exceptionally encouraging<br />

for the further development of the platform, including<br />

integration of other fields in medical education.<br />

5A3 Standards for an international<br />

distributed online case repository<br />

Chris Candler*, Colin Melville and Dave Collins<br />

University of Oklahoma, Science Centre, 941 Stanton L. Young<br />

Blvd, BSEB 115A, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA<br />

Teaching cases have been used by medical schools for<br />

years as a means to simulate the patient encounter,<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.29 -<br />

provide early exposure to clinical problems, and to<br />

ensure a consistent educational experience. Recently,<br />

many schools have developed online cases to<br />

supplement existing coursework. Through the use of<br />

emerging technologies, cases may display high-quality<br />

multimedia, track student reasoning, facilitate facultystudent<br />

collaboration, and even adapt to the student’s<br />

educational needs. While schools have created online<br />

cases for a variety of purposes, development costs are<br />

rarely trivial. Unfortunately, medical schools have not<br />

employed the same technologies to share and reuse<br />

these costly resources. New technologies could be used<br />

to develop case banks that house cases independent of<br />

purpose or pedagogy. The authors propose the<br />

development of an international case repository and<br />

suggest a technical implementation based on distributed<br />

systems and open standards such as the eXtensible<br />

Markup Language.<br />

5A4 Digital study of medicine<br />

U Arnold*, P Langkafel, L Peppel, I Reisinger and<br />

J W Dudenhausen<br />

Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, <strong>Berlin</strong> Biomedical<br />

Exchange Office, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger<br />

Platz 1, D-13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Digital media becomes more and more a major force<br />

in medicine and medical education. This representative<br />

study among students of medicine demonstrates the<br />

big differences between varying student samples<br />

concerning the use of and the expectations on new<br />

media and e-learning. In a sample survey (n=282) using<br />

machine readable questionnaires students of the first<br />

pre-clinic and the first clinic semester were questioned<br />

about their current and future computer and internet<br />

use as well as their attitude as regards these subjects.<br />

57.8 % of the beginners use a PC and the internet more<br />

than once a week while 12.6% do not use computers at<br />

all. More than half of the beginners (55%) do not know<br />

internet based learning at all. While only 0.6% of the<br />

beginners claim to use CD-ROM for learning purposes<br />

this number increases to 23.9% among the students<br />

from the first clinic semester. Nearly half of the students<br />

wish to see an amount of 16 to 30% for new media<br />

based learning in the curriculum of the future. The<br />

detailed results will be discussed focussing on their<br />

consequences for e-learning in the field of medical<br />

education.<br />

5A5 Electronic learning objects and<br />

resource discovery<br />

David A Davies<br />

University of Birmingham, Medical Education Unit, School of<br />

Medicine, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

A challenge facing many institutions engaged in<br />

teaching is to find electronic learning resources to meet<br />

the requirements of the curriculum. Electronic learning<br />

resources may be clinical images, digital video clips,<br />

case scenarios, MCQs, etc. These ‘learning objects’ may<br />

be viewed as the building blocks for new web-based


teaching packages. There are opportunities for the<br />

development of new learning objects both within an<br />

institution but also by sharing existing resources with<br />

other institutions. A central issue therefore becomes<br />

how does any individual know what resources are<br />

available either locally or remotely? We have developed<br />

an internet-based system that greatly facilitates<br />

resources discovery. Our system uses open standards<br />

and does not rely upon any specific hardware or<br />

software platform. By using our Electronic Curriculum<br />

as an example, which we first demonstrated to <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

two years ago, we will show, using real examples, how<br />

institutions can collaboratively share learning objects.<br />

5A6 Filling a curriculum map with<br />

Reusable Learning Objects<br />

N K McManus*, R M Harden, D Davidson, S Khogali and<br />

J M Laidlaw<br />

SCPMDE, Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

Session 5B Evaluation of PBL<br />

5B1 Changing to PBL: does it have<br />

an effect on junior doctors’<br />

conceptualisation of<br />

communication skills?<br />

P A O’Neill*, S C Willis and A Jones<br />

University of Manchester, Research and Teaching Building, South<br />

Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Nell Lane, Manchester<br />

M2O 2LR, UK<br />

In 1994 Manchester Medical School introduced a<br />

learner-centred, problem based learning course, which<br />

involves more emphasis on acquisition of effective<br />

communication skills. This study explored how<br />

Manchester graduates conceptualise communication<br />

skills. Twenty-four traditional course graduates and 23<br />

new course graduates were interviewed 3 months into<br />

their first job. Graduates were asked to reflect on how<br />

well the course had prepared them for being an effective<br />

communicator. Interviews were tape-recorded,<br />

transcribed, coded and analysed. Traditional course<br />

graduates conceptualised communication as ‘talking<br />

to people’. Being an effective communicator was<br />

described as ‘a personal thing’ rather than something<br />

which could be taught or learned. New course graduates<br />

conceptualised communication skills as being<br />

important for patient outcomes; and as something<br />

which could be both taught and learned. A comparison<br />

between traditional and PBL course graduates suggests<br />

that there are some differences in their<br />

conceptualisation of communication skills.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.30 -<br />

For a computer-based learning system to be widely<br />

usable, it must be possible to tailor the information<br />

presented to the learner to match the level of study and<br />

topic of interest. To achieve this, it is necessary to<br />

describe the content in a way that makes it reusable in<br />

a variety of contexts. By applying a standard template<br />

to describe structure within topics, specifying<br />

associations between concepts, and describing the<br />

content using a standard coding scheme, it is possible<br />

to produce standalone ‘Reusable Learning Objects’.<br />

These can then be filtered by the system to match the<br />

learner’s requirements. In an experimental<br />

implementation to investigate methods for creating<br />

these electronic curriculum maps, a prototype system<br />

is being produced covering three areas in neurology,<br />

cardiology and dermatology. A web interface allows<br />

these sections to be developed concurrently, then<br />

delivered to a wide audience.<br />

5B2 How do medical students<br />

characterize good problem-based<br />

learning (PBL) tutoring after a<br />

year’s experience?<br />

Gillian Maudsley<br />

University of Liverpool, Department of Public Health, Whelan<br />

Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK<br />

In 1996, Liverpool’s 5-year undergraduate medical<br />

(MBChB) curriculum became problem-based.<br />

Students’ initial experiences of problem-based learning<br />

(PBL) and PBL tutors could influence subsequent<br />

progress. Empirical evidence on students’ perceptions<br />

of PBL tutors’ role is developing. The aim was to<br />

explore how medical students conceptualize good PBL<br />

tutors (and learning) in a problem-based curriculum.<br />

The subjects were 224 medical students at end of Year<br />

1. A cross-sectional (self-completed questionnaire)<br />

survey of mostly open-ended questions explored, e.g.:<br />

main advantage/disadvantage of PBL; characteristics<br />

of a good PBL tutor. Qualitative data-themes<br />

formulated inductively and iteratively. 137/224 (61.2%)<br />

responded. Despite diverse views, students mostly<br />

highlighted that, e.g.: good tutors should be<br />

approachable, ‘knowledgeable’ (without imposing<br />

knowledge), encourage participation; and PBL is good<br />

for acquiring, retaining, and applying knowledge (yet<br />

lack of ‘structure’ can cause concern). The implications<br />

of the results will be related to previous literature.


5B3 Predicting outcome by behaviour in<br />

PBL groups?<br />

Kristin Wigen*, Are Holen, Øyvind Ellingsen and<br />

Hansjørg Hohr<br />

Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Department<br />

of Community Medicine & General Practice, MTFS, N-7489<br />

Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

In the fall of 1999 and 2000, new medical students at<br />

the Norwegian University of Science and Technology<br />

were asked to complete these questionnaires: (1)<br />

Entwistle’s Learning Style Inventory - 30 items, (2)<br />

Braithwaite’s shortened neuroticism scale - 15 items,<br />

and (3) Craig’s Locus of Control of Behaviour Scale -<br />

17 items. Additionally, variables included the admission<br />

scores and gender of the students. Behaviour in PBL<br />

groups was assessed by peers on Holen’s Group Process<br />

Evaluation Scale once each term for each student. The<br />

aim was to study the correlations between these<br />

variables and the academic achievements of the students<br />

at their first exams by the end of the first year in June<br />

2000 and 2001. Preliminary findings will be presented<br />

and briefly discussed.<br />

5B4 Student evaluation of a problembased<br />

learning module into an<br />

occupational therapy course<br />

Deirdre Connolly* and Morag Donovan<br />

Trinity College Dublin, School of Occupational Therapy,<br />

Rochestown Avenue, Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin, IRELAND<br />

“ I’m very satisfied with this course. The method of<br />

continuous assessment was very helpful and beneficial.<br />

I wonder how this volume of material could be covered<br />

in any other way”.<br />

“Tiring, inflexible and inconsistent marking”.<br />

These are contrasting opinions of two third year<br />

occupational therapy students on their experience of<br />

Problem Based Learning (PBL). As PBL encourages<br />

open-minded, reflective and active learning<br />

(Margetson, 1991), qualities that are highly valued from<br />

a university education, it was decided to introduce a<br />

PBL module into the four-year honours degree course<br />

in occupational therapy. Students were then asked to<br />

evaluate the first semester of using the PBL approach.<br />

This paper presents the process involved in setting up<br />

the module and the quantitative and qualitative results<br />

of the initial evaluation.<br />

5B5 Evaluation of student performance<br />

in the problem based learning<br />

(PBL) group<br />

David C M Taylor<br />

The Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Crown<br />

Street, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK<br />

During the course of each semester, students in years<br />

one and two of the medical course at Liverpool<br />

University complete a self assessment form which<br />

relates to their performance in the PBL Group. A form<br />

is also completed independently for students by their<br />

PBL tutor, and the two forms are compared. If there<br />

are differences between the perceptions of student and<br />

tutor, then an informal conversation takes place to<br />

identify possible explanations. We originally used a<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.31 -<br />

form similar to that developed in Hong Kong, where<br />

there are five descriptors for each of five domains;<br />

participation, communication, preparation, critical<br />

thinking and group skills. It rapidly became apparent<br />

that we needed to add two other domains – “Evaluation<br />

Skills” and “Cross Curricular Links”. This change<br />

means that students and staff are required to reflect on<br />

what we believe to be the key skills for problem-based<br />

learning.<br />

5B6 Influence of tutor qualification on<br />

test achievement and student<br />

evaluation in a problem-based<br />

course of basic pharmacology<br />

J Matthes*, B Marxen, R-M Linke, W Antepohl,<br />

W Lehmacher and S Herzig<br />

Gleueler Str.24, 50931 Koln, GERMANY<br />

Increased demand on staff when using problem-based<br />

learning (PBL) necessitates involvement of tutors at<br />

different stages of medical or non-medical (under-,<br />

post-,) graduate education. To address whether such<br />

differences in qualification affect evaluation of PBL<br />

by participants or their outcome (test results), we<br />

analysed data of a 3½ year longitudinal study<br />

performed with 3rd year medical students taking a PBLcourse<br />

in basic pharmacology. We compared student<br />

tutors (undergraduate, >3rd year; n=30), nonspecialized<br />

professional tutors (physicians, pharmacists<br />

or natural scientists during postgraduate education;<br />

n=38) and specialized professional tutors (completed<br />

postgraduate education; n=26). While evaluation and<br />

outcome of student-led groups did not differ from staffled<br />

groups, tutor experience with PBL inproved<br />

evaluation scores. Interestingly, student tutors as well<br />

as non-specialized professional tutors came off badly<br />

in some evaluation parameters, however their groups´<br />

test achievement equalled that of specialized<br />

professional tutors.<br />

5B7 Individual perceptions of group<br />

learning and functioning in a<br />

problem-based learning programme<br />

Janet MacDonald<br />

Academic Departmentt, Postgraduate Medical & Dental<br />

Education, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park,<br />

Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK<br />

Drawing on data from a cohort of BSc Occupational<br />

Therapy students on a PBL programme, this paper<br />

reports on students’ individual perceptions of their own<br />

and others’ participation and performance within small<br />

group learning. Students were asked to rate the<br />

contributions and performance of themselves, other<br />

group members and the group as a whole with factors<br />

influencing functioning being considered.<br />

Questionnaires were completed by students who were<br />

then involved in group discussion and subsequently<br />

completed individual action plans with the intention<br />

of enhancing future group involvement and personal<br />

development. Initial findings explore issues such as<br />

group development and cohesion, use of ground rules,<br />

contextual learning and the role of the group in personal<br />

development. Difficulties involved in conducting this<br />

type of inquiry will also be briefly discussed.


Session 5C Curriculum evaluation<br />

5C1 A course programme evaluation:<br />

contribution of students’ selfevaluation<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Jorge Lima and Joao Martins-Silva<br />

Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

A course programme evaluation (CPE) is useful to<br />

highlight issues for introducing further changes. The<br />

aim of this work was to compare the results of the CPE<br />

performed in the discipline of Cellular Biochemistry<br />

in three consecutive years. The first year students in<br />

1999 (n=199), in 2000 (n=189) and in 2001 (n=173)<br />

of the Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon were required to<br />

answer a questionnaire anonymously with 19 closed<br />

questions. Phi and Cramer’s VC statistical analysis were<br />

used. The answers profile for the majority of the<br />

questions was similar in the three consecutive years.<br />

The main differences were those related to the influence<br />

of the teaching process in the assessment methods and<br />

in students’ self-confidence. The majority of students<br />

were not motivated with their self-evaluation. It is<br />

concluded that the course programme evaluation<br />

depends on the student population and not exclusively<br />

on the changes introduced by the teaching staff.<br />

5C2 A national evaluation of the reforms<br />

to higher specialist training in the<br />

UK: methodological issues<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and<br />

Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK<br />

Over the past 5 years, wholesale reform of higher<br />

specialist training in the UK has occurred with changes<br />

in training structure, processes, infrastructure,<br />

assessment, records, post types, endpoint qualification,<br />

curricula, selection, standard setting, and monitoring.<br />

The Department of Health commissioned a national<br />

evaluation, conducted over three years. The evaluation<br />

was designed and conducted as policy research,<br />

involving 15 researchers with expertise in postgraduate<br />

medical education, qualitative and quantitative research<br />

methods, management, selection, public sector<br />

economics, assessment, and pedagogy. Data collection<br />

methods included surveys, consultative groups,<br />

interviews, site visits, case studies, documentary<br />

analysis and in-depth reference studies. Seven focal<br />

specialties were studied. Data for the 20 separate reports<br />

of the evaluation were gathered from upwards of 5,000<br />

participants. The evaluation covered costs, organisation,<br />

management, funding, change management,<br />

assessment, appraisal, educational processes and<br />

outcomes, new roles and responsibilities, selection, and<br />

effects on service and workload. Methodological issues<br />

will be discussed.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.32 -<br />

5C3 Evaluation of PME courses in<br />

General Practice in Germany<br />

S Wilm*, R Jahromi, S Krause and B Hemming<br />

Heinrich-Heine University, Department of General Practice,<br />

PO Box 10 10 07, D-40001 Duesseldorf, GERMANY<br />

Vocational training in general practice in Germany<br />

requires 240 hours of accompanying courses, aiming<br />

at reinforcing professional knowledge, problem solving<br />

abilities and at training in interdisciplinary teamwork<br />

and audit. For the participants it has the character of an<br />

expensive obligation, with possibly negative effects on<br />

intrinsic motivation and demands. The continuous builtin<br />

evaluation of courses in Duesseldorf/North-Rhine<br />

covers written interviews with participants and teachers,<br />

participatory observation, oral interviews and focus<br />

groups. In 1999 and 2000 71 seminars were evaluated.<br />

935 questionnaires of participants (response rate 70%),<br />

46 data sheets for participatory observation, 33<br />

questionnaires of 29 teachers and 10 focus groups show<br />

that the educational quality increased, while the overall<br />

satisfaction of the trainees decreased. Possible reasons<br />

for this complex phenomenon are discussed.<br />

Organizational aspects influence participants’<br />

satisfaction much more than content of seminars.<br />

5C4 The Matrix: a visual presentation of<br />

registrar term evaluation<br />

Richard Tarala and Alistair Vickery<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Royal Perth<br />

Hospital, GPO Box X2213, Perth, Western Australia 6847,<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Evaluation of junior medical officer posts can be<br />

hindered by the need to distribute questionnaires, the<br />

time required for their completion and by low response<br />

rates. Collation and assessment can be time-consuming<br />

and the resultant evaluation difficult to interpret. We<br />

used a simple evaluation tool for the assessment of<br />

registrar terms. Trainees were asked to assess on a fivepoint<br />

scale the workload and the training/teaching value<br />

of each rotation they had experienced over the previous<br />

two years. We have undertaken a pilot to provide a<br />

‘snapshot’ or audit of the trainees’ perception of the<br />

rotations. The evaluation can be performed quickly and<br />

the collated results when plotted in a graphical<br />

(“matrix”) form provide a powerful visual assessment<br />

of the trainee’s perspective of each post. This evaluation<br />

can be used to assess the workload of each position to<br />

assist in reallocation of workload and to optimise<br />

training in each post.<br />

5C5 Site visits as a method to assess the<br />

educational quality of clerkships<br />

Janke Cohen-Schotanus* and Rein P Zwierstra<br />

Institute for Medical Education (OWI-OK), Faculty of Medical<br />

Sciences, University of Groningen, Ant.Deusinglaan 1, 9713<br />

AV Groningen, NETHERLANDS<br />

Clerkships, as part of the training of medical students,<br />

are organized in several hospitals. In general, students<br />

are content with this training. However, what do we


know about the educational quality of the clerkships?<br />

To answer this question we developed a procedure for<br />

structured site visits. The visits were conducted by a<br />

Visitation Committee on the basis of an assignment of<br />

the director of the Institute for Medical Education.<br />

Before the actual visit, the committee sent out<br />

questionnaires and gathered written information about<br />

the clerkships. During the site visit, the committee<br />

discussed the educational topics with the groups<br />

involved in the programme.<br />

After the procedure the committee concluded that in<br />

general the students were trained satisfactorily.<br />

However, in the clerkships more educational structure<br />

is necessary. Students need to receive feedback on the<br />

way they practise their skills and on attitudinal aspects<br />

much more frequently and on a structured basis.<br />

5C6 Impact of a new curriculum on the<br />

clinical competence of medical<br />

students at the University of<br />

Barcelona Medical School (UBMS)<br />

Ramon Pujol*, Frederic Manresa, Francesc Gudial,<br />

Eduard Kranfly, Josep Ma Martinez Carsetera<br />

Bellvitge Unit, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Hospital, Dept<br />

of Internal Medicine, c/Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de<br />

Llibregat, SPAIN<br />

UBMS has recently modified its undergraduate<br />

curriculum. A group (A) of 44 students belonging to<br />

the first cohort (1999-2000) of the new curriculum was<br />

compared with another group (B) of 51 students<br />

belonging to the last cohort (1998-1999) of the<br />

traditional curriculum. The assessment was performed<br />

at the end of licensure by means of a multistation OSCE<br />

of 17 cases with 22 stations including 10 common cases<br />

for both cohorts. Statistical analysis included Cronbach<br />

Alpha test to analyse reliability and the result was 0.79,<br />

- 4.33 -<br />

and for comparability t-student test was used. Group A<br />

showed better scores, particularly in interprofessional<br />

relationships (mean values A vs B: 59.5 vs. 48.6;<br />

p=0.001); attitudes (59.7 vs. 41.6; p=0.001); technical<br />

skills (70 vs 61.6; p=0.01); clinical knowledge (62.9<br />

vs. 56.6; p=0.001), and clinical judgement (47.2 vs.<br />

42; p=0.001). The new curriculum has improved the<br />

clinical competence of last year’s students assessed by<br />

a multistation OSCE examination.<br />

5C7 Lessons learnt in designing and<br />

implementing a curriculum<br />

evaluation<br />

Helen Graham* and Mary Seabrook<br />

Department of Medical and Dental Education, Guys, Kings &<br />

St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, Sherman<br />

Education Centre, 4th floor, Thomas Guy House, London SE1<br />

9RT, UK<br />

Evaluation is particularly important when a new course<br />

is established. The new year 4 medical curriculum at<br />

Kings College, London was introduced in 1999. It<br />

teaches reproductive and sexual health; child health,<br />

development and ageing; and trauma, locomotion and<br />

rehabilitation to 360 students across 4 main campuses.<br />

Since inception, an evaluation strategy has gradually<br />

been developed by the year head and the course<br />

management committee. Feedback was collected from<br />

students and teachers within the teaching hierarchy<br />

during the year using a range of methods. These<br />

included meetings, facilitated discussions, written and<br />

computer-based questionnaires, teacher reports and email.<br />

In this presentation we will discuss how the<br />

various methods worked, the advantages and<br />

disadvantages of each and the problems encountered.<br />

We shall also describe the mechanisms used to ensure<br />

teacher participation in the evaluation and course<br />

development process.<br />

Session 5D Assessing communication skills/patients as examiners<br />

5D1 Detecting rater bias on a measure<br />

of spoken English proficiency<br />

Marta van Zanten*, Danette McKinley, John Boulet and<br />

Gerald Whelan<br />

ECFMG, Test Development and Research/CSA, 4th floor, 3624<br />

Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA<br />

Rater severity can affect the validity of scores and<br />

introduce bias that will impact the measurement of<br />

examinee ability. Few studies, especially in the area of<br />

clinical skills assessment, have examined the effect of<br />

rater demographics on rater severity. In this study,<br />

standardized patient (SP) ratings of spoken English<br />

proficiency were contrasted by SP and examinee<br />

characteristics. Two analyses were conducted. In the<br />

first analysis, least square mean scores were calculated<br />

based on whether English was the native language of<br />

the examinee and the SP. Examinees whose native<br />

language was not English received significantly lower<br />

ratings from the SPs, regardless of the SP’s native<br />

language. In the second analysis, data were analyzed<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

based on SP and examinee gender. Female examinees<br />

received higher ratings than male examinees from SPs<br />

of both genders. The results suggest that the SP<br />

characteristics studied had no effect on ratings of<br />

spoken English proficiency.<br />

5D2 Comparison of communication<br />

skills in residency with<br />

performance on ECFMG Clinical<br />

Skills Assessment<br />

W Burdick*, J Boulet, S Peitzman, G Whelan and D Brody<br />

ECFMG, 3624 Market Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia,<br />

Pennsylvania 19104-2685, USA<br />

The Education Commission for Foreign Medical<br />

Graduates assesses graduates of foreign medical<br />

schools for readiness to enter US residencies using a<br />

ten station standardized patient examination. The<br />

Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) tests data gathering,


clinical reasoning, written communication, and oral<br />

communication skills, including spoken English. We<br />

assessed the communication skills of first year internal<br />

medicine residents using trained observers and postencounter<br />

patient surveys in an outpatient clinic setting<br />

and compared these results with performance on CSA.<br />

Over 250 encounters from about 60 residents who had<br />

graduated from foreign medical schools were scored<br />

by observers and patients. Moderate correlation with<br />

communication skills as assessed by CSA was found.<br />

This evidence suggests that CSA is a valid predictor of<br />

performance in the first year of residency.<br />

5D3 ACT: a new computer-assisted<br />

assessment (CAA) method for<br />

communication-skills of medical<br />

students<br />

R L Hulsman* and J D Donnison-Speijer<br />

Academic Medical Centre, Department of Medical Psychology,<br />

J4, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

CAA of communication skills is innovative and has<br />

several advantages: a broad range of communication<br />

problems can be covered in one assessment; both the<br />

testing and judgement procedures are highly<br />

standardised; students can be assessed in large groups<br />

without a complex organisation. ACT, developed in our<br />

medical school, was used for the first time in April and<br />

May 2001. More than 200 third year students were<br />

assessed. ACT presents three short movies of doctorpatient<br />

encounters. Topics are: history taking, breaking<br />

bad news, shared decision making. Each topic is<br />

covered by 5 to 10 questions; 20 questions in total.<br />

The assessment model of ACT is based on Miller’s<br />

pyramid (Acad Med 1990; 65:S63-67) yielding four<br />

types of essay questions: 1. knowledge, 2.<br />

understanding, 3. skill phrasing, 4. integration of skills.<br />

Presented will be: the adapted assessment model,<br />

examples of questions, the program design, and results<br />

about the feasibility and reliability of ACT.<br />

5D4 How accurate is lay person<br />

assessment of clinical competence<br />

of student doctors? The<br />

comparison of the assessment of<br />

medical students by faculty and<br />

standardized patients during the<br />

Objective Structured Clinical<br />

Examination<br />

P Heasman*, K Pitkala and N Paganus<br />

University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, P O Box 63, 00014<br />

Helsinki, FINLAND<br />

This paper discusses the results of two types of<br />

assessment of the students carried out during the OSCE,<br />

a performance-based assessment of clinical<br />

competence. For the first time in the history of the<br />

Medical School in Helsinki a comprehensive OSCE<br />

was arranged in December 2000. All participants (n=<br />

80) were sixth year undergraduate medical students.<br />

The exam consisted of ten stations where simulated<br />

consultations with standardized patients (SPs) took<br />

place. Professional actors were used as patients to<br />

guarantee a similar experience to all students. During<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.34 -<br />

the consultation a faculty member assessed the clinical<br />

performance of the student and the doctor-patient<br />

interaction using a checklist for the assessment of the<br />

clinical skills and a communication skills questionnaire.<br />

The students were also evaluated by the actors with an<br />

assessment form. While some students with low ratings<br />

in clinical skills by the faculty scored high on the actors<br />

evaluations, none of the students to whom the SPs gave<br />

the maximum scores, failed. Inter-station reliability of<br />

the SP ratings was considerably higher than clinician<br />

rating of communication skills. Also there was a poor<br />

correlation between SP and clinician ratings, equaling<br />

0.22. The scores of a single student varied depending<br />

on the clinical situation he or she was confronted with.<br />

Results and their implications for the future<br />

development of the medical students’ integrated<br />

competence assessment will be discussed.<br />

5D5 Do simulated patients grade interpersonal<br />

skills as well as Faculty?<br />

A S Arora*, N Natt, S Kluck and R Tiegs<br />

Mayo Foundation, Department of GIH, 200 First Street SW,<br />

Rochester MN 55905, USA<br />

Simulated patients (SPs) are being used to assess a<br />

number of skills in medical students. The SP may grade<br />

students with regard to history taking, physical exam<br />

and inter-personal skills (IPS) according to a checklist.<br />

Using SPs to grade student performance has been<br />

shown to be reliable though it is difficult to assess<br />

validity of this method. The aim of this study was to<br />

determine the validity of SPs’ scoring of student IPS at<br />

Mayo Medical School. Third year medical students<br />

undertaking a Clinical Skill Assessment had IPS<br />

evaluated by SPs and faculty observers. Identical 5section<br />

IPS checklists were completed following each<br />

student encounter by the SP and the faculty. There were<br />

8 clinical encounters for each student. The agreement<br />

between faculty and SP was very high in most of the<br />

sections in the IPS checklist. In conclusion, SPs are<br />

able to evaluate students' interpersonal skills as<br />

effectively as faculty.<br />

5D6 The contribution of non-medical<br />

assessors to the assessment of<br />

poorly performing doctors<br />

Lesley Southgate* and Peter McCrorie<br />

Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education,<br />

University College London Medical School, Archway Campus,<br />

Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

The UK Medical (Professional Performance) Act 1995<br />

gives the General Medical Council powers to assess<br />

any doctor on the register whose performance in<br />

practice may be seriously deficient, and below the<br />

standard for fitness to practise. The Council has stated<br />

its commitment to involve members of the public<br />

equally in all stages of the development and<br />

implementation of the assessment programmes, which<br />

comprise peer review of performance in the workplace<br />

by a team of three assessors, followed by tests of<br />

competence. More than 35 doctors from several<br />

disciplines have now been assessed within the<br />

procedures. The non-medical assessors contribute<br />

equally to the database assembled during the


assessments. We will present the background to their<br />

participation; data from actual assessments in general<br />

practice, surgery and psychiatry, and conclude with a<br />

discussion of the implications for partnership within<br />

professional regulation between the profession and<br />

members of the public.<br />

5D7 Assessment in the elective clinical<br />

rotation: centrally reviewed case<br />

reports<br />

W M Molenaar*, S A Koopmans, M D Talsma and<br />

L H van Essen<br />

Institute of Medical Education, University of Groningen, Ant.<br />

Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, NETHERLANDS<br />

The performance of medical students in clinical<br />

rotations is usually assessed by supervising clinicians.<br />

- 4.35 -<br />

Students at the University of Groningen in addition have<br />

to write a case report during their elective clinical<br />

rotation. Since students are widely scattered for their<br />

elective rotations individual clinicians supervise only<br />

a few of them, which tends to bias their judgements.<br />

Accordingly, the assessments of the students’ clinical<br />

performances by the supervising clinicians were<br />

skewed towards ‘excellent’. To overcome this problem<br />

all case reports are centrally graded by one of three<br />

medical specialists using criteria known to the students<br />

and their supervisors. The major criterion is the<br />

relevance of the ‘lesson’ to be learned from the patient’s<br />

history. This study analyzes the scores over the years<br />

1998 through 2000 (714 reports). The distributions of<br />

given grades were relatively balanced and very similar<br />

in each year and the reviewers showed comparable<br />

patterns.<br />

Session 5E Postgraduate education for general practice/<br />

family medicine<br />

5E1 An educational approach to<br />

significant event auditing in<br />

primary care<br />

J McKay* and P Bowie<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of<br />

Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK<br />

Little is known about the content and educational value<br />

of significant event audits (SEA) in primary care.<br />

General practitioners (GPs) in the west of Scotland are<br />

encouraged to submit a SEA as part of their<br />

postgraduate education. Two trained assessors<br />

independently mark SEAs and educational feedback<br />

is offered to the GP. Of 132 SEAs submitted, 47%<br />

involved primarily clinical issues, 29% practice<br />

administration and 17% involved both. Main areas of<br />

analysis were in disease management (36%), drug<br />

prescribing (20%) and communication (32%).<br />

Complaints (14%) are not a major factor in prompting<br />

SEAs. 68% of SEAs were judged educationally<br />

satisfactory by both assessors; 24% satisfactory by one<br />

assessor only; and 9% unsatisfactory by both assessors.<br />

SEAs judged satisfactory by both assessors were more<br />

likely to have involved the implementation of change<br />

(P


5E4 The use of video in General Practice<br />

Registrar training and assessment<br />

C M Wiskin, Stephen Field* and John Skelton<br />

West Midland GP Unit, 27 Highfield Road, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 3DP, UK<br />

In 1994 a questionnaire-based evaluation was<br />

conducted among training practices in the West<br />

Midlands. A 2000 comparative study identified changes<br />

in the use of and attitude towards video as a training<br />

and assessment tool in General Practice. Areas of<br />

interest are future application to GP trainer reaccreditation<br />

and the MRCGP examination, and issues<br />

of informed consent. Questionnaires combined Likert<br />

scales, evaluation scales for levels of statement<br />

agreement/disagreement, demographic information<br />

and free text comments. Greater frequency of use across<br />

most targeted areas was reported, in particular obtaining<br />

appropriate consent. Relationships between the general<br />

practice trainers’ personal and practice uses of video<br />

with their registrars and their opinions about other postgraduate<br />

uses of videos are positively correlated. Rank<br />

order lists of perceived vulnerable patient groups<br />

remained identical over the six-year period. Video for<br />

teaching, testing and developing self-awareness is<br />

increasingly acceptable to GP Trainers.<br />

5E5 The consultation styles of female<br />

GP Registrars with male and female<br />

patients<br />

Sarah Hillman* and John Skelton<br />

Dept of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical School,<br />

University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT,<br />

UK<br />

It is acknowledged that there are differences between<br />

men and women in conversation – it is often argued<br />

for example that men communicate competitively and<br />

women co-operatively. Yet male and female registrars,<br />

with patients of both sexes, are trained similarly, and<br />

assessed with the same criteria for their Summative<br />

Assessment examination. Ten western-dressing female<br />

GP Registrars in the South Birmingham area (UK) were<br />

videod with male and female patients, and data analysed<br />

using language concordancing software and discourse<br />

analysis techniques. Preliminary results suggest that<br />

the sex of the patient may be one factor which<br />

constrains consultation style, and that the speech-style<br />

of participating Registrars is both characteristically<br />

“feminine” and co-operative.The fact that key<br />

characteristics of co-operative language are both valued<br />

in the patient-centred methodology and regarded as<br />

typical of female speech has implications for the<br />

training and assessment of registrars of both sexes.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.36 -<br />

5E6 The development, implementation<br />

and evaluation of a ‘concordance’<br />

training course<br />

Jon Dowell*, Claudia Pagliari and Sean McAleer<br />

University of Dundee, Tayside Centre for General Practice, Kirsty<br />

Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4AD, UK<br />

We report the development and assessment of a<br />

‘concordance’ course. The four day course included<br />

building relationships, assessing beliefs, identifying<br />

barriers, considering these with patients, formal<br />

decision sharing process and agreeing treatment goals.<br />

Change in knowledge, attitude and skills was assessed<br />

using a written exam and double marked simulated<br />

surgeries. The eight General Practitioners attending<br />

rated the course highly (30/35 Range 27-33).<br />

Knowledge improved with True/False scores increasing<br />

from 13 to 17 out of 22 (P=0.005), Short Essay from<br />

20.4 to 25.1 out of 45 (P=0.062). Patients’ rating<br />

increased from 26.5 to 28.1 out of 35 (ns). Blinded<br />

scoring of 48 consultations rose from 14.3 to 16.1 out<br />

of 26 (p=0.04 Inter-rater reliability: rho = 0.59 p <<br />

0.001, Internal consistency: a = 83). This work shows<br />

that concordance skills can be taught and measured.<br />

5E7 A linguistic study of informationgiving<br />

in 30 doctor-patient<br />

consultations<br />

Andy Shanks* and John Skelton<br />

Department of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical<br />

School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

The need for patient-centred consultations is wellestablished.<br />

However few linguistic studies have<br />

analysed what kind of communication makes patients<br />

more proactive. This paper employs a type of discourse<br />

analysis developed at Birmingham University for<br />

educational settings, now widely used for analysis of<br />

organisational language. 30 consultations were<br />

analysed according to the IRF (initiation, follow-up,<br />

response) model. Eight different types of exchange<br />

were identified including the ‘doctor-inform’ exchange,<br />

which is used when the doctor passes on facts, opinions<br />

and ideas about treatment to the patient. Patient<br />

interruptions of doctor-inform exchanges are often met<br />

with short answers and little response. However, when<br />

doctors responded at length to patients’ questions and<br />

checked understanding, patients initiated questions<br />

more frequently. The evidence suggests that patients<br />

are more likely to initiate exchanges if the doctor checks<br />

frequently for understanding and concordance.<br />

Secondly, a more informative style of consultation<br />

creates more proactive patients.


Session 5F Assessment<br />

5F1 Objective Structured Preclinical<br />

Exams (OSPE): a new test format of<br />

summative student assessment in<br />

the Problem-Based Learning (PBL)<br />

curriculum at the Faculty of<br />

Medicine of the University of Bern<br />

Barbara Stadelmann*, R Hofer, Urs Brodbeck and Ara Tekian<br />

Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of<br />

Bern, Buehlstrasse 28, CH-3012 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

In October 1999, the Faculty of Medicine of the<br />

University of Bern implemented a new system of<br />

summative student assessment in the preclinical PBL<br />

curriculum of medical education. It is interdisciplinary<br />

or at least multi-disciplinary, and allows assessment of<br />

knowledge, skills and attitudes. About half of the exam<br />

consists of traditional multiple choice questions<br />

(MCQ). The other half has been replaced by the OSPE,<br />

a new test format allowing assessment of how well<br />

students understand, apply and integrate their<br />

knowledge, and how well their data interpretation and<br />

communication skills are developed. It is analogous to<br />

the clinical counterpart, the OSCE. During 2 – 2 1/2<br />

hours students rotate through a series of stations<br />

consisting of interdisciplinary oral, structured oral and<br />

written exams. Evaluation of the first cycle of<br />

assessment revealed high reliability for both the<br />

traditional MCQ-exam and the new OSPE (Cronbachalpha<br />

> 0.8).<br />

5F2 The quality of an extendedmatching<br />

multiple choice<br />

examination<br />

J Beullens*, B Van Damme, H Jaspaert, E Struyf and<br />

P J Janssen<br />

Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine K.U.<br />

Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 17, B-3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

Last year we reported the development of an extendedmatching<br />

multiple choice test for final year medical<br />

students at K.U. Leuven. Extended-matching questions<br />

(EMQs) start from a case and have one correct answer<br />

within a list of 7 to 26 alternatives. Indications were<br />

given for the reliability and validity of the test. This<br />

year two parallel exams of 200 EMQs were constructed<br />

and solved on separate occasions by respectively 168<br />

and 178 students. In contrast with the test, which lasted<br />

half a day, the exam took a whole day and the students<br />

were prepared for question format and content.<br />

Feasibility, reliability and validity seemed to be<br />

indicated and will be reported. In the discussion of<br />

feasibility attention will be paid to the possible<br />

influence of fatigue and growing familiarity with the<br />

question format on the scores. Face, content and<br />

criterion validity will be evaluated.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.37 -<br />

5F3 Evaluation of a five-dimensional<br />

assessment strategy within a<br />

problem-based learning medical<br />

curriculum<br />

Paul Julian*, Scott Reeves* and Alistair Lumb*<br />

Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Dept of<br />

General Practice, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End<br />

Road, London E1, UK<br />

This paper reports findings from an evaluation of a<br />

problem-based learning (PBL) assessment strategy<br />

within a new medical curriculum. As there is little<br />

published material on PBL assessment for medical<br />

students, it was decided to develop a new strategy. As a<br />

result, a five dimensional assessment strategy was<br />

developed. The five areas used to assess learning were:<br />

student attendance; the production of learning<br />

objectives; input into group work; an individual written<br />

assignment and a verbal assessment of progress. To<br />

obtain a comprehensive understanding of issues linked<br />

to this assessment strategy a multi-method evaluation<br />

was undertaken. Questionnaire and interview data were<br />

collected with students and tutors to explore their views<br />

and experiences of this assessment strategy. Findings<br />

from this work indicate that, although students and<br />

tutors consider this assessment strategy to be of value,<br />

problems around assessment inconsistency and the<br />

weighing of these different dimensions need further<br />

development.<br />

5F4 A preclinical exam to assess the<br />

networked structure of knowledge<br />

of basic science in the Universidad<br />

Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina)<br />

Ana Maria Reta*, Maria del Carmen Montbrun and<br />

Maria Jose Lopez<br />

Asesoria Pedagogica, Facultad de Ciencias Medicas, Universidad<br />

Nacional de Cuyo, Centro Universitario, Parque General San<br />

Martin, 5500 Mendoza, ARGENTINA<br />

The new curriculum promotes the acquisition of a<br />

networked structure of knowledge. Students must pass<br />

a Preclinical Exam in Basic Sciences before going into<br />

clerkships. This exam has been administered twice<br />

already. Its format was as follows: Four complex clinical<br />

cases in 2000 and eight cases in 2001 were followed<br />

by a number of questions dealing with the basic science<br />

subjects. Results showed that: 97.1% (2000) and 94.5%<br />

(2001) of the students passed. Reliability, measured<br />

by the Cronbach alpha coefficient: 0.867 and 0.830;<br />

mean scores: 73.27% and 70.20%; standard deviations:<br />

8.77 and 8.08. The results allow the following<br />

conclusions: 1) The format of the exam seems adequate<br />

to assess the acquisition of a networked structure of<br />

knowledge. 2) The new curriculum promotes this kind<br />

of knowledge. 3) Further research must be done,<br />

including a control group educated in a traditional<br />

curriculum.


5F5 Predictive value for academic<br />

performance of two assessment<br />

devices applied to medical<br />

students<br />

Ma Eugenia Ponce de León C*, Armando Ortiz and<br />

M del Carmen Ruiz Alcocer, Camino Santa Teresa<br />

277 Casa 15, Bosques del Pedregal, Delegación Tlalpán, CP<br />

14010, MEXICO D F<br />

872 students admitted in 1998 to the National<br />

Autonomous University of México Medical School<br />

answered a learning strategies and study habits<br />

questionnaire, as well as a diagnostic exam testing for<br />

background knowledge on Physics, Chemistry,<br />

Mathematics, Biology, Spanish, English, and General<br />

Knowledge. Our aim was to follow up their academic<br />

performance during their first two years (basic<br />

sciences) at Medical School, and to compare their<br />

average grade score with the results obtained on the<br />

questionnaire and the diagnostic exam (predictive<br />

value). Results showed a weak but positive association<br />

with three of the ten areas of the questionnaire: learning<br />

strategies, preparation for the exams and problemsolving<br />

skills. A statistical significance and a positive<br />

correlation were found in the diagnostic exam with<br />

General Knowledge, Spanish, Biology and Chemistry.<br />

5F6 Self-assessed clinical skills levels<br />

of newly graduated physicians in<br />

relation to an intended curriculum<br />

A M Moercke* and B Eika<br />

University of Aarhus, Enhed for Medicinsk Uddannelse, Det<br />

Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Universitetsparken, Bygning<br />

611, 8000 Aarhus, DENMARK<br />

We have explored the degree of overlap between an<br />

intended curriculum and the learned curriculum<br />

concerning clinical skills. In 1999 we conducted a<br />

Delphi-study in which 52 experts reached consensus<br />

Session 5G Outcome-based education<br />

5G1 The Scottish Learning Outcomes<br />

Project Phase II - Assessment: “the<br />

proof of the pudding”<br />

Jacqueline Furnace* and John Simpson*, on behalf of<br />

Scottish Deans’ Medical Curriculum Group<br />

Cottar House, Meddens, Newmachar, Aberdeenshire AB21 0QJ,<br />

UK<br />

Following the successful completion of Phase I of the<br />

Learning Outcomes Project the Scottish Deans’<br />

Medical Curriculum Group (SDMCG) sought to<br />

maintain the momentum created by this collaborative<br />

work and in addition, we considered it essential to<br />

demonstrate our assertion that the Learning Outcomes<br />

are a useful and practical tool in undergraduate<br />

medicine rather than purely theoretical. With this in<br />

mind we decided to test the robustness of the outcomes<br />

by looking at their assessment. We established several<br />

working groups - each assigned different outcomes -<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.38 -<br />

on skills levels for 210 practical clinical skills to be<br />

attained during undergraduate medical education. In<br />

summer 2000 we mailed a questionnaire listing these<br />

210 skills to the 226 just graduated Danish physicians.<br />

They were asked if they could meet the minimum skills<br />

level for each of the skills listed. None of the responders<br />

met the minimum of all the 210 skills. On average the<br />

responders met the minimum of 74% (155) of the skills.<br />

We concluded that newly graduated Danish physicians<br />

have gaps in their clinical skills. Making checklists and<br />

stating learning objectives is recommended as a<br />

necessary but not sufficient step. Therefore we are<br />

trying to develop a bottom up strategy for the<br />

curriculum design process.<br />

5F7 The dynamics of knowledge<br />

structure of graduating medical<br />

students based on results of the<br />

Medical Licensing Examination<br />

M Mrouga*, Y Bogachkov and L Artemchuk<br />

Testing Board, 5 Estonska St, Apt. 85, Kyiv 03190, UKRAINE<br />

The licensing examination for medical doctors (MLE)<br />

in Ukraine is undergoing its last year of piloting.<br />

However, MLE results are already taken into<br />

consideration during final exams, thus providing a<br />

certain motivation for the students. They are also used<br />

as part of medical schools’ rating, providing motivation<br />

for schools as well. For better preparation and selfassessment<br />

of students, the pretest is administered prior<br />

to MLE using the actual test MLE materials from<br />

previous years. Based upon pretest results students can<br />

build their intensive training to MLE in 1-2 weeks.<br />

Current research investigates the difference in<br />

knowledge structure between pretest and actual test<br />

results and possible sources of influence on such<br />

difference and dynamics of knowledge structure<br />

between the two parts of the licensing examination.<br />

to consider the overall implications for assessment,<br />

identify assessment tools, develop guidelines and<br />

establish the cost of required resources. The groups<br />

began work at the beginning of October 2000 and have<br />

until the end of May 2001 to complete their task.<br />

Already there has been an unprecedented exchange of<br />

knowledge and ideas and some useful and practical<br />

suggestions have emerged.<br />

5G2 Recent developments in an<br />

outcome-led curriculum<br />

Nick Ross<br />

The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B17 8HN, UK<br />

This paper reports on current developments in the<br />

MBChB at the University of Birmingham and discusses


the relationship between the outcome structure of the<br />

course and current change drivers, which include<br />

preparation of a programme specification for QAA.<br />

The nested outcomes that have been a feature of the<br />

current curriculum since its inception in 1996 are<br />

currently being reviewed. In addition to revalidation<br />

of outcome content at course and module level, this<br />

will involve fundamental restructuring of the outcome<br />

set. The current ‘tree’ structure (in which a number of<br />

detailed module outcomes contribute to a single year<br />

outcome and thence to a single endpoint outcome) is<br />

to be replaced by a ‘net’ structure, enabling crosscontribution<br />

and emphasising horizontal as well as<br />

vertical integration. Links between formal teaching and<br />

outcomes will be supplemented by links from learning<br />

opportunities. The benefits and potential pitfalls for<br />

learning and assessment will be discussed.<br />

5G3 A new instrument of curriculum<br />

development: curriculum as a<br />

function of professional outcomes<br />

I Bulakh*, Y Voronenko and I Filonchuk<br />

Testing Board and National Medical University, 22 Pushkinska<br />

St, Suite 304, Kyiv, 01004, UKRAINE<br />

Under a national program of development of new<br />

standards for higher education, medical educators face<br />

the need to work out the new professional descriptions,<br />

new curriculum and new diagnostic tools for Ukrainian<br />

medical schools. In the first phase an expert team has<br />

developed the professional description of a doctor<br />

expressed in terms of outcome skills that should be<br />

possessed by the medical graduate and in terms of<br />

relevant lists of pathologies, emergencies and<br />

laboratory investigations. Also, earlier there was<br />

developed the test blueprint for the medical licensing<br />

examination that describes the medical professional in<br />

terms of knowledge which was structured by<br />

pathologies, by subject and by medical tasks<br />

(prevention, diagnostic, treatment, etc). In the second<br />

phase, the curriculum is being constructed as a function<br />

of professional description and test blueprint,<br />

demonstrating the misfit between the scope of desirable<br />

final outcomes and regulated time for their mastering.<br />

5G4 Focusing on learning outcomes for<br />

the Preregistration House Officer<br />

(PRHO) year<br />

E A Hesketh* and M S Allan<br />

Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484 Perth Road,<br />

Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

The General Medical Council’s document ‘ The New<br />

Doctor’ outlines areas in which new medical graduates<br />

can expect to develop during PRHO training. The<br />

document not only emphasises the development of<br />

clinical skills and knowledge, but also the wider aspects<br />

of communication, disease prevention and the role of<br />

the doctor within the health service. Are PRHOs being<br />

given the opportunity to develop in all these areas? This<br />

paper describes the perceptions on this issue from those<br />

closely associated with the delivery of PRHO training.<br />

The study is part of a larger project which aims to<br />

specify the expected outcomes for the PRHO year. This<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.39 -<br />

paper focuses on a questionnaire which was used to<br />

explore the views of doctors in training, consultants<br />

and nurses on the importance given in reality and ‘best<br />

practice’ PRHO training to key learning outcomes.<br />

Findings showed that there was a desire for more<br />

emphasis on all the outcomes in PRHO training,<br />

although some need to be given more prominence if<br />

‘The New Doctor’ is to be properly implemented.<br />

5G5 The ACGME Outcome Project: a<br />

model resident assessment system<br />

Susan Swing<br />

ACGME, 515 N State St, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610, USA<br />

As a part of its Outcome Project, the Accreditation<br />

Council for Graduate Medical Education is developing<br />

conceptual models of dependable assessment systems<br />

for residency programs. The models are intended as<br />

guidelines to assist programs in meeting new<br />

accreditation standards for evaluating residents’<br />

attainment of the ACGME’s general competencies. This<br />

presentation will describe the development process for<br />

the models and an example model. Development steps<br />

include Outcome Project Advisory Group work and<br />

feedback from experts and residency program directors.<br />

The model consists of general principles and features,<br />

assessment approaches for each competency, and<br />

example assessment methods. The recommended<br />

assessment approaches include: (a) tracking of learning<br />

objectives attainment; (b) focused assessment of patient<br />

care by supervisors; (c) ratings of professionalism and<br />

communication skills by patients and professional<br />

associates; (d) standardized test assessment of medical<br />

knowledge; and (e) portfolio assessment of practicebased<br />

learning and improvement and systems-based<br />

practice.<br />

5G6 Development of an outcome-based<br />

clinical curriculum at International<br />

Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan,<br />

K H Ong, C M K Patrick and Q Akhtar<br />

International Medical University, 33 A Jalan 17/1, Block A-4,<br />

Condo 3A, Astana Damansara, 46400 Petaling Jaya, Selangor,<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

Eight major outcomes were identified for our new<br />

clinical School. The outcomes form the basis to reflect<br />

the competencies expected of the IMU graduate. This<br />

paper evaluates how our undergraduate curriculum was<br />

developed with the aim of achieving these objectives.<br />

One hundred and thirteen study-guides, the community<br />

and family case study (CFCS) and the learning portfolio<br />

formed our core curriculum. The “selectives”<br />

complimented the core. The IMU curriculum has<br />

adopted task-based learning, which is a continuum of<br />

PBL undertaken in the earlier phase. The study-guides<br />

based on various tasks identify how the 8 outcomes<br />

can be achieved and the outcome measures. The CFCS<br />

consists of students adopting and visiting a family in<br />

the community for two years. Specific objectives<br />

guided by “themes” have been identified for each visit.<br />

The students are required to develop a portfolio<br />

consisting of case summaries, case reports, projects and<br />

maintain a logbook.


5G7 An evaluation of the internal<br />

validity of specific learning<br />

outcomes in phase II of a revised<br />

undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

F J Cilliers* and E M Bitzer<br />

University of Stellenbosch, Division for University Education,<br />

P O Box 19063, Tygerberg 7505, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

The objective was to undertake a formative evaluation<br />

of part of a revised undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

by determining the degree of congruence between<br />

specific and exit outcomes. A cross sectional case-study<br />

utilising document analysis was carried out. 1510<br />

specific outcomes from 13 modules were compared<br />

- 4.40 -<br />

for congruence with each of 32 exit outcomes. 1495<br />

specific outcomes were considered congruent with exit<br />

outcomes. Between 0-68.9% of all specific outcomes<br />

were considered congruent with any given exit<br />

outcome. Three exit outcomes were addressed by<br />

>=15% of specific outcomes: two addressed lower<br />

order cognitive outcomes. 27 exit outcomes were<br />

addressed by


5H4 Self-directed, self-organized casebased-learning<br />

in final year<br />

students<br />

Jana Junger, Christiane Roth, Stephan Zipfel,<br />

Wolfgang Eich and Wolfgang Herzog<br />

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg,<br />

Bergheimerstr. 58, 69115 Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />

The objective is to promote self-directed learning and<br />

to train interdisciplinary teamwork in final year<br />

students. Final year students from different medical<br />

departments meet to discuss a self-selected case on their<br />

ward with a modified case based method.The roles of<br />

tutor and presenter are played by students of the same<br />

peer-group. New tutors are trained by their<br />

predecessors. One teacher supervises the process.<br />

Because of the different background of students,<br />

everybody contributes his own experience of the<br />

respective internistic department. The close relationship<br />

to everyday work and active involvement of students<br />

increases the motivation to learn. The students realize<br />

the advantages of well-prepared and presented cases<br />

for the whole learning group. Evaluation of the tutorials<br />

showed good results concerning engagement of tutors<br />

and learning-atmosphere. It is concluded that selforganized<br />

peer group learning might be an additional<br />

model of case-based learning in advanced students.<br />

5H5 Changing to ‘self-induced learning’<br />

in a speech therapy department<br />

Martin Peleman<br />

Arteveldehogeschool, Campus Sint-Lievenspoortstraat, Sint-<br />

Lievenspoortstraat 143, 9000 Gent, BELGIUM<br />

The Speech Department of the Arteveldehogeschool<br />

changed its curriculum from a traditional teachercentered<br />

towards a more student-centered educational<br />

system. Because of the apparent differences with PBL,<br />

we prefer to define our new system as ‘self-induced<br />

learning’. One third of the content of the original<br />

theoretical courses was transformed into different types<br />

of tasks which are dealt with by the students in group<br />

sessions and under the supervision of a teacher. This<br />

supervision is mainly focused on the process of working<br />

and studying together in an efficient way. The project<br />

is gradually implemented over the three years of the<br />

curriculum. Students themselves as well as staff<br />

members and external professionals and organisations<br />

were consulted during the whole process of this<br />

curricular change. All of them also took part in the<br />

continuous evaluation of the project during the first<br />

year.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.41 -<br />

5H6 Student participation in the<br />

organization of education at a<br />

medical school - a comparison of<br />

two South African cases<br />

B G Lindeque and Pierre L Bredenkamp*<br />

Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, P O Box<br />

19063, Tygerberg 7505, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

The political democratization of South Africa caused<br />

the international community to open up - trends and<br />

innovations in education worldwide had therefore a<br />

significant impact on training in South Africa, resulting<br />

in curricular reform. Pretoria and Stellenbosch were<br />

the first medical schools to change - student<br />

participation became a key element to drive this change.<br />

The Pretoria medical school implemented a problemorientated<br />

integrated model and Stellenbosch<br />

emphasized a core curriculum with certain key<br />

elements (integration, clinical relevance, stated<br />

outcomes). At both schools, students were utilized as<br />

important participants in all committee structures. Both<br />

schools went along the route of implementing the early<br />

years while developing the later years at the same time.<br />

Thus students played a major role in the continuous<br />

improving of the standards of training, as well as the<br />

effectiveness of the changes. This led to students<br />

becoming an integral part of the management of the<br />

faculty as a whole.<br />

5H7 Preparing the way: encouraging<br />

clinical tutors to be co-producers in<br />

the learning process<br />

Peter Barton* and Jillian Morrison<br />

Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow,<br />

4 Lancaster Crescent, Glasgow G12 0RR, UK<br />

In year 3 of Glasgow University’s new student-centred<br />

problem-based curriculum, students receive 20 days,<br />

one day per week, of structured “Clinical Practice”.<br />

GPs and hospital tutors provide this on alternate weeks.<br />

Clinical Practice in the Community (CPC), an<br />

innovative course of community based education,<br />

comprises:<br />

1 Student Consultation Surgery: supervised personal<br />

consulting;<br />

2 Signs and Symptoms Surgery: history taking and<br />

examination practice;<br />

3 Longitudinal Care Project (LCP): students<br />

undertake detailed assessments of patients with<br />

chronic illness. The LCP contributes 20% to<br />

summative assessment.<br />

From CPC’s earliest iterations, 80 GP tutors have been<br />

involved as co-producers. Using small group<br />

workshops, questionnaire surveys, telephone<br />

discussions, and a 2-day staff development programme,<br />

academic staff and tutors have worked together to<br />

design and develop the course. The course and its<br />

clinical tutors are highly evaluated by students and<br />

external examiners alike. We believe co-production is<br />

an essential part of curriculum design.


Session 5I Educating the educators (2)<br />

5I1 How to help clinical and multimedia<br />

staff develop joint programs<br />

Eleanor Flynn<br />

Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentisty and Health<br />

Sciences, Level 7, Medical Building, University of Melbourne,<br />

Victoria 3010, AUSTRALIA<br />

As medical education courses use multimedia based<br />

modes of delivery more, it becomes vital that clinical<br />

and multimedia staff understand each other’s frames<br />

of reference. They need to work effectively together to<br />

produce programs which meet the needs of students in<br />

a timely manner by recognising, defining and<br />

overcoming the problems that occur. The project being<br />

used as an illustration of how to manage these problems<br />

is the development of a web based program to teach<br />

Rational Test Ordering to postgraduate year 1 & 2<br />

doctors for the Postgraduate Medical Council of New<br />

South Wales. The particularly useful techniques were<br />

the development of a detailed storyboard preceded by<br />

an exhaustive needs analysis, especially to the project<br />

manager who was a clinician moving into multimedia<br />

education. The presentation will give examples of the<br />

problems and their solutions especially those relating<br />

to improving communication between clinicians and<br />

multimedia staff.<br />

5I2 “Getting Started in Clinical<br />

Teaching” - a staff development<br />

initiative<br />

J A Dent* and P E Preece<br />

Clinical Skills Centre, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital<br />

& Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Enabling clinicians to fulfil their clinical teaching role<br />

necessitates support mechanisms which facilitate<br />

linking enthusiasm for student-teaching to the<br />

requirements of a structured curriculum. ”Getting<br />

Started in Clinical Teaching” comprises instructional<br />

booklets supplemented by a two-day course providing<br />

a combination of educational theory and practical<br />

instruction. It aims to support clinical teachers in wards,<br />

out-patient clinics and the Clinical Skills Centre.<br />

Information on curriculum construction, adult learning<br />

and curriculum outcomes is provided, together with<br />

practical experience of learning resources available in<br />

these venues. The course includes content-preparation,<br />

delivery mechanisms, models for organising student/<br />

patient interactions and the role of constructive<br />

feedback. Workshops are used to construct clinical<br />

teaching sessions using the approaches described<br />

including simulation, role-play and self-video. Selfcritique<br />

and peer review are encouraged. Areas of<br />

potential resistance to change are discussed. The<br />

“Getting Started” booklets summarising keypoints are<br />

suitable for wider dissemination.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.42 -<br />

5I3 Governance in medical teaching:<br />

pilot study<br />

Iain Robbé<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, Temple of Peace &<br />

Health, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NW, UK<br />

Quality in tertiary teaching is increasingly important<br />

(McLean, 2001) and it can be linked to the government<br />

policy of improving medical practices through<br />

governance (Scally & Donaldson, 1998). A checklist<br />

for governance was developed to investigate its<br />

theoretical validity (Cohen & Manion, 1989) for<br />

medical educators. Random sample [20%, n=12] of<br />

postgraduate educators in a medical college completed<br />

the checklist using a five point Likert scale and<br />

discussed its validity compared to the literature, their<br />

experiences and governance issues. Respondents<br />

judged the checklist to assess governance had high<br />

construct and content validity. They easily identified<br />

tasks they aimed to achieve to provide quality teaching.<br />

Checklist issues of infrastructure, coherence, culture,<br />

appropriateness of tasks, and systems to assess<br />

performance were evaluated positively. There was high<br />

theoretical validity in this setting. Further research is<br />

needed to test the validity and reliability of these results.<br />

5I4 The role of an education unit in<br />

health professional education:<br />

proactive or responsive<br />

Margaret Horsburgh* and Rain Lamdin<br />

Faulty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland,<br />

Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand<br />

The teaching of health professions at The University<br />

of Auckland has undergone significant change in the<br />

last few years. The transformation has been from a<br />

medical school to a multi-professional Faculty of<br />

Medical and Health Sciences. At an undergraduate level<br />

medical, nursing, medical science and health science<br />

students now share learning opportunities. In order to<br />

support learning and teaching across the Faculty and<br />

establish best practice for curriculum, learning,<br />

teaching and assessment a multi-professional unit has<br />

been established. This presentation describes the goals<br />

of the Unit and identifies the tension between being<br />

responsive to individuals and groups and being<br />

proactive through setting an agenda for educational<br />

development within the Faculty. Potential conflict<br />

between the roles of curriculum management,<br />

monitoring and appraisal, leadership for change and<br />

research are discussed. Conclusions are drawn about<br />

the purpose and value of such centres in a multiprofessional<br />

environment.


5I5 Beyond teacher training; the<br />

construction of a faculty<br />

development strategy<br />

Patricia Rosado Pinto* and Ramiro Avila<br />

Department of Medical Education, Faculdade de Ciencias<br />

Medicas, Campo de Santana, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa,<br />

PORTUGAL<br />

In Portuguese medical schools the pedagogical<br />

preparation of faculty members has been a neglected<br />

enterprise. Furthermore faculty are constantly being<br />

asked to assume new educational roles for which they<br />

have received no specific training. Thus formal faculty<br />

development programmes are becoming more and more<br />

vital. The aim of this presentation is to describe the<br />

institutional strategy of our Medical Education<br />

Department, established in 1996, concerning: teacher<br />

training workshops for junior and for senior lecturers;<br />

Journal clubs and sharing good practice sessions;<br />

Working sessions with the teachers - rethinking the<br />

teachers’ assumptions about teaching and learning;<br />

discussing curricular issues; designing and developing<br />

specific educational and evaluation materials, providing<br />

educational feedback. More than isolated courses on<br />

“teaching how to teach” we aim at a real,<br />

comprehensive and structured staff development<br />

strategy in which subject matter and educational experts<br />

can work together avoiding isolated discipline<br />

knowledge and contributing to a systematic<br />

improvement of teaching.<br />

5I6 The profile of the perfect teaching<br />

professor<br />

F Scheele*, J Th M van der Schoot and A J Goverde<br />

St Lucas Andreas Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE<br />

Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

The aim of the study was to assess the characteristics<br />

of the perfect teaching professor from the perspective<br />

of postgraduate trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology.<br />

A written interview was sent to 120 trainees. The<br />

interview contained 3 questions such as: ‘What is your<br />

Session 5J Education and cultural diversity<br />

5J1 The development and evaluation of<br />

a programme to teach cultural<br />

diversity to medical undergraduate<br />

students<br />

Nisha Dogra<br />

University of Leicester, Greenwood Institute of Child Health,<br />

Westcotes House, Westcotes Drive, Leicester LE3 3TP, UK<br />

The study aimed to assess any attitudinal change in<br />

students following teaching on cultural/racial diversity<br />

using a previously developed questionnaire and whether<br />

the teaching enabled the learning objectives to be met<br />

in a measurable way. Students completed a<br />

questionnaire designed in a previous study at two<br />

stages; the first before the component on cultural<br />

diversity was delivered and the second after the sessions<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.43 -<br />

advice to improve your teaching professor?’ The<br />

answers were subsequently divided in three categories:<br />

knowledge (the head), practical skills (the hands) and<br />

attitude (the heart). 74 trainees responded. 74% of the<br />

answers given fell in the heart category, 23% in the<br />

head category and 3% in the hand category. From the<br />

perspective of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology<br />

the perfect teaching professor is the king of positive<br />

feedback and has personal interest in the trainee. The<br />

perfect teacher has good knowledge and average skills.<br />

It is recommended that the teaching professor should<br />

appoint a stimulating tutor with interest in the social<br />

aspects surrounding the trainee.<br />

5I7 Evidence retrieval in medical<br />

education: obstructions and<br />

opportunities<br />

Alex Haig<br />

SCPMDE, Education Development Unit, Tay Park House, 484<br />

Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

With the ever-increasing emphasis on best evidence in<br />

medical education it is imperative that researchers and<br />

practitioners have full access to the evidence in order<br />

to reduce bias. The various factors impeding evidence<br />

retrieval in medical education will be outlined, and the<br />

problems inherent with database indexing will be<br />

highlighted with the results of a study of comparative<br />

search strategies. By examining the search strategies’<br />

rates of precision, sensitivity, and specificity it can be<br />

shown that the major databases containing relevant<br />

peer-reviewed studies (Medline, Embase, ERIC) are<br />

not indexed for effective searches in medical education.<br />

Presently there is no existing database or search tool<br />

that provides the conceptual context required for<br />

evidence retrieval for medical education. Alternative<br />

approaches to compensate for current inadequate<br />

indexing will be outlined, as will possible future models<br />

that could resolve existing problems and provide<br />

analytical tools for the evidence-based research and<br />

decision-making of tomorrow.<br />

on cultural diversity. The time interval between stage<br />

one and two was one week. The cultural diversity<br />

component was developed using a range of sources.<br />

140 out of 181 (77.3%) students completed the<br />

questionnaire at both stages. The findings include<br />

statistically significant changes that reflect more<br />

“positive” attitudes about cultures coming together and<br />

about specific cultures. The study indicates that<br />

attitudes changed over the period of teaching. There<br />

is, however, scope for further development of measures<br />

to enable attitudinal shifts to be measured.


5J2 Aboriginal health: a tool in the<br />

process of reconciliation?<br />

G Garvey* and I E Rolfe*<br />

University of Newcastle, Faculty of Medicine and Health<br />

Sciences, University Drive, Callaghan 2308, AUSTRALIA<br />

The inclusion of culturally appropriate, relevant and<br />

academically sound content and practical experience<br />

in Aboriginal Health is an important tool in the process<br />

of reconciliation in Australia. The inclusion of<br />

Aboriginal Health content also serves several other<br />

purposes. It recognises the importance of Aboriginal<br />

Health in Australian society and also provides<br />

Aboriginal students with a sense of belonging. It can<br />

also assist in attracting and retaining health<br />

professionals to work in Aboriginal communities and<br />

provides all students with an understanding of cultural<br />

practices and beliefs of patients from other cultures.<br />

We aim to outline the Aboriginal Health content for<br />

health professional students at the Faculty of Medicine<br />

and Health Sciences, Newcastle, Australia. We will<br />

present an innovative, specifically designed multimedia<br />

resource that is used to orientate students to<br />

Aboriginal History, Cultural Awareness, Aboriginal<br />

Health and working with Aboriginal organisations.<br />

5J3 Valuing diversity: the effectiveness<br />

of a roleplay workshop as part of a<br />

newly introduced communitybased<br />

diversity module<br />

Sue Conning*, Alison Hooper, Margot Turner and Val Wass<br />

Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Department<br />

of General Practice, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe<br />

Road, London SE5 3PJ<br />

Learning about the diverse needs of people with<br />

disabilities, deprivation, homosexuality or minority<br />

ethnicity is challenging. We run a “diversity” course<br />

where students interview individuals, visit community<br />

organisations and explore issues raised in seminars.<br />

Evaluation showed that some viewed these issues as<br />

common sense. A workshop using trained, standardised<br />

patients was introduced into the module. Specific<br />

diversity scenarios were enacted and students then<br />

reflected on their personal reactions to these in small<br />

groups. Students completed a questionnaire evaluating<br />

the impact of this workshop. A cultural discourse<br />

analyst observed the scenarios and group interaction.<br />

197 (60%) students completed the questionnaire (20%<br />

non-attendance). Students rated the workshop very<br />

positively. It proved an innovative experience, which<br />

challenged their own prejudices and added further<br />

personal reality to their community experiences.<br />

Reasons for this will be discussed. This interactive<br />

learning model proved most effective in encouraging<br />

students to explore their personal approaches to<br />

diversity issues.<br />

5J4 Using negative role models<br />

positively<br />

S E Gull* and K H Matheson<br />

Cambridge, 42 Southgate Street, Bury St Edmunds IP33 2AZ,<br />

Suffolk, UK<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.44 -<br />

The influence of the negative role model will be<br />

presented. The main aim of the study was to consider<br />

the issue of gender and role models for women in<br />

medical education. One investigator (SEG) carried out<br />

semi-structured interviews with 8 undergraduate<br />

students and 10 female doctors. A question asked was<br />

“what characteristics of role models influenced you<br />

during your medical education?”. The importance of<br />

role models was acknowledged. The positive and<br />

negative attributes of role models will be discussed with<br />

particular reference to the positive effect of negative<br />

role models. Role models appear to be related to the<br />

self-identity of the student, and negative attributes may<br />

be influential in a positive as well as a negative way.<br />

5J5 What factors influence<br />

underrepresented minority (URM)<br />

students in their choice of medical<br />

schools?<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Mark Urosev<br />

University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Medical<br />

Education (m/c 591), 808 S. Wood St, CME 986, Chicago IL<br />

60612, USA<br />

This study investigates specific factors influencing<br />

underrepresented minority students’ (URMs) choice<br />

among medical schools. Quantitative and qualitative<br />

pre-matriculate data were gathered from all applicants<br />

to the University of Illinois at Chicago College of<br />

Medicine (1999/2000-2000/2001). Applicants were<br />

classified both by ethnicity and student groups listed<br />

as follows: interviewed and denied (ID); interviewed,<br />

accepted and matriculated (AM); and interviewed,<br />

accepted but declined the offer (AD). A series of Chisquare<br />

tests of independence and t-test were performed.<br />

MCAT scores were significantly higher for the AD<br />

group, whereas GPA was statistically different only<br />

between the ID and AD students. Particular choices<br />

such as the prestige and affiliation of undergraduate<br />

institutions and medical schools, multiple acceptances,<br />

and choices among multiple acceptances were also<br />

statistically dependent on student groups and ethnicity.<br />

Distinguishable trends exist regarding the selection of<br />

a medical school that follow either student ethnicity,<br />

or entrance categorization.<br />

5J6 Education for professionalism in<br />

medicine<br />

Geoffrey Westwood* and Barbara Westwood<br />

Bankstown Health Service, Locked Mail Bag 1600, Bankstown<br />

NSW 2200, AUSTRALIA<br />

One of the themes for this conference is professionalism<br />

in medical education. The concept of professionalism<br />

in medical practice as distinct from medical education<br />

is discussed along with what constitutes<br />

professionalism in current medical practice in Australia.<br />

The question is proposed that unless medical education<br />

addresses the issues of professionalism then it is<br />

unrealistic to expect young doctors to exhibit so-called<br />

professional behaviour in their practice of medicine.<br />

The authors draw on their long experience in health<br />

administration and health education.


5J7 Characteristics of students admitted<br />

for the medical course at the Faculty<br />

of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto,<br />

University of Sao Paulo, Brazil<br />

A R L Cianflone*, M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo,<br />

M L V Rodrigues and L E de A Troncon<br />

Faculty of Medicine or Ribeirao Preto, Rua Dom Luiz Amaral<br />

Mousinho, 1662-ap.2, 14090-180 Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

In order to determine some characteristics of the<br />

medical students, a standardized questionnaire was<br />

applied to 96 students admitted in 1994 and to 98<br />

students admitted in 2000. The results were: age at<br />

admission: 18 years or less (62.8%); number of<br />

Session 5K Contexts for learning<br />

5K1 Clinical education in the health care<br />

professions: a critical analysis of<br />

the literature<br />

Alison Rushton<br />

Coventry University, School of Health & Social Sciences, Priory<br />

Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK<br />

Clinical education is an integral component of medical<br />

education, providing an essential bridge between the<br />

academic and clinical environments. A soft systems<br />

methodology provided a conceptual framework for<br />

structuring an analysis of clinical education. The search<br />

encompassed all major databases and manual searching<br />

of key journals for healthcare professions. Content<br />

analysis identified emerging themes, and informed the<br />

sub-divisions of the analysis. Key themes included:<br />

balance between theoretical and clinical course<br />

components, timing of placements, assessment, models<br />

of placement, supervisory process, and roles of the<br />

clinical educator and the university tutor. The analysis<br />

identified a paucity of good quality research, with both<br />

theory-practice and literature-practice gaps in<br />

existence. The literature also highlighted the necessity<br />

for change and the need to develop theory and research.<br />

The findings reflect that a structured approach to<br />

address the issues raised by clinical education at<br />

individual profession and interdisciplinary levels is<br />

perhaps required.<br />

5K2 “Contracts for Learning”: project to<br />

improve the quality of attachments<br />

at a District General Hospital<br />

Richard Ayres*, Henry Averns and Lin Sanders<br />

Northern Devon Healthcare Trust, Medical Education Centre,<br />

North Devon District Hospital, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 4JB,<br />

UK<br />

Our District Hospital serves a mainly rural population<br />

of 160,000 and has good links with local GPs and<br />

community hospitals. Undergraduate medical students<br />

come for various attachments, mostly from Bristol<br />

University. Often they have no clear idea what they<br />

want from the attachment, and sometimes we have no<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.45 -<br />

previous applications: 1(64.9%) and >1 (13.4%);<br />

previous experience in other university courses: 5.1%;<br />

father with university degree: 76.8%; mother with<br />

university degree: 53.1%; students who have parent<br />

physicians: 19.5% (other relatives physicians: 39.5%).<br />

38.5% of the students decided to apply for medicine<br />

between the ages of 14 and 16 years and 30.5% decided<br />

between 10 and 13 years. The disciplines of better<br />

performance during the high school were Biology<br />

(91.5%), Chemistry (78.2%), Physics (77.5%) and<br />

Mathematics (77.5%). The reasons given for<br />

application to Medicine were: liking Biology (45%);<br />

personal achievement (30%); to help people (23%).<br />

clear idea what to teach them. “Contracts for Learning”<br />

is a new project based on a model already used here<br />

for nursing students. We email students four weeks<br />

before their attachment. We provide detailed profiles<br />

of teaching staff in the hospital and primary care; also<br />

particular departments, GP surgeries and community<br />

hospitals. This amounts to an extensive menu of choices<br />

(including multidisciplinary modules offered to<br />

healthcare students). Students then submit a form<br />

detailing their learning requirements. We then produce<br />

a “Learning Contract” specifying what learning<br />

experiences we will provide. We will be presenting our<br />

early experience of this project.<br />

5K3 Does the dedicated teaching<br />

environment in ambulatory care<br />

improve acquisition of learning<br />

outcomes?<br />

Clare I L Stewart*, Paul E Preece and John A Dent<br />

Dundee University, Clinical Skills Centre, Ninewells Hospital<br />

and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Current trends in undergraduate medical education are<br />

away from traditional ward-based learning to<br />

ambulatory care teaching. We wanted to know whether<br />

students gain more learning outcomes from a dedicated<br />

ambulatory teaching environment than a conventional<br />

outpatient clinic. A comparative evaluation study using<br />

a semi-structured student questionnaire and a structured<br />

patient questionnaire was performed. Surprisingly,<br />

results indicated the learning environment and<br />

organisation of the teaching were rated equally.<br />

However, more learning outcomes were achieved<br />

utilising the Ambulatory Care Teaching Centre<br />

(ACTC), but each venue demonstrated particular<br />

strengths with regard to individual outcomes. The level<br />

of patient satisfaction in the ACTC was high, implying<br />

patient care was not adversely affected utilising this<br />

setting. This information will inform practice for the<br />

content of future teaching sessions.


5K4 Could we improve on what patients<br />

our pediatrics students saw in<br />

outpatient clinics?<br />

Pedro Herskovic*, Alicia Vasquez, Cristian Breinbauer,<br />

Patricia Gomez, Viviana Herskovic, Marcela Jacard,<br />

Claudio Missarelli and Erika Troncoso<br />

Pediatrics Department, University of Chile, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Campus Oriente, Casilla 16117, Correo 9, Providencia,<br />

Santiago, CHILE<br />

For the last two years we have registered every contact<br />

of fifth year medical students with pediatric outpatients.<br />

In 1999 we found that exposure to pathologies included<br />

in the contents for the rotation ranged from 43.5% to<br />

71.7%. In year 2000 an intervention was made with<br />

the students’ tutors to increase their awareness about<br />

the need of contact with more pathologies. Our<br />

objective was to check if such intervention would<br />

improve on the deficiencies detected in 1999. In year<br />

2000 six student groups attended 50 sessions in<br />

outpatient clinics. Patients were registered with up to<br />

three diagnoses, which were compared with the 46<br />

pathologies included in our learning objectives. Patient<br />

encounters ranged from 38 to 127 per group. Exposure<br />

to pathologies ranged from 43.0% to 80.4%, which was<br />

similar to what was observed in 1999. Correlation was<br />

found between the number of patients seen and contact<br />

with more pathologies. A briefing session for tutors<br />

did not improve the completion of the rotation<br />

objectives. We have to keep assessing what is going on<br />

in clinical rotations.<br />

5K5 Using the ward round for teaching<br />

and learning: how do junior<br />

doctors learn from consultants<br />

through ward-based teaching?<br />

Alan Bleakley<br />

Cornwall Postgraduate Education Centre, Royal Cornwall<br />

Hospital, Truro Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK<br />

Traditional psychological models of knowledge and<br />

skills transmission fail to tell the entire story of how<br />

junior doctors are effectively taught on ward rounds,<br />

moving from novice to expert status through<br />

‘professional adhesion’. This paper presentation reports<br />

an ongoing combined qualitative methods research<br />

project with a mixed speciality group of twenty-five<br />

consultants in a large rural hospital in Britain. Data<br />

analysis of semi-structured interviews responding to<br />

examples of videotaped ward practice, has led to a more<br />

anthropological, rather than the conventional<br />

psychological, exploration of the working modes of<br />

specific communities of practice in a complex teaching<br />

and learning context. Contemporary models of<br />

constructed, distributed and situated learning, of<br />

cognitive apprenticeship, of adaptation to a ‘habitus’<br />

(informal rules and regulations of a community of<br />

practice) and of the construction of practitioner<br />

identities, are used as an exploratory, and in some cases<br />

explanatory, framework for the data collected from the<br />

study.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.46 -<br />

5K6 Clinical skills training needs of final<br />

year medical students and PRHOs -<br />

a comparison<br />

D MacLeod*, E Gill, J Gate and J Rees<br />

NHS, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool<br />

L9 4EL, UK<br />

We compared the clinical skills training needs of final<br />

year medical students and PRHOs. We surveyed 257<br />

final year medical students undergoing clinical skills<br />

training, including a ‘Harvey’ cardiac patient simulator<br />

and communication training. Then, 22 PRHOs<br />

completed a questionnaire assessing training needs to<br />

plan clinical skills teaching. The most frequent student<br />

revision requests were all commonly encountered<br />

OSCE stations; catheterization, suturing,<br />

ophthalmoscopy, IV fluid management and breast<br />

examination (100%, 95%, 79% and 58% of student<br />

sessions respectively). By contrast, PRHOs requested<br />

training on infrequently performed skills (joint<br />

aspiration, pneumothorax aspiration, central vein<br />

cannulation) or common but complex skills. Selfassessed<br />

training needs of final year medical students<br />

reflect impending OSCE assessment, whilst degree of<br />

exposure and skill complexity drive training needs for<br />

the PRHOs. This suggests some adjustment in student<br />

skills training and the need for further skills training<br />

sessions for PRHOs.<br />

5K7 The impact of a precepted diabetic<br />

foot care program<br />

Linda Z Nieman, Lewis E Foxhall*, Frank Sifuentes and<br />

Lee Cheng<br />

UT Houston Health Science Center, Family Practice and<br />

Community Medicine, 6431 Fannin, Suite JJL324, Houston TX<br />

77030, USA<br />

Diabetes is a growing international health problem that<br />

too often leads to foot amputation. Over a two summer<br />

period, 156 preclinical students in the Texas Statewide<br />

Family Practice Preceptors hip Program screened the<br />

feet of more than 300 diabetics, 30% of whom had<br />

loss of pedal sensation. Screening was accomplished<br />

with the Semmes Weinstein 5.07/10g, monofilament.<br />

Students also taught these patients diabetic foot care.<br />

From the analysis of the copies of the patient<br />

evaluations submitted to us, we found that patients<br />

whose age was greater than 60 years and patients who<br />

received their care in rural settings were more likely to<br />

have a greater number of foot problems than those<br />

patients who were younger and those who received care<br />

in metropolitan areas. The students’ participation in<br />

diabetic screening and patient education has saved<br />

preceptors time and is considered helpful by patients.<br />

This program is transferable to other settings.


Session 5L Evaluation of multiprofessional education<br />

5L1 The benefits of a multiprofessional<br />

education programme can be<br />

sustained<br />

G J Mires*, F L R Williams, R M Harden and P W Howie<br />

University of Dundee, Department of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee,<br />

DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Improved understanding by third year medical students<br />

about the professional roles of doctors and midwives<br />

in the care of labouring women following a<br />

multiprofessional education programme have<br />

previously been reported (Mires et al, 1999). Following<br />

a clinical attachment in the fourth year, the previously<br />

observed changes in awareness of professional<br />

responsibilty were maintained in the same group of<br />

students and in some areas enhanced. We believe that<br />

a short multiprofessional course early in the medical<br />

curriculum can change awareness of professional<br />

responsibility. Further, we have evidence that these<br />

attitude changes were maintained and enhanced<br />

following a clinical attachment later in the educational<br />

programme. This reinforcement of multiprofessional<br />

experiences may enhance working practice after<br />

graduation.<br />

(Mires GJ, Williams FLR, Harden RM, Howie PW, McCarey M,<br />

Robertson A. Multiprofessional education in undergraduate<br />

curricula can work. Medical Teacher 1999;21:281-285)<br />

5L2 Self-directed multiprofessional<br />

continuing medical education with<br />

facilitators: an experiment in four<br />

European countries. The Belgian<br />

story<br />

J Goedhuys*, C Geens, N Mathers, K Billingham, G Maso<br />

and O Solas-Gaspar<br />

Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 J,<br />

Minderbroedersstraat 17, 3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

In order to further implement fundamental options like<br />

self-directed learning, multiprofessional education and<br />

case-based learning, Continuing Medical Education has<br />

to provide a model that integrates the values of these<br />

options into daily practice. The aim of our project was<br />

to try out such a model in UK, Belgium, Italy and Spain.<br />

In this paper the Belgian experience is reported. Six<br />

general practice/family medicine group practices were<br />

selected, with at least two GPs and at least one extra<br />

discipline attached to the practice. Two facilitators<br />

(young GPs) were appointed to three practices each.<br />

They facilitated the group in constructing a common<br />

learning agenda and made sure the group found the<br />

methods to realise it. All processes and outcomes were<br />

registered and all participants were interviewed<br />

afterwards. Results show a high satisfaction, perceived<br />

relevance and enhanced teamspirit. The balance<br />

between task-oriented and group-oriented facilitation<br />

will be discussed.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.47 -<br />

5L3 Interprofessional education in a<br />

clinical and non-clinical<br />

environment: teachers’ and<br />

learners’ perspectives<br />

John Jenkins and Sue Morison*<br />

Queen’s University Belfast, School of Nursing & Midwifery,<br />

Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL,<br />

UK<br />

This paper presents the results of the evaluation of an<br />

interprofessional education (IPE) pilot programme for<br />

undergraduate medical and nursing students. The pilot<br />

involved 136 students in the specialist areas of<br />

paediatrics and Children’s Nursing. Three groups, with<br />

a maximum of 44 students per group undertook the<br />

project during 2000-01. Experts from both professions,<br />

University and Health Service, delivered the<br />

programme and assessed student learning. Qualitative<br />

and quantitative evaluation techniques were employed<br />

to compare the success of classroom-based (lectures,<br />

problem-based learning (PBL), case discussion) and<br />

clinical placement (tutorials, ward rounds, teamwork)<br />

teaching and learning. The views of both teachers and<br />

learners will be presented. Initial results suggest that<br />

both students and teachers identify PBL as the most<br />

successful classroom-based teaching and learning<br />

strategy but that clinical placement learning was<br />

preferred overall. That teaching staff demonstrated a<br />

positive attitude to IPE was also important.<br />

5L4 Interprofessional education:<br />

experiences of students<br />

J Agsteribbe*, R M H Schaub and J Cohen-Schotanus<br />

University of Groningen, Department of Education, Faculty of<br />

Medical Sciences, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

The courses of the undergraduate dental and dental<br />

hygienist training at Groningen University are partially<br />

shared. The concept of this educational programme is<br />

that dentists and dental hygienists join forces within<br />

their workfield. The students therefore should get<br />

acquainted with the concept of working together. The<br />

research question is: how do students experience this<br />

concept? In order to answer this question we used the<br />

critical incidents method. We asked the students<br />

(n=300) to answer the following question: “ During<br />

which event in the course did you personally experience<br />

the team concept and did it work out well for you, or<br />

did it not work out at all?” 85 forms were returned to<br />

us. The students’ opinions towards their professional<br />

colleagues became increasingly critical. In particular<br />

the dental hygienist students did not have the feeling<br />

they were taken seriously by the teachers and the dental<br />

students.


5L5 “Capturing the learning”: the<br />

development of interprofessional<br />

education in the Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Health and Biological Sciences,<br />

University of Southampton<br />

D Humphris* and S Colly<br />

New Generation Project, Building 67, University of<br />

Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, Hants SO17 1BJ, UK<br />

The Faculty of Medicine, Health & Biological Sciences,<br />

University of Southampton have a track record of<br />

developing a number of successful small<br />

interprofessional teaching and learning projects. This<br />

paper reports the findings of a study designed to<br />

‘Capture the Learning’ emerging from the experience<br />

of the last decade of inter-professional education<br />

activity in the Faculty. This small-scale qualitative study<br />

involved interviews with 16 key informants from a<br />

range of professional backgrounds, from across the<br />

Faculty and service. This paper reports the key emergent<br />

themes from the analysis of data. This includes a<br />

reflection on the conditions necessary for the<br />

development of interprofessional education and<br />

learning in the Faculty. The outcomes of this study will<br />

be related to the development of the Faculty’s<br />

commitment to the establishment of the New<br />

Generation Project.<br />

- 4.48 -<br />

5L6 Learning interprofessionally: a<br />

review of experiences<br />

A Le May*, F Kitsell, I Giles and C Stephens<br />

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Building 67, University of<br />

Southampton, Southampton, Hants SO17 1BJ, UK<br />

This paper details the educational approaches used in<br />

a programme of interprofessional education within the<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Health and Biological Sciences<br />

at the University of Southampton. This initiative<br />

focussed on 1,000 first year undergraduate students<br />

undertaking courses in medicine, midwifery, nursing,<br />

occupational therapy, physiotherapy and podiatry.<br />

Students were split into 100 facilitated learning groups<br />

and asked to construct a scenario, from a selection of<br />

clinical topics, against which they answered 3 clinically<br />

focussed questions and critically appraised their<br />

experiences of team working. Assessment was through<br />

an oral presentation of their work to peers and<br />

facilitators. The entire experience has been evaluated<br />

from both the students’ and the facilitators’ view points<br />

– salient issues raised in this evaluation will be<br />

presented and discussed in the light of planned future<br />

interprofessional exercises during the second and third<br />

years of these students’ programmes. Conclusions<br />

surrounding the opportunities and barriers to<br />

interprofessional education will be drawn.<br />

Session 5M Teaching about EBM, critical thinking and research<br />

5M1 Questions as the key to knowledge:<br />

teaching medical students in<br />

Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

Jonna Skov Madsen*, Birgitta Wallstedt, Carl Joakim<br />

Brandt and Mogens Horder<br />

Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical<br />

Biochemistry, DK-5000 Odense C, DENMARK<br />

There is a focus on teaching Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

(EBM) but until recently EBM training was not<br />

incorporated in our undergraduate curriculum. We<br />

introduced an EBM course in the 9th semester (out of<br />

13) in the subject matter ‘clinical biochemistry’. The<br />

course consisted of seven (1-hour) lectures during three<br />

weeks. First an introduction to the EBM method was<br />

given after which students in small groups chose and<br />

focused their own question, undertook a structured<br />

search and selected one article. The process and results<br />

were subsequently presented to and discussed within<br />

the entire group of students. The course was evaluated<br />

using a questionnaire. Students improved in the<br />

evaluation of scientific articles and in seeking<br />

information and reported that they had been stimulated<br />

to understand concepts instead of memorising details.<br />

In our opinion medical students should be introduced<br />

to EBM at an early stage to be able to practice EBM<br />

throughout their education.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

5M2 Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine<br />

to healthcare professionals:<br />

implementing and evaluating the<br />

programme<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

Many papers have described the importance of<br />

exposing healthcare professionals to the ‘new<br />

paradigm’ of evidence-based medicine (EBM) as one<br />

of the best ways to improve patient care. To this end,<br />

we developed and evaluated short courses in EBM for<br />

health professionals from 1998 to 2000 at the United<br />

Medical Education Consortium, London. Each of the<br />

courses lasts for four weeks. The aims of the course<br />

are to enable participants to learn how to go through<br />

logical laid questions, search on-line databases, review<br />

articles critically and apply information from the<br />

literature to specific clinical questions. All the<br />

participants were surveyed immediately before and<br />

after the short course to assess changes in reading,<br />

critical evaluation and literature search in medical<br />

decision making. The results showed that on-line<br />

database search and critical appraisal skills increased<br />

significantly in the participants, as did their tendency<br />

to use MEDLINE, BIDS and original research articles<br />

to solve clinical problems.


5M3 Impact of a short interactive<br />

curriculum on medical students’<br />

appreciation of EBM and CAM<br />

Samuel N Forjuoh*, Robert A Henry, Terry G Rascoe,<br />

Barb Symm and Janine C Edwards<br />

Department of Family & Community Medicine, Scott & White<br />

Memorial Hospital, Texas A & M University, System Health<br />

Science Center, College of Medicine, Scott & White Santa Fe<br />

Center, Temple, TX 76504, USA<br />

To evaluate the impact of a short, interactive curriculum<br />

on students’ appreciation of evidence-based medicine<br />

(EBM) and complementary/alternative medicine<br />

(CAM), a one-page anonymous questionnaire was<br />

distributed to all third-year students during their sixweek<br />

family medicine clerkship before/after a new<br />

curriculum, comprising interactive sessions on<br />

principles of epidemiology, biostatistics, EBM/CAM.<br />

The majority reported that the new instruction in<br />

epidemiology (83%), biostatistics (88%), EBM (95%),<br />

and CAM (100%) would help their future work. Even<br />

though the increase in their mean response on<br />

appropriateness of integrating EBM/CAM from 3.79<br />

to 4.05 on a 5-point Likert scale was not statistically<br />

significant (p=.095), significant changes were reported<br />

in the areas of “critiquing the medical literature”<br />

(p=.030) and “appraising a clinical trial” (p


5M7 Experimental courses in<br />

Biochemistry - initiation to<br />

scientific research in<br />

undergraduate medicine<br />

Carlota Saldanha*, Rui Mesquita and J Martins-Silva<br />

Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, PORTUGAL<br />

Experimental courses in biochemistry have been<br />

carried out in order to develop critical thinking,<br />

autonomy and decision-making capacity in first year<br />

students. To determine the students’ outcomes in terms<br />

of learning success and satisfaction, an anonymous<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.50 -<br />

questionnaire with 15 questions based on a Likert scale<br />

(bad, insufficient, sufficient, good, very good) was<br />

applied to the 14 students that attended the course in<br />

1998/1999, at the beginning and the end of the course.<br />

At the end of the course there was an increase in the<br />

number of students who responded ‘very good’ to: the<br />

stay in the lab, to using bibliographic search, to what is<br />

the quality control, to doing statistical analysis and to<br />

making oral results presentations. There was an increase<br />

in the students’ interest in research, practical skills in<br />

the lab and their knowledge in different areas of<br />

biomedical research.


Session 6 Workshops 2<br />

6/1 Basic Skills Faculty Development<br />

Workshop<br />

Dr Anita Duhl Glicken<br />

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Box C219, 4200 E<br />

9th Avenue Denver, Colorado 60262, USA<br />

Background<br />

Medical faculty are often recruited directly from<br />

clinical practice and while clinical expertise is<br />

invaluable to an applied educational process, these<br />

individuals may feel unprepared for the expectations<br />

and demands of academic teaching.<br />

Aims<br />

The purpose of this workshop is to provide new faculty<br />

with participatory learning experiences designed to<br />

enhance basic skills that contribute to success in the<br />

academic environment. The workshop will also benefit<br />

senior faculty who wish to improve their skills or<br />

mentor new faculty in their program. Materials will be<br />

provided to enable participants to replicate this<br />

workshop at their own institution.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Faculty interested in improving their own teaching skills<br />

or mentoring new faculty<br />

Content and structure<br />

Two faculty development modules, designed to increase<br />

awareness of active teaching strategies, will engage<br />

participants in an interactive exploration of ways to<br />

enhance didactic teaching through the creation of a<br />

complete course syllabus that serves as a contract for<br />

partnership in learning. In addition, participants will<br />

explore strategies to improve student-faculty<br />

communication and feedback. These model workshops<br />

illustrate two components of an existing integrated<br />

program for faculty development. As a final exercise,<br />

time permitting, participants will review an existing<br />

integrated framework for faculty development and<br />

generate a strategic plan for developing a framework<br />

within their program. This plan will address issues of<br />

needs assessment, identification of educational<br />

components, models and strategies for course delivery,<br />

and assessment.<br />

This workshop will include several interactive<br />

exercises. Participants will work together to apply<br />

principles presented in class and to generate new<br />

information to share with the larger group. Brief<br />

computer-generated presentations will be used to share<br />

information and guide discussions in the larger group.<br />

Handouts will be distributed.<br />

6/2 An Introduction to Clinical<br />

Judgment Analysis<br />

Dr Anthony LaDuca<br />

National Board of Medical Examiners, 3750 Market Street,<br />

Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.51 -<br />

Background<br />

Medical school faculty and practising physicians place<br />

great importance on clinical judgment. Frequently, it<br />

is cited as a crucial element of a clinician’s proficiency.<br />

For some, judgment encompasses the “art” of medicine<br />

and the prospect of teaching it is seen as daunting if<br />

not impossible. But expert judgment has been studied<br />

for decades and clinical judgment has been the object<br />

of many investigations in Europe and North America<br />

for more than 30 years. Despite this lengthy history,<br />

few clinician educators are familiar with the concepts<br />

underlying judgment theory and judgment analysis.<br />

This workshop is intended to address that need.<br />

Aims<br />

• To introduce participants to the theory and practice<br />

of judgment analysis in clinical applications;<br />

• To engage participants in a systematic judgment<br />

analysis exercise;<br />

• To encourage participants to locate places for CJA<br />

in their instructional program;<br />

• To familiarize participants with the principal<br />

features of judgment theory as formulated by<br />

Brunswik and Hammond.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Post-graduate clinical education teaching faculty and<br />

administrators; clerkship directors; members of student<br />

progress committees; medical education support<br />

professionals; other medical school faculty and<br />

administrators.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The presenter will lead participants in a CJA exercise,<br />

such as diagnosing pneumonia. This exercise will use<br />

a Web-based CJA system developed by the NBME. The<br />

CJA system produces a graphical representation of the<br />

participant’s judgment “policy” and statistical feedback<br />

comparing that policy with a criterion policy. The<br />

participant is permitted to complete a second block of<br />

“cases” after which further feedback is provided. This<br />

latter feature illustrates the powerful instructional<br />

potential for CJA technology.<br />

1 [20 m] Participants engage a Web-based CJA<br />

Tutorial on chest pain. Presenter leads discussion<br />

of the meaning of graphical and statistical feedback<br />

2 [20 m] Participants complete exercise on diagnosis<br />

of pneumonia in 30 patients presenting in an<br />

emergency department. Feedback is discussed.<br />

3 [20 m] Participants complete the second block of<br />

30 pneumonia cases and discuss the feedback.<br />

4 [45 m] Presenter leads discussion of theoretical<br />

foundations of judgment analysis.<br />

5 [45 m] Working in small groups, participants begin<br />

to construct an original CJA problem as a means of<br />

addressing the potential utility of a computer-based<br />

CJA system in their instructional programs.<br />

6 [30 m] Small groups report on their products.


6/3 Norwegian Federation for Medical<br />

Education<br />

Chairperson: Dr Eivind Drange<br />

The workshop consists of three parts. All participants<br />

are welcome to attend parts 1 and 2. Part 3 is an<br />

Extraordinary General Assembly of the NFME.<br />

Part 1: 14.00-14.45<br />

Plenary: Reform in a medical school –<br />

needed, wanted, possible?<br />

Kirsti Lonka, Ph.D. Director, Development and Research<br />

Unit, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

University of Helsinki, Finland/Professor in Medical Education,<br />

Karolinska Institutet, Sweden<br />

Medical education is in the constant process of change,<br />

which makes it a dynamic field of study. Typical<br />

proposals for the improvement of undergraduate<br />

medical education have involved teaching the practical<br />

skills needed in general practice and closer integration<br />

of theoretical and clinical studies. Movement towards<br />

problem-based curricula is taking place all over the<br />

world. Also communication studies and professional<br />

growth are emphasized. In Finland, curriculum reforms<br />

have been frequent. Probably the most radical one took<br />

place in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of<br />

Tampere in 1994, when a pure PBL (problem-based<br />

learning) curriculum was started. Faculty of Medicine<br />

at the University of Helsinki began to evaluate and<br />

reform its curriculum of medical studies in 1994. This<br />

process resulted in Helsinki 2000, a hybrid-PBL<br />

curriculum, which was introduced in 1998. In this<br />

program, a systematic programme was also integrated<br />

to support students’ personal growth and to advance<br />

their communication and thinking skills. The main<br />

challenges for such a change process are not economic<br />

or technical, but rather, social and psychological. Most<br />

teachers lack educational training, and their<br />

understanding of the learning process is rather modest.<br />

A new approach to teaching requires medical teachers<br />

to view students as active constructors of knowledge.<br />

However, even though reforms may look good on paper,<br />

their implementation is the main challenge of medical<br />

education. Successful reforms are not possible without<br />

serious scientific research on medical education.<br />

Part 2: 1500-1545<br />

Workshop: NFME and <strong>AMEE</strong> – do we need<br />

them both?<br />

A discussion on the future role of NFME and possible<br />

co-operation with <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

The workshop will start with a closed debate among<br />

the panel followed by an open discussion.<br />

NFME and <strong>AMEE</strong> pursue similar objectives, and in<br />

many ways they fulfil them using the same means.<br />

Because of this, some Nordic institutions have claimed<br />

that there no longer is a need for NFME. At the<br />

workshop we want to challenge this claim and discuss<br />

if and how the two organisations can work side by side<br />

and together.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.52 -<br />

6/4 Bedside Cardiology Skills Training,<br />

featuring “Harvey”, the Cardiology<br />

Patient<br />

Simulator and the UMedic Computer System<br />

Dr Michael S. Gordon, University of Miami School of<br />

Medicine, USA<br />

Dr Joel M Felner, Emory University School of Medicine, USA<br />

Center for Research in Medical Education, P O Box 01690 (D-<br />

41), Miami, FL 33101, USA<br />

Background<br />

As changes in medical care reduce the faculty time and<br />

patients available for teaching, simulation and<br />

multimedia systems are becoming a required<br />

component of medical curricula. The requirement for<br />

the faculty is leadership and a willingness to accept<br />

and implement change.<br />

Aim<br />

The objective of this workshop is to demonstrate the<br />

effective use of simulation to teach and assess bedside<br />

cardiology skills.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The presentation will be interactive, with full audience<br />

participation in the “patient” evaluation through video<br />

projection and audio for impulses, heart sounds and<br />

murmurs. Examples will be presented using the<br />

UMedic multimedia computer system. UMedic features<br />

“Harvey”, a life-sized manikin capable of simulating<br />

the bedside findings of 27 cardiac diseases, including<br />

blood pressure, venous, arterial and precordial impulses<br />

and auscultation. The UMedic system provides a<br />

comprehensive standardized multimedia curriculum in<br />

cardiology that includes the history, bedside findings,<br />

laboratory evaluation and therapy, and measures learner<br />

performance.<br />

6/5 Risk Management in Medical<br />

Education<br />

Directors of Research in Postgraduate Medical<br />

Education Group<br />

Presenters: Dr Kwee Matheson, Dr Alistair Thomson and<br />

Dr Andrew Long<br />

West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 2QZ,<br />

UK<br />

Background<br />

There is worldwide interest in risk management. Studies<br />

in the USA and Australia quote that up to 16% of<br />

hospital admissions suffer adverse events. Costs are<br />

estimated at £2 billion in the UK alone and are<br />

escalating. Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME)<br />

may help doctors prepare to manage and minimise risk,<br />

but medical education itself may need risk<br />

management.<br />

Aims<br />

This workshop aims to identify the issues and to<br />

develop a model for good practice to guide Directors<br />

of PGME (DPGME).


Content and structure<br />

Plenary 30 mins., Group work 1 hour, Report back and<br />

discussion 1 hour.<br />

Participants will explore the relevance of risk<br />

management to PGME by discussing the following<br />

subjects through plenary and small group work, under<br />

the guidance of experienced facilitators:<br />

Why errors occur; How we can learn from mistakes;<br />

Risk management and the learning cycle; Clinical/<br />

critical incident reporting and links with audit; How<br />

can PGME contribute to a safer environment; Trainers<br />

and trainees: both angels and devils; Educational<br />

governance: Standards, Assessment and Poor<br />

Performers; Validity and reliability of current<br />

assessment methods; Culture versus curriculum; The<br />

risks to DPGME; What can the DPGME do to<br />

encourage a pro-active approach to risk management?<br />

Conclusions from this workshop should be a template<br />

to help medical educators fulfill their key role in risk<br />

management.<br />

6/6 The professional and<br />

organisational culture of medical<br />

education – an exploratory<br />

workshop in the context of an<br />

interactive exhibition*<br />

Dr Elizabeth Krajic Kachur, Dr Nobaturo Ban and Hannah<br />

Kedar<br />

Medical Education Development, 201 East 21st Street, Suite<br />

2E, New York, New York 10010, USA<br />

(There will be an exhibition linked to this workshop in<br />

Research Building Seminar Room 1.0020 1st floor<br />

throughout the Conference)<br />

Aims<br />

This session will provide an opportunity to explore and<br />

reflect upon the professional and organizational<br />

environment of medical education as it currently exists<br />

and as it might develop in the future. This increased<br />

awareness should help participants better understand<br />

their current study/work situation and empower them<br />

to move the field into a direction that will assure<br />

progress.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Education professionals, teachers, administrators,<br />

trainees involved in medical education.<br />

Content and structure<br />

• 15min Welcome and introductions<br />

• 15min Exhibition background and orientation<br />

• 30min Individual exploration of exhibition areas<br />

with the help of a worksheet that asks for the<br />

completion of specific questions (e.g., identify what<br />

exhibition area/item makes you feel most “at home,”<br />

list what objects/images you would have expected<br />

to see)<br />

• 30min Discussion of individual experience (first<br />

in pairs and then in a large group format, a list of<br />

adjectives that describe the current cultural climate<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.53 -<br />

will be generated) 30min Medical education in the<br />

future (participants work alone or in pairs, they pick<br />

an exhibition area and draw on a flip chart sheet<br />

what this area would look like in 20 years)<br />

• 30min Presentation and discussion of individual<br />

drawings that get posted on the wall and<br />

incorporated in future exhibitions (at the end of this<br />

discussion a list of adjectives describing the<br />

predicted future culture of medical education is<br />

generated by the group and the two lists are<br />

juxtaposed for an additional debate)<br />

• 15min Strategies for strengthening or changing<br />

culture - What can you do to be an active participant<br />

in your culture? (a list will be generated and a tips<br />

sheet based on the literature will be disseminated)<br />

• 15 min Generation of Take-Home-Points from the<br />

session.<br />

6/7 Students teaching communication<br />

skills<br />

Organisers: Diana Mitter, Heiderose Ortwein, Jan<br />

Schildmann & Gunda Siemssen<br />

Students from Charité, Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Aims<br />

At German medical schools there is a long tradition of<br />

students teaching communication skills in peer groups.<br />

We therefore would like to invite you to experience<br />

different methods we use at the Charité, Medical<br />

Faculty at the Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>. Two options<br />

are available to participants: one session will<br />

demonstrate the work of history taking groups<br />

(Anamnesegruppe) led by student tutors. In parallel<br />

there will be a training for future student tutors of<br />

breaking bad news courses.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Invited are persons interested in teaching<br />

communication skills (professors, students and<br />

administration professionals).<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be divided in two sessions - a<br />

practical part with experimental methods and a second<br />

part including discussion of the following topics:<br />

advantages and disadvantages of student tutors (from<br />

our experience students can learn a lot as tutors of<br />

communication skills courses), quality management<br />

(e.g. training and supervision of future tutors),<br />

comparison of student recruitment in different<br />

countries. A summary of results will be sent to all<br />

participants after the conference.<br />

6/8 Developing professional attitudes<br />

in medical training: theory, practice<br />

and evaluation<br />

Professor Amanda Howe<br />

Dept of Primary Care, University of East Anglia Medical School,<br />

Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK


Aims<br />

To examine the evidence base for effective learning of<br />

professional attitudes in medicine, and to evaluate the<br />

methods through which this aspect of learning can best<br />

be evaluated.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Any educators or researchers interested, particularly<br />

those involved in creating or evaluating the ways in<br />

which professional attitudes can be influenced through<br />

education & training.<br />

Content and structure<br />

Each participant should come prepared to join in by<br />

providing a single overhead, outlining their contribution<br />

to this field (what they do), its evidence base or<br />

theoretical framework (why they do it), and how they<br />

evaluate the impact on professional attitudes. These will<br />

be shared at introduction, and followed by a keynote<br />

of about 20 minutes. We will then work in small groups<br />

to consider a) the level of consensus b) the strengths of<br />

different approaches c) key questions which remain and<br />

how these might be addressed. These will be shared in<br />

plenary at the end.<br />

6/9 <strong>AMEE</strong>-IberoAmerican Network<br />

Workshop<br />

Organiser: Professor Margarita Barón-Maldonado, <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Background<br />

Over the past few years, participation by teachers and<br />

students from Latin American countries at <strong>AMEE</strong><br />

Conferences has been growing steadily. A discussion<br />

forum has been set up to allow them to discuss areas of<br />

particular relevance and interest to them. Because of<br />

the close links that exist between universities in Spain<br />

and Latin America, a new group has been set up,<br />

facilitated by <strong>AMEE</strong>, which will be known as the<br />

<strong>AMEE</strong>-IberoAmerican Network for Medical<br />

Education, chaired by Professor Margarita Barón-<br />

Maldonado, President of <strong>AMEE</strong>.<br />

Who should attend<br />

The workshop is open to anyone who wishes to attend.<br />

Comments and suggestions for further topics for<br />

discussion can be Emailed to: amee@dundee.ac.uk<br />

Content and structure<br />

The following topics have been suggested by<br />

participants for initial discussions:<br />

1 What are <strong>AMEE</strong> expectations from the group<br />

function? What are IberoAmerican group<br />

expectations from <strong>AMEE</strong>?<br />

2 Presentations from each country relating to the<br />

current state of medical education, new<br />

developments and challenges;<br />

3 Accreditation of Medical Schools, particularly in<br />

relation to Mercosur;<br />

4 Potential collaboration both within the Network and<br />

with other organisations.<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.54 -<br />

6/10 Problem-based Learning<br />

Dr Stewart Mennin, and Dr Scott Obenshain<br />

Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, BMSB, Box 507,<br />

School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque,<br />

New Mexico 87131-5134, USA<br />

6/11 Portfolios as a method of student<br />

assessment<br />

Dr Miriam Friedman Ben-David<br />

Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Tay Park<br />

House, 484 Perth Road, Dundee, DD2 1LR UK<br />

Aim<br />

This workshop aims at informing medical educators<br />

about portfolios.<br />

Who should attend<br />

Medical educators who are interested in innovative<br />

methods of assessing professional behaviours will<br />

benefit from this workshop.<br />

Content and structure<br />

It will contain a review of the use of portfolios,<br />

psychometric aspects unique to portfolio assessment,<br />

selection of portfolio material and guidelines for<br />

implementation. Participants will work in small groups<br />

to design, implement and evaluate administration of<br />

portfolios. Half of the time will be devoted to plenary<br />

presentation and discussions and the other half to small<br />

group work.<br />

6/12 Learning Needs Assessment in<br />

undergraduate and postgraduate<br />

medical education<br />

Professor Janet Grant<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, Walton Hall,<br />

Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK<br />

Aims<br />

• To consider the role of needs assessment in<br />

undergraduate and postgraduate medical education<br />

• To consider and evaluate methods of needs<br />

assessment<br />

• To identify how needs assessment is and can be done<br />

efficiently and effectively<br />

• To consider and evaluate the consequences of needs<br />

assessment for educational planning and review<br />

Who should attend<br />

The workshop concerns only undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate medical education, but participants from<br />

other health care disciplines will be welcome.<br />

Objectives<br />

By the end of the meeting, participants should be able<br />

to:<br />

• State the roles of needs assessment in undergraduate<br />

and postgraduate medical education


• Describe and evaluate the available methods of<br />

educational needs assessment<br />

• Advise about practical needs assessment methods<br />

• Plan the stages that follow on from educational<br />

needs assessment in undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate medical education.<br />

• Offer a critical appreciation of needs assessment in<br />

education.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will consist of a series of short<br />

presentations, with comprehensive handouts. Integrated<br />

with this will be participative group exercises which<br />

will enable participants to review each of the objectives<br />

stated above and make practical plans for their own<br />

situations.<br />

6/13 A European core curriculum?<br />

Prof. dr. Lennart N. Bouman<br />

MedEducad Consultancy, In de Korenmolen 17, 1115 GN<br />

Duivendrecht , The Netherlands<br />

Aim<br />

The aim of the workshop is to produce a set of global<br />

aims and objectives that could act as a common<br />

framework for the medical schools in the European<br />

Community. This framework must fit into the directives<br />

of the European Council on the mutual recognition of<br />

Tuesday 4 September<br />

- 4.55 -<br />

formal qualifications. Secondly it must be adapted to<br />

the profound changes that the professional roles of the<br />

doctor will undergo in the near future.<br />

Who should attend<br />

The workshop will help participants to become familiar<br />

with European legislation on the requirements for<br />

primary medical education and its continuation into<br />

residency and continuing education afterwards. This<br />

may be beneficially to those who will be involved in<br />

future curriculum planning on a local or national scale.<br />

Content and structure<br />

The workshop will be based on two key papers:<br />

1 European Council Directive 93/16/EEC, from<br />

Internet available as:<br />

http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1993/<br />

en_393L0016.html<br />

2 Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education<br />

from the American Association of Medical Colleges<br />

(AAMC), available as:<br />

http://www.aamc.org/meded/msop/report1.htm<br />

In the first hour we will discuss content and significance<br />

of these two papers (participants are requested to<br />

download these papers and read them prior to the<br />

workshop). In the second hour elements for a core<br />

curriculum will be selected in small group discussions.<br />

The outcomes will be discussed in plenary in the last<br />

hour.


Session 7A New learning technologies<br />

7A1 An international web-based<br />

Master’s degree in Primary Care<br />

Peter Toon* and Trish Greenhalgh<br />

University College London, 137 Roding Road, London E5 0DR,<br />

UK<br />

Worldwide, the academic basis of primary care needs<br />

strengthening. In the UK, Masters’ degrees, usually<br />

part-time over three years, have become important in<br />

this process. Since 1999 University College London<br />

(UCL) has offered a multidisciplinary MSc in Primary<br />

Care, largely through web-based distance learning.<br />

Students, mostly UK based, follow a structured<br />

programme of reading, with exercises to help them<br />

relate their study to previous learning and their<br />

professional life, and work together in virtual group<br />

discussions and seminars using computer conferencing.<br />

As a pilot for the proposed UK “e-university”, we are<br />

now developing a similar course for an international<br />

audience. The scope, methods and content of the<br />

existing course and our qualitative evaluations will be<br />

described, and the issues involved in devising a course<br />

for an international audience in a discipline which has<br />

strong culturally and organisationally specific elements<br />

will be considered.<br />

7A2 Can practical courses on<br />

interpreting blood smears be<br />

substituted by an interactive, webbased<br />

learning programme?<br />

U Woermann*, A Tobler and M Montandon<br />

Division for Instructional Media, Institute of Medical Education,<br />

University of Bern, Inselspital 38, CH-3010 Bern,<br />

SWITZERLAND<br />

In Bern, medical students learn to interpret blood<br />

smears in two practical courses. Because students felt<br />

very unsure in this skill, the web-based programme<br />

HemoSurf was developed. Some students suggested<br />

replacing the course by HemoSurf. How much of their<br />

sureness in interpreting blood smears would students<br />

attribute to HemoSurf? In a questionnaire students<br />

indicated that 61% used HemoSurf, 72% printed<br />

materials, and 11% did not prepare. Students using<br />

HemoSurf invested on average less than an hour, but<br />

attributed 49% of their sureness to HemoSurf and only<br />

30% to the practical courses (six hours). The students<br />

using printed materials spent on average more than an<br />

hour, but attributed only 19% of their sureness to these<br />

materials. We conclude that HemoSurf is an efficient<br />

tool to learn interpretation of blood smears. We will<br />

replace the practical courses by a small group format<br />

discussing the impact of haematological investigations<br />

on clinical medicine.<br />

7A3 The management of student<br />

feedback using the World Wide Web<br />

Stephanie Cobb* and Helen Graham<br />

King’s College, Room 4.14 Henriette Raphael House, Guy’s<br />

Campus, London SE1 9RT, UK<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.56 -<br />

This poster will outline the introduction of web-based<br />

student feedback for large group clinical teaching to<br />

undergraduate medical students. In a pilot study at the<br />

GKT School of Medicine, London, a system for<br />

implementing web-based feedback to replace<br />

traditional paper-based methods was set-up, and the<br />

potential for this method explored. The steps taken in<br />

this process will be illustrated and explained. These<br />

include:<br />

1 The recruitment of teachers and students to an<br />

electronic method of student feedback.<br />

2 The briefing of teachers and students in use of the<br />

system.<br />

3 The implementation of the pilot study.<br />

4 The evaluation of the method.<br />

7A4 Web-based student feedback on<br />

large group teaching: how does it<br />

compare with traditional paper<br />

methods?<br />

Helen Graham* and Stephanie Cobb<br />

Department of Medical and Dental Education, Guys, Kings &<br />

St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, Sherman<br />

Education Centre, 4th floor, Thomas Guy House, London SE1<br />

9RT, UK<br />

Quality assurance is integral to good teaching. It<br />

requires a commitment from students to provide regular<br />

feedback, and from teachers to analyze and act on<br />

information received. The organisation and analysis of<br />

student feedback is time-consuming and difficult to<br />

co-ordinate for a complex clinical course. Web-based<br />

feedback using a dedicated school web-site offers the<br />

advantage of ease of collation of student assessment<br />

ratings and comments. In Year 4 of the undergraduate<br />

course at Guys, Kings and St Thomas’ School of<br />

Medicine, Kings College London, web-based student<br />

feedback of large group teaching was compared with<br />

traditional paper based methods using response rates<br />

and quality of assessments. The preference of teachers<br />

for both methods was assessed and their comments<br />

sought. The advantages and disadvantages of both<br />

methods will be presented.<br />

7A5 Reflection on experiences by using<br />

trigger movies<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan H Bolk and<br />

Peter G M de Jong<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Onderwijscentrum IG, kamer<br />

C5-54, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

During clerkships, students encounter a lot of new<br />

impressive, and sometimes frightening or sad<br />

experiences. At the Leiden University Medical Center,<br />

an obvious need for reflection on this subject becomes<br />

apparent during small group sessions in which case<br />

histories are discussed. Unfortunately no structural<br />

attention is paid to these experiences during the first<br />

few months of clinical education. From the small group


sessions, difficult situations encountered by students<br />

during practice were collected. Situations occurring the<br />

most frequently were translated into script and recorded<br />

on video using actors. Subsequently, these materials<br />

are used as a trigger for discussion in small group<br />

settings under supervision of an experienced physician.<br />

The use of the trigger movies improved the capability<br />

of students to cope with emotions and helped them to<br />

handle difficult situations better during practical work.<br />

7A6 Provision of IT learning facilities for<br />

healthcare education<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

In recent years there has been an increase in the use of<br />

information technology in medical education. This is<br />

in response to a growing recognition of the need to<br />

promote computer literacy among healthcare<br />

professionals. Our main objective was to design and<br />

implement Computer Aided Learning (CAL)<br />

applications, which can be integrated into the healthcare<br />

education curriculum. Hence a logical approach to CAL<br />

was developed by building a team of professionals<br />

which forms a CAL Unit, using existing expertise and<br />

by implementing a process to ensure that the CAL had<br />

a maximum impact upon healthcare education. The<br />

CAL resources include: multimedia learning facilities,<br />

learning guides, computer aided assessment, model<br />

patients, anatomical models, statistical models, IT<br />

interactive learning facilities, teaching and learning<br />

facilities via the Internet, diagnostic and treatment<br />

models. We have now implemented over 27 IT based<br />

learning resources and course evaluations have showed<br />

that these have been well received by users.<br />

7A7 Development and evaluation of an<br />

interactive Computer Assisted<br />

Learning (CAL) programme on<br />

vaginal hysterectomy<br />

Vikram Jha*, Shelley Widdowson, Sean Duffy and<br />

Keith Allenby<br />

St James’s University Hospital, Academic Department of<br />

Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Level 9, Gledhow Wing, St James’s<br />

Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK<br />

In Gynaecology,understanding of anatomy and surgical<br />

principles involved in vaginal surgery such as vaginal<br />

hysterectomy is often confusing to students and junior<br />

trainees. The aim was to develop a CAL programme in<br />

CD-ROM form combining video, illustrations and<br />

three-dimensional images for better understanding of<br />

vaginal hysterectomy. We used Macromedia’s ‘Director’<br />

to develop the CD-ROM. This allows text, graphics,<br />

video and sound to be combined to create interactive<br />

material. The video was filmed and edited at the<br />

Hospital. The illustrations were resized and exported<br />

as quick time. The three-dimensional images were<br />

created using anatomical models and True Space<br />

programme. The CD-ROM has been piloted amongst<br />

fourth year students. It has received a positive response.<br />

It is intended to demonstrate the CD-ROM and present<br />

the evaluation results at the meeting.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.57 -<br />

7A8 Links from ultrasound to anatomy -<br />

how is a multimedia teacher<br />

accepted?<br />

Dietmar Borchert*, Gunnar Schley, Edda Klotz,<br />

Peter Rauh, Clemens Reisinger and Thomas Medveczky<br />

Humboldt - University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Medical Faculty, Department<br />

of Study Organisation, Schumanstrasse 20-21, 10117 <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Since Spring 1998 a group of students has tried to<br />

establish a multimedia teacher existing of ultrasound<br />

machines, computer, specialized monitors and<br />

additional mulitmedia tools. Students from the first<br />

course were educated in ultrasound in parallel with the<br />

normal anatomy curriculum. In small groups of 4<br />

students they learned to handle ultrasound machines<br />

and to integrate their knowledge of anatomy with<br />

practical experience. The multimedia teacher was<br />

equipped with ultrasound software, videos and weblinks.<br />

The computer can be driven via wireless, handheld<br />

mouse menus. Pictures of special interest with<br />

hyperlink-explanation can be loaded and structures on<br />

the ultrasound images can be compared and identified.<br />

Students are able to save and edit their own images.<br />

We tried to estimate how web-based and multimedia<br />

learning is accepted by students and if early handling<br />

of ultrasound machines improves knowledge in<br />

anatomy.<br />

7A9 Development of a computer-based<br />

simulation: the Dynamic Patient<br />

Simulator<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, J M van Baalen,<br />

E M Schoonderwaldt<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Heelkunde Onderwijs K6-R,<br />

Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

For obvious ethical and legal reasons it is not allowed<br />

for students to practise medicine on patients without<br />

supervision. At Leiden University Medical Center a<br />

computer-based simulation program, the Dynamic<br />

Patient Simulator (DPS), was developed to overcome<br />

this restriction. DPS provides medical students with<br />

the opportunity to practise medicine on a virtual patient,<br />

offering all the possible diagnostic and therapeutic<br />

actions as in real life. Students can practise making<br />

decisions autonomously, considering the state of the<br />

patient and accepting responsibility for the<br />

consequences. Students therefore acquire clinical<br />

experience in an early stage of their studies and are<br />

encouraged to fill gaps in their knowledge. DPS can<br />

be used in the absence of a teacher because a built-in<br />

assistance system attempts to help students on request,<br />

depending on the student’s preceding actions. The<br />

system provides feedback, gives a final score and can<br />

therefore be used as a self-test.<br />

7A10 Introduction of laptop computers in<br />

Leiden Medical School<br />

Peter G M de Jong*, Hermiette E Idenburg and<br />

Henk L Hendrix<br />

Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Onderwijscentrum<br />

IG, Kamer C5-54, P O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden,<br />

NETHERLANDS


In 1998, the board of the Leiden University Medical<br />

Center decided to introduce information and<br />

communication technology (ICT) in the medical<br />

curriculum to prepare students for their professional<br />

life as a medical doctor. To attain this goal, special<br />

facilities for students have been created in 2000 to buy<br />

a laptop computer. For students, participation in the<br />

laptop-project is voluntary and only first-year students<br />

are allowed to join. Participants pay only one-third of<br />

Session 7B Problem-based learning<br />

7B1 Measuring success: partnership in<br />

evaluation (work in progress report)<br />

P O’Neill, D Graham, A Garden, S. Watmough*, J Brown<br />

University of Liverpool, Curricular Development Unit,<br />

Department of Primary Care, 2nd Floor Thornley Building,<br />

Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK<br />

An innovative collaborative evaluation project is taking<br />

place between the Universities of Liverpool and<br />

Manchester and the Mersey Deanery. The goal is to<br />

assess whether the new problem-based learning<br />

curricula at Liverpool and Manchester are producing<br />

Pre-registration House Officers who are capable of<br />

meeting the competencies expected by the General<br />

Medical Council and the National Health Service.<br />

Preliminary work at Liverpool has involved<br />

questionnaire surveys of Educational Supervisors and<br />

Pre-registration House Officers. Mersey Deanery has<br />

delivered questionnaires to Pre-registration House<br />

Officers in the area. University of Manchester has<br />

compiled data on cohorts from the old curriculum<br />

whilst continuing to work with Pre-registration House<br />

Officers who have graduated from the new curriculum.<br />

Further questionnaires, focus groups and interviews<br />

will be held to gauge differences between old and new<br />

curricula cohorts and assess the educational aspects of<br />

the PRHO year.<br />

7B2 A new PBL course with an<br />

examination with standardised<br />

patients at the end<br />

S Schewe*, C Mueller and R Putz<br />

Medizinische Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universitat, Ludwig-<br />

Maximilians-Universitat, Pettenkoferstr 8a, D-80336 Munich,<br />

GERMANY<br />

A new problem-based learning (PBL) course dealing<br />

with disorders of the musculoskeletal system (MuSkel)<br />

was introduced at Ludwig-Maximilians University<br />

(LMU) Medical School lasting 4 weeks. All 234 4th year students were enrolled in the summer term 2000.<br />

For the first time at the LMU an examination with<br />

standardised patients has been carried out at the end of<br />

this course. MuSkel followed 3 other PBL-courses<br />

successively implemented at the LMU. With the new<br />

form of this examination other insights into correctable<br />

deficits of medical education could be found, e.g. the<br />

demand of teaching a more structured clinical<br />

examination, of teaching problem-solving strategies,<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.58 -<br />

the total costs, the Medical Center pays for all other<br />

costs. Insurance of the laptop is included, as well as<br />

access to a specially designed wireless network. Effects<br />

of introducing laptops have been evaluated by a<br />

questionnaire performed in January 2001 among all<br />

first-year students. This questionnaire shows that the<br />

use of Internet and Microsoft Office has increased<br />

enormously, but teachers do not take advantage of the<br />

possibilities presented.<br />

considering cost-effectiveness and time constraints of<br />

ambulatory medicine. The opinion of the students about<br />

this type of examination was very positive. Focussing<br />

on practical skills assessment gave further insights in<br />

deficits which could be partially corrected in the second<br />

MuSkel course in the winter term 2000/2001.<br />

7B3 Training the problem-based<br />

learning tutor: implementation<br />

issues<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

Problem-based learning (PBL) is widely regarded as a<br />

useful strategy to improve students’ learning in Medical<br />

School and to prepare graduates for the informational<br />

challenges of the years to come. This has led to many<br />

medical schools adopting this educational approach,<br />

which increases the need to train tutors to facilitate PBL<br />

groups. Therefore, we developed a PBL training<br />

programme for medical teachers. The training<br />

programme, which lasts for four weeks, is devoted to<br />

acquainting teachers with the key elements of PBL.<br />

The principles, the seven steps, the tutorial sessions,<br />

group interaction, information management, critical<br />

analysis skills, assessment and evaluation of PBL group<br />

sessions were also dealt with during this period. The<br />

role of the group tutor to facilitate and not to lecture<br />

was emphasised, as well as the goals of PBL. The tutors<br />

practised acting as PBL tutor, scribe and group member.<br />

Evaluation of the course showed that it has wide appeal<br />

and has been well received by the teachers. The<br />

strongest influence for any modifications made have<br />

come from the teachers who have participated in the<br />

course and they had recommended for the programme<br />

to continue. We therefore recommend it as a realistic<br />

way of training teachers as PBL facilitators.<br />

7B4 PBL in Psychiatry - the Holocaust:<br />

a unique experience<br />

T Fischel*, T Weizman and G Zalsman<br />

Geha Psychiatric Center, 13 Tsel Hagiva, Ramat Gan 52374,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

Planning a rotation in psychiatry meets a major<br />

problem: whether and how to incorporate an inner touch


in the student’s soul. Group dynamic and projective<br />

“games” are some of the possible methods. Teaching<br />

and learning about the holocaust and its emotional<br />

implications, is another challenging problem. We aim<br />

not to be reductive by teaching psychiatric diagnoses.<br />

In order to meet those two difficulties we constructed<br />

a PBL session. The goal was to produce a learning<br />

experience, which involved a controlled emotional<br />

touch. The case was about a “child survivor”, who<br />

organized his life and personality as a stiff and<br />

demanding character, and appeared in the emergency<br />

room with somatic complains. Besides theoretical<br />

subjects such as PTSD, somatization disorders and<br />

obsessive-compulsive personality, the students learned<br />

about “child survivor” “survivors` guilt” “second<br />

generation”. The presentation includes the case, the<br />

emotional response and the students’ feedback to this<br />

unique experience.<br />

7B5 Clinical skills of medical students<br />

participating in lecture-based<br />

versus problem-oriented training<br />

W Rimpau<br />

Park-Klinik Weissensee, Abteilung fur Neurologie, Schonstrasse<br />

80, 13086 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Medical education in Germany is theory-oriented. New<br />

methods to improve and evaluate skills are needed.The<br />

study was designed to determine whether students with<br />

lecture-based versus problem oriented training in<br />

neurology have different clinical skills. A prospective<br />

cohort study was carried out. The outcomes of a<br />

modified version of the objective structured long<br />

examination record (OSLER) were compared between<br />

two groups of students. Group I (n=20): Students of<br />

the Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, with a 4-month<br />

reform-elective in their final (sixth) year of medical<br />

training. Their previous training has been lecture-based.<br />

Group II (n=25): Students with a 6 week neurology<br />

training in their fourth year at the University Witten-<br />

Herdecke, who have a problem oriented curriculum<br />

throughout their entire training. Students of the lecturebased<br />

group showed satisfying but significantly worse<br />

outcomes.<br />

7B6 Systematic observations of<br />

problem-based study groups - what<br />

do they reveal?<br />

K Lonka*, P Sauri and N Paganus<br />

University of Helsinki, Leiviskatie 2 E 64, Fin-00440 Helsinki,<br />

FINLAND<br />

The curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine at the<br />

University of Helsinki was changed towards PBL in<br />

1998. The aims of the present study are: 1) To see how<br />

the new approach to teaching and learning works, and<br />

whether something should be done to improve it, and<br />

2) to see whether group functioning is related to<br />

students’ study success. A systematic observation of<br />

tutorial groups was carried out during Spring term<br />

2001. A closing session of all 14 first-year tutorial<br />

groups (10-12 students in each) was observed once.<br />

All students and their tutors were given questionnaires<br />

which were filled in after a tutorial session. A specific<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.59 -<br />

observation sheet was also developed and an external<br />

observer was hired. The observer also gave feedback<br />

to the group. Data are presented that consist of the<br />

questionnaire data, a summary of observation forms,<br />

and study success of each group.<br />

7B7 “Pathomechanisms” - a 9-week<br />

integrative and problem-based<br />

learning oriented course within the<br />

3rd year of the curriculum at the<br />

Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus,<br />

Technical University Dresden<br />

Oliver Tiebel*, Ines Nitsche and Andreas Deussen for the<br />

Core Planning Group<br />

Institute of Clinical Chemistry & Laboratory Medicine, Medical<br />

Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr 74, 01307<br />

Dresden, GERMANY<br />

To prepare physicians for the changing demands of<br />

future developments in medicine the Dresden Medical<br />

Faculty is restructuring its curriculum implementing<br />

problem-based learning elements. The changes start<br />

from the 3rd year of the curriculum. This year -<br />

equivalent to the first clinical year - consists of 4 PBLcourses:<br />

“Pathomechanisms” (9 weeks), “Basics of<br />

Pharmacotherapy” (6 weeks), “Infectiology” (11<br />

weeks) and “Emergency Medicine” (3 weeks). In this<br />

presentation we will focus on the structure and<br />

organization of the “Pathomechanisms” course which<br />

has been organized as an interdisciplinary enterprise<br />

including pathology, laboratory medicine,<br />

pathophysiology and pathobiochemistry. Cases<br />

discussed in small groups of students and tutored by<br />

experienced mentors are supplemented by lectures<br />

specifically related to the case topic and course<br />

objectives. Additionally students have two practical<br />

classes each week focussing on pathology and clinical<br />

pathology. A clinical examination class which extends<br />

over the entire study year supplements the course.<br />

7B8 Characteristics of tutors’<br />

assessment by students when PBL<br />

is being implemented<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Marcela Lopez-Cabrera<br />

National Autonomous University of Mexico, Porto Alegre 259,<br />

“A-402”. Col. San Andres Tetepilco, Delegacion Iztapalapa, DF<br />

09440, MEXICO<br />

The students’ perception regarding the performance of<br />

the tutor has particular characteristics when PBL is<br />

being implemented, since they are going through a<br />

transitional process from a traditional to a studentcentered<br />

approach. Thus, the tutor’s performance must<br />

be adequately monitored, given that the students are<br />

adapting to the teacher´s new role. In order to assess<br />

the tutor’s performance, we selected the functions that<br />

are most significant of the change in their new role,<br />

and that are directly related to the tasks of the students,<br />

that is, those functions the students might have an<br />

opinion about whether they are being adequately<br />

accomplished, and if the tutor’s performance is<br />

facilitating their learning. The elements of the tutor’s<br />

performance that were selected to be evaluated are:<br />

support in knowledge elaboration; directing the


learning process; promoting knowledge integration;<br />

stimulating group member interaction; respect for the<br />

students; warmth and accountability.<br />

7B9 From traditional teachers to PBL<br />

tutors: how to start the change?<br />

Yolanda Marin-Campos* and Lizbeth Mendoza-Morales<br />

National Autonomous University of Mexico, Porto Alegre 259,<br />

“A-402”. Col. San Andres Tetepilco, Delegacion Iztapalapa, DF<br />

09440, MEXICO<br />

One of the most difficult elements to change for<br />

achieving successful implementation of PBL, in<br />

traditional curriculum schools, is the acceptance of the<br />

teachers’ new role as tutors. In this project a program<br />

is presented, whose main challenge has been to<br />

demonstrate the advantages of PBL over the traditional<br />

teaching system. To do so, a 60-hour workshop was<br />

designed in which sceptical teachers are presented with<br />

the theoretical and methodological basis of PBL, so<br />

that they themselves can find the answers to their many<br />

questions.This workshop has been developed<br />

throughout 6 years, working with teachers from the<br />

basic and clinical sciences. Included are the educational<br />

theories that are the basis of PBL components, the<br />

“How to” apply it to the students’ learning process,<br />

evaluation methods and some of the methodological<br />

approaches important for educational research<br />

development.<br />

7B10 Development of a problem-based<br />

curriculum leads to enhancement<br />

in faculty development - the<br />

Dresden experience<br />

N Lorenz*, T Aretz, E Armstrong and the Harvard-<br />

Dresden Medical Education Alliance<br />

Technical University, Dresden Carl Gustav Carus, Children’s<br />

Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Session 7C Curriculum planning and change<br />

7C1 A model of curriculum management<br />

in an integrated medical curriculum<br />

Gregory J S Tan* and B E Mustaffa<br />

International Medical University, Sesama Centre, Plaza<br />

Komanwel, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA<br />

Curriculum management is an integral component of<br />

any curriculum. The success of curriculum<br />

development and implementation to a certain extent<br />

depends on how well the curriculum is being managed.<br />

Creation of tiers of responsibilities to provide the<br />

management structure and a well-defined line of<br />

communication and standing operating procedures<br />

allow “checks and balances” to be instituted to the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.60 -<br />

Medical education in Germany needs innovative<br />

approaches to face the challenges of medicine in the<br />

21st century. Therefore, an educational alliance<br />

between Harvard Medical International and the<br />

Technical University of Dresden (TUD) is restructuring<br />

TUD’s undergraduate medical curriculum by using an<br />

interdisciplinary approach since 1999. Problem-based<br />

learning is incorporated in integrated classes consisting<br />

of lectures, tutorials and practical training. To foster<br />

the new curriculum, to establish a high quality of<br />

education, and to train faculty members in PBLmethods<br />

a faculty training program was developed<br />

simultaneously. A tutor-training group educated 120<br />

faculty members in an 18-month period. When the<br />

development of the curriculum after the 2nd state<br />

examination led to a demand for new and more complex<br />

teaching and assessment methods a transition of the<br />

“tutor-training group” to a working group for faculty<br />

development was made. The process and methods will<br />

be described in detail.<br />

7B11 An orientation programme for 1st<br />

year students in a problemorientated<br />

MBChB curriculum - the<br />

Pretoria experience<br />

Pierre L Bredenkamp<br />

Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, P O Box<br />

19063, Tygerberg 7505, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

Because the Pretoria medical school changed its model<br />

of teaching and training from a traditional to a problemorientated<br />

integrated one, an orientation programme<br />

(which lasts two weeks) was introduced before the first<br />

block. Five aims were set for the programme, focusing<br />

on information, support, motivation, opportunity and<br />

exposure. Detail regarding these objectives, as well as<br />

the outline of the programme as a whole, will be given.<br />

Every student received a block book, and the 35<br />

learning sessions, as well as the 10 visits, were<br />

evaluated. The method of this evaluation and the results<br />

will be made available. The recommendations which<br />

had been made, will also be shown.<br />

management of the curriculum. This paper describes<br />

how the International Medical University (IMU) utilises<br />

the above principles to manage its medical curriculum<br />

in a 3-tier management structure. The structure is<br />

dynamic and it allows an exposition of the curriculum<br />

philosophy and monitoring of the curriculum (an<br />

internal audit) through its structural linkage. Its<br />

dynamism is further reflected in the coherent<br />

participation and ownership of the curriculum by all<br />

Faculty members as one would expect in the<br />

management of a modern medical curriculum.


7C2 The University of Rochester’s<br />

Double Helix Curriculum<br />

Elaine F Dannefer<br />

University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue,<br />

Box 601, Rochester NY 14642, USA<br />

Beginning in 1999, a fourth-year, interdisciplinary<br />

curriculum has been phased in at the University of<br />

Rochester. Called the Double Helix Curriculum, this<br />

curriculum integrates basic science and clinical<br />

medicine throughout the four years of undergraduate<br />

education with the clinical strand comprising<br />

approximately 30 of curricular time in years one and<br />

two and 70% in years three and four, with the basic<br />

science strand representing the converse. An 18-month<br />

ambulatory clerkship in years 1 and 2 is followed by<br />

inpatient clerkships and electives. Students begin their<br />

education with a course that provides the foundation<br />

for the practice of evidence based medicine and<br />

includes biostatistics, epidemiology and skills related<br />

to searching and evaluating the scientific literature.<br />

Two-week long comprehensive assessments at the end<br />

of years 2 and 3 provide feedback for students as well<br />

as a means of assessing the curriculum.<br />

7C3 Academic administration and<br />

mixed programmes<br />

S Sharma Khanal* and S Koirala<br />

B P Koirala Institute, Dharan, NEPAL<br />

The B.P. Koirala Institute is a Health Sciences<br />

University in Nepal with undergraduate courses in<br />

medicine, nursing, dentistry and allied health sciences<br />

plus postgraduate courses to PhD level. This poses an<br />

overwhelming challenge for maintaining harmonious<br />

and positive administrative approaches. It becomes<br />

further intensified as trained manpower is scarce in<br />

Nepal and the potential danger of manpower leaving<br />

the Institute has led to new approaches to retain<br />

teachers. These will be presented in the poster.<br />

7C4 Learning responsibly -<br />

implementing written guidelines for<br />

medical students<br />

Richard Phillips*, Ann Wylie and Anne Stephenson<br />

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy’s King’s<br />

and St Thomas’ Medical School, King’s College London, Weston<br />

Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK<br />

Contemporary medical undergraduate curricula include<br />

early patient contact in community settings. Whilst<br />

there may be concurrent teaching in ethics, the focus<br />

of this may be on the behaviour of a qualified doctor;<br />

what of the students’ responsibilities to patients and<br />

each other? As a department, we have 1,800 students<br />

placed in hundreds of community settings during the<br />

year, and we are concerned about student awareness of<br />

their current ethical responsibilities. We prepared<br />

written guidelines for students about responsible<br />

learning. Questionnaire follow-up in 1999-2000<br />

showed only 121 of 263 students definitely had read<br />

the booklet (of these 121, the majority found it helpful),<br />

and 20% said they had lost it altogether. For 2000-2001<br />

modifications were made in delivery and highlighting<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.61 -<br />

the material, and the questionnaire repeated. This<br />

presentation reports on more detailed results of both<br />

questionnaires and will discuss the modifications and<br />

the implications.<br />

7C5 HEICUMED - a novel approach to<br />

student medical education at the<br />

Medical Faculty of the University of<br />

Heidelberg, Germany<br />

Hubert J Bardenheuer* on behalf of the HEICUMED<br />

Group<br />

Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld<br />

346, 69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />

Heidelberg Medical Faculty developed “HEICUMED“,<br />

in which the clinical years are completely reorganized<br />

into organ-related block courses (“modules”). Modules<br />

are taught multiple times during the year in small<br />

student groups. A multidisciplinary planning group<br />

redesigned the original plan and combined the modules<br />

into interdisciplinary “clusters”, such as surgery and<br />

medicine. Strong connections between the various<br />

disciplines are guaranteed by lectures and cases related<br />

to leading symptoms. Subjects like pathology,<br />

radiology, clinical laboratory, etc are all integrated into<br />

the topics of the week and taught alongside. This novel<br />

approach of student education is directed to<br />

significantly improve:<br />

• students’ clinical and practical instructions and<br />

keeping training of medical facts at a high level;<br />

• the personal interactions with faculty members;<br />

• case-related problems in which all pieces of<br />

knowledge in clinical medicine have to be<br />

connected; and<br />

• teamwork by encouraging studying in groups and<br />

establishing PBL group learning.<br />

7C6 Enhancing curriculum renewal<br />

through a “clinical presentation”<br />

approach to undergraduate medical<br />

education<br />

Nehad El-Sawi<br />

University of Health Sciences, 1750 Independence Avenue,<br />

Kansas City, MO 64106, USA<br />

UHSCOM has revised its ‘discipline based’ curriculum<br />

and adopted the ‘integrative clinical presentation<br />

curriculum’ modelled, in part, after the Calgary<br />

curriculum. The discipline-based curriculum<br />

emphasized traditional basic sciences but lacked<br />

integration throughout disciplines, and across the four<br />

years. The integrative Clinical Presentation curriculum<br />

combined a strong knowledge base of basic and clinical<br />

sciences where clinical instruction guides basic science<br />

learning. Each clinical presentation began with a<br />

decision tree review, demonstration of its use, and a<br />

series of lectures covering the related basic and clinical<br />

sciences, ending with opportunities to practice<br />

diagnostic reasoning. The integration of subject matter<br />

created a coherent foundation for students` subsequent<br />

efforts at organizing the relationships between various<br />

basic and clinical science concepts.


7C7 Continuous training in General<br />

Practice as an integral part of an<br />

undergraduate medical curriculum<br />

- the Witten/Herdecke Model<br />

(Germany)<br />

W Kunstmann*, Dieter Wollgarten, René Vollenbroich<br />

and Markus Gschwind<br />

University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, GERMANY<br />

Changes in the demographic composition of our<br />

population as well as changes in health care delivery<br />

will strengthen the role of general practitioners in the<br />

future. However, undergraduate medical education has<br />

not yet appropriately responded to the outlined secular<br />

trends, and training for students in respective settings<br />

is broadly missing. At the University of Witten/<br />

Herdecke (Germany) a course for continuous training<br />

in general practice has been established as a mandatory<br />

part of its undergraduate medical curriculum.<br />

Beginning in year 1 and ending in year 5, students will<br />

perform 6 training units in general practice, each of 14<br />

days’ length. Each unit is structured by a training<br />

manual, containing specific tasks to be performed by<br />

students under supervision of their doctors. Tasks cover<br />

areas such as communication, history taking, physical<br />

examination, long-term patient care, prevention as well<br />

as economic and management aspects of health care<br />

delivery. The course design and its learning objectives<br />

will be presented.<br />

7C8 Developing sense of ownership for<br />

curriculum changes within all<br />

teaching faculty of an Asian<br />

medical school<br />

C B Hazlett*, T F Fok, S S C Chung and J C Y Cheng<br />

Office of Educational Services, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese<br />

University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New<br />

Territories, HONG KONG<br />

Major curriculum changes are difficult, and prove to<br />

be eventually ineffective if there is no wide<br />

endorsement among the teaching staff. At the Chinese<br />

University of Hong Kong a curriculum change designed<br />

to enhanced skills (clinical, communication, and life<br />

long learning), as well as for enhancing integration of<br />

basic, social and clinical skills throughout the entire<br />

five years of its medical undergraduate programme<br />

were proposed by the Faculty’s leaders. Initially, many<br />

teaching staff regarded such a change to be of dubious<br />

need and of low priority, particularly in comparison to<br />

other work obligations in clinical service and/or in their<br />

basic or clinical research. The steps taken and methods<br />

used to effect changes in attitude towards, to build<br />

support for and to develop a sense of ownership of the<br />

changes within the entire teaching staff are given in<br />

this presentation. The process of introducing the<br />

curriculum change is still ongoing, but the approaches<br />

used to date have successfully co-opted a reasonably<br />

high level of willingness and cooperation in at least<br />

designing and beginning the implementation of change.<br />

Mechanisms for securing this cooperation within an<br />

Asian medical school context are compared and<br />

contrasted with methods frequently proposed and used<br />

in medical schools operating in Western societies.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.62 -<br />

7C9 Sci45: Framework for the<br />

implementation of a career<br />

guidance instrument<br />

Janet Grant*, Rodney Gale, Mairead Beirne and<br />

Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, MILTON KEYNES MK7 6AA, UK<br />

The rigorous psychometric development of the<br />

Specialty Choice Inventory [Sci45] was reported at the<br />

1999 <strong>AMEE</strong> meeting. This 130-item instrument<br />

matches respondents to 45 specialties. The successful<br />

implementation of Sci45 depends on its flexibility to<br />

respond to many different needs. To date, six potential<br />

uses for Sci45 are being developed:<br />

• Availability on CD-ROM for individual use;<br />

• Use for final year medical students to assist them<br />

in their career choice: about 20% of career choices<br />

are made at this stage;<br />

• For hospital clinical tutors to offer to all doctors in<br />

training;<br />

• Development of Sci45 to include subspecialty<br />

profiles so that selection panels can ensure a wide<br />

range of trainees for a range of subspecialty posts;<br />

• For research into variables that might impinge on<br />

successful progress through the training grades;<br />

• To provide independent feedback to selection panels<br />

to help them reflect on their decisions.<br />

7C10 The facilitation process in a<br />

problem-based curriculum at the<br />

Nelson R. Mandela School of<br />

Medicine<br />

Jacqueline van Wyk, Peter Olmesdahl, Veena Singaram*<br />

and Michelle McLean<br />

University of Natal, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education<br />

Development, Private Bag 7, PBX Congella, 4013, SOUTH<br />

AFRICA<br />

The Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine’s studentcentred,<br />

5-year, problem-based curriculum greatly<br />

emphasizes the role of students as self-directed learners.<br />

Large group resource sessions are scheduled with the<br />

objective of introducing students to concepts and<br />

principles. Students are expected to use a variety of<br />

resources to solve their cases/problems, hopefully<br />

engendering deep learning strategies. Groups of<br />

students from diverse cultural and social backgrounds<br />

meet twice weekly (2 x 2h sessions) for small group<br />

sessions. Problem identification and resolution are two<br />

phases monitored by facilitators in order to guide and<br />

check whether learning outcomes (as identified by<br />

module designers) are achieved by students. This report<br />

describes various aspects of facilitation within the<br />

Faculty, including selection of facilitators, training, their<br />

role, perceptions of facilitators prior to and after a<br />

module and their experiences during the module.<br />

Student perceptions of the role of facilitators are also<br />

discussed.


Session 7D Curriculum evaluation/staff development<br />

7D1 Students’ feedback: a public health<br />

course in medical education<br />

Eva Rasky*, Wolfgang Freidl; Willibald-Julius Stronegger<br />

Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Karl-Franzens-<br />

University Graz, Universitaetsstrasse 6/I, A-8010 Graz,<br />

AUSTRIA<br />

Since 1999 Austrian universities have been required<br />

by law to evaluate the teaching competence of their<br />

faculty. The Institute of Social Medicine and<br />

Epidemiology, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, started<br />

evaluating its courses in 1998. Public health is a<br />

required one-week course within the medical school<br />

curriculum. We used a standardized questionnaire<br />

developed by an expert committee of this university<br />

including five sections with ratings on 5-point scales.<br />

The students answered the questionnaire at the end of<br />

the module, therefore the response rate was nearly<br />

100%. The performance of three teachers in the time<br />

period from 1998 to 2000 was analysed by descriptive<br />

analysis of 240 questionnaires. Around 60% of the<br />

students were female and 40% were male. The results<br />

and the relevance of evaluating public health courses<br />

will be discussed.<br />

7D2 Action Research Methodology: a<br />

possible framework for course<br />

evaluations<br />

Alison Rushton* and Gill James<br />

Coventry University, School of Health & Social Sciences, Priory<br />

Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK<br />

The process of curriculum design incorporates<br />

evaluation of existing courses. This paper describes a<br />

possible methodology for such evaluations. A<br />

conceptual framework, based upon action research<br />

methodology, was developed; combining diagnosis<br />

with reflection. This framework was used in the<br />

evaluation of a physiotherapy undergraduate course in<br />

the UK. The course was structured around a thematic<br />

approach, whereby the core areas of physiotherapy<br />

practice informed the course design. The diagnostic<br />

phase identified all aspects impinging upon the success<br />

of the programme. All stakeholders (including students,<br />

tutors and funding bodies) were targeted for the data<br />

collection phase. Reflection is seen as an important<br />

component of the action research cycle, facilitating<br />

prescription of data collection methods (which included<br />

focus groups, questionnaires, module evaluations and<br />

analysis of existing documentation). These data were<br />

analysed and triangulated and the results provided a<br />

reasoned justification for maintaining and<br />

strengthening the thematic approach of this course.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.63 -<br />

7D3 The opinion of graduates of the<br />

Faculty of Medicine of the<br />

University of Barcelona on the new<br />

medical curriculum<br />

J Palés*, A Gual, A Vallés, Ma T Estrach, F Climent,<br />

X Gasull, R Gilabert, A Llobet, Y Compta, L Peri and<br />

J A Bombi<br />

Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Medicina, Departmento<br />

de Ciencias Fisiologicas I., Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona,<br />

SPAIN<br />

Our Faculty introduced in 1994 a new curriculum that<br />

has represented a significant change from the old one.<br />

To evaluate the results of this curriculum in order to<br />

facilitate appropriate future development, a<br />

questionnaire was administered to the graduates, asking<br />

about their opinion on the following aspects:<br />

accomplishment of the curriculum objectives, the<br />

quality of medical education offered by the Faculty,<br />

the influence of the national board examination on the<br />

development of the curriculum, the effort that the new<br />

curriculum requires of the students and the strong and<br />

weak points of the program. 120 students (80% of total<br />

students) answered the questionnaire. In general, the<br />

acceptance of the new curriculum by the students was<br />

high although some deficiencies have been detected.<br />

The information furnished by the graduates will be<br />

useful in introducing the necessary modifications to<br />

improve our educational program in the coming years.<br />

7D4 Comenius University Quality<br />

Assurance System (CUQAS) and<br />

students’ participation in graduate<br />

medical education evaluation<br />

L Plank*, J Danko, E Rozborilova, P Galajda and K Dokus<br />

Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Dean’s Office, Comenius<br />

University, Zaborskeho 2, SVK 036 45 MARTIN, SLOVAK<br />

REPUBLIC<br />

We believe that students should take an active part in<br />

the process of education evaluation applied at the<br />

Jessenius Medical Faculty. Students in the 11th and 12th<br />

semester were asked to answer an anonymous<br />

questionnaire on education quality in four basic clinical<br />

subjects (four-grade-quality-system). Questions related<br />

to the structure and content of lectures, teachers´<br />

approach towards students, contacts with patients and<br />

others. In contrast to prevailing positive evaluations<br />

within the scale of “fully”, “partially satisfied” and<br />

“more satisfied than unsatisfied”, less than 1/5 of<br />

students were “not satisfied” with at least one of the<br />

evaluated education components. The education quality<br />

evaluation system helps the faculty management to<br />

improve educational standards and to identify its weak<br />

and strong components. In the future, this is planned<br />

to be applied annually for the whole graduate education<br />

within the uniform CUQAS system and database.


7D5 Research in medical education:<br />

constructing an ethical framework<br />

E B Peile* and A Slowther<br />

Department of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford,<br />

Chiltern Waters, 1 Stablebridge Road, Aston Clinton, Bucks<br />

HP22 5ND, UK<br />

Proposals for research in medical education are<br />

frequently submitted to UK medical research ethics<br />

committees, which are more accustomed to considering<br />

the implications of research on patients than research<br />

on learners. After reviewing relevant codes for<br />

educational research, we propose an adaptation to a<br />

framework of medical research ethics for use in medical<br />

education research. Key issues in our suggested<br />

framework include:<br />

• Scientific validity of the research on medical<br />

education<br />

• Safety aspects, including<br />

- risk to the students’ psychological well-being<br />

- risk to patients from exposure to learners<br />

• Consent procedure:<br />

- are students fully informed about the study and<br />

the implications for their education?<br />

- is consent voluntary and without coercion?<br />

• Confidentiality issues, including whether examiners<br />

or assessors will have access to research<br />

information.<br />

We discuss some ethics considerations, which may help<br />

to inform the critical appraisal of research projects in<br />

medical education and thereby encourage good<br />

practice.<br />

7D6 Students’ perceptions of the<br />

Physiology course in a traditional<br />

medical school<br />

F Riggione*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez<br />

Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Educacion Medica,<br />

Escuela de Medicina “Luis Razetti”, Facultad de Medicina,<br />

Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Apartado de<br />

Correos No 90.350, El Hatillo 1083A, VENEZUELA<br />

Students’ perceptions of learning experiences<br />

contribute to a better understanding of the need for<br />

curricular reform. We explored the opinion of 2nd year<br />

medical students after their 36 week Physiology course<br />

of lectures and laboratory sessions. 166 students<br />

received a 25 item survey and 146 responses (88%)<br />

were evaluated. 76% of the respondents attended 50%<br />

or less of the lectures. 64% considered the course to be<br />

detailed and 57% to be complex. 34% considered it<br />

relevant and 34% difficult. Teachers were considered<br />

competent by 56%, accessible by 51% and rigid by<br />

48%. On a 5 point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 5 = very<br />

much) their experience of the course was defined as<br />

significant (mean score = 3.65), pleasurable (2.51) and<br />

stressing (2.28), while it lacked “feeling of discovery”<br />

(0.55) and motivation (0.37). 41% of respondents<br />

indicated to have learnt 50% or less of the course<br />

contents, and only 9% indicated learning >70%.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.64 -<br />

7D7 Students’ perceptions of a<br />

traditional undergraduate course in<br />

Microbiology<br />

Z Uzcategui*, J Perez-Ojeda and J F Perez-Gonzalez<br />

Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Educacion Medica,<br />

Escuela de Medicina “Luis Razetti”, Facultad de Medicina,<br />

Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Apartado de<br />

Correos No 90.350, El Hatillo 1083A, VENEZUELA<br />

Microbiology can be an abstruse subject for medical<br />

students. We explored the opinion of our students after<br />

their 36 week traditional Microbiology course of<br />

lectures and laboratory sessions in the 2nd year. 187<br />

students completed a 25 item survey of their<br />

experiences in the course. 71% of respondents attended<br />

50% or less of the lectures and 100% attended >85%<br />

of the compulsory laboratory sessions. 68% thought<br />

the course was relevant, 41% found it detailed and 24%<br />

excessive. Teachers were considered competent (79%),<br />

accessible (69%), interested (66%) and stimulating<br />

(41%). The students defined their learning experience<br />

by grading items on a 5 point Likert scale (0 = not at<br />

all, 5 = very much), as significant (mean score = 4.15),<br />

creating a “feeling of discovery” (4.08), leading to new<br />

questions (3.88), pleasurable (3.7) and stimulating<br />

(3.63). 88% of respondents indicated to have learnt<br />

>50% of the course’s contents.<br />

7D8 Faculty development in General<br />

Practice - the German experience<br />

M Ehrhardt, P Engeser, M Herrmann, T Lichte, N Donner-<br />

Banzhoff and S Wilm*, on behalf of the participants<br />

Heinrich-Heine University, Department of General Practice, PO<br />

Box 10 10 07, D-40001 Duesseldorf, GERMANY<br />

Since 1978 General Practice has been a required subject<br />

of the undergraduate curriculum in Germany. However,<br />

only about one third of all 33 medical schools have<br />

established academic departments. At the remaining<br />

schools, GP teachers are often working in isolation and<br />

without adequate support. In 1999 the National Society<br />

of General Practice started a programme to help GP<br />

teachers develop their academic skills. Six weekends<br />

spanning 1 1/2 years are being offered covering<br />

teaching, clinical work, quality issues, research and<br />

academic survival skills. Participants are expected to<br />

work together in small groups on projects during<br />

intervals and to complete an international practicum<br />

of at least one week duration. There is also an intranet<br />

platform to facilitate the exchange of ideas and<br />

materials.<br />

While in the beginning the learner-centered philosophy<br />

created tension and uncertainty, the group has now<br />

found a working identity that participants find<br />

enjoyable and productive.<br />

7D9 Medicine and ethnic issues; do our<br />

tutors reflect their community?<br />

D Reeves, R Loudon and J Parle*<br />

Department of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical<br />

School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 3QR, UK<br />

We conducted an audit of primary care teaching<br />

practices in order to determine the characteristics of


doctors providing different elements of the extensive<br />

Birmingham community based curriculum. 185<br />

questionnaires (concerning gender, ethnicity, languages<br />

spoken) were distributed. 540 doctors from 163<br />

practices responded (practice response rate 88%).<br />

Ethnic and gender differences were clear across<br />

different practice types. The 2001 Amendment to the<br />

1976 UK Race Relations Act will mean for the first<br />

time that providers of services to the public will have<br />

Session 7E Postgraduate education<br />

7E1 Exploring the views of Basic<br />

Surgical Trainees on their training<br />

programme and their future in<br />

Surgery<br />

Jeremy Brown*, Linda de Cossart and Charmian Wiltshire<br />

Mersey Deanery, 1st Floor, Hamilton House, 24 Pall Mall,<br />

Liverpool L3 6AL, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to explore views of Basic<br />

Surgical Trainees (Senior House Officers) on a training<br />

scheme for Basic Surgical Training that complies with<br />

college requirements. A quantitative study postal<br />

questionnaire devised in liaison with UK Medical<br />

Careers Research Group was distributed to 115 Mersey<br />

Basic Surgical Trainees. Qualitative data were collected<br />

from free-text responses. Questions focused on career<br />

choices, views on the scheme, and assessment. 93<br />

(81%) questionnaires were returned. 51 (54%) were<br />

graduates from local university, 49 (52.7%) came<br />

directly onto the Mersey BST scheme from PRHO<br />

posts, 4 (4.3 %) had more than 1 year’s UK SHO<br />

experience. 26 (27.9%) changed their surgical specialty<br />

intention since medical school; factors influencing<br />

change were: - PRHO/SHO experience; teachers;<br />

departments. A young, parochial and inexperienced<br />

cohort of trainees who have strong convictions were<br />

identified. Many issues raised have one common<br />

denominator: the strong influence of teachers on<br />

trainees.<br />

7E2 An assessment of the skills base<br />

and attainments of Senior House<br />

Officers on a regional Basic<br />

Surgical Training <strong>Programme</strong><br />

Linda de Cossart, Charmian Wiltshire and Jeremy Brown*<br />

Mersey Deanery, 1st Floor, Hamilton House, 24 Pall Mall,<br />

Liverpool L3 6AL, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to assess the skills base and<br />

achievements of trainees on a Basic Surgical Training<br />

<strong>Programme</strong>. All trainees on the 3-year Basic Surgical<br />

Training <strong>Programme</strong> insituted in 1996/7 were given a<br />

questionnaire designed to find out their aspirations and<br />

opinions about the programme and design. The findings<br />

related to the trainees’ logbook for the general surgical<br />

operations of abscess drainage, appendisectomy,<br />

inguinal hernia repair, upper and lower GI endoscopy,<br />

varicose vein surgery and small bowel anastomosis. The<br />

results were analysed by year of training and whether<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.65 -<br />

to demonstrate they are working for equality rather than<br />

merely avoiding discrimination. This audit, experience<br />

with attempts to collaborate with secondary care<br />

teachers plus our larger curriculum development project<br />

stimulate a wider debate about whether, when<br />

commissioning teaching practices, we should assess<br />

other aspects of quality of service provision; and<br />

whether, in the absence of an appropriate environment,<br />

learning outcomes are achievable.<br />

performed independently or supervised. 84 (73%) of<br />

trainees returned analysable forms. Abscess drainage<br />

and appendisectomy are acquired most often as the<br />

three years progress but a few still do not achieve<br />

independence by year three. The Profession should<br />

insist on ‘Protected Operative Teaching’ for surgical<br />

trainees.<br />

7E3 Personal and Professional<br />

Development Groups for Junior<br />

Hospital Doctors<br />

Alan Naftalin and Peter Bruggen<br />

Newham General Hospital, 22 Mackeson Road, London NW3<br />

2LT, UK<br />

You were a junior doctor. In personal and professional<br />

development groups at Newham General Hospital in<br />

East London, UK, the valued experience was often<br />

discovering that each was not alone. Others had<br />

‘strange’ thoughts and feelings. The figure of a junior<br />

doctor will be surrounded by radiating lines labelled:<br />

blushing, feeling faint, losing 3D thought, frozen<br />

memory, challenged by consultants, dreaming of<br />

patients, psychosomatic symptoms, unable to stop eye<br />

contact, erections, impulse to touch too much, being<br />

told off, feeling embarrassed, needing to rescue the<br />

deprived, fostering special relationships, scoring PR<br />

and PV examinations, enjoying power, etc. Pens or<br />

labels will be provided for participants to add ideas or<br />

experiences. In the corners will be background to the<br />

group, and references; details and email addresses of<br />

both authors; invitation to mailing list or web site; and<br />

invitation for suggestions.<br />

7E4 The educational needs of doctors<br />

with English as a second language<br />

when consulting in General<br />

Practice in the United Kingdom<br />

Sylvia Chudley and John Skelton<br />

West Midlands Dept of Postgraduate Education for General<br />

Practice, 16 Ashmore Road, Cotteridge, Birmingham, B30 2HA,<br />

UK<br />

Results of the consulting skills component of the<br />

national summative assessment procedure in the United<br />

Kingdom, (assessment of videotaped consultations),<br />

indicate that the failure rate is significantly higher in<br />

those doctors who have had undergraduate medical


training abroad. Preliminary observations suggest that<br />

these doctors have specific difficulties that relate not<br />

only to linguistic problems, but to cultural differences<br />

in 1) communication in general, 2) communication<br />

within the medical consultation, and 3) the nature of<br />

the teacher/pupil relationship. This research explores<br />

these 3 issues through in-depth interviews with such<br />

doctors who are currently training in general practice.<br />

A better understanding of the educational needs of<br />

doctors from abroad should enable educators to provide<br />

appropriate training and preparation for work in general<br />

practice in the United Kingdom.<br />

7E5 “No such thing as a free lunch” -<br />

how free are bleep-free sessions?<br />

Jane Ross* and Rose Martin<br />

Postgraduate Office, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical<br />

School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Bleep-free weekly educational sessions have been<br />

identified as an essential requirement in the clinical<br />

training of PRHOs. A GMC review supported by<br />

anecdotal evidence identified this issue as a concern.<br />

A three phase prospective audit to evaluate the effect<br />

of implementing a trust-wide bleeping policy in the<br />

provision of bleep-free weekly educational sessions for<br />

PRHOs was evaluated.<br />

Phase 1: 6 weeks: a researcher intercepted all bleep<br />

interruptions during weekly PRHO teaching.<br />

Bleeping reasons were logged into a coding<br />

grid.<br />

Phase 2: Implementation of Trust Bleeping Policy.<br />

Phase 3: 6 weeks (repeat of phase 1).<br />

Bleeping incidents were logged and coded pre and post<br />

policy implementation. Results showed improved<br />

negotiated bleep responsibility to colleague, a decrease<br />

in bleeping incidents during teaching sessions and<br />

decrease in non-essential bleep interruptions.<br />

Implementation of a bleeping policy improved bleepfree<br />

sessions for PRHOs.<br />

7E6 The SHO Record of In-Service<br />

Training and Achievement (RITA)<br />

and Portfolio<br />

Rose Martin* and R W Newton<br />

SCPMDE, Postgraduate Office, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and<br />

Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Documentation will be required to support the new<br />

SHO RITA process; models are currently being<br />

developed and tested. The SHO Portfolio and Record<br />

of In–Service Training and Achievement has been<br />

developed in the East Region and is currently being<br />

piloted in Tayside and Edinburgh amongst all SHOs<br />

within medicine and its sub-specialties. The SHO<br />

Portfolio aims to promote a more structured approach<br />

to SHO training, appraisal and assessment. It is based<br />

on the concept of a partnership between SHO and<br />

Educational Supervisor; the documentation includes a<br />

training agreement which emphasises the<br />

responsibilities on both sides in ensuring that learning<br />

opportunities are maximised. It enables a continuum<br />

of training, incorporating a strategy for the management<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.66 -<br />

of poor performance which can be passed from the<br />

initial Educational Supervisor to the next, if the training<br />

plan is not completed. Split between five sections and<br />

based on the GMC’s Good Medical Practice booklet,<br />

the final section is designed to enhance the CV and<br />

detail critical incident analysis, audit projects, record<br />

interesting cases and provide a platform for promoting<br />

clinical and educational achievement at interview.<br />

Specific Royal College documentation can be inserted<br />

and the portfolio itself should be used to inform the<br />

Revalidation process.<br />

7E7 General Practice Registrar audit<br />

and implementation of change<br />

J McKay*, J R M Lough and T S Murray<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of<br />

Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK<br />

General practice registrars (GPRs), submit an audit<br />

project as part of the summative assessment process.<br />

Assessment of these projects does not require the<br />

registrar to implement change nor collect a second data<br />

set. From 1988 west of Scotland GPRs were required<br />

to submit a completed audit cycle (CAC), which<br />

included implementing change and a second data<br />

collection. Audit submissions in the 3 years before and<br />

after the introduction of CAC were compared. Projects<br />

submitted after the introduction of CAC were<br />

significantly more likely to have 3 or less criteria<br />

(p


7E9 Psychosocial training in the Family<br />

Residency in Spain: present<br />

situation and proposals for the<br />

future<br />

José Ramón Loayssa Lara<br />

Servicio Navarro de Salud, Centro de Salud de Noaín, 31110<br />

Noaín, SPAIN<br />

The psychosocial training in the family practice<br />

residency in Spain, despite the increasing interest and<br />

the growing number of educational activities, is not<br />

obtaining the desired results. In order to formulate a<br />

proposal for curriculum development, a study of the<br />

programme in the different teaching units was<br />

undertaken. Based on the suggestions of the faculty<br />

and on the analysis of experiences in different countries,<br />

a series of recommendations and possible lines of<br />

development are discussed.<br />

7E10 Step by step to methodological<br />

exam: report on first year<br />

experiences with the new<br />

introduced GP Licence<br />

Examination in Austria<br />

R Willnauer*, M Schmidts, M Lischka<br />

Institute for Medical Education, University of Vienna, Wahringer<br />

Gurtel 18-20, Postfach 10, A-1097 Wien, AUSTRIA<br />

There are three prerequisites for being granted a licence<br />

as a GP: 3-year-inhouse rotational training,<br />

accompanied by a certification process (longitudinal<br />

evaluation) and a summative examination at the end of<br />

the training period. This exam was introduced in<br />

November 1999 and is held three times a year. The<br />

exam is made up of 20-25 case vignettes followed by<br />

1-5 questions in SAQ format. The cases are developed<br />

by GPs and are thoroughly reviewed. Required answers<br />

are predetermined by GP experts. Answers are<br />

corrected by specialists on machine readable sheets,<br />

providing PC-based item analysis and scoring. We will<br />

report on:<br />

• our attempts to meet quality criteria (objectivity,<br />

reliability, validity)<br />

• results of four examinations (total of 372<br />

candidates)<br />

• institutional and organisational experience with the<br />

instruction of examination methodology.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.67 -<br />

7E11 Development of professional<br />

doctorates in healthcare disciplines<br />

Alan Castle*, Graham A Mills and Valda Bunker<br />

University of Portsmouth, Centre for Radiography Education,<br />

St George’s Building, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2HY, UK<br />

Originally, the PhD was a qualification for an academic<br />

career. Recently the appropriateness of this<br />

qualification has been questioned as it is not necessarily<br />

relevant to industry or professional interests.<br />

Consequently universities are re-shaping Doctoral level<br />

learning by providing flexible, part-time, work-based<br />

‘Professional Doctorates’ (PD). These are “equal in<br />

rigour but different in substance” to a PhD. The<br />

University of Portsmouth has recently developed an<br />

innovative PD programme supporting multidisciplinary<br />

learning in biomedical sciences,<br />

chiropractic, medical imaging, nursing and pharmacy.<br />

Entry to the programme is at Master’s level, with<br />

Doctoral level learning in two parts. A ‘taught’ Part 1<br />

(1-2 years) includes advanced research techniques,<br />

professional review and publication and dissemination<br />

units. Part 2 (2-3 years) comprises the work-based<br />

professional research and development project<br />

submitted as a portfolio. This curriculum model,<br />

facilitating continuing professional development, is<br />

appropriate for all healthcare disciplines and suitable<br />

for adoption by other higher education institutions.<br />

7E12 The appointment process for<br />

Anaesthetic Registrars in South<br />

Thames<br />

J Clarke* and J Pateman<br />

St George’s Hospital London, Department of Anaesthesia,<br />

Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK<br />

Each 6 months we appoint approximately 25 registrars<br />

to our training scheme from about 100 applicants.<br />

Historically we used the classical large panel, roundtable,<br />

15 minute interview technique. For the last 18<br />

months we have employed an OSCE style interview<br />

process using 4 ‘tables’. Candidates rotate through all<br />

tables, where they undergo targeted questioning on<br />

different aspects of the person specification that cannot<br />

be obtained from their paper application. The<br />

advantages are that each candidate is now interviewed<br />

for 32 minutes and we are able to explore in greater<br />

detail desirable attributes. Furthermore because we are<br />

now able to interview up to 50 candidates in one day,<br />

the short listing has become a less important part of<br />

the process and we can interview a more diverse group.<br />

Audits carried out have shown a marked preference<br />

for this technique amongst both interviewers and<br />

interviewees.


Session 7F Assessment<br />

7F1 Validity of assessment techniques:<br />

students’ views differ from<br />

observed outcomes<br />

W Colin Duncan<br />

University of Edinburgh, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre<br />

for Reproductive Biology, 37 Chalmers Street, Edinburgh EH3<br />

9ET, UK<br />

We assess medical students in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology using a combination of four assessment<br />

techniques: continuous assessment (CA), multiple<br />

essay questions (MEQ), OSCE exam and clinical exam.<br />

This study aimed to compare the students’ perception<br />

(n=75) of validity of these assessment techniques with<br />

actual validity. Validity of each component was assessed<br />

by correlation with the final mark. Students’ perception<br />

was obtained by asking students what they felt they<br />

deserved and what they felt they got in each assessment.<br />

In predicting final mark, CA performed worst<br />

(r=0.667), followed by MEQ (r=0.791), Clinical<br />

(r=0.861) and finally OSCE (r=0.877). In the students’<br />

perception, CA performed best (-3.8% difference),<br />

followed by MEQ (-4.9%), Clinical (-5.4%) and finally<br />

OSCE (-11%). There is a clear inverse relationship<br />

(r=0.705) between the students’ perception of<br />

assessment validity and the actual validity in this<br />

assessment scenario.<br />

7F2 Assessment reliability in an MSc<br />

programme in Diabetes<br />

J Huber*, N Munro, A Felton, C Parker, P Delaney and<br />

C McIntosh<br />

School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West<br />

Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK<br />

Reliability within examinations is a precondition to<br />

validity. In order to confirm internal reliability in<br />

assessment instruments, a range of measures can be<br />

employed. This study aimed to establish the reliability<br />

of assessments used in a Diabetes Masters programme.<br />

Percentage scores from the attendance cohort (1999/<br />

00) for the four assessments in a ‘management of<br />

diabetes’ module were analysed, resulting in an alpha<br />

coefficient of .75. Correlations between individual<br />

assessments and the total assessment scores (corrected<br />

for the individual assessment) were .58, .41, .64 and<br />

.57. Both the alpha and item-total correlations indicate<br />

a satisfactory level of internal reliability. The figures<br />

indicate that all assessments evaluate a common skills<br />

range. Alphas greater than .8 are recognised as<br />

achievable in professional examinations. In order to<br />

attain this it will be necessary to evaluate assessment<br />

two further to understand why this essay has a lower<br />

correlation with the overall grade achieved.<br />

7F3 Two years of progress-testing at<br />

the Charité<br />

A Mertens*, J Hoffmann, S Kölbel, R Raschke, K Duske, J<br />

Berger and U Hennewig<br />

HU <strong>Berlin</strong> Medical Faculty, Charité, AG Reformstudiengang,<br />

Medizinische Fakultat, Schumannstr 20-21, 10117 <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.68 -<br />

The Humboldt-University Progress-Test is based on the<br />

principles for Progress-Testing developed in the<br />

Netherlands. It will be shown that the format works<br />

also within a traditional German medical faculty. The<br />

results of the four tests organized in <strong>Berlin</strong> so far will<br />

be presented, including a summary of our subsequently<br />

performed test-evaluation programme. Special<br />

attention will be payed to the comparison of the students<br />

in the reformed curriculum vs. the students in the<br />

traditional curriculum in all respects.<br />

7F4 OSCE for a Paediatric Trainee<br />

Internship examination:<br />

multicentric experience<br />

M Aldunate, A Lopez, A Mena, M Varas, X Trivino,<br />

A Vasquez*, R Lillo, T Miranda and E Mandiola<br />

ESC Medicina - Officina de Educacion Medica, Fac Medicina,<br />

Universidad de Chile, La Siembra 8952 Vitacura Santiago,<br />

CHILE<br />

The University of Chile and the Catholic University,<br />

the main Chilean Universities, started in 2000 a joint<br />

program in order to consolidate and improve the<br />

assessment system for the paediatric training period<br />

(internship 6th year). The objective of the program was<br />

to improve the quality of the final assessment of clinical<br />

competences of the Paediatric trainee (internship) in<br />

two Chilean Universities. Members of both Schools of<br />

Medicine have developed, organized, implemented and<br />

run an identical, simultaneous, multicentric and interuniversity<br />

20 station OSCE in order to assess 124<br />

students; to analyze the results and statistically compare<br />

them to other traditional assessment methods.<br />

Questionnaires were used for considering the results<br />

and opinions as well as academic opinions before and<br />

after the OSCE. The OSCE allowed the measurement<br />

of main objectives in all domains and the components<br />

of predetermined clinical competences. Statistical<br />

analysis of results showed the advantages of this method<br />

in relation to the traditional exam. The results of the<br />

questionnaire analysis are presented and discussed.<br />

Results permit the recommendation of the OSCE as a<br />

clinical examination of the Paediatric trainee at the end<br />

of the internship period in both Schools of Medicine.<br />

7F5 Third year medical student written<br />

history and physicals: how many is<br />

enough?<br />

Paul A Hemmer*, Thomas Jamieson, Kim Gibson, Lisa<br />

Moores, Andy Donato, Margaret Gaglione, Steven Durning,<br />

Alan Wimmer, Bonnie Cary-Freitas and Louis Pangaro<br />

USUHS - EDP, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda MD 20814,<br />

USA<br />

The aim was to determine when students can reliably<br />

write a history and physical. In 1998-99, faculty ranked<br />

20 specific aspects of 10 student write-ups, using a<br />

validated, 4-point Likert scale rating form. We assessed<br />

intra-write up reliability/correlation and inter-write up<br />

reliability (Cronbach’s alpha). Data were available for<br />

240 students (1998-1999). The table summarizes the


number of write-ups necessary to achieve a specific<br />

level of agreement for seven of the 20 rated categories.<br />

Write-up Variable a � 0.7 a � 0.8<br />

Chief Complaint<br />

HPI (degree that history<br />

Never Never<br />

differentiates possible etiologies) 9 10<br />

PE (precision)<br />

Problem List (specificity of<br />

Never Never<br />

problem) 4 Never<br />

Analysis (level/depth) 8 9<br />

Scholarship (level/depth) 3 9<br />

Overall 2 10<br />

Items most correlated with the overall score:<br />

Assessment and Plan (.83), Level of Analysis (.7), HPI<br />

(.64), and Level of Scholarship (.6). It is concluded<br />

that fostering a student’s transition from “Reporter” to<br />

“Interpreter” requires 8-10 written H&Ps.<br />

7F6 Student fitness to practise<br />

procedures<br />

Chris Stephens<br />

The Department of Medical Education, Office of School of<br />

Medicine, University of Southampton, MP 801 Level C, South<br />

Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton,<br />

SO16 6DY, UK<br />

Students can be suspended from their course for a<br />

number of reasons such as health, conduct and<br />

academic progress. These three do not cover specific<br />

professional areas related to medicine and so the School<br />

of Medicine University of Southampton developed<br />

student fitness to practise procedures. These procedures<br />

are based on a number of GMC documents and link<br />

into the University’s regulations and have been used<br />

on a number of occasions. The presentation will explore<br />

a number of case scenarios to illustrate that there is<br />

often overlap between the different areas, how the<br />

fitness to practise procedures need to reflect current<br />

GMC professional conduct guidance and why the<br />

system needs to be fair, transparent and open.<br />

7F7 Deriving the assessment<br />

framework for the Three Royal<br />

Colleges Diploma in Prison<br />

Medicine<br />

Lesley J Southgate*, Jon H Fuller and Jaz Bihku<br />

Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education,<br />

University College London Medical School, Archway Campus,<br />

Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

Prisoners suffer from high levels of mental health<br />

problems, substance misuse, communicable diseases<br />

and chronic physical illness. But health services for<br />

UK prisoners have been isolated from the wider health<br />

community in the NHS. Improving the health and health<br />

care of prisoners has not been a priority for either the<br />

Prison Service or the NHS. As a result, despite patches<br />

of good practice, services overall have fallen short of<br />

collective aspirations. As a contribution to CPD for<br />

prison medical officers, three UK Royal Colleges<br />

(General Practice, Physicians, Psychiatry) have<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.69 -<br />

established a Diploma in Prison Medicine. The Diploma<br />

is delivered by the University of Nottingham, but the<br />

assessment and quality assurance framework was<br />

developed and is implemented by the Examination<br />

Board from the Royal Colleges. We describe here the<br />

derivation of the assessment framework, both content<br />

and methods, and present data from the first three years<br />

of the Diploma.<br />

7F8 Assessment in an outcome-based<br />

curriculum at the International<br />

Medical University (IMU), Malaysia<br />

J C Ramesh*, S Raman, M I Nurjahan, A Radhakrishnan,<br />

K H Ong, C M K Patrick and A K H Wong<br />

International Medical University, 33 A Jalan 17/1, Block A-4,<br />

Condo 3A, Astana Damansara, 46400 Petaling Jaya, Selangor,<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

Eight major outcomes were identified for the clinical<br />

programme of the International Medical University<br />

(IMU). The outcomes form the basis to reflect the<br />

competencies expected of our graduates. Task-based<br />

study-guides, a community and family case study<br />

(CFCS) and the learning portfolio form our core<br />

curriculum. We employ a variety of assessment tools<br />

to assess the competencies achieved in the eight IMU<br />

outcomes. These include end of posting examinations<br />

as well as the portfolio. Both OSPE and OSCE are used<br />

in the professional examinations to assess the various<br />

outcomes. An OSCE grid has been developed to<br />

evaluate the effectiveness of our assessment in<br />

measuring all the IMU outcomes. Issues related to<br />

community and health are assessed in the CFCS. The<br />

final semester is for senior clerkship and a structured<br />

exit viva at the end will be used to assess the<br />

competency in the outcomes before the students<br />

graduate.<br />

7F9 Psychosocial profile of medical<br />

students as a predictor of the<br />

academic success in medical<br />

school in Mexico<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-<br />

R, Victoria Bermudez, Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-<br />

Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, 1815 JFK Blvd. Apt #<br />

1606, Philadelphia PA 19103, USA<br />

We examined the contribution of psychosocial<br />

measures in predicting academic success among<br />

Mexican medical students. Participants were 694<br />

medical students at the Autonomous University of<br />

Nuevo Leon, in Mexico. A set of psychosocial scales,<br />

including Jefferson Medical College’s noncognitive<br />

questionnaire, was administered. Data supported the<br />

psychometrics of the instruments. Participants were<br />

divided into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of those who<br />

succeeded in the first and second years of medical<br />

school (n=277). Group 2 included those students who<br />

were put on probation (n=339). Group 3 comprised<br />

those who were dismissed (n=78). We compared these<br />

3 groups on a number of psychosocial measures, and<br />

found significant differences among the groups on the<br />

following scales: Depression, Stress Life Events,<br />

Terman Merrill IQ, Self-esteem, Cognitive Process or


Thinking Problems, Family Structure and Function.<br />

Findings have implications in admission decisions and<br />

in academic and professional counselling.<br />

7F10 Psychometric data for Jefferson<br />

Medical College’s Non Cognitive<br />

Questionnaire in Mexican medical<br />

students<br />

Adelina Alcorta-G*, Mohammadreza Hojat, Jesus Ancer-<br />

R, Victoria Bermudez, Juan Montes-V, Santos Guzman, A-<br />

Enrique Alcorta-G and Marcos Vinicio<br />

Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, 1815 JFK Blvd. Apt #<br />

1606, Philadelphia PA 19103, USA<br />

A Spanish version of the Jefferson Medical College’s<br />

Noncognitive Questionnaire was administered to 700<br />

first year medical students at the Autonomous<br />

University of Nuevo Leon, in Mexico. Factor analysis<br />

resulted in a factor matrix that was comparable to that<br />

obtained between noncognitive scale scores and<br />

external criterion measures. Results of this study<br />

support the construct validity, criterion-related validity,<br />

and internal consistency aspect of reliability<br />

(Cronbach’s alpha) of the noncognitive measures<br />

(general anxiety, test anxiety, loneliness, self-esteem,<br />

extroversion, stressful life events, neuroticism and locus<br />

of control) in Mexican medical students. We concluded<br />

that the noncognitive questionnaire, in general, is a valid<br />

and reliable instrument for Mexican medical students<br />

to investigate the contribution of personal qualities,<br />

Session 7G Teaching and learning (1)<br />

7G1 What do first year medical students<br />

value in a learning situation?<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Alejandra Blanco, Soledad Campos<br />

and Amelia Cabrera<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Lack of appropriate learning skills when entering<br />

medical school is one the major obstacles our students<br />

face during their first year at medical school. We used<br />

the critical incident technique to determine which<br />

elements in a learning episode during high school were<br />

highly valued as most effective by students admitted<br />

to medical school. Incidents were coded for learning<br />

characteristics, and for disciplines mentioned. Seventyone<br />

medical students recently admitted were included<br />

in the study. Faculty personal aptitudes was the most<br />

frequently cited element (34%), followed by practical<br />

teaching (22%), students’ personal growth or<br />

transformation (13%), influence of the evaluation<br />

(12%), team working (8%), and good teaching<br />

resources (8%). Sciences related to medicine were the<br />

most influential (65%), while humanistic disciplines<br />

(23%), and exact sciences (9%) were mentioned too.<br />

These data permit the design of educational activities<br />

using those elements in order to improve their efficacy.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.70 -<br />

personality factors and psychosocial characteristics in<br />

predicting academic success in medical school, and<br />

professional success in medical practice, which is the<br />

broader goal of this project.<br />

7F11 Portfolio based assessment of<br />

students during their internship<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Soledad Campos, Isabel Fernández<br />

and Alfredo Olivieri<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Portfolio is an assessment tool that allows students to<br />

record and reflect on key events of their daily activities.<br />

Our sixth year (internship) students record their daily<br />

activities, their reactions to their real life work, they<br />

identify their learning needs, and their studying<br />

strategies, including self evaluation. The faculty gives<br />

student feedback, helps her/him to apply her/his<br />

learning in a practical context, and challenges and<br />

motivates the intern to advance in their learning.<br />

Thirteen students and four faculties were involved in<br />

this project. Despite the lack of previous experience<br />

with the instrument, students and faculties found it<br />

useful. Faculty development activities directed towards<br />

improving the use of the portfolio, and protecting time<br />

(minimum 2 hours/week) to meet with the students are<br />

changes we are planning to perfect its use. Portfolio is<br />

not used for promotion but for developing and<br />

consolidating adult and life-long learning strategies.<br />

7G2 Application of Schon’s model for<br />

small-group teaching<br />

Francine Borduas* and Réjean Laprise<br />

Association des médecins omnipraticiens de Québec, Clinique<br />

médicale de Neufchatel, 2350 boul Bastien #2, Québec G2B<br />

1B5, CANADA<br />

Schon proposed that physicians acquire expertise<br />

through a process of reflection in and on action. This<br />

process is triggered by abnormal cases seen in the<br />

clinic, which cause ‘surprises’. These surprises lead to<br />

the investigation of the new phenomena and<br />

experimentation of new course of actions, which are,<br />

ultimately, integrated into practice. We present an<br />

application of Schon’s model for small-group teaching.<br />

An interactive workshop, based on the study of a real<br />

patient followed by her doctor for 15 years, was<br />

designed to cause ‘surprises’ among participants and<br />

make them go through the process described by Schon.<br />

This method was assessed during a CME event. Results<br />

from the administration of a multiple choice<br />

questionnaire pre- and post-intervention showed a<br />

significant improvement in knowledge following the<br />

event (p


7G3 Teaching and learning about case<br />

presentations: the need for early<br />

intervention<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd<br />

Imperial College School of Medicine, Connaught House,<br />

Apartment 17, Davies Street, London W1K 3DA, UK<br />

At Imperial College School of Medicine, students are<br />

introduced to case presentations during their second<br />

year. During a three-hour session, the content and<br />

context of case presentations are discussed and students<br />

participate in a brainstorming activity to identify<br />

characteristics of effective presentations. Students then<br />

work in small groups to prepare and deliver a case<br />

presentation based on a videotaped interview.<br />

Approximately five presentations are made in each<br />

session. In addition to the content of the presentation,<br />

students receive feedback on their presentation skills.<br />

Data will be presented from an assessment conducted<br />

three-months after the session and a clinical attachment.<br />

The assessment examines students’ knowledge in<br />

relation to the content and context of presentations and<br />

the features of effective presentations. Students are also<br />

asked about their experiences of case presentations<br />

during their clinical attachments and if there is anything<br />

else they would like to have addressed in the session.<br />

7G4 Master teacher, master learner<br />

M P Oosthuizen<br />

University of Pretoria, P O Box 1266, Tand en Mond Hospital,<br />

Pretoria 0001, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

The aim of this study was to make use of a whole brain<br />

teaching and learning model for the study-unit of toothmorphology<br />

in a 3rd year dental curriculum to<br />

accommodate and develop students’ knowledge, skills<br />

and attitudes.The Herrmann Whole Brain Model on<br />

teaching and learning was used to stimulate a learningcentred<br />

approach. His instrument was used to determine<br />

thinking style preferences of the individual students<br />

and the group as a whole. Whole brain teaching<br />

interventions were designed to accommodate and<br />

develop diverse thinking style preferences during<br />

learning activities. The results of this study indicated a<br />

significant improvement of students’ retention,<br />

participation and attitudes toward the content and<br />

learning as well as group interaction and problem<br />

solving. The impact of this pre-clinical intervention in<br />

the third year is still evident and contributing to the<br />

students’ performances in their clinical work during<br />

the fourth year. This success had a major impact on the<br />

decision of the faculty to incorporate whole brain<br />

teaching and learning in the new outcomes-based<br />

learning-centred curriculum for dentistry.<br />

7G5 Hemisphericity in medical students<br />

N E Fernandez-Garza*, I A Benitez-Trejo, C Salinas-<br />

Guerra, A Davila-Flores and J A Castellanos-Lopez<br />

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon,<br />

Nuno de Guzman 309, Col. Cumbres, 3er Sector, Monterrey,<br />

N.L., c.p. 64610, MEXICO<br />

From Sperry studies, attention has been focused on<br />

brain dominance or hemisphericity. Left hemisphere<br />

(LH) is considered better for verbal tasks and right (RH)<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.71 -<br />

for visual. For the teaching-learning process, it is<br />

important to consider which learning style (verbal or<br />

visual) is more used by students. In this project, nine<br />

medicine students were tested in five cognitive<br />

paradigms; reaction time was measured. Paradigms<br />

were: (1) simple reaction time (SRT) to familiarize with<br />

the procedure; (2) memory using letters (LS); (3)<br />

memory using patterns (PM); (4) patterns recognition<br />

using letters (LTM); and (5) patterns recognition using<br />

patterns (PC). All subjects had the lowest reaction time<br />

in the SRT, in second were LS and PM, third LTM and<br />

fourth PC. These suggest that the cognitive process in<br />

which memory is involved are well developed (LH),<br />

but the same is not true for the cognitive processes<br />

involved in pattern recognition (RH).<br />

7G6 Medical student preferences for an<br />

“ideal textbook” of Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology<br />

M S Marsh* and D Katopi<br />

GKT Medical School, Academic Dept of Obstetrics &<br />

Gynaecology, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, King’s College Hospital,<br />

Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK<br />

Although medical students increasingly use CAL and<br />

the internet for their medical education, and much effort<br />

is put into the presentation of this information, the<br />

textbook still remains the chief tool for self directed<br />

learning. There is surprisingly little data concerning<br />

student opinion of the form and content of textbooks.<br />

We surveyed 88 (of approximately 100) 4th year<br />

medical students undergoing a course in Obstetrics and<br />

Gynaecology (O & G) about their “ideal textbook” for<br />

O & G. 46% of students wanted a book of A5 size,<br />

80% wanted some coloured content, 83% wanted the<br />

type in a medium size, 75% wished it to be made up of<br />

lists and short notes and 67% with one topic per page<br />

or double page. 79% of students wanted space for notes<br />

within the text pages. It appears there is consensus<br />

amongst medical students about the content and form<br />

of textbooks of O & G.<br />

7G7 What can be learnt from medical<br />

atlases? Expert and novice visual<br />

schemata in breast sonography<br />

R Pauli* and J Huber<br />

School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West<br />

Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK<br />

Medical education in the visual domain focuses on<br />

teaching diagnostic processes verbally, usually by<br />

discussion between expert and trainee. A problem with<br />

this approach is that visual medical information may<br />

not be easily or efficiently transmitted in this mode.<br />

Our research aims to address the degree to which<br />

observers are able to extract visual features of breast<br />

sonograms, which are diagnostically significant. The<br />

first study compared expert and novice interpretations<br />

of breast sonograms taken from medical atlases. It was<br />

found that novices do not trail far behind experts in<br />

accuracy. The second study aimed to investigate the<br />

overlap between diagnostic categories and visual<br />

characteristics in breast sonograms by examining<br />

novices’ image categorisation strategies. This further<br />

confirmed that readily available visual information


lends itself to making diagnostic classifications. The<br />

evidence shows that medical atlases aimed at illustrating<br />

typical appearances are useful, but should perhaps cover<br />

less typical appearances.<br />

7G8 Community-based Public Health<br />

Education in Healthy City Project<br />

Yosuke Yamane*, Kuninori Shiwaku, Keiko Kitashima and<br />

Anuurad Erdembileg<br />

Department of Environmental Medicine, Shimane Medical<br />

University, Enya 89, Izumo 693-8501, JAPAN<br />

The drastic changes in the field of public health require<br />

educational innovation in the university. The<br />

development of a new learning strategy should be<br />

problem-solving; student autonomy; holistic approach<br />

to the complicated physical-mental-social<br />

phenomenon. We have performed community-based<br />

public health education integrating family health,<br />

school health, occupational health and community<br />

health since 1979. The persistent exposure of the<br />

student into the community dynamics is useful to<br />

understand the health promotion strategy. The<br />

education in the healthy city model is especially<br />

effective to recognize community empowerment,<br />

collaboration with the inhabitants, care workers,<br />

researchers and policy makers, the partnership between<br />

the community and the academic, social support<br />

networking and policy making for amenity community.<br />

7G9 Two different types of professorial<br />

authority: results in a traditional<br />

faculty of medicine<br />

Carlos E. de la Garza-Gonzalez*, Norberto Lopez-Serna<br />

and Ma Esthela Morales-Perez<br />

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon,<br />

Administracion de Correos no 3, Apartado postal no 712, 64460<br />

Monterrey N.L., MEXICO<br />

We compare the results of the final examination of four<br />

groups of students. Two of them had the Embryology<br />

course on an annual, and the other on a semi-annual<br />

basis. All groups had the same professor during the<br />

entire course. In one of the groups in each term, the<br />

examination was performed on a highly authoritarian<br />

basis, for example: seat assignment in alphabetical<br />

order; once the professor was in the lecture hall, the<br />

students have to use only one of the access doors; five<br />

minutes after the scheduled start time re-entry was<br />

forbidden, students were not allowed to talk to each<br />

other, among others. In the other groups none of the<br />

above conditions was demanded. A z test on the final<br />

exam results at a level of confidence of 95% was done.<br />

We did not find a significant difference.<br />

7G10 The “excellent teacher” seen by<br />

mid-course students<br />

M Patrício, A V Carneiro and J Fernandes e Fernandes<br />

Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, University of Lisbon, Av Prof<br />

Egas Moniz, Piso 1, 1649-028 Lisboa Codex, PORTUGAL<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.72 -<br />

The importance of a role model in the teaching-learning<br />

process is well accepted. The objective of the study<br />

was to identify perceptions of mid-course students on<br />

the characteristics of an “excellent teacher”. Third year<br />

students (n=66) completed a semi-structured<br />

questionnaire on the profile of an excellent teacher<br />

(open questions followed by 32 specific characteristics<br />

- Likert scale). Quantitative analysis reveals a teacher<br />

is perceived as:<br />

• information provider (selection of topics to be<br />

taught 99%; transmission of clear information 97%;<br />

distinguishing essential from non-essential<br />

knowledge 97%).<br />

• facilitator (creating the opportunities for practical<br />

training 95%; available to students 90%)<br />

• assessor (fair when assessing 94%)<br />

• nice person (agreeable when dealing with students<br />

94%), and<br />

• planner (organizing the program 90%; integration<br />

of the discipline in other course areas 83%)<br />

Qualitative analysis confirms, in general, these results.<br />

Curiously enough, 21% of the students state as nonimportant<br />

qualities: being a role model, having a broad<br />

culture, good leadership and good research abilities.<br />

A discussion will take place on the implications for<br />

the teaching-learning process.<br />

7G11 Underrepresented minority (URM)<br />

students’ perception of mentoring,<br />

advising and role modelling in<br />

medical school<br />

Ara Tekian*, Laura Hruska and Jorge Girotti<br />

University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Medical<br />

Education (m/c 591), 808 S. Wood St, CME 986, Chicago IL<br />

60612, USA<br />

This study investigates the underrepresented minority<br />

(URM) students’ perception of particular characteristics<br />

and functions associated with their mentor, adviser, or<br />

role models. A two-part brief questionnaire was given<br />

to 56 URM and non-URM first and second year<br />

medical students studying at the University of Illinois<br />

at Chicago College of Medicine. Paired t-test revealed<br />

significant results among all levels of comparisons that<br />

include opinion differences between URM and non-<br />

URMs, mentor, role model and advisor functions and<br />

characteristics like empathy, maturity, resourcefulness,<br />

providing resources, and availability. The results show<br />

a clear differentiation among the perceived<br />

characteristics and expected functions of mentors,<br />

advisors and role models between URMs and non-<br />

URMs. Results from the first part of the questionnaire<br />

are reinforced by an evaluation of the second part that<br />

includes open responses from students emphasizing<br />

particular qualities and responsibilities for each role.


Session 7H Teaching and learning (2)<br />

7H1 “Project Carrapato (*Tick)”: a<br />

psychological focus in medical<br />

training<br />

I R P Scavariello, M S V M Silveira, E H V Celeri*,<br />

S L Brenelli and R S Cassorla<br />

Group for Psychopedagogic Assistance to Medical/Nursing<br />

Students and Resident Doctors - UNICAMP, Faculty of Medical<br />

Sciences, Tessalia Vieira de Camargo St 126/6111, Barao<br />

Geraldo District, Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970, BRAZIL<br />

The separation of the basic course from the clinical<br />

course can be a cause of anguish and conflict in medical<br />

students. With the aim of reducing this conflict, the<br />

teaching body at the medical school developed the<br />

“Project Carrapato(*Tick)” during the reception for the<br />

year 2000 freshmen. This project familiarised the<br />

freshmen with the medical reality. The students<br />

accompanied the hospital activities of the medical staff<br />

for a week. After this, they were divided into 5 reflection<br />

groups which were coordinated by the GRAPEME<br />

professionals and FCM docents. The project was seen<br />

as a possible preventive action because it helped<br />

students to: reflect and expose their expectations,<br />

anguish and fears; question their fantasies; experience<br />

limitations. This can help to avoid or reduce the<br />

development of inadequate defence mechanisms that<br />

hinder personal and professional growth.<br />

* next to (jargon)<br />

7H2 Evaluating of videotape sessions<br />

for learning communication skills<br />

A Nogueras*, M Bernaus, X Claries and J de Nadal<br />

I. Universitari Parc Tauli, Parc Tauli s/n,0820 Sabadell,<br />

Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

Evaluating training systems to develop and assess<br />

communication skills is not easy. We report an<br />

extension of our experience. Since 1997, we have<br />

carried out a short training program in doctor-patient<br />

communication for first year residents; it incorporates<br />

simulated patients, role-play techniques and each<br />

participant is videotaped. 81 residents have taken part.<br />

Before and after the course, a validated video showing<br />

a questionable doctor-patient interview is presented to<br />

the students for evaluation of the doctor’s<br />

communication skills, scored on a scale from 0 to 10.<br />

The first day 25-percentile of the video interview score<br />

varied every year and sometimes did not show a normal<br />

distribution, nevertheless, the number of students that<br />

scored high the first day always fell down notoriously<br />

on the last day’s evaluation: in 1997 from 27% to 14%;<br />

in 1998 from 39% to 6%; in 1999 from 50% to 37%<br />

and in 2000 from 24% to 6%. It is concluded that videos<br />

of validated simulations of clinical interviews can help<br />

to evaluate the usefulness of courses such as the one<br />

reported.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.73 -<br />

7H3 Acting up? The recruitment and<br />

maintenance of a professional role<br />

play team for undergraduate and<br />

postgraduate medical training and<br />

assessment<br />

C M Wiskin* and P Croft<br />

The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

Role play is widely used in medical education.<br />

Professional role players provide constructive teaching<br />

for participant development. The recruitment of<br />

individuals with the aptitude for professional role play<br />

is key. Theatrical sourcing may have its uses, but other<br />

attributes need consideration. Our role play team has<br />

10 years’ experience. Its role players are consistently<br />

involved in undergraduate and specialist postgraduate<br />

training. Demographics, educational/vocational<br />

qualifications, professional experience and educational<br />

interests of role players were collected. Supporting<br />

evaluation comes from postgraduate delegates (all<br />

specialties), facilitators and students. Not all actors can<br />

role play, not all role players can act. Personal skills,<br />

articulacy, intellectual involvement, improvisation and<br />

teaching skills are crucial. Results, skills lists,<br />

recruitment criteria and recommendations are<br />

presented. Training role players is less of an issue than<br />

the initial recruitment of individuals capable of<br />

developing as medical educators.<br />

7H4 Analysis of clinical competence at<br />

pre-graduate level<br />

Gitte Wichmann-Hansen* and Berit Eika<br />

Enhed for Medicinsk Uddannelse, SVF, Universitetsparken,<br />

Bygning 611, 8000 Aarhus C, DENMARK<br />

The overall objective of this study is to explore what<br />

opportunities the clinical clerkship offers medical<br />

students to develop their clinical competence, and how<br />

these opportunities can be maximized. The study takes<br />

its theoretical starting point in a semantic analysis of<br />

the term ‘clinical competence’, showing that it means<br />

both the ability and right to act adequately in clinical<br />

situations. A general aim of clinical clerkships is to<br />

train medical students in acting adequately in a clinical<br />

situation. Data from our pilot field observations<br />

indicate that it is difficult to reach this aim, since the<br />

students are only rarely given the right to act. Often<br />

they are passive observers or performing isolated<br />

repetitive tasks without feedback from trainers.<br />

Therefore, our working hypothesis is that learning<br />

clinical competence requires that students participate<br />

as legitimate members of the community. This<br />

hypothesis is described in a set of ideal criteria.


7H5 Use of paper-cases in<br />

undergraduate clinical<br />

Dermatology education in Germany<br />

A Boer*, R Kaufmann, W H Boehnke and F Ochsendorf<br />

Universitats-Hautklinik Frankfurt/M, Theodor Stern Kai-7,<br />

60590 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY<br />

In Germany practical dermatology teaching is primarily<br />

performed as a bedside course. Large numbers of<br />

students made it increasingly difficult to find<br />

appropriate patients for demonstration. In recent years<br />

we developed paper-cases (short story and photo<br />

material), which were tried over 2.5 years in PBLseminars<br />

with voluntary and randomly assigned<br />

students. In each group the students matched the<br />

intended teaching goals in 75% (mean). After a tutortraining<br />

our residents were allowed to use the papercases<br />

individually to substitute patients when necessary.<br />

Last semester 14% of the patients needed were replaced<br />

by paper cases. A third of the residents used this<br />

opportunity and evaluated it as a good alternative. 80%<br />

of the students received paper-case teaching, 77% of<br />

them evaluated this type of education either good (55%)<br />

or very good (22%). We conclude that paper-cases are<br />

a useful alternative if there are not enough patients.<br />

7H6 Development of a Learning<br />

Resource Centre for healthcare<br />

professionals: an example of an<br />

innovative enterprise<br />

C Osonnaya*, K Osonnaya and E Burke<br />

Dept of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary<br />

College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS,<br />

UK<br />

In 1998, the need to develop a learning skill centre<br />

arose at United Medical Education Consortium<br />

(UMEC) in London with resources for multiprofessional<br />

teaching and learning in healthcare<br />

educational approaches, administration, research,<br />

clinical and computer skills. Logs of all the users of<br />

the centre between 25 February 1998 and 28 February<br />

2001 were kept. All the courses run by the centre were<br />

monitored and evaluated using standardised evaluation<br />

forms. Data about activities were analysed to compare<br />

the usage of the centre’s resources by different groups<br />

in different years (25 February 1998 and 27th February<br />

2001) and their needs for skill facilities. The evaluation<br />

results show that availability of flexible skills training<br />

facilities for UMEC members and visitors have created<br />

an effective teaching and learning environment. Our<br />

future plan involves investigating how to provide more<br />

informed multidisciplinary teaching using new<br />

technology and extending the services to a wider<br />

audience.<br />

7H7 Legal theories of recourse for failed<br />

medical students in the United<br />

States<br />

Thomas Jamieson<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones<br />

Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-4712, USA<br />

Medical students aggrieved by a failing grade(s) or<br />

disenrollment sometimes consider legal action. In the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.74 -<br />

United States students typically cite an institutional<br />

breach of the constitutional right to procedural<br />

propriety (“procedural due process”) and/or arbitrary<br />

motivation (“substantive due process”). Caselaw has<br />

established that constitutional protections are owed<br />

medical students, but courts have consistently offered<br />

a presumption of legitimacy to institutions’ decisions<br />

and students have seldom prevailed when alleging<br />

inadequate due process. Although minimally exercised<br />

to date, prospective medical student plaintiffs may<br />

begin to consider alternative premise(s) for a legal<br />

challenge. Increasingly, courts view students as<br />

consumers with expectations for acceptable<br />

institutional performance of services based on “implied<br />

contract.” Medical schools should be cognizant of the<br />

concept of “contract” and of stipulations in their own<br />

handbooks. If these documents can be read as “implied<br />

contracts” institutions must ensure they are actually<br />

doing what they say they are doing.<br />

7H8 An evaluation of organising student<br />

participation in curriculum reform<br />

using a mentoring programme at the<br />

Nelson R Mandela School of<br />

Medicine, University of Natal,<br />

Durban, South Africa<br />

Dorothy Appalasamy, Michelle McLean* and<br />

Jacqueline van Wyk<br />

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Private Bag X7,<br />

Congella 4013, South Africa<br />

In implementing (January 2001) a student-centred<br />

curriculum at the Nelson R Mandela School of<br />

Medicine, an already successful (re: addressing student<br />

needs) mentoring programme involving 4th and 5th<br />

year students, was modified to assist 1st year students<br />

cope with the new learning paradigm. First year<br />

students enrolled for Curriculum 2001 were organised<br />

into twenty tutorial groups (n = ± 200) for Module 1,<br />

each group being allocated a trained facilitator. Twenty<br />

senior students underwent training to work with these<br />

tutorial groups, with the aim to provide peer support<br />

for group members. Mentors meet regularly with their<br />

groups and with the year co-ordinator for input,<br />

clarification and for evaluation of student progress and<br />

needs. Preliminary results indicate that 1st year students<br />

have embraced the concept of PBL. Issues, for example,<br />

relating to the small group process and timetabling,<br />

have been addressed by the mentors and the year coordinator.<br />

7H9 Medical education – more than<br />

learning?<br />

Thomas Eichholz and Catharina Crolow<br />

Charité, Zeppelinplatz 6, 13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

For most medical students, medical education is mainly<br />

an instrument to acquire the knowledge to treat the<br />

patients. In our poster we want to discuss chances<br />

existing in medical education in Germany. Does<br />

medical education offer alternatives an an extra<br />

qualification, as a field of research and as a basis for a<br />

career?


Session 7I Continuing professional development (1)<br />

7I1 The roles of hospital consultants:<br />

more than just patients and<br />

students<br />

Patsy Stark<br />

University of Leeds, Clinical Skills Learning Centre, The General<br />

Infirmary at Leeds, A Floor Gilbert Scott Building, Leeds LS1<br />

3EX, UK<br />

Hospital consultants undertake roles extending beyond<br />

clinical medicine and undergraduate teaching. In most<br />

healthcare systems they are increasingly required to<br />

do more. How do they identify and prioritise roles and<br />

cope with increasing pressures? A study carried out at<br />

University of Leeds School of Medicine and the Leeds<br />

Teaching Hospitals Trust aimed to discover the range<br />

of consultants’ roles, how they prioritise activities and<br />

their perceptions of change. Semi-structured interviews<br />

with hospital consultants were conducted. Analysis of<br />

the data was performed using qualitative methods. The<br />

participants revealed wide-ranging roles inside and<br />

outside the employing organisation, strong allegiances<br />

to aspects of their work and frustrations about<br />

increasing demands. In general this was not reflected<br />

in job plans or contracts. It was concluded that<br />

consultant contracts and job plans must recognise not<br />

only the obvious clinical and undergraduate teaching<br />

roles but also those which have impact on professional<br />

organisations multiprofessional groups and other<br />

institutions.<br />

7I2 Continuing medical education X<br />

indexation? Authors’ opinions<br />

about editorial policies of a<br />

Brazilian academic journal<br />

Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues*, Valderes<br />

Aparecida Coelho Falaschi and Julio Cesar Voltarelli<br />

Hospital das Clínicas - Oftalmologia, Faculdade de Medicina de<br />

Ribeirao Preto, 12 andar - Campus Universitario, 14048-900<br />

Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

The main objective of this investigation was to find<br />

out authors’ opinions about some aspects of editorial<br />

policies of an academic journal, published by a<br />

Brazilian Medical School/University Hospital. This<br />

journal emphasizes Continuing Medical Education,<br />

publishing mainly review papers and topic symposia,<br />

and it is not indexed in MEDLINE. The instrument used<br />

was a self-administered, non-identified questionnaire<br />

answered by 28 members of the scientific community,<br />

authors of some papers published by the journal, in the<br />

last three years. On a three points scale (3 - definitely<br />

agree, or high level of adequacy; 1 - definitely disagree,<br />

or inadequate), participants rated the quality of different<br />

aspects of editorial policies adopted by Revista<br />

Medicina-Ribeirão Preto (Brazil). Most authors agreed<br />

with the policy “emphasis in continuing medical<br />

education” (mean = 2.39, s = 1.22) even if it prevents<br />

indexation in MEDLINE.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.75 -<br />

7I3 Learning HSR by doing: forming<br />

parallel learning groups<br />

Saeed Asefzadeh<br />

Qazvin University of Medical Science & Health Services, Qazvin,<br />

IRAN<br />

Health Systems Research (HSR) is a necessary<br />

approach for resolving health problems. We assessed<br />

the educational needs of the health workers for HSR<br />

through focused group discussions in order to develop<br />

a module that can enable them to participate actively<br />

in HSR. A module for the health workers has been<br />

designed in 10 steps as a practical guide for problem<br />

solving – from finding problems to evaluating the<br />

solution. The focus of our work is a change from<br />

traditional workshops to continuous in-the-field<br />

training workshops using learning by doing method.<br />

At least two hours a week, the health workers as a<br />

learning group come together and one step of the<br />

module is taught and practised on the real identified<br />

problems. The participants track and work on the step<br />

during the week. In this way the learning group makes<br />

up a parallel learning group which works continuously<br />

and learns autonomously to develop the health<br />

organisation.<br />

7I4 Towards a flexible workforce - a<br />

basis for change<br />

F French*, M Awramenko, A Scott, C Ubach, L Leighton-<br />

Beck, G Needham, J Mollison and H Coutts<br />

SCPMDE, Dept of Postgraduate Medicine, Room 25, Westburn<br />

Centre, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2XG, UK<br />

The Scottish Executive seeks increased flexiblity<br />

among healthcare professionals. The Scottish Council<br />

for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education has<br />

commissioned a study of perceptions of flexible<br />

working among non-training grade doctors and<br />

dentists. Hospital consultants have been selected as the<br />

first group for study and this will be the first<br />

comprehensive study of hospital consultants in<br />

Scotland. The aims of the study are:<br />

• to elicit the views of non-training grade doctors and<br />

dentists regarding flexible working;<br />

• to assess the implications of increased flexibility<br />

on continuing professional development;<br />

• to ascertain levels of job satisfaction and<br />

occupational stress.<br />

Focus groups and/or interviews will be used to inform<br />

the design of a questionnaire. Follow-up interviews will<br />

be conducted to clarify/expand on issues arising from<br />

the survey. Selected results from the survey of hospital<br />

consultants will be presented.


7I5 Ensuring cost-effective CPD:<br />

perspectives, problems and policy<br />

Clive Belfield and Celia Brown*<br />

Centre for Research in Medical & Dental Education, School of<br />

Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

CPD must be cost-effective if the optimal quantity is<br />

to be funded within health care systems burdened by<br />

resource constraints. This paper details the<br />

requirements for ensuring effective and cost-effective<br />

CPD established as part of an investigation into CPD<br />

funding, provision and participation in the UK NHS.<br />

The perspectives for ensuring cost-effective CPD are<br />

framed within a taxonomy that describes an educational<br />

intervention (Bullock and Thomas, 1997). Thus issues<br />

pertinent to both provider and participant: access,<br />

management and planning, curriculum and pedagogy,<br />

setting, assessment and evaluation are addressed. There<br />

are however a number of constraints that hinder the<br />

adoption of cost-effective CPD strategies. Empirical<br />

and primary evidence that suggests current practice<br />

fails to meet the requirements is presented and the<br />

implications for CPD policy in the UK are discussed.<br />

7I6 Improving your skills in preventive<br />

medicine: this CME workshop works!<br />

François Goulet*, André Jacques* and Danielle Saucier<br />

College des Médecins du Québec, 2170 René-Levesque Ouest,<br />

Montréal QC H3H 2T8, CANADA<br />

A 90-minute workshop offered to small groups has been<br />

developed to help family physicians to include<br />

evidence-based intervention to their periodic health<br />

examination (PHE). After the workshop, participants<br />

completed a questionnaire with opened and closed<br />

questions. Between September 1996 and December<br />

1997, 40 workshops were held reaching 667<br />

participants (16.7 participants/workshop) in all regions<br />

of the province of Quebec. The evaluations (98.5%<br />

response rate) showed that participants have reached<br />

the workshop objectives (2.05 on the Likert scale –3 to<br />

+3). The most important messages retained were a<br />

better choice of tests (34.9%) and physician’s self<br />

involvement (27.2%). Changes anticipated in their<br />

practice were: better screening of tests (38.9%),<br />

enhancement of knowledge (18.9%) and to insist on<br />

counselling (12.8%). Role playing and discussion with<br />

peers were effective methods used to produce<br />

anticipated changes in the practice of family physicians.<br />

7I7 CME program in Kuwait<br />

K Al-Jarallah and I G Premadasa*<br />

Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Behbehani Bldg, 10th<br />

Floor, PO Box 1793, Al-Sharq, Safat 13018, KUWAIT<br />

The Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization is the<br />

designated authority for implementing a unified<br />

continuing medical education scheme. The CME<br />

Center administers the scheme, which commenced in<br />

September 2000. The current phase covers medical and<br />

dental practitioners. Participation in CME activities is<br />

optional, but includes reinforcement policies. The<br />

program operates in 5-year cycles, with practitioners<br />

expected to acquire a minimum of 250 credit points<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.76 -<br />

within the cycle. CME activities fall into one of two<br />

categories. The web site of the CME Center at<br />

www.kims.org.kw/cme provides details of the scheme,<br />

and an online facility for participants to register, and<br />

for CME providers to apply for accreditation of<br />

activities. Program implementation is monitored by<br />

reviewing random samples of organizers and<br />

participants. Peer review by an external evaluator has<br />

led to quality assurance. International recognition has<br />

been received via accreditation by Royal Colleges in<br />

North America and Europe.<br />

7I8 The theory of perspective<br />

transformation and its applicability<br />

to CME<br />

Jill Donahue*, Stephen Hotz and Réjean Laprise*<br />

Aventis Pharma, 49 Fallingbrook Street, Whitby, Ontario L1R<br />

1M4, CANADA<br />

In the field of adult education, Jack Mezirow published<br />

his theory of Perspective Transformation which has<br />

become one of the most important contributions to the<br />

recent adult education literature. He identified 10<br />

phases a learner goes through before he/she<br />

incorporates a new perspective. There are many lessons<br />

from this theory that we can apply to our work in CME.<br />

After interacting with the poster, the participant will<br />

be able to:<br />

1 identify parallels between issues faced by<br />

practitioners in CME and contributions of the theory<br />

of Perspective Transformation;<br />

2 assess the application of key concepts of the theory<br />

to needs assessment, design and evaluation<br />

The key point of the presentation is that when designing<br />

CME one should consider that in order to incorporate<br />

a new perspective, a learner may go through ten phases<br />

that begin with a disorienting dilemma.<br />

7I9 The transtheoretical model of<br />

behaviour change: does it apply to<br />

clinical practices?<br />

Réjean Laprise*, Jill Donahue and Stephen Hotz<br />

Aventis Pharma, Department of Professional Education, 2150<br />

St Elzear Boulevard West, Laval, Quebec H7L 4A8, CANADA<br />

The transtheoretical model (TTM) proposes that people<br />

go through a series of 5 different stages of readiness<br />

when adopting new behaviours. Stage-specific<br />

educational interventions based on this model were<br />

shown to facilitate adoption of healthy behaviours in<br />

patients. In this presentation, we show evidence that<br />

the TTM may also be useful with physicians. A study<br />

was carried out on a convenient sample of 195 general<br />

practioners attending continuing medical education in<br />

cardiology. Physicians were asked to stage themselves<br />

according to their readiness to prescribe an ACE<br />

inhibitor to a high risk cardiac patient, to rate the<br />

importance they put on this medical practice and to<br />

indicate their degree of confidence in overcoming<br />

barriers associated with the performance of this clinical<br />

behaviour. The relationship between readiness to<br />

change behaviour on one hand, and self-confidence and<br />

importance on the other hand, were consistent with<br />

predictions made from the TTM.


Session 7J Continuing professional development (2)<br />

7J1 Sharing visions: working with CPD<br />

coordinators in General Practice<br />

Simon Smail* and Paul Hocking<br />

Dept of Postgraduate Education for General Practice, School of<br />

Postgraduate Studies, University of Wales College of Medicine,<br />

Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK<br />

During 2000, twenty general practitioners were<br />

recruited to work part-time with the Dept of<br />

Postgraduate Education for General Practice in Wales<br />

as ‘CPD co-ordinators’. Each general practitioner was<br />

employed to work one day a week to develop a managed<br />

programme of CPD in the locality for which they were<br />

responsible, drawing on local resources and supported<br />

with an operational budget. Since all these staff were<br />

facing new challenges in working as educational<br />

managers, a two-day workshop was held to assist them<br />

in developing a vision for their future work. This<br />

workshop used a variety of methods, including an<br />

‘imaginisation’ exercise in which the participants were<br />

asked to draw graphical representations of the ideals<br />

they wished to pursue in their work. The concepts were<br />

then discussed and developed into themes. This<br />

presentation describes the methods used in the<br />

workshop and presents the outcome in summary form.<br />

7J2 The “Advanced Training Practice”:<br />

a questionnaire and interviewbased<br />

study of their role<br />

John Skelton and Steve Field*<br />

West Midland GP Unit, 27 Highfield Road, Edgbaston,<br />

Birmingham B15 3DP, UK<br />

In the West Midlands Region, UK, 6 practices have<br />

been designated “Advanced Training Practices” (ATPs).<br />

They offer specialised, often remedial, training to GP<br />

Registrars who, for example, have failed summative<br />

assessment. Registrars, trainers and other stakeholders<br />

have previously been studied to assess support offered<br />

for communication skills: this study extends this work<br />

by questionnaire and interview with trainers, to assess<br />

the perceived value of ATPs. Many Registrars at ATPs<br />

are overseas graduates. Major issues are poor English<br />

language and communication, (eg from doctors<br />

accustomed to a doctor-centred environment), poor<br />

cross-cultural understanding, poor study skills and<br />

defective knowledge. For trainers, a major issue is the<br />

extent to which Registrars are “trainable”: however,<br />

they have confidence in their ability to train and assess.<br />

The specialised needs of Registrars are adequately met,<br />

but the level of additional support, particularly through<br />

commercially available materials, requires expansion.<br />

7J3 Does gender make a difference?<br />

CME for the female physician<br />

Jane Tipping* and Jill Donahue<br />

10987 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario L6C 1M9,<br />

CANADA<br />

The population of female physicians in Canada is<br />

growing such that the percentage of female primary<br />

care physicians in practice is equal to males. CME is<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.77 -<br />

still designed and conducted based on the learning<br />

needs of a population that has been predominantly<br />

male. This research questions the assumption that the<br />

two genders are the same in their approaches to<br />

learning. The research identifies ways in which learning<br />

differs for female physicians in terms of preferred<br />

activity, motivation and participation. In addition, the<br />

particular challenges female physicians encounter in<br />

CME will be discussed along with strategies that may<br />

better meet the needs of this group.<br />

7J4 Strategic planning for effective<br />

partnerships<br />

Jane Tipping* and Danielle Deslauriers<br />

10987 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario L6C 1M9,<br />

CANADA<br />

We have reached a point in the evolution of CME<br />

whereby the creation of true partnerships between<br />

stakeholders and the effective pooling of resources is<br />

becoming a necessity. Within the past several years,<br />

the role of the pharmaceutical industry in Canada as a<br />

credible partner and provider of CME has become<br />

evident. Without dialogue between the stakeholder,<br />

duplication of efforts, territorial issues and<br />

miscommunication can arise resulting in less value for<br />

the learner. Ways to align mutual goals are sorely<br />

needed. This presentation will discuss the directions in<br />

which CME is growing and describe attempts of Merck<br />

Frosst Canada to align itself with the developing needs<br />

of the field. The presentation will critique a needs<br />

assessment technique used with 36 Canadian CME<br />

leaders; discuss results; the implications of<br />

pharmaceutical involvement in CME; and help<br />

determine ways in which partnership between<br />

academia, industry and others responsible for CME can<br />

grow.<br />

7J5 Integrating practice reflection and<br />

practice adjustment planning into<br />

the design of a CME meeting<br />

R L Thivierge*, L Samson and J V Patenaude<br />

721 Hartland, Montreal H2V 2X5, CANADA<br />

The new context of Continuing Professional<br />

Development (CPD) and of the Maintenance of<br />

Certification (MOC) of the Royal College of Physicians<br />

in Canada, brings an important pathway to ensure one’s<br />

CPD: the development of Personal Learning Projects<br />

(PLP). At the end of each half-day of a scientific<br />

meeting, periods of “reflection on my practice” (called<br />

CPD modules) are conducted by a facilitator as an<br />

integrated part of the program. Module 1 serves as an<br />

introduction to CPD, PLP and practice reflection<br />

generalities. Module 2 will help the participants to<br />

select specific key-messages derived from educational<br />

sessions to be applied to their practice environment<br />

(selecting own PLP). Module 3 helps to plan the<br />

validation and the implementation of their PLP once<br />

they are back to work. This model of intervention in<br />

CME meetings facilitates the linking between theory<br />

and practice.


7J6 The Catalan Council of Physicians’<br />

Colleges Accreditation Diploma in<br />

Continuing Medical Education<br />

A Ramos*, J Aliaga, A Gual and H Pardell<br />

College of Physicians of Barcelona, Centre of Studies, P Bonanova<br />

47, 08017 Barcelona, SPAIN<br />

The Catalan Council of Physicians’ Colleges has<br />

initiated an individual accreditation system, based on<br />

accredited Continuing Medical Education (CME). The<br />

system is voluntary and physicians can opt to obtain<br />

the Diploma of College Accreditation if the following<br />

prerequisites are achieved: a minimum of 10 credits<br />

obtained from the CME, accumulated to a minimum<br />

of 3 training activities carried out within the two<br />

previous years. The system includes a Technical<br />

Accreditation Office which deals with technical and<br />

administrative aspects and the Accreditation<br />

Commission which determines the accreditation system<br />

and grants the credits to be endorsed by the Governing<br />

Boards of the 4 Physicians’ Colleges in Catalonia<br />

(Barcelona, Girona, and Tarragona). This paper<br />

contains the first 100 accreditation requests, the<br />

percentages of concessions and denials, as well as the<br />

average of credits obtained, the activities presented, and<br />

a description of age and gender among other parameters<br />

of interest.<br />

- 4.78 -<br />

7J7 Breaking bad news: how to learn in<br />

a CME workshop<br />

François Goulet*, André Jacques* and Robert Carrier<br />

College des Médecins du Québec, 2170 René-Levesque Ouest,<br />

Montréal QC H3H 2T8, CANADA<br />

A 90-minute workshop offered to small groups was<br />

developed to help physicians to break bad news to their<br />

clientele. After the workshop and six months later,<br />

participants were asked to complete opened-question<br />

questionnaires. Between September 1997 and June<br />

1998, 50 workshops were held, reaching 706<br />

participants. From this number, 520 participants could<br />

be reached six months later. 207 participants (40%)<br />

completed the second questionnaire and 74% of them<br />

were identified from the first questionnaire to estimate<br />

the correlation. After six months, the key-messages<br />

retained were: never be overwhelmed, always have hope<br />

to offer, be prepared, find the right moment. The<br />

barriers still existing are: bad news is bad news,<br />

discomfort, and difficulty in taking the time. The<br />

participants found the workshop extremely helpful.<br />

Role playing and discussions with peers were effective<br />

methods used to produce changes in the practice.<br />

Session 7K International medical education<br />

7K1 Differences in learning style and<br />

satisfaction with Residency training<br />

for United States and<br />

internationally trained students<br />

Steven R Daugherty<br />

Kaplan Medical, 820 West Jackson, Suite 550, Chicago IL 60612,<br />

USA<br />

A national sample of medical residents training in the<br />

United States was surveyed about their residency<br />

experience. 3,604 returned usable surveys for a 64%<br />

response rate. Analyses examined ratings of satisfaction<br />

and what contributed most to learning experience for<br />

US trained students compared with the respondents<br />

who completed undergraduate medical education<br />

outside the US (IMGs). Results show that IMGs<br />

reported less time with attending physicians (5.61 vs.<br />

4.94, 7-point scale) and were overall less satisfied with<br />

their residency experience (5.14 vs. 4.78). US trained<br />

students rated contact with attending physicians and<br />

other residents as contributing most to their learning<br />

experience, while IMGs rated reading, patient rounds<br />

and lectures as the most important elements. These<br />

results suggest important differences both as to how<br />

IMGs learn and the structure of their residency training<br />

programs. Results are discussed with an eye towards<br />

students’ expectations and specialty selection.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

7K2 Crossing borders - The <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Biomedical Exchange Office<br />

U Arnold* and J W Dudenhausen<br />

Charité, Humboldt-University <strong>Berlin</strong>, <strong>Berlin</strong> Biomedical<br />

Exchange Office, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger<br />

Platz 1, D-13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

“To promote international education and qualification<br />

of medical students” is the mission of the <strong>Berlin</strong><br />

Biomedical Exchange Office (BBEO), which was<br />

initially founded in 1996 as a cooperation project<br />

between the medical faculties of Humboldt-Universität<br />

(Charité) and Freie Universität <strong>Berlin</strong> (University<br />

Hospital Benjamin Franklin). The activities of the<br />

BBEO are:<br />

International Exchange<br />

• ERASMUS/SOKRATES<br />

• Biomedical Sciences Exchange Program between<br />

North America and Europe (BMEP)<br />

• Bilateral Cooperation<br />

• International Courses in English<br />

New Technologies in Education<br />

• Medic@l Deutsch<br />

• MedVoice<br />

• IMIPPP<br />

• Other projects


Service for Students. The BBEO<br />

• provides extensive personal consulting;<br />

• writes letters of recommendation for applications<br />

at foreign medical schools;<br />

• hands out various information regarding study<br />

abroad, and provides up-to-date information on the<br />

website;<br />

• shows poster exhibitions, extended by lectures and<br />

discussions, on the subject;<br />

• offers special medical language courses for<br />

incoming and outgoing students.<br />

7K3 Academic medical education in<br />

developing countries: an analysis<br />

of papers presented at medical<br />

education conferences in Argentina<br />

Angel M Centeno*, Gustavo Amestoy and<br />

Amelia Cabrera<br />

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Austral-Medicina,<br />

Av J Peron 1500, B1629AHJ Derqui, Pilar, Pov Buenos Aires,<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Globalization of medical education, including some<br />

agencies’ proposals of defining a universal curriculum,<br />

make it necessary to define what kind of activities are<br />

conducted in different regions. In order to determine<br />

what aspects of medical education were of interest in<br />

our country, what kind of methods were used and which<br />

disciplines were the most active in medical education,<br />

228 papers presented at two consecutive medical<br />

education conferences in Argentina were analyzed.<br />

Curriculum design (11%), problem based learning<br />

(10%), faculty development (10%), program evaluation<br />

(8%), teaching methods (8%), disciplines integration<br />

(7%), informatics and multimedia (5%), community<br />

service (5%), evaluation methods (5%), continuing<br />

medical education (5%), and admissions (5%), were<br />

the most frequently cited.<br />

Thirty percent of the papers were research based, and<br />

70% were narrative descriptions of programs in<br />

progress. Basic and clinical sciences were equally<br />

represented, the latter mainly in postgraduate education.<br />

These results are similar to those reported in developed<br />

countries.<br />

7K4 Communication skills training in<br />

Germany - results of a survey<br />

Jan Schildmann* and Ulrich Schwantes<br />

Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong> (Charite), Department of General<br />

Practice, Vogelsang 16, 78343 Horn, GERMANY<br />

The training of communication skills has become an<br />

important part of the curricula at many medical schools<br />

in Europe. In Germany however a lot of universities<br />

do not offer regular communication skills courses. To<br />

find out more about the actual situation regarding<br />

education in this field of medical education we<br />

conducted a survey among medical students who took<br />

part in seminars and lectures organised by the<br />

department of General Practice at different Medical<br />

Schools in Germany. The aim of our survey was to<br />

explore the existing learning opportunities offered by<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.79 -<br />

the medical faculties. Furthermore we asked the<br />

students about their needs regarding this aspect of<br />

medical training. In our presentation we will show the<br />

data of the survey and our conclusions for the future<br />

development of communication skills training as part<br />

of the training at German Medical Schools.<br />

7K5 Reform of the medical educational<br />

system in Georgia<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilasonia and A Telia*<br />

Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Ave, Tbilisi<br />

380077, GEORGIA<br />

Tbilisi Medical State University prepares annually 500<br />

specialists in medicine and pharmacy. Ten years ago<br />

our country moved to a new economic formation under<br />

difficult social and economical conditions and faced<br />

the necessity for reforms in the medical educational<br />

system. Following the Soviet era, and without central<br />

financing, medical education tries to fill the vacuum<br />

with “European air”. At the Medical University reform<br />

has been partially implemented. The learning process<br />

consists of three stages:<br />

1 Two years – basic course – examination<br />

2 Three years – clinical course – examination<br />

3 Two years – specialization – state examination<br />

certification (specialty – medical affairs,<br />

qualification – physician).<br />

A net of University clinics has been created as well as<br />

a rectorial post. The second step of the reform involved<br />

the establishment of outcome-based education,<br />

development and optimization of the learning process,<br />

translation of standard educational programs and<br />

textbooks, and acquaintance with the European<br />

educational system and standards. Realization of this<br />

goal is fairly difficult without support from the<br />

international community.<br />

7K6 Results and main objectives of the<br />

first stage of education reform at<br />

the TSMU<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia and N Pruidze*<br />

Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Ave, Tbilisi<br />

380077, GEORGIA<br />

Based on the tradition of European medical education,<br />

a high medical school was founded in Georgia in 1918;<br />

its successor is Tbilisi State Medical University. A new<br />

period of this high school started in 1992, when total<br />

autonomy was given to the high schools in independent<br />

Georgia. Since this time it has become possible to<br />

implement the cardinal changes in medical education<br />

and to engage highly qualified pedagogical and medical<br />

staff, which was quite difficult during the period of<br />

transition from one politico-economic system to<br />

another. In that period, well-known medical schools in<br />

the USA, Austria, Germany, France, Spain, Turkey,<br />

Egypt, etc. became our partners. At Tbilisi State<br />

Medical University there are departments of General<br />

Practice, Pediatrics, Preventive Medicine and<br />

Healthcare Management, Stomatology, Military<br />

Medicine, Medical Biology, Psychosomatic Medicine,


Psychotherapy and Pharmacy. Studies in the faculty of<br />

General Practice consist of 14 semesters, in total 8800<br />

academic hours. In our opinion, the curriculum is<br />

overloaded and a revision of the teaching methodology<br />

is needed. We aim to have close integration with<br />

European medical schools, which will give us an<br />

opportunity of reciprocal recognition of qualifications.<br />

7K7 First international integrated<br />

surgery course at the Charité,<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, Germany<br />

Hajo Schmidt-Traub<br />

Charité, Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong>, Isländische Str. 11, <strong>Berlin</strong>,<br />

GERMANY<br />

In cooperation with the Karolinska Institutet,<br />

Stockholm, Sweden, a 16 week surgery course took<br />

place in <strong>Berlin</strong>. It included surgery, orthopaedics,<br />

anaesthesia, radiology and urology. The course was<br />

mainly planned and organised by students who had<br />

taken part in the Stockholm international surgery<br />

course. The aim of the course was to mediate both<br />

practical and theoretical skills. The students were<br />

integrated into the daily routine of a general hospital<br />

and participated in practical and problem based<br />

seminars. Half of the students came from foreign<br />

countries. Language of instruction was English. The<br />

students’ learning experiences in seminars and hospital<br />

departments were evaluated. Feedback from both<br />

students and teachers was very positive. This project<br />

proved to be a good example of a different way of<br />

teaching. Therefore it may have a positive impact on<br />

the future structure of the medical curriculum at the<br />

Charité.<br />

Session 7L Special subjects<br />

7L1 Illegible notes - do tomorrow’s<br />

doctors need teaching on how to<br />

write more clearly?<br />

E Westcott, A Kontoyannis*, N Murch, T Reid and<br />

K Sixsmith<br />

University of Wales College of Medicine, 9 Connaught Road,<br />

Roath, Cardiff CF24 3PT, UK<br />

Hand-written entries by doctors in patient notes aim to<br />

communicate information to other team members. It<br />

is important that these entries can be easily read and<br />

understood. 205 patient clerkings were read by medical<br />

students (fourth year) to asses the percentage of illegible<br />

words and unrecognisable abbreviations, and the<br />

absence of date, time, patient details and doctor’s<br />

identification. Whereas the recording of patient<br />

identification was good (due to the use of patient<br />

‘addressograph’ stickers), the recording of the doctor’s<br />

identification (name, position, bleep number), was<br />

incomplete in over half the entries. This poster discusses<br />

the implications of poorly written patient notes and<br />

suggests methods for improvement. These results call<br />

for improved teaching on handwriting legibility, the<br />

appropriate use of abbreviations and the recording of<br />

doctor identification. The use of doctor ‘identograph’<br />

stickers is suggested.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.80 -<br />

7K8 Counting the uncounted:<br />

estimating the number of overseas<br />

doctors in training grades in the UK<br />

currently not employed in the NHS<br />

Janet Grant, Mairead Beirne* and Heather Owen<br />

Open University Centre for Education in Medicine, The Open<br />

University, Walton Hall, MILTON KEYNES MK7 6AA, UK<br />

The main aims of this project were to:<br />

• Estimate the size of the pool of unemployed<br />

overseas doctors in the UK and to indicate its<br />

distribution across specialties and subspecialties;<br />

• Determine the career and job-seeking strategies of<br />

these doctors;<br />

• Describe the scope for improving these doctors’<br />

prospects of employment;<br />

• Estimate the background availability of posts.<br />

Because of their unemployment, there are no records<br />

of unemployed overseas doctors in the UK. This project<br />

therefore addressed the challenge of counting the<br />

uncounted. An approach to estimation was therefore<br />

selected which involved adopting a variety of methods<br />

and triangulating these to reach an overall view of the<br />

magnitude of the pool, its distribution and the reasons<br />

behind it. The methods adopted included:<br />

• Survey of Senior House Officer applicants<br />

• Documentary analysis<br />

• Secondary analysis of GMC and DoH statistics<br />

• Survey of competition for posts.<br />

7L2 An active method to prepare<br />

students to lead medical<br />

interviews: an experience at Xavier<br />

Bichat Medical School<br />

Corinne Pieters; Dominique Maillard*, Françoise<br />

Blanchet-Benqué<br />

Hopital Louis Mourier, Explorations Fonctionnelles, 178, rue<br />

des Renouillers, 92700 Colombes, FRANCE<br />

This study describes a series of two active trainings,<br />

teaching basic communication skills in the pre-clinical<br />

curriculum. In the first intervention, of a one-day<br />

duration, students had to reformulate in a popular radiostyle,<br />

different messages from a scientific paper, in front<br />

of 20 students. In the second intervention of a threehour<br />

duration, students working in small groups of 10,<br />

had to (from a video extract): observe behaviours of a<br />

patient meeting several doctors, analyse the styles of<br />

verbal and non-verbal communication and expose to<br />

other students the communication gap between the<br />

patient and the doctors he/she met. Each presentation<br />

is followed by a group discussion and a synthesis done<br />

by the teacher. Formative assessment will allow the<br />

students to master their own abilities to conduct medical<br />

interviews.


7L3 Teaching medical students patient<br />

advocacy skills; An<br />

interdisciplinary intervention using<br />

Standardized Patients/Families<br />

Graceanne Adamo*, Virginia Randall, Janice Hanson,<br />

William Sykora, Aileen E Zanoni, Elizabeth Jeppson and<br />

Richard E Hawkins<br />

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, National<br />

Capital Area Medical Simulation Center, 4301 Jones Bridge<br />

Road, Bethesda MD 20814, USA<br />

We describe an innovative medical education<br />

intervention, designed by interdisciplinary faculty<br />

collaborators, to teach and evaluate patient advocacy<br />

skills. The intervention is integrated into the required<br />

Family Medicine Clerkship within a comprehensive<br />

clinical experience in a simulation center. The goals of<br />

this educational intervention are to instill in medical<br />

students the appropriate knowledge, skills and attitudes<br />

to advocate effectively for their patients in a managed<br />

care environment. Intervention activities evolve around<br />

encounters with standardized patients/families. The<br />

specific clinical challenges focus on discharge planning<br />

for patients with significant home-health care needs.<br />

Related instructional activities include: individual<br />

feedback from standardized patients and faculty, an<br />

interactive teaching session featuring an advocacy<br />

contact workbook, interviews with real patients, and<br />

an opportunity to practice advocating to a standardized<br />

attending physician on behalf of a patient or family.<br />

Outcome measures include participant satisfaction and<br />

performance on the final clinical examination.<br />

7L4 The parameters affecting attitudes<br />

to death among students in a<br />

Medical College in Taiwan<br />

Ming-Liang Lai<br />

Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University<br />

Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, TAIWAN<br />

The parameters affecting the attitude to death and dying<br />

(anxiety, avoiding, philosophical thinking, and reality<br />

facing) were evaluated through a questionnaire to<br />

students at the Medical College of National Cheng<br />

Kung University. The anxiety response was more<br />

frequently noted in the female gender, in more<br />

pessimistic students, in those who consider religion to<br />

be important in their life, particularly Daoism and<br />

Buddhism, and in students not in the Department of<br />

Medicine. The avoiding response was noted more in<br />

the male, with AB blood type, and in students in the<br />

Department of Medicine. Interesting enough, the<br />

sophomore and higher-grade medical students seemed<br />

more avoiding than freshman. The pessimists, and those<br />

who had considered their own death, who had read<br />

books on thalantology, seen movies or read novels with<br />

death or dying as the main theme, presented a<br />

significantly stronger tendency towards philosophical<br />

thinking. Finally the reality facing response was more<br />

frequently noted in those who had read books on<br />

thalantology.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.81 -<br />

7L5 Evaluation of practical sessions in<br />

Clinical Anatomy: a strategy for<br />

educational improvement<br />

M A F Tavares* and M C Silva<br />

Institute of Anatomy, Medical School of Porto, Alameda Hernani<br />

Monteiro, 4200-319- Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

We have evaluated the students’ response to practical<br />

teaching sessions in Clinical Anatomy in our Medical<br />

School using action-research. The aim was to identify<br />

problems and to introduce changes which might<br />

improve the program and the performance of the<br />

teaching staff. At the end of each section of the program,<br />

each student completed a “target type” questionnaire<br />

with eight different components. As each quarter of<br />

the whole class had its own teacher, an analysis of<br />

variance was used to evaluate the target questions in<br />

the various sections of the program, and the<br />

performance of the four teachers. This research method<br />

gave us feedback on the students’ responses while the<br />

program was in progress. The results emphasize the<br />

importance of action-research in assessing and<br />

improving a developing program in a basic discipline<br />

of the medical curriculum.<br />

(Supported by Project PRAXIS XXI PCSH/C/CED/157/96)<br />

7L6 Towards a more effective teaching<br />

of Gross Anatomy: introducing new<br />

integrated clinical concepts and<br />

improving peer presentations/<br />

evaluation techniques<br />

Ameed Raoof*, Thomas Gest, William Burkel and<br />

Tamara Stein<br />

University of Michigan Medical School, Department. of<br />

Anatomical Sciences, Office of Medical Education, 3808 Med<br />

Sci Bldg II, Ann Arbor MI 48109-0608, USA<br />

Relevance and teaching methods of gross anatomy<br />

remains one of the most frequently assessed subjects<br />

among basic medical sciences. The medical gross<br />

anatomy course is taught at the University of Michigan<br />

to an average of 170 students. Measures to enhance<br />

effectiveness and promote relevance and learning<br />

opportunities included the introduction of new<br />

integrated clinical teaching concepts. These included<br />

clinical tutorials, clinical vignettes and modified<br />

practical exam questions. Students’ opinions about<br />

these techniques were assessed at the end of the<br />

semester. An interesting array of responses was<br />

obtained. Also, plans were laid down on providing<br />

students with clinical data related to the cadavers they<br />

dissect during the next semester. In addition, the peer<br />

presentation/evaluation technique that has been applied<br />

for a few years witnessed some further improvements.<br />

Students’ opinion about the new measures showed a<br />

significant improvement in the effectiveness of the<br />

technique in promoting the relevance of anatomical<br />

knowledge.


7L7 Putting the salutogenic orientation<br />

into practice: the life cycle course<br />

at the Technion<br />

H Eshach*, R Van-Raalte, L Dolev, H Bitterman and<br />

D Hermoni<br />

Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, PO Box 9649, Bat<br />

Galim, Haifa 31096, ISRAEL<br />

The salutogenic orientation, which focuses on origins<br />

of health, poses that we study the location of each<br />

person, at any time, in the ‘health ease/disease’<br />

continuum rather than dichotomize between healthy<br />

and sick people. The Life Cycle course at the Technion<br />

presents human social development from birth to death.<br />

Students, equipped with the salutogenic and<br />

biopsychosocial model, learn that patients’ “stories”<br />

reveal etiologically significant data that is often missed<br />

by clinicians. The aim is to identify a shift in students’<br />

perspectives regarding data about psychosocial aspects<br />

of the “patient story”. Before and after the Life Cycle<br />

course, students were provided with cases that required<br />

knowledge of the psychosocial aspects surrounding<br />

patients’ lives in order to treat them. Students were<br />

asked to rank contributing factors, including<br />

psychosocial and pathological factors, according to<br />

their relevance to the intended treatments. Results are<br />

pending and will be presented at the conference.<br />

7L8 ASAMANS (Ask Students About<br />

Medicine And National Socialism)<br />

T Drewes*, P Langkafel* and S Muller*<br />

Charité, Department of Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine,<br />

Humboldt-University of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353<br />

<strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Medicine during National Socialism (1933-1945) in<br />

Germany and the consequences for medical practice<br />

nowadays are the topic of this presentation. Focus of<br />

the study is the knowledge, assessment and attitudes<br />

of medical students towards medicine and National<br />

Socialism. We asked in which way medical education<br />

at the Charité/<strong>Berlin</strong> promotes the discussion of this<br />

subject among students. We asked about general basic<br />

topics such as euthanasia, medical experiments in<br />

concentration camps and the role of German doctors<br />

during National Socialism. A sample of 300 students<br />

at the start, middle and end of the studies (first, fifth,<br />

tenth semester) answered a questionnaire of 35<br />

questions between April and May 2001. The team<br />

consisted of one physician and two medical students.<br />

The results will be discussed and presented at the<br />

conference. Further information will be posted at<br />

www.asamans.de<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.82 -<br />

7L9 Stress among medical doctors<br />

J Agsteribbe* and J Cohen-Schotanus<br />

University of Groningen, Department of Education, Faculty of<br />

Medical Sciences, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

While interviewing medical doctors we noticed quite<br />

a number of complaints concerning job load and lack<br />

of leisure time. The overwhelming amount of<br />

complaints surprised us since one of the objectives for<br />

medical training is to learn to deal with stress and to<br />

become aware of the mutual influences of work and<br />

private life. Our research question is therefore: are<br />

workers in the medical profession more susceptible to<br />

stress than those in other occupations? 235 medical<br />

doctors were interviewed by phone and asked to fill<br />

out the General Health questionnaire (GQH-12); 150<br />

responded. The results indicated that: i) medical doctors<br />

were more stressed than their age group with the same<br />

educational level; ii) female doctors were much more<br />

stressed than their male colleagues; iii) female doctors<br />

are at a greater risk of experiencing stress than male<br />

doctors. It therefore seems necessary to pay more<br />

attention to this phenomenon during medical training.<br />

7L10 Introducing changes in medical<br />

education: the “Strategy” of<br />

Clinical Anatomy at the Medical<br />

School of Porto<br />

M A F Tavares<br />

Institute of Anatomy, Medical School of Porto, Alameda Hernani<br />

Monteiro, 4200-319- Porto, PORTUGAL<br />

The discipline of Clinical Anatomy, as introduced in<br />

the Medical School of Porto in academic year 1995/<br />

1996, involved big changes in the way we teach<br />

anatomy to medical students, by adopting a clinically<br />

oriented approach. The teaching/learning program has<br />

been developed over the last 5 years through an actionresearch<br />

project: (1) organisation of a new approach in<br />

Sections (regional approach) divided into different<br />

Units (physical examination, sectional and imaging<br />

anatomy sessions, malformations and anatomical<br />

variations, case-studies); (2) development of<br />

instructional materials (study guides, handouts, casestudies)<br />

and (3) introduction of interactive audiovisuals.<br />

This program involved all the staff and students as<br />

active researchers in this project. Its full implementation<br />

is providing medical students with a solid anatomical<br />

competence through the acquisition of an “anatomical<br />

reasoning” that aims to provide skilled clinical<br />

performance.<br />

(Supported by Project PRAXIS XXI PCSH/C/CED/157/96)


Session 8A Computer mediated learning and assessment<br />

8A1 Preparing clinical small group<br />

sessions by using digital video in<br />

CBE<br />

Marianne G Nijnuis*, Caro Brumsen, Jan A Gevers<br />

Leuven and Peter G M de Jong<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Onderwijscentrum IG, Kamer<br />

C5-54, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

Small-group patient demonstrations form an important<br />

part of the Internal Medicine clerkship in Leiden. The<br />

purpose of these meetings is to discuss symptoms, signs<br />

and management of common health problems and<br />

diseases. In practice it is often difficult to get a patient<br />

with the required diagnosis at the right time and place.<br />

As a result, most cases have to be presented in written<br />

text. In order to make better use of the available patient<br />

material several patients were recorded on digital video<br />

at a time that was more convenient for them. The images<br />

were used in a computer based educational program.<br />

Students are requested to study this program on the<br />

evening before the small-group discussion takes place.<br />

During the session the students can discuss the case<br />

under supervision of a clinician. The use of this new<br />

teaching method has improved the educational value<br />

of the already highly appreciated patient<br />

demonstrations.<br />

8A2 Inter-physician communication<br />

training through computer-based<br />

patient simulations<br />

S Eggermont*, P M Bloemendaal, E Schoonderwaldt and<br />

J D Donnison-Speyer<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Heelkunde Onderwijs K6-R,<br />

Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, NETHERLANDS<br />

Communication between physicians is essential in<br />

modern medicine; therefore communication training<br />

should be integrated in medical curricula. A joint<br />

project of the Leiden University Medical Center and<br />

the Amsterdam Medical Center, will result in twenty<br />

computer-based cases, developed in the Dynamic<br />

Patient Simulator (DPS). DPS is a computer program<br />

for creating and running patient simulations. In such a<br />

simulation several students treat one virtual patient<br />

asynchronously, enabling them to practise clear and<br />

adequate communication by training the transfer of the<br />

patient’s medical record. For this purpose we created a<br />

model of the inter-physician communication. With this<br />

model we can differentiate between multiple types of<br />

communication with different modalities, such as<br />

transfer of collected evidence, consultancy and<br />

strategies for further evidence collection, assessment<br />

and intervention. In our presentation we will explain<br />

the communication model and demonstrate its<br />

implementation in DPS.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.83 -<br />

8A3 Computer Assisted Learning: using<br />

and doing research in primary care<br />

Linda Leighton-Beck*, Philip Hannaford, Neil Hamilton,<br />

Sara Shaw and Yvonne Carter<br />

Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education,<br />

Postgraduate Medical Department, University of Aberdeen,<br />

Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK<br />

Development of CAL for research in primary care<br />

resulted from practitioners’ expressed needs, and the<br />

policy agenda. National collaboration achieved funding<br />

for a demonstration model. The project will:<br />

• design an innovative educational intervention to<br />

support staff in health settings, nationally and<br />

internationally;<br />

• develop a comprehensive course on research -<br />

Understanding Research and, Learning to do<br />

Research - utilising, initially, CD-ROM;<br />

• develop applications facilitating web access;<br />

• evaluate the concept through a pilot CD-ROM.<br />

The CD-ROM has been developed as a demonstration<br />

model through a collaboration of researchers and Medi-<br />

CAL technologists. Evaluation of its educational value<br />

and technological robustness will utilise questionnaire<br />

and interview of a defined sample of General<br />

Practitioners and healthcare professionals. Evidence of<br />

usefulness, effectiveness and accessibility will inform<br />

development. Successful outcomes will facilitate<br />

progress from demonstration model to platform support<br />

tools, customised to the needs of specialities.<br />

8A4 Extracting core competencies<br />

“bottom up” from case histories by<br />

an online consensus seeking<br />

process in family medicine<br />

Peter Schlaeppi* and Ralph Bloch<br />

Institute of Medical Education IAWF, University of Bern,<br />

Inselspital 37A, CH-3010 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

This project responds to the need for a clear and detailed<br />

definition of the required competencies for future<br />

family physicians in Switzerland. The aim of the project<br />

is to demonstrate that a web-based platform is a feasible<br />

and comfortable means to define relevant core<br />

competencies based on case histories. The practitioners<br />

of an expert panel had to write case histories based on<br />

their daily work. The panel outlined core problems and<br />

core criteria to solve core problems. Thus, a core<br />

competence is defined as a bundle of the criteria<br />

necessary to solve a core problem. In a first step 82<br />

core competencies consisting of 348 criteria could be<br />

identified. Online work was well accepted by the panel.<br />

Working together online seems to be a feasible means<br />

to seek relevant consensus in the continuing process<br />

of developing and updating core competencies in<br />

family medicine.


8A5 A new era of teaching: an<br />

innovative resource for continuing<br />

medical education and evidencebased<br />

management<br />

K El-Hayes, B McElhinney, B Adams, E Boyd and<br />

K McKinney<br />

1 Oakridge, Castlewellan Road, Banbridge, Co Down BT32<br />

4RT, NORTHERN IRELAND<br />

The aim of the project was to use and develop the skills<br />

of existing personnel to create a unique educational<br />

resource suitable for use by the multiprofessional team<br />

and adaptable to any setting. Using standard Microsoft<br />

Office software, resources from established Obstetric<br />

and Gynaecology texts and RCOG publications were<br />

used as references and incorporated with commercially<br />

available CD ROMs and pre-existing protocols and<br />

procedures into an interactive format. The result is an<br />

educational, multimedia computerised shell adaptable<br />

to any speciality. It forms a huge, informative teaching<br />

source that includes:<br />

• Case Based Learning<br />

• Evidence Based Protocols<br />

• All-encompassing hospital directory<br />

• Animated presentations of common procedures<br />

• Enormous database for self-assessment including<br />

MCQs, essay questions etc.<br />

• User-friendly site.<br />

There is no doubt that the result is an unfolding journey<br />

of extreme magnitude. We believe that the<br />

incorporation of this concept is essential for personal<br />

development in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the new<br />

Millennium. Forget the WWW: meet the Obs and<br />

Gynae Wide Web.<br />

8A6 Evaluating medical student and<br />

resident education: a CME software<br />

J C Edwards*, P Ogden and A A Stricker<br />

Department of Family & Community Medicine, Texas A & M<br />

University, 810 Southern Hills, College Station, Texas 77843-<br />

1114, USA<br />

The software CME program titled “Evaluating Medical<br />

Student and Resident Education” delivers an interactive<br />

multimedia application on CD-ROM. Designed as an<br />

interactive tutorial, it requires only 30 to 45 minutes<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8B Implementation of PBL<br />

8B1 Problem-based learning for<br />

trainees in Anaesthesiology<br />

Sigrid Adam* and Jan Klein<br />

University Hospital Rotterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology,<br />

Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015<br />

GD Rotterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

In order to increase the efficiency of learning during<br />

postgraduate training we educate our residents in a<br />

programme which is problem-based. Weekly tutorials<br />

- 4.84 -<br />

for a busy doctor to complete. Objectives are: (1)<br />

understand and apply the concept of judge/<br />

diagnostician in evaluating student/resident<br />

performance; (2) understand and apply defined<br />

standards to evaluate reliably. The content, new in<br />

medical education, addresses the physician tendency<br />

to nurture trainees. The outcome - ability to change<br />

roles from teacher to judge/diagnostician. Brief<br />

instruction and four videotaped interactions between<br />

attending physicians and trainees provide self-diagnosis<br />

and practice. The program incorporates two published<br />

examples of defined standards. Print materials can be<br />

downloaded from the CD-ROM. MPEG-1 compressed<br />

videos provide exceptional quality, closely matching<br />

movie industry standards at 30 frames/second. This<br />

high quality video prevents use of the internet, which<br />

would lessen quality.<br />

8A7 Metabolic challenges on CD-ROMs<br />

Marie-Paule Van Damme*, Jonathan Gould, Bruce Livett,<br />

Janet Macaulay, Ron Maxwell and Graham Parslow<br />

Monash University, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular<br />

Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Clayton 3800, Victoria,<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

As a way of engaging students more actively in their<br />

learning process, we have created multimedia<br />

presentations that offer:<br />

• “Self-Directed Learning” using interactive tutorials<br />

on various aspects of metabolism, nutrition and<br />

diabetes;<br />

• “Problem-solving exercises” requiring students to<br />

think logically and integrate information drawn<br />

from a variety of sources;<br />

• “Case studies” to teach students to apply their<br />

knowledge to specific clinical cases, such as “The<br />

Effects of Alcohol on Metabolism” and “Dietary<br />

Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes”.<br />

These programs have been compiled as two CD-ROMs:<br />

“Biochemistry-A Metabolic Challenge” and<br />

“Nutritional and Hormonal Aspects of Diabetes”. They<br />

challenge students to acquire a wide understanding of<br />

the interdependence of metabolic processes occurring<br />

in the major tissues of the body under different<br />

nutritional and hormonal states. Surveys have shown<br />

that the use of these teaching tools improves student<br />

understanding and enjoyment of the subject compared<br />

to conventional teaching methods.<br />

involve 9 trainees per group. Since active learning is<br />

known to improve knowledge and recall, the specific<br />

learning objectives of a fictive patient case are worked<br />

out by the group and discussed with the support of a<br />

tutor. Self-studies are an integral part of the programme<br />

which also involves questions and instructions<br />

distributed by the tutor via internet. According to the<br />

concept of iterative integration the learning issues of<br />

the cases gradually get more difficult and are


longitudinally related to what has already been learned.<br />

Residents find this form of learning very encouraging<br />

and stimulating. Besides improvement of knowledge,<br />

problem-based learning also improves the quality of<br />

teamwork and communicative skills.<br />

8B2 Communicating with students in a<br />

problem-based curriculum:<br />

experiences with WebCT<br />

Michelle McLean and Kathy Murrell<br />

University of Natal, Department of Physiology, Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Private Bag X7, Congella 4013, SOUTH AFRICA<br />

A problem-based curriculum was introduced at the<br />

Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine (University of<br />

Natal, Durban, South Africa) in January 2001. Several<br />

factors required that the year co-ordinator be able to<br />

communicate with students on a daily basis. After<br />

evaluating several packages, WebCT (Web Course<br />

Tools) was chosen as the front-end product for the<br />

delivery of Internet material because of e-mail and<br />

bulletin board facilities, its ability to handle high quality<br />

graphics and streaming video, as well as the integration<br />

of student records and student tracking. Accessing<br />

WebCT from sites outside the campus was considered<br />

important, in the light of the community work senior<br />

students would be undertaking. Results from the<br />

preliminary evaluation of WebCT by first year students<br />

(after Module 1) are encouraging. This presentation<br />

will discuss the development of module course material<br />

in WebCT, as well as how students of differing<br />

educational background have embraced the technology.<br />

8B3 Faculty members and senior<br />

students as facilitators in PBLgroups<br />

- similarities and differences<br />

Are Holen*, Kristin Wigen and Oyvind Ellingsen<br />

Institute of Community Medicine and General Practice,<br />

Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, Norwegian University of<br />

Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

Both faculty members and senior students may serve<br />

as facilitators (tutors) in PBL-groups at the Faculty of<br />

Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and<br />

Technology. Each group has two alternating facilitators;<br />

one only may be a senior student. A scale has been<br />

developed to assess central dimensions of the<br />

facilitators’ group behaviour. Once each term, the<br />

students complete the scale. Along with general<br />

feedback, the results are given to the facilitators. The<br />

aim is to improve facilitators’ contributions to group<br />

interaction and learning processes in PBL-groups.<br />

Findings about similarities and differences between<br />

faculty members and senior students as facilitators will<br />

be presented and discussed. Also, some reflections on<br />

senior students as facilitators in PBL-groups will be<br />

discussed.<br />

8B4 Tutors’ perspectives of problembased<br />

learning<br />

Diana Kelly<br />

Department of Education for Medicine & Dentistry, 4th Floor,<br />

Henrietta Raphael House, Guy’s Campus, St Thomas Street,<br />

London SE1 9RT, UK<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.85 -<br />

While PBL has been widely written about, there is<br />

limited research concerning PBL tutors’ perspectives.<br />

This study set out to explore teachers’ viewpoints in a<br />

context where PBL was introduced part way through<br />

the undergraduate curriculum, and as one of several<br />

teaching methods. The aim was to investigate the<br />

question: how do teachers perceive and experience their<br />

role as PBL tutors? Research was conducted during<br />

1999/2000 at King’s campus of Guy’s, King’s and St.<br />

Thomas’ School of Medicine. Qualitative methods of<br />

data collection and analysis were used, with interviews<br />

being conducted with tutors from the newly established<br />

PBL programme. From the findings it emerged that<br />

tutors faced challenges as they grappled with the<br />

complexities of their role. These challenges were<br />

located within personal understandings and external<br />

perceptions of PBL, as well as tutors’ own experiences.<br />

Discussion of the findings will be the focus of this<br />

presentation.<br />

8B5 The E.D.I.T. project in Linköping:<br />

using web-based scenarios for PBL<br />

Wolfram Antepohl*, Anne-Christine Persson, Margareta<br />

Bachrach-Lindström and Björn Bergdahl<br />

Division of Medical Education, Linköping University, University<br />

Hospital, S-581 85 Linköping, SWEDEN<br />

In the spring term of 2001, the Faculty of Health<br />

Sciences, inspired by the Graduate Medical <strong>Programme</strong><br />

at the University of Sydney, started to implement its<br />

E.D.I.T. (Educational Development using Information<br />

and Communication Technology)-project. The idea<br />

behind the project is to increase the reality aspects of<br />

scenarios (cases or problems) used to facilitate learning<br />

in a problem-based curriculum. Apart from text<br />

documents, web-based scenarios may contain video<br />

clips, digital images of high quality (plain photographs,<br />

x-ray, microscopy, etc.), sound, graphics and other<br />

media formats. In the fifth semester of the medical<br />

curriculum, EDIT was implemented as a pilot project.<br />

Twenty-five patient scenarios were designed and put<br />

on an intranet-server using the media formats<br />

mentioned above. PBL groups worked in rooms<br />

equipped with a computer connected to the intranet, a<br />

projector and an interactive whiteboard. Students’ and<br />

tutors’ experiences with the new scenario format were<br />

evaluated using qualitative and quantitative approaches.<br />

Group sessions were observed and analysed concerning<br />

potential effects on the PBL-process. The project and<br />

results of the evaluation will be presented during the<br />

conference.<br />

8B6 How to promote success in a PBL<br />

tutorial session<br />

N Paganus*, K Lonka and T Hatonen<br />

Faculty of Medicine, Learning Centre/Development & Resource<br />

Unit, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014 Helsinki,<br />

FINLAND<br />

The present study examines the effects of students’<br />

attitudes towards PBL on study behaviour and learning<br />

outcomes. The quality and functioning of the tutorials<br />

in relation to learning outcomes were looked at. The<br />

participants were 17 second-year medical students. Six<br />

PBL-tutorial sessions were videotaped. Of the total of


540 minutes of videotape, “brainstorming”, “setting<br />

learning goals”, and “evaluation” were analysed. The<br />

participants filled in Likert-type questionnaires. After<br />

the last session, the students also answered open-ended<br />

questions. The relations among students’ attitudes, time<br />

spent on individual study, student behaviour in tutorials,<br />

and their academic achievement were analysed. It was<br />

found that students with a positive attitude used more<br />

time for individual study and concentrated more on<br />

medical knowledge than on irrelevant comments during<br />

tutorials. It appeared that the positive attitude, study<br />

time spent, and an active role in tutorial sessions were<br />

all related to good exam grades.<br />

8B7 Evaluation of the student staff in the<br />

experience of PBL in the Federal<br />

University of Roraima - Brasil<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8C Curriculum planning<br />

8C1 Priorities in the content of the<br />

curriculum from the standpoint of<br />

the academic staff<br />

E Nagle*, R Velins and V Pirags<br />

Latvian Medical Academy, Department of Medical Biology, Riga<br />

Stradina University, Dzirciema Str. 16, Riga LV-1007, LATVIA<br />

A questionnaire of academic staff has been conducted<br />

to ascertain opinion about the most important aims and<br />

essential elements of the curriculum highlighted in the<br />

National Concept “Tomorrow`s Doctors in Latvia”.<br />

Teachers were asked to arrange the aims of a curriculum<br />

in order of relevance. The sequence was as follows:<br />

knowledge as a basis for medical practice, health<br />

promotion and prevention, independent learning and<br />

life long learning. This questionnaire highlights also<br />

that the most essential elements of the curriculum are<br />

the compulsory amount of theoretical knowledge<br />

defined for each study term, mastering of appropriate<br />

practical skills and introduction of optional study<br />

modules. Analysis of these results could be used for<br />

further curriculum planning at the Faculty of General<br />

Medicine.<br />

8C2 Reforming the core curriculum of<br />

the Reformstudiengang in <strong>Berlin</strong> - a<br />

Delphi study<br />

B Huenges*, W Burger, J W Dudenhausen, U Frei,<br />

C Frommel, H-P Lemmens, U Schwantes and D Scheffner<br />

Arbeitsgruppe Reformstudiengang Medizin, Charité, Campus<br />

Virchow-Klinikum, Lehrgebaude, 2 Stock, Augustenburger Platz<br />

1, 13353 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

After experiences with three semesters in the new<br />

reformed curriculum we realised the necessity to<br />

reconstruct our core content. To do this, about 1400<br />

topics, derived by different health and disease surveys,<br />

were reviewed. Out of these our interdisciplinary core<br />

group identified 376 ‘health problems’ (123 patients’<br />

- 4.86 -<br />

Alvaro Tulio Fortes*, Cesar Ferreira Penna de Faria,<br />

Ruy Guilherme de Souza and Fernado Menezes da Silva<br />

UFRR Brasil, Rua Irineu Lucena 50, Mecejana, Boa Vista<br />

Roraima, 6930-4210, BRAZIL<br />

From the history of Medicine, and particularly in the<br />

area of Medical Education, can be observed prominent<br />

aspects in its secular evolution. The first one, classical<br />

medicine, comes from Ancient Greece and the other,<br />

clinical medicine, originates in Occidental Europe,<br />

which today constitutes the basis of modern scientific<br />

medicine. This work intends, through an evaluation on<br />

the part of the student staff, to demonstrate the<br />

developed activities, the experiences and the results of<br />

the introduction of a model of problem-based medical<br />

education in the Medicine course of the Federal<br />

University of Roraima. A total of 128 evaluations<br />

relating to the organization and content of the program,<br />

the system of evaluation, the physical structure and the<br />

human factors, have been carried out on the learning<br />

of 1st and 4th years.<br />

symptoms and signs, 205 diseases and diagnoses, and<br />

48 general aspects of medicine) which appeared crucial<br />

for modern medical education. Topics were selected<br />

according to their frequency, urgency and exemplarity.<br />

This corpus represents the basis for a faculty wide<br />

Delphi survey, started in April 2001. In the first round,<br />

463 faculty members from 63 different departments<br />

were contacted and asked to review our proposal from<br />

the point of view of their area of practice. This<br />

procedure was chosen to promote faculties’<br />

involvement and feeling of ownership of the<br />

‘Reformstudiengang Medizin’.<br />

8C3 Early clinical clerkship - does it<br />

make a difference?<br />

Berit Eika* and Ole Sonne<br />

Enhed for Medicinsk Uddannelse, SVF, Universitetsparken,<br />

Bygning 611, DK 8000 Aarhus C, DENMARK<br />

The effects of an early (2nd year) 8 week long clinical<br />

clerkship were investigated. Students with clinical<br />

exposure were compared to students without clinical<br />

experience on: 1) attitudes towards medical education,<br />

and 2) performance on a short essay examination in<br />

physiology. More students with clinical exposure felt<br />

they had insight into the medical profession. When<br />

compared to students with no clinical experience, the<br />

early clinical exposure induced a more favourable<br />

attitude towards the significance of early patient<br />

contact. No differences were found in the two groups’<br />

study motivation, feelings for having chosen the right<br />

study, or sense of belonging to the profession. The<br />

students with clinical exposure performed slightly<br />

better on the physiology examination, but other<br />

differences in study population could account for this.<br />

In conclusion, despite very positive evaluations of early<br />

clinical clerkships it is difficult to document that the<br />

clerkship changes students’ attitudes or performance.


8C4 ECTS (European Credit Transfer<br />

System) as a tool in curriculum<br />

development<br />

B Grether<br />

Veterinarmedizinische Fakultat der, Universitat Zurich,<br />

Winterthurerstr. 252, CH 8057 Zurich, SWITZERLAND<br />

The European credit transfer system is based on the<br />

total study workload of an average student. The “lecture<br />

per week” is no longer the measure for study workload;<br />

credits also allow the reflection of student time devoted<br />

to other learning activities such as e-learning, group<br />

work, directed self-study and time spent in skills labs.<br />

Whereas transferring an already existing curriculum<br />

into credits may be very difficult, ECTS can be a helpful<br />

tool when planning a new curriculum. The total amount<br />

of study workload will be defined for each course,<br />

including contact hours, pre- and post- course<br />

assignment, preparation for examinations and time<br />

necessary for various learning activities other than<br />

lectures. By attributing credits for this a balance of<br />

study workload over the whole course of study can be<br />

found. A credit system may also create an environment<br />

adequate for introducing new self-directed learning<br />

methods.<br />

8C5 The continuum of professional<br />

development<br />

H M R Meier<br />

University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University<br />

Avenue, Department of Psychiatry, Room 929, Toronto ON<br />

M5G 1X5, CANADA<br />

The first Elective provides the first step on the lifelong<br />

journey of professional development. This<br />

teaching-learning relationship offers additional<br />

dimensions for student and Tutor. Appropriate support<br />

for the Tutor’s professional contribution, including<br />

educational credits, enhances the spirit of the Electives<br />

programme and encourages experience in areas underrepresented<br />

or not yet represented in the core<br />

curriculum. Collaboration with CME and rural medical<br />

education includes conceptualisation of faculty<br />

development applicable beyond the Electives<br />

programme, as changes in core curriculum increasingly<br />

involve off-campus Tutors.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8D The final examination<br />

8D1 Consistency of examination marks<br />

T Vik*, K H Karlsen and S Westin<br />

Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Department of<br />

Community Medicine, Medical Faculty, Olav Kyrres gt 3, N-<br />

7489 Trondheim, NORWAY<br />

To assess the consistency of examination marks, four<br />

examiners marked two cases given to 69 graduating<br />

medical students as part of the final board examination.<br />

- 4.87 -<br />

8C6 Evaluating ethics seminars<br />

Gerald Neitzke<br />

Department of History, Ethics & Theory of Medicine, Hannover<br />

Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg - Str 1, D30623<br />

Hannover, GERMANY<br />

Teaching medical ethics involves teaching aims and<br />

objectives on different levels. On a cognitive level facts<br />

are taught to extend students’ knowledge. On an<br />

affective level emotions and conscience are dealt with<br />

to foster students’ attitudes and conduct. On the<br />

practical level skills are exercised to achieve sound<br />

moral judgement and decision-making, teamqualifications,<br />

and communication skills. If the<br />

effectiveness of ethics seminars is to be evaluated, all<br />

levels of teaching objectives have to be considered.<br />

Changes of attitudes and behaviour are key qualities<br />

of successful moral education. How can they be<br />

measured and what are fundamental conditions of such<br />

tests? Results should not be biased by students’ moral<br />

convictions. Behavioural changes should be<br />

distinguished from changes of attitudes only. A control<br />

group in a strict statistical sense has to be found. This<br />

presentation scrutinises the prerequisites of a standard<br />

of best evidence in ethics education.<br />

8C7 A tool to evaluate medical ethics<br />

seminars<br />

Mareike Moeller* and Gerald Neitzke<br />

Geibelplatz 4, 30173 Hannover, GERMANY<br />

The development and testing-phase of a survey to<br />

evaluate ethics seminars are presented. At Hannover<br />

Medical School one third of first year medical students<br />

get the chance to attend ethics classes. This offers the<br />

opportunity of an ideal study design with a randomised<br />

control group. The questionnaire is designed to test<br />

affective and practical components related to specific<br />

teaching aims. Attitudes like moral conscientiousness<br />

and empathy, and abilities like argumentation skills and<br />

decision-making are detected. The rationale is to<br />

measure students’ development in the handling of moral<br />

dilemmas before and after attending ethics classes.<br />

Students are confronted with two case histories which<br />

pose moral problems. A total of 16 statements (4 on<br />

each teaching objective) are to be approved/disapproved<br />

on a ratio scale. The pre-test took place already; the<br />

post-test will be carried out in July 2001. The<br />

questionnaire and preliminary results are presented.<br />

The marks were scored from 5 (failed) to 12 (excellent)<br />

and grouped in four categories: Failed, acceptable,<br />

good, and excellent. No student failed. Mean score<br />

given by one examiner (7.9; SD: 1.6) was significantly<br />

lower than that given by the other three (9.4; SD: 1.2).<br />

Correlation coefficients between examiners’ scores<br />

varied from 0.61 to 0.72 (p < 0.001). Agreement in<br />

classifying a student’s knowledge as acceptable, good<br />

or excellent varied from no (kappa: 0.04; 95% CI: -


0.05 - 0.13) to moderate (kappa: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 -<br />

0.70) between various pairs of examiners. Agreement<br />

between two endocrinologists assessing a case in<br />

endocrinology was only fair (kappa: 0.21; 95% CI:<br />

0.02-0.40). The results suggest unreliable (inter-rater)<br />

grading in written clinical case examinations.<br />

8D2 Identifying threshold competence<br />

in an undergraduate qualifying<br />

clinical examination<br />

John Cookson* and Stewart Petersen<br />

Leicester Warwick Medical School, Division of Medical<br />

Education, Faculty of Medicine, P O Box 138, Leicester LE1<br />

9HN, UK<br />

Undergraduate qualifying examinations seek to identify<br />

those who are competent to proceed to house officer<br />

training. This requires definition of the standard of<br />

competence required of the new graduate, and its<br />

conversion to a threshold within an examination. We<br />

have attempted to define the concept of the ‘minimally<br />

competent’ practitioner – one who is just able to<br />

proceed. The final professional clinical examination<br />

at LWMS is graded in terms of five ‘categories of<br />

competence’, with precise grade descriptors. We asked<br />

consultants who train house officers to define the<br />

minimally competent new graduate in terms of the<br />

proportions of patients where they would not perform<br />

satisfactorily in each category of competence.<br />

Proportions ranged from 0% to 50%. There was a clear<br />

tendency for history and examination skills to be<br />

considered more important. The findings have<br />

implications for setting examination thresholds.<br />

8D3 The validity of performance<br />

standards on a certification<br />

examination for occupational<br />

therapists<br />

Ernest Skakun<br />

Division of Studies in Medical Education, 2 J3000 WMC, Faculty<br />

of Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, University of Alberta,<br />

EDMONTON, Alberta, T6G 2R7, CANADA<br />

This study investigated the validity of passing scores<br />

set by the Nedelsky and Angoff methods for an<br />

occupational therapy national certification exam. Eight<br />

judges rendered Nedelsky and Angoff judgments for<br />

302 multiple choice items. Judges used a five-point<br />

scale to rate the competence of examinees selecting<br />

each alternative as an answer. Judges’ decisions were<br />

correlated with scores of examinees near the passing<br />

scores. Item difficulties were computed for examinees<br />

with scores just above (higher) and just below (lower)<br />

the passing scores for each method. The number of<br />

alternatives rated as “significant concerns about<br />

competence” and selected as possible answers was<br />

compared for higher and lower scoring examinees. The<br />

correlation between judges’ decisions and examinee<br />

scores around the passing score was 0.34 and 0.23 for<br />

the Angoff and Nedelsky methods respectively.<br />

Comparisons of proportion correct for higher and lower<br />

candidates showed more consistency for the Angoff<br />

method.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.88 -<br />

8D4 Reliability of a sequential clinical<br />

examination<br />

Stewart Petersen* and John Cookson<br />

Leicester Warwick Medical School, Division of Medical<br />

Education, Faculty of Medicine, P O Box 138, Leicester LE1<br />

9HN, UK<br />

Clinical competence of students at Leicester Warwick<br />

Medical School is assessed by direct observation of<br />

consultations with a series of patients. Summative<br />

assessments are sequential. All students are observed<br />

with 2 or 4 patients, (depending on stage in the course),<br />

and those whose competence remains in doubt are<br />

observed with a further 3 or 4. In each consultation, a<br />

different pair of examiners observes students<br />

continuously. Examiners grade independently<br />

performance in five categories of competence defined<br />

by precise descriptors. There are precise grade<br />

descriptors. All examiners are trained. In a full, final<br />

examination, therefore, each student has 16 grades for<br />

each of five categories of competence. Analysis of data<br />

from three full cycles of assessment demonstrates that:<br />

(i) there is a high degree of inter-examiner reliability;<br />

(ii) eight cases are sufficient to mitigate case specificity;<br />

(iii) students vary in the relationship between<br />

performance in different categories of competence.<br />

8D5 Considerations of Legal, Ethical,<br />

Organizational Aspect of Clinical<br />

Competence in a National<br />

Licencing Examination, Evaluation<br />

at the Medical Council of Canada<br />

Jacques E. Des Marchais*, Dale W. Dauphinee and<br />

David Blackmore<br />

12420 rue Joseph-Edouard-Samson, Montreal Quebec H4K<br />

2N9, CANADA<br />

Organizations responsible for development and<br />

administration of national licensing examinations are<br />

becoming major partners in responding to evolution<br />

of emerging new social needs, such as Considerations<br />

of Legal, Ethical and Organizational aspects of medical<br />

practice(CLEO).The Medical Council of Canada<br />

(MCC) has been responsible for developing an<br />

examination process which leads to licensure to practise<br />

in the Canadian provinces. The study presents the<br />

decision-making process which has resulted in the<br />

development of the CLEO content of the Medical<br />

Council of Canada Qualifying Examination. The<br />

validation process of this new content is demonstrated<br />

as well as specific objectives in each of the three CLEO<br />

components. Results are presented from the first<br />

mandatory implementation, in May 2000, for about<br />

2000 candidates. Comparison with the MCQ scientific<br />

component is presented and discussed. Integration of<br />

CLEO disciplines into the second component (OSCE)<br />

of the MCC Qualifying examinations is also<br />

demonstrated.<br />

8D6 Combining different components of<br />

an assessment procedure<br />

J Degryse*, J Goedhuys, A Roex and A Dermine<br />

ACHG K U Leuven, Department of General Practice,<br />

Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J, B3000 Leuven, BELGIUM


In Flanders the Departments of General Practice in<br />

different universities worked together to organise a<br />

common final assessment procedure. This takes place<br />

at the end of the vocational training period in General<br />

Practice and takes the form of a certification exam.<br />

This assessment procedure is built out of four different<br />

components: a well-designed written knowledge test,<br />

a structured oral exam, a large scale OSCE type exam<br />

and a structured report from the trainers. A pass-fail<br />

standard is defined for each separate module using<br />

appropriate procedures. A final pass-fail decision is<br />

based on a combination of the scores obtained from<br />

the different modules. This presentation discusses the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.89 -<br />

different approaches that can be used to combine the<br />

different component scores. From a pure reliability<br />

perspective the reliability analysis of composite scores<br />

can be computed using a multivariate reliability<br />

analysis. The discussion is illustrated with data collected<br />

from the final assessment procedure in 1996-2000. The<br />

impact of using different approaches and computation<br />

methods is simulated and discussed. The choice for a<br />

specific combination method should be inspired by the<br />

psychometric characteristics of the assessment tools<br />

but the final decision is made on an empirical basis.<br />

Session 8E Postgraduate education/career choice<br />

8E1 Teaching with patients: moving<br />

beyond ‘learning by osmosis’<br />

Kath Green<br />

South Thames Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental<br />

Education, 33 Millman Street, London WC1N 3EJ, UK<br />

Teaching with patients in everyday workplace contexts<br />

(such as ward rounds, clinics, theatre etc.) provides a<br />

unique opportunity for postgraduate doctors to gain<br />

insight into the complex thinking that lies at the heart<br />

of professional practice in medical education. It is easy<br />

to assume, however, that these inexperienced doctors<br />

will ‘pick up’ a range of important generic skills (e.g.<br />

communicating with patients, working in multiprofessional<br />

teams, understanding patient anxiety etc.)<br />

merely by accompanying a more experienced clinician<br />

in one of the above contexts. Could it be that some of<br />

the excellent role models of good practice being<br />

provided by experienced colleagues are going largely<br />

unnoticed by postgraduate doctors whose personal<br />

agendas may be narrowly focused on exam preparation?<br />

Some ideas for raising the status of this kind of<br />

‘teaching by example’ will be outlined and opened up<br />

for further discussion.<br />

8E2 The effect of an interactive<br />

postgraduate education<br />

programme on parenteral treatment<br />

in Macedonia<br />

M Ivanovski, P D Toon*, K Zafirovska, F Tozija and B Gomes<br />

University College London, 137 Roding Road, London E5 0DR,<br />

UK<br />

Macedonia has no formal system of postgraduate or<br />

continuing education for doctors working in primary<br />

care. These doctors are poorly equipped and have little<br />

access to current medical information. Treatment is<br />

therefore often inappropriate; overuse of antibiotics and<br />

injected drugs, and high referral rates are particular<br />

problems. To improve matters the Chamber of<br />

Physicians encouraged the Ministry of Health to<br />

support a programme of continuing education using<br />

World Bank funds and foreign technical assistance.<br />

Evidence-based guidelines were customised and<br />

translated, and an 18 day course based around these<br />

was developed. This was piloted in the Prilep region in<br />

1999. It was well received by participants, and is now<br />

being extended throughout the country. We will present<br />

details of the course and data demonstrating a fall in<br />

the cost of injectable drugs in the Prilep region by 26%<br />

in the four months following the course, compared with<br />

the previous year.<br />

8E3 Promoting innovation in<br />

postgraduate education through<br />

the accreditation process<br />

Judith Armbruster<br />

ACGME, 5555 N Sheridan, Apt 601, Chicago IL 60640, USA<br />

U.S. residency programs and their institutions are<br />

subject to many destabilizing influences, eg, economic<br />

pressures for clinical productivity, shortened<br />

hospitalizations, decentralization of patient care, all of<br />

which may negatively impact teaching. The ACGME,<br />

the U.S. accrediting agency for postgraduate medical<br />

education, has initiated a project to help programs meet<br />

these challenges. An invitation was issued to programs<br />

and institutions to submit proposals for innovative<br />

approaches to teaching and evaluation. The proposals,<br />

which must also ensure the training quality is not<br />

compromised, should result in initiatives that may be<br />

adopted by other institutions. Principal benefits of the<br />

RFP (request for proposals) approach are that it will<br />

stimulate creativity and flexibility in teaching<br />

institutions, recognize and reward viable innovation,<br />

and promote the sharing of information among<br />

programs. Over 100 proposals were received. This<br />

presentation will explain future plans for the project<br />

and describe some of the most promising proposals.<br />

8E4 A new development in<br />

postgraduate surgical education:<br />

the Intermediate Breast Course - a<br />

distance learning course<br />

H M Sweetland*, E Hoadley-Maidment and M Galea<br />

Raven Dept of Education, Royal College of Surgeons of England<br />

(RCS), University of Wales College of Medicine, University<br />

Department of Surgery, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, UK


In the UK there have recently been significant changes<br />

in Postgraduate Surgical training. The RCS has been<br />

instrumental in developing new courses for surgical<br />

trainees. In 1999 a Committee of breast surgeons set<br />

out to plan and develop a Distance Learning course<br />

for breast trainees. The aims of the course were to<br />

present breast disease as an interesting specialty area,<br />

provide basic knowledge but stimulate learning ‘on the<br />

job’, and ultimately to encourage more trainees into<br />

breast surgery. The curriculum was planned together<br />

with a distance learning study guide and 3 study days<br />

to teach practical skills and to discuss what has been<br />

learnt from the study guide and the clinical situation.<br />

The course has run from October 2000 to April 2001,<br />

and it is currently being evaluated from participant<br />

feedback. The rationale, curriculum and evaluation of<br />

the course will be presented. It is proposed that this<br />

course will be a model for further courses to be<br />

organised by the RCS.<br />

8E5 Attitude change in neonatologistsin-training<br />

by participation in the<br />

neuropediatric follow-up of former<br />

premature infants<br />

J B Hentschel<br />

Department of Neonatology, Universitaets-Frauenklinik des<br />

Inselspitals, Schanzeneckstr 1, CH 3012 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

Attitudes among neonatologists towards resuscitation<br />

of premature infants at the limit of viability (range 22-<br />

26 weeks gestation) differ. Many families of immature<br />

infants are burdened by varying degrees of disability<br />

of their child. Participation in neuropediatric followup<br />

of premature infants is part of neonatology training,<br />

but not every neonatologist-in-training is exposed to<br />

such a program. It is unknown whether changes in<br />

attitude occur in neonatologists exposed to outcomes<br />

of prematures; the hypothesis is that active participation<br />

in a follow-up program is likely to influence attitudes<br />

indicated by an opinion change regarding resuscitation<br />

of infants at the limits of viability. A research design is<br />

proposed containing a pre- and post-training<br />

questionnaire administered to pediatric residents in<br />

neonatology training before and after participation in<br />

a neuropediatric follow-up program of prematures,<br />

compared to questionnaire results in residents who do<br />

not participate in such a follow-up.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8F Teaching and learning<br />

8F1 Impact of peer tutoring on the<br />

patient-centered interviewing skills<br />

of first-year medical students<br />

D Nestel* and J Kidd<br />

Imperial College School of Medicine, Connaught House,<br />

Apartment 17, Davies Street, London W1K 3DA, UK<br />

- 4.90 -<br />

8E6 Factors that influence the career<br />

choice of medical specialization<br />

M B M Soethout* and G van der Wal<br />

Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Department of Social<br />

Medicine, EMGO-Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081<br />

BT. Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS<br />

To identify factors that influence the career choice for<br />

medical specialization, a review of the literature was<br />

carried out, based on a qualitative and quantitative study<br />

design. Altogether 24 studies were analyzed. The results<br />

showed that most studies were of good quality. A<br />

quantitative assessment showed that many factors, like<br />

‘hours and working conditions’, ‘domestic<br />

circumstances’ and ‘enthusiasm for specialty’ played a<br />

role in the medical career choice. Nowadays more<br />

women than men study medicine. The majority of<br />

doctors with a first choice of general practice at the<br />

time of qualification achieved this. Women, who<br />

wanted a clinical specialization, could not accomplish<br />

or continue this career sufficiently. Social Medicine<br />

was not very popular for qualified doctors, but some<br />

years after qualification a substantial amount of doctors,<br />

especially women, worked in this field. The method of<br />

this review and the results will be presented.<br />

8E7 Personality differences in doctors<br />

affect the factors associated with<br />

their medical specialty choice<br />

Gillian B Clack*, Derek Cooper and John O Head<br />

51 Burbage Road, Herne Hill, London SE24 9HB, UK<br />

Attention has been drawn in the literature to the change<br />

in focus over the years on factors associated with<br />

medical specialty choice, ranging from personality,<br />

attitudes and values, socio-economic factors, the effect<br />

of medical education, to the influence of debt, expected<br />

earning and anticipated working conditions. 313 out<br />

of 464 doctors surveyed (68% response rate) completed<br />

a questionnaire, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator<br />

(MBTI), which measures normal personality<br />

differences. They also gave details of factors which<br />

most influenced them in their choice of medical<br />

specialty from 30 options, e.g. experience on the course,<br />

opportunities for research, need for security, etc.<br />

Analysis of this data resulted in significant differences<br />

being found between the factors which were most<br />

important to the different personality types. These<br />

results will be presented which will be of interest to<br />

those involved in recruitment to the different<br />

specialities.<br />

In medical education, peer tutoring is most frequently<br />

used for knowledge-based subjects. There are no<br />

published accounts of peer tutoring in relation to the<br />

acquisition of patient-centred interviewing skills. At<br />

Imperial College, 23 third-year medical students<br />

participated in a project in which they facilitated<br />

sessions for their first-year colleagues in the skills of


patient-centred interviewing. In each session, two thirdyear<br />

students co-facilitated a group of six first-year<br />

students as they practised the skills of patient-centred<br />

interviewing. Each first-year student interviewed a<br />

simulated patient and then received feedback from the<br />

actor, facilitators and fellow students on their<br />

interviewing skills. Two months after the sessions, the<br />

patient-centred interviewing skills of the first-year<br />

students were assessed. In this presentation, the<br />

interviewing skills of first-year students are compared<br />

with those of students who worked in groups facilitated<br />

by medical teachers.<br />

8F2 Peer Assisted Learning - a teaching<br />

strategy for the new millennium?<br />

Joy R Crosby and H Mei-Ling Ball*<br />

Curriculum Office, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School,<br />

Dundee DD1 9SY, UK<br />

Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) is a key learning tool<br />

and increasingly being used in medical education. For<br />

2 years, a voluntary PAL system has been run in Dundee<br />

Medical School using 4th and 5th year students to tutor<br />

2nd and 3rd years. Tutee evaluation of each session<br />

was performed using a brief questionnaire of tutee<br />

satisfaction and motivation for attendance. 626<br />

responses were returned and analysed showing a highly<br />

favourable response to PAL, with 95% rating sessions<br />

as useful / very useful and 93% as a good / very good<br />

learning aid. Particular focus on why students attended<br />

PAL sessions showed a diverse range of motivation,<br />

with an emphasis on enhancing exam performance. The<br />

effect of attending PAL reflected in exam performance<br />

was also examined. These data have been used to devise<br />

a tutee profile which will be used to make the scheme<br />

more accessible and beneficial to all students.<br />

8F3 An insight into how students learn<br />

about a cardiovascular problem<br />

using study guides<br />

Shihab E O Khogali*, Jennifer M Laidlaw, Stuart D<br />

Pringle and R M Harden<br />

Dept of Cardiology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital<br />

& Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK<br />

A study guide is a useful tool to help students manage<br />

their learning more effectively, but to what extent does<br />

the format of these guides play a part in the learning<br />

process? One hundred and fifty-one second year<br />

medical students were given three different formats of<br />

guides covering the topic of hypertension. The guides<br />

were timetable-based; problem-based; outcome-based.<br />

Although the content for all three types was the same,<br />

the weighting on the different components of the guides<br />

differed. Students were asked to select the guide of their<br />

choice to learn about the topic. From our study, we<br />

concluded that:<br />

1 In general students find study guides helpful in<br />

managing their learning;<br />

2 The guide which adopted a timetable approach to<br />

learning was the preferred choice;<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.91 -<br />

3 The guide which adopted an outcome-based<br />

approach was the least preferred choice;<br />

4 Of all the components of guides, the incorporation<br />

of a clinical problem was deemed the most helpful.<br />

8F4 Study guides in an outcome-based<br />

medical curriculum at the<br />

International Medical University<br />

(IMU), Malaysia<br />

M I Nurjahan*, J C Ramesh, S Raman, R Ammu,<br />

K H Ong, C M K Patrick and Q Akhtar<br />

International Medical University, Clinical School, Jalan Rasah,<br />

70300 Seremban, Negri Sembilan, MALAYSIA<br />

An outcome-based undergraduate curriculum with<br />

eight major outcomes was developed for our clinical<br />

school. The core curriculum consists of 113 studyguides<br />

among others. This paper describes how the<br />

study guides were developed with the aim of facilitating<br />

task-based and independent learning. These guides<br />

were prepared and reviewed utilizing a “study guide<br />

matrix” by a multidisciplinary faculty; and these form<br />

a key learning resource throughout the clinical years.<br />

A study guide was prepared for each key clinical<br />

problem. They identified learning issues in the 8<br />

outcomes including basic medical sciences in each of<br />

the problems and specific themes like ethics, which<br />

run through the curriculum. The IMU adopts a spiral<br />

curriculum and revisiting basic sciences in solving<br />

clinical problems is one of our outcomes. The guides<br />

help the students manage their own learning and obtain<br />

the maximum from each clinical attachment in<br />

accordance with the major outcomes.<br />

8F5 How authors of an extensive<br />

distance learning programme for<br />

surgical trainees differed in their<br />

use of the specified template<br />

Jennifer M Laidlaw*, Ronald M Harden, Lorraine J<br />

Robertson and E Anne Hesketh<br />

SCPMDE, Education Development Unit, Tay Park House,<br />

484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, UK<br />

The development of new technologies has resulted in<br />

an increased use of and interest in distance learning.<br />

The production of effective distance learning materials<br />

is time consuming and requires the skills of content,<br />

educational, and technical experts. A wide range of<br />

content experts may contribute to a programme, but<br />

often they are based at a distance from each other, and<br />

frequently with no previous educational expertise in<br />

producing distance learning materials. This was the<br />

situation encountered by the Centre for Medical<br />

Education Dundee when commissioned by The Royal<br />

College of Surgeons of Edinburgh to produce 42<br />

distance learning modules to prepare Basic Surgical<br />

Trainees for the AFRC examination. To tackle this<br />

initiative, a template was developed which defined the<br />

educational strategies to be adopted in the programme,<br />

and to help authors to structure their content. This paper<br />

examines the use made of the template by the authors,<br />

and in particular, the extent to which they utilised the<br />

various educational strategies which were built in to<br />

the programme’s design.


8F6 Context-dependent memory in a<br />

meaningful environment: in the<br />

classroom and at the bedside<br />

Franciska Koens*, Olle Th.J. ten Cate and Eugene J F M<br />

Custers<br />

School of Medical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Universitair<br />

Medisch Centrum, Stratenum 0.303, Onderwijsinstituut, Postbus<br />

85060, 3508 AB Utrecht, NETHERLANDS<br />

Godden and Baddeley (1975) showed that divers who<br />

learned words under water or on land, recalled these<br />

words better when the recall condition matched the<br />

original learning environment, a finding often cited in<br />

the medical education literature. Because the ecological<br />

validity of this experiment for medical education can<br />

be questioned, we replicated the Godden and Baddeley<br />

study, but now contrasting a clinical with an educational<br />

environment. Besides that, we added medically<br />

meaningful subject matter (clinical case description and<br />

biomedical words) to the non-medical type of common<br />

words used in the G&B study. Preliminary results<br />

indicate no significant differences. However, there does<br />

appear to be a slight tendency towards better recall of<br />

the case description if the encoding took place in the<br />

clinical environment.<br />

Godden D, Baddeley A. Context-dependent memory in two natural<br />

environments: on land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology<br />

66[3], 325-331. 1975<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8G Assessment in postgraduate and<br />

continuing education<br />

8G1 A computerized adaptive test as an<br />

element of the final assessment of<br />

general practitioners in Flanders.<br />

Possibilities, difficulties, dilemmas…<br />

A Roex* and J Degryse<br />

K.U. Leuven, ACHG - Department of General Practice,<br />

Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok j, B3000 Leuven, BELGIUM<br />

The many advantages of CAT make it very attractive<br />

for use in the final assessment procedure for general<br />

practitioners in Flanders. The actual written test is based<br />

on a 3 dimensional blueprint. The item response theory,<br />

which is essential for the development of a CAT, is<br />

based upon the assumption that the test scores reflect<br />

the amount of one latent trait possessed by the<br />

individual. Is the general practitioner’s competency<br />

unidimensional and how can our blueprint be adapted<br />

to take account of this assumption? Subdividing the<br />

test in different modules and working with testlets are<br />

some of the solutions we will discuss in order to solve<br />

the problem of case-specificity as described by Elstein<br />

et al. (1978), Norman and Newble (1985) and van der<br />

Vleuten (1988). Several mathematical constructs (1, 2<br />

and 3 parameter models) can be used to make a CAT.<br />

Each of these has implications on the size of the item<br />

database software choice.<br />

- 4.92 -<br />

8F7 Continuous Interactive Class (C.I.C)<br />

J Medrano*, R Calpena, A Compan, M T Pérez Vázquez,<br />

J Lacueva and M Díez<br />

Miguel Hernandez University, Facultad de Medicina, Carretera<br />

Alicante-Valencia, km 87, 03550 San Juan, Alicante, SPAIN<br />

In 1999 we initiated a pedagogical project in teaching<br />

called Continuous Interactive Class. Consisting of a<br />

technical card comprising objectives and contents of a<br />

theme to learn, 6 students with a tutor, after consulting<br />

the bibliography, discuss a theme that is outlined on<br />

the web. An electronic mailbox is opened so that any<br />

student may consult his/her tutor. Finally, an interactive<br />

“seminary” takes place to discuss the mail received and<br />

the problems that have arisen, elaborating a new<br />

version. Educational contents are better explained and<br />

brought up to date and the active participation of the<br />

group increases student motivation. There was low<br />

participation by the students through e-mail and lack<br />

of interest in the change of pedagogical methodology.<br />

The reasons for this were considered to be too many<br />

exams and classes, fear of change and possibly low<br />

availability of personal computers.<br />

8G2 Insight 360: a tool for looking at<br />

doctors’ performance<br />

E B Peile* and R Conradt<br />

Department of Primary Healthcare, University of Oxford,<br />

Chiltern Waters, 1 Stablebridge Road, Aston Clinton, Bucks<br />

HP22 5ND, UK<br />

Researching effectiveness of GP registrar education,<br />

we needed to develop proxy measures of performance<br />

in trained doctors in order to look at the outcome of<br />

training. We adapted a tool which is used in<br />

developmental work with general practices. Insight 360<br />

contrasts the perceptions of a doctor’s patients and<br />

colleagues with self perception in relevant areas of<br />

performance. We encourage groups of trained<br />

practitioners to take part in this exercise. Each<br />

respondent is asked to rate both the importance of a<br />

particular item of performance, and how well the doctor<br />

performs on this item. Individual reports are prepared<br />

for each doctor taking part, and we also prepare group<br />

reports, if requested. This feedback material can be very<br />

useful towards the doctor’s personal development. The<br />

database provides us with valuable indicators of a<br />

doctor’s perceived performance, enabling us to look<br />

for influences of education and training.


8G3 Impact on non-principals in<br />

General Practice of the summative<br />

assessment audit project<br />

P Bowie, A Garvie and J Oliver<br />

Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of<br />

Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK<br />

General practice registrars (trainees) must pass an audit<br />

project as part of summative assessment (SA). Its<br />

impact after training on audit knowledge, ability to<br />

recognise audit criteria and standards, and attitudes<br />

towards audit is unknown. 200 GP non-principals in<br />

the west of Scotland were surveyed (79% response rate)<br />

to assess these factors. 67 respondents (42%) underwent<br />

SA and 91 (58%) had not. Respondents rated their<br />

knowledge of different areas of audit method.<br />

Significantly higher mean scores were recorded for the<br />

SA group in every area (P


complex four-flap Z-plasty, suggesting a lesser ability<br />

to transfer learned principles to a novel and more<br />

complex task. The ability to mentally manipulate threedimensional<br />

objects is related to initial performance<br />

on a spatially complex surgical procedure. Subjects<br />

with lesser visual-spatial abilities achieve satisfactory<br />

levels of performance following practice and feedback.<br />

8G7 Validity of MIST-VR in the<br />

assessment of laparoscopic skill<br />

A M Paisley*, P Baldwin and S Paterson Brown<br />

University of Edinburgh, University Department of Surgery, Royal<br />

Infirmary, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to determine whether MIST-<br />

VR laparoscopic simulation correlates with<br />

performance in theatre. Error, economy and time taken<br />

for 36 surgical trainees, 37 surgically naïve students<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

Session 8H Curriculum change<br />

8H1 Innovation and reform of medical<br />

education: evaluating the UNI<br />

program in Latin America<br />

E C Ribeiro*, G Werneck, A Aguiar and V Brant<br />

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Nucleo de Tecnologia<br />

Educacional para a Saude, Centro de Ciencias da Saude<br />

SubsoloBloco A Sala 33, Cidade Universitaria - Ilha do Fundao,<br />

Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-590, BRAZIL<br />

The UNI program is a Kellogg Foundation initiative in<br />

the field of human health resources development in<br />

Latin America, based on the idea that partnership<br />

between university, local health services and<br />

community should be the cornerstone for innovation<br />

of professional training and health practices. The study<br />

evaluates the achievement of UNI schools students of<br />

a set of expected and consistent professional attitudes<br />

according to principles guiding the UNI Program. The<br />

study includes comparison with non-UNI schools of<br />

the eight countries involved so that inference of<br />

program results can be performed. The design includes<br />

a categorization of schools according to variables<br />

referenced to the concepts of innovation and reform<br />

defined in a theoretical model in which the medical<br />

school is considered as a space of transformation and<br />

reproduction of social practices. The methodological<br />

pathway is discussed, particularly the study design and<br />

instrument construction, its limits and possibilities.<br />

8H2 Promoting responsive curriculum<br />

change within the 21st century<br />

Cam Enarson<br />

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center<br />

Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA<br />

The process of curriculum change is complex, political<br />

and dynamic. The curriculum reform process includes:<br />

1) identification of the rationale for curricular change;<br />

2) managing the change process; 3) development of<br />

- 4.94 -<br />

and 16 surgical consultants to complete 2 tasks on<br />

MIST-VR were recorded. 26 trainees and 36 students<br />

underwent repeat assessment after 6 months. A<br />

validated in-theatre technical assessment form was<br />

completed by each trainee’s consultant. Trainee MIST-<br />

VR performance did not correlate significantly with<br />

consultant assessment and was not significantly<br />

different from that of consultants or students. A<br />

significant but weak correlation was found between<br />

MIST VR time score and duration of surgical<br />

experience (p=0.036, rho=-0.242 Spearman). Trainees<br />

showed significant improvement in time and economy<br />

after 6 months (median (IQR) time 0 to time 6 months:<br />

time (seconds): 217(176-291) to 184(157-215)<br />

p=0.003; economy score: 26(19-32) to 21(16-25)<br />

p=0.002 Wilcoxon); however, similar improvement was<br />

also seen in the student group. Further work into this<br />

area is needed.<br />

the new curriculum model/plan; 4) curricular<br />

implementation. The curriculum renewal process at the<br />

Wake Forest University School of Medicine will be<br />

used to illustrate the curriculum planning process noted<br />

above. Wake Forest University embarked on a 3 year<br />

curriculum planning process in 1995. During the first<br />

year of planning, ten principles were identified to serve<br />

as the foundation for the new curriculum. A curriculum<br />

model was developed during the second- and thirdyears<br />

which showed the 46 month educational program<br />

as a continuum. Implementation of the new Prescription<br />

for Excellence: A Physician’s Pathway to Lifelong<br />

Learning curriculum is occurring over a 4 year period.<br />

A program evaluation plan has been developed linked<br />

specifically to curricular goals and objectives.<br />

8H3 Improving the University and NHS<br />

Teaching Hospital Trust<br />

Partnership to identify SIFT<br />

spending<br />

Andrea J Bolshaw<br />

University of Birmingham, Medical School, Medical Education<br />

Unit, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK<br />

The perceived underspend of SIFT on Undergraduate<br />

teaching is widely acknowledged throughout UK<br />

medical schools and NHS teaching hospitals. In order<br />

to monitor the provision of services under the SIFT<br />

contracts, the University of Birmingham Medical<br />

School has developed a vehicle in the form of a<br />

Framework Agreement to strengthen links with the<br />

NHS and ensure the highest quality clinical care,<br />

teaching and research. In collaboration, a system has<br />

been developed to monitor compliance with the<br />

Agreement in the form of Undergraduate Clinical<br />

Education Monitoring Visits. This paper sets out how<br />

such a mechanism has been developed, and as a result,<br />

offers guidelines for the design and implementation of<br />

a framework for quality monitoring of undergraduate


teaching activities within NHS hospital trusts. A<br />

thorough insight will be given into how this practical<br />

strategy works in real terms to effectively meet high<br />

standards in university medical education.<br />

8H4 Assessment of medical student<br />

attitudes toward relevant aspects of<br />

medical practice<br />

Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues*, L E de A Troncon,<br />

M F A Colares, J F C Figueiredo, ARL Cianflone,<br />

CE Piccinato, LC Peres and JA Dela-Coleta<br />

Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, Department of Clinical<br />

Medicine, Hospital das Clinicas, Campus Universitário, 14048-<br />

900 Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

At the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto<br />

(University of São Paulo, Brazil), a 5-point Likert scale<br />

containing 52 items was developed for measurement<br />

of medical student attitudes toward 6 relevant aspects<br />

of medical practice. Preliminary tests determined the<br />

scale’s apparent and content validity and showed high<br />

internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86).<br />

Attitudes of graduating classes of medical students were<br />

measured for 4 consecutive years. Pooled results from<br />

317 students showed predominantly positive attitudes<br />

toward: 1) psychological issues in organic diseases; 2)<br />

primary care; 3) aspects of medical work in the<br />

community; and either conflicting or undefined<br />

attitudes were detected toward the following aspects:<br />

4) mental diseases; 5) physician roles in medical<br />

research and 6) death-related situations. Data obtained<br />

are likely to represent deeper medical school values<br />

and have to be taken into consideration for further<br />

improvements in medical student education.<br />

8H5 Effect of a curriculum reform of<br />

graduating student performance<br />

M L V Rodrigues*, J F C Figueiredo, L E A Troncon,<br />

C E Piccinato, L C Peres, A R L Cianflone and M F A Colares<br />

Hospital das Clínicas - Oftalmologia, Faculdade de Medicina de<br />

Ribeirao Preto, 12 andar - Campus Universitario, 14048-900<br />

Ribeirao Preto SP, BRAZIL<br />

Aiming at evaluating the efficacy of a new curriculum<br />

implemented at the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão<br />

Preto, a yearly objective assessment of graduating (6th<br />

year) students was performed. Shortly before<br />

graduation, all students underwent sets of multiplechoice<br />

questions (MCQs) and groups of 18-20 students/<br />

year were randomly assigned to OSCEs for either<br />

clinical (real and standardised patients) or procedure<br />

(mannequins) skills. The average MCQs score for the<br />

new curriculum (63.1, SD=8.9, n=261) was<br />

significantly higher (p


Session 8I Communication skills training<br />

8I1 Which interviewing skills must be<br />

actively taught at medical school?<br />

K Aspegren*, P Henriksen, P Lonberg-Madsen and<br />

M Stromming<br />

Laboratorium for Kliniske Faerdigheder, Rigshospitalet, Afsnit<br />

5404, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Kobenhavn O, DENMARK<br />

The study looked at which interviewing skills must be<br />

actively taught at medical school. 29 and 60 students<br />

from the last semester in their studies, and from two<br />

different years, were randomly selected in a medical<br />

school where there is little systematic training of<br />

interviewing skills. They were videotaped as they<br />

performed an interview with a standardised patient. The<br />

interviews were rated using the Arizona Clinical<br />

Medical Interview Rating Scale. Interrater reliability<br />

was controlled. The students rated high on 6 of the 14<br />

items of the scale, low on 2 and very low on 6. The<br />

strengths were such as characterize civil conversation.<br />

The weaknesses were important interviewing skills<br />

such as summarizing, using open ended questions, etc.<br />

There was good agreement between years, indicating<br />

a systematic trait in strengths and weaknesses. We<br />

believe our results can be used for planning<br />

interviewing skills courses in medical schools.<br />

8I2 Implementing communication skills<br />

training at the Charité - a project by<br />

students and doctors<br />

Jan Schildmann*, Carsten Schwarz, Eva Herrmann,<br />

Heiderose Ortwein, Amelie Klambeck, Andreas Brunklaus<br />

and Ulrich Schwantes<br />

Humboldt University <strong>Berlin</strong> (Charite), Department of General<br />

Practice, Vogelsang 16, 78343 Horn, GERMANY<br />

A lack of formal training in communication skills<br />

during the time as medical students combined with the<br />

impression that the ability to talk with patients is<br />

essential for our practical work was the motivation for<br />

us (3 doctors and 3 students) to organise optional<br />

courses in this field at the medical faculty of the<br />

Humboldt University in <strong>Berlin</strong>. Within the last 1½ years<br />

courses about how to break bad news, a communication<br />

skills course for students during their first clinical year<br />

and a role play session as part of a course in paediatrics<br />

for fifth year students have been the preliminary results<br />

of our work which is supported by the medical faculty.<br />

In this short communication we will describe our<br />

experiences so far and discuss our plans to implement<br />

the training of communication skills as part of the<br />

curriculum at our faculty within the next few years.<br />

8I3 Teaching sexual history-taking to<br />

health care professionals in<br />

primary care<br />

J R Skelton* and P M Matthews<br />

Department of Primary Care & General Practice, Medical<br />

School, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, BIRMINGHAM<br />

B15 2TT, UK<br />

History-taking is essential to diagnosis, yet little work<br />

has been done on the development of sexual history-<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.96 -<br />

taking, nor on how to train people to undertake it<br />

adequately. Courses designed to assist healthprofessionals<br />

in sexual history-taking were delivered<br />

in a variety of formats, and evaluations collected from<br />

participants. 114 participants took part in 9 teaching<br />

interventions. All courses were very positively<br />

evaluated (89.95% for quality: 91% for relevance).<br />

Role-play, which was a feature of all courses, was<br />

particularly valued as a methodology. Free text<br />

comments centred on the power of such courses as<br />

consciousness-raisers, and as helping to overcome<br />

embarrassment, and the need to develop and change<br />

communication strategies. Good sexual history-taking<br />

should be part of the health professional’s armoury. It<br />

can be taught, and courses designed to teach it are<br />

highly acceptable to participants.<br />

8I4 SEX SEX SEX, oh yes, and how’s<br />

your knee?<br />

Annie Cushing* and Dason Evans<br />

St. Bartholomews & The Royal London Queen Mary’s, School<br />

of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Human Science &<br />

Medical Ethics, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, UK<br />

Our study shows that, with the exception of the<br />

specialities of O&G and sexual health, medical students<br />

rarely ask patients questions about sex, even when they<br />

think this might be an issue. A workshop using roleplay<br />

was introduced to address this shortfall in general<br />

medical history taking. One hundred and ninety two<br />

students completed pre- and post- workshop<br />

questionnaires comprising 12 attitudinal statements.<br />

Subsequent cohorts completed a questionnaire to assess<br />

future intentions to ask patients about sexual health<br />

issues. Results showed a statistically significant<br />

improvement in all the attitudinal statements. After the<br />

workshop 84% of students stated they were now likely<br />

to ask patients about sex when they thought it was<br />

relevant. Moreover one-third intended to include such<br />

questions as part of their review of systems. There<br />

remains a group who do not think they will be asking<br />

patients questions about sexual health.<br />

8I5 Training of the systemic approach<br />

in doctor patient communication I:<br />

history taking from a third party<br />

K P M van Spaendonck* and E M van Weel-Baumgarten<br />

University of Nijmegen, 300 Med Psych Neuro, PO Box 9101,<br />

6500 HB Nijmegen, NETHERLANDS<br />

The format of the usual training of communication<br />

skills is derived from the conversation of the doctor<br />

with an individual patient. However, when a patient<br />

does or cannot speak for himself (for instance because<br />

the patient is too young or too ill), the patient is<br />

represented by somebody else. This is generally a<br />

parent, a partner or an adult child, who in turn speaks<br />

on behalf of the family to which the patient belongs.<br />

Moreover, doctors have to deal increasingly with<br />

patients who are accompanied by a third person. In<br />

both cases, doctors have to face so-called systemic


dynamics, a term derived from family therapy, and<br />

which focuses on relations, coalitions, behavioural<br />

codes etc within the core family. Systemic dynamics<br />

may have a strong impact on diagnosis and treatment.<br />

In the first part of this double presentation, we will<br />

show a video of a training, which involves the major<br />

sources of information distortion, which might result<br />

from history taking from a third party.<br />

8I6 Training of the systemic approach<br />

in doctor patient communication II:<br />

history taking with a patient and a<br />

third party<br />

E M van Weel-Baumgarten* and K P M van Spaendonck<br />

University of Nijmegen, Hermelynstraat 50, 6531 JZ Nijmegen,<br />

NETHERLANDS<br />

The next part of this double presentation focuses on a<br />

training of a consultation with a patient and a third party.<br />

In such cases the doctor is confronted with two people<br />

who usually have a long history of intimate life in<br />

common, which has resulted in a specific pattern of<br />

interaction and behavioural codes. Any remark of the<br />

doctor addressed to one of them, also has implications<br />

for the other, and may disrupt the mentioned pattern of<br />

interaction and behavioural codes. This type of<br />

consultation involves a number of skills: to be in control<br />

of the consultation, to negotiate, to give both parties<br />

equal attention. Training also focuses on how to avoid<br />

pitfalls, such as choosing sides, arbitrating, allowing<br />

Session 8J Clinical teaching<br />

8J1 Increasing student awareness of<br />

strengths and weaknesses using a<br />

standardized patient case<br />

Devra Cohen*, Jerry Colliver, Mark Swartz and Randal Robbs<br />

The Morchand Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One<br />

Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1127, New York NY 10029, USA<br />

Two classes of seond-year medical students (n=105,<br />

class of 1999; n=107, class of 2000) rated awareness<br />

of their strengths and weaknesses in performing a<br />

physical examination, taking a history, and<br />

communicating with a patient before and after an<br />

interaction and feedback session with an SP. The ratings<br />

were on a 5-point scale; 1-not at all; 2-a little; 3moderately;<br />

4-very; 5-extremely. The results showed<br />

that students were “moderately” aware of their strengths<br />

and weaknesses before the encounter and “very” aware<br />

following the encounter. The ratings increased from<br />

pre to post on average 1.0 standard deviation (ranging<br />

from .69 to 1.21 DSs) showing increased awareness of<br />

strengths and weaknesses as a result of the whole<br />

interactive session. Changes in awareness of strengths<br />

and weaknesses for each of the three outcomes<br />

separately as well as relationships between changes in<br />

awareness and performance on the SP case will be<br />

discussed.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.97 -<br />

the dominant party to overrule the other etc. A tripartite<br />

consultation requires different communication skills<br />

than a patient-centred interview. In our presentation<br />

we will also show a video of how students can be trained<br />

in this type of consultation.<br />

8I7 Breaking bad news - evaluation of<br />

courses run by students and young<br />

doctors<br />

H Ortwein*, E Herrmann, A Brunklaus, A Kreutz,<br />

C Schwarz and J Schildmann<br />

Department of Anaesthesiology, Charité, Humboldt University<br />

of <strong>Berlin</strong>, Lychener Str 60, 10437 <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Breaking bad news is one of the most challenging tasks<br />

in medical communication. At German medical schools<br />

communication skills training is usually not part of the<br />

curriculum. A group of experienced students and young<br />

doctors started a breaking bad news course for medical<br />

students in their fourth year of medical training. During<br />

a weekend course, participants receive excessive<br />

training of the subject in role-plays in small groups.<br />

Every student is able to play the role of the doctor as<br />

well as the patient’s part in different situations which<br />

are handed out as paper cases. We evaluated these<br />

course with questionnaires, one before and one after<br />

the course. The values of self-rating regarding the<br />

capability to break bad news improved. Teaching<br />

methods like peer group learning and role-plays were<br />

judged positive for the subject.<br />

8J2 Clinical dermatology: prospective<br />

randomized comparison of a<br />

traditional, a personal bed-side<br />

teaching (PBST) and a problemoriented-practical<br />

(POP) course<br />

F R Ochsendorf*, H Boehncke, R Hovelmann, A Boer and<br />

R Kaufmann<br />

Zentrum Dermatologie und Venerologie, Klinikum der J W<br />

Goethe-Universitat, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt/<br />

M, GERMANY<br />

To assess satisfaction, practicability and knowledge<br />

gain, students were randomly allocated to a traditional<br />

course (lectures and bed-side teaching; evaluable<br />

n=137), bed-side teaching groups always with the same<br />

teacher (PBST, n=37) and POP groups only using<br />

“paper-cases” (n=36) over two terms. For evaluation,<br />

a questionnaire and multiple-choice tests, written<br />

anonymously at start and end of the course, were used.<br />

The PBST-course (1.7 ± 0.7; mean ± SD) and the POPcourse<br />

(1.6 ± 0.8) were rated significantly better<br />

(p


8J3 Clinical skills training - a new<br />

curriculum between BEME and<br />

reality<br />

Peter Frey<br />

University of Bern, Department of Instructional Media (AUM),<br />

Inselspital 38, CH - 3010 Bern, SWITZERLAND<br />

Clinical skills like history taking and physical<br />

examination are basic skills for clinical reasoning and<br />

the right decisions in patient management. How should<br />

a curriculum be planned and implemented to get the<br />

best evidence medical education? At the Medical<br />

School of Berne Switzerland fundamental changes in<br />

the third year curriculum (first clinical year) allows<br />

the establishment of a new state-of-the art curriculum.<br />

The presentation describes the needs and the change<br />

management, how the goals and objectives were<br />

formulated, the instructional strategies (small group<br />

work, standardization of the training, instruction of<br />

tutors, use of guidelines), the credit system, the use of<br />

information technologies and the barriers of the new<br />

curriculum. Homepage: http://studmed.unibe.ch<br />

8J4 The effects of student gender on<br />

patients’ willingness to be<br />

examined by medical students<br />

William P Metheny*, Roxanne Jamshidi and Kara Pitt<br />

Brown University School of Medicine/Women and Infants<br />

Hospital, 101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905, USA<br />

Gender discrimination by patients can affect the clinical<br />

experiences medical students get. Excluding male<br />

medical students from the gynecologic exam or the<br />

prenatal visit may directly affect their clinical<br />

performance. We hypothesized that patients who were<br />

told the student’s gender (males in particular) prior to<br />

the examination were more likely to reject the student<br />

than patients who were not told the student’s gender in<br />

advance. Our experiment tested this hypothesis by<br />

assigning students to one of two female residents in an<br />

ob/gyn clinic who in asking permission of the patient<br />

would either refer to the student as a medical student<br />

(gender neutral) or identify the student’s gender.<br />

Patients (n=66) did not differ (p> .05) in responding to<br />

the two conditions; however they rejected only males<br />

in the gender specific situation. The way students are<br />

presented to patients can affect patient receptivity to<br />

them.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.98 -<br />

8J5 Reality shock among medical<br />

students attending first clinical<br />

rotation<br />

I Levi* and T Fischel<br />

Sackler Medical School, 13/2 Tsel Hagivaa, Ramat Gan, ISRAEL<br />

Discrepancy between fantasy that is perceived during<br />

preclinical studies, and reality as met during clinical<br />

rotation may cause difficulties and frustration, a state<br />

that can be defined as “reality shock”. An open<br />

interview was conducted with 40 students attending<br />

their first clinical rotation in an internal medicine<br />

department. Main difficulties described by the students<br />

were their position within the department staff, and their<br />

right to disturb patients while taking their history and<br />

making a physical examination. Significant gaps in<br />

“doctor–patient relationship” as met in real life opposed<br />

to what was learned at school, and gaps in “success<br />

rates” in medical treatment between real life and fantasy<br />

contributed also to “reality shock”. Reality shock is<br />

common in medical students attending their first<br />

clinical experience and can contribute to students’<br />

frustration and burnout. Medical schools should take<br />

this into consideration in planning the preclinical and<br />

clinical curriculum.<br />

8J6 Experiential clinical learning in a<br />

horizontally-integrated, problembased<br />

curriculum<br />

Tim Dornan*, Arno Muijtjens and Henny Boshuizen<br />

Universities of Manchester and Maastricht, 10 Raynham Avenue,<br />

Didsbury, Manchester M20 6BW, UK<br />

The aim of the study was to test whether better<br />

horizontal integration was achievable in the clerkship<br />

phase of a problem-based curriculum. Eight first<br />

clerkship students using a learning portfolio and<br />

attending weekly group tutorials to support selfdirected<br />

reflective clinical learning were compared with<br />

16 historical and 16 contemporary controls. Results<br />

revealed mean agreement with: ‘I was able to see the<br />

types of patients I needed to see’ rose from 3.5 ± 1.1 to<br />

4.4 ± 0.7; 0.1>p>0.05. Historical controls commented<br />

on the inappropriateness of casemix whereas<br />

experimental subjects commented positively about<br />

casemix, and outpatient learning. Mean rating of<br />

outpatient learning rose: 3.6 ± 0.8 to 4.6 ± 0.5 (p=<br />

0.001). Mean rating for inpatient learning was<br />

unchanged. Despite those improvements, learning<br />

remained strongly influenced by the clerkship’s<br />

specialty interest. It was concluded that some measures<br />

of experiential clinical learning improved; other<br />

interventions are needed to help students cross specialty<br />

boundaries.


Session 8K International aspects of medical education<br />

8K1 Influence of Studying on Students’<br />

Health (ISSH)<br />

T Schweickert*, P Hodzic, V Jurkovic, J Seitz*, O Onur*<br />

and T Shiozawa*<br />

German Medical Students’ Association, Gringelsbach 61, 52080<br />

Aachen, GERMANY<br />

The aim of the project is to find out if there is a<br />

correlation between studying and students´ health,<br />

especially if there is a significant correlation between<br />

the students´ health and the various medical education<br />

systems. This study is part of an international project<br />

organized by the IFMSA (international student<br />

organization). Croatian Students developed a<br />

questionnaire for students, which consists of 27<br />

questions divided into four sections – General<br />

information, General health information, Studying,<br />

Health and Lifestyle. In our analysis we focus on three<br />

aspects: 1) education system 2) educational level 3)<br />

medical/non medical students. The first steps of the<br />

study have shown that students’ health has deteriorated<br />

since the beginning of their studies. They consider their<br />

health to be worse compared to the peer population.<br />

About one third suffer from vision deterioration,<br />

headaches and digestion problems and they sleep less,<br />

drink much more coffee and take less care of<br />

themselves.<br />

8K2 A comparison of curricula – a cross<br />

country approach<br />

J Mirecka*, Paola Binetti, Jan Hijlman, Roy Remmen,<br />

K Lipinski<br />

Department of Medical Education, Medical College of<br />

Jagiellonian University, Str. Kopernika 19E/1, 31-501 Krakow,<br />

POLAND<br />

Comparison of undergraduate medical curricula in<br />

various countries was undertaken within the JEP-<br />

Tempus project and involved four medical schools . It<br />

was found that:<br />

• The total number of hours varied from 3500 to<br />

6500;<br />

• The lists of courses were not compatible because<br />

of their different names and content;<br />

• The content of courses could be compared after<br />

identifying the topics according to the traditional<br />

disciplines;<br />

• When viewed from this perspective the essential<br />

content of four curricula appeared quite similar;<br />

• The accents underlying importance of particular<br />

subjects were distributed differently;<br />

• The structure of curricula reflected by percentage<br />

of lectures, small group sessions, laboratories,<br />

varied considerably;<br />

• Other components of the curricula such as<br />

clerkship, electives, bed-side teaching, research,<br />

revealed also school specificity.<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.99 -<br />

8K3 International differences in medical<br />

content preparation<br />

Steven R Daugherty* and Rochelle Rothstein<br />

Kaplan Medical, 820 West Jackson, Suite 550, Chicago IL 60612,<br />

USA<br />

Scores of medical students from eight regions of the<br />

world were compared by means of a standardized,<br />

content-focused exam targeted to the United States<br />

Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE, Step 1). The<br />

diagnostic exam was offered in English to participants<br />

studying at Kaplan Medical Centers in the United<br />

States. Analyses examined differences in scores in<br />

traditional medical subject area and by organ system<br />

knowledge. Results show that students trained outside<br />

the US averaged significantly lower scores in most<br />

areas, with the largest differences found in<br />

Biochemistry, Behavioral Sciences, and General<br />

Principles. Scores on Microbiology were most similar<br />

to US students across all groups. Students trained in<br />

South America had the lowest scores, while students<br />

from Asia show the most similarity to US trained<br />

students. Results are discussed with reference to the<br />

role of language fluency in determining test scores and<br />

international differences in medical education.<br />

8K4 New trends at TSMU: elaboration of<br />

medical education conception<br />

R Khetsuriani, B Kilassonia, Z Avaliani* and G Simonia<br />

Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Avenue,<br />

Tbilisi 380077, GEORGIA<br />

In Georgia, as in other post-Soviet countries, a<br />

necessary condition for success of the current reform<br />

in healthcare is a basic reorganization of the medical<br />

education system, which first of all means introduction<br />

of the optimal model of teaching. The Outcome-based<br />

Model of medical education has been considered as<br />

the most acceptable method of teaching at TSME. This<br />

means the introduction of a flexible, integrated teaching<br />

frame-plan and appropriate study programs, that enable<br />

us to align professional activity of the graduates with<br />

the knowledge accepted at the University. The aims of<br />

the teaching process and main criteria, which should<br />

correspond to each grade of the study process, will be<br />

defined according to the last outcome. For optimization<br />

of the teaching process at TSMU some problems must<br />

be solved. First of all it is necessary to take part in the<br />

important process of inter-recognition and interacknowledgement<br />

of recognised medical schools,<br />

which, through international experiences and with<br />

support from <strong>AMEE</strong> and the other educational<br />

organizations and international programs, will give us<br />

the opportunity to improve the qualifications of our<br />

university professors at other medical schools through<br />

visits and training courses. In addition, it is very<br />

important to extend the existing practice of student<br />

exchanges with leading university clinics (more than<br />

100 students are being trained abroad annually).


8K5 Learning Needs Assessments for<br />

Refugee Doctors; establishing<br />

baseline data about medical<br />

knowledge and experience<br />

Lesley J Southgate* and Joan F Fuller<br />

Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education,<br />

University College London Medical School, Archway Campus,<br />

Highgate Hill, London N19 3UA, UK<br />

The profound and all embracing sense of loss<br />

experienced by refugees may be compounded for<br />

professionals, many of whom feel their special skills<br />

and knowledge are unused. Dependence on welfare and<br />

charity, loss of pride and socio-economic standing<br />

contribute further to low self-esteem and lack of<br />

confidence. We organised a learning needs assessment<br />

workshop for refugee doctors as part of a wider<br />

programme. Participants took a knowledge test in the<br />

same format as the new GMC PLAB test. Next, doctors<br />

working in the NHS interviewed refugee doctors to<br />

ascertain their experiences and expectations. Feedback<br />

from the interviewers and the refugee doctors was<br />

systematically recorded. We present here the outline<br />

of the wider programme, the themes from the<br />

interviews, the results of the knowledge test and plans<br />

for future work.<br />

8K6 Helping refugee doctors back to work<br />

M J Bannon*, E Paice, G MacFadden, G Cowan,<br />

S Cheeroth and Y H Carter<br />

London Deanery, Medical Education Department, Level 6V,<br />

Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex<br />

HA1 3UJ, UK<br />

It is estimated that there may be as many as 2,000<br />

refugee doctors living in the UK. They face a variety<br />

of hurdles (including loss of professional<br />

documentation and status, separation from family/<br />

friends, financial hardship and language difficulties).<br />

To date, a minority has succeeded in gaining clinical<br />

employment in the NHS. In November 2000, a project<br />

was initiated by London Deanery with the following<br />

aims:<br />

• To offer refugee doctors support, career advice and<br />

help with obtaining clinical attachments;<br />

• To directly place them as appropriate in specially<br />

arranged supervised senior house officer posts.<br />

Session 8L Special subjects<br />

8L1 And now for something completely<br />

different… reflective style learning<br />

of the Arts in medicine<br />

Paul Lazarus<br />

University of Leicester, Department of General Practice and<br />

Primary Health Care, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen<br />

Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK<br />

There is an increasing trend towards including a study<br />

of the Arts in undergraduate medical curricula, and the<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.100 -<br />

To date 20 doctors have been seen; 6 have been directly<br />

placed in clinical posts; 4 have clinical attachments that<br />

will lead to clinical posts. As a result of these efforts a<br />

network of support has begun for refugee doctors in<br />

West London. By listening to their stories, we have<br />

gained an enhanced appreciation of the difficulties<br />

faced by them.<br />

8K7 New York University School of<br />

Medicine Master Scholars Program<br />

Sharon K. Krackov<br />

Master Scholars Program, Dean’s Office, New York University<br />

School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA<br />

New York University School of Medicine’s new and<br />

unique Master Scholars<br />

Program was launched in June 2000. The overall<br />

mission is the creation of a fabric of learning that<br />

promotes the principles of humanism and<br />

professionalism throughout all aspects of the education<br />

of physicians. A second mission is that the Master<br />

Scholars Program serves as a center for the<br />

development of ideas on contemporary social and<br />

ethical issues. It achieves these missions in a variety of<br />

ways through:<br />

1 The medical student curriculum where humanism<br />

and professionalism are interwoven with the study<br />

of science;<br />

2 Student mentoring activities;<br />

3 Seminars where students and faculty discuss topics<br />

of relevance;<br />

4 Development of joint degree programs with the<br />

other schools of New York University;<br />

5 Monthly colloquia on topics of public interest;<br />

6 Scholarly publications;<br />

7 A planned international symposium in London in<br />

Spring <strong>2002</strong>.<br />

This broad program is implemented through five<br />

theme-based Societies (biomedical and health sciences;<br />

medical informatics and technology; health policy and<br />

public health; bioethics and human rights; and arts and<br />

humanities in medicine in which both students and<br />

faculty participate. [www.MasterScholars.med.nyu.edu]<br />

Leicester-Warwick Medical School has set up a module<br />

using the study of literature, drama, music and visual<br />

art to enhance students’ understanding of the human<br />

experience in health and sickness. As well as marking<br />

a departure from the study of more traditional scientific<br />

and clinical subjects, new ground is broken in using<br />

multi-disciplinary tutoring and in introducing students<br />

to a more reflective style of learning in the form of<br />

personal learning journals. This presentation describes<br />

why and how the module was set up and how reflective


learning practice is useful to students and doctors. An<br />

evaluation of the module’s success so far will also be<br />

given.<br />

8L2 Seamless humanities: on integrating<br />

medical humanities into medical<br />

education: the Witten project<br />

C Hick*, B Matzke, B Strahwald, A Weymann and<br />

W Vermaasen<br />

Universitat Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str.50, 58448<br />

Witten, GERMANY<br />

We report on the curricular development and first year<br />

experience with the “seamless” integration of medical<br />

humanities into a medical reform curriculum at Witten<br />

/ Herdecke University, Germany, aiming at enhancing<br />

the communicative and ethical competences of medical<br />

students. Specifically addressed will be the strategies<br />

employed for opening up problem-based learning and<br />

simulated patients to topics in medical ethics,<br />

philosophy of medicine and medical history. We will<br />

stress the importance of overcoming traditional<br />

disciplinary orientations in the medical humanities and<br />

argue for a topical, hands-on approach seeking to<br />

develop the “humanistic skills” of medical students in<br />

clinical contexts.<br />

8L3 Improving clinical reasoning in<br />

novice clinicians: a diagnostic<br />

training aid to support clinical<br />

reasoning in student<br />

physiotherapists<br />

Gill James<br />

Coventry University, School of Health and Social Sciences, Priory<br />

Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK<br />

Medicine and physiotherapy (PT) are two health care<br />

professions to identify difficulties in Clinical Reasoning<br />

(CR). CR comprises cognition, knowledge and metareasoning,<br />

with research suggesting that knowledge is<br />

the key to expertise. This paper describes the testing of<br />

a diagnostic training aid, designed to support<br />

knowledge. Two groups of PT students (halfway<br />

through their clinical education hours) were recruited.<br />

Using a standardised case study, they verbally reasoned<br />

about the diagnosis and treatment plan. One group used<br />

the training aid. Content analysis and the Mann-<br />

Whitney test were used to analyse these data. Subjects<br />

using the diagnostic training aid (n=8) recruited<br />

significantly more knowledge (p


symptom control (nausea, vomiting, anorexia,<br />

constipation, bowel obstruction, dyspnea, cough,<br />

delirium, depression, anxiety). Residents complete a<br />

pre-post knowledge assessment questionnaire at the end<br />

of their rotation. Statistical analysis (n=28<br />

questionnaires) demonstrated a significant increase in<br />

knowledge for each educational domain taught during<br />

this experience. This teaching format can be considered<br />

when implementing Palliative Care education into<br />

Internal Medicine residency programs.<br />

8L7 Teaching stress management and<br />

empathic communication to<br />

medical students<br />

Ray Melmed and Hannah Kedar*<br />

The Hebrew University, Hadassah Faculty of Medicine, Centre<br />

for Medical Education, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120,<br />

ISRAEL<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.102 -<br />

A workshop based on principles of neuro-psychoimmunology<br />

combined with skills of empathic<br />

communication was designed as a 2-week elective for<br />

6 th year medical students. The workshop included topics<br />

such as the psycho-neuro-physiological basis of stressinduced<br />

syndromes (e.g., panic disorder, chronic pain)<br />

and of behavioural interventions in these situations;<br />

the use of relaxation, meditation and guided imagery<br />

in medical practice; principles of empathic<br />

communication and their application to difficult<br />

interpersonal situations (e.g., angry, depressed, or<br />

anxious patients); breaking bad news; truth telling; and<br />

difficulties around sex-related issues in medical<br />

practice. Teaching methods were mostly experiential,<br />

including role-plays, videotapes, exercises of<br />

relaxation, and encounters with patients. Feedback data<br />

presented reflect high appreciation of this workshop<br />

and emphasise the need to include these topics in the<br />

curriculum.


Session 9 Plenary<br />

1 The role of clinical experience in<br />

the acquisition of clinical<br />

reasoning: Implications for<br />

education<br />

Geoff Norman<br />

McMaster University Medical School, Dept of Clinical<br />

Epidemiology, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5,<br />

CANADA<br />

An extensive body of research in psychology and<br />

medicine indicates that many diagnostic problems aRe<br />

solved by recognizing their similiarity to a previously<br />

encountered specific example. This “exemplar-based”<br />

reasoning is both efficient and effective. However, if<br />

this is a critical component of expertise, we must give<br />

serious consideration to how students can obtain<br />

sufficient clinical exposure. The talk will review some<br />

of the research evidence in support of exemplar-based<br />

reasoning, and describe experimental tests of alternate<br />

instructional strategies.<br />

2 Keeping standards up to date<br />

Susanne Pruskil<br />

Medical Student, Charité, Medical Faculty of Humboldt-<br />

University, <strong>Berlin</strong>, GERMANY<br />

Wednesday 5 September<br />

- 4.103 -<br />

Medical knowledge is expanding and changing rapidly.<br />

Consequently standards in medical education should<br />

be adapted continuously. However our learning<br />

objectives are largely overstuffed, reflect specialty/<br />

departmental interests and their relevance is often<br />

unclear. The aim of a modern medical school should<br />

be to include a manageable, ever-adapting,<br />

interdisciplinary core curriculum. Relevant standards<br />

are of crucial importance for the self-directed<br />

undergraduate learner as well as for the lifelong<br />

postgraduate learner.<br />

3 Humour in medical education is<br />

like a box of chocolates …<br />

Ron Berk<br />

The Johns Hopkins University, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore<br />

MD 21205-2110, USA<br />

This session will present research-based teaching<br />

techniques for integrating humour into your course<br />

handouts, examples, case studies, discussion questions,<br />

problems, tests, wedding invitations and parking tickets.<br />

Examples include quotations, cartoons, multiple-choice<br />

items, top 10 lists, anecdotes and skits/dramatizations<br />

with music. This presentation “boldly goes where no<br />

medical educator has gone before,” maybe!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!