Project: Not Project no: Author: Materials Conert Name 15000 psi Reinforcement Name Grade 60 Cross-sections Name 2- Rectangle 2100, 450 DRM1 [[nJ==) StatiCa® fe E MPa} MPa} 345 278014 fy E Unit mass [MPa} [MPa] (gin 4137 1999380 7850 f51= 1000.0 10-4, f5¢ = 1000.0 to-4, Material Picture z 1 soon gsi oR: Mt g ~ 450Project: Not Project no: (a=) StatiCa® Author: =o Geometry Name Type. Properties Position Mi Beam L: 11.60 m; Cross-section: 2; / M: M1; IP: 5; MP:5: 01 Opening Rectangular; W: 1.20 m; H: 0.80 m Xoo meena ©2 Opening Rectangular; W: 1.20 m; H: 0.80 m Sg Se X:4.60 m; 2: 0.25 m LS1 Line support; Z (Pressure only); Local; L:0.45m —_-M: M1, Edge 1; Part of edge; From beginning; X: 0,00 m LS2 Line support X;Z (Pressure only); Local; L:0.45m —_-M: M1, Edge 1; Part of edge; From beginning; X: 2.50 m LS3. Line support; Z (Pressure only); Local L:0.45m —_-M: M1, Edge 1; Part of edge; From beginning: X: 8.75 m Loads SDL Low, LL Low DLL+U, SDL Up 66.5 12.8.39.0 LLUp, ct 2, ¢3Peder Load case SDL Low - Permanent Not Line loads Begin Name fed Direction Position Mt: Edge 1 SDL Low 19 1.9 Global Z Whole rgth Load case LL Low - Variable Line loads Begin Name 1a Direction Position Mi: Edge 1 uw “37 “37 Global Z Whe th Load case DL L+U - Permanent Line loads Begin Name wa Direction Position M1: Edge 3 DL. 86.5 -86.5 GlobalZ ‘atote length Load case SDL Up - Permanent Line loads Bogin End Name 1a i Direction Position M1: Edge 3 sOLUP1 “128 “12.8 GlobalZ Pastieg be edge: 0.00 m MI: Edge 3 ‘SOL.UP2 “320 -82.0 Global Z piston on edge: 0.00 m Load case LL Up - Variable Line loads Begin End Name wa ie Direction Position Mit: Edge 3 LL up 18.5 “18,5. Global Z postion on edge: 0.00 m Combination Name Type Content ce us 1.40"SDL Low + 1.40°DL L+U + 1.40°SDL Up. ce us 1.20"SDL Low * 1.60°LL Low + 1.20°DL L4U + 1.20°SDL Up 3 SLS = Crack with SDL Low + LL Low + DL L+U + SDL Up ca SLS - Deflection SDL Low + LL Low + DL L+U + SDL Up cs SLS- Crack width + Deflection SDL Low + LL Low + DL L+U + SDL Up Length Im 11.60 Length (rm) 11.60 Length Im] 11.60 Length (m] 9.10 Length Im]Project: Not Project no: Author: [[n]==) StatiCa® Reinforcement Scheme of reinforcement Concrete: 5000 psi; Steel: Grade 60 Results Summary Overview table hack item Combination Increment Item us cr 100.0% Strength of concrete ° Check iter item Utilization Strength of concrate ma céac,im: 37.0% o Strength of reinforcement S12 eslesim: 0.2%, os/08,im: 8.7% oe Anchorage length sT2 __wifed: 99.9% eo sis cs) 100.0%, v100.0% Crack wth } Checkitem Combination Increment Critical check tem Utilization (Crack width c3 (LT) 6100.0%, V100.0% wiv SI2 11.2% eoProject: Not Project no: Author: ULS - Summary Stross flow Above yield Compression | | Thies proportional orce ‘Summary of reactions and applied loads: C1, Load increment: G100.0% Fy Type oo ‘Summary of reactions 00 ‘Summary of applied load 00 Check of equilibrium 00 ULS - Strength Detailed concrete strength results: C1, Load increment: 6100.0% x z oe fe ‘Member In] Im IMPa} [tes] Mt 9.80 0.00 73 39 Mt 11.00 0.00 00 00 [[nJ==) StatiCa® b/ fod 1000 om oso ol os / 0s,lim oa 1000 800 600 400 200 00 oc J oc,lim oa oo 200 406 60.0 20.0 100.0 Explanation tN) My kvm] 19625 9368.2 -1962.5 9968.2 00 cr) cl Sesim 4) 37.0 OK 0.0 OKProject: Not | Project no: [[x]=F] StatiCa® ‘Author: ce sr in Detailed reinforcement strength results: C1, Load increment: G100.0% Member x z o 5 24!0%,1m tale, im im [MPa] [te-4] val 4 sta 8.95 -0.87 32.3 16 a7 02 0K TOP Rebar 9.49 4.00 546 15 147 01 0K stt 2.80 -0.87 23.2 12 62 01 0K Skin bot6 9.45 0.70 105.7 10 28.4 0.1 0K BOT Rebar 8.89 -1.00 “16.4 08 44 0.1 0K ‘Skin bot8 9.63 0.00 146 “0.7 39 0.1 0K sT3 11.20 0.20 gr or 26.4 0.1 0K sta 8.35 -0.74 96.0 or 25.8 0.1 0K ‘Skin botd 10.19 0.35 858 04 23.0 00 0K ‘Skin bot2 949 0.36 607 03 163 0.0 0k stt 3.40 “0.74 590 03 188 0.0 0k ‘Skin bott 9.36 -0.70 519 03 139 0.0 0k BOT Rebar 5.88 =1.00 287 02 a 00 ok ‘Skin bot3 3.53 0.00 302 02 81 0.0 0k Concrete stress/strength ratio oc /oc,lim ra are 238 308 are 247 216 185 184 123 93 62 3 00Project: Not Project no: [[aJ=F) StatiCa® ‘Author: ce sr in Concrete principal stress maa 00 os 42 18 24 30 37 43 49 55 64 or 7 ‘Concrete principal strain ¢¢ tes) 00 03 07 10 13 16 20 23 28 30 33 38 39Project: Not | Project no: [[x]=F] StatiCa® Author: ce sr in Directions of principal stresses at Compressive strength reduction factor ke2 ke2 8 1.00 092 08a 075 067 058 050 042 033 025 oar 0.03 0.00 Reinforcement strainilimit strain ratio= g/t, (%]Project: Not Project no: Author: Reinforcement stress/strangth ratio - 0/05,tim %) 0.0% Reinforcement stress -o, [MPa] a Oo HH | EE e_| Reinforcement strain -¢, [10-4] [[n]==) StatiCa®Project: Not Project no: [[nJ==) StatiCa® Author: ce sr in ULS - AnchorageProject: Not Project no: [[nJ==) StatiCa® Author: —— Detailed anchorage results: C1, Load increment: G100.0% Member x z » Fa Foot Frot Fim Tolfg tm tm [MPs] kN) ik] td 0 st2 895 -1.00 24148 49 52 999 OK st2 955 -1.00 42 148 168 178 49.1 0k sT2 835-074 02 48 243 258 17 0k siz 895-087 oA 148 62 a7 54 OK stt 280 -1.00 24 103 “38 40 86.7 OK stt 3101.00 08 103 19 126 342 OK stt 3400.74 09 103 149 158 1.8 OK stt 280-087 01 103 59 62 49. 0K Skin bots 976 0.900 1838 “4 28 99.9 OK Skin bot3 694 0.00 28 35 a7 12 413 OK Skin bots 353 0.00 09 38 120 a4 14 0K Skin bot3 963 0.00 oA 35 58 39 74 0K Skin bot 1123 0.00 0338 93 104 145. 0K Skin bot2 969-035 420 58 167 23.0 64.1 OK Skin bot2 936-035 14 58 63 47 617 OK Skin bot2 949-035 os 58 240 247 32.6 OK Skin bot2 902-035 00 58 “4 o7 04 OK Skin bot2 955-035 02 58 26 266 127 OK Skin bot 969-035 420 58 93 184 49.3 OK ‘kin bott 922-070 1923 28 60 562 OK ‘Skin bot 956-070 oe 23 136 140 412 OK ‘Skin bot 936-070 o4 23 206 169 56 OK ‘kin bott 875-070 re 23 45 10 42. 0K sT3 120074 0768 "7 124 303 OK sta 4120 0.00 0768 220 233 276 OK sT3 1120020 oo 68 248 26.41 10 0k sT3 1150 0.74 09 68 08 09 ot OK Skin bold 1153 0.35 09 55 137 199 490 OK Skin bolt 9990.35 07 85 20 15.0 354 OK Skin bolt 101908 02 85 339 23.0 96 OK Skin bots 677088 09 85 a7 12 12. 0K Skin bots 1120070 08 05 tar 98 349. 0K Skin bots 1780.70 os 08 20.1 136 214 OK Skin bots 945070 09 0s 419 284 04 OK Skin bots 543070 09 0s 18 12 0.1 OK BOT Rebar 307 -1.00 os 63 68 09 427 OK BOT Rebar 869 -1.00 05 63 18 1 422 OK BOT Rebar 588 -1.00 00 63 556 17 00 OK BOT Rebar 8891.00 4 6318 44 44 0K BOT Rebar 1109 -1.00 on 63 339 a2 37 OK TOP Rebar 1082 1.00 05 39 478 75 240 OK TOP Rebar 702 0.95 02 39 183 25 123 OKProject: Not Project no: ‘Author: x Memb imber im TOP Rebar 9.49 TOP Rebar 5.55 Bond stress check value -To/fgg [%] Force check value = Ftot/Fiim (% z Im) 1.00 1.00 %» [MPa] 00 0.0 KN) 39 39 Ftot kN] 105.7 20.2 [[nJ==) StatiCa® FiotFim ——Tofea (%] 1%) 147 09 oK 28 04 OKProject: Not Project no: Author: Bond stress - r) [MPa] Set gs Creep coefficient ‘Type of input Input by user SLS - Crack Creep coefficient Detailed crack results: C3, Load increment: G100.0%, V100.0%, wm=0-300 mm. Member st2 sT3 ‘Skin bots st TOP Rebar ‘Skin botS ‘Skin bot2 ‘Skin bott BOT Rebar ‘Skin bot3 Intermediate crack results Member a) sT2 sT3 ‘Skin bot 0.0 st TOP Rebar 0.0 ‘Skin bots 0.0 ‘Skin bot 0.0 ‘Skin bott 0.0 BOT Rebar 0.0 ‘Skin bot3 0.0 x tm) 8.35 41.20 11.20 3.10 9.49 10.59 3.33 9.42. 6.95 3.60 {tesa} 07 os 02 oa 10 03 03 02 0. 02 z im) {mmm 316 1 316 316 316 71 316 0.74 o2r 0.35 0.94 1.00 0.70 0.35 0.70 0.95 0.00 ® {mm 13 13 16 13 29 16 16 16 29 16 [mm 0.033 0.027 0.020 0.020 oo17 0017 0.011 0.010 0.008 0.008 Pett tal 1.03 1.03 1.24 1.03 4.02 1.24 1.24 1.24 4.02 1.24 ([[a]=E) StatiCa® 25 whim (%) 112 0k 9.4 OK 68 OK 67 OK 57 OK 56 OK 35 OK 34 OK 28 OK 28 OK Wb Ir em [mm] a a 0027 2601.87 019079487 0.006 0280.00 001s 074 487 0017 186 0.00 010 = 0620.00 0.008 086 = 0.00 0.008 088 0.00 0.002 © 283 = 0.00 000s = 0830.00 Note: There are TCM intermediate values displayed in the table above, Adequate POM values are not available in current version of the program:Project: Not Project no: (a=) StatiCa® hah es Crack width -w [mm] TT et EECEEEEEEU Crack width check w/ whim To =] oo | 1000 900 oo SLS - Deflection Detailed deflection results: C4, Load increment: G100.0%, V100.0% im x z Mest Yen uy ue Member im (m {mm} [mm [mm [mm] mt 1160 1.08 07 12 0.0 13. 0K mt 10.26 “1.05 08 04 +08 OKProject: Not | Project no: [[x]=F] StatiCa® Author: ~ Deflection Bill of material Homs numberingProject: Not Project no: Author: Brief reinforcement bar table Index @ [mm] #9 #5 #5 45 #5 #4 #4 #4 Material toms: Grade 60 12 Grade 60 6 Grade 60 6 Grade 60 6 Grade 60 4 Grade 60 19 Grade 60 9 Grade 60 2 Detailed reinforcement bar tables Parameter Index. © [mm] Material Number of items Length mm) Weight [ka] ‘otal length (mm Parameter Index © [mm] Material Number of items Length mm] Weight [kg] Total length (r] Parameter Index. © [mm] Material Number of items Length {mm} Weight [ka] ‘otal length (mm Value Grade 60 2 11963 6 143.56 Value 2 as Grade 60 6 5874 35.25 Value 3 #5 Grade 60 6 3249 5 19.49 StatiCa® Length {mm} Weight [ka] Total length {mi 11963 61 143.58 5874 9 35.5 3268 5 19.49 989 2 593 E14 18 4726 5922 5 401.12 5322 5 4790 5322 5 10.84 Shay x 41417, y Shape 9. 5597 J Shape 191 L 2693 3Project: Not Projet ne: (=I=E] StatiCa’ Pret —— Famer ta shape ex © fom) 7% 5 nbn fore i = Length rm 7 west z Total length [m] 5.93 Parameter Vahe Shape index 5 ® [mm] a5 Mata Grade 60 Number fer 4 — sy ls Length [mm] 11814 Weight [kg] 18 Total length [m] 47.26 Parameter Vane shape wes 3 © [mm] a4 Matera ernie Nunber fora 8 Length [mm] 8322 Weight (kg) 5 ‘Total length [m) 101.12 Parameter abe index 7 [mm] ae Leng 02 weight 5 Tal eogt FA a Parameter Vahe ide a © [mm] He ata Grade 60 Number fora 2 Length [mm] 5322 Weight [kg] 5 ‘otal length {rn} 10.64Project: Not Project no: [x7] StatiCa” Author: “ . Overview table © [mm 4 4s #9 Total length of © (mm 16967 10793 143.56, Weight per meter of © [kg/m] 1 2 5 Tota weight of © [x] 150 168 rar Total weight of bars [kg] 1053 Volum of concrato 3} 10.10 Reinforcement weight per volumo unit of concrete [kam] 104 Explanation ‘Symbol Properties Position FeotFim Tole Creep coefficient Pest Explanation Characteristic compressive cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days ‘Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete CCharacterstc yield strength of reinforcement W- Width; H- Height; T- Thickness; L- Length; r= Radius; a - Inclination M- Master; MP - Master point; IP - Insert point The extrome value of compressive stross ac of concrete of selected subregion. Minimum compressive strain of concrete cc Compressive strength reduction factor ke2 ‘The ratio of concrete stress and concrete strength. It presents the level of material utilization witn respect to concrete strength Maximum stress along the length of reinforcement bar. Maximum strain along the length of reinforcement bar. ‘The ratio of stress and strength of the reinforcement. It presents the level of material utilization with respect to reinforcement strength. The ratio of strain and limit strain ofthe reinforcement. It presents the level of material utlization with respect to limit strain Bond stress on the surface of reinforcement bar. ‘The anchorage force. Itis developed at the ends ofthe bars due to hooked anchorage. ‘Total force developed along the length of the bar. It consists of the anchorage force due to hooked anchorage and bbond force, which integrates bond stresses acting on the surface of the bar. The ratio of total force in the bar and limit value ofthe force, It presents the level of utlization of the rebar. The limit value of the force is calculated as the minimum of two values: (a) the force calculated as the sum of ultimate anchorage force and the force developed from the end of the bar to the point of interest assuming ultimate bond strength, (b) the ultimate strength ofthe bar. ‘The ratio of bond stress and ultimate bond strength for selected (group of bars and applied portion of the load. It shows the level of utilization with respect to ultimate bond strength between the rebar and adjacent concrete. Final value of creep coefficient at time interval (0 = 28 days, tinf = design working life) Total crack width including effect of ereep. the mean strain in the conerete between cracks the mean strain in the reinforcement under relevant combination of loads, including the effect of imposed deformations and taking into account the effects of tension stiffening. Only the additional tensile strain beyond the state of zero strain of the concrete at the same level is considered ‘mean value of axial tensile strength of concrete diameter of reinforcing bar effective reinforcement ratioProject: Not Project no: StatiCa® Author: “ . symbol Explanation ra cafeulated crack wiath ®, inclination ofthe cracks (the angle between the global coordinate system and the crack direction) % bar inclination (the angle between the global coordinate system and the axis of enforcement bar) Vest Immediate deflection caused by otal load, calculated with shor-erm stifnesses, ven Long-term effects of iong-term load Aue Deflection increment caused by variable load & Total deflection including effect of cree. Calculation presumptions ‘+ Minimum amount of reinforcement resisting at least the tensile stresses prior cracking has to be provided in cracked zones. + tis assumed that a transverse rebar or adequate overlap Is provided to enable full anchorage of the stirrups. + The analysis and code checks are performed for support conditions as specified in the project. No change of supports in construction/service stages is considered. + itis assumed that the user has included strength reduction factor (as its inverted value) into the load factors of all combinations + The crack width is checked in the vicinity ofthe reinforcement only. No control of cracking is performed in non-reinforced + The presentation of crack spacing is schematic only. It does not represent the crack spacing computed for the calculations.