Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/271455172
CITATIONS READS
26 22,770
3 authors:
Leon Pretorius
University of Pretoria
217 PUBLICATIONS 829 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Research on all renewable energy sources, especially their impact on quality of power. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Jan-Harm C Pretorius on 18 December 2019.
Abstract – Projects are generally undertaken because that project scope, time and cost comprise the three key
they are part of the plans to meet business needs and charter triple constraint variables [1], [3], [4], [6], [10], [11], [12].
organizations to new levels of performance. Projects are Project time addresses the scheduling and duration of the
however constrained by conflicting demands and competing project, cost addresses the budget and resources of the
priorities within the project environment. Neglecting to project, and scope addresses the requirements and work of
manage these constraints accurately and effectively may be
the project. A time-constrained project is bounded by the
sufficient to condemn a project even if all other project
management activities are performed to a high standard of completion agenda, whereas a cost-constrained project is
excellence. The aim of this paper is to improve the bounded by the scheduling of expenditure. Scope-
interpretation of the triple constraint and its dynamics and constrained projects are bounded by the performance
indicate how this may advance the delivery of project criteria of the deliverables. Project quality constitutes an
success. An integrated model is proposed to facilitate the integral dimension of project management and is
strategic management of the triple constraint trade-offs as a supported by the triple constraint [3], [4], [6], [7], [10],
function of the project higher purpose. [11], [13], [14].
The project management triangle (Fig. 1) is a useful
Keywords - Project management, triple constraint,
model to illustrate the consequences of change on the
trade-offs, scope, time, cost
triple constraint to key project stakeholders. The triangle
reflects the fact that the three constraints are interrelated
I. INTRODUCTION
and involve trade-offs – one side of the triangle cannot be
changed without impacting the others. Project quality
Products and solutions need to be constructed faster,
takes root in all three variables of the triple constraint and
cheaper and better. Around the world mission-critical
is affected by balancing the three factors [4], [10].
projects are being launched all the time involving
It may easily be argued that triple constraint affairs
significant capital investments and high-risk ventures.
reside at the kernel of the most essential determinations
Projects are becoming the way of the working world.
surrounding projects.
What makes project delivery successful is however a topic
of much academic debate, and depends by whom and
B. Introducing the research rationale
against which value system the project is being evaluated.
It is generally agreed that to be considered successful, a
According to research by the Gartner Group, only
project must be fit for purpose (add strategic value) and it
16% of information technology (IT) projects are
must have achieved its delivery targets [1], [2].
completed within the desired time frame and budget and
In reality it is not always considered practical to
achieve the desired results. More than 30% of projects are
deliver all the project targets exactly as planned. Trade-
cancelled and over 50% of projects will experience cost
offs need to be considered and priorities must be set in
overruns. Less than 30% of the projects companies
order to realize strategic decisions. The project
employ to change their businesses are successful [1].
management body of knowledge (PMBOK®) endorses
The current literature in the project management
that every project is governed by the triple constraint,
domain suggests that there exists a lack of appropriate
which reflects a framework for evaluating these
(and consistent) scholarship on the triple constraint and its
competing demands [3], [4], [5].
dynamics [7]. The term ‘triple constraint’ did not even
appear in the initial issues of the PMBOK® Guide
A. Introducing the triple constraint
glossary or index.
The triple constraint is a critical project management
concept that originates from the basis for undertaking a
project and provides direction for framing the project. The
Cost Scope
triple constraint constitutes one of the primary building
blocks of the project plan and is paramount to the Quality
monitoring and controlling process group [3], [4], [6], [7],
[8], [9].
Although the triple constraint theme has various Time
interpretations, the literature shows a general agreement Fig. 1. Project management triangle.
This knowledge gap results in project managers not The type of study associated with this paper is
being able to effectively prioritize and exploit the triple primarily non-empirical defined through an extensive
constraint trade-offs. It is proposed that a thorough literature study, conceptual analysis and construction of an
comprehension of the triple constraint dynamics is integrated model using secondary data. Theory building in
paramount to effective project management. the research occurred through retroductive and deductive
Another problem is that project managers often create strategies. Conceptual explication was used to derive the
an illusion of tangible progress by relying heavily upon model through analysis and integration of concepts
traditional on-time, on-budget and on-target measures – discovered through the literature study.
yet this tactic fails to address the strategy ambiguity or The research undertook basic case study analysis as a
establish appropriate project goals [15]. mechanism to demonstrate that the derived model is valid
It has also become commonplace in many projects to and useful, which also introduced an empirical element
view the triple constraint trade-offs as organizational into the research design. The results from the case study
problems that have a definitive solution (‘either/or’ analysis have been generalized to refer back to the project
choices) – yet this tactic fails to effectively negotiate the management body of knowledge in terms of applicability.
triple constraint and leads to destructive conflict. Collins The integrated model presented in this paper is highly
& Porras discovered that instead of being oppressed by the conceptual. The emphasis in the study was on qualitative
‘Tyranny of the Or’, highly visionary companies liberate reasoning both in definition, explanation and application,
themselves with the ‘Genius of the And’ – the ability to rather than an emphasis on empirical and other
embrace both extremes of a number of dimensions at the quantitative techniques. The findings of the research study
same time [16]. This conjecture is supported by the should thus be considered as preliminary rather than
Polarity ManagementTM philosophy [17]. conclusive, pending further research.
Without the effective management of the triple
constraint as an interrelated system, projects run the risk
of becoming separated from purpose. A mechanism is III. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
needed on how to manage this seemingly contradictory
task when it comes to constraint trade-offs. The premise is A substantial range of literature has been considered
that if these constraints are managed properly, in the study with reference to more than 100 sources
organizations will be successful in delivering projects and representing authoritative knowledge across the fields of
meeting organizational goals. project management [7]. This section provides an
This paper examines the notion behind the project overview of some of the key concepts surrounding the
management triangle and power structure of its triple constraint, and concludes with a consolidated triple
constraints. An integrated model is proposed for managing constraint model.
relative flexibility within the triple constraint towards a
beneficial outcome in terms of project success. A. Dynamics of the triple constraint
Derive key attributes to where the up-arrow (↑) implies an increase, the down-
formulate an integrated model
through conceptual analysis
arrow (↓) implies a decrease, and S, T, and C refers to
and synthesis scope, time and cost respectively.
Relationships (1), (2) and (3) denote that any triple
Evaluate the integrated model
through case study exploration constraint variable can be delivered at the expense of one
or both of the remaining two variables. Further analysis
Conclude on the signifies that when there is pressure on the triple
appropriateness of the
developed model
constraint, at least one of the variables needs to be flexible
in order to validate a quality balance [7], [11].
Fig. 2. Research process.
1992
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE IEEM
r
Fig. 3 is only one of many possible ways of how to
pe
ea
illustrate these dynamic relationships. The illustrations
Ch
also depend on which factors are fixed and which are Faster
flexible. It should be highlighted that the changes are not Time
always symmetric, i.e. if two variables need to increase, Fig. 4. Better, faster, cheaper – is this really possible?
one may increase proportionally more than the other – for
example, more resources may need to be added in order The following analogy may be drawn between the
not to exceed the deadline by too much. ‘good, fast or cheap - pick two’ permutations and the key
The important consideration is that a connected triple constraint relationships [7]:
triangle must be maintained at all times. Fig. 4 illustrates 1) Relationship 1, S↑ α T↑ C↑, implies that the
that it is not possible to maintain the triple constraint as a effect of increasing scope (S↑), or effort (pressure) to
triangle when all three variables are pursued achieve scope, necessitates an increase in time (T↑) and/or
simultaneously [9]. cost (C↑). If cost remains unchanged, then the project can
be delivered good (because S↑) and cheap (because C
B. Good, fast, or cheap? Pick two fixed as planned) but not fast (because T↑);
2) Relationship 2, T↓ α S↓ C↑, implies that the
Within the project management and consulting
effect of reducing time (T↓), or effort (pressure) to
environment, the adage ‘good, fast or cheap - pick two’ is
achieve time, necessitates a reduction of scope (S↓) and/or
commonly encountered. Good, fast and cheap respectively
refer to the three key elements of the triple constraint an increase in cost (C↑). If scope remains unchanged, then
namely the extent of work (scope), the schedule (time) the project can be delivered fast (because T↓) and good
and the budget (cost). The notion is that projects are (because S fixed as planned) but not cheap (because C↑);
generally constrained to choose two of the three elements 3) Relationship 3, C↓ α S↓ T↑, implies that the
and sacrifice the other in order to gain the chosen two. effect of reducing cost (C↓), or effort (pressure) to
The ‘good, fast or cheap - pick two’ impression is a achieve cost, necessitates a reduction of scope (S↓) and/or
manifestation of the ‘Tyranny of the Or’ – the rational an increase in time (T↑). If time remains unchanged, then
view that cannot easily accept paradox, that cannot live the project can be delivered cheap (because C↓) and fast
with two seemingly contradictory forces or ideas at the (because T fixed as planned) but not good (because S↓).
same time [16]. This concept pushes people to believe that
things must be either A or B, but not both. That is to say, C. Supporting factors of the triple constraint
in terms of the triple constraint, one can choose either
good-and-fast, or good-and-cheap, or fast-and-cheap; but Within the context of this paper the three prime
critically not all three (Fig. 4). elements of scope, time and cost are considered central to
The ’good, fast or cheap - pick two’ trade-off can be the triple constraint. Project management literature,
demonstrated with an adaptation of Barker & Cole’s however, sporadically indicates quality and performance
seesaw model as illustrated in Fig. 5. If pressure is put on as an adjunct to or substitute for scope, and occasionally
timescales (fast) then costs can be expected to go up; designates customer satisfaction and project risk as
alternatively, if pressure is put on costs (cheap) then ancillary constraints [7].
timescales can be expected to go up. From the seesaw Project scope encapsulates capability and grade
example it is clear that, with the scope of work (good) attributes. Quality and grade are not the same. Grade
remaining pivotal, the project cannot be delivered refers to the set of attributes on which the quality of a
simultaneously fast and cheap as well; one of the elements product will be judged [19]. Quality constitutes an
has to be flexible [5], [7]. uncompromising and inherent objective of the project
specification that takes root in all three properties of the
triple constraint.
t Time
Cos
Cost
ter) (Che
(Fas aper
Sc
Sc
e
st
st
T im )
Co
Co
op
op
e
Good Good
Time
versus
Time
Fig. 3. The triple constraint relationship S↑ α T↑ C↑. Fig. 5. Good-and-fast vs. good-and cheap.
1993
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE IEEM
A lower-grade material, for example, is not 1) Effective projects bring form and function to
necessarily a lower-quality material, as long as the grade ideas or needs, and yield beneficial change or added value.
of material is appropriate for its intended use. 2) The higher purpose of a project is fundamentally
Performance is an operational assessment metric for the the driver of the project.
triple constraint in terms of project accomplishment, 3) The triple constraint constitutes a balance of the
which should be continuously monitored and controlled three interdependent project elements of scope, time and
throughout the project. Performance and quality are hence cost as a function of the project higher purpose.
not substitutes for scope [4], [9], [14], [19]. 4) The concepts of quality, customer satisfaction,
Customer satisfaction is fulfillment of the consumer performance and risk have an impact on the triple
requirements, expectations and needs, and constitutes a constraint, but do not inherently constrain the project.
performance measure in terms of quality or excellence. 5) The cause and effect of new or changing triple
Risk impacts the performance of the triple constraint, constraint requirements are constantly negotiated during
which may precipitate change in terms of the triple all phases of a project.
constraint trade-off dynamics [6], [10], [11], [20]. 6) Change within the triple constraint is
This paper presents a classic interpretation of the compensated through proportional trade-offs.
triple constraint, focusing on the ‘big three’ of scope, time 7) Failure to deliver all three triple constraint
and cost without adding or subdividing. variables on target does not necessarily imply project
failure.
D. Power structure of the triple constraint 8) Flexibility is an indispensable triple constraint
requirement in order to accommodate shifts in project
One of the challenges project managers face is the emphasis, and to ensure a beneficial project outcome.
iterative and infringing requirements of the customer. A 9) The three key triple constraint relationships
good starting point is thus to understand the customer’s signify that at least one of the triple constraint variables
priorities in order to identify the most important aspect of must be constrained (otherwise there is no baseline for
the project and obtain an optimum balance between the planning), and at least one of the variables must have
constraints [5], [9]. capacity for exploitation (otherwise quality may be
Dobson’s theory on the Hierarchy of Constraints affected).
defines a project by listing the triple constraint variables in 10) The triple constraint can be prioritized into a
order of flexibility [6]. Dobson proposes that exploitation power structure by ranking the variables into a hierarchy
of flexibility in the weaker (more flexible) constraints can of flexibility (capacity for exploitation).
be used as a tool to meet the absolute requirement of the 11) The power structure derives from the project
driver (least flexible) constraint in order for the project to objectives and higher purpose and may be influenced by
succeed. The driver constraint is derived from the raison environmental change.
d’être of the project and is the constraint that has to be 12) Capitalizing on the pliability of the two more
met otherwise the project fails. There can only be one flexible constraints can be used as a mechanism to achieve
project driver at any given time. The weak constraint has the essential demands of the primary triple constraint
the greatest flexibility, but is not necessarily the least variable (the driver).
important. The middle constraint normally has a small
amount of flexibility and can either be very close to the F. Consolidated triple constraint model
driver in importance to the project mission, or may
sometimes have flexibility more akin to the weak The integrated model was realized through conceptual
constraint. synthesis of the key derived triple constraint attributes
It is important to note that flexibility, and not discussed in the previous section. The matured model is
importance, serves as the ranking criterion. Importance is presented in Fig. 6. The consolidated model has been
the relative merit of the constraints considering the long- dubbed the TRIJECT model (an acronym created from the
term value of the project. Flexibility is the extent to which titles ‘TRIple constraint’ and ‘proJECT management’).
the project manager can manipulate the constraints in The project management triangle, which constitutes
order to successfully deliver the project [6]. the heart of the TRIJECT model, is supported by the two
It is presupposed that the effective management of the more flexible constraints (time and cost in this instance)
triple constraint power structure and its dynamics is and forms the foundation of the triangle. The primary
central to project success. Details pertaining to trade-off triple constraint variable (scope in this instance) aligns the
strategies and exploitation considerations are documented triangle with the project higher purpose. The triangle
in [7]. projection is dynamic and can pivot about its axis to
accommodate change within its power structure. The
E. Key attributes of the triple constraint triple constraint hierarchy may be influenced by the
project environment, which impacts the higher purpose
The following fundamental characteristics were and objectives of the project. The model embodies three
consolidated in support of the physiology of the dimensions, in which each facet of the triple constraint
consolidated triple constraint model [7]: may drive the project.
1994
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE IEEM
Project
Higher Purpose
A key part of the Smithsonian’s ability to get
congressional funding unlocked for the project involved
the national focus on the upcoming Bicentennial
Driver Constraint
celebrations. National attention would be focused on
Washington, D.C., and the National Mall during the
Scope festivities, and the President of the United States would be
Project on hand to cut the ribbon. The consequences of missing
Environment the Bicentennial would have been hugely humiliating for
the Smithsonian and for the NASM team. The time
Time Cost constraint has therefore been assigned in the lead position
Flexible Flexible
Constraint Constraint as the driver for this project. Before settling on the
primary triple constraint variable, the critical question of
why this project is being undertaken needs to be reviewed.
Project Objectives
The term ‘world-class’ may constitute a variety of
Fig. 6. TRIJECT model. potential meanings, each with different consequences for
time and cost. For example, how many air and spacecraft
The central presence of quality is signified by the should hang in the new building, or how complicated
outline shape of the TRIJECT model, which, using some should the audiovisual exhibits be. The distinction
imagination, resembles a capital letter ‘Q’. between the work of the NASM and the project of the
The rationale of the TRIJECT model is based on the NASM needs to be considered. The project ends, but the
achievement of the primary triple constraint variable work is ongoing. What must be done to meet the demands
through the exploitation of the two more flexible of opening day is only a prelude to the indefinite lifespan
constraints and alignment with the project higher purpose. of the open museum. It can therefore be argued that the
The continuous cycle implied by the model represents scope constraint, although probably the most important, is
the ongoing and interrelated nature of this process as also the most flexible (weak) constraint for this project.
change is introduced into the system. Monitoring and The USD 40 million federal appropriation is a definite
controlling hence manifest a requisite part of this cycle. number, but not an exact one. Major construction projects
The model also accounts for the ancillary issues such as often have a contingency reserve of up to 10% of the
‘the why’ of the project and change within the project budget for change orders and other problems. Considering
environment as well as quality and control. flexibility and following the process of elimination, cost
In practice the TRIJECT model is expected to overlap may thus be identified as the middle constraint for this
and interact dynamically with the project management project.
process groups. Details pertaining to the proposed
protocol and application of the consolidated triple B. Case investigation and system analysis
constraint model are documented in [7].
The triple constraint compromise to manage was
identified as the trade-off between the exploitation of the
IV. CASE STUDY ANALYSIS USD 40 million budget (the cost constraint), and the
requirements / features that constitute a world-class
Evaluation of the TRIJECT model was limited to the museum (the scope constraint). The success of this project
exploratory review of the theoretical model and protocol was driven by the deadline (the time constraint) to open
against a simplified case in order to facilitate a conceptual the museum on the nation’s Bicentennial celebration July
understanding of the integrated model in practice. The 4, 1976 in order to attain national focus (the higher
observed case was the building project of the Smithsonian purpose). With the project mission and triple constraint
Institution, National Air and Space Museum (NASM) [6], power structure defined, the TRIJECT model for the
[7]. There is no claim that this case is representative of the NASM project can be delineated as shown in Fig. 7.
general project management milieu. Exploitation of the project budget (C↑) alleviates the
pressure to rollback on the museum’s scope requirements,
A. Case paraphrases and system definition and supplements the effort to ensure that the deadline for
opening the museum is met (more money and resources
The NASM project mission, essentially, was to build can be spent to get the same or more work accomplished
a world-class aviation and space museum for a budget of within a limited period of time). The cost constraint
approximately USD 40 million and open it on July 4, includes both cash and non-cash resources. Exploitation of
1976. The project mission statement satisfies the triple the project scope (S↓), on the other hand, alleviates the
constraint, which is defined as follows: pressure to add additional cost and resources to the
1) Time constraint = July 4, 1976 museum budget, but also supplements the effort to ensure
2) Cost constraint = USD 40 million that the deadline for opening the museum is met.
3) Scope constraint = World-class museum. Exploiting flexibility in the scope constraint should
however not compromise quality, i.e. the museum’s
1995
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE IEEM
1996
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE IEEM
1997
View publication stats