Abstract
Social relationships powerfully influence human emotions. Understanding how relationships influence emotions enables people to make important social inferences, such as what will delight or upset someone and which people are allies or enemies. In this Perspective, we bring together research that has separately addressed reasoning about emotion and reasoning about affiliation. People expect others’ emotions to reflect their appraisals of a situation relative to what they value. People also expect others to value the welfare of friends, family and group members. This common connection to value can support joint reasoning across these two domains. An intuitive theory representing the connection between affiliation and emotion can enable people to use relationships to better predict others’ emotions, including empathy and counter-empathy, and to infer relationships from observed emotional responses. We also review evidence that human infants can make inferences about emotion and affiliation separately, and we propose future work to explore the development of joint reasoning across these domains.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$59.00 per year
only $4.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carey, S. The Origin of Concepts (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).
Gerstenberg, T. & Tenenbaum, J. B. in The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning (ed. Waldmann, M. R.) 515–547 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).
Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. M. Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind Lang. 7, 145–171 (1992).
Wellman, H. M., Phillips, A. T. & Rodriguez, T. Young children’s understanding of perception, desire, and emotion. Child Dev. 71, 895–912 (2000).
Ullman, T. D. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Bayesian models of conceptual development: learning as building models of the world. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 2, 533–558 (2020).
Dennett, D. C. The Intentional Stance (MIT Press, 1987).
Saxe, R. & Houlihan, S. D. Formalizing emotion concepts within a Bayesian model of theory of mind. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 17, 15–21 (2017).
Baker, C. L., Jara-Ettinger, J., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–10 (2017).
Smaldino, P. E. in Computational Social Psychology (eds Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J. & Nowak, A.) 311–331 (Routledge, 2017).
Guest, O. & Martin, A. E. How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 789–802 (2021).
Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Yuille, A. Probabilistic models of cognition: conceptual foundations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 287–291 (2006).
Moors, A. On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emot. Rev. 5, 132–140 (2013).
Scherer, K. R. in Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (eds Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. J.) 637–663 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999).
Oatley, K. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. Cognitive approaches to emotions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 134–140 (2014).
Siemer, M., Mauss, I. & Gross, J. J. Same situation–different emotions: how appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion 7, 592–600 (2007).
Wellman, H. M. & Woolley, J. D. From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: the early development of everyday psychology. Cognition 35, 245–275 (1990).
Wu, Y., Muentener, P. & Schulz, L. E. One- to four-year-olds connect diverse positive emotional vocalizations to their probable causes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11896–11901 (2017).
Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M. & Barrett, L. F. Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: evidence from a remote culture. Emotion 14, 251–262 (2014).
Mesquita, B. & Frijda, N. H. Cultural variations in emotions: a review. Psychol. Bull. 112, 179–204 (1992).
Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N. & Gross, J. J. The experience of emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 373–403 (2007).
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M., De Boeck, P. & Ceulemans, E. Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cogn. Emot. 21, 689–713 (2007).
van Dijk, W. W. Not having what you want versus having what you do not want: the impact of type of negative outcome on the experience of disappointment and related emotions. Cogn. Emot. 13, 129–148 (1999).
Smith, C. A. & Kirby, L. D. Putting appraisal in context: toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion. Cogn. Emot. 23, 1352–1372 (2009).
Wellman, H. M. & Banerjee, M. Mind and emotion: children’s understanding of the emotional consequences of beliefs and desires. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 9, 191–214 (1991).
Wu, Y., Haque, J. A. & Schulz, L. E. in Proc. 40th Annu. Meeting Cognitive Science Society 1193–1198 https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/cogsci18_proceedings.pdf (2018).
Barrett, L. F. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 1–23 (2017).
Peelen, M. V., Atkinson, A. P. & Vuilleumier, P. Supramodal representations of perceived emotions in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 30, 10127–10134 (2010).
Skerry, A. E. & Saxe, R. Neural representations of emotion are organized around abstract event features. Curr. Biol. 25, 1945–1954 (2015).
Skerry, A. E. & Saxe, R. A common neural code for perceived and inferred emotion. J. Neurosci. 34, 15997–16008 (2014).
Ong, D. C., Zaki, J. & Goodman, N. D. Computational models of emotion inference in theory of mind: a review and roadmap. Top. Cogn. Sci. 11, 338–357 (2019).
Anzellotti, S., Houlihan, S. D., Liburd, S. Jr & Saxe, R. Leveraging facial expressions and contextual information to investigate opaque representations of emotions. Emotion 21, 96–107 (2021).
Wu, Y., Baker, C. L., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Schulz, L. E. Rational inference of beliefs and desires from emotional expressions. Cogn. Sci. 42, 850–884 (2018).
Ong, D. C., Zaki, J. & Goodman, N. D. Affective cognition: exploring lay theories of emotion. Cognition 143, 141–162 (2015).
Houlihan, S. D., Ong, D., Cusimano, M. & Saxe, R. in Proc. Annu. Meeting Cognitive Science Society 854–861 https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/CogSci2022Proceedings-1.pdf (2022).
Teo, D. W. H., Ang, Z. Y. & Ong, D. in Proc. Annu. Meeting Cognitive Science Society 2200–2206 https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/CogSci2022Proceedings-1.pdf (2022).
Jara-Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L. E. & Tenenbaum, J. B. The naïve utility calculus: computational principles underlying commonsense psychology. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 589–604 (2016).
Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naϊve theory of rational action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 287–292 (2003).
Luo, Y. & Baillargeon, R. Do 12.5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions? Cognition 105, 489–512 (2007).
Ullman, T. D. et al. in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Bengio, Y., Schuurmans, D., Lafferty, J., Williams, C. & Culotta, A.) 1874–1882 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2009).
Hamlin, J. K., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J., Goodman, N. & Baker, C. The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model. Dev. Sci. 16, 209–226 (2013).
Powell, L. J. Adopted utility calculus: origins of a concept of social affiliation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1215–1233 (2022).
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. Evolutionary psychology: new perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 201–229 (2013).
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. in Handbook of Emotions 3rd edn (eds Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M. & Barrett, L. F.) 114–137 (Guilford Press, 2008).
Delton, A. W. A Psychological Calculus for Welfare Tradeoffs (Univ. California, 2010).
Howard, R. M., Spokes, A. C., Mehr, S. & Krasnow, M. Welfare tradeoff psychology is present in children and adults. Preprint in PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6daeg (2018).
Lemerise, E. A., Thorn, A. & Maulden Costello, J. Affective ties and social information processing. Soc. Dev. 26, 475–488 (2017).
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V. E., Kikas, E. & Salmivalli, C. Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: does relationship type matter? Dev. Psychol. 43, 889–900 (2007).
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V. E. & Salmivalli, C. Affect-congruent social-cognitive evaluations and behaviors. Child Dev. 79, 170–185 (2008).
Afshordi, N. & Liberman, Z. Keeping friends in mind: development of friendship concepts in early childhood. Soc. Dev. 30, 331–342 (2021).
Qi, W. & Vul, E. The evolution of theory of mind on welfare tradeoff ratios. Evol. Hum. Behav. 43, 381–393 (2022).
Quillien, T. Rational information search in welfare tradeoff cognition. Cognition 231, 105317 (2023).
Rhodes, M. Naïve theories of social groups. Child Dev. 83, 1900–1916 (2012).
DeScioli, P. & Kurzban, R. The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PLoS ONE 4, e5802 (2009).
Pietraszewski, D. Towards a computational theory of social groups: a finite set of cognitive primitives for representing any and all social groups in the context of conflict. Behav. Brain Sci. 45, e97 (2021).
Earp, B. D., McLoughlin, K. L., Monrad, J. T., Clark, M. S. & Crockett, M. J. How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments. Nat. Commun. 12, 5776 (2021).
Jara-Ettinger, J., Schulz, L. E. & Tenenbaum, J. B. The naïve utility calculus as a unified, quantitative framework for action understanding. Cogn. Psychol. 123, 101334 (2020).
Charness, G. & Rabin, M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q. J. Econ. 117, 817–869 (2002).
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Why social preferences matter – the impact of non‐selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Econ. J. 112, C1–C33 (2002).
Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Learning a commonsense moral theory. Cognition 167, 107–123 (2017).
Heider, F. in The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations 79–124 (Wiley, 1958).
Wondra, J. D. & Ellsworth, P. C. An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences. Psychol. Rev. 122, 411–428 (2015).
Manstead, A. S. R. & Fischer, A. H. in Appraisal Processes in Emotion (eds Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A. & Johnstone, T.) 221–232 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001).
Martin, A., Lin, K. & Olson, K. R. What you want versus what’s good for you: paternalistic motivation in children’s helping behavior. Child Dev. 87, 1739–1746 (2016).
Jacobsson, F., Johannesson, M. & Borgquist, L. Is altruism paternalistic? Econ. J. 117, 761–781 (2007).
Sibicky, M. E., Schroeder, D. A. & Dovidio, J. F. Empathy and helping: considering the consequences of intervention. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16, 435–453 (1995).
Barrett, L. F. Variety is the spice of life: a psychological construction approach to understanding variability in emotion. Cogn. Emot. 23, 1284–1306 (2009).
Jackson, J. C. et al. Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science 366, 1517–1522 (2019).
Zhao, Z., Thornton, M. A. & Tamir, D. I. Accurate emotion prediction in dyads and groups and its potential social benefits. Emotion 22, 1030–1043 (2022).
Smith, R. H. & van Dijk, W. W. Schadenfreude and gluckschmerz. Emot. Rev. 10, 293–304 (2018).
Batson, C. D. Altruism in Humans (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Zaki, J. Empathy: a motivated account. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1608–1647 (2014).
Peters, B. J., Reis, H. T. & Gable, S. L. Making the good even better: a review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 12, e12407 (2018).
Reis, H. T., Lemay, E. P. Jr & Finkenauer, C. Toward understanding understanding: the importance of feeling understood in relationships. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 11, e12308 (2017).
Hareli, S. & Hess, U. What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: an appraisal perspective on person perception. Cogn. Emot. 24, 128–140 (2010).
Hareli, S., Shomrat, N. & Hess, U. Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion 9, 378–384 (2009).
Hess, U., Adams, R. & Kleck, R. Who may frown and who should smile? Dominance, affiliation, and the display of happiness and anger. Cogn. Emot. 19, 515–536 (2005).
Knutson, B. Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. J. Nonverbal Behav. 20, 165–182 (1996).
Weiner, B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol. Rev. 92, 548–573 (1985).
Trommsdorff, G., Friedlmeier, W. & Mayer, B. Sympathy, distress, and prosocial behavior of preschool children in four cultures. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 31, 284–293 (2007).
Chung, W., Chan, S. & Cassels, T. G. The role of culture in affective empathy: cultural and bicultural differences. J. Cogn. Cult. 10, 309–326 (2010).
Wang, Y. A. & Todd, A. R. Evaluations of empathizers depend on the target of empathy. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 121, 1005–1028 (2021).
Bryant, G. A. et al. Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4682–4687 (2016).
Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D. & Zaki, J. The emerging study of positive empathy. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 9, 57–68 (2015).
Godwin, L. J., Groves, M. M. & Horm-Wingerd, D. M. “Don’t leave me”: separation distress in infants, toddlers, and parents. Early Child. Educ. J. 20, 13–17 (1993).
Laird, J. D. & Strout, S. in Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (eds Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B.) 54–64 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 33 (1995).
Russell, D., Cutrona, C. E., Rose, J. & Yurko, K. Social and emotional loneliness: an examination of Weiss’s typology of loneliness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 46, 1313–1321 (1984).
MCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychol. Bull. 127, 49–266 (2001).
Sznycer, D. & Lukaszewski, A. W. The emotion-valuation constellation: multiple emotions are governed by a common grammar of social valuation. Evol. Hum. Behav. 40, 395–404 (2019).
Gopnik, A. The Gardener and the Carpenter: What the New Science of Child Development Tells Us About the Relationship Between Parents and Children (Macmillan, 2016).
Clark, M. S. & Reis, H. T. Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 39, 609–672 (1988).
Liberman, Z., Kinzler, K. D. & Woodward, A. L. Friends or foes: infants use shared evaluations to infer others’ social relationships. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 966–971 (2014).
Lundqvist, L.-O. & Dimberg, U. Facial expressions are contagious. J. Psychophysiol. 9, 203–211 (1995).
Fischer, A. H. & Manstead, A. S. R. In Handbook of Emotions 3rd edn (eds Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M. & Barrett, L. F.) 456–468 (Guilford Press, 2008).
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Manstead, A. S. R. The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 87, 510–528 (2004).
van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Manstead, A. S. R. The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 86, 57–76 (2004).
Reschke, P. J., Walle, E. A., Flom, R. & Guenther, D. Twelve-month-old infants’ sensitivity to others’ emotions following positive and negative events. Infancy 22, 874–881 (2017).
Skerry, A. E. & Spelke, E. S. Preverbal infants identify emotional reactions that are incongruent with goal outcomes. Cognition 130, 204–216 (2014).
Phillips, A. T., Wellman, H. M. & Spelke, E. S. Infants’ ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition 85, 53–78 (2002).
Wu, Y. & Schulz, L. E. Inferring beliefs and desires from emotional reactions to anticipated and observed events. Child Dev. 89, 649–662 (2018).
Clément, F. & Dukes, D. Social appraisal and social referencing: two components of affective social learning. Emot. Rev. 9, 253–261 (2017).
Wu, Y., Schulz, L. E., Frank, M. C. & Gweon, H. Emotion as information in early social learning. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 30, 468–475 (2021).
Boccia, M. & Campos, J. J. Maternal emotional signals, social referencing, and infants’ reactions to strangers. New Dir. Child Dev. 44, 25–49 (1989).
Walden, T. A. & Ogan, T. A. The development of social referencing. Child Dev. 59, 1230–1240 (1988).
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J. & Klinnert, M. D. Maternal emotional signaling: its effect on the visual cliff behavior of I-year-olds. Dev. Psychol. 21, 195–200 (1985).
Smith-Flores, A. S. & Feigenson, L. “Yay! Yuck!” toddlers use others’ emotional responses to reason about hidden objects. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 221, 105464 (2022).
Smith-Flores, A. S., Perez, J., Zhang, M. H. & Feigenson, L. Online measures of looking and learning in infancy. Infancy 27, 4–24 (2022).
Moll, H., Koring, C., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. Infants determine others’ focus of attention by pragmatics and exclusion. J. Cogn. Dev. 7, 411–430 (2006).
Asaba, M., Wu, Y., Carrillo, B. & Gweon, H. in Proc. Annu. Meeting Cognitive Science Society 2650–2656 (2020).
Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. Preschoolers and toddlers use ownership to predict basic emotions. Emotion 15, 104–108 (2015).
Jin, K., Houston, J. L., Baillargeon, R., Groh, A. M. & Roisman, G. I. Young infants expect an unfamiliar adult to comfort a crying baby: evidence from a standard violation-of-expectation task and a novel infant-triggered-video task. Cogn. Psychol. 102, 1–20 (2018).
Jin, K. & Baillargeon, R. Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 8199–8204 (2017).
Johnson, S. C., Dweck, C. S. & Chen, F. S. Evidence for infants’ internal working models of attachment. Psychol. Sci. 18, 501–502 (2007).
Pun, A., Birch, S. A. J. & Baron, A. S. The power of allies: Infants’ expectations of social obligations during intergroup conflict. Cognition 211, 104630 (2021).
Olson, K. R. & Spelke, E. S. Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition 108, 222–231 (2008).
DeJesus, J. M., Rhodes, M. & Kinzler, K. D. Evaluations versus expectations: children’s divergent beliefs about resource distribution. Cogn. Sci. 38, 178–193 (2014).
Liberman, Z. & Shaw, A. Children use partial resource sharing as a cue to friendship. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 159, 96–109 (2017).
Liberman, Z. & Shaw, A. Secret to friendship: children make inferences about friendship based on secret sharing. Dev. Psychol. 54, 2139–2151 (2018).
Fawcett, C. & Liszkowski, U. Infants anticipate others’ social preferences. Infant Child Dev. 21, 239–249 (2012).
Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychol. Sci. 14, 402–408 (2003).
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450, 557–559 (2007).
Thomas, A. J., Saxe, R. & Spelke, E. S. Infants infer potential social partners by observing the interactions of their parent with unknown others. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121390119 (2022).
Powell, L. J. & Spelke, E. S. Human infants’ understanding of social imitation: Inferences of affiliation from third party observations. Cognition 170, 31–48 (2018).
Liberman, Z., Kinzler, K. D. & Woodward, A. L. Origins of homophily: Infants expect people with shared preferences to affiliate. Cognition 212, 104695 (2021).
Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L. & Kinzler, K. D. Preverbal infants infer third-party social relationships based on language. Cogn. Sci. 41, 622–634 (2017).
Denham, S. A. et al. Preschool emotional competence: pathway to social competence? Child Dev. 74, 238–256 (2003).
Hare, M. & Parent, J. Child emotional competence: a unified framework and assessment review of emotion reasoning, emotion stability, emotion regulation, and empathy. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/582wg (2022).
Shutts, K. & Kalish, C. W. in Advances in Child Development and Behavior vol. 61 (ed. Lockman, J. J.) 335–374 (JAI, 2021).
Spelke, E. S. & Kinzler, K. D. Core knowledge. Developmental Sci. 10, 89–96 (2007).
Smith, C. A. & Ellsworth, P. C. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48, 813–838 (1985).
Sznycer, D., Sell, A. & Lieberman, D. Forms and functions of the social emotions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 30, 292–299 (2021).
Repacholi, B. M. & Gopnik, A. Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Dev. Psychol. 33, 12–21 (1997).
Chiarella, S. S. & Poulin-Dubois, D. Cry babies and pollyannas: infants can detect unjustified emotional reactions. Infancy 18, E81–E96 (2013).
Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N. & Tomasello, M. Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behav. Dev. 21, 315–330 (1998).
Cameron, C. D., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E. & Anderson, S. Motivated empathic choices. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 66, 191–279 (2022).
Davis, M. H. in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (eds Stets, J. E. & Turner, J. H.) 443–466 (Springer, 2006).
Decety, J. & Jackson, P. L. A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15, 54–58 (2006).
Hudson, S. T. J., Cikara, M. & Sidanius, J. Preference for hierarchy is associated with reduced empathy and increased counter-empathy towards others, especially out-group targets. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 85, 103871 (2019).
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Rapson, R. L. Emotional Contagion. vii, 240 (Cambridge Univ. Press; Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1994).
Preston, S. D. & de Waal, F. B. M. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–20 (2002).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank D. Barner, C. Oveis, B. Pepe, M. Pesowski and L. Smith for their helpful comments on previous versions of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Desmond Ong and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith-Flores, A.S., Powell, L.J. Joint reasoning about social affiliation and emotion. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 374–383 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00181-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00181-0