Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structure, folding and flexibility of co-transcriptional RNA origami

Nature Nanotechnology volume 18, pages 808–817 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

RNA origami is a method for designing RNA nanostructures that can self-assemble through co-transcriptional folding with applications in nanomedicine and synthetic biology. However, to advance the method further, an improved understanding of RNA structural properties and folding principles is required. Here we use cryogenic electron microscopy to study RNA origami sheets and bundles at sub-nanometre resolution revealing structural parameters of kissing-loop and crossover motifs, which are used to improve designs. In RNA bundle designs, we discover a kinetic folding trap that forms during folding and is only released after 10 h. Exploration of the conformational landscape of several RNA designs reveal the flexibility of helices and structural motifs. Finally, sheets and bundles are combined to construct a multidomain satellite shape, which is characterized by individual-particle cryo-electron tomography to reveal the domain flexibility. Together, the study provides a structural basis for future improvements to the design cycle of genetically encoded RNA nanodevices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Principles for RNA origami design and folding.
Fig. 2: Cryo-EM characterization of 5HT structures.
Fig. 3: Tertiary structure of KL and crossover motifs.
Fig. 4: Cryo-EM and SAXS characterization of 6HB structures.
Fig. 5: NS-TEM and cryo-ET characterization of 16HS structure.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The sequences of the designs used and the images of the blueprints are available in the Supplementary Information. Text versions of the blueprints are available from the corresponding author upon request. The volumes from the final refinements of our cryo-EM single-particle analysis datasets have been deposited to the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes EMD-13633 (5HT-A), EMD-13926 (5HT-A-twist-corrected), EMD-13636 (5HT-B), EMD-13592 (5HT-B-3X), EMD-13627 (6HB), EMD-13628 (6HBC-young-1), EMD-13630 (6HBC-PBS-mature-1), EMD-13626 (6HBC-young-2) and EMD-13625 (6HBC-mature-2). The atomic models have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the PDB codes 7PTQ (5HT-A), 7QDU (5HT-A-twist-corrected), 7PTS (5HT-B), 7PTK (6HBC-young-1) and 7PTL (6HBC-mature-1). The 16HS volumes reconstructed from the cryo-ET data have been deposited to the EMDB under accession codes EMD-28669 to EMD-28684.

References

  1. Jasinski, D., Haque, F., Binzel, D. W. & Guo, P. Advancement of the emerging field of RNA nanotechnology. ACS Nano 11, 1142–1164 (2017).

  2. Ohno, H., Akamine, S. & Saito, H. RNA nanostructures and scaffolds for biotechnology applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 58, 53–61 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J. & Franco, E. RNA nanotechnology in synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 63, 135–141 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Geary, C., Rothemund, P. W. & Andersen, E. S. A single-stranded architecture for cotranscriptional folding of RNA nanostructures. Science 345, 799–804 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Høiberg, H. C., Sparvath, S. M., Andersen, V. L., Kjems, J. & Andersen, E. S. An RNA origami octahedron with intrinsic siRNAs for potent gene knockdown. Biotechnol. J. 14, 1700634 (2018).

  6. Krissanaprasit, A. et al. Genetically encoded, functional single-strand RNA origami: anticoagulant. Adv. Mater. 31, e1808262 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, M. et al. In vivo production of RNA nanostructures via programmed folding of single-stranded RNAs. Nat. Commun. 9, 2196 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jepsen, M. D. E. et al. Development of a genetically encodable FRET system using fluorescent RNA aptamers. Nat. Commun. 9, 18 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, D. et al. Branched kissing loops for the construction of diverse RNA homooligomeric nanostructures. Nat. Chem. 12, 249–259 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, M. T. A., Pothoulakis, G. & Andersen, E. S. Synthetic translational regulation by protein-binding RNA origami scaffolds. ACS Synth. Biol. 11, 1710–1718 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pothoulakis, G., Nguyen, M. T. A. & Andersen, E. S. Utilizing RNA origami scaffolds in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for dCas9-mediated transcriptional control. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 7176–7187 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geary, C., Grossi, G., McRae, E. K. S., Rothemund, P. W. K. & Andersen, E. S. RNA origami design tools enable cotranscriptional folding of kilobase-sized nanoscaffolds. Nat. Chem. 13, 549–558 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Severcan, I. et al. A polyhedron made of tRNAs. Nat. Chem. 2, 772–772 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Afonin, K. A. et al. In vitro assembly of cubic RNA-based scaffolds designed in silico. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 676–682 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ko, S. H. et al. Synergistic self-assembly of RNA and DNA molecules. Nat. Chem. 2, 1050–1055 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hao, C. et al. Construction of RNA nanocages by re-engineering the packaging RNA of Phi29 bacteriophage. Nat. Commun. 5, 3890 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Afonin, K. A. et al. Multifunctional RNA nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 14, 5662–5671 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, J., Liu, Z., Jiang, W., Wang, G. & Mao, C. De novo design of an RNA tile that self-assembles into a homo-octameric nanoprism. Nat. Commun. 6, 5724 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geary, C., Chworos, A., Verzemnieks, E., Voss, N. R. & Jaeger, L. Composing RNA nanostructures from a syntax of RNA structural modules. Nano Lett. 17, 7095–7101 (2017).

  20. Zakrevsky, P. et al. Truncated tetrahedral RNA nanostructures exhibit enhanced features for delivery of RNAi substrates. Nanoscale 12, 2555–2568 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, C. et al. 3D RNA nanocage for encapsulation and shielding of hydrophobic biomolecules to improve the in vivo biodistribution. Nano Res. 13, 3241–3247 (2020).

  22. Kappel, K. et al. De novo computational RNA modeling into cryo-EM maps of large ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Methods 15, 947–954 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, K. et al. Cryo-EM structure of a 40 kDa SAM-IV riboswitch RNA at 3.7 Å resolution. Nat. Commun. 10, 5511 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kappel, K. et al. Accelerated cryo-EM-guided determination of three-dimensional RNA-only structures. Nat. Methods 17, 699–707 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, K. et al. Cryo-EM and antisense targeting of the 28-kDa frameshift stimulation element from the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 747–754 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Su, Z. et al. Cryo-EM structures of full-length Tetrahymena ribozyme at 3.1 Å resolution. Nature 596, 603–607 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, D., Thelot, F. A., Piccirilli, J. A., Liao, M. & Yin, P. Sub-3-Å cryo-EM structure of RNA enabled by engineered homomeric self-assembly. Nat. Methods 19, 576–585 (2022).

  28. Bonilla, S. L., Vicens, Q. & Kieft, J. S. Cryo-EM reveals an entangled kinetic trap in the folding of a catalytic RNA. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq4144 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, S. et al. Topological crossing in the misfolded Tetrahymena ribozyme resolved by cryo-EM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2209146119 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen, E. S. et al. Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid. Nature 459, 73–76 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bai, X. C., Martin, T. G., Scheres, S. H. & Dietz, H. Cryo-EM structure of a 3D DNA-origami object. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20012–20017 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin, T. G. et al. Design of a molecular support for cryo-EM structure determination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7456–E7463 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Laing, C. & Schlick, T. Analysis of four-way junctions in RNA structures. J. Mol. Biol. 390, 547–559 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ennifar, E. et al. The crystal structure of the dimerization initiation site of genomic HIV-1 RNA reveals an extended duplex with two adenine bulges. Structure 7, 1439–1449 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ennifar, E., Walter, P., Ehresmann, B., Ehresmann, C. & Dumas, P. Crystal structures of coaxially stacked kissing complexes of the HIV-1 RNA dimerization initiation site. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 1064–1064 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ennifar, E. & Dumas, P. Polymorphism of bulged-out residues in HIV-1 RNA DIS kissing complex and structure comparison with solution studies. J. Mol. Biol. 356, 771–782 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kieken, F., Paquet, F., Brule, F., Paoletti, J. & Lancelot, G. A new NMR solution structure of the SL1 HIV-1Lai loop-loop dimer. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 343–352 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Baba, S. et al. Solution RNA structures of the HIV-1 dimerization initiation site in the kissing-loop and extended-duplex dimers. J. Biochem. 138, 583–592 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Takahashi, K. et al. NMR analysis of intra- and inter-molecular stems in the dimerization initiation site of the HIV-1 genome. J. Biochem. 127, 681–686 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, D., Shao, Y., Piccirilli, J. A. & Weizmann, Y. Structures of artificially designed discrete RNA nanoarchitectures at near-atomic resolution. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf4459 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Richardson, J. S. et al. RNA backbone: consensus all-angle conformers and modular string nomenclature (an RNA Ontology Consortium contribution). RNA 14, 465–481 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rupert, P. B., Massey, A. P., Sigurdsson, S. T. & Ferre-D’Amare, A. R. Transition state stabilization by a catalytic RNA. Science 298, 1421–1424 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Isambert, H. The jerky and knotty dynamics of RNA. Methods 49, 189–196 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Clatterbuck Soper, S. F., Dator, R. P., Limbach, P. A. & Woodson, S. A. In vivo X-ray footprinting of pre-30S ribosomes reveals chaperone-dependent remodeling of late assembly intermediates. Mol. Cell 52, 506–516 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhai, X. et al. LoTToR: an algorithm for missing-wedge correction of the low-tilt tomographic 3D reconstruction of a single-molecule structure. Sci. Rep. 10, 10489 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Benson, E. et al. DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale. Nature 523, 441–444 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Silvester, E. et al. DNA origami signposts for identifying proteins on cell membranes by electron cryotomography. Cell 184, 1110–1121.e16 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lei, D. et al. Three-dimensional structural dynamics of DNA origami Bennett linkages using individual-particle electron tomography. Nat. Commun. 9, 592 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, S. T. et al. Designed and biologically active protein lattices. Nat. Commun. 12, 3702 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Watters, K. E., Strobel, E. J., Yu, A. M., Lis, J. T. & Lucks, J. B. Cotranscriptional folding of a riboswitch at nucleotide resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 1124–1131 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu, D., Wang, M., Deng, Z., Walulu, R. & Mao, C. Tensegrity: construction of rigid DNA triangles with flexible four-arm DNA junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 2324–2325 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou, H. & Zhang, S. Recent development of fluorescent light-up RNA aptamers. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 52, 1644–1661 (2021).

  55. Shibata, T. et al. Protein-driven RNA nanostructured devices that function in vitro and control mammalian cell fate. Nat. Commun. 8, 540 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Liu, H. et al. Kinetics of RNA and RNA:DNA hybrid strand displacement. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 3066–3073 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Guo, S. et al. Tuning the size, shape and structure of RNA nanoparticles for favorable cancer targeting and immunostimulation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 12, e1582 (2020).

  58. Chandler, M., Panigaj, M., Rolband, L. A. & Afonin, K. A. Challenges to optimizing RNA nanostructures for large-scale production and controlled therapeutic properties. Nanomedicine 15, 1331–1340 (2020).

  59. Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zadeh, J. N. et al. NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 170–173 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3D variability analysis: resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107702 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Cryst. D 74, 519–530 (2018).

  68. Rodrigues, J., Teixeira, J. M. C., Trellet, M. & Bonvin, A. pdb-tools: a Swiss army knife for molecular structures. F1000Res. 7, 1961 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Cryst. D 75, 861–877 (2019).

  70. Terwilliger, T. C. et al. Model morphing and sequence assignment after molecular replacement. Acta Cryst. D 69, 2244–2250 (2013).

  71. Afonine, P. V. et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Cryst. D 74, 814–840 (2018).

  72. Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Richardson, J. S., Williams, C. J., Videau, L. L., Chen, V. B. & Richardson, D. C. Assessment of detailed conformations suggests strategies for improving cryoEM models: helix at lower resolution, ensembles, pre-refinement fixups, and validation at multi-residue length scale. J. Struct. Biol. 204, 301–312 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Lavery, R., Moakher, M., Maddocks, J. H., Petkeviciute, D. & Zakrzewska, K. Conformational analysis of nucleic acids revisited: Curves+. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5917–5929 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Blanchet, C., Pasi, M., Zakrzewska, K. & Lavery, R. CURVES+ web server for analyzing and visualizing the helical, backbone and groove parameters of nucleic acid structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W68–W73 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Lyngso, J. & Pedersen, J. S. A high-flux automated laboratory small-angle X-ray scattering instrument optimized for solution scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 54, 295–305 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Li, Y., Beck, R., Huang, T., Choi, M. C. & Divinagracia, M. Scatterless hybrid metal–single-crystal slit for small-angle X-ray scattering and high-resolution X-ray diffraction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 1134–1139 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Oliveira, C. L. P., Vorup-Jensen, T., Andersen, C. B. F., Andersen, G. R. & Pedersen, J. S. in Applications of Synchrotron Light to Scattering and Diffraction in Materials and Life Sciences (eds Gomez, M.; Nogales, A.; Cruz Garcia-Gutierrez, M. & Ezquerra, T. A.) 231–244 (Springer, 2009).

  79. Steiner, E. M. et al. The structure of the N-terminal module of the cell wall hydrolase RipA and its role in regulating catalytic activity. Proteins 86, 912–923 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Carragher, B. et al. Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 132, 33–45 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Sun, M. et al. Practical considerations for using K3 cameras in CDS mode for high-resolution and high-throughput single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107745 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Fernandez, J. J., Li, S. & Crowther, R. A. CTF determination and correction in electron cryotomography. Ultramicroscopy 106, 587–596 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Weigert, M. et al. Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Methods 15, 1090–1097 (2018).

  88. Zhang, L. & Ren, G. IPET and FETR: experimental approach for studying molecular structure dynamics by cryo-electron tomography of a single-molecule structure. PLoS ONE 7, e30249 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Ludtke, S. J., Baldwin, P. R. & Chiu, W. EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. J. Struct. Biol. 128, 82–97 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We dedicate our work to the late Ned Seeman, who pioneered the research field of structural nucleic acid nanotechnology and greatly inspired our work and directly or indirectly influenced our careers. We acknowledge the EMBION Cryo-EM Facility at iNANO, Aarhus University, for time under application ID 0042. We thank P. Nissen and A. Briegel for their early support of the project and valuable discussion, S. Sparvath for early design and experiments with the 6HB and A. Briegel and H. C. Høiberg for early NS-TEM characterization of 6HBs. We thank R. Rosendahl and C. Bus for technical assistance. The work at iNANO was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark under the Research Project 1 grant (9040-00425B) to E.S.A., the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council post-doctoral fellowship (532417) to E.K.S.M., the Carlsberg Foundation Research Infrastructure grant (CF20-0635) to E.S.A., the European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator grant (683305) to E.S.A. and Novo Nordisk Foundation Ascending Investigator grant (NNF20OC0060694) and Interdisciplinary Synergy grant (NNF21OC0070452) to E.S.A. The work at the Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, was supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy (contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231) and the US National Institutes of Health (nos. R01HL115153, R01 GM104427, R01MH077303 and R01DK042667) to J.L. and G.R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Ewan K. S. McRae, Helena Østergaard Rasmussen, Andreas Bøggild, Michael T. A. Nguyen, Nestor Sampedro Vallina, Thomas Boesen, Jan Skov Pedersen, Cody Geary & Ebbe Sloth Andersen

  2. Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Helena Østergaard Rasmussen & Jan Skov Pedersen

  3. The Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Jianfang Liu & Gang Ren

  4. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Thomas Boesen & Ebbe Sloth Andersen

Authors
  1. Ewan K. S. McRae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helena Østergaard Rasmussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianfang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Bøggild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael T. A. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nestor Sampedro Vallina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Boesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jan Skov Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gang Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Cody Geary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ebbe Sloth Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, E.K.S.M., N.S.V., M.T.A.N., C.G. and E.S.A. Methodology, E.K.S.M., M.T.A.N., H.Ø.R., N.S.V., C.G. and J.L. Data curation, E.K.S.M., A.B., H.Ø.R. and J.L. Investigation, E.K.S.M., H.Ø.R., A.B., T.B. and E.S.A. Visualization, E.K.S.M., E.S.A. and J.L. Funding acquisition, E.K.S.M., J.S.P., G.R. and E.S.A. Project administration, J.S.P., G.R., C.G. and E.S.A. Supervision, J.S.P., C.G., G.R. and E.S.A. Writing (original draft), E.K.S.M. Writing (review and editing), E.K.S.M., H.Ø.R., J.L., M.T.A.N., N.S.V., A.B., T.B., J.S.P., G.R., C.G. and E.S.A.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebbe Sloth Andersen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Nanotechnology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Overview of RNA origami designs, cryo-EM reconstructions and atomic models used in the study.

a, Example cryo-EM reconstructions for sheets (top row) and bundles (bottom row). b, Table listing RNA origami designs by name, blueprint, number of nucleotides, EMD ID, Gold-Standard Fourier Shell Correlation (GSFSC) for the reconstructions, PDB ID and model resolution (see Supplementary Table 10 for further details).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Reconstruction and model measurements of 5HT.

a, 5HT-A reconstruction based on local refinement of the 3 central helices shown at contour levels 0.344, 0.267 and 0.136 from left to right and colour coded by local resolution. b, Curves+ analysis of the 5HT-A model with helical axis shown as black lines. c, Curves+ analysis with backbone shown as red lines with major and minor groove measurements shown as grey lines. d, Tabulated data from Curves+ analysis of the helical components from the 5HT-A model. *All helical regions exclude KLs. **Crossover values are only based on the three central helices. e, Structural comparison of 5HT-B and 5HT-B-V2. Overlay of 5HT-B reconstructions with different kissing-loop sequences (blue is 5HT-B and red is 5HT-B-V2).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Definition and measurements of angles θ, φ and τ.

a, Schematics showing the definition of crossover angle θ, curvature angle φ and twist angle τ. Diagrams use arrows for 3′ and dots for 5′ when seen from side and circle with a dot for 3′ and circle with a cross for 5′ when seen from end. Direction of angles shown with arrow. Red lines indicate seam base pairs. The seams (S) and helices (H) are numbered from 5′ to 3′. b,c,d, Measurements of θ, φ and τ angles for different RNA origami designs, where angles are identified by seams and helices involved.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Comparison of KL regions and position of adenines.

a, Two views of the instance of bulged-out adenines from our 6HBC-mature dataset. A notable protrusion is present where the adenines are modelled, and a clear lack of density is in the spot where density from base stacking adenines is observed in our highest resolution 5HT-A dataset b, and our lower resolution 5HT-B dataset, c. Adenines shown in red against coulomb potential map shown in cyan. d, A similar gap in density was observed in helix 3 of the 6HB no clasp reconstruction. Left image shows top view. Right image shows side view.

Extended Data Fig. 5 KL motif from X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM.

a, X-ray structure used for modelling RNA origami in silico and b, the model from our cryo-EM data. A line drawn between the phosphate of the first A in the KL motif and 3 nucleotides after the motif is parallel to the helical axis in the EM model, but tilted in the X-ray model. This, along with the P-P distance shows that the KL is compacted and underwound in the cryo-EM structure and can be approximated as 8 bp of A-form helix.

Extended Data Fig. 6 SAXS data and model fitting.

a, SAXS data showing observed scattering pre and post structural transformation of the 6HBC and the predicted scattering from the models prior to rigid-body minimization. b, Fit of the predicted scattering from rigid-body optimized 6HBC-Young and 6HBC-Mature models to the experimental scattering from early and late time points. Black line denotes q = 0.09 Å−1. c, Two views of an overlay of the two conformations (young and mature are turquoise and beige, respectively) of the 6HBC with the cross-strand adenine base stack shown in red.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Cryo-EM images of 16H-Satellite RNA and effect of electron dosage.

a, On a same area of the satellite sample, a series of un-tilted cryo-EM images were acquired under a same illumination condition, for example the electron dose of 50 e−Å−2 for each of six images. Thus, the images are corresponding to radiation damage after 50 e−Å−2, 100 e−Å−2, 150 e−Å−2, 200 e−Å−2, 250 e−Å−2 and 300 e−Å−2, respectively. After a dose above 100 e−Å−2, the radiation damage caused ‘bubbling’ phenomena on the supporting carbon area (left edge). However, the RNA particles in vitrious ice are not showing bubbling even at the dose of 300 e−Å−2. b, Zoomed-in images of three representative areas with particles. The radiation damage blurred the detailed structural features, but the low resolution shape of the particles remains.

Extended Data Fig. 8 IMOD 3D reconstruction from cryo-ET of 16H-satellite.

a, Central slice of the IMOD 3D reconstruction and b, zoomed-in areas that contains 16HS particles. c, The IMOD 3D reconstruction of a selected area shown in the Chimera software and colored based on the height along the normal direction to the plane, where particles are indicated by boxes and d, shows zoomed-in images of selected particles.

Extended Data Fig. 9 IPET 3D reconstruction and effects of masking and low-pass filtering.

IPET cryo-EM 3D reconstruction of two different particles imaged under the dose of 130 e−Å−2 (a) and dose of 68 e−Å−2 (b). Left panels show the central slice of the IPET cryo-EM 3D reconstruction of an individual particle without using the particle-shaped mask. Second left panel shows the central slice using the automatically generated particle-shaped soft mask. Middle panel shows the masked particle low-pass filtered to 60 Å. Second right panel show the final 3D density map. Right panel shows the final 3D density map superimposed with fitted model.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Cryo-ET 3D reconstruction of 16 individual particles of 16H-Satellite RNA.

a, Perpendicular views of the cryo-ET 3D reconstructions with the corresponding fitted models of 8 representative particles. The tilt series was imaged under the total electron dose of 130 e−Å−2. b, Another 8 cryo-ET reconstructions of individual particles that were imaged under the electron dose of 68 e−Å−2. c, Table listing FSC analyses of the final map resolution. Two resolutions were measured for ‘map vs. map’ analysis at FSC = 0.5 and FSC = 0.143 and one resolution was measured for ‘map vs. model’ analysis at FSC = 0.5.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Videos 1–4, Tables 1–12 and Figs. 1–31.

Supplementary Video 1

Cryo-EM reconstruction of 5HT-A RNA origami. First, a map from a local refinement using a mask covering the entire structure is shown, autogenerated by cryoSPARC. Colouring has been applied to the map through the motifs modelled into the map. Tetraloops are depicted in yellow, crossovers in blue and KLs in magenta. The map is further refined by local refinement using a mask covering only H2–H4 (shown in grey at the timestamp of 0:47–0:51). This results in better local resolution at the crossovers and central KL. The local resolutions are coloured on the map surface.

Supplementary Video 2

6HBC maturation necessitates the breaking of H6 KL. First, reconstructions of the young and mature 6HBC conformers with the surface near the A2:A2′ stack (coloured in red) are shown. The A2:A2′ stack of the young conformer faces inwards, but the A2:A2′ stack of the mature conformer faces outwards. The rotation of each half of H6 in opposite directions is required to transition between the two conformers; when visualized by interpolation, it becomes clear that the central KL must break for this to occur.

Supplementary Video 3

Local dynamics of 5HT-A RNA origami. Three principal modes of variability were solved using cryoSPARC’s 3D variability analysis algorithms. Each mode is displayed as a volume series comprising 20 different volumes reconstructed from particle sets classified along a given motion trajectory.

Supplementary Video 4

Local dynamics of 6HBC-young and 6HBC-mature conformers. Three principal modes of variability were solved from both 6HBC-young and 6HBC-mature datasets using cryoSPARC’s 3D variability analysis algorithms. Each mode is displayed as a volume series comprising 20 different volumes reconstructed from particle sets classified along a given motion trajectory.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McRae, E.K.S., Rasmussen, H.Ø., Liu, J. et al. Structure, folding and flexibility of co-transcriptional RNA origami. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 808–817 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01321-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01321-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing