Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Candidacolonium agrostis, a novel species associated with summer patch-like disease on Agrostis stolonifera in East China

More Information
  • Received Date: 30 May 2023
    Accepted Date: 31 August 2023
    Published Online: 08 October 2023
    Grass Research  3 Article number: 20 (2023)  |  Cite this article
  • Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) is one of the most preferred turfgrass species for putting greens on golf courses throughout China. In autumn 2020 and summer 2021, a summer patch-like disease was observed on creeping bentgrass putting greens at two golf courses in East China. Fungal isolates with similar morphology were consistently isolated from the dark root tissues. Four representative isolates from the two golf courses were identified through morphological, biological, and phylogenetic analyses. Bayesian methods and maximum likelihood were used to construct phylogenetic trees based on both multiple and single loci of partial sequences of the 18S nuc rDNA (SSU), ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 nuc rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and 28S nuc rDNA (LSU) regions, and of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB1), minichromosome maintenance complex 7 (MCM7), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1) genes, respectively. The isolates consistently formed a highly supported clade within the genus Candidacolonium, which was further supported by distinctive morphological characters. In pathogenicity tests, the fungus produced slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia, colonized roots of creeping bentgrass via ectotrophic, dark runner hyphae, and caused disease symptoms with root discoloration, root and shoot mass reduction, and yellow leaf spots. This pathogenic fungus is described as a new species, Candidacolonium agrostis sp. nov., and is most likely the cause of a summer patch-like disease on creeping bentgrass in East China.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Fig. S1 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from ITS DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
    Supplemental Fig. S2 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from rDNA (the combined ITS, LSU and SSU) DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
    Supplemental Fig. S3 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from MCM7 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
    Supplemental Fig. S4 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from RPB1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
    Supplemental Fig. S5 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from TEF1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
    Supplemental Fig. S6 A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived from the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, MCM7, RPB1, and TEF1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
    Supplemental Table S1 Species name, isolate IDs, and GenBank accession numbers for fungal isolates used for phylogenetic analyses in this study.
  • [1]

    Li Q, Li R, He F, Yang Z, Yu J. 2022. Growth and physiological effects of chitosan on heat tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Grass Research 2:6

    doi: 10.48130/GR-2022-0006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhou Y, Yin M, Liu F. 2022. First report of summer patch of creeping bentgrass caused by Magnaporthiopsis poae in southeastern China. Plant Disease 106:1527

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-21-1892-PDN

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Kaminski JE, Dernoeden PH, O'Neill NR, Momen B. 2002. Reactivation of bentgrass dead spot and growth, pseudothecia production, and ascospore germination of Ophiosphaerella agrostis. Plant Disease 86:1290−96

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.12.1290

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Shi Y, Zhang J, Li H, Li M, Huang B. 2018. Butanediol-enhanced heat tolerance in Agrostis stolonifera in association with alteration in stress-related gene expression and metabolic profiles. Environmental and Experimental Botany 153:209−17

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Landschoot PJ, Jackson N. 1989. Magnaporthe poae sp. nov., a hyphopodiate fungus with a Phialophora anamorph from grass roots in the United States. Mycological Research 93:59−62

    doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(89)80137-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hu J, Liu Q, Liu M, Zhang F, Xiao Y, et al. 2017. First report of summer patch of creeping bentgrass caused by Magnaporthe poae in China. Plant Disease 101:634

    doi: 10.1094/pdis-09-16-1385-pdn

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Kerns JP, Tredway LP. 2007. First report of pythium root dysfunction of creeping bentgrass caused by Pythium volutum in North Carolina. Plant Disease 91(5):632

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0632C

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Thomas SL, Bonello P, Lipps PE, Boehm MJ. 2006. Avenacin production in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) and its influence on the host range of Gaeumannomyces graminis. Plant Disease 90:33−38

    doi: 10.1094/PD-90-0033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Tredway LP. 2006. Genetic relationships among Magnaporthe poae isolates from turfgrass hosts and relative susceptibility of 'Penncross' and 'Penn A-4' creeping bentgrass. Plant Disease 90:1531−38

    doi: 10.1094/PD-90-1531

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Wetzel HC, Dernoeden PH, Millner PD. 1996. Identification of darkly pigmented fungi associated with turfgrass roots by mycelial characteristics and RAPD-PCR. Plant Disease 80:359−64

    doi: 10.1094/PD-80-0359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Vines PL, Hoffmann FG, Meyer F, Allen TW, Tomaso-Peterson M. 2021. Gaeumannomyces nanograminis, sp. nov., a hyphopodiate fungus identified from diseased roots of ultradwarf bermudagrass in the United States. Mycologia 113:938−48

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.2021.1911192

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Câmara MPS, O'neill N, van Berkum P, Dernoeden PH, Palm ME. 2000. Ophiosphaerella agrostis sp. nov. and its relationship to other species of Ophiosphaerella. Mycologica 92:317−25

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061162

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Luo J, Zhang N. 2013. Magnaporthiopsis, a new genus in Magnaporthaceae (Ascomycota). Mycologia 105:1019−29

    doi: 10.3852/12-359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Vines PL. 2015. Evaluation of ultradwarf bermudagrass cultural management practices and identification, characterization, and pathogenicity of ectotrophic root-infecting fungi associated with summer decline of ultradwarf bermudagrass putting greens. Master of Science Thesis. Mississippi State University, Mississippi. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/2079

    [15]

    Stephens CM, Gannon TW, Cubeta MA, Sit TL, Kerns JP. 2022. Characterization and aggressiveness of take-all root rot pathogens isolated from symptomatic bermudagrass putting greens. Pytopathology 112:811−19

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-21-0215-R

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wong PTW, Dong C, Stirling AM, Dickinson ML. 2012. Two new Magnaporthe species pathogenic to warm-season turfgrasses in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 41:321−29

    doi: 10.1007/s13313-012-0118-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wong PTW, Dong C, Martin PM, Sharp PJ. 2015. Fairway patch - a serious emerging disease of couch (syn. bermudagrass) [Cynodon dactylon] and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) turf in Australia caused by Phialocephala bamuru P. T. W. Wong & C. Dong sp. nov. Australasian Plant Pathology 44:545−55

    doi: 10.1007/s13313-015-0369-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hernández-Restrepo M, Groenewald JZ, Elliott ML, Canning G, McMillan VE, et al. 2016. Take-all or nothing. Studies in Mycology 83:19−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2016.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wong PTW, Tan YP, Weese TL, Shivas RG. 2022. Magnaporthiopsis species associated with patch diseases of turfgrasses in Australia. Mycosphere 13:602−11

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhang N, Zhao S, Shen Q. 2011. A six-gene phylogeny reveals the evolution of mode of infection in the rice blast fungus and allied species. Mycologia 103:1267−76

    doi: 10.3852/11-022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hu J, Zhou Y, Geng J, Dai Y, Ren H, et al. 2019. A new dollar spot disease of turfgrass caused by Clarireedia paspali. Mycological Progress 18:1423−35

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-019-01526-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Hulvey J, Popko JT Jr, Sang H, Berg A, Jung G. 2012. Overexpression of ShCYP51B and ShatrD in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates exhibiting practical field resistance to a demethylation inhibitor fungicide. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78:6674−82

    doi: 10.1128/AEM.00417-12

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, et al. 2020. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20:348−55

    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13096

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:772−80

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315−19

    doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

    [27]

    Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14:587−89

    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61:539−42

    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32:268−74

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:1188−95

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59:307−21

    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 49:293−96

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Rayner RW. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. 34 pp.

    [34]

    Bruen TC, Philippe H, Bryant D. 2006. A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172:2665−81

    doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.048975

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:254−67

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Dress AWM, Huson DH. 2004. Constructing splits graphs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 1:109−15

    doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2004.27

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Cunningham CW. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14:733−40

    doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025813

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Freeman J, Ward E. 2004. Gaeumannomyces graminis, the take-all fungus and its relatives. Molecular Plant Pathology 5:235−52

    doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00226.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Hornby D, Slope DB, Gutteridge RJ, Sivanesan A. 1977. Gaeumannomyces cylindrosporus, a new ascomycete from cereal roots. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 69:21−25

    doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(77)80110-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Geng J, Zhou Y, Dong Y, Lamour K, Yang Z, et al. 2023. Candidacolonium agrostis, a novel species associated with summer patch-like disease on Agrostis stolonifera in East China. Grass Research 3:20 doi: 10.48130/GR-2023-0020
    Geng J, Zhou Y, Dong Y, Lamour K, Yang Z, et al. 2023. Candidacolonium agrostis, a novel species associated with summer patch-like disease on Agrostis stolonifera in East China. Grass Research 3:20 doi: 10.48130/GR-2023-0020

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(1600) PDF downloads(234)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Candidacolonium agrostis, a novel species associated with summer patch-like disease on Agrostis stolonifera in East China

Grass Research  3 Article number: 20  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) is one of the most preferred turfgrass species for putting greens on golf courses throughout China. In autumn 2020 and summer 2021, a summer patch-like disease was observed on creeping bentgrass putting greens at two golf courses in East China. Fungal isolates with similar morphology were consistently isolated from the dark root tissues. Four representative isolates from the two golf courses were identified through morphological, biological, and phylogenetic analyses. Bayesian methods and maximum likelihood were used to construct phylogenetic trees based on both multiple and single loci of partial sequences of the 18S nuc rDNA (SSU), ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 nuc rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and 28S nuc rDNA (LSU) regions, and of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB1), minichromosome maintenance complex 7 (MCM7), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1) genes, respectively. The isolates consistently formed a highly supported clade within the genus Candidacolonium, which was further supported by distinctive morphological characters. In pathogenicity tests, the fungus produced slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia, colonized roots of creeping bentgrass via ectotrophic, dark runner hyphae, and caused disease symptoms with root discoloration, root and shoot mass reduction, and yellow leaf spots. This pathogenic fungus is described as a new species, Candidacolonium agrostis sp. nov., and is most likely the cause of a summer patch-like disease on creeping bentgrass in East China.

    • Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.), one of the major cool-season turfgrass species, is widely planted in temperate and subtropical regions of China[1,2]. It exhibits fine leaf textures, high shoot densities, short internodes, prostrate growing habits and tolerance to extremely close mowing[3]. However, creeping bentgrass is not well adapted to the persistent hot and humid conditions during summer months, which often results in reduced plant vigor and increased susceptibility to diseases[4]. The root disease, summer patch, caused by Magnaporthiopsis poae, was originally isolated from symptomatic roots of Kentucky bluegrass in the USA[5]; it has been documented in creeping bentgrass in China, recently[2,6]. Take-all patch, caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. avenae, pythium root rot or dysfunction (Pythium spp.) were common root diseases of creeping bentgrass in the USA[7,8], but have not been documented in China. Among the root associated pathogenic fungi, there are a few fungi that colonize plant roots via darkly pigmented, ectotrophic, runner hyphae, which were named ectotrophic root-infecting (ERI) fungi[9]. Members of the ERI fungi were soil-borne, and some of them were the causal agents of destructive turfgrass diseases[10]. Several well-known genera of ERI fungi have been described on turfgrass, including Gaeumannomyces, Ophiosphaerella, and Magnaporthiopsis[1113]. Recently, a new genus of ERI fungi, Candidacolonium, was described by Vines[14], and was associated with the decline of ultradwarf bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis) in late summer and early fall in the Deep South of the USA[14,15]. Virulence tests revealed that C. cynodontis was one of the most destructive and aggressive ERI fungi and the main cause of summer decline observed on ultradwarf bermudagrass[14]. C. cynodontis readily produced round to mitten-shaped hyphopodia, which were frequently observed on roots as well as stolons[14].

      In autumn 2020 and summer 2021, a summer patch-like disease emerged on creeping bentgrass greens at two golf courses in East China. Initially, the symptom of the disease showed multiple irregular yellowing spots (3−10 cm in diameter). As the disease progressed, the spots coalesced into larger irregular patches. Roots of the creeping bentgrass were sparse, shortened and dark colored. Dark ectotrophic runner hyphae and slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia were observed inside and on the surface of brown or black roots under the microscope. The symptomatology, time of occurrence, as well as presence of slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia, suggested that the disease on creeping bentgrass may be caused by an ERI fungal species[9].

      Accurate identification of ERI fungi is generally difficult and time consuming by traditional morphological methods[10]. With the exception of the different shapes of hyphopodia and the occasional production of ascocarps and ascospores, the ERI fungi do not produce distinguishable features that allow for precise and timely identification[14,16,17]. In addition, production of ascocarps was often difficult due to attenuated biotypes or incompatible mating types[10]. According to only morphological characters, accurate identification of ERI fungi was often hampered by highly similar structures, especially conidia, among close related species[18,19]. Multi-locus molecular phylogenetic analysis had been successfully used for the identification of ERI fungi, especially for new species[18, 20].

      The objective of this study was to employ molecular as well as morphological methods to identify the fungal isolates recovered from diseased creeping bentgrass roots, and determine the main fungal species that cause the summer patch-like disease on creeping bentgrass by pathogenicity tests. The work will provide important references for the management of creeping bentgrass root diseases at golf courses in East China.

    • Samples of symptomatic creeping bentgrass were collected by a soil corer (5 cm in diameter and 15 cm in depth) from the putting greens at Taihu golf course in Wuxi city, Jiangsu province and Jianhu golf course in Shaoxing city, Zhejiang province (China). Root materials were rinsed with distilled water to remove organic materials and soil particles, and microscopically checked for the presence of dark and runner hyphae, a characteristic sign of ERI fungi. Dark colored roots were cut into sections with 2−3 cm in length, surface disinfested with a 0.6% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, rinsed two consecutive times with sterile-distilled water, placed on sterile filter paper, and dried in a laminar flow hood. The dried root sections were transferred onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium amended with 50 mg·L−1 each of streptomycin sulfate, ampicillin and tetracycline. Plates (9 cm in diameter) were incubated at 25 °C until hyphal growth was observed from the discoloring root tissues. Two to three consecutive hyphal tip transfers were conducted to obtain pure cultures. Fungal cultures were stored for the long term as described by Hu et al.[21].

    • Fungal cultures were grown on PDA at 25 °C for 7−10 d to produce actively growing colonies. Mycelia of each strain were scraped without agar medium using a sterilized scalpel and put into a 2-mL micro-centrifuge tube. The genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted with the previously described method[22]. Concentration and purity of the extracted gDNA was tested by a NanoDrop 2000/2000c device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). DNA samples of the fungal isolates were stored at −20 °C for further use.

      PCR amplifications were conducted on a thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA) in a 30-μL reaction volume. The PCR reaction system and cycling condition were the same as described in a previous study[14]. Six genes were used for multi-locus phylogenetic analysis, including the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), 28S large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene and 18S small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene regions of rRNA gene, the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II gene (RPB1), a DNA replication licensing factor gene for mini-chromosome maintenance complex component 7 (MCM7) and the translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (TEF1). Partial sequences of ITS were used for preliminary identification through BLAST analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Isolates were considered as new fungal species and were further used for multi-locus phylogenetic, morphological and biological analyses, if the percent identity of their ITS sequences was less than 97% as compared with the submitted ITS sequences in GenBank database through BLAST analysis. Primers used for PCR amplifications of the six genes were the same as in Vines' research[14]. PCR products were examined electrophoretically in 1% agarose gels. The PCR fragment was purified and sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for sequencing. The obtained sequences of the potential new species were deposited in GenBank, and the specific information of the strains representing different species used for constructing the phylogenetic tree is provided in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Species name, isolate IDs, and GenBank accession numbers for fungal isolates used for phylogenetic analyses in this study.

      Species nameIsolate IDITSLSUSSUMCM7RPB1TEF1
      Buergenerula spartinaeATCC 22848aJX134666DQ341492DQ341471JX134706JX134720JX134692
      Candidacolonium agrostisb13g11OM910761OM910782OM900029OM938227OM938229OM938231
      Candidacolonium agrostis13g12OM910762OM910783OM900030OM938228OM938230OM938232
      Candidacolonium agrostisJH1OP811262OP811312OP811273OP957424OP957426OP957428
      Candidacolonium agrostisJH2OP811263OP811313OP811274OP957425OP957427OP957429
      Candidacolonium cynodontisHP24-3KJ855497KM401637KP129316KP007344KP268919KP282703
      Candidacolonium cynodontisHP38-4KJ855498KM401638KP129317KP007345KP268920KP282704
      Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminisGSGC15-4KJ855495KM401635KP129314KP007342KP268917KP282701
      Gaeumannomyces graminis var. avenaeCBS 187.65JX134668JX134680JX134655JX134708JX134722JX134694
      Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiM55JF414850JF414900JF414875JF710395JF710445JF710420
      Gaeumannomyces paulograminisRS7-1KJ855507KM401647KP129326KP007350KP268929KP282713
      Magnaporthiopsis cynodontisRS7-2KJ855508KM401648KP129327KP007351KP268930KP282714
      Magnaporthiopsis cynodontisKR10-6KJ855499KM401639KP129318KP007357KP268921KP282705
      Magnaporthiopsis cynodontisTPC5-3KJ855514KM401654KP129333KP007356KP268936KP282720
      Magnaporthiopsis incrustansWW3-5KJ855515KM401655KP129334KP007332KP268937KP282721
      Magnaporthiopsis panicorumCM10S2KF689644KF689634KF689594KF689604KF689614KF689624
      Magnaporthiopsis poaeTAP41KJ855512KM401652KP129331KP007354KP268934KP282718
      Magnaporthiopsis rhizophilaM23JF414834JF414883JF414858JF710384JF710432JF710408
      Nakataea oryzaeM21JF414838JF414887JF414862JF710382JF710441JF710406
      Nakataea oryzaeM69JX134672JX134684JX134658JX134712JX134726JX134698
      Nakataea oryzaeM71JX134673JX134685JX134659JX134713JX134727JX134699
      Ommidemptus affinisATCC 200212JX134674JX134686JX134660JX134714JX134728JX134700
      Pseudophialophora cynodontisRW3-4KJ855509KM401649KP129328KP007352KP268931KP282715
      Pseudophialophora eragrostisCM12M9KF689648KF689638KF689598KF689608KF689618KF689628
      Pseudophialophora eragrostisCM20M5-2KF689647KF689637KF689597KF689607KF689617KF689627
      Pseudophialophora panicorumCM9S6KF689651KF689641KF689601KF689611KF689621KF689631
      Pseudophialophora schizachyiiAL2M1KF689649KF689639KF689599KF689609KF689619KF689629
      Pyricularia griseaM83JX134671JX134683JX134657JX134711JX134725JX134697
      Slopeiomyces cylindrosporusCBS 610.75JX134667DQ341494DQ341473JX134707JX134721JX134693
      a ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia; CBS = Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, the Netherlands. b Species names in boldface indicate newly submitted sequences from this study.
    • Phylogenetic analyses were implemented in PhyloSuite software version 1.2.1[23]. The amplified sequences of the six individual genes were aligned respectively with the MAFFT program by the algorithm G-INS-i[24], alignments were checked with characteristics weighted equally. The incongruence length difference test[25] was implemented to determine if data for the six genes could be combined with the software PAUP 4.0a169[26]. A multi-locus dataset was produced by concatenating the aligned sequences of individual genes with the Concatenate Sequence program[23]. The best nucleotide substitution models for individual genes were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) with the ModelFinder program[27]. Individual gene trees were generated for each gene with the above predicted model parameters. Phylogenetic analysis was performed with the multi-locus dataset using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) approaches. BI phylogenies were implemented using MrBayes 3.2.6[28] with partition model (2 parallel runs and 10 million generations), in which 25% of the initially sampled data were discarded as burn-in, the remaining trees were applied to calculate posterior probabilities (PP). ML phylogenies were conducted using IQ-TREE[29] with Edge-linked partition model (5000 ultrafast bootstraps)[30] and Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood-ratio test[31]. Clades with PP ≥ 0.95 and bootstrap values (BS) ≥ 70% were considered as well supported. Phylograms were annotated and viewed with Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) version 6[32].

    • Cultural characteristics were recorded from PDA. Mycelial plugs (diameter at 5 mm) were taken from the margins of one-week growing colonies, transferred to new PDA plates (diameter at 9 cm), and incubated in the dark at 25 °C. The diameter of the colony for each culture was measured daily for five days. The color of fungal colony was noted according to Rayner[33]. Microscopic measurements and photographs were conducted from slides of fungi mounted in sterile-distilled water with a stereo-microscope (OLYMPUS SZX16), and with a digital microscope (OLYMPUS DP80). The width of the hyphae and the size of the hyphopodia were measured from 20−30 structures depending on availability. The specimens and ex-type culture were deposited and preserved in Fungarium of Guangdong Institute of Microbiology (GDGM) and Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC), respectively.

    • Two isolates (13g11 and JH1) of the potential new species were used to estimate the optimal temperature for their growth. The isolates were grown on PDA at 25 °C for 5 d. Mycelial plugs with 5-mm in diameter from the margin of the colony were obtained and transferred onto the center of new PDA plates. The plates were sealed and incubated in the dark at 4, 20, 25, 29, and 37 °C for 5 d. Each isolate had three replications at each temperature, and mycelial growth was measured at the end of the incubation. The effects of temperature treatment were identified by analysis of variance using the general linear model procedure implemented in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). The mean differences were compared with Fisher's protected least significance difference (LSD) test at α = 0.05.

    • Pathogenicity experiments were conducted by artificial inoculations with the type strain 13g11. Inoculum was prepared through sterilizing oat (Avena sativa) seeds in a 50 mL flask. Ten actively growing mycelial plugs with 5-mm in diameter of the strain were added to the sterilized oat substrate, which was shaken and incubated at 28 °C in the dark for one month. Inoculations were conducted in plastic pots (15 cm top diameter × 10 cm bottom diameter × 15 cm height) by placing eight inoculated oat seeds over 100 g of sterilized Pindstrup substrate (Pindstrup Mosebrug, Pindstrup, Denmark) and sand mixture (1:1, v/v), and healthy creeping bentgrass were transplanted to the pots from the Baima research station of Nanjing Agricultural University. The plastic pots inoculated with eight noninfected and sterilized oat seeds served as the control. The inoculated pots were placed in a growth chamber with 95% relative humidity and a 12-h day/night cycle at 26/22 °C. All pots were covered with plastic bags for the first 5 d and watered once daily to favor disease development. The inoculated plants were monitored for development of symptoms weekly, and a final assessment was conducted one month after the inoculations. Re-isolations and identifications were performed as described above to fulfill Koch's postulates.

    • Recombination event between the potential new species and its phylogenetically related species was characterized with the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) model by performing a pairwise homoplasy index (Φw) (PHI) test[34]. The test was performed in SplitsTree4 v.4.16.1. (http://uni-tuebingen.de),[35] and the recombination level within phylogenetically related species was determined. Recombination was considered when the PHI value was below 0.05 (Φw < 0.05). The relationships between closely related species could be visualized by constructing a phylogenetic network with the LogDet transformation and the NeighborNet method, and the network was displayed with the EqualAngle algorithm and bootstrap analysis (1,000 replicates)[36].

    • Partial sequences of ITS, LSU, SSU, MCM7, RPBI and TEF1 genes were sequenced in four isolates (13g11, 13g12, JH1 and JH2). The incongruence length difference test generated a p value of 0.01 of the concatenated dataset, which indicated that some incongruence was shown in the datasets for the six regions. These regions were still combined, because studies revealed that the threshold of significance at 0.05 might be too conservative, and it had been shown that concatenating incongruent datasets improved the accuracy of phylogeny[37]. The single-locus BI phylogenetic trees for ITS, rDNA (ITS + LSU + SSU), MCM7, RPB1, and TEF1 were shown in Supplemental Figs S1S5. The multilocus dataset comprised 3,778 characters, there were 504 nucleotide characters (including gaps) in the SSU alignment, 510 in ITS, 819 in LSU, 500 in MCM7, 612 in RPB1, and 833 in TEF1. A total of 2,833 characters were conserved, and 689 were parsimony informative.

      GTR+F+I+G4 was estimated as the best nucleotide substitution model for ITS, rDNA, RPB1, MCM7 and TEF1. The multi-locus phylogenetic tree constructed was similar to those constructed from the datasets of individual markers. The BI and ML phylogenetic trees were constructed similarly in topology (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Fig. S6), and only the BI tree is shown in Fig. 1.

      Figure 1. 

      Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, MCM7, RPB1, and TEF1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥ 75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.

      Our four fungal isolates were placed with confidence into the subclade of Candidacolonium (PP = 1, BS = 100%), from which a new species in Candidacolonium was identified, and found to be distinct from C. cynodontis in this genus. A new species of Candidacolonium is thereby proposed based on the phylogeny analysis and morphological characteristics (see Taxonomy; Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Disease symptoms, morphological characters and pathogenicity of Candidacolonium agrostis. (a) Summer patch-like disease on creeping bentgrass putting green. (b) Front and back of colony on PDA plate after 14-d incubation. (c) Hyphopodia. (d), (e) Creeping bentgrass top growth one month after inoculation with sterile and 13g11 inoculum, respectively. (f), (g) Creeping bentgrass roots one month after inoculation with sterile and 13g11 inoculum, respectively.

    • The two isolates of the potential new species, 13g11 and JH1, exhibited similar growth rates. They all grew well at 20−29 °C, but did not show growth at 4 °C, and reached maximal growth at 26−29 °C (Fig. 3). The two isolates 13g11 and JH1 grew significantly slower (p < 0.05) than the two M. poae isolates Y15 and S24 at 20, 26 and 29 °C after 5 d of inoculation.

      Figure 3. 

      Total mycelial growth (colony diameter, mm) of Candidacolonium agrostis (13g11 and JH1) and Magnaporthiopsis poae (Y15 and S24) isolates on PDA after 5 d of incubation in the dark at temperatures of 4, 20, 26, 29 and 37 °C. Error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation.

    • The inoculation experiment in the growth chamber led to disease symptoms on creeping bentgrass and fulfilled the Koch's postulates. The roots turned dark-colored and rotted one month after inoculation. Runner hyphae with brown color were apparently observed from roots of all grasses with fungal inoculation (Fig. 2). No symptoms could be found on the grass roots with control treatment. The fungal isolates with similar morphology were consistently recovered from all inoculated samples, and a representative isolate was selected for molecular identification by ITS sequencing. The morphology of the recovered fungal isolates was similar with the isolate 13g11 used for inoculation, and the ITS sequence matched that of the inoculated isolate with 100% identity. Foliar and root health were significantly reduced in inoculated samples compared with uninoculated samples.

    • A PHI test using a six-locus concatenated dataset (ITS, LSU, SSU, MCM7, RPBI and TEF1) revealed that the recombination event was not observed between C. agrostis and C. cynodontis (Φw = 1.0), indicating that they were two different species. No recombination event was observed among the four isolates (13g11, 13g12, JH1 and JH2) within the new species C. agrostis (Φw = 1.0).

    • In this study, phylogenetic analyses revealed an un-described species in the genus Candidacolonium causing summer patch-like disease in East China. The proposed new species was isolated from creeping bentgrass roots and is named Candidacolonium agrostis.

      Candidacolonium agrostis J. Hu and J. M. Geng, sp. nov.

      MycoBank: MB849256.

      Typification: China, Jiangsu province: Wuxi city, 31°24′38.9″N, 120°07′24.4″E. Roots of Agrostis stolonifera, 11 Oct. 2020, J. Hu and J. M. Geng, 13g11 = THAS136. (holotype: not CDGM89573, ex-type culture: GDMCC 3.776.).

      Additional specimens examined: China, Jiangsu province: Wuxi city, 31°24′38.9″N, 120°07′24.4″E. Roots of Agrostis stolonifera, 11 Oct. 2020, J. Hu and J. M. Geng, 13g12 = THAS137. China, Zhejiang province: Shaoxing city, 118°80′24.2″N, 32°06′46.5″E. Roots of Agrostis stolonifera, 15 Jul. 2021, J. Hu and Y. L. Dong, JH1. China, Zhejiang province: Shaoxing city, 118°80′24.2″N, 32°06′46.5″E. Roots of Agrostis stolonifera, 15 Jul. 2020, J. Hu and Y. L. Dong, JH2.

      Morphological description: Colony diameter was measured approximately 19.0 mm on PDA at 25 °C in the dark after 5 d of incubation. The color of colony was bright white after 7-d growth, and pale grayish buff after 14- to 21-d growth. Reverse of the colony was pigmented dark grayish buff at the center of PDA plate. Hyphae were septate, 2.8-3.6 µm (mean = 3.2; S.D. = 0.3; n = 30) wide, and hyaline to brown in color. Brown stigmatopods measured 5.0-11.8 × 4.6-6.3 (mean = 7.0 × 5.4; S.D. = 1.8, 0.6; n = 30) Brown slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia measured 7.9-11.8 × 4.2-8.5 µm (mean = 10.4 × 6.5; S.D. = 1.1, 1.1; n = 30).

      Notes: C. agrostis was phylogenetically close to C. cynodontis. However, it clearly formed a single clade with high PP/BS values (1/100%). BLAST analyses showed that the ITS, LSU, MCM7, RPBI and TEF1 sequences of C. agrostis differed from C. cynodontis by 20, 1, 12, 18, 15 bp, respectively. No nucleotide differences were observed in LSU between the two species. C. agrostis grew faster than C. cynodontis on PDA plate in the dark at 25 °C, and its host was Agrostis stolonifera. The two species showed different colony colors[14]. The differences in the sizes of hyphae and hyphopodia were not apparent between the two species[14].

      Etymology: The specific epithet refers to its host's generic name.

      Distribution: East China

    • In this study, a new species in the genus Candidacolonium was identified, causing a summer patch-like disease on creeping bentgrass in East China. The concatenated six-gene and individual gene datasets were highly homologous in topology. BI and ML analyses were able to separate all the taxa into two main clades (A and B). Multiple plant pathogenic species in the genera Gaeumannomyces, Magnaporthiopsis, Buergenerula, Nakataea and Omnidemptus formed the clade A. Clade B comprised three distinct lineages, the novel species proposed in this study, C. cynodontis and the genus Psedophialophora belonged to the clade B. The concept of new species is well supported not only by the multi-locus phylogenetic analysis, but also by morphological and biological characteristics, and the root habit of the fungi.

      Morphological features such as hyphopodial morphology have traditionally been used as identifying features for ERI fungi[18]. Similar to C. cynodontis, C. agrostis also produces slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia, which are distinct to lobed or simple hyphopodia produced by the genus Gaeumannomyces[14,38]. It is appears that the slightly lobed or mitten-shaped hyphopodia may be characteristic of Candidacolonium spp. However, other ERI fungi, such as Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus, also produce similarly shaped hyphopodia[39]; therefore, these hyphopodia are not diagnostic for Candidacolonium spp.

      The disease severity caused by C. agrostis was significantly different at the two sampled golf courses. This may be because they were sampled at different times, i.e. during a hot summer and a cool autumn. C. agrostis has been observed to cause severe damage on creeping bentgrass putting greens during hot weather. In vitro assays of temperature sensitivity also support that C. agrostis grows better at higher temperatures. Moreover, creeping bentgrass are weakened by many stressed factors during the hot summer months, and become increasingly vulnerable to ERI fungi[9]. Similar pathogenicity results were observed in other ERI fungi, including C. cynodontis, which caused more severe disease at 30 °C than at 20 °C in an in vivo evaluation[15]. The pathogenicity analysis in this study successfully recreated the disease symptoms; however, they were not as severe as observed by the superintendents at golf courses. This is probably because turfgrass plants used for the in vivo evaluation were grown in a growth chamber with 12-h day/night cycle at 26/22 °C, which was at near optimal conditions, and the plants were not stressed. To gain a better understanding of the role C. agrostis play in the summer patch-like disease, field conditions must be considered. A proposed evaluation strategy could be to inoculate C. agrostis isolates into established creeping bentgrass turf, and the research plots be managed according to golf course standards.

      C. agrostis is demonstrated to be associated with canopy decline symptoms of creeping bentgrass during summer months. The symptoms of affected creeping bentgrass were similar to summer patch disease, which is a common and very destructive root disease of cool-season turfgrasses[5]. To date, the fungus M. poae is known as the only pathogen associated with root disease on creeping bentgrass in China. This study reports a new fungal species of Candidacolonium associated with summer patch-like symptoms on creeping bentgrass that has a different growth rate, morphology and genetics compared with the causal agent of summer patch M. poae. The results from this study confirmed the pathogenicity of C. agrostis on creeping bentgrass in the controlled environment and its association with creeping bentgrass at two golf courses in East China. By contrast, summer patch of creeping bentgrass in North China, is caused by M. poae. Summer patch-like disease on creeping bentgrass in East China has not been widely studied[2,6]. Further investigation into the distribution and prevalence of C. agrostis populations on creeping bentgrass in East China is warranted, and should lead to better understanding of the overall damage caused by this fungus in this region.

      In conclusion, a novel ERI fungal species in the genus Candidacolonium was obtained and identified from roots of creeping bentgrass that showed summer patch-like disease at golf courses in East China. Prior to this study, M. poae was the only known ERI fungus in the Magnaporthaceae associated with summer patch on creeping bentgrass in China. The finding brings about inquiries concerning the role this fungal species plays in the root disease of creeping bentgrass putting greens during summer months in East China. Future studies may include developing the control methods, determining the host range, identifying the dissemination modes, as well as developing rapid diagnostic methods for this fungal species.

      • Jiangsu Institute of Botany Talent Fund, grant number: JIBTF202212. We thank Jiangsu Institute of Botany Talent Fund (grant number: JIBTF202212) for financial support, we also thank Zhang Hongliang from Wuxi Taihu Golf Club for helping collect the diseased samples and providing historical information of the disease.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Supplemental Fig. S1 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from ITS DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
      • Supplemental Fig. S2 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from rDNA (the combined ITS, LSU and SSU) DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
      • Supplemental Fig. S3 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from MCM7 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
      • Supplemental Fig. S4 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from RPB1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
      • Supplemental Fig. S5 Majority rule Bayesian phylogenetic tree derived from TEF1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
      • Supplemental Fig. S6 A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree derived from the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, MCM7, RPB1, and TEF1 DNA sequence data sets. Nodes having Bayesian inference posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥75% are shown. The tree is rooted with Pyricularia grisea M83.
      • Supplemental Table S1 Species name, isolate IDs, and GenBank accession numbers for fungal isolates used for phylogenetic analyses in this study.
      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (1) References (39)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Geng J, Zhou Y, Dong Y, Lamour K, Yang Z, et al. 2023. Candidacolonium agrostis, a novel species associated with summer patch-like disease on Agrostis stolonifera in East China. Grass Research 3:20 doi: 10.48130/GR-2023-0020
    Geng J, Zhou Y, Dong Y, Lamour K, Yang Z, et al. 2023. Candidacolonium agrostis, a novel species associated with summer patch-like disease on Agrostis stolonifera in East China. Grass Research 3:20 doi: 10.48130/GR-2023-0020

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return