Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Cambridge Books Online http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres Edited by Emmanuela Bakola, Lucia Prauscello, Mario Telò Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601 Online ISBN: 9781139519601 Hardback ISBN: 9781107033313 Chapter 2 - Comedy and the Pompe pp. 40-80 Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge University Press ch a p ter 2 Comedy and the Pompe Dionysian genre-crossing Eric Csapo This chapter presents some new and some neglected evidence for the phallic processions of the Dionysian Pompe (Parade). The phallic choruses performed on the first official day of the Dionysia at Athens, only one or, at most, two days before the comic contests. If for no other reason, their place in this volume is justified by Aristotle’s notorious claim that: ‘comedy arose from those who led off the phallic rites’ (Poet. a–). But it is not just the diachronic relationship between these genres that interests me here. The new evidence I present is iconographic and, unlike the iconographic material normally adduced to support or contest the theory that comedy evolved from phallic choruses, this iconographic material is contemporary with comedy. My series of vase-paintings extends from the time of the formal introduction of comedy at the Athenian Dionysia to a date well within Aristotle’s lifetime. This permits me at least to pose the question of a synchronic relationship between phallic choruses and comedy. Aristotle may of course have been guessing and he may have been wrong. Neither of these possibilities really supports the claim of PickardCambridge and others that this ‘unhappily robs his statements of all historical value’. I should at once confess that I have trouble in understanding what ‘arose from’ and the like might mean, since comedy as we know it   I thank E. Bakola, L. Prauscello and M. Telò for inviting me to contribute this chapter. For assistance and advice I would like to thank J. R. Green, A. Hartwig, I. McPhee, M. C. Miller, S. Nervegna, E. G. D. Robinson, J. Rusten, P. Wilson and The Centre for Classical and Near Eastern Studies of Australia. For the provision of photographs and permissions I owe special thanks to E. Bakola, A. Christopoulou and the National Archaeological Museum in Athens, E. Kalinovskaya, V. Matveyev and the Hermitage Museum, A. Koronakis and  C Ephoria, F. Lissarrague, S. Paspalas and the Australian Archaeological Institute at Athens and K. Schauenburg. This paper was prepared with the generous assistance of an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant. Further thanks to J. R. Green, who recently brought Masseria  to my attention, but unfortunately too late for me to include it here in my discussion of the Pistoxenos Painter’s cup in Orvieto. On Aristotle’s claim and its historical and cultural value, see also Rosen in this volume. Pickard-Cambridge : –; cf. Scullion : .  Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  shows affinities with many genres (iambos, dithyramb, hymn, tragedy and satyr-play, to name just a few) and has manifestly absorbed the influence of all of them by the time we catch sight of it. Genres are not like biological forms, with only two parents, let alone like single-cell protozoa with only one, and they are rarely ‘born’ at any discrete or determinable moment. The historical value of Aristotle’s testimony lies elsewhere. It lies in the fact that a perceptive and intelligent eyewitness readily believed that comic and phallic choruses had something important in common and that this something probably included elements of spectacle as Aristotle’s statement is notably based on autopsy (that is why to his statement that ‘comedy arose from those who led off the phallic rites’ he adds ‘that even now they continue as a custom in many of our cities’). One can still doubt, of course, whether Aristotle’s belief was a good one, but one should not doubt that it was at least based on close knowledge of the genres and rational reflection. Cultural history, unlike biology, needs to account for beliefs, true or false. So Aristotle’s statement does have historical value even if we reject the literal truth of the statement. The material I present has implications for both diachronic and synchronic history of comedy’s relationship with a sub-literary and (despite Aristotle) generally overlooked performance genre. Considerations of space, however, dictate that the focus must be on the presentation and interpretation of a group of nine vase-paintings. I need to establish the claim that they do in fact relate to the phallic entertainments of the Dionysian Pompe: the few people who know these vase-paintings attribute them directly to comedy or to non-Greek cults. The first three sections of this chapter examine the iconographic evidence for phallic performers in the fifth century; the fourth clears away some misconceptions about the Pompe; it is only in the fifth that I can begin very briefly to sketch out how the phallic performances influenced the comic genre and in the sixth to ask how the comic genre impacted on the form of phallic performances. The treatment will be very far from exhaustive. It aims to open new territory: in it one will find underdeveloped and empty spaces.     For the influence of biology on Aristotle’s evolutionary theories, see in the first instance Depew . There is no question therefore of a ‘contradiction’ with Aristotle’s later statement that the early history of comedy is unknown (Poet. b). Despite Aristotle’s assurances, even as careful a scholar as Rusten (b: , ) writes that phallic processions ‘ceased with the introduction of comedies to the Dionysia’ and that comedy simply ‘replaced’ them. The possibility that Aristotle had historical evidence should not, however, be dismissed, and especially not in the case of dithyramb: see Csapo and Miller b: ; Depew : . See also Storey : –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo Figure . Attic red-figure fragments by the Berlin Painter, c.  bc phallic choruses in fifth-century attic vase-painting Two small fragments of a water jar or wine jug were unearthed in the nineteenth-century excavations of the Athenian acropolis (Figure .).  Attic red-figure (hereafter rf ) fragments, Berlin Painter, c.  bc, Athens, NM Acropolis Collection G , .; Beazley, ARV 2 .. The fragments were found in September and October of . The upper fragment measures . m., the lower . m. in height. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  The jar was manufactured close to the traditional date of the introduction of a competition for comedy at the Athenian Dionysia,  bc. The fragments are by the Berlin Painter -– the Michelangelo of red figure. Yet, despite the artistry, and despite preserving tantalizing bits of one of the most extraordinary scenes in all Greek art, these particular fragments have never received more than a few rare and passing glances – and glances from scholars in various subdisciplines (iconography, religion, theatre history) that have lost contact over the years. The subject is not an easy one. Even the great John Beazley threw up his hands in genuine perplexity asking: ‘Who can this be?’ Beazley rarely missed a detail, but he did here. He should have asked ‘Who can these be?’ There are certainly two figures, not the single figure implied by Beazley’s question or the manner in which the fragments are joined and displayed in the National Museum in Athens. The upper fragment from the shoulder of the vase preserves the head of a man described as ‘ugly’ and ‘middle-aged’ in the literature. It is the unusual costume that is mainly responsible for the impression of deformity or dereliction. Most particularly, it is the large phallos that emerges from his forehead. The effect is reinforced by another phallos attached to his nose (only the stump is preserved – but what else could it have been?). A third phallos sits atop a lost stick, which he once carried in his lost right hand. Phallos-sticks of this sort characterize the entertainers who are the subject of this essay. Their hand-held phallos-sticks regularly descend to ground level. Since no trace of the stick appears on the lower fragment we can be sure that the surviving fragments were not originally in vertical alignment and that the restoration is wrong. Graef and Langlotz correctly assigned the lower fragment to a second man. The Berlin Painter, therefore, showed at least two men in shin-length tunics of an identical ivy-leaf pattern, a costume so unusual – to say nothing of the phalloi – that it permits no doubt that the artist intended to show part of a costumed chorus. We can guess that the second man wore a crown of ivy leaves like the first, perhaps also phalloi. He may even have carried a phallos-stick, but if so, he held it in a different position. The costume      Suda s.v. Chionides. The date receives some rough confirmation from restorations of the Dionysian Victors’ Lists (IG ii ) but it is certainly not beyond dispute. See most recently Olson : –. Beazley :  no. , pl. .. Cf. the drawing in Hoffmann :  fig. , or Frontisi-Ducroux : . Graef and Langlotz : ; Beazley : . Graef and Langlotz :  no.  and pl. . Cf. Herter : ; Herter a: –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo is completed by the boots we find on the lower fragment. These boots are a recurrent feature among the phallos-stick bearers: they are laceless and unadorned except for a vertical seam that appears on the side. Some examples show that the upper boot can be turned down to form a cuff. Most scholars identify this boot with a type that writers of the fifth century bc called kothornoi: notoriously loose and formless (the same boot could be worn on either foot). Interestingly kothornoi later became the hallmark of tragic actors, but these later kothornoi look very different. In the first half of the fifth century we find boots of this type on contemporary symposiasts and on tragic choreuts. Kothornoi appear already to have developed strong Dionysian associations, even if not exclusively so. Possibly earlier in date than the Berlin Painter’s phallos-bearers is a solitary and generally obliterated figure from a cup attributed to the Antiphon Group (Figure .). No phallic protrusions emerge from the head. We see only a ribbon. The figure also carries a phallos-stick. The phallos-stick is covered with dots. Many of these dots when viewed closely have a heart shape or at least a triangular shape. We are evidently to think of the stick as entwined in ivy. Like the Berlin Painter’s phallos-bearers, this phallos-bearer also wears a long shin-length garment, but this one is fringed. One can make out a few dots above the fringe. On his feet the phallos-bearer wears the boots we have identified as kothornoi. They have the same vertical seam running up from the ankle as the Berlin Painter’s pair, but apparently with an added piece to reinforce the heel. A horizontal line just under the fringe of his garment shows that his boot is folded over into a cuff. A cup by the Pistoxenos Painter in Orvieto shows phallos-stick bearers of a similar stamp (Figure .). It is a decade or so later than the Berlin Painter’s chorus. Two men in the tondo (a) and four men on the side (b) sport kothornoi and shin-to-ankle-length garments with fringes. Long garments of this sort are mostly worn by women. The garments are belted. Belts too are almost exclusively used by women: these are particularly     Pickard-Cambridge : –; E. Simon : –. Genre scenes with tragic choreuts have the same simple undecorated form, unlaced, either cuffless or cuffed, and usually showing a vertical seam and narrow pointed toes, sometimes markedly curved up at the ends (see our Figures .–.): 1. Attic rf oinochoe fragments, Near Hermonax, c.  bc, Agora P , MTS2 AV , Moore :  no. ; Froning :  fig. . 2. Attic rf bell krater, – bc, Ferrara T C, MTS2 AV  and pl. a; Pickard-Cambridge : fig. . 3. Attic rf pelike, Phiale Painter, c.  bc, Boston MFA .–, MTS2 AV , Pickard-Cambridge : fig. . Dionysus himself prefers the Thracian style embades: Carpenter : –, . Attic rf cup fragments, Antiphon Group, – bc, Louvre C; ARV 2 , . The fragments have never been published. F. Lissarrague very generously photographed the fragments at my request. Attic rf cup, Pistoxenos Painter, c.  bc, Orvieto, Faina ; ARV 2 ., ; Addend.2 . The cup was excavated in the s from a cemetery just North of Orvieto: see G. Körte . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Figure . Attic red-figure cup fragments, Antiphon Group, – bc emphasized by overfolds with fringes at the waist. Two of the men are pipers and they wear a type of hat elsewhere associated with rustics. The pipers also have sleeves. The other four men are evidently members of the chorus. Their heads are bald and tied with ribbons. All sport scruffy beards. Their garments are spotted. Even in the drawing, which was executed with a very different interpretation in mind, the spots frequently reveal the distinctive heart shape of ivy leaves. A crown of ivy leaves is very clear on the hat of the piper in the tondo (a). The phallos-sticks held by four of  See Pipili : –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 eric csapo  A B Figure .a and b Attic red-figure cup, Pistoxenos Painter, c.  bc the men are also very clearly meant to be seen as wrapped in ivy. The ivy theme is picked up by the decoration under the handles. Sadly none of these chorusmen has phalloi emerging from his head, but the phallic theme is nonetheless very prominent: the phallic tip of the sticks is emphasized Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  A B Figure .a and b Attic red-figure cup, Sabouroff Painter, c.  bc. with added red and the artist has been very careful to outline the distinctive eye-spots that often characterize Greek phalloi. A cup by the Sabouroff Painter shows a chorus in much the same costume as the Pistoxenos Painter’s chorus (Figure .). It is accompanied by the phallos-stick on the less well-preserved side (far right of b, before  Attic rf cup, Sabouroff Painter, c.  bc, Malibu .AE.; ARV 2 , ; Kavvadias : –,  no. , pls. –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo handle). The stick has the characteristic eye and is decorated not with ivy but with a ribbon. The chorus have nearly bald heads bound with red ribbons and shaggy beards like those of the Pistoxenos Painter (Figure .). The choreuts also have long tresses dangling from the sides and back of their heads. In this case, the details of the relative size of the heads, the wide staring eyes, stiff gaping mouths and a general similarity of features suggest the possibility of a uniform mask. The chorus wear ankle-length garments with effeminate overfolds, like the Pistoxenos Painter’s chorus, but this time the garments are still more effeminate, with overfolds under the breasts and with the addition of elaborate pleats. The choreuts wear kothornoi, like the Pistoxenos Painter’s chorus, but this time with the more stylishly upturned toes, which may underscore their effeminacy. They are more obviously dancing than any of their colleagues. Only the absence of ivy in the costume makes this chorus unlike other phallos-stick bearers, but ivy at least is present on the pot: ivy-leaf decoration appears prominently above the handles. Probably related to our phallos-stick bearers is a figure on a lekythos in Athens who marches with a vigorous step (Figure .). His garment is sleeved like those of the Pistoxenos Painter’s chorus and covered with tadpole-like blobs with descending tails: a few of them attain the heart shapes of ivy leaves that were evidently intended, even if quickly and carelessly applied. One can make out the horizontal lines above the figure’s hip to show that his garment has a belt or possibly a hem. This is female fashion if not quite the feminine overfolds of the Pistoxenos and Sabouroff Painters’ choruses. He wears boots. This is clear from the folded cuff visible on the right below his knee. His head suggests a mask (or at least the elaborate disguise) of a wild man. The nose is pointy and his ears are satyrlike. He also has a very large extra eye on his forehead. If he is supposed to be a Cyclops, his eye is far off centre. Nothing impels us to determine his species: he is a creature of fantasy, not nature. The stringy hair reinforces the general impression that whatever he is meant to be, it is of a low order of civilization. In his right hand he holds a large knife in a very aggressive    This less well-preserved side, generally ‘B’, was probably intended as the principal decoration: see Kavvadias : . See Simon : . There is a suggestion of curvature of this sort on the boots of Figures . and . but nothing explicit as here and on the choral genre scenes. Attic rf lekythos, c.  bc, found in Athens in  and currently in the storerooms of Gamma Ephoria (inv. no. A). The vase was found in ‘Grave VIII’ excavated near Veikou and Aglaurou Streets in Koukaki (south of Philopappos Hill). See Alexandri :  and pl.  . J. R. Green first brought this vase to my attention. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Figure . Attic red-figure lekythos, c.  bc posture. The shape of the knife and the way he holds it is unparalleled. The painter clearly wished to emphasize the superfluous extension of the  Two curving lines rise up from the back and appear to extend beyond the neckline. They do not appear to be part of the knife. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo handle beyond the grip, because he interrupts the otherwise fairly tidy upper frieze in order to show it. The handle curves abruptly upwards. It appears likely that a phallos is intended. In his left hand he holds the remnant of a torch (one can see a vertical line separating two bits of wood and horizontal lines binding them together). It curves slightly to the right above the point where he grasps it (not visible in the photograph). The top is lost. One should perhaps infer that the painter means to incorporate the torch in the wildman’s gesture of menace towards his imaginary victim. phallic choruses and the dionysia So who are these men? The Pistoxenos Painter’s cup is the only one that has received much comment. The Beazley Archive calls this group ‘bearded barbarians’, ‘Northerners’ and ‘Agathyrsoi’. The line of interpretation goes back to nineteenth-century German scholarship and its conviction that Greeks do not dress or behave in this way. Gustav Körte thought them Asiatic and probably Lydian. Friedrich Hauser seized upon Herodotus’ description of the Argippaioi, a tribe of Scythian mountain dwellers, who, he says, ‘from birth are all bald, snub-nosed and long-bearded, both males and females’. From this promising beginning Hauser gleaned passages from Herodotus’ description of completely different tribes and races of people, concluding that our dancers wore beaver-pelts fringed with human scalps, and deciding with curious precision that the Pistoxenos Painter had drawn Agathyrsoi, a people about whom the only relevant information we have is Herodotus’ claim that they ‘live in luxury and wear lots of gold’. Some of these ornaments are visible, he thought, on the pot and highlighted in added red. They were obviously difficult to interpret: the man right of centre on Figure .b is said to wear a phiale around his neck. Hauser thought the phiale an obscure allusion to Heracles’ visit to Scythia. Near the beginning of his account of Scythia, Herodotus records that the Pontic Greeks claimed that Heracles came to Scythia, had intercourse with the mistress of the country, who was half-woman and half-snake, and left her pregnant with triplets, giving instructions that any son of his who proved able to string his bow and put on his belt remain in Scythia and that any who could not should be banished. Only the youngest, named    The prevailing assumption at the time was that Dionysus himself was foreign and Asiatic: see Isler-Kerényi : –.  Hauser in Hartwig : – quoting Hdt. .. G. Körte : .  On the Scythian snake-goddess, see Ustinova . Hdt. .. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Scythes, succeeded. He and his line became the kings of Scythia, ‘and to this day Scythians carry bowls (phialai) hanging from their belts’. Even in the matter of the gold ornaments Hauser manhandles his only witness. The myth does not explain why the Agathyrsoi wear phialai but clearly indicates that they do not. The banished sons of Heracles are called Agathyrsos and Gelonos. It is a misrepresentation to call Scythes, Agathyrsos and Gelonos ‘die drei Stammväter der Skythen’, as does Hauser, let alone ‘die drei Stammesväter der Agathyrsen’ as Bulle calls them. The tale clearly marks Scythes alone as the ancestor of the Scythians. It functions to establish the Scythians’ exclusive right to their territory. For the purpose of the tale Agathyrsos and Gelonos serve as the ancestors of non-Scythians: they are as Corcella describes them ‘eponyms of other peoples of the region’; indeed most modern scholars are inclined to regard the Agathyrsoi as Thracians (Herodotus himself says that ‘their ways most resemble the Thracians’). But it would be a mistake to give the impression that the value of the analysis depends on the precise designation of the tribe to which our chorus of ‘Scythians’ belong. Although archaeology offers no confirmation that Scythians decorated their persons with bowls, the testimony may well be true. But Hauser’s evidence is irrelevant no matter which Scythians you choose. Herodotus reports that Scythians wear phialai ‘hanging from their belts’ (zosteres is used of girdles that go around the waist), not strung around their necks as we see them on Figure .b. Far more disturbing is the fact that not a single item of clothing in any way resembles anything that archaeology or iconography can show was ever worn by an ancient Scythian or Thracian. Despite the fact that it had very little going for it, Hauser’s theory was accepted as ‘schlagend’ and ‘geistvoll’ by Bulle and as ‘very probable’ by Beazley, who extended the barbarian label to our other dancers by the Berlin Painter, the Sabouroff Painter and the painter belonging to the Antiphon Group; current iconographers still treat the connection with Agathyrsoi as     Hauser in Hartwig : ; Bulle : . Hdt. .–.  See Corcella :  on Hdt. ... Hdt. .. Corcella : , . The standard modern treatments are Tsiafakis  and Raeck . Hauser’s methodology required no real knowledge of Scythian material culture. He was happy to draw upon a generic stereotype of the savage, in what would now seem a parody of the more outrageous trends in nineteenth-century comparative anthropology: the fringes on the garments of the chorus from Orvieto, Hauser admits, are too string-like for furs or beaver pelts, so he did not hesitate to argue from the customs of North American Indians that they must be human scalps: ‘die Angabe, dass die Kahlköpfe ihren besiegten Feinden das Fell vom Kopfe ziehen, [hat] eine innere Warscheinlichkeit für sich’ (Hauser in Hartwig : ). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo established fact. For Hauser and Bulle the only real question was how the painter came to acquire ‘such a detailed knowledge of Scythian costume and customs’: Hauser thought he must have been a Scythian slave trained as an artist in Athens; Bulle thought that the requisite knowledge for a portrait of ‘such ethnographic precision’ could ‘scarcely be credited to an artisan of the Athenian potters’ quarter’ and must therefore have been copied from a drama based on the antics of the Agathyrsoi (as if we might not just as easily ask how a poet came to portray a distant central Asian tribe with ‘such ethnographic precision’). Hauser’s far-fetched theory may not deserve a formal refutation. In light of its reception, unfortunately, a refutation is required. If not to advertise their barbarism, why would choruses prance about in unusual costumes, carrying phallos-sticks and wearing masks or otherwise distorting their facial features through the application of extraneous penises? Had it not been for Hauser, the answer would have been obvious. They do this to advertise their connection with Dionysus. Ironically, the Dionysian context is most urged by the very features that led Hauser to conclude that the Pistoxenos painter drew Scythians. Hauser took the spots on the garments of the dancers in Orvieto as indications of shagginess and – with the help of Herodotus on Scythians – decided that they wore beaver fur. On closer inspection the spots indicate varying degrees of care in attempts to render the shape of ivy leaves. Ivy is in fact very much on the menu. Some of our performers wear ivy wreaths (Figures ., .), others red ribbons. Ivy is entwined around most of the phallos-sticks (Figures .–.). And ivy leaves appear in the marginal decoration of the scenes (Figures .–.). All of this should have indicated that the images have nothing to do with Scythia and everything to do with Dionysian art and cult. Ivy is of course ubiquitous almost anywhere where Dionysus is present. It is especially worn at the Dionysia. Sacred law required all inhabitants of Attica to garland their heads during the Dionysia. This was true even outside Athens: a Euboean decree of / bc, for example, requires everyone to wear ivy garlands during the Pompe of the Dionysia, with a free distribution to all residents and a mandatory rental fee for visitors. The pendants around the necks of the Orvieto entertainers are very unlikely to be phialai. On Hartwig’s line drawing, Figure .b, the ghostly half-circle around the neck of the second dancer from the right, with its    Bulle : – (quotation ); Beazley at ARV 2 p.  (‘Addenda I’); Kavvadias : –.  Blech : –; Bierl : . Hauser in Hartwig : ; Bulle : .  IG xii , . Sacred laws in Dem. Meid. –; Philoch. FGrH  F . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  phiale-like central knob and the suggestion of metalware lobes, is a pretty clear instance in which Hauser’s interpretation guided Hartwig’s hand in rendering what was obviously a faint and much-damaged image (no photograph of the side of the cup has ever been published). Originally, the neck ornament probably resembled that of the man at the lower left of Figure .b, which does not at all resemble the shape of a phiale. Both ornaments are coloured with added red, not because they represent the gold frippery of the decadent Agathyrsoi, but because the colour and shape of the ornaments echo the phalloi on the tips of the choruses’ phallos-sticks (which are also marked with added red). The phalloi emerging from the head and nose of the Berlin Painter’s entertainer may be iconographically unique, but ancient sources, albeit late, consistently mention the neck, in addition to the loins, as a common place to tie on a phallos to celebrate the Dionysia. Dionysian processions were rife with phallic imagery: some even came to be known by the term periphallia meaning something like ‘phalloi all over the place’. Finally, the bald heads and long beards have a simpler explanation than the putative effects of inbreeding in the remote mountain communities of Central Asia. Baldness and long beards not only are a familiar feature of comic ugliness but follow a pattern well known from the depiction of phallic and Dionysian creatures. Baldness and shaggy beards are above all characteristic of satyrs. The many minor phallic deities who came to be connected with Dionysus are also, according to Herter, characterized by baldness and wedge beards. The reasons require no explanation. Ancient physiognomists, who habitually deduce human character on the analogy of natural forms (in this case assimilating heads and genitals), consistently identify baldness and shaggy beards as signs of lewdness and erotic hyperactivity. The proof that our choruses are connected to Dionysus, however, is their use of phallos-sticks. In Greek art such phallos-sticks otherwise appear only in the hands of the mythical counterparts of our Dionysiac dancers:     Suda s.v. - (- ), cf. Suda s.v. .!2- ( ); Etym. magn. p.  Kallierges; [Nonnus], Or. . and .; Apostol. .. See further Herter :  and nn. – below on the martyrdom of Saint Timotheus. I am not convinced that the Attic black-figure (hereafter bf ) fragment, found at Segesta and attributed to Sophilos, shows a man wearing a hat with phalloi (Fuchs and Tusa :  fig. ; cf. Blech :  n. ; Bierl :  n. ). Hesych. s.v.  -  ( ); Herter a: ; Herter : . Herter : , cf. . Arist. Hist. an. a–b, Gen. an. b; Comm. in Arist. Graeca .. (Johannes Philoponus); Della Corte : . Baldness and wedge-beards become the distinguishing characteristics of pimps in New Comedy (who also have phallic names and display phallic behaviour): Poll. .; MNC 3 vol. i.–. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo komasts, satyrs and at least once Dionysus himself. Some of the satyrs sporting phallos-sticks have already been closely associated with Dionysian processions, in particular a red-figured amphora by the Flying Angel Painter: on one side we see a satyr holding a phallos-stick and on the other a satyr father holds his son up on his shoulder as if to watch the parade (whence the name ‘Flying Angel’). Otherwise satyrs consistently use phallos-sticks as a weapon, either in the hunt or in battle. Though essentially mythical fantasy, we will see (below) that the visual simile that turns the phallos-stick into an aggressive weapon is also very much rooted in ritual. The link between phallos-sticks of this sort and Dionysus and his retinue is in Greek iconography virtually exclusive. It was the presence of the phallos-stick that urged Bulle to suppose that we must have a Dionysian scene, but he contented himself with the observation that the Agathyrsoi must also have worshipped Dionysus and that the image was in any case mediated by drama. Since Bulle’s time, more judicious scholars have interpreted the Dionysian quality of our phallic choruses in one of two ways: as performers in comedy and as choral entertainers belonging to Dionysian processions.     Lissarrague : : ‘It should be noted that the phallos as weapon is the specific attribute of satyrs. The maenads of course do not have such weapons, nor does Dionysus.’ Dionysus: he does appear once with the phallos-stick on a now largely forgotten fragment of a late bf hydria, once Rhusopoulos Collection, Athens. The fragment known only from a murky drawing in Vorberg :  may be a processional scene (there are curving lines that hint at the Dionysian ship-cart). Komast: Corinthian fragment of unknown vessel shape, early sixth century bc?, Corinth  (KP ); Seeberg :  no. bis; Stillwell and Benson :  no. , pl. . For the interpretation of the fragment, cf. the Middle Corinthian phiale, Athens NM , illustrated in Smith :  fig. , at twelve o’clock. Satyrs: Attic rf cup from Vulci, Painter of Berlin , once Rome market, ARV 2 , ; Attic rf volute krater, Nikosthenes Painter, c.  bc, Munich , ARV 2 , ; Attic rf amphora, Flying Angel Painter, Boston MFA ., ARV 2 , , Addenda2 ; Attic rf skyphos, Brygos Painter, c.  bc, Thebes Museum, ARV 2 , ; fragmentary rf cup, Foundry Painter, ARV 2 , ; Attic rf cup-skyphos from Capua, Near the Painter of Bologna , – bc, Brussels, Bibliothèque Royale , ARV 2 . The phallos-sticks used by satyrs resemble those used by phallic dancers except in so far as the bottom end of the stick is consistently shaped like testicles. A rf pelike fragment (Louvre G , Pan Painter, ARV 2 , ) shows a phallos-stick beside a man catching a boar or pig. The man is bald on top with shaggy sides and beard and, though the ears are not obviously those of a satyr, his appearance and primitive hunting techniques make it likely that assimilation to a satyr is intended (the other side shows a young man catching a deer with his bare hands): see Peirce : . Another possible exception is the phallos-stick held by Pothos in the sculpture in Samothrace by Scopas, if the reconstruction by Bulle  is correct. But the trefoil-shaped appendages on either end of the ‘phallos-stick’ on the gem in Berlin, upon which the reconstruction ultimately depends, make it unlike any other. The trefoil shape brings it much closer to sceptre iconography, though it would still be unusual for a sceptre to have trefoil-like tips on both ends. See Herter a:  and esp. Hedreen : . The amphora by the Flying Angel Painter (see previous note) was produced c.  bc. This is true of the Corinthian komast as well: for the link with Dionysus, see esp. Csapo and Miller b: –. Bulle : . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Erika Simon first ascribed the Sabouroff Painter’s chorus (Figure .a–b) to a comedy with a chorus of old men dressed up as women, citing for example Cratinus’ Effeminates (Malthakoi). Of all the phallos-stick bearers we have examined, the Sabouroff Painter’s chorus have the best credentials for illustrating a comic chorus: they may indeed wear masks (as may our wildman in Figure .), and if the old men are disguised as women, there may be a reason for de-emphasizing the typical comic somation with its padded bellies and buttocks, and its bodytights. Transvestism could also excuse the shin-length garments and boots that would otherwise be unexpected and unparalleled for comic choreuts (and rare for comic actors). Three problems remain, however, for any identification of the Sabouroff Painter’s vase as a comic chorus. In the iconography comic choruses otherwise dance with a uniform step and this must have been standard practice in the theatre as well. Moreover, a comic chorus of transvestites has no obvious reason to dance with a phallos-stick unless they are cultic transvestites (but if they are, then what is left to support the notion that they are also comic?). Most importantly the closest parallels in time, style, costume and movement are the choruses of the Berlin Painter, Antiphon Group and Pistoxenos Painter (Figures .–.). None of these appears to wear a mask. Two (Figures .– .) are certainly not transvestites and so have no excuse for not wearing or de-emphasizing normal comic padding. Most importantly, even though the jury is still out on whether comic choreuts normally wear the phallos, these choruses do, and do so in a way that no comic actor or choreut ever does: they wear them only in unnatural places and they wear them erect, quite unlike the standard limp and unimaginatively located phalloi of comedy. The unique costumes and above all the phallos-sticks (and other phallic paraphernalia) were rightly perceived by a tiny minority of scholars to be key to the identity of two of the vase-paintings of our group. Herter first recognized that the Berlin Painter’s chorus (Figure .) are entertainers at a Dionysiac procession: he specifically identified them as a kind of entertainer called ‘ithyphalloi’. Green first recognized that the effeminate    E. Simon : . Kavvadias’ suggestion that the chorus might belong to satyr-play arises from the mistaken belief that satyr-play could have other than a satyr chorus (: ). For other examples of effeminate choruses in comedy, see Bakola : –. Which is why Green excluded this vase from his list of early comic choruses (:  n. ). Herter a: –; Herter : ; cf. Blech :  n. , who compares their headgear with Semos’ description of phallophoroi; and Hoffmann : , who refers them to the Anthesteria. Although Herter cited the Pistoxenos Painter’s vase in this context, he nonetheless accepted their identification as ‘Agathyrsoi’ (a: ). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo chorus of the Sabouroff Painter had much in common with the description of the costume of the ithyphalloi described by Semos of Delos (c.  bc). Semos evidently contextualized his work On Paeans with a general discussion of processional choruses, among them choruses from Dionysian parades. The description of the ithyphalloi is the fullest example. The ithyphalloi ‘wear the masks of drunken men, are garlanded and have flowery [or “ornate”] sleeves. They wear whitish chitons and gird them with a tarantinon that reaches down to their ankles.’ The effect of effeminacy is in this case evidently desired: the Suda adds that the ithyphalloi ‘are guardians of Dionysus and accompany the phallos, wearing women’s clothing’; from Synesius we learn that the ithyphalloi also wore their hair in tresses. The descriptions of the figures on our vase-paintings are by no means precise, but they come interestingly close in the case of the Pistoxenos and Sabouroff Painters’ choruses. Both choruses seem to wear girded effeminate ankle-length robes and one of them (the Sabouroff Painter’s) certainly gives a strong suggestion of masks. More problematic is the fact that both choruses wear ribbons rather than garlands, that only the Sabouroff Painter’s choreuts have tresses, that only the Pistoxenos Painter’s auletes wears sleeves, and that these sleeves are not exactly ‘flowery’, but have ivy patterns. Semos’ description of the costume of the ithyphalloi actually coincides with only half the details we see in the Pistoxenos and Sabouroff Painters’ choreuts. Against these inaccuracies we must reckon that Semos lived some two hundred and fifty years after the production of our vases and in an age when literary science displayed a compulsion for over-nice and often arbitrary genre-distinctions. More important is the fact that, from Semos’ description of the ithyphalloi’s song, it is clear that the chorus carried a phallos or phalloi of some sort. In the archaic and classical periods genres were still embedded in specific performance occasions and practices and it is to these that we must look if we are to understand the identity and function of the phallic dancers depicted in late archaic and early classical vase-paintings.     Green :  n. . Semos FGrH  F  (Athen. a); Suda s.vv. - - ( ), .!2- ( ), 8  ( ); Phot. Lexicon s.v. .!2- ( .); Hesych. s.v. .!2- ( ); Syn. Calvitii encomium . (= Suda s.v. /2#  (/ )). Thorough discussion of Semos’ fragment in Bierl : –. We do not know what a tarantinon is. It is also worn by the Spartan dancers called Gypones (Poll. .), where the material is described as ‘diaphanous’. See Bierl :  n. , with further literature. Semos FGrH  F : ‘Make way, open wide for the god. He wishes to march through your midst upright and bursting.’ Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  ithyphalloi , phallophoroi and others In Attica phallic choruses are only attested, whether in literary or epigraphic sources, for the Pompe of the Dionysia in the city or in the demes. We hear from our Hellenistic sources, principally Semos of Delos, of various kinds of phallic performers (autokabdaloi, phallophoroi, ithyphalloi and phalloidoi), but classical sources only certainly attest the ithyphalloi as a distinct genre or subgenre of phallic performers. It is, however, likely that classical Athenians would have recognized at least two types of phallic chorus, even if they did not have distinct labels. I infer this not from different elements of costume (I doubt very much that costumes were ever as regular as Semos implies), but from the two very different types of phalloi that were processed at the Dionysia and the very different kinds of choral performance they presuppose. The Pompe of the Dionysia included very large phallic ‘floats’ that had to be carried by choruses of men or carried on wagons. Inscriptions and iconography make it clear that Athenian colonies (and subject states) were obliged to contribute gigantic phalloi of this sort, doubtless along with    Herter a: –; Pickard-Cambridge : , –, , ; R. Parker : –. The one apparent exception is ithyphalloi singing a hymn for Demetrius the Besieger in  or  bc on the occasion of his ‘epiphany’ in Athens at the time of the procession to Eleusis (Democh. FGrH  F ; Duris FGrH  F ). But this is probably only an apparent exception. The ithyphalloi were incorporated into the Eleusinian procession for this particular occasion in order to honour Demetrius (who identified himself with Dionysus and because he identified himself with Dionysus). See Csapo : – citing earlier literature. Knowledge of performers known as ‘ithyphalloi’ is indicated by Cratin. fr.  from his Archilochuses produced sometime between  and  bc (Luppe ). Youth gangs named after the phallic performers are attested by Dem. In Conon. , , , which cannot be precisely dated but was most likely delivered in the s (Carey : ). Ithyphalloi are certainly described by Hyp. fr.  Jensen. ‘Phallophoroi’ may, however, also be pre-Hellenistic: see below, n. . Rotstein denies that the autokabdaloi are phallic on the grounds that both Semos and Sosibius list various forms of entertainers in order to draw strict distinctions and infers that, because phallophoroi and ithyphalloi did, autokabdaloi and iamboi ‘wore no mask, mocked no one in the audience, carried no phalloi ’ (: ). The lists of Semos and Sosibios represent varieties of Dionysian entertainers, often only regional variants, and invite one to see them as overlapping, not mutually exclusive categories. The principal evidence is the cup in Florence, below with n. . Note also the intriguing [D5 ]2 at line  of the lamentably fragmentary inscription IG ii  which deals with the Pompe of the Dionysia including the phallic procession ( -[ ] at line  is an inevitable supplement). See Cole :  and Wilson : . There are a few non-Attic parallels or near parallels to the phallic float: a rf calyx krater argued to be from Boeotia (Brommer ; Auffarth : , figs. –); the bf ‘Clazomenian’ amphora fragments in the Ashmolean museum, Oxford . (Boardman ; Csapo : –, details pl. ). As reconstructed by Boardman it is a Dionysiac ship with phallic attributes rather than a phallos. It would, however, be easy to reconstruct the image as a phallos with naval attributes. It is carried in the same manner as the contemporary phallic ‘floats’ on the Florence cup. The giant phallus in Ptolemy’s parade was carried on a wagon (Kallixeinos in Athen. e). Other evidence for phallos-wagons from Hellenistic Delos and Edessa in Csapo : . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo choruses of men to carry them, to the Pompe of the Athenian Dionysia. Images of this kind of gigantic phallos survive on an Athenian black-figured cup of about  bc, now in Florence. On the cup we see two choruses of six and seven men (probably meant to represent pairs, one man on either side of a phallos, so twelve to fourteen men), visibly bending under the weight of enormous phallos-poles (in fact they are complex double poles ridden by sculpted satyrs and komasts). Carrying floats of this size is heavy work and allows little freedom of movement – certainly no independent movement – and little breath for more than a periodic refrain. Indeed the choreuts need close co-ordination if the phallos-pole is to remain upright. It is for this reason that they are furnished with a leader, or exarchos, who directs their movements and takes up the principal burden of the song. In the miniature phallic procession staged in Aristophanes’ Acharnians, a pair of slaves carry the phallos-pole (presumably a simplified and much smaller version of the sort of thing we see on the cup in Florence). Their exarchos, Dicaeopolis, does most of the singing: the slaves’ task is limited to singing refrains of ‘O Phales, Phales’ and to holding the phallos upright. On the Florence cup the phallos-bearers appear to be unmasked and, except for erect phalloi tied to their loins, naked, as we might expect of Greek men involved in very demanding physical exertion. It is these performers whom Aristotle thinks of when inferring an origin for comedy: it is the separation of, and interactivity between, exarchos and chorus that strikes him as the minimally necessary combination of fission, and fusion, to trigger the evolutionary process that led to Old Comedy with its entirely separate but integrally linked components of chorus and actors. Aristotle refers to these ritual choruses only with vague descriptive periphrasis ‘those who led off the phallika’ (Poet. a). If we are justified in giving a name to these performers we should probably think of the men on the Florence cup as phallophoroi. ‘Phallophoroi’ may not have been a technical term for this genre of performance until much later.      IG i .–; SEG  p. ; IG ii ; Accame : –; Krentz : –; Dreher : , –; Rhodes and R. Osborne : – no. ; Dio Chrys. .; Cole ; Csapo . Attic bf cup, Florence ; see most recently Iozzo , with further literature. Csapo –: –. Ar. Ach.  indicates that two slaves carry the phallos (not one as suggested by R. Parker : ) so it is apparently something larger than a phallos-stick that they carry. Philomnestos, a historian of unknown date (FGrH  F ), refers to an Antheas of Lindos who composed ‘comedies’ which he ‘led off for his phallophoroi’ (? 5#   !’  ( - 9 -  ( ). Sourvinou-Inwood :  would place Antheas in the sixth century bc (contra Pickard-Cambridge :  n.  ‘a poet of late but unknown date’): that Philomnestos thinks of Antheas as early should surely be inferred from Philomnestos’ report that ‘he first invented the use of compound nouns in poetry which technique was later used by the Phliasian Asopodoros Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Phallos-sticks are very different from these huge phalloi. Our ancient texts also connect them exclusively with Dionysian processions, and most often with Dionysian processions in Athens. The scholiast to Aristophanes’ Acharnians a describes them as: ‘a long piece of wood fitted with a leather penis at the end’. ‘Long’ of course is relative, but the detail ‘fitted with a leather penis at the end’ shows that the scholion does not refer to the gigantic phallic floats such as we see on the Florence cup, which are evidently entirely of wood, each phallos-pole carved from a single timber, and which would more accurately have been described as ‘representing large penises’ rather than ‘fitted’ with them. In the case of phallos-sticks, the division between wooden stick and leather phallos is emphasized by the use of added red for the phallic tip of the sticks by the Pistoxenos Painter (Figure .). Moreover, the scholiast informs us that Athenians furnished themselves with both ‘public and private’ phalloi. The large floats provided by City or deme and colonies and subjects are clearly beyond the means of most private citizens. Unlike the phallos-bearers we see on the Florentine cup, our phallosstick-bearing choruses are highly mobile and active. Although there is some evidence to suggest that phallos-stick bearers could also make use of an exarchos (see on Figure ., below, pp. –), the exarchos is in this case a far less necessary role. Certainly the vase-paintings we have studied show groups of men without obvious leaders and with little co-ordination in their movements. Far from appearing regimented and measured, their movements in Figures .–. are lively and wild, with all the choreuts equally engaged in song and dance. The phallos-stick itself, like a baton, appears to serve both the spectacle and the music. In the Sabouroff Painter’s cup (Figure .b) it appears to move (autonomously?) with the movement of the dance. In the other cases it seems to be held more or less vertically     [also undatable] in chanted iambics’. Crusius (: –) suspected that later antiquity acquired this information through the peripatetic literary historian Lobon of Argos (late fourth or early third century bc, see Garulli : –): Crusius and other nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholars characterize Lobon as a forger or hoaxer, but this has been discredited as a philological conspiracy theory: Farinelli . The term ‘phallophoroi’ is otherwise first attested by Sosibius c.  bc (FGrH  F ). A late lexicographer perhaps guesses (from the name) that men who tie phalloi to their loins are ‘ithyphalloi’: [Nonnus], Or. .., ... The phallos-stick (as opposed to other forms of phalloi) is described by 8 Ar. Ach. ; 8 Clem. Al. Protr. . p. , – St.; Suda s.v. -  (E ); Atil. Fort. p. , – K.; Terent. Maur. (Keil, Gramm. Lat., vol. vi) –. 8 Ar. Ach. . The images listed in n.  and n.  indicate a single timber for the large ‘floats’ or ‘phallos-poles’ and this is explicitly attested for the phallos at Delos: Vallois : . Possibly we are to think of it as fixed in the ground: see Suda and Phot. s.v. ithyphalloi ( , .). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo like a walking stick, but even so it surely served as more than just an idle prop: Terentianus Maurus implies that the ithyphalloi beat the ground with them in rhythmic accompaniment to their song. Indeed, two out of the three sources that connect phallos-sticks with any particular genre, connect them with ithyphalloi. Lively dance, song and aggressive behaviour are certainly more consistent with what we know of this genre of performer. the character of the pompe or why do phalloi have sticks? In a recent book Kenneth Rothwell describes the Pompe of the Athenian Dionysia as a ‘formal and dignified’ ritual, stressing its religious and sacrificial function and contrasting it with the free, wild and creative aristocratic komos in which he seeks the origin of comedy. Was the Pompe really ‘formal and dignified’? Surely the costume and processional accoutrements of the choruses that participated in the Dionysian Pompe are not easily reconcilable with formal dignity. Apologists have for centuries excused the phalloi as religious and fertility symbols, tolerated, we are encouraged to believe, by the piety of an otherwise mortified populace. Piety certainly licenses the phalloi. But our archaic and early classical images of drunken men on the march bristling with erect phalloi tied to heads and necks, or with them fixed like spearpoints on wooden sticks, are at best indifferent symbols of piety, and poorer still, if they are meant to represent love and fertility. Surely the images, like the sticks themselves, express the Pompe’s carnival mood of playful transgression and aggression. This is why phallos-sticks consistently appear as weapons in the hand of satyrs in Athenian vase-imagery. And surely the phallic knife poised in the hands of the Dionysian clown on the redfigured lekythos signifies ritually licensed aggression (Figure .), as does the rhinoceros-like placement of phalloi on forehead and nose on the face of the entertainers captured (or imagined) by the Berlin Painter (Figure .). Even the large phallic floats are not just passive dolmens. The phallophoroi, according to Semos, frequently rushed forward thrusting the phallos into     Terent. Maur. (Keil, Gramm. Lat., vol. vi) –: ithyphallica porro citarunt musici poetae, | qui ludicra carmina Baccho versibus petulcis | Graio cum cortice phello tres dabant trochaeos, | ut nomine fit sonus ipso, Bacche Bacche Bacche. Mar. Plot. p. , ff. K.; Terent. Maur., previous note. The exception, Atil. Fort. p. , ff. K., connects them with phallophoroi and phalloidoi. Song and dance: Hyp. fr.  Jensen; Democh. FGrH  F . Aggression: see below. Rothwell : . Cf. Sourvinou-Inwood : , who claims that the Pompe of the Dionysia ‘involved a certain solemnity’. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  the watching crowd and then paused (or ‘performed a stationary dance’) while mocking the spectators. Semos’ ithyphalloi advertised the invasive quality of their eponymous props: ‘make way, open up wide for the god, because, upright and bursting, he wants to march through your midst’. The name ‘ithyphalloi’ became popular among disaffected, vandalistically minded aristocratic Athenian youth gangs, not because the ritual performers were famously ‘formal and dignified’, but surely because they came to symbolize the physically aggressive and transgressive behaviour to which these alienated and arrogant youths aspired. You do not put on a mask and phallos in order to look like a satyr, but to act like one! Verbal aggression is well attested for the Pompe (as it is for other Dionysian processions in Athens) – this is why the word pompeia came to denote aggressive abuse. On Semos’ testimony, verbal abuse formed part of the performance of the phallophoroi and it should probably be inferred from his report that the autokabdaloi were also later called iamboi. But a certain amount of physical aggression was also tolerated and expected. Demosthenes tells us of one Ctesicles who thought it fitting to participate in the Athenian Pompe carrying a leather strap. Unfortunately he happened upon a personal enemy and thrashed him with it. The revealing thing is that Ctesicles pleaded not guilty to violent assault due to ‘the influence of the Pompe and drunkenness’ and would have been excused the assault had it not been for the history of enmity between Ctesicles and his victim, which made the violence look more like premeditation than the        Semos FGrH  F  (On Paians): ‘then charging forward [the phallophoroi] would mock whomever they chose’. ‘Clearly an aggressive gesture’, notes C. G. Brown : . For the connection between phallic entertainers and ritual abuse: see Brown : –; Bierl : – ( for the interpretation of  ); Hedreen : . In addition to the passages on pompeia, below n. , see also 8 Dem. De falsa legatione a (Dilts). Semos FGrH  F . For the sexual innuendo, see Csapo : . Dem. .–, , , . For the other youth gangs with phallic names, see Herter : –; Bierl : . On masks at the Pompe: Dem. De fals. leg.  with scholion; 8 Dem. Meid.  (Dilts); FrontisiDucroux . Cf. the expressions  >  and 2   - (Pl. Phdr. b; Platon. Diff. Char. . Kost.; Ioh. Chrys. MPG .., .., .., .., .., etc.). Sourvinou-Inwood :  is wrong to suppose that the words komos and komazein are technically limited to the night procession of the Eisagoge: Halliwell : –. Men. Perinthia fr.  Arnott; 8 Dem. De cor. b (Dilts); Harp. s.v.      > ; Phot. Lex. s.v.      > ( .); Phot. Lex. s.v.    ( ,); Suda s.v.      > ( ). The term ‘from the wagons’, usually referred by modern scholars to the Anthesteria and Lenaia because of Phot. Lex. s.v.   @ 75@ ( .) and Suda s.v.   @ 75@ $ ( ), is likely to be common to all the main Dionysian processions at Athens. See Dion. Hal. Ant. Rom. ..; 8 Lucian, Iupp. trag. .a–b (Rabe); 8 Lucian, Eun. . (Rabe); Halliwell : – with further literature. See above, n. ; cf. Sosib. FGrH  F . See C. G. Brown : . Rotstein :  disagrees. Dem. Meid. . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo sort of random outburst one might expect on this occasion. A scholiast to Demosthenes says that in the Pompe, men wore felt caps underneath masks to muffle the impact of blows to the head acquired when they abused one another. Unruliness was not only licensed but expected. For this reason Aeschines could demonstrate the habitually good behaviour of Epicrates by claiming he showed perfect control even at the Pompe of the Dionysia. Decrees honouring ephebes make specific reference to their orderly conduct at the Dionysia. Decorum and good order from any semi-organized group of young men was so far from being expected that the Athenians created boards of ‘Wardens (epimeletai) of the Pompe’, who appear also to have been called ‘Wardens of Good Conduct in the Theatres’ and ‘Wardens of the Choruses’. Their task was ‘to make sure that choruses did not lose control’ – not likely to refer to the circular, tragic or comic choruses, which could hardly be expected to riot in the middle of their performance, but to the many choruses of men at the Pompe, who paraded about armed with phallos-sticks and very drunk. The Christian polemicists clearly recognized the primarily aggressive and transgressive character of phallos-sticks and phallic processions. The ancient martyrology, Deeds of Saint Timothy, gives the most sensational account. At the Katagogia for Dionysus at Ephesus on  January, ad , the participants are said to have ‘tied on indecent adornments, and even hidden their faces with masks so as not to be recognized, and carried sticks and images of idols’. Here the ‘indecent adornments’ can only be phalloi and ‘sticks and images of idols’ seems to refer to phallos-sticks, or phallos-sticks and thyrsoi (only the phallos-sticks could be called ‘images of idols’). Timothy, outraged and disgusted by ‘the indecent ornaments they had put about themselves’, blocked the processional route and demanded that the Ephesians give up their idolatry. Instead they advanced upon him with the weapons at hand and we are told that he achieved a grizzly,       8 Dem. . (Dilts). Felt bands or caps are also seen on the heads of tragic and comic actors. This suggests that the caps are worn for comfort rather than protection. It is the cultural assumptions behind the scholiast’s claim that are of interest. Felt bands or caps: Attic rf pelike, Phiale Painter, c.  bc, Boston MFA .–, ARV 2 , ; Attic rf chous, c.  bc, Hermitage .  (Figure .). Cf. second figure from right on the first-century ad mosaic from the Casa del Poeta Tragico in Pompei, Naples NM . Aeschin. De falsa leg. . The inscriptions are all second–first century bc: IG ii , ll. –; IG ii , ll. , ; IG ii , ll. –; IG ii , ll. –; IG ii , l. ; IG ii , l. . See the discussion in Csapo and Wilson : . Usener . The event may well be historical: see Keil ; Herter b: . On the ‘indecent ornaments’, see Herter a: ; Herter b: ; and Herter :  and n. . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  if poetic martyrdom, beaten to death by the phallos-sticks of the pagan faithful, a martyrdom so delightfully Dionysian, that one would sooner be tempted to shelve Timothy with Orpheus and Pentheus than with Lawrence and Anthony. A second episode of phallic transgression is known from Antioch in ad : a heathen ran into church brandishing phalloi and shouting abuse at the Christian faithful before (as Bishop Athanasius reassures us) the wrath of God struck him blind. These are the last two recorded uses of the Dionysian phallos. It is easy to dismiss any diachronic or even synchronic connection between drama and Dionysian ritual if we think of the Dionysian Pompe as a formal and dignified procession of civic officials, priests and sacrificiants. Our sources suggest that for most Athenians the Pompe, not the dramatic competition, was the climax of the festival. It was a playful, creative and transgressive ritual that involved costume, role-playing, dance, music, obscenity, abuse, mock aggression, laughter and direct, universal participation. Rothwell’s interpretation of the Pompe conforms to a broader trend in scholarship since the s that identifies the aristocratic symposium as the mainspring of (especially archaic) Greek cultural achievement. It is true that much of our ‘lyric’ poetry seems to assume a sympotic setting and also true that imagery related to music and dance is found mainly on vessels designed for the symposium. Many poetic and musical genres grew up in the elite symposium. But most such genres were also only seconded to the elite symposium from popular festival entertainments and others were never absorbed into elite culture, even if they are found on sympotic vessels. Elites were not as isolated from the public religious and festival activities of the     The phallos-sticks used at the Katagogia are uncomprehendingly referred to as rhopala in the Greek version and pali in the Latin. Athanasius, Hist. Arianorum . (Opitz) with Herter : . It is very tempting to connect the Berlin Painter’s phallic nose (Figure .) with the false noses or long-nosed masks used in medieval and modern carnival, as does Hoffmann (: ). The Berlin Painter’s phallic costume is, however, creative costuming beyond the Dionysian norm. Far more tempting is to derive from phallos-sticks the plastic clubs that gangs of young celebrants use to beat each other over the head at carnival processions in Athens today (also  , see above, n. ). Despite its transformation, the carnival hardware would show a gratifying continuity in both spirit and function. Symposium and lyric poetry: Rösler : ; Pellizer : ; Stehle : –. Symposium and komast vases: Fehr ; Isler-Kerényi ; Seeberg ; Smith ; Steinhart : – (although Steinhart does not distinguish regularly between public banquet and private symposium); Smith , passim. Symposium and komos vases: Steinhart (above); Rothwell . Without denying the importance of the elite symposium, much of the more recent literature takes a softer stand on its exclusivity or even its primacy in the development of music/poetry: see Budelmann b: –; Carey : –; and on iambos, especially Rotstein : –. See for komast and komos vases, Csapo and Miller b: –, –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo polis as the lingering adherents of the polarized ‘alterity’ theories spawned during the Cold War would have us believe. This is particularly true of the Dionysian entertainments that developed in Athens and elsewhere: they were certainly colourful, creative and transgressive enough to appeal to the aristocrat in his cups, even if they did derive from the common culture of the masses. what comedy owes to the phallika ‘Discourse of genres’ implies a primarily synchronic relationship. If so, it is nonetheless necessary to outline a theory of the diachronic relationship between Athenian comedy and the choruses that participated in the Dionysian Pompe: first because received wisdom is that Attic comedy began much earlier than reliable evidence allows; secondly because a belief in comedy’s lineal or collateral descent from choruses of the Pompe appears to have influenced the character and performance of many comic choruses in the fifth century bc. In what follows I traverse some heavily trodden ground but aspire to more concision and more strictly evidence-based conclusions than is usual in discussions of comedy’s origins. Attic vase-painting gives a clear indication of the impact that the creation (or revival) of the Athenian Dionysia had upon popular consciousness. Dionysian imagery first appears in Attic black figure from about  bc onwards, at first derived from and imitating Corinthian themes. But Dionysian imagery becomes rampant only around  bc, when Attic art also introduces many new subjects, and in particular subjects related to Dionysian processions. Hedreen has shown that the treatment of Dionysian myth, especially in depictions of the Return of Hephaestus, is directly informed by the spirit and spectacle of the Dionysian Pompe. Even satyrs after  bc begin to show a previously unknown and uncharacteristic discipline in their dance, moving in procession or with orchestrated movements. It is from about  bc that we can date the beginning of a series of over twenty Attic vases that show elaborately costumed choruses, depicting animal riders, beasts or transvestites. These are indeed komoi, but hardly the spontaneous aristocratic entertainments hypothesized by Rothwell. They perform a processional dance that is more lavishly    Carpenter ; Shapiro : –; Hedreen ; Csapo and Miller b: –; Smith : .  Hedreen . Hedreen . Green : –; Rothwell : –; Csapo and Miller b: –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  equipped, better choreographed and more practised than any known performance before them. This new interest in Dionysian processional imagery begins early in the time of Peisistratus’ tyranny and its sudden efflorescence at this date is hard to explain except in relation to Peisistratus’ creation of the Great Dionysia (or its reorganization on a grand scale). Iconography confirms the general view that Peisistratus attempted to eclipse the many local festivals of Dionysus by creating a far more elaborate festival, centred in Athens, and centred ultimately on the person of the tyrant himself. The iconographic evidence (we have little else) thus suggests the following scenario for the early history of the City Dionysia. It was created (or greatly expanded) about  bc. The primary event was a parade that included choruses of various types. That some of these choruses were perceived as dithyrambic, or actually performed hymns called dithyrambs, seems probable: the komos (‘animal rider’) vases and some satyr choruses are likely candidates. Other choruses were, from the very beginning, phallic. Both phallic and ‘dithyrambic’ types have several Dionysian features in common: they might have leaders (exarchoi), they wear costumes, and the costumes are by nature bestial or grotesque – indeed the phallic and bestial imagery freely crosses the boundary, if such it can be called (I doubt that the archaic Pompe recognized the boundaries or genres distinguished by later Greeks). Despite the fact that the name ‘dithyramb’ was certainly in use and meaningful at this time, our evidence suggests that both species of Dionysian processional choruses were still thought of, generically, as komoi: that is why the men’s choruses (popularly also called ‘circular chorus’ or ‘dithyramb’) that were later held in the theatre might be referred to by this archaizing term and why also comedy literally means ‘song of the komos’. We should probably think of a generic Dionysian       Csapo and Miller b: . The control and development of Dionysian cult was a conscious policy of archaic tyrants, notably Periander of Corinth, Cleisthenes of Sicyon and Pheidon of Argos: the subject is profoundly treated in the recent work of Seaford, especially: Seaford b; Seaford ; and Seaford . The Peisistratan creation of the City Dionysia was challenged by Connor  but reconfirmed by Sourvinou-Inwood ; cf. R. Parker : –. For the ‘dithyrambic’ imagery of the komos vases, see Csapo , esp. –; Rusten b: –; Hedreen : –, –; Seaford : . See above, nn. –. For the iconographic representation of the exarchos, see Csapo – (to which add Athens NM : see Smith : pl. a). Pickard-Cambridge : –; Csapo and Miller b:  (citing other literature). The interpretation of komos is disputed both in the Fasti and in the Law of Euegoros. I hope to address the problem elsewhere. Note that Kourebion/Epikrates is said to 1 in the Pompe of the Dionysia (Dem. De fals. leg. ; Aeschin. De fals. leg. ). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo choral form, ‘komos’, of two main varieties, dithyrambic choruses and phallika, each with subvarieties: animal-rider (or beast) choruses and satyrs for the former; phallophoroi and ithyphalloi for the latter. The vase-paintings of animal-rider (or beast) choruses from the Pompe show both processional and circular song and dance. Even in the classical period the Pompe moved slowly, probably from the Dipylon gate, stopping to perform sacrifice and hymns at altars, and especially at the Altar of the Twelve Gods in the Athenian agora. The existence of important stations along the processional route of course explains why our komos vases depict dancing both in a linear (processional) and in a circular formation (circling altars). The part of the agora adjacent to the Altar of the Twelve Gods was known as the ‘orchestra’ or dancing place and later became a book market outside the festival season. But during the festival season (both Dionysia and Panathenaea), wooden stands (ikria) were set up for those who wished to sit and watch the succession of choral performances around the altar. We appear still to have the text of at least one dithyramb performed at the Altar of the Twelve Gods, written by Pindar (fr.  M). Things changed when a theatre was built north of the Sanctuary of Dionysus: the archaeological remains suggest a date for the building of the theatre at the very end of the sixth century bc. With the building of the theatre, a much larger audience could gather at the end-point of the procession and this probably encouraged a far greater elaboration of choral set pieces than did the smaller ‘stations’ along the processional route. Possibly prizes previously existed for komoi; we have no way of telling. But with the building of the theatre there was an unprecedented opportunity for       Csapo : –. Xen. Eq. Mag. .. The altar, which dates back to the time of the Pisistratids, was doubtless a station on the processional route even before the classical agora was built. The archaic route probably moved on from the Altar of the Twelve Gods, along the Street of the Tripods, through the archaic agora, to stop again at the large plateia in front of the Old Prytaneon, before finally moving on to the Sanctuary of Dionysus: Schmalz . It is possible, but I think unlikely, that Xenophon is referring to performances connected to the procession of the Eisagoge (or a connected ‘komos’) which took place the night before the Pompe, as Sourvinou-Inwood argued (: –; cf. R. Parker : ): in this case it would have nothing to do with the phallic choruses (which are uniquely attached to the Pompe), but would have something to do with dithyrambs. Wycherley : – nos. , –. Wycherley :  nos. –, ; Camp : – fig. ; Camp :  and pl. . Zimmermann : –; Wilson : . It is interesting that tradition placed the transfer of entertainment from the agora to the newly built theatre in / bc after the wooden stands (ikria) collapsed: Suda s.v. Pratinas ( ) cf. Phot. Lex. s.v. ikria ( .) (the collection of evidence by Hammond : – conflates two traditions: one that there were performances in the agora before the theatron, meaning ‘theatre’, was built; second that there was a poplar or poplars above the ikria of the Theatre of Dionysus before the theatron, meaning ‘[‘Lycurgan’] auditorium’, was built; see Roselli : –. The logic is presumably that benchwork built onto the natural slope of the acropolis above the theatre would not need to be so elaborate and so a collapse of ikria there would be less catastrophic). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  establishing a contest that a large audience might witness, and it is probably no coincidence that Athenian civic records of the competition stretched back no earlier than the last decade of the sixth century. It is from c.  bc that the Fasti (as usually reconstructed) record winners of tragic and men’s and boys’ choruses. That men’s and boys’ choruses soon came to be known as ‘circular’ suggests that an effective separation was soon made between the processional and the theatrical entertainments. Some such development is indicated by the ancient testimony that Lasos of Hermione ‘introduced the contest for dithyrambs’ as well as Pindar’s testimony that Lasos first converted the dithyramb from a linear to a circular form. In official speech, however, men’s and boys’ choruses are never called dithyrambs, presumably because true dithyrambs were perceived to be processional and cultic. The building of the theatre may have prompted another set of changes in the iconographic record. The most important shows a shift in focus from the procession to the theatre. Within a decade or two of the building, the komos vases with beast choruses, animal riders and transvestites come to an end. At the same time two new subjects, based on the theatrical competitions, appear: we have the first appearance in Attic vase-painting of choregic tripods (and other imagery related to the men’s and boys’ lyric choruses) and the first depictions of tragic choruses. Paradoxically, perhaps, the Pompe continues to be a topic of interest, but with a new subject. It is in about  bc that we get the first depictions of the choruses of ithyphalloi that are the subject of this chapter. The ithyphalloi doubtless emerge as a subject because of new interest stimulated by the expansion of the City Dionysia; but unlike the new genres they are not theatrical. (By this date ‘theatrical genres’ could have included comedy, added to the Dionysia around  bc.) Depictions of comedy in vase-painting appear only much later, and they focused for the most part on actors. Might it be that early comedy was so close in form and spirit to the phallic choruses that the former sparked the vase-painters’ interest in the latter? (This is a genuine question, not a disguised proposition.) The building of the theatre doubtless had some impact on the performance of the phallic choruses. In late classical and Hellenistic times the theatre could be the site of a prolonged and climactic performance by phallic choruses: Hyperides mentions the ithyphalloi dancing in the orchestra     Suda s.v. Lasos ( ); Pind. fr. b M (with D’Angour ; D’Angour’s theory is criticized and modified, unsuccessfully in my view, by Porter ). Csapo and Miller b: –. Choregic imagery: Csapo b. Tragic choruses and choreuts: Csapo a: –. Csapo a: –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo and Semos’ account of both ithyphalloi and phallophoroi focuses on the moment that the choruses enter the theatre. But ithyphalloi remained primarily processional and non-theatrical, as is clear from Demochares’ account of the ithyphallic procession to greet Demetrius the Besieger. Not much later we have evidence that the actors’ union, the Artists of Dionysus, who in Hellenistic times assumed much of the responsibility for organizing the Dionysian Pompe, also provided the choruses of ithyphalloi, at least at the Soteria in the time of Ptolemy Philadelphus. It is impossible to say in what sense comedy existed in Athens as a separate genre before around  bc, when it was officially adopted as a competitive genre at the City Dionysia. Before this date there is no trace of Attic comedy apart from the rather desperate efforts of later scholars (ancient and modern) to invent a tradition older than the Doric. But comedy did already exist certainly in Sicily and possibly in Megara and elsewhere in the Peloponnese. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that after the building of the theatre the phallic choruses expanded their normal processional repertoire to include a finale in the theatre with more plot and narrative structure and that this gradually grew into a fully theatrical event. Even if this was the case, we would still have to believe that the main models for the creation of Attic comedy were the already evolved narrative and theatrical genres of tragedy, satyr-play, circular chorus and Dorian comedy, not to mention evolved literary genres such as iambic poetry (despite the cultic obscenity and abuse already practised in phallic processions). By the time we can measure its pulse, Attic comedy is sui generis and multigeneric. The one most striking feature that comedy inherits from its carnival matrix is an unrestricted freedom in appropriating the form and contents of other genres, and for this reason it has fairly been called a ‘carnival of genres’.       Hyp. fr.  Jensen; Semos FGrH  F  (PMG a; Bierl : –); cf. the prominence of the theatre in a third-century ad phallic performance in Euboea (SEG  no. ,  no. ; Csapo : ). Democh. FGrH  F ; Duris FGrH  F . Ath. c (Powell : ); Lightfoot : ; Bierl :  n. . See also n.  below. The efforts of later scholars to defend the theory of the genre’s Attic origins have left us only the (dubiously formed) name Sousarion, a fragment that is clearly a later forgery, and biographical details of the poet which indicate that, if he existed, he may have been Megarian and composed iambic poetry (rather than real comedy). Rusten b is surely right to cast doubt on both the name and the tradition. For a possible original coalescence of iambos, dithyramb and phallic procession, see Csapo and Miller b: . I refer to the Bakhtinian reading of Aristophanes by Platter . Bakhtin took a particular interest in Greek Old Comedy, ‘a polyglot genre’ (: ), in developing his carnival theory and his approach has had broad resonance in recent work on Old Comedy: see esp. Carrière , Möllendorff . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  What ancient Athenians thought, even if questionable or untrue, is, nonetheless, important for understanding later developments in comedy. We cannot be sure if phallic choruses were supposed to be the origin of comedy by anyone earlier than Aristotle, but the connection is an easy one: in addition to sharing a mixture of choral and individual delivery, both genres were scurrilous, obscene, potentially aggressive and abusive; both employed costume which emphasized the phallos, physical distortion of the body and potentially masks. Aristotle does, however, mention a debate, possibly much older than his day, in which pro-Dorians supported their claim to have invented comedy by disputing the derivation of ‘komoidia’ from ‘komos’. There can be no doubt that ‘komoidia’ really did mean the ‘song of the komos’ and it is very likely that all the various genres of processional chorus (including but not limited to the phallic varieties) that appeared in Dionysian parades were closely associated in the popular mind with comedy. A large percentage of the earliest known titles of comedy, not only from Athens, but even from Sicily, appeal to choral types that are either known from the archaic Pompe or part of a broader Dionysian matrix of processional choral forms: titles such as Epicharmus’ Komastai (alternatively called Hephaestus and reportedly about the Return of Hephaestus), Dionysoi, Bacchae and Harpagai (apparently about Kotyto, whose choral forms were assimilated to Dionysian komoi) – this is all the more surprising if, as many believe, Sicilian comedy had no chorus. From the first fifty years of comedy in Athens we have a very high density of beast choruses: Magnes’ Birds, Gall-Flies, Frogs, Crates’ Beasts, Ecphantides’ Satyrs, Callias’ Satyrs (relevant too no doubt are the plays entitled Dionysus by Magnes, Crates and Ecphantides). And, as we will see in a moment, such choruses continue to be popular. The synchronic influence of the komos is most palpable in the second and third generation of Attic comedy. Recent studies of Cratinus make it very clear that he cultivated a public image of himself as a poetic reactionary: Emmanuela Bakola in particular has convincingly shown that Cratinus presented himself as a champion of traditional ‘Dionysiac poetics’ in opposition to the comic poets of his day, who, he felt, had strayed too far from their roots, particularly, it seems, in their emulation of tragedy. It is not just for his revival of the spirit of Archilochus that Aristophanes spoke of ‘the initiates in the Bacchic rites of the bull-eating tongue of     Philomnestos, who seems to presuppose such a connection, is undatable (see above, n. ). Arist. Poet. a–b. Kerkhof : , –; Jameson, Jordan and Kotansky : –. Bakola : – and passim. Bakola picks up from the important studies of Cratinus and iambos of Rosen  and Biles , who however speak more narrowly of an ‘Archilochean poetics’. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo Cratinus’ (Ran. ). Cratinus claimed to draw his creative inspiration directly from Dionysus, writing only when drunk and reviving the ‘traditional’ Dionysian spirit of comedy. Cratinus’ choruses frequently have a Dionysian or closely paradionysian persona: he wrote a Boukoloi (not ‘Cowherds’ but a term referring to worshippers who process with Dionysus in the form of a bull), a Euneidae (named after the clan of musicians and priests of Dionysus Melpomene who also organized Dionysian parades), Thracians (probably Thracian women processing for the cult of Bendis, an orgiastic cult with dance and music broadly assimilated to that of Dionysus), one or two choruses of transvestite men (Malthakoi and Drapetides), and at least two satyr choruses (Dionysalexandros and Satyroi), and a beast chorus (Cheirones), not to mention a play called Dionysoi, whose chorus was presumably composed of the god’s worshippers. About some of these plays we know enough to be sure that Cratinus imitated cultic choruses: in Boukoloi (as in Euripides’ Bacchae) the parodos imitates a processional dithyramb; in Dionysalexandros both the parodos and the exodos seem to have imitated cultic processions. Even in Archilochoi the fragments suggest that iambic poetry was conceived to be a performative rather than a literary genre and possibly in a komos setting: the fragments refer to an annual festival and notably to ithyphalloi (frr.  and ). In presenting himself as an authentic Dionysian poet, Cratinus draws liberally upon all the choral types associated with either Dionysus’ mythic retinue (satyrs, bacchants) or his festival retinue composed of the typical choral groups that perform in the Pompe: satyrs, beasts, transvestites, iambists and ithyphalloi. But he does this without privileging any single choral type: like the Pompe, Cratinus’ comedy is both generically inclusive and transgressive. Cratinus probably marks the high point of the Pompe’s influence upon comedy, but the influence continues to be felt until well into the fourth century and the era associated with ‘Middle Comedy’. Beast choruses continue to appear in comedy until – bc. Satyr choruses in comedy have their main burst of popularity in the s and s bc and are afterwards only revived by the archaizing Timocles as late as the s bc. At least one classical comedy had a chorus whose persona was drawn directly from the Pompe, Ephippus’ Obeliaphoroi, although we may suspect the respective Komastai of Ameipsias (or Phrynichus) and Timocles’ Dionysiazousai. Other choruses definitely had a mystic or Dionysian character and are likely to have incorporated motifs common to the choruses of   Bakola : –, –. The exodos in which the satyrs escort Dionysus to the Greek ships alludes to a Dionysian Pompe even without the scapegoat overtones argued by Bakola.  Storey . See the thorough study by Rothwell : –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  the Pompe: Eupolis’ Baptai (with a chorus of transvestite worshippers of the orgiastic goddess Kotyto), Autocrates’ Tympanistai (see fr. ), Phrynichus’ Mystai, Antiphanes’ Carians (a transvestite or effeminate chorus of orgiastic worshippers of Cybele) and of course the respective Bacchae of Antiphanes, Diocles and Lysippus. The beast choruses of Aristophanes are well known; Babylonians may have had a chorus of Asiatics introducing Dionysus; Seasons appears to have been about the rites of Sabazius; the chorus of Lemnian Women introduced the cult of Bendis. It should be remembered that Acharnians (–) directly incorporated a representation of the Pompe. what the phallika owe to comedy: phallic choruses in fourth-century vase-painting Whatever comedy owed to phallic choruses, it is clear from vase-painting that from about  bc at the latest comedy dominated the intergeneric exchange. Four Attic vase-paintings from the first half of the fourth century show that the costume and character of phallic dancers underwent some assimilation to those of comic choreuts and actors. The latest surviving wielder of a phallos-stick is indeed embedded in a scene that is otherwise entirely concerned with comedy. Hitherto unnoticed, the phallos-stick appears on a well-known chous in St Petersburg dated to about  bc (Figure .). The chous shows five children playing the roles of Dionysian entertainers (a recurrent motif in choes). Each of the children is in costume and each is associated with a comic actor’s mask. All of the figures wear the protective band used by actors to shield the sides and (in some cases) top of the head against the hard edges of the mask (and doubtless also to secure the fit). And yet the figures on the far        Storey a: –. This list of choruses that draw upon komos types familiar from the Pompe would be much longer if it could be shown that choruses of ‘foreigners’ appeared on the series of Attic komos vases, as is frequently claimed (e.g. Seeberg : –; Rothwell : –), but this seems to me the same kind of misreading of general Dionysian costume and imagery as led to the initial identification of our phallic performers as Lydians and Scythians. Play titles such as the Lydians of Magnes or the Cretans of Nicochares are likely to be relevant as choruses of worshippers introducing an orgiastic cult (either that of Dionysus or the various deities that are regularly conflated with Dionysian cult in ancient drama), but not qua foreigners. Norwood : –, –. Attic rf chous, c.  bc, Hermitage . . Rusten (forthcoming) demonstrates the importance of this vase to the history of comedy. If Bulle is right that Scopas’ Pothos carried a phallos-stick, then the gem, mentioned in n.  above, is later. But see the doubts expressed in the same note. See Csapo a: –. Rusten (forthcoming) shows that the masks are accurate representations of known types. See above, n. . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo Figure . Attic red-figure chous, c.  bc Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Figure . Attic red-figure bell krater, Hare-Hunt Painter, c. – bc right and left of the scene are certainly not dressed as actors: one wears the costume of a choregos and the other appears to be dressed as a piper. There is therefore a certain blurring of comic actor imagery with other personnel involved in Dionysian entertainment. The three boys in the centre of the visual field all wear the actor’s bodytights and the comic somation (padded body with enlarged stomach, buttocks, breasts and phallos). It is the ‘actor’ on the left who is of particular interest to our investigation. He carries the mask of a comic king (it has a little crown and is the usual mask for Zeus in western Greek comic vase-paintings). Unlike the other two ‘actors’ he also wears a himation, though possibly only as a mark of his superior social status. In place of a sceptre, however, the figure carries a phallos-stick. We do not actually have an image of a phallic entertainer, but rather an image in which the cultic symbol of one Dionysian entertainer is confused with, or appropriated to the use of, another. The readiness with which the attribute of a phallic dancer is transferred to a comic actor is of particular interest as the first sign of a process of assimilation, at least in vase imagery, of the performers in the Pompe to the performers in the theatre. Although phallos-sticks are missing from three fourth-century vasepaintings of choral entertainers, the entertainers have enough points in common with their fifth-century counterparts to make it likely that they too are to be thought of as choruses at the Pompe. One is known only from a drawing made in  (Figure .): the Attic red-figured bell krater upon  Rusten (forthcoming). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo which it is based has never been photographed and I infer that it is in poor shape. Nonetheless, we can see ivy-wreathed men wearing spotty bodysuits moving in procession; one appears to carry a cake. These costumes look something more like comic actors’ costumes, since they include the usual form of actor’s phallos and a suggestion of padding. But the figures are not likely to be comic actors or a comic chorus. The padding is slight and the bodysuit worn in comic costume, since it represents stage-nakedness, is never decorated and never belted as this is. Moreover the facial features are differentiated and not distorted: even if the faces are meant to be seen as masked, the masks are not uniform and the beardlessness of the figure on the left shows that the chorus is of mixed age. Comic choruses never show this diversity. One should note too that the toes of the piper are articulated but none of the toes of the choreuts, suggesting that they are wearing boots. Possibly Gerhard could not make out (or did not recognize) the ivy spots that are here rendered as Xs and Os. He also could make nothing of the stick in the hand of the rightmost dancer. It is too long and crooked to be a torch. It may be a walking stick, but a walking stick is an odd prop for a chorus especially of men in their prime. It is likely that Gerhard would have misrecognized a phallos-stick if he saw it. The vase indicates a processional movement: the feet of the four leftmost figures are all directed to the right and their bodies appear to describe a stylized march rather than what we would call a dance. The rightmost figure faces the group and has one arm raised in what might appear to be a speaking gesture (Gerhard apparently took him to be holding something small in his right hand, but this is unlikely). His configuration conforms to a standard schema for showing a lead singer, or exarchos. Even without the detail of a phallos-stick, we would have to conclude from the processional nature of the image, the details of costume (including the ‘comic’ phalloi), the ivy crowns as well as the ‘ivy spots’ on the costume, and of course the presence of the cake, that the vase is meant to depict a chorus from a Dionysiac procession. The phalloi indicate a connection with the Dionysian Pompai, the only processions at Athens for which phallic choruses are attested. An image on a recently published Athenian bell krater of – bc shows a chorus which is certainly meant to be interpreted as a group     Attic rf bell krater, Hare-Hunt Painter, c. – bc, S. Agata de’ Goti, formerly collection Mustilli, ARV 2 , MMC 3 , AV . Gerhard a: pl.  and Gerhard b: . Gerhard’s drawing is reproduced in Wieseler : pl. ix, ; Bieber :  fig. . Gerhard b: . Even the chorus of old men on the bf skyphos, Thebes BE ., carry torches not sticks: see Green :  fig. a. Csapo –. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  Figure . Attic red-figure bell krater, – bc of performers from the Pompe of the Dionysia (Figure .). The bell krater shows a group of four men in procession against a background of decorative ivy leaves. The first man on the right is bald, front and top, like the Sabouroff Painter’s group, and prances in what appears to be a mincing effeminate manner (krotalos-players sometimes adopt this stance). The second and third men have several days’ growth of beard on the side of their faces like the Berlin Painter’s choreuts. All the men wear ivy garlands (the berries are emphasized with added white), spotty bodytights and large ‘looped’ phalloi. The phalloi are certainly of the type worn by comic actors (and possibly comic choreuts). So are the bodytights, but only in form: comic tights are never decorated but are designed to represent naked flesh. And there is no suggestion of comic padding. Three of the men wear the familiar kothornoi highlighted in added white paint. There is enough similarity in costume with the early classical phallic choruses of Figures .–. to suggest that the spots on the costume are intended to suggest ivy. We are probably to recognize the men as masked: Ian McPhee tells me that the line of the chin continues up to the ear, contrary to  Attic rf bell krater, Telos Group (Schauenburg) or Telos Painter (McPhee), – bc, Naples, private collection. Schauenburg : pl. .–; Green : . I thank Dick Green for bringing this vase to my attention. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo the normal practice of the Telos Painter and other painters of the fourth century. In any case the faces are different and suggest men of different ages: they are certainly no comic chorus. Threatening, probably, is the way the figure on the left holds his stick or torch. The middle figures are engaged in transporting important contributions to the feast that will follow the sacrifice at the end of the procession. I do not know the identity of the prominent object emphasized by added white paint in the hand of the man second in the procession: Green very plausibly suggests a Mediterranean white radish. Unmistakable, however, is the large object, also emphasized by added white that the man with the radish(?) carries on a pole together with the man behind him. It is not a cake, but something equally suited to the sacrificial procession of an Athenian festival, indeed one uniquely attested for the Pompe of the Dionysia. It is a kind of bread baked on a stick called ‘obel bread’. The exclusively Dionysian quality of obel bread seems to have elicited an aetiological myth that Dionysus invented the bread while on military campaign: no doubt so that it could be carried by his creatures while ‘on the march’. That obel-bread carriers, obeliaphoroi, were no less colourful      I. McPhee per litteras; Schauenburg : ; Green : : Green sees ‘jutting chins’, but adds that ‘it is hard to say if the painter omitted to fill in their beards, or if the intention was simply to make them grotesque’. Green : , but it is not primarily, I suspect, ‘festive food’, as Green suggests (the most common use of the radish in Greek literature, if not in Greek culture, is to provide an emetic). The associations of the radish in this context are at least as likely to be symbolic as alimentary, and to allude to the phallic nature and function of the vegetable: Ar. Nub.  (with scholia ad loc. and a, d, a); 8 Ar. Plut. ; Lucian, De mort. Peregr. . (with scholia ad loc.); Hesych. s.v. =- !  ; Suda s.vv.   ( ) and =-  ( ); Carey . The obel bread said to be found on choes (van Hoorn :  figs. –, ; Crosby : ) is in fact streptos cakes: see Hamilton : . Choes are not in any case restricted to themes related to the Anthesteria; they have a broad (and not exclusive) preference for Dionysian themes. Ath. b; Poll. .; Paus. Attic. %ttikän ½nom†twn sunagwgž 1; Phot. Lex. s.v. obelias artos ( .). See also Kassel and Austin on Ar. fr. . Schauenburg : – considers but ultimately rejects the notion that the object is meant to represent meat. A Boeotian bf lekanis lid, c.  bc (Adolphseck Schloß Fasanerie ; van Straten , V, fig. ; cf. Schauenburg : ) shows meat being stacked over most of the length of a long spit (the one possible Attic equivalent, a cup by Makron, ARV 2 /, Para. , Addend. , is described by van Straten :  as ‘man taking dough (?) from lebes on tripod stand’). Schauenburg, however, notes the difference in shape (the object here is in fact ‘stomach shaped’, exactly as Photius describes obel bread). But one should also note that the Boeotian lekanis is careful to articulate the divisions between slices of meat. Moreover, the Telos Painter and the painter of the agora polychrome oinochoe (see below) paint the bread white (it is uncooked or semi-cooked dough which is meant to be baked at the sacrifice in the sanctuary), even though the agora polychrome has seven different colours, including pink, at his disposal. Moreover, one never sees men carrying meat in this way, nor is one likely to (Attic scenes of men carrying meat are very different: see van Straten : ): the meat is butchered and cooked at the place of sacrifice. Only live animals appear in sacrificial processions. If food is carried it is almost invariably cakes or bread (for the radish, see above, n. ). Ath. b drawing on the Epikleseis of Socrates. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  characters than phallic entertainers, if they were indeed distinguishable, is suggested by the attested use of ‘obeliaphoroi’ as a derogatory term for workers and rustics. Obeliaphoroi were interesting enough to Ephippus for him to give their name to one of his comedies (and evidently therefore to the chorus). Depictions of obel bread appear twice elsewhere: once on an Attic polychrome oinochoe, and once on an Apulian bell krater. Only in the case of the Apulian krater do the obeliaphoroi clearly wear full comic costume. Indeed the comification of the subject is so complete that the figures are drawn on top of a stage. The Attic oinochoe, though it is frequently referred to comedy, is far more likely to belong to our small (but growing) repertoire of images of entertainers from the Dionysian Pompe. Although the details of costume have not survived in any clear form, enough remains to show that both figures share features with our phallic choruses: they have long beards and one is depicted in kothornoi and the same kind of rustic hat we find drawn by the Pistoxenos Painter (Figure .). Yet another chorus of Dionysian performers appear on an Attic redfigured bell krater excavated from an ancient cemetery in Cástulo, near Linares in Southern Spain (Figure .). This is a far more doubtful case. The costumes look comic: lines at the four visible ankles and the three visible wrists indicate the use of the bodytights worn by actors and choreuts. The use of the comic bodysuit (somation) is indicated by the large bellies, buttocks and phalloi. Even the piper (second from left) wears a comic body: the lines on his upper thigh make this especially clear. There are, however, good reasons to think this is not comedy. The one Attic vasepainting and the two Attic reliefs that do certainly show comic choruses show uniform masks, costumes and movements, only the piper excepted (the pipers wear the same formal costume that we find in scenes of tragedy). Here, however, the costumes are distinguished, even if all appear comic       Ephipp. frr. –. Phot. Lex. s.v. obelias artos ( .). Attic polychrome oinochoe, c.  bc, Agora P , MMC 3 AV ; Apulian bell krater, Near to the Painter of Copenhagen , – bc, St Petersburg  (W. ), PhV 2 . The claim that all of the polychrome oinochoai in the group published by Crosby  are somehow related to comedy cannot be sustained. In fact Agora P , identified by Webster in PickardCambridge : fig.  as an ‘effeminate reveller’ is very likely to be another phallic entertainer from the Pompe: he wears the cuffed kothornoi and carries a staff that, judging from the photograph of the pot, is intended to be a phallos-stick. Unfortunately the poor quality of the painting and the even more lamentable state of its preservation allow no firm ground for argument. Attic rf bell krater, – bc, Cástulo ; Blázquez : – fig. , pls. –; McPhee : ; Domı́nguez and Sánchez :  no. ,  fig. ; Green : . The published photograph makes clear, as the drawing does not, that there are lines at the wrists of the rightmost figure. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo Figure . Fragments of an Attic red-figure bell krater, – bc (including the costume of the piper). Only the figure on the right looks masked, or at least has a grotesque face, but not those on either side of the piper. It is possible that the figures that flank the piper are wearing roughly the same costume (the one on the right does not have the himation worn by the one on the left). If this is a scene from comedy it must show an image of two choreuts, a piper and a comic actor. But if this is so, the vase is truly unique: there is virtually no representation in Greek art that shows choreuts and actors together in performance. But the choreuts are not shown making uniform movements or even movements that might strike the viewer as belonging to the same pattern. It is very hard to see how the painter could have expected anyone to recognize that these two figures are meant to represent a comic chorus. Their incoherent, vaguely processional movements (a procession seems indicated by the presence of torches) seem rather to suggest the iconography of entertainers at the Pompe. But if so, they share nothing more with the genre than this vaguely processional and non-uniform movement and the ivy garlands whose traces are visible on the heads of the rightmost figures. The fragment from Cástulo remains problematic no matter what genre we refer it to.  The small figure adjacent a tragic chorus on an Attic rf krater in Basel (BS ) is a notable exception, if this is an actor. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013 Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian genre-crossing  conclusion From about  bc Athenian art takes a minor interest in the choral groups that performed in the Dionysian Pompe. From about  to  bc we have several vase-paintings of choral groups who wear costumes typified by sleeved, belted and ankle length (sometimes fringed) garments, ivy spots, kothornoi, ivy garlands and sometimes masks. They move and dance in procession to pipe music and are associated with such Pompe-specific props as phallos-sticks, phallic adornments and obel bread. They are not comic but they have a lot in common with comedy. They may not be precisely the subgenre of phallic chorus that Aristotle was visualizing when he derived comedy from ‘those who led off the phallika’, but they were surely included within his general purview when he linked comedy and phallika. Even if the diachronic relationship between phallika and comedy is wrong (at the very least it is simplistic), the remains of Old Comedy attest to a general belief that a special relationship existed between them. Athenian comic poets frequently model their choruses after choral varieties (including phallic choruses) known from the Pompe, and this is especially true of self-styled Dionysian traditionalists and archaizers, such as Cratinus and (much later) Timocles. By about  bc, however, we have strong evidence that the main influence flowed from comedy to phallika: the costume of phallic performers remains clearly distinct from comedy but undergoes a high degree of assimilation nonetheless: one wonders if the ‘voluntary’ performers were already being replaced by professional actors in the fourth century Pompe: this appears to have been standard practice in Hellenistic times. The vase-paintings also show that our phallic performers belong to a broad community of Dionysian choral performers with whom they share many motifs, and with whom they share the same occasion (the Pompe) and purpose (carnival, sacrifice). The patterns that differentiate our phallic performers from other phallic performers and other komoi are variable, relatively vague and easily transgressed. This is a characteristic of Dionysian choruses and of Dionysus himself, who transgresses all norms and barriers. But this transient and permeable quality is something that comedy also  See n.  above. For the artists organizing and/or participating in processions generally: Aneziri : , –, –, ; Lightfoot : . Already in the Euboean decree of c.  bc (IG xii , , – supplements) it appears that pipers and perhaps other artists who were hired for the theatrical competitions were also required to participate in the Pompe (in IG xii , , ll. –, – all contest performers are required to take part in the procession for the Artemisia). Cf. Aneziri : . Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013  eric csapo inherits to a far greater degree than tragedy or even satyr-play. For this reason comedy can fairly be called a ‘genre of genres’ and in this respect too it resembles its cultic Dionysian matrix. Old Comedy draws freely upon all musical and speech genres, but Old Comedy mostly draws its form and contents from the cognate Dionysian genres of tragedy, satyrplay, dithyramb, iambos and the sub-literary choral komoi of the Pompe. In this sense, Aristotle is both deeply insightful and surely wrong, or at least overstating the case, when he derives comedy specifically from the phallika. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 129.78.139.28 on Tue Jun 04 23:24:55 WEST 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519601.005 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2013