Pseudococcus calceolariae (scarlet mealybug)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell)
- Preferred Common Name
- scarlet mealybug
- Other Scientific Names
- Dactylopius calceolariae Maskell 1879
- Erium calceolariae (Maskell) Lindinger 1935
- Pseudococcus citrophilus Clausen 1915
- Pseudococcus fragilis Brain 1912
- Pseudococcus gahani Green 1915
- Pseudococcus similans
- International Common Names
- Englishcitrophilus mealybugcurrant mealybug
- EPPO code
- PSECGA (Pseudococcus calceolariae)
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Symptoms
P. calceolariae feeds on the phloem of deciduous and evergreen plants in warm, temperate climates. Under these conditions, populations of P. calceolariae seldom reach sufficiently high levels to debilitate the plant, and the symptoms of attack are usually restricted to visual sighting of mealybugs or sooty mould. When P. calceolariae (or other mealybugs) shelter in fruit, for example within the calyx (pipfruit), around the stalk (pipfruit) or under fruit sepals (citrus, persimmons) they are often hidden from view, and cannot be seen without cutting open the fruit. Sooty mould fungi growing around the calyx or sepals on excreted honeydew are a good indicator of the presence of mealybugs in the fruit. Sooty mould on foliage may result from mealybugs or other Sternorrhyncha.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Fruit/external feeding | ||
Plants/Fruit/honeydew or sooty mould | ||
Plants/Growing point/external feeding | ||
Plants/Growing point/honeydew or sooty mould | ||
Plants/Inflorescence/external feeding | ||
Plants/Inflorescence/honeydew or sooty mould | ||
Plants/Leaves/honeydew or sooty mould | ||
Plants/Leaves/honeydew or sooty mould | ||
Plants/Roots/external feeding | ||
Plants/Stems/external feeding | ||
Plants/Stems/honeydew or sooty mould |
Prevention and Control
Introduction
Mealybugs are generally recognized as being difficult to control.
Chemical Control
For the past four decades, P. calceolariae has been kept under reasonable control by broad-spectrum contact or systemic insecticides, but this situation is beginning to change. For example, in New Zealand, P. affinis [P. viburni] has developed resistance to some organophosphates (Charles et al., 1993). Because of this, organophosphates are gradually being replaced by 'softer' pesticides, such as insect growth regulators. However, the insect growth regulators effective against mealybugs, such as buprofezin, are persistent chemicals and there is a risk of mealybugs developing resistance to them.
Biological Control
Sufficient success has been achieved using natural enemies to ensure that biological control of mealybugs has been regularly studied, especially with the development of IPM programmes (Charles, 1993; Laudonia and Viggiani, 1986; Moore, 1988). This impetus is likely to continue.Biological control of P. calceolariae was successfully achieved as early as 1928, in California, by the Australian parasitoids Tetracnemoidea brevicornis (as Tetracnemus pretiosus) and Coccophagus gurneyi (Compere and Smith, 1932). As was common from about 1890 to 1930, the biological control programme was closely linked with New Zealand. C. gurneyi was introduced to New Zealand at the same time (Charles, 1989), and has also been introduced to the Republic of Georgia (Yasnosh, 1995). Both parasitoids were introduced into Chile where they achieved substantial control (Zuniga, 1985). In Italy, control is maintained by the introduced mealybug parasitoids T. brevicornis, T. peregrina and Anagyrus fusciventris (Laudonia and Viggiani, 1986). The Australian coccinellid Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is a voracious predator of mealybugs, and has been distributed widely to control a number of mealybug species around the world (Moore, 1988).
Impact
P. calceolariae is an endemic pest throughout most of Australia, and is perhaps the most serious pest of citrus in South Australia (Altmann and Green, 1991). P. calceolariae is commonly found throughout the major fruit-growing regions in New Zealand, and may be very common locally on most fruit crops (Charles, 1993). It can be a severe pest, at least locally, in Italy (Laudonia and Viggiani, 1986). The introduction of natural enemies has reduced its importance in the Republic of Georgia (Yasnosh, 1995).Mealybugs are pests for several reasons. They may debilitate parts of the plant through sap depletion, transmit disease (Petersen and JG Charles, Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, personal communication), or scar fruit, for example P. calceolariae feeding under the 'button' of citrus fruit causes a necrotic halo mark. A heavy infestation can cause fruit drop (Altmann and Green, 1991). More commonly, the presence of mealybugs in other perennial fruit crops leads to unacceptable growth of sooty mould fungi on honeydew deposits on the fruit, either as a deposit on the cheek (which is difficult to remove at packing) or around the stalk, calyx or sepals. For growers producing fresh fruit for export markets, the presence of mealybugs or sooty mould may be sufficient to limit the sale of that fruit to local markets at reduced prices. Some countries accept the fruit, but insist on fumigation, which is costly, and results in poorer quality fruit with a shorter shelf-life.P. calceolariae has recently been shown to be a vector of the closterovirus associated with grapevine leafroll disease, and is implicated in the spread of this disease in vineyards (Petersen and JG Charles, Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, personal communication).The significance of mealybugs as pests thus varies among country, crop and grower. The pest status of P. calceolariae (and mealybugs in general) can only be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 24 November 2019
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.