Abstract
We focus on teacher cognition of how to engage students in scientific practices in the classroom by drawing on the empirical literature related to teacher knowledge of inquiry-based instruction, scientific inquiry, and our own work centered on engaging teachers in authentic scientific investigations. Teacher cognition of scientific practices is important in light of the renewed emphasis in the US and abroad on the practices of science, that emphasizes carrying out scientific ways of thinking in the classroom to foster higher-level thinking in children. Although engaging students in inquiry-oriented pedagogy has been advocated for over a hundred years, this kind of teaching is rare. Even some of the most informed teachers struggle to (1) articulate what inquiry is, often recognizing only the most salient features of inquiry, and (2) engage their students in critical aspects of doing science and understanding the nature of science. In this chapter we explore what teachers need to know in order to enact sophisticated science pedagogy related to scientific practices in the classroom. We also argue that teachers need to have integrated knowledge of science concepts, scientific practices, nature of science, and pedagogy, and to take a metacognitive stance towards their teaching to support students in engaging in scientific practices in the classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abd-El Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673–699.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.
Abell, S. K. (2007). In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Science teacher knowledge. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Science Education, 76(6), 581–595.
Alexander, R. J. (1984). Innovation and continuity in the initial teacher education curriculum. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching? What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing them for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 808–830). New York: Routledge.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., & Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: Reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 218–228.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making senseof teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 93(2), 322–360.
Brown, P. L., Abell, S. K., Demir, A., & Schmidt, F. J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90(5), 784–802.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beleifs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013a). Inquiry-based instruction in science classrooms: Is it happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013b). Inquiry-based professional development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 1947–1978.
Capps, D. K., Shemwell, J. T., & Young, A. M. (2016). Over reported and misunderstood? A study of teachers’ reported enactment and knowledge of inquiry-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 934–959.
Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1970). An analysis of experienced science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 70(5), 366–376.
Carlsen, W. S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471–481.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & Hee, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 665–674.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.
Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II). New York: Routledge.
Crippen, K., & Antonenko, P. D. (2018). Designing for collaborative problem solving in STEM. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in stem education (pp. 89–116). Springer.
Department for Education and Skills/Qualification and Curriculum Authority. (2004). Science – the national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.
Dobey, D. C., & Schafer, L. E. (1984). The effects of knowledge on elementary science inquiry teaching. Science Education, 68, 39–51.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3–56.
Finley, F., Lawrenz, F., & Heller, P. (1992). A summary of research in science education- 1990. Science Education, 76, 239–254.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). A tale of two hamlets. In the making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109–120.
Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2009). The change of science teachers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1819–1846.
Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929.
Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 423–440.
Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry: A case study approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 185–216.
Ministry of Education of Singapore. (2007). Primary science syllabus. Ministry of Education of Singapore: Curriculum Planning & Development Division.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2001). Subject content knoweldge and teacher talk in the primary science classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 369–379.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 80–84.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Smith, D. M., & Cooper, B. (1967). A study of the use of various techniques in teaching science in the elementary school. School Science and Mathematics, 67(6), 559–566.
Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 263–268.
Usak, M., Ozden, M., & Eilks, I. (2011). A case study of beginning teachers’ subject matter (SMK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of teaching chemical reaction in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 407–429.
van Driel, J., Berry, A., & Meirink. (2014). Science teacher knowledge. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II). New York: Routledge.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Meaning, learning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wheeler, G. F. (2000). In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 471–496). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Yerrick, R., Radosta, M., & Greene, K. (2018). Technology, culture and young science teachers—A promise unfulfilled and proposals for change. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 117–138). Springer.
Zohar, A. (2004). Higher-order thinking in science classrooms: Students’ learning and teacher’ professional development. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crawford, B.A., Capps, D.K. (2018). Teacher Cognition of Engaging Children in Scientific Practices. In: Dori, Y.J., Mevarech, Z.R., Baker, D.R. (eds) Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66657-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66659-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)