Skip to main content
Log in

A monolithic finite element strategy for conjugate heat transfer

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by several applications such as thermal management of electronic components, the design and modeling of heat exchangers, etc. this work presents an efficient monolithic finite element strategy for solving thermo-fluid-structure interaction problems involving a compressible fluid and a structure undergoing small deformations. This formulation uses displacement variables for the structure and velocity variables for the fluid, with no additional variables required to ensure traction, velocity, temperature and heat flux continuity at the fluid-structure interface. The use of an exact tangent stiffness matrix ensures a quadratic rate of convergence within each time step. The robustness and good performance of the method is demonstrated by applying the proposed strategy to a wide spectrum of problems pertaining to steady/transient, two/three-dimensional/axisymmetric problems involving conjugate heat transfer. In particular, it is shown that the proposed formulation yields good results even when the fluid is almost incompressible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50
Figure 51
Figure 52
Figure 53
Figure 54
Figure 55
Figure 56
Figure 57
Figure 58
Figure 59
Figure 60
Figure 61
Figure 62
Figure 63
Figure 64
Figure 65

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. John M House, Christoph Beckerman and Theodore F Smith 1990 Effect of a centered conducting body on natural convection on natural convection heat transfer in an enclosure. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A : Applications : An International Journal of Computation and Methodology. 18: 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jong Yun Oh, Man Yeong Ha and Kyung Chun Kim 1997 Numerical study of heat transfer and flow of natural convection in an enclosure with a heat generating conducting body. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A : Applications : An International Journal of Computation and Methodology. 31: 289–303

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang L M, Shu C, Chen Z and Wu J 2020 Three-dimensional lattice Boltzmann flux solver for simulation of fluid-solid conjugate heat transfer problems with curved boundary. Physical Review. E 101, 053309: 1–15

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Man Yeong Ha and Mi Jung Jung 2000 A numerical study on three-dimensional conjugate heat transfer of natural convection and conduction in a differentially heated cubic enclosure with a heat-generating cubic conducting body. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 43: 4229–4248

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Man Yeong Ha, Mi Jung Jung and Young Soo Kim 1999 Numerical study on transient heat transfer and fluid flow of natural convection in an enclosure with a heat-generating conducting body. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications. 35: 415–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Purusothaman A and Murugesan K and Ali J Chamkha 2019 3D modeling of natural convective heat transfer from a varying rectangular heat generating source. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 138: 597–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan Yan and David E Keyes 2015 Smooth and robust solutions for Dirichlet boundary control of fluid-solid conjugate heat transfer problems. Journal of Computational Physics. 281: 759–786

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. William D Henshaw and Kyle K Chand 2009 A composite grid solver for conjugate heat transfer in fluid–structure systems. Journal of Computational Physics. 228: 3708–3741

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Habchi S and Acharya S 1986 Laminar mixed convection in a partially blocked, vertical channel. International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer. 29: 1711–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adel Hamouche and Rachid Bessaih 2009 Mixed convection air cooling of protruding heat sources mounted in a horizontal channel. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 36: 841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bathe K J and Dong J 1989 Studies of finite element procedures - The use of ADINA-F in fluid flow analyses. Computers and Structures. 32: 499–516

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Timothy J Young and Kambiz Vafzai 1998 Convective cooling of a heated obstacle in a channel. International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer. 41: 3131–3148

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Premachandran B and Balaji C 2005 Mixed convection heat transfer from a horizontal channel with protruding heat sources. Heat Mass Transfer. 41: 510–518

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazemi-Kamyab V, Van Zuijlen A H and Bijl H 2013 A high order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithm for unsteady conjugate heat transfer problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 264: 205–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiaomin Pan, Changhoon Lee and Jung-ll Choi 2018 Efficient monolithic projection method for time-dependent conjugate heat transfer problems. Journal of Computational Physics. 369: 191–208

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaminski D A and Prakash C 1986 Conjugate natural convection in a square enclosure : effect of conduction in one of the vertical walls. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 29: 1979–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matjaz Ramsak 2015 Conjugate heat transfer of backward-facing step flow: A benchmark problem revisited. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 84: 791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nouri-Borujerdi Ali and Arash Moazezi 2017 Investigation of obstacle effect to improve conjugate heat transfer in backward facing step channel using fast simulation of incompressible flow. Heat Mass Transfer. 54: 135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shankar Durgam, Venkateshan S P and Sundararajan T 2019 Conjugate Forced Convection from Heat Sources on Substrates of Different Thermal Conductivity. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer. 1–13

  20. Shankar Durgam, Venkateshan S P and Sundararajan T 2020 Effect of Thermal Conductivity on Cooling of Square Heat Source Array under Natural Convection in a Vertical Channel. Heat Transfer Engineering (Taylor & Francis). 41: 947–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarado-Juárez R, Montiel-González M, Villafán-Vidales H I, Estrada C A and Flores-Navarrete J 2020 Experimental and numerical study of conjugate heat transfer in an open square-cavity solar receiver. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 156: 106458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barozzi G S and Corticelli M A 2000 Natural convection in cavities containing internal sources. Heat and Mass Transfer 36: 473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Debasish Mishra, Muralidhar K and Ghoshdastidar P S 1995 Computation of flow and heat transfer around a vertical discrete protruding heater using an operator-splitting algorithm. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications. 28: 103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Madhusudhana G Rao and G S V L Narasimham 2007 Laminar mixed convection in a vertical channel with heat generating components. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 50: 3561–3574

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Apurv Kumar and Balaji Chakravarthy 2011 ANN based estimation of heat generation from multiple protruding heat sources on a vertical plate under conjugate mixed convection. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 50: 532–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyes Boutina and Rachid Bessaih 2011 Numerical simulation of mixed convection air-cooling of electronic components mounted in an inclined channel. Applied Thermal Engineering. 31: 2052–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramesh Sugavanam, Alfonso Ortega and Choi C Y 1995 A numerical investigation of conjugate heat transfer from a flush heat source on a conductive board in laminar channel fl . International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 38: 2969–2984

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Yonglin Ju and Zhongqi Chen 1996 Numerical simulation of natural convection in an enclosure with discrete protruding sources. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications. 30: 207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dutta S and Jog C S 2021 A monolithic arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian-based finite element strategy for fluid-structure interaction problems involving a compressible fluid. International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering. 122: 6037–6102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Pian T. H H and Tong P 1986 Relations between incompatible displacement model and hybrid stress model. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 22: 173–181

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Pian T H H and Sumihara K 1984 Rational approach for assumed stress finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 20: 1685–1695

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Jog C S 2010 Improved hybrid elements for structural analysis. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures. 5: 507–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jog C S 2005 A 27 node hybrid brick and a 21 node hybrid wedge element for structural analysis. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 41: 1209–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prathap G and Naganarayana B P 1995 Consistent thermal stress evaluation in finite elements. Computers and Structures. 54: 415–426

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Miranda S and Ubertini F 2001 On the consistency of finite element models in thermoelastic analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 190: 2411–2427

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Jog C S 2011 A finite element method for compressible viscous fluid flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 66: 852–874

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Gupta Anshul 2000 WSMP : Watson Sparse Matrix Package Part II - direct solution of general sparse systems. IBM Research Report RC: 21888

  38. Gupta Anshul 2002 Recent advances in direct methods for solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations. ACM Transcations on Mathematical Software. 28: 301–324

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Boley B A 1956 Thermally induced vibrations of beams. Journal of Aerospace Sciences. 23: 179–181

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Manolis G D and Beskos D E 1980 Thermally induced vibrations of beam structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 21: 337–355

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. An C, Vieira C B and Su J 2013 Integral transform solution of natural convection in a square cavity with volumetric heat generation. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 30: 833–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhonglu Lin, Ahmed A Sheikh Al-Shabab, Dimitrios Vitlaris, Panagiotis, Tsoutsanis, Antonis Antoniadis and Martin Skote 2015 Effects of Heat-Conductive Obstacles on Conjugate Heat Transfer of Backward-Facing Step Flow. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum : 1–12

  43. COMSOL Inc, Stockholm, Sweden. 2020. COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual, version 5.5

  44. Lyons C G 1996 A simple equation of state for dense fluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 69: 269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C S Jog.

Appendix I. An appendix section

Appendix I. An appendix section

The equations of state used are as follows:

Air: The reference values used are \(\rho =1.2\ \mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^{3}\), \(\theta =300\,\text {K}\), \(p=1.0332\times 10^5\ \mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}^{2}\), \(\lambda =-1.2\times 10^{-5}\,\text {kg/(m-s)}\), \(\mu =1.81\times 10^{-5}\,\text {kg/(m-s)}\), \(\kappa =0.025\,\text {W/m-K}\), \(c_v=717.5\,\text {J/kg-K}\), \(\gamma =1.4\).

Equation of state with \(R=287\,\text {J/(kg-K)}\) is

$$\begin{aligned} p=\rho R\theta . \end{aligned}$$

Dependence of viscosity (Sutherland model) and thermal conductivity on temperature:

$$\begin{aligned} \mu =1.68\times 10^{-5}\left( \frac{\theta }{273}\right) ^{3/2} \left( \frac{383.5}{\theta +110.5}\right) ;\quad \kappa =\frac{1004.5}{0.71}\mu . \end{aligned}$$

Water: The reference values used are \(\rho =998.2\ \mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^{3}\), \(\theta =293.15\,\text {K}\), \(p=1.15\times 10^5\ \mathrm{N}/\mathrm{m}^{2}\), \(\lambda =2.4\times 10^{-3}\,\text {kg/(m-s)}\), \(\mu =1.0\times 10^{-3}\,\text {kg/(m-s)}\), \(\kappa =0.6\,\text {W/m-K}\), \(c_v=4186\,\text {J/(kg-K)}\).

Equation of state: Let \(\theta _c=\theta -273.15\) and \(\theta _m=1-273.15/\theta \), and let

$$\begin{aligned} \xi _1&=-6.1080450661\times 10^{-5}, \\ \xi _2&=8.2642214762\times 10^{-6}, \\ \xi _3&=-6.2519152251\times 10^{-8}, \\ \xi _4&=3.9657777214\times 10^{-10}, \\ \xi _5&=-1.0376611585\times 10^{-12}, \\ \eta _1&=1.8344791239\times 10^{-3}, \\ \eta _2&=-3.9483220928\times 10^{-5}, \\ \eta _3&=1.3275626596\times 10^{-7}, \\ \zeta _1&=9.4323986272\times 10^{-3}, \\ \zeta _2&=-1.4369670293\times 10^{-4}, \\ \zeta _3&=4.5608124905\times 10^{-7}, \\ v_{0T}&=1.0002119572 \times 10^{-3}\\&\quad (1+\xi _1\theta _c+\xi _2\theta _c^2+\xi _3\theta _c^3 +\xi _4\theta _c^4+ \xi _5\theta _c^5), \\ A_T&=0.13848005907(1+\eta _1\theta _c+\eta _2\theta _c^2+\eta _3\theta _c^3), \\ B_T&=2.705412322\times 10^8(1+\zeta _1\theta _c+\zeta _2\theta _c^2+\zeta _3\theta _c^3), \\ \gamma&=\frac{1}{v_{0T}A_T}\left( v_{0T}-\frac{1}{\rho }\right) . \end{aligned}$$

Then the equation of state for water is [44]

$$\begin{aligned} p=B_T\left( e^{\gamma }-1\right) . \end{aligned}$$

Viscosity as a function of temperature:

With

$$\begin{aligned} a_0&=-0.632330751534553\times 10^{1}, \\ a_1&=-0.172884319864045\times 10^{1}, \\ a_2&=-0.129387215150281\times 10^{4}, \\ a_3&=0.855455700673371\times 10^{5}, \\ a_4&=-0.298613655084593\times 10^{7}, \\ a_5&=0.636747286334842\times 10^{8}, \\ a_6&=-0.886000936016751\times 10^{9}, \\ a_7&=0.829771395998954\times 10^{10}, \\ a_8&=-0.527056628477971\times 10^{11}, \\ a_9&=0.223820320419432\times 10^{12}, \\ a_{10}&=-0.608047314470892\times 10^{12}, \\ a_{11}&=0.954774572690503\times 10^{12}, \\ a_{12}&=-0.658627182450538\times 10^{12}, \end{aligned}$$

the viscosity as a function of temperature is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \log \mu&=a_0+a_1\theta _m+a_2\theta _m^2+a_3\theta _m^3+a_4\theta _m^4\\&\quad +a_5\theta _m^5+a_6\theta _m^6+a_7\theta _m^7+a_8\theta _m^8 \\&\quad +a_9\theta _m^9 +a_{10}\theta _m^{10}+a_{11}\theta _m^{11}+a_{12}\theta _m^{12}. \end{aligned}$$

Thermal conductivity as a function of temperature: With

$$\begin{aligned} b_0&=-0.578034373459441, \\ b_1&=0.948808414124313, \\ b_2&=0.336358632865199, \\ b_3&=-4.72493981250531, \end{aligned}$$

the thermal conductivity as a function of temperature is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \log \kappa =b_0+b_1\theta _m+b_2\theta _m^2+b_3\theta _m^3. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santhosh, A.K., Jog, C.S. A monolithic finite element strategy for conjugate heat transfer. Sādhanā 47, 223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01991-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01991-3

Keywords

Navigation