Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Hybrid Clustering Approach Based Q-Leach in TDMA to Optimize QOS-Parameters

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wireless sensor networks comprised of massive micro-sensor devices which installed in geographical areas used for surveillance, monitoring and control the applications and remote sensing process. Several smart WSN (wireless sensor network) applications have been raised nowadays. The efficiency of the WSN advancement applications have some issues such as lifetime duration, energy consumption and reliable communication. The cluster based hierarchical routing protocols like LEACH used to improvise the transmission of data techniques. But randomized cluster head selection affects the lifetime of network and energy and other QoS parameters. Hence the enhancement of the routing protocol has highly needed to optimize the QoS parameters for obtaining efficiency. To improve the QoS parameters of energy efficiency, network lifetime, stability, throughput and other parameters the efficient routing protocol developed based on efficient clustering approach of cluster head (CH) selection in time division multiple access (TDMA) schedule. For WSN, to attain the efficiency the optimal QoS parameters the efficient hybrid clustering approach and TDMA schedule based new routing protocol Q-LEACH has been proposed. For homogeneous and heterogeneous network of WSN the fitness function has been calculated. Hence the optimal cluster head CH has been selected from the fitness function leads to minimal energy and balancing of load. As per TDMA frame redesign every cluster node has its turn for data transmission in allocated slot. Hence all nodes equally send’s the data as per allocated slot and hence same amount of energy also used. Hence energy efficiency leads to long network life time. The proposed work of efficient hybrid clustering approach has been analysed in terms of QoS parameters such as energy efficiency, network lifetime, throughput and other parameters. The results of the proposed study evaluated with other existing approaches and comparative analysis have been performed. By comparison it shows that the proposed method yields better network stability compared to existing protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

  1. 1.

    https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mlr.20190401.14

  2. 2.

    https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2016.06.05

  3. 3.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-01978-9

  4. 4.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-07000-x

  5. 5.

    https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2017.70811

  6. 6.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.08.003

  7. 7.

    https://www.acadpubl.eu/jsi/2018-118-16-17/articles/16/29.pdf

  8. 8.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1696-1

  9. 9.

    https://www.acadpubl.eu/jsi/2018-118-7-9/articles/9/54.pdf

  10. 10.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2016.1400052wc

  11. 11.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-0960-x

  12. 12.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4382-1

  13. 13.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.041

  14. 14.

    https://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/2018-120-6/6/515.pdf

  15. 15.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2666082

  16. 16.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57277-1_10

  17. 17.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2017.2726014

  18. 18.

    https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwmc.2019.10020391

  19. 19.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/elecsym.2019.8901669

  20. 20.

    https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhi.2019.099673

  21. 21.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2576475

  22. 22.

    https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8569326

  23. 23.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3407

  24. 24.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719879384

  25. 25.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/iwcmc.2017.7986418

  26. 26.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-0951-y

  27. 27.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5649-x

  28. 28.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6005-2_42

  29. 29.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2017.2661201

  30. 30.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.084

  31. 31.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2018.2869345

  32. 32.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1558-2

  33. 33.

    http://www.tagajournal.com/gallery/v14.278.pdf

  34. 34.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2016.1226306

  35. 35.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.06.005

  36. 36.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1063-4

  37. 37.

    https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-188784/v1

Code Availability

N\A.

References

  1. Thakur, U. K., & Dethe, C. (2019). QoS aware cloud based routing protocol for security improvement of hybrid wireless network. Machine Learning Research, 4, 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaur, S., & Mir, R. N. (2016). Clustering in wireless sensor networks-a survey. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 8, 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaur, T., & Kumar, D. (2019) A survey on QoS mechanisms in WSN for computational intelligence based routing protocols. Wireless Networks (pp. 1–22)

  4. Jaiswal, K., & Anand, V. (2019). EOMR: An energy-efficient optimal multi-path routing protocol to improve QoS in wireless sensor network for IoT applications. Wireless Personal Communications (pp. 1–23).

  5. Aadri, A., & Idrissi, N. (2017). An energy efficient hierarchical routing scheme for wireless sensor networks. Computer Science Information Technology, pp. 137–148.

  6. Sarkar, A., & Murugan, T. S. (2016). Routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: What the literature says? Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 3173–3183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Priya, I. L., Lalitha, S., & Paul, P. V. (2018). Energy Efficient Routing Models in Wireless Sensor Networks-A Recent Trend Survey. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118, 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guleria, K., & Verma, A. K. (2019). Comprehensive review for energy efficient hierarchical routing protocols on wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 25, 1159–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhavana, V., Rathi, J., Reddy, K. R., & Madhavi, K. (2018). Energy efficiency routing protocols in wireless sensor networks—A comparative study. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118, 585–591.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Han, G., Jiang, J., Guizani, M., & Rodrigues, J. J. C. (2016). Green routing protocols for wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, T., Song, J.-Y., Zou, J.-Y., Ding, J.-H., Wang, D.-Q., & Jin, R.-C. (2016). An overview of performance trade-off mechanisms in routing protocol for green wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 22, 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jadidoleslamy, H. (2017). A hierarchical multipath routing protocol in clustered wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 96, 4217–4236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tyagi, P. & Verma, V. (2018). Leach routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Advances in Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (vol. 2).

  14. Tandel, R. I. (2016). Leach protocol in wireless sensor network: A survey. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 7, 1894–1896.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arora, V. K., Sharma, V., & Sachdeva, M. (2016). A survey on LEACH and other’s routing protocols in wireless sensor network. Optik, 127, 6590–6600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sirajuddin, M., & Srikanth, M. (2018). INCREASING THE LIFE SPAN OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS USING IMPROVED LEACH PROTOCOL. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 120, 7481–7493.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Singh, S. K., Kumar, P., & Singh, J. P. (2017). A survey on successors of LEACH protocol. IEEE Access, 5, 4298–4328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhushan, B., & Sahoo, G. (2019). Routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. In: Computational intelligence in sensor networks. Springer (pp. 215–248).

  19. Xu, L., Collier, R., & O’Hare, G. M. (2017). A survey of clustering techniques in WSNs and consideration of the challenges of applying such to 5G IoT scenarios. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4, 1229–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaur, T., & Kumar, D. (2019). Computational intelligence-based energy efficient routing protocols with QoS assurance for wireless sensor networks: A survey. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 16, 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirsan, A. S., Al Rasyid, M. U. H. & Syarif, I. (2019). Efficient energy for cluster head selection using new LEACH-based routing protocol in wireless sensor network. In: 2019 international electronics symposium (IES) (pp. 70–75).

  22. Ahmad, S., Zafar, M. H., Ashraf, M., Khan, I., & Khan, F. Q. (2018). Energy-efficient TDMA based clustering scheme for WSN. In: Proceedings of the Pakistan academy of sciences: A. physical and computational sciences (Vol. 55, pp. 53–65).

  23. Agarkhed, J., & Patil, Y. D. (2019). Energy efficient service differentiated QoS aware routing in cluster-based wireless sensor network. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligence, 1, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Samara, G., & Aljaidi, M. (2019). Efficient energy, cost reduction, and QoS based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.09636.

  25. Brar, G. S., Rani, S., Chopra, V., Malhotra, R., Song, H., & Ahmed, S. H. (2016). Energy efficient direction-based PDORP routing protocol for WSN. IEEE access, 4, 3182–3194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rozas, A., & Araujo, A. (2019). An application-aware clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks to provide QoS management. Journal of Sensors, vol. 2019.

  27. Al-Baz, A., & El-Sayed, A. (2018). A new algorithm for cluster head selection in LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 31, 3407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, F., & Wei, J. (2019). An energy-efficient unequal clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15, 1550147719879384.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bahbahani, M. S. & Alsusa, E. (2017). DC-LEACH: A duty-cycle based clustering protocol for energy harvesting WSNs. In: 2017 13th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 974–979).

  30. Batra, P. K., & Kant, K. (2016). LEACH-MAC: A new cluster head selection algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 22, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dutt, S., Agrawal, S., & Vig, R. (2018). Cluster-head restricted energy efficient protocol (CREEP) for routing in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 100, 1477–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta, V. & Doja, M. (2018) H-leach: Modified and efficient leach protocol for hybrid clustering scenario in wireless sensor networks. In: Next-generation networks (pp. 399–408), Springer.

  33. Hasan, M. Z., Al-Rizzo, H., & Al-Turjman, F. (2017). A survey on multipath routing protocols for QoS assurances in real-time wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19, 1424–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalaivaani, P., & Krishnamoorthy, R. (2019). Performance analysis of various hierarchical routing protocols using spatial correlation. Measurement, 144, 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mostafaei, H. (2018). Energy-efficient algorithm for reliable routing of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66, 5567–5575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarkar, A., & Murugan, T. S. (2019). Cluster head selection for energy efficient and delay-less routing in wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks, 25, 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Beni G. & Christopher, C. S. (2018). Analysis of energy efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks.

  38. Tiab, A., Bouallouche-Medjkoune, L., & Boulfekhar, S. (2018). A new QoS aware and energy efficient opportunistic routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, 33, 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zenia, N. Z., Aseeri, M., Ahmed, M. R., Chowdhury, Z. I., & Kaiser, M. S. (2016). Energy-efficiency and reliability in MAC and routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor network: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 71, 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marappan, P., & Rodrigues, P. (2016). An energy efficient routing protocol for correlated data using CL-LEACH in WSN. Wireless Networks, 22, 1415–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Priya, J. S., Alenazy, W. M., & Sathyabama, A. (2021). Energy efficient cluster based routing protocol for WSN based on hybrid BSO-TLBO optimization model.

Download references

Funding

This research work was not funded by any organization/institute/agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Prince Shri Venkateshwara Padmavathy Engineering College, Chennai, India

    M. Preetha

  2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India

    N. Anil Kumar

  3. Department of Computer Science, R.M.K Engineering College, Kavaraipettai, India

    K. Elavarasi

  4. Department of Master of Computer Applications, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India

    T. Vignesh

  5. Saveetha School of Engineering, Chennai, India

    V. Nagaraju

Authors
  1. M. Preetha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Anil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Elavarasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Vignesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Nagaraju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I Am Dr. Preetha Marappan Hereby State That The Manuscript Title Entitled “A HYBRID CLUSTERING APPROACH BASED Q-LEACH IN TDMA TO OPTIMIZE QOS-PARAMETERS” Submitted To The Wireless Personal Communications, I Confirm That This Work Is Original And Has Not Been Published Elsewhere, Nor Is It Currently Under Consideration For Publication Elsewhere. And I Am Professor In the Department of CSE, Prince Shri Venkateshwara Padmavathy Engineering College, and Chennai. I’m the corresponding author of our paper, my contribution work on this paper is to Writing, developing, and reviewing the content of the manuscript. And my co-authors N. Anil Kumar, K. Elavarasi, T. Vignesh and Dr. V. Nagaraju works were to cite the figure, table and references. We are the entire contributors of our paper. And no other third party people involved in this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Preetha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

I confirm that this work is original and has either not been published elsewhere, or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

Ethics Approval

No animals or human participants are involved in this research work.

Informed Consent

I confirm that any participants (or their guardians if unable to give informed consent, or next of kin, if deceased) who may be identifiable through the manuscript (such as a case report), have been given an opportunity to review the final manuscript and have provided written consent to publish.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Preetha, M., Anil Kumar, N., Elavarasi, K. et al. A Hybrid Clustering Approach Based Q-Leach in TDMA to Optimize QOS-Parameters. Wireless Pers Commun 123, 1169–1200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09175-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09175-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation