Abstract
In the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of alkanes, some important advances of the last decade have made it possible to accelerate the development and industrial insertion of the M1 based catalytic systems. These catalysts may be fine-tuned to account for the inevitable variability of different chemicals and impurities in the feedstocks. The latter may include, among others, different blends of shale gases, with different ratios of the C1-C3 alkanes and impurities such as sulfur, phosphorus, etc. In this article, we review the recent progress achieved in our understanding of the crystal structures and the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) reaction mechanisms of the multi-metal oxide (MMO) M1 catalyst. Firstly, the complex crystal structure of the M1 phases has been examined using quantum mechanics (QM), reactive force field (ReaxFF), and machine learning (ML) approaches. Secondly, we discussed the ODH mechanism on the M1 phase based on the QM simulations including the finite cluster model and the periodic slab model. Finally, we proposed a catalyst design approach to improve the selectivity of the M1 phase based upon the ODH reaction mechanism. We also briefly discuss the concept of the CE (“Concurrent Engineering”, introduced by the European Space Agency). The development of the CE concepts may be applied to the M1 catalytic systems in the future allowing businesses to be agile and react fast to the changing production conditions, thereby making them uniquely competitive in the ODH of alkanes and other areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
05 December 2020
The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error. The authors would like to correct the error with this erratum.
Notes
Private communication, Prof. John Monnier, University of South Carolina, October 1, 2019.
References
Ren T, Patel M, Blok K (2006) Energy 31:425
Lemonidou AA, Vasalos IA (1989) Appl Catal 54:119
Gao X, Tang Z, Zhang H, Ji D, Lu G, Wang Z, Tan Z (2010) J Mol Catal A 325:36
Corma A, Huber GW, Sauvanaud L, O’Connor P (2007) J Catal 247:307
Cavani F, Ballarini N, Cericola A (2007) Catal Today 127:113
Sattler JJHB, Ruiz-Martinez J, Santillan-Jimenez E, Weckhuysen BM (2014) Chem Rev 114:10613
Grabowski R (2006) Catal Rev Sci Eng 48:199
Atanga MA, Rezaei F, Jawad A, Fitch M, Rownaghi AA (2018) Appl Catal B 220:429
Centi G, Cavani F, Trifirò F (2001) Selective oxidation by heterogeneous catalysis. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
Kang DB, Anderson AB (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107:7858
Thorsteinson EM, Wilson TP, Young FG, Kasai PH (1978) J Catal 52:116–132
Hinago H, Komada Y (2000) (Mitsubishi Chem Corp.). Ammoxidation catalyst for use in producing acrylonitrile or methacrylonitrile from propane or isobutane by ammoxidation. U.S. Patent 6,063,728, May 16, 2000
D B et al (2013) Top Catal 56(18–20):1952–1962
Sun L, Chai Y, Dai W, Guangjun Wu, Guan N, Li L (2018) Catal Sci Technol 8:3044–3051
Vajda et al (2009) Nat Mater 8(3):213. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2384
A.Y. Borisevich, S. Wong, S.N. Rashkeev, M.V. Glazoff, S.J. Pennycook, S.T. Pantelides, Dual Nano-Particle/Substrate Control of Dehydrogenation Catalysis, Advanced Materials, vol.19, pp. 2129–2133 (2007). Also see; B. M. Weckhuysen, R. A. Schoonheydt, Alkane dehydrogenation over supported chromium catalysts, Catal. Today 1999, 51, 223.
Jinshu T, Jiangqiao T, Mingliang X, Zhaoxia Z, Shaolong W, Shuai W, Jingdong L, Yong W (20019) Sci Adv (Chemistry) v.5: Art. eaav8063
Shi L, Wang D, Song W, Shao D, Zhang W-P, Lu A-H (2017) ChemCatChem 9:1788–1793
Grant JT, Carrero CA, Goeltl F, Venegas J, Mueller P, Burt SP, Specht SE, McDermott WP, Chieregato A, Hermans I (2016) Science 354:1570–1573
Tian J, Lin J, Mingliang Xu, Wan S, Lin J, Wang Y (2018) Chem Eng Sci 186:142–151
Grant JT, McDermott WP, Venegas JM, Burt SP, Micka J, Phivilay SP, Carrero CA, Hermans I (2017) ChemCatChem 9:3623–3626
Goddard WA III, Mueller JE, Chenoweth K, van Duin ACT (2010) Catal Today 157:71–76
DeSanto P, Buttrey DJ, Grasselli RK, Lugmair CG, Volpe AF, Toby BH, Vogt T (2003) Top Catal 23:23–38
Pyrz WD, Blom DA, Vogt T, Buttrey DJ (2008) Angew Chem Int Ed 47:2788–2791
DeSanto P, Buttrey DJ, Grasselli RK, Lugmair CG, Volpe AF, Toby BH, Vogt TZ (2004) Kristallogr 219:152–165
Fu G, Xu X, Sautet P (2012) Angew Chem Int Ed 51:12854–12858
Cheng MJ, Goddard WA III (2016) Top Catal 59:1506–1517
Govindasamy A, Muthukumar K, Yu J, Xu Y, Guliants VV (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:4544–4549
Muthukumar K, Yu JJ, Xu Y, Guliants VV (2011) Top Catal 54:605–613
Yu J, Woo J, Borisevich A, Xu Y, Guliants VV (2012) Catal Commun 29:68–72
Yu J, Xu Y, Guliants VV (2014) Catal Today 238:28–34
Yu J, Xu Y, Guliants VV (2014) Top Catal 57:1145–1151
Cheng MJ, Goddard WA III (2015) J Am Chem Soc 137:13224–13227
Annamalai L, Liu Y, Ezenwa S, Dang Y, Suib SL, Deshlahra P (2018) ACS Catal 8:7051–7067
Guliants VV, Bhandari R, Brongersma HH, Knoester A, Gaffney AM, Han S (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:10234–10242
Guliants VV, Bhandari R, Swaminathan B, Vasudevan VK, Brongersma HH, Knoester A, Gaffney AM, Han S (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:24046–24055
Grasselli RK, Buttrey DJ, DeSanto P, Burrington JD, Lugmair CG, Volpe AF, Weingand T (2004) Catal Today 91–92:251–258
Grasselli RK (2005) Catal Today 99:23–31
Goddard WA III, Liu L, Mueller JE, Pudar S, Nielsen RJ (2011) Top Catal 54:659–668
Li X, Buttrey DJ, Blom DA, Vogt T (2011) Top Catal 54:614–626
Murayama H, Vitry D, Ueda W, Fuchs G, Anne M, Dubois JL (2007) Appl Catal A 318:137–142
Ji H, Jung Y (2017) J Chem Phys 146:064103
Sanchez JM, Ducastelle F, Gratias D (1984) Phys A 128:334–350
de Fontaine D (1994) Solid State Phys 47:33–176
Greeley J, Norskov JK, Mavrikakis M (2002) Ann Rev Phys Chem 53:319–348
Cheng MJ, Goddard WA III (2013) J Am Chem Soc 135:4600–4603
Rozanska X, Fortrie R, Sauer J (2007) J Phys Chem C 111:6041–6050
Rozanska X, Sauer J (2009) J Phys Chem A 113:11586–11594
Cheng MJ, Goddard WA, Fu R (2014) Top Catal 57:1171–1187
Lwin S, Diao W, Baroi C, Gaffney AM, Fushimi RR (2017) Catalysts 7:109
Cheng MJ, Fu R, Goddard WA (2014) Chem Commun 50:1748–1750
Ueda W, Vitry D, Katou T (2005) Catal Today 99:43–49
Oliver JM, Nieto JML, Botella P (2004) Catal Today 96:241–249
Grasselli RK, Burrington JD, Buttrey DJ, DeSanto P, Lugmair CG, Volpe AF, Weingand T (2003) Top Catal 23:5–22
Holmberg J, Grasselli RK, Andersson A (2004) Appl Catal A 270:121–134
Cheng MJ, Goddard WA III (2016) Top Catal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-016-0669-9(2016)
IEA. Energy statistics of OECD countries 2001/2002 and energy statistics of non-OECD countries 2001/2002 (2004 Edition). Paris: International Energy Agency; 2004.
DOE. Manufacturing Consumption Energy Survey. Washington DC: Energy Information Administration of the US Department of Energy.
Feyel S, Schrçder D, Rozanska X, Sauer J, Schwarz H (2006) Angew Chem 118, 4793; Angew Chem Int Ed 2006, 45:4677.
Feyel S, Schrçder D, Schwarz H (2006) J Phys Chem A 110:2647
Klisinska A, Loridant S, Grzybowska B, Stoch J, Gressel I (2006) Appl Catal A 309:17
Heracleous E, Vakros J, Lemonidou AA, Kordulis C (2004) Catal Today 91:289
Christodoulakis A, Heracleous E, Lemonidou AA, Boghosian S (2006) J Catal 242:16
Watson RB, Ozkan US (2000) J Catal 191:12
Heracleous E, Lemonidou AA (2006) J Catal 237:175
B. Solsona, J. M. Lopez Nieto, P. Concepcion, A. Dejoz, F. Ivars, M. I. Vazquez, J. Catal. 2011, 280, 28.
Iwamoto M, Yoda Y, Egashira M, Seiyama T (1989) J Phys Chem 1976:80
Solsona B, Concepcion P, Demicol B, Hernandez S, Delgado JJ, Calvino JJ, LopezNieto JM (2012) J Catal 295:104
Ji L, Liu J, Chen X, Li M (1996) Catal Lett 39:247
Valenzuela RX, Bueno G, Cortes Corberan V, Xu Y, Chen C (2000) Catal. Today 61:43
Choudhary VR, Mulla SAR, Rane VH (1998) J Chem Technol Biotechnol 71:167
Lian JC, Finazzi E, Di Valentin C, Risse T, Gao HJ, Pacchioni G, Freund HJ (2008) Chem Phys Lett 450:308
Leveles L, Fuchs S, Seshan K, Lercher JA, Lefferts L (2002) Appl Catal A 227:287
Cherginets VL, Rebrova TP (1999) Electrochim Acta 45:469
Volkovich VA, Griffiths TR, Fray DJ, Fields M (1997) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 93:3819
Botella P, Garcia-Gonzalez E, Dejoz A, LopezNieto JM, Vazquez MI, Gonzalez-Calbet J (2004) J Catal 225:428
Konya T, Katou T, Murayama T, Ishikawa S, Sadakane M, Buttrey D, Ueda W (2013) Catal. Sci Technol 3:380
Fang Chen N, Ueda W, Oshihara K (1999) Chem Commun 517.
Adesina AA, Cant NW, Saberi-Moghaddam A, Szeto CHL, Trimm DL (1998) J Chem Technol Biotechnol 72:19
Lopez Nieto JM, Botella P, Vazquez MI, Dejoz A (1906) Chem Commun.
USP 6,740,620B2, 5/24/04, Single Crystalline Phase Catalyst”
USP 6,965,050, 11/15/05, Single Crystalline Phase Catalyst”
Gartner CA, van Veen AC, Lercher JA (2013) ChemCatChem 5:3196
Botella P, Garcia-Gonzalez E, Lapez Nieto JM, Gonzlez-Calbet JM (2005) Solid State Sci 7:507
Melzer D, Xu P, Hartmann D, Zhu Y, Browning ND, Sanchez-Sanchez M, Lercher JA (2016) Angew Chem Int Ed 55:8873
Nieto JML, Botella P, Vazquez MI, Dejoz A (2002) Chem Commun 1906–1907.
Shibuta Y, Ohno M, Takaki T (2018) Adv Theory Simul 1:1800065
Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Phys Rev B 47:558
Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) Phys Rev B 59:1758
Kresse G, Furthmuller J (1996) Comput Mater Sci 6:15
Kresse G, Furthmuller J (1996) Phys Rev B 54:11169
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: the co-author name has been corrected as William A. Goddard III.
Appendix 1 An Example of Molecular Dynamics Modeling of the ODH of Propane on M1
Appendix 1 An Example of Molecular Dynamics Modeling of the ODH of Propane on M1
The reaction mechanism of ODH of propane has been examined using the quantum mechanics simulations [33, 88,89,90,91]. However, the detailed reaction processes are not been fully known. Here we applied the ReaxFF [39] molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to examine the ODH of propane on M1 catalyst.
We first optimized the M1 crystal structure using the ReaxFF. It is quite complex because of the partial occupation of the sites Mo/Te/V. Here we used one possible crystal structure in which five V atoms are close to the Te S12 site [33]. This configuration is predicted to be efficient for the ODH process based on the QM simulations [33]. After the crystal is optimized, we constructed a five-layer slab model of M1-phase and added 5 propane (C3H8) molecules into the slab model. There are two surfaces in this model because of the periodic boundary condition.
The system was first equilibrated at temperature for 25 ps. Then we heated the system to a higher temperature of 500 K within 10 ps. To observe the ODH of C3H8 in short MD timescale, we applied the cook-off simulations in which the C3H8 molecules are heated from 500 to 3000 K within 25 ps. The M1 slab remained at 500 K to avoid the thermal degradation at high temperature. A time step of 0.25 fs was applied for integrating the equations of motion in the MD simulations.
To analyze the fragments in the ReaxFF MD simulations, we applied the molecular fragment recognition analysis algorithm using the connectivity matrix and bond orders at 0.25 ps intervals. Independent molecules are identified if their bond orders are smaller than 0.3, and then were assigned with specific ID numbers to track the reaction paths. The breaking or formation of bonds because of thermal fluctuations was avoided by a time window of 1.0 ps in which every bond must exist for 1.0 ps.
To uncover the chemical reactions of the propane on M1 phase, we first examined the important fragments including C3H8, C2H4, H2 and C2H6 as representatives during the ReaxFF MD cook-off simulation, as shown in Fig. 1. During the initial heating-up process, from 500 to 2500 K, no chemical reactions are observed. At ~ 2600 K, we observed the first reaction in which the C3H8 is decomposed to C2H5 and CH3. The C2H5 is decomposed to one C2H4 and one free H radical soon. Meanwhile the CH3 is bonded to the surface O. As the temperature continuously increase, more C3H8 molecules are decomposed, leading to the production of more C2H4 and H radicals. Some H radicals are combined in gas phase and form H2 molecules at ~ 2800 K. It is interesting to notice that one C3H6 fragment (CH3–CH = CH2) forms because the M1 phase absorbs H from C3H8 (Fig. 8)
We then examined the initial C3H8 decomposition mechanism, as shown in Fig. 2. The C3H8 molecule is dissociated into C2H5 and CH3; then, the CH3 is bonded to the O–Mo. The Mo is bonded to Te, suggesting that the Te may play some roles in the C3H8 decomposition. The initial decomposition does not occur in V-rich region as suggested by the QM simulations. This may be due to the small area of V-rich region in our model. It is interesting to notice that one C3H8 molecules are constrained in the hollow region on the lower left part of our supercell. However, this molecule is not decomposed in our simulation since only Mo atoms are in this hollow region. This suggests the importance of Te atoms in the C3H8 decomposition reaction (Fig. 9).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaffney, A.M., An, Q., Goddard, W.A. et al. Toward Concurrent Engineering of the M1-Based Catalytic Systems for Oxidative Dehydrogenation (ODH) of Alkanes. Top Catal 63, 1667–1681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01327-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01327-7