Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is an objective evaluation essential for determining the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic surgery among patients with esophageal achalasia?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite a high degree of satisfaction with laparoscopic Heller–Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia, some cases show no improvement in postoperative esophageal clearance. We investigated whether an objective evaluation is essential for determining the therapeutic effect of LHD.

Methods

We investigated the difference in symptoms, regarding esophageal clearance, using timed barium esophagogram (TBE), in 306 esophageal achalasia patients with high postoperative satisfaction who underwent LHD. Furthermore, these patients were divided into two groups, in accordance with the difference in postoperative esophageal clearance, in order to compare the preoperative pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical results.

Results

Although the poor postoperative esophageal clearance group (117 cases, 38%) was mostly male and the ratio of Sigmoid type was high compared to the good postoperative esophageal clearance group (p = 0.046, p = 0.001, respectively); in patients with high surgical satisfaction, there was no difference in terms of preoperative symptom scores and surgical results. However, although the satisfaction level was high in the poor esophageal clearance group, the scores in terms of the postoperative dysphagia and vomiting were high (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.004, respectively). The AUC was 0.9842 upon ROC analysis regarding the presence or absence of clearance at 2 min following postoperative TBE and the postoperative feeling of difficulty swallowing score, with a cut-off value of 2 points (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 100%) in cases with a high degree of surgical satisfaction.

Conclusion

The esophageal clearance ability can be predicted by subjective evaluation, based on the postoperative symptom scores; so, an objective evaluation is not essential in cases with high surgical satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moonen A, Boeckxstaens G (2014) Current diagnosis and management of achalasia. J Clin Gastroenterol 48:484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Furuzawa-Carballeda J, Torres-Landa S, Valdovinos MÁ, Coss-Adame E, Martín Del Campo LA, Torres-Villalobos G (2016) New insights into the pathophysiology of achalasia and implications for future treatment. World J Gastroenterol 22:7892–7907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ (2015) Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA 313:1841–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reynolds JC, Parkman HP (1989) Achalasia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 18:223–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spiess AE, Kahrilas PJ (1998) Treating achalasia: from whalebone to laparoscope. JAMA 280:638–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patient Care Committee Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (2004) Esophageal achalasia: SSAT patient care guidelines. J Gastrointest Surg 8:367–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Farrell TM, Kohn GP, Augenstein V, Fanelli RD (2012) SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 26:296–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Katada N, Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Shibata T, Moriya H, Kikuchi S, Watanabe M (2012) Recent trends in the management of achalasia. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 18:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhong C, Tan S, Ren Y, Lu M, Peng Y, Fu X, Tang X (2020) Quality of life following peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 26:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Doubova M, Gowing S, Robaidi H, Gilbert S, Maziak DE, Shamji F, Sundaresan S, Villeneuve PJ, Seely AJE (2020) Long-term symptom control following laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication for achalasia. Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.095,Sep3,2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG (2018) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 267:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kostic SV, Rice TW, Baker ME, Decamp MM, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH, Richter JE (2000) Timed barium esophagogram: a simple physiologic assessment of achalasia. J thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120:935–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Neyaz Z, Gupta M, Ghoshal UC (2013) How to perform and interpret timed barium esophagogram. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 19:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsuboi K, Omura N, Yano F, Kashiwagi H, Yanaga, (2009) Results after laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation for esophageal achalasia in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Esophagus 22:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Patti MG, Molena D, Fisichella PM, Whang K, Yamada H, Perretta S, Way LW (2001) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for achalasia: analysis of success and failures. Arch Surg 136:870–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balm ME, Delfyett W, Levine MS, Metz DC, Katzka DA (2002) Achalasia: a disease of varied and sbtle symptoms that do not corelate with radiographic findings. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1916–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicodeme F, de Ruigh A, Xiao Y, Rajeswaran S, Teitelbaum EN, Hungness ES, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE (2013) A comparison of symptom severity and bolus retention with Chicago classification esophageal pressure topography metrics in patients with achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlson DA, Beveridge CA, Lin Z, Balla M, Gregory D, Tye M, Ritter K, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE (2018) Improved assessment of bolus clearance in patients with achalasia using high-resolution impedance manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:672–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Olivaira JM, Birgisson S, Doinoff C, Einstein D, Herts B, Davros W, Obuchowski N, Koehler RE, Richter J, Baker ME (1997) Timed barium swallow: a simple technique for evaluating esophageal emptying in patients with achalasia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group (2015) The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27:160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Japan esophageal society 2017 Descriptive Rules for Achalasia of the Esophagus, June 2012: 4th edition. Esophagus 14:275–289

  22. Tsuboi K, Omura N, Yano F, Hoshino M, Yamamoto SR, Akimoto S, Masuda T, Kashiwagi H, Yanaga K (2020) Therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic Helle-Dor surgery for chest pain in patients with achalasia: a single institutional experience. Esophagus 17:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuboi K, Omura N, Yano F, Hoshino M, Yamamoto SR, Akimoto S, Masuda T, Kashiwagi H, Yanaga K (2017) Impact of esophageal flexion level on the surgical outcome in patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia. Surg Today 47:1339–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Omura N, Kashiwagi H, Tsuboi K, Ishibashi Y, Kawasaki N, Yano F, Suzuki Y, Yanaga K (2006) Therapeutic effects of a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication of the chest pain associated with achalasia. Surg Today 36:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaezi MF, Pandlfino JE, Vela MF (2013) ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1238–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Achkar E, Richter JE (2002) Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment. Gut 50:765–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B, Svenson LW (2010) Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival: a population-based study.  Neurogastroenterol Motil 22:e256–e261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Fuji City General Hospital, 50 Takashima-cho, Fuji, Shizuoka, 416-0951, Japan

    Kazuto Tsuboi

  2. Department of Surgery, Nishisaitama-Chuo National Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

    Nobuo Omura

  3. Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Kazuto Tsuboi, Fumiaki Yano, Nobuo Omura, Masato Hoshino, Se-Ryung Yamamoto, Shunsuke Akimoto, Takahiro Masuda, Yuki Sakashita, Naoko Fukushima & Toru Ikegami

Authors
  1. Kazuto Tsuboi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fumiaki Yano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nobuo Omura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masato Hoshino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Se-Ryung Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shunsuke Akimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takahiro Masuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuki Sakashita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Naoko Fukushima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Toru Ikegami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuto Tsuboi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Tsuboi, Yano, Omura, Hoshino, Yamanoto, Akimoto, Masuda, Sakashita, Fukushima, and Ikegami have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuboi, K., Yano, F., Omura, N. et al. Is an objective evaluation essential for determining the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic surgery among patients with esophageal achalasia?. Surg Endosc 36, 3932–3939 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08712-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08712-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation