Skip to main content
Download PDF

The immediate effect of cervical rotation-traction manipulation on cervical paravertebral soft tissue: a study using soft tissue tension cloud chart technology

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 25, Article number: 184 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the reliability of the Soft Tissue Tension Cloud Chart (STTCC) technology, an original method combining multi-point Cervical Paravertebral Soft Tissue Test (CPSTT) with MATLAB software, we conducted a preliminary analysis on the immediate effects of Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) on cervical paravertebral soft tissue.

Methods

30 patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy (CSR) were included in this study. We analyzed the differences in CPSTT before and after treatment with Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation (CRTM), a representative OMT technique in Traditional Chinese Medicine, using the STTCC technology.

Results

The STTCC results demonstrated that post-treatment CPSTT levels in CSR patients were significantly lower than pre-treatment levels after application of CRTM, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Additionally, pre-treatment CPSTT levels on the symptomatic side (with radicular pain or numbness) were higher across the C5 to C7 vertebrae compared to the asymptomatic side (without symptoms) (P < 0.001). However, this difference disappeared after CRTM treatment (P = 0.231).

Conclusions

The STTCC technology represents a reliable method for analyzing the immediate effects of OMT. CSR patients display uneven distribution of CPSTT characterized by higher tension on the symptomatic side. CRTM not only reduces overall cervical soft tissue tension in CSR patients, but can also balance the asymmetrical tension between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides.

Trial registration

This study was approved by the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (Website: .https://www.chictr.org.cn.) on 20/04/2021 and the Registration Number is ChiCTR2100045648.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Neck pain is a common reason for general practitioner visits and one of major contributor to disability, as measured by Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) [1]. An epidemiological study [2] estimated over 288.7 million cases of neck pain and 28.6 million related disability cases worldwide in 2017. Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy (CSR), one of the primary causes of neck pain, is characterized by pain in one or both upper extremities accompanied by neck pain, secondary to neural compression or irritation in the cervical spin e[3, 4]. Due to its safety and cost-effectiveness [5,6,7], conservative therapy is the most common initial treatment approach for CSR and the Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) represents a key conservative treatment method. Distinct from modern medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has developed a unique theoretical framework derived from extensive clinical experience summarizatio n[8] and OMT in TCM is an important part of it. Currently, as a safe and effective physiotherap y[9, 10], OMT in TCM has been widely used, and it has been included in many clinical practice guidelines for CS R[11,12,13]. However, analyzing treatment effects through modern technology remains an important challenge limiting the popularization of these approaches.

Recent advances in spinal biomechanic s[14, 15], neuroimagin g[16, 17], and electrophysiolog y[18, 19] have facilitated therapeutic mechanism research on OMT. However, the impact of OMT on cervical paravertebral soft tissues has been relatively underexplored due to a lack of reliable assessment indicators. Paravertebral soft tissue play a significant role in the pathogenesis and treatment of CSR [20]. In particular, increased Cervical Paravertebral Soft Tissue Tension (CPSTT) associates with neck pain symptoms [21], while physical modalities demonstrate advantages in managing this type of pain [22]. Developing objective measures and relevant instrumentation to evaluate OMT effects on paravertebral soft tissues represents an important research need.

To address this need, the Soft Tissue Tension Analysis System (STTAS, Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) was jointly developed by the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Tianjin Mingtongshiji Technology Company. This system comprises supporting software, an adapter, and a soft tissue tension probe that generates function curves depicting tissue tension at varying compression forces. The reliability of this equipment has been verifie d[23, 24]. Building on this foundation and integrating MATLAB software with multi-point CPSTT testing, we innovated the Soft Tissue Tension Cloud Chart (STTCC) technology for comprehensive and intuitive soft tissue tension assessments. Leveraging this novel methodology, we selected 30 CSR patients to analyze the immediate impacts of OMT on cervical paravertebral soft tissues, exploring an innovative technique for evaluating real-time therapy effects on paravertebral tissues.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Soft tissue tension analysis system

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Supporting software soft tissue tension analysis system

Full size image

Materials and methods

This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Website: https://www.chictr.org.cn, Registration Number: ChiCTR2100045648) and the Ethics approval and consent to participate (Approval Number: WJEC-KTK2020–012-P002). All patients have signed informed consent. All the procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Participants

From May 2021 to November 2021, 30 CSR patients were recruited for participation at Wangjing Hospital and the Orthopaedic institute of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. The same physician performed CRTM treatment on all patients.

Sample size

As an exploratory study, prior research on intervention testing typically utilizes sample sizes of 20–25 per grou p[25]. Accounting for potential subject refusal of second soft tissue tension assessments, 30 participants were enrolled.

Inclusion criteria

Patients met the Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine’s diagnostic criteria for CS R[26], with typical symptoms of neck pain and upper extremity radicular pain or numbness. Additional inclusion criteria were age 18–65 years and imaging findings of “cervical degeneration” and “foraminal stenosis”. Two chief physicians confirmed all diagnoses.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with spinal tuberculosis, osteomyelitis, nervous system tumors, severe chronic diseases such as serious cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, blood diseases, liver and kidney dysfunction, cervical spondylosis myelopathy, severe osteoporosis, spinal stenosis, arm muscle strength ≤ grade 3, skin diseases or lesions at the treatment site, and a history of cervical surgery operations would be excluded. Female patients during pregnancy, lactation, and menstruation would also be excluded.

Informed consent

Eligible patients received explanations of study purpose, methods, interventions, and assessments. Patients provided written informed consent and medical history self-reports prior to enrollment.

Interventions

Patients underwent Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation (CRTM), representing OMT techniques from TCM. Standard CRTM protocols have been established with proven safety and efficacy across clinical trial s[27, 28].

CRTM entails the following steps (Fig. 3): 1) 10–15 minute massage, 2) head rotation to physiological limit with slight lowering, 3) operator head embrace and pre-traction force application, and 4) operator gives a short lifting force, we can hear some snaps form the cervical joints when this manipulation is successful. The same physician performed all CRTM procedures.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Operation process of CRTM

Full size image

The CPSTT tests

Pre-treatment CPSTT assessments occurred within 5 minutes prior to massage, while post-treatment assessments took place within 5 minutes after CRTM. A total of 68 detection points (Fig. 4) are used to record the CPSTT in every test. Two operators and the patient participated in each assessment. One operator uses the probe, and the other records the data on the software (the same operator performed all probe measurements). During compression, the probe remained perpendicular to the skin surface. One software operator initiated recording, while the other operator applied and maintained constant pressure before slowly withdrawing the probe. Measurement duration lasted 4 seconds at each point (Figs. 5 and 6). Soft tissue tension calculations utilized spring displacements under 500 g compression across all detection points.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Detection points

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

The process of soft tissue tension test

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Test process diagram

Full size image

Generating of STTCC

The Cervical Soft Tissue Tension Cloud Charts of CPSTT are drawn by MATLAB R2015a software (MathWorks Company, U.S.A.). The first thoracic spinous process serves as the origin point of the space-rectangular coordinate system. The settings for the abscissa and ordinate are shown in Fig. 7 and the vertical is set as the probe displacements of each detection point.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Abscissa and ordinate of detection points

Full size image

Statistical analysis and accuracy assessment

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (K-S test) is used to test continuous variables for a normal distribution and is presented as the median with an interquartile range. Continuous detection indices are analyzed using the t-test or the Mann-Whitney test (M-W test). P < 0.05 indicates that the differences between before and after CRTM is statistically significant.

All statistical analysis is carried out with SPSS Statistics 22.0 software (International Business Machines Corporation, CA, U.S.A.). Figures are created in GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, CA, U.S.A.).

Results

Characteristics of participants

30 CSR patients were selected for this study, including 11 males and 19 females. The mean age of these 30 patients is (49.79 ± 11.54) years old, and the median course of disease is 4.5 weeks. 8 patients experience radicular pain or numbness in their left arms, while the remaining 22 experience these symptoms in their right arms. Among them, there are 11 patients with arm radicular pain and another 19 patients with arm numbness (Table 1).

Table 1 Information of 30 CSR patients
Full size table

STTCCs before and after CRTM

We average the CPSTT data of 30 patients at each point before and after CRTM respectively, and the mean data of each point is taken as the vertical coordinate to generate a STTCC (Fig. 8). The spring displacement in the red area is larger than the blue region. Hence, the red areas have lower tension and the blue areas have higher tension. According to the STTCC, it can be seen that the red area mainly includes C1-C6 level and the outward part of C7 level, while the blue area mainly includes T1-T3 level and the interior part of C7 level, which show the average tension of cervical soft tissue is lower than thoracic. Because the stiffness of the muscle belly is lower than that of the muscle tendon, two peaks can be seen on both sides of the C1-C6 level (Fig. 8, D1 and D2). The peaks before CRTM are short and sharp, and they become wider and higher after CRTM. Furthermore, when comparing before and after CRTM (Fig. 8, A1 and A2), it is discovered that soft tissue tension at the C3-C7 level, as well as the outward T1-T2 level, is significantly lower after treatment. All these phenomena show that the CPSTT after CRTM is lower than before.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Cloud charts for average CPSTT

Full size image

Statistical analysis of CPSTT

Then, we performed statistical analyses for CPSTT at each detection point prior to and after CRTM. Firstly, all the significance values of the K-S test are lower than 0.001 (P < 0.001), indicating that these data don’t conform to the normal distribution. Therefore, the M-T test is used to analyze these data. According to statistics, the median of probe data before CRTM is 6.226 mm, and the quartiles are q25 = 5.428 mm and q75 = 7.217 mm, respectively. The median of the data after CRTM is 6.695 mm, and the quartiles are q25 = 5.854 mm and q75 = 7.690 mm. The M-T test shows statistically significant differences between before and after CRTM (P < 0.001), which suggests that CRTM can reduce the CPSTT of CSR patients (Fig. 9 and Table 2).

Fig. 9
figure 9

The CPSTT before and after treatment

Full size image
Table 2 M-W test for before and after CRTM
Full size table

CPSTT characteristics of CSR patients

Meanwhile, to explore the relationship between CPSTT and radicular pain or numbness, we analyze the tension data of the symptomatic side (with radicular pain or numbness) and the asymptomatic side (without symptoms) before and after CRTM. According to the distribution area of the brachial plexu s[29], we mainly analyze the CPSTT at the C5-C7 level.

The STTCCs are drawn in the same way. To make the distinction between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides more obvious, all data from the asymptomatic side was placed on the left side of cloud charts, while data from the symptomatic side was placed on the right. The results are shown in Fig. 10. We can see the differences: the CPSTT of the symptomatic side is obviously higher than that of the asymptomatic side before treatment, and the differences decrease after treatment. Statistically, the K-S test suggests that the CPSTT at the C5-C7 level doesn’t conform to a normal distribution (P < 0.001). According to the result of the M-T test, the median of the symptomatic side data at the C5-C7 level before CRTM is 6.450 mm, and the quartiles are 5.360 mm (q25) and 7.230 mm (q75). The asymptomatic side data are 6.890 mm, 5.930 mm (q25), and 8.028 mm (q75). The M-T test shows a statistically significant difference between before and after CRTM (P < 0.001). After CRTM, the symptomatic side median is 7.054 mm, and the quartiles are 6.245 mm (q25) and 8.316 mm (q75). The asymptomatic side data are 7.121 mm, 6.304 mm (q25), and 8.483 mm (q75). The difference isn’t statistically significant (P = 0.231). In addition, both the differences before and after CRTM on the symptomatic side and the asymptomatic side are statistically significant (P < 0.001, P = 0.008) (Table 3 and Fig. 11). These results show a correlation between soft tissue tension at C5-C7 levels and symptoms of radicular pain or numbness. After treatment, both the CPSTT of the symptomatic side and the asymptomatic side have significantly improved, while the difference between the symptomatic side and the asymptomatic side has no statistical significance, which suggests that CRTM can reduce and balance the CPSTT of CSR patients.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Cloud charts for average CPSTT

Full size image
Table 3 M-W test for symptomatic side and asymptomatic side
Full size table
Fig. 11
figure 11

The compare between asymptomatic side and symptomatic side

Full size image

Discussion

Neck pain is one of the top five chronic pain conditions in terms of prevalence and years lost to disabilit y[30], causing a huge economic burden every yea r[31], and CSR is a common disease that causes it. As an economical and applicable treatmen t[32, 33], physical therapy, such as OMT or acupuncture, is widely recommended for neck pain patients, especially in low- and middle-income communitie s[34]. The immediate effect of OMT on cervical muscles or soft tissue is one of the main fields of study in understanding the mechanism of OMT. In this study, we evaluated the reliability of the original STTCC technology and preliminarily identified the immediate effect of CRTM on the overall reduction and balanced distribution of CPSTT in patients with CSR.

Application prospect of STTCC technology

In fact, there are many evaluating tools available to describe soft tissue tension or muscle tension with different theories, such as Myotonometr y[35, 36], MyotonPR O[37, 38], Shear Wave Elastograph y[39, 40], and the STTAS in this study. All these tools can be used to evaluate and analyze the stiffness of soft tissue. However, it is a problem figuring out how to describe the data generated by these technologies in an intuitive and comprehensive way. Currently, many researchers evaluate the stiffness of one muscle using the single-point muscle tension tes t[41,42,43], which cannot fully reflect the overall condition of the muscle, especially when it is used to evaluate the effect of OMT. Hence, we combined MATLAB software with the multi-point CPSTT test and created the STTCC technology (Fig. 8 and Fig. 10). Compared with simple data analysis, this method can reflect the change of soft tissue tension and the distribution of soft tissue tension between each detection point more directly. Though Shear Wave Elastography technology can achieve a similar effect, it needs a professional ultrasound doctor to coordinate and analyze. Meanwhile, STTCC technology can be used to describe the data formed by myotonometry and MyotonPRO, which is a supplement for the traditional methods of muscle stiffness testing. In addition, as long as the detection points are selected properly and the coordinates are set properly, this method can be used to describe muscle stiffness or soft tissue tension in many places, such as the knee, back, arm, or leg.

CPSTT and neck pain

Cervical musculoskeletal tissues, particularly the muscles, critically maintain spinal stabilit y[44]. Biomechanical research shows complex interplay between passive and active stabilizing structure s[45]. Effective control over muscular force and stiffness helps preserve kinematic stabilit y[46]. It has been found that muscle force and stiffness were proportional to the dynamic stability of the spin e[47], which confirms the protective effect of muscles on spine stability. However, muscular fatigue and strain on surrounding soft tissues can provoke mechanical neck pai n[4], representing the initial phase of CSR progression and degeneratio n[48]. Certain lifestyle factors may exacerbate these processes, enhancing disease chronicit y[49]. Additionally, injuries or structural damage can hasten cervical degeneration. Patients sustaining cervical soft tissue damage develop significantly more frequent long-term degenerative changes compared to the general populatio n[50]. After lower trapezius muscle strengthening exercises, patients with neck pain demonstrate significant improvements in muscle morphology and function corresponding to reduced symptom s[51]. Multiple studies confirm associations between heightened cervical muscle stiffness and neck pai n[52,53,54,55]. These collective findings underscore critical cervical soft tissue involvement in neck pain and substantiate the importance of targeted muscle interventions for CSR.

CRTM has immediate effects of reducing and balancing CPSTT

Our results demonstrate CRTM effectively decreases CPSTT in CSR patients (P < 0.001), corroborating prior investigations on OMT-induced muscle relaxation and pain relie f[56, 57]. However, one study in asymptomatic volunteers found no impact of cervical manipulation on muscle tone, elasticity, or stiffness despite modulating pressure pain threshold s[58]. The discrepancy likely reflects differences between healthy participants versus CSR patients with baseline muscle dysfunction. Hence, we believe our conclusions on CRTM-mediated CPSTT reductions in the target patient population remain valid.

Meanwhile, interestingly, we also find a significant difference in soft tissue tension between CSR patients symptomatic side (with radicular pain or numbness) and asymptomatic side (C5 to C7, P < 0.001). This difference, as well as the standard deviation of CPSTT, disappeared after the CRTM interventions, implying that CRTM can balance soft tissue tension on the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides. We find a few studies [59] with similar results to this conclusion. On the contrary, some studie s[60, 61] discovered that the cervical muscle thickness and cross-sectional area of the symptomatic side were lower in chronic CSR patients than the asymptomatic side. But the relationship between soft tissue tension and muscle thickness has not been established. Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm this field.

Study advantages and limitations

Utilizing our original STTCC analysis technology, we provide intuitive visualization of CRTM impacts on CPSTT in CSR patients. Investigating associations between CRTM and CPSTT advances the objectification of TCM technique assessments while exploring potential alleviation mechanisms. We also characterize preliminarily correlations between heightened CPSTT and radicular CSR symptoms, alongside CRTM balancing effects for CPSTT.

As an initial investigation, limitations include our modest sample size (N = 30) constraining result generalizability. We lacked age or symptom duration stratification, spanning a wide age range that could obscure tension profiles unique to certain demographics. Moreover, OMT is usually criticized that the effect is not sustainable, but our work haven’t yet used this technology to verify the long-term intervention effect of OMT at this stage. Nevertheless, our central novel contributions entail developing an innovative methodology for analyzing and visually representing CRTM consequences on cervical soft tissues while elucidating initial evidence for CRTM-mediated CPSTT reduction and balancing in the target population. These foundations pave the way for future mechanistic research on TCM techniques.

Conclusion

Leveraging our novel STTCC technology, current findings indicate CRTM decreases and balances CPSTT in CSR patients, potentially alleviating neck pain. Meanwhile, the STTCC represents a reliable analytical approach for quantifying and visualizing muscle stiffness.

Abbreviations

CSR:

Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

YLDs:

Years Lived with Disability

OMT:

Orthopaedic Manual Therapy

TCM:

Traditional Chinese Medicine

CRTM:

Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation

CPSTT:

Cervical Paravertebral Soft Tissue Tension

STTAS:

Soft Tissue Tension Analysis System

STTCC:

Soft Tissue Tension Cloud Chart

K-S test:

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

M-T test:

Mann-Whitney U-test

References

  1. GBD 2017. Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. “Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.”. Lancet (London England). 2018;392:1789–858.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, Buchbinder R, Mansournia MA, Bettampadi D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2017. BMJ. 2020;26(368):m791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging, MA MD, Kirsch CFE, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® cervical neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(5S):S57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Theodore N. Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(2):159–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barton C, Kalakoti P, Bedard NA, Hendrickson NR, Saifi C, Pugely AJ. What are the costs of cervical radiculopathy prior to surgical treatment? Spine. 2019;44(13):937–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvin MD, Miller JA, Lubelski D, Rosenbaum BP, Abdullah KG, Whitmore RG, et al. Variations in cost calculations in spine surgery cost-effectiveness research. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(6):E1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carreon LY, Anderson PA, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV, Glassman SD. Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion five years after surgery. Spine J. 2013;38(6):471–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Wong YK, Liao F. What has traditional Chinese medicine delivered for modern medicine? Expert Rev Mol Med. 2018;20:e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/erm.2018.3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu L, Wei X, Wang S. Does cervical spine manipulation reduce pain in people with degenerative cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review of the evidence, and a meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(2):145–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei X, Wang S, Gao J, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine for the Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: an overview of systematic reviews. Evid Based Complem Alternat Med. 2015;793649

  11. Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(7):A1–A83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whalen W, Farabaugh RJ, Hawk C, et al. Best-practice recommendations for chiropractic Management of Patients with Neck Pain. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2019;42(9):635–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kjaer P, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, et al. National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(9):2242–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang X, Ye L, Wu Z, et al. Biomechanical effects of lateral bending position on performing cervical spinal manipulation for cervical disc herniation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018;2018:2798396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng Z, Wang K, Wang H, et al. A finite element study of traditional Chinese cervical manipulation. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(9):2308–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Didehdar D, Kamali F, Yoosefinejad AK, et al. The effect of spinal manipulation on brain neurometabolites in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients: a randomized clinical trial. Ir J Med Sci. 2020;189(2):543–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845019-02140-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moser N, Mior S, Noseworthy M, et al. Effect of cervical manipulation on vertebral artery and cerebral haemodynamics in patients with chronic neck pain: a crossover randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e025219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dina L, Khan NI, Kelly H, et al. Manipulation of dysfunctional spinal joints affects sensorimotor integration in the prefrontal cortex:a brain source localization study. Neural Plastic. 2016;2016(8):803–10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haavik-Taylor H, Murphy B. Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study. Clin Neurophys. 2007;118(2):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8(8):817–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz RS, Leavitt F, Small AK, et al. Intramuscular pressure is almost three times higher in fibromyalgia patients: a possible mechanism for understanding the muscle pain and tenderness. J Rheumatol. 2021;48(4):598–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzcharles MA, Cohen SP, Clauw DJ, et al. Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions. Lancet. 2021;397(10289):2098–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao Y, Fang W, Yan A, et al. Discussion on relationship between soft tissue tension and cervical physiological curvature change of patients with scapular muscle fasciitis. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014;27(5):376–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao Y, Fang W, Yan A, et al. Case-control study on the treatment of patients with scapular muscle fasciitis by Pizhen. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014;27(4):291–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(2):180–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of cervical spondylosis. Founding Conference of Vertigo Group of Cervical Spondylosis Professional Committee of Chinese Rehabilitation Association and Multidisciplinary seminar on Vertigo. 2012.

  27. Zhu L, Zhang Q, Gao J, Li J, Luo J, Yang K, et al. Clinical observation on rotation-traction manipulation for treatment of the cervical spondylotic of the neuro-radicular type. China J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2005;18(8):489–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Q, Zhu L, Gao J, Yu J, Feng M, Yang K, et al. Clinical observation on rotation-traction manipulation for treatment of the cervical Spondylotic radiculopathy. China J Tradition Chin Orthopaed Traumatol. 2009;21(06):9–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilcrease-Garcia BM, Deshmukh SD, Parsons MS. Anatomy, imaging, and pathologic conditions of the brachial plexus. Radiograph. 2020;40(6):1686–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ (Clin res ed.). 2017;14(8):358.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, Bui AL, Bulchis A, Chapin A, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013. JAMA. 2016;316:2627–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Herman PM, Whitley MD, Ryan GW, Hurwitz EL, Coulter ID. The impact of patient preferences and costs on the appropriateness of spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pach D, Piper M, Lotz F, Reinhold T, Dombrowski M, Chang Y, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Tuina for chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial comparing Tuina with a no-intervention waiting list. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(3):231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chou R, Côté P, Randhawa K, et al. The global spine care initiative: applying evidence-based guidelines on the non-invasive management of back and neck pain to low- and middle-income communities. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 6):851–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McGowen JM, Hoppes CW, Forsse JS, et al. The Utility of Myotonometry in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation and Human Performance Programming. J Athl Train. 2022; https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0616.21.

  36. Kisilewicz A, Madeleine P, Ignasiak Z, et al. Eccentric exercise reduces upper trapezius muscle stiffness assessed by shear wave Elastography and Myotonometry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Saldiran TÇ, Yazgan P, Akgöl AC, et al. Radial shock-wave therapy for frozen shoulder patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot trial comparing two different energy levels. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(3):412–22. https://doi.org/10.23736/S19739087.22.07087-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li YP, Liu CL, Zhang ZJ. Feasibility of using a portable MyotonPRO device to quantify the elastic properties of skeletal muscle. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e934121. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.934121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dieterich AV, Yavuz UŞ, Petzke F, et al. Neck muscle stiffness measured with shear wave Elastography in women with chronic nonspecific neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(4):179–88. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2020.8821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, et al. Shear-wave Elastography: basic physics and musculoskeletal applications. Radiograph. 2017;37(3):855–70. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen G, Wu J, Chen G, et al. Reliability of a portable device for quantifying tone and stiffness of quadriceps femoris and patellar tendon at different knee flexion angles. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0220521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hu X, Lei D, Li L, et al. Quantifying paraspinal muscle tone and stiffness in young adults with chronic low back pain: a reliability study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14343. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32418-x.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiménez-Sánchez C, Ortiz-Lucas M, Bravo-Esteban E, Mayoral-Del Moral O, Herrero-Gállego P, Gómez-Soriano J. Myotonometry as a measure to detect myofascial trigger points: an inter-rater reliability study. Physiol Meas. 2018;39(11):115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aae9aa.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Izzo R, Guarnieri G, Guglielmi G, Muto M. Biomechanics of the spine. Part II: spinal instability. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(1):127–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(4):383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kang HG, Dingwell JB. Dynamics and stability of muscle activations during walking in healthy young and older adults. J Biomech. 2009;42(14):2231–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Graham RB, Brown SH. Local dynamic stability of spine muscle activation and stiffness patterns during repetitive lifting. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(12):121006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kelly JC, Groarke PJ, Butler JS, et al. The natural history and clinical syndromes of degenerative cervical spondylosis. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:393642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sihawong R, Sitthipornvorakul E, Paksaichol A, Janwantanakul P. Predictors for chronic neck and low back pain in office workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study. J Occup Health. 2016;58(1):16–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Watkinson A, Gargan MF, Bannister GC. Prognostic factors in soft tissue injuries of the cervical spine. Injury. 1991;22(4):307–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Park SH, Lee MM. Effects of lower trapezius strengthening exercises on pain, dysfunction, posture alignment, muscle thickness and contraction rate in patients with neck pain. Randomized Controlled Trial Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e920208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Matsui T, Hara K, Kayama T, et al. Cervical muscle diseases are associated with indefinite and various symptoms in the whole body. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(5):1013–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Aikawa R, Kishino T, Shibasaki S, et al. Relationship between trapezius muscle hardness and transverse cervical artery flow in association with neck and upper-back stiffness. Clin Physiol Funct Imag. 2020;40(6):385–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Anan T, Kajiki S, Oka H, et al. Effects of an artificial intelligence-assisted health program on workers with neck/shoulder pain/stiffness and low Back pain: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(9):e27535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Shin HJ, Kim SH, Hahm SC, Cho HY. Thermotherapy plus neck stabilization exercise for chronic nonspecific neck pain in elderly: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Niu K, Li Y, Guan H, et al. Optimization of traditional Chinese medicine rolling manipulation and pressure attenuation. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(7):7654–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Buttagat V, Narktro T, Onsrira K, Pobsamai C. Short-term effects of traditional Thai massage on electromyogram, muscle tension and pain among patients with upper back pain associated with myofascial trigger points. Complement Ther Med. 2016;28:8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nogueira N, Oliveira-Campelo N, Lopes Â, et al. The acute effects of manual and instrument-assisted cervical spine manipulation on pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception, and muscle-related variables in asymptomatic subjects: a randomized controlled trial. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2020;43(3):179–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen W, Chen Z, Wu JT, et al. Imbalance of mechanical properties about bilateral shoulder and neck muscle in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy using MyotonPRO. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2022;26(03):430–4.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Noormohammadpour P, DehghaniFirouzabadi A, Mansournia MA, et al. Comparison of the cross-sectional area of longus Colli muscle between patients with cervical radicular pain and healthy controls. PMR. 2017;9(2):120–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Amiri-Arimi S, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Rezasoltani A, et al. Asymmetry of cervical multifidus and longus Colli muscles size in participants with and without cervical radicular pain. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2020;43(3):206–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank all the participants and investigators in this study.

Trial registration

Registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry already. (Website: https://www.chictr.org.cn, Registration Number: ChiCTR2100045648).

Data sharing statement

All data reported in this study are available upon request by contacting the corresponding author.

Funding

This study is funded by the Beijing Nova Program in 2019 (Grant number: Z191100001119025), the Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant number: ZYYCXTD-C-202003) and the Beijing NOVA Interdisciplinary Cooperation Project in 2022 (Grant number: 20220484228).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xu Wang, Zikai Jin and Tianxiao Feng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

    Xu Wang, Zikai Jin, Tianxiao Feng, Shengjie Fang, Chuanrui Sun, Xiaokuan Qin, Kai Sun, Liguo Zhu & Xu Wei

  2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Kai Sun, Guangwei Liu, Liguo Zhu & Xu Wei

  3. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Zikai Jin & Tianxiao Feng

  4. Anhui Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Long Liang

  5. Liaocheng Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Liaocheng, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Shengjie Fang

Authors
  1. Xu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zikai Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tianxiao Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shengjie Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chuanrui Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaokuan Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kai Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Long Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Guangwei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Liguo Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xu Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xu Wei, Kai Sun, and Liguo Zhu contributed to the study design. Xu Wang, Zikai Jin, and Tianxiao Feng were responsible for the statistical analysis and the manuscript writing. Xu Wang, Shengjie Fang, Chuanrui Sun, and Xiaokuan Qin made a contribution to the participant selection and data acquisition for this study. Long Liang and Guangwei Liu guided the operation of the software. All authors contributed to the data interpretation and critical review of the manuscript, as well as its submission for publication. Xu Wang, Zikai Jin, and Tianxiao Feng contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wangjing Hospital on 12 January 2021 (Approval Number: WJEC-KTK2020–012-P002). All 30 subjects were informed of the study content and signed informed consent and all the procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

This manuscript does not contain image files that may reveal information about subjects and authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Jin, Z., Feng, T. et al. The immediate effect of cervical rotation-traction manipulation on cervical paravertebral soft tissue: a study using soft tissue tension cloud chart technology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25, 184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07277-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07277-5

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us